We have great lives. Undermining would be things like intentionally injecting subtle bugs. Or surreptitiously inserting encumbered code. This is pretty much nothing.
If the package is the least bit interesting, somebody will create a distribution free of the ads. Or rebrand the package.
SourceForge basically tried this when they had no reputation left to lose.
This is not a function for client-side validation. This is what a confirmation page is for. The server repeats the data back and the client then hits accept. Now there is no risk of communication issue even with corrupt data. Listen to air traffic control sometime. The pilots always repeat back instructions. Same principle. The pilots don't make their own ATC decisions. And this is a very apt analogy because humans communicating over radio frequency do get a lot of corrupted data.
I could never recommend exploiting a found defect. Its unethical and really the reason that we have to have laws. Obtaining free tickets this way isn't really much different than shaking them out of a vending machine (assuming you don't damage the machine). But if a company doesn't have an established bug bounty program, I would *never* contact them with a defect report. I would definitely sell it on one of the markets for these. It's just less risky. Until there are laws protecting people who report bugs, it's just not a safe activity. If there's a bug bounty in place that's somewhat of a contract (IANAL) and means that the recipient is interested in handling defect reports correctly. Not a legal shield but at least something. If there's nothing in place, reporting honestly is a fool's errand.
It's a good analogy, but don't try this at home. It's possible that one or both of you could get prosecuted. No, I'm not a lawyer. If for no other reason, the waitress could lie and say you left without paying and she never agreed to the alternate price. Unless you have it in writing, I wouldn't want to face a judge saying that the waitress agreed to give me a discount.
More interesting, what happens if I use a browser that doesn't respect the read-only field or if I show a trivial amount of sophistication and just submit my own POST request. Does the server accept the changes? If this is just a cosmetic issue, that's no so bad. If the data can actually be altered with minimal effort, you should ask for your money back!
And what purpose would it be for the client to present a price? If you have to calculate it anyway? And what do you do if the two don't match? All you're adding here is complexity. I can see having the client *calculate* a price for experience reasons. i.e. a page where I indicate 2 adults and 1 child and JavaScript updates an estimated total. But there should *always* be an order confirmation screen with a price calculated by the server and presented back. You don't need to submit the result of the client-side calculation to generate this page. In the best case you're wasting a trivial amount of bandwidth. In the worst you're introducing needless complexity. Sorry but I don't see any good reason for this.
This could just as well be a US government agency so maybe it's just how all government tends to work. It's stories like this that make me more sympathetic to the anti-government crowd.
I guess it depends on your definition of "alongside." Here's an example of the Conotton Creek Trail.
https://www.google.com/maps/pl...
The Northeast corridor is part of that subsidy. Take it away and we'll have to either let Amtrak stop operating or make up the lost profits in additional subsidies.
Yes the *can* work and the can also *not* work. And when they do work, Microsoft gains no benefit. When they don't work, the OS is perceived as unreliable. Look how many people out there still claim that Windows crashes. They could be shills but maybe it really does crash for them. On the other hand, many large enterprises have tens of thousands of Windows clients deployed and they are very reliable. The difference is, of course, name-brand hardware with stable drivers. Many lower-level drivers are timing-dependent. For the vast majority of hardware in use these days, the drivers are all provided by Microsoft, and this doesn't really apply. Looking at my current system, about 70% of the drivers are from Microsoft, 15% from Intel, and a smattering of other drivers mostly for the radios and Ethernet. If there isn't an updated driver, I wonder if you could still get the latest version of Windows if you just disabled these devices in the BIOS! Obviously if Intel doesn't support the CPU that's a bit harder as, well, disabling that in the BIOS wouldn't be useful!
This seems to be the one route in the US where a train service can make money so it's no surprise that he *wants* to build this route. If he could bore under existing railway rights of way, it should be a relatively simple project from an administrative standpoint (no worrying about easements et cetera). The tracks would then carry only freight and the number of tracks would be reduced in favor of green space and walking trails. Amtrak would go bankrupt and there would never be a public train service in this country again. I'll let others opine whether this is good or bad but certainly would be the outcome.
