We should respond directly to this attack, even if that involves a kinetic attack against the source.
You know someone's trying to justify something awful when they use newspeak instead of plain english. Just say you want war with Russia because they embarassed your political party.
A hack of the RNC would likely reveal that they tried to do to Trump what the DNC did to Bernie, they just failed. Or rather, Trump beat them because he fought back, unlike Bernie who rolled over. All that this would do is confirm what Trump has been saying, that the system is rigged.
Because the Republicans haven't collaborated with Putin's efforts to poison the democratic process in the US?
The left is bizarre to me. They're incensed about the leaks, about something naughty Trump said, but read Hillary's emails that she funded the moderate beheaders in Syria so Israel would be happy with a nuclear Iran and now we've got 400k dead, ISIS, and the migrant crisis threatening to destabalize Europe and they're totally cool with that. I do not get it. I mean, I get why the media and the political classes do it: money. But I have no idea what your average left-leaning voter gets out of this.
Because those guys were wrong on the issues. Republicans want the border secured, the illegals deported, the spread of Islam fought, and an end to nation building and the rejection of TPP. The only candidate who got those issues right is Trump.
Maybe you should read a little something called THE SECOND AMENDMENT, you commie!
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State from the threat of bigfoots, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The assumption is that they are replicating their world based on the same basic units.
But that assumption is entirely unfounded. The vast majority of the simulations that we create don't have anything resembling our fundamental particles, forces, and genes. The physics of Pac-Man don't represent our reality.
Christians believe heaven (the higher reality) is incomprehensible to human minds. Don't even bother trying to understand heaven; you can't. You're going with the muslim concept of heaven, that it's just like earth, but better, and with girls that don't poop. I find that less plausible.
I don't think it's necessarily a desire for the supernatural, just control. The good vindicated, the wicked punished. An awful lot of atheists reject the moral teachings of religion, but then invent their own morality and want it enforced by government or Human Resources.
If they can simulate the universe so perfectly as it seems, then they can print us out [by taking our simulated genes and assembling them in the 'natural world', from which we are an instance].
You're assuming our genes are meaningful in the physics of the higher reality. We create all kinds of simulations (video games) that have physics that are in no way similar to the physics of our reality. For all we know in the higher reality there's no such thing as protons, electrons, neutrons, etc.
Do you think Assange has all emails for all organizations or something? He has what people give him. He doesn't have RNC emails because no one gave him RNC emails.
Why is he releasing them now, in an apparent attempt to influence the election?
Because they're relevant now.
The release of DNC email and not RNC does not contribute to people's understanding of the situation, and functions as an act of deception.
Wait, so revealing the DNC's corruption is an act of deception? That is a truly twisted worldview.
You liked Assange when he was leaking US military documents (was that an "act of deception" since he didn't release non-US military or Al Qaeda documents at the same time?) because you don't like the US military. Now that he's leaking documents from somebody you do like, you think Assange is a bad man. It doesn't sound like Assange is the one who's biased here. Pretty sure that's you.
Would you feel the same way if he were leaking only RNC documents and not DNC documents?
You should read more about Assange. That's always been his MO. You just didn't mind when he leaking information about the US military but now that he's crapping on the Democratic party he's a bad bad man.
They better have terminator guards then, too. If you have to have armed people to defend you, then you've got to feed them, so now you need an even bigger bunker to hold more guards and more supplies.
It's almost like you'd be better off just having neighbors that don't want to kill you.
Slashdot Mirror
I do my haxx0ring while riding a horse.
We should respond directly to this attack, even if that involves a kinetic attack against the source.
You know someone's trying to justify something awful when they use newspeak instead of plain english. Just say you want war with Russia because they embarassed your political party.
Do you think this is the only instance of foreign governments trying to influence US elections? And what do you propose we do about it?
According to Colin Powell Bill is still dickin' bimbos.
