The totality of the gravity would be the same, albeit lower density as it's over a larger volume. But in a 10 year timescale that's impossible to expand to the size of a galaxy.
"Just look at the epic failure of SUSY or read "Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray" "
Or just look at the Higgs Boson, or Special And General relativity who's predictions came to fruition... You're cherry picking.
The way Google has behaved in the last few years is terrible, it's become much worse in the last 18 months.
I'm actively avoiding as much of thier ecosystem as possible now because thier abandonment policy.
"No one has "live" encoded video on anything other than dedicated encoding hardware in a really REALLY long time."
Tell that to the 10's of millions of Twitch users that don't use CPU or GPU acceleration.
There's several Star Trek and science fiction films which outline this problem. It's possibly unavoidable as we as humans want to live mostly on the surface of an ever expanding sphere, not in the middle or bottom.
No they aren't. But that's only a small part of the reason why I'd move personally. Wrong place to explain, but Google has shafted me on YouTube, Google Maps Contributions and the Nexus 6P
In concrete terms, ESO/ESA VLT surpassed Hubble by quite some margin. But if we can fix Hubble with a *relatively* cheap robotic mission, it would make economic and scientific sense.
"It's distinctly possible, indeed even probable, that ARM becomes useless, and the entire mobile market moves to x86."
There is ZERO indication for this at all. You literally just pulled that out of your arse.
I've seen this argument before but for me there's one major flaw. If a society decides to evolve down in scale they inherently have less computing and storage power. You might argue back that at those small scales, they are more efficient. To which I'd respond that you can have your cake and eat it by having your computing at small scales all the way up to macro scales. A bit like a jupiter sized computer that works on the level of quarks or some such.
The assumption being that computing and storage are important in a highly developed species.
Slashdot Mirror
The totality of the gravity would be the same, albeit lower density as it's over a larger volume. But in a 10 year timescale that's impossible to expand to the size of a galaxy.
That is a brilliant post with a lot of information.Thanks. So transwarp conduits then?
"Just look at the epic failure of SUSY or read "Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray" " Or just look at the Higgs Boson, or Special And General relativity who's predictions came to fruition... You're cherry picking.
All you've done is describe the multiverse, which has been theorised for as long as the big bang (if not longer)
Hangouts got the axe now too. Google really are out of control
You might not, but others do. I have a 180,000 follower community on there that has nowhere else to go that makes sense.
The way Google has behaved in the last few years is terrible, it's become much worse in the last 18 months. I'm actively avoiding as much of thier ecosystem as possible now because thier abandonment policy.
Oh that old chestnut. If you've been studying the technology beyond the soundbites it has indeed changed since the 1980's in exponential ways
"No one has "live" encoded video on anything other than dedicated encoding hardware in a really REALLY long time." Tell that to the 10's of millions of Twitch users that don't use CPU or GPU acceleration.
It hasn't lead the way for years now.
There's several Star Trek and science fiction films which outline this problem. It's possibly unavoidable as we as humans want to live mostly on the surface of an ever expanding sphere, not in the middle or bottom.
Yep.. thats says everything I need to know.
No they aren't. But that's only a small part of the reason why I'd move personally. Wrong place to explain, but Google has shafted me on YouTube, Google Maps Contributions and the Nexus 6P
Why is somebody as dumb as you on /.?
The Hubble Space Telescope is a joint ESA/NASA project
http://sci.esa.int/hubble/
Google had fucked me over a few times in the last 18 months I've had enough
Just like everything else Google
Yeah the shuttle was an absolute disaster financially. IIRC it was just a dick competition with Russia.
In concrete terms, ESO/ESA VLT surpassed Hubble by quite some margin. But if we can fix Hubble with a *relatively* cheap robotic mission, it would make economic and scientific sense.
You know I was thinking the same. In 2018 we should be using semi-automated or at least remote controlled robots for things like this.
Hubble is not just a NASA project. It would be bad for ESA too.
It seems...
You want to avoid technical terms on a technical website? That's what Google Search for.
By the very description of what they are doing, that IS overclocking.
"It's distinctly possible, indeed even probable, that ARM becomes useless, and the entire mobile market moves to x86." There is ZERO indication for this at all. You literally just pulled that out of your arse.
I've seen this argument before but for me there's one major flaw. If a society decides to evolve down in scale they inherently have less computing and storage power. You might argue back that at those small scales, they are more efficient. To which I'd respond that you can have your cake and eat it by having your computing at small scales all the way up to macro scales. A bit like a jupiter sized computer that works on the level of quarks or some such. The assumption being that computing and storage are important in a highly developed species.