Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft CIO Stuart Scott Gets Axed

avjt writes "Microsoft has terminated its CIO Stuart Scott for 'violation of company policies'. They won't elaborate. Now what do you think this guy has done?" Ya know, I'm positive someone reading this story knows the answer to the mystery... and they could post it anonymously and be totally fine because there will be a hundred other totally wrong guesses and it would be completely impossible to distinguish the two ;)

533 comments

  1. google time by tritonman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Time to google for articles where he said something good about Linux...

    1. Re:google time by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 0

      That was exactly my thought. Maybe they found out he's running Debian or Ubuntu at home.....

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    2. Re:google time by Hanners1979 · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's a bit heartless - It was probably using Google and not Live Search that got him into trouble in the first place. ;)

    3. Re:google time by javiern100 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      what about if he was involved in that Nigeria student laptop mess?

    4. Re:google time by chrish · · Score: 1

      He probably bought an iPod.

      --
      - chrish
    5. Re:google time by monkeyboythom · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How does a CIO get fired "after an investigation for violation of company policies"?

      1. Misrepresented himself. Is his resume completely honest? Some have been canned for claiming work that they didn't do or graduated from schools when they didn't,
      2. Tried to his station/authority to manipulate or obfuscate reporting numbers for a false picture of the company's standing or fiscal health. Did he misreport the Vista numbers, inflating them artifically (or report lower)? Any monkeying with reports to make himself look better or others look worse can get you fired in a Sarbanes-Oxley world.
      3. Personal conduct. From HP spying on fellow board members and employees to outright unfavorable corporate behavior (e.g. being sleazy to the point of lawsuits) is yet another way of getting fired.

      He came to Microsoft in 2005 so he's not a long timer in the company. If Microsoft is trying to push him out, then we'll see if he responds with a lawsuit.

    6. Re:google time by MindKata · · Score: 2

      "Maybe they found out he's running Debian or Ubuntu at home"

      And from this, it looks like he has been in the job since summer 2005.
      http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2005/dec05/12-05Scott.mspx

      So its taken them 2 years to find out he is running linux. I guess two years to finally turn on a PC (to do some work), is about right for at Microsoft CIO.

      ... it must have been a rainy day, so he had to take the day off from the golf course. So I guess in the end, tech support reported him, once they found out he can't run Microsoft golf sim on his PC.

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
    7. Re:google time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chair!

    8. Re:google time by blazerw11 · · Score: 5, Informative

      After reading through all of the comments. You don't want to do this unless your really bored. It looks like he was having an affair with a VP that reports to him. Type "/ValleyWag" to find the comment with the informative link. (If you are using IE, user your circa 1983 find function.)

      --
      A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices. -- William James
    9. Re:google time by McFadden · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sounds the most plausible explaination I've heard yet. What is completely unfathomable however, is that Ballmer, possibly the dumbest fuck ever to run a hugely powerful corporation still goes on, despite the fact that the entire organization is crumbling under his 'leadership'. Mind you, I suppose Bush is still running the country, so clearly these things have a pattern to them.

    10. Re:google time by rrhal · · Score: 5, Funny

      4) Took pictures of MacIntosh Computers being unloaded into his building.

      --
      All generalizations are false, including this one. Mark Twain
    11. Re:google time by EriDay · · Score: 4, Funny

      If we add:

      4. Tried to hire CowboyNeal as Intern.

      This can become a slashdot poll. Once the results are in, we'll know the real reason.

    12. Re:google time by ubrgeek · · Score: 5, Funny

      Misrepresented himself. Is his resume completely honest? Some have been canned for claiming work that they didn't do or graduated from schools when they didn't

      I resent that.

      ubrgeek
      MA, BS, PhD - Cambridge, Yale, Harvard
      Inventor of automobile, SuperBall(tm) and the Internet.

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    13. Re:google time by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 2, Informative

      After reading through all of the comments. You don't want to do this unless your really bored. It looks like he was having an affair with a VP that reports to him.

      Oh, come on. That's a company tradition. Bill Gates didn't just shag someone who reported to him, he married her.

      --
      I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
    14. Re:google time by soloport · · Score: 4, Funny

      4) Couldn't say "Developers!" more than seven times in a row without getting tongue-tied.

    15. Re:google time by jo42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Incompetence rules?

    16. Re:google time by VorpalRodent · · Score: 3, Funny
      You, sir, are a liar. You cannot possibly have invented the internet.

      We all know that the internet was invented by the same politician who is single-handedly saving us from global warming.

      However, I will cede that the inventor of the automobile has not recently been in the news, and so its entirely feasible that you are he.

      --
      Take it to the limit, everybody to the limit, come on, everybody fhqwhgads.
    17. Re:google time by JackMeyhoff · · Score: 1

      Big deal. You are allowed a life you know. This isn't primary school.

      --
      http://www.rense.com/general79/wdx1.htm
    18. Re:google time by RedLeg · · Score: 1

      Incompetence rules? It's called the Peter Principle.
    19. Re:google time by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      developers developers dyslexicers... oh screw it

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    20. Re:google time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Congratulations, you have been effectively been brainwashed by a propaganda campaign. Gore never ever claimed he invented the internet. He said he created it, and rightly so due to the relentless backing and funding he obtained. Internet is not tcp/ip or www.

    21. Re:google time by dwlovell · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, because quarter after quarter of record revenues AND profits means your company is crumbling. Not to mention their stock is the highest its been in 5 years.

      But, yes crumbling, disaster!!

      -David

    22. Re:google time by Cannelloni · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, I remember that incident. Somebody at Microsoft was fired for doing just that some five or six years ago.

      --
      Beauty is in the beholder of the eye.
    23. Re:google time by tygt · · Score: 1

      (If you are using IE, user your circa 1983 find function.)
      Not to defend IE, but I believe that your "/ValleyWag" to search is probably a search method that significantly predates the IE CTRL-F method - it was certainly in the ex/vi editor long before, and a case can be made for it being in the ed editor before those (as the slash is used in pattern matching/searching).

      Anyhow, I do prefer to use my "/pattern" (circa PDP-7, whenever that was, but certainly more antiquated than the IE one - shows you that "progress" isn't always), as you apparently do as well....

    24. Re:google time by michrech · · Score: 2

      For those that managed to miss it, you can read a bit about it here.

      --
      bork bork bork!
    25. Re:google time by afidel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah but this guy was boning someone other than his wife who directly reported to him AND was expensing his love nest. That's a lot of no-no's including the big one, misappropriation of company funds.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    26. Re:google time by john82 · · Score: 1

      Congratulations AC, you have been effectively been brainwashed by a propaganda campaign. Gore said he created the Internet. Being on the floor of the Senate to vote on funding DOES NOT constitute creating anything. There are plenty of real creators who deserve credit. And in that light, I'd put Metcalf, Engelbart, Nelson, Andreesen, Berners-Lee et al far ahead on the list of credits before Al "Look at me!" Gore.

    27. Re:google time by Kilraven · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ha Ha. That is hilarious.

      However, on to a more serious note, I noticed your use of the question mark without express written approval. As inventor and sole proprietor of all things Question Mark, I request you delete and remove any and all references to the Question Mark effective immediately. Failure to comply within a timely matter will force me to write an angry letter, explaining how very angry I am.

      --
      I didn't want to leave this blank.
    28. Re:google time by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      Or maybe he just went back to work at ESPN.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    29. Re:google time by defile · · Score: 5, Informative

      You are referring to this, presumably?

      "During my service in the United States Congress I took the initiative in creating the Internet. I took the initiative in moving forward a whole range of initiatives that have proven to be important to our country's economic growth and environmental protection, improvements in our educational system."

      You can't even convince politicians in Congress today that there is value in having anything to do with the internet besides enacting child protection laws. Gore has understood the value since the 1970s and been acted in his political capacity to develop and support legislation that created it and brought it to the public. Exactly what other kind of creation do you expect from politicians? Can only the guys on the front-lines take credit for creating something? Does it somehow diminish their value by acknowledging Gore's contribution?

      See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Gore's_contributions_to_the_Internet_and_technology#Congressional_work_and_Gore_Bill

    30. Re:google time by aichpvee · · Score: 2, Informative
      While I'm hoping that the GP was just making a joke and blew the delivery, to set the record straight (again!), here is what Gore actually said.

      I took the initiative in creating the Internet. I took the initiative in moving forward a whole range of initiatives that have proven to be important to our country's economic growth and environmental protection, improvements in our educational system.
      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    31. Re:google time by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      I still use edit/tpu :D

      How's that for not moving with the times?

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    32. Re:google time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best guys go there own way.
      Good luck to his departure, i wish him all the best.
      A job loss can be a great opportunity!

      Dave

    33. Re:google time by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      What America needs is less Peter Principle, and more Dilbert Principle.

    34. Re:google time by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

      Perhaps back in the day when Apple computers used PPC chips, but today many people run Windows XP and Vista on x86 Macintoshes. It would be no different from somebody unloading Dells or HPs.

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    35. Re:google time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see we've skipped our morning medication today, didn't we, Mr. Nigma?

    36. Re:google time by Stormcrow309 · · Score: 1

      I will gladly claim a vast amount of prior art, called the breath of English literature.

      --

      In God we trust, all others require data.

    37. Re:google time by operagost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He said he was involved in creating the internet, which had already been created years before his "initiative". That's like Henry Ford claiming he invented the automobile, when it had been invented decades before although he improved the process of manufacturing them.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    38. Re:google time by Four_One_Nine · · Score: 1
      The 'breath' of English literature. There's a 'bad' pun in there somewhere.

      On another note, Isn't there a Mr. "Question Mark" who, along with his Mysterians, actually invented said punctuation?

      --
      I did it for Johnny.
    39. Re:google time by Darby · · Score: 4, Funny

      However, I will cede that the inventor of the automobile has not recently been in the news, and so its entirely feasible that you are he.

      So what?

      Dude, you're talking to the guy who invented the *superball*.
      Try and get some perspective in future ;-)

    40. Re:google time by VorpalRodent · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right. I'll be more careful next time. Some achievements (like inventing the Superball) bring with them the right to "enhance" one's resume.

      --
      Take it to the limit, everybody to the limit, come on, everybody fhqwhgads.
    41. Re:google time by rkanodia · · Score: 5, Informative
      Two things: first, research in network protocols costs a lot of money. Second, building the infrastructure costs a lot of money. Geeks may not like to admit that, but it counts for a lot. Saying that the internet had already been 'created' is rather disingenuous. If the internet of today consisted of a couple hundred research institutions which were connected via a haphazard set of links of dubious uptime, then you wouldn't be able to buy things on Amazon.com or get Google Maps on your cellphone or call your friends on Skype or look up Al Gore on Wikipedia. Vint Cerf and Bob Kahn had this to say about the 'Al Gore claims he invented the internet' meme:

      [A]s the two people who designed the basic architecture and the core protocols that make the Internet work, we would like to acknowledge VP Gore's contributions as a Congressman, Senator and as Vice President. No other elected official, to our knowledge, has made a greater contribution over a longer period of time. Last year the Vice President made a straightforward statement on his role. He said: "During my service in the United States Congress I took the initiative in creating the Internet." We don't think, as some people have argued, that Gore intended to claim he "invented" the Internet. Moreover, there is no question in our minds that while serving as Senator, Gore's initiatives had a significant and beneficial effect on the still-evolving Internet. The fact of the matter is that Gore was talking about and promoting the Internet long before most people were listening. We feel it is timely to offer our perspective. As far back as the 1970s Congressman Gore promoted the idea of high speed telecommunications as an engine for both economic growth and the improvement of our educational system. He was the first elected official to grasp the potential of computer communications to have a broader impact than just improving the conduct of science and scholarship. Though easily forgotten, now, at the time this was an unproven and controversial concept.

      So if you know more about the early days of the internet/the late days of ARPANET than Vint Cerf and Bob Kahn, I would consider myself extraordinarily fortunate if a person of such amazing insight could shed some light on their mistake.
    42. Re:google time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it means you got a good accounting firm cooking your books. Happens all the time especially when your products sales suck as much as Vistas does...

    43. Re:google time by drharris · · Score: 1

      Yes! Because books are the definitive measure of a companies stability..

      Google "Enron"

    44. Re:google time by Darby · · Score: 1

      Some achievements (like inventing the Superball) bring with them the right to "enhance" one's resume.

      Yeah, that's true.... I just meant that you seemed to think it was a big deal that he invented the car ;-)

    45. Re:google time by ajs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He said he was involved in creating the internet, which had already been created years before his "initiative". Ah... no. Try again.

      In the early-to-mid 1980s when the Internet as we know it was evolving out of the ARPANet, Gore was on the floor of Congress yammering on about how this crazy new tech was going to be important, and the U.S. had to be there first. He argued for vastly more funding to the NSF than anyone thought the Internet needed (it's just some computer geeks linking research databases, right?) I remember reading about his efforts on Usenet back in the late 80s and wondering, "I know why this is important, but how they heck does a politician know?!" In the end, of course, it was more important than either the geeks or the politicians could have predicted.

      Go read the Congressional Record for his speeches about the Internet. The funding for the development of all of those low-number RFCs like DNS and SMTP came from projects that Gore pushed as if he actually knew why they were important. Did he? I have no clue, but if I don't give props to the one politician to see the value in the Internet from the start, I'll never convince any politician that doing right by technology is going to help their careers. We have enough of the, "the Senator from Disney," types already, and I'd rather not have more.
    46. Re:google time by McFadden · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because quarter after quarter of record revenues AND profits means your company is crumbling.
      Well sure, live in the now, and ignore the future outlook for MS. I think most people see a very challenging road ahead for the Redmond beast and Ballmer so far hasn't looked anything like the person to be steering the ship through those waters.
    47. Re:google time by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      MS is the corporation equivalent of an oil tanker. It has momentum, and even with the engine off it keeps going forwards for quite a while. It's hard for MS not to make money, considering all the long term contracts companies and large corporations have with them. They're in a way what IBM was in the 70s and 80s, the company you have to have a contract with if you have something to do with computers, no matter how much you resent them, and corporations tend to go for fixed costs (like "corporate licenses") rather than having to deal with licensing on a daily base. Thus, MS keeps generating revenue, even if they ceased all activity.

      Also, don't confuse stock value with company health. While MS is far from being SCO, where shareholders play roulette with the stock in hope of some sort of lawsuit. The value of MS lies in the aforementoined quality of being an oil tanker.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    48. Re:google time by nitro316 · · Score: 0

      Yeah he updated to the newest version of Ubuntu.

    49. Re:google time by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      But in being that he built a time machine 5000 years in the future (our future), he traveled back to the beginning of written language, and established the concept of ownership of logical property, and that he was the firm holder of all rights on the mark known as question.

          He has now come to our modern time to assert these rights on his property, to acquire rights to assets which will be valuable to our new alien overlords in the year 2012, in turn will spell their demise by the year 4930, 5 years before his birth.

          Being that this is all outside of our timeline, we are completely unaware of these changes. Through a fluke of the universal design, he has momentarily crossed through our timeline, and is never to be heard from again. .... or will he? ....

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    50. Re:google time by anothy · · Score: 1

      Not to mention their stock is the highest its been in 5 years.
      They've had a good few weeks, sure, but there's been very little motion for years. they've substantially underperformed the NASDAQ, S&P 500, Dow Jones, and HP (!!!). They've been roughly competitive with SUN (!), and of course they don't hold a candle to the stars like GOOG and APPL. you've got to go back after a decade for those comparisons to stop being true (overall). The company's been moving mostly on inertia since about 2000 (coincidentally, related or not, the same year Gates started backing away from Microsoft and focused more on his philanthropic efforts). Their increasing difficulty to entice users into successive upgrades - making themselves their own biggest competitor - is very troubling for their longevity. They did very well turning themselves around circa 1996 after a late arrival to the internet game, but that was very much thanks to Gates' direction. They've been unable to extend their dominance to anywhere beyond Windows and Office, despite the fact that the filed continues to broaden around them.

      Microsoft's huge, and will be around for a very long time, but that's a far cry from saying their "healthy". People live with terminal diseases for decades all the time.
      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
    51. Re:google time by Himring · · Score: 1

      Blah, blah, blah,

      Look, politics is easy. One of the basic rules is be careful how you puff your record, or, better yet, never do it at all. Let your friends do that instead. Gore made a goof. He probably deserves all the credit in the world for his early work promoting the Internet, but he goofed politically in what he said and it's never gone away. Guess what? It never will. These things stick and they stick to all politicians.

      I believe is disliking them all equally. It sooths the mind.

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    52. Re:google time by TheJodster · · Score: 2, Funny

      After reading through all of the comments. You don't want to do this unless your really bored. It looks like he was having an affair with a VP that reports to him.

      I would find it highly ironic to find out after years of Microsoft screwing me over that it is actually against company policy for Microsofties to screw each other.

