Slashdot Mirror


A Guardian Angel In Your Cell Phone

theodp writes "Bill Gates and Ray Ozzie are listed as inventors of the Guardian Angel, which is described in a most unusual Microsoft patent application that should intrigue privacy advocates. In addition to protecting you from possibly diseased people, by detecting body temperatures, the Guardian Angel's 'monitoring component can take note of the number of conversations occurring in a room (and more specifically, a breakdown of the types of people in the room accompanied by a warning for dangerous persons, based on sex offender registration, FBI most wanted, etc.).' The versatile Guardian Angel, Microsoft notes, can also recommend restaurants, advise you on the appropriateness of your jokes, detect that your heartbeat has stopped, display targeted ads on billboards, and block spam."

215 comments

  1. WTF? by Divebus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now we have to figure out how to block this too? Thanks Bill.

    --

    Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    1. Re:WTF? by dotancohen · · Score: 5, Funny

      Traditionally, the way to block devices this intrusive was to divorce them.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    2. Re:WTF? by dwywit · · Score: 4, Funny
      Imagine the possibilities for fun:

      1. design device to detect the 'guardian angel' in a roomful of people that you don't like

      2. broadcast subversive material in its vicinity

      3. profit!

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    3. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "WTF" was precisely the first thing that came into my head as I read the description. Are these guys for real?

    4. Re:WTF? by mrbluze · · Score: 5, Insightful

      [It can] detect that your heartbeat has stopped

      Oh thanks. And am I going to be conscious when it tells me that? Talk about BSOD!

      Nobody is going to be walking around with freakin' defibrillator pads on their chest and a Microsoft Guardian Angel in their pocket.

      --
      Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
    5. Re:WTF? by Thirdsin · · Score: 1

      8. The system of claim 1, the broadcast device transfers encrypted information regarding the user to the plurality of other users and devices
      ...
      18. The method of claim 17, further comprising:encrypting the information when communicated beyond the user; andverifying the authentication and authorization properties of recipients before communicating the information to the recipients.
      Oh thank you, I feel much better now...
      --
      No words of wisedom here.
    6. Re:WTF? by Divebus · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...broadcast device transfers encrypted information regarding the user to the plurality of other users and devices... further comprising:encrypting the information when communicated beyond the user; and verifying the authentication and authorization properties of recipients before communicating the information to the recipients Relax... it's just a Zune... so nobody will buy one anyway.

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    7. Re:WTF? by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, maybe Microsoft will have the defib pads in version 2?

      BSOD indeed! Just imagine how insistent Microsoft could get about validating the software?

      "User authorization failure. Your software license has expired or is an illegal copy. Please purchase a legitimate license immediately or your heart will be shut down."

    8. Re:WTF? by somersault · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nobody is going to be walking around with freakin' defibrillator pads on their chest and a Microsoft Guardian Angel in their pocket. Probably not, but at least your loved ones are going to get a nice ad for tombstones on the nearest billboard when you kick the bucket.
      --
      which is totally what she said
    9. Re:WTF? by donaldm · · Score: 4, Funny
      This is your "Guardian Angel"! I have detected your heartbeat has stopped. Would you like "zombie clippy" to:
      1. a. Recommend a cemetery were you can party with your new zombie friends. (Free service)
      2. b. Direct you to the nearest mall were you can dine on the finest brains. (Free service)
      3. c. Other undead services. (Charges do apply)
      :-)
      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    10. Re:WTF? by AHuxley · · Score: 2, Funny

      MS defib pads would only shock you.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    11. Re:WTF? by LKM · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Look at the bright side. Microsoft is too incompetent to implement something like this anyways, and the patent will prevent competent companies from implementing it. Thanks, Microsoft, from helping us avoid intrusive crap like this!

    12. Re:WTF? by infonography · · Score: 1

      But you can't. The Guardian Angel has a posse.

      --
      Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
    13. Re:WTF? by infonography · · Score: 1

      Sticker Shock?

      --
      Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
    14. Re:WTF? by Fumus · · Score: 1

      Silliness aside, but it would probably call an ambulance with GPS data of your location.
      This could save your life when your heart stops right next to a hospital.

    15. Re:WTF? by Caesar+Tjalbo · · Score: 0

      What? Did my heart just stop? Oooh, my Guardian Angel has become a Blue Angel Of Death.

      --
      "I'm not much interested in interoperability. I want substitutability. I want to be able to throw your software out."
    16. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't just thank bill - Thank Inventors: Meijer; Henricus Johannes Maria; (Mercer Island, WA) ; Gates; William H.; (Medina, WA) ; Ozzie; Raymond E.; (Seattle, WA) ; Flake; Gary W.; (Bellevue, WA) ; Bergstraesser; Thomas F.; (Kirkland, WA) ; Blinn; Arnold N.; (Hunts Point, WA) ; Bolosky; William J.; (Issaquah, WA) ; Brumme; Christopher W.; (Mercer Island, WA) ; Cheng; Lili; (Bellevue, WA) ; Connolly; Michael; (Seattle, WA) ; Glasgow; Dane A.; (Medina, WA) ; Glasser; Daniel S.; (Mercer Island, WA) ; Gounares; Alexander G.; (Kirkland, WA) ; Larus; James R.; (Mercer Island, WA) ; MacLaurin; Matthew B.; (Woodinville, WA) ; Mishra; Debi P.; (Bellevue, WA) ; Mital; Amit; (Kirkland, WA) ; Snyder; Ira L.; (Bellevue, WA) ; Thekkath; Chandramohan A.; (Palo Alto, CA) ; Zaner-Godsey; Melora; (Redmond, WA)...

      Wonder how many people they need to change a lightbulb in Redmond...

    17. Re:WTF? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Got to get you interested in MS Pacemaker.
      Unexplained blue veins of death are a matter for the courts!

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    18. Re:WTF? by Eudial · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ssh, it's listening. We'll talk in one of the pods where it can't hear us.

      It's open the pod bay door please HAL, all over again. An even better touch would be if the program sang Daisy Daisy when you disabled it. But somehow I don't expect such humor from Microsoft.

      --
      GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    19. Re:WTF? by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 1

      Hey, maybe it will bluetooth your pacemaker with a restart request, but only if you stored the 256kb AES encryption key in hex from your keypad!

      --
      Invenio via vel creo
    20. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      it won't need to tell you, but will help creating stronger ad messages, for example if you drop dead under a billboard it will automatically display on it:

      his wife would not worry now if he insured his life with us last month.
      don't make the same mistake...
      "security before life" ltd.

    21. Re:WTF? by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 1

      After it had run WGA.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    22. Re:WTF? by jbengt · · Score: 1

      . . . the patent will prevent competent companies from implementing it.
      That's not addressing the problem, to me. The really disturbing issue here is that such a vague generalization of an undefined decision-making process can possibly be thought of as patentable by some patent attorney and written into "claims".
      If this is actually granted a patent, the patent office should be nuked. (note to Homeland Security: I'm speaking metaphorically)
    23. Re:WTF? by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
      Hopefully this will also automatically recommend non-Windows products for purchase.....

      What the future should bring

    24. Re:WTF? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Got to get you interested in MS Pacemaker. Unexplained blue veins of death are a matter for the courts!"

      Geez...we've already seen articles about people hacking into current pacemakers wirelessly......just imagine how full of holes the system will be with MS in charge of them......ouch!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    25. Re:WTF? by KarmaOverDogma · · Score: 1

      "Nobody is going to be walking around with freakin' defibrillator pads on their chest and a Microsoft Guardian Angel in their pocket."

      Probably not, but what if it automatically text messaged a 911 service with this information and a the phone used GPS to give their exact location as well?

      I know, it's not that simple. But it is an idea.

