Slashdot Mirror


Despite Outrage From Users, Microsoft Continues To Install Bloatware Applications Onto Every Windows 10 PC (windowscentral.com)

Before Windows 10, a clean install of Windows only included the bare essentials a user would need to get started using their PC. With Windows 10, a clean install stays that way for about two minutes, because the second you hit the desktop, the Microsoft Store immediately starts trying to download third-party apps and games. Users have long complained about it, but it turns out Microsoft never put paid to it. Windows Central writes: And these apps keep trying to install themselves even after you cancel the downloads. There are six such apps, which is six too many. These apps are often random, but right now they include things like Candy Crush, Spotify, and Disney Magic Kingdoms. You should not see any of these apps on a fresh install of Windows 10, yet they are there every single time. There are policies you can set that disable these apps from automatically installing, but that's not the point. On a fresh, untouched, clean install of Windows 10, these apps will download themselves onto your PC. Even if you cancel the installation of these apps before they manage to complete the download, they will retry at a later date, without you even noticing. The only way I've found that gets rid of them permanently is to let them install initially, without canceling the download, and then uninstall the apps from the Start menu. If you cancel the initial download of the bloatware apps before they complete their first install, the Microsoft Store will just attempt to redownload them later and will keep doing so until that initial install is complete. This is not a good user experience, Microsoft.

490 comments

  1. Malware installs bloatware... by fbobraga · · Score: 0, Troll

    I don't understand tech people that still uses crap like Windoze...

    1. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by sconeu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because some of our clients have specialized equipment with interface software that only runs on Windows?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't understand tech people that still uses crap like Windoze...

      I don't understand humans that still use air from the atmosphere to breathe.
      I don't understand rail commuters that still board trains.
      I don't understand grass seed companies that still use fescue seeds.

      Windows is the most common platform out there- of course a large number of tech workers are still going to be using it.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    3. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Sique · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It might be shitty bloatware, but there are no alternatives (other than those also running on Windows), and the complexity of the problem does not allow for an inhouse re-development, as there are not enough installs to rectify the cost.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    4. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Where is exactly "out there"? In the mobile market? In cloud system backends? Etc.

      If we are taking "everything counts", then, no it isn't. Are you from the past?

    5. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by sentiblue · · Score: 1

      Lots/most of times it's not for employees to say. The company endorses hardware/os/software for their people to use. You just shutup and use it if you wanna work for them. Period!

    6. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by saloomy · · Score: 1

      The real issue is that Microsoft doesn't see these things as bloatware for the Windows 10 intended audience. If you want a professional or enterprise OS, buy Windows 10 Enterprise. You will find that all the Microsoft crap is gone. Of course, it costs more, but has more support and capabilities (like VPN just works). If you run around buying home and SOHO versions, its intended for highschoolers who use candy crush and spotify.

    7. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by tepples · · Score: 2

      What edition does Microsoft expect a small local business with about a dozen PCs to buy?

    8. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by tepples · · Score: 1

      Do you expect the majority of desktop and laptop users in small and medium businesses to give up their desktop or laptop PC in favor of a mobile device connected to a cloud system backend? I didn't think so.

    9. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by TomBauserman · · Score: 1

      Enterprise. If you're using it for anything that even remotely resembles a business, they expect you to use enterprise. Otherwise you're someone who plays Candy Crush.

    10. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

      For entertainment.
      I cannot play my games on Linux.

      --
      The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
    11. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by kurkosdr · · Score: 1

      Have a good graphics card? Windows is a supplementary product. Also, Windows gets better battery life on laptops. Plus there are lots of applications that only work on Windows. And the only real alternatives are Mac OS X (which runs only on Apple machines) and Ubuntu, which has problems like having to wait for repository middle-men to repackage apps like VLC before you can get them. Microsoft has the desktop and laptop market by the balls and they know it. Still, nobody plays Candy Crush on a frickin' laptop, so Microsoft, in their attempt to turn their "store" into a passive income source are needlessly burning goodwill...

    12. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

      So a home business or small office professional (lawyers, accountants, etc) have to buy Enterprise even if they have little need for many of the features?

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    13. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What the hell do you think lawyers and accountants do? Them playing candy crush is more productive to society and anything else they ever do (which is mostly about enriching themselves).

    14. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well at least that's a good side to Windows 10. We should absolutely give them to every lawyer and accountant. Home version or even Lawyer and Accountant version... completely free! Paid for by mandatory bloatware that would make the world a better place.

    15. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by kurkosdr · · Score: 1

      I on the other hand don't understand neckbeards who still pretend Windoze should not be the preference of "tech people". Mac OS X is an elitist OS with slow hardware uptake, and unless the Desktop Linux people solve the problem of "my 2.5-year old LTS cannot get the latest VLC because the repository middle-men haven't repackaged it yet", I am not going nowhere near Desktop Linux, thank you very much. And so will 98% of the populance, tech people or not. Stop trying to pretend Desktop Linux is the natural home of "tech people". The release candidate of Windows 7 managed to get more "tech people" to install it than the entirety of Desktop Linux ecosystem, despite not being marketed by Microsoft in any way. Those were "tech people" who actively avoided and still avoid Desktop Linux despite being free.

    16. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I like Linux, but Windows has some advantages, that is why My system is setup for duel boot.
      This is my experience, other peoples impressions may very (Due to differences in hardware)
      1. UI seems to have better responses times. From watching a video, playing games, or just dealing with a Code Editor the UI seems to run a bit more quickly and more responsibly.

      2. Better support for hardware and drivers. Heck on a System 76 Laptop supposedly built for Linux, the Fingerprint reader works in Windows but not in Linux. Also If I have some USB Device, there is a better chance of it working for Windows.

      3. Software Availability. Unfortunately for some software there really isn't a good Linux version, or replacement. I have yet to find something really comparable to Photoshop. GIMP is usable but not really that good.

      4. Works better with well work. If you work for a company that is a Microsoft Shop, then having windows to do you work with it makes things much easier. (and not getting blamed for using a silly hacked solution)

      5. Libraries, There are a bunch of good libaries that are windows only, and most of the open source libraries for Linux have a windows port.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    17. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, But I doubt you will see to many Open Source Development projects for "Rare use device, made by only a few vender's who will only offer support if you use their own software"

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    18. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand tech people that still uses crap like Windoze...

      Because we're paid to.

    19. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there any part of the Windows 10 Spy/Virus that is a good user experience? Not from what I have read!

      And yes Linux IS a viable alternative for almost all home users and businesses. Anyone who does not think so either has not given Linux a fair trial, or needs some rare proprietary software. Microsoft sees your computer as something for them to take over. Linux does not.

    20. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also a total shit design.

    21. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seriously.

      Do you really consider Windows a necessity of the same magnitude as air, rail transportation etc? Talk about a Stockholm syndrome.

      No wonder you'll get raped for all eternity, you're essentially telling us you can't live without Windows and thus a total hostage to Microsoft. It's bizarre. You're actually mentally ill.

    22. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      almost all app are web apps that run on a browser, by a few years now: it's just an excuse to use Windoze, in the majority of cases * I used to work for serpro.gov.br : almost all desktops there runs linux (besides a few cases where run Windoze is needed, there's some [normally old] managers that still use windows by lack of knowledge...)

    23. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd totally trade my Winblows for a Linux laptop installation, but I'd have to accept handling all issues myself.

      The problem basically comes down to IT support, which is still strongly Winblows.

    24. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      The problem basically comes down to IT support, which is still strongly Winblows.

      yeap, and tech-savy people using windows (mostly for playing games...) is a bad example (stimulating non tech-savy people to use it...), I think...

    25. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by supremebob · · Score: 1

      Be careful that you're not standing in a glass house before throwing stones at Microsoft. Ubuntu has a history of installing third-party crap into their default installations as well. Apple doesn't, but MAN they really make it hard not to pay for an upgraded iCloud account if you're using one of their devices.

    26. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Set up for duel boot? Pistols at high noon?

      1. Bullshit. Sorry, you've just made that crap up.

      2. Just flat out wrong. Windows basically doesn't support ANY hardware, the hardware manufacturers support Windows. Big difference. Linux supports VASTLY more hardware than Windows even so, though it might be hardware you don't care about, but others do, and you're not the world sunshine.

      3. Unfortunately people are just stuck in their little world and most of the problems with software availability relates to being hung up on there not being "Microsoft" logos or "Windows" flags, or the name Adobe being absent. If there is other software which is perfectly able to do the job seems to be completely irrelevant. One has to wonder how our forefathers made do with paper and pen or typewriters. If you listen to people talking about using anything other than Windows, it's obvious that they are positively going to die if they try something else. When you have victims who have convinced themselves to that degree, things are pretty hopeless.

      4. Linux still works way better with interacting with Windows than Windows does interacting with anything else. Once again, you're attributing the problem to the wrong cause.

      5. There are plenty of good libraries for Linux too. Your final fallacy is that just because libraries have Windows ports doesn't mean these are any good. A prime example of this would be GTK.

    27. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by fbobraga · · Score: 1
      I don't expressed myself well - correcting:

      I don't understand tech people that still uses crap like Windoze in this personal (not "for work") desktop...

    28. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      The post is not related to any particular distro...

    29. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Apple doesn't, but MAN they really make it hard not to pay for an upgraded iCloud account if you're using one of their devices.

      Interesting, I"ve never run into this with my Apple stuff (iPad, iPhone and mbp).

      In fact, until just recently, I'd never really even used the iCloud that came free with it, and I only use that just enough now to help keep sync between the 3 items the messages, etc.....

      I've never seen a reason to, nor felt compelled to pay for iCloud and I use my Macs for a LOT of stuff.....can you give some examples where they are making "it hard not to pay for an upgraded iCloud account if you're using one of their devices."

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    30. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Really? How is a web app supposed to know about an attached hardware device (in this case, a special purpose 3d scanner for orthodontics)?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    31. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Seriously.

      Do you really consider Windows a necessity of the same magnitude as air, rail transportation etc? Talk about a Stockholm syndrome.

      No wonder you'll get raped for all eternity, you're essentially telling us you can't live without Windows and thus a total hostage to Microsoft. It's bizarre. You're actually mentally ill.

      If I'm writing software for people using Windows machines. Yes. If I'm supporting people using Windows machines. Yes.

      It's only a fantasy land that all your clients run Linux desktops.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    32. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by dmitrygr · · Score: 1

      Battery life. My laptop (t470) gets 20h battery life streaming a youtube video over wifi in windows, and 7h doing the same in linux. I get 6 hours compiling linux kernel in a loop in a linux vm, and only 4 doing the same in linux natively on the same hardware. microsoft has better docs from intel, and until this changes, linux on laptop is only a joke, or for people who do not care about battery life one notable exception: chromebooks, because google also gets ecret intel docs i assume.

      --
      -------
      1. Enjoy your job
      2. Make lots of money
      3. Work within the law

      Choose any two.
    33. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      You are talking about a very specific case, that may need windoze...

    34. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh wow! you went there... ok,, you do not get support for windows at all unless it is through the oem. Microsoft does not provide free support and for that matter, what support you get is atrocious! I handled all my support for all my relatives with windows. Most fall into the following categories: hardware failure (not ms fault), malware, windows eating itself. The only ones i do not get calls on now is linux ones.

    35. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You'd think HIPAA requirements would send that straight to a *NIX type machine, as Win anything is wholly incapable of meeting the security aspects.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    36. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      Very strange... Battery life is not so different in laptops I've got some contact with...

    37. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't understand tech people that still uses crap like Windoze...

      ...

      Windows is the most common platform out there- of course a large number of tech workers are still going to be using it.

      It's interesting then that in my world, the windows using tech worker is an exception. Hundreds of devs and tech workers I work with all use *nix of one flavor or another. Why? Because everything they do pretty much interacts with a *nix server. In fact, I can't recall touching a windows "server" in at least 5 years at a multitude of clients big and small.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    38. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a browser/app problem, or it's an OS problem?

    39. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Haha if only. All kinds of scientific, industrial and automotive equipment interface software only runs on Windows, all from industries that should bloody well know better.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    40. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's living from the status quo and a coasting on inertia, not necessity.

      Windows isn't necessary. Society was working pretty well up to the late 1980's when Microsoft became dominant. If Microsoft went insta-kaboom, it would still continue to work. It would certainly be problematic until the problems it would cause were solved were solved, but they would be solved. You'd be amazed how fast all kinds of solutions not involving Microsoft would pop up if they just went away, because suddenly there's a motivation rather than whiny resistance. It certainly wouldn't be a disaster like removing air or rail transport, statements like that is just an insane amount of hyperbole from hysterics who are afraid of change.

    41. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Linux exclusively and I can tell you it isn't ready for general desktop business use. I wish it were. Things as simple as editing an old excel file just don't work properly. If Libre or Open Office could just get the bugs worked out and catch up, it would get usability most of the way there for business.

    42. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Oh, I agree. When Win 10 first came out, I submitted an article that I titled "Is Windows 10 a HIPAA Violation Waiting To Happen?".

      Unfortunately, at this point, when you buy new computing hardware, you can't get 7 or 8 (as bad as 8 was, it didn't have this shit).

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    43. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Dude, your sig is SO appropriate to this topic, and your comment in particular.

      Congratulations (and I'm serious there).

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    44. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until companies see the value in developing for Linux, large subsets of people will require Windows: Tax guys, lawyers, photographers, video editors, etc.

    45. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

      "It's a poor craftsman that blames his tools", and sometimes Windows is the tool you have to use.

      --
      "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    46. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The problem is our lives revolve around proprietary software, that aren't run by people like who... So Windows it is

    47. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 1

      Microsoft Store? What's that?

      (I'm just a personal user and not a company anything, so this configuration probably isn't for you.) I've got legal copies of windows, yet I run a Pirated Windows LTSB version (Verified ISO.) It works perfectly fine, I've got control of when updates happen (although it still occasionally full-screen nags), and I don't have to put up with monthly experiments on the GUI.

      I can't purchase things from the Microsoft Store since the app is missing, but I consider that a baseline GOOD thing. My login creds are strictly local without having to touch the internet. Oh, and did I mention that my interface stays stable over time?

      I do like the configuration in 57368280, although that's a bunch of extra work. Also, I *DO* think there's a way to uninstall the Store in normal Windows (or maybe hiding it or its target directories behind special ACLs), just do it before connecting to the internet.

      --
      If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
    48. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      If you honestly think someone like me is going to give up their favorite hobby to avoid setting a "BAD EXAMPLE" you're incredibly naiive. And no I'm not going to switch to Linux compaitble games. That's like giveing up chocolate for carob on religious grounds. Never going to happen.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    49. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      Principles, principles... :P

    50. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. Troll.

    51. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Security, privacy, stability... aren't these features you want for your business of any kind? MS has seemingly concluded the home edition doesn't need these.

    52. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      But you absolutely can buy new computing hardware without windows as just a few examples. So there's no excuse for buying substandard security for any reason.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    53. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are clueless. Candy crush doesn't require a good graphics card. And a laptop will run candy crush just fine.

    54. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about rather than simply asserting there are better options, you list some?

    55. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you waiting for middle men on Linux? You have no clue how Linux works. Stop acting like you do.

    56. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by cciechad · · Score: 1

      I second this I dual boot a fairly modern i7 8th gen Asus laptop and as long as the activities are usually similar (ie mostly using the integrated graphics vs the discreet) I find runtimes very close and usually Linux(4.19 kern Manjaro) seems to edge out Windows.

      --
      https://www.fsf.org/associate/support_freedom
    57. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Tell me that again.

      I work for one of worlds largest engineering firms, and they still run Windows 7SP1

      When Linux, out of the box can do the following, then it is enterprise ready:
      A) run all Autodesk software going back to 2014
      B) run all Adobe software count back to CS4
      C) remotely deploy software patches while the user is still using the machine without forcing them off it and losing their work.
      D) remotely install the OS unattended, and not just Dell Servers with OOB DRAC cards.
      E) work with all NVidia Quadro parts
      F) work with all NVme drives
      G) work with thunderbolt usb-c hardware docking stations and proprietary dell models.
      H) work with usb license dongles

      Linux works okay for cheap web hosting (Free/NetBSD is better) but really what is holding Linux back is one standard hardware configuration that Adobe and Autodesk can work on. If that hurdle could be reached, Iâ(TM)m sure nvidia would be encouraged to develop enterprise drivers. Until then, there are none.

    58. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a stupid statement. You can't use Linux to open old Windows file types so that is a fault in Linux? What a twat.

    59. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, if you need documents in a non-proprietary format, you have to use a device or O/S which is able to open those old files and convert them to an open format. You can't blame tools based on open standards for not being able to access proprietary locked-down old file formats.

      It was a business choice made in the past which left you handling a bunch of files tied to Microsoft tools, it was the 'easy' solution at the time, may have been the 'cheapest' choice at the time, but certainly did not provide for an open long-term storage format.

      A Linux desktop system configured for business use can have exactly the tools required to deal with modern, open-standards data formats, and can provide exactly what the business requires it's workers to be using and nothing more. It is stupid to say, because I have configured a messy desktop setup and cannot open old Microsoft Office documents, then it is not ready for a business desktop. You really do not sound like an experienced IT professional.

    60. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

      Things as simple as editing an old excel file just don't work properly.

      Maybe you're doing something wrong. LibreOffice works like a champ with all my spreadsheets.

      microsoft free (and good riddance) since July 4th.

      --
      Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
    61. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by tysonedwards · · Score: 1

      Canâ(TM)t agree more. Even on a prosumer front, using a Thunderbolt 3 docking station causes compatibility issues on Linux where I simply canâ(TM)t address an external GPU reliably - and thatâ(TM)s acknowledging the current cold plug requirement for External GPUs. The work around is to host a VM, present the secondary card to it, and then distribute tensorflow models to it for execution. Anything short of that and itâ(TM)s a 50/50 chance whether it will run on my laptopâ(TM)s discrete gpu or give me the external. And for those of you who go âoeyou should be using a desktop or a cloud hostâ, Iâ(TM)d like to say âoeI travel quite a bitâ.

      --
      Thirty four characters live here.
    62. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Again, the issue is that some (external) hardware requires Windows. And you can't buy 7, other than third party, and it's EOL'ed beginning of 2020. Similarly, as atrocious as 8 is, it's EOL'ing in 2023.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    63. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Xnet+Project · · Score: 1

      We have 1 machine used for gaming as the reset is Linux. Sadly it's purpose most days is media, music, and gaming.

      Two things keeping us on a singular Windows machine:

      1.) FL Studio (We just like how it works versus other DAW's)
      2.) Gaming as a whole (not just some games.)

      Once we can get past these without having to run a Windows VM to run an application we'd prefer to a higher native degree, then we will be 100% Linux.

    64. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Possibly, but there are a lot of technical oriented tools that only work on Windows. You may be able to find alternatives of course but it's a lot of extra work and the alternatives often aren't as good as the original. A lot of this comes from having Windows programmers be so numerous and inexpensive. Other times they just don't want to pay the cost of maintaining expensive software on more than one platform. These are a big driver of VM software so that you can use the tools even if on Mac or Linux.

      For a good example, FPGA software for the popular vendors.

