I already set my DNS servers to cloudflare (1.1.1.1) when they launched their service. Now I can use it over https so no one along the network path can snoop my dns queries. If there is a faster or more private dns service, I'd like to know about it so I can switch to it.
It's a shift that diminishes their reach on the platform -- and it's the same one being deployed against prominent racists to limit their visibility
Considering the leader of the party (the president) is a prominent racist, and racism is a problem endemic almost exclusively to the party and its followers, I expect it's working as designed.
People with ADD do have atypical reactions to stimulants... it calms them down.
I had serious ADHD as a kid, and taking amphetamine (dexedrine) controlled it. I mostly outgrew it, but as an adult decades later, I can drink a bunch of caffeine at night and have no trouble sleeping.
There is, however, one thing about this that's surprising--and that's that you get the same kind of effects in normal people. One of the old methods for confirming an ADD diagnosis is that you had an atypical reaction to stimulants...which Adderall and Ritalin are. To be specific, they're amphetamines...
Secondly, California laws says it's not protected when the parties "may reasonably expect that the communication may be overheard or recorded". (Note the word "may", may be overheard, not "will be overheard".
I can reasonably expect that the NSA or another agency may be listening. So I'm free to record any call then?
I RTFA and it does say it wasn't carpool lanes that were removed... 3 passengers were required to use the road at all.
So if you remove the 3-passenger requirement, capacity will not change but usage will increase, so of course it will slow down.
If you change a carpool lane into a regular lane, capacity will increase, and depending on how much usage increases traffic can speed up or slow down.
Read the summary again, it's not a carpool lane, it's ALL traffic.
Whoever wrote the article needs a kick in the crotch.
No they wouldn't. Because even though there are plenty of gun toting crazies in the US you do not fire ICBMs anywhere near a nuclear power. NK shares a border with China. China would not sit still with missiles coming in or stand off bombers in bound.
So NK is free to nuke anyone because they share a border with a nuclear power? No. Nuking the US would get an automatic response of getting nuked back, that's not a gun-toting crazy response. That's the response if they don't want others thinking they could get away with nuking them too. And it wouldn't be an ICBM, it would be SLBMs from a nearby submarine.
China would stay out of it and watch the firework show, they're not stupid
Realistically even if NK nuked an American city America would not nuke back. Conventional forces would be shredding NK in a matter of hours. More likely nukes would be detonated in NK by NK during that time.
The US would nuke back, without hesitation. If they didn't, they would be inviting others to try it too. That's MAD.
Um. If there is a tie, then they will work it out. The superdelegates are the way it's worked out. Frankly, in a tie, I would think it would be appropriate for the party to have a say in picking Clinton. I like Sanders, but he's really not a Democat anyway.
So I repeat, the first article YOU linked says "California in 2013 received less rain than in any year since it became a state in 1850." Like I said, you're contradicting yourself. I think I found what you missed though, the 1924 stat was for "water year", which is different from a calendar year.
That was a strawman against the 3-year period stat in my original post anyway. You can't even get your strawman attack right.
Not wrong. Nice straw man argument by you though. The article specifically said "there is no three-year period when California's rainfall has been as low and its temperatures as hot as they have been from 2012 to 2014, the researchers found".
Three year period, not one.
But even in the article you posted it says "California in 2013 received less rain than in any year since it became a state in 1850." So now you're being contradicted by your own post.
From the Intel data sheet on their series 530 SSD: "Uncorrectable Bit Error Rate (UBER): 1 sector per 10^16 bits read". So it's extremely unlikely a rotted bit will go unnoticed.
This is even better than most HDDs, which are 1 per 10^15 on enterprise drives and 10^14 on consumer drives
The shitty test you're talking about didn't even *test* aspartame, it tested saccharine, which hasn't been in a diet drink for several decades. More shitty "science" that shitty newspapers can't bother to actually do 2.5 seconds of research on.
It tested aspartame, saccharin, and sucralose. And it was well done and published in Nature, not somewhere you often find "shitty tests". Both these facts are in the linked article.
Slashdot Mirror
Why is Pence so hot to get to the moon asap? What could possibly be scheduled for 2024 that the vice president would want some great publicity for?
zero visibility to internal DNS resolution for corporate networks
Ham handed is the kindest thing I can say about this.
If this actually causes a problem, your corporate IT department just plain sucks.
