Slashdot Mirror


Bizarre Particles Keep Flying Out of Antarctica's Ice, and They Might Shatter Modern Physics (livescience.com)

There's something mysterious coming up from the frozen ground in Antarctica, and it could break physics as we know it. From a report: Physicists don't know what it is exactly. But they do know it's some sort of cosmic ray -- a high-energy particle that's blasted its way through space, into the Earth, and back out again. But the particles physicists know about -- the collection of particles that make up what scientists call the Standard Model (SM) of particle physics -- shouldn't be able to do that.

Sure, there are low-energy neutrinos that can pierce through miles upon miles of rock unaffected. But high-energy neutrinos, as well as other high-energy particles, have "large cross-sections." That means that they'll almost always crash into something soon after zipping into the Earth and never make it out the other side. And yet, since March 2016, researchers have been puzzling over two events in Antarctica where cosmic rays did burst out from the Earth, and were detected by NASA's Antarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna (ANITA) -- a balloon-borne antenna drifting over the southern continent.

ANITA is designed to hunt cosmic rays from outer space, so the high-energy neutrino community was buzzing with excitement when the instrument detected particles that seemed to be blasting up from Earth instead of zooming down from space. Because cosmic rays shouldn't do that, scientists began to wonder whether these mysterious beams are made of particles never seen before. Since then, physicists have proposed all sorts of explanations for these "upward going" cosmic rays, from sterile neutrinos (neutrinos that rarely ever bang into matter) to "atypical dark matter distributions inside the Earth," referencing the mysterious form of matter that doesn't interact with light.

158 comments

  1. Science Journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But the particles physicists know about -- the collection of particles that make up what scientists call the Standard Model (SM) of particle physics -- shouldn't be able to do that.

    Sure, there are low-energy neutrinos that can pierce through miles upon miles of rock unaffected.

    Why does author contradict theirself in the very next sentence?
    Anyway this is interesting news.
    How do instruments detect which direction single particles are coming from?

    1. Re:Science Journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Miles and miles" as stated != the diameter of the Earth, which is thousands and thousands of miles. You misread a vague sentence, it's going to happen in physics reporting to a lay audience.
         

    2. Re:Science Journalism by frith01 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Low-energy neutrinos = pass through

      High-energy neutrinos = bounce off everything, BUT we are seeing them coming from our planet. So if they are not bouncing off things, then are they being generated? or what is the mechanism that makes them appear to be coming from the planet.?

      Direction of travel is determined similar to following a traveller who has a strobe light attached. When you identify the spot you see the light initially, then the same light shows up awhile later at another spot, you can determine the back-azimuth to the originating dot. (collector is large enough to see 2 or more interactions within the collection material)

    3. Re: Science Journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was my understanding that low energy neutrinos needed very large, very dense detectors to capture the relatively rare interaction events.

    4. Re:Science Journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Okay, if it's not a contradiction, then it's plain wrong. Neutrinos go through the diameter of the Earth all the time.

    5. Re:Science Journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't expect known high energy neutrinos to pass all the way through the Earth unscathed but their detector is going off saying so. So basically they're detecting a new kind of neutrino, or similar actor.

    6. Re:Science Journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or they are not passing through the entire diameter of the earth but just a chord.

    7. Re:Science Journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      http://cds.cern.ch/record/374272/files/9812262.pdf

      The penetration of ultrahigh energy neutrinos through the Earth, with energies E greater
      than 10 TeV or so, can be strongly affected by neutrino interactions with matter. This is due
      to the increase of neutrino cross sections with energy. At these ultrahigh energies we have
      significant attenuation of the neutrino fluxes on transversing through the Earth and, indeed,
      complete absorption for energies above about 108 GeV or so, depending on the nadir angle of
      the neutrino beam. Realistic estimates of these effects are crucial for predicting the number of
      neutrinos reaching the large km3 scale detectors after penetration through the Earth. Clearly
      the magnitude of this ultrahigh energy neutrino flux has important implications for neutrino
      astronomy. For example, it is hoped that the neutrino flux coming through the Earth will point
      back to its Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) origin [1]. Clearly the magnitude of the signal, and
      the ability of the Earth to reduce the background due to atmospheric neutrinos, are crucial in
      this exciting endeavour.

    8. Re:Science Journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or they might find them elsewhere as well if they had an detector positioned there.

    9. Re:Science Journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could they be trapped, bouncing off between earth surface and the atmosphere?

    10. Re:Science Journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could they be trapped, bouncing off between earth surface and the atmosphere?

      Not possible even a little bit.

