Kind of like you have 4 dicks in your mouth. Two of them jizz and it drips out your nose. Then you tickle the balls of the fifth with your lips while tonguing the taint of the 3rd. That leaves 2 dicks in your mouth! See simple fucking reading comprehension!
OK, now I know this is complete marketing B.S. (look, I'm being nice!). There is no reasonable use of "Blockchain" in "Directing Traffic and Tracking Vehicles". That is utter and complete nonsense.
Just call it, "Blockety McBlockFace" and be done with it. F.F.S. (see, I'm being nice again).
Eat shit and die. Fuck you! I'll see you in hell first. I don't download your shitty fucking music and I'm not paying any fucking tax for it. You can go fuck yourselves. If this were instituted in the U.S. I would make it my mission in life to start a "group" to hunt you all down and put a fucking bullet in your fucking brain pan. Fucking worthless goddamn pieces of shit!
Bullshit. You'll barely fucking notice them. And if you do, they'll look "pretty". You're a fucking shill. Go kill yourself. The rest of us will enjoy clean energy. Fucking worthless loser piece of shit. Just fucking kill yourself. You're a complete waste of oxygen. Just shut the fuck up!
> The only reason I can think of for wanting to intentionally polarize the country is to give the commoners something to fight about so the elites in washington on both sides of the aisle can continue to sell off the country to the highest bidder.
I said effectively this same thing this morning to someone who was telling me all about this mess. Couldn't agree more.
That's the important bit too. "Accused". Anyone can be accused. From what I've seen and heard (which isn't much to be honest) I'd tend to think that his accuser is being truthful, but, from what I've heard of the details, it isn't clear-cut. 30 years is a long time ago.
>> We're about to seat a guy with repeated accusations
I have to admit, I haven't been following that closely. My 75 year-old mother insists that she has watched all the testimony and she says it seems to her to be a hit job without sufficient evidence. I'm somewhat skeptical of her assessment because she tends to watch too much Fox News and she comes from a generation where women put up with this sort of shit and blamed themselves.
Could you provide some solid links and references regarding the evidence and testimony? I'd be interested in facts as opposed to speculations. I'm truly interested in whether or not there is any there there on this. I don't want a Supreme Court Justice who is a cocksucker who sexually assaults women. I'd like to know the facts; unfortunately, I've seen little reporting beyond wild speculations.
>> If you don't think that's a problem then, well, I don't know what to tell you except "Party before Country".
Normally, I'd be with you on this, but, from what I've actually been able to get clear confirmation of, the case here isn't clear-cut and those who "support" Kavanaugh aren't necessarily supporting a sexual assaulter. They may legitimately believe he is innocent. They may be right?
Then again, they just might be naive and/or full-of-shit.
I'd like to know the facts. There seems to be a dearth of them though.
How in the hell is truth "Flamebait"? This is a political issue so politics is definitely "On-Topic" for this. If we're going to keep allowing stupid, shitty, jingoistic slogans to drive politics, then, expect to be called out on it!
If you want to take credit, you have to take blame. I give 2 shits about Hilllary. What does her being a completely worthless piece of shit have to do with the current President and others in charge of the country doing everything they can to undermine American democracy and the livelihood of the American citizenry?
Where we sell-out the American people so that a few more Wall Street bankers can line their pockets. Trump whose power stems from shady, mafia-backed, and kremlin-backed tax-evading "Real Estate" deals. Should we expect anything different? MAGA!
YOu're a fucking fool. You assume so much without evidence. You've proved yourself incapable of any sort of logical, rational thought. You just spout off assumptions without evidence. You're a fucktard.
Where's the phobia? I didn't say it was anything bad. I just said you should stop sucking your own dick and suck your boyfriends' dicks. It's nasty for you to be sucking your own dick. Do all gays suck their own dick? Is that your assertion. Who's homophobic? Look in the mirror you useless prick!
You choosing not to use certain words are your standards for you. You preventing me from using certain words because you don't like them is you imposing your standards on me. I'm not forcing you to use words you don't want to use. Why do you insist upon saying I can't use certain words? Who is imposing on who in this equation? You are limiting someone else's speech by wrongly claiming they are imposing on you. That is the same kind of BULLSHIT argument that leads to being against gays, abortion, etc. You are against being gay. OK, don't be gay. That's for you to decide. You don't get to decide that someone else should or shouldn't be gay. You don't believe in abortion. Fine, don't abort your progeny. You don't get to decide for someone else though. That is the problem with "morals" they are all about you imposing your will on someone else. That makes you the aggressor and you are in the wrong. I will fight you until the end. You do not get to decide for me what is and isn't right unless and until I try to interfere with your ability to exercise your rights. It's as simple as that.
