Eh, he's right about facts not mattering. People aren't rational. We make emotional decisions and then rationalize them.
And as for his comments section that was a good move. I used to read it and there was good discussion there but then it started getting brigaded by stormfront. Straight-up Hitler-loving white power shit. Closing that down was a good idea.
Hillary called Jesse Jackson a n*gger and has screamed about Jews and retarded kids. She was a member of an all-white country club until political pressure made her quit. She intimidated and silenced her husband's rape victims so as not to damage her political career.
Neither Trump nor Clinton have a stellar record when it comes to sex and race issues. If your deciding factor for president is "no sexists, no racists" then neither the Democrat nor the Republican is for you this cycle. Pick Johnson or Stein.
Me, I'm voting Trump because I don't care about sexism or racism but he's the only one I believe will actually 86 the TPP. And he'll stop the Mexican rapists.
Gotta punish that wrongthink. How much you want to bet they'll vigorously prosecute those who say mean things about immigrants or women, but gosh just never find the time to investigate someone who bashes white people or men...
this tape just demonstrates that he thinks his money makes sexual assault okay.
I think he very correctly but crudely stated that an awful lot of women are gold digging whores, and so they don't mind when rich famous guys go digging in their pussies because that's how they get their gold. The only people to whom this is surprising are beta males and dykes, and they weren't voting for Trump anyway.
Most entertaining October ever. I think it'll be funny watching more pussyleaks comes out, the media going apoplectic, and then nothing happening because everyone already knows Trump is a sleazy womanizer. That's not new information.
Only thing I can think of that will actually sink Trump is if they've got a video/audio of him using the n-word. And in a bad way, like calling someone it or saying "man I really hate n*ggers." But if he's saying something like "I'm a gorilla dick nigga that makes dyke pussies wet" I think his numbers will go up.
I don't think either scandal changed anyone's opinion of either candidate. Before this weekend we knew Trump was a sleazy womanizer and Hillary was a corrupt politician in the pockets of Wall Street. After this weekend we know Trump is a sleazy womanizer and Hillary is a corrupt politician in the pockets of Wall Street. I'm still voting Trump because the election isn't about who gets to date my daughter.
I think they're repugnant in different ways. I wouldn't let Trump around my wife or daughter, and I wouldn't let Clinton around my wallet, or anything that will let her arm terrorists and destabilize secular governments. Thankfully the election isn't about who gets to date my daughter.
My guess is he's using the tax return thing as schmuck bait.
1. No one is going to be deciding their vote based on his tax returns. There is not a single person saying "gee, I'm find with building a wall, deporting millions of people, and banning muslims, but what if there's something shady in his tax returns?!?! Nope, #ImWithHer!" Similarly, ask any Hillary voter who's demanding to see Trump's taxes "so, if the taxes turn out good, and he's rich as fuck and gives lots to charity and has no Russian ties, you'll vote for him?" Of course not. Which makes the entire issue a red herring.
2. Since the content of the tax returns will not effect anyone's vote, it's great to keep the establishment media harping on them. Let them waste days of breath and gallons of ink on something of absolutely no consequence. If he released them and they're fine, do you think the media would say "oh, then he's a great choice for president, we have no further complaints." No, they would just move on to something else that might actually be damaging. Don't interrupt your enemy while they're making a mistake.
So if were Trump's media strategist (which is to say, Trump) and at the beginning of the year when they started going after him for his tax returns I would have said "regardless of the contents of the taxes, do not release them...pretty much ever and let the media scream about nothing." Alternatively, if the taxes show good things, wait until a week before the election, then release them and make everyone who was screaming about the taxes for a year look stupid.
I would have thought that perhaps the right might want women, trans folks, and homos to serve in the military
Women in non-combat roles, and homos so long as they're not too homo. Trans people need mental help.
Perhaps the right might have wanted gender equality. If a womyn-born-womyn wants to choose to be a baby-machine, no helping her, but maybe there was a better way.