    11. Re: Science Journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I suspect they might have thought of that though, as in scientific terms this is known as FUCKING OBVIOUS

    12. Re:Science Journalism by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Is it implausible that a part of neutrinos could have just the right energy to collide with matter after passing through Earth "almost once"? I thought the same thing held for other particles, and that by giving them the right energy, you could achieve a desired penetration depth.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    13. Re: Science Journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The earth is moving around the sun so if these things keep coming up and they are all from the same very far away source, wouldn't their trajectories show that?

    14. Re:Science Journalism by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Maybe there's a hole or a tunnel.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    15. Re:Science Journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, Earth has monkeys flying out of its butt, too?

    16. Re:Science Journalism by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should have read a little further where it clarifies that. Did your finger get tired?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  2. I know...I Know! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    The Lizard People are coming to greet us! All hail the Great Lizard.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  3. Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever.

  4. So.. by syn3rg · · Score: 4, Funny

    they figured out the 7th chevron...

    --
    The contents of this message have been doubly encrypted by ROT13
    1. Re:So.. by TFlan91 · · Score: 0

      I don't think this reference applies...

      (Currently rewatching SG1/Atlantis with my wife, at S09 and S02 respectively)

    2. Re:So.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think they finally completed the massive calculations they needed to open the Antarctica gate. The breathtakingly large computations supplied by their scheme... bitcoin. Everyone knows this....

    3. Re:So.. by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      I think they finally completed the massive calculations they needed to open the Antarctica gate. The breathtakingly large computations supplied by their scheme... bitcoin. Everyone knows this....

      So we can update the "what is bitcoin" Analogy to;-

        "Imagine if leaving your car idling 24/7 solved sudokus that you could trade for heroin, and also open up some sort of hell gate to ancient eskimo pharos"

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
  5. Disclosure preparation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just remember: we told you so

  6. I wonder if these Things can mutate? by filesiteguy · · Score: 1

    I mean, small particles coming out of the Antartic ice. Maybe they're alien and will slowly take on human shapes to terrorize any researchers there.

    1. Re:I wonder if these Things can mutate? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Then we might need someone to fight them. Perhaps some sort of predator.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re:I wonder if these Things can mutate? by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 1

      Nah, they've detected the Stargate!!

      --
      Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
  7. So, the options are... by Narcocide · · Score: 2

    1) Originating from within the Earth's crust.
    2) Bouncing off something in the Earth's crust.
    3) Leaking through the Earth from an undetected particle beam impact on the other side, originating deep in space.

    Who wants to bet on one?

    1. Re:So, the options are... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      1) Originating from within the Earth's crust. 2) Bouncing off something in the Earth's crust. 3) Leaking through the Earth from an undetected particle beam impact on the other side, originating deep in space.

      Who wants to bet on one?

      A very good chance of just that. If every claim of something something shatter modern physics actually did shatter modern physics, modern physics would be irrecoverably shattered long ago.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    2. Re:So, the options are... by Zorpheus · · Score: 1

      Maybe 2), I don't know. I think 3) is what the summary says can't happen, and 1) would be an unknown process which might be even more revoutionary than an unknown particle.

    3. Re:So, the options are... by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Yea, we all know that the real story here is the horrifying lack of diligence surrounding monitoring of cosmic ray impacts on our planet and atmosphere, but I really like the romantic notion of some sort of exotic matter having laid unnoticed for centuries under the ice pack until one day it melted a bit too much.

    4. Re:So, the options are... by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think I'll bet on 4) They made a mistake.
      And however unlikely it might be, there's also 5) They're lying.

    5. Re:So, the options are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6) Microwave was on :)

    6. Re:So, the options are... by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      No bets, this is so strange and unexpected that option 4 - some sort of unexpected failure in the sensors or the data processing/interpretation - seems to be the most likely result.

    7. Re:So, the options are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7) Balloon encountered strong updraft, payload tipped over momentarily

    8. Re:So, the options are... by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

      7. Previously unobserved 2-dimensional high-energy particle. Can only be detected if observed precisely edge-on, or maybe face-on.

      --
      The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
    9. Re:So, the options are... by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Oh, I like this one because it's from Star Trek.

    10. Re:So, the options are... by Megol · · Score: 2

      8) A glitch in the simulation.

    11. Re:So, the options are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Earth really is flat.

    12. Re:So, the options are... by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

      whatwhatwhat? Crap. So much for my one original thought for this year.

      Which episode BTW?

      --
      The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  8. I'm not saying it was aliens... by khandom08 · · Score: 5, Funny

    but it was aliens

    1. Re:I'm not saying it was aliens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The particles convey something that they call ... mass effect.

    2. Re:I'm not saying it was aliens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't worry, predators will hunt them all down.

      worry about the predators though.

  9. Yog-Sothoth knows the gate. by He+Who+Has+No+Name · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yog-Sothoth is the gate.
    Yog-Sothoth is the key.