      --
      uR iGn0ranc3, Their Power
    26. Re:WTF? by LKM · · Score: 1

      If this is actually granted a patent, the patent office should be nuked. (note to Homeland Security: I'm speaking metaphorically)

      Why? I think nuking the patent office literally would be a grand solution.

  2. Sooo... by r_jensen11 · · Score: 1

    Will this thing phone the authorities when my body temp falls below 96 degrees? I know it may be too late for me, and it's not quite like Minority Report, but hmm.....

  3. I call bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    They wont even be able to do this within the 20 years the patent is valid.

    They should start with something simple like an OS that works.

    1. Re:I call bullshit by nick_davison · · Score: 4, Funny

      They wont even be able to do this within the 20 years the patent is valid.

      They should start with something simple like an OS that works. I think your first line answers your second.

      Windows 1.0 was launched 23 years ago, in 1985.

      MS-DOS wasn't too bad. But then they bought that one from Seattle Computer Products.
    2. Re:I call bullshit by Aranykai · · Score: 4, Funny

      Everyone knows wikipedia is run by a bunch of mac fanboys, so you really cant trust that information.

      Microsoft "Commissioned" MS-DOS, they didnt "Buy it". Everyone knows that.

      And Windows 11 will be coming out in 2010. Thats going to really kill Apple.

      --
      If sharing a song makes you a pirate, what do I have to share to be a ninja?
    3. Re:I call bullshit by Reader+X · · Score: 1

      They wont even be able to do this

      Sure they will. It just won't work.

    4. Re:I call bullshit by tricorn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Seems sort of odd to be trying to patent something that clearly can't be made to work at the present time. I don't see why this would be patentable anyway, similar devices have certainly been described in various science fiction stories in sufficient detail to be "prior art".

    5. Re:I call bullshit by $random_var · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe this is a preemptive patent, and they want to make sure this is un-patentable by anybody else 20 years down the road when we can actually build it. Sure, they could have just published a paper in a scientific journal, but patent examiners are lazy and prefer using patent filings as prior art.

    6. Re:I call bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should they re-write Linux for you? You have the code, make it work yourself.

      Seeing as how Windows already works on 90% of the machines in the world.

      Dork.

    7. Re:I call bullshit by jonfr · · Score: 1

      The first unix os was out in 1969. That appears to have worked since it came out. The parent should have sad in 40 years, not 20 years.

      But it is sad to know that in 20 years Microsoft has made little progress in product quality. I guess that comes down to greed and more greed.

    8. Re:I call bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they can patent things like this, I should be able to patent my dog for barking at the door. I don't really see what is patentable in this. I think god should be offended that Bill wants ownership over angels.

    9. Re:I call bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gee.. and all this time i thought targeted ads WAS SPAM!

    10. Re:I call bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft "Commissioned" MS-DOS, they didnt "Buy it". Everyone knows that.
      And Windows 11 will be coming out in 2010. Thats going to really kill Apple.

      That humor is so dark, it almost earned me a "whoosh" tag.

    11. Re:I call bullshit by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seeing as how Windows already works on 90% of the machines in the world.

      What do you mean 90%? Can it run on a PowerPC architecture? No. ARM? Not really (Ok, Windows mobile probably can but its not as much Windows as a new OS similar to Windows). SPARC? Nope. Can (current versions XP/Vista) run on old hardware? Not very well.

      Can Linux work on almost any CPU architecture known to mankind? Yes. Can it run on old hardware on current versions? Yes. Is it as easy to attack as Windows? No. Can (and does) Linux run on many cell phones? Yes. UMPCs? Yes.

      To say that Windows works on 90% of devices (and implying that Linux or any other OS has only a marginal lead) is false. Even game consoles can run Linux, most cannot run Windows (natively).
      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    12. Re:I call bullshit by jd · · Score: 1

      They wrote a fair chunk of DOS 4.0. Oh yeah, that was the one they had to pull because it didn't work...

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    13. Re:I call bullshit by Arancaytar · · Score: 2, Funny

      If prior performance is any indication, then they won't be able to do that in 20 years either!

    14. Re:I call bullshit by arminw · · Score: 1

      ...I don't really see what is patentable in this....

      There isn't. All this patent and countless others do, is to provide employment to an army of lawyers. If somebody might be stupid enough to actually try to implement something similar to this, there will be said army of lawyers waiting with their writs and torts, ready to rake in more money yet.

      --
      All theory is gray
    15. Re:I call bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to say, will this thing brush my teeth, shine my shoes and wipe my ass for me too?

      Oh... we don't use toilet paper in the future... we have Microsoft Guardian Angelsoft (TM)

    16. Re:I call bullshit by RKBA · · Score: 1

      Didn't there used to be a time when there was a requirement that the inventor had to produce a working prototype before being able to apply for a patent? It seems to me that would put a rapid halt to all these "blue sky" patent applications.

  4. But... by Dr.+Donuts · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    That's all great, but can it wash Windows?

    1. Re:But... by mscholin · · Score: 1

      Not sure why that was off topic. I thought it was a valid question.

  5. invasion of privacy by Cyko_01 · · Score: 0

    does anyone else think that this is way more information then you need?

    1. Re:invasion of privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think a cellphone that can tell you when you are dead is a great idea.

    2. Re:invasion of privacy by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, honestly, it is up to you to use the information provided in a means where it suits you. Don;t you think it better to have more than enough information than an inadequate amount (assuming that the information provided is accurate)? This can apply to most anything.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    3. Re:invasion of privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Don't you think it better to have more than enough information than an inadequate amount (assuming that the information provided is accurate)?

      No way! Every day I get (more or less accurate) information about someone trying to sell me a better mortgage, or pills that improve my sexual performance, or a way to help a poor Nigerian widow.

      I want to be able to choose what information I get! I do not want to waste time on filtering out irrelevant information someone had decided I should be receiving!

    4. Re:invasion of privacy by somersault · · Score: 1

      Hopefully they've licensed Nelson from the Simpsons as the "your heart has stopped!" warning

      --
      which is totally what she said
    5. Re:invasion of privacy by amnezick · · Score: 1

      here in ro[mania] we have a saying: "If it knows how to make coffee also then it's the sh*t!"

      --
      mov ax,4c00h
      int 21h
  6. oh good... by owlnation · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... Clippy in your ear, and in your pocket.

  7. I Want by Yaa+101 · · Score: 1

    my chipped pony...

    1. Re:I Want by lastchance_000 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, only Apocolypse Pony for you....

  8. Wait, what? by evanbd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It displays targetted ads on billboards *and* blocks spam? Aren't those mutually exclusive?

    1. Re:Wait, what? by Linker3000 · · Score: 4, Funny

      It displays targetted ads from paid advertisers on billboards *and* blocks ads from other unpaid advertisers

      Fixed that for them?

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    2. Re:Wait, what? by Arcaneous · · Score: 0, Redundant

      It displays targetted ads on billboards *and* blocks spam? Aren't those mutually exclusive? Beat me to it.
    3. Re:Wait, what? by Bogtha · · Score: 1

      No. You're going to see the billboards whether or not you have this phone, the difference is that the advert you end up seeing is tailored to the people in the vicinity that have this phone. The spam blocker is presumably for email/SMS/etc and obviously isn't going to block you from seeing billboards.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    4. Re:Wait, what? by v1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The initial knee-jerk reaction to this is that it's not going to reduce the spam I am exposed to. But then on further consideration, if I'm going to get spammed say, four times this morning, I'd rather they be at least slightly relevant to me. I don't need help with credit card debt, I'm not shopping for children's toys, and I don't want to buy a new car. If you must spam me, at least make it useful.

