Slashdot Mirror


S Korea & China Mandate Common Chargers, Data Cables

mrbill writes "Seems that South Korea and China have mandated Common Cell Phone chargers and data cables. No proprietary chargers and data cables any more. Must use USB for charging etc. "

362 comments

  1. Mandate by Tekoneiric · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This should happen all over. I wonder how much electronic waste is from cables and wall warts?

    --
    *It's not what you can do for the Dark Side but what the Dark Side can do for you!*
    1. Re:Mandate by hal9035 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Isn't that the point of USB? What's the "U" stand for, anyway? Since all things come from China.....

    2. Re:Mandate by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wonder how much electronic waste is from cables and wall warts?

      How will those poor struggling phone manufacturers will make a living if they can't sell an adapter for $39.99?

      And imagine the shock of...having everyone connect their phone upto their PC via USB without buying some proprietary hookup? (and having to re-buy that hookup every time someone upgrades the phone?). That's a lot of $$$!

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    3. Re:Mandate by blugu64 · · Score: 1

      It stands for Universal. Ohh I see what you were doing there.....

      --
      "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
    4. Re:Mandate by Ontology42 · · Score: 1

      In soviet China, Phone charge you!

    5. Re:Mandate by trewornan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Slashdot is not a typical cross section of the general public - most people are unlikely to buy a data cable or flasher for their mobile phone.

    6. Re:Mandate by ucblockhead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Definitely! Or, at least, things would be better if electronic devices standardized on a small (5) subset of voltage requirements.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    7. Re:Mandate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One up for Mother Earth whom we are collectively strangling to death
      with our industrial and consumer waste. And one up for the consumer
      who is being fleeced by these greedy companies.

    8. Re:Mandate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But in china, any phone can charge you - over USB!

    9. Re:Mandate by egamma · · Score: 2, Funny

      You DO realize that half the electricity used to make that post was generated by a coal plant, 20% caused by the artificial blockage of rivers, and 3% from nuclear power plants, right?

    10. Re:Mandate by Total_Wimp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is a totally awesome idea, except it's also stupid as hell.

      I've wanted manufacturers to standardize on USB for a few years now. It would truly be wonderful, as many of you have been happy to point out. But what happens when something better comes along? What happens when someone has a great idea, but finds out he can't legally implement it?

      I don't know what that idea may be. It could be the ability to safely and seamlessly hop amperage and voltage to much higher levels based on communication between power-only hubs and devices. It may be an even better connection. It may be much faster data that requires two more wires. I really don't know.

      If it was an industry association mandating the standard, it would be different. Mavericks with good ideas could at least go it alone and see if anyone bites. Industry giants reading good press about the new connection could push for a change and get it.. That actually happens in the marketplace, but governments don't even come close to moving that quickly. If the law prevents people from getting a new idea to market until the law is changed, or government bureaucracy grinds along, it'll put a big damper on innovation.

      Once again, I like USB and I would love all my portable devices to be recharged by it, but once you make differences illegal, you end up paying a heavy price. We shouldn't celebrate a great idea at the moment if it means we'll pay dearly down the road.

      TW

    11. Re:Mandate by Danga · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've wanted manufacturers to standardize on USB for a few years now. It would truly be wonderful, as many of you have been happy to point out. But what happens when something better comes along? What happens when someone has a great idea, but finds out he can't legally implement it?

      Well they could release the product with the standard cable and then sell the new, improved cable as an additional purchase. If the new cable is actually better then people will pay the extra money to get it and it probably would eventually become the new standard.

      Standards can be updated you know and while it may be a hassle I think it would be worth it in this case where such a huge amount of waste is produced.

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
    12. Re:Mandate by BiAthlon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, what if they come out with something better than USB. Like, I dunno, USB 2.0 or something. It could be faster and people couldn't use it because it's newer.

    13. Re:Mandate by funfail · · Score: 1

      Most phones and computers support Bluetooth connections by now, so that's a non-issue.

      A standard charger is a nice idea, though.

    14. Re:Mandate by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Most phones and computers support Bluetooth connections by now, so that's a non-issue.

      Unless you use Verizon Wireless.......

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    15. Re:Mandate by mandelbr0t · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know what that idea may be. It could be the ability to safely and seamlessly hop amperage and voltage to much higher levels based on communication between power-only hubs and devices. It may be an even better connection. It may be much faster data that requires two more wires. I really don't know.

      This makes absolutely no sense. According to your argument, we should never standardize anything, because it might screw up someone's future idea. There are no features at this point in time that require a change to the already existing USB standard to make mobile phones work. They will charge in a certain amount of time via the powered line. They will transfer data at a certain rate because that's how USB works. I'd rather have a standard connector available that works in a known way right now than worrying about what the future will bring. Imagine what your house would be like if electricity never had any standards set. You'd have to make sure that the wall socket the electrician installed and the power cable for the new device you bought were compatible. In addition to different wattage of power supplies, they'd also run on dozens of different voltages. But, we can take it for granted. No one discovered something later on that overturned all of the standards we'd decided on for electricity. Are you seriously suggesting that USB is such an immature technology that the connectors and cables we already use are subject to change?