    1. Re:Yog-Sothoth knows the gate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yog-Sothoth does not know de wae.

    2. Re:Yog-Sothoth knows the gate. by sheramil · · Score: 1

      I really hope this doesn't lead to A Colder War...

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Colder_War

  10. Hmm.... by gerald.edward.butler · · Score: 2

    I wonder how this relates to the findings that are staring to become apparent at CERN/LHC showing unusual decays for (I believe if I recall correctly - please correct me if I am mistaken) muons into electrons (or perhaps it was the other way, I'll have to see if I can locate the reference)? I read an article recently claiming that they are approaching 5-sigma on something they originally thought was just an experimental apparatus artifact but now is strongly believed to be "New Physics"? Could these two things be related?

  11. Re:And Out Of Madonna's Butt? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    In this case, it's coming out of Montana's butt.

  12. Death Star Laser - First Shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's no moon.........its a space station.

  13. The Thing by julian67 · · Score: 2

    Nobody of my generation is surprised by this news. Ever since we saw The Thing we've been expecting it.

      https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0...

  14. Here is an article referencing what I recalled.... by gerald.edward.butler · · Score: 3, Interesting

    https://futurism.com/measureme....

    Now, it appears I was mistaken, they are somewhere between a 2.5 and 4 sigma, but, it is still under study. Interesting? Someone qualified care to comment?

  15. They Might Shatter Modern Physics ! by EvilSS · · Score: 3, Funny

    They we shouldn't store modern physics above Antarctica! Who's bright idea was it to put it there in the first place?

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    1. Re:They Might Shatter Modern Physics ! by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      You'd think we'd store modern physics on a durable media. There's so many storage materials that are not prone to shattering.

    2. Re:They Might Shatter Modern Physics ! by lgw · · Score: 3, Funny

      Most materials would shatter at Antarctic temperatures. Hopefully this isn't the only modern physics, but just a backup in cold storage.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:They Might Shatter Modern Physics ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      come on, who broke the Standard Model? it was right on the coffeetable last night, and now its in pieces all over the shag carpet! its gonna be a real hassle to clean up. ok, if no one fesses up, im gonna have to revoke everyones science license.

  16. Ever seen the film Volcano? by devslash0 · · Score: 1

    What if melting ice capes are not what we think they are? What if global warming is the effect rather than the cause? What if those "upward going" particles are a sign that something is happening in the mantle deep under the North Pole, causing nuclear disturbance, ejecting matter and increasing the global temperature as the result?

    I'm not saying there is anything happening there and surely some of you will doubt my sanity but is it really such an implausible theory? We only managed to probe a tiny fraction of the crust. On the other hand, we know how violent and unpredictable other planets can be.

    What if the end is actually near?

    1. Re:Ever seen the film Volcano? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I certainly hope it is. Existence has become boring. The end would surely be much more fascinating, even if it is relatively brief.

    2. Re:Ever seen the film Volcano? by jeff4747 · · Score: 4, Funny

      What if those "upward going" particles are a sign that something is happening in the mantle deep under the North Pole

      What if you knew where Antarctica was located?

    3. Re: Ever seen the film Volcano? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if you had any idea of what "high energy" means?

      These particles are so energetic the sun couldnâ(TM)t even produce them.

  17. LOL ... Godzilla ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, the secret is out ... Lord Godzilla is due to emerge this year, we've been keeping it as a surprise.

    Surprise!!

  18. Bad cable by lengel · · Score: 1

    Well, I guess we know where that faulty cable that skewed the first OPERA results https://science.slashdot.org/s... ended up.

  19. My hypothesis by joetomato · · Score: 3, Funny

    The intern they hired to mount the sensor on the pole skipped the part about "This end up"

    1. Re:My hypothesis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The intern they hired to mount the sensor on the pole skipped the part about "This end up"

      The more likely variant of this is that the physicist who designed the device didn't put a directional label on it all because he thought it should be obvious to anyone.

  20. Classified base? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some kind of particle we don't fully understand, emitted from a very remote location we aren't expecting human activity in.

    Classified base using classified technology?

  21. Re:And Out Of Madonna's Butt? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Montanna's butt or Stewart's butt?

    She's the same person you know.

  22. Religious conspiracy theory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine the Garden of Eden is under all that ice. It's protected by the angel Jophiel. Either Jophiel or his sword is emitting particles we haven't seen since before the birth of science. Or one of the forbidden trees is putting out the particles. With the current president, I could almost believe in an end times scenario...

  23. Two events by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get to twenty at least before you tell the press.

    1 event - keep it to yourself but have a look see.
    2 events - tell your office mate and see if you are doing it wrong. ...
    20 events - put out a paper and get some other people to help you look at this.6 if you work at Ice Cube ...
    2 years and much confirmation later. Tell the science press ...
    Hell freezes over. ...
    Put it on slashdot.