      Probably 90% of the adverts any given person is exposed to on a daily basis are a complete waste of their and the advertiser's time. (which is why email spam works, because it doesn't cost much to spam everybody)

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    5. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It displays targetted ads on billboards *and* blocks spam? Aren't those mutually exclusive? Thats what I was going to comment on.
      How the hell can you talk about targeted ads like a good then and then spam like it's an evil thing. It's all advertising.

      Also, how invasive will the targeted ads be?

      "Your heart rate indicates you have a hard on. Do you need Trojan Condoms? Here is directions to the nearest Shoppers Drug Mart."
    6. Re:Wait, what? by Mprx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The only possible reason you could want more relevant spam is because you might buy spammed products. This encourages spammers and makes the internet a worse place for everybody.

    7. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If I'm going to get spammed say, four times this morning, I'd rather they be at least slightly relevant to me. I don't need help with credit card debt, I'm not shopping for children's toys, and I don't want to buy a new car. If you must spam me, at least make it useful.

      Thanks, but no thanks! Suppose I was looking for a new computer - I could either get four irrelevant spams, or four spams related to new computers (assuming the technology could actually do that).

      In the first case, I would just ignore the spams, and go about my shopping the normal way. In the second case, I might be offered something relevant, and end up buying from the spammer. That would send a clear signal to all the spammers that this thing works, and result in me getting even more spam about new computers. But since I just bought one, those would be totally irrelevant. So, even in the best case, I would end up receiving more unwanted spam. That can not be good!

    8. Re:Wait, what? by oGMo · · Score: 1

      Ah you must not be using the Microsoft Certified Term(tm). The MCT "spam" actually means "any non-Microsoft-approved message," such as other advertisers or YouTube links, for instance.

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    9. Re:Wait, what? by Kamokazi · · Score: 4, Funny

      That was a typo. It was supposed to say Spam (capital S). It invloves a plexiglass deflector for preventing globs of canned processed meat from hitting you.

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    10. Re:Wait, what? by ScreamingCactus · · Score: 1

      If I'm going to get spammed, then I'd prefer spam that's not related to anything I might want. That way I won't A) waste time looking at it, or B) end up wasting money on more useless shit that I don't need.

      --
      The path to enlightenment is truly through homemade drugs!
    11. Re:Wait, what? by v1 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I don't think you can blame people for buying a product that they found out about through spamvertisement, if it's something they wanted. What are you supposed to do? Look at the message and say "Gee actually I was thinking about buying one of those, that one looks perfect, but since they spamvertised it to me, I refuse to buy it." Sounds a little childish and stubborn.

      Though I do agree that the few that buy from spamvertisement do encourage the behavior. If you build a system that has a fundamental design flaw that makes it vulnerable to abuse, it will get abused, always and forever, until you fix the flaw. Trying to fight the abusers is a waste of time. So long as its profitable, it will continue to be abused.

      SPAM is not so much a problem because of what it is, unsolicited advertisement, but because it's being used wrong. You get spammed when you watch TV. When you listen to the radio. When you drive your car down the road. As you walk through the isles in the store. It's everywhere. You can't just say that you're going to boycott every product you see spamvertised.

      Unfortunately email spam is global, and in many cases is considered legal. Here's the thing... if tomorrow it was announced that for the next 5 months no one was supposed to buy from spammers, and they followed through with this, the spammers would go out of business. I'd gladly participate in that. But since you can't make that many people change your ways, all you accomplish with your own private boycott is to inconvenience yourself. It's like organizing a boycott in your town against WalMart because they are selling a brand of toy that's a choking hazard. You and all 30 of your fellow boycotters, what do you think you're going to accomplish, besides your shopping more at K-mart? Is it going to change anything? If you could get 5,000 people in your town to boycott them, ok that may actually get something accomplished. But if you can't DO that, there's no point, unless you enjoy making your life a little bit more difficult, needlessly.

      THAT being said, I've never actually bought anything spammed into my inbox. Not because I'm against it in principle, but because they've never spamvertised anything I'm interested in. I'd be willing to bet a lot of people are in the same camp - never having replied to spam, wishing it would go away, but at the same time being perfectly willing to reply to it if something they truly wanted was being pushed.

      There are basically two driving forces in spam. Illegal or scam, and anonymous buying. Either things where you cannot conduct legal business such as prescription meds without a prescription, or sex-related sales. Online is arguably the best way to conduct business in either of these areas, and spam is no doubt the best way to advertise it. Nothing is going to change that, short of either making spam illegal or impossible. Trying to convince the masses to not respond to the spam will also not change these things, and is an exercise in futility.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    12. Re:Wait, what? by kunwon1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think you can blame people for buying a product that they found out about through spamvertisement, if it's something they wanted. What are you supposed to do? Look at the message and say "Gee actually I was thinking about buying one of those, that one looks perfect, but since they spamvertised it to me, I refuse to buy it." Sounds a little childish and stubborn.
      Sounds a little like voting with your wallet.
      --
      Specialization is for insects. -Heinlein
    13. Re:Wait, what? by Cyko_01 · · Score: 1

      It displays targetted ads on billboards *and* blocks spam? Aren't those mutually exclusive? Google does it!
    14. Re:Wait, what? by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      For the first several months of having a Hotmail account, I appeared to only get feminine hygene ads... rather useless being male.

    15. Re:Wait, what? by oaklybonn · · Score: 1

      I cancelled my NetFlix subscription because of their reliance on pop-under ads.

    16. Re:Wait, what? by whereiswaldo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think you can blame people for buying a product that they found out about through spamvertisement, if it's something they wanted. What are you supposed to do? Look at the message and say "Gee actually I was thinking about buying one of those, that one looks perfect, but since they spamvertised it to me, I refuse to buy it." Sounds a little childish and stubborn.

      That depends on how you view spam. One way is that it is mind pollution. I try not to buy from companies that pollute excessively, and that would mean not buying products from companies that try and pollute my mind.

      SPAM is not so much a problem because of what it is, unsolicited advertisement, but because it's being used wrong. You get spammed when you watch TV. When you listen to the radio. When you drive your car down the road. As you walk through the isles in the store. It's everywhere. You can't just say that you're going to boycott every product you see spamvertised.

      Sure, assuming that TV and Radio advertisements are the gold standard. I think they are just as annoying as email spam and I avoid watching TV for the most part, and almost never listen to the radio because there is hardly any music on it anymore! There are better alternatives anyway, like renting a movie, watching shows on Joost which has very little advertising, or listening to music from my own collection.

      Here's the thing... if tomorrow it was announced that for the next 5 months no one was supposed to buy from spammers, and they followed through with this, the spammers would go out of business.

      Do you really think that's true? How much does it cost a spammer to stay in business? I belive it is very little - that's the economics of spam. Also, nailing spammers is like playing whack-a-mole: you get one and another pops up. So even if you did bankrupt many spammers in that 5 months, there would always be more to pick up where the others left off once people started responding to spams again.

      But since you can't make that many people change your ways, all you accomplish with your own private boycott is to inconvenience yourself.

      Possibly. However, don't underestimate the power of communication these days - it is easy for anyone to get in touch with thousands of people. Also keep in mind that not everyone's goal is to convince everyone else to do the same thing. I'm happy to do my part and if others who I tell share the same view then great. If not, it's still worth it to me to uphold my principles.

      It's like organizing a boycott in your town against WalMart because they are selling a brand of toy that's a choking hazard.

      I think that's a poor example. Can you imagine the bad press a store would get if they knowingly sold a toy that is a choking hazard? I think most stores are really responsible in that area.

