There is a constitutional right to the free exercise of religion, explicitly conveyed by the 1st amendment. Of course, getting the Supreme Court to remember that (cf Employment Division v. Smith) is a completely different matter.
It's because all the would-be moderators have been trolled and have responded in his thread, thereby effectively preventing them from moderating him in any direction.
That's because the republicans were all summarily pardoned before the republicans lost the presidency. It's kinda hard to get a conviction when you're not allowed to serve an indictment.
"Teachers of English" isn't any less ambiguous, because it could be interpreted as meaning "teachers who teach English folk". Perhaps you should try "teachers of the English language", which is far more verbose than doing a prefix construction: "English-language teachers".
I could've sworn macos8 only installed on *040s, so are you sure you crammed it onto an unmodified LC? Of course running and installing are two completely different chores....
From the article: "I know I could use a spare machine as a firewall and run Linux's IP masquerading. My only spare machine, however, is an old 486dx2-66 with an NE2000 ethernet card. Not exactly a speed demon, and speed is exactly why I got a cable modem."
AFAIK, only Illinois has a constitutional provision prohibiting the combining of separate matters into one legislative bill. There is certainly no federal equivalent, as suggested by the most cursorary glance at C-SPAN.
Sure databases and heavy duty scientific computing benefit from the vastly larger address space, but day to day gaming, office tasks, web
surfing, mp3 listening and Natalie Portman porn viewing (I had to say it) won't benefit much at all.
That's only because you're letting yourself be shortsighted. When faster processors emerge, you'll start seeing a real market for interactive 3d virtual-reality Natalie Portman.
It is not without a cost but the cost is way less than Itanic.
Hmmm. At least the Titanic didn't sink until after its commercial launch, which did sell lots of seats. At this rate, Itanium isn't going to get out of the dockyards.
It's "affect". You already exist, and so it couldn't effect you -- bring about your existence. And if some moderator mods me down for being helpful, I'll go apeshit.
You have it wrong. Nuclear fission is post-solar power, as it uses elements created in the supernova death of stars. Nuclear fusion is pre-solar power, as it uses hydrogen isotopes that were created in the big bang and have nothing to do with stars.
This is parallel to the FTC's action, which was settled by an agreement not to engage further in these price fixing methods. The state lawsuit goes beyond that and seeks monetary damages.
The three words that scare the crap out of the RIAA?: Northern Mariana Islands. That's right, we're not just talking about the full sovereign force of twenty-four states plus Puerto Rico. This action has been joined in full by the Northern Mariana Islands. Don't you see? The Northern fucking Mariana Islands!
Slashdot Mirror
There is a constitutional right to the free exercise of religion, explicitly conveyed by the 1st amendment. Of course, getting the Supreme Court to remember that (cf Employment Division v. Smith) is a completely different matter.
My name is Grelli! And I AM CANADIAN!
;-)
I'm sorry, you have the wrong 12-step meeting. This one is for slashdot addicts.
There is no one way sign on this bridge!
Sure there is: down. Surely I'm not the only one who can't shake a mental image of the Tacoma Narrows bridge.
It's because all the would-be moderators have been trolled and have responded in his thread, thereby effectively preventing them from moderating him in any direction.
Legal arguments are all about slippery slopes. History has proven it's entirely unreasonable to rely on arbitrary stopping points.
That's because the republicans were all summarily pardoned before the republicans lost the presidency. It's kinda hard to get a conviction when you're not allowed to serve an indictment.
"Teachers of English" isn't any less ambiguous, because it could be interpreted as meaning "teachers who teach English folk". Perhaps you should try "teachers of the English language", which is far more verbose than doing a prefix construction: "English-language teachers".
I could've sworn macos8 only installed on *040s, so are you sure you crammed it onto an unmodified LC? Of course running and installing are two completely different chores....
Which one? The middle finger, I suppose.
Hey, if you are in Poland, you're probably doing something else with potatoes anyway. ;-)
From the article: "I know I could use a spare machine as a firewall and run Linux's IP masquerading. My only spare machine, however, is an old 486dx2-66 with an NE2000 ethernet card. Not exactly a speed demon, and speed is exactly why I got a cable modem."
That would be a "no".
Just without the chutzpah to try.
Now I'm torn[.]
Nope, sorry. That's not allowed. It violates Adobe's other patent, on tear-off menus. You'll be hearing from their lawyers in the morning.
I correct people's grammar when they mistakenly "correct" other people's grammar, anonymous coward.
AFAIK, only Illinois has a constitutional provision prohibiting the combining of separate matters into one legislative bill. There is certainly no federal equivalent, as suggested by the most cursorary glance at C-SPAN.
"Fast" is an adverb. "Slow" is not. If this is a bug, then it's a bug in the English language, not in the instant application thereof.
"Just wait for McKinley!"
Right. The last time there was a McKinley in the public spotlight, he got assasinated. By an Anarchist. Parallels, anyone?
Sure databases and heavy duty scientific computing benefit from the vastly larger address space, but day to day gaming, office tasks, web
surfing, mp3 listening and Natalie Portman porn viewing (I had to say it) won't benefit much at all.
That's only because you're letting yourself be shortsighted. When faster processors emerge, you'll start seeing a real market for interactive 3d virtual-reality Natalie Portman.
It is not without a cost but the cost is way less than Itanic.
Hmmm. At least the Titanic didn't sink until after its commercial launch, which did sell lots of seats. At this rate, Itanium isn't going to get out of the dockyards.
And what would petrifying the device accomplish? All you'd end up with was a lump of rock shaped like a computer, incapable of processing anything.
It's "affect". You already exist, and so it couldn't effect you -- bring about your existence. And if some moderator mods me down for being helpful, I'll go apeshit.
You have it wrong. Nuclear fission is post-solar power, as it uses elements created in the supernova death of stars. Nuclear fusion is pre-solar power, as it uses hydrogen isotopes that were created in the big bang and have nothing to do with stars.
This is parallel to the FTC's action, which was settled by an agreement not to engage further in these price fixing methods. The state lawsuit goes beyond that and seeks monetary damages.
The three words that scare the crap out of the RIAA?: Northern Mariana Islands. That's right, we're not just talking about the full sovereign force of twenty-four states plus Puerto Rico. This action has been joined in full by the Northern Mariana Islands. Don't you see? The Northern fucking Mariana Islands!
Well, can you buy $25,000 worth of shiny boxes, then? Shiny boxes just kick ass.