It does not make sense to teach everyone *how* to code any more than it makes sense to teach everyone law or brain surgery or aircraft repair.
However, everyone does need some degree of understanding *what* coders do, for the simple reason that coding is something that has a large impact on society and the economy. Same as people (particularly those choosing careers or education) need to know what law or surgery or aircraft maintenance are, and maybe some rudimentary knowledge of the field so they have some minimal frame of reference in common with the experts.
Sun? I'm not having your dirty solar panels in our street
They don't want your street. They want all that desert that no-one is using. I'm sure you think your street is the most awesome, special, exceptional street anywhere, but it's not good enough.
It does seem that the find is more of a statistical fluke, given that twins and death in childbirth are not unknown phenomena. But we may well learn something. Or not. Either way science will happen.
The problem here is that "fluff" is being used to mean anything that's not the sexy and exotic part of the algorithm. Genuine "fluff" gets in the way of comprehension and is bad code, but structuring and redundancy are extremely valuable.
Perhaps Jeb Bush is trying to show voters that he believes in transparency for government officials. Instead he is showing that he has entirely misunderstood the point.
What is so much better about CEOs making 500 times as much as their office workers
The catch is that there are always examples of truly gifted CEOs who, on the basis of both supply and demand and the value they bring to a business actually are worth the exceptional salary they earn.
Of course, the other 99% of CEOs who 'earn' the inflated salaries think they deserve that kind of compensation but actually don't; most of them add nothing to the business or do so only by chance.
I find this troubling, not because I disagree with a policy of permitting assisted suicide - it's a tricky issue and I accept that there's no perfect solution - but because far too often 'unconstitutional' is a thinly disguised version of 'something the Supreme Court disagrees with politically'.
This is a political matter for Parliament, not a question of law that needed clarification. It would be nice if our politicians were not so lazy and cowardly that they decline to deal with the issue, but that does not mean it's a good idea for the judicial branch to start legislating for them. Even if you think judicial activism is a good idea - and not everyone does - it can be taken too far.
Slashdot Mirror
programmers got it in their heads that being called an engineer is better than being a programmer or software developer.
Unless you specifically need to be a programmer or software developer, it is better being called an engineer.
Which is why in many places it is illegal to call yourself an engineer unless you licensed to be one.
...because of the human...
But we're talking about banks.
As opposed to February, which is in summer. (Note both depend on your hemisphere.)
It does not make sense to teach everyone *how* to code any more than it makes sense to teach everyone law or brain surgery or aircraft repair.
However, everyone does need some degree of understanding *what* coders do, for the simple reason that coding is something that has a large impact on society and the economy. Same as people (particularly those choosing careers or education) need to know what law or surgery or aircraft maintenance are, and maybe some rudimentary knowledge of the field so they have some minimal frame of reference in common with the experts.
I wouldn't buy that for a dollar.
Sun? I'm not having your dirty solar panels in our street
They don't want your street. They want all that desert that no-one is using. I'm sure you think your street is the most awesome, special, exceptional street anywhere, but it's not good enough.
It's been coming true for all of those 25 years. People just didn't pay attention when it was merely about other people losing their jobs.
It does seem that the find is more of a statistical fluke, given that twins and death in childbirth are not unknown phenomena. But we may well learn something. Or not. Either way science will happen.
Unless not all "fluff" is equal.
Maybe they're relying on everyone else to have their children vaccinated. Their own children, of course, are exceptional.
The question remains, how were the prison workers who allowed this in the first place punished?
goto is open to abuse.
Rigid prohibition of goto is also open to abuse.
Oracle says a lot of things.
They inflicted Fusion on my employer, and not a single claim about it has turned out to be true.
Why would anyone want to deep-fry the scoop?
The problem here is that "fluff" is being used to mean anything that's not the sexy and exotic part of the algorithm. Genuine "fluff" gets in the way of comprehension and is bad code, but structuring and redundancy are extremely valuable.
I've never heard a model of space-time geometry called 'god' before...
Perhaps Jeb Bush is trying to show voters that he believes in transparency for government officials. Instead he is showing that he has entirely misunderstood the point.
Thats a bit like asking what is south of the south pole.
Maybe. But the current model could be wrong.
It would be wonderful to study all these things scientifically.
A lot of terrible harm has been done and is being done precisely because the people studying them were not actual scientists.
And the theory of evolution wasn't political? What about the belief that the Earth orbits the sun?
No, those weren't political.
The ignorance in your statement is mind-boggling
Yet you are more or less in agreement:
The biggest problem in the social sciences isn't their practices, it is that their findings are inherently political
What is so much better about CEOs making 500 times as much as their office workers
The catch is that there are always examples of truly gifted CEOs who, on the basis of both supply and demand and the value they bring to a business actually are worth the exceptional salary they earn.
Of course, the other 99% of CEOs who 'earn' the inflated salaries think they deserve that kind of compensation but actually don't; most of them add nothing to the business or do so only by chance.
I find this troubling, not because I disagree with a policy of permitting assisted suicide - it's a tricky issue and I accept that there's no perfect solution - but because far too often 'unconstitutional' is a thinly disguised version of 'something the Supreme Court disagrees with politically'.
This is a political matter for Parliament, not a question of law that needed clarification. It would be nice if our politicians were not so lazy and cowardly that they decline to deal with the issue, but that does not mean it's a good idea for the judicial branch to start legislating for them. Even if you think judicial activism is a good idea - and not everyone does - it can be taken too far.
No, he informed people about what other people already knew.
He does not have the superpowers some people seem to think he has.
No, there's no debate.
Lies are something different.