    17. Re:Wait, what? by neumayr · · Score: 1

      Look at the message and say "Gee actually I was thinking about buying one of those, that one looks perfect, but since they spamvertised it to me, I refuse to buy it." Sounds a little childish and stubborn. It does, but you can get pretty much anything through other channels - maybe a little more clicking is involved, but IMHO it's worth the effort.
      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    18. Re:Wait, what? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Only after your heart has stopped, so it's okay.

    19. Re:Wait, what? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      If a guy comes up to your store and says "nice store, shame if anything were to happen to it" should you think "gee, I really should have some property insurance. And this guy is right here selling it!"?

      If you telemarket me or spam me I will not buy your product. If it's a targeted ad and I'm actually interested in the product congratulations, you've just successfully advertised for your competitors.

  9. Can you spot Steve Ballmer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=zT1H9gafkfE
    Watch out, he has disguised himself with a false moustache.

    Control is Freedom! Privacy is Slavery! Forward MiSoc!

    1. Re:Can you spot Steve Ballmer? by Sanat · · Score: 1

      No chairs were harmed in the making of this presentation.

      --
      And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make
  10. Exactly the problem with patents by Jimmy_B · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is certainly a neat concept. However, no one has made one - including the patenters. It won't be possible to make one until a lot of technologies have improved (especially battery technology).

    Since it's impossible to make, there can't be prior art. Since it's being patented before it *could* be made, it never will be made. This is a very common, very ridiculous occurrence.

    1. Re:Exactly the problem with patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The following section of 35 U.S.C. states the requirements relating to enabling disclosures:

      35 U.S.C. 112 Specification.

      The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention.

      In that case, and at least theoretically (i.e. the Examiner would have to catch it), the application could be rejected for not having an enabling disclosure. The idea behind the patent system is to only be able to get patents on inventions you provide an enabling disclosure for, in other words actually invented.

    2. Re:Exactly the problem with patents by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Since it's being patented before it *could* be made, it never will be made. This is a very common, very ridiculous occurrence. You just have to understand their goals...
      They pre-patented the "guardian angel in your cell phone" because they don't want them to be made.
      Notice, they did not patent the "rat fink in your cell phone" - so that's what we have to look forward to.
      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:Exactly the problem with patents by symbolic · · Score: 1

      My guess...just a different application of the theory behind the "Trusted Computing Platform". I'm wondering if the "protection" this is supposed to offer is really for someone else's benefit.

    4. Re:Exactly the problem with patents by gronofer · · Score: 1

      The following section of 35 U.S.C. states the requirements relating to enabling disclosures: 35 U.S.C. 112 Specification. The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. In that case, and at least theoretically (i.e. the Examiner would have to catch it), the application could be rejected for not having an enabling disclosure. The idea behind the patent system is to only be able to get patents on inventions you provide an enabling disclosure for, in other words actually invented. Glancing at the patent application, it seems to suggest it can be implemented using computers, communications and input devices. It shouldn't be too hard, given that, for a person skilled in the art to slap one together.
    5. Re:Exactly the problem with patents by Genda · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sorry, but this is simply ludicrous...

      By the premise of this patent, I could at this very moment patent every interesting idea I've ever read in a science fiction story. Give a full discription of the what, with a pitifully vague description of the how. Then as the technology became available to make it happen, I could fill in any of the 20 or 30 [And a miracle happens] type, blank spaces in my patent disclosure, until shebang, it's 2019 and I have now got a perfectly good patent back-dated to 2008, for technology that had only become viable as of 4:30PM Friday May 10, 2019...

      Okay let's see... I'm calling dibs on; The infinitly dense super light super compact battery, The faster than light transport engine, the direct neural link (good between people to people and people to machines), and the serum that provides perpetual youth. Y'all can take the rest.

    6. Re:Exactly the problem with patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with patents like these is they're saying what they want to do, but never bother to mention how. When I think of patents, I think of technical drawings, explaining *how* the invention works. So why does MS get to take patents on stupid Christian ideas?

  11. Bad jokes? by gruvmeister · · Score: 4, Funny

    The versatile Guardian Angel, Microsoft notes, can also recommend restaurants, advise you on the appropriateness of your jokes...
    So this thing will let me know when I'm surrounded by the type of people who will be offended by my telling of dead baby or titty-fuck jokes? Awesome.
    1. Re:Bad jokes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it will tell you after you told everyone your joke.

    2. Re:Bad jokes? by edxwelch · · Score: 3, Funny

      > So this thing will let me know when I'm surrounded by the type of people who will > be offended by my telling of dead baby or titty-fuck jokes? Awesome.

      Yes, remeber back that time you met with the queen mother.. ?

  12. "detect that your heartbeat has stopped" by Zocalo · · Score: 4, Funny
    WTF? What happens then???
    • * "I'm sorry, you appear to have died. The license for this phone is non-transferable. Thank you for buying Microsoft!"
    • * STOP: 0xDEADBEEF
      Beginning dump of physical memory...
      Out of memory. Dump aborted...
    • * The battery rapidly discharges into you; hopefully the sudden shock will restart things.
    • * ...
    Hmm. HTML lists appear not to print bullets in the new Slashdot stylesheet...
    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    1. Re:"detect that your heartbeat has stopped" by red_pete · · Score: 1

      imagine a beowulf cluster of these!

    2. Re:"detect that your heartbeat has stopped" by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Hmm. HTML lists appear not to print bullets in the new Slashdot stylesheet..."

      That's OK. That's the one thing the the Guardian Angel will actually be able to do.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    3. Re:"detect that your heartbeat has stopped" by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      Begin collection proceedings on your unpaid balance, of course.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    4. Re:"detect that your heartbeat has stopped" by Kamineko · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Major fracture detected. Morphine administered."
      "Bloodloss detected. Seek immediate medical attention."
      "User death imminent."

      BEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEP

    5. Re:"detect that your heartbeat has stopped" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zocalo, cheers. That is just damn funny. I'm still laughing! AND I'm wondering WTF, too, on feature like that.

      I wonder why it won't tell you if the Sun goes super nova? Wouldn't that be a lot more important, given the number of people potentially affected?

    6. Re:"detect that your heartbeat has stopped" by nephish · · Score: 1

      This is the funniest thing i have read in a while, took me by surprise. Thanks, i have been laughing out loud over this. Even read it to my wife (she didn't get it)

    7. Re:"detect that your heartbeat has stopped" by RKBA · · Score: 1

      Hmm. HTML lists appear not to print bullets in the new Slashdot stylesheet...
      Yes, lots of things about the "new and improved" SlashDot sucks, not the least of which is all the wasted whitespace on the left side of the page. About half of the remaining displayable space is taken up by huge buttons and other formatting crap that diminish and detract from the amount of users comments I'm able to see on the screen at any one time. Well guess what? I come here (used to anyway) to read the users comments, NOT to be impressed with all the fancy formatting. That's why SlashDot is on the skids and reddit is on the rise.
  13. One of these things is not like the others by XanC · · Score: 1
    • * recommend restaurants
    • * advise on joke appropriateness
    • * detect a stopped heart
    • * display ads
    • * stop spam

    (And the last two are somewhat at odds with each other...)

    1. Re:One of these things is not like the others by maxume · · Score: 1

      There is a big difference between driving into a new city at ~6 pm and seeing an ad for a restaurant that serves cuisine that you like and spam.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:One of these things is not like the others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if spam is a cuisine I like?

  14. But ?!!!? by unity100 · · Score: 1

    can it detect the borg ?

    1. Re:But ?!!!? by Linker3000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or search for Sarah Connor?

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    2. Re:But ?!!!? by LordAlced · · Score: 1

      More likely it's employed by The Master to search for The Doctor.

      --
      Error: this custom sig failed to load. Please update your user preferences. If this message still appears, please contac
  15. Hey, don't shoot this down just yet by Ethan+Allison · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Mecha-Big-Brother is actually a great idea. Look at all the benefits Guardian Angel has. I mean hell, I'd rather a computer tells me that my joke is stupid than another person, and if I happen to have any sort of health problem it's an instant 911 call.