      Note that some changes to the technology (such as your additional wires example) are not precluded. Remember 80-pin IDE cables? Increased transfer rates on additional wires without changing the motherboard's interface. There's only one reason to have no standards on data/power cables for electronic devices, and that's to sell the high-margin accessories. The data cable for my phone is stupid: it's a USB cable with a proprietary connection to the phone. As a result, the data transfer rate is only 115200 BPS instead of the 400+ Kbps of USB2. RS232 over USB -- how pointless.

      mandelbr0t

      --
      "Please describe the scientific nature of the 'whammy'" - Agent Scully
    16. Re:Mandate by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      $39.99? A friend of mine got a cellphone a while ago, asked if it could be linked with a laptop and used as a modem. The person said yes, there is a cable for a few dollars that lets you do that. Now, a few months later she's going away for a while, went to go get this cable for a few dollars. Turns it it actually costs $175 and is just a fucking serial cable without any fancy electronics or converters. $175 for a straight serial cable. Can't get a third party one, either. The shape of the connector is patented.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    17. Re:Mandate by redcane · · Score: 1

      Not sure whether your figures are averages for some particular place (where does Anonymous coward live anyway?), but right here in my house it's green power baby! Our quota of power is filled by solar, wind, hydro, and biomass generation. Although I'm planning to put solar panels on here when I can afford it to avoid transmission losses. I was also considering a wind generator, but I'm not sure how the neighbours would like it.

    18. Re:Mandate by Total_Wimp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think standardization is great. It's more than great. It allows things like CDs, gasoline and soda vending machines to work. I wouldn't have it any other way. But notice that none of the above is mandated by law.

      If I prefer to make a device that uses floppy disks or DVDs for data transfer, no one is going to stop me. Despite the fact that the industry standardizes on cans of about the same size, manufactures felt plenty free to start making plastic bottles. Nothing in America says I have to use a gasoline powered car. If I want to use natural gas or electric, it's no problem.

      I'm not against standardization. I'm against laws that enforce standardization. Industries should come together and standardize on a format. If they don't, consumers suffer, but that shouldn't be an excuse to force them.

      As you point out, something standardized by the government is AC outlets. They haven't changed in how many years? Is it honestly the best outlet that could possibly be made? Is it possible we could have safer, flatter, more portable plugs if not for the prongs? We probably wont know for many years to come, if ever. Maybe 220 would be superior, like in Europe? But you don't have the option of having your house equipped with European-style outlets. If you want 220, you have to go with American-style appliance outlets. Do you want to have smart conductive plates that communicate with whatever you place against them and give just the right amount of juice making wall warts a thing of the past? And they don't fry your toddler who discovered the butter knife? Can't have it. Are their better ideas than the off-the-cuff examples I just gave? Almost certainly, but who would spend the time developing them knowing the legal hurdles they'd have to jump to even start up a small commercial operation.

      Is this a huge problem. Probably not, but we'll never know what we may have missed out on. Innovation is how I make my living in IT, and how I enjoy my very cool toys. Standardization is totally, totally awesome, but I would not give up innovation to get it.

      TW

    19. Re:Mandate by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      This is one of those cases where I wish a government could pass a law that basically says "Hey, listen to those smart people over there." Obviously there are issues with a government deciding standards, especially when it comes time to update them. I think a good compromise (whether or not the government should be involved at all is another topic) would be to let an organization that knows what it's doing, such as IEEE, ISO, etc., and can update standards much quicker than the government, decide what the standards should be.

    20. Re:Mandate by Derf+the · · Score: 1

      In this particular case we might have got the best of both... if only China wasn't quite so big.
      One significant country mandates, the manufactures standardise for that market; if it works well, this rolls out world wide. Worthy innovation arrives, world changes to next standard, legislated country after certain lag changes rules to allow improvement.

      --
      No. You can't look at my Sig; it's mine, and I'm not showing you.
    21. Re:Mandate by Moonwick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, he's pointing out that there's a difference between standards and laws.

      --
      Only on slashdot can a posting be rated "Score -1, Insightful".
    22. Re:Mandate by diskis · · Score: 1

      Yes, brilliant. I'm gonna go put up a solar panel on my roof.
      No, wait, I forgot... There is a whole family living up there. And some weird old lady living on their roof.

      Pretty much any industrialised country has more than half of its population living in cities. That's why nuclear power is such a brilliant idea. Lots of power per area the power plant takes. And who cares about the uranium mines? They are anyways in some faraway place.

      Sorry. Most enviromentally friendly powersources are simply not usable yet.

    23. Re:Mandate by urbanRealist · · Score: 1

      I agree with what you say, but the fact is that cell phone companies have not standardized. While it's preferable for industries to standardize on their own terms, what if they don't? Your post does not address this, but the Korean and Chinese have created laws that do.

      --
      I've seen a lot of things, but I've never been a witness.
    24. Re:Mandate by quenda · · Score: 1
      But what happens when something better comes along? What happens when someone has a great idea, but finds out he can't legally implement it?

      Yes, the problem with standards is that they stick.
      This is why the US got stuck with NTSC, AMPS, 110V and Imperial measurement, while the rest of the world moved on to PAL/SECAM, GSM, 220V+, and metric.
      Actually, the rest of the world is a bit stuck too, just with better standards.
      So the lesson is, don't standardise too early, especially if your country is overly resistant to change. (Are you guys still using 1c coins and paper $1? :-)
    25. Re:Mandate by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      The thing I am going to worry about is what the power connector on a powered USB hub is supposed to now look like.

    26. Re:Mandate by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      [...] (and having to re-buy that hookup every time someone upgrades the phone?).