      --
      A little misunderstanding? Galileo and the Pope had a little misunderstanding...
    53. Re:google time by aminorex · · Score: 1

      If it makes them both more productive, I can't see how it could be considered misappropriation.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    54. Re:google time by mqduck · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did he misreport the Vista numbers, inflating them artifically I thought that WAS company policy.
      --
      Property is theft.
    55. Re:google time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fine, I'll post anonymously (Score 2 be buggered). On your point '3. Personal Conduct.' In my direct experience (and only mine) with Microsoft this is unlikely to get you fired unless you're bringing the company into disrepute. F*cking your secretary and various others' secretaries and random sluts in a hotel during a business trip is openly encouraged by the various boy's clubs at Microsoft - and yes, I have had direct personal experience with this phenomonon. When I outed one such arsewipe at Microsoft he called his friend running my company and tried to have me fired (after his wife left him, taking the kids). We didn't laugh about this even though it was clearly a joke, let me tell you, but sure as shit the guy did not receive his comeuppance from Microsoft, only from his (now ex) family. His Microsoft cronies simply patted him on the back for the extra women on the side and consoled him for his loss. That company was one I used to respect (even given thier shitty OS and apps domination) and frankly now I'd be happy for them to shrivel up and disappear, leaving everything to the Gates Foundation. As it happens, I'm now a happy Ubuntu user mainly because I hate every damned thing Microsoft stands for - this experience was just another.

    56. Re:google time by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1

      it's funny, but people always down politicians that ACTUALLY make a science contribution, look @ jerry brown who was dubbed "moonbeam" after proposing state run and leased communication satellites- to this day people call him moonbeam as a put-down, but if it weren't for him satellite communications and state leasing $ from such (esp. gps broadcasters) wouldn't be where they are today.... but moonbeam is still an insult

    57. Re:google time by umghhh · · Score: 1

      maybne he did not fart strong enough to inflate them properly?

    58. Re:google time by Stormcrow309 · · Score: 1

      That's sweet! See my tag line please. In other words, I would like to see proof.

      --

      In God we trust, all others require data.

    59. Re:google time by djwudi · · Score: 1

      You mean there's still someone left who missed it?

      (Though, judging by the sudden spike in hits I got...sheesh. Of all the stupid things to get (in)famous for....)

      --
      "We communicate daily and say nothing. We have rebuilt the Tower of Babel and it is a television antenna." -- Ted Koppel
    60. Re:google time by michrech · · Score: 1

      You mean there's still someone left who missed it?

      (Though, judging by the sudden spike in hits I got...sheesh. Of all the stupid things to get (in)famous for....) Never underestimate the lagging brain power of us slashdotters (I had completely forgotten about it until it was mentioned in the thread -- I'm sure there are at *least* a few that did actually miss it, too. :) )
      --
      bork bork bork!
  2. obvious by tomstdenis · · Score: 5, Funny

    Got fed up with Vista and installed $SOME_DISTRO instead. :-)

    Somehow this is gonna cost me karma... :-(

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:obvious by darxider · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No. He bought a Mac.

    2. Re:obvious by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      From what I hear, there is already some Linux use inside MS. I don't think that would be the problem.

      More likely backtracking and installing XP. I think MS is more worried about XP as a competator to Vista than Linux right now.

      Which is hillarious, but at the same time, the probably think "at least we still make a profit with XP, unlike Vista"

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    3. Re:obvious by pjotrb123 · · Score: 1

      No, he was reading Slashdot all day

      --
      I liked my next sig a lot better
    4. Re:obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      >No, he was reading Slashdot all day

      on a Mac :)

    5. Re:obvious by neersign · · Score: 1, Funny

      nobody has thrown out any "wide stance" jokes yet...i'm surprised.

    6. Re:obvious by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Somehow this is gonna cost me karma... :-( Well done! You've said a variation on the Magic Phrase that gets you sympathy votes. Karma whore.
      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    7. Re:obvious by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Funny votes don't get you karma. Are you new here?

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    8. Re:obvious by Hansu · · Score: 1

      With $SOME_DISTRO running Firefox

      --
      .signature: Command not found
    9. Re:obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're probably not far off. He probably authorized something that went against MS propaganda. ie used a competitor's product, used OSS in some niche somewhere, allowed someone to implement Linux or even a Mac.

      If news of that ever got out, it would make Balmer look like a fool... OK, bigger fool.

    10. Re:obvious by tomknight · · Score: 1

      They *used* to. Sounds more like he's old here....

      --
      Oh arse
    11. Re:obvious by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      The "new" bit was a joke, I realized his UID was smaller, just figured he would have remembered that funny doesn't get karma [and hasn't since I joined in 2001 as far as I know].

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    12. Re:obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kids these days eh? He said, on slashdot, that M$ sucks and they want to install Linux, and expects to get modded down. tomstdenis - just link to goatse.cx and say "must have got caught looking at this". Works every time.

    13. Re:obvious by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      With $SOME_DISTRO running Firefox

      Give the guy a break. He was googling the setup of his favorite OpenGL games.

    14. Re:obvious by jkrise · · Score: 4, Funny

      He was Chief Information officer, remember? So maybe he truthfully reported all the 14 sales of Vista?

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    15. Re:obvious by tomknight · · Score: 1

      The problem is thatI only realised that a year or so ago and stopped making karma increasing jokes about then. Used to be the easiest way to bump up karma after a few dodgy comments....

      --
      Oh arse
    16. Re:obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe he advocate switching all desktops within microsoft to linux to save cost....

    17. Re:obvious by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      You'd be surprised how many Microsoft employees use Linux, a Mac or both (I worked there for about a year and a half, and I remember my surprise one day when I walked into the office of one of our project managers and saw Pine on his desktop; when I commented, he said it was an SSH session to his Linux box at home. I thought it took balls to have that on a monitor facing the door). A number of people on my team - myself included - only used Windows at work. At home, most my team were completely Linux/Mac/BSD.

    18. Re:obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He called the Help Desk to get his new iPod touch mounted to Linux.

    19. Re:obvious by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Which was discovered to NOT be a Mac, cuz he was running SOME DISTRO and modified it according to:

      http://www.howtoforge.com/mac4lin_make_linux_look_like_a_mac_p6

      which was found to really be based on:

      http://linux.softpedia.com/get/Desktop-Environment/KDE/KDM-Vista-like-Theme-25822.shtml

      and

      http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=31585

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    20. Re:obvious by zzottt · · Score: 0

      When I worked at MS, Linux talk was akin to committing murder.
      I would not be suprized if he was canned because of some idle chit chat between staff about open-source software... well I was pretty much canned for it. I know I was given a bad review for talking about the merits of Linux and the problems Microsoft will have if they don't approach the situation differently. That bad review sealed my fate and I was forced out.

  3. No it wouldn't... by ByOhTek · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ya know, I'm positive someone reading this story knows the answer to the mystery... and they could post it anonymously and be totally fine because there will be a hundred other totally wrong guesses and it would be completely impossible to distinguish the two ;)


    Taco said in one of his write-ups, comments will (very rarely) be removed for legal reasons.

    Whichever post dissapears after MS sends an email threatening legal action. That is the reason... Everyone, ready your screenshots!
    --
    Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    1. Re:No it wouldn't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Whichever post dissapears after MS sends an email threatening legal action.

      No need for a threatening email. They politely request a retraction and send a check! Yes, /. has sold out!

    2. Re:No it wouldn't... by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      No, they would do this for free (I'd hope)

      Seriously - by confirmation, the takedown would do more to expose the truth than to hide it.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    3. Re:No it wouldn't... by Sneftel · · Score: 1, Funny

      Slashdot isn't able to stand up for basic editorial values like fact-checking, not shilling, or just plain copy editing for basic grammar and spelling. So pardon me if my faith is only as strong as the actual practice of their principles.

      "Don't split that infinitive! It goes against our principles!"
      --
      The opinions stated herein do not necessarily represent those of anybody at all. Deal with it.
    4. Re:No it wouldn't... by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      Have they tried clearing browser cookies/cache?

      There's more ways than just IPs to track someone.

      Also, was the post posted with [post anonymously], which can still apparently affect your Karma (unless you get the [No Karma Bonus], because then, while the post may still be AC, and not IP linked, it is account linked.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    5. Re:No it wouldn't... by john_is_war · · Score: 1

      You can't mod any post in a thread where you posted, so you can be linked to ONE AC in a thread, but it's impossible to tell which one.

      --
      Live life to the fullest. It's not that life is short, but that you are dead for so long.
    6. Re:No it wouldn't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, was the post posted with [post anonymously], which can still apparently affect your Karma (unless you get the [No Karma Bonus], because then, while the post may still be AC, and not IP linked, it is account linked. Ah, crap! So that's why my acct's Karma is in the toilet!

      Shitcock.
  4. He got fired for.... by scrantaj · · Score: 0

    Stealing office supplies

    1. Re:He got fired for.... by greichert · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... telling Apple how to implement a Blue Screen Of Death in MacOS X.

    2. Re:He got fired for.... by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

      Lol You totally missed something. Were they Office 2003 supplies or Office 2007 supplies? There is a difference.

      --
      The game.
    3. Re:He got fired for.... by andawyr · · Score: 1

      Building a better life, was he?

    4. Re:He got fired for.... by rueger · · Score: 1

      That would be a "kernal panic" in Apple-speak, except that Macs never crash so it must have been my imagination.

    5. Re:He got fired for.... by rueger · · Score: 1

      Whoops... that's obviously "kernel"..

    6. Re:He got fired for.... by greichert · · Score: 1

      I used a wrong link. I should have posted a link to the BSOD that happens when people install Leopard.

    7. Re:He got fired for.... by thegnu · · Score: 1

      Lol You totally missed something. Were they Office 2003 supplies or Office 2007 supplies? There is a difference.

      Word is they had to halt production on new copies of Office 2007, because he was pirating hundreds of ribbons a day.

      And piracy is stealing.
      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    8. Re:He got fired for.... by notgm · · Score: 1

      HE STOLE CLIPPY!

  5. He was caught... by kclittle · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ... using Ubuntu on his personal laptop.

    --
    Generally, bash is superior to python in those environments where python is not installed.
    1. Re:He was caught... by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey, I like how you just copied a post directly off the story site! That's the spirit of re-use in action.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    2. Re:He was caught... by AVee · · Score: 1

      Hey, watch your words! This is a Microsoft story, it is called "Visual Basic inheritence".

    3. Re:He was caught... by kclittle · · Score: 1

      You think I read the f* article? You must be new here... :)

      --
      Generally, bash is superior to python in those environments where python is not installed.
  6. The reason... by limabone · · Score: 5, Funny

    When filling out a form, under the section that said 'DO NOT WRITE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE' he wrote 'OK'

    1. Re:The reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Old Simpsons joke...

    2. Re:The reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was great.

      Since you didn't put (c)2007 I'm going to assume I can use that one...

    3. Re:The reason... by jkrise · · Score: 1

      No no no... the real reason is a small mistake in a press release, he's rumoured not to have sent: "According to our Chair-Man , Vista offers Excel-lent value for our money...."

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
  7. Booyah! by wooden+pickle · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Holla at a playa when you see him in the street!

    1. Re:Booyah! by skoaldipper · · Score: 1

      Even now, he can be heard shouting "Boom-shaka-laka!" while strutting down to 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway.

      --
      I hope, when they die, cartoon characters have to answer for their sins.
    2. Re:Booyah! by lonechicken · · Score: 1

      Holla at a playa when you see him in the street! This shouldn't have been moderated as Offtopic. If anything, I'd go with "Playa hatin'"
    3. Re:Booyah! by NeoChaosX · · Score: 1

      Thank you, I knew I wasn't the only one who thought of the SportsCenter anchor when I saw the guy's name.

      --
      One man's selflessness is another man's annoyance.
  8. Ballmer Attitude? by eldavojohn · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Maybe his daughter was caught using an iPod? Or perhaps his work machine's cache was found to have a Google Search results page in it?

    But, in all seriousness, it wouldn't surprise me if Microsoft had a very stringent agreement with it's employees such that you're guilty of violating company policy at all times. Something really vague and impossible to avoid like "you shall not support a competitor in anyway with any of your personal funds or free time." They only let you go if they want to and so few get let go on these grounds that nobody really cares about it. Does anyone know if this is the case?

    It really wouldn't surprise me if they treated their employees the same way they treat their customers.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Ballmer Attitude? by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      I doubt it is anything so draconian as that. I've heard of many competitor products being used inside of MS HQ.

      The catch-all is probably something more subtle, like requiring employees turn off the lights in the office/cube when they leave, or something like that - easily forgettable and innocuous.

      (Note: most companies I've seen have these to give them a right to fire anyone for any reason, so MS really shouldn't be treated differently from anyone else on this matter).

      And he wasn't necessarily caught by a catch-all. It's also possible he did something legitimately harmful.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    2. Re:Ballmer Attitude? by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Few people are ever fired for a breach of a minor rule in any corporation. Supposedly minor rules are usually only invoked if the breach is a cause of a wider problem. For example, an unproductive employee might be fired for visiting personal websites during working hours. The cause of the firing is that the employee isn't worth keeping because they (amongst other things) spend all day browsing the web and not working, not that the websites were not work related.

      Remember, it kills morale and makes people want to leave if they're in fear of losing their jobs over something other than performance and/or disruptive behavior. It's also expensive - an employee of any worth takes months, sometimes years, to replace, and crucial information is inevitably lost whenever anyone leaves. While corporations suck at the whole morale thing, it's an exaggeration to assume that most people are fired over something "innocuous". Even if the reason given might appear that way, the fact is the corporation wouldn't be firing the person in the first place if there wasn't a good reason to get rid of them.

      That said, the reason in this case could be as simple as Scott isn't worth anything close to waht he was being paid and was easily losable.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    3. Re:Ballmer Attitude? by Ubergrendle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's a few dangers with this approach...IANALB...

      #1, if he can prove in court that Microsoft wasn't actively supporting this policy at all times and simply used it as an excuse to dismiss him, Microsoft would be legally liable. Same with using him as a scapegoat or as an example; disproportionate application of corporate policies is a big no-no. Varies by state-to-state of course.

      #2, just because a corporation has an HR policy does not necessarily mean that its legal. This is somewhat less likely since I'm sure MS has lawyers who review these things (especially since they've been nailed for this in the past), but we'll know how 'fair' his dismissal was if this ends up in court.

      My wild-ass guess would be something incredibly stupid or personally dumb happened, like using corporate resources to download pr0n or warez, or liasons with staff members, etc. On an outside chance, he might have pursued a strategic policy that was against the mandate of the board of directors (e.g. "he's our plan for segregation applications from O/S releases" board "you aren't supposed to do that"). Either way we're not meant to know, unless this ends up in court.

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    4. Re:Ballmer Attitude? by Halo- · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The catch-all is probably something more subtle, like requiring employees turn off the lights in the office/cube when they leave, or something like that - easily forgettable and innocuous. (Note: most companies I've seen have these to give them a right to fire anyone for any reason, so MS really shouldn't be treated differently from anyone else on this matter).
      IANAL, but I strongly suspect that in order of any of these "catch-alls" to be enforceable, they would have to be applied in a demonstratively consistent fashion.
      I'm pretty sure most major companies realize that their CIO has enough money and savvy to hire a good lawyer if their grounds for dismissal is questionable. A dismissal like this is going to damage his reputation, and I'm sure if he thinks the reason behind it is BS, he's going to go for damages.
      In

      And he wasn't necessarily caught by a catch-all. It's also possible he did something legitimately harmful.
      I think it's highly likely that he did something most people would agree was "bad." It might have been something personal, like a substance abuse problem, or something professional, like falsifying records. Microsoft wouldn't fire someone this high up without a good reason.
    5. Re:Ballmer Attitude? by tgd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Eh, if you walk around their campus you see iPhones, you see iPods, their employees use Google and GMail.

      Now maybe at his level its different, but they are not cold blooded fascists who instill fear in their employees.

      Its hard to keep 75k of them if you do.

    6. Re:Ballmer Attitude? by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      #2 is actually a little more than that. What if a company has a policy to only hire male engineers under the age of 40? Just because a company fully enforces and complies with that policy doesn't make it illegal.

    7. Re:Ballmer Attitude? by CmdrGravy · · Score: 4, Funny

      The real reason for this should be immediately obvious to anyone as schooled in espionage as I am.

      A common gambit for agencies wishing to implant a mole into a rival agency is to first of all establish their lack of attachment for the potential mole, common techniques for this are high profile embarrasing sackings or similar. Just as we see here.

      Don't be surprised to see this guy revert to the life of an itinerant alcoholic for a while telling the world about how he made it big with one of the top dogs in the software industry and how he could have been great if the bastards hadn't dragged him down like that and how he'd do anything for revenge.

      The aim obviously is for him to be hired by Red Hat or someone similar where he can then work from within to destroy them.

      It's all obvious for those looking at the right signs.

    8. Re:Ballmer Attitude? by chrish · · Score: 1

      I doubt "liaisons with staff members" would be a fireable offence at MS, Gates married one of his subordinates a number of years back.

      Maybe he just stopped showing up for work. "I wouldn't say I've been missing work..."

      --
      - chrish
    9. Re:Ballmer Attitude? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm thinking along the same lines. This ex-CIO is a guy with over ten years of traditional corporate experience who would have quickly recognized Ballmer's limitations as CEO, and the liabilities that are consequent to Ballmer's asinine behavior. He might well have been the first person with Real Corporation Experience to be in a position to assess Ballmer's performances.

      Ballmer once threatened to "fucking kill" the competition and alluded to having arranged a murder before. Ballmer has a long standing and active history of threatening behavior, most recently his absurd public threats of patent litigation. At the very least, Ballmer doesn't understand that the CEO of a multibillion dollar global corporation keeps himself and his company's name out of the mud: at that level you contract with creeps who will hire expendables to do your dirty work.