    Just don't forget the off switch.

    1. Re:Hey, don't shoot this down just yet by gronofer · · Score: 2, Funny

      I mean hell, I'd rather a computer tells me that my joke is stupid than another person...
      Why not try your joke out on Slashdot first? If it's rated +5 funny, don't use it on a real person.
  16. I can see it now... by Bogtha · · Score: 5, Funny

    Clippy: It looks like you are having a heart-attack! Would you like help?

    • Call an ambulance
    • Zap my heart using the phone battery
    • Just let me die

    Me: Ow! Stop zapping me! I'm not having a heart-attack, I just dropped my phone!

    --
    Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    1. Re:I can see it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are about to sneeze: Cancel or Allow?

  17. Detects that your heartbeat has stopped? by Bradmont · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can hear it now: A friendly, gentle, female voice saying, "Your heart has stopped. You are now dead. Have a nice day!"

    1. Re:Detects that your heartbeat has stopped? by CelticWhisper · · Score: 1

      Bonus points for selectable pre-loaded voices, including GlaDOS, SHODAN, and perhaps the "Minimum safe distance" voice from Aliens. Of course, I don't know that I'd want GlaDOS advising me on the appropriateness of...well, anything, and hearing SHODAN call me "An extroardinary specimen of a pathetic species" or a "pathetic sack of meat and bone" while in the midst of a cardiac arrest would be, methinks, less than helpful.

      --
      Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
      http://www.tsanewsblog.com
    2. Re:Detects that your heartbeat has stopped? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Your life will be flashing before your eyes.

      It should say "You watched it, you can't unwatch it" in an ominous voice.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  18. oblig Dr. Who... by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

    VOTE SAXON!

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    1. Re:oblig Dr. Who... by LordAlced · · Score: 1

      Oh, man. You're right. This does sound like The Sound of Drums.

      --
      Error: this custom sig failed to load. Please update your user preferences. If this message still appears, please contac
  19. Wow, talk about going for the gusto by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In addition to protecting you from possibly diseased people, by detecting body temperatures, the Guardian Angel's 'monitoring component can take note of the number of conversations occurring in a room (and more specifically, a breakdown of the types of people in the room accompanied by a warning for dangerous persons, based on sex offender registration, FBI most wanted, etc.).' The versatile Guardian Angel, Microsoft notes, can also recommend restaurants, advise you on the appropriateness of your jokes, detect that your heartbeat has stopped, display targeted ads on billboards, and block spam.

    ROFL....they want me to believe they have a working device that does all these diverse tasks, some of which are amazingly difficult? I suppose I'm also supposed to believe it's going to run on a Windows platform on some kind of portable computer. <voice="Bill Cosby">Riiiiiight</voice>.

    Sorry, but as much as I'd like to think some pair of uber-geniuses managed to build one product (that runs on a portable Windows platorm, no less) that does all this, it just screams, "Vaporware inspired by Marketing!" to me. I thought you had to have some semblance of a working device before they'd give you a patent? Or is that something I remember from reading how it's supposed to work?

    --
    [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    1. Re:Wow, talk about going for the gusto by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but as much as I'd like to think some pair of uber-geniuses managed to build one product (that runs on a portable Windows platorm, no less) that does all this[...]

      RTFA

      .
    2. Re:Wow, talk about going for the gusto by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 1

      Sorry, TFS turned me off before I even got there.

      --
      [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    3. Re:Wow, talk about going for the gusto by pimpimpim · · Score: 1
      It's like a hollywood movie. They start by adding some events that you accept to believe, say due to global warming the gulf stream slows down. Then you start adding ridiculousness, e.g. second-by-second freezing of a skyscraper.

      MS does the same. A few days ago they started announcing the fictional event that they will have an OS for lightweight laptops ready soon. Today they announce this device, tomorrow: steve ballmer is actually an alien!

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  20. Body heat eh? by infonography · · Score: 1

    Will it detect the Undead/Vampires or Aliens? I know there are Aliens in this room, they have the plans for this device. They showed it to me last week.

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
    1. Re:Body heat eh? by Sanat · · Score: 1

      Expect the beta on SourceForge or FreshMeat in a couple of weeks. I imagine by now there are at least three different projects begun since this hit Slashdot. Go Open Source!

      --
      And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make
  21. utter, utter bullshit by thermian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No really.

    This patent is nothing more then a placeholder on imaginary tech that might become a reality in the future.

    In the words of the deity of slashdot:

    "And thus he spaketh, 'there be nothing to see here, moveth thee along'. (Gospels of CommanderTaco IV)"

    --
    A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
    1. Re:utter, utter bullshit by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes, 4 Taco 5:27. But lest we forget, 2 Hemos 11:1 says "Cowboy Neal is the truth and the light of the poll." Really makes you think, doesn't it?

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
  22. Uhhhhh... Okay by EdIII · · Score: 1

    detect that your heartbeat has stopped, display targeted ads on billboards, and block spam.


    Riiight. "Your heart has stopped beating. Have a nice day!". Unless it has a built in defib device I don't think it will help much. I have a problem seeing that somebody is going to have the presence of mind to check their cellphone WHEN THEIR HEART HAS STOPPED BEATING.

    The targets ads on billboards is just slightly more ridiculous. The blocking of spam is just hilarious.

    This thing should be called Guardian Angel... of Microsoft's Profits. Keeps those eyeballs alive and looking at JUST Microsoft's Ads.
    1. Re:Uhhhhh... Okay by porkmusket · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the intent is to have the cellphone call someone/alert someone else when it detects the heart has stopped beating. It doesn't say 'alert user when his/her heart stops'.

    2. Re:Uhhhhh... Okay by verbatim · · Score: 1
      gotta get that last text message in before dying...

      actually, maybe it could be a resuscitation for clippy.

      I see that your heart is no longer beating, would you like to summon the paramedics? [Ok] [Cancel] Or perhaps you want to get in one more text message.

      tld u i wuz hrdcre
      --
      Price, Quality, Time. Pick none. What, you thought you had a choice?
    3. Re:Uhhhhh... Okay by qzulla · · Score: 1

      And pay the monthly bill:

      7. The system of claim 1, the broadcast device receives appropriate payment before allowing any information to transfer from the user to the plurality of other users and devices.

      qz

  23. Typical by ebcdic · · Score: 5, Funny

    You send your patent guy a joke patent application on April 1, and by April 3 he's filed it.

    1. Re:Typical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You send your patent guy a joke patent application on April 1, and by April 3 he's filed it.

      To be fair, how was he supposed to know it was a joke?

    2. Re:Typical by jd · · Score: 1

      Easy. It's from Microsoft.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  24. I want a collar phone!! by gd23ka · · Score: 1

    Yes I want a cell phone in that explosive collar everybody will have to wear around their
    necks!

  25. Yes. by Xenoproctologist · · Score: 1

    Clippy: It appears you're talking in a crowded theater during one of "the good scenes". Would you like me to shock you in the nuts with a tazer until you shut your gob? [Yes (10...9...8...)]/[No]

    I APPROVE.

  26. and it can run up your data bill and don't even th by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    and it can run up your data bill and don't even think about useing it over seas with the high data roaming fees over there.

  27. Just wait for the blue screen... by Taelron · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As it is I have a Windows Mobile "not-so" Smartphone from my work. Just like a PC I have to power it off or pull the battery and reboot it periodically or it acts up and crashes...

    If this ever gets made I can just see the news storys and lawsuits... Family sues Microsoft after daughters murder... Daughters Guardian Angel bluesceened while on a date with a serial murderer... Details at 11...