I already set my DNS servers to cloudflare (1.1.1.1) when they launched their service. Now I can use it over https so no one along the network path can snoop my dns queries. If there is a faster or more private dns service, I'd like to know about it so I can switch to it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
It's a shift that diminishes their reach on the platform -- and it's the same one being deployed against prominent racists to limit their visibility
Considering the leader of the party (the president) is a prominent racist, and racism is a problem endemic almost exclusively to the party and its followers, I expect it's working as designed.
There is, however, one thing about this that's surprising--and that's that you get the same kind of effects in normal people. One of the old methods for confirming an ADD diagnosis is that you had an atypical reaction to stimulants...which Adderall and Ritalin are. To be specific, they're amphetamines...
(Make Exclamation points Great Again)
Secondly, California laws says it's not protected when the parties "may reasonably expect that the communication may be overheard or recorded". (Note the word "may", may be overheard, not "will be overheard".
I can reasonably expect that the NSA or another agency may be listening. So I'm free to record any call then?
Or maybe not... Tribune Media spun off the newspapers into a seperate company 3 years ago, Tribune Publishing.
Among the newspapers it is about to buy are the Chicago Tribune and the Los Angeles Times
So if you remove the 3-passenger requirement, capacity will not change but usage will increase, so of course it will slow down. If you change a carpool lane into a regular lane, capacity will increase, and depending on how much usage increases traffic can speed up or slow down.
Read the summary again, it's not a carpool lane, it's ALL traffic.
Whoever wrote the article needs a kick in the crotch.
People are starting to realize they are just a simulation and nothing really matters
No they wouldn't. Because even though there are plenty of gun toting crazies in the US you do not fire ICBMs anywhere near a nuclear power. NK shares a border with China. China would not sit still with missiles coming in or stand off bombers in bound.
So NK is free to nuke anyone because they share a border with a nuclear power? No. Nuking the US would get an automatic response of getting nuked back, that's not a gun-toting crazy response. That's the response if they don't want others thinking they could get away with nuking them too. And it wouldn't be an ICBM, it would be SLBMs from a nearby submarine. China would stay out of it and watch the firework show, they're not stupid
Realistically even if NK nuked an American city America would not nuke back. Conventional forces would be shredding NK in a matter of hours. More likely nukes would be detonated in NK by NK during that time.
The US would nuke back, without hesitation. If they didn't, they would be inviting others to try it too. That's MAD.
Um. If there is a tie, then they will work it out. The superdelegates are the way it's worked out. Frankly, in a tie, I would think it would be appropriate for the party to have a say in picking Clinton. I like Sanders, but he's really not a Democat anyway.
He's really more of a Democrat than Hillary is.
I just used Help/About to update Firefox on this 64-bit Windows 10 machine, and can verify it works.
If you updated from the 32-bit version, you are still running the 32-bit version
To switch to 64-bit, you need to uninstall 32-bit then install 64-bit. get it here:
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/fi...
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/fi...
http://www.nature.com/news/sug...
I read it, you're the illiterate one.
So I repeat, the first article YOU linked says "California in 2013 received less rain than in any year since it became a state in 1850." Like I said, you're contradicting yourself. I think I found what you missed though, the 1924 stat was for "water year", which is different from a calendar year.
That was a strawman against the 3-year period stat in my original post anyway. You can't even get your strawman attack right.
Wrong
Not even the driest year in the last 120 http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/
1924 for the win
Not wrong. Nice straw man argument by you though. The article specifically said "there is no three-year period when California's rainfall has been as low and its temperatures as hot as they have been from 2012 to 2014, the researchers found". Three year period, not one.
But even in the article you posted it says "California in 2013 received less rain than in any year since it became a state in 1850." So now you're being contradicted by your own post.
And a much newer article from the same site with data that this is the worst drought in at least 1200 years:
http://www.mercurynews.com/dro...
From the Intel data sheet on their series 530 SSD: "Uncorrectable Bit Error Rate (UBER): 1 sector per 10^16 bits read". So it's extremely unlikely a rotted bit will go unnoticed. This is even better than most HDDs, which are 1 per 10^15 on enterprise drives and 10^14 on consumer drives
The SSD will detect bit rot the same way a HDD does, they use ECC
A microwave oven for just a few seconds will do it
The shitty test you're talking about didn't even *test* aspartame, it tested saccharine, which hasn't been in a diet drink for several decades. More shitty "science" that shitty newspapers can't bother to actually do 2.5 seconds of research on.
It tested aspartame, saccharin, and sucralose. And it was well done and published in Nature, not somewhere you often find "shitty tests". Both these facts are in the linked article.