      This guy was probably fired because he wouldn't go along with some particular stupid Ballmerism and he wouldn't drink the antifreeze.

    10. Re:Ballmer Attitude? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Its hard to keep 75k of them if you do. That's what the free all-you-can-drink Kool-Aid is for!
      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    11. Re:Ballmer Attitude? by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Maybe he'll end up with the other two Microsoft moles at that patent troll that's suing Red Hat and Novell.

    12. Re:Ballmer Attitude? by Grave · · Score: 1

      I see that by "schooled in espionage" you meant "paranoid"...

    13. Re:Ballmer Attitude? by Deadstick · · Score: 5, Funny
      It really wouldn't surprise me if they treated their employees the same way they treat their customers.

      Well, that's what ValleyWag says he was doing...

      rj

    14. Re:Ballmer Attitude? by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      It would actually, since federal law prohibits an employer from discriminating based on age.

    15. Re:Ballmer Attitude? by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      "liaisons with staff members"

      I'm betting this is exactlly what it is. I'm thinking he got caught with his dick up some intern's ass probably on Bill's desk too. I would think that woudl be grounds for firing even if it wasn't corp. policy.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    16. Re:Ballmer Attitude? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking as an ex-MSFT person - the vast majority of people in my department used Firefox and Google. No "pronouncement from upon high" ever came down.

    17. Re:Ballmer Attitude? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example, an unproductive employee might be fired for visiting personal websites during working hours.

      You don't know how many slashdot readers you just hurt with this statement.

    18. Re:Ballmer Attitude? by Z00L00K · · Score: 1
      One important thing is that an employee may look unproductive sitting in a corner drinking his coffee but sometimes that employee is the same one that can and will do whatever is necessary as soon as all hell breaks loose. If he (or she for that matter) can resolve a major problem in five minutes where it may take any other person several hours he's still worth his salary. This is not completely unusual in the industry - even if it may be less extreme.

      OK, replace "drinking coffee" with just about anything. Most persons of that level aren't really drinking coffee anyway when they don't have anything important to do. They may be strolling around simulating being busy or so. Some may even be proactive and resolve problems that are growing before anybody notices.

      The real problem is that some managers don't recognize this kind of people and thinks that they are just overhead. Well - in a way they are - but not as much as the manager.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    19. Re:Ballmer Attitude? by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Sue for what?

      We wanted your services, so we pay you to stick around.
      We no longer need/want your services, so we stop paying you to stick around.

      As long as M$ doesn't slander/libel the guy out the door, what damage is done?

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    20. Re:Ballmer Attitude? by aminorex · · Score: 1

      There might be some merit in your observations if corporations were unitary rational actors. However, they are not. They are aggregations of persons who behave in only a vaguely approximately rational fashion, and usually in their own interests when they do behave rationally -- only accidentally do they behave rationally in the corporate interest. He probably pissed someone off. Most people I've seen get fired were fired because they pissed someone off. I can't think of a single instance of anyone getting fired for being dead weight, except when the company was on its last legs -- and I've seen a LOT of dead weight, believe you me. Especially at the CxO level. The alternative is that he was caught red-handed in a criminal act.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    21. Re:Ballmer Attitude? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One important thing is that an employee may look unproductive sitting in a corner drinking his coffee but sometimes that employee is the same one that can and will do whatever is necessary as soon as all hell breaks loose.

      This is a common complaint (on both sides) between sysadmins and management. The best sysadmins don't appear to be doing much a lot of the time, because they have the infrastructure set up so that it is stable and (generally) automated. To management it looks like they're not doing anything. In some cases companies have laid off their sysadmins only to find that whoops, they now spend so much time fighting fires and losing productivity to downtime that perhaps having a sysadmin might be a good idea after all.

    22. Re:Ballmer Attitude? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's going to go and work for Acacia. http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20071011205044141

    23. Re:Ballmer Attitude? by emil+wildschwein · · Score: 1

      "the corporation wouldn't be firing the person in the first place if there wasn't a good reason to get rid of them."

      Not necessarily. Say, the CEO tells the VP to disband the department, the group you are in gets closed down, everyone gets laid off "for strategic reasons". The real reason is to demote the department head and eliminate loyal people who could support him.

      This can happen to anyone. Believe me, I know what I am talking about: it happened to me and ruined my career.

  9. I know what he did... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    He bought a Sony Playstation 3, then looked for help setting it up via Google on his Linux based computer.

    1. Re:I know what he did... by EvilRyry · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I heard he was looking on Google for information on how to install Linux on his playstation 3 from his Linux computer.

    2. Re:I know what he did... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      using Google from Opera on his Wii to get info on installing Fedora 7 on his PPC iMac while loading AAC files on to his iPod, talking to friends via GAIM and working on a presentation in OpenOffice.org ?

      Or looking at some really filthy pr0n at work.

    3. Re:I know what he did... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The PS3 was setup fine. He was Googling how to get his iPod connected to the PS3.

    4. Re:I know what he did... by Technician · · Score: 1

      He bought a Sony Playstation 3, then looked for help setting it up via Google on his Linux based computer.

      That's what got him noticed. After they examimed his laptop, they found him developing code to make Open Office able to open Office 2007 files and was working on a converter to use iTunes files on his Zune.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    5. Re:I know what he did... by robi2106 · · Score: 1

      He is a CIO, not a dev. That means he was caught bonking the secretary on the CEO's desk (you are supposed to do that on your own desk) or he clogged up the corporate "T:\" drive with porn.

  10. What are you guys doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are you all doing CmdrTaco just gave you an ordr to post unfounded accusations anonymously! Why aren't you making slanderous posts yet?

  11. more obvious by SimonGhent · · Score: 1

    Broke a chair?

    Has he never heard of demarkation?

    --
    simon
    1. Re:more obvious by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 0, Troll

      Got caught putting Superglue on Ballmer's chair to keep him from throwing it?

      Got convicted of stealing office supplies for turning off Clippy?

      Got caught actually following an ISO without commoditizing it?

      Got caught following an NDA instead of stealing the ideas for pre-release by Microsoft before their partner?

      We could go on all day on this one.

    2. Re:more obvious by dintech · · Score: 2, Insightful

      More likely he side-stepped some chair related punishment. That's grounds for dismissal at MS I think.

      Seriously though, I think considering his level it's possible that it could be in relation to some kind of trading of MS stock. Either himself or someone he knows.

    3. Re:more obvious by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      .. glued steve and bills butts together...

      Yeah, we can go on all day with this.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

  12. my money's on... by crossb0nez · · Score: 0, Troll

    he bought an iPhone.

    --
    Rule of Acquisition #19: Satisfaction is Not guaranteed.
  13. iPod by eelke_klein · · Score: 0, Troll

    His daughter bought a cool iPod instead of a lame Zune.

    1. Re:iPod by DMoylan · · Score: 1
  14. balmer by wwmedia · · Score: 5, Funny

    balmer run out of chairs to toss! so he moved onto the management, which is a smart move they are thick as wood anyways

    1. Re:balmer by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      Lacking mod points, I'll just post instead

      That is probably the funniest comment on this thread.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    2. Re:balmer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A chair joke!

      You're fucking hilarious!

      Did you make that up all by yourself!?

      Those chair jokes just never stop being funny!

      Jackass.

    3. Re:balmer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Relax, Balmer, that one will get old after your next temper tantrum.

  15. Challenging Steve Balmer to a throwing chair fight by sjwest · · Score: 1

    Is not the thing to do

  16. Belinda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    He was baggin' Belinda.

    1. Re:Belinda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bagging of the tea kind, I hope?

    2. Re:Belinda by sqldr · · Score: 1

      with an iphone

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    3. Re:Belinda by jo42 · · Score: 1

      ...talk about a double-bagger...

    4. Re:Belinda by phalse+phace · · Score: 1

      He was baggin' Belinda.

      Who's Belinda?

      Oh, you mean Melinda.

  17. nudity by Gigiya · · Score: 3, Funny

    he deemed himself the "chief indecent officer", came to work naked, and refused to let anyone not notice his lack of clothes lolololol

    1. Re:nudity by rubycodez · · Score: 2, Funny

      if that's the case I want to be their CFO

  18. Who knows by El+Lobo · · Score: 1
    I'm sure few people knows. Often those things are left between the person and their bosses and seldom get aired in public.

    Now let's the conspiration theories fly, but often the reality is much simpler and mundane...

    --
    It's time to realise that Abble's products are the biggest abomination these days. Just say NO to the dumb iAbble way!!
  19. They realized.... by nick+graham · · Score: 1

    Sportscenter was taking up too much of his time.

  20. i tagged this booyah by Vorpix · · Score: 1

    not as much because i have something against THIS stuart scott, but my first thoughts were of stuart scott

    --
    frog blast the vent core
  21. Watching porno and .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Got caught playing with his Wii

  22. Huh? by p51d007 · · Score: 0

    Did he steal office supplies, or Microsoft Office supplies, or office supplies for Microsoft Office, or Microsoft office supplies for the office, or......forget it, I'm confusing myself

  23. political incorrect by hyperinactive · · Score: 5, Funny

    Stuart L. Scott's middle name is Linus.

  24. Caught in the men's room... by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ... with an iPhone.

    1. Re:Caught in the men's room... by thegnu · · Score: 0

      Am I the only person who's thought of writing "Hi, Larry!" on the tips of my shoes? Because we should all start doing that. That guy's a jerk.

      Oh, also, here's for bringing back capes. If you've never worn a cape, I highly recommend it. It's the most awesome fucking thing in the world.

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
  25. Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He tried to stop Steve from throwing his chair?

  26. Pretty remarkable by dal20402 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Usually, at levels this high, executives who misbehave are quietly asked to resign. The fact that his termination was this public and graceless tells me he did something pretty egregious, because Microsoft apparently wants to not just get rid of him but warn other corporations not to hire him. Misappropriation of corporate funds, in some way, seems the most likely candidate to me.

    Please note I'm not informed at all, just speculating.

    1. Re:Pretty remarkable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it were something like that, though, wouldn't they be all about making it public? The fact that its kept so quiet suggests something that would embarass Microsoft if it got out. So they give him a pretty vicious public thwapping, but don't give a reason why.

    2. Re:Pretty remarkable by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Ahh, but if this speculation disappears shortly, we'll know.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    3. Re:Pretty remarkable by Billosaur · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Two words: sexual harassment.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    4. Re:Pretty remarkable by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The fact that his termination was this public and graceless tells me he did something pretty egregious
      I agree, but I think the reasons for public termination may be different. Possibly harassment or discrimination or something like that. Pay off harassed employee, with public termination of the harasser as a condition of the settlement.

      I somehow find it hard to believe that MS would want to warn other corporations about hiring him.

      It could also be a problem that other MS employees are aware of, and the public termination sends a notice to employees who would cross the same lines he did. Plus, it sends the message that the highest-ups face consequences for their actions, and thus can be good for company morale among the drones.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    5. Re:Pretty remarkable by teknopurge · · Score: 1

      More like they wanted to make a public statement that they do NOT condone what ever it is he did. Something sexual/amoral perhaps????

    6. Re:Pretty remarkable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Nonsense! Balmer wouldn't do that to his CIO!

    7. Re:Pretty remarkable by thealsir · · Score: 1

      A very sound and reasonable premise. Microsoft does not typically act brutally with employees firing-wise, contrary to the Slashdot zeitgeist.

      --
      Do not downmod posts "overrated" simply because you disagree with them.
    8. Re:Pretty remarkable by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yup. For one, at that level, or with management in general, it's always sexual harassment. Well, sometimes it's gross incompetence. The harassment I don't get, though. I mean, if they want some free sex, couldn't they just go to a bar and say, "Yeah, I'm a VP of a multi-billion dollar corporation, and I make nine thousand dollars an hour. Let's take my jet and go screw in the hot tub at my 4th summer place."

      Nope. It's like it's the opposite of the thrill of the hunt for them, preying on people who (they think) can't really defend themselves.

      Plus, you just look at this guy and you know he's a complete pussy hound. The insecure type, that's always chasing it like it's the last piece he'll ever get. Just totally ruled by it, the poor thing.

      Then again, I could be completely wrong.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    9. Re:Pretty remarkable by acvh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Insightful comment above. For a "Chief Anything Officer" to be terminated the behavior must have been directly offensive to the CEO and/or the Board of Directors. Stealing their money is one, but I think it unlikely in this case. For one, you can be criminally charged for that, and why would they let him off so easy?

      My guess is that he disclosed, to a third party, some information about Microsoft that, while not on the level of corporate espionage, was something Microsoft wanted kept secret. You know, something like "Vista was written in XCode on a iMac".

    10. Re:Pretty remarkable by Idaho · · Score: 1

      Two words: sexual harassment.


      That's the rumour indeed. It's unlikely that this will be "officially" confirmed by any of the parties involved.
      --
      Every expression is true, for a given value of 'true'
    11. Re:Pretty remarkable by Idaho · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's the rumour indeed. It's unlikely that this will be "officially" confirmed by any of the parties involved.


      Stupidly quoting myself but...on second thought, the rumour is not "sexual harassment", but at least the first word was involved.

      Apparently he was having an affair with a direct subordinate.
      --
      Every expression is true, for a given value of 'true'
    12. Re:Pretty remarkable by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm... I'd be fired there within a minute. I think one of their marketing chicks is hot.... And normally, I don't fall for blondes.

    13. Re:Pretty remarkable by pak9rabid · · Score: 0, Troll

      Two words: sexual harassment.

      Scott: Word around the office if you've got a fat cock.
      Mailroom Employee: Yes, I do..
      Scott: I've got a fat cock too. Maybe we should rub our fat cocks together sometime. Maybe a little oil..two fat cocks..together..oil..

    14. Re:Pretty remarkable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      twelve words: why do people persist with this phrase template? It's never been funny....

    15. Re:Pretty remarkable by blindd0t · · Score: 1

      That's why everybody should be required to watch this video before they are hired.

    16. Re:Pretty remarkable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh..... Since when did Microsoft ever act with grace, either to its employees or its customers?

      I don't hate Microsoft, but I have been both. I had a high up Microsoft manager actually say to me
      that "My Dad died, and it didn't effect my productivity..."

      For all you know, the CIO refused to let Microsoft take more than 60 hours of his life per week....

    17. Re:Pretty remarkable by TheSkyIsPurple · · Score: 1

      I doubt it.

      From what I've seen at my company, that also warrants the "has decided to move on in his career" treatment.

    18. Re:Pretty remarkable by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      The harassment I don't get, though. I mean, if they want some free sex, couldn't they just go to a bar and say, "Yeah, I'm a VP of a multi-billion dollar corporation, and I make nine thousand dollars an hour. Let's take my jet and go screw in the hot tub at my 4th summer place."


      Well, it is that exact quote which will get you fired for sexual harassment if any of your employees happens to be in the bar and take offense (or pretend to take offense).
    19. Re:Pretty remarkable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, that's a new approach. Instead of farking the customers they're farking each other.

    20. Re:Pretty remarkable by ebonum · · Score: 1

      PLEASE! The CIO of the biggest software company in the world leaving is news. Don't read anything into the fact that that M$ made this public. Depending on the circumstances, a public announcement for a CIO departure may be required under SOX. His replacement might have a significant impact on company spending, policies, etc. M$ can't hide this even if they want to.

    21. Re:Pretty remarkable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sex across management lines is a criminal offense you know...sorta like crossing species lines, really, if you think about it... >:-)

    22. Re:Pretty remarkable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      male or female?

    23. Re:Pretty remarkable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one I work with knows anything.

      Every quarter or so they send out cautionary tales related to standards of conduct rules. People get fired for violating all sorts of rules like giving contracts to relatives or putting personal expenses on expense reports. I'm sure he violated something like that, but I doubt the official story will ever be released.

    24. Re:Pretty remarkable by Intron · · Score: 1

      three words: lack of imagination

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    25. Re:Pretty remarkable by Billosaur · · Score: 1

      Except that, as we saw with the Isaiah Thomas case over at Madison Square Garden, if the company does nothing about it, they soon become the target of a lawsuit and there is the potentially messy publicity that goes with that. Mind you, people have said plenty of bad things about MS in regards to their software and their business practices, but the goings-on in Redmond are oft shrouded in mystery. When your CIO gets involved in something questionable, in this post-Enron world, you have to nip it in the bud quickly or face being dragged through the mud. The public doesn't care that Vista may suck, but they do care if there's a personal scandal at the highest level.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    26. Re:Pretty remarkable by Grave · · Score: 1

      Actually, once you reach that level, if you're not putting in more than 60 hours a week, you're being lazy. Those massive paychecks don't come from a 40 hour workweek (not that even an 80 hour week justifies some of them, but...)

    27. Re:Pretty remarkable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for funniest of the morning.

    28. Re:Pretty remarkable by Billosaur · · Score: 1

      I somehow find it hard to believe that MS would want to warn other corporations about hiring him.

      They might, but of course they can't come right out and say that, lest they be sued for defamation. In this society, former employers keep mum about employees who leave under any circumstances, making in-company references worthless, since employees still with the company are admonished to pass all requests for references to HR, and HR will only tell you that someone did in fact work at the company and when. In a way, this perpetuates the presence of employees with poor work skills, as they cannot truly be flagged as being bad employees, so they get picked up elsewhere. Put another way, it's harder to get a reputation in an industry than it used to be.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    29. Re:Pretty remarkable by AVee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Frankly, I doubt that would be enough reason to fire him this public, not at that level. He really pissed off someone, so unless the last name of this subordinate was Balmer I fairly sure it involves money somewhere.