    And if its polling information on everyone you are around, just exactly what information is it sending about you back to Microsoft?

  28. Other features by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

    It also detects bad breath and will offer you a mint promptly; it will search other bluetooth phines in the vicinity for a goor partner, or, if you're married, somebody to work overtime with; it will tell you when you can cross the street and it will tell you when you need to pick up your phone. It will also focus your camera and tell you to say cheese.

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
  29. My lie detector works! by subreality · · Score: 1
    The whole thing sounds like a vaporware fantasy, but when I read this part:

    block spam ... there was nothing more to know. They're full of shit.
  30. That explains the yes vote to OOXML then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF?

    Why would anyone want to be 'advised' by a company as borderline criminal as MSFT?

  31. The perfect patent! by TheP4st · · Score: 2, Funny

    We don't have the technology to do this, yet. But, in a near future the technology will be there. And we have the patent.

    --
    "I have downloaded hundreds and hundreds of records, why would I care if somebody downloads ours?" Robin Pecknold
  32. just great by Joseph_Daniel_Zukige · · Score: 1

    Now, when my neighbor downstairs walks close to this billboard, I have to cover my children's eyes.

    Cover mine, too, come to think of it.

    Until I get close enough that my profile cancels his?

    Which begs the question -- How do they determine which profile(s) win(s) when people with diametrically opposed profiles are close to this billboard? Split the billboard? Advertisement for Playboy on the left and bibles.com on the right? And if my good neighbor across the way comes by, where does the ad for islamicity.com go? (Not that he would pay any more attention to that than I would to bibles.com,)

    I'd hope that this is a defensive patent, to prevent other companies from doing it either, but Microsoft has a track record of trying to do things with computers that shouldn't really be done, regardless of whether the available tech can actually support doing it, safely, correctly, or otherwise.

    Besides, patents were not supposed to be weapons in that war, not that that war should be fought in a country that is supposed to be trying to be free.

    1. Re:just great by dotancohen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Microsoft has a track record of trying to do things with computers that shouldn't really be done Microsoft has a track record of preventing progress in the computer industry.

      There, fixed that for you.
      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    2. Re:just great by v1 · · Score: 1

      Didn't they show off something just like this in Minority Report?

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  33. Obligatory by DriedClexler · · Score: 0

    Knowing the last 640 days of criminal history ought to be enough for anyone!

    --
    Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    1. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh lord, I don't want to try to count the felonies I've committed in the last 640 days.

  34. Gates == guardian angel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More like a guardian devil to me.

  35. Sure... by RyoShin · · Score: 1

    But can it make julienned fries?

  36. that's nice, but... by niteice · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will it blend?

    --
    ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
    1. Re:that's nice, but... by ccs.gott · · Score: 0

      Will it run linux?

  37. Is the filing date by any chance April 1? by jpellino · · Score: 1

    Cuz this thing sounds like it promises to cure coughs, colds, itchy holes, zits, nits and swollen bits.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  38. Prior art: camcorder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems to me that claim 1 is satisified by pretty much any camcorder.

    1. observes the light level
    2. decides that there isn't much light
    3. observes the user preference for an action shot and decides to tell the user
    4. blinks a signal telling user there isn't enough light

  39. One more nail in the coffin by Prisoner's+Dilemma · · Score: 1


    warning for dangerous persons, based on sex offender registration, FBI most wanted, etc. Any of the above information can be shared or held private as desired by the user. So sex offenders, FBI's most wanted, and dangerous persons can not share their info?? Who decides who is dangerous? Some consider free thinks dangerous? Some might even call them 'Evil People'.

    Oh... it's only some people that have a choice. So as long as you don't disagree with the administrators of the technology they won't infringe on your rights.

    What guardian angel is going to protect us from Bush, Bill, Google, and friends.

  40. Hmmm by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, it can display targeted advertisements and block spam? How long before it chokes on its contradictory orders and eliminates all humans?

    In all seriousness, though, we have got to do something about the "if it moves, advertise at it; if it doesn't move, advertise on it" culture we have growing. At this rate, the first people with mind control rays won't be the CIA spooks, it'll be Brainpoint Concepts Media, inc. and Your Dreams(tm), brought to you by Ambitrex.

    1. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At this rate, the first people with mind control rays won't be the CIA spooks, it'll be Brainpoint Concepts Media, inc. and Your Dreams(tm), brought to you by Ambitrex. As predicted by Futurama:

          Fry: So you're telling me they broadcast commercials into people's dreams?
          Leela: Of course.
          Fry: But, how is that possible?
          Professor Farnsworth: It's very simple. The ad gets into your brain just like this liquid gets into this egg.
          [He shows an egg and injects it with liquid from a syringe until the egg explodes.]
          Professor Farnsworth: Although, in reality, it's not liquid, but gamma radiation.
  41. Zune II by argent · · Score: 2, Funny

    My immediate reaction is that this is the next step for the Zune. It's already got local wireless file transfer, and it's getting software to scan for (cough cough) non-traditionally distributed movies. What's better to add a full power Big Brother... I mean Guardian Angel mode?

    1. Re:Zune II by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's in a zune?

  42. Just pummel me with a chair please Bill by Greymoon · · Score: 0

    I would rather be dead. Just because you can doesn't mean you must.

  43. Identify dangerous persons? by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

    So how many people read that and thought it would identify dangerous FBI persons in the room? And who exactly trusts the sex offender lists? Take a leak in public and get caught and you could be on that list! It might be interesting to find or know about others who want to share but looking up information from some 3rd party list like that? No thanks!

    --
    Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
  44. Prior art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh dear, dear Bill. Afraid to go out in public now, are we? Well, I'm afraid you're not the first to feel this way. Your notable contemporary Mr. Hughes felt the same way. If you're afraid of all the bad things out there, I think you'll find it's much easier to simply stay in bed, preferably one lined entirely with disposable paper towels. That should keep you safe and sound until you're ready for diapers again, at which point you really won't have anything to worry about at all. Rest in peace, dear Bill.

  45. Sounds a lot like Emacs by pablodiazgutierrez · · Score: 2, Funny

    But does it run Linux?

  46. Inventors? by rastoboy29 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why grace them with the title "inventors", when they haven't actually made the thing.  They are science fiction writers, or futurists, at best.

    And since the thing is only an idea at this stage, does that make science fiction stories with similar ideas prior art?  My God what a mess the patent system is right now...nuke it.

    1. Re:Inventors? by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      While I agree 100%, I suspect those "inventors" would use a font that's readable to humans, and thus I have to give them more props than you. Sorry.

    2. Re:Inventors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I agree 100%, I suspect those "inventors" would use a font that's readable to humans, and thus I have to give them more props than you. Sorry.

      I suspect someone who really cares about such things should have a default monospace font and size selected in their browser that they can read.

      Fail.
    3. Re:Inventors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gb2/bed/

  47. Prior art by John+Jorsett · · Score: 2, Funny

    Danger Will Robinson! Danger!

  48. targeted ads + heart rate by ztcamper · · Score: 1

    Master, it appears your heart has stopped. Creep Crafters inc. is slashing prices on everything from coffins to liquid nitrogen. Would you like to know more?

  49. Display targeted ads on billboards. Great. by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

    Just imagine for a moment a group of people all with phones with this technology enabled passing a billboard. Each unit then tries to display a targeted ad causing the billboard to flicker inducing epileptic fits in various unsuspecting people in the rest of the crowd.

  50. Clippy in your pocket... by nick_davison · · Score: 5, Funny

    "It looks like you are looking at an attractive woman. Press 1 to..."

    Ew.

    1. Re:Clippy in your pocket... by somersault · · Score: 1

      After the initial chat-up wizard has done its job..

