Then why don't you read the whole chapter ? Or the whole book ? You will find it full of cruel ruthless commands to kill.
Then "you need to interpret this". Great. There are lots of books published about this interpretation stuff. Trust me you do not want to turn to them either. They directly state that muslims should massacre jews, beat their women and children, etc. That muslims should conquer by force any non-muslim government and make non-muslims pay a 50% income tax, and refuse their entry into police or military forces.
Sharia is the interpretation of the quran, you know. It does not exactly have this peaceful reputation you speek off. But don't worry. Just look up "Barbary wars", to see how muslim states used to respond to america.
Note also, that slavery still exists today in Saudi arabia, the only sharia country in the world. (no Iran does not enforce sharia, for example for most Iranian loans intrest IS due...) (and yes, it's not called slavery, just "servants" that can be raped without punishment and cannot leave the house without written permission from their "employer").
The Muslim version of Jehovah specifically states (like the Christian version) that vengeance is his and that the unbelievers shall suffer, not that you should MAKE them suffer.
Oh, if you say so. Personally I would interpret the "literal words" of the muslim god a bit differently :
Quran 8:12 "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them."
Personally, I wouldn't go with your interpretation. The muslim god specifically calls for muslim mass murder
And in this country we have a higher conviction rate against minorities than whites. So instead of being punished for being a woman, you're punished for being a minority.
Please substantiate this claim. Please give me a link that says the US executed hundreds of women, in front of their children, without conviction. Oh and that would have to be minority members. Do you seriously claim the US does this ?
I didn't say the US took away freedom. I am saying they prevent it. They're not allowed to assemble in many cases there, either. And in THIS country, we don't permit people to assemble in many public locations. Three people on a street corner can legitimately be investigated by the police for being a gang.
Quite right. The US takes away the muslims' "right" to publicly behead women. What scandalous behavior ! What monsters ! *cough*
Congratulations! You just proved beyond the shadow of a doubt that you are a racist. Welcome to my foes list.
Glad to be there. Tell me, is it my fault that the muslim god demands mass murder ? Would you prefer everybody shuts up about it and just gets on with business without telling you ?
Notice that racist obviously implies race being involved. Which is not the case here. Following the mass-murdering muslim god is a choice, just like becoming a murderer is a choice. Tell me, why are you racist against murderers ? In fact, becoming a racist is also a choice. Why are you being racist against my choices ? Do tell.
You may also notice that you did not make my foes list.
"The report spoke of public beheadings of women who were accused of being prostitutes, which took place in front of family members, including children."
This sentence uses the word ACCUSED, in case you can't read, not convicted.
"The report also describes human rights violations directed against children. The report states that children, as young as 5 years old, are recruited into the Ashbal Saddam, or "Saddam's Cubs," and indoctrinated to adulate Saddam Hussein and denounce their own family members. The children are also subjected to military training, which includes cruelty to animals. The report also describes how parents of children are executed if they object to this treatment, and in some cases, the children themselves are imprisoned."
"Iraqi citizens were not allowed to assemble legally unless it was to express support for the government."
Is this the freedom that the US has taken away that you are talking about ? Because I'm mighty confused.
The US is a LOT better than any muslim. And it's a LONG way down before the US arrives at the average islamic level of "freedom". Saddam killed nearly 5% of his population. That is, the killings we know of.
The translation of the arabic word "islam" is "oppression" or "submission" depending on intonation. That's not a coincidence.
Just look at Bush. Whatever else the war on Iraq did, it created freedom for the Iraqi people. As much freedom as there is to be had in the islamic middle east, at least.
And yet he is constantly blasted for it. So is Blair, and to a lesser degree Australian politicians. Yet political and religious mass-muderers like khatami of Iran, are constantly glorified as the voice of reason.
I am amazed at how people here who never fail to blast any attempt at safeguarding freedom, can complain about this. You never fail to point out the least violation of freedom that a muslim suicide terrorist CLAIMS to have experienced (and as we all know they're very reliable people, *cough*) and you act surprised when people don't stand up for freedom ?
If you glorify people who fight and murder innocent people, just to take away freedom, like all the people in guantanamo do, this is what you'll get : censorship, and worse. Like it exists in their countries. Anyone who even talks about a woman gets beheaded in public. That's what these muslims are fighting for. That's what they're murdering innocent people for.