Trying to get a new OS to work with an old driver is hard. In fact it's so hard, that Linux pretty much requires drives to be compiled for your exact kernel. Trying to do this without assistance from the manufacturer of the device seems like a fools errand. The policy here seems quite reasonable. MSFT will provide updates for as long as the device manufacturer supports the device. After that you still get security updates but no high-risk feature updates.
This makes Microsoft's job a lot easier. But it also helps the device manufacturers. The hardware business is somewhat commoditized and the margins are razor-thin. This allows vendors to differentiate and make a few more points of margin by supporting the hardware for longer. That should be easier if the hardware is of higher quality so it also prevents a race to the bottom.
Sure there are a few people out there who want to try to run Windows/10 creator on their 386/33. And those people will figure out how to obtain and install the latest version of Windows whether Microsoft provides it via the update mechanism or not.
Some people will complain about everything Microsoft. But it's really hard to find valid complaints about Windows as a consumer OS.
Mac OS and Linux are out there but it's not a case of them being better and people not knowing. They are probably about equal to Windows but not enough of an improvement to compel a switch.
Obviously in the data center, Linux is eating Windows' lunch but that's a different situation. Nobody runs unsupported hardware there. Well, at least they shouldn't.
I have no idea why you responded to this ridiculous AC. Glad it got modded down quickly.
How would a sales guy for Tesla know about the cost/benefit of other solutions anyway? Maybe there's a better solution out there for the Australian government and maybe not.
It would be silly for a sales guy from one vendor to talk about the cost/benefit of another vendor's solution since (s)he won't be nearly as familiar with it as their own. Plus there is a conflict of interest.
In a government procurement situation, each vendor presents their solution in the best light, the customer takes a critical eye, and then decides what solution is best.
This probably should happen in commercial situations as well. Sometimes in non-government business, there is a bit more room for personal preferences, but even then the general process is the same.
If Tesla had been hired to do the independent comparison, I'd expect a large glass wall to avoid conflict of interest, but that's not what's happening here.
Yes but then there is also the kernel base address randomization mentioned in the summary. Put the two together and you get a number that is larger than the total address space of the machine. So essentially all you know is that the problem space is 2^64 for each function whose address you'd like to determine.
Their gender *does* matter when it comes to tourist visas. In many countries, the treatment of women is so poor that they can make a prima facia case for asylum once they get here. Which unfortunately means that the consulates are then put in a very difficult situation of not wanting to discriminate against women but they only way they can avoid doing so is to treat men equally as poorly. It's really hard to grant tourist visas from certain regions of the world as pretty much everybody who lives there has a valid asylum claim.
I'm sure that there is quite a bit of truth to this, but I don't think that you paint a complete picture. Those who receive heroin-like drugs in the hospital do have a much lower addiction rate but part of this may be due to the drugs binding with inflamed tissue rather than the brain. If we were to start giving the drugs to hospital patients without injuries that warranted it, we would likely see physical addiction in that group. And withdraw from heroin is quite brutal physically including leaking fluids from all orifices. Your point stands that these drugs can be used safely and I agree that addiction has a huge social component. But you are underestimating the physical effects of drugs like heroin.
If the situation in a country is so bad that we have to bomb them, seems that we have a moral obligation to accept refugees. In fact that would be the ideal way to reduce our military operations if we had to commit to taking a certain number of refugees per dropped bomb.
Having a clear statue does not mean we have a constitutional situation. If the statue said "The President may violate the establishment clause," it wouldn't last despite being very clear. Here, Congress has vested power in the president. But Congress can't vest in the president powers that Congress itself doesn't have. That would be trying to bring through the back door what is not allowed through the front. The ruling will be much more nuanced that you are predicting. IANAL
Whether statins and anti-depressants are beneficial to a particular patient is a bit more complex than you make it out to be.
The fact is that both of those have established mechanisms by which the affect the function of the body in a way that is intended to be positive. i.e. they do something and that something is in many cases good.
That's still significantly different than an expensive placebo.
I'm not questioning your statement but I'm struggling with this a bit. If I have a runway long enough for a 747 to take off on, for a regional jet, it's essentially infinite. I think part of the issue here is that the planes are not certified to fly at these temperatures regardless of runway length.
Slashdot Mirror
https://www.amazon.de/dp/B01MG... You can purchase from amazon.de in the US. You may have to pay freight though.
