The best thing I've heard about this is that Mark Setrakian is involved. Competitors and real fans of robot fighting know him as one of the great geniuses of the sport.
He won the first Robot Wars with The Master. His later machines, Mechadon and Snake, were far less competitive, but were much more interesting.
I've been involved with robot fighting for over 15 years.
You're incorrect. Autonomous robots aren't as fun to watch as human controlled ones for at least 2 reasons:
1. The current state of the art just isn't good enough. 2. It's hard to root for a soulless lump of metal, whereas you can vicariously experience the competition through the human competitors.
Also, every robot fighting competition I've ever competed in has allowed autonomous competitors, as long as they have fail-safe remote control. So you're welcome to build your own autonomous fighting robot.
Copyright and trademark infringement are common and this sort of thing has been a source of controversy for a while now.
But the next big blowup will be over things that are illegal in themselves just by their shape and arrangement of parts. I'm talking about things like weapons, drug paraphernalia, and pathogens. It's likely we'll see a crackdown or at least a panic resulting in calls for licensure of many of the most useful creation tools ever designed.
Take the humble AK-47 rifle, for example. It's designed for ease of manufacture, making it a likely target for replication. This makes enforcing highly restrictive gun laws very difficult in a world full of machines that can build them from simple raw materials.
Over the holidays, I got a chance to give Google TV a serious tryout at my parents' house. They bought the Sony Blu Ray player with Google TV built in.
I liked it so much that I ordered one for my living room. It arrives tomorrow.
The Netflix/Amazon/web integration works very well and there's even an app store. I'm planning to use it for all my TV viewing and getting rid of cable.
I've become a recent convert to the idea of using a password card or password chart to remember my passwords for me. There's not nearly as much to remember, as you use a code to look up the password on a printed card. But if you lose the card, anybody finding it will only see a random sequence of letters and numbers.
You gotta be kidding. You're wrong about just about everything. Read, for instance what Amnesty International has to say: http://www.amnesty.org/en/region/cuba
I saw Sony's setup at one of their stores. If you're at all interested, I suggest you go check it out, but please lower your expectations.
The 3D effect is OK and the glasses aren't too awful to deal with, but the image is very flickery, especially if you move your head. It's also not quite as good if you're viewing from an angle; you really need to see it straight on.
The summary is misleading. They didn't actually win the $1 million yet. Masten Space and Unreasonable Rocket are both going to have a crack at the prize and have until October 31 to best Armadillo's performance.
You're too young to remember "The job's not done 'til Lotus won't run." Microsoft apparently would make minor changes in MS-DOS and early versions of Windows so that Lotus 1-2-3 (the most popular spreadsheet of the era) wouldn't work right.
Try the Yoxos Eclipse distribution tool. It lets you easily roll your own version of Eclipse with the add-ons you want. The plugin list is very extensive. I assume that it supports the Subversion plug-in, though I haven't needed it.
I've got a couple Goldtouch keyboards that have a great improvement: extra Delete and Backspace keys on the left hand side of the keyboard. It's very helpful when you've got your right hand on the mouse.
Also, Goldtouch moved the Windows and Right Click/Context Menu keys off of the main area into a separate space. Both of these are great improvements.
I've volunteered with FIRST every now and then when I'm able to.
The phrase "gracious professionalism" always struck me as both condescending to the contestants and unnecessary.
We have the perfectly good term "sportsmanship" which means pretty much the same thing. At various other robotics competitions (BattleBots, Robot Battles, etc.) nearly everyone I've met has been a good sport, and likeable too. Going on and on about "gracious professionalism" at the various official functions implies that the contestants are unable to figure it out on their own and thus need to have it drilled into their heads.
I would like to put in an entirely self-promoting word for Big Blue Saw. 12 pitch (and possibly finer) gears come out just fine when waterjet cutting, and can be a lot cheaper than having custom gears made at a gear specialist. See my photos of an aluminum gear made for a fighting robot.
I heard the story directly from Brian Nave of Team Logicom, but I'm sure you could find the tale on the RFL or BattleBots forums on Delphiforums.com. Team Logicom has a variety of robots; I believe the machine in question was in or near the 220 pound class. The fact that the RW producers were worried about it damaging the arena should tell you something.
I think your analysis is, indeed, flawed. You could just as easily look at the RW UK robots/teams that competed at BB and see that they didn't do so well, either. The fact is, the UK robots were designed for the UK arena, with many more arena hazards and the house robots. This makes spinners much harder to operate. Move the US machines to the RWUK arena, and they do much worse. The converse is also true.
I will point out that the US has produced far more machines in a variety of weight classes and events.
Really, you have no idea what you're talking about. I won't go into the detail, but I'll just point out that Team Logicom, from Florida, USA, brought one of their bots, a spinner, over to RW UK. They were told that it was too powerful and wouldn't be able to compete.
i considered working on a robot for RW till I realised that there was no visible sponsorship allowed No real prize money, and no merchandising money either. You didn't even get to keep the trophy if you won.
Most of the American competitors are, in fact, friends. Teams go a long way to help each other out. I've met some wonderfully intelligent and creative people through robot fighting.
Slashdot Mirror
True, though there is some precedent for human-machine pairing in sports like auto racing.
The old NASCAR was a great example of this. Fans who drove Chevys would root for the Chevy to win.
The best thing I've heard about this is that Mark Setrakian is involved. Competitors and real fans of robot fighting know him as one of the great geniuses of the sport.
He won the first Robot Wars with The Master. His later machines, Mechadon and Snake, were far less competitive, but were much more interesting.
Here's a video of Mechadon in action:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=El8ne4zSCY0
I've been involved with robot fighting for over 15 years.
