Doesn't matter how successful Palm was... they failed which mean they didn't know what they were doing. Any new phone is just another new kid in the block. Choosing a kid to play with is just plain arrogant. Exclusive? Who gives a flying phuck!!! The world is not gonna drop AT&T and join Verizon just because Palm (a failed company) came back to make a phone only for Verizon. Doing that literally means they deny their own success by not accepting non-verizon customers.
I think you missed the point. They swapped out the good parts with fake parts rendering the phones broken. They return the broken phones to get a refund. Apple suffers all the set backs in this situation because they're not even exchanging for another device.
So for a long time I kinda didn't like how Apple would disable iPhones because they were not repaired by authorized dealers or by Apple itself. I thought Apple was trying to monopolize the repair works to itself... Now that I read this article, I see what kind of battle they've been trying to fight.
I know lots of people hate the President and it's their right... but did you have to bring him into this subject? No wonder you have to post as an anonymous COWARD.
Don't you have to make credit card payments to PSN? And by having credit card statement, can't they just use your credit card number to confirm who owns the account? The fact that the hacker guarantees the original owner cannot get it back leads me to believe that Sony hasn't done a good enough job.
I think it has to be done in a production line fashion... you can't get a sticker until the code is burned into the device... and with a production line constantly moving, you can't really put one sticker on another machine by mistake.
California is one of the most populated states in US. If default pw is banned here, it's banned everywhere. You wonder why?
Any company who wants to sell a product in CA will sell the same product everywhere else in the country. Abiding CA regulations alone will bring inheritance to other states. Bravo!!!
Nowadays... if you type above 90WAM and you're a Linux sysadm... it becomes an advantage... and I assure you people won't offer you data entry positions:p
Have you ever seen a linux administrator issuing a 50-character long command within a few seconds?
Are you serious? This is exactly what happened to me!
When I was 20, I was extremely good with Excel... and you have to know Excel back in the 90s was a lot more simple than it is now. The fist time it started having macros, I was able to automate a full day of work down to a few mins. I thought it should have been a well recognized accomplishment so I bragged to my boss and got fired because she didn't want to pay me a whole day to do 5mins work. But that firing actually became a better opportunity for me though. Few people I bragged to told me where to go to find a job with my Excel knowledge and I actually found a much better job. After 20 years of mild use of Excel I have to say most of my "expert" Excel skills are gone.
Supermicro provides lots of hardware for cloud providers like AWS, Softlayer, etc...
I run several VMware clusters that employ a few Supermicro and I've come to learn that Supermicro doesn't care. I've applied firmware updates to all my bare metal hypervisors except the supermicros and it's my plant to replace them all with another brand. But of course, this is server class hardware. I've been using MacBook Pro for the past 10 years so I don't even know anything to recommend anymore. Good luck!
And to say that President Trump is predictable is overestimating yourself. God damn Xi Ping can't predict Trump. Putin can't predict Trump... Kim Jong-Un can't predict Trump. Except for people who voted for Trump... Clinton and the entire opposition force can't predict Trump. Who are you to say that he is predictable?
Every president opened their mouth to further their agenda. Not just Trump. Don't confuse yourself. Question is, would someone be stupid enough to use the emergency notification system to do that?
This comes from sour losers who don't like the President. If in fact a catastrophic event occurs and the President was not allowed to use the system, those same sons of bitches will whine "Why didn't the administration warn us?". Making speculation that the President will use the system to send irrational/biased messages is just plain stupid!!! He gets to say whatever he wants on his own twitter account but he will definitely be removed from office if he uses it to further his agenda.
When I was fresh out of high school and in college, I had a data entry job in a silicon valley high tech company. Each day I received Excel reports from multiple sources ranging from dozens to a hundred attachments. My job was to organize them and enter into a database. Now I wasn't a programmer at all. In fact I only learned Visual Basic macro on my own and instead of formatting those reports into the format I want and merging before data entry, I used the VB macro to record my actions which turned directly into code. I fixed that code up a little bit so that it could read the entire directory (where I dropped the attachments) and processed an entire day of work in under a minute. Sure enough, I lost my job only a week after that because someone found out that I automated the job. Now if I was to set the macro to run one record every 10secs, I would have been able to keep my job for a while LOL.
