Do people read this crap before they mod it up? Hey moderators, some of you need to get a brain and know what the other person is talking about before you start waving the mod-stick around.
I meant it was a tradition *like* recursive acronyms. kde/gnome wern't the first and only things to spark a naming convention. (like java, qt, etc, etc)
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
Re:I could create another compiler to...
on
Galeon At A Glance
·
· Score: 1
damn... I hate to call you out, but mozilla is what I was referring to. It is developed around the gnome development model *BY* gnome people. (some even funded by redhat)
It was about 50% of a browser when they started, and konq is already MUCH faster and MUCH more stable with many of the MOST important features.
(not posting anon because I don't care about my karma, and no one will read this.) -EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
It really is my opinion. It is (in this forum) flamebait, but not troll. I have plenty of karma to spare.:)
I have programmed on both platforms, and been an advocate of both platforms at some time. If you try gnome 1.4 and kde 2.1, and are asked "Which is more stable, complete, powerfull, and easy to use?", you will say "kde". I use it because I want it to work. Have you seen Kmail? Have you seen Evolution? You get my point yet?
Sure, everything in gnome would be great if it ever got finished (I give it 2-3 years at the current rate). KDE is ready now! It works great NOW!
I live in the now... carpe dium if you will... I don't have time to hack config files after a gnome crash because my panel won't pop up now.
Guess I needed the "I feel this way... you don't have to" disclaimer:D
Thanks for the complement though. It's not often that I'm pure or perfect at much of anything the first time around.
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
> They've consistently offered the most complete and versatile distribution.
Wow... by complete you mean netscape, pine, and some 15 IRC clients? Mandrake and Suse have far more available programs (that are *ALL* in the menus... thats "userland")
> with terms like "konsole"
Wow... it's a play on words like 90% of the rest of free software. Bet you hate Mozilla for being like Godzilla too right?
> I respect everyones choice regarding the distro they use
As do I, but I doubt anyone spells console "konsole" when they aren't talking about *the* "konsole". It's not fruit-cake-frenchies that named it Konsole... it's sorta a free software tradition (think recursive acronyms)
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
It's not extreemly "advanced", but it's great. It's been shown time and time again that RPM packaging is a chore that gets as little time as needed. (ie. post install script requires bash, but did you put bash in the requirements?)
Slackware has README files for packages that require other packages (like for 7.1's 3dfx stuff). Read the README and install stuff rather than try to rpm it and have rpm tell you.
Not that big of a difference.
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
I think konq is better. Thats why I use it. On Windows, I use mozilla. Why? Because I don't trust Microsoft IE. Period. It has the absolute worst track record for security issues, many of which are absolutely discracefull. Since they own the browser market, it doesn't impact their usage very much.
I use OSS because I like security. I like to review code for security issues. It's how I get my rocks off.
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
Mozilla is protected. This is what Open Source software is all about. I wonder if this will tip the tides in the konqueror/mozilla battle. I, personally, don't use Mozilla (was never impressed too too much) but I'm glad it's OSS/Free Software.
Thanks Netscape,
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
Many government sponsered research projects headed by DARPA et all are BSD. That means I can use it and change the liscense to GPL, and you can use it and not release the source code. "awful jackass..."
DARPA pays companies to do research projects to develop a solution to a problem. I think it should all be GPL so you don't run around profitting solely on all the research that the govt paid for. You think you some how are owed that right? Who-ever you are... please stop selling Steve the rock.
You don't think the govt has a right to IP? You don't think they should be able to choose how to use it (in this case... it benifits the *MOST* people... perhaps not M$ however).
Seems like you have a lot of conflicting views.
---
/em bonks Steve Balmer on the head
Steve Balmer has been slain by his filthy lies.
---
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
I had one until about a month ago. I was rather disturbed by the fact that several parts on the inside had microdot versions of the DMCA on it, and one chip said property of the NSA...
but perhaps I'm just being paranoid.
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
so? whats the difference between a slackware netinstall and a openbsd netinstall? slackware supports a curses interface. Just about the same functionality.
Also, the sendmail exploit is not linux only. I have confimed the exploit on linux, open/net/freebsd and show very promising results on bsdi. I do not believe this is a known vulnerability.