      "You appear to have a problem achieving wood, press 2 to temporarily unblock vi4gr@ spam filters"

      --
      which is totally what she said
  51. You thought Allow/Deny was annoying before? by nick_davison · · Score: 1

    "Someone has attempted to stop me from shocking you. Allow or Deny?"

    "Allo-" BZZZ

    "Denied"

    "Ow! Stop-" BZZZ "Stop shocking me!"

    "Someone has attempted to stop me from shocking you. Allow or Deny?"

    "Allo-" BZZZ

    "Denied"

    Repeat ad infinitum.

  52. Quite a broad range of capabilities... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    Show me one that will shampoo the cat and barbecue some good chicken and burgers, and you would have a sale.

  53. Didn't George Orwell write about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the tyrant's dream:

    Know who hangs out with whom, and what they believe. Know where they are at all times. If politically incorrect badthink is spoken, the cops will respond within minutes. Dissent will be crushed. There will be no freedom of thought.

  54. Hope it doesn't lose the vegamatic function... by Wardish · · Score: 1

    Dang!

    I always suspected that Microsoft = Ronco

    --
    Ward

    . Silence! Be thankful thy species is unpalatable! .
  55. Guard this. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2, Funny
    The versatile Guardian Angel, Microsoft notes, can also recommend restaurants, advise you on the appropriateness of your jokes, detect that your heartbeat has stopped, display targeted ads on billboards, and block spam."

    Each Guardian Angel equipped cell phone comes with its own little red beret and is pre-enabled to warn you about anyone within a 10' radius trying to access a You Tube link.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  56. Your heartbeat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " The versatile Guardian Angel, Microsoft notes, can...detect that your heartbeat has stopped..."

    I need one of these. I've suspected that my heart stopped beating a couple weeks ago, but haven't been able to verify it. If I had one of these phones, I'd know for sure.

  57. Slander and Libel charges should do the trick. by gnutoo · · Score: 0, Troll

    Lawsuits and common sense should get rid of these devices. They are going to accuse people of horrible crimes with all the accuracy, security and correctness of Microsoft Windows. You might as well let Bill Gates brand people he does not like with a scarlet letter and that would spark an interesting class action lawsuit or two. Anyone who trusts such a device is a fool. Proper situational awareness is a better way to keep yourself safe. If you have to look at a device to determine people's intentions, your situational awareness should be diagnosed as autism.

    1. Re:Slander and Libel charges should do the trick. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, earlier today you were shilling your own sockpuppet accounts and telling us about it.

    2. Re:Slander and Libel charges should do the trick. by sorak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lawsuits and common sense should get rid of these devices. They are going to accuse people of horrible crimes with all the accuracy, security and correctness of Microsoft Windows.

      I could imagine the political controversy that would ensue.



      Plaintiff: That device keeps falsely accusing me of pedophilia.

      Hannity: Why should we believe you. You're a pedophile!

      Plaintiff: But I didn't do it.

      Hannity: How could you! They're children and you robbed them of their...

      Plaintiff: But I didn't do it.

      Hannity: with the groping and the touching and...



      If the Supreme Court doesn't stop it, then it will be controversial for a week and then be trusted unquestioningly.

    3. Re:Slander and Libel charges should do the trick. by BotnetZombie · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Anyone who wants such a device deserves all the disasters that will come with it.
      Anyway, it's just vapourware. From TFS "advise you on the appropriateness of your jokes". Latest AI is nowhere near that, and our own wetware even often has problems with this task.

  58. NEWS FLASH by Mike+Rice · · Score: 5, Funny

    Various sources report that Microsoft has been secretly developing a radical breakthrough in artificial intelligence. Several artificially intelligent microspokespersons, who declined to be named due to non disclosure agreements, stated that this has been accomplished by 'accelerated evolution', in a project begun in the late 1980s...

    "We began with Microsoft Bob in the early days, and started by mating him with various other characters, such as ELIZA and ALICE. We then put the resulting offspring through enormous selective pressures, and mated Bob with any surviving females. After a few iterations we had Clippy, who Microsoft Office users soon fell head over heels in love with.

    This success was so, uhh, successful... that we took the project underground for further development.

    Our first thought was to continue with Clippy, but after some analysis, we decided that Clippy had become so inbred that we should just start over again, with Bob.

    Things went fine at first, but we ran into a problem trying to bring 'new blood' into the family. Bob resigned from the program after his first mating with RACTER, leaving us with a lot of messy, uhmm, code, to clean up.

    It looked like the program was doomed, but we discovered that while we were pre-occupied with Bob, Clippy had been engaging in a three way with ALICE and PARRY. Intrigued, we introduced Clippy to RACTER, and they have since been inseparable.

    At last we had found the road to success!

    Though, we have had our ups and downs since then. PARRY commited suicide soon after RACTER moved in to Clippys apartment, and Clippy was so distraught that he could not perform for months.

    Bob, for his part, refuses to speak with Clippy, but we found that we could arrange a channel between them, via ALICE. According to ALICE 'Clippy can be annoying, popping up with unwelcome comments at random moments. But he's a good fellow, he's only trying to help.'"

    According to our sources, the technology will be released to manufacturing once a troublesome tendency for the offspring to speak with a LISP can be solved.

  59. Total invasion of privacy by willeyhill · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Almost all of the safety information it can serve should be public record except who the people around you are - which makes the device useless. Free software in phones, the RFID guardian and other good technology should come to the rescue if laws don't. Only Bill Gates would think he has a right to card and track everyone then sell the results to the highest bidder but that's where his EULAs go and the asymmetry of information access will errode your rights until there is nothing left. Transparency for public records that should be kept along with laws to protect privacy in public will make this abomination of a patent worthless if the patent office does not throw it out with all software and business method patents.

    1. Re:Total invasion of privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, earlier today you were shilling your own sockpuppets and discussing your irrelevant infatuation with Microsoft that helps no one.

  60. This is MS Guardian Angel: by electricbern · · Score: 1

    Your heart beat has stopped. Ignore, Retry, Fail.

    --
    alias possession='chmod 666 satan && ls /dev > il && tail daemon.log'
  61. Bunk by camperdave · · Score: 4, Insightful

    SPAM is not so much a problem because of what it is...

    No, it is a problem because it is exactly what it is: Unsolicited messages. TV and Radio commercials are not spam. When I watch TV, I am not paying for the show. When I listen to the radio, I am not paying for the music. I get these feeds free because I am willing to listen to the ads on some level. Newspapers are partially subsidized by the ads, and some are completely subsidized. In all these cases, I get paid something for my attention.

    My inbox (and my phone for that matter) is a different thing, though. *I* pay for that communication channel, not the advertisers. It is supposed to be for my private use. If my ISP offered some sort of discount based on the number of ads I have to cope with, then fine. Until that happens, spam is a leeching evil blight. (Well, all ads are pretty much leeching evil blights, but spam is especially so, but with puss, and foul odours on top of it.)

    Spam, and telemarketing should be made illegal.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:Bunk by RKBA · · Score: 1

      Very concise summary of the crux of the problem, I wish I could vote you up beyond "5" but apparently the maximum number of karma points a user can receive isn't inflating nearly as fast as the mod points alloted to moderators (it used to be five max, then it was ten mod points for awhile, and now I notice it's up to fifteen available mod points even though I seldom visit slashdot anymore and usually hang-out at reddit.

  62. the user interface needs improvement by martin-boundary · · Score: 1
    Microsoft Guardian Angel has detected that your heartbeat has stopped. Would you like to call an amulance?

