I have a 50mm f1.4 and I do pretty well with it focus wise. I would say i hit focus about 75% of the time.
I'm not expecting 50mm f1.8 performance from a f0.95 lens.
But, I certainly expect it will be easier to use than the world's most difficult lens, the Canon MP-E 65mm Macro lens. I have one of those and my ratio of good to bad is around one good to around ninety-nine bad.
My gut says we are talking apples and oranges. You're obviously interested in video performance which is fine. And I am sure your Panasonic is a great machine for that purpose.
Myself I am interested in stills photography. So the Panasonic just has never proved all that appealing.
Straight outta the chute for Nikon. As an avid photographer, Canon gear here, it is nice to see some competition in what I think is a bit of a stagnant market.
Good to know that an AC who is afraid to post under his own name is telling me all about "phishing" when the headline is talking about "hacking" There's a difference there Mr. Smart AC!
I personally find Yahoo!'s front page to be far far far more egregious player than FB. FB at one time had their "Trending Stories" component which was a blatantly biased attempt to subvert what was actually trending. As time wore on FB realized people simply were not buying their slanted opinion of what was important. Ultimately FB shuttered the "Trending Stories."
But Yahoo! That's a totally different animal. Maybe, and I mean maybe, one out of twenty headlines presented is not biased. I read their headlines every single day and despite all their trying I still ain't buying.
But I've seen the ads, so I know you're a paid liar. Let's just get that out up front so you can absorb this next part unfiltered:
I see no evidence of the figure $50,000. That appears to have been pulled out of your ass just as clearly as you claim all the other real evidence was. Literally only you Russian trolls are harping over and over on this nonsensical figure. What do you think that tells me about your entire statement here, and in fact your entire chain of statements going back to well before the election?
I'll give you a hint; It doesn't make you look very smart.
Wow, I would not discuss "smart" if I were you. An extremely easy Google search reveals the $50,000 figure.
I'm sorry, but there is no significant historical record to accurately reflect any particular reason for a particular set of fires. While you may wish for the reason to be "abnormal climate" there is simply no way to know at the moment.
I.E. Please notice the "Post-2000" heading in this particular Wikipedia article:
The US Civil War was over the right of States to secede, and the States that seceded made it very clear that the "State's Right" over which they seceded was the right of a State to permit slavery.
No, the US Civil War was about States rights which is only tangentially related to succession at best.
In 1992, when I first got on the Internet, I accessed it via a dial up modem which got it's feed over a Pacific Bell owned wire. There were, to my knowledge, ZERO alternatives.
Later in the 1990s I began to receive my Internet through a microwave connection offered by Sprint. At that time the cable companies probably had an offering somewhere, someway, but I did not have access.
Eventually I went to a DSL connection which utilized wires then owned by AT&T.
Today, I can get Internet via a satellite dish, cable company wire, DSL over an AT&T owned wire, over cell transmission services offered by AT&T or Verizon, Google fiber, or a WISP.
The options for internet service have only been growing under free markets. More & more & more.
I don't buy your assertion about limited Internet options.
I can't make out whether this is some SJW bemoaning "something" or some alt-right wanting to somehow make a $$$.
I can say this, it is frigging Texas! And trust me if there is a dollah to be made by recycling those things the meth-heads will find a way to bring it down.
Sure, along the way a few meth-heads will get killed, but hey that's a double bonus right there!
Slashdot Mirror
I have a 50mm f1.4 and I do pretty well with it focus wise. I would say i hit focus about 75% of the time.
I'm not expecting 50mm f1.8 performance from a f0.95 lens.
But, I certainly expect it will be easier to use than the world's most difficult lens, the Canon MP-E 65mm Macro lens. I have one of those and my ratio of good to bad is around one good to around ninety-nine bad.
I want it for the depth of field performance which is certainly not achievable with f3.5.
My gut says we are talking apples and oranges. You're obviously interested in video performance which is fine. And I am sure your Panasonic is a great machine for that purpose.
Myself I am interested in stills photography. So the Panasonic just has never proved all that appealing.
To each his own I suppose.
I would love to have one of those f0.95 50mm primes they plan on releasing in 2019. Now that would be a fun toy to say the least.