I think we are confused as to what "auto installed" means. I mean a custom set of pkg sets for slackware or a redhat install disk. What the hell are you talking about?:)
So, I needed to build a firewall. I did a netinstall of slackware, enabled IPMasq, and added about 10 rules, and poof I was done. That bare bones install was pretty damn nice.
I think people are far to zealotous about thier OS of choice. Also, so-called wierd custom versions are the best you can have. If you have a farm of webservers with others added regularly, it is easiest and fastest to spend an hour or two to create a custom install disk or package list. make a package or two (optimized for processor) of all the critical stuff. -EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
1)OpenSSH shiped with OpenBSD 2.7 is vulnerable to a remote root exploit.
2)Sendmail is vulnerable to several exploits.
3)To call me ignorant only shows your low knowledge. Perhaps you should learn a little more about Redhat. Kitchen sink is a quite good approach. I don't think you understand anything. Any real network admin has distro disks for servers. So what if it takes you 20 minutes to make he auto install disk... it's totally worth it when you have a *REAL* job and *REAL* deadlines. (Not some 3l33t college kid who takes 12 hours to build his machine.
4)You are resorted to re-peating ignorate falcities at this point. Read up bitch so you don't embarass yourself. You so called "Network OS" is a wonderfull OS. I use it and love it. It is not worthy of any more flames than linux is. (windows perhaps) (definaly hurd)
So this is a big fuck you just for you. Some blue balled teen... with nuttin to do.
Maybe we can learn to get along a bit and stop being such an ignorant zealot. It's bullshit. All OSes have strengths and weaknesses. (Like most Linux distros auto install) I'm sick of arguing what is better. Get a job... and get a life.
out. -EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
The problem is they say "default install". If you use the "default install" with OpenBSD, you have a big fat useless server with no services running. There have been multible exploits in services that are installed, but not started, by default.
Lets keep it in mind that Theo et al are also a little slow to come forward with exploits. Most of the time they don't even make the openbsd.org page.
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
There is only one site that people would have to hack to take down the internet. Internap. They have routeing data for the entire world. With that data you could take out the 80 or so networks by simply owning the routers, or the routers behind them, and flooding UDP. It's kinda sick, but I guess it is like everything else these days. Everyone *thinks* it is reliable, safe, and etc. Reality is that given 72 hours, anyone with decent skill could (without fear of any type of punishment) take any 1/2 of the internet down.
The internet is not a web. it is a wire. It's just a lot of people hook on to that wire.
NOTE: I do not encourage this however. How else will I read slashdot?!?
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
Believe me... I understand that main sites can me loaded. Never download from a site or mirror you don't trust. A few sites on my "trust" list:
ftp.ibiblio.org
ftp.redhat.com
ftp.slackware.com (ftp.freesoftware.com)
ftp.cdrom.com
One bad thing is that these are all *very* popular sites! Therefore, they are targets for someone who would want to do this. The upside is, they are highly maintained & secured.
Some say "source RPMs fix the problem!!"
I say "your full of crap!!"
A source RPM can be backdoored in both the sourcecode, or the rpm spec file. It could contain the exact same sourcecode that the main distribution contains, but have a modified spec file that emails/etc/shadow to some hotmail account.
Source RPMs are not any more safe than RPM files. Sure, if the person was stupid, they may have included the source for the modified version of the trojaned code, but more than likly, they are going to compile that object statically, and put the original source files in the RPM *with* the.o file. Then you would compile their binary into the other binaries built from source *WITHOUT KNOWING*! Most spec files do not do a make clean before they build, and this (of course) could be taken out *because* it is open source. Open source solves a whole lot of problems... problems that are becoming more and more important every day. But it also opens up new problems that don't exist in commercial products. Don't be a OSS zealot... Most of the time you are wrong.
The only way you can know for certain that the file you have is unmodified is to use crypto. If you don't trust that Redhat/whoever will stop at nothing to be sure that you don't get backdoored software, you shouldn't be using thier products. That is one of the reasons I hate MS software. It is known for it's easter eggs/backdoors. It makes me uncomfortable.
A point to note... This is exactly the reason the US is going to abolish crypto laws. It will help protect both consumers, and corporations.
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
I really like this thing. It has a good amount of memmory, and enough power to boot. Plus the pricetag is pritty nice.