    65. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Apparently Windows 10 Pro no longer means Professional. Pro users are also treated badly even though it's impossible to buy the Enterprise edition if you're not actually an enterprise.

      The whole point behind the big changes in Windows 8 and 10 was to monetize the customers. Microsoft wanted a piece of the pie that they assumed Apple and Google were getting, only doing this on the PC rather than in content displaying devices.

    66. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Windows 10 Enterprise seems to only be available through Volume Licensing. I don't know exactlly what qualifies as Volume Licensing, but I'm pretty sure it's more than most small businesses.

    67. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? No such assertion was made, nor was "better" defined. What's better? Something which doesn't spy on you? Something that is produced by Microsoft, Adobe?

      "Better" is a useless criteria, because it depends on what you want. If you pee yourself at the mere thought of using something without the Microsoft branding, Microsoft will always be "better" for you.

      If you value your privacy, tools which might be slightly clumsier but does the job will always be better, because they don't spy on you. The problem however, is that a lot of people doesn't even think of trying something else, because they "need" proprietary application X of brand Y. What they usually mean though is that they have their comfort zone that they really, really, really don't want to leave. Which is something entirely different.

      After all, neither the people who built the eg. the Kölner Dom nor those at St. Peter's Basilica had access to the latest proprietary CAD programs. But they sure got shit done anyway. (No, Linux isn't as dire as that, the point is that there is no need, but you might have to adjust your methods.)

      So, who are you? Someone who gets shit done, or are you hiding behind your software as an excuse?

    68. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      But who plays Candy Crush on a laptop, and why?

    69. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Because Windows has historically sucked as a development environment. It has ever so slightly improved over time but it's still just a wannabe if you're not developing Windows applications.

    70. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Even for Windows shops they've moved everything to the cloud (because the masters at Microsoft told them to). Word, Excel, Sharepoint, Outlook, and all the "must have" Windows crap is now in the cloud. I was really worried after my company was acquired by a big Windows oriented company, but so far the Macs work great because all the Windows stuff is online.

      Although a Mac has always worked reasonably well with Office. Unlike an earlier job where I had one Windows computer for email and Office apps and a second computer to do the actual work; crazy but that's why office chairs swivel.

    71. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Then the answer has been in the special case above: buy a special purpose machine, and keep it air-gapped. Yes, that makes transfers a pain in the ass, but at least you won't be leaking patient records to the world.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    72. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by mathew7 · · Score: 1

      I just bought the Surface Go to install linux (xubuntu 18.04) on it. Out of box experience is the best I've had with tablets (since all I tried were Atom based and this is Core M successor, as in really a Core i chip).
      The 1st problem was wifi chip (a bin download solved this).
      After 1 week, I got to the details:
      - idle desktop power draw: 1.5-2W in W10, 3W in ubuntu
      - 1080p60 streaming: 7w in W10, 10W in ubuntu
      So....now I want to see where I can reduce power consumption; and video streaming is a problem as only chromium-dev has HW decoding and is really unstable.

      Oh...shit.....MS still got my money!

    73. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      When you say that manufacturer's support Windows, that is true, but it goes a bit further. For instance, many USB devices will only work on Windows but mysteriously fail on other systems because those device don't follow standards.

    74. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      You do understand that Enterprise is entirely overkill for most small businesses right like a one person law office. You do understand that Enterprise is per year licensing right? Please tell me why a lawyer in a one person law firm should get Enterprise over Pro.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    75. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      WTF? I agree with you. And was complimenting you.

      My point was that even Enterprise has this shit, maybe less, but still has it, even though "it's not got much spam in it".

      There is NO reason that they should force Enterprise on anyone to avoid bullshit. I can see this in Home, but Pro versions should be able to stop this shit.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    76. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, so the real problem here is the way Microsoft watered down the Pro version. If the Pro version actually offered any benefit over Home then it would suit the needs of small businesses perfectly.

    77. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example, these should be in the Pro version:

      https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/client-management/group-policies-for-enterprise-and-education-editions

      And here is some more on the topic:

      https://www.computerworld.com/article/3276278/microsoft-windows/windows-10-pro-is-a-dead-end-for-the-enterprise-gartner-says.html

    78. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm wondering if this post really needs all those "smart quotes".

    79. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd mod you up if I could. This is exactly why the scene can be trusted more then the multi billionaire techie boys club that exists on the market today. Pirates give real options that simply don't exist in current offerings. Fuck DRM, and artificial scarcity and locked in vendor offerings; hello pirate customization for the win! Even when I make the purchase to support devs, I still install and use the pirate versions instead. Get to keep the shiny packaging intact and less resources being used to save those CPU cycles and memory for real tasks.

    80. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget all the users out there who need support and are also using Widows. Much easier to support when you are all on the same page. Yea sure, you can just VM everything if you wanted to, and in some cases this is perfectly fine; but in the end it doesn't really matter cuz I tried so hard and got so far - so Windows it is. Pretty much sums up my entire reasoning behind its continued use, oh yea it also runs all my games...

    81. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Overkill? Nah ... no version of windows is overkill.... even Enterprise sucks.

      The only thing overkill is the cost.

    82. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Win 10 kills me over and over and over again

    83. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by supremebob · · Score: 1

      Well, for one thing, your phone will stop backing itself up properly once you hit the 5 GB storage limit on the free account.

    84. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      You have a problem with accountants? I get the lawyer hatred... But accountants?

    85. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      I agree.. It's linux's fault it can't open old windows files.. Just like it's Windows fault that it can't read punch cards from the IBM mainframe era.

      Can't read a punch card? Windows sucks!

    86. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      Many Linux distributions offer paid support. (Redhat is one).. So, you can pay for windows and get free support, or get free Linux and pay for support...

      What is the problem?

    87. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, if your Linux-GNU is systemd free. After years of fails in video, file storage, audio subsystems & HDD failure errors, my computers are stable again. Dev1 Linux makes them stable again without & free of systemd.

    88. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I on the other hand don't understand neckbeards who still pretend Windoze should not be the preference of "tech people". . I am not going nowhere near Desktop Linux, thank you very much. And so will 98% of the populance, tech people or no

      I'm not a 'neckbeard' but I am an experienced computer user and software developer. I switched to linux in 2005 and never looked back. There are no Windows (sorry, I meant windoze) computers in my home, and we've never needed one. Sometimes the linux software needs are a bit 'special', but it's free, and when I see what Windows users put up with and the hoops they have to jump through just to configure their own hardware I don't think I'm losing anything. You see, when I choose to update the OS it happen quietly in the background while I'm using the machine. Any software I require is available for download and installs without problem (or forcing a re-boot), and that 2 year old VLC? It's working just fine.
      I'm not going anywhere near a MS OS thank you very much. And if you check out the software tech development sites you'll see 98% of the populace is quite comfortable using a lunux desktop, rather that avoiding it. Any good software developer will be quite capable in either environment.
       

    89. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You canâ(TM)t use recent Office versions to properly open older versions. Epic really,,

    90. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And red hat has a booming business supporting a "free" operating system.

      And apple clearly has a different model altogether.

      Just because the model is different doesn't mean you should be so offended.

    91. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a local network connection to a local fileserver, without any inbound/outbound routing beyond access to the file storage? The fileserver can than exposed to the rest of the network as needed.

    92. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh man, it would be great if you let us know when windows 10 is able to do the first two. That would be awesome, because as it is now it can't run illustrator except the newest version (font select and other things broken in basically all versions), and most of the engineering places I do contract admin work for all run windows 7 because 10 broke so much autodesk stuff

      But, wait, the fact that windows can't do the things you're listing isn't going to change your mind at all, is it?

    93. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      I don't understand tech people that still uses crap like Windoze...

      Because the other option is crapple

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    94. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well we know now!

      My scientific instrument company will never deploy a Windows based solution again.

    95. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ReactOS. Look it up.

    96. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give me a break. Red Hat is worth 2% of Microsoftâ(TM)s business. If we had a neighbor who earned 2% of everyone else we wouldnâ(TM)t exactly be racing to get in her line of work.

    97. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This attitude is why Linux isn't usable in business

    98. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by sn0wflake · · Score: 1

      Pay a Linux company to run Windows... How about just using Windows? Seriously, I tried Linux several times in the span of a decade, hoping that Linux would become a strong contender to Windows. That hope faded steadily over the years when trying out new promising distributions and revisiting old distributions. I couldn't see any difference from something made in 2006 or something made in 2012. I'm not only referencing the various CLI and GUI interfaces, I'm also referring to the experience. Nothing had been made to make life easier. Still the same poor PnP support, still a pain in the butt to try and make hardware work, still the same ugly CLI interface everywhere, and doing the simplest thing more often than not required a CLI command, or it was simply faster. Linux also feels like stacking a house of card in a bog. Take one wrong look at Linux and it comes crashing down. Everything also changes so quickly that regular software companies cant keep up with Linux. Last thing is the horrible Linux community filled to the brim with the most anti-social people you can find on Earth.

    99. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >rare

      Yes, AAA gaming is rare. Bravo.

      I ran Linux for 10 years as my only OS. Then I went back to windows (7) because I wanted to actually use my computer for something other than Firefox.

    100. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like that's "network connected". That would be insufficient.

    101. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Well, for one thing, your phone will stop backing itself up properly once you hit the 5 GB storage limit on the free account.

      I back my phone up to the computer....no need for iCloud for that...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    102. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by kurkosdr · · Score: 1

      Most applications are developed as Windows applications, sorry.

    103. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by BitterOak · · Score: 1

      Because some of our clients have specialized equipment with interface software that only runs on Windows?

      That may be true in some cases, but I bet the vast majority of Windows installations are on systems without any special hardware at all.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    104. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      True, but that doesn't mean the development environment doesn't suck.

    105. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by kurkosdr · · Score: 1

      It doesn't. Unix weenies think it does.

    106. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The Windows development environment starts by buying additional tools, usually IDEs in which you spend all your time so that you don't have to interact with the rest of Windows.

    107. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      By all means use Windows. I'm not a zealot and think a person should use what they want to use or what works best for them. I still have a Windows 7 PC. It does some things that I haven't been able to accomplish on Linux (running Photoshop for one example). And yes, Linux does not have drivers for all brand new devices/peripherals. Although, it is fairly easy to find out if a particular device does have driver support or not. Most of the time, if the hardware is common (printer, etc), the driver will appear eventually.

      But.... if you are going to use Windows you will have to resign yourself to the fact that you don't/can't know everything it is doing. I think it is somewhat fair to say that at this point maybe MS doesn't exactly have your best intentions at heart.. Windows 10 seems to be on track to be a walled garden and an ad delivery system. It's not exactly there yet, but I don't think it's hyperbole to say that it is at least at few steps down that path. MS is certainly back up to their old tricks with Edge and Windows 10. We've seen the pop-ups that claim that using anything besides Edge is somehow "insecure". I personally think that is a load of bullshit and is a very typical MS tactic. They've been pulling this crap since the DR-DOS days...

      I do believe that Linux is the better choice, all things being equal. i.e. If what you need to do can be accomplished in both, then I would recommend Linux. The Linux live-cds / thumbdrives have made testing hardware configurations pretty easy.

      I am 100% Linux (or modified Linux) for my business. I absolutely will not trust MS / Windows with anything critical. Your mileage / opinion may be different, and that's fine. But for me, Linux (Debian and RouterOS) have proven themselves over and over again for stability and reliability. Yeah, I have to go through an extra step or two when choosing hardware, but I'm okay with that.

      All OS's will have security issues from time to time and Linux is no exception, but the reaction times (in my experience) seem to favor Linux when one measures the time from exploit to patch. There certainly are also far more attacks on Windows. Certainly part of that is because it is a much larger target audience, but I'm sure some of it is due to design deficiencies. Windows has an awful large burden of legacy code or legacy compatibility to lug around. Linux not so much..

      I would recommend taking another look at Linux, specifically Linux Mint.. It's one hell of a nice OS. It might change your view on Linux.. You can get a Live CD for it, so it's a painless test process.

      I'm very happy that I made the switch (mostly) to Linux about two decades ago (Debian 2.2 if memory serves).. I have never regretted it. I do still have to keep that one laptop with Win7 around, but its days are numbered. Once support for Windows 7 ends I will not upgrade to a newer MS OS. Worst case scenario; I'll buy one last Win7 license and install it in a VM.

    108. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The price to you of 1-2W continuous draw over a year is basically nothing.

    109. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because nobody could possibly load up a web browser and use the free online office from Microsoft to read those files in Linux, right?

      No, it can't be that you have no idea what you're doing, it must be Linux.

      Libreoffice does have some issues, it has those same issues on windows.

      I CAN'T OPEN MY OFFICE FILES IN WORD PERFECT, WINDOWS IS USELESS!!!!!

      Seems a little silly, no?

    110. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by kurkosdr · · Score: 1

      Every other operating system (Android, Windows Mac OS X, iOS, even frickin' AmigaOS) works the normal way, aka the developer creates the package and either uploads it to some website or to some "store". Only Desktop Linux (and to a lesser degree Unix) imposes the need of repository middlemen who will repackage applications (it's not a security fiasco waiting to happen, honest) or forces the user to package the application himself. Stop acting as if this is something normal. PS: I will believe Snaps or Flatpack when I see them working for more than a handful of apps.

  2. Resistance is futile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You will be assimilated.

    1. Re:Resistance is futile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the year of GNU+Linux on the desktop!

    2. Re:Resistance is futile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if only someone would actually make a distribution that works on every f**king machine I have without it f**king up on some or other thing on at least every computer I have, except for that single one computer, which gets f**ked up after the first upgrade.

      SERIOUSLY WTF :tableflip:

      passphrase : artifact

    3. Re:Resistance is futile. by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      if only someone would actually make a distribution that works on every f**king machine I have without it f**king up on some or other thing on at least every computer I have, except for that single one computer, which gets f**ked up after the first upgrade.

      SERIOUSLY WTF :tableflip:

      passphrase : artifact

      That's a pretty good job of trolling you did there. Good enough, in fact, that I can use it as a springboard for something useful. Microsoft has the active and willing co-operation of virtually every hardware vendor in the space, while Linux devs get very little of that co-operation, and in fact often have to resort to very complex and time-consuming reverse engineering. Many of the people who do this volunteer their time, and as much as I swear at Linux for its various deficiencies, I always feel deep gratitude for those who provide and maintain it, and I always keep in mind how much worse Windows is in so, so many ways. Not the least of which is that, whenever I'm forced to use Windows, I feel as though I've been slimed and need to take a shower. In particular, using Windows 10 makes me feel viscerally disgusted, and I only do it when the need is extreme. Linux never provokes that reaction in me.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  3. First sentence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, couldn't get past the blatant lie in the first sentence. Windows installs have included bloatware since at least Win95 OSR2.

    1. Re:First sentence by rickb928 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wait, USB drivers were not bloatware. They just didn't work.

      There's a difference.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    2. Re:First sentence by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well how to define bloatware? Is it just a program that is installed that you never use, or not needed by an other application?
      If that is the case Bloat where was around back in the MSDos 3 days. If you weren't a programmer, why is you disk filled with GWBasic!
      MSDos 5 you got these silly games where you throw bananas at each other.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:First sentence by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The way I remember it was WIndows 95 OSR2 would do its install and then upon the first bootup, it would immediately launch the installer for IE4 and gave you no option to cancel or decline it. Microsoft did a pretty good job of keeping you from getting out of the installer, but there was nothing they could do about the reset switch. After booting back up, the forced IE4 installer was gone and the OS was perfectly functional (as Windows 95 goes) without it. I think you may have been stuck with IE3 doing this but I don't remember now.

    4. Re: First sentence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Bloatware"

      I know it when I see it.

  4. What outrage? by Brett+Buck · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's no real outrage - people still keep buying the accursed thing in massive numbers. If anyone was really outraged, they would get something else.

    1. Re:What outrage? by DogDude · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If anyone was really outraged, they would get something else.

      There is no practical alternative. But no, most people don't care, either.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    2. Re:What outrage? by sakono · · Score: 2

      There aren't really any alternatives for most people. I can't use linux if I want to be able to play most of my games as they are not supported on linux. I also have programs for work that will not work on linux and me and a coworker have been unable to modify it to work. Mac OS is a whole nother thing as it only installs on specific hardware configurations unlike windows and linux/unix so for many Windows is really the only OS they can use. which sucks. luckly I only mess with windows 10 at work. I still have windows 7 at home.

    3. Re:What outrage? by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If anyone was really outraged, they would get something else.

      Most are annoyed by Windows antics, not "outraged". Compatibility and familiarity trumps the alternatives so far.

      Macs are more expensive and don't run a lot of software titles, Google also pulls marketing shenanigans, Linux is unfamiliar and is hard to get help for unless you want to put up with impatient volunteers lacking people skills (I'm just the messenger).

      Until the alternatives improve, people will put up with a degree of MS spamware and forced upgrades. In the land of C-, you can stay D+ for a long time.

    4. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no real outrage - people still keep buying the accursed thing in massive numbers. If anyone was really outraged, they would get something else.

      I came here to post this, so I'm glad you did instead because from an AC it would have languished at score=0.

      People keep buying and using Windows, so they can't be that outraged. It sure looks like a user-abusive OS to me, but.... if they like being abused, or they just don't mind whatever latest shit MS has pulled, hey, great for them. Takes all kinds.

    5. Re:What outrage? by blahplusplus · · Score: 0

      There's no real outrage - people still keep buying the accursed thing in massive numbers.

      The free market cannot exist in an internet enabled society, you'd need physical proximity to these companies to have any accountability at all. That's the reason software companies have basically invaded everyones privacy and personal space, you'd have to be physically two blocks from their offices for your outrage to have any effect. It's not that those mad angry people aren't there, it's that there is always a portion of the population that is perpetually ignorant and stupid for corporations to develop an in with, thereby causing collapse of the rest because you'd need to be able to co-ordinate.

      The free market fairy never existed, the human mind did not evolve to make rational decisions in a high tech capitalist society and we're seeing the result - total loss of freedom because the average consumer is a tech illiterate moron.

    6. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Me and a coworker..." When did me stop being an objective pronoun become a nominative pronoun? Is this a common thing in British English? Are you simply uneducated?

    7. Re:What outrage? by Doke · · Score: 1

      Schools and home use are switching heavily to Chromebooks. A large part of that is price, but some is to avoid Windows.

    8. Re: What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is learned helplessness. If you can't use alternatives, I hope you don't work anything related to IT.

    9. Re:What outrage? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What alternative is there? Linux doesn't work for most people and it's pretty hard to buy a computer with it pre-installed and supported. Macs are expensive and MacOS has it's own issues.

      They put up with this shit because there isn't an alternative.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you'd have to be physically two blocks from their offices for your outrage to have any effect.

      Huh? Since when do purchase decisions have to be made 2 blocks from a company's office?

      Of course people can have an effect. If people stopped buying MS shit because of the crap they pull, they would stop pulling the crap or go bust.

    11. Re:What outrage? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      So run Linux and a copy of Windows 8.1 in a virtual machine.

    12. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So run Linux and a copy of Windows 8.1 in a virtual machine.

      Is there any loss of framerate when you're running something like Monster Hunter World in a VM? What about Fortnite?