You invent a "safe" reality you can live in and deny anything that contradicts the safe space you've built for yourself. Psychology is crap science. Plain and simple. You haven't done anything or provided any argument to show otherwise. All you have done is run your mouth and be insulting. You started the personal attacks, not me. That show that you are intellectually and emotionally insecure according to your own "profession". I challenge you to provide any evidence for anything you have claimed. You can't. Because you are a hack and a charlatan. You probably feel the need to attack others intellectually because you have a deep-rooted insecurity due to the fact that you are a coward and have never done anything of merit or built anything of value in your life. While psychologists sit around and navel-gaze about how they can "help" someone who is being abused, I kneecap the abuser.
Coward. You run fearfully from an argument you can't win. Your world falls flat and crumbles around you. You retreat to your "safe space" to covet your "Intellectual Superiority"! Yay for you! What do you want? A cookie? Here have cookie my friend: https://www.youtube.com/watch?....
Have a cookie. You'll feel better. Don't worry, no need to curl up in the fetal position, rock back and forth, and tell the bad man to stop.
More circular logic. Psychology says... so, you are wrong...., so psychology is right.
Here's the thing. It is obvious that you are a fearful coward who has a need to feel intellectually superior by creating a sandbox of your own design and playing in it and declaring it to be the one true playing in the dirt hobby. You are wrong. Your persistent need to feel that you are intellectually superior, based on your own declarations (unlike your unfounded speculation about my background) proves you are a cowardly, weak, person who fears life and other human beings and you are desperate to controls other's thoughts about you and your so-called "profession". Have a little back-bone man. Don't be so fearful of disagreement. Everything can't be the way you have fantasized it to be.
Now, it appears I was mistaken, they are somewhere between a 2.5 and 4 sigma, but, it is still under study. Interesting? Someone qualified care to comment?
I wonder how this relates to the findings that are staring to become apparent at CERN/LHC showing unusual decays for (I believe if I recall correctly - please correct me if I am mistaken) muons into electrons (or perhaps it was the other way, I'll have to see if I can locate the reference)? I read an article recently claiming that they are approaching 5-sigma on something they originally thought was just an experimental apparatus artifact but now is strongly believed to be "New Physics"? Could these two things be related?
Slashdot Mirror
Kind of like you have 4 dicks in your mouth. Two of them jizz and it drips out your nose. Then you tickle the balls of the fifth with your lips while tonguing the taint of the 3rd. That leaves 2 dicks in your mouth! See simple fucking reading comprehension!
Thank you for the complement. I'm glad you approve of the debate style I use against complete nonsense.
OK, now I know this is complete marketing B.S. (look, I'm being nice!). There is no reasonable use of "Blockchain" in "Directing Traffic and Tracking Vehicles". That is utter and complete nonsense.
Just call it, "Blockety McBlockFace" and be done with it. F.F.S. (see, I'm being nice again).
Actually, it hasn't. There is no Internet Tax that goes to the Music industry.
Eat shit and die. Fuck you! I'll see you in hell first. I don't download your shitty fucking music and I'm not paying any fucking tax for it. You can go fuck yourselves. If this were instituted in the U.S. I would make it my mission in life to start a "group" to hunt you all down and put a fucking bullet in your fucking brain pan. Fucking worthless goddamn pieces of shit!
Go fuck yourself. It is not an honest debate. You are a complete over-entilted fucking prick.
>> These will be a complete eyesore
Bullshit. You'll barely fucking notice them. And if you do, they'll look "pretty". You're a fucking shill. Go kill yourself. The rest of us will enjoy clean energy. Fucking worthless loser piece of shit. Just fucking kill yourself. You're a complete waste of oxygen. Just shut the fuck up!
> The only reason I can think of for wanting to intentionally polarize the country is to give the commoners something to fight about so the elites in washington on both sides of the aisle can continue to sell off the country to the highest bidder.
I said effectively this same thing this morning to someone who was telling me all about this mess. Couldn't agree more.
>> he's accused
That's the important bit too. "Accused". Anyone can be accused. From what I've seen and heard (which isn't much to be honest) I'd tend to think that his accuser is being truthful, but, from what I've heard of the details, it isn't clear-cut. 30 years is a long time ago.
>> We're about to seat a guy with repeated accusations
I have to admit, I haven't been following that closely. My 75 year-old mother insists that she has watched all the testimony and she says it seems to her to be a hit job without sufficient evidence. I'm somewhat skeptical of her assessment because she tends to watch too much Fox News and she comes from a generation where women put up with this sort of shit and blamed themselves.
Could you provide some solid links and references regarding the evidence and testimony? I'd be interested in facts as opposed to speculations. I'm truly interested in whether or not there is any there there on this. I don't want a Supreme Court Justice who is a cocksucker who sexually assaults women. I'd like to know the facts; unfortunately, I've seen little reporting beyond wild speculations.
>> If you don't think that's a problem then, well, I don't know what to tell you except "Party before Country".
Normally, I'd be with you on this, but, from what I've actually been able to get clear confirmation of, the case here isn't clear-cut and those who "support" Kavanaugh aren't necessarily supporting a sexual assaulter. They may legitimately believe he is innocent. They may be right?