I want to know:
Does it work with linux?
How much is the modem?
When I get a pda, it is going to have to have a miniature KEYBOARD available! This wireless keyboard is neat, but it looks like a toy. I just don't think typeing on it would be easy enough for it to be worth using it.
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
There was a lot of finger pointing, but don't think the truth ever came out.
Why exactly was the beta gcc put in Redhat?
It seems there would have to be a serious reason to justify using it. Most companies put out software for redhat, that users of other distros can run dispite it being developed on redhat. Making a binary incompatability between redhat and the rest of the world is a pritty big step that looks to be monopolistic. I just want to know what technical reason required it to be done in the first place. -EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
I considder myself to be a "big picture thinker". Success is 20 years from now, not some overly-hyped fad. There *most* *definately* is a trend in IT twards redhat. Most companies develop on it. Most people use it. Most private developers have switched to redhat because of it's support in the linux comunity.
My question is, will redhat (as a corporation) quash it's compeditors, or work with them to increase the value of all offerings? -EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
it really is the same company. They closed thier doors, and re-opened under another name the same day to dodge taxes. -EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
I just don't have any common interests with 95% of girls. Therefore I have nothing to talk about with them, and I don't even get to use these sex tips I've all but memorized. I think I'm attractive. I bathe (at least every 2-3 days). I even do some ocean kyacking. I just can't seem to find a girl because the only places around here that girls may be found are clubs. I hate house music. The only girls I've found that are even remotely intelligent, and interested in computers are fat, ugly, hairy, and mean. In South Carolina... there just isn't that much of a geek-chick population.
Anyone got some tips? Places that might be cool to hunt for a chick?
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
When I cracked microsoft's development servers a few months ago, I came across a copy of MicrosoftShred. It was probably the best program they have made. It XORs a file against itself. The data is totally un-encryptable.
I applaud M$ for a job well done.
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
Slashdot Mirror
Do people read this crap before they mod it up? Hey moderators, some of you need to get a brain and know what the other person is talking about before you start waving the mod-stick around.
very good grasshopper, but no cookie!
I meant it was a tradition *like* recursive acronyms. kde/gnome wern't the first and only things to spark a naming convention. (like java, qt, etc, etc)
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
damn... I hate to call you out, but mozilla is what I was referring to. It is developed around the gnome development model *BY* gnome people. (some even funded by redhat)
It was about 50% of a browser when they started, and konq is already MUCH faster and MUCH more stable with many of the MOST important features.
(not posting anon because I don't care about my karma, and no one will read this.)
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
thanks buddie,
:)
:D
It really is my opinion. It is (in this forum) flamebait, but not troll. I have plenty of karma to spare.
I have programmed on both platforms, and been an advocate of both platforms at some time. If you try gnome 1.4 and kde 2.1, and are asked "Which is more stable, complete, powerfull, and easy to use?", you will say "kde". I use it because I want it to work. Have you seen Kmail? Have you seen Evolution? You get my point yet?
Sure, everything in gnome would be great if it ever got finished (I give it 2-3 years at the current rate). KDE is ready now! It works great NOW!
I live in the now... carpe dium if you will... I don't have time to hack config files after a gnome crash because my panel won't pop up now.
Guess I needed the "I feel this way... you don't have to" disclaimer
Thanks for the complement though. It's not often that I'm pure or perfect at much of anything the first time around.
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
> They've consistently offered the most complete and versatile distribution.
Wow... by complete you mean netscape, pine, and some 15 IRC clients? Mandrake and Suse have far more available programs (that are *ALL* in the menus... thats "userland")
> with terms like "konsole"
Wow... it's a play on words like 90% of the rest of free software. Bet you hate Mozilla for being like Godzilla too right?
> I respect everyones choice regarding the distro they use
As do I, but I doubt anyone spells console "konsole" when they aren't talking about *the* "konsole". It's not fruit-cake-frenchies that named it Konsole... it's sorta a free software tradition (think recursive acronyms)
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
It's not extreemly "advanced", but it's great. It's been shown time and time again that RPM packaging is a chore that gets as little time as needed. (ie. post install script requires bash, but did you put bash in the requirements?)
Slackware has README files for packages that require other packages (like for 7.1's 3dfx stuff). Read the README and install stuff rather than try to rpm it and have rpm tell you.