Straight outta the chute for Nikon. As an avid photographer, Canon gear here, it is nice to see some competition in what I think is a bit of a stagnant market.
Good to know that an AC who is afraid to post under his own name is telling me all about "phishing" when the headline is talking about "hacking" There's a difference there Mr. Smart AC!
Haha! Go for it, but at least be honest enough to post as anything other than AC....
Back in the mid-90s the first time I turned on ZoneAlarm I was getting a break-in attempt about once every 5 seconds on my IP address.
Today, in 2018, I see hackers attempting to hack my website multiple times daily.
Give it a break liberals. Hacking isn't new nor is it infrequent.
I personally find Yahoo!'s front page to be far far far more egregious player than FB. FB at one time had their "Trending Stories" component which was a blatantly biased attempt to subvert what was actually trending. As time wore on FB realized people simply were not buying their slanted opinion of what was important. Ultimately FB shuttered the "Trending Stories."
But Yahoo! That's a totally different animal. Maybe, and I mean maybe, one out of twenty headlines presented is not biased. I read their headlines every single day and despite all their trying I still ain't buying.
FB is bad, but Yahoo! is egregiously bad.
But I've seen the ads, so I know you're a paid liar. Let's just get that out up front so you can absorb this next part unfiltered:
I see no evidence of the figure $50,000. That appears to have been pulled out of your ass just as clearly as you claim all the other real evidence was. Literally only you Russian trolls are harping over and over on this nonsensical figure. What do you think that tells me about your entire statement here, and in fact your entire chain of statements going back to well before the election?
I'll give you a hint; It doesn't make you look very smart.
Wow, I would not discuss "smart" if I were you. An extremely easy Google search reveals the $50,000 figure.
https://www.google.com/search?...
> But HE would like to regulate what they can say like in China.
Huh?
and other useful structures I see no particular reason to put out any fire. It's a natural process of renewal.
I'm sorry, but there is no significant historical record to accurately reflect any particular reason for a particular set of fires. While you may wish for the reason to be "abnormal climate" there is simply no way to know at the moment.
I.E. Please notice the "Post-2000" heading in this particular Wikipedia article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Have a great day!
Nailed It!
In 1995 to the engineers at Edwards Air Force Base. "What is the longest duration flight you have going? A month?"
I got the ole "No comment" with a wink.
My gut tells me the US has an aircraft out there from years ago that has already done the Airbus feat.
But, regardless, it is a neat trick.
I'm sorry but your education has failed you. The United States is a Republic. Very different.
And just use paper. Be done with it.
If you don't like Facebook's offerings then offer something better.
Really, Are you so chickenshit you have to post as AC? I thought so.
If you are just going to allow illegals to vote anyway. Stupid is as stupid does.
yeah, Service expansions like that great DMV service.
Give me a break. CA can't even issue a drivers license without a 6 hour wait.
The US Civil War was over the right of States to secede, and the States that seceded made it very clear that the "State's Right" over which they seceded was the right of a State to permit slavery.
No, the US Civil War was about States rights which is only tangentially related to succession at best.
I have to say, Perl does take a real man to code in.......
In 1992, when I first got on the Internet, I accessed it via a dial up modem which got it's feed over a Pacific Bell owned wire. There were, to my knowledge, ZERO alternatives.
Later in the 1990s I began to receive my Internet through a microwave connection offered by Sprint. At that time the cable companies probably had an offering somewhere, someway, but I did not have access.
Eventually I went to a DSL connection which utilized wires then owned by AT&T.
Today, I can get Internet via a satellite dish, cable company wire, DSL over an AT&T owned wire, over cell transmission services offered by AT&T or Verizon, Google fiber, or a WISP.
The options for internet service have only been growing under free markets. More & more & more.
I don't buy your assertion about limited Internet options.
I can't make out whether this is some SJW bemoaning "something" or some alt-right wanting to somehow make a $$$.
I can say this, it is frigging Texas! And trust me if there is a dollah to be made by recycling those things the meth-heads will find a way to bring it down.
Sure, along the way a few meth-heads will get killed, but hey that's a double bonus right there!