  24. Tachyons by Tomahawk · · Score: 3, Informative

    Obviously tachyons -- since they travel backwards through time they would be observed as traveling upwards.

    1. Re:Tachyons by gerald.edward.butler · · Score: 1

      Yes, we need to be on the look-out for this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    2. Re:Tachyons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously tachyons -- since they travel backwards through time they would be observed as traveling upwards.

      Unsure if OP is being funny, but it's funnier to interpret it as funny. Ergo: Wouldn't that be chronitons?

  25. Frozen alien ship! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Itâ(TM)s the reptilian mothership frozen in the Antarctic ice for millennia about to be freed by their engineered global warming! It is well known reptilians need the heat and their terraforming to free the ship and provide a suitable habitat is almost here!

  26. Re:Future Predictions. by Topwiz · · Score: 1

    About 75% (26 of 35) of the Senate seats up for re-election are held by Democrats. The odds are good that the Republicans pick up at least one.

  27. Re:And Out Of Madonna's Butt? by Tablizer · · Score: 0

    Obama was right, there are 57 states ;-)

  28. wait for it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This may be the leading edge of a UFO disclosure.

    A true one or a false flag ?

    If it leads to a war or a NWO, I would bet false flag.

    If it's true, things are about to get weird & wild.
    I am hoping for the best, free energy, space travel & freedom.

    1. Re: wait for it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First it'll lead to an alien invasion, then a rise of the anti Christ to quell the invasion

      Flat earth 101

  29. WW2 base by AshFan · · Score: 0

    The German WW2 base must still be going strong. Maybe having Shogoth trouble near the mountains of madness?

  30. Another excuse to drill in the arctic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I must be paranoid but the only thing I can think of is this being used as an excuse. I don't disagree it's interesting nor that it shouldn't be studied but given our current climate (no pun intended); I am skeptical about not only the ramifications but logistics of doing so.

    The Arctic poles and Oceans serve as DMZs for a reason. When you have countries willing to drag sheets of ice to sell water or build Islands to claim it extends their coast line, they won't give a damn what happens to the Environment in the process.

  31. Simpsons did it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just took the hollow Earth and Agartha theories and put your religion on it. Nothing novel, sorry.

  32. To be pedantic, they are coming from that directio by raymorris · · Score: 2

    Apparently they are coming from the direction of the North Pole, through the South Pole ..

  33. Weak Interaction by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 5, Informative

    Neutrinos are leptons (like the electron) but have no charge. This means that they cannot interact via the electromagnetic force like every other matter-like particle (fermion). Instead, they can only interact via the weak interaction.

    We have known for several decades that the electromagnetic and weak interactions are really two aspects of the same electroweak force. What makes the weak force different from the electromagnetic force is that the carriers of the weak force, the W and Z bosons, have large masses ~90 times that of a proton whereas the electromagnetic force is transmitted by massles photons.

    At low energies when particles collide there is not enough energy to create "real" (on-shell) W and Z bosons and so it is extremely rare that particles will interact via the weak force at low energy. So, if this is the ONLY way you have to interact you basically hardly every interact at all. This is what happens for low energy neutrinos.

    However, at _really_ high energy - about 10,000 times or more the energy of a proton in the Large Hadron Collider - collisions of neutrinos with matter have enough energy to create real W and Z bosons. When this happens the chance of a weak interaction starts to become similar to that of an electromagnetic interaction and neutrinos can no longer pass through the Earth.

    1. Re: Weak Interaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Earth as a pole to pole particle accellerator?

  34. Low Level Fusion in the Earths Core by Zorro · · Score: 2

    Maybe a slow and uncommon type of fusion at the Earths core.

    Add a little Helium 3 and get a Fusion event every few seconds.

    1. Re: Low Level Fusion in the Earths Core by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These particles are so energetic they couldn't even come from the sun...

    2. Re: Low Level Fusion in the Earths Core by baker_tony · · Score: 1

      If they're that energetic, they probably came from my son...

  35. Mutate? Maybe. Aliens? No by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, you might be a lot closer than you thought to a possible explanation (not the alien bit but the mutation), assuming these observations are confirmed. We already now that neutrinos oscillate between different flavours as they travel - or as you put it "mutate". However, all the known flavours interact via the weak force which, at these insanely high energies, is no longer very weak at all.

    One way around having all the high energy neutrinos interacting with the Earth is something called a sterile neutrino. This is a hypothetical new "flavour" of neutrino which does not interact at all. Some experiments have claimed to observe evidence for them but I think it is fair to say that many of us particle physicists remain rather unconvinced by the data so far.

    However, if these sterile neutrinos do exist then they may allow neutrinos to survive passage through the Earth even at realy high energies. Essentialy a high energy neutrino "mutates" into a sterile neutrino, flies through the Earth and then mutates back into a known-flavour of neutrino, interacts in the ice and is picked up by ANITA.