Absolutely not. "Gender equality" as the left defines it doesn't work. If the US started off with "gender equality" then America would have never happened. The colonists would get off the boat, set up a gender equal town and then each generation would produce fewer people than the generation before. This is happening now. Neither the US nor Europe are producing kids so the powers that be are importing Mexicans and Muslims who don't give a shit about gender equality but do breed. So, your "gender equal" society will last a few generations more but then you'll all die out.
I suppose the right was just a fantasy of mine where circumstance of birth would give way to strength of spirit, some imaginary possibility where people could live up to their full potential despite how they were born.
No because biology is a real thing. No amount of insanity makes a woman into a man or vice versa. And intelligence is mostly genetic, not environmental, so an awful lot of your potential is determined by the circumstances of your birth. This is science. Your ideas about equality are delusions, because people aren't equal, never have been, and never can be.
Yeah, I suppose I've deluded myself into thinking the alt-right were somehow different from the right. I suppose it's probably one in the same. You're right; there really was no appreciable difference. I was misguided.
Now we wonder why faggots like me become Democrats. No mystery now!
It is, as you said, because you are prone to delusions.
I get it, you Democrats are nice people and you want to be nice and have everyone think you're nice. The problem is that your ideas do not work because they are based on false assumptions, and societies that try to implement them fail. Me and my patriarchy are evil as fuck, but it's been working since the dawn of civilization.
I don't think Putin necessarily wants a "weak" US so much as a US that isn't openly hostile to Russia. Hillary and the neocon crew want war with Russia over Syria. Trump doesn't, and that's in the best interests of Russia, and the US, and Syria, and Europe, and basically everyone except Hillary and her cronies.
No, how about fuck you? Your morality came from a very special episode of Blossom. This retarded slave mentality that White Man, it shall be your burden to open your home to everyone, even those who hate you and want to destroy your home, and if you don't give them all of your shit (and better yet, your neighbors' shit) then you're a Bad White and should be shamed. In the meantime the wealthy assholes brainwashing you with this shit are getting richer and richer off the results of the stupid ideas they implanted in your head.
Does it bother you that Wall Street bankers and financiers own media companies that collude with the DNC to spread propaganda to influence our elections?
Yeah, Utopia doesn't exist. It's kind of the meaning of the word.
Hillary's idea of open borders is she lets semi-retarded 3rd worlders flood into the country so she can buy their votes with social programs, and free trade so her corporate masters can exploit the slaves who stay in the 3rd world. No thank you. I would rather have a nation, with borders and laws.
My first response to this leak in particular is to wonder why Clinton didn't release the transcripts in the first place.
Because they revealed she has different policies she tells the bankers versus the peasants, and she plans to implement open borders and gun control via executive action..?
A bunch of #NeverTrumpers said again "Never Trump." This isn't shocking. We don't have two political parties. We have a uniparty system that does whatever Wall Street and the military industrial complex want while the corporate owned media keep all the peasants fighting over fags and abortions. So Republicans denouncing Trump is hardly news. They're paid by the same people who pay for the DNC.
The tradition of releasing taxes to assuage fears of conflicts of interest is only 40 years old. Can we not start a new tradition of disclosing speeches for the same purpose?
What is "influencing," though? The DNC leaks exposed what anyone with a half a brain has understand for a long time: our news media is just propaganda. We don't so much have state-run media as we have a media-run state. The same corporations that own the media own the politicians. So when the corporate media spreads political propaganda they're influencing the election. When WikiLeaks does it they're influencing the election. What's the difference?
Slashdot Mirror
Eh, he's right about facts not mattering. People aren't rational. We make emotional decisions and then rationalize them.
And as for his comments section that was a good move. I used to read it and there was good discussion there but then it started getting brigaded by stormfront. Straight-up Hitler-loving white power shit. Closing that down was a good idea.