      I can strongly recommend Nokia in this regard. They only have a few different charger types, and tend to be compatible across multiple phone generations.

    27. Re:Mandate by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Standards are easily updatable for the most part, yes.

      However, this is not a "standard" rather than a government mandate.

      By mandate, we mean "Do this, or else" - a totally different arena.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    28. Re:Mandate by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      And the next thing you know a copy of an IEEE spec will cost you $10,000 and will be heavily copy-protected with all kinds of rewards to turn in people around the office that photocopy them.

      One thing that bugs me to death is government-mandated use of non-open standards (ie ones you can't access without paying a fee).

      Just try and post the National Electric Code on your website and see what happens.

      Laws should be free for anyone to read - you should not have to pay to understand the laws that you will be punished if you violate.

    29. Re:Mandate by Kosi · · Score: 1

      Most phones and computers support Bluetooth connections by now, so that's a non-issue.

      Unless you use Verizon Wireless.......


      I beg do differ: unless you are dumb enough to accept a crippled device. Either chose a provider that doesn't cripple their phones or take the money instead a cheap phone and buy your own.

    30. Re:Mandate by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Either chose a provider that doesn't cripple their phones

      I'd love to. Too bad none of them have signal out here. Not much point to a cell phone if you can't use it.

      take the money instead a cheap phone and buy your own

      The only way around VZW's phone crippling is to buy Alltel or Sprint branded CDMA phones and have them set to join VZW's network. I've never found a place to just buy uncrippled CDMA phones. Lot's of places that sell GSM ones.

      And before somebody replies with "get GSM service", see the first comment about "no signal".

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    31. Re:Mandate by jwo7777777 · · Score: 1

      The venerable ancestors comments about getting a different provider are like telling someone to watch broadcast TV because you personally do not like the cable company.

      In some places you either put up with Verizon's maniacally egotistical policies or you talk a lot on land lines....

  2. Hooray!!!! by waterford0069 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    'nuff said

  3. Way to go! by Argon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hate it the way the same vendor changes connectors for different phones. Nokia gets the credit for using the same connector for all it's phones.

    1. Re:Way to go! by Nick_Psyko · · Score: 1

      Apart from the new phones such as the 6111 which use a smaller pin. None of the existing chargers fit.

      --
      mountvol \\?\brain{dbe069b1-65ae-11d5-bab4-806d6172696f}\hu mor\
    2. Re:Way to go! by lars_boegild_thomsen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They GOT credit you mean. Utopia is is not more - they now use a thinner and completely incompatible plug in several of their phones. I decided - no more Nokia. This is the very reason I've bought Nokia for a long time.

    3. Re:Way to go! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same physical connector unfortunately doesn't help always. ACP-7E, ACP-12E and ACP-9E all have the same physical connector but only 7E and 9E are able to charge nokia 9110.

    4. Re:Way to go! by clonmult · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Have you looked at the Nokia range recently?

      They're now on a smaller version of the power adapter, and use either USB or the pop-port connector for data connections.

      Admiteddly, they're migrating away from the proprietary connections towards USB, and to 3.5mm headphone sockets.

    5. Re:Way to go! by Calinous · · Score: 1

      I have a Nokia 1600 phone - and it has a charger for the old standard (wider plug), but it seems to have a hole for a smaller plug - could that be the new charger?

    6. Re:Way to go! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      As does Sanyo, well at least the 5 or so models I've owned.

      Next on the list of things to standardize....
      Portable music players and their dock ports. Each model or company can add above and beyond a standard if they should choose. The standard should include nothing less then power, basic song selection and playing buttons (FF, RWD, Shuffle, repeat, pause, Play, stop) and speaker/line level out. Please do not tell me this is a bad idea because companies make money and get some benefits from being proprietary. I am a user and buyer of electronics gear and I want what is good for me. An exclusive licensing deal between a company and a third party accessory maker is of NO advantage to me and never will be. Imagine of the headphone jack across multiple vendors was proprietary.

    7. Re:Way to go! by whyloginwhysubscribe · · Score: 1

      no - sure it's for a headset...

    8. Re:Way to go! by Da+Fokka · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that really pissed me off when I bought a 6280! Apparently some new phones come with a convertor but my 6280 didn't and now I have 5 obsolete chargers lying around.

    9. Re:Way to go! by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know what you're talking about. I've had Nokia phones over the last ten years with at least six different connectors for data cables and handsfree systems (21xx series - eg 2190, 61xx series - eg 6185, 9000, 9290, 3220 (actually my wife's), and 6010 (that bizarre 1.8mm handsfree jack.) Even counting just the last five years (6185, 9290, 3220, and 6010), that's four completely different connectors. In terms of current model range, I believe there are phones covering three different, incompatible, connectors.

      And to make matters worse, while the phones above may electrically have had similar connectors within their product families (that is, the 6150 had the same pins as the 6185), data cables frequently for one frequently weren't compatible with other models.

      Nokia also gets a thumbs down for eschewing the 2.5mm jack for handsfree kits.

      Nokia is by far the worst offender. Most Motorola, for example, phones made in the last five years have the same connector for data and power (or, recently, mini-USB - even better), and have proper 2.5mm handsfree jacks.

