Slashdot Mirror


User: Tumbleweed

Tumbleweed's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4,632
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4,632

  1. CGI or SFX? on Movie Landmarks for CGI Effects? · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Computer-generated, or special effects in general? Big difference there. You can drop Westworld if you're talking CGI, BTW.

    If just SFX, hey, Ray Harryhausen (sp?) did some great stuff "back in the day". Certain 2001: A Space Odyssey was the beginning of the realistic stuff. There's nothing in there that looks any worse than Star Wars: A New Hope, and it's a lot more realistic. (Fighters using aerodynamic maneuvers in space? Yeah, right.)

    Certainly a lot of technology was invented at ILM for the first three Star Wars films, and you've gotta respect that.

    Terminator 2 for the morphing.

    Aliens for mixing live action and miniatures (the duel between Ripley and the alien queen was a mix - amazing stuff; just saw a special on the Alien series last night - AMAZING work and you never notice it's fake - that's why it's so great).

    For non-human CGI, nothing has surpassed the original Jurassic Park, really - it's pretty much levelled off there, if not gone down a bit, likely due to budgetary concerns. The stuff Weta did for the LOTR movies is great, but isn't groundbreaking in terms of anything other than sheer scale.

    For CGI humans, I'd have to say 'Final Flight of the Osiris' in the Animatrix is the best I've seen (same people that did the Final Fantasy movie), but it still has a long ways to go. The skin _still_ isn't right, though the movement is almost perfect. Hair is good, but not great (yet). I suspect hair will be perfected before skin will.

    Here's the killer idea: what happens when the only thing left to artificially generate are the voices? Artificial voice actors? Yikes!

  2. Re:Hello, I'm Troy McClure... on LPI certification: Compiling Sources and Managing Libs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That would the just the 'Elevator to Hell', not the Express. The express gives no warning. :)

  3. Hello, I'm Troy McClure... on LPI certification: Compiling Sources and Managing Libs · · Score: 4, Funny

    You may remember me from such LPI training films as, "rm / -rf, the Silent Killer," and "shutdown -rn now: Express Elevator to Hell, System Going Down!"

  4. Re:In other news... on Windows Is 'Insecure By Design,' Says Washington Post · · Score: 1

    > General Issimo Francisco Franko is still dead.

    He's not dead - he's hiding in my closet with Elvis, Jimmy Hoffa and God.

    Seriously.

  5. a better way to motivate people to patch on Windows Is 'Insecure By Design,' Says Washington Post · · Score: 1

    Instead of a big red screen on bootup telling them there are new patches, a big screen saying free porn if you click here (which installs any new patches).

    C'mon, it's the DUMB people who don't patch their systems, so play to their weaknesses. Free porn, free money, whatever obvious lie (to a normal person) should be enough to get them to fall for it.

  6. Re:in societ russia... on Drink Coffee, Support Mozilla · · Score: 0, Funny

    > Step 1. Look down at your keyboard.
    > Step 2. Notice that the "c" and "v" keys are right next to each other.
    > Step 3. Quit being a spelling Nazi and do something with your life.

    Step 4. PROFIT! :)

    (I can't believe you didn't complete that!)

  7. Re:bad analogy on Mac's Immunity To Recent Virus Attacks · · Score: 1

    > True. But they don't. And that's the point :-)

    The more popular Macs become (because of the advent of OS X the G5 hardware), the more likely they WILL come. That's the price for popularity - people always wanting to take you down a peg or two.

    Granted, a superior security model to that of MS products will help limit the damage done by such a virus, but when you have people willing to click on any attachment someone sends to them in an e-mail, you can never totally eliminate the possibility of damage.

  8. marzipan on Mac's Immunity To Recent Virus Attacks · · Score: 1


    > What the hell does "putting marzipan in your pie plate bingo!" mean?

    It means you don't watch enough Buffy the Vampire Slayer, that's what it means. :)

  9. Re:aaaaaaaaaag!!! on OpenOffice.org for Mac Delayed Two Years · · Score: 4, Interesting

    > Keynote PPT
    > ??? Word
    > ??? Excel
    > MySQL + Enterprise Objects Framework or something Access
    > Mail+AddressBook Entourage/Outlook

    PowerPoint = Keynote
    Word = Appleworks wp (rumoured to be under dev)
    Excel = Appleworks ss (rumoured to be under dev)
    Access = Filemaker Pro (rumoured to be taken back in-house, though that may have been debunked recently)
    Outlook = Mail (being upgraded in Panther)

    Really, the only 'missing' components are a good word processor and spreadsheet, at this point. We'll see what's missing in the Panther version of Mail as far as how well it compares to Outlook. It may be more of an Outlook Express class app than an Outlook class one.

