So copyright infringement and public health that one I thought pretty improbable myself... but how about this one: "Hate Crime" and infringement. Watch as the ADL and "Southern Poverty Law Center" get in on the act.
Oh man it's not that I don't know what it's all about. It is about disempowering the people even further and forcing people unto public transportation does exactly what you say it does... it burns up your time billable or not, it takes an extra effort _and_ you can't go where you want to go when you want to go. I lived in one of those $shitholes mentioned above and "public transportation" there costs as much as owning a car here and train and bus service is discontinued during the night.
Bit late in the game to be posting here but remorse buys you virtually nothing especially in European courts. Of course the opposite isn't a smart move either, flipping off the judge and telling him you're going to do it again will make things noticeably worse.
Whether they have a "strong case" against you or not is something you shouldn't assume early on just because you were caught red-handed. Whatever ground you give up is ground that is most of the time never recovered so mull things through with your attorney first.
Seriously... that is probably the dumbest advice you can give.
Here in their own words:
"OpenDNS protects millions of people a day across hundreds of thousands of schools, businesses and homes. We BLOCK phishing sites, give you the power to FILTER out adult sites and proxies among more than 50 categories, and provide the precision to BLOCK individual domains."
"I can't wait for these types of cars to hit mass production and come down in price so that us normal people can afford them.
That is what I'd call the ultimate "gas tax holiday."
$50 gets me 200 miles of transportation today. Believe me the way things are going when that car becomes available 200 miles will be $100 in electricity and metered road usage.
I would get one if I could have it for a reasonable price today. I'm not going to wait outside the store when the first affordable ones become available in five years from now.
"1. What are your educational qualifications. Please list all relevant college degrees as well as the name of the institution which granted them to you. Feel free to list any papers you published on this topic."
So you're asking if I have a degree in politics, journalism or sociology then, because that's obviously what qualifies people to hold an opinion on climate change:-) That and toeing to the line with IPCC.
"2. Please tell me what this has to do with MS demoing a datacenter in a shipping container, and why I should give a shit or a rats ass."
The article mentions the so-called 'carbon footprint'. Reason enough right then and there to speak out against it.
"Extra credit will be granted if you answer either question with interpretive dance. A video of you doing said interpretive dance on youtube will meat this requirement"
Sorry "Songs and Dances" are entirely the domain and hallmark of accomplished and professional liars. Al Gore would be the guy who "meats" your requirement there.
So they're shoving their "carbon footprint" at us wherever and whenever they can, and man-made global warming is A LIE! Okay so here's something I want you to see...
but just going to youtube I find something hilarious...
"This video is to express my beliefs on Global Warming. If any individual should post a ridiculous comment, I will block that individual and remove that individual's comment This video is to express my beliefs on Global Warming. If any individual should post a ridiculous comment, I will block that individual and remove that individual's comment. Your opinions are allowed, but please refrain yourself from unecessary misbehaviour. (more)"
Right there is no need to be hostile or otherwise an asshole about it. Most of the time you're dealing with someone who believes they're doing the "right thing" and sometimes you're dealing with an asshole. Antagonizing them does not help and will make dealing with them so much harder.
I have had my registration and dl handed back to me with "Sir, I respect your rights but I still believe you're hiding something. Drive safely." to which I answered, "Thanks, officer" and that was the end to an intense 20 minute attempt to get me to consent to a search just because I turned around in the parking lot of a closed business.
Right the question to ask you is "Am I free to leave?".
"Cooperating" with you and someone handing you those 100g of crack rock they might have hidden or handing you that small roach you're talking about,... it all boils down to a charge and a conviction. Never mind that handing you a roach gives you probable cause to search the insides of their asses. BUT the conviction part is what people will want to AVOID at all costs, even if it's just for drug paraphernalia because that takes away all chances for worthwhile employment for a very long time. The only thing that is remotely hilarious here is that you're handing misinformation right after I advised police officers will give harmful advice.
"And yes, we often *can* search even when you deny consent because the reason we asked to search in the first place probably rises to the level of "probable cause."
