... when the problem is corporate greed that supports CEOs and shareholders.
The middle class is collapsing and it's in a panic. They know where the money is going and they want to prepare their kids so they will be able to play on that turf.
There's no money in coding and, only a tiny percentage of kids have a natural aptitude for it.
The money grab supported by Congress, PACs, Big Business, and SCOTUS has reached a critical mass where there are two layers to American society:
1.) The haves 3.) The have-nots
There are no realistic cures, either... certainly not teaching children to code.
Y'all are missing the whole point regarding the significance of the Manning breach.
Manning had access to information that was too sensitive for his position and rank. He walked in with a Lady Gaga DVD (that's one) and inserted it into a work computer (that's two) and was allowed to copy stuff (that's three) and he walked out with the stuff in digital form (that's four).
What do advertisers learn from anyone using a fingerprint scanner at customs?
Answer:
"They were at the airport, going through customs..."
So, you're a traveler, coming from one place and going to another, at a particular time and you've made (or not) certain declarations, and this ain't your first rodeo and stuff.
Again, class action suits are not designed to benefit the injured. It's a volume deal that has very little, to no, impact on the class and a much larger impact on the defendant.
If we take $10 million and spread it out among the population of the class, most members of the class will not bother filing a claim.
The litigation's intent is to hurt the defendant and make them stop bad practices -- not to make millionaires of the members of the class.
No need to apologize in case I'm a fox... the truth doesn't depend upon that.
Really? You know damn well advertisers want to know where you have been, what you were doing there, how long you stayed, what you bought, who you met with...
That level of granularity is gold for advertisers.
So you're saying it's not specifically illegal to yell "Fire!" in a crowded theater when there is no fire, but it is generally illegal (just not specific.
That's crap and it's like saying it's not specifically against the law to steal a one dollar bill. Nowhere in the legal jurisprudence is the term, "one dollar bill" mentioned, however, it's still illegal.
And fuck you for making me jump through your goddam hoop and throw this at you:
I'm in the legal profession and we just did a hell of a lot of work to silo HIPAA-related documents and exhibits to comply with the "Business Associate" part of this:
Slashdot Mirror
Welcome to death if you are on the losing end.
... follow the money.
There are no statistics that indicate a push for coders is a good idea.
Statistically, a negligible number of students could be affected in a positive way, but they have the tools trhey need to start learning from home.
The rest of the effort is just a an appeasement to the tax payers in a state rated 44th overall.
Coding will not save the Arkansas school system.
How does that fit with this?
The Robots That Will Put Coders Out of Work
You just described kids as "consumers."
Who collects from consumers?
CEOs and shareholders.
By your logic, every kid should be exposed to rigorous math, the violin, pharmaceutical sales, Christian evangelism ...
Why choose coding?
... when the problem is corporate greed that supports CEOs and shareholders.
The middle class is collapsing and it's in a panic. They know where the money is going and they want to prepare their kids so they will be able to play on that turf.
There's no money in coding and, only a tiny percentage of kids have a natural aptitude for it.
The money grab supported by Congress, PACs, Big Business, and SCOTUS has reached a critical mass where there are two layers to American society:
1.) The haves
3.) The have-nots
There are no realistic cures, either ... certainly not teaching children to code.
... do some other things first.
Arkansas is ranked 44.
Y'all are missing the whole point regarding the significance of the Manning breach.
Manning had access to information that was too sensitive for his position and rank. He walked in with a Lady Gaga DVD (that's one) and inserted it into a work computer (that's two) and was allowed to copy stuff (that's three) and he walked out with the stuff in digital form (that's four).
Question:
What do advertisers learn from anyone using a fingerprint scanner at customs?
Answer:
"They were at the airport, going through customs ..."
So, you're a traveler, coming from one place and going to another, at a particular time and you've made (or not) certain declarations, and this ain't your first rodeo and stuff.
Advertisers don't have that information ... yet.
This is totally wrong.
If the system were built right, your parents would just use the thing and move on.
It's not the users who need educating.
It's the fucking coders.
Why in Sam Hill can't a COMPUTER PROGRAM do whatever it is you do on your parent's computer????
OK. To determine your footprint of importance, let's take the total population of you divided by 7 billion ...
Again, class action suits are not designed to benefit the injured. It's a volume deal that has very little, to no, impact on the class and a much larger impact on the defendant.
If we take $10 million and spread it out among the population of the class, most members of the class will not bother filing a claim.
The litigation's intent is to hurt the defendant and make them stop bad practices -- not to make millionaires of the members of the class.
No need to apologize in case I'm a fox ... the truth doesn't depend upon that.
Really? You know damn well advertisers want to know where you have been, what you were doing there, how long you stayed, what you bought, who you met with ...
That level of granularity is gold for advertisers.
You're missing the point.
Class action suits are not designed to provide compensation to the current class. It's to discourage FUTURE screw-ups.
Target knows if they get hit again in the future, another class action suit for the same thing will be much, much harder on them.
Class action suits are just about the only way to affect change regarding big business.
For reference, see tobacco, asbestos, and silicosis.
No.
It's sold to the advertisers.
... is for revenge and the mistaken idea that punishing Snowden would be a deterrent.
Snowden is no hacker any more than Manning is. Both were inside the perimeter and walked off with the goods.
The Snowden documents (not Snowden himself) will reveal more as time goes on.
The best tactic for US is to just leave Snowden alone to minimize the publicity.
In the matter of threatening Germany, that's no surprise -- and it worked.
Move along, nothing to see ...
Do y'all have a website called, PirateFirðir?" :p
So you're saying it's not specifically illegal to yell "Fire!" in a crowded theater when there is no fire, but it is generally illegal (just not specific.
That's crap and it's like saying it's not specifically against the law to steal a one dollar bill. Nowhere in the legal jurisprudence is the term, "one dollar bill" mentioned, however, it's still illegal.
And fuck you for making me jump through your goddam hoop and throw this at you:
In law, fraud is deliberate deception to secure unfair or unlawful gain. Fraud is both a civil wrong (i.e., a fraud victim may sue the fraud perpetrator to avoid the fraud and/or recover monetary compensation) and a criminal wrong (i.e., a fraud perpetrator may be prosecuted and imprisoned by governmental authorities).
Emphasis mine.
Sorry. It's not opinion. It's reality.
... because it favours one right over another.
How about making gun ownership mandatory? How about everyone HAS to speak?
... bay?
Well, enjoy your freedom for now.
You're next in line.
You're full of shit.
I'm in the legal profession and we just did a hell of a lot of work to silo HIPAA-related documents and exhibits to comply with the "Business Associate" part of this:
If a covered entity engages a business associate to help it carry out its health care activities and functions, the covered entity must have a written business associate contract or other arrangement with the business associate that establishes specifically what the business associate has been engaged to do and requires the business associate to comply with the Rules’ requirements to protect the privacy and security of protected health information. In addition to these contractual obligations, business associates are directly liable for compliance with certain provisions of the HIPAA Rules.
... a fine using Bitcoin and stuff.