    30. Re:Pretty remarkable by cmowire · · Score: 1

      The harassment I don't get, though. I mean, if they want some free sex, couldn't they just go to a bar and say, "Yeah, I'm a VP of a multi-billion dollar corporation, and I make nine thousand dollars an hour. Let's take my jet and go screw in the hot tub at my 4th summer place."
      That's because sexual harassment is not about sex, it's about power.

    31. Re:Pretty remarkable by fm6 · · Score: 2, Informative

      That would certainly explain why they're being so hush-hush. On the one hand, ignoring a sexual harassment complaint can get you sued. On the other hand, saying one of your people is accused of sexual harassment can also get you sued.

      General principal: when somebody is being really, really tight-lipped, either they're planning on invading a foreign country or they're trying to avoid litigation. And the security measures are less extreme for the invasion! I've been in meetings about such issues where I was told not to take notes, not to discuss the issue in email, and not to discuss the issue at all with anybody who didn't have a specific need to know. And don't ask for hints, because that could get me fired — and probably sued myself.

    32. Re:Pretty remarkable by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      The harassment I don't get, though. I mean, if they want some free sex, couldn't they just go to a bar and say, "Yeah, I'm a VP of a multi-billion dollar corporation, and I make nine thousand dollars an hour. Let's take my jet and go screw in the hot tub at my 4th summer place."

      Your dick will always get you in trouble. Once it starts thinking, logic goes out the window. How many men have thrown away careers because of it?

    33. Re:Pretty remarkable by Marcion · · Score: 1

      As long as it is not this or this one.

    34. Re:Pretty remarkable by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      complete pussy hound

      Yeap, I'm definally adding that phrase to my list for future use.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    35. Re:Pretty remarkable by Mark_in_Brazil · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Apparently he was having an affair with a direct subordinate.
      Um... I have to ask these questions, even though I know the 'turfers are going to pound me for it with negative mods.

      Can that really be the case?
      More to the point, was Melinda French a direct subordinate of Bill Gates?

      FWIW, I honestly don't know and seriously wonder. The Wikipedia article on her just says she was the "unit manager" (huh huh - insert humorous comment here) for several Microsoft products (Publisher, Bob, Encarta, and Expedia).

      --
      "It is nice to know that the computer understands the problem. But I would like to understand it too." --Eugene Wigner
    36. Re:Pretty remarkable by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      PLEASE! The CIO of the biggest software company in the world leaving is news

      Of course it is. But it's not that they are announcing it, it's that they are going out of their way to say that he did something wrong. That's just not done unless it's something they really need to distance themselves from.

    37. Re:Pretty remarkable by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      But that's what I don't get! How is it so exciting to force someone that's scared you'll fire them to have flirt-have sex with you? I don't crush ants and go, "ooh look at me, I'm so POWERFUL!" If you were trying to feel your own power, it seems like bagging your boss would be the way to go.

      Guess that's why I'm not a CXO.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    38. Re:Pretty remarkable by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You misunderstand. He was not given the opportunity to resign. He was canned, and not for purely performance-related reasons (instead, for violating company policy in some manner).

      This is not about hiding it, it's about how MS chose to terminate him, and how, not whether, they chose to publicize it.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    39. Re:Pretty remarkable by bugnuts · · Score: 1

      He really pissed off someone, so unless the last name of this subordinate was Balmer I fairly sure it involves money somewhere. Maybe the last name was Balmer, and he broke it off? Then, jilted Steve fired him?

    40. Re:Pretty remarkable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >definally
      I'm adding that one to mine.

    41. Re:Pretty remarkable by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Ah hah, distributing microsoft product the old fashioned way eh!

    42. Re:Pretty remarkable by Tony · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is generally a very good place to work. Everyone I know who works (or has worked) there has loved it.

      It's still a very evil corporation that has set the computing industry back over a decade, but it's a great place to work.

      --
      Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
    43. Re:Pretty remarkable by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      More to the point, was Melinda French a direct subordinate of Bill Gates?...she was the "unit manager"...for several Microsoft products (Publisher, Bob, Encarta, and Expedia).

      I'd like to think that the unit manager of Encarta did not report directly to the CEO.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    44. Re:Pretty remarkable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Three different words: didn't play ball.

      Microsoft has violated the law any number of times. It has surreptitiously funded harassment lawsuits against competitors and has done business with corrupt foreign governments and other illicit agencies. My guess is that Scott got axed because he wouldn't play ball, or perhaps he was about to blow the whistle on something particularly egregious. Hopefully once he is out of the borg he'll be able to speak freely.

    45. Re:Pretty remarkable by glgraca · · Score: 1

      Why wouldn't they want their competitors to hire him? :-P

    46. Re:Pretty remarkable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmmm... I'd be fired there within a minute. I think one of their marketing chicks is hot.... And normally, I don't fall for blondes.
      Hot? You must drink heavily
    47. Re:Pretty remarkable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She's about a 6-pack.

    48. Re:Pretty remarkable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Nope. If we believe the ValleyWag on this one (uh oh...), the lady in question is a VP there at MS HQ herself. His underling, yes, but VPs just don't take that kind of crap at all. Sexual harassment necessarily involves pressuring somebody into sexual behavior, and you don't much pressure VPs -- they know they can hand your ass to you in court.

      And neither it is about them having an affair per se (although it must have seemed like a very awkward PR/gossip disaster waiting to explode), it's about them both having lied about "emergency family leave" they took at the same time to go humping together somewhere. Or maybe more realistically a combination of the two...

      So who would it be, then? Go figure...

      http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/exec/default.mspx?group=A-D

      One of those and a VP directly under CIO. If we believe the 'Wag, that is.

      So, like another poster some way above very illustriously did, I'll just wrap this up by stating "Of course I could be completely wrong" so I'll too get the +5 Insightful for that bit alone ;-)

    49. Re:Pretty remarkable by Z00L00K · · Score: 1
      Hmmm... Seems to me that it still is some kind of excuse or emergency reason to kick him out.

      There has to be something more to this - just having an affair seems to be a too thin reason. Maybe he was messing around with the chairmans mistress?

      If it was only an affair with a co-worker (even if he was a manager of that co-worker) the more obvious reason would have been to quietly assign him to a different position.

      Maybe the affair led him to neglect some of his assigned tasks and caused a major loss because of that, but that couldn't be publicly known so then it's better to have the "sex" bail-out.

      Just go figure where he will be looking for a new job next...

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    50. Re:Pretty remarkable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I hearing that right? Is he shouting "Give it up for me" in the first vid?

      Jupp, sounds like sexual harassment to me, aight!

      So Steve is next getting fired then?

    51. Re:Pretty remarkable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so. Once you are at that level at Microsoft, you are judged by how many hours the folks under you are putting in. 60 hours a week was about all anybody put in within top three layers of the "six layers" between the bottom and Bill at Microsoft. With the exception of Bill and maybe those that reported directly to him. But he has his own mental and overdrive issues which (I would hope) he is getting over.

      Mostly us grunts worked the hours, the folks running a particular project worked the hours, but the guy owning the product generally did his 60 and left. Folks with enough money in the bank to retire generally did 40 unless they had "overdrive" issues.

      Nobody worked much with anyone else, everyone all by themselves.

      That said, the affair with the VP sounds and smells like the truth.

    52. Re:Pretty remarkable by blueskies · · Score: 1

      4?

    53. Re:Pretty remarkable by Shotgun · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was going to moderate, but I have to respond to this.

      All the "seminars" I've been to lead to me to understand that you can't separate the two. I quote "seminars", because they really don't provide information as much as they provide warnings.

      -If you doink a subordinate, it can be view as sexual harassment, whether it was consenual or not, or whether quid pro quo was offered or not.
      -If another employee knows you're doinking another subordinate, it can be view as sexual harassment, whether it was consenual or not, or whether quid pro quo was offered or not.
      -If you make a sexual comment about another employee, it can be viewed as sexual harrassment.
      -If you are overheard making a sexual comment about another employee, it can be viewed as sexual harrassment. "Sexual" will be determined by the person hearing the comment at the time they hear it.
      -If someone feels "threatened" by your presence you can be canned. (I worked with a fellow who had this happen to him. He was black. She was white. Yay for the good ol' South).
      -If coorperations don't react to the situation with incredibly disproportionate measures, they expose themselves to ridiculous lawsuits.

      This is only in corporate America, and I can only hope to GOD that the rest of the world is not this insane.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    54. Re:Pretty remarkable by blindd0t · · Score: 1

      I've seen the first one before, but the second one was really well-done. Thanks for the good laugh!

    55. Re:Pretty remarkable by KillerCow · · Score: 1

      I mean, if they want some free sex, couldn't they just go to a bar and say, "Yeah, I'm a VP of a multi-billion dollar corporation, and I make nine thousand dollars an hour. Let's take my jet and go screw in the hot tub at my 4th summer place."


      Yes they can, and they do. The narcissism is so thick up there that they think that they can do it to anybody though -- employees included.
    56. Re:Pretty remarkable by BlueTrin · · Score: 1

      Unless it involved some chair with long legs maybe ...

      --
      Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
    57. Re:Pretty remarkable by jddj · · Score: 1

      Two other words:

      "Mattress Tag"

    58. Re:Pretty remarkable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good analysis. What I heard from a mgr in Scott's org is that he gave someone a negative performance review after a broken-off affair. It was the review, not the affair, that violated company policy. I heard that the other party was an admin though, not another VP. I agree that by not camouflaging it as "leaving to pursue other opportunities" they are definitely sending the signal that the big boys aren't above the rules, which is a good thing.

    59. Re:Pretty remarkable by surfingmarmot · · Score: 1

      "Apparently he was having an affair with a direct subordinate." And most corporate HR and legal departments consider that a serious sexual harassment violation because of the supervisory relationship. It is a key element of a prima facie case of sexual harassment. It makes the firm liable for big judgments should the subordinate employee sue if the relationship goes sour one day. I have taken sexual harassment training at several large tech firms and all of them taught us that it would be grounds for summary dismissal.

    60. Re:Pretty remarkable by mqduck · · Score: 1

      But that's what I don't get! How is it so exciting to force someone that's scared you'll fire them to have flirt-have sex with you? I dunno, is it the sex?
      --
      Property is theft.
  27. Tabloids for nerds, things that don't matter... by mattgreen · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...often the reality is much simpler and mundane... What are you doing bringing reality into this? We're trying to film the nerd equivalent of 90210 here, and you barge in with your 'reality' like it actually means something!
    1. Re:Tabloids for nerds, things that don't matter... by Sirch · · Score: 1

      We're trying to film the nerd equivalent of 90210 here You know, I never thought Slashdot could suffer during the writers' strike. I know better now.
    2. Re:Tabloids for nerds, things that don't matter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nerd equivalent of 90210 here,


      Beverly Hills, 31337

    3. Re:Tabloids for nerds, things that don't matter... by bondjamesbond · · Score: 0

      Quick show of hands... who gives a fuck about hollywood?? That's what I thought.

    4. Re:Tabloids for nerds, things that don't matter... by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      If that's what we're doing here, then I'm guessing it's one of those "you can't say no to Melinda" situations.

  28. Random medical screening results by ciaohound · · Score: 4, Funny

    A test came back negative -- his body was NOT composed of pure evil, which of course violates MS company policy. Subsequent tests confirmed it, although he is appealing to the World Anti-Doping Agency. Floyd Landis was unavailable for comment.

    --
    Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
    1. Re:Random medical screening results by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they'll hire Crudpuppy to take his place?

  29. Violation by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has terminated its CIO Stuart Scott for 'violation of company policies'. They won't elaborate.

    He probably installed OpenBSD in an all-RedHat shop? Tool...

  30. He got fired because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know several people who currently work at Microsoft. It's not because he installed linux or owns an ipod or some such silliness, since I know these people have done those things. I would imagine that it's actually something more serious, like an inappropriate work relationship (still thinking it's not something they would fire you for, at the CIO level) or divulging info to a competitor or inappropriate use of company funds.

    1. Re:He got fired because... by nuzak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Congratulations on posting the first reply that looks like it was penned by someone over the age of 15. The rest of the lame joke comments make me feel like I'm on digg.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    2. Re:He got fired because... by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Inappropriate work relationship: They would've quietly let him go unless there was a lawsuit brought against him although that might have been known by the press. Maybe he was boning Ballmer's or Gates' wife (or daughter(s))
      Divulging info to a competitor: Well, unless he planned on jumping ship he might not have done that. Indeed a good possibility
      Inappropriate use of company funds/stock/falsifying data: You don't get fired for that, you resign yourself after a large SEC investigation and get a big cash bonus on top of it. Gee, don't you read the news.

      It was either 2: he was boning a higher up (CEO's or board's) wife or daughter or he was caught with kiddy porn.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    3. Re:He got fired because... by JerryLove · · Score: 1

      I would imagine that it's actually something more serious, like an inappropriate work relationship (still thinking it's not something they would fire you for, at the CIO level)

      Recall though that Melindia Gates was an employee of Bill Gates. It would have to be *very* inappropriate.
    4. Re:He got fired because... by Talsan · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that Boeing's CEO was canned a couple of years ago over a consensual interoffice affair (CBC Story).

      I'd say it probably wasn't a use of funds issue, but interoffice romance, sexual harassment, or browsing porn at work could possibly do it.

    5. Re:He got fired because... by Igarden2 · · Score: 1

      Is it possible he got axed for hitting on Melinda?

      --
      Normally I ascribe all life to intelligent design, but in your case I'll make an exception.
    6. Re:He got fired because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The scuttlebutt is that he was boning a direct subordinate (while he's married, not sure about her), and so causing friction with other team members. That's enough to get you fired in most companies.

    7. Re:He got fired because... by ak3ldama · · Score: 1

      Recall though that Melindia Gates was an employee of Bill Gates. It would have to be *very* inappropriate.

      What I have seen nobody mention, I am about to postulate: It was a guy. This is Microsoft, not Open Source. I don't think the MS people would be quite as tolerant of this.

      --
      "but money is the God of Algiers & Mahomet their prophet." - Rich. O'Bryen June 8th 1786
    8. Re:He got fired because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not because he installed linux or owns an ipod or some such silliness

      I first read that as "It's not because he installed linux on his ipod or some such silliness". Too bad, that would be a cool reason for getting fired from Microsoft.

    9. Re:He got fired because... by Surt · · Score: 1

      Inappropriate work relationship seems unlikely given the Bill/Melinda situation.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  31. Typo.... by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 2, Insightful
    After reading the first dozen posts, I realized you made a mistake:

    ...they could post it anonymously and be totally fine because there will be a hundred other totally fucking stupid guesses...
    self.don(flame_retardant_suit)
    --
    [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    1. Re:Typo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      syntax error

    2. Re:Typo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought he must have given an honest opinion of Vista. Publicly.

  32. Clippy by redshirt1111 · · Score: 5, Funny

    He told Clippy to, and I quote, "Get Bent".

    1. Re:Clippy by barzok · · Score: 1

      Actually, I believe he told Clippy to "get straightened" as Clippy is already a bent piece of wire.

    2. Re:Clippy by mqduck · · Score: 1

      Dude, I love you.

      --
      Property is theft.
    3. Re:Clippy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was the funniest comment I've seen on Slashdot in quite a while. Thank you.

  33. No, no no... by j.sanchez1 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Ballmer found out he named his kids Ubuntu and Google

    --
    Speedy thing goes in; speedy thing comes out.
  34. Helped someone bypass WGA? by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    And it wasn't that he bypassed WGA, it was that he helped someone.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  35. Seriously by SailorSpork · · Score: 0

    Get real guys, there's no way he was fired for using Linux or Google searches. The chip they install in every MS employee's brain disallowes deviance from the collective (more specifically, Gates clicks the "Deny" button that pops up in his head).

  36. Maybe I'm too cynical by faloi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But for someone at CIO level to get canned it was either something that borders, or is just straight up illegal that MS is trying to keep under wraps primarily because it would damage their reputation, whether it was something tacitly approved by them or completely unknown to them. Or, possibly, they had it out for him and used some minor infringement as the basis for letting him go. Something like "Sorry, the company limit on gifts from vendors and suppliers is $50, and that widget was clearly $51 after tax!"

    Either way I'm sure he has some majestic golden parachute that will help ensure that neither he nor his family could potentially go hungry for the next 5 generations if they're marginally competent at managing money, provided he never talks about it...of course.

    --
    "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
    1. Re:Maybe I'm too cynical by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At my last job, when the CIO was fired all hush-hush and mysterious like, it was because he was stealing. They didn't want that out and made a deal for him to pay back the money rather than go to jail. I think you are right - it was something along those lines.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    2. Re:Maybe I'm too cynical by crivens · · Score: 1

      If he did something illegal, isn't that like the pot calling the kettle black? Unless he did something illegal that they couldn't hide/defend. Cynical!

    3. Re:Maybe I'm too cynical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure he has some majestic golden parachute that will help ensure that neither he nor his family could potentially go hungry for the next 5 generations

      With a golden parachute he will definitely not go hungry. Neither his family, if he lands appropriately.

  37. Stop crime now - use unreasonable force by Benson+Arizona · · Score: 5, Funny

    Terminating him seems a bit harsh - couldn't they just have sacked him?