      Oh wait you haven't actually done this and you're unaware that this solution doesn't work for popular games.

    13. Re:What outrage? by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

      If you can even get them to play.
      I haven't found a way to even get them to play in a VM.

      --
      The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
    14. Re:What outrage? by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

      Then you drink Googles Koolaid which is the same as MS but flavored red instead of purple.

      --
      The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
    15. Re:What outrage? by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      you'd have to be physically two blocks from their offices for your outrage to have any effect.

      Huh? Since when do purchase decisions have to be made 2 blocks from a company's office?

      You're not getting that before the internet existed they physically had to give you the entire software in order to get paid, you have no ability to influence their behavior via purchasing because they can always find a bunch of uninformed people to sustain themselves. The elite market participants can protect everyone else if there was some way to hold the company accountable (aka storming their offices). In reality since their customers are 100's of miles away, merely "not buying" from a company does not work. I'll give you an example from videogames...

      What does a 40 year old and a 15 year old have in common in terms of their awareness and buying habits? AKA nothing. If you're going to tell an informed audience that kids and their idiot parents are going to not buy games for their teens for christmas/birthday/whatever. I got a bridge I want to sell ya. Most people who are purchasing things have no idea how they work, they are not qualified to be market participants. The brain did not evolve to live in a free market society so you get these bad outcomes where corporate lawlesness gets accepted because of the ass backward nature of how the human mind is constructed. It's not in your interest to buy broken products or fraudulently made ones. But companies hire a bunch of scientists to manipulate people via advertising. The average person is not equipped to make sensible decisions in a high tech society.

    16. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have a copy of Windows 8.1 then just run that. The outrage is about Windows 10. Why did you have to complicate things by shoving Linux into the solution? Windows 8.1 will receive security updates until 2023.

    17. Re:What outrage? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Because if you're smart you'll stop using Microsoft products completely, or at least minimize it as much as possible. Or do you want to live in a Microsoft-only world, where you don't even have control anymore of your own hardware? That's what they want, why make it easy for them? Get Linux and take back control.

    18. Re:What outrage? by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      it's pretty hard to buy a computer with it pre-installed and supported

      Define "Linux". The second most popular type of laptop computer right now are Chromebooks, which do everything most people need (and will cover a much greater percentage of those left's needs once Crostini is ready.) I've stopped recommending Windows machines to family members who have problems with computers. a Chromebook fits their requirements perfectly, with no risk of being bamboozed by calls from "Windows" about viruses on their computers.

      The scope of the environment Microsoft controls is reducing rapidly. Nerds can run Ubuntu (or I guess a Ubuntu fork, because Ubuntu isn't hipster compliant enough); people who need a computer to write emails, browse the web, and occasionally pay their taxes or write letters, are well served by Chromebooks. Macs have their creativity niche. Which leaves Windows as a gamers platform, for those gamers who want something a little more mod friendly than a console.

      Everyone has choices right now.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    19. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just because of vendor lock-in.

    20. Re:What outrage? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      People keep buying and using Windows, so they can't be that outraged

      I get outraged at bad drivers all the time. I still drive my car. There are no alternatives that work for me.

    21. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So run Linux and a copy of Windows 8.1 in a virtual machine.

      Been there, done that, bought the T-shirt, etc. I choose to use OS X and Linux, but I'm forced to run Windows, too.

      Some applications need direct access to the hardware; VMs don't do the job. Some applications just run too slowly in a VM to be practical. Regardless, you're still having to pay for a Windows license, increasing the reported numbers and encouraging the bumbling behemoth into thinking that more people actually want to use their operating system.

      Too many applications, especially specialized apps and games, only run on Windows. There's no philosophy behind that; the developers need to eat, so they target the massive heard of sheep. Unfortunately, the reverse reinforces things: the sheep keep buying Windows because that's what their specialty applications and/or games run on.

    22. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to 2002! They want their FUD back. Linux is fine for 95% of the users out there. Android and Chromebooks are based on Linux. Android is on billlions of devices. Linux is on just about every set top box there is. My kids know linux including my 11 year old who has been working on it for 6 or more years, and she is mentally delayed. My dad has been using Linux since 2005 or 2006. He is 72 now. LInux is a piece of cake to install. Also now with Steam Play, Linux has a vast amount of games that were just windows only. I have 689 Steam games and all but 11 require windows. All the other are either native, Steam play (something like 545 of those), crossover or wine. There is absolutely no reason other than laziness to ditch windows.

    23. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      doh.... i need to proof my writing:

      [ Also now with Steam Play, Linux has a vast amount of games that were just windows only. I have 689 Steam games and all but 11 require windows. ]

      should have read: Also now with Steam Play, Linux has a vast amount of games that were just windows only. I have 689 Steam games and all but 11 do not require windows.

    24. Re:What outrage? by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Linux is unfamiliar and is hard to get help for unless you want to put up with impatient volunteers lacking people skills (I'm just the messenger).

      All of the major distributions offer paid commercial support. And there are independent businesses that also support Linux. It is only if you want free support that you need to talk with "impatient volunteers lacking people skills."

    25. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      found the gamer excuse...again <_<

    26. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might consider looking into this:

      https://steamcommunity.com/games/221410/announcements/detail/1696055855739350561

    27. Re:What outrage? by bluelip · · Score: 1

      That's why you play games on a console and not a computer which is used to accomplish things.

      --

      Yep, I never spell check.
      More incorrect spellings can be found he
    28. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.reddit.com/r/VFIO/

      Using VFIO causes games to work great. It's pretty much a vm with dedicated hardware so you don't even get any performance hits.

    29. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously? You expect people to run their games in a VM just to avoid this nonsense?

    30. Re:What outrage? by green1 · · Score: 2

      There have been several very practical alternatives for decades now. It's not that people can't migrate, it's that they simply don't. Is it ignorance? is it simple momentum? I'm not sure, but there is really no good reason for anyone to use Windows anymore in 2018.

      I haven't owned a windows machine in 20 years, My wife (who is far from techie) hasn't owned one in 10. We haven't missed it in the slightest, and I haven't run in to anything that I couldn't do just as easily (or usually more easily) in Linux. And the more time goes on, the more stuff is cloud based anyway, which means that the vast majority of people could use ANYTHING that has a web browser in it to replace all of their day to day operations.

      And don't give me the "but there's this one person that has an extreme niche case that doesn't operate on anything but windows!" argument, we all know that this is nowhere near the majority of users.

    31. Re:What outrage? by green1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To add to this, if you want free support for MS products you get... none. If you want paid support for MS products, you pay through the nose, and the only solution is "have you rebooted? yes? ok, have you used the system restore cd?"

      I have found linux support far better in that most times I can find actual answers on how to fix things, for free, and not the tired "reboot and system restore" that seems to be the bread and butter of "support" in the Windows world.

    32. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. I've been a sysadmin for 21 years and I switched over to an iPad. If I need Office-style apps, Pages and Numbers do quite well and they can create PDFs on the fly for things like my CV. Since Apple controls the HW and SW stacks, everything works all of the time. I have a Linux laptop for when I need the command line.

    33. Re:What outrage? by green1 · · Score: 2

      Linux would work for the vast majority of people if they'd only try it. It's only because MS shills such as yourself keep claiming otherwise that people don't try.

      Linux these days is far easier to use than Windows, has better support, and runs almost everything that you can think of. Sure there are a small handful of niche applications that maybe 0.00001% of the population actually use that don't work, but that's hardly "most people"

      There *IS* and alternative, people just have to quit being told it doesn't exist.

    34. Re: What outrage? by sakono · · Score: 1

      I work in printer/copiers. Don't have much of a choice in what applications I can use or OS. shit we had to modify the windows 7 version of the main software we use to get it to install on the windows 8 and windows 10 laptop we were given. the software people for the printers don't care. hell I can't update to newer browsers because they don't work with the old security practicals the printers use.

    35. Re:What outrage? by sakono · · Score: 1

      Yes I screwed up grammatically. congrats for pointing it out. It happens when I'm talking to someone and typing at the same time now and then. Didn't mean to get your panties in a twist. I'm only human, I make mistakes.

    36. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me one operating system other than Windows that fully supports Oculus Rift.

    37. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, in Linux's case it's more like easy availability of alternatives. People need to be able to go to Best Buy or Amazon and have a range of Ubuntu (or whatever) computers to select from. The consumption cycle for low technical skill people is to buy a computer and use it until it dies. The buying of the computer part is part of the problem.

    38. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That requires a lot of hassle for most Joe Sixpacks. This is OP's original point: Linux is not for Joe Sixpacks. Those that play modded Skyrim on their PC because that's what they want and don't know how the actual Operation System/Computer works, runs Windows. The options that aren't Windows either 1) runs Skyrim with a lot of pain (Linux, though this is getting slightly better with Proton but not "ready" for 90% of Windows-only titles) and 2) doesn't run Skyrim at all (OS X, IIRC. Correct me if I'm wrong).

      This is the problem. People put up with Windows because application developers don't invest time, and Linux porting houses (Feral Interactive for games) do not have the man-power to port everything. If Linux developers put their minds to it and supported just one distro instead of forking every 15 minutes, they could possibly get the momentum to actually get applications/developers to work on the OS.

    39. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux via Steam

    40. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enable 3d acceleration, if you have a modern video card it will still even use them depending on if you're using VMWare workstation vs hyper-v

    41. Re:What outrage? by DogDude · · Score: 2

      All of our business software is Windows-only. We're in retail. There are no usable Linux alternatives.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    42. Re:What outrage? by swb · · Score: 0

      The thing I wish would happen is that all the fucking Linux scolds would just shut up and stay out of these threads, as if their "you should have switched to Linux, it's easier than my wife these days" comments add any substance.

      I mean, some of us (try) to make a buck doing computer work and switching people to Linux, even if we wanted to, isn't really viable when they want/expect/need Windows.

      What I don't get is that Microsoft still needs the vast army of consultants/IT people to support its products yet it continues to alienate them by making their products *harder* to customize and run cleanly.

      I mean, I get it -- they make money off this and if shit like Xbox and Candy Crush or whatever paid content was easy to turn off, the adoption rate would drop right off a cliff and MS wouldn't make money at it.

      MS obviously sees the not-too-distant future as one where they are irrelevant and are trying to restructure their business into some weird mix of Apple, Android and Microsoft all at the same time, with consumers locked into a monthly service that Microsoft gatekeeps and collects market intel from. I'm not sure how they get hardware makers to go along with a walled garden they don't control, but maybe that's where the experience of Android comes in.

    43. Re:What outrage? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      I like Chrome OS for what it is, basically a platform to run the Chrome browser on. But I couldn't use it for anything really serious, so I see it more like a mobile OS than a desktop/workstation.

      Businesses are not going to move to Chrome OS for example.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    44. Re:What outrage? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu doesn't appear to even offer individual support. You have buy at least 50 PC's.

      I'm sure there are 3rd parties that have individual plans, but most consumers use word of mouth to judge such. It has to build up to a critical mass to be viable. The "network effect" matters in getting acceptance.

    45. Re:What outrage? by Aristos+Mazer · · Score: 1

      Linux has no marketing department. It isn't running ads to "put Linux under your Christmas tree" or anything like that. The only meaningful alternative to Windows is MacOS*, and a lot of people don't want to shell out the money for Apple or don't like Apple's walled garden. Linux isn't a commercial OS. It doesn't come preinstalled on computers that you typically find in the latest Amazon sale or on the floor at Best Buy. No one is pushing it into the consumer view. And if someone did get a Linux box somehow, I have no idea who they would call to help them turn it on or troubleshoot anything that went wrong with it. Linux effectively does not exist in the consumer sphere.

      * Maybe Chrome OS. I'd accept an argument for that.

    46. Re:What outrage? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      There is no practical alternative. But no, most people don't care, either.

      They do care, but most seem to accept it as a fact of life that desktop computers will suck one way or another. As people rely more on phones and tablets, they too are becoming a source of headaches. "Why the [bleep] can't I transfer my photos from this mobile to gizmo to this other mobile gizmo?"

    47. Re:What outrage? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Correction: "...from this mobile gizmo to this other mobile gizmo"

    48. Re:What outrage? by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu doesn't appear to even offer individual support. You have buy at least 50 PC's.

      Well that is new. I bought a single desktop support just last year. I am betting you could buy it if you called. I also bet it will return to the website if a lot of people call! :)

    49. Re:What outrage? by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      I get free Microsoft support pre-emptively calling me all the time when I have a virus. I just give them remote admin access to my PC and they fix it right up.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    50. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More an exasperated sigh or a resigned shrug here. It sucks, but I need at least one laptop running windows for work, so what can you do?

    51. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, most are outraged. Like when I own you with my malware, you get outraged.

    52. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh bullshit. Linux cant do half of that shit and I'm writing this from a Ubuntu PC.

      Pull your head out of your ass mate, Linux is so far behind Windows in the "Just works" it's not fucking funny.

    53. Re: What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be blunt, if you have a problem and you have not already tried rebooting and a system restore (aka known good install), you are wasting everyone's time/money.

      Just because you have so much technical debt that trying it in a clean install is a "huge hassle" or whatever doesn't make it Microsoft's fault that the eighty fifth click yes to agree install you did via browser borked the system. Bitch about legitimate complaints like candy crush, not that.

    54. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off you judgemental asswipe.

    55. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to run this when those glasses were available for DEVs, now, are you kidding me, its FACEBOOK shit!

    56. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want linux help from someone with people skills, pay for it. You know, like you have to do with windows.

      The difference being, you can stop paying for linux when you think you have gotten enough help. Can't do that with windows - not paying is illegal and called 'piracy'.

      Also, if you have some people skills, you can manipulate those linux geeks. "Damn, this linux stuff failed me! Where is the windows cd?" Then they fix things for you, to prevent you from going back to the evil empire. (Never mind that yoy no longer get windows on a cd - they don't know.)

    57. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      User absusive? User abusive is Apple.

      They call their users fucking retards ("no reasonable person would believe our" lies.. I mean ads). You're too stupid to be trusted with out-of-market apps. 3rd party repairs? Fuck you, i'm disabling the whole phone instead of just the part that got repaired. Problem with our devices? Nope, you're the one that's the problem... unless we lose a lawsuit. In which case, we were still right but the stupid courts are dumb. Let me mysteriously slow down your phone when your battery has a problem... but I won't tell you until we get caught doing it.

      Uninstalling a few apps once in a while is annoying at best. Or you just leave it there and it takes like 0.001% of most drives these days.

    58. Re:What outrage? by goose-incarnated · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All of our business software is Windows-only. We're in retail. There are no usable Linux alternatives.

      And that's why you use Windows at home?

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    59. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, I have little sympathy if you can't play your vidya games. Don't you have anything better to do?

      Showing your true colors there, Rick. You decided that the thing a person wants to do with their PC isn't worthy, so therefore, you can just dismiss it out of hand. You are part of this problem, Rick. The issue of gaming holding people back from upgrading from Win10 to Linux is a genuine problem.

      Perhaps you thought it was okay to say that since you're responding to some rando AC and your post won't get modded up for everyone to call you out? Even though that AC threw a bit of a stinger in there, the AC has a point: The state of Linux gaming is not great.

      Your attitude of "having something better to do" is pretty shameful on Slashdot. This is a site for news -- you know, the segment of population that enjoys what might be considered unusual or frivolous pastimes? You should be ashamed of yourself for hanging your judgmental attitude out there. Voices from the Hellmouth, indeed.

    60. Re:What outrage? by chiefcrash · · Score: 1

      I find it interesting you declare that there's "no good reason for anyone to use Windows anymore", and then talk about "the majority of users" when confronted with the idea of a Windows-only niche...

      --
      Show me on the 1st Amendment bobblehead where the moderator touched you...
    61. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have found linux support far better in that most times I can find actual answers on how to fix things, for free, and not the tired "reboot and system restore" that seems to be the bread and butter of "support" in the Windows world.

      Oh really? One of the reason I have stayed away from Linux is that most (not all) users are a string of slightly more than condescending crowd. Twice I tried to move in Linux and twice I was bitten off by the elite.

      So much for ''community'' thank you very much.

    62. Re:What outrage? by Brannon · · Score: 1

      The second most popular type of laptop computer right now are Chromebooks, which do everything most people need (and will cover a much greater percentage of those left's needs once Crostini is ready.)

      Apple says hello.

    63. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you tried SteamPlay yet?

    64. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's pretty hard to buy a computer with it pre-installed and supported

      Define "Linux". The second most popular type of laptop computer right now are Chromebooks, which do everything most people need (and will cover a much greater percentage of those left's needs once Crostini is ready.) I've stopped recommending Windows machines to family members who have problems with computers. a Chromebook fits their requirements perfectly, with no risk of being bamboozed by calls from "Windows" about viruses on their computers.

      The scope of the environment Microsoft controls is reducing rapidly. Nerds can run Ubuntu (or I guess a Ubuntu fork, because Ubuntu isn't hipster compliant enough); people who need a computer to write emails, browse the web, and occasionally pay their taxes or write letters, are well served by Chromebooks. Macs have their creativity niche. Which leaves Windows as a gamers platform, for those gamers who want something a little more mod friendly than a console.

      Everyone has choices right now.

      Well said.

    65. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is very little alternative for good gaming support. If you expect to play the flagship titles, there is no alternative.

      I've moved all my data off Win10, but it still holds court as the ultimate hardware console.

    66. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of our business software is Windows-only. We're in retail. There are no usable Linux alternatives.

      The problem is that people like the one you're responding to are locked into their bubble to a degree that they won't accept there are legitimate reasons people use Windows, and will just blame any excuses as laziness. They simply can't comprehend that Linux won't satisfy the needs of everyone, or hell, some people might prefer the Windows desktop experience (and all its faults) to the Linux one. These people are incredibly stubborn and cannot be debated with, so it's best not to try.

    67. Re:What outrage? by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      There are two issues with that analysis:

      1. More and more applications are being delivered via the browser.
      2. It's not really that any more. Almost Chromebooks are capable of running native apps, there just aren't many right now. More than 90% of Chromebooks, and pretty much all new Chromebooks, can run Android applications. And, as I said, Crostini is being rolled out now, making the functionality of a Chromebook indistinguishable from that of any more traditional GNU/Linux system, except with really strong sandboxing.

      I would have no problem running a business from my Chromebook. My major reason for not using one as my primary system is that I'm a software developer, but that may change once Crostini becomes production ready. Being able to run Atom and/or Eclipse, with a native Outlook client, moderately good Microsoft file format options (Microsoft's own Office Online and Mobile Office work fine on it already), without having to deal with Windows 10's constant BS, will be awesome. It's already working better for certain applications than my Windows PC does.

      If they could release a version with Firefox instead of Chrome, it'd be perfect.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    68. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If anyone was really outraged, they would get something else.

      There is no practical alternative. But no, most people don't care, either.

      That really depends on what the definition of "practical" is. People who argue, "I need Windows for x, y, or z," are really saying, "I am willing to be bent over and screwed because I'm unwilling to FIND an alternative to x, y, or z, and so I pay MONEY to the people who MAKE x, y, and/or z, REWARDING THEM for only supporting M$ Window$.