    There are a lot of ifs involved at this stage. The first thing is that we need to confirm (or not) ANITA's observation and interestingly (at least for those of us who work on it!) the IceCube experiment is probably in one of the best positions to do this. If confirmed then things will get a lot more interesting but while you are waiting for that expect lots of crazy ideas (like yours but with equations) from theorists trying to explain it!

    1. Re: Mutate? Maybe. Aliens? No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice. The most insightful comment here gets +1...

    2. Re:Mutate? Maybe. Aliens? No by spaceman375 · · Score: 1

      Since the electrons that make aurora bounce or reflect (particle or wave, you choose) as they ride down Earth's magnetic lines and go back up, perhaps the high energy neutrinos also bounce from a direct hit or "reflect" under the right conditions. One coming in from the side might undergo a glancing blow and be re-directed upwards. I'd kind of expect a bit of anomalous leakage when you are talking billions of particles.

      --
      On the one hand you take life too seriously, and on the other, you do not take playful existence seriously enough. Seth
    3. Re:Mutate? Maybe. Aliens? No by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      No, for two reasons. First the electrons trapped by the Earth's magnetic field have an electric charge so they interact with EM fields. Neutrinos have no charge and hence are completely oblivious to any EM field. Secondly, though, the energy of neutrino they detected, 0.6EeV is ~100,000 times higher in energy than a proton in the LHC. At these energies even if we had an electron the Earth's magnetic field would be far, far too weak to reflect it.

    4. Re:Mutate? Maybe. Aliens? No by spaceman375 · · Score: 1

      I was implying that the electroweak force may have a similar mechanism to the electromagnetic force, not that neutrinos would interact electromagnetically. Once the energies are high enough, if they interact (weak force) at all, there may be a set of conditions that result in the neutrino "bouncing" back the way it came.

      --
      On the one hand you take life too seriously, and on the other, you do not take playful existence seriously enough. Seth
    5. Re:Mutate? Maybe. Aliens? No by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      I was implying that the electroweak force may have a similar mechanism to the electromagnetic force, not that neutrinos would interact electromagnetically.

      What you asked was whether neutrinos would ever bounce up and down the field lines like electrons. This requires an EM interaction since the field lines you talk about are from a magnetic field. This is not an interaction between matter and neutrinos which can proceed by any type of interaction that both atoms and neutrinos feel but an interaction between a particle and a field where the interaction type has to be the one producing the field.

      Hence as I said, it is not possible for neutrinos to bounce up and down the lines of the Earth's magnetic field: they do not have any direct interaction with the field and at any energy where an indirect (second order) interaction might be even vaguely likely (it would be even weaker than a normal weak interaction!) the energy of the neutrino would be so high that the amount of deflection would be tiny due to the weakness of the field and certainly no where near enough to reflect it.

    6. Re:Mutate? Maybe. Aliens? No by spaceman375 · · Score: 1

      I am replying mostly because of your strident tone when attempting to lecture me. Once again you missed what I said in your haste to refute. it. I never said the neutrinos would interact with magnetic lines, my second comment even specifically says so. Do try to keep up. As for deflection, how about a direct hit on a nucleus, or even perhaps a quark within a nucleus. Rebound can be a bitch.

      --
      On the one hand you take life too seriously, and on the other, you do not take playful existence seriously enough. Seth
    7. Re:Mutate? Maybe. Aliens? No by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      I never said the neutrinos would interact with magnetic lines...

      Ummm, yes you did and I quote:

      Since the electrons that make aurora bounce or reflect (particle or wave, you choose) as they ride down Earth's magnetic lines and go back up, perhaps the high energy neutrinos also bounce from a direct hit or "reflect" under the right conditions.

      You give the example of electrons reflecting and riding on field lines and then ask if neutrinos can do the same thing under the right circumstances. Hence you asked if neutrinos can also reflect along magnetic field lines. You cannot ride along the field lines without an EM interaction to tie you too them. You might not have intended to ask that but that is, indeed, exactly what you asked. Do try to keep up with the basics of the English, or indeed any other, language where sentences are related to each other.

      However, the alternative explanation you are saying that you meant to ask is even more bizarre. You now seem to want to know if neutrinos can just reflect without any interaction with a field in which case the answer is very obviously no because of an extremely fundamental law: conservation of momentum.

    8. Re:Mutate? Maybe. Aliens? No by spaceman375 · · Score: 1

      In all instances above I am referring to the electroweak interactions.
      The analogy you keep tripping over is simple: Given the example of electrons "reflecting" when interacting with an electromagnetic field, I postulate a similar mechanism may redirect a neutrino when it interacts with an electroweak force. Stop trying for the strawman and claiming I'm trying to say neutrinos interact electromagnetically.