Hillary called Jesse Jackson a n*gger and has screamed about Jews and retarded kids. She was a member of an all-white country club until political pressure made her quit. She intimidated and silenced her husband's rape victims so as not to damage her political career.
Neither Trump nor Clinton have a stellar record when it comes to sex and race issues. If your deciding factor for president is "no sexists, no racists" then neither the Democrat nor the Republican is for you this cycle. Pick Johnson or Stein.
Me, I'm voting Trump because I don't care about sexism or racism but he's the only one I believe will actually 86 the TPP. And he'll stop the Mexican rapists.
Problem is he's pro-TPP. I can't vote for anybody who supports the TPP.
Gotta punish that wrongthink. How much you want to bet they'll vigorously prosecute those who say mean things about immigrants or women, but gosh just never find the time to investigate someone who bashes white people or men...
this tape just demonstrates that he thinks his money makes sexual assault okay.
I think he very correctly but crudely stated that an awful lot of women are gold digging whores, and so they don't mind when rich famous guys go digging in their pussies because that's how they get their gold. The only people to whom this is surprising are beta males and dykes, and they weren't voting for Trump anyway.
I'm guessing it has to be the mics at the debates because it doesn't happen during any of his other speeches or interviews.
Most entertaining October ever. I think it'll be funny watching more pussyleaks comes out, the media going apoplectic, and then nothing happening because everyone already knows Trump is a sleazy womanizer. That's not new information.
Only thing I can think of that will actually sink Trump is if they've got a video/audio of him using the n-word. And in a bad way, like calling someone it or saying "man I really hate n*ggers." But if he's saying something like "I'm a gorilla dick nigga that makes dyke pussies wet" I think his numbers will go up.
I don't think either scandal changed anyone's opinion of either candidate. Before this weekend we knew Trump was a sleazy womanizer and Hillary was a corrupt politician in the pockets of Wall Street. After this weekend we know Trump is a sleazy womanizer and Hillary is a corrupt politician in the pockets of Wall Street. I'm still voting Trump because the election isn't about who gets to date my daughter.
I think they're repugnant in different ways. I wouldn't let Trump around my wife or daughter, and I wouldn't let Clinton around my wallet, or anything that will let her arm terrorists and destabilize secular governments. Thankfully the election isn't about who gets to date my daughter.
My guess is he's using the tax return thing as schmuck bait.
1. No one is going to be deciding their vote based on his tax returns. There is not a single person saying "gee, I'm find with building a wall, deporting millions of people, and banning muslims, but what if there's something shady in his tax returns?!?! Nope, #ImWithHer!" Similarly, ask any Hillary voter who's demanding to see Trump's taxes "so, if the taxes turn out good, and he's rich as fuck and gives lots to charity and has no Russian ties, you'll vote for him?" Of course not. Which makes the entire issue a red herring.
2. Since the content of the tax returns will not effect anyone's vote, it's great to keep the establishment media harping on them. Let them waste days of breath and gallons of ink on something of absolutely no consequence. If he released them and they're fine, do you think the media would say "oh, then he's a great choice for president, we have no further complaints." No, they would just move on to something else that might actually be damaging. Don't interrupt your enemy while they're making a mistake.
So if were Trump's media strategist (which is to say, Trump) and at the beginning of the year when they started going after him for his tax returns I would have said "regardless of the contents of the taxes, do not release them...pretty much ever and let the media scream about nothing." Alternatively, if the taxes show good things, wait until a week before the election, then release them and make everyone who was screaming about the taxes for a year look stupid.
I would have thought that perhaps the right might want women, trans folks, and homos to serve in the military
Women in non-combat roles, and homos so long as they're not too homo. Trans people need mental help.
Perhaps the right might have wanted gender equality. If a womyn-born-womyn wants to choose to be a baby-machine, no helping her, but maybe there was a better way.
