Most of this seems to be anecdotal. The reality is, if more women were trying to get in the field, more women would be hired in the field. I see gender gaps in all sorts of environments. I work as an IT consultant for a plethora of companies, and the reality is this: There are offices/professions that are mostly if not entirely female, and there are offices that are mostly male. This has nothing to do with 'bringing up' this is simply because when a resume comes in for a job, there is a pool that's either slanted male or slanted female. Because the people applying have a specific desire/qualifications as to what they want to do.
In the military, all veterans are on the Domestic Terrorist watchlist. I do not know about the FBI or CIA and how they categorize domestic terrorism though.
I know, I know, I'm going to get downvoted tremendously, but this ludicrous.
People on here and apparently in Alabama are under the impression that Evolution is 'science', that it's true, and anyone who believes otherwise are idiotic peasants.
The reality: Evolution is about as much 'science' as every other theory, that is to say it's not science at all. It may be a scientific theory, but that doesn't make it synonymous with science in the least bit. Science is a TOOL. It assists in evaluating the validity of a hypothesis. It can even be described as a body of knowledge.
All of this to say that if you really believe the theory is above reproach, I wonder if you really understand scientific method.
First off I'd like to thank the other countries that sell hazardous materials. They've made it necessary for the United States Government to create stringent regulations on exports and imports included but not limited to printer cartridges.
Next I'd like to thank OSHA for their stringent regulations on HAZMAT imports. Because that Cyan ink might kill me one day. https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaw...
Third on the list, but certainly not last, I'd like to thank HP for being the segue corporation for implementing lockout/tagout functions on printing devices should implementation of cartridges from dissimilar regions ever occur.
And lastly, Thank you Xerox and various other copier/printer vendors for following suit. Especially Xerox for stamping such a quaint price of slightly more than $500 for each resolution to the problem.
Yeah I agree, they should have responded better, but I'd be pissed at someone publicly posting a zero day exploit for the world to see. That's infinitely worse than what Microsoft did.
You don't need to be rich in order to implement solar panels. Implement it in stages or save up. The only reason he can't afford it is simply because he isn't SAVING, he's spending.
In order to foster a more uniform environment for the group known formally as 'The Party', we would do well to adopt the Newspeak Dictionary as well as the Newspeak Medical Dictionary.
With Samsung recording data on the Smart TV's, it's not too far-fetched that the IoT will in large part be a system of tracking end users to inundate them with more targeted Ads.
Ummm wait, what? So you use an asymmetric key system as a pseudo-symetric-key-not-really-a-key password....
I don't mean to be negative.... But the only benefit you're gaining is grabbing a long password. You could do that with any other password generator.
Come on guys, seriously? Everyone already knows that Oscorp is already using genetically modified spider silk for technological advancements. Their venom also has amazing attributes for those with the right DNA.
Having had two Associates Degrees, 5 years of experience in the field, and returning to college exclusively online, I would agree with this assessment. College wasn't necessarily the "cure all" learning experience, but instead it taught me diligence, study skills, and most importantly WHAT to learn. When I was a kid, I knew nothing about computing. But the years in college pointed me in the direction I needed.
I'm sorry..... but Just because I disagree with him, you assume I'm jealous? I believe that's called Ad Hominem.......
You've taken my entire argument and exaggerated it way out of porportions in attempt to undermine my point. I believe you are the only one who assumed I wanted to find someone I agree with 100%. So let me try to explain one more time...
The communistic phrase was an hyperbole. In essence, he believes that the software community is entitled to contribute to the community. Which is all well and good, in fact... it's immensely beneficial. But he takes it a step further and boycotts ANY hardware or software technology that doesn't follow the GPL license. Which is still Ok, if that's what he wants to do. But he takes it yet even FURTHER and criticizes other business and licensing models, including the BSD license. THAT is what bewilders me. I see the benefit in both. But he acts like Steve Jobs or Bill Gates committed a capital sin by being closed source.