    1. Re:Stop crime now - use unreasonable force by EvilMonkeySlayer · · Score: 1

      But that means buying him a sack. And frankly I don't think he'd get into it no matter how nicely they asked.

    2. Re:Stop crime now - use unreasonable force by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 2, Funny

      They remembered to sack the people responsible for the initial sacking too, right?

    3. Re:Stop crime now - use unreasonable force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got sacked once. It totally sucked. I was getting to know this girl, and the next thing I knew, I woke up in the Hudson River in a SACK! She tried to kill me!

    4. Re:Stop crime now - use unreasonable force by MadJo · · Score: 1

      Who killed Stuart Scott?
      I suggest it was Microsoft in the Kitchen with an Axe!

    5. Re:Stop crime now - use unreasonable force by Surt · · Score: 1

      Being sacked by Bill Gates is a fate worse than death, just ask Melinda.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  38. 2 words by Joe+U · · Score: 1

    Penguin Lust

    1. Re:2 words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No response? This works on so many levels.

  39. Perhaps someone figured out by jayhawk88 · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...that he's the BOFH? In which case expect him to be back within a week with a 20% raise, and Steve Ballmer nowhere to be found.

    1. Re:Perhaps someone figured out by j.sanchez1 · · Score: 1

      ...that he's the BOFH? In which case expect him to be back within a week with a 20% raise, and Steve Ballmer nowhere to be found.

      Wow, that really brings back a lot of memories. I remember crying I was laughing so hard the first time I read the adventures of the BOFH. Thanks!

      --
      Speedy thing goes in; speedy thing comes out.
    2. Re:Perhaps someone figured out by j.sanchez1 · · Score: 1

      By the way, here are the "original" BOFH postings that are not on the Register website. The Register only runs them from 2000 and later.

      --
      Speedy thing goes in; speedy thing comes out.
  40. shagging interns by *weasel · · Score: 1

    or something similarly pedestrian.

    --
    // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    1. Re:shagging interns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or something similarly pederastian

      there, fixed it for you

  41. Bills Revenge by rclandrum · · Score: 1

    He was let go because his stock was about to vest...

  42. Maybe he is really... by seanellis · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pamela Jones!

  43. The real reason... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0, Troll

    He started behaving like a convicted monopolist instead of a monopolist. Having a conscience as an executive is not always a desirable trait.

  44. Rumor: love affair by slashflood · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... according to ValleyWag.

    1. Re:Rumor: love affair by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Rumor: love affair

      From Stuart's quickly updated PressPass page we see in the bottom that he-

      lives with his wife and seven children in Washington. He spends his free time with his family, coaching sports teams, leading youth groups, and playing golf.

      Ouch.
    2. Re:Rumor: love affair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "sports teams, leading youth groups" Gotta be the K-porn

    3. Re:Rumor: love affair by jj00 · · Score: 1

      I have a hard time believing that they would publicly terminate him over an affair. Doing something publicly (as has been mentioned in earlier comments), implies that they are warning other companies about something.

      I'm guessing there is some misappropriation of funds going on here, or he really screwed over a client in some way. Maybe he was selling stuff from the MS store on ebay.

      I can't believe how interested everyone is about this (including myself), considering how everyone hates when the media talks about Paris Hilton and the like. I'm sure this story won't be featured on Good Morning America, but it hasn't stopped the rumor mill.

    4. Re:Rumor: love affair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The main thing is that he may have promoted his lover over other more qualified people. By publically terminating him they lower thier risk of suit by employees passed over due to the affair.

    5. Re:Rumor: love affair by Surt · · Score: 1

      It seems like firing him over that would be asking for a huge lawsuit considering how the CEO met his wife.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    6. Re:Rumor: love affair by isdnip · · Score: 1

      Actually, they very well might fire him for having an affair with a subordinate. That is usually seen as an explicit violation of company rules, and, in business, is often seen as a serious violation. It may, for instance, lead to favoritism, and influence promotions or management decisions. Or it can be seen as somewhat coercive. I'm pretty sure the Pentagon takes it seriously too, among all levels of the military. Bonking a peer or someone outside of your chain of command is one thing; bonking down the chain is something else entirely.

    7. Re:Rumor: love affair by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

      Yep. Google Harry Stonecipher, former CEO of Boeing.

    8. Re:Rumor: love affair by serutan · · Score: 1

      The word at MS is that he gave an admin an unfavorable review after a broken-off love affair. It was the review, not the affair, that violated company policy. I haven't heard anything about another VP being involved except on the web.

  45. Some information... by Funkcikle · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/exec/stuartsc/default.mspx

    * He is a Six Sigma black belt.
    * Scott lives with his wife and SEVEN children.
    * He helped "ensure that Microsoft is the "first and best customer" of its own products."
    * He spends his free time with his family, coaching sports teams, leading youth groups, and playing golf.

    I'm guessing...he was teaching Six Sigma karate to underprivileged inner-city girls and, as happened with his wife, got too close and BAM...instant pregnancies all round.

    Seriously...who has SEVEN CHILDREN? On PURPOSE?

    1. Re:Some information... by dkf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Seriously...who has SEVEN CHILDREN? On PURPOSE? Mormons?
      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    2. Re:Some information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Seriously...who has SEVEN CHILDREN? On PURPOSE?

      Mormons... The correct answer is Mormons.

    3. Re:Some information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget Catholics! We can breed like rabbits, too.

    4. Re:Some information... by Funkcikle · · Score: 0, Troll

      I hardly think this is the time for name-calling. The poor guy is unemployed and has seven (that we know about so far) children to support.

    5. Re:Some information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Seriously...who has SEVEN CHILDREN? On PURPOSE?

      Jesus jumpers.

    6. Re:Some information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if the guy had spent more time at home with his kids rather than (allegedly) fooling around, he wouldn't have this problem.

    7. Re:Some information... by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Seriously...who has SEVEN CHILDREN? On PURPOSE? Mormons and Catholics, i.e. members of those religions that don't care about uncontrolled population growth and its consequences.
      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    8. Re:Some information... by Pharmboy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Seriously...who has SEVEN CHILDREN? On PURPOSE?

      My mom.

      Really, no joke. I'm the 6th of 7. Not saying she isn't insane, just saying some people want lots of kids.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    9. Re:Some information... by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Someone who can afford it? At that corporate level, he's certainly pulling down several hundred thousand dollars a year, especially including stock options.

    10. Re:Some information... by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

      If money is no object, having seven kids can be fun. However, for most of us that would mean bankruptcy in order to keep up with trends or whatever junior needs to keep up with the neighbors, who aren't dividing their income 9 ways (husband, wife + 7 kids)

      --
      stuff |
    11. Re:Some information... by peterprior · · Score: 1

      Morons

      There - fixed that for you...

    12. Re:Some information... by Andy_R · · Score: 1

      Not only that! "Scott is also the executive sponsor for Microsoft's Operational Enterprise Risk Management efforts and supports the integration of management principles from the Quality & Business Excellence team, which drive continuous and breakthrough process improvements across the company."

      I'm guessing he got fired for using the Dilbert mission statement generator on his CV.

      --
      A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    13. Re:Some information... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The poor guy is unemployed and has seven (that we know about so far) children to support.

      The "poor guy" was a top executive for one of the biggest corporations in the world. I can pretty much guarantee you that he and his litter o' puppies aren't going to be out on the street any time soon. They may have to scale down their lifestyle a bit ... like, say, sell one of their yachts ... but this isn't $JOE_DOWNSIZED_TECH_WORKER we're talking about.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    14. Re:Some information... by tokul · · Score: 5, Funny

      Seriously...who has SEVEN CHILDREN? On PURPOSE?
      One drove too fast and they are six
      One went to wrong place and they are five
      One learned to fly a plane (almost) and they are four
      One was a brave astronaut until shuttle crashed
      One slept with wrong wife and they are two
      One used wrong crack and there is only one
      Last boy is a nerd. End of your genealogy tree.
    15. Re:Some information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Catholics and Mormoms. They want to fill the world with their dumb kids. Why dumb? Well, statistically, the more kids you have, the less time you can spend with each one, the dumber they get.

    16. Re:Some information... by ThirdPrize · · Score: 1

      Cue Michael Jackson jokes.

      --
      I have excellent Karma and I am not afraid to Troll it.
    17. Re:Some information... by njfuzzy · · Score: 1

      "Seriously...who has SEVEN CHILDREN? On PURPOSE?"

      Someone wealthy enough to have a stay at home wife and hired help, I'm guessing.

      --
      My Photography - http://ian-x.com
      The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
    18. Re:Some information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAVING seven kids is fun? MAKING seven kids is fun. HAVING seven kids (from a woman's perspective) is anything but fun.

    19. Re:Some information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Seriously...who has SEVEN CHILDREN? On PURPOSE?"

      Mormons. (I was one) I shot myself in the foot and fsck'ed around with a bunch of women/my flock. Well soon afterwards my faith was like a skyscraper, and each child was another floor collapsing on top of the one below.

    20. Re:Some information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mormons, Catholics and those on full-time Welfare

    21. Re:Some information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mormons and Catholics, i.e. members of those religions that don't care about uncontrolled population growth and its consequences.

      Yeah, cause the world's coming to a collapse due to an overpopulation of Mormons and Catholics.

    22. Re:Some information... by Schnapple · · Score: 1
      If money is no object, having seven kids can be fun.
      My wife is a fan of the show Jon & Kate plus 8, a reality show which follows a family which, after having twins, decided to have one more child and due to overzealous fertility drugs, had sextuplets. So they have eight children.

      I can definitively say that in my opinion, absolutely nothing about having more than two children looks like fun at all. This show actually brought my wife and I to an agreement about the concept of selective abortion. Hell, if I had twins I would not only be "done" with the whole kid thing, but I would be pissed off that I had to put them through college at the same time (instead of only having a short window that they'd both be in)
    23. Re:Some information... by Nimey · · Score: 1

      There's 1.1 billion Catholics in the world, and quite a number of those in poor Third World countries that can't feed all of their people[1]. Not all Catholics drank the Kool-Aid about not using protection, but surely there's enough among that 1.1 billion to account for quite a lot of population growth.

      There's about 13 million Mormons[2], so (for the moment) they don't have the sheer number of breeders to be as much of a problem.

      [1] See "A Modest Proposal" by Jonathan Swift for a solution. ;-)
      [2] Both population figures courtesy Wackypedia.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    24. Re:Some information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Seriously...who has SEVEN CHILDREN? On PURPOSE?

      These people http://www.duggarfamily.com/, approaching three times over. Also my parents, you insensitive clod! But unlike the Duggars, they weren't religious about it, just "stupid", according to Mom.

    25. Re:Some information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just in case you weren't joking, six sigma is a fancy term for quality improvement: Six Sigma made famous by Jack Welch.
      Corporate types eat it up as if it were some revolutionary way to have sex. I met a couple of "master black belts" from LG, and they are seriously nuts.
      Anyways, it's not a type of martial art.

    26. Re:Some information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Six Sigma black belt has nothing to do with karate........

    27. Re:Some information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously...who has SEVEN CHILDREN? On PURPOSE?

      Mormons

    28. Re:Some information... by evilklown · · Score: 1

      "Seriously...who has SEVEN CHILDREN? On PURPOSE?"

      http://www.duggarfamily.com/

      "Jim Bob & Michelle Duggar are grateful to God for the birth of their 17th child Jennifer Danielle Duggar!"

      I think this guy has one (or ten) up on ole Stuie here. Maybe we should divert some presidential campaign funding to condom ads...

    29. Re:Some information... by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      I love how intelligent people complain about others breeding and effectively unbreed themselves out of the population.

      Thanks a lot for not thinking ahead.

      If you want lots of smart people working on future solutions, then breed. Jeez. Stop letting the un-smart people overpopulate you.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    30. Re:Some information... by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      Catholics.

    31. Re:Some information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mormons?

      Nope. A wife.

    32. Re:Some information... by Nimey · · Score: 1

      That's orthogonal to what I'm talking about -- I'm talking about overburdening the planet.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    33. Re:Some information... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      When I clicked "Reply to this" I was in the mood to complain about people bashing Mormons just for the fun of it. (You've probably guessed, I'm Mormon.) For some reason I lost that desire while the reply page loaded so I'm just going to point out that the earth could support far more people than we have living on it if we were more concerned about growing food and building infrastructure and such than waging wars and eyeing the land of neighbouring countries (and I don't just mean the U.S., I mean the world as a whole).

    34. Re:Some information... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      My grandma had neither excess money nor hired help. In fact they were somewhat poor.

      Ok ok, she only had *six* kids. I guess that's why.

    35. Re:Some information... by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Just wrap your willies and I'll have nothing to say.

      If sea levels do in fact rise, we're going to lose some arable land.

      WRT to placing infrastructure above warfare & such, that priority change probably won't happen. Human nature.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    36. Re:Some information... by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

      Seriously...who has SEVEN CHILDREN? On PURPOSE?

      Mormons do. Here's a true story. At my 20th year high school reunion (I went to a large US high school and we had over 400 students in my graduating class) we had a small number of teachers who came by. Our principal, who had just retired, dropped by as well. I saw this guy with a lady who seemed to be his wife off to the side. The guy had completely gray hair and he looked to be over 50, as did his wife, who was also completely gray. I asked one of my friends who the guy was, figuring it was a teacher. I was shocked to find out it was a guy who graduated with us who I had quite a few classes with. He looked so old, I thought he was a teacher from years ago, but he wasn't even 40 years old yet. I found out that he and his wife (both Mormons) had either 7 or 8 surviving kids plus one who had died some years earlier. I guess having that many kids just sucked the life out of him because he looked old - really old.

    37. Re:Some information... by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Not anymore...

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    38. Re:Some information... by tritonman · · Score: 0

      it says he play golf, maybe he beat ballmer in a game, you KNOW not to beat the boss!

    39. Re:Some information... by cjsnell · · Score: 1

      Seriously...who has SEVEN CHILDREN? On PURPOSE? Mormons.
    40. Re:Some information... by SWad · · Score: 1

      He couldn't afford to buy 7 copies of Vista for his kids' computers.

    41. Re:Some information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked for Stuart at GE. He had 5 kids of his own and two they adopted from Guatemala. I guess it's hard to believe this guy was involved in any kind of inappropriate office behavior like sex with a subordinate. But I can say he behaved with a sense of entitlement that might lead him to dip his hand a little too deep into the company cookie jar.

    42. Re:Some information... by Cassini2 · · Score: 1

      Seriously...who has SEVEN CHILDREN? On PURPOSE?
      They were trying for a girl ...
    43. Re:Some information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pffffft. Population control isn't an issue. You just have to make sure that your kids kill enough other children to maintain zero population growth.

    44. Re:Some information... by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      For anyone else wondering "WTF is Six Sigma", it appears to be yet another management method whereby you save the company money by measuring everything within an inch of it's life.

      I think.

      The web pages that talk about it don't seem to be written in any dialect of English that I'm familiar with.

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    45. Re:Some information... by misterooga · · Score: 1

      One of the relatives of my wife's have 5 or 6 children in their family. They simply tried for a boy as the parents strongly believed a son will take care of them later on once the girls move out. I believe all the kids have a difference of 1 year from their eldest.

      It's just different culture and belief.

      Nowdays, kids just abandon their parents anyway.

    46. Re:Some information... by painandgreed · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Seriously...who has SEVEN CHILDREN? On PURPOSE?

      Go watch Idiocracy and then tell me your opinion of geeks having seven kids. It's up to the geeks to save the world!

    47. Re:Some information... by bondjamesbond · · Score: 0

      he's certainly pulling down several hundred thousand dollars a year


      Are you kidding me? Have you no concept of huge money company salaries? He's making several mil/yr + stock. His kids have a nanny and his wife has several maids and a "tennis instructor" (wink wink nudge nudge say no more). He's going to be just fine.

    48. Re:Some information... by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      If I could afford it, I would.

      7 kids has been the average norm for humanity.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    49. Re:Some information... by nuzak · · Score: 1

      > Nowdays, kids just abandon their parents anyway.

      Used to be that houses were inherited between generations instead of being sold off to pay for a retirement. When you boot 'em out at 18 and only want them back on Thanksgiving and Christmas, then don't be surprised if they grow a little bit distant.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    50. Re:Some information... by g1zmo · · Score: 1

      I'd give you a funny point if I had one. The other replies prove that even a simple twist of words can be hard to pull off in writing, especially when a lot of the readers aren't native English speakers.

      --
      I have found there are just two ways to go.
      It all comes down to livin' fast or dyin' slow.
      -REK, Jr.
    51. Re:Some information... by Clandestine_Blaze · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing...he was teaching Six Sigma karate to underprivileged inner-city girls and, as happened with his wife, got too close and BAM...instant pregnancies all round. I'm not sure I know of many underprivileged inner-city girls who care much about:

      • Continuous efforts to reduce variation in process outputs is key to business success
      • Manufacturing and business processes can be measured, analyzed, improved and controlled
      • Succeeding at achieving sustained quality improvement requires commitment from the entire organization, particularly from top-level management


      Let alone get pregnant off of it. :-)

      Six Sigma Black Belt Certification
    52. Re:Some information... by MagicBox · · Score: 1

      Catholics also believe in the right to life and are against abortion for example in cases when the child is born retarded. I guess your parent must have been Catholics. Fucking retard.

