... Jim Crow laws made to prevent blacks from voting were part of the democratic party.
You're trolling.
The Supreme Court helped undermine the Constitutional protections of blacks with the infamous Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) case, which legitimized Jim Crow laws and the Jim Crow way of life.
... you felt it was important to post this drivel twice.
So, no wiggle room here that my cursor was spinning and that I got an error saying this object no longer exists so I copied my text, opened another tab, and successfully posted there.
Regarding the more civil part of your post:
What, precisely, is the point of contention? We're essentially taking a similar position but for different reasons.
Slashdot Mirror
I agree with the direction you're taking this.
Twitter, Google (all their shit), Apple (all their shit), Instagram, Snapchat, every goddam web page ...
We're so screwed and there's absolutely no turning back.
You're not fooling anyone with that remark.
You don't have an answer.
I am more concerned about data gathering by organizations where I didn't willingly give consent.
Guess who does that? Facebook.
Data miners dig into your Facebook shit, via API, and you're screwed.
By Facebook.
Didn't answer my question.
I don't give a flying fuck about copyright.
Me, personally: copyright is not an issue with me.
I don't care if copyright goes to infinity.
Explain why I should, in my context.
... as to precisely why I care?
I have no intention of making money off someone else's work, ever.
I'm the public domain. Why do I need copyright to expire?
Seriously: Why?
... and now that we have the password, the computer will use AI, blockchain and the cloud to find all you bitches (or bastards, as may apply).
The Washington Post agreed to withhold certain details ... at the request of the Navy ...
... requested this of the goddam contractor.
Never heard of that, so thank you for the education. (Seriously)
From Wikipedia:
This makes cable and satellite all but essential for acceptable television in much of the region.
... provide internet to 30% of the goddam state?
For every motherfucker out there with a computer, there's another motherfucker out there with a computer.
The strategy for hacking blockchain is no different from hacking anything else: Learn the theory then apply the theory.
Nah.
Headhunters are like real estate sales persons.
It's a Bungee position.
Troll equality.
Just what I was thinking.
Popular Mechanics is a content provider.
Well just SHIT!
You got me.
During my career, I got a lot of calls offering a position and then asking if I knew anyone who was available.
My answer was that all the good people I knew already had jobs.
The callers were, indeed, low-ballers.
... the tipping point.
Unemployment is at an all-time low.
That means lots of room for entry-level jobs.
Those jobs pay even if you're taking a smoke, shit, or a coffee break.
When jobs become scarce, the gif economy will expand again.
--
Even so, that number hasn't changed much in 20 years and is so low that it represents "noise."
There's no point in addressing batshit crazy rabid dogma.
You asserted that the Democratic party was the sole source of Jim Crow.
I cited a SCOTUS ruling that established Jim Crow as the law of the land.
You assert that the Democratic party was the sole source of Jim Crow.
You and I know the definition of insanity.
You are dismissed as trolling.
Please don't vote, OK?
... Jim Crow laws made to prevent blacks from voting were part of the democratic party.
You're trolling.
The Supreme Court helped undermine the Constitutional protections of blacks with the infamous Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) case, which legitimized Jim Crow laws and the Jim Crow way of life.
SCOTUS is apolitical.
The answer is obvious: You provide the evidence that supports your assertion and the answer is, "Yes."
Get cracking.
... you felt it was important to post this drivel twice.
So, no wiggle room here that my cursor was spinning and that I got an error saying this object no longer exists so I copied my text, opened another tab, and successfully posted there.
Regarding the more civil part of your post:
What, precisely, is the point of contention? We're essentially taking a similar position but for different reasons.
The "system," is populated by ________. (hint: voters)
The electoral system is not the problem.
Americans are well aware of how that works and they accept it.
There's no disproportionate problem of any kind.
Voters are not banned from voting and that includes voting for politicians who would change the election laws.
For "problems," with voters, look to those who don't.
... because American voters also want a Wall.
They want to be isolationist and nationalistic.
They do not want to invest in the education needed to produce rocket scientists.
They want coal plants to stay open for jobs despite the owners' assertion that "we don't use manual labour like we used to."
They want nuclear power but they have no indigenous people who can build a plant.
They are anti-science.
America will never dominate in any regard going forward.
They want to be great again by going backwards.
... because American voters also want a Wall.
They want to be isolationist and nationalistic.
They do not want to invest in the education needed to produce rocket scientists.
They want coal plants to stay open for jobs despite the owners' assertion that "we don't use manual labour like we used to."
They want nuclear power but they have no indigenous people who can build a plant.
They are anti-science.
Judge Orders EPA To Produce Science Behind Pruitt's Climate Claims
America will never dominate in any regard going forward.
They want to be great again by going backwards.