I think fighting the domain owner and strip them of what they own is such bullshit!!!
Besides the cash, the fact that they want season tickets and MS tablets is because they are fans of both MS and the football team.. what they ask may seem like lots of money to individuals but to MS and the team is breakfast change. Why did they spend way more than that in legal fees to rob something from someone who legitimately owns it?
Lots/most of times it's not for employees to say. The company endorses hardware/os/software for their people to use. You just shutup and use it if you wanna work for them. Period!
Don't ever be too cocky and have a big mouth about your own security... you'd never have enough protection. Every system can get hacked and mocking a victim is just stupid.
I consider myself an apple fan boy... but I must say you're way off from describing us. You accuse us of falsehoods and ignorance against human health. What the phuck does that even mean? We make technical arguments because we know what we're talking about. That doesn't make us disrespectful or ignorant to anyone else. You on the other hand, go and accuse strangers of shit that don't even make sense. Do you even know what you're talking about?
It doesn't go through your head. The wireless transceiver is on the side which communicates with other devices outwards. Internally it wires received sound to both speakers without actually sending any wireless signals "through" your head.
Although the Macbook Pro has 4x thunderbolt3 (USB-C) ports and a 35mm headphone port, its USB-C ports are fully capable of sound/video too.
So when the iPad Pro comes with a USB-C headphone, that headphone will work with the macbook pro. Leaving only the iPhone incompatible. I sent a msg to Mr. Cook to address my growing worries about the headphone incompatibilities but he never replied.
Regardless, this doesn't affect me. I use a Bose QC35 which works flawlessly with macbookpro, ipad, iphone. The only minor problem with this headphone is that although it can pair more than 2 devices, it only tries to connect to the last 2 connected device upon power up. In order to connect to other paired devices, you'd have to keep one of the latest 2 out of range, powered down, or out of communication in some way.
Those new smartphones will look exactly like iPhone X and any future versions of it... with one inevitable exception: They will come pre-loaded with some kind of SuperFish app that will send cookies, surfing history, usernames/passwords, messages, phonebooks back to the factory for "customer satisfaction research".
Hahahaha... I think in modern regulations.. if the CEO and BoD of a company want to make import changes to their company, they need to get permissions from traders.... if it may cost the traders money, it will most likely be rejected.
About 5 years ago, the CIA gave a computing contract to AWS and IBM did the same challenge. The agency did aknowledge IBM's challenge and opened up a bidding prodess which AWS won anyway. Only few months after that I was offered an interview with AWS which requires that I secure a high level security clearance certification. I had no doubt that this was the work to be done at the agency, but I did have one disqualification for security clearance so I didn't even bother with the interview.
Now back to Oracle... they've always been a predator in this world. They don't cry when they're the single vendor of a lucrative contract but if someone else gets anything, they bitch. They keep raising licensing costs and changing licensing models on existing customers knowing that it takes them years to leave. Some of the customers are so much built on 11g that they can't leave at all. The most funny/silly thing I've seen with them is that Ellison said Google stole Android from them LMFAO!!!
Quoting the lawyer: Groupon lawyer J. David Hadden argued that IBM was overreading the scope of its patents and claiming ownership of building blocks of the internet. "A key question for you in this case is whether these patents cover the world wide web," Hadden told jurors. "They do not and that is because IBM did not invent the world wide web."
This guy just made my day as the stuff he said is so hilarious. So in general he's not challenging the validity of the patent but actually challenges where it gets used. If IBM didn't invent the www, then they can't claim anything on their patent because it's being used on the www. This guy just literally invalidated 100% patents in all countries world wide. Because if nobody invented Earth, then everything invented to be used on Earth is not a patent.