      Gah.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    10. Re:Way to go! by R.D.Olivaw · · Score: 2, Informative
      Yeah, that really pissed me off when I bought a 6280! Apparently some new phones come with a convertor but my 6280 didn't and now I have 5 obsolete chargers lying around.
      I had the same problem. There is a solution. It does cost more money though and I wish that they hadn't changed it.
      It would be nice if all chargers become interchangeable though. I think that will lead to phones coming without chargers as you can either use you older ones or buy them seperately.
    11. Re:Way to go! by Gubbe · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, except that they actually include an adapter in the frickin' box so that you can still use your old chargers with the new thinner socket.

      Considering how large the old connector is, what else could they have done to decrease its footprint in newer, slimmer phones?

    12. Re:Way to go! by RMH101 · · Score: 1
      agreed on the nokia stuff - there's been a couple of years where they've kind of standardised, but my first 5 nokia gsm phones *all* used different chargers. same charging voltage, too, just different connectors.

      oh, and what's *standard* about a 2.5mm jack? what's wrong with a 3.5mm one you can plug decent headphones into, for god's sake?

    13. Re:Way to go! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      My N70 and 770 both use the new kind of charger, but one of them (I think the N70) came with an adapter to plug in the old kind of charger. This was useful, since I already owned a USB power adaptor set which included an old-Nokia end.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    14. Re:Way to go! by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Except that at some point they changed the spec of the charger to supply a substantially higher voltage - the old type will still charge a newer phone, but a lot more slowly.

      Confused the hell out of my brother who couldn't figure out why his nice shiny new phone had lousy battery life - he'd only ever charged it using the old charger and it had never had a proper full charge.

    15. Re:Way to go! by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      3.5mm., 3 conductor = stereo headphones (left, right and common earth). 2.5mm., 3 conductor = microphone and mono headphone.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    16. Re:Way to go! by jack_csk · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on... don't get me started. DKU2, DKU5, parport, USB, etc...
      Motorola adpots USB far earlier than Nokia, I would say.

    17. Re:Way to go! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Imagine of the headphone jack across multiple vendors was proprietary.

      It is, if you have a Nokia phone. They're finally moving to a normal jack but for ages the headset connection has been through the data connection port, which is absolutely asinine. And now, Motorola is doing the headset through the mini-usb connector... I'm pretty sure that was never part of the spec :P

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    18. Re:Way to go! by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      re motorola miniusb its not quite standard,
      I have a v3 and motorola usb-mini usb lead, also got some external 2.5 drives that come with usb - miniusb leads
      they do not work with the phone. problem is the motorola mini usb connector is just that little bit longer with the pins on the phone socket just out of reach.

    19. Re:Way to go! by AaronLawrence · · Score: 1

      It's a fine theory, but unfortunately my new Nokia 6234 didn't come with such an adapter.
      Perhaps they just did it on the first phone or two that used the new plug ...

      --
      For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert. - Arthur C. Clarke
    20. Re:Way to go! by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      missing the point. i want a 3.5mm jack that normal headphones will work in for stereo audio playback. i then want 3.5mm jacks for phone headsets that have an extra set of contacts for mic. much like the way most digi camcorders and cameras use a 3.5mm jack to get stereo audio and composite video out of them - result, everyone happy.

  4. Or do the dual thing... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My Dad got a new cell phone made by the same company that makes my cell phone that comes with a dual power interface. At home, he uses the pin connector to charge. At my place, he can use the flat connector that I use to charge my cell phone.

    1. Re:Or do the dual thing... by leon.gandalf · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a Sanyo. I think they were just set up so that with data cable use you just needed ONE wire.

  5. amperage by yincrash · · Score: 1

    what if a device needs more power than usb port supplies?

    1. Re:amperage by prefect42 · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily a killer. Dell Axim PDAs can charge off a USB connected cradle, but it's not enough juice to run it. An additional (standard round hollow) connector provides additional power to enable charging and using in the cradle. Annoyingly there's no mini-usb connector on the Axim, so I can't charge without the cradle (or an adapter for the separate PSU).

      --

      jh

    2. Re:amperage by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      That's generally a sign that the device was poorly designed and should be fixed. It's been a long time since I've seen a handheld device that requires more power to charge than can be supplied by a USB port. The ones that required supplementary power were designed for USB 1.1. USB 2.0 ports can carry a lot more power.

    3. Re:amperage by spikestabber · · Score: 1

      The average modern USB 2.0 port can provide upwards of 2000mA.

    4. Re:amperage by CoolVibe · · Score: 1

      Well, what about firewire? ISTR that firewire can provide more power than USB.

    5. Re:amperage by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Then it does not get sold in China or the product will be redesigned. What do you think will happen?

      The best news of this, is that it will force designers to keep to low energy costs. Now, I wish that china and EU would get together and come up with limits on how much energy a monitor and a computer can use. That would have a huge impact on energy useage of future systems.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    6. Re:amperage by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      I thought the spec required 500 mA available per port?
      The USB2 ports on my Dell D600 and Mac Mini all supply about this much.

    7. Re:amperage by Calinous · · Score: 1

      The powered (6-pin) Firewire will certainly do so - but if all you have is a 4-pin unpowered Firewire port, you are out of luck

    8. Re:amperage by spikestabber · · Score: 1

      A laptop is about 500mA, a typical decent motherboard on a desktop can deliver 2000mA at least. I know mine can.