  10. good news for Apple's products, though on OpenOffice.org for Mac Delayed Two Years · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Rumour has it they're enhancing their own products, so this may turn out well in the end, after all. Just not via Open Source products...

  11. Re:Good followup. on Netgear Routers DoS UWisc Time Server · · Score: 1

    > what doesn't kill you, will only make you stronger.

    Yeah, or cripple you for life, or make you go broke, or, or, or... There are more than two outcomes... :)

  12. Re:bad analogy on Mac's Immunity To Recent Virus Attacks · · Score: 1

    > We should start calling them Outlook viruses. Put the blame where it belongs, on the bad email applications.

    Well, I use Outlook, and *I* don't get these viruses. If we put the blame where it belongs, we should called them User viruses. :)

  13. bad analogy on Mac's Immunity To Recent Virus Attacks · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Macs aren't "vaccinated" against Windows-based e-mail viruses or worms.

    Saying Macs are "immune" in this case is about like saying my car is immune to Polio. It just doesn't apply in this case. Macs won't be "immune" to Mac-based viruses, when they come along.

    Anyone dumb enough to launch an executable e-mail attachment without first virus-scanning it is dumb enough to do it on any platform they run. Bragging about Macs not being susceptible to this round of viruses is merely bragging about how few Macs there are, and how it isn't worth the time of the virus-writers to make Mac-based viruses. Whoopee.

    I'm still saving up money for a G5, though it has nothing to do with how susceptible to viruses it is or isn't.

  14. settlement with IBM? on SCO Says IBM is Beating Up on Them · · Score: 1

    They'll be lucky if their "settlement" doesn't end with a double-tap to the head.

  15. Re:Victory by forfeit on New Longhorn Screenshots Leaked · · Score: 1

    I love that phrase precisely because most people completely miss it. :)

    And hey, if _Houdini_ says it's a neat trick, it's a neat friggin' trick!

  16. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis on SoBig: Worst is Yet to Come · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do you work for the government, by any chance? :)

  17. Re:Victory by forfeit on New Longhorn Screenshots Leaked · · Score: 1

    Hey, Bob was ahead of his time! Misunderstood. So sad. If Bob were alive today, he'd be rolling over in his grave over what people say about him on Slashdot. *BWG*

    Alas, poor Bob, I knew him well...

  18. Re:Changing the look and feel on New Longhorn Screenshots Leaked · · Score: 1

    I'd rather they go with the original Amiga one, the Guru Meditation Error. That was sweet, and sorely missed when they removed it.

  19. Re:Victory by forfeit on New Longhorn Screenshots Leaked · · Score: 2, Funny

    > MS Bob v2.0

    Dude, a little respect, if you please. That's "MS Bob 2005" to you, okay? :)

  20. 18-yr old robots on Japan's Proposed 30-Year Robot Program · · Score: 1

    > But I suppose we could encurrage them to develope some 18 year old robots instead.

    Cherry 2000!

  21. obligatory Simpsons joke... on Japan's Proposed 30-Year Robot Program · · Score: 1

    "And I, for one, _welcome_ our new childlike robot masters..."
    - Kent Brockman

  22. or... on Japan's Proposed 30-Year Robot Program · · Score: 4, Funny

    let's let Japan do all the spending on the project, then we'll buy one of their fancy schancy new robots, and reproduce it ourselves.

  23. better yet on DARPA Looks Beyond Moore's Law · · Score: 1

    > See, if we get everybody to take xanax or zoloft, there's no limit to how fast computers will appear to be working.

    Let's just kill everyone, then our computers will seem infinitely fast! Dude, if you're gonna dream, Dream Big!

  24. ps on Divx Now Adware Supported Only · · Score: 1

    "Spoon!"

    Can't believe I forgot to mention that. *sigh*

  25. Re:windows media player? on Divx Now Adware Supported Only · · Score: 1

    > Putting DRM, the fact that you have to use Windows to use it, and the fact that some of them can launch IE aside

    Yes, putting aside all the EVILNESS, Hitler wasn't a half-bad painter, either. You seem to be missing the point, young padawan.

    Evil is bad. It's just no darned good. Ya don't cotton to it. You need to smack it on the nose with the rolled-up newspaper of justice, and say, "Bad dog! Bad dog!" Or at least, that's what the Tick always says. That and something about gravity being a harsh mistress.