      Ironically, they're complaining about the problem, WHILE the actions they take are tending to make it worse. It'd be like people flying private jets and driving SUVs with one person per each, to a conference about GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE.

      I have little sympathy for that. "But my company requires..." are you an indentured servant? If all (or even most) of the employees at a company refused to use some software, the bosses would... well, the bosses would probably fire them all, but when they couldn't find anyone to replace them because everyone else who is a potential replacement won't do it either, they'd be obliged to stop. I understand this is hard as hell to do, and would require people to band together in ways they never do in real life, but that's a big chunk of WHY Misro$oft manages to keep their position despite making software like what's being talked about in this article, software that makes people really mad.

      Meanwhile, elsewhere, acros the street, there's a dealership giving away tanks, for free, that come with a complete set of tools and manuals for every single part... and people still buy the cars that cost way too much, aren't safe...

      We continue to preach the gospel of GNU and Linux... even though it seems hopeless, because it's the right thing to do.

    69. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the people who complain that software isn't out there to do what they GNU/Linux are forgetting that every tool in the Linux (or UNIX) toolbox today, that can be/are freely distributed, had to be written by someone. Rather than whining that the software doesn't exist, take some of the money you'd pay Microsoft or whoever is writing Microsoft-Windows-Compatible-Only software, and pay someone else to write a GNU/Linux-compatible version, and free yourself from Microsoft tyranny instead of whining about how you HAVE to run Windows because your retail software only runs on Windows?

      The plain and simple fact is that doing nothing about the problem only guarantees the continuity of the problem.

    70. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "reboot and system restore" that seems to be the bread and butter of "support" in the Windows world.

      Being Devil's Advocate here:

      The reason for this is because said users are impatient and taking 6+ hours to run a google search on the problem and try 3-4 fixes before finding the one that works in your case is too long. Hell for most of these users if it's not fixed within an hour, you're either fired or they will interrupt you and say they will take it to Best Buy.

      Restore takes about ~45 minutes on average. Reformat takes longer but gets the job done. (Assuming they will wait long enough.)

      The other issue is most of them have no idea what a "config file" is and the split second they see a wall of text, they will be muscle memorying the X button in their heads while saying "it's broken beyond repair." The vast majority of users in the US cannot think critically, and have been babied and handheld through their entire computing lives. No amount of linux support is going to fix that. Unless it's as simple as "click button to try and fix it" they will never set foot near linux unless forced to by their family geek. This generation is too screwed up for anything less right now. We can fix things for future generations, but the current ones will need reeducation to fix what's wrong with them on this front.

      So, yeah. Windows' default of "reboot and restore" isn't so much a de facto method so much as it is the de jure method.

    71. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Define "Linux"

      When people say "linux" they do *not* mean the kernel. They mean a distribution of the GNU/linux system. More often than not, something debian derived.

      "Linux" is shorthand for the whole software freedom movement. No freedom = not linux.

      What we're seeing here, is some embrace and extend.

    72. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody is buying Windows 10, and certainly nobody is choosing to use the Microsoft Store. You want a new computer? Congratulations! You play Candy Crush now. Microsoft's orders.

    73. Re:What outrage? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Businesses are not going to move to Chrome OS for example.

      Why not? In most of the businesses i've seen, the typical user has fairly limited requirements that are satisfied easily by web based tools. Switching such users to chromebooks brings significant cost and security benefits.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    74. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There have been several very practical alternatives for decades now. It's not that people can't migrate, it's that they simply don't. Is it ignorance? is it simple momentum? I'm not sure, but there is really no good reason for anyone to use Windows anymore in 2018.

      I haven't owned a windows machine in 20 years, My wife (who is far from techie) hasn't owned one in 10. We haven't missed it in the slightest, and I haven't run in to anything that I couldn't do just as easily (or usually more easily) in Linux. And the more time goes on, the more stuff is cloud based anyway, which means that the vast majority of people could use ANYTHING that has a web browser in it to replace all of their day to day operations.

      And don't give me the "but there's this one person that has an extreme niche case that doesn't operate on anything but windows!" argument, we all know that this is nowhere near the majority of users.

      you are correct... even gaming is becoming very viable on a linux system... my next gaming box in 2020 WILL be a linux box

    75. Re:What outrage? by novakyu · · Score: 1

      Wake me when Chromebooks can run AutoCAD and COMSOL.

    76. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, why pay $4 for a game on a steam sale when you can buy it for $40 for your playstation even though it's 4 years old already?

    77. Re:What outrage? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Why the fuck would I pay millions for bespoke development on Linux of a corporate accounting system, when I can just go out and buy one from Oracle?
      Or a corporate expense system?
      A workflow engine?
      An inventory management system?
      A POS system?
      A software asset management system?
      A process automation engine?
      A payroll system?
      A sales tax system?
      A corporate intranet with attached content management system?
      An integrated comms system, that includes messaging, desktop sharing, email and voice comms?
      A corporate tax system?
      A project portfolio management system?
      A market trading system?
      A payroll tax system?
      A contact management system?
      A marketing platform?
      A sales lead management system?
      A customer service system?
      An IT ticketing system?
      A facilities management system?

      I could go on, but hopefully you get the point already.

      I'm also very aware that non-Windows options exist for all of those. But why the fuck would I cripple my business by constraining my options like that?

    78. Re:What outrage? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Maybe for most people the car is adequate and they lack the time or energy to build the fucking tank and keep it running.

      But please, what exactly is the alternative to Lightroom that gives me catalogue management, the ability to process 2000 photos in a couple of hours, integration to my hosting site?

      Which other OS will run all 808 games I have on Steam, let alone the ones I own that aren't on that platform?

      Can you ask my camera manufacturer to supply their software for Linux, because they don't perceive this to be a viable market for them?

      You're bitching that I accept an OS I'm not terribly happy with but ignoring one of the things that matters the most: I can get whatever fucking software I want or need to run on it.

      There are 2-3 applications that run on whatever the fuck Apple call their OS these days that it would be nice to have access to, but buying from Apple is like buying from Microsoft while stabbing yourself in the testicles. No.

      There are no applications that run on Linux that I can't also run on Windows that I actually want to run. Sure, there's plenty of server-side shit but - get this - I run that on a Linux server and not on my desktop PC.

      We continue to preach the gospel of GNU and Linux.

      The rest of us skip the religion and get on with our lives.

    79. Re: What outrage? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      This is bullshit. He explicitly mentioned games and you think there are alternatives?

      Following your logic we may as well close all libraries and book stores. There's a linux manual, that should be enough book for everybody.

      Following your logic we may as well close all cinemas and shut down hollywood. Fritz Lang made Metropolis, nobody else needs any other film.

      Following your logic would be fucking stupid. I hope you don't work on anything related to IT.

    80. Re:What outrage? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      That's why you play games on a console

      Consoles don't run many of the games I enjoy playing.

      How many of the Zachtronics catalogue are available on consoles?
      Is Zero-K available on consoles?
      When were the Car Mechanic Simulator series ported to consoles?
      Has one of the largest selling games franchises in history, Football Manager, ever been on console? (Actually, yes - but not the full version)

      a computer which is used to accomplish things

      I use my computer to accomplish my objectives of making it through another day without killing everybody around me. Its ability to distract and entertain me helps tremendously with this; I can watch films, listen to music, read books, access the internet and play games. It's very versatile.

      Of course, I can also write books, write games and edit photographs on it, and post them to the internet.

      Given such flexibility, why would I spend more money on a console that I don't need?

    81. Re:What outrage? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      people will put up with a degree of MS spamware

      Buy PC with Windows 10 on it. Three hours later it's configured how I want it.

      MS spamware subsequently encountered: Umm. Oh, I think I remember having to uninstall something added by an update a few months ago. One thing.

      If people are getting spammed by MS then it means they don't know how to use a computer well enough to use Linux anyway.

    82. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's web/cloud version of AutoCAD. I'm not sure about COMSOL, never use it.

    83. Re:What outrage? by Daralantan · · Score: 1

      I like Chrome OS for what it is, basically a platform to run the Chrome browser on. But I couldn't use it for anything really serious, so I see it more like a mobile OS than a desktop/workstation.

      Ignoring his second post here, I took the original post to mostly mean for regular everyday people. I assumed the qualifier was "family members who aren't good with computers." And it quickly makes me realize that this would likely best apply to my Mom, who was thinking of getting a new cheap computer soon-ish.

      Thinking about it, I almost feel like I should just recommend her one because she only uses her home PC for rare youtube, email, and... I guess printing email? That, plus she keeps installing a 10-15 year old copy of Office from one of my aunts on every computer and uses it for almost nothing. Would simply need to get her to try Google Docs for the rare notes she might type.

      The only issue I can think of is that she definitely prefers using a desktop to using a laptop.

    84. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux has no marketing department.

      Yes it does, it is just a really lousy one. It basically runs the same 20 year old ad that tells people they are stupid and lazy for not having switched already because every single possible thing anyone could ever want to do with a computer can be done with a Linux computer better than a Windows one, and if you pose one irrefutable example where that isn't the case you are stupid for wanting to do that in the first place.

      And wanting to double click setup.exe is stupid you should type apt get and if you don't know what a dependency is you are stupid and lazy.

    85. Re:What outrage? by sremick · · Score: 1

      it's pretty hard to buy a computer with it pre-installed and supported.

      I know, so incredibly hard. It's unfortunate that Dell is such a tiny company that no one has heard of.

      Dell will happily sell you a Latitude laptop with Ubuntu installed, and it knocks like $100 off the cost. The Precision workstations are available with Red Hat. All you have to do is ask. And the Latitudes (and Precision Mobile) laptops are the only ones you should be looking at from them anyway... the Inspirons are junk, and avoid the Latitude 3000 series as that's basically just an Inspiron now too.

    86. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EXTREMELY not true. There are Linux alternatives to almost every retail-related peice of software. Your management/execs just don't want to fork over the cash to retrain everyone.

    87. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to sell your sole to be able to play games, then it's your choice. It's a bad choice, but it's still yours to make.

    88. Re:What outrage? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Sure, if you go out of your way or dig around, you may get such. But the fact you have to go out of your way emphasizes my point.

    89. Re:What outrage? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Sure there are a small handful of niche applications that maybe 0.00001% of the population actually use that don't work, but that's hardly "most people"

      Yes, because only 0.00001% of the population plays games on their computers. And only 0.00001% of the population runs Microsoft Office. As bad as it is, people know Office and are used to it, and most don't want to learn something else. And only 0.00001% of the population run apps like Photoshop and other Adobe software.

      I agree with you, there are alternatives, but to the average non-technical user, they usually aren't feasible.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    90. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Here is the alternative that I chose. My PC at home is running Win7 and it will continue to run Win7 until it breaks or MS stops supporting security updates to it.

      In the meantime, I am getting very comfortable running Ubuntu Linux and LibreOffice. The trend I see is that both Linux and LibreOffice have made great strides to be full featured and easy to use. At the same time, Office have bloated to ridiculous levels and the Windows philosophy has changed to to believe that everyone in the world is too stupid to manage and control their own computer and that Microsoft always knows best. Oh, and they can push some crapware to everyone's computer and make a few extra bucks, then that's what they will do.

      I am betting on the fact that when the time comes for me to end of life my Win7 computer, Linux will have improved even more and that Microsoft's products will become more full of ads and more expensive as they move to subscription based licensing model. While I still find my Win7 computer to be useful, I am absolutely certain that it will be my last personal computer running Windows.

    91. Re:What outrage? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      I would have no problem running a business from my Chromebook. My major reason for not using one as my primary system is that I'm a software developer [and I need] to run Atom and/or Eclipse, with a native Outlook client, moderately good Microsoft file format options (Microsoft's own Office Online and Mobile Office work fine on it already) [and] If they could release a version with Firefox instead of Chrome, it'd be perfect.

      So, except for the lack of ability to develop software, communicate with clients using the file formats they expect, and use your preferred browser, there's nothing from stopping you from running your software development business from a Chromebook. Which leaves business tasks you can perform as... webmail to clients and looking up documentation on the internet. Whoa, that's a powerhouse.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    92. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh Really? Was it a bunch of people saying "Did you even bother to read the FAQ section?" because I bet your stupid fucking questions were already answered, and you expected people to answer them directly because you think you're so important that you can't be bothered to look through something you don't need to find what you do.

      In basically every case that I've seen linux people be shitty that's been the situation. Now, in the BSD world it's different, because the documentation is even better and there's little excuse for not reading the manual.

      Maybe you had a legit problem caused by your garbage hardware, maybe you just needed some extra hand-holding because you're really bad at google. I dunno. But it was almost certainly your fault, because I've seen loads of people bend over backward to help idiot newbies.

    93. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why the fuck would I cripple my business by constraining my options like that?

      One might say the same about the Windows versions.

    94. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're saying is that Linux isn't a meaningful alternative because it isn't marketed properly? That's the only reason you can come up with? And you think Chrome OS is better? OK!

    95. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, basically, you're an arrogant asshat. OK!

    96. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not Linux that fails to satisfy the needs of everyone. It's the software developers, not the OS developers who create this problem.

      There are more than enough tools and documentation available for any competent programmer to learn how to write his or her software to run perfectly on Linux. When commercial software developers choose to ignore the existance of these things, and instead chooses to use lazy shortcuts and middleware to get the job done "now" as opposed to "correctly", that's when you get Windows-only software.

      Windows and its laissez-faire "who gives a fuck about established standards" ecosystem is attractive to lazy software developers who don't care to understand why a program does or doesn't compile. The only responsibility Linux has to bear for a lack of commercial software is that it actually forces programmers to have a slightly passable level of talent and knowledge. Hell, even for lazy programmers, you can cheap out in Linux too by using shortcuts like boost, but at least boost doesn't lock your users into running Linux.

      If you just demanded a higher standard of talent from the people you FUCKING PAY to design and maintain your retail software, you'd have it on Linux. Anyone who runs a business should fire all the lazy bastards who can't code without Windows and endeavour never to hire another person again who relies on such crutches. If you can't code without Windows, you are mentally disabled.

    97. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely correct. If I didn't have hundreds of Steam games that might not run in Linux, I would switch to Linux today. If Steam could guarantee that all of them could run in Linux or on a Steam Machine, I would never use Windows again.

  5. solution? by e432776 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a frustrating aspect of win10: lack of control over what programs are installed on your machine. I don't primarily use win10, but for machines I have set up I think I solved the problem by disabling automatic updates in the Windows Store. Of course, this means updates are..disabled. Perhaps others have a better way to handle this?

    In any case, disrespectful behavior by Microsoft.

    1. Re:solution? by MeNeXT · · Score: 1

      What you are advocating is apathy. It always solves the problems.

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
    2. Re:solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I pirated an Enterprise copy because it's the only way I was able to figure out disabling all the crap I don't want. I own a copy of Windows 10 Pro, and I still need to pirate Windows just to disable to crap it comes with. I would buy Enterprise, but they won't sell me a single copy for home use, so instead I will never pay for Windows again. I think it's a win-win, because if Microsoft actually wanted me to buy Windows 10 they would make available a version that isn't bogged down with shit, so clearly this is the result they're aiming for.

    3. Re:solution? by swilver · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes, put Win10 behind a firewall + proxy. Then only give the applications that need internet access the address/pw of the proxy and donot set the proxy of Windows itself. For Chrome you'll need FoxyProxy to set one without using the system settings.

      You may also need software like Proxifier to have other application go through your proxy.

      Net effect: Nothing has internet unless you allow it, resulting in a much more relaxing experience (apps donot download updates, and generally just donot do stuff behind your back without your knowledge). Windows cannot updates its tiles, nor download software, nor update itself. It's quite peaceful.

    4. Re:solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, put Win10 behind a firewall + proxy. Then only give the applications that need internet access the address/pw of the proxy and donot set the proxy of Windows itself.

      A warning to others, if you follow this advice, ALL of your Win10 computers behind the proxy will still get and apply windows updates.

      Win10 can extract proxy server information from some other applications, mainly web browsers, and apply it to the system for Edge.
      It will then obtain windows updates.

      At that point, if you haven't explicitly modified the registry to disable it, Win10 will distribute those updates peer-to-peer between themselves and all the others will update.

      If you want this to work you'll want to search for "Disable windows 10 peer to peer updates" and "Disable windows 10 global proxy sharing", and make sure you do this on ALL of the windows 10 systems on the same network/vlan before allowing even a single one application level proxy access.

    5. Re:solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, put Win10 behind a firewall + proxy. Then only give the applications that need internet access the address/pw of the proxy and donot set the proxy of Windows itself. For Chrome you'll need FoxyProxy to set one without using the system settings.

      You may also need software like Proxifier to have other application go through your proxy.

      Net effect: Nothing has internet unless you allow it, resulting in a much more relaxing experience (apps donot download updates, and generally just donot do stuff behind your back without your knowledge). Windows cannot updates its tiles, nor download software, nor update itself. It's quite peaceful.

      Just a heads up - "donot" is not a word - native English speakers use "do not" or "don't".

    6. Re: solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a heads up - pointing out what is most likely a typo as an intentional neologism makes you look like the kind of tedious and jejune spodnockiter that no one wants to play with after school.

    7. Re:solution? by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      You can do the same thing with Windows Firewall, only allow chrome.exe access to the default gateway for example.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    8. Re:solution? by technosaurus · · Score: 1

      Or deny svchost.exe access to the network.

    9. Re:solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Certain games refuse to run if the windows update is disabled, since they use the windows update service to patch themselves.

    10. Re:solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree and have been doing this ever since the late 90s. Egress control in a network is VERY VERY important and stops most nasty things before they even start as they can't phone home. I use Slackware (without systemd rubbish) to roll my own Linux router. iptables and tc are very powerful tools and give the same control of everything as a high end router from the major manufacturers. I then can use wireshark (or tcpdump and grep) at the router on the IP address of the newly installed machine (or software) to see just what it is attempting to do over the network. Very interesting! The trouble with consumer (toy) routers/modems is that they have limited egress control (they have OK ingress control though) and unfortunately in today's environment you need to be able to examine all network packets and (sometimes) do fine grained control. And now people will say that this solution is just not practical for the "average user." To this, I say : "shut up!" If you don't want to be pwned by a corporate, nigerian or soviet block actor, then you had better learn or pay someone who knows what they are doing. The days of safely allowing unfettered egress of OSs and software onto the wild west web went when raw telnet became "unsafe." Flame away children!

    11. Re:solution? by dwywit · · Score: 1

      Don't forget "updateorchestrator.exe" and
        "windows10updaterapp.exe" (or whatever they're called this week).

      What burns me up is that the windows 10 update/feature upgrade process is allowed to spawn so many tcp connections to download files that it will saturate a domestic internet connection. The resource monitor shows you exactly how many tcp connections, ports in use, remote IP, etc. So I've tried setting maxnumtcpconnections to 10 in the registry - that key actually disappeared after it was ignored and the 1803 feature update completed.

      Then there's powershell and NetQosPolicy - tried limiting http/80 and https/443 traffic - ignored. Tried limiting "windows10updaterapp.exe" - also ignored.