      --
      On the one hand you take life too seriously, and on the other, you do not take playful existence seriously enough. Seth
  36. The old ones have awakened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The age of Cthulu is upon us.

    1. Re:The old ones have awakened by tmjva · · Score: 1

      Surprised you're the only one who brought this up.  The literature quotient of slashdot subscribers has fallen.

      Have you tried the "Antarctic Express" by Kenneth Hite?

      --
      Tracy Johnson
      Old fashioned text games hosted below:
      http://empire.openmpe.com/
      BT
  37. Rocket Man II by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Mars: "Psst, Earthie, you realize you have funny particles spewing out of your ice hole? See a doctor, 'kay?"

  38. Re:Here is an article referencing what I recalled. by Kjella · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's only one law of quantum mechanics: Whenever you think you've wrapped your head around a concept, it gets weirder.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  39. Re: Here is an article referencing what I recalled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a lot of smegma

  40. The earth has a huge molten core at the center by jerryjnormandin · · Score: 1

    I am willing to bet our plants molten core dynamo has something to do with this phenomenon. Possibly radiation enters the earth's north pole, interacts with the earth's dynamo and is spewed out through the earth's south pole ?

  41. Up? Or sort of up? by MiniMike · · Score: 1

    Did they get an accurate vector measurement or just a 'sort of up' instead of 'sort of down' measurement of the cosmic ray? One possibility to rule out is that the rays didn't travel through the bulk of the Earth, but just cut secants through a small portion of the Earth and then up into the detector. Didn't see this addressed in TFA. If these are coming in at a large angle from perpendicular, then this might not 'break' anything. If not, this would reinforce that this is something interesting.

  42. Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Third impact. Coming soon. Shinji get in the giant fucking hosts file.

  43. Re: Future Predictions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our new theorcratic overlords. Weâ(TM)ve seen how well it goes in the Middle East, why not here??

  44. Only two possible answers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Drone weapons platform with working zero point module
    2. Buried stargate

  45. Classified base? by SatoriTindalos777 · · Score: 0

    Particles we're not familiar with emanating from a very remote, secluded location. Stray emissions picked up from a classified base, perhaps?

  46. Rock? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, there are low-energy neutrinos that can pierce through miles upon miles of rock unaffected.

    The rule of thumb I learned was that a neutrino has a 50/50 chance of penetrating half a light-year of Lead. But I had a questionable teacher.

  47. cet tv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The particles are literally following a line dictated by gravity.

    Think of a water strider's feet sitting on the surface of water. The surface tension prevents the foot from penetrating the surface but also creates a lens that allows light to bend around it creating a distortion effect wherever you see the feet touching the surface.

    Now imagine the model of gravity demonstrated by placing a heavy object in the center of a diaphragm causing the diaphragm to distort. This demonstrates gravity in only 3 dimensions sense we can't interpret a fourth, but it shows the effect of matter within a given space.

    Much like light bending around the strider's feet on water, particles are likely interacting with matter in the same way that aren't breaking through the surface tension of 4 dimensional space. In other words, the particles are traveling around the 4th dimensional surface but appear to be moving through it.

    has anyone considered the ramifications of breaking the surface tension of 4th dimensional space?

    1. Re:cet tv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'all forget'n "Trust No One! "

  48. Neuschwabenland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Particles are coming from underground national socialist Neuschwabenland state.

  49. Influenced by Magnetic, not gravitational fields. by Martin+S. · · Score: 1

    Pardon my presumed ignorance.

    Doesn't this suggest whatever has been found is influenced more by the Earth Magnetic field than by its gravitational fields?

    If not, can somebody explain why?

  50. It's not *that* oblate by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Isn't it weird if this only happens in Antarctica? But if it happens everywhere and nobody noticed before, isn't that weird?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  51. You're an arseHOLEtechnican? LOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Arstechnica = losers who stalked me (as you do now anonymously unidentifiably) to NTCompatible.com & Windows IT Pro magazine forums to their public dismay in Jeremy Reimer & Jay Little + Jarrett DeAngelis (who posts here on /. until I drove his ass off too) when their websites were REMOVED by their hosting providers in Shaw Canada & CrystalTech (for both email harassing me caught on a tracking ticket + stalking me & posting lies about me on them).

    Right AFTER I destroyed them both PUBLICLY @ Windows IT Pro on Exchange Servers memory being freed UNHALTING them (which tells you Exchange is HEAVILY POINTER ORIENTED linked list driven, which leads to memory fragmentation that CAN halt a serverware).

    Jay Little the "self-proclaimed 'EXCHANGE EXPERT'" HAD TO CONCEDE IT from MICROSOFT'S OWN DOCUMENTATION proving it FOR me there (where they as usual stalked me AS YOU ARE NOW)

    Peter Bright/Dr. Pizza (alias GOITERMAN, lol) can tell you what happened to his IRC server after that (lol).