      --

      The phaomnneil pweor of the hmuan mnid. Fcuknig amzanig eh!
    53. Re:Some information... by geekwithsoul · · Score: 1

      And how many children do Mormon and Catholic bunnies have? Is is said the procreate like tribbles?

    54. Re:Some information... by ettlz · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm the 6th of 7.
      ...that's not a canonical drone identifier, please specify adjunct and unimatrix numbers as well.
    55. Re:Some information... by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Actually its not unless you don't believe that smart people could fix that problem. Whether its floating cities or space travel or better use of food resources or living under the oceans, there are potential future technological solutions that won't exist without the procreation of more smart people.

      Think about it more.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    56. Re:Some information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Yeah, cause the world's coming to a collapse due to an overpopulation of Mormons and Catholics.


      Any is too many!

    57. Re:Some information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gul Dukat?

    58. Re:Some information... by epine · · Score: 1

      J.S. Bach had twenty children with two wives, half survived to adulthood. Any way you look at it, that's a lot of organ music.

    59. Re:Some information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a reason for geeks to have two or maaaaybe three kids, not a reason to have *seven*. I mean, damn. That's way too many for most people to support to their fullest potential, not just in money but also in necessary personal parental attention.

      The success of our species didn't come from the have-tons-of-kids-and-some-will-survive approach. It came from forming social networks and passing on knowledge and opportunity to the next generation. That doesn't really scale up well to bigger and bigger broods.

    60. Re:Some information... by MrCopilot · · Score: 1
      Seriously...who has SEVEN CHILDREN? On PURPOSE?

      Catholics.

      --
      OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
    61. Re:Some information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense, dude, but that's BECAUSE they're insane.

    62. Re:Some information... by Firrenzi · · Score: 1

      so will there ever be the 7th son of the 7th son then?

      --
      The Tao that can be named is not the Tao
    63. Re:Some information... by docwatson223 · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, I have 4 and I know quite a few IT guys who have as many or more than I do. The truth is that we can afford to do so, so why not? Big families used to be the rule but as the economy has changed, only those with the means can afford to have them. A big family is the mark of success now. Get with it!

  46. What any good CIO should do by Verteiron · · Score: 1

    Exempted himself from all security policies so he could download porn at work.

    --
    End of lesson. You may press the button.
  47. During a random soul check... by stan_freedom · · Score: 0, Troll

    Despite his non-compete contract, it was determined that he still had his soul.

  48. True Reason. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    #Comment Deleted for Legal Reasons#

  49. Fired? by H8X55 · · Score: 1

    Fired?!
    On his day off!?!
    For stealing boxes?!?!
    What!?!?!
    Was he trying to build a clubhouse?!?!?!

    1. Re:Fired? by FlyByPC · · Score: 2, Informative

      For stealing boxes?!?!
      Yes. Eight-Xeon-CPU "boxes," with 64GB of memory, 200-TB RAID arrays of solid-state drives, and next-generation GPUs that make the ST Holodeck look lame.
      --
      Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
    2. Re:Fired? by H8X55 · · Score: 1

      it was actually a reference to the 1995 american comedy Friday.

      but that's okay.

    3. Re:Fired? by berashith · · Score: 1

      ya, i saw the video. It looked just like him, from the back.

    4. Re:Fired? by FlyByPC · · Score: 1

      Ah. That makes sense, then.

      ...but I got modded *informative*?!? Go figure...

      --
      Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
  50. two wild guesses by mzs · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Microsoft basically paid for the new members in the Swedish OOXML vote and a subsidiary of Microsoft in Hungary was raided by the police in July. I have no knowledge that it is related to either of this, an out-right firing of such a high level person usually means basically stealing money. Not even a sexual harassment scandal would do that, just a quiet resignation.

  51. definitely porn by Synonymous+Bosch · · Score: 1

    hey, i'm just saying :)

  52. He answered... by Skiron · · Score: 1

    ... a press question truthfully and honesty (these words do not exist in MS corp along with Ethically and Morally).

  53. A case where "ask" can mean "axe" by tepples · · Score: 1

    Usually, at levels this high, executives who misbehave are quietly asked to resign. Or when they get axed, they get axed to resign.
  54. Re:Some information... who has 7 children? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Somebody who is never at home anyway. Nannies deal with the kids.

  55. A couple of problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
    There are a couple of problems with the theory that a Microsoft insider would anonymously post the truth behind Stu's termination:
    1. Only a few of us know the truth, posting the truth is a good way to violate company policies, and you see what happens when you violate company policies, so even anonymous posting just means pressure is applied to ... let's just say a few ... people until it is determined who the one is and BOOM, job over
    2. We don't like really like slashdotters that much, so we don't care if you never know the real reason
    3. The truth is not exciting or anything...it's just mundane policy violation...so posting it is less enjoyable than reading all the wild-ass guesses
    4. Halloween is over
    I'll never tell. Even if I did, you'd be all "Meh" and say the idea that he was bangin' Melinda or selling Microsoft secret plans to Google is much more intriguing. So, sure, he was a Google mole. Just run with that one.
    1. Re:A couple of problems by mav[LAG] · · Score: 3, Informative

      My guess is that this post is from a real Microsoft insider, probably someone in support or IT.

      Arrogant? Check.
      Condescending? Check.
      Thinks "slashdotters" are some kind of homogeneous Microsoft-bashing species? Check.
      Thinks Google competes with Microsoft? Check.
      Gives out information which is absolutely no use to anyone? Check.

      It just has the ring of truth.

      --
      --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
    2. Re:A couple of problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Do you really count as an insider if you've never even been in the same building as Scott?

      I, Slashdot, am amused by your disdain, and return it.

    3. Re:A couple of problems by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 1

      Let me preface this by saying that I do not work for Microsoft and never have nor ever will. Nor do I have any Microsoft friends, acquaintances, or professional relationships. In fact, I doubt if I would know anything Microsoft if it ran up and slapped me in the face. As a matter of fact, I doubt that I would recognize the guy who runs it, Steve Jobs, if he tried to french kiss me on the subway. Frankly, I never heard of whats-his-name until I saw this post. Now, let me tell you my two bits about why this guy got fired -- politics. Obviously, he likes Hillary, perhaps a bit too much (if you get my drift) and Bill found out about it. Any idiot would know this, and I am a living proof.

  56. Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t.

  57. Actually... by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 1

    He's just better at throwing chairs across rooms than a certain CEO is.

  58. Re:Challenging Steve Balmer to a throwing chair fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not with Balmer sitting in it. Moving anything that big requires a fork lift, and a sign saying "wide load".

  59. Picture the Scene by ickoonite · · Score: 2, Funny

    Undoubtedly because he was caught using an iPhone or an iPod touch. Or perhaps he brought a MacBook Pro to work. I can see it now!

    Ballmer: What the fuck is that?
    Scott: Oh yeah, it's a MacBook Pro. Sexy piece of kit, isn't it?
    Ballmer: What the fucking fuck? Fucking sexy? No, it's not fucking sexy. It's fucking Apple, that's fucking what. What the fuck?
    Scott: ...Er...It's only running Vista, if that helps. I erased that...oh-so-lovely (whoops) Mac operating system...Mac X, or whatever it's called...
    Ballmer: You fucking fuck! Get the fuck out of my fucking face!

    Ballmer grabs a chair. Scott exits quickly stage left.

    :P

    1. Re:Picture the Scene by monoqlith · · Score: 0

      You forgot some stage directions. Here, I'll fix it for you.

      Scott: ...Er...It's only running Vista, if that helps. I erased that...oh-so-lovely (whoops) Mac operating system...Mac X, or whatever it's called...

      Ballmer unhinges his shoulder, grabs Scott's dome, and rubs his moist armpit up and down Scott's pouting face, while screaming,

      Ballmer: You fucking fuck! Get the fuck out of my fucking face!

      Ballmer grabs a chair. Scott exits quickly stage left. As he leaves, he hears the loud, anguished wails of Ballmer, crooning like a beached orca: "DEVELOPERS!!!!" For this is the mourning call of Ballmer.

  60. poor bastard put Ubuntu on his kid's laptop (n/t) by toby · · Score: 1, Redundant

    n/t

    --
    you had me at #!
  61. We're Waiting by trongey · · Score: 1

    Come on, Stevie B. We know you're reading this. Just pop in as AC and give us the dirty on ol' Stu.

    --
    You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
  62. Corporate Vice President of Messaging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stuart L. Scott is corporate vice president and chief information officer (CIO) of Microsoft Corp. Under Scott's leadership, Microsoft IT is responsible for security, infrastructure, messaging and business applications for all of Microsoft, including support of Microsoft product groups, corporate business groups, and the global sales and marketing organization.

    Snooping on other people's email?

  63. It's Tragic by Fieryphoenix · · Score: 1

    The man over-reacted a tidge when someone took his red stapler.

  64. I've worked with MS reps before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...and caught one of them using Google. When asked 'shouldn't you be using Live?', the answer I received was 'Ya, but I want to find something...."

    Slashdot makes be feel uncomforable posting as AC when the CAPTCHA is 'tracking'.

  65. Top contenders by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1
    1. Something sexual.
    2. Breaching Microsoft's email [non-]retention policy and having the truth about Microsoft business activities turn up during discovery in some legal action.
  66. Two Ideas - Just Guesses by gregory311 · · Score: 1

    I have two guesses as to why Stuart Scott was fired. They are worth what you paid! 1. He was running some kind of online side business on microsoft infrastructure. 2. Perhaps his academic credentials were not real. In other words, he did not really earn one of the degrees he claimed before he was hired by M$.

    --
    -- Anybody here remember the Atari 800?
  67. Re Scott firing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He forgot to add a cover sheet to his TPS report

  68. lolol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The rest of the lame joke comments make me feel like I'm on digg.
    wtf ur sayn bout digg losr??? digg ur ass!!!
  69. He probably by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Bolted all the chairs down. Just for a laugh.

    --
    Deleted
  70. Imagery mischeif by wavefreak · · Score: 1

    He photo shopped gene simmons' tongue onto a pic of Balmer

  71. He threw a paperweight.... by sledge_hmmer · · Score: 1

    ....at someone. Obviously Ballmer was not happy that it wasn't a chair. *I know I am going to get burned for this one!*

  72. Re:Only way he could have gotten his results. by nschubach · · Score: 1

    So in other words... he caught one of the flying chairs and it pissed off monkey boy?

    --
    Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  73. EULA by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 2, Funny

    He violated the terms of the EULA.

    1. Re:EULA by Javaman59 · · Score: 1

      I really thought there were no good jokes left in this one, but that's the best of all!

      --
      I'm a software visionary. I don't code.
  74. Re:Corporate Vice President of Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe M$ hired security to snoop on Google, got found out, and the buck stopped with him.

  75. Got caught using Firefox by PenguinBoyDave · · Score: 0

    In Redmond, that is treason!

    --
    I'm not a troll, but I play one on Slashdot.
  76. He had an affair with a subordinate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The rumor mill is already gushing about the story: turns out Scott had an affair with one of his subordinates, who recently go a big promotion that raised many eye brows around the company. The two were on leave together when the investigation started: http://www.pollsb.com/polls/poll/3617/microsoft-fires-cio-stuart-scott-possibly-for-inter-office-affair-with-his-subordinate

    1. Re:He had an affair with a subordinate by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

      That's some hot action! Seriously though, good riddance.

      --
      stuff |
  77. One thing came to mind... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BOO YAH!

    Oh, wait, wrong Stuart Scott :)

  78. fired for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    getting drunk and removing his chip with bbq tongs

  79. EXACTLY! by DaedalusHKX · · Score: 0

    When M$ loses someone to Linux or BSD or Minix or whatever, that's a customer they've lost for life, no biggie, it was probably unavoidable given their poor treatment of customers, and general abuse/lying/cheating/hypocrisy track records. That and notice that Vista looks and acts the way KDE has looked for about 5 years, and the way Gnome has looked for at least 3. I would wager there's more than "some" Linux usage at M$. Getting M$ pinheads actually admitting it, heh that is going to be another thing altogether, unless they're starved for news coverage in a particular month.

    Losing customers to the fruit company isn't so bad either, they can still sell them office software from their subsidiary Main Soft (their fruit friendly branch). Thus they can still claim unit sales... which makes stocks go up :) (Even the units they "give away for free" aren't "free" they are claimed as "units shipped" and thus help stock values go up. Same thing for the Bill and Mel "foundation", so long as they stay away from associations with the Nazis, or somesuch bad rap, they can continue to give with conditions such as "1 million for your school, but you can only buy M$ computers with it". Units shipped, stocks up baby, its what its all about. Bill's fortune and power is linked to his stock value in M$. He's not about to let it fall. You can guarantee Ballmer will be out on his ass before Gates lets M$ drop in the toilet.)

    Now, with that being said, if they begin to lose customers to a product they have end of life'd now that's gonna hurt big time. (I recall an announcement that XP was EOL'ed sometime this year... but as I don't use it and don't care for trolling the M$ website anymore, I can't say for sure.)

    Any press is GOOD press. Remember that saying. M$ always gets in the news somehow, and only in the last 6 years have the geeks learned to substitute another name in its stead into OSS games, software, stories, etc. This is good, the less press they get, the better. It is about the only way to not advertise FOR them.

    So in my opinion he got axed with a generous severance package because he was:
    A) expendable, nobody liked him, he didn't come to drinking parties at Bill or Ballmer's houses.
    B) he installed XP or suggested someone else do it, or suggested/authorized it without consulting the big B's.
    C) said something in a private memo about Vista (like "its a bucket of turd and smells strongly thereof") and was unrepentant.
    D) any of the above but mainly A PRESS GAINING STUNT. They say getting your company name in the press once a week or more often is good for business, especially if you are a publicly traded company. M$ obviously knows this.

    --
    " What luck for rulers that men do not think" - Adolf Hitler
    1. Re:EXACTLY! by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      I'd have to disagree with your first statement. People do occasionally switch back to Windows - I've seen a number. I tried Linux and went back to Windows after a couple of months. I tried FreeBSD, and for now, it is definetly my preferred OS, but when there's a decent port of KDE4 to Windows, it is very possible that I will end up going back to Windows.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    2. Re:EXACTLY! by NickFortune · · Score: 1

      M$ always gets in the news somehow, and only in the last 6 years have the geeks learned to substitute another name in its stead into OSS games, software, stories, etc. This is good, the less press they get, the better. It is about the only way to not advertise FOR them.

      So, basically: "Don't say mean things about Microsoft, it only makes them stronger"

      That's positively Orwellian. "War is Peace; Freedom is Slavery; Ignorance is Strength; Silence is Criticism" I don't know which of the Redmond spin doctors came up with that meme, but I hope they gave him a bonus for it.

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
    3. Re:EXACTLY! by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      People do occasionally switch back to Windows

      An there are people who switch from linux to windows. I'm guilty of that. I started off with a linux dominated system in '95. It had a a windows '95, small, partition on it to play games. Over the years that small partition got bigger but I was still primary linux.

      Then I installed some red hat patches and for some reason my keyboard and mouse stopped working. The patches had nothing to do with the keyboard and mouse. camel meets straw. I formated the fucker that night and installed windows.

      Two years went by and I need a server so I pulled together some spare hardware and installed linux on a duron 700. I used it for awhile keeping it current in the hardware. When I retired the linux box the hardware was a athlon 3000+ with 1 GB of RAM and Suse 10.2. I even tried to make it into a myth box but mythtv kicked my ass. After three days of fucking with it, I said "fuck it" and had mediaportal running on XP up in an hour.

      Recently I needed the hardware the linux box was running on. So I moved the suse 10.2 to a mickysoft virtual server. It stayed as a virtual server for a few months. A couple weeks ago I tried to upgrade it to 10.3 The results where not pretty so I shut it down. It will probably be down for good.

      Linux doesn't do what I need it to do anymore. I'm a photographer and linux just doesn't have the support for the equipment and software I need, like for the printers and photoshop. If you say gimp is as good as photoshop then your and idiot and need to just shut up.

      recently I've been thinking about a Mac. I'm sure it will pass but not so certain it will pass in time....

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    4. Re:EXACTLY! by tiny1877 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      MythTV kicked your ass? n00b. Had mine up and running in a weekend. Only recently stopped using it because I got a Dish HD DVR when I bought my house and didn't care to mess with making it work with that. *shrug* Would still be in use if my brother wanted to pay schedulesdirect or whomever for listing info and record stuff.

    5. Re:EXACTLY! by jo42 · · Score: 1

      Mebbe he said "XP Good! Vista Bad." ?

    6. Re:EXACTLY! by xhrit · · Score: 1

      "If you say gimp is as good as photoshop then your and idiot and need to just shut up."

      And you think I am an idiot.

    7. Re:EXACTLY! by ByOhTek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "in a weekend"? That's good?

      In Windows, the worst TV tuner (an ATi All in Wonder) took at most 2 hours to set up, and then only because I had to get the video drivers as well. Most TV tuners took less than half an hour from insertion of board to watching TV.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    8. Re:EXACTLY! by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And you think I am an idiot.

      Mark Twann, I think, once said, "it's best to keep your mouth shut an let the world think your a fool than open your mouth and remove all doubt." I'm pretty sure I butchered that quote but you should get the point. I would suggest that you take Mark Twann's advice to heart.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    9. Re:EXACTLY! by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1
      I would think that you would be correct in that "n00b" statement. When I tried to do the mythbox I had been out of touch with linux at that level for years. I beat on it for 3 days before giving it up for lost. To my credit I had most of it working. I had the S/dpif sound working, the remote needed programming but worked, and I had video at 1920x1080. The only problem was I couldn't get the video on the mythbox as good as I could get it on MP under windows. What is was is the graphics card, radeon 9700, drivers that I had to use under myth just where not as good as the windows.