      I've got 16 Lenovo laptops (Celerons!!!! with W10 Home!!!!!!) in a small school to maintain until the board can afford to upgrade to i5 models with W10 Pro, and a Windows server running WSUS. I'm going to screw Windows 10 down so tight it'll need CPR. Until then I use a powershell script to remove the bloat and control as much of the update process as I can.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    12. Re:solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are like somebody with Stockholm syndrome. "You learn to live with the smell of shit from the bucket in the corner of the room you can never leave. The daily beatings take a bit more getting used to but honestly can't be too bad 'cause I'm still alive, right? It's a nice quiet life without too many distractions, really".

  6. Re:Anyone else read "bloat" ware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, step away from the mirror.

  7. Well... by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They probably paid Microsoft more for access than you did for your operating system. Enjoy being captive to this new customer experience!

    1. Re:Well... by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 2

      Welcome to the modern law of supply and demand. The suppliers have become the customers of other corporations, and the people who pay and think they are the customers (people buy Windows 10 as part of a new computer) have nothing to say anymore.

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    2. Re:Well... by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      Cable should be free, let the ads and networks pay for my views!

    3. Re:Well... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the modern law of supply and demand. The suppliers have become the customers of other corporations, and the people who pay and think they are the customers (people buy Windows 10 as part of a new computer) have nothing to say anymore.

      Could go either way.

      One could argue that the OS is a component of the PC, so of course the PC manufacturer is the customer.

      Or, one could argue that the PC manufacturer is a reseller of the OS.

  8. Is 2019 to be the year of Linux on the desktop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Probably not, but we are investing heavily in creating custom scripts to remove all of this crap which we'll have to re-run after every feature update.

    "Enterprise" edition my ass.

    1. Re:Is 2019 to be the year of Linux on the desktop? by walterbyrd · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Systemd is just as bad as Microsoft. It's sad.

    2. Re:Is 2019 to be the year of Linux on the desktop? by Shikaku · · Score: 1

      Systemd is easily avoidable. http://without-systemd.org/wik...

  9. Re:But whatabout Google? by willaien · · Score: 1

    The difference is that Microsoft actually installs some of these applications, like Candy Crush.

  10. The degration of the Pro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MacBook "Pro", iPad "Pro", Windows 10 "Pro".

    All have nothing to do with professionals.

  11. At least they're windows store apps. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You didn't ask for them, they take up bandwidth (Though presumably the windows store won't download or update apps without asking if you're on a meterd connection - But good luck trying to tell windows you're metered before the first login lol), they take up storage space, they put their dumb icons right on your start menu..

    You could call them bloatware, but they're not quite as bad as the old pre-load bloatware of the XP and Vista bad-old-days.

    They're windows store apps, so they live in that safe little user mode jail. No crap left around in your system folders, half-registered DLLS or shell extensions dangling int the breeze filling event logs with errors every few seconds. They're not even as bad as phone bloat, which can make unwanted apps part of the system image and non-removable.

    It is pretty dumb that they auto-download without asking. Microsoft has a lot of other problems to fix with their really bad store first. (Pretty much any non-trival large application is a nightmare to deal with because installs and updates can fail silently.)

    1. Re:At least they're windows store apps. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But good luck trying to tell windows you're metered before the first login lol

      Ever thought of pulling out?
      Ethernet cable I mean.

      You had to do something similar in XP before SP2 when firewall was OFF by default when you plugged in DSL modem which usually meant your machine was owned before you managed to count to 10.

      New Windows, old tricks.

    2. Re:At least they're windows store apps. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Initial setup walks you through to setup WiFi and the activation process. You can activate later but process is convoluted and less accessible than going with the defaults.

    3. Re:At least they're windows store apps. by dwywit · · Score: 1

      You can pre-empt windows doing anything internet-related by not giving it an internet connection until you've set everything the way you want it - at least, whatever Windows will allow you to do.

      On most retail machines, Windows will install and configure itself on first power up. It'll search for network connections as part of that, but it will get to a usable state without. Don't plug in an ethernet cable, and don't give it access to any wi-fi (turn it off in the BIOS or use the hard switch/keyboard combo if you have open SSIDs in range).

      Don't give it any network access until you've done what you can to restrict it.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    4. Re:At least they're windows store apps. by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      "keep network services running but hide them behind a firewall so they cant be used" is pretty stupid, surely simply turning those services off by default so that even without a firewall there are no exploitable services to connect to would have been a better idea?

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  12. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Water still wet, fire still bad, small green creatures from Alpha Centauri still small green creatures from Alpha Centauri.

  13. they also mess-up sysprep as well. by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    they also mess-up sysprep as well.

    1. Re:they also mess-up sysprep as well. by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

      They don't want you to use that any longer. I run into this a lot.
      They want you deploy it.

      --
      The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
  14. Forced Telemetry / Data Theft add on = distrust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows 10 and other Microsoft products forcibly spying on you is not enough for the company.

    Oh, forcing you to give your identity to use a freaking Office/Word Processor? WTF?

    Google, Apple, heck even Roomba are all in the evil territory now.

  15. Decrapifier PowerScript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have been using the PowerScript decrapifier by csand on new installs, and it is amazing.
    A word of caution: Run the script while the computer is unplugged from the Internet. Otherwise, Store tries to install while the script tries to uninstall and may miss something.

  16. Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I just finished setting up a nice i7 32gig ram nvidia 1050ti gaming rig under Linux Mint 19. Steam downloaded all the games and with the new Proton thing I'm getting Windows titles as well for some things. Keep on truck'n Microsoft... I'm not impacted by the downloads and if other people want your OS that's their problem.

  17. What were you expecting from a "free" upgrade? by TheDarkener · · Score: 0

    I feel bad for all the "lusers" (M$ term). I feel bad for me because I continue to support their networks for the time being. It will be a very happy day when I can rid myself of the Micro$oft support guy and go full on Linux + F/OSS for my endeavors.

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  18. Found the LUDDITE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only LUDDITES would be mad that Appsoft apps apps while apping other apps, including Appy App Saga!

    Apps!

  19. it turns out Microsoft never put paid to it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "it turns out Microsoft never put paid to it"
    Am I having a stroke, or does this make no sense?

    1. Re:it turns out Microsoft never put paid to it by superwiz · · Score: 1

      No and no. You are not having a stroke. And, no, it does not make any sense.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    2. Re:it turns out Microsoft never put paid to it by knorthern+knight · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Put paid to X" is an obscure idiom that means to end/destroy X, in this case, ending the practice of downloading bloatware. The writer was being fancy. They really should "eschew obfuscation".

      --

      I'm not repeating myself
      I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
    3. Re: it turns out Microsoft never put paid to it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The author accidentally a word.

  20. I'm not outraged. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I moved to Xubuntu.

  21. bare essentials by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    Before Windows 10, a clean install of Windows only included the bare essentials a user would need to get started using their PC.

    Like a media player with a music video.

    And solitaire.

    1. Re:bare essentials by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

      No thanks if they are the Win 10 versions of those
      Media Player is still garbage and now the Solitaire game comes with ads, doesn't auto complete, and doesn't do a cool thing when you when a hand.

      --
      The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
    2. Re:bare essentials by Blue23 · · Score: 1

      Listen up, back in NT days Minesweeper /was/ essential.

      --
      LITTLE GIRL: But which cookie will you eat FIRST? C. MONSTER: Me think you have misconception of cookie-eating process.
    3. Re:bare essentials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I miss solitaire and minesweeper too, but any free version now - ms or otherwise - is basically going to be 75% spy/adware, 20% bloat and maybe 5% what you actually wanted, so I'm not sure I'd want it pre-installed.

      I miss the days when software mostly either just did what it said it did or at worst was harmlessly awful but easy to expel.

  22. We need the Geek's Rebellion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And come together to force Microsoft to release a non shit version of Windows 10. We know we can't fight Microsoft in court (we tried before). We need drastic action. I say we release a virus that mass installs Linux on computers and tell them that Microsoft upgraded them to Linux because Windows is shit.

    1. Re:We need the Geek's Rebellion by sqorbit · · Score: 2

      Until there is an affordable and viable alternative any amount of outrage, scream, yelling or rebellion won't effect Microsoft at all. Linux is not a viable alternative. I say that writing from a Linux based machine and all my home PCs are now running Linux. Apple is not an affordable alternative. There's no clear threat to Microsoft so there's no reason to worry about a rebellion.

      --
      Sent from my TARDIS
    2. Re:We need the Geek's Rebellion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to disagree Linux is not a viable alternative. To what? Linux can do almost everything windows can and quite a few things windows cannot. Plus it is yours to do with as you want.

    3. Re:We need the Geek's Rebellion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to disagree Linux is not a viable alternative. To what? Linux can do almost everything windows can and quite a few things windows cannot. Plus it is yours to do with as you want.

      Honestly it isn't viable period. I have Linux and Windows systems. I love Linux but my experience has been Linux desktop is a disaster.

      Linux X11 simply isn't reliable or performant. It's constantly crashing and glitching multiple times a day I've either had to restart X or the entire system last time I attempted to use as a desktop. Granted I tend to abuse UIs and Windows isn't perfect (GDI exhaustion is a common occurrence) Shit like Wayland and fruits of ongoing DRM work can't come soon enough.

      The Linux driver model where all drivers have to be mainlined/distro and can't be reasonably provided by hardware vendors due to lack of usable binary interface severely limits the applicability of Linux.

      On windows I can just download an updated NIC or GPU driver from respective vendor. On Linux if you want a new driver the answer is go fuck yourself. Some vendors have tried to keep up and provide loadable modules for each specific kernel version but it's an unreasonable unwinnable battle.

      Linux fonts and processing is TOTAL SHIT. Aliasing is basically required and even that is piss poor.

      Maintenance picture is more annoying than Windows. Major in-place upgrades are a dice roll if the system will be bootable when completed. If you get behind even a little you are fucked. They'll pull all the old files from Mirror sites so nothing works anymore at which point you can't install anything without pulling it down yourself and compiling from source.

      Third party commercial software is for all intents and purposes totally non-existent. Worse still thanks to all manner of fragmentation exceedingly difficult for software vendors to produce nontrivial Linux software that work for everyone across all distros without giving all your source code away. Basically if it doesn't come bundled with a distro UR fucked.

      Simple things like mirroring an existing volume is impossibly difficult and requires taking volumes offline. I gave up trying to re-establish a simple two-disk mirror on a Linux system after two solid days of fucking around with MD CLI bullshit. In windows it's a two click and done operation and completely online.

      Linux is great for networking and backend servers but desktop...sorry no.. not even close.

      All rather sad state of affairs. I'll gladly pay for an OS that works. All Microsoft seems to want to do is shovel malware down our throats and charge us rent. They won't even take my money. Linux is too heavily influenced by availability of source code that development of robust mature interfaces is seen as pointless and not perused even though it is in fact absolutely essential to ever have a chance at replacing Windows.

      My plan is to keep using W7 with a large number of hacks to disable MS malware until it is no longer feasible to do so or Linux gets its shit together which ever comes first.

    4. Re:We need the Geek's Rebellion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why didn't you just "I'm a noob, I have no idea what I'm doing and I'm getting frustrated by my noobishness"? It would have been considerably shorter.

      I have no idea what you're doing with X11. It's stable, it's reliable and it works. I've had graphics drivers crash on me in the past, but I can't remember xfree or xorg itself ever crapping out on me, and that's since 1996.

      Please, give that driver "issue" a rest. You only make yourself look stupid. Linux isn't Windows, get hardware that is supported. It's not even hard these days. Also be ware, which relates to your "maintenance" woes, that you get to chose: Use the bleeding edge, or use something which is known good. Don't use the bleeding edge and then whine when you get cut. Especially not if you're a noob. You have to learn the system before you start playing with the bleeding edge, walk before running, etc. It's not rocket science.

      All your complaints are basically the same; Trying to treat Linux as if it's Windows, and crying when you get problems. No surprise. You'd be exactly as unhappy going from Linux to Windows, using the same methodology. Incompetence (doesn't know the platform you're using), arrogance ("all computers are, or should be the same") and ignorance (doesn't have a clue how things work), over and over again.

      Get yourself a nice, stable distribution like OpenSUSE Leap (YAST should help a great deal for a Windows user) or something similar, and learn the system. Realize that it's not Windows, and that being Windows isn't the definition of "ready" or not. If it was, Macs wouldn't be "ready" either.

    5. Re:We need the Geek's Rebellion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to disagree Linux is not a viable alternative. To what? Linux can do almost everything windows can and quite a few things windows cannot. Plus it is yours to do with as you want.

      Honestly it isn't viable period. I have Linux and Windows systems. I love Linux but my experience has been Linux desktop is a disaster.

      Linux X11 simply isn't reliable or performant. It's constantly crashing and glitching multiple times a day I've either had to restart X or the entire system last time I attempted to use as a desktop. Granted I tend to abuse UIs and Windows isn't perfect (GDI exhaustion is a common occurrence) Shit like Wayland and fruits of ongoing DRM work can't come soon enough.

      Wow... i have none of these issues on kubuntu 18.04... then again, i use nvidia proprietary drivers and game at 4k. DRM needs to die. I never have a x11 crash.

      The Linux driver model where all drivers have to be mainlined/distro and can't be reasonably provided by hardware vendors due to lack of usable binary interface severely limits the applicability of Linux.

      On windows I can just download an updated NIC or GPU driver from respective vendor. On Linux if you want a new driver the answer is go fuck yourself. Some vendors have tried to keep up and provide loadable modules for each specific kernel version but it's an unreasonable unwinnable battle.

      This is how i update my nvidia driver on ubunutu (kubuntu): sudo apt update; sudo apt upgrade
      I cannot see how this is hard. I am running the latest beta for linux which is 396.54.05. I can game in 4k with a gtx titan and amd 8350 at 4.5Ghz.
      As for nic driver, you can just update your kernel to do this. Drivers come with the kernel. Install app called ukuu and go to town. However you do not need to.

      Linux fonts and processing is TOTAL SHIT. Aliasing is basically required and even that is piss poor.

      Seem fine to me.

      Maintenance picture is more annoying than Windows. Major in-place upgrades are a dice roll if the system will be bootable when completed. If you get behind even a little you are fucked. They'll pull all the old files from Mirror sites so nothing works anymore at which point you can't install anything without pulling it down yourself and compiling from source.

      Uh... not even sure what you are talking about here.... i never had this issue in 12 years of running linux... even back in Suse days.

      Third party commercial software is for all intents and purposes totally non-existent. Worse still thanks to all manner of fragmentation exceedingly difficult for software vendors to produce nontrivial Linux software that work for everyone across all distros without giving all your source code away. Basically if it doesn't come bundled with a distro UR fucked.

      Bullshit: ever heard of snaps? flatpaks? I basically use open source software if it suits my needs and 3rd party if it doesnt. I have a blueray/dvd ripper software i paid for works great. This was the case maybe 10 years ago or more.. but hasnt been the case for a while. But if it makes you feel better....

      Simple things like mirroring an existing volume is impossibly difficult and requires taking volumes offline. I gave up trying to re-establish a simple two-disk mirror on a Linux system after two solid days of fucking around with MD CLI bullshit. In windows it's a two click and done operation and completely online.

      Wow really? windows does not give you the ability to do this if you are running home or win10 home/free version. You never stated what distro you tried, but this is easy on ubuntu. Also, you have to change to dynamic disks which precludes any dual booting.

      Linux is great for networking and backend servers but desktop...sorry no.. not even close.

      My 72yr old dad would disagree with you.

  23. Just give the app 0 stars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could give the app 0 stars, flag it as auto-installing cramware or play some Candy Crush and share your experiences with your friends and family on Facebook. Really it is great once you try it, your family will feel connected with you knowing that you care enough about them to let them know the status of your gaming.

    1. Re:Just give the app 0 stars by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

      Doesn't really do anything
      All you will get is a boiler plate thank you for using our app we have sent the review to the relevant teams and nothing changes.

      --
      The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
  24. What are they gonna do? by dnaumov · · Score: 1

    Switch to Linux? Ha-ha.

    1. Re:What are they gonna do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should switch to GNU/Linux. Moving from Windows 10 to a bare kernel might be disconcerting.

  25. Newflash.. by sqorbit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Microsoft doesn't care what users think. Anyone who is surprised at this is just being silly. Microsoft has shown no desire to actually cater to users. Edge is quite possibly the most horrible web browser ever produced and they force it upon users. Windows 8 interface was a total failure, yet they still crammed it into the Windows 10 menu. These are only some examples. Microsoft has no motivation to actually make positive changes for end users.

    --
    Sent from my TARDIS
    1. Re:Newflash.. by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

      Edge is better than IE11.
      Its still effectively IE12, but it is a better browser than the ones before it.

      --
      The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
    2. Re:Newflash.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was actually on the win8 beta team. We brought up the gawd awful user interface they were trying to force and we all said it was going to lead to failure and a backlash. They told us to pound sand. That was the last beta I was on... and i was on all of them from 98. I was running my work laptop on linux for years but not my home gamer.... well when Steam for Linux came out i jumped ship... Still dual boot for one game only...Fallou4... I got it to run under Wine with mods but my hardware is a little slow. Only reason i keep windows....

    3. Re:Newflash.. by Solandri · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Microsoft doesn't care what users think. Anyone who is surprised at this is just being silly. Microsoft has shown no desire to actually cater to users.

      You are not the customer. You are the product. Your usage info and access to your computer (to force-install programs) is being sold to the actual customers - companies wanting marketing info and to sell you things.

      The difference is Facebook and Google have to give their product away for free to get people to agree to be the product. Microsoft somehow still manages to get people to pay for the "privilege" of becoming the product.

    4. Re:Newflash.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Edge is better than IE11.

      Its still effectively IE12, but it is a better browser than the ones before it.

      I used it once to download a better browser but it seemed ok.

    5. Re:Newflash.. by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      Well, correction, they do cater to, and care about, users who aren't the small minority who complain on /.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    6. Re:Newflash.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It still costs consumers money to purchase cell phones that use Android OS. Google charges a royalty fee for smart phone manufacturers the permission to use their OS

  26. Outrage: Solitaire requires internet access! by modi123 · · Score: 2

    What the article fails to properly address is the massive outrage that Solitaire now *REQUIRES* internet access. No more plinking away at quick hands when the network is recycling, or a PC is being scanned. Ugh.

  27. Not my experience by mcvos · · Score: 2

    While this would be absolutely inexcusable behaviour for an OS, it doesn't match my experience with Windows 10. I haven't seen any unusual apps show up. My system looks remarkably clean. Almost suspiciously so...

    1. Re:Not my experience by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      This is controlled by a few settings and from what I gather there may also be a regional case to it. For one, turning off "suggested apps" typically kills all of these shenanigans along with many others (I never saw a popup over the Chrome icon declaring the awesomeness of Edge either).

  28. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  29. Microsoft should have been broken up in 2001. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only usable build of Windows 10 is the Windows 10 LTSB edition.

    You get fucked with the bullshit consumer editions, get used to "windows as a service" garbage, and this includes the all the fun apps that your kids will run because it looks cool.

    Staying Windows 7 until 2021, or until DOJ breaks them up.