Where does "probable cause" come in during a traffic stop? A crack pipe in plain view or just "duh well he looked kinda shady and shifty and kinda nervous when he handed me his registation". Plenty of moral cops out there, but few ethical.
It's hilarious to some extend... but...
on
EULAs For Malware
·
· Score: 1
In most jurisdiction if one burglar breaks into another burglar's home he goes to jail. But... if somebody is sold a very poor quality of cocaine in a drug deal they can't sue to get their money back.
Most jurisdictions will prosecute the crime but will not afford the protections of civil law. So in turn somebody might get prosecuted for violating criminal statutes, but they can't ever hope to successfully sue for lost profits.
Oh I can imagine you have been asked to be lenient. The thing I'm not sure about is whether you were aware of the ulterior reasons behind those requests.
CRIMES ACT 1900 - SECT 319 General offence of perverting the course of justice 319 General offence of perverting the course of justice
A person who does any act, or makes any omission, intending in any way to pervert the course of justice, is liable to imprisonment for 14 years.
I didn't know that. This is the kind of law you would expect to find in the Chinese penal code. So unless the course of justice allows you to keep from incriminating yourself, you're "perverting". See what loyalty to the old cunt gets you?:-)
"but it may harm your defence"... the key word is "may" here. It might, again it might not. I think this paragraph serves to intimidate. But of course the UK _is_ going gung-ho 1984...
Sorry but I most "basically" better fundamentally disagree. Officers and prosecutors are evaluated on the basis of convictions achieved. You will rarely find an officer making an recommendation to the prosecutor to go lenient.. usually it is YOU that will receive a "recommendation": A Plea Bargain. And of course if you want leniency, offering up others to prosecution is the best way to get it, but that's something you best think through first before you spend a lot of time in close quarters with very angry people. AND(!) IF(!) you think it's worth it, you discuss that first with YOUR ATTORNEY(!) and NOT the prosecutor much less the officer.
I'll second that. I wish I could mod your post up all the way to +10 and change the font color to yellow on black.
What you describe is entirely correct. When an officer starts asking you questions if you know what's good for you UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES ANSWER any questions or volunteer any information. Instead and again like you said: Ask "Officer am I under arrest?". If you're not then leave. If you are, tell them "Officer I am invoking my right to remain silent". They will threaten that remaining silent only makes things worse. In many cases they will threaten with arrest if you remain silent or they will offer to help you if you admit to the charge. A POLICE OFFICER HAS NO INFLUENCE ON CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS OTHER AS A WITNESS. A police officer can not reduce your charges, a police officer can NOT drop charges. But... they are permitted to lie to you in order to obtain incriminatory information. They are permitted to offer false legal advice if it serves the prosecution(!).
You can expect some very tense moments with officers when you deny them permission to search your vehicle or your property or if you remain silent. I have been there. Be prepared for pressure but know that in the end it's better to get intense with the Officer than with your future cell mates (not that I have been there;-) )
Actually it is true. We actually smell and taste like pretty much like pork when fried. Our meat has a lot of fat which makes us very tasty. Still human is not at all a healthy food choice as most predators agree.
So you might want to take a look at the
Georgia Guidestones
# Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature
# Guide reproduction wisely - improving fitness and diversity.
# Unite humanity with a living new language.
# Rule passion - faith - tradition - and all things with tempered reason.
# Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
# Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a one world court
# Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
# Balance personal rights with social duties.
# Prize truth - beauty - love - seeking harmony with the infinite.
# Be not a cancer on the earth - Leave room for nature - Leave room for nature.
A lot of maintaining, guiding, uniting, ruling, protecting and balancing to be
going on, hope you're all up for it.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes I want a cell phone in that explosive collar everybody will have to wear around their
necks!
The more the merrier! I don't believe in carbon footprint and population control bullshit and neither should you.
So copyright infringement and public health that one I thought pretty improbable myself... but how about this one: "Hate Crime" and infringement. Watch as the ADL and "Southern Poverty Law Center" get in on the act.
Oh man it's not that I don't know what it's all about. It is about disempowering the
people even further and forcing people unto public transportation does exactly
what you say it does... it burns up your time billable or not, it takes an extra effort
_and_ you can't go where you want to go when you want to go. I lived in one of those
$shitholes mentioned above and "public transportation" there costs as much as owning a
car here and train and bus service is discontinued during the night.