      I beat on that thing for 3 days before saying "fuck it." I had MP up and running in full 1920x1080 glory in about an hour. No, I didn't need to run it in 1920x1080 but by god I had a HD tv and I was going to use it as such. Damn the lack of media!

      Oh an by the way. I'm not an English teacher and I don't give a flying ratts ass about what you people think of my spelling or grammer. I would think that you fuck nuggets that must correct that would figure that out by now.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    10. Re:EXACTLY! by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      Your complaint is invalid because that problem has since been fixed. [/what people always say to me when I complain about Ubuntu]

    11. Re:EXACTLY! by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      For one, you are mistaken in your assumption that I complain. I do not complain about anything. I Bitch. There is a difference.

      Two, I like your answer so I'm writing it down for future use.

      Three, (yes I could have used a list), I have no idea what complaint you are bitching about.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    12. Re:EXACTLY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Mark who?

    13. Re:EXACTLY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, you forgot to add "RTFM" and a cryptic man page reference to qualify for Yet Another Linux Fanboy -- those yesterday's converts and todays "power users" who populate the forums and successfully manage to keep people who respect their time away from Linux.

      Hey, I *didn't* call you an idiot.

    14. Re:EXACTLY! by tiny1877 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but windoze sucks. It only took me a weekend because I had issues getting the program data to load properly and the PVR-150 card was not picked up with the correct tuner id. Most of the time I spent was researching the PVR-150 issue.

    15. Re:EXACTLY! by Penguinisto · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mark who?

      Clemens.

      (wait for it...)

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    16. Re:EXACTLY! by deniable · · Score: 1

      Mark Twann, invented the scanner driver.

  80. Good. Now they need to Fire Kevin by GregPK · · Score: 1

    Ever since Kevin, took over from Walmart, operations at the retail level have sucked, and not in a good way. A lot of good people have left, and even more want to leave. Something like a 30-40 percent turnover per year. It's rediculous. Also, I'm willing to bet that Kevin had something to do with him getting discovered as he was the former CIO at Walmart who's ethical practices aren't exactly "well known".

  81. There's your answer... by gosand · · Score: 5, Funny
    He helped "ensure that Microsoft is the "first and best customer" of its own products."


    There's your answer - he pushed them to use Vista internally.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:There's your answer... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      There's your answer - he pushed them to use Vista internally.

      Not suprising they would do this. Some of their disgruntled customers are telling them to take Vista internally.

    2. Re:There's your answer... by MLease · · Score: 1

      I didn't know Vista was available in suppository form. Although now that you mention it, it does make sense.

      -Mike

      --
      I'm sorry; I don't know what I was thinking!
  82. Distributing Microsoft Products? by starman97 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Says here 'Scott was charged with the distribution of Microsoft products among employees.'

    So, was he bootlegging Halo betas?
      I cant see them firing him for giving out copies of Vista.

    http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/microsoft-executive-fired-violating-company/story.aspx?guid=%7B3C9D5FC9-8119-4559-93AE-8FA7ED975002%7D&dist=hplatest

    --
    Starman97@Gmail.com (bring it on spammers)
    1. Re:Distributing Microsoft Products? by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1

      Says here 'Scott was charged with the distribution of Microsoft products among employees.'

      Hmmm. So everybody at Microsoft secretly uses a Mac or runs Linux on a PC and he caused productivity to implode by insisting that they actually use the products they were creating. Having been briefly exposed to Vista (until I could wipe it off of my Wife's laptop) and hearing her complain about the gawd-awful ribbon interface in the new office, I can believe it.

      Cheers,
      Dave
      --
      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
      Ben
    2. Re:Distributing Microsoft Products? by Evil+Poot+Cat · · Score: 1

      That would be 'charged with', as in 'tasked with'.

    3. Re:Distributing Microsoft Products? by KangKong · · Score: 1

      Which doesn't rule out an affair with another employee. Microsoft probably owns all derivate work, including children.

    4. Re:Distributing Microsoft Products? by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      "Says here 'Scott was charged with the distribution of Microsoft products among employees.'"

      Man, I'm going to let my boss know about this. If not even Microsoft wants to use Microsoft products at work, then the rest of should get a clue.

    5. Re:Distributing Microsoft Products? by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

      I think you're on to something there...

      Wish I had some mod points cuz that's +1 insightful

      --

      The Digital Sorceress
    6. Re:Distributing Microsoft Products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he was bootlegging Vista...

      Nah. Who'd ever want to do that?

      More likely, he got the chair thrown at him 'cause he forced the whole company to migrate to Vista, resulting in a 50% decline in productivity among executives. Ballmer in particular, did the chair-throwing.

    7. Re:Distributing Microsoft Products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have fired him for using Microsoft products too :)

    8. Re:Distributing Microsoft Products? by Repton · · Score: 1
      'Scott was charged with the distribution of Microsoft products among employees.'

      Wow, that puts a whole new spin on the "screwing a subordinate" line from other posters...

      --
      Repton.
      They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
  83. Its obvious .... by HW_Hack · · Score: 1

    in meetings and in emails concerning Vista and M$ future plans - he actually said what everyone secretly thinks about Vista etc.

    OR

    He may have actually suggested that the Emporer has no clothes (or plans)

    --
    Its not the years, its the mileage .....
  84. Monkey Boy by Darth+Cider · · Score: 1

    He was overheard referring to Steve Ballmer as Uncle Fester and Monkey Boy, a la Fake Steve Jobs.

  85. One obvious possibility by GrueMaster · · Score: 1

    Could it have something to do with the Nigerian Government's purchase of Classmate Systems preloaded with Mandriva and wiped on delivery? The two do seem close together.

  86. Liability by athloi · · Score: 1

    He did something for which the company might get sued (sexual harassment could qualify) and has been fired to protect the company. Legal action is like being bit by a zombie. Expect your former friends to shoot you in the head ASAP.

    1. Re:Liability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great analogy.... if I had mod points I'd award you one for that.

  87. divulging info to a competitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, you mean something like:

    "I know we're partnering with you and all, but don't read too much into that. It's just until our in-house version of your product is ready to be bundled with Windows."

  88. Ready for the google staff... by mvfuentes · · Score: 1

    Ready for the google staff... Just, Another coin fired from the emperium...

  89. It's a November Fools Day joke by SlappyBastard · · Score: 0

    Jeez. Look at the friggin calendar, will ya?!

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
  90. I heard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...he marched into Ballmer's office with a remote control and a nasty case of gas.

  91. Made a pass at... by canuck57 · · Score: 1

    Maybe made a pass at Balmer when he bent over to pick up a chair.

    Or maybe more hideous, he ran Linux at home.

    1. Re:Made a pass at... by fm6 · · Score: 1

      You can't fire somebody for having bad taste in men.

  92. Re:Rumor: love affair: Ballmer's Butt Buddy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    He refused to swallow anymore.

  93. He added three words to the License... by Known+Brave · · Score: 0

    He added three words to Microsoft's License so it reads:
    "Microsoft - All Rights Reserved / All Wrongs Denied"

    Fired the guy but may keep the change.

    Business as usual.

  94. Dodging chairs too well? by hAckz0r · · Score: 1

    Reflex time improves with continued exposure to aberrant behavior. ;)

  95. Indirect warning, lawsuit avoidance by Shivetya · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I somehow find it hard to believe that MS would want to warn other corporations about hiring him. this day and age a company can get whacked for giving out truthful but otherwise damaging reviews of former employees. There have been numerous occasions where former consulting companies I worked for would ask about someone I may have worked with just to get a picture they cannot get from past employers. By doing it this way Microsoft is able to pass along the big red flag without actually setting themselves up for defamation suits
    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  96. The two big internet rumors are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:The two big internet rumors are... by ObjetDart · · Score: 1
      probably not pr0n as he seems to be a religious guy.

      Oh please..."religious" people are some of the biggest pr0n hounds on the planet.

      --
      I read Usenet for the articles.
  97. Why wouldn't that supprise you? by Toreo+asesino · · Score: 1

    Believe it or not, Microsoft does consist of real people too, partly as cyborgs are incredibly difficult to toilet train and I won't even start on the eating habits.

    All public communication channels to and from Microsoft (the stuff Slashdot feeds on for instance) represent, well, very little of what's inside.

    --
    throw new NoSignatureException();
  98. Bribery by blugeoned · · Score: 1

    Maybe this is a delayed reaction to the bribery scandal from a few weeks ago over the OOXML adoption and the screwup of the OOXML adoption itself. I can see where a bribery scandal that could be traced back to high-level executives could pose serious problems for MS in Europe.

  99. Nigeria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *quietly whispers title of post and saunters away*

  100. Reading Slashdot by FozE_Bear · · Score: 1

    It wasn't porn, he was reading Slashdot on company time.

  101. Microsoft CIO Stuart Scott Gets Axed??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft CIO Stuart Scott Gets Chaired

    There fixed the headline for you.

  102. six sigma by xenomouse · · Score: 1

    Six Sigma is a process management... process.

    I think.

    But it's definitely not karate!

  103. Re:OS/Sex Scandal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was caught having sex with Linus at his desk.

    Fixed that.

  104. Not enough corruption, perhaps ? by unity100 · · Score: 1

    You know, the aptitude for bribery, shady competition, backstabbing, monopolistic leanings and such ? And chair throwing skillz ? Maybe he lacked those 'qualities' ?

  105. mod up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wish I had some mod points, someone mod this insightful please?

    1. Re:mod up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, if either of you took the time to read and think, you'd notice that normally when a CIO is terminated he's given the chance to resign and so he isn't publicly fired. Get it?

  106. Ripping / Piracy by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

    The guy has 7 kids is married and is a techie. He's too corporate to be hip, so he buys his way into being 'cool' through being the provider. I bet he had like a 15 terrabyte home server that just ripped movies, software and music all day long.

    He probably has the 25+mbps bonded DSL, some sort of outlandish automated ripping system and was sharing the spoils of his hobby with his co-workers and friends. You know the kind of piracy setup that only a 6 figure salary can afford.

    Microsoft then finds out that he's A) in deep shit with a whole lot of companies and organisations (MPAA, RIAA, etc etc) and B) has even been pirating Microsoft software and distributing it so they can him without being specific in an agreement to not get him arrested and sued for $10,000,000 in copyright violations.

  107. Strange no one mentioned this by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is it a coincidence this happened so shortly after Microsoft finally accepted to comply with the EC's decision in the anti-trust case?

    It might be totally unrelated, but I noticed no one had mentioned this yet.

  108. Probably not trying to hide something by snowwrestler · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When a business wants to hide the wrong-doing of an executive, they buy them out and everyone keeps their mouth shut. One publicly terminates an executive when one wants to send a public message. Often the message is that the business is responsive to a situation. So if the executive is harassing someone, or committing a crime, the business can try to limit its liability by showing that it took all possible steps to remedy the situation.

    Also, at the executive level, ticky-tack reasons for firing someone aren't really applicable. If the CEO doesn't like the CIO, he just cans him and brings in his own guy. This can be a kind of message too...fire a rival and consolidate power. And if that turns in an employment lawsuit, a little gift violation is not going to stand up in court.

    --
    Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Probably not trying to hide something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Washington is an "at-will" state. You can be fired because your boss is a Taurus and his horoscope said that an Ares would give him problems... and that's you.

  109. diverting attention away from nigeria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly.
    Diverting attention away from Nigeria gaffe.
    Nothing more to it.
    A hundred legal vehicles exist for the chap to continue workng for msft at better salaries.
    Like Acacia.
    Some Govt somewhere has referred to the Nigeria case and raised an objection.
    So, before the mainstream media can make do something big about it, hide it behind something shadier.

    Nothing more to it.
    No misappropriation of funds (that's most common in companies that big, and that's OK)
    Even the MSFT-spies-and-Feds angle is old knowledge.
    What is needed TODAY AND NOW, is a diversion from the Mandriva-Nigeria issue.
    They are already badmouthed by the media for being litigous
    They don't want to lose more third world Govt orders.

  110. lawyers recommended it by DriveDog · · Score: 1

    How about this... once again, something he did or said made MS, according to their legal department, vulnerable to a lawsuit. By preemptively publicly removing him, they hope that a judge will see that MS is not liable, that the CIO acted in violation of policy and is only himself liable. Unfortunately, whatever he did is either not clearly against MS policy or often goes unpunished, so if they say publicly what he allegedly did, they'll be subject to his next lawsuit.

    (Everything I write here is only my personal opinion, not that of my employer, etc.)

  111. Obligatory by AndyG314 · · Score: 1

    Those who have sacked those who sacked those who sacked the engineers of this album have been sacked

    --
    If it's dead, you killed it.
  112. It'll come out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone that high up in the food chain affects market prices for stocks, some shareholders will demand an explanation to see how there might be further ramifications down the pike. this isn't someone just quit, it is one of their head honchos got fired. The real info will come out.

  113. this isn't news, and certainly doesn't matter by m1ndrape · · Score: 0

    this type of journalism is no better than some of the rags on celebrities in the supermarket.

    --
    Donald Ray Moore Jr. (mindrape)
    Suspected Terrorist
  114. Depends I Guess by kaiwai · · Score: 1

    I guess it depends on the underlying motives. A lot of people assume companies are run by completely heartless bastards; but you'll find there are ones out there who will even listen to employee's lower done.

    There was actually a mate who ran a company, he found out there was an individual stealing money - he later found out that the individual had a gambling problem; rather than punish the individual he actually went and helped the individual out. That individual still works there.

    If there were mitigating circumstances, generally speaking it can be in the best interest for the two parties to come to an arrangement and have what ever is taken, repaid, then taking it to court and most likely getting nothing; if someone is truly repentant, they will pay back without needing to ask.

  115. I'm the one who... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    caught him using a debugger in the first place. Did I get a raise for uncovering this gross violation? Of course not.

  116. Embezzlement probably by JPriest · · Score: 1

    He probably did something like use his company card to buy personal goods etc. Although I suppose it could have been sexual harassment or something.

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
  117. This site sucks by bakamaki · · Score: 1

    I think he didn't get fired I think Dre just axed him a question.

  118. You guys are nuts! by erc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You guys are nuts ... for a big company to say that a high-ranking employee was fired for any reason is a pretty risky thing to do from a legal standpoint. They must've had a darned good reason to can Scott. Even when a CXX is caught doing something, it's usually handled much more gracefully - he's allowed to resign "for personal reasons" or "to seek a different position" or allowed to stay on the payroll while he finds another job, even if the true reason was that the guy was sleeping with his secretary or got caught with his hand in the cookie jar. He also might've been caught on the losing end of a corporate power play - the folks who report to him and the folks who are his peers are always jockeying for position, looking for an opportunity to look good to *his* boss in case they see an opportunity to set him up to get rid of him...

    Regardless, most of the opinions posted here about why the guy was sacked are just plain silly.

    --
    -- Ed Carp, N7EKG erc@pobox.com PGP KeyID: 0x0BD32C9B What I'm up to: http://intuitives.mine.nu
  119. 640k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He installed 641k of memory.

    1. Re:640k by unitron · · Score: 1

      640k (Score:0)
      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 07, @11:05AM (#21267877)
      He installed 641k of memory.

      Mod points! My kingdom for mod points!

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  120. My theory. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Being CIO Chief Information Officer. It would probably most likely would be due to leaking some information. It could be releasing some specs before hand, or some. Or even something like giving the root password for the Cisco Router to Cisco customer support, who is based in an other country...
    Hording money or going with unsavory consultants, Who will buy 20,000 feet of Cat 5 itemize it as Cat 6 and pocket the difference. Taking bribes. A slew of things.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  121. Heard saying by SnarfQuest · · Score: 0, Redundant

    He was heard saying "I can't find any copyright violations in Linux."

    They fined him $699, and canned him.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  122. "axed"? More like chaired. (n.t.) by Non-Huffable+Kitten · · Score: 1

    no text

    --
    Medium cat is MEDIUM.
  123. You didn't hear it from me by edwardpickman · · Score: 1

    It involved a goat, a shower and a bar of soap.....I've said too much already.

  124. This is what happens when you try to apply 6 Sigma by geekoid · · Score: 1

    to software development.

    6 sigma is a way to measure and decrease defects over time. However people are intertwined with software development, and software methodologies tend to change;which means new vectors for defects. This is similar to why it doesn't work well in retail.

    Plus, you must understand statistics, or hire statisticians to be really succesfull

    For the record, if I could afford to put 7 children through college, not need my wife to work and can afford live in help, I would have 7 kids.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  125. He was fired for reading Slashdot at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Duh.

  126. Just trying to help the anonymous truth teller by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    Ah, CRAP!!! I get busy and don't look at Slashdot for a while. So I miss that a Microsoft Hive Queen has been deleted from the Collective until there's already about a zillion comments on it. And a lot of the comments are funny. And most of the writers came up with the same ideas I did...earlier (and probably funnier).

    Caught using Linux/Apple/Firefox/Whatever: check.

    Caught having an affair: check.

    Caught dumping Vista for XP Pro: I didn't see it, but it's too good to miss. So check.

    Caught pirating: See above.