    9. Re:amperage by networkBoy · · Score: 5, Informative

      you're both right.
      The spec calls for 500mA but most vendors connect the port to an *unfused* 5V line. This (IMHO) is a BadIdea (tm). sure you can draw 2A, you can try to draw 100A too but something's gonna give.
      Case in point: http://xbx.networkboy.net/modules/gallery/albums/a lbum18/P1000121.jpg
      It's a design flaw (in most cases) that you can draw that much current from a USB port.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    10. Re:amperage by spikestabber · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A lot of motherboards power the USB through the +5VSB rail thus are unable to provide a lot of USB power over 500mA. Motherboards that come with 10 USB ports or more are powered by the main 5V rail, its rather trivial to find out you can get at least 2000mA out of one of them.

    11. Re:amperage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the maximum supplied voltage allowed? The standard states 4.4-5.25VDC ( Wikipedia ).

      A Motorola v325 phone i've used has been able to run off a voltage range between 4.6 and 5.6VDC through the external mini USB connector. I'd like to be able to run the phone off of a 6VDC battery. Would it be safe to operate int 6-6.4VDC range?

    12. Re:amperage by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      I had this problem with a USB to IDE hard drive. It works fine on my HP laptop, but not on my PowerBook. The genius bar guy said it was exactly due to that. Apparently not all USB device manufactures feel obliged to stay within spec. I found some benchmarks that show the PB actually can access data faster by using a firewire enclosure anyway (despite the nominal data rate being faster for USB2). We'll see how that works...

      I wonder if this will be a problem for phone manufacturers. If they are limited to 500mA @ 5V, that may limit the speed of recharging their batteries. Also, are they going to have to have USB transformers to get down to 3V? Anybody here more familiar with chargers? Anything below 13.8kV and I start to get confused. :-)

    13. Re:amperage by mpoulton · · Score: 1

      6V or above is really pushing it. Fortunately, all you need to do is install a few (3 to 5) silicon diodes in series with the power supply. Each diode drops about 0.3 to 0.5V, thus reducing the voltage at the phone to within spec.

      --
      I am a geek attorney, but not your geek attorney unless you've already retained me. This is not legal advice.
    14. Re:amperage by GotenXiao · · Score: 1

      At first I thought, "damn, popped cap". Then my eye went across a bit.

      Microsoft.

      Says it all, really.

      --
      Goten Xiao
    15. Re:amperage by pete.com · · Score: 1

      Now, I wish that china and EU would get together and come up with limits on how much energy a monitor and a computer can use.

      What would the criteria be to detemine the amount of power a computer can use? Do you use a low end computer (email and web only POS) for the baseline, or a gaming machine that requires lots of CPU and Video or how about a high end desktop for video editing with multiple multi-core processers and a couple high end video cards, and a RAID array? What about servers?

    16. Re:amperage by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      USB2 has a much higher protocol overhead than FireWire, so it tends to be slower than FireWire 400 (assuming you have a device that comes close to being able to saturate it). FireWire 800 is even faster; I have two FireWire 800 drives on a chain and between them they can shift more data than USB2's theoretical maximum speed.

      The FireWire specification allows sending up to 40W through the port; almost as much as the maximum drain of the old iBooks (45W). Unfortunately, it doesn't require than any port actually provide this much power, and so most don't.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    17. Re:amperage by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      FireWire allows each device to either draw or provide up to 40W. Unfortunately, the key part here is 'up to.' An iBook has a 45W power supply and a FireWire port; I very much doubt it can provide 40W to it (the same goes for PowerBooks with 65W PSUs and even MacBook Pros with 85W PSUs).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    18. Re:amperage by bdonalds · · Score: 3, Funny
      The average modern USB 2.0 port can provide upwards of 2000mA.

      [snarky]So uhhh...have you ever seen the movie "Gone in 60,000 milliseconds"?[/snarky]
      --
      The most important thing to do in your life is to not interfere with somebody else's life. -FZ
    19. Re:amperage by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Now, I wish that china and EU would get together and come up with limits on how much energy a monitor and a computer can use.

      What would the criteria be to detemine the amount of power a computer can use? Do you use a low end computer (email and web only POS) for the baseline, or a gaming machine that requires lots of CPU and Video or how about a high end desktop for video editing with multiple multi-core processers and a couple high end video cards, and a RAID array? What about servers? (handwave) The "experts" can figure all that technical stuff out after. He just wants the law passed now.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    20. Re:amperage by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 3, Funny
      [snarky]So uhhh...have you ever seen the movie "Gone in 60,000 milliseconds"?[/snarky]
      [even_more_snarky]No, did you see "Gone in 1 Minute?"[/even_more_snarky]
      --
      the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
    21. Re:amperage by bdonalds · · Score: 1

      [red-faced]Hahaha! Great catch...I can't believe I snarked my own damn self! :)[/red-faced]

      --
      The most important thing to do in your life is to not interfere with somebody else's life. -FZ
    22. Re:amperage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you damage a device that has a charger for 500mA but you use a charger that puts out 850mA?

    23. Re:amperage by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      Thanks! That explanation makes sense. I was afraid the benchmark was just BS, so I hadn't decided to buy an enclosure yet.

    24. Re:amperage by lhorn · · Score: 1

      A 520mA PTC current limiting device who can reset itself when the load is removed costs about 1 $ here in Norway, bought over the counter. Omitting this saves money for Microsoft, benefiting YOU, as a customer buying a cheaper product. Thanks, networkBoy, for directing my attention to this situation, rest assured that the box did not die in vain, but enlightened people all over the world in its demise.