Because obviously the hacker is guilty of more crimes than that judge
-> clear violation of privacy of thousands of people -> use of that information for private gain -> passing off vigilante-collected information to the police -> (plus or minus) collecting that same porn
All this obviously without a court order, or even being in the police force.
This is also seriously worse than the riaa has ever done. So what should the punishment for the hacker be ? Clearly he cannot go free, despite having caught this criminal.
It has indeed been over 2 years since this was announced. I wonder what is going wrong ? Are these displays too expensive ? Too many patents ? Difficulty in designing ? What is going wrong here ?
Everybody keeps talking about reliable sources
on
Is Wikipedia Failing?
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
But is there anyone here who can name one source where we would not be able to find a glaring error or even something that would be considered a flat out lie by a lot of people ?
I mean even stuff like the BBC, that used to be the definition of reliable has been shown to flat-out lie about some topics. So maybe the problem is not with wikipedia, but with people demanding reliable sources.
There aren't any reliable sources. Wikipedia, like the Britannica, like the Bible, like Muhammad's sayings like Shinto's roll's and like anything else is just a human's opinion. It is fallible, corruptible, incomplete, and potentially for sale.
They did not just invade "the holy land" (which is not Israel btw, but Israel + Lebanon + most of Syria + South Turkey + all of Jordan + parts of Egypt + large part of Saudi Arabia). They had a 200.000 man strong army (with a reputation for extreme ruthlessness) standing outside prague.
THAT set off the crusades.
Just as the "Spanish inquisition" overlaps with the "Reconquista", which sheds an entirely different light on these events.
You can give constant examples of islamic terrorism against "the west" going back a thousand years, and more. There has not been a single period of 20 years in history (except pre-islamic history) that has not known moslem terrorism.
Did you know that moslems killed a kennedy in 1968 ? How could decades of american presence cause that ?
Did you know that the founding fathers themselves lost several ships to moslem terror ? Decades of of U.S. presence in the gulf... riiiight.
And I still think this principle outlaws both loans and insurance. It's a great attempt to use details, and corner cases that are allowed, but it's not accurate. These rules clearly outlaw avoiding risk, thereby taking away the incentive to participate in the economy.
Besides, the simple fact that the nobel peace prize winner of last year was attacked by muslim clerics is telling.
This clearly does not allow for loans to a private person in any reasonable economy. So what is your point ?
Even most of the stuff this article permits is hotly debated in these countries, and most scholars agree that it is haram anyway.
The fact that you immediately attack me, unfortunately, is very stereotypical (and obviously intolerant). I do not know everything. If this disturbs you, go fuck yourself. If you wish to help me understand, then sure, I'd love to hear more.
And then you do... what. As practice proves putting people who used to be so far from eachother that they couldn't possibly reach one another in a city, so close that they can no longer deny their differences... people start killing eachother.
Education is nice, but takes 10 years at least and parents WANT their children to kill "the other bastards" (for various definitions of "the other bastards"). E.g. terrorism in the west.
We need to deal with the ideology that makes them set those bombs on innocent people. With a bottle and some heavy booze you can make a most effective bomb, so you can't effectively disarm people.
You have to go with the "Bombs don't kill people, people kill people" here. What makes Iraqi's set these bombs on innocents ?
That the patent department is stupid and cannot judge wether a patent is "a substantial technical improvement" as required by law. Not a problem with the patent system itself.
Perhaps peer review would prevent these issues. Give everybody who requested a patent last year the chance to review current patents and accept them or not. If not, they need to explain why and an agreement needs to be found by e.g. removing some claims. Something like this might just work.
Slashdot Mirror
Then why don't you read the whole chapter ? Or the whole book ? You will find it full of cruel ruthless commands to kill.
...) (and yes, it's not called slavery, just "servants" that can be raped without punishment and cannot leave the house without written permission from their "employer").
Then "you need to interpret this". Great. There are lots of books published about this interpretation stuff. Trust me you do not want to turn to them either. They directly state that muslims should massacre jews, beat their women and children, etc. That muslims should conquer by force any non-muslim government and make non-muslims pay a 50% income tax, and refuse their entry into police or military forces.