    Has a better arm than Ballmer: check.

    Theft/Murder/Coveting his neighbor's ox: check

    Coveting his neighbor's (cough) ass (cough): check.

    Damn it, I WILL NOT BE DENIED! What's left? Interspecies sex? Are Bill Gates' kids old enough to date?

    Wait, wait.....I got it! He photocopied his bum and mistakenly hit "Reply All" when the e-mail should have gone to Ballmer as part of the secret Microsoft submission ritual.

    TA DA!!!!!

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  127. Harrassment by Grendel_Prime · · Score: 1

    On his application for the job, in the line indicating sex, he wrote in the word "YES" and checked it. MS didn't notice till they went to digitize their HR paperwork to store on their FILECABINET LIVE initiative.

  128. As CIO, his mistake was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As CIO, his mistake was a "technology refresh" where he overnight replaced every PC with a 512 MB RAM Celeron laptop running Windows Vista Penultimate Edition.

  129. He took the blue pill. by neo · · Score: 1


    I suspect that public termination is a deterrent to other members of the company, not a warning to other companies. This kind of termination is an example to others that whatever he did (office love affair?) will not be tolerated. It takes balls to terminate someone this high up. Kudos to the HR department and whoever signed the paper.

    On the other hand kudos to the guy for having an office love affair. Too bad you got caught.

  130. that'll do it by ElephanTS · · Score: 1

    He came into the office one day and said, 'You know, I've been thinking, we make some right sh*t don't we?'

    --
    spoonerize "magic trackpad"
  131. i know what he did by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1

    I know what he did.

    He got a Mac.

  132. what he did...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    surfed for porn. kept it on his pc. gets discovered when showing off pictures during a presentation. ....that, or he was caught by Balmer with an iPod/iPhone.

  133. Maybe he was just joking. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    "I see that by "schooled in espionage" you meant "paranoid"..."

    I think that by "schooled in espionage" he meant "joke".

  134. yes, but by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 2, Funny

    you are not supposed to promote your lover way beyond his or her level of competence.

  135. Well... by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

    But that's what I don't get! How is it so exciting to force someone that's scared you'll fire them to have flirt-have sex with you? I don't crush ants and go, "ooh look at me, I'm so POWERFUL!"

    Well... good for you.

  136. Not if he was fired for cause... by mikelieman · · Score: 1

    I'm sure his contract has a clause stating that he doesn't get a payout if he's terminated for cause.

    --
    Technology -- No Place For Wimps! Grateful Dead and Jerry Garcia Chatroom -- http://www.wemissjerry.org
  137. Boo Hoo Fuck You Scott by gelfling · · Score: 1

    I don't care what the damn reason is. I'm sure they'd escort my ass the hell out the door too if I did whatever you did. The difference is, Scott, that you get to weep all over the steering wheel of your Porsche on the way home, wallow in a bathtub full of money when you get there and stare at your real Monets hanging on the wall. So fuck you, man.

    BTW kids, the CIO role in MS is not a top exec spot. It's second tier. MS doesn't give shit for people who don't move PRODUCT. He MUST have been stealing. Guaranteed.

  138. Oy. by jkmiecik · · Score: 1

    Figures, this thread is full of "MS IS FULL OF HORRIBLE PEOPLE" posts.

    They found out he did something wrong and canned his ass. They didn't try to hide the violation, let him "step down" etc. They FIRED him.

  139. I Called Bill and Found Out What It Was... by bratwiz · · Score: 1


    Turns out this guy had a poster of Linus Torvalds taped to the inside of his locker.

  140. In best Linda Hamilton impersonation: by ciaohound · · Score: 1

    "You're terminated, fucker."

    --
    Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
  141. Re:obvious Karma by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Apparently not.

    Every post I see that says "I will get modded down" gets modded Funny.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  142. Obligatory whoosh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Please report to the nearest citizen reeducation station for a much needed humor implant.

  143. Computer Security Violation by oldzoot · · Score: 1

    Being the CIO, he is responsible for computer security within the company.
    He violated due diligence by certifying the use of an insecure operating system at Microsoft, notably Windows Vista. /duck

    OldZoot

    --
    enough is too much
  144. It may be a good thing for him after all by Cannelloni · · Score: 1

    Ironically, getting fired from Microsoft might be the best thing that ever happened in that guy's life. I mean, just imagine how it must feel to work for a *bleep* like Steve Ballmer? To have a big, paranoid, evil corporation slowly eating away at your soul, eroding your mind and destroying your personal self? No money in the world is worth it. Really.

    --
    Beauty is in the beholder of the eye.
  145. Sports Center Tag by BooRolla · · Score: 1

    Hello,

    I wanted you to be sure you witnessed the first and last "Sports Center" tag to ever be used on /.

  146. He was working on catchy sayings.... by gsfprez · · Score: 1

    like:
    "Cooler than the other side of the pillow"
    and
    "Booyah!"

    instead of getting his damn job done.

    --
    guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.
  147. Did he by boltik · · Score: 1

    failed the chair throwing test?

  148. My Guess by sirgoran · · Score: 1

    His computer dual booted to four distros of Linux and no Win OS.

    His web browser was Firefox.

    His mail program was gmail.

    His Office suite was Star Office.

    His personal website ran PHP and Apache on a Sun box.

    His cell phone was an iPhone.

    He told Ballmer he was "just a stupid little panty waste".

    I figure any one of those would get you canned...

    --
    Carpe Scrotum - The only way to deal with your competition.
  149. and the number one reason is... by DrPeper · · Score: 0

    Jack Thompson sent a letter.

  150. Read the ToS by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Funny

    He should have read the ToS before he broke open the shrink-wrap on his office.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  151. obligatory by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 2, Informative

    Gee, I bet you're a lot of fun at parties!

  152. nope by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

    Er, on what basis? You can't sue someone for wrongful termination just because you don't like why you were fired, and then hope the jury sees it your way. There isn't some principle written into the law that says you can only be fired if a jury of your peers agrees it was "fair."

    In essence, there are some very narrowly and specifically defined grounds for a wrongful termination suit, namely discrimination based on your sex, race or age, or if you were fired in retaliation for "whistle-blowing" to any of several government agencies. There may be others, too. But the point is that unless a legislature has defined specific grounds for a wrongful termination suit, you can be fired for any reason or no reason at all, and you have zero recourse unless the company failed to honor your employment contract.

    Especially when, as is probable in this case, the guy agreed when he was hired -- in writing, or by the act of showing up for his first day of work -- that he would abide by certain clearly-stated corporate principles, e.g. not boffing people who report to you, and then was caught not doing so. A lawsuit that can't allege sex or race discrimination, and which has to overcome violation of his conditions of employment, probably won't even come before a jury -- a judge would toss it as soon as the defendant asked him to.

  153. Related to Android? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was fired the day of the Android press conference. Maybe he was caught doing something illegal/improper to get information out of Google regarding Android. If MS security was investigating, and all the evidence they had to work with was information proprietary to Google, then heir investigation would've closed with the information being confirmed in Google's press conference.

    At that point it becomes a serious legal burden to keep him on staff, no matter how high up he is.

  154. I thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that the CIO had been throwing chairs in his office... Unfortunately, Ballmer heard the noise and wanted to sue him for patent infringement, upon which the CIO tried to defend himself with a SuSE Linux installation CD, saying: "you see, I'm a Novell customer, you promised not to sue those". Eventually, Bill Gates caught a glimpse of the Linux CD in the CIO's hands and the rest is history. Or maybe the CIO's name showed up in the network report of using Google search, or the system report showed he had iTunes installed?

  155. He threw a chair... by gabrieltss · · Score: 1

    at Balmer! Blamer didn't apprieciate it so they "threw" him out.

    --
    The Truth is a Virus!!!
  156. The Reason by timlyg · · Score: 0

    They discovered he owned a DVD pirated version of Redhat.

  157. Re:Reading Slashdot / Not Porn by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 1

    Wash your mouth out!

    Since when is slashdot not porn (for geeks)?

    --
    Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
  158. Well, that does it! by Nybble's+Byte · · Score: 1, Funny

    I guess he'll never be promoted to chair-man of the board.

    Imagine a young single woman named Eula getting hired by Microsoft, one day yelling in the back of a car, "Violate me! Violate me!" If the guy is also a MS employee, do you think he'll get canned?

  159. Personally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...I think that this particular post happens to be particularly insightful. If I was betting money on the reason for him getting fired, it'd be on that.

  160. Duh by Vexor · · Score: 1

    He bought a mac, installed linux on it, end of story.

    --
    ~Vexed and loving it!
  161. one of three things by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Funny

    My guess is snuff, kiddie pr0n, or necrophilia. Or he may have really crossed the line and gotten into the furry stuff.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  162. Ballmer by sentientbrendan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    is still pretty derideable. Not so much because he's running microsoft into the ground or anything. Overall, Microsoft is doing pretty well, and I'd probably say their stock and outlook is a bit undervalued by most people.

    However, he's screwed up on two major fronts and kind of failed to repent on at least one of them.
    1. He let the vista development get strung out like it did. This probably isn't largely his fault, but as CEO he should have realized something was going very wrong and forced the development team to start removing features instead of pushing back the launch date. Windows is still Microsofts most important product, and he should have kept a better eye on it.
    2. He seems to have some vendetta going with Google, for reasons that are totally beyond me. I honestly don't see how or why Microsoft and Google are in competition, and I tend to think that Microsoft is wasting a lot of money pretending that they are a serious search and ads company like Google or Yahoo. Maybe they'll prove me wrong in the long run, they did with the XBox, but I tend to see their web initiatives as a distraction from more promising products.
    3. He seems to have encouraged a very inefficient corporate culture with a lot of levels of management and lots of meetings. I don't think the Google style flat management structure is an appropriate approach for a company the size of Microsoft (or a company the size of Google for that matter), but I think that something has to be done to address how sluggish the company has gotten. Something like Apple style skunkworks projects for some of their key projects would probably make sense.

  163. Sorry to burst your bubble ... by jchenx · · Score: 2, Informative

    Maybe his daughter was caught using an iPod? Or perhaps his work machine's cache was found to have a Google Search results page in it?

    But, in all seriousness, it wouldn't surprise me if Microsoft had a very stringent agreement with it's employees such that you're guilty of violating company policy at all times. Something really vague and impossible to avoid like "you shall not support a competitor in anyway with any of your personal funds or free time." They only let you go if they want to and so few get let go on these grounds that nobody really cares about it. Does anyone know if this is the case?

    It really wouldn't surprise me if they treated their employees the same way they treat their customers.
    Sorry to burst your bubble, but as someone who works at MS, they don't treat their employees like that. (Nor do I think we treat all of our customers like that either, but that's a separate discussion!)

    There are plenty of people around here (myself included) that use competing products. We're talking about Macs, Firefox, Google, iPhone, iPod, PlayStation, etc. Yeah, some of it is competitive analysis and such, but a lot of it is just due to personal preference, and it is draconian to think that an employer would force such measures on their employees. Obviously MS would like everyone to drink nothing but Kool-Aid, and will suggest people buy Zunes, use Live Search, etc. and I think that's fine and healthy. I would expect Google and Apple to do the same thing with its employees, allowing them to run/own/use the competition's products.
    --
    -- jchenx
    1. Re:Sorry to burst your bubble ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yer fired.

  164. Why is the mainstream media not covering this? by ostomator · · Score: 1

    So yeah, I have been greppping the main stream media for the last twenty four hours, and the best i can find is this : microsoft stock price drops marginally (video, safe for work). I mean seriously. An executive at a major company gets fired and the talking heads don't think this is news worthy? What am I missing here? And by "grepping" I mean seriously searching for the sound "microsoft" being mentioned on any national television or radio news. Do you know if they have and I have just missed it? Not that I own stock or anything. Bob if at first you don't succeed, redefine success

  165. Luckily French Melinda Gates Was Single by meehawl · · Score: 1

    I guess it's lucky, then, that Melinda French was a frisky 20-something single when she and Bill started shagging. And out of that union came Bob...

    --

    Da Blog
  166. Re: I believe Acacia is hiring ex-Microsoft execs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or he could try the BBC.

  167. the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop yer' speculatin'. It's the oldest reason in the book: fidlin' with a subordinate and then givin' her a big ole promotion: http://www.pollsb.com/polls/poll/3617/microsoft-fires-cio-stuart-scott-possibly-for-inter-office-affair-with-his-subordinate

  168. Moonlighting by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1
    Microsoft has terminated its CIO Stuart Scott for 'violation of company policies'. They won't elaborate. Now what do you think this guy has done?

    I think he was fired because he was moonlighting with ESPN, and being the most annoying guy on SportsCenter.

    (ESPN is a cable television network that focuses mainly on sports, since you don't know. It is that channel you occasionally watch poker on late at night, and SportsCenter is a show other people watch sometimes. Naturally I don't expect anyone to mod my post up for being funny, because no one here will get it.)

    --
    This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  169. Okay, here's the deal. by DaedalusHKX · · Score: 1

    Instead of saying "Microsoft sucks." (we all already know this)

    Try saying "[Your flavor of OS] is great, here's why!" (perhaps we might learn something.)

    As to the other arguments I seem to have spawned, I found something out. Every time I ended up running Linux or BSD, I ended up LEARNING something. The only thing I learned about computing, or crypto or anything else is this... "if they get physical access to your machine, it ain't your machine or your data ANY MORE... however, if you're running any OS that starts with Win... it ain't your data or your machine ANYWAYS! Read the EULA and the bug reports that go superficially fixed."

    That's my 10 cents.

    --
    " What luck for rulers that men do not think" - Adolf Hitler
    1. Re:Okay, here's the deal. by NickFortune · · Score: 1

      Instead of saying "Microsoft sucks." (we all already know this)

      hmmm... but the clever people at Redmond are constantly inventing new forms of suckage, and these need to be discussed. For instance the recent software updates that affected even machines that had disabled updates; that is something people need to know about because it brings into question a widely trusted subsystem of what is probably the world's most widely deployed O/S. Just to pick a single example.

      Try saying "[Your flavor of OS] is great, here's why!" (perhaps we might learn something.)

      Gentoo is really cool. It's the most flexible distro I've encountered, and great if you have a wide range of computing interests and like to push the envelope a little. That said, it's not for everyone, and the lamentable "ricer" mindset of early enthusiasts have given it a bit of a bad name in some circles. All the same, it suits me just fine.

      None of that means we shouldn't also discuss Microsoft.

      I can applaud your attempts to inject a little positivity into a debate that all too frequently descends into ritual mud-slinging, and certainly, I hope we can aspire to a higher standard of criticism than "Microsfot Sucks!". On the other hand, there are many valid reasons to discuss Microsoft. To keep silent in the face of their anti-competitive practices and abuses of trust serves MS far more than it does either the free software community or Microsoft's own user base.

      And that's my two ha'porth.

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
  170. Some guesses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It would have to be a major offense for the matter to be handled in this way.


    In no particular order:


    1. He pulled an Andy Fastow and was making money on the side from shell companies contracting with Microsoft
    2. He slept with Belinda Gates
    3. He is an idiot and the firing was just an excuse
    4. He lied about his past and/or experience
    5. Misuse of company funds, hiring hookers and taking the company plane on the company's dime to Fiji
    6. Insider trading
    7. Sexual misconduct / harassment / dating a subordinate / pedophilia


    Hmmm ... my bet is on either (1) or (7), with perhaps a bit of (3) thrown in for good measure.

  171. CIOs can do anything, IT security-wise... by ibsteve2u · · Score: 1

    Maybe he let some external organization or other access internal Microsoft records for some purpose or other...

    --
    Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
  172. Agreed :) by DaedalusHKX · · Score: 1

    We should discuss them, but descending into the "ritual mudslining" you just mentioned ends up losing us the little credibility we "geeks" have with those who sign the purchasing orders or checks.

    Everytime we recall what is bad, we should be suggesting more evidently what OS has a track record of NOT doing this. Instead of a 20 piece website about why M$ sucks, why not a 20 piece website why such suckage doesn't occur in (your flavor of OS here).

    Even the idiotic flame wars between the distros. WTF?! As if the distros had enough turf to fight over, instead of biting at the big boy's heels...

    So having had some background in geekdom and in pin striped salesmanship (don't ask), I find that its EASIER to sell YOUR idea or product by pushing it more than slandering your opposition. Bring up their failures, answer questions but PUSH YOUR PRODUCT.

    Why do you think M$ has survived the "Linux Onslaught" so far? Because they give Linux VERY LITTLE of their limelight. "We are aware of it but not concerned." Is this true? Sure they are aware of Linux and BSD (they used the BSD net tools didn't they?) but they are outright lying about their level of concern. I mean hell they got a "Linux and OSS Strategy Group" (or whatever it is they call it nowadays). This kind of stuff should be learned from.

    This is what I meant. RedHat on the other hand has been bungling their own attempts. Slow servers, etc. I like Gentoo and will continue to use it. I like LFS, but again its the "ricer" factor... its easy to tweak. Ubuntu, Debian and Kubuntu have been my "kiddie grade" linuxes, good for all things I don't do (for the more "mainstream computer user" types among us.)

    I like the pro liberty concept amongst some of the Linuxes, their usage generally suggests, sure, its free, but it A, takes work and B, takes responsibility. Getting all that done can be expensive on those of us who aren't trained to handle either of those options.

    --
    " What luck for rulers that men do not think" - Adolf Hitler