But a contract that breaks the law is not a contract in law. So... if the govt made it expressly legal to circumvent it, then that clause in the contract would be void.
This is run of the mill stuff - you often see language in contracts "...to the extent enforceable by law...".
1. Queue all orders 2. Delay. 1 second? 2 seconds? Even maybe 5 seconds. 3. Randomise the queue 4. Execute all orders 5. Goto 1
Kills front running, probably kills HFC. Basically strategy proofs the whole thing. Somebody cryptomath geek can probably finess the protocol some more, but this is the basic plan.
Prohibition fails. Google are just supporting the problem, not the solution. They should be advocating decrimilization and treatment as an illness, not as a crime.
I think you are pretty close./. recycles its moderators. Very quickly. This is probably not quite doable for wikipedia.
I suggest that there is some limit on the length of time one can be an admin. Increase the size of the pool (still have screening), but decrease the time you can admin. There are lots of ways. Some sort of cycle - 6 months on, 6 months off - that sort of thing...
There is some truth to what you say, but I don't think this is publicity that the hive will mind.
They have been "hackers on steroids" for a long time now, and this just furthers their reputation as people not to mess with.
I doubt that anyone will do time for this - it's just simply to easy to be anon these days. The only members of the hive who have been caught are LOICers not proxying.
Regardless of all of that, this is still massive HBGary fail.
The emails are the gift that keeps giving, see wikileaks angle today.
Anonymous: No damage. No arrests, no lawsuits, no exposure of anyone that wasn't already in the open.
HBGary: Emails stolen. Websited pwnd. Crap security protocols exposed. Significant reputational damage. Corporate imaged tarnished (looking like fools will do that to you).
Slashdot Mirror
This old chestnut?
It's 2016, and we are STILL having this one?
2001 wants it's bullshit arguments back.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... aka "There ain't no such thing as a fair election"...
But a contract that breaks the law is not a contract in law. So... if the govt made it expressly legal to circumvent it, then that clause in the contract would be void.
This is run of the mill stuff - you often see language in contracts "...to the extent enforceable by law...".
2 seconds on google would let you discover that you don't need a signature to make a contract.
I think I might even have had an account there...
Has aerospace solved the halting problem then?
Oh look - another meaningless flamewar... what's this about again?
well, perhaps not sure. Just hopeful.
I am sure that you can make the counter argument for me.
1. Queue all orders
2. Delay. 1 second? 2 seconds? Even maybe 5 seconds.
3. Randomise the queue
4. Execute all orders
5. Goto 1
Should stop this kind of bullshit.
Words fail me.
That thing had to go. I miss my plugs, but, that fucker had to go....
1. Queue all orders
2. Delay. 1 second? 2 seconds? Even maybe 5 seconds.
3. Randomise the queue
4. Execute all orders
5. Goto 1
Kills front running, probably kills HFC. Basically strategy proofs the whole thing. Somebody cryptomath geek can probably finess the protocol some more, but this is the basic plan.
No, seriously, who the fuck is John Romero?
Prohibition fails. Google are just supporting the problem, not the solution. They should be advocating decrimilization and treatment as an illness, not as a crime.
Reminds me strangely of BeOS.
Everything old is new again.
Nuclear reactors are inherently unsafe. There is no fool proof method to ensure cooling.
Which is why it is not possible to actually insure them. So they are subsidised.
Which is why nuclear energy is artificially cheap.
There are so many other inherently safe methods of producing power, that nuclear is ridiculous. Get over it already.
It's not the that the subsidy is too low, it's that the subsidy for carbon based energy production is way too high.
You're new round here, aren't you?
I think you are pretty close. /. recycles its moderators. Very quickly. This is probably not quite doable for wikipedia.
I suggest that there is some limit on the length of time one can be an admin. Increase the size of the pool (still have screening), but decrease the time you can admin. There are lots of ways. Some sort of cycle - 6 months on, 6 months off - that sort of thing...
YHBT. YHL. HAND.
Gee Ted, in your awful future, I would've be paying PER WORD.
Fuck you. You lost. Move on.
There is some truth to what you say, but I don't think this is publicity that the hive will mind.
They have been "hackers on steroids" for a long time now, and this just furthers their reputation as people not to mess with.
I doubt that anyone will do time for this - it's just simply to easy to be anon these days. The only members of the hive who have been caught are LOICers not proxying.
Regardless of all of that, this is still massive HBGary fail.
The emails are the gift that keeps giving, see wikileaks angle today.
Lets just score this:
Anonymous: No damage. No arrests, no lawsuits, no exposure of anyone that wasn't already in the open.
HBGary: Emails stolen. Websited pwnd. Crap security protocols exposed. Significant reputational damage. Corporate imaged tarnished (looking like fools will do that to you).
Summary: There IS such a thing as bad publicity.
Final Score:
Anonymous 5, HBGary, 0.
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=19548&cid=1878668
I wonder if this still works. Haven't tried it in decades.