    "The great arseHOLEtechnica" (not) RUN OUT of their own server chatrooms hahaha (by "yours truly").

    In effete retaliation they edited my posts & impersonated me on their little private playpen of UNDERACHIEVER losers.

    APK

    P.S.=> ABOVE ALL ELSE: Thanks for outing yourself as 1 of the "few, the defeated" from arseHOLEtechnica - always a pleasure exposing your lame asses (that are nothing more than do-NOTHING "ne'er-do-wells" THAT CAN'T STAND THEMSELVES for it (lol, no shit) & that you are REDUCED to STALKING ME by UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous too... lmao!)... apk

  52. Registered /.ers disagree w/ you #3/6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    APK solution STILL relevant Thud457 June 11 2015

    Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa on Saturday May 16, 2015

    In a footnote, I would like to note that I find your hosts file admirable - by vel-ex-tech (4337079) on Tuesday November 24, 2015

    APK's monolithic hosts file is looking pretty good at the moment - by Culture20 on Thursday November 17

    you're right about hosts files - by drinkypoo (153816) on Thursday May 26

    APK, I know people give you a lot of shit regarding hosts, but please don't ever stop - by nasredin (958927) on Friday June 12, 2015 @03:34PM

    APK

    P.S.=> Are you ENJOYING the taste of EATING YOUR WORDS yet? apk

  53. Registered /.ers disagree w/ you #6/6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the Host File Engine performs exactly as promised - by mmell (832646) on Thursday February 16, 2017

    (APK) is still right a hosts file really does work. It even blocked a some of the video ads that were inserted into a stream OrangeTide February 10 2016

    I do use APK's host file on all my systems at home by OrangeTide December 01 2017

    I've never tried to belittle (APK's work), I've flat out said it's good - by BronsCon (927697) on Thursday February 11, 2016 @06:48PM (#51491263)

    APK

    P.S.=> YOU'RE OUTNUMBERED DOZENS TO 1 - toss on 100,000++ users of my program worldwide too & SEE SUBJECT: JUST FOR "GOOD MEASURE"!... apk

  54. Addendum you bullshitting LIAR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: It's FREEWARE so how can you ask a refund? You didn't PAY ANYTHING for it!

    * You called the Better Bullshit Bureau for BULLSHITTERS like you liar.

    30 /.ers prove you wrong too https://science.slashdot.org/c... https://science.slashdot.org/c... https://science.slashdot.org/c... https://science.slashdot.org/c... https://science.slashdot.org/c... https://science.slashdot.org/c...

    APK

    P.S.=> Unbelievable how SOME idiots around here have NOTHING BETTER TO DO than try to give me guff - me, who produced a ware that gives you more SPEED/SECURITY/RELIABILITY & even ANONYMITY online... apk

  55. Registered /.ers disagree w/ you #1/6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your software is just fine - well written, functional... I'm going to continue using the Host File Engine by mmell February 17, 2017

    Your premise that hostfiles are a good way to deal with advertising and malvertising is quite valid - by JazzLad April 20, 2016

    his hosts program is actually pretty good by xenotransplant August 10 2015

    his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources by alexgieg September 25 2015

    I like your host file system by Karmashock September 09 2015

    that APK guy, I use his host file by rogoshen1 Tuesday March 03, 2015

    I personally use a HOSTS file blocker produced from a genius called APK by 110010001000 October 27 2017

    * SEE SUBJECT & TELL US: How does EATING YOUR WORDS taste?

    APK

    P.S.=> You're already VASTLY OUTNUMBERED but many more are coming... apk

  56. Registered /.ers disagree w/ you #2/6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apk has the answer for that - really... kill automatic updates by adding a hosts file entry setting updates.steam.com or whatever to 127.0.0.1. You have to find the right hostname for each software you want to block updates on by raymorris (2726007) on Friday July 06, 2018

    APK your posts on this and the hosts file posts, and more, have never been in error and/or bad advice by BlueStrat (756137) on Wednesday June 21, 2017

    I support APK's stand on the hosts file and can't see why it's not used more than it is. My hosts file is 144247 lines long (4,332 Kb) it & a firewall serves me very well - by Trax3001BBS (2368736)

    ABP is insufficient as a solid hosts file does everything APK reminds us about fast turtle September 17 2013

    You need APK's hosts file - by Teun (17872) on Wednesday August 06, 2014

    APK

    P.S.=> You EATING YOUR WORDS != GOOD NUTRITION! ... apk

  57. Registered /.ers disagree w/ you #4/6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I say the following as a caring human being who agrees with how useful HOSTS files are: Your zeal is to be respected - by dave420 (699308) on Monday September 08, 2014

