Slashdot Mirror


User: wpmegee

wpmegee's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
118
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 118

  1. Re:So, which will MS Office support? on The Massachusetts Office Party · · Score: 1

    I agree with the parent poster, they're philosophy has always been embrace, extend, and extinguish. They already nearly destroyed Java this way, why not XML? As long as it interoperates with other versions of Office/XP/Vista, why should they give a damn?

  2. Re:Now we know... on Intel Reveals Next-Gen CPUs · · Score: 1

    If it's even a small improvement over the Pentium M processor, I will be happy. A 2 Ghz P-M performs on a par with at least a 2.8ghz P-4, and we're talking clock speeds on the Conroe of 2.5-3Ghz, and dual core, along with all the other architectural enchancements like the new bus, cache, and SSE3. Also, they haven't finalized cache sizes, clock speeds, or chipsets yet, so it would be difficult to come up with hard and fast performance figures at this time. My inner geek is praying for the potential of this chip to be realized.

  3. Re:Now we know... on Intel Reveals Next-Gen CPUs · · Score: 1

    I can't multiply today, should be 4.8ghz in the last sentence of the first paragraph.

  4. Re:Now we know... on Intel Reveals Next-Gen CPUs · · Score: 1

    Cooler, quieter, more efficient, and faster clock-for-clock than any other x86 chip on the market including the Athlon64, Pentium M, and Pentium 4. At least 30% faster per Ghz than the Pentium M, which is in turn >30% faster per Ghz than the P4. So that 3Ghz Conroe will be approximately equal to a dual-core 4.6Ghz Pentium 4 and put out 65W of heat/power.

    Better cache handling, faster bus, 4-issue wide core. 35W TDP for Mobiles, 65W desktops, 85W for servers. Sounds like the best of all worlds to me.

    Check out this Inq article:
    http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=25623

  5. Re:No Obligatory Snipery? on Rootkits: Subverting the Windows Kernel · · Score: 1

    Bow before me, for I am root.

  6. Re:Warlocks on Ask Questions of the World of Warcraft Team · · Score: 1

    Invisibility != Stealth. Rogues don't use invis, they use stealth which Detect Invis doesn't catch.

    Soul link is nice, but I'm not sure I could give up Ruin (MD/Ruin specced right now), but i could do 13/31/7 or something along those lines. Just curious how you're specced?

    PvE I don't have problems getting shards, it's in PvP where I tend to burn through them with Shadowburn/Succubus dieing/munching healthstones constantly.

    You're probably right about the infernal, but still, the cooldown is too long. I'll think about respeccing again - grr there goes 15g.

  7. Re:LEEROY JENKINS!! on Ask Questions of the World of Warcraft Team · · Score: 1, Funny

    At least I have chicken.

  8. Re:OK, I have a question. on Ask Questions of the World of Warcraft Team · · Score: 1

    New frog pets FTW!

    I'm never giving up my White Kitten though. /hug /kiss /pat

  9. Re:Please... on Ask Questions of the World of Warcraft Team · · Score: 1

    Hearthstone is your friend. So are warlocks who will summon you for 2g if you ask nicely.

  10. Re:Warlocks on Ask Questions of the World of Warcraft Team · · Score: 0

    I don't have to. Dozens and dozens of other players have posted all these concerns, both on the official forums and on forums.worldofwar.net. The official site forums are full of so much spam and BUFF THIS NERF THAT OMG NINJA posts that they're pointless anyway. There are hundreds of thousands posts a day there, search is a mess, and the threads expire after a week or so - good luck trying to bookmark a thread and come back in a month.

    Also, not a single one of the Blizz customer service reps plays a Lock as their main. How the fuck are they ever going to understand our concerns if they do not experience the game mechanics for themselves. We're supposed to be evil mages, but at this point in time, we're crippled mages.

  11. Re:Caydiem on Ask Questions of the World of Warcraft Team · · Score: 1

    Let's see, druids cat form is far worse than a rogues, their Bear form is average - no better than a Pallie tanking. I *never* see a druid in any form other than Humanoid/Night Elf in an instance.

    They are made to be healers which they excel at. They get the best buff in the game and are superb healers, with heals-over-time, aoe heals, and combat rez which is very nice if you Paladin/Priest dies. They also get leather which makes them more likely to survive than priests. I've never, ever heard druids called overpowered... in fact their feral forms are underpowered if anything.