Not that big of a difference.
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
I think konq is better. Thats why I use it. On Windows, I use mozilla. Why? Because I don't trust Microsoft IE. Period. It has the absolute worst track record for security issues, many of which are absolutely discracefull. Since they own the browser market, it doesn't impact their usage very much.
I use OSS because I like security. I like to review code for security issues. It's how I get my rocks off.
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
Mozilla is protected. This is what Open Source software is all about. I wonder if this will tip the tides in the konqueror/mozilla battle. I, personally, don't use Mozilla (was never impressed too too much) but I'm glad it's OSS/Free Software.
Thanks Netscape,
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
/bonk
Open Source != GPL
Many government sponsered research projects headed by DARPA et all are BSD. That means I can use it and change the liscense to GPL, and you can use it and not release the source code. "awful jackass..."
DARPA pays companies to do research projects to develop a solution to a problem. I think it should all be GPL so you don't run around profitting solely on all the research that the govt paid for. You think you some how are owed that right? Who-ever you are... please stop selling Steve the rock.
You don't think the govt has a right to IP? You don't think they should be able to choose how to use it (in this case... it benifits the *MOST* people... perhaps not M$ however).
Seems like you have a lot of conflicting views.
---
/em bonks Steve Balmer on the head
Steve Balmer has been slain by his filthy lies.
---
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
I had one until about a month ago. I was rather disturbed by the fact that several parts on the inside had microdot versions of the DMCA on it, and one chip said property of the NSA...
but perhaps I'm just being paranoid.
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
so? whats the difference between a slackware netinstall and a openbsd netinstall? slackware supports a curses interface. Just about the same functionality.
:)
Also, the sendmail exploit is not linux only. I have confimed the exploit on linux, open/net/freebsd and show very promising results on bsdi. I do not believe this is a known vulnerability.
I think we are confused as to what "auto installed" means. I mean a custom set of pkg sets for slackware or a redhat install disk. What the hell are you talking about?
So, I needed to build a firewall. I did a netinstall of slackware, enabled IPMasq, and added about 10 rules, and poof I was done. That bare bones install was pretty damn nice.
I think people are far to zealotous about thier OS of choice. Also, so-called wierd custom versions are the best you can have. If you have a farm of webservers with others added regularly, it is easiest and fastest to spend an hour or two to create a custom install disk or package list. make a package or two (optimized for processor) of all the critical stuff.
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
ok. here goes.
@#$@
1)OpenSSH shiped with OpenBSD 2.7 is vulnerable to a remote root exploit.
2)Sendmail is vulnerable to several exploits.
3)To call me ignorant only shows your low knowledge. Perhaps you should learn a little more about Redhat. Kitchen sink is a quite good approach. I don't think you understand anything. Any real network admin has distro disks for servers. So what if it takes you 20 minutes to make he auto install disk... it's totally worth it when you have a *REAL* job and *REAL* deadlines. (Not some 3l33t college kid who takes 12 hours to build his machine.
4)You are resorted to re-peating ignorate falcities at this point. Read up bitch so you don't embarass yourself. You so called "Network OS" is a wonderfull OS. I use it and love it. It is not worthy of any more flames than linux is. (windows perhaps) (definaly hurd)
So this is a big fuck you just for you. Some blue balled teen... with nuttin to do.
Maybe we can learn to get along a bit and stop being such an ignorant zealot. It's bullshit. All OSes have strengths and weaknesses. (Like most Linux distros auto install) I'm sick of arguing what is better. Get a job... and get a life.
out.
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
The problem is they say "default install". If you use the "default install" with OpenBSD, you have a big fat useless server with no services running. There have been multible exploits in services that are installed, but not started, by default.
Lets keep it in mind that Theo et al are also a little slow to come forward with exploits. Most of the time they don't even make the openbsd.org page.
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
they also release the code... it's on freshmeat.
shutup.
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
There is only one site that people would have to hack to take down the internet. Internap. They have routeing data for the entire world. With that data you could take out the 80 or so networks by simply owning the routers, or the routers behind them, and flooding UDP. It's kinda sick, but I guess it is like everything else these days. Everyone *thinks* it is reliable, safe, and etc. Reality is that given 72 hours, anyone with decent skill could (without fear of any type of punishment) take any 1/2 of the internet down.