    There is no real way to stop this. Sadly regulators in DC decided that Microshit wasn't worth breaking up.

  30. Easy fix: LTSB/LTSC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Easy fix for this. Windows 10 LTSB/LTSC.

  31. Re:Anyone else read "bloat" ware by rickb928 · · Score: 1, Funny

    No.

    Substantially normal people do not, in fact, see 'Trump' in everything.

    Just the trolls, the disaffected Leftists, and of course you, who clearly forgot to post Anonymous.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  32. Don't understand the issue at all... by Excelcia · · Score: 2

    I honestly don't understand the issue at all. While the automatic Windows updates were a big problem for me, a problem which resurfaced a few times, I have never had an issue with the app store. I do not even have a Microsoft app store login. My Windows 10 has never tried to automatically install any apps.

    Since buying this laptop a year and a half ago, I've done two Windows upgrades on it. Both times Cortana, Edge, and a few other built-in bits that are hard to remove showed back up, requiring install_wim_tweak to remove. But no app store programs have ever appeared.

    Windows Update, though, was a huge problem for me. Microsoft doesn't get free reign to put updates on my computer, I vet each one and apply them. Microsoft has been pushing hard, especially with its last two "upgrades" to prevent people from disabling automatic updates. And I mean they have gone to heroics. Two "protected" windows services which have no other real duty except to look out for if the Windows Update service is disabled and undisable it. Also a whole host of task scheduler settings are doing the same thing. For those wanting control of Windows Update back, I highly recommend Windows Update Blocker in concert with Windows Update Mini Tool. There are several forum threads that speak toward how to do this relatively easily.

    1. Re:Don't understand the issue at all... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Ditto. I don't see this crap as bloatware that demands a response. If my PC gets low on disk space I just groom. Lots of other stuff is easier to identify and remove.

      If it's eating cycles, I can see that pretty quickly and deal with it. Users who are unable to do so are often unable to discern performance problems.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    2. Re:Don't understand the issue at all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Two "protected" windows services which have no other real duty except to look out for if the Windows Update service is disabled and undisable it. "

      Decades of "hurr durr windoze has weak security" as a result of everybody turning off windows updates is what led us to this.

      Everybody complained that windows had bad security practices, so microsoft improved them, and now everybody complains about -that-.

    3. Re:Don't understand the issue at all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No. People are complaining that in addition to making updates harder to disable (which is good) MSFT is also pushing junk with updates (which is bad).

    4. Re:Don't understand the issue at all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Decades of "hurr durr windoze has weak security" as a result of everybody turning off windows updates is what led us to this.

      No, Windows having weak security is exclusively a result of Microsoft's failure to provide security. Windows update is nothing more than a pressure valve to moderate cost to Microsoft and end user's of Microsoft's ongoing failure to provide a secure product.

      Everybody complained that windows had bad security practices, so microsoft improved them, and now everybody complains about -that-.

      Any assertion forced updates are for security must logically admit the reason for update is a total failure of Microsoft to provide that security in the first place.

      What people are complaining about is forced conscription into perpetual beta programs that interfere with productivity when what they expect and demand is an operating system suitable for production use.

    5. Re:Don't understand the issue at all... by Calydor · · Score: 2

      Do you consider Windows forcing the installation of un-vetted and non-native programs as part of its update process to be GOOD security?

      Holy crap, where's your bar for when something is bad security?

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    6. Re:Don't understand the issue at all... by Excelcia · · Score: 1

      Everybody complained that windows had bad security practices, so microsoft improved them, and now everybody complains about -that-.

      I don't have any problem with Windows updates. I do have a problem when they are all mandatory. I don't even have a problem with Microsoft making Windows updates automatic by default. I have a significant problem with not being able to turn them off, and an even bigger problem when Microsoft makes significant efforts to force updates on those who have clearly disabled the automation.

      I can't tell you how many problems I have circumvented by vetting each update that goes on my computer. Driver issues, mutually incompatible updates, DirectX problems, and most especially the large number of updates that don't play well with pre-boot authentication systems and/or pre-boot drivers required for RAID systems. Windows used to play very well with pre-boot drivers, but lately it has been getting worse and worse as Microsoft makes concerted efforts to not play nicely with systems like VeraCrypt. I also avoided the entire Windows 8 -> Windows 10 upgrade fiasco, where people were treated a series of increasingly invasive notices that they "can" upgrade, that progressed to "should" then "shall" and were essentially forced to, or where it happened silently at night and untold data was lost. Microsoft is still getting dinged for that little gem. Most recently it's been the incomplete, wrong, and competing updates to provide meltdown/spectre "patches". Poorly tested fixes which caused problems with hosts of drivers and caused performance issues for millions of people needlessly, since the early versions didn't actually fix the problem. I'm all for rapid deployment of a fix, but it should actually be a "fix" and should be tested. The meltdown/spectre fiasco has been a lesson on what not to do.

      The thing is, no one can say "hey, don't apply KB123blahblah, it causes a freeze on computers with _______ hardware" any more, because normal people can't stop it. So instead of a dozen or a hundred computers getting bricked and having to restore from recovery partitions with the resulting loss of data, it's thousands with each bad patch.

      So don't talk about this being Microsoft's "improved" security. It is not improved security. It is improved control.

      And for anyone with the time and knowledge to do it properly, I still highly recommend taking control back of Windows update and making sure each patch that gets applied is well tested before using on your own computer.

    7. Re:Don't understand the issue at all... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Yep, never a good idea to create a Microsoft Account. Without an account you can't download free applications, so I would assume that no account means that it won't automatically download free applications. Without an account you can't even run some pre-installed applications (Mail) presumably because then they can't track you as easily.

    8. Re:Don't understand the issue at all... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Did you completely miss the period of time in which Windows was actively downloading advertisements and upgrading users computers to Windows 10 without permission?

      Turning off general and important updates is a standard practice for many even though they keep security updates on. Anyone who treats updates as all-or-nothing needs to get more education. When Microsoft stooped to supplying advertisements in its "security" updates was the last straw for many,

    9. Re:Don't understand the issue at all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or jsut get the Pro version, where you can simply disable automatic updates with a registry setting... or set your connection to metered.

    10. Re:Don't understand the issue at all... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I will trust Microsoft once they prove themselves to be trustworthy. So far I'm still waiting.

    11. Re: Don't understand the issue at all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you can't. You still can't stop forced reboots with Pro.

  33. People are complainign about Google! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quick, Quick! Spam some content-less anti-Microsoft stories!

  34. This a a Wonderful Feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do people complain?
    There are so many great apps that would never get any attention without this.
    I'm not a power-user and I depend on Microsoft's help and guidance.
    If this pesters some people, maybe they should use a different computer.
    I hear good things about Apple.

    1. Re:This a a Wonderful Feature by phishybongwaters · · Score: 1

      I for one do not expect or want to see fucking candycrush or minecraft on a clean install of an enterprise grade OS. So please explain to us mouth breathers how preinstalled fucking shit games is helping or guiding you? Fucking obvious troll is obvious

    2. Re:This a a Wonderful Feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you would find it perfectly acceptable if, say, Google decided to randomly install Apps on Android phones without permission?

    3. Re:This a a Wonderful Feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so true, and it keep coming back after each update!

    4. Re:This a a Wonderful Feature by omnichad · · Score: 1

      "Enterprise-grade" only describes capabilities and code quality. Actually subscribing to the Enterprise version means you've paid the protection money to make sure nothing bad happens to the nice set up you've got there.

    5. Re:This a a Wonderful Feature by DarkRookie · · Score: 0

      1. Because its an ongoing problem
      2. Bullshit. The MS app store is like the rest. Full of hot garbage and if there is anything good on it, there is no way to search for it
      3. I truly feel sorry for you if you need MS guidance
      4. Not really much in the way of options.
      5. The red ones are delicious. The yellow and greens one need to mature more before they are picked. They are very sour.

      --
      The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
  35. Increasingly common by Jon+Peterson · · Score: 1

    It's annoying but it's been a growing trend for a long time. Android phone makers are far worse in shipping unremovable random software. I remember years ago being infuriated that Linux distributions started shipping huge amounts of software as compulsory installed components (and even more as default options), while OSes like Solaris would still default to a minimal base install.

    Having a system assume you want Python installed is less annoying than one assuming you want Candy Crush installed, but only marginally.

    Anyway, it's an unstoppable trend.

    --
    ----- .sig: file not found
  36. No historical perspective by jdavidb · · Score: 2

    Before Windows 10, a clean install of Windows only included the bare essentials a user would need to get started using their PC

    Really? There wasn't a huge lawsuit about this?

    1. Re:No historical perspective by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      If you are thinking about IE, that's not bloatware, it is an essential piece of software. Even if you didn't use it as your default browser, you probably used it at least once to download your favorite alternative browser.

      The point of lawsuit is that a web browser is so essential that not letting user choose is anti-competitive.

    2. Re: No historical perspective by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Also the point of the 90s lawsuit wasn't that MS included IE but some of the tactics it did to prevent Netscape from getting installed. Like bribing/threatening OEMs not to install Netscape or their prices would go up.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    3. Re:No historical perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before Windows 10, a clean install of Windows only included the bare essentials a user would need to get started using their PC

      Really? There wasn't a huge lawsuit about this?

      You can't sue, it's in the EULA.

    4. Re:No historical perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, because the original statement is a lie. Windows has always come with far more programs than only the bare essentials. WordPad, MSPaint, Minesweeper, multiple background images, etc... are not essential to running an operating system.

      As much as I don't like them doing this, I just see this as a delayed installation of the base install. Just like if you download an installer or minimal CD which then downloads the rest of what it wants to install. Microsoft is 'nice' enough to directly download the latest version after the core OS installation and user account setup instead of adding it to the installation media and making the Desktop take even longer to install.

      What's a little more important is how are these apps added to your store account? Did it auto-accept their terms and conditions for you? Does it download them when you're out of space? Downloads over a metered connections? Does Win10 installation ask you about a cloud account? (I use Win10 Enterprise and don't have a Microsoft cloud/store account associated with my user) Are these apps eventually deleted and replaced with new ones? In 5 months does it download more apps?

      Anyway, this is a good reminder to never trust rankings nor polls. Whomever pays the most gets the top rankings. That includes apps, books, websites, movies, comparison sites, TV shows, people (you can buy reputation services), etc... I'm sure those apps are paying Microsoft for this and I'm sure those automatic installations are boosting their installation stats which boosts their ad revenue. Morally bankrupt companies are everywhere.

    5. Re:No historical perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wash, rinse, and most importantly: repeat until your users collapse from exhaustion.

    6. Re:No historical perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are thinking about IE, that's not bloatware, it is an essential piece of software. Even if you didn't use it as your default browser, you probably used it at least once to download your favorite alternative browser.

      The point of lawsuit is that a web browser is so essential that not letting user choose is anti-competitive.

      IE was 100% bloatware. The fact that people commonly used it to download and install a real browser proves nothing; during the era you're referring to, you could install the browser from these shiny plastic discs called CD-ROMs; in the very early days, you might have been able to do it from a floppy disk.

      The idea that IE was "integral" to the OS is silly. The previous version had Explorer, a FILE browser that did not interface with the internet, and Internet Explorer, which DID, were TWO SEPARATE pieces of software. Combining the two and then pretending they are magically inseparable is as absurd as... I can't think of a metaphor, that's how absurd it is.

      ALL they'd have had to do to uncouple them is delete that component, and put the one from the previous version of Windows when they were separate BACK.

      Microsoft SHOULD have been treated like Ma Bell and Standard Oil. BROKEN UP.

    7. Re:No historical perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you don't understand the difference between File Explorer and Internet Explorer?
      Back before Edge, both explorers used parts of the same dll's, hence the argument that IE was "integrated" into the OS.

      Why not try to pull some additional late 90's BS out of your ass.

    8. Re:No historical perspective by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Really? There wasn't a huge lawsuit about this?

      No there was not. There was a lawsuit about a specific anti-competitive behaviour targeted at a specific company's product through bundling. But that ultimately has zero to do with what is going on here.

  37. Demonstration of Robustness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The installation is probably a part of Microsoft field measurement package.

  38. News flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you, Microsoft.

  39. The alternatives. by Xnet+Project · · Score: 1

    As of late, there have been alternatives for users to move to another operating system within the past 2 years now. The concern is this could potentially force consumers hands into make a decision sooner rather than later.

  40. I do it old school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I play solitaire on my Windows laptop. No internet required.

    A 17” laptop makes a nice card table once you close the lid, but you need to use small cards.

    1. Re:I do it old school by omnichad · · Score: 1

      The other option is to play games on your desktop while your laptop is at work. This requires a somewhat larger desk.

  41. Even on Pro by Yggdrasil42 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The even more ridiculous thing is that this happens even on the Pro version. The one that's supposed to be for doing work. And those "policies you can set that disable these apps from automatically installing"? Yeah, they don't work anymore. As a result every employee gets Candy Crush and the like installed on every machine. Absolutely insane.

    1. Re:Even on Pro by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      I just built a new gaming PC this last weekend and installed Windows 10 Pro. It's exactly what you described. When I checked the Start Menu for the first time, I saw that Candy Crush, a hidden object game, the Dolby Experience, and a variety of other bloatware was already installed. On a brand new, fresh install of Pro.

      Ridiculous.

      And that's not even considering all of the other bad behavior the OS engages in by default. I went through every single control panel to enable every privacy-focused setting I could find, but after two days I'm still discovering new toggles that need switching off as I stumble upon hidden panes that are linked from control panels that I had thought I'd already covered in detail. Not to mention that disabling the telemetry collection seems to be virtually impossible.

      Given that the last time I tried using Windows 10 it blue screened on me twice within the first 30 minutes (granted, it was the first week after its release and I was running it in a VM, but still...), I don't exactly have a stellar opinion of the system, though at least you can hide Cortana from the taskbar now, so that's something, I guess?

    2. Re:Even on Pro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ($Appx = Get-AppxPackage | select name $appx | Out-File -FilePath C:\Appx.txt) and then use this one.

      Modify with prefered package names from 1rst script
        ($AppsList = "Microsoft.Office.Onenote","Microsoft.BingFinance","Microsoft.BingNews","Microsoft.BingWeather","Microsoft.XboxApp","Microsoft.SkypeApp","Microsoft.MicrosoftSolitaireCollection","Microsoft.BingSports","Microsoft.ZuneMusic","Microsoft.ZuneVideo","Microsoft.Windows.Photos","Microsoft.People","Microsoft.MicrosoftOfficeHub","Microsoft.WindowsMaps","microsoft.windowscommunicationsapps","Microsoft.Getstarted","Microsoft.3DBuilder"

      ForEach ($App in $AppsList)
      {
      $PackageFullName = (Get-AppxPackage $App).PackageFullName
      $ProPackageFullName = (Get-AppxProvisionedPackage -online | where {$_.Displayname -eq $App}).PackageName
      write-host $PackageFullName
      Write-Host $ProPackageFullName
      if ($PackageFullName)
      {
      Write-Host "Removing Package: $App"
      remove-AppxPackage -package $PackageFullName
      }
      else
      {
      Write-Host "Unable to find package: $App"
      }
      if ($ProPackageFullName)
      {
      Write-Host "Removing Provisioned Package: $ProPackageFullName"
      Remove-AppxProvisionedPackage -online -packagename $ProPackageFullName
      }
      else
      {
      Write-Host "Unable to find provisioned package: $App"
      }

      })

      Copy-Paste between ( )

    3. Re: Even on Pro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the enterprise version?

    4. Re:Even on Pro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To add insult to injury, programming languages are following the same pattern as microsoft / apple by putting unwanted shit on your computer.
      For example, the tic-tac-toe game built into the Rust base library object code found in every rust-compiled executable.

    5. Re:Even on Pro by dwywit · · Score: 1

      Hit up Task Scheduler - you can turn off the uploads, although you can't really stop the collection.

      As a matter of interest, where does windows store the telemetry data while it awaits upload? Perhaps the data storage can be nuked periodically, before it attempts to upload.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    6. Re:Even on Pro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry fool, your script (the 1rst) does not work.

      Open PowerShell as a member of the admin group ( but then, you probably run as Administrator and on Linux as root ALL the time - dumbass) and run:
      Get-AppxPackage -AllUsers | select name | Out-File -FilePath C:\temp\Appx.txt
      Oh yeah, anyone who writes files to the root of C: is an absolute idiot.

    7. Re:Even on Pro by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      As a result every employee gets Candy Crush and the like installed on every machine.

      Which idiot system admin let company machines out the door with the "Suggested Apps" setting enabled in Windows?

    8. Re:Even on Pro by Yggdrasil42 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your insightful comment. Of course we disable those. These apps are not part of Suggested Apps (those only cover suggestions appearing in your Start Menu). They're instead part of the "Microsoft Consumer Experience", which can only be disabled in Windows 10 Enterprise (or Education), not in Pro.

      Apparently MS believes Pro users to be quite different from Enterprise users. There used to be other ways to disable the installation of this crap, but MS has removed these over time. I welcome any solutions that actually work.

    9. Re:Even on Pro by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      These apps are not part of Suggested Apps (those only cover suggestions appearing in your Start Menu).

      Source? Because there are plenty of articles on the net saying they are, and I can only confirm that I don't have any of those apps on any Widnows 10 machines except briefly on the one where that one setting was disabled. After enabling that setting none of the listed apps appeared again.

  42. The document you're looking for is... by Jadecristal · · Score: 2

    Yes, Windows 10 is a [...redacted...].

    The document you're looking for is here, if you're stuck with it:

    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-...

    1. Re:The document you're looking for is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there not a simple "Don't spam me bro" switch?

    2. Re:The document you're looking for is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Applies to

      Windows 10 Enterprise, version 1607 and newer
      Windows Server 2016

      You're probably the 10th person who's said "just get Enterprise" like a snide moron, as if that's an accessible or affordable option for individuals.

    3. Re:The document you're looking for is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      annnd look at the article....

      "Applies to
              Windows 10 Enterprise, version 1607 and newer
              Windows Server 2016"

      So not the home or pro versions, where you can change some of these settings but they end up getting changed back with large updates.

  43. Network effects by sjbe · · Score: 1

    I don't understand tech people that still uses crap like Windoze...

    Then study up on network effects.

    1. Re:Network effects by Xnet+Project · · Score: 1

      I don't understand tech people that still uses crap like Windoze...

      Our excuse would be for gaming. Not every PC game can play on Linux (PlayOnLinux, WINE, DXVK, etc..) at least not yet.

  44. Umm, I don't see it by holophrastic · · Score: 1

    I'm running win 10. I don't see any such thing.

    1. Re:Umm, I don't see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me neither

  45. Windows has always included games by default by eggstasy · · Score: 1

    Millions of people enjoyed playing the default solitaire under Windows 3.1, why would you complain about games in the default install?

    1. Re:Windows has always included games by default by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2

      They used to preinstall games.

      Now they preinstall conduits for monetization.

    2. Re:Windows has always included games by default by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100 times this. I still install original Windows Games on customer Win10 machines because forcing an elderly person to watch a 60-second ad between every Solitaire/Freecell game is just cruelty.