  12. Warlocks on Ask Questions of the World of Warcraft Team · · Score: 1, Interesting

    When are our complaints that have existed since retail going to be resolved?

    I love my class, but have a few issues.

    1) soul shards - We are the only class that must go grind and collect reagents to go about daily functioning. Make them purchaseable, or perhaps give us a trinket that lets us summon one for free once every ten minutes.

    2) escape spell - Mages get Polymorph and Ice Block, Priests get Insta-cast AOE fear (ours takes 2 seconds) and mind control. Please give us something to stop us getting repeatedly raped by rogues. Perhaps give us banish back like it worked in the beta, useable on everyone, perhaps cost a shard, with a cooldown

    3) end game pets - Make the infernal not cost a reagent, it's a nice pet no doubt, but gets expensive. Also the cooldown time is ridiculous, how bout 30 mins. with guaranteed 10-min enslave? The doomguard is nice, but please give us a reliable way to get one. Waiting for curse of doom to proc sucks.

    4) Enslave demon. Far too short to be useful for the danger envolved.

    5) Voidwalker - please buff his dps - hitting for 20 is seriously gimped. Also I can break is agro very easily with a shadow bolt or Immolate crit.

    6) Invisiblity - why the hell are mages getting invis. back. If they get it back, all the other casters are entitled to it as well - they already get portals and free food, water, and mana pots.

    Yes i know this is more than one question. Thanks blizz.

    Oh yes, nerf shamans.

  13. Re:SATA-150 and Ultra ATA-133? on High-End, High-Capacity SATA-150 Roundup · · Score: 1

    Hot plugging was the chief reason I believe. Don't know who in their right mind would hot-swap an internal drive while the system was on tho...

  14. Re:Buy Seagate! on High-End, High-Capacity SATA-150 Roundup · · Score: 1

    I've only owned one maxtor, got burned on a 5400rpm 30gb way back when - received 3 faulty drives in a row - could've been the Dell system it was in, which I subsequently junked. Also had 2 WDs fail on me, one of which was my fault.

  15. Buy Seagate! on High-End, High-Capacity SATA-150 Roundup · · Score: 4, Informative

    I always try to buy seagate, ~$10 price difference, and the 5-year warranty is priceless. You only get a 3-year warranty on most other drives, or 1 year if you buy retail Western Digital.

    And if you see Maxtor, run like the wind!

  16. Re:Another problem on Arizona School Won't Use Textbooks · · Score: 1

    Your child has no rights until they turn 18.

  17. Re:Ballmer hurts his own credibility on Ballmer: 'We'll catch Google' · · Score: 1

    It means the same thing it's always meant. Embrace, extend, extinguish.

  18. Re:Can someone sum this up? on MIT Physicists Create New Form of Matter · · Score: 1

    Solid, liquid, gas, plasma, neutron star, and now this.

  19. Naming schema on GeForce 7800 GTX Review · · Score: 1

    Any idea how many different versions of the X800 there are? Ati's naming scheme is just as bad as Nvidia's.

    X800
    X800SE
    X800XL
    X800XT
    X800XT PE
    X850
    X850XT
    X850XT PE
    X850XL

    Which is easier to figure out now, smart guy?

  20. Re:Quite true on Apple May be Intel Show Pony · · Score: 1

    The sole purpose of BTX is to cool the blast-furnace that is the Prescott. And it's now irrelevant since every one of Intel's future processors will be based on the Pentium M.

  21. Crossbar latch on Single Molecule Transistor A Reality · · Score: 1
    How similar is this to HP's crossbar latch, another molecular-sized transistor?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossbar_latch

  22. Re:Sourceforge! on Self-wiring Supercomputer · · Score: 1
    Dammit.
    #include <stdio.h>
  23. Re:Sourceforge! on Self-wiring Supercomputer · · Score: 1

    #include

  24. Re:Type-R power supply on Hiper Type-R Modular Blue Line 580W PSU Review · · Score: 5, Funny

    Throw on a V-TEC sticker and get +5 amps on the 12V rail!

  25. Re:Natural evolution of an OS on Kernel Changes Draw Concern · · Score: 1

    Whoops, sorry OP. Thought there was a period after NT line and you meant XP was based on linux.