      --
      accept no limits but time
    25. Re:amperage by 808140 · · Score: 1

      FWIW, and I don't know if this was the GP's intention, but in science 2000mA is not the same as 2A -- the former is 4 significant figures and the latter only 1. So 2000mA is in reality 2000mA plus or minus some error quantity (3 or 5, perhaps) in the last digit, ie, 1997mA ~ 2003mA. 2A is the same, which could mean 0 to 4A, a rather large difference. So it would be more correct to say that 2000mA is equivalent to 2.000A.

      In fact, this latter notation would be more correct, as scientific notation generally requires that there be only one digit in front of the decimal point. When SI prefixes are being used, the SI prefix which minimises the number of digits before the decimal point should be chosen.

    26. Re:amperage by Teun · · Score: 1

      A charger can be capable of 850 vs. 500 mA.
      It does not put it out.
      The only damage you could get by a wrong power supply is when it's output Voltage is too high.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    27. Re:amperage by Teun · · Score: 1

      I've got an external HD and it's USB cable has two connectors, the secon one is there just to tap power from a second USB port in case one cannot supply sufficient.
      I've seen other setups where an additional power cable could be plugged into the PS2 socket.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    28. Re:amperage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have the USB specification in front of me right now, but IIRC, it is against the specification to only draw power from the USB bus if you are not enumerating a device.

    29. Re:amperage by NerveGas · · Score: 1

      While they *can* supply upwards of 2 amps, they're not supposed to - 500 ma is the spec. It's generally the cheap cards that will just push any amount of current through until the resistance (and heat) begin to self-limit, better cards will shut the port off, and report to the OS *why* the port was shut off.

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    30. Re:amperage by NerveGas · · Score: 1

      Easy. No more than the electrical service to which it is attached can safely deliver. :-)

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    31. Re:amperage by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Yeah,
      This was one of those "can you fix this" questions from someone. My rather quick answer was: no
      In reality it may have been fixable, but the lifespan of everything connected with that supply would be questionable.

      That current limiting part costs money, and M$ went so far as to use a non IEEE compliant PHY for the network port because it was 35 cents cheaper than a compliant part of vastly superior quality. When you're selling at a loss it's vastly more difficult to push quality over BOM price.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  6. suddenly by jimstapleton · · Score: 0

    I want to live in China, or South Korea.

    I like that idea. mini USB connector for data and power, have it connect to either a PC, or a powerusb plug.

    --
    34486853790
    Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    1. Re:suddenly by jandrese · · Score: 1

      It's not like you can't buy phones in the States or in Europe that use USB for both charging and data. My 2 year old Blackberry 7100t does just that (although if you try to charge it off of a USB 1.1 port it will complain and take forever). It even uses the bog standard headphone port. When on the road, my charger consists of one 3 foot standard USB cable that I hook to my laptop. Should I forget the cable on a long trip (the battery life on this phone is pretty good, it's never been a problem) all I have to do is hit any electronics or even department store and pick up a new one.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:suddenly by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      You want to live in Communist China just so you can have standardized cell fone cables? At least South Korea is democratic.

    3. Re:suddenly by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      True, but with many phones, you don't know before hand what you are getting in terms of connections. ANd so I didn't know when I got this phone (didn't know all the other BS wrong with it either).

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    4. Re:suddenly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, at the rate the US and China are going, China is going to be more free than us any day now. Actually, in a lot of ways, they already are.

    5. Re:suddenly by djupedal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      'At least South Korea is democratic.'

      Have you lived in either country? I've lived in both, and believe me, these days I'll take China (where I'm living now) over the peninsula any day of the week.

      Oh, and since when is governmental mandatory hardware configuration democratic..?

    6. Re:suddenly by ACMENEWSLLC · · Score: 1

      My cellphone uses mini USB. My bluetooth headset uses MiniUSB. One of my cameras uses mini-USB. The list goes on.

      The funny thing is, I now have enough USB chargers that came with these devices that I have one everywhere I could possible need one.

    7. Re:suddenly by Azghoul · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      How's that one-child-per-household bullshit going over there?

      Anyone who'd rather live in China than the US needs to have their head examined, particularly if the only frigging reason is to have a standard cell phone charger. WTF.

    8. Re:suddenly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't you (or anyone else) notice the original post about the South Korean cell phone chargers -- it's dated a year ago. I've been living here for 2.5 years and wow... I knew long ago that phones here all had the same chargers. What's more, you can go into any convenience store (and many times, if you're in a restaurant, you can ask the waiter) and charge your cell phone. In a convenience store you generally have to pay, and you leave it and come back in 15 minutes or so.. and ta-da! Even on the subways in Seoul, they have charging devices that deduct money (no doubt a small amount.. things are generally cheap, the subway costing, at most, $0.90-$1 per ride) from your subway card to pay for recharging your phone.

      Ah.. I've wanted to live in South Korea for quite a while.. lucky me, I do live here.

      P.S. sorry to post as AC, I tried to create an account but I'm still waiting for the password email from /. (I had one years ago but.. forgot my password. Been just reading the site since then. Lazy me)

    9. Re:suddenly by bdares · · Score: 1

      It's been about 2 years since South Korea started using the standardized chargers. It's now expected that most internet cafes (PC bangs we call them here) supply chargers at each terminal. As the parent said, convenience stores have booths for paid charging.

