Bzzzzt wrong, they have the right to search on entrance, but not on exit. Again you can't sign your rights away, they cannot legally detain you period end of story.
Even with wholesale clubs, the most they can do is cancel your membership and in the case of costco return a portion of your membership fee according to their own membership rules. You cannot sign your constitutional rights away. Period end of story. I've done it at costco and just walked out. They tried to stop me until I threatened to call the police, I complained to coperate and then the manager apologized to me. They didn't cancel my membership.
Why would you go to a hospital that doesn't understand the difference between lifestyle and genetic predisposition for all of these problems listed, with the exception of smoking. I seriously can't wait for the pending lawsuit.
There will be a lawsuit about this. It's just a matter of when. It looked like it's the employer doing the fining not the insurance company, which I know in my state if an employer holds back any part of your paycheck, you can get back 3 times the amount.
I used to have Speakeasy, and I'm too damn far away from the CO, on comcast I get 8 times the download speed, and 3 times the upload speed. I was getting below 1 megabit on DSL, and only 384k up max.
RCW 9A.46.020 Definition -- Penalties. (1) A person is guilty of harassment if:
(a) Without lawful authority, the person knowingly threatens:
(i) To cause bodily injury immediately or in the future to the person threatened or to any other person; or
(ii) To cause physical damage to the property of a person other than the actor; or
(iii) To subject the person threatened or any other person to physical confinement or restraint; or
(iv) Maliciously to do any other act which is intended to substantially harm the person threatened or another with respect to his or her physical or mental health or safety; and
(b) The person by words or conduct places the person threatened in reasonable fear that the threat will be carried out. "Words or conduct" includes, in addition to any other form of communication or conduct, the sending of an electronic communication.
(2)(a) Except as provided in (b) of this subsection, a person who harasses another is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
(b) A person who harasses another is guilty of a class C felony if either of the following applies: (i) The person has previously been convicted in this or any other state of any crime of harassment, as defined in RCW 9A.46.060, of the same victim or members of the victim's family or household or any person specifically named in a no-contact or no-harassment order; or (ii) the person harasses another person under subsection (1)(a)(i) of this section by threatening to kill the person threatened or any other person.
(3) The penalties provided in this section for harassment do not preclude the victim from seeking any other remedy otherwise available under law.
----
BTW how many weapons out there have gamepads attached them them? Seems to me that to be actually training to kill cops, you'd at least need a gun based game controller. This guy should be dis-barred.
This doesn't make a lot of sense to me, since the current Intel processors are still 32bit, and the latest PPC processors are 64 bit. I would think that going with the Athlon 64 would have made much more sense. Now they're going to go backwards?
Absolutely brilliant, so you want just criminals to be able to have guns. Here's a clue for you, there are already lots of guns out there. Logic would dictate, that if we banned all guns right now, well all those guns out there wouldn't just go away all of a sudden. Guess what now you have a bunch of un-registered firearms in the hands of criminals. No way to trace them, because you banned all guns, so if someone get's shot, there is now no way to possibly trace the weapon. I nominate you for a darwin award.
Slashdot Mirror
Bzzzzt wrong, they have the right to search on entrance, but not on exit. Again you can't sign your rights away, they cannot legally detain you period end of story.
Even with wholesale clubs, the most they can do is cancel your membership and in the case of costco return a portion of your membership fee according to their own membership rules. You cannot sign your constitutional rights away. Period end of story. I've done it at costco and just walked out. They tried to stop me until I threatened to call the police, I complained to coperate and then the manager apologized to me. They didn't cancel my membership.
I dunno maybe because we like Freedom, Liberty, and well the entire constitution, not just bits and pieces of it like the far left or far right.
What do you mean they couldn't make it work? It works just fine.
Banks aren't regulated, and for all you know the guy is a scam artist.
Ya in certain parts of the country. You mean you've never been lawyer beating?
Why would you go to a hospital that doesn't understand the difference between lifestyle and genetic predisposition for all of these problems listed, with the exception of smoking. I seriously can't wait for the pending lawsuit.
No I hire a lawyer and beat them, so I don't pay higher premiums. See higher premiums work well don't they?
Both types are Genetic as well as diet related.
BMI is bullshit, and you're an idiot if you think it is accurate.
There will be a lawsuit about this. It's just a matter of when. It looked like it's the employer doing the fining not the insurance company, which I know in my state if an employer holds back any part of your paycheck, you can get back 3 times the amount.
I used to have Speakeasy, and I'm too damn far away from the CO, on comcast I get 8 times the download speed, and 3 times the upload speed. I was getting below 1 megabit on DSL, and only 384k up max.
So, who shot Kennedy? ;)
Ah, so your saying you have no problem with secret laws. China should fit you just fine then.
Better watch out, if he knew what the word meant, he might come after you for criminal harrasment. ;)
RCW 9A.46.020
Definition -- Penalties.
(1) A person is guilty of harassment if:
(a) Without lawful authority, the person knowingly threatens:
(i) To cause bodily injury immediately or in the future to the person threatened or to any other person; or
(ii) To cause physical damage to the property of a person other than the actor; or
(iii) To subject the person threatened or any other person to physical confinement or restraint; or
(iv) Maliciously to do any other act which is intended to substantially harm the person threatened or another with respect to his or her physical or mental health or safety; and
(b) The person by words or conduct places the person threatened in reasonable fear that the threat will be carried out. "Words or conduct" includes, in addition to any other form of communication or conduct, the sending of an electronic communication.
(2)(a) Except as provided in (b) of this subsection, a person who harasses another is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
(b) A person who harasses another is guilty of a class C felony if either of the following applies: (i) The person has previously been convicted in this or any other state of any crime of harassment, as defined in RCW 9A.46.060, of the same victim or members of the victim's family or household or any person specifically named in a no-contact or no-harassment order; or (ii) the person harasses another person under subsection (1)(a)(i) of this section by threatening to kill the person threatened or any other person.
(3) The penalties provided in this section for harassment do not preclude the victim from seeking any other remedy otherwise available under law.
----
BTW how many weapons out there have gamepads attached them them? Seems to me that to be actually training to kill cops, you'd at least need a gun based game controller. This guy should be dis-barred.
So if you like someone, and they fuck you up the ass without you're premission. Is that ok?
Technically an IPOD isn't an MP3 player, since all audio is encoded to apples codec on the IPOD.
This doesn't make a lot of sense to me, since the current Intel processors are still 32bit, and the latest PPC processors are 64 bit. I would think that going with the Athlon 64 would have made much more sense. Now they're going to go backwards?
What is a server, wouldn't a linux router also fit this definition?
We don't know what we would do with out you stating the obvious to us!
I bet that doesn't include all the routers out there that run some flavor of linux.
Speakeasy DSL can give you 6 Megabit down, and I bet you don't get 768k up, and you're still sharing you're bandwidth with your neighbors.
Absolutely brilliant, so you want just criminals to be able to have guns. Here's a clue for you, there are already lots of guns out there. Logic would dictate, that if we banned all guns right now, well all those guns out there wouldn't just go away all of a sudden. Guess what now you have a bunch of un-registered firearms in the hands of criminals. No way to trace them, because you banned all guns, so if someone get's shot, there is now no way to possibly trace the weapon. I nominate you for a darwin award.
How affective is a GPS going to be, if someone builds a small faraday cage around it?