    3. Re:Windows has always included games by default by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get her a faster machine, she can click new game and shorten the delay. But then you probably tell her that she "has" to let the adds run.

  46. Re:But whatabout Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "this is a product that exists, if you take action you can choose to install it"

    vs.

    "a product has been installed without your knowledge, if you remove it it's going to come back"

  47. No alternatives by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If anyone was really outraged, they would get something else.

    That implies that there is something else for them to get. There really isn't. Microsoft was convicted in court of having a monopoly. Do you know what that word means? It means there aren't other options on the PC. The only other options are linux which perpetually lags Windows on the PC desktop in application options and the OS X which is both pricey and ties you to Apple. Both linux and OS X are fine options for some but as much as it irritates me to say it, Windows is the best offering available for a lot of people and companies. A lot of software people want is only available on Windows. If the people around you use Windows chances are high you will too. If you play games on your PC it's a virtual certainty are you are running Windows to do it.

    1. Re:No alternatives by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

      If you play games on your PC it's a virtual certainty are you are running Windows to do it.

      This.

    2. Re:No alternatives by geek · · Score: 1

      Microsoft was convicted in court of having a monopoly. Do you know what that word means? It means there aren't other options on the PC.

      Maybe YOU should learn what it means. You aren't "convicted" of having a monopoly. Its not a crime to be a monopoly. Abusing it is but you can be a monopoly all day long. 30 years and you people still haven't learned a thing about that case.

  48. Internet overages by tepples · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Grooming" will not recover the $10 per GB that your satellite or fixed-wireless ISP bills you for having downloaded the apps in the first place.

    1. Re:Internet overages by tepples · · Score: 1

      life is pay to play and you're the one in the boondocks.

      And that's the fault of city zoning boards that threaten residents for just growing a victory garden. In addition, who can serve residents of the boondocks other than a business in the boondocks?

    2. Re:Internet overages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you should have (or it should have automatically, if newer) detected and set a metered connection. takes care of both problems

    3. Re:Internet overages by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      "Grooming" will not recover the $10 per GB that your satellite or fixed-wireless ISP bills you for having downloaded the apps in the first place.

      Setting your connection to metered will prevent the Windows Store from downloading apps just fine. Maybe users should use the settings they have available to them?

      Full Disclosure: I have never seen these 3rd party apps on my Windows systems. Either I'm very lucky or doing something righter than those numnuts at Windows Central.

  49. This is exactly why... by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 0

    ...I recommend Windows for gaming, and only for gaming. You really don't need it for any other purpose.

    1. Re:This is exactly why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do not even need it for gaming now... Steam play works remarkably well.

    2. Re:This is exactly why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...I recommend Windows for gaming, and only for gaming. You really don't need it for any other purpose.

      I won't even go that far. Simplify your life and just buy a console. It's dedicated to that purpose.

  50. New Account by shaksys · · Score: 1

    It happens when a new user account is created too, after already removing it from the primary user account.

    1. Re:New Account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modern Apps are Appx packages. An installed application is removed for a specific user with remove-appxpackage in powershell. If you don't want it to install for the next user you use remove-appxprovisionedpackage.

      We do this in our SCCM OSD task sequence to remove the things we don't want in the image. There is also a knob to turn off "Consumer Experiences" in group policy, so this is a belt-and-suspenders fix.

      It's not all roses though. A Win10 feature upgrade will derp all of the provisioned packages back onto the system. We've been told that's going to be fixed in a future feature upgrade.

  51. Re:TFS is as broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't worry, RBG, who says the age of consent should be lowered to 12, will "age out" soon.

  52. Users are still confused in the 21st Century. by geekmux · · Score: 1

    Dear Microsoft User,

    Understand one thing.

    You are the consumer, NOT the customer.

    In short, Fuck You Very Much, and Have a Nice Day.

    - Microsoft

    1. Re:Users are still confused in the 21st Century. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't think EVERY SINGLE company is doing exactly the same thing, you're pretty delusional.

      I mean, Shazam's entire business model was to snoop on what people were listening to, and now another company has it.

      Also, are you guys seriously getting worked up about having two games preinstalled? Why didn't you complain about Minesweeper and Solitaire that have been included in Windows since 3.1?

    2. Re:Users are still confused in the 21st Century. by geekmux · · Score: 1

      If you don't think EVERY SINGLE company is doing exactly the same thing, you're pretty delusional.

      I mean, Shazam's entire business model was to snoop on what people were listening to, and now another company has it.

      Also, are you guys seriously getting worked up about having two games preinstalled? Why didn't you complain about Minesweeper and Solitaire that have been included in Windows since 3.1?

      Minesweeper doesn't download a bloatware update every other month. Or run a background update service. Or update and reboot your system without asking you. Or require you to create an account online, and log in to the Minesweeper servers to obtain a license. Or attempt to re-install itself without asking.

      All of this other stupid shit does. BIG difference when it comes to just about everything that matters in a corporate environment. On top of all of that, when I configure the OS to uninstall (or not install) Minesweeper, it fucking does it. That is NOT how this shitware is acting.

      TL; DR - If Minesweeper was pulling this same crap with updates and re-installs, it would be on the shitware list too. It's as benign as a pet rock by comparison.

  53. Common Signs You Have Malware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. A program tries to install or update even when you select no.
    Windows 10 did this on upgrades from 7. Even when user selected the red X button.

    2. You notice bloatware/unwanted programs.
    Windows 10 does this. See this article.

    3. You notice unwanted search suggestions/your default search engine is changed.
    Windows 10 Bing will try everything in its power to fool you into using it.

    4. You notice large amounts of external connections sending personal data not required for any sort of normal function.
    Yes Windows 10 does this too.

    5. You lose control of your security/admin rights on your PC.
    Windows 10 home pushes updates to core code without your control.

    Its not just Windows 10. Check out other lovely MS products like Office 365. Try to install it without Skype or One drive.Care to wonder why you can't install just the regular Office apps without going through a lengthy process to disable Skype and OneDrive? Review your terms for Office. They legally own the right to view/modify/access any content created or used by MS Office apps. Skype let's them have access to all of your conversations and video. They arnt simply satisfied with viewing your Excel and Word files anymore.

    This is not some rant to say Linux/OS X/Android is better. I'm just saying by law you lose all rights to your personal data and privacy when you install Windows 10. If you think they arnt interested in YOU because you are a nobody than why do they go through so much trouble to collect it all? If companies pay software engineers to design functionality you better believe they intend to use it.

  54. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, "clean install" means installing the OS from scratch. It does not imply "random hardware" nor does it exclude buying hardware. If you do not already have a computer, your "fresh install" of Linux also requires you to buy the computer.

  55. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it's Microsoft. Install a fresh copy of Windows 10 Home or Pro with an ISO file downloaded directly from Microsoft, and you still get 3rd party Windows 10 apps from the Windows store downloaded by default. Even of self built, generic hardware.

  56. With Windows 10, you no longer own your computer by lophophore · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Once you install Windows 10, you no longer own your computer. Microsoft can install what ever they want on it, and reboot it when ever they want. That also gives them the ability to remove anything they want from your computer.

    --
    there are 3 kinds of people:
    * those who can count
    * those who can't
  57. Meanwhile in a saner world.. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Meanwhile, in a saner world, I'm getting the kinks worked out of using Ubuntu 18.04 with a Virtualbox install of Windows 8 (to support the whole TWO Windows-only apps I need to keep using), and IDGAF about Windows 10 -- and never will. Why aren't you doing the same?

    1. Re:Meanwhile in a saner world.. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      IDGAF about Windows 10 -- and never will. Why aren't you doing the same?

      Because even with the extra bloat, Windows 10 performs better than Windows 8 - almost as much of an improvement as 7 was over Vista.

    2. Re:Meanwhile in a saner world.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because I tried Ubuntu years ago. They started doing what was pretty much forced updates. So I went back to Debian.

  58. I like Linux by DougDot · · Score: 0

    Not being a flock member, & all... Baaaaa.

    1. Re:I like Linux by TeknoHog · · Score: 0

      I've been reading /. since 2000 or so, and used Linux since 1999. Using Linux and bashing Microsoft has been the /. mantra all the time -- more so in the early years, I think. There have always been more obscure niches of geeks here, starting with the BSD crowd, for instance, but Linux has seemed like the norm. So I might as well say "baaaa" as a member of the GNU herd.

      What I don't understand is the ongoing presence of Microsoft news here. You'd think that after all the bashing of the early noughties we'd be past that, happily using our Free software and just ignoring all the drooling idiots who keep using Windows. I understand the occasional funny bits related to MS and their quest to reimplement Unix poorly a few decades late. But most of the news don't seem relevant to the crowd who is supposedly smart enough to use at least Ubuntu.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:I like Linux by overlook77 · · Score: 1

      I think 'drooling idiots that use Windows' is a tad harsh. I have to use Windows at work like most people. I tried to run Linux at home on the family computer several times but it just got old when all your Steam games wouldn't work, or the kids want to play Roblox and there was no Linux support, or you hardware choices were limited.

    3. Re:I like Linux by overlook77 · · Score: 1

      I would add I am still holding onto Windows 7 as long as possible...

    4. Re:I like Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you people keep glossing over the real problem: you play video games. on a computer.
      fix THAT, and your dependence on microsoft windows disappears.

  59. How much does Windows 10 Enterprise cost? by tepples · · Score: 3, Informative

    Nonsense, either get an Enterprise license

    How many PCs does a company need before it qualifies to buy Windows 10 Enterprise licenses? And how much does it cost per seat? In my experience, "Request a Quote" as stated in Microsoft's comparison page means "if you have to ask, you can't afford it." The "Learn More & Try" link ultimately links to an ROI calculator, but I could not try the ROI calculator because it was blurred out by a modal dialog that requires the user to submit personal and company information and authorize a Microsoft salesperson to contact the user.

    or just uninstall the apps

    Just uninstalling the apps doesn't undo the fact that having downloaded them in the first place counts against the monthly data transfer allowance that your ISP imposes.

    1. Re:How much does Windows 10 Enterprise cost? by jonesy16 · · Score: 2

      It's funny to me that on a site like Slashdot, we can have a confluence of the raging "I hate Windows", the blind recommendations of "everyone should switch to Linux" and at the same time admit that we are subject to ISP's where a 100 MB download is something we need to be concerned about.

      If technology is your true obsession in traditional Slashdot sense, then you could really care less about people running Windows because it's not you. You're already running Linux and think the rest of the world should just give up, and you're paying for gigabit fiber because #fiber.

      If you're anyone else, Windows gets the job done, you don't notice or don't care that 6 stupid games appeared minutes after installing your computer and quickly figured out you could right-click and uninstall them and go about your business. You'll not even be aware that the ISP's covering the majority of the population have either eliminated data caps (Comcast) or have caps so reasonably high (>350 GB) that a few hundred MB on a wasted game download is inconsequential (CenturyLink, AT&T, Cox) or you'll be thankful that in Windows you can set a connection as Metered to limit background downloads.

      https://broadbandnow.com/inter...

    2. Re:How much does Windows 10 Enterprise cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot, and you'll need an active directory domain server with a Windows Server license to provide the activation license. Not worth it for a small business.

    3. Re:How much does Windows 10 Enterprise cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It costs 500$ for a single year of a msdn account. With that you get a large number of windows keys, including 50 seats of enterprise.
      Sure, it's supposed to be for application development / test... but they don't shut the keys off when the subscription expires. Just be sure to export your keys so you have them later on.

      Additionally there's a setting to allow 'suggested' applications (Show suggestions occasionally in Start), by disabling it, you disable the download of these apps. If you install a version of windows 10 offline, tweak these settings, then go online for the patches, you don't get these apps with this setting disabled.

    4. Re:How much does Windows 10 Enterprise cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Pro version works equally well, and is available to everyone.

    5. Re:How much does Windows 10 Enterprise cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fwiw I filled in a bunch of literal garbage on the ROI forms and it didn't seem to care. It also never took me to anything that looked like a quote.

    6. Re:How much does Windows 10 Enterprise cost? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Just uninstalling the apps doesn't undo the fact that having downloaded them in the first place counts against the monthly data transfer allowance that your ISP imposes.

      If you have such a sensitive cap then why is your connection not set to "metered" in Windows? In which case you will in fact not have those downloaded apps.

  60. Re:Anyone else read "bloat" ware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny, I thought it was Santa Yoda

  61. Hey Dipshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't logon to Windows with a MS account and you won't install that crap... Use local user logon or whatever the fuck mickeysoft calls it. Better yet install Linux.

  62. Re:Bullshit by sinij · · Score: 1

    I confirm that even Enterprise Win 10 does this by default and you have to create policy to stop this from happening.

  63. Easy fix by m0s3m8n · · Score: 2

    There is an easy fix for this that does not require anything too difficult. Use gpedit,msc and turn off all cloud content settings, then force a gpupdate. Remediate the crap that is there and you are done. Also, there are several good powershell scripts on spiceworks that will remove just about everything. Combine the two and things are good again. Also, when I set up new Windows 10 machines, I do not connect to a network until the above steps are completed.

    --
    Conservative, mod down for violating /. political norms.
    1. Re:Easy fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gpedit is not part of Windows 10 Home Premium - the default you're stuck with on retail machines

    2. Re:Easy fix by DeathAndTaxes · · Score: 2

      Firstly, anything that starts off with 'Use gpedit' isn't simple. Secondly, if you cannot provide more specific advice than "turn off all cloud content settings," it's not simple. Lastly, gpedit does not come with home edition, which is what most users have.

        C:\WINDOWS\system32>gpedit.msc
        'gpedit.msc' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
        operable program or batch file.

    3. Re:Easy fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like Stockholm's Syndrome to me, chap.

    4. Re:Easy fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is an easy fix for this that does not require anything too difficult. Use gpedit,msc and turn off all cloud content settings, then force a gpupdate

      Which is going to be massively more complex than most end users will ever even remotely be able to do.

      I'm glad I prevented my Windows 8.1 machine from updating, but .. damn in Windows 10 a piece of shit ran by assholes and idiots.

      My next PC will just have to be a Linux machine with enough RAM to run Windows 10 in a VM where I can disable its access to the network.

      There's no way I'd run it as a standalone host any more.

    5. Re:Easy fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gpedit is not available on Home editions. Also, turning off Cloud Content, as noted in the Description of the setting only applies to Enterprise and Education SKUs.

    6. Re:Easy fix by strikethree · · Score: 1

      There is an easy fix for this that does not require anything too difficult. Use gpedit,msc and turn off all cloud content settings, then force a gpupdate.

      Don't forget to have this policy applied at each bootup because Microsoft WILL revert your changes. This is not a set-once-and-forget type of thing.

      The only thing you control is the hardware. They have claimed control over the software, which is technically a theft if you paid for Windows.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  64. This is why I haven't bought Windows in 12 years by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

    Microsoft's shittyness reached intolerable levels (for me) during the Vista fiasco about 12 years ago, and I've stopped purchasing Windows. Instead I download and use pirated versions of Windows that have the phone-home "features" disabled and the worst of the bloat removed. The pirate groups that I recognize do an excellent job and also are quite trustworthy (that is, they don't put virus or trojans on it and is safe to use if you get it from their site).

  65. But wait... there's more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like many, I have a number of applications that are essential for some of my activities that run only in a windows environment. I would love to have VMS as my OS but... and yes, I have used and loved Unix and its children and even some traditional IBM systems. Reliability is a big factor in my book and the current Win10 is a descent into Hell.

    In addition to the persistent bloatware that keeps coming back (I refuse to authorize access and then uninstall) there is another cute feature:

    In tracing down errors in my errorlog, I discovered that there is a thing called the beta app flag -- if it is set to some value, apparently, new features are quietly being tested. The details were where ESENT was failing hundreds of times an hour -- running because the beta flag was x8000 or somesuch. Found a bunch of stuff on the MS site but no response to the question.. what is this flag and why is it there.

  66. Re:Easy fix: LTSB/LTSC by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

    "LTSB is a licensing option for Windows 10 Enterprise and is available only for customers with a Volume License agreement."

    Not such an easy fix.

    --
    Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
  67. Microsoft never gives a good user experience. by stooo · · Score: 1

    >> " This is not a good user experience, Microsoft."
    Yep.
    Microsoft never gives a good user experience.
    Did you expect something else ? why ?

    --
    aaaaaaa
  68. Read the damn EULA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you read the EULA, you will clearly see that you authorize Microsoft to perform unattended software installation. If you don't want this to happen, don't buy Windows.

  69. Re: Anyone else read "bloat" ware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kinda like Republicans still see Obama everywhere.

  70. Linux/windows games by keith_nt4 · · Score: 1

    I watched this video immediately before opening slashdot and seeing this story. By coincidence.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    I actually already knew something about this. Just happen to see Linus' rendition. Not Torvalds. The other one.

    Seems like Valve really has had it out for MS going to back windows 8. Now there's really no reason to run Win 10 any more. Unless you want to manage hyper-v.

    --
    "UNIX is very simple, it just needs a genius to understand its simplicity." -Dennis Ritchie
    1. Re:Linux/windows games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Now there's really no reason to run Win 10 any more ...Did you watch that video until the end?

      *Except that PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds does not work due to Easy Anti-Cheat.* ...*Except that Crysis won't work due to DRM/SecuROM*...

      There is like 60% of Windows games on Steam that either use DRM (Denuvo, SecuROM, etc.) or are multiplayer and require anti-Cheat (Punkbuster, Easy Anti-cheat, non-VAC ones) that flat out refuse to play on Proton because of that.

      That's reason enough to run Windows 10 until Valve strong-arms developers/DRM developers to work on Linux.

    2. Re:Linux/windows games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GTA5 not running is a deal breaker for me.
      Not getting win10 though. Hanging in with 8.1 and classic shell.

    3. Re:Linux/windows games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And my scanner. I doubt that there's a Linux driver for it. I know that there is no win10 driver for it.

    4. Re:Linux/windows games by keith_nt4 · · Score: 1

      Well i assumed it is still a work in progress. Not sure how much I really want the DRM crap on my PC anyway whether windows or linux. Might have to give it a few more years for it be primetime ready. I can use wine or something else if there's something i really can't live without. I haven't gotten into PUBG anyway. I did put Fortnite on my Switch though.

      --
      "UNIX is very simple, it just needs a genius to understand its simplicity." -Dennis Ritchie
  71. Why not? by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 2

    I mean, people keep getting Windows despite all the abuse they are subjected to.

    1. Re:Why not? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I mean, people keep getting Windows despite all the abuse they are subjected to.

      That's because people in general don't crumble into a ball of tears whenever they get their feelings hurt. If having Candy Crush installed is "abuse" then yeah humans in generally will happily take "abuse", hell some (bored housewives) may even thank Microsoft for their thoughtful "abuse".

      Now if you'll excuse me I need to "abuse" on the Firefox update on my machine. That's how we're using that word right? Maybe I'll reboot my phone while I'm at it so the latest update can be "abused" on the phone.

  72. Perspective of a vendor by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    As a vendor who sells Windows pre-installed on my machines, I am outraged by this! Microsoft should be pre-installing MY bloatware, not someone else's bloatware! I demand that Microsoft automatically install 3 firewalls, 4 backup utilities, 2 CD burners, 30-day trials of all Intuit software, plus a free office suite that can't open any formats you've ever heard of.