Bit late in the game to be posting here but remorse buys you virtually nothing especially in European courts.
Of course the opposite isn't a smart move either, flipping off the judge and telling him you're going to do
it again will make things noticeably worse.
Whether they have a "strong case" against you or not is something you shouldn't assume early on just because
you were caught red-handed. Whatever ground you give up is ground that is most of the time never recovered
so mull things through with your attorney first.
foreach $shithole (@shitholes_on_planet) {
give_a_shit $shithole
}
??
NOT.
Seriously... that is probably the dumbest advice you can give.
Here in their own words:
"OpenDNS protects millions of people a day across hundreds of thousands of schools, businesses and homes. We BLOCK phishing sites, give you the power to FILTER out adult sites and proxies among more than 50 categories, and provide the precision to BLOCK individual domains."
but assholes keep extending it.
"I can't wait for these types of cars to hit mass production and come down in price so that us normal people can afford them.
That is what I'd call the ultimate "gas tax holiday."
$50 gets me 200 miles of transportation today. Believe me the way things are going
when that car becomes available 200 miles will be $100 in electricity and metered
road usage.
I would get one if I could have it for a reasonable price today. I'm not going to wait
outside the store when the first affordable ones become available in five years from now.
"1. What are your educational qualifications. Please list all relevant college degrees as well as the name of the institution which granted them to you. Feel free to list any papers you published on this topic."
:-) That and toeing to the line with IPCC.
So you're asking if I have a degree in politics, journalism or sociology then, because that's obviously
what qualifies people to hold an opinion on climate change
"2. Please tell me what this has to do with MS demoing a datacenter in a shipping container, and why I should give a shit or a rats ass."
The article mentions the so-called 'carbon footprint'. Reason enough right then and there to speak out against it.
"Extra credit will be granted if you answer either question with interpretive dance. A video of you doing said interpretive dance on youtube will meat this requirement"
Sorry "Songs and Dances" are entirely the domain and hallmark of accomplished and professional liars. Al Gore would be
the guy who "meats" your requirement there.
So they're shoving their "carbon footprint" at us wherever and whenever they can,
and man-made global warming is A LIE! Okay so here's something I want you to see...
but just going to youtube I find something hilarious...
"This video is to express my beliefs on Global Warming. If any individual should post a ridiculous comment, I will block that individual and remove that individual's comment This video is to express my beliefs on Global Warming.
If any individual should post a ridiculous comment, I will block that individual and remove that individual's comment.
Your opinions are allowed, but please refrain yourself from unecessary misbehaviour. (more)"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ov6GPTB4Tio
ROFL. Right this is my Slashdot discussion, if you post something ridiculous I will block you and remove the comment, watch me do it.
Anyhow... this is what I really want you to take a look at: Matt Durkin's Global Warming Swindle documentary.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5549114236765477681&q=global+warming+swindle&ei=wWkaSKiMIovSrgP_m_HGAQ
Watch that and _then_ post and tell me what you think of it!
I don't think M$ even wants to get started on this one.
Right there is no need to be hostile or otherwise an asshole about it. Most
of the time you're dealing with someone who believes they're doing the "right
thing" and sometimes you're dealing with an asshole. Antagonizing them does not
help and will make dealing with them so much harder.
I have had my registration and dl handed back to me with "Sir, I respect your
rights but I still believe you're hiding something. Drive safely." to which I
answered, "Thanks, officer" and that was the end to an intense 20 minute
attempt to get me to consent to a search just because I turned around in the
parking lot of a closed business.
Right the question to ask you is "Am I free to leave?".
... it all boils down to a charge and a conviction. Never mind that handing
"Cooperating" with you and someone handing you those 100g of crack rock they
might have hidden or handing you that small roach you're talking about,
you a roach gives you probable cause to search the insides of their asses.
BUT the conviction part is what people will want to AVOID at all costs, even
if it's just for drug paraphernalia because that takes away all chances for
worthwhile employment for a very long time. The only thing that is remotely
hilarious here is that you're handing misinformation right after I advised
police officers will give harmful advice.