You're incorrect. Autonomous robots aren't as fun to watch as human controlled ones for at least 2 reasons:
1. The current state of the art just isn't good enough.
2. It's hard to root for a soulless lump of metal, whereas you can vicariously experience the competition through the human competitors.
Also, every robot fighting competition I've ever competed in has allowed autonomous competitors, as long as they have fail-safe remote control. So you're welcome to build your own autonomous fighting robot.
You haven't seen the product of a high end machine.
They can stand up to pretty demanding service, like rocket engines:
http://blog.reprap.org/2011/06/paul-breed-of-unreasonable-rocket-fame.html
Copyright and trademark infringement are common and this sort of thing has been a source of controversy for a while now.
But the next big blowup will be over things that are illegal in themselves just by their shape and arrangement of parts. I'm talking about things like weapons, drug paraphernalia, and pathogens. It's likely we'll see a crackdown or at least a panic resulting in calls for licensure of many of the most useful creation tools ever designed.
Take the humble AK-47 rifle, for example. It's designed for ease of manufacture, making it a likely target for replication. This makes enforcing highly restrictive gun laws very difficult in a world full of machines that can build them from simple raw materials.
Over the holidays, I got a chance to give Google TV a serious tryout at my parents' house. They bought the Sony Blu Ray player with Google TV built in.
I liked it so much that I ordered one for my living room. It arrives tomorrow.
The Netflix/Amazon/web integration works very well and there's even an app store. I'm planning to use it for all my TV viewing and getting rid of cable.
I've become a recent convert to the idea of using a password card or
password chart to remember my passwords for me. There's not nearly as much to remember, as you use a code to look up the password on a printed card. But if you lose the card, anybody finding it will only see a random sequence of letters and numbers.
You gotta be kidding. You're wrong about just about everything. Read, for instance what Amnesty International has to say:
http://www.amnesty.org/en/region/cuba
I saw Sony's setup at one of their stores. If you're at all interested, I suggest you go check it out, but please lower your expectations.
The 3D effect is OK and the glasses aren't too awful to deal with, but the image is very flickery, especially if you move your head. It's also not quite as good if you're viewing from an angle; you really need to see it straight on.
The summary is misleading. They didn't actually win the $1 million yet. Masten Space and Unreasonable Rocket are both going to have a crack at the prize and have until October 31 to best Armadillo's performance.
You're too young to remember "The job's not done 'til Lotus won't run." Microsoft apparently would make minor changes in MS-DOS and early versions of Windows so that Lotus 1-2-3 (the most popular spreadsheet of the era) wouldn't work right.
Try the Yoxos Eclipse distribution tool. It lets you easily roll your own version of Eclipse with the add-ons you want. The plugin list is very extensive. I assume that it supports the Subversion plug-in, though I haven't needed it.
Here's a couple I found:
http://www.digitalview.com/controllers/comparison.php
I've got a couple Goldtouch keyboards that have a great improvement: extra Delete and Backspace keys on the left hand side of the keyboard. It's very helpful when you've got your right hand on the mouse.
Also, Goldtouch moved the Windows and Right Click/Context Menu keys off of the main area into a separate space. Both of these are great improvements.
I've volunteered with FIRST every now and then when I'm able to.
The phrase "gracious professionalism" always struck me as both condescending to the contestants and unnecessary.
We have the perfectly good term "sportsmanship" which means pretty much the same thing. At various other robotics competitions (BattleBots, Robot Battles, etc.) nearly everyone I've met has been a good sport, and likeable too. Going on and on about "gracious professionalism" at the various official functions implies that the contestants are unable to figure it out on their own and thus need to have it drilled into their heads.
It's technology oriented, but not computer-oriented:
1.Windows 80.60%
2.Macintosh 13.83%
3.Linux 4.36%
4.(not set) 0.52%
5.iPhone 0.43%
From there, market share starts to get vanishingly small.
I would like to put in an entirely self-promoting word for Big Blue Saw. 12 pitch (and possibly finer) gears come out just fine when waterjet cutting, and can be a lot cheaper than having custom gears made at a gear specialist. See my photos of an aluminum gear made for a fighting robot.
Big Blue Saw is running a this week. Design an aluminum part, and they'll cut it for you.
Definitely cover on-demand manufacturing. Then again, I'm prejudiced.
I think Robot Wars is great too.
I heard the story directly from Brian Nave of Team Logicom, but I'm sure you could find the tale on the RFL or BattleBots forums on Delphiforums.com. Team Logicom has a variety of robots; I believe the machine in question was in or near the 220 pound class. The fact that the RW producers were worried about it damaging the arena should tell you something.
I think your analysis is, indeed, flawed. You could just as easily look at the RW UK robots/teams that competed at BB and see that they didn't do so well, either. The fact is, the UK robots were designed for the UK arena, with many more arena hazards and the house robots. This makes spinners much harder to operate. Move the US machines to the RWUK arena, and they do much worse. The converse is also true.
I will point out that the US has produced far more machines in a variety of weight classes and events.
I guess I should know better.
But hey, I did manage to get moderated up.
Really, you have no idea what you're talking about. I won't go into the detail, but I'll just point out that Team Logicom, from Florida, USA, brought one of their bots, a spinner, over to RW UK. They were told that it was too powerful and wouldn't be able to compete.
BB already has/had a bonus for walkers. It didn't really help. I would prefer to see a separate walker tournament.
Flamethrowers do look cool, but you'd have to allow a weight bonus for them, as they don't do squat against metal armor.
Most of the American competitors are, in fact, friends. Teams go a long way to help each other out. I've met some wonderfully intelligent and creative people through robot fighting.