  73. Re:Anyone else read "bloat" ware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Trump Derangement Syndrome is real!

  74. Re:Easy fix: LTSB/LTSC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you can buy them as a small business/home user how? These are Enterprise-Agreement/Licensing only.

  75. So 2012... wait a minute... by Koreantoast · · Score: 1

    I was going to joke about how Candy Crush is so 2012, and then I saw they're still pulling in hundreds of millions of dollars per year with around 300 million active users a month (at least at the end of 2017). So uh... I guess for a large part of the population, it's still a key application that should be standard...?

  76. If you're running win 10 by maxbuzz · · Score: 1

    Your computer belongs to M$.

    1. Re:If you're running win 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's about right, saying that apple is not that far behind, give them few more years..

  77. Re: Anyone else read "bloat" ware by rickb928 · · Score: 0

    Will, I did see 'trump' in the post...

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  78. Keep Calm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep calm and buy a Macbook.

  79. Except that you can not by Cyberax · · Score: 4, Informative

    The thing is, you simply can NOT buy Win 10 Enterprise unless you are a large company. They sell licenses starting with 50 users.

    1. Re:Except that you can not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The thing is, you simply can NOT buy Win 10 Enterprise unless you are a large company. They sell licenses starting with 50 users.

      This is only true for what they call an "E5" enterprise agreement.

      There is also a lower "E3" enterprise licensing model that only requires 5 device licenses, usually $150 each but you can purchase a placeholder device cal that is $30 to fill in the required 5 total.
      It's then $84/user/year with no real minimum requirement.

      E3 does not come with a deployment image version of windows 10 enterprise, but instead as an upgrade to windows 10 professional.
      That does mean you'll need a licensed copy of 10 pro to upgrade to enterprise, but they do allow OEM pro versions as well as retail and system builder.

      Don't get me wrong, it's still far more expensive and complicated than this should be, and it's asinine to have removed the basic local/group policy functionality out of professional edition.

      But with a 5 computer minimum in E3, enterprise edition isn't completely out of reach even for a home user. Even if it's still complete bullshit to be necessary in the first place.

    2. Re: Except that you can not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus 270 bucks plus 84 bucks a year for an operating system?! I'm not sure if you noticed, but Microsoft are the only people still charging money for an OS unless you're deep into enterprise terroritory. Nevermind that's the premium you must pay for an aggravation free experience. That's totally asinine.

  80. Old Article by Edgewood_Dirk · · Score: 1

    Did no one else notice this is from February? How is this "news"? I know it's still happening, but come on, did someone just feel like digging up anti-M$ dirt?.

  81. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, a clean install is taking a system and wiping the drive and installing a brand new install without addons that you do not pick yourself.

    you can actually boot from the internet and do a clean install of mac os. been that was since at least 2013... I had a mac pro back then i did this with. I cannot remember the key boot sequence, but you hold down i think 4 keys and power on and it would ask to connect to wireless and then boot from internet image at apple.

  82. False from the first sentence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Before Windows 10, a clean install of Windows only included the bare essentials a user would need to get started using their PC. With Windows 10,"

    False. Even Windows 95 came pre-loaded with AT&T WorldNet, AOL, MSN and games. The Disney Channel bar got added in Windows 98. This isn't all that new.

  83. Hmm... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    And Microsoft wonders why so many companies are still using Windows 7! Here's a hint: I don't need Candy Crush on my work computer!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  84. Redirect your anger elsewhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Candy Crush, Spotify, and Disney Magic Kingdoms

    I see those all the time on machines friends/relatives have purchased from OEMs.

    I can't say the same for any of my own machines, which are all running from the Windows 10 ISOs I get from MSDN, or those I've purchased retail.

    You get what you pay for. OEMs get extra money by pushing third-party titles. If these bother you so much, then sometimes that "tax" is worth paying. Not seeing anything from McAfee after a clean install is bliss.

  85. Well there's your problem by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    This is not a good user experience, Microsoft.

    You're assuming that Microsoft wants to give you a good user experience. They do not. They want to make money. And since Candy Crush is paying them more than you are, this is the result.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  86. Thanks Microsoft! by Improbus · · Score: 1

    Thanks for giving me the push to finally move my computing infrastructure to Linux/BSD.

  87. MSMG Toolkit by Krutontar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So there is this handy little utility called the MSMG Toolkit. You'll have to make a junk login for the forum but it's well worth it. https://forums.mydigitallife.n... Basically, you can modify your ISO so annoying things like Windows Store, Cortana, Edge, every single app, all kinds of things just aren't there when you do your clean install or upgrade from DVD. Not "disabled"...I mean not there at all. It's not the most user friendly thing in the world but there is a handy youtube video where the dude walks you through it. It's like of like that old utility nLite for windows XP except without a pretty GUI. Makes the new Windows 10 experience a lot more tolerable.

  88. What about Windows 10 Enterprise Edition? by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    Same bloat?

  89. Once you go linux, you'll never go back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WINE 3.16 (and Lutris) on LinuxMint Cinnamon? All my games work. I've tried over 2 dozen games and most of them are in the most played titles. I am running a dualboot setup for now until I get all my data off the Windows, but gaming on Linux late 2018 is now viable. That was my ONE blocker to going all in. And that barrier has been crushed with DXVK and soon vkd3d (which wraps vulcan around DX12 calls). For any novices set it up install Lutris and get your game on.

  90. You left the cable plugged in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are installing Windows with an ethernet cable plugged in then you are doing it wrong. You always install without a network connection. Then you install all policies. Then you reboot. Then you plug the cable in.

  91. Demographics is destiny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pls open bobs and vagene
    pls open candy crush and spotify

  92. Much bigger problem: Start Menu by dryo · · Score: 1

    Hey, this is annoying. It sucks to have bloatware installed automagically. But what is much worse? The fact that I can't organize the Start Menu anymore. All of the bloatware Windows Store Apps such as "Mixed Reality Portal" are at the top level of an alphabetical list. I can't put them in a subfolder labeled "Crap" ... or, as I label it in the Apple domain, "iCrap"

  93. Re:Bullshit by DogDude · · Score: 1

    If there's software to connect to the Internet, your drive isn't wiped.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  94. Re: Anyone else read "bloat" ware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obama generate syndrome is like that.

    Still waiting for a birth cert.

  95. Its annoying but deal with it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least most in question can be easily removed, its the apps that cannot be removed that trouble me the most. I don't think the user should be locked out of removing Mail, Edge, Cortana function or other Microsoft apps that in many Win 10 issues cannot be removed.

  96. Welcome to the Matrix. by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

    You are the resource.

  97. Can't make a living selling operating systems by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    There isn't money in selling operating systems anymore (or really for the last 20 years). It's all about the bundling deals with partners.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  98. Re:Easy fix: LTSB/LTSC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can get a 90 day free trial of LTSB never tried using it past the 90 day limit. Does it work past the 90 day limit?

  99. Easy solution by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

    Easy solution: Uninstall the Windows Store completely (along with anything else you want gone listed in this link):

    https://www.laptopmag.com/arti...

    Store: Get-AppxPackage *windowsstore* | Remove-AppxPackage

    1. Re:Easy solution by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

      I don't usually do this, but I'm going to reply to my own post because Microsoft can simply reinstall that crap every 6 months when they put out a new OS update.

      A slightly more complicated solution would be to add those commands to a PowerShell script file and add it either to the list of Startup commands or to the Windows Task Scheduler to re-run it periodically.

    2. Re:Easy solution by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Even with these caveats, still a good suggestion.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  100. Re:With Windows 10, you no longer own your compute by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    You have the same relationship with almost any of the auto-updates sources you likely have enabled, regardless of OS.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  101. This post is very confusing to me. by PCM2 · · Score: 2

    This post is very confusing to me. EVERY Windows 10 PC? I've been using Windows 10 for years and NOTHING from a third party has EVER been installed automatically onto my machine. And by "machine," I mean a half-dozen different machines. I'm on a Windows 10 machine right now and none of the listed applications is installed on it. I last bought a brand-new Windows 10 machine in June and none of these apps is installed on it, either. So where is this idea coming from? I'd really like to know.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  102. Might want to toss those Windows out the door... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Switch to GNU plus Linux! A winning combination

  103. Re:Bullshit by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

    I really doubt that Microsoft is doing this.

    I don't. I found Candy Crush on my Win 10 system after the last (and I mean last) forced update when I was looking in Defender for a way to open a hole in the firewall. There was a hole for Candy Crush there. Huh?

    You can't buy a "mac OS" DVD and install it on some random hardware, which is what a "clean install" means in common parlance.

    "Clean install" means installing onto an empty hard drive, not "random hardware". Windows doesn't run on "random hardware", either. Yes, you can do a clean install on MacOS. I've done it when I had to replace a failed hard drive on a Macbook.

  104. Finally had enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Running OpenSUSE and loving it. Buh bye Windows.

  105. Fiber in some places costs 6 figures by tepples · · Score: 2

    If technology is your true obsession in traditional Slashdot sense

    Many people for whom technology is their true obsession have friends or relatives for whom technology is not their true obsession.

    then you could really care less about people running Windows because it's not you.

    I regularly use Xubuntu but must support friends and relatives using Windows. Some use Windows because all applications or peripherals in a particular category are incompatible with X11/Linux.

    You're already running Linux and think the rest of the world should just give up, and you're paying for gigabit fiber because #fiber.

    If fiber costs 6 figures where you live,[1][2][3] you're probably not going to get fiber even if you are technically inclined.

    You'll not even be aware that the ISP's covering the majority of the population

    Several of my friends are or were among the minority who use satellite or fixed cellular because they live in an area not covered by fiber or cable.

    or you'll be thankful that in Windows you can set a connection as Metered to limit background downloads.

    Does "Metered" stop these particular applications from being downloaded? Last time I used Windows 10, I seem to remember that the UI of Windows Update stated that some updates (to the effect) "necessary to keep Windows running" would still be downloaded over metered connections. In addition, the UI allows marking only Wi-Fi, not an Ethernet connection to a satellite or cellular modem, as metered. It's possible to mark Ethernet as metered but only with registry tweaks.

    [1] "Want fiber Internet? That’ll be $383,500, ISP tells farm owner" by Jon Brodkin
    [2] "Man builds house, then finds out cable Internet will cost $117,000" by Jon Brodkin
    [3] "Victorian couple quoted up to $1.2m to connect to NBN Co's fibre service" by Jessica Longbottom and Ben Knight

  106. Re:Easy fix: LTSB/LTSC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MSDN subscription at the 500$ level gets you said LTSB license.

  107. Re:Bullshit by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

    If there's software to connect to the Internet, your drive isn't wiped.

    Welcome to Pixie, my friend.

  108. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck Micro$oft!

  109. Stop using Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, unless you are a gamer, why use Windows? A Linux install will get you access to Chrome or Firefox just like Windows will. Go buy a Mac if you want. Just stop using Microsoft products and they'll take notice.

    1. Re:Stop using Windows by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Seriously, unless you are a gamer, why use Windows? A Linux install will get you access to Chrome or Firefox just like Windows will. Go buy a Mac if you want. Just stop using Microsoft products and they'll take notice.

      The only thing I still need Windows for is Adobe Creative Cloud. Which doesn't quite work under Wine. The moment there exists a native port to Linux, I'll leave M$ and Apple behind and never look back.

      Why not a mac? Because I don't want to be locked into the hardware. I can build a high performance Linux or even Windows box for a fraction of the cost of a mac, and it's equipped with what I need, not with what Apple thinks I should have.

      A pox on both their houses.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  110. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You had a sublime experience installing software? Next thing you'll tell me is that you orgasmed when it hit 100% finished..

    You seriously need to get out more. Seriously, get some help.

  111. This is explicitly illegal in Canada by davecb · · Score: 1

    The CRTC has fined companies, for example A $250,000 Reminder that "CASL" is Not Just an Anti-Spam Law

    , In that case, the action was taken under Canada’s Anti-Spam Law using section 8 of the Act, which prohibits the installation of software without consent, including malware.

    There are at least two class actions waiting for the proclamation of a section which allows American-style suits in additional to prosecution. Guess who they target?

    See also https://crtc.gc.ca/eng/interne...

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
  112. Not a good experience by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    > This is not a good user experience, Microsoft.

    Well, not for *us*. It's great for Microsoft.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  113. Get over yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who gives a shit. Unless youâ(TM)re buying a new pc everyday who cares. Everything comes with bloatware. Have you seen blenders from the 80s with a button for every food type when a speed dial would do? Have you seen the stuff that comes with cars these days. Have you bought an iPhone, Apple, android, device. Or installed Ubuntu with their amazon store. Get over it

  114. Re:With Windows 10, you no longer own your compute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, so what makes you run to Microsoft's defense in this case but not defend others' behavior?

  115. It was worse before by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Some of these apps shared something, likely the microsoft installer service, with Windows Update so if you manually started running updates too soon it'd crash the install of the apps and hang windows updates and upon reboot you wouldn't be able to open the start menu. You'd click it and nothing would happen. They allegedly fixed this but all they really did was make it less prevalent.

  116. Zing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your mother is a C- and she stays D+ all the time!

  117. Re:TFS is as broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another baseless age restriction that goes against nature.

  118. Re: Anyone else read "bloat" ware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah I agree.
    And I'm European.
    We've got a lot of work to do ...
    You Americans are free to help us out. Well the white part that is. Come any time.

  119. Re:Easy fix: LTSB/LTSC by toddestan · · Score: 1

    Last time I played with it, it doesn't disable completely but basically acts like a copy that Microsoft has decided has been pirated. Since you don't actually have a license at that point I guess to Microsoft it's basically one and the same.

    Also, even if you do get a license, you couldn't just reactivate your old trial install - you have to a fresh reinstall. Don't know if that's the same either.

  120. Re: Anyone else read "bloat" ware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But... He's black!

  121. Follow me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just one of the reasons why I still exclusively use Slackware 95.

  122. Re:This is why I haven't bought Windows in 12 year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Found the cheap-ass criminal.

  123. Oh dammit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every time there's some post about the crap of Windows 10 I will definitely read the article and try to find the crap described. however 9 out of 10 times I'll fail. And more importantly, I'll then see recommendations of Windows 10 enterprise in the next five minutes. That's when I realized I am running a copy of pirated Enterprise.
    So the solution is clear.

  124. nonsense by sad_ · · Score: 1

    and because of these types of nonsense i don't want anything to do with windows. it's just one more item to add to an already long list of things that windows does.
    you don't need windows, or at least 95% (if not more) of _home_ users are perfectly fine on another (linux based) OS.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  125. Pedantic by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Maybe YOU should learn what it means. You aren't "convicted" of having a monopoly.

    Thank you Captian Pedantic. You saved the day again!

    Here's a little clue for you. For a company to be convicted of abusing a monopoly (which Microsoft was) it has to first be established in a court of law that they actually ARE a monopoly. You are correct that it is not illegal to be a monopoly and that convict is technically the wrong word. The purpose of my statementi s that Microsoft's monopoly status was established beyond any doubt in a court room for anyone who foolishly doubted it prior to that. The point is that there isn't much in the way of other options for PC operating systems because Microsoft has a de-facto monopoly on PC operating systems. Monopoly status = minimal alternative options. Got it?

  126. Re: Anyone else read "bloat" ware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And from Kenya, and he got his fake birth certificate from Ben Ghazi, and he i still trying to take their guns, and he took forever to respond to Katrina, and he caused the war in Iraq by doing nothing about 9/11.

  127. Re:With Windows 10, you no longer own your compute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux: No forced updates, ever. No forced reboots, ever. No forced removals, ever. You could hardly be more wrong.

  128. Re:This is why I haven't bought Windows in 12 year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Found the MS bootlicker.

  129. Microsoft Anti-Customer Behavior by ChodaBoyUSA · · Score: 1

    Too many people excused the anti-customer spyware/malware behavior of Microsoft and Windows 10 because "it is free". But, it is NOT FREE NOW. There is absolutely no excuse for a paid product to behave this way. I guess Microsoft will keep on until another Federal investigation occurs. Since they are charging for Windows 10 licenses now, I asked Microsoft if that version would be devoid of the spyware. They never responded, so that must mean, "no".

  130. Linux really is the answer for most by Joshs922 · · Score: 1

    We have been using Debian Linux at home for many years now and have not missed Windows. I run Windows 7 in a VM so I can run Quickbooks. That's all I need it for. I am getting more and more friends and family on Linux all the time, and it is working for them too. My uncle is an old Microsoft guy (former contractor) and now runs Linux Mint at home and at work and loves it. I got my teenage niece on Linux and she *never* calls me with problems. She called me once about how to hook up her printer. I told her to plug it in-she said "Oh, it says 'configuring printer'. Oh, hey! It's printing!" - and this was a random Canon inkjet printer. Just worked. I have my sister-in-law on Linux Mint now too.. She paid $45 for a perpetual license of Moneydance software and switched from abusive Quicken and she is off and running, downloading from her bank, etc. No issues. She's a professor in a community college in L.A. and runs Mint on her personal laptop. I got my cousin's wife on Linux Mint as well. She's been running it for a year now and I haven't had a *single* phone call for support. My mom's computer is next! I love instlalling Linux for people because *they don't call me for support ever*. :)

  131. Metered Ethernet by tepples · · Score: 1

    The Windows 8/10 network GUI shows "Metered" only for Wi-Fi, not for wired Ethernet. Instead, the user has to edit the registry to change the default media cost of all Ethernet connections. If a less-technical user's desktop PC has an Ethernet connection to the satellite or fixed-cellular modem, the user is unlikely to know that it's even possible to mark Ethernet as metered.

    1. Re:Metered Ethernet by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Huh? Ethernet? Isn't that the thing that Linux users use?

      I jest, but only slightly. Ethernet is being reduced to the domain of the techhead and away from the millennial with their laptops on their couches watching adverts that ask "what is a computer".

      And for us techheads there's HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\NetworkList\DefaultMediaCost

      But I do actually have one complaint of my own for how they have implemented this system. Bluetooth access points (i.e. sharing internet on your mobile phone) appears to the system as an ethernet connection.

      But I have little sympathy for *this* complaint. Whining about your data because the Windows store downloads Candy Crush on a system well known for downloading multi gigabyte OS updates in the background without warning or visual cue is a disingenuous. I struggle to get outraged, especially since the downloading of "Suggestions" is controllable by a windows setting.

  132. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if I told you that software can be run from computers that don't even have drives hooked up?

    ROM is a thing.

  133. Bloatware removal by arcadesdude · · Score: 1

    Have to run it each time after update but much easier to remove than manually doing each one. http://github.com/arcadesdude/...

    --
    --arcades
  134. Not anti-union and not neutral... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    "We are not anti-union, but we are not neutral either" says the narrator in the video. So they're pro-union? Logically that's the only position remaining. They seem to be really bad at helping people unionize.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Not anti-union and not neutral... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Fuckin' hell, wrong tab, ignore...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  135. This is not a good user experience, Microsoft. by Askmum · · Score: 1

    Microsoft does not give s#!t about your user experience.