We have great lives. Undermining would be things like intentionally injecting subtle bugs. Or surreptitiously inserting encumbered code. This is pretty much nothing. If the package is the least bit interesting, somebody will create a distribution free of the ads. Or rebrand the package. SourceForge basically tried this when they had no reputation left to lose.
This is not a function for client-side validation. This is what a confirmation page is for. The server repeats the data back and the client then hits accept. Now there is no risk of communication issue even with corrupt data. Listen to air traffic control sometime. The pilots always repeat back instructions. Same principle. The pilots don't make their own ATC decisions. And this is a very apt analogy because humans communicating over radio frequency do get a lot of corrupted data.
I could never recommend exploiting a found defect. Its unethical and really the reason that we have to have laws. Obtaining free tickets this way isn't really much different than shaking them out of a vending machine (assuming you don't damage the machine). But if a company doesn't have an established bug bounty program, I would *never* contact them with a defect report. I would definitely sell it on one of the markets for these. It's just less risky. Until there are laws protecting people who report bugs, it's just not a safe activity. If there's a bug bounty in place that's somewhat of a contract (IANAL) and means that the recipient is interested in handling defect reports correctly. Not a legal shield but at least something. If there's nothing in place, reporting honestly is a fool's errand.
It's a good analogy, but don't try this at home. It's possible that one or both of you could get prosecuted. No, I'm not a lawyer. If for no other reason, the waitress could lie and say you left without paying and she never agreed to the alternate price. Unless you have it in writing, I wouldn't want to face a judge saying that the waitress agreed to give me a discount.
More interesting, what happens if I use a browser that doesn't respect the read-only field or if I show a trivial amount of sophistication and just submit my own POST request. Does the server accept the changes? If this is just a cosmetic issue, that's no so bad. If the data can actually be altered with minimal effort, you should ask for your money back!
And what purpose would it be for the client to present a price? If you have to calculate it anyway? And what do you do if the two don't match? All you're adding here is complexity. I can see having the client *calculate* a price for experience reasons. i.e. a page where I indicate 2 adults and 1 child and JavaScript updates an estimated total. But there should *always* be an order confirmation screen with a price calculated by the server and presented back. You don't need to submit the result of the client-side calculation to generate this page. In the best case you're wasting a trivial amount of bandwidth. In the worst you're introducing needless complexity. Sorry but I don't see any good reason for this.
This could just as well be a US government agency so maybe it's just how all government tends to work. It's stories like this that make me more sympathetic to the anti-government crowd.
I guess it depends on your definition of "alongside." Here's an example of the Conotton Creek Trail. https://www.google.com/maps/pl... The Northeast corridor is part of that subsidy. Take it away and we'll have to either let Amtrak stop operating or make up the lost profits in additional subsidies.
Yes the *can* work and the can also *not* work. And when they do work, Microsoft gains no benefit. When they don't work, the OS is perceived as unreliable. Look how many people out there still claim that Windows crashes. They could be shills but maybe it really does crash for them. On the other hand, many large enterprises have tens of thousands of Windows clients deployed and they are very reliable. The difference is, of course, name-brand hardware with stable drivers. Many lower-level drivers are timing-dependent. For the vast majority of hardware in use these days, the drivers are all provided by Microsoft, and this doesn't really apply. Looking at my current system, about 70% of the drivers are from Microsoft, 15% from Intel, and a smattering of other drivers mostly for the radios and Ethernet. If there isn't an updated driver, I wonder if you could still get the latest version of Windows if you just disabled these devices in the BIOS! Obviously if Intel doesn't support the CPU that's a bit harder as, well, disabling that in the BIOS wouldn't be useful!
This seems to be the one route in the US where a train service can make money so it's no surprise that he *wants* to build this route. If he could bore under existing railway rights of way, it should be a relatively simple project from an administrative standpoint (no worrying about easements et cetera). The tracks would then carry only freight and the number of tracks would be reduced in favor of green space and walking trails. Amtrak would go bankrupt and there would never be a public train service in this country again. I'll let others opine whether this is good or bad but certainly would be the outcome.
