I would guess advantages can only be properly quantified if both his legs are prosthetics because when you have one real leg the capabilities of other leg has to be adjusted to match the real one.
Withstanding earthquake at one particular strength does not mean it can withstand all earthquakes. And it probably isn't going to be helpful in a lot of cases as well, because where are you moving the whole thing away when you know there is an earthquake/tsunami coming? Japan is a bunch of islands for crying out loud. And you probably have to stay connected to the grid while you are moving it out of immediate danger. So until you have high-speed mobile plants fooling around external risks are probably not going to mean much to disaster-level events as we have yet technology to stop nature from dealing damage to us.
If people classify chess as a sport, so should these things, no? But then again, When will we see simultaneous exhibitions with esports where one guy fights against 30-50 people and win?
If people are illegally sharing stuff, then get 4 pieces of paper, print stuff with ink, and mail it to them? Why bother wasting the ink, paper and postage to send the letters if no further actions are to be taken?
The easiest effective defense, then, is to simply require
user approval whenever a script requests pixel data. Modern
browsers already implement this type of security | for ex-
ample, user approval is required for the HTML5 geolocation
APIs. This approach continues the existing functionality of
<canvas>
while disallowing illegitimate uses, at the cost of
yet another user-facing permissions dialog.
Does that sounds like lack of common sense or...? I would imagine that the user is the most vulnerable link of the entire system. Permission dialogs never work as a security sanity check because people simply click ok/yes/agree most of the time. Or the web site can witheld data until the user agrees to pixel extraction.
Is it People who can heavily influence the rules bend the rules for personal gain, people who don't get to influence the rules cheat
Or People grew up in capitalist areas bend the rules for personal gain, people who grew in communist area cheat
? I can't quite tell which case it is and they both describe the results well
Sounds like someone is already manipulating the count because they don't want you to see how it is done.
Seriously, come on, you can use these in an airgapped settings (USB sticks back and forth?) so hacking should never have been an issue if your system is otherwise clean.
What about UV index or temperature or humidity? I meant if they arent measured on the same spot as everything else then the usefulness of those will suffer
Still 50. Guam and other places are like the Virgin Islands where they don't get to become incorporated. Maldives just become one of those unincorporated places.
I am saying the Journal should put up some funding to reproduce the results. It can be random testing or all the papers, but the journal should invest in keeping its own reputation of being fraud free, no?
"See, this is exactly why we oppose stem cell research. They are all frauds."
Seriously though, I would have imagined that the papers should only get published if the results themselves were reproducible. Somehow those are skipped and the whole peer review system is in trouble. At the end, I would think whoever reviewed the papers should also be disciplined.
I would have thought some of these should be airgapped for security reasons by design? Is it so hard to go to work these days that you have to hook it up to the outside?
I don't usually code except on bash (and possibly my ever increasing proxy auto config), and I prefer nano (I got used to dos before switching to linux) over most editors that needs xorg for easier sudo when needed.
Slashdot Mirror
"Island communities" in China sounds awfully familiar... Taiwan?
That sounds like the name of a type of a virus that infects operating systems instead of humans.
Maybe one is already in development...
For tor, if who you rent the server from has a policy for exit nodes, run some non-exit nodes
I would guess advantages can only be properly quantified if both his legs are prosthetics because when you have one real leg the capabilities of other leg has to be adjusted to match the real one.
Withstanding earthquake at one particular strength does not mean it can withstand all earthquakes. And it probably isn't going to be helpful in a lot of cases as well, because where are you moving the whole thing away when you know there is an earthquake/tsunami coming? Japan is a bunch of islands for crying out loud. And you probably have to stay connected to the grid while you are moving it out of immediate danger. So until you have high-speed mobile plants fooling around external risks are probably not going to mean much to disaster-level events as we have yet technology to stop nature from dealing damage to us.
Yay for serpentspeak!
If people classify chess as a sport, so should these things, no? But then again, When will we see simultaneous exhibitions with esports where one guy fights against 30-50 people and win?
I would imagine that browsers that has no need for image capability would skip most image generation/handling functions.
If people are illegally sharing stuff, then get 4 pieces of paper, print stuff with ink, and mail it to them? Why bother wasting the ink, paper and postage to send the letters if no further actions are to be taken?
The easiest effective defense, then, is to simply require user approval whenever a script requests pixel data. Modern browsers already implement this type of security | for ex- ample, user approval is required for the HTML5 geolocation APIs. This approach continues the existing functionality of <canvas> while disallowing illegitimate uses, at the cost of yet another user-facing permissions dialog.
Does that sounds like lack of common sense or...? I would imagine that the user is the most vulnerable link of the entire system. Permission dialogs never work as a security sanity check because people simply click ok/yes/agree most of the time. Or the web site can witheld data until the user agrees to pixel extraction.
Is it
People who can heavily influence the rules bend the rules for personal gain, people who don't get to influence the rules cheat
Or
People grew up in capitalist areas bend the rules for personal gain, people who grew in communist area cheat
? I can't quite tell which case it is and they both describe the results well
Skipping all images to avoid tracking? Back to ncurses it is then
Sounds like someone is already manipulating the count because they don't want you to see how it is done. Seriously, come on, you can use these in an airgapped settings (USB sticks back and forth?) so hacking should never have been an issue if your system is otherwise clean.
I would imagine if Brand.com is actually effective Rick Santorum would already have used it back in 2012.
What about UV index or temperature or humidity? I meant if they arent measured on the same spot as everything else then the usefulness of those will suffer
I am sure "Is it gender linked/dominated/driven?" would be asked next
Still 50. Guam and other places are like the Virgin Islands where they don't get to become incorporated. Maldives just become one of those unincorporated places.
Since when did the US got power to arrest people in Maldives? Does that mean they can just go into arbitrary countries and arrest people arbitrarily?
I am saying the Journal should put up some funding to reproduce the results. It can be random testing or all the papers, but the journal should invest in keeping its own reputation of being fraud free, no?
How long would it take to regulate fracking? Hopefully it won't take forever to do that.
"See, this is exactly why we oppose stem cell research. They are all frauds."
Seriously though, I would have imagined that the papers should only get published if the results themselves were reproducible. Somehow those are skipped and the whole peer review system is in trouble. At the end, I would think whoever reviewed the papers should also be disciplined.
Anywhere from Eastern Europe (UTC+2, 7AM-4PM) to Myanmar (UTC+6:30, 11:30AM-8:30PM) would also be reasonable, no?
I would have thought some of these should be airgapped for security reasons by design? Is it so hard to go to work these days that you have to hook it up to the outside?
I don't usually code except on bash (and possibly my ever increasing proxy auto config), and I prefer nano (I got used to dos before switching to linux) over most editors that needs xorg for easier sudo when needed.
"Oh drat." - Said the rat who got caught in the mouse trap