    But I love APK!The power of the hostfile compels you! by ratboy666 (104074) on Friday January 29, 2016

    APK was right all along! C:\WINDOWS\HOSTS is the solution ;) - by sabri (584428) on Friday October 21, 2016

    No complaints from me, I like APK's spam. Reminds me to use a host file. Also, his stuff is free. - by aaaaaaargh! (1150173) on Tuesday November 17, 2015

    I'm a fan of apk. Yes he trolls, but he only trolls where it's contextually appropriate. I respect that - by Noah Haders (3621429) on Wednesday July 29, 2015

    APK

    P.S.=> Your words YOU'RE EATING: You choking on them yet? ... apk

  58. Registered /.ers disagree w/ you #5/6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works. - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015

    get around to 'installing' a hosts file list, not sure which one, likely the one from someonewhocares.org. If it works as well as what I used for a while about ten years ago, I'll be happy. And grateful to APK for the lesson and the reminder. - by kermidge (2221646) on Wednesday March 27

    I actually went and downloaded a 16k line hosts file and started using that after seeing that post, you know just for trying it out. some sites load up faster. - by gl4ss (559668) on Thursday November 17

    dammit MS, you proved APK right about something by lgw

    APK

    P.S.=> You still haven't said how EATING YOUR WORDS tastes?... apk

  59. Wasn't I: It was c6gunner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    c6gunner shot himself down w/ his FAKEname on a post impersonating me https://linux.slashdot.org/com... & w/ c6gunner altering /. user's words there.

    All since I challenged c6gunner to show better work than mine he did & you can't c6gunner "ne'er-do-well"!

    Right after you tried to mock me 1st https://linux.slashdot.org/com... for no good reason & I didn't bug you @ all!

    YOU DEMAND PROOF OF OTHERS "I've yet to see you provide any evidence of that." by c6gunner on Monday March 15, 2010 @10:02PM (#31490942) ?

    Thus so I DEMANDED IT OF YOU & YOU FAILED!

    * c6gunner = "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!

    APK

    P.S.=> You say hosts are shit here https://slashdot.org/comments.... ?

    50++ /.ers & security pros + RESULTS SAY DIFFERENT:

    Proof's here from /.ers https://slashdot.org/comments.... https://slashdot.org/comments.... https://slashdot.org/comments.... https://slashdot.org/comments.... https://slashdot.org/comments.... https://slashdot.org/comments....

    Proof from SECURITY PROS https://slashdot.org/comments....

    Proof by & REAL RESULTS w/ hosts working vs. threats https://slashdot.org/comments....

    So EAT YOUR WORDS... apk

  60. c6gunner = "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!"... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    c6gunner shot himself down w/ his FAKEname on a post impersonating me https://linux.slashdot.org/com... & w/ c6gunner altering /. user's words there.

    All since I challenged c6gunner to show better work than mine he did & you can't c6gunner "ne'er-do-well"!

    Right after you tried to mock me 1st https://linux.slashdot.org/com... for no good reason & I didn't bug you @ all!

    YOU DEMAND PROOF OF OTHERS "I've yet to see you provide any evidence of that." by c6gunner on Monday March 15, 2010 @10:02PM (#31490942) ?

    Thus so I DEMANDED IT OF YOU & YOU FAILED!

    * c6gunner = "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!

    APK

    P.S.=> You say hosts are shit here https://slashdot.org/comments.... ?

    50++ /.ers & security pros + RESULTS SAY DIFFERENT:

    Proof's here from /.ers https://slashdot.org/comments.... https://slashdot.org/comments.... https://slashdot.org/comments.... https://slashdot.org/comments.... https://slashdot.org/comments.... https://slashdot.org/comments....

    Proof from SECURITY PROS https://slashdot.org/comments....

    Proof by & REAL RESULTS w/ hosts working vs. threats https://slashdot.org/comments....

    So EAT YOUR WORDS... apk

  61. All these SciFi references by cellocgw · · Score: 1

    And yet I'm the first to point out that these readings (obviously false) are planted by the sophons?

    --
    https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  62. Re:30++ registered /.ers say differently #1/7 by Napoleon++BONERpart · · Score: 1

    msmash's gay title is gay!

  63. Re:30++ registered /.ers say differently #1/7 by Retard++Pusher · · Score: 1

    lol

  64. Streetlight Effect by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    Isn't it weird if this only happens in Antarctica?

    No, that is just the Streetlight effect. The ice in Antarctica makes an ideal medium for detecting these particles so it is not surprising that we see them there.

  65. Direction is a perception too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just a thought... Could these be some form of anti-particles, for which time or space folds the other way around, causing them to be observed moving backwards. I.e. they are actually coming from outer space, although our perception leads us to believe they come from us?