Absolutely not. "Gender equality" as the left defines it doesn't work. If the US started off with "gender equality" then America would have never happened. The colonists would get off the boat, set up a gender equal town and then each generation would produce fewer people than the generation before. This is happening now. Neither the US nor Europe are producing kids so the powers that be are importing Mexicans and Muslims who don't give a shit about gender equality but do breed. So, your "gender equal" society will last a few generations more but then you'll all die out.
I suppose the right was just a fantasy of mine where circumstance of birth would give way to strength of spirit, some imaginary possibility where people could live up to their full potential despite how they were born.
No because biology is a real thing. No amount of insanity makes a woman into a man or vice versa. And intelligence is mostly genetic, not environmental, so an awful lot of your potential is determined by the circumstances of your birth. This is science. Your ideas about equality are delusions, because people aren't equal, never have been, and never can be.
Yeah, I suppose I've deluded myself into thinking the alt-right were somehow different from the right. I suppose it's probably one in the same. You're right; there really was no appreciable difference. I was misguided.
Now we wonder why faggots like me become Democrats. No mystery now!
It is, as you said, because you are prone to delusions.
I get it, you Democrats are nice people and you want to be nice and have everyone think you're nice. The problem is that your ideas do not work because they are based on false assumptions, and societies that try to implement them fail. Me and my patriarchy are evil as fuck, but it's been working since the dawn of civilization.
I'm a paleoconservative.
What is the alt-right, and how is it different from the right?
But our corporations are multinationals with multinational interest. I find that more threatening than a foreign government.
I don't think Putin necessarily wants a "weak" US so much as a US that isn't openly hostile to Russia. Hillary and the neocon crew want war with Russia over Syria. Trump doesn't, and that's in the best interests of Russia, and the US, and Syria, and Europe, and basically everyone except Hillary and her cronies.
No, how about fuck you? Your morality came from a very special episode of Blossom. This retarded slave mentality that White Man, it shall be your burden to open your home to everyone, even those who hate you and want to destroy your home, and if you don't give them all of your shit (and better yet, your neighbors' shit) then you're a Bad White and should be shamed. In the meantime the wealthy assholes brainwashing you with this shit are getting richer and richer off the results of the stupid ideas they implanted in your head.
Yup, Hildawg's got it so in the bag you don't even need to show up to vote.
Does it bother you that Wall Street bankers and financiers own media companies that collude with the DNC to spread propaganda to influence our elections?
And is this surprising to anyone?
We learned nothing new this weekend. Trump is sleazy, Clinton is corrupt. Don't let Trump near your wife and don't let Clinton near your wallet.
Yeah, Utopia doesn't exist. It's kind of the meaning of the word.
Hillary's idea of open borders is she lets semi-retarded 3rd worlders flood into the country so she can buy their votes with social programs, and free trade so her corporate masters can exploit the slaves who stay in the 3rd world. No thank you. I would rather have a nation, with borders and laws.
Also, I don't believe Assange is on Trump's side. He's just against Hillary and the corporate/globalist/US power structure.
My first response to this leak in particular is to wonder why Clinton didn't release the transcripts in the first place.
Because they revealed she has different policies she tells the bankers versus the peasants, and she plans to implement open borders and gun control via executive action..?
A bunch of #NeverTrumpers said again "Never Trump." This isn't shocking. We don't have two political parties. We have a uniparty system that does whatever Wall Street and the military industrial complex want while the corporate owned media keep all the peasants fighting over fags and abortions. So Republicans denouncing Trump is hardly news. They're paid by the same people who pay for the DNC.
The tradition of releasing taxes to assuage fears of conflicts of interest is only 40 years old. Can we not start a new tradition of disclosing speeches for the same purpose?
What is "influencing," though? The DNC leaks exposed what anyone with a half a brain has understand for a long time: our news media is just propaganda. We don't so much have state-run media as we have a media-run state. The same corporations that own the media own the politicians. So when the corporate media spreads political propaganda they're influencing the election. When WikiLeaks does it they're influencing the election. What's the difference?
But what about when an armed black guy gets shot by a black cop in a city with a black police chief? Why is there unrest after that?