"And yes, we often *can* search even when you deny consent because the reason
we asked to search in the first place probably rises to the level of "probable cause."
Where does "probable cause" come in during a traffic stop? A crack pipe in
plain view or just "duh well he looked kinda shady and shifty and kinda
nervous when he handed me his registation". Plenty of moral cops out there,
but few ethical.
In most jurisdiction if one burglar breaks into another burglar's home he
goes to jail. But... if somebody is sold a very poor quality of cocaine in a
drug deal they can't sue to get their money back.
Most jurisdictions will prosecute the crime but will not afford the protections
of civil law. So in turn somebody might get prosecuted for violating criminal
statutes, but they can't ever hope to successfully sue for lost profits.
Oh I can imagine you have been asked to be lenient. The thing I'm not sure
about is whether you were aware of the ulterior reasons behind those requests.
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/ca190082/s319.html
:-)
CRIMES ACT 1900 - SECT 319
General offence of perverting the course of justice
319 General offence of perverting the course of justice
A person who does any act, or makes any omission, intending in any way to pervert the course of justice, is liable to imprisonment for 14 years.
I didn't know that. This is the kind of law you would expect to find in the Chinese penal code. So unless the course of justice allows you to keep from incriminating yourself,
you're "perverting". See what loyalty to the old cunt gets you?
"but it may harm your defence"... the key word is "may" here. It might, again it might not. I think this paragraph serves to intimidate. But of course the UK _is_ going gung-ho 1984...
Sorry but I most "basically" better fundamentally disagree.
Officers and prosecutors are evaluated on the basis of convictions
achieved. You will rarely find an officer making an recommendation
to the prosecutor to go lenient.. usually it is YOU that will
receive a "recommendation": A Plea Bargain. And of course if you
want leniency, offering up others to prosecution is the best way
to get it, but that's something you best think through first before
you spend a lot of time in close quarters with very angry people.
AND(!) IF(!) you think it's worth it, you discuss that first
with YOUR ATTORNEY(!) and NOT the prosecutor much less the officer.
I'll second that. I wish I could mod your post up all the way to +10 and change the font color to yellow on black.
;-) )
What you describe is entirely correct. When an officer starts asking you questions if you know what's good for you UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES ANSWER any questions or volunteer any information. Instead and again like you said: Ask "Officer am I under arrest?". If you're not then leave. If you are, tell them "Officer I am invoking my right to remain silent". They will threaten that remaining silent only makes things worse. In many cases they will threaten with arrest if you remain silent or they will offer to help you if you admit to the charge. A POLICE OFFICER HAS NO INFLUENCE ON CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS OTHER AS A WITNESS. A police officer can not reduce your charges, a police officer can NOT drop charges. But... they are permitted to lie to you in order to obtain incriminatory information. They are permitted to offer false legal advice if it serves the prosecution(!).
You can expect some very tense moments with officers when you deny them permission to search your vehicle or your property or if you remain silent. I have been there. Be prepared for pressure but know that in the end it's better to get intense with the Officer than with your future cell mates (not that I have been there
Check this: Address Bar on taskbar missing. This is no longer available at the request of the US Department Of Justice (DOJ)
If those parasites don't like it they should ask for a private build. What's next?!?
You're not supposed to notice that. Please call 911 for FREE cable!!
Actually it is true. We actually smell and taste like pretty much like pork when fried.
Our meat has a lot of fat which makes us very tasty. Still human is not at all a healthy
food choice as most predators agree.
So you might want to take a look at the Georgia Guidestones
# Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature
# Guide reproduction wisely - improving fitness and diversity.
# Unite humanity with a living new language.
# Rule passion - faith - tradition - and all things with tempered reason.
# Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
# Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a one world court
# Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
# Balance personal rights with social duties.
# Prize truth - beauty - love - seeking harmony with the infinite.
# Be not a cancer on the earth - Leave room for nature - Leave room for nature.
A lot of maintaining, guiding, uniting, ruling, protecting and balancing to be going on, hope you're all up for it.
See that's exactly what I'm talking about.