Trying to get a new OS to work with an old driver is hard. In fact it's so hard, that Linux pretty much requires drives to be compiled for your exact kernel. Trying to do this without assistance from the manufacturer of the device seems like a fools errand. The policy here seems quite reasonable. MSFT will provide updates for as long as the device manufacturer supports the device. After that you still get security updates but no high-risk feature updates. This makes Microsoft's job a lot easier. But it also helps the device manufacturers. The hardware business is somewhat commoditized and the margins are razor-thin. This allows vendors to differentiate and make a few more points of margin by supporting the hardware for longer. That should be easier if the hardware is of higher quality so it also prevents a race to the bottom. Sure there are a few people out there who want to try to run Windows/10 creator on their 386/33. And those people will figure out how to obtain and install the latest version of Windows whether Microsoft provides it via the update mechanism or not. Some people will complain about everything Microsoft. But it's really hard to find valid complaints about Windows as a consumer OS. Mac OS and Linux are out there but it's not a case of them being better and people not knowing. They are probably about equal to Windows but not enough of an improvement to compel a switch. Obviously in the data center, Linux is eating Windows' lunch but that's a different situation. Nobody runs unsupported hardware there. Well, at least they shouldn't.
So we could call this a battery of batteries! :)
I have no idea why you responded to this ridiculous AC. Glad it got modded down quickly. How would a sales guy for Tesla know about the cost/benefit of other solutions anyway? Maybe there's a better solution out there for the Australian government and maybe not. It would be silly for a sales guy from one vendor to talk about the cost/benefit of another vendor's solution since (s)he won't be nearly as familiar with it as their own. Plus there is a conflict of interest. In a government procurement situation, each vendor presents their solution in the best light, the customer takes a critical eye, and then decides what solution is best. This probably should happen in commercial situations as well. Sometimes in non-government business, there is a bit more room for personal preferences, but even then the general process is the same. If Tesla had been hired to do the independent comparison, I'd expect a large glass wall to avoid conflict of interest, but that's not what's happening here.
Yes but then there is also the kernel base address randomization mentioned in the summary. Put the two together and you get a number that is larger than the total address space of the machine. So essentially all you know is that the problem space is 2^64 for each function whose address you'd like to determine.
Their gender *does* matter when it comes to tourist visas. In many countries, the treatment of women is so poor that they can make a prima facia case for asylum once they get here. Which unfortunately means that the consulates are then put in a very difficult situation of not wanting to discriminate against women but they only way they can avoid doing so is to treat men equally as poorly. It's really hard to grant tourist visas from certain regions of the world as pretty much everybody who lives there has a valid asylum claim.
I'm sure that there is quite a bit of truth to this, but I don't think that you paint a complete picture. Those who receive heroin-like drugs in the hospital do have a much lower addiction rate but part of this may be due to the drugs binding with inflamed tissue rather than the brain. If we were to start giving the drugs to hospital patients without injuries that warranted it, we would likely see physical addiction in that group. And withdraw from heroin is quite brutal physically including leaking fluids from all orifices. Your point stands that these drugs can be used safely and I agree that addiction has a huge social component. But you are underestimating the physical effects of drugs like heroin.
The financial performance of Uber is abysmal. Despite the fact that drivers subsidize the rides pretty heavily, they still lose money!
If the situation in a country is so bad that we have to bomb them, seems that we have a moral obligation to accept refugees. In fact that would be the ideal way to reduce our military operations if we had to commit to taking a certain number of refugees per dropped bomb.
Having a clear statue does not mean we have a constitutional situation. If the statue said "The President may violate the establishment clause," it wouldn't last despite being very clear. Here, Congress has vested power in the president. But Congress can't vest in the president powers that Congress itself doesn't have. That would be trying to bring through the back door what is not allowed through the front. The ruling will be much more nuanced that you are predicting. IANAL
"Rock" is the slang word I usually use for my penis!
Whether statins and anti-depressants are beneficial to a particular patient is a bit more complex than you make it out to be. The fact is that both of those have established mechanisms by which the affect the function of the body in a way that is intended to be positive. i.e. they do something and that something is in many cases good. That's still significantly different than an expensive placebo.
And also prosecute them if they pay the ransom!
Thank you. Sorry I can't mod up.
I'm not questioning your statement but I'm struggling with this a bit. If I have a runway long enough for a 747 to take off on, for a regional jet, it's essentially infinite. I think part of the issue here is that the planes are not certified to fly at these temperatures regardless of runway length.