      The charging booths in convenience stores have been around for a long time, actually. The three major cell phone companies here (LG, SK, and KTF) have used unified chargers for their own brands for a much longer time, so it wasn't uncommon even 5 years ago to see 3-6 charging booths in stores.

    10. Re:suddenly by Teun · · Score: 1

      How's that one-child-per-household bullshit going over there?

      As a Good Slashdotter you'd be quite well off having the whole basement to yourself :)

      Oh you mean your own kid?
      Hmm sorry to upset you but that takes at least a GF, if not a wife...

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    11. Re:suddenly by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1
      Oh you mean your own kid?
      Hmm sorry to upset you but that takes at least a GF, if not a wife...

      Because people never get drunk, go home with some stranger they met in the bar, and end up with a kid nine months later? Granted this is Slashdot and nobody would have experience with bars, never mind meeting women, but I thought people would have at least heard about it before.
    12. Re:suddenly by rawtatoor · · Score: 1

      Oh, and since when is governmental mandatory hardware configuration democratic..?
      It's democratic because it benefits the people and not private organizations. I think its nice to see some actual democracy in the world even if I have it's capitalistic twin here in the US.
    13. Re:suddenly by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      this is slashdot... there isn't enough beer in the world to make even the most desperate woman on earth want us.

      Oh, wait, that's what mixed drinks are for, isn't it?

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
  7. FINALLY by xtal · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I have been waiting for this for a long time. This is one case where the sheer insanity of having 12 different chargers makes some sense for a legislated standard. It's unfortunate the industry couldn't play nice enough to not require it, but at the same time, it's NEEDED here.

    You'd be pretty pissed if you could only use a GM-approved fill neck for your car. Why is your phone any different?

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:FINALLY by AsnFkr · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You'd be pretty pissed if you could only use a GM-approved fill neck for your car. Why is your phone any different?

      1. I don't drive my phone.

      2. A charger for a phone only costs $10, and I can buy it...and take it places with me. There dosen't *have* to be a standard for the industry to survive. It's inconvenient for people, but they *can* deal with it.

      3. The Gasoline industry would have a seizure if car manufactures made different sized gas tank receptacles (of whatever they are called), so their industry dictates a standard. Cell phones and mp3 players and the like have an industry where selling more accessories (uh, like non-standard power bricks) equals more revenue.

    2. Re:FINALLY by croddy · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are two different sizes, by the way. The larger one is for diesel.

    3. Re:FINALLY by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      Oh, is that why they are different sizes? I wondered why my SUV doesnt start anymore.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    4. Re:FINALLY by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It's inconvenient for people, but they *can* deal with it.
      But why should they?
    5. Re:FINALLY by Hercules+Peanut · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have been waiting for this for a long time. This is one case where the sheer insanity of having 12 different chargers makes some sense for a legislated standard.

      If it is sheer insanity and it is self inflicted.

      Speaking for the U.S. (I know a lot of other countries are represented on slashdot with different laws and fundamental principles) this is a market issue. We don't have to buy cell phones. We don't have to buy phones with proprietary adapters. We do because it isn't that big of a deal. Yes, it's wasteful. Americans always have been. Yes it's annoying. Americans don't (or didn't) expect legislation to prevent annoying corporate habits.

      We have too many laws in this country as it is. We also have too many real problems as it is. I'm all for government mandates around information like a warning label that says this is a proprietary cable and only works with your Treo 650. Mandating convenience for the american public is NOT the american way. It never was.

      You'd be pretty pissed if you could only use a GM-approved fill neck for your car.

      No, I would laugh and buy someone else's car. I was very interested in the VW Turbo Diesel but knowing I couldn't get diesel fuel at every gas station made me look elsewhere. I didn't call for a government mandate requiring all cars to use the same fuel or for gas stations to sell all types of fuel.

      Why is your phone any different?

      Why should my cell phone be any different indeed.
    6. Re:FINALLY by griffjon · · Score: 1

      I agree; I shouldn't have to pay iGo or someone like $10/head to get a universal power adapter for my laptops and cell phone and such. It's pure insanity the hassle this causes consumers

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    7. Re:FINALLY by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      It's old history at this point, but the nozzle was different for leaded gasoline as well.

      I remember as a kid yelling at my grandfather who had obtained an adapter so he could fill his unleaded car with leaded. Of course, I also had a tendency to hide grandma's smokes too. She didn't appreciate it, but I didn't want her dying of lung cancer.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    8. Re:FINALLY by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Actually, after I acquired my latest Nokia so that I could call the office from Europe I had the problem that it used a new and smaller connector. I had problems finding replacement/alternate chargers anywhere. Nevermind cheap or expensive. I would have been happy just to find something without resorting to mail order or the provider's store.

              The connectors should be a function of the electrical properties of the current, not a side effect of vendorlock.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    9. Re:FINALLY by mrbcs · · Score: 1

      Oil industry logic at it's finest. Charge us MORE money for NOT putting lead in unleaded gas.

      --
      I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
    10. Re:FINALLY by AJWM · · Score: 1

      Yep. The stuff they put in gasoline to raise the octane rating, which is what they used to use tetraethyl lead (TEL) for, costs more than tetraethyl lead. Or at least it used to, not much call for TEL these days. (Although it's still used in some avgas formulations, I think.)