Slashdot Mirror
Doesn't matter how successful Palm was... they failed which mean they didn't know what they were doing. Any new phone is just another new kid in the block. Choosing a kid to play with is just plain arrogant. Exclusive? Who gives a flying phuck!!! The world is not gonna drop AT&T and join Verizon just because Palm (a failed company) came back to make a phone only for Verizon. Doing that literally means they deny their own success by not accepting non-verizon customers.
I think you missed the point. They swapped out the good parts with fake parts rendering the phones broken. They return the broken phones to get a refund. Apple suffers all the set backs in this situation because they're not even exchanging for another device.
So for a long time I kinda didn't like how Apple would disable iPhones because they were not repaired by authorized dealers or by Apple itself. I thought Apple was trying to monopolize the repair works to itself... Now that I read this article, I see what kind of battle they've been trying to fight.
I know lots of people hate the President and it's their right... but did you have to bring him into this subject? No wonder you have to post as an anonymous COWARD.
Don't you have to make credit card payments to PSN? And by having credit card statement, can't they just use your credit card number to confirm who owns the account? The fact that the hacker guarantees the original owner cannot get it back leads me to believe that Sony hasn't done a good enough job.
I think it has to be done in a production line fashion... you can't get a sticker until the code is burned into the device... and with a production line constantly moving, you can't really put one sticker on another machine by mistake.
California is one of the most populated states in US. If default pw is banned here, it's banned everywhere. You wonder why?
Any company who wants to sell a product in CA will sell the same product everywhere else in the country. Abiding CA regulations alone will bring inheritance to other states. Bravo!!!
Nowadays... if you type above 90WAM and you're a Linux sysadm... it becomes an advantage... and I assure you people won't offer you data entry positions :p
Have you ever seen a linux administrator issuing a 50-character long command within a few seconds?
Are you serious? This is exactly what happened to me!
When I was 20, I was extremely good with Excel... and you have to know Excel back in the 90s was a lot more simple than it is now. The fist time it started having macros, I was able to automate a full day of work down to a few mins. I thought it should have been a well recognized accomplishment so I bragged to my boss and got fired because she didn't want to pay me a whole day to do 5mins work. But that firing actually became a better opportunity for me though. Few people I bragged to told me where to go to find a job with my Excel knowledge and I actually found a much better job. After 20 years of mild use of Excel I have to say most of my "expert" Excel skills are gone.
Supermicro provides lots of hardware for cloud providers like AWS, Softlayer, etc... I run several VMware clusters that employ a few Supermicro and I've come to learn that Supermicro doesn't care. I've applied firmware updates to all my bare metal hypervisors except the supermicros and it's my plant to replace them all with another brand. But of course, this is server class hardware. I've been using MacBook Pro for the past 10 years so I don't even know anything to recommend anymore. Good luck!
And to say that President Trump is predictable is overestimating yourself. God damn Xi Ping can't predict Trump. Putin can't predict Trump... Kim Jong-Un can't predict Trump. Except for people who voted for Trump... Clinton and the entire opposition force can't predict Trump. Who are you to say that he is predictable?
Every president opened their mouth to further their agenda. Not just Trump. Don't confuse yourself. Question is, would someone be stupid enough to use the emergency notification system to do that?
This comes from sour losers who don't like the President. If in fact a catastrophic event occurs and the President was not allowed to use the system, those same sons of bitches will whine "Why didn't the administration warn us?". Making speculation that the President will use the system to send irrational/biased messages is just plain stupid!!! He gets to say whatever he wants on his own twitter account but he will definitely be removed from office if he uses it to further his agenda.
When I was fresh out of high school and in college, I had a data entry job in a silicon valley high tech company. Each day I received Excel reports from multiple sources ranging from dozens to a hundred attachments. My job was to organize them and enter into a database. Now I wasn't a programmer at all. In fact I only learned Visual Basic macro on my own and instead of formatting those reports into the format I want and merging before data entry, I used the VB macro to record my actions which turned directly into code. I fixed that code up a little bit so that it could read the entire directory (where I dropped the attachments) and processed an entire day of work in under a minute. Sure enough, I lost my job only a week after that because someone found out that I automated the job. Now if I was to set the macro to run one record every 10secs, I would have been able to keep my job for a while LOL.