Sharia is the interpretation of the quran, you know. It does not exactly have this peaceful reputation you speek off. But don't worry. Just look up "Barbary wars", to see how muslim states used to respond to america.
Note also, that slavery still exists today in Saudi arabia, the only sharia country in the world. (no Iran does not enforce sharia, for example for most Iranian loans intrest IS due
Oh, if you say so. Personally I would interpret the "literal words" of the muslim god a bit differently :
Quran 8:12 "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them."
Personally, I wouldn't go with your interpretation. The muslim god specifically calls for muslim mass murder
Please substantiate this claim. Please give me a link that says the US executed hundreds of women, in front of their children, without conviction. Oh and that would have to be minority members. Do you seriously claim the US does this ?
Quite right. The US takes away the muslims' "right" to publicly behead women. What scandalous behavior ! What monsters ! *cough*
Glad to be there. Tell me, is it my fault that the muslim god demands mass murder ? Would you prefer everybody shuts up about it and just gets on with business without telling you ?
Notice that racist obviously implies race being involved. Which is not the case here. Following the mass-murdering muslim god is a choice, just like becoming a murderer is a choice. Tell me, why are you racist against murderers ? In fact, becoming a racist is also a choice. Why are you being racist against my choices ? Do tell.
You may also notice that you did not make my foes list.
Let's contrast your "full deck" with mine, shall we ?
a m_Hussein's_Iraq
This is what the muslim god demands :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_Sadd
Let's quote some highlights, shall we ?
"The report spoke of public beheadings of women who were accused of being prostitutes, which took place in front of family members, including children."
This sentence uses the word ACCUSED, in case you can't read, not convicted.
"The report also describes human rights violations directed against children. The report states that children, as young as 5 years old, are recruited into the Ashbal Saddam, or "Saddam's Cubs," and indoctrinated to adulate Saddam Hussein and denounce their own family members. The children are also subjected to military training, which includes cruelty to animals. The report also describes how parents of children are executed if they object to this treatment, and in some cases, the children themselves are imprisoned."
"Iraqi citizens were not allowed to assemble legally unless it was to express support for the government."
Is this the freedom that the US has taken away that you are talking about ? Because I'm mighty confused.
The US is a LOT better than any muslim. And it's a LONG way down before the US arrives at the average islamic level of "freedom". Saddam killed nearly 5% of his population. That is, the killings we know of.
The translation of the arabic word "islam" is "oppression" or "submission" depending on intonation. That's not a coincidence.
Because this is what the other guy is fighting for :
m
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2966790.st
Killing people because that is "God's will".
Just look at Bush. Whatever else the war on Iraq did, it created freedom for the Iraqi people. As much freedom as there is to be had in the islamic middle east, at least.
And yet he is constantly blasted for it. So is Blair, and to a lesser degree Australian politicians. Yet political and religious mass-muderers like khatami of Iran, are constantly glorified as the voice of reason.
I am amazed at how people here who never fail to blast any attempt at safeguarding freedom, can complain about this. You never fail to point out the least violation of freedom that a muslim suicide terrorist CLAIMS to have experienced (and as we all know they're very reliable people, *cough*) and you act surprised when people don't stand up for freedom ?
If you glorify people who fight and murder innocent people, just to take away freedom, like all the people in guantanamo do, this is what you'll get : censorship, and worse. Like it exists in their countries. Anyone who even talks about a woman gets beheaded in public. That's what these muslims are fighting for. That's what they're murdering innocent people for.
Because obviously the hacker is guilty of more crimes than that judge
-> clear violation of privacy of thousands of people
-> use of that information for private gain
-> passing off vigilante-collected information to the police
-> (plus or minus) collecting that same porn
All this obviously without a court order, or even being in the police force.
This is also seriously worse than the riaa has ever done. So what should the punishment for the hacker be ? Clearly he cannot go free, despite having caught this criminal.
Because this device isn't there yet.
It has indeed been over 2 years since this was announced. I wonder what is going wrong ? Are these displays too expensive ? Too many patents ? Difficulty in designing ? What is going wrong here ?
But is there anyone here who can name one source where we would not be able to find a glaring error or even something that would be considered a flat out lie by a lot of people ?
