"It judges risk based on human behavior and then assigns a security countermeasure for a given user by sending all that info to security software advertisers."
Evidence is an attribute that that exists only after criteria are met. I can destroy my hard drive today and be charged with a crime tomorrow. When the authorities realize what I have done, there's nothing they can do. The hard drive only becomes evidence after probable cause has been established and a warrant has been issued and I am made aware that my hard drive is evidence.
There are exceptions, but not as relates to this matter.
... the court can instruct the jury to assume that the evidence that was destroyed showed exactly what the prosecution says it shows...
You are an asshat and what pisses me off is that you know damn well that you are making a false statement.
The editorial cartoons created a lot of stir, which attracts a lot of eyeballs, and therefore money. After the initial thrust by the editors, it became a pissing contest -- a reality show -- that crossed the line of common sense.
Delfeil adds: “I believe that we are fools who took an unnecessary risk. That’s it. We think we are invulnerable. For years, decades even, it was a provocation and then one day the provocation turns against us.
... I know when the Cretaceous period ended because the dinosaurs (except birds) went extinct and stuff, but I don't know when the Cretaceous period started or the Anthropocene period, either, but Bennett Haselton.
I don't know if your intention is to be clever or if you are just very poor at debating, but I will save you some time by informing you that the "cowardice" button is inoperative, just as iare the, "You must be gay," and, "You must be in favor of killing all newborn kitty cats."
1.) Google is right over there ==> and it's your friend.
Why would you be interested in impressing people with your point of view? Wouldn't you have to change your point of view each time you are addressing a different audience? How do you collect impression index data of each audience to determine the magnitude and polarity of the impression you are making?
Is there an app for that?
And, "No.," I don't think that either [I]slamic culture, [G]erman culture, or drug laws should be changed because:
1.) The objection to depicting Muhammad, is not embedded in the Islamic culture. Muslims have long produced artwork that includes likenesses the Prophet. Recent rabid rebels who have hijacked the Muslim religion are responsible for that nonsense. Look it up.
2.) The prohibition of Holocaust denial in Germany is not cultural, either. It is law. There are lots of countries and lots of laws. I don't have the authority (or interest) to change laws in those countries.
3.) (Assuming US, here) Drug laws are the product of legislation and I'm not interested at this time in changing any drug laws. I am consumed, currently, with making my legacy Windows XP machines think they are embedded ATM machines so they will continue to be updated against security exploits by Microsoft and stuff. Inquire if you wish.
Bullshit. You don't watch Shark Tank.
If you're in China, I hope you use a VPN to get your message out and stuff.
In your scenario, where does the economic relationship of the parties fit in?
... the United States government wants to prohibit encryption.
Why are you censoring yourself with fucking asterisks?
"It judges risk based on human behavior and then assigns a security countermeasure for a given user by sending all that info to security software advertisers."
Formerly anonymous.
Those support my position.
... The "do nothing" Congress is flipping from a tie (House vs Senate) to mostly one side.
These appointments are meaningless if nothing gets done.
Politics is the only reality show that's better than Survivor®.
"My position on the subject has evolved."
"Three can keep a secret, if two of them are dead."
~ Benjamin Franklin
No.
Evidence is an attribute that that exists only after criteria are met. I can destroy my hard drive today and be charged with a crime tomorrow. When the authorities realize what I have done, there's nothing they can do. The hard drive only becomes evidence after probable cause has been established and a warrant has been issued and I am made aware that my hard drive is evidence.
There are exceptions, but not as relates to this matter.
You are an asshat and what pisses me off is that you know damn well that you are making a false statement.
So fuck you very much.
... your ratio's upside down.
... Russia can do whatever it wants to do.
There were already product distribution players in the industry when Amazon came along, am I right?
They have not run out of ideas, as evidenced by this idea to stream stuff.
The entertainment industry is not the best way to lose tons of money
80 Ways to lose money foolishly
.
... and avoid providing metadata to big business.
Not accurate at all.
The editorial cartoons created a lot of stir, which attracts a lot of eyeballs, and therefore money. After the initial thrust by the editors, it became a pissing contest -- a reality show -- that crossed the line of common sense.
Delfeil adds: “I believe that we are fools who took an unnecessary risk. That’s it. We think we are invulnerable. For years, decades even, it was a provocation and then one day the provocation turns against us.
“He shouldn’t have done it, but Charb did it again a year later, in September 2012.”
I didn't pay for, nor read, any cartoons of Muhammad. I think cowardice or bravery apply to pissing contests.
Yawn.
These guys are not quite as boring as Anonymous.
I'm going with, "simply incomprehensible."
Non-muslims wouldn't be affected by that.
The French cartoonists didn't get that memo.
... I know when the Cretaceous period ended because the dinosaurs (except birds) went extinct and stuff, but I don't know when the Cretaceous period started or the Anthropocene period, either, but Bennett Haselton.
And like my knees.
I don't know if your intention is to be clever or if you are just very poor at debating, but I will save you some time by informing you that the "cowardice" button is inoperative, just as iare the, "You must be gay," and, "You must be in favor of killing all newborn kitty cats."
1.) Google is right over there ==> and it's your friend.
2.) Citation needed.
3.) Who gives a shit?
Why would you be interested in impressing people with your point of view? Wouldn't you have to change your point of view each time you are addressing a different audience? How do you collect impression index data of each audience to determine the magnitude and polarity of the impression you are making?
Is there an app for that?
And, "No.," I don't think that either [I]slamic culture, [G]erman culture, or drug laws should be changed because:
1.) The objection to depicting Muhammad, is not embedded in the Islamic culture. Muslims have long produced artwork that includes likenesses the Prophet. Recent rabid rebels who have hijacked the Muslim religion are responsible for that nonsense. Look it up.
2.) The prohibition of Holocaust denial in Germany is not cultural, either. It is law. There are lots of countries and lots of laws. I don't have the authority (or interest) to change laws in those countries.
3.) (Assuming US, here) Drug laws are the product of legislation and I'm not interested at this time in changing any drug laws. I am consumed, currently, with making my legacy Windows XP machines think they are embedded ATM machines so they will continue to be updated against security exploits by Microsoft and stuff. Inquire if you wish.