The internet is not a web. it is a wire. It's just a lot of people hook on to that wire.
NOTE: I do not encourage this however. How else will I read slashdot?!?
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
It is important to note also, you should download the signatures directly from the distributor of the software you are trying to validate.
DONT use mirrors to get the signatures or md5 sums... that is as insecure as not even checking them!
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
Don't trust them.
/etc/shadow to some hotmail account.
.o file. Then you would compile their binary into the other binaries built from source *WITHOUT KNOWING*! Most spec files do not do a make clean before they build, and this (of course) could be taken out *because* it is open source. Open source solves a whole lot of problems... problems that are becoming more and more important every day. But it also opens up new problems that don't exist in commercial products. Don't be a OSS zealot... Most of the time you are wrong.
Believe me... I understand that main sites can me loaded. Never download from a site or mirror you don't trust. A few sites on my "trust" list:
ftp.ibiblio.org
ftp.redhat.com
ftp.slackware.com (ftp.freesoftware.com)
ftp.cdrom.com
One bad thing is that these are all *very* popular sites! Therefore, they are targets for someone who would want to do this. The upside is, they are highly maintained & secured.
Some say "source RPMs fix the problem!!"
I say "your full of crap!!"
A source RPM can be backdoored in both the sourcecode, or the rpm spec file. It could contain the exact same sourcecode that the main distribution contains, but have a modified spec file that emails
Source RPMs are not any more safe than RPM files. Sure, if the person was stupid, they may have included the source for the modified version of the trojaned code, but more than likly, they are going to compile that object statically, and put the original source files in the RPM *with* the
The only way you can know for certain that the file you have is unmodified is to use crypto. If you don't trust that Redhat/whoever will stop at nothing to be sure that you don't get backdoored software, you shouldn't be using thier products. That is one of the reasons I hate MS software. It is known for it's easter eggs/backdoors. It makes me uncomfortable.
A point to note... This is exactly the reason the US is going to abolish crypto laws. It will help protect both consumers, and corporations.
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
congrats...
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
Aparently the old saying "You have to be a rocket scientist to run linux" isn't true after all...
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
I really like this thing. It has a good amount of memmory, and enough power to boot. Plus the pricetag is pritty nice.
I want to know:
Does it work with linux?
How much is the modem?
When I get a pda, it is going to have to have a miniature KEYBOARD available! This wireless keyboard is neat, but it looks like a toy. I just don't think typeing on it would be easy enough for it to be worth using it.
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
There was a lot of finger pointing, but don't think the truth ever came out.
Why exactly was the beta gcc put in Redhat?
It seems there would have to be a serious reason to justify using it. Most companies put out software for redhat, that users of other distros can run dispite it being developed on redhat. Making a binary incompatability between redhat and the rest of the world is a pritty big step that looks to be monopolistic. I just want to know what technical reason required it to be done in the first place.
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
I considder myself to be a "big picture thinker". Success is 20 years from now, not some overly-hyped fad. There *most* *definately* is a trend in IT twards redhat. Most companies develop on it. Most people use it. Most private developers have switched to redhat because of it's support in the linux comunity.
My question is, will redhat (as a corporation) quash it's compeditors, or work with them to increase the value of all offerings?
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
it really is the same company. They closed thier doors, and re-opened under another name the same day to dodge taxes.
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
I just don't have any common interests with 95% of girls. Therefore I have nothing to talk about with them, and I don't even get to use these sex tips I've all but memorized. I think I'm attractive. I bathe (at least every 2-3 days). I even do some ocean kyacking. I just can't seem to find a girl because the only places around here that girls may be found are clubs. I hate house music. The only girls I've found that are even remotely intelligent, and interested in computers are fat, ugly, hairy, and mean. In South Carolina... there just isn't that much of a geek-chick population.
Anyone got some tips? Places that might be cool to hunt for a chick?
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night
When I cracked microsoft's development servers a few months ago, I came across a copy of MicrosoftShred. It was probably the best program they have made. It XORs a file against itself. The data is totally un-encryptable.
I applaud M$ for a job well done.
-EvilMonkeyNinja
a.k.a. Joseph Nicholas Yarbrough
Security Grunt by Day
Programmer by Night