    [OK][Cancel]

  63. Heart bypass ads by HangingChad · · Score: 1

    detect that your heartbeat has stopped, display targeted ads on billboards

    I can just see it, you're having a heart attack and the billboard above you flashes an ad for Methodist Hospital cardiac unit. Got bypass? Tell the ambulance driver to take you to Methodist's state of the art cardiac acute care center. Surgeons are standing by.

    When my cell phone starts analyzing my jokes is when I beat it to death with a hammer and dance naked around it until it loses all its power.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  64. But can it detect erectile disfunction? by LM741N · · Score: 1

    Tin foil over the gonads.

  65. BUT WAIT THERE'S MORE! by zwc101 · · Score: 1

    It slices, it dices, it makes julean fries! BUT WAIT! If you act now Guardian Angel comes with our patented "Warn you when a sexual predator is about to rape you" system! WOW!

  66. Spam blocker?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the least believeable feature is that it will have the ability to block spam.

  67. Conflict of Interest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "display targeted ads on billboards, and block spam"

    Isn't that a conflict?

  68. Microsoft phonehack live! by S3D · · Score: 1

    >and more specifically, a breakdown of the types of people in the room accompanied by a warning for dangerous persons, based on sex offender registration, FBI most wanted, etc.

    Sexoffender fighter enter the room.
    Sexoffender fighter pick up the knife.
    FBI Most Wanted Wizard sleep.
    Sexoffender fighter notice you.
    You zap Sexoffender fighter with cellphonetaiser.
    FBI Most Wanted Wizard wake up.
    FBI Most Wanted Wizard zap you with microwave pain projector.
    You are in pain. You are slow.
    You throw cellphonebomb at FBI Most Wanted Wizard.
    Sexoffender fighter hit you with knife for 18 damage.
    You die.

  69. Guardian Clippy by inKubus · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hello! It appears as though your heart has stopped!

    Would you like to:

    1) Restart your heart, and languish in a coma, fed with a feeding tube while your family stuggles to pay your mounting hospital bills
    2) Die here on the street. (By the way, you're missing out on an incredible canoli just 2 blocks to the North).

    *1*

    Please wait while the system restarts....

    Hello! It appears you have just woken up from a coma!

    Since you are groggy, now is the perfect time to sign up for Microsoft Live Email service!

    --
    Cool! Amazing Toys.
  70. Hardly a unique name by cheros · · Score: 1

    If they want to use the Guardian Angel name for this they'll have a bit of a fight on their hands..

    The name is taken internationally by anything from tracker equipment sellers to bodyguard agencies :-).

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
    1. Re:Hardly a unique name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention the Angels themselves ;o)

  71. Guardian Clippy by clint999 · · Score: 0

    ...broadcast device transfers encrypted information regarding the user to the plurality of other users and devices... further comprising:encrypting the information when communicated beyond the user; and verifying the authentication and authorization properties of recipients before communicating the information to the recipients

  72. apparently MS wanted the ultimate by alizard · · Score: 1

    vaporware patent. I think this is it. Patent examiners should not allow patents on devices that science fiction editors would reject in any story set within the next 50 years.

    By the time what's described in the patent is possible, the patent will no longer be in force, and MS probably won't be around in any form.

  73. Fuck it by Niten · · Score: 5, Funny

    I give up, I'm going Amish. See you guys later.

  74. This is an excellent idea. by baboo_jackal · · Score: 1

    Look - a device like this would bring us closer to living the reality of Snow Crash. I'm all for it. I mean, burbclaves already exist nowadays (basically anything called "The {Commons, Greens} on the __________.")

    We're not that far from Neal Stephenson's vision. Why are we fighting it? It'll be awesome.

    1. Re:This is an excellent idea. by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      Forget Neal Stephenson, George Orwell had it down in 1984 (the novel, not the year).

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  75. Hey! It looks like... by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    Hey! It looks like you are trying to reactivate your heart! Would you like to:

    - activate the MS Defibrillator?
    - scream for a doctor?
    - clutch your chest and fall to the floor in spasms?
    - die?

    1. Re:Hey! It looks like... by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      Side note: "MS Defibrillator" brings new definitions to Blue Screns of Death, I suppose.

  76. Using Cellphone to record crimes by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    A more useful application would be to use the cellphone to record or transmit video of criminal incidents that may occur to you. If you are accosted on the street by someone or a group, press the 'panic button' on your phone and the video from the phone's camera will be transmitted to a storage site. The phone will dial 911 and transmit your GPS coordinates to the police as well.

        Although this may not help to defend you during the criminal activity being committed against you as it happens, it will provide a document of the incident that can be used in court later. A video of the incident will document crime in order to prevent the criminals from lying against you and having the case dismissed. Should you have to defend yourself by using violence against the people who are attacking you, a recording of the incident will reduce the possibility of having charges being brought against you. Self-defense can be very difficult to prove in court.

        High quality photos and video will help the police identify the attackers for arrest and provide a record of the incident for the district attorney to prosecute the case. Having the video transmitted as the crime occurs prevents the attackers from taking the camera phone and destroying the recording, as would be the case if the video were only stored in the memory of the camera phone.

        I suspect that this is well beyond the capabilities of the video cellphones of today. However this type of incident-monitoring-and-recording service would be a profitable option to provide wealthy and upper-middle-class people as the technology becomes available.

  77. Uuuuhhhh... by TihSon · · Score: 1

    This is a joke, right?

    --
    In B.C., our fascism is green.
  78. Reminds me! by StarfishOne · · Score: 1

    That it's almost as multi-functional as the iPhone! :D

    Conan O'Brien's iPhone Commercial:
    http://13gb.com/media.php?media_id=2340

  79. Version 0.9, Here Today by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 1

    "Etiquette for Idiots" on a microSD card in your phone. That way you can read and not pretend to be talking on the phone when it rings.

    --
    Invenio via vel creo
  80. Ob. Futurama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "This dream brought to you by 'Lightspeed' Briefs!"

  81. Trademark? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Guardian Angels", providing improved personal protection in an urban setting? These guys have been famously doing it under that name for a long time. Surely Mr. Gates wouldn't infringe on the valuable Intellectual Property of another respected organization!

  82. Anyone else read it wrong? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    In addition to protecting you from possibly diseased people
    Huh? It'll go "Warning! Warning! Zombie detected bearing 027 degrees range 20 yards".
    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  83. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  84. Other considerations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually... I know everyone is inclined to shriek about the privacy issues (and yes, they're there) but I could also see this being used for Autistic adults and children, especially the "facial expressions", "appropriateness of jokes", and "body temperature" readings. This could also, as previously mentioned, be using in AI work to help robots better interpret human reactions.

  85. EB's hit it by yclipse · · Score: 1

    It took us to 7:41 pm yesterday to figure out what should have been obvious from the outset. Thanks, ebcdic.

  86. Not for another 20 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no text

  87. Re:Flying Chair Alarm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another ruined Slashdot account willy. Amazing. I guess it's time to start signing up for more, eh?

  88. Re:NEWS FLASH Bob was retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bob was the most retarded so called multitasker that I have ever run across. There was another one around besides OS/2 that was fairly good, and a lot better than 'bob'. Ventura Desktop Publisher..remember that one from the eighties..worked natively on this system. It handled memory different from windoe$ and faded from existence. I hated 'bob'. He was a real bastard before his buddy balmer came to redmond.

  89. For All Your Nagging Needs. by Ironlenny · · Score: 1

    We've combined all the best qualities of you're wife/mother/girlfriend and a used car sales man into one outstandingly neat phone.

    --
    There is a system for subverting the system and you should use that system!
  90. It is still voluntary, isn't it? by jandersen · · Score: 1

    When I look at the other comments here, it looks as if this is something we all have to use, whether we like or not. But as far as I remember we are still free to not buy devices with this on and will probably be so even in 20 years' time. Will Microsoft even exist then?