Your bout about Stallman being threatening and whatnot is pointless. That was never implied, or indicated by me. And to write me off and accuse me of Jealousy.... ROFL... Ok
You completely missed my point.... I have nothing wrong with the GPL or BSD licenses. I love them. But Stallman has a communistic extreme mindset. I thank him for his extremism, because without it, the GPL wouldn't have gotten the motivation and the drive forward that it needed. Linus's kernel wouldn't have had the success it had without the building blocks that the GPL community brought to it.
My point is Stallman's extremism. He criticizes and belittles everyone that disagrees with his GPL mindset. I know that the vast majority of/. is part of the open sourced community and that Microsoft and Apple are targeted. For good reasons. But the reality is, BOTH corporations bring a lot to the IT industry. And Stallman throws the baby out with the bathwater and wants nothing to do with anything closed source. I for one, can't find an adequate replacement technology for Active Directory in the open sourced community. Now I know that at its root, it uses the LDAP framework. But it does it well. The *nix community lacks a satisfactory replacement.
The nuts and bolts of what I'm saying is that Stallman disregards anything that's not GPL.
Your point about a Hammer... completely erroneous.
Stallman is a joke! He's super brilliant, but his stupid "Software should always be free, so I'm going to travel the world and make a religion out of this" idea is ludicrous. I mean... If I build something, I should get to decide what to do with it. If I want it free, then I'll make it free. If I want to make it closed, then I'll make it closed. That simple. And Facebook..... DUH!
Facebook makes a killing off of data mining. Everyone knows that. Same with Google. If you don't want companies to know what your buying habits are, go to a brick and mortar shop and use cash. I personally prefer seeing ads that are geared towards me. I don't want to see Women's magazine ads popping up. But... tech stuff, linux stuff... awesome.
Most of this seems to be anecdotal. The reality is, if more women were trying to get in the field, more women would be hired in the field. I see gender gaps in all sorts of environments. I work as an IT consultant for a plethora of companies, and the reality is this: There are offices/professions that are mostly if not entirely female, and there are offices that are mostly male. This has nothing to do with 'bringing up' this is simply because when a resume comes in for a job, there is a pool that's either slanted male or slanted female. Because the people applying have a specific desire/qualifications as to what they want to do.
In the military, all veterans are on the Domestic Terrorist watchlist. I do not know about the FBI or CIA and how they categorize domestic terrorism though.
Give this guy a beer
I know, I know, I'm going to get downvoted tremendously, but this ludicrous. People on here and apparently in Alabama are under the impression that Evolution is 'science', that it's true, and anyone who believes otherwise are idiotic peasants. The reality: Evolution is about as much 'science' as every other theory, that is to say it's not science at all. It may be a scientific theory, but that doesn't make it synonymous with science in the least bit. Science is a TOOL. It assists in evaluating the validity of a hypothesis. It can even be described as a body of knowledge. All of this to say that if you really believe the theory is above reproach, I wonder if you really understand scientific method.
First off I'd like to thank the other countries that sell hazardous materials. They've made it necessary for the United States Government to create stringent regulations on exports and imports included but not limited to printer cartridges. Next I'd like to thank OSHA for their stringent regulations on HAZMAT imports. Because that Cyan ink might kill me one day. https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaw... Third on the list, but certainly not last, I'd like to thank HP for being the segue corporation for implementing lockout/tagout functions on printing devices should implementation of cartridges from dissimilar regions ever occur. And lastly, Thank you Xerox and various other copier/printer vendors for following suit. Especially Xerox for stamping such a quaint price of slightly more than $500 for each resolution to the problem.
Sohojet has been doing this for years.
Yeah I agree, they should have responded better, but I'd be pissed at someone publicly posting a zero day exploit for the world to see. That's infinitely worse than what Microsoft did.
I can see the reason for them doing this. If you found a vulnerability and posted it on a public forum, that's a major security risk.