I mean even stuff like the BBC, that used to be the definition of reliable has been shown to flat-out lie about some topics. So maybe the problem is not with wikipedia, but with people demanding reliable sources.
There aren't any reliable sources. Wikipedia, like the Britannica, like the Bible, like Muhammad's sayings like Shinto's roll's and like anything else is just a human's opinion. It is fallible, corruptible, incomplete, and potentially for sale.
So shouldn't gaia or other "environmentalists" be protecting the viruses ? That 50% or so of humans die every 10 years is "natural" for humans.
Besides, sooner or later it's going to happen anyway. (oh and btw people would work from home to avoid getting infected)
They did not just invade "the holy land" (which is not Israel btw, but Israel + Lebanon + most of Syria + South Turkey + all of Jordan + parts of Egypt + large part of Saudi Arabia). They had a 200.000 man strong army (with a reputation for extreme ruthlessness) standing outside prague.
THAT set off the crusades.
Just as the "Spanish inquisition" overlaps with the "Reconquista", which sheds an entirely different light on these events.
How is the "fairness doctrine" different from Chavez putting all media under his direct command ?
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20030303/klein
Decades ? Cool, you just proved my point.
... riiiight.
You can give constant examples of islamic terrorism against "the west" going back a thousand years, and more. There has not been a single period of 20 years in history (except pre-islamic history) that has not known moslem terrorism.
Did you know that moslems killed a kennedy in 1968 ? How could decades of american presence cause that ?
Did you know that the founding fathers themselves lost several ships to moslem terror ? Decades of of U.S. presence in the gulf
I think any reasonable spectator will immediately come to the conclusion that it is islam that has a problem with the west, not the other way around.
- And obviously ... like all banks ... use the result to their advantage. Nice way to screw people out of owning property. Courtesy of allah.
And I still think this principle outlaws both loans and insurance. It's a great attempt to use details, and corner cases that are allowed, but it's not accurate. These rules clearly outlaw avoiding risk, thereby taking away the incentive to participate in the economy.
Besides, the simple fact that the nobel peace prize winner of last year was attacked by muslim clerics is telling.
This clearly does not allow for loans to a private person in any reasonable economy. So what is your point ?
Even most of the stuff this article permits is hotly debated in these countries, and most scholars agree that it is haram anyway.
The fact that you immediately attack me, unfortunately, is very stereotypical (and obviously intolerant). I do not know everything. If this disturbs you, go fuck yourself. If you wish to help me understand, then sure, I'd love to hear more.
Too bad that loans are forbidden in Islam ... so 1/5th of the world's population cannot do this.
7 .htm
PC police would call what you are saying a "racist comment". Like distributing pork soup to the homeless :
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/brussels01040
And then you do ... what. As practice proves putting people who used to be so far from eachother that they couldn't possibly reach one another in a city, so close that they can no longer deny their differences ... people start killing eachother.
... nobody knows what will happen.
Education is nice, but takes 10 years at least and parents WANT their children to kill "the other bastards" (for various definitions of "the other bastards"). E.g. terrorism in the west.
Then again
http://www.isi.edu/CRAFT/
Much more details.
There will always be "guys with bombs".
We need to deal with the ideology that makes them set those bombs on innocent people. With a bottle and some heavy booze you can make a most effective bomb, so you can't effectively disarm people.
You have to go with the "Bombs don't kill people, people kill people" here. What makes Iraqi's set these bombs on innocents ?
Even in a thunderstorm in Belgium a solar panel will still produce 5 watts without problems.
That can duplicate itself, given a block of metal and, say some silicone ?
Check this out : http://tvision.sourceforge.net/
Yep, the old turbo vision. Very useful, object oriented, shortcut keys built-in. Mouse handling, very fast, very well debugged. Great stuff
That the patent department is stupid and cannot judge wether a patent is "a substantial technical improvement" as required by law. Not a problem with the patent system itself.
Perhaps peer review would prevent these issues. Give everybody who requested a patent last year the chance to review current patents and accept them or not. If not, they need to explain why and an agreement needs to be found by e.g. removing some claims. Something like this might just work.
Which is a great thing, because ... no manufacturers ... no phones. Which is exactly what the free market is about.