Then again, they just might be naive and/or full-of-shit.
I'd like to know the facts. There seems to be a dearth of them though.
How in the hell is truth "Flamebait"? This is a political issue so politics is definitely "On-Topic" for this. If we're going to keep allowing stupid, shitty, jingoistic slogans to drive politics, then, expect to be called out on it!
MAGA! Bitches!
If you want to take credit, you have to take blame. I give 2 shits about Hilllary. What does her being a completely worthless piece of shit have to do with the current President and others in charge of the country doing everything they can to undermine American democracy and the livelihood of the American citizenry?
Where we sell-out the American people so that a few more Wall Street bankers can line their pockets. Trump whose power stems from shady, mafia-backed, and kremlin-backed tax-evading "Real Estate" deals. Should we expect anything different? MAGA!
2007 would be an 11 or 12 year old car. 2007 models hit the "showroom" in summer of 2006 usually.
YOu're a fucking fool. You assume so much without evidence. You've proved yourself incapable of any sort of logical, rational thought. You just spout off assumptions without evidence. You're a fucktard.
Where's the phobia? I didn't say it was anything bad. I just said you should stop sucking your own dick and suck your boyfriends' dicks. It's nasty for you to be sucking your own dick. Do all gays suck their own dick? Is that your assertion. Who's homophobic? Look in the mirror you useless prick!
You choosing not to use certain words are your standards for you. You preventing me from using certain words because you don't like them is you imposing your standards on me. I'm not forcing you to use words you don't want to use. Why do you insist upon saying I can't use certain words? Who is imposing on who in this equation? You are limiting someone else's speech by wrongly claiming they are imposing on you. That is the same kind of BULLSHIT argument that leads to being against gays, abortion, etc. You are against being gay. OK, don't be gay. That's for you to decide. You don't get to decide that someone else should or shouldn't be gay. You don't believe in abortion. Fine, don't abort your progeny. You don't get to decide for someone else though. That is the problem with "morals" they are all about you imposing your will on someone else. That makes you the aggressor and you are in the wrong. I will fight you until the end. You do not get to decide for me what is and isn't right unless and until I try to interfere with your ability to exercise your rights. It's as simple as that.
Please, stop sucking your own dick. It's nasty. Go suck your boyfriends' dicks instead.
Yes, we need to be on the look-out for this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Yep. I was right. You want a cookie. Have a cookie. Feel better.
You invent a "safe" reality you can live in and deny anything that contradicts the safe space you've built for yourself. Psychology is crap science. Plain and simple. You haven't done anything or provided any argument to show otherwise. All you have done is run your mouth and be insulting. You started the personal attacks, not me. That show that you are intellectually and emotionally insecure according to your own "profession". I challenge you to provide any evidence for anything you have claimed. You can't. Because you are a hack and a charlatan. You probably feel the need to attack others intellectually because you have a deep-rooted insecurity due to the fact that you are a coward and have never done anything of merit or built anything of value in your life. While psychologists sit around and navel-gaze about how they can "help" someone who is being abused, I kneecap the abuser.
Coward. You run fearfully from an argument you can't win. Your world falls flat and crumbles around you. You retreat to your "safe space" to covet your "Intellectual Superiority"! Yay for you! What do you want? A cookie? Here have cookie my friend: https://www.youtube.com/watch?....
Have a cookie. You'll feel better. Don't worry, no need to curl up in the fetal position, rock back and forth, and tell the bad man to stop.
Just have a cookie. You'll be ok.
More circular logic. Psychology says ... so, you are wrong...., so psychology is right.
Here's the thing. It is obvious that you are a fearful coward who has a need to feel intellectually superior by creating a sandbox of your own design and playing in it and declaring it to be the one true playing in the dirt hobby. You are wrong. Your persistent need to feel that you are intellectually superior, based on your own declarations (unlike your unfounded speculation about my background) proves you are a cowardly, weak, person who fears life and other human beings and you are desperate to controls other's thoughts about you and your so-called "profession". Have a little back-bone man. Don't be so fearful of disagreement. Everything can't be the way you have fantasized it to be.
https://futurism.com/measureme....
Now, it appears I was mistaken, they are somewhere between a 2.5 and 4 sigma, but, it is still under study. Interesting? Someone qualified care to comment?
I wonder how this relates to the findings that are staring to become apparent at CERN/LHC showing unusual decays for (I believe if I recall correctly - please correct me if I am mistaken) muons into electrons (or perhaps it was the other way, I'll have to see if I can locate the reference)? I read an article recently claiming that they are approaching 5-sigma on something they originally thought was just an experimental apparatus artifact but now is strongly believed to be "New Physics"? Could these two things be related?
It's pretty obvious that you were molested as a child and now have become an abuser yourself, right?
You see how that works. No evidence required. Just a proclamation. You're an idiot.