You don't need to be rich in order to implement solar panels. Implement it in stages or save up. The only reason he can't afford it is simply because he isn't SAVING, he's spending.
LOL, yup!
I wouldn't say it has no benefit. Remember when phones first had internet. It had no real benefit then, but now.... yeah, it's extremely helpful.
This is a possibility. This is why Baby Monitors were such a scare. But I didn't misunderstand the problem.
In order to foster a more uniform environment for the group known formally as 'The Party', we would do well to adopt the Newspeak Dictionary as well as the Newspeak Medical Dictionary.
With Samsung recording data on the Smart TV's, it's not too far-fetched that the IoT will in large part be a system of tracking end users to inundate them with more targeted Ads.
Ummm wait, what? So you use an asymmetric key system as a pseudo-symetric-key-not-really-a-key password.... I don't mean to be negative.... But the only benefit you're gaining is grabbing a long password. You could do that with any other password generator.
Come on guys, seriously? Everyone already knows that Oscorp is already using genetically modified spider silk for technological advancements. Their venom also has amazing attributes for those with the right DNA.
Having had two Associates Degrees, 5 years of experience in the field, and returning to college exclusively online, I would agree with this assessment. College wasn't necessarily the "cure all" learning experience, but instead it taught me diligence, study skills, and most importantly WHAT to learn. When I was a kid, I knew nothing about computing. But the years in college pointed me in the direction I needed.
I'm sorry..... but Just because I disagree with him, you assume I'm jealous? I believe that's called Ad Hominem....... You've taken my entire argument and exaggerated it way out of porportions in attempt to undermine my point. I believe you are the only one who assumed I wanted to find someone I agree with 100%. So let me try to explain one more time... The communistic phrase was an hyperbole. In essence, he believes that the software community is entitled to contribute to the community. Which is all well and good, in fact... it's immensely beneficial. But he takes it a step further and boycotts ANY hardware or software technology that doesn't follow the GPL license. Which is still Ok, if that's what he wants to do. But he takes it yet even FURTHER and criticizes other business and licensing models, including the BSD license. THAT is what bewilders me. I see the benefit in both. But he acts like Steve Jobs or Bill Gates committed a capital sin by being closed source. Your bout about Stallman being threatening and whatnot is pointless. That was never implied, or indicated by me. And to write me off and accuse me of Jealousy.... ROFL... Ok
Metaphor....
You completely missed my point.... I have nothing wrong with the GPL or BSD licenses. I love them. But Stallman has a communistic extreme mindset. I thank him for his extremism, because without it, the GPL wouldn't have gotten the motivation and the drive forward that it needed. Linus's kernel wouldn't have had the success it had without the building blocks that the GPL community brought to it. My point is Stallman's extremism. He criticizes and belittles everyone that disagrees with his GPL mindset. I know that the vast majority of /. is part of the open sourced community and that Microsoft and Apple are targeted. For good reasons. But the reality is, BOTH corporations bring a lot to the IT industry. And Stallman throws the baby out with the bathwater and wants nothing to do with anything closed source. I for one, can't find an adequate replacement technology for Active Directory in the open sourced community. Now I know that at its root, it uses the LDAP framework. But it does it well. The *nix community lacks a satisfactory replacement.
The nuts and bolts of what I'm saying is that Stallman disregards anything that's not GPL.
Your point about a Hammer... completely erroneous.
Stallman is a joke! He's super brilliant, but his stupid "Software should always be free, so I'm going to travel the world and make a religion out of this" idea is ludicrous. I mean... If I build something, I should get to decide what to do with it. If I want it free, then I'll make it free. If I want to make it closed, then I'll make it closed. That simple. And Facebook..... DUH! Facebook makes a killing off of data mining. Everyone knows that. Same with Google. If you don't want companies to know what your buying habits are, go to a brick and mortar shop and use cash. I personally prefer seeing ads that are geared towards me. I don't want to see Women's magazine ads popping up. But... tech stuff, linux stuff... awesome.