A hack of the RNC would likely reveal that they tried to do to Trump what the DNC did to Bernie, they just failed. Or rather, Trump beat them because he fought back, unlike Bernie who rolled over. All that this would do is confirm what Trump has been saying, that the system is rigged.
You aren't outraged?
Because the Republicans haven't collaborated with Putin's efforts to poison the democratic process in the US?
The left is bizarre to me. They're incensed about the leaks, about something naughty Trump said, but read Hillary's emails that she funded the moderate beheaders in Syria so Israel would be happy with a nuclear Iran and now we've got 400k dead, ISIS, and the migrant crisis threatening to destabalize Europe and they're totally cool with that. I do not get it. I mean, I get why the media and the political classes do it: money. But I have no idea what your average left-leaning voter gets out of this.
America loves hot, white, jailbait ass.
But the sober, serious and intelligent people have been the ones invading other nations and funding terrorists. Isn't that worse?
Because those guys were wrong on the issues. Republicans want the border secured, the illegals deported, the spread of Islam fought, and an end to nation building and the rejection of TPP. The only candidate who got those issues right is Trump.
Clearly the answer is more social programs.
This country's gone to hell, and that's why I'm voting Trump.
Maybe you should read a little something called THE SECOND AMENDMENT, you commie!
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State from the threat of bigfoots, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
But we need our guns to shoot bigfoots.
The assumption is that they are replicating their world based on the same basic units.
But that assumption is entirely unfounded. The vast majority of the simulations that we create don't have anything resembling our fundamental particles, forces, and genes. The physics of Pac-Man don't represent our reality.
Christians believe heaven (the higher reality) is incomprehensible to human minds. Don't even bother trying to understand heaven; you can't. You're going with the muslim concept of heaven, that it's just like earth, but better, and with girls that don't poop. I find that less plausible.
I don't think it's necessarily a desire for the supernatural, just control. The good vindicated, the wicked punished. An awful lot of atheists reject the moral teachings of religion, but then invent their own morality and want it enforced by government or Human Resources.
I am the only true human!
Shit, he's on to us, guys.
If they can simulate the universe so perfectly as it seems, then they can print us out [by taking our simulated genes and assembling them in the 'natural world', from which we are an instance].
You're assuming our genes are meaningful in the physics of the higher reality. We create all kinds of simulations (video games) that have physics that are in no way similar to the physics of our reality. For all we know in the higher reality there's no such thing as protons, electrons, neutrons, etc.
Why does he have DNC and not RNC emails?
Do you think Assange has all emails for all organizations or something? He has what people give him. He doesn't have RNC emails because no one gave him RNC emails.
Why is he releasing them now, in an apparent attempt to influence the election?
Because they're relevant now.
The release of DNC email and not RNC does not contribute to people's understanding of the situation, and functions as an act of deception.
Wait, so revealing the DNC's corruption is an act of deception? That is a truly twisted worldview.
You liked Assange when he was leaking US military documents (was that an "act of deception" since he didn't release non-US military or Al Qaeda documents at the same time?) because you don't like the US military. Now that he's leaking documents from somebody you do like, you think Assange is a bad man. It doesn't sound like Assange is the one who's biased here. Pretty sure that's you.
Would you feel the same way if he were leaking only RNC documents and not DNC documents?
But that's the organization he has the emails from. Should he not release DNC emails unless he also has RNC emails to leak?
In what way is the information "biased?" Was the information he released biased before, or is it only biased now?
You should read more about Assange. That's always been his MO. You just didn't mind when he leaking information about the US military but now that he's crapping on the Democratic party he's a bad bad man.
Should have used the more politically correct phrase, "dune coon."
Never forget the 7 million Jews who died in car accidents 1941 - 1945.
Who says they don't hoard ammo and seed/rations?
They better have terminator guards then, too. If you have to have armed people to defend you, then you've got to feed them, so now you need an even bigger bunker to hold more guards and more supplies.
It's almost like you'd be better off just having neighbors that don't want to kill you.