I think fighting the domain owner and strip them of what they own is such bullshit!!! Besides the cash, the fact that they want season tickets and MS tablets is because they are fans of both MS and the football team.. what they ask may seem like lots of money to individuals but to MS and the team is breakfast change. Why did they spend way more than that in legal fees to rob something from someone who legitimately owns it?
Lots/most of times it's not for employees to say. The company endorses hardware/os/software for their people to use. You just shutup and use it if you wanna work for them. Period!
Don't ever be too cocky and have a big mouth about your own security... you'd never have enough protection. Every system can get hacked and mocking a victim is just stupid.
The last fool that jacked the price up a few hundred % ended up in jail... although not for jacking the price.
I consider myself an apple fan boy... but I must say you're way off from describing us. You accuse us of falsehoods and ignorance against human health. What the phuck does that even mean? We make technical arguments because we know what we're talking about. That doesn't make us disrespectful or ignorant to anyone else. You on the other hand, go and accuse strangers of shit that don't even make sense. Do you even know what you're talking about?
It doesn't go through your head. The wireless transceiver is on the side which communicates with other devices outwards. Internally it wires received sound to both speakers without actually sending any wireless signals "through" your head.
Although the Macbook Pro has 4x thunderbolt3 (USB-C) ports and a 35mm headphone port, its USB-C ports are fully capable of sound/video too.
So when the iPad Pro comes with a USB-C headphone, that headphone will work with the macbook pro. Leaving only the iPhone incompatible. I sent a msg to Mr. Cook to address my growing worries about the headphone incompatibilities but he never replied.
Regardless, this doesn't affect me. I use a Bose QC35 which works flawlessly with macbookpro, ipad, iphone. The only minor problem with this headphone is that although it can pair more than 2 devices, it only tries to connect to the last 2 connected device upon power up. In order to connect to other paired devices, you'd have to keep one of the latest 2 out of range, powered down, or out of communication in some way.
Those new smartphones will look exactly like iPhone X and any future versions of it... with one inevitable exception: They will come pre-loaded with some kind of SuperFish app that will send cookies, surfing history, usernames/passwords, messages, phonebooks back to the factory for "customer satisfaction research".
Hahahaha... I think in modern regulations.. if the CEO and BoD of a company want to make import changes to their company, they need to get permissions from traders.... if it may cost the traders money, it will most likely be rejected.
About 5 years ago, the CIA gave a computing contract to AWS and IBM did the same challenge. The agency did aknowledge IBM's challenge and opened up a bidding prodess which AWS won anyway. Only few months after that I was offered an interview with AWS which requires that I secure a high level security clearance certification. I had no doubt that this was the work to be done at the agency, but I did have one disqualification for security clearance so I didn't even bother with the interview.
Now back to Oracle... they've always been a predator in this world. They don't cry when they're the single vendor of a lucrative contract but if someone else gets anything, they bitch. They keep raising licensing costs and changing licensing models on existing customers knowing that it takes them years to leave. Some of the customers are so much built on 11g that they can't leave at all. The most funny/silly thing I've seen with them is that Ellison said Google stole Android from them LMFAO!!!
Quoting the lawyer: Groupon lawyer J. David Hadden argued that IBM was overreading the scope of its patents and claiming ownership of building blocks of the internet. "A key question for you in this case is whether these patents cover the world wide web," Hadden told jurors. "They do not and that is because IBM did not invent the world wide web."
This guy just made my day as the stuff he said is so hilarious. So in general he's not challenging the validity of the patent but actually challenges where it gets used. If IBM didn't invent the www, then they can't claim anything on their patent because it's being used on the www. This guy just literally invalidated 100% patents in all countries world wide. Because if nobody invented Earth, then everything invented to be used on Earth is not a patent.