      Of course if you want to use gas with a low octane rating (and destroy your engine through premature detonation), or use real octane (and pay even bigger bucks), that's your choice (if you can find either).

      --
      -- Alastair
    11. Re:FINALLY by Constantine+Evans · · Score: 1

      You should note that this doesn't even work for everything. Newer Dell laptop power adapters use three wires, with one wire reserved for confirming that the power adapter was made by Dell. The BIOS prevents the batter from being charged by other adapters. And thus, Dell can make the adapters as unreliable as they please, and no manufacturer can compete with them.

  8. And what about laptops... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...though I don't know is USB has the ompf for that, a standard would be nice. Especially if it worked on planes too.

    1. Re:And what about laptops... by pasamio · · Score: 1

      So you buy a wall connector that has a standard usb female slot on the bottom to connect a bulk standard usb cable in if things are that bad for you and your laptop can't do it. I've got one that is useful to charging my mp3 or palm when i would rather that my mac laptop charge itself faster on the road. I've regularly charged my pda off my laptop back to full strength (I also have a spare laptop battery, plus the mac sleep mode is like a hybrid of sleep/hibernate but thats another discussion) since my mac's battery usually has enough charge and it works even when my mac is sleeping (e.g. pda and laptop connected via usb in the same bag). If I could get my phone to do the same then all I need is one adapter when I'm travelling around the world (and its various power adapters).

      --
      I always wondered where this setting was...
    2. Re:And what about laptops... by Myself · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the medium-power DC standard is called "twelve volts on a pair of Powerpoles", and all my DC-capable laptop chargers have been modded to take it as input.

      For less power, there's USB. For more power, AC is usually appropriate, but the larger Powerpole connectors (SB 350 series in particular) are common on truck winches, tow truck jumper cables, golf carts, and electric forklifts.

    3. Re:And what about laptops... by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      ...a standard would be nice.

      Lots of standards would be even nicer.

      --
      What?
  9. Samsung by celardore · · Score: 1

    I recently got a Samsung E900 phone. One of the things that annoys me most about it is that it has just one port. For everything. I can't charge my phone while taking the photos etc off it. If they could address that, then it sounds like a good idea.

    1. Re:Samsung by jone1941 · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that there is only one port. If I had to guess I'd say mini-usb or some slightly modified version of that. Given that have you checked to see if it is charging when you plug it into your USB jack on your computer? If it isn't charging there is likely something wrong with your computer (no power to the usb jack, or it's a USB 1.1 jack). The charger is just a usb power cable being stepped down from your outlet.

      --
      Fear trumps hope and ignorance trumps both
    2. Re:Samsung by hakubi · · Score: 1

      While my Samsung t809 has no problem charging with the USB cable. Though the one connector would be problem if I wanted to use a wired headset and charge the phone at the same time. But that's why I have bluetooth.

    3. Re:Samsung by hakubi · · Score: 1

      Probably not mini-USB, since every Samsung slider phone uses an ultra-thin proprietary connector. The internets seem to disagree as to whether the phone can charge by USB. But take the above advice and try a different computer or ensure your port has the power to charge the phone.

    4. Re:Samsung by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Then you guess wrong. My partner has the same model and it's some ultra-thin proprietary connection.

      And it doesn't charge off USB. I've plugged it directly into two computers and a powered USB hub, but no luck.

  10. Standardization Rules by zoomshorts · · Score: 1

    Standardization Rules. It does tend to screw those proprietary
    morons, but, what the hell...screw them :)

  11. Mostly good news for consumers by dgm3574 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    However, always beware the law of unintended consequences. It seems likely to me that the costs for this will be passed on to us, one way or another. The mobile manufacturers aren't just going to redesign and retool for free.

    I would personally rather see more features, better battery life or enhanced reception than plug standardization.

    Anyway, the USB port standard is pretty marginal. I've found them not to be all that durable, especially if you have to plug/unplug items frequently - like one will likely do with a phone charger.

    All that said, I actually do have enough USB-chargeable devices that I'd like to see airlines and auto-makers start offering USB charging ports.

    1. Re:Mostly good news for consumers by cyclop · · Score: 1

      However, always beware the law of unintended consequences. It seems likely to me that the costs for this will be passed on to us, one way or another. The mobile manufacturers aren't just going to redesign and retool for free.

      Yes, but it's a market with prices dropping (albeit slowly, in the last years), so it's not that much a hassle.

      I would personally rather see more features, better battery life or enhanced reception than plug standardization.

      As far as I'm concerned, cell phones have already too much features. Standardization is the only essential one we don't have.

      I've found them not to be all that durable, especially if you have to plug/unplug items frequently - like one will likely do with a phone charger.

      You are probably right, but most cell phone plugs totally suck in this sense. You can be sure that USB is not worse than most of them. And the advantage of having standard USB cables to pass data is good too.
      If only they standardize data protocol...sigh.

      --
      -- Patent no.123456: A way to personalize /. comments with a sig attached to the end.
    2. Re:Mostly good news for consumers by bensafrickingenius · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "However, always beware the law of unintended consequences. It seems likely to me that the costs for this will be passed on to us, one way or another."

      I disagree. Costs will go WAY down. Instead of paying high prices for proprietary, hard-to-find cables, we'll be able to cruise into Wal-Martz and ask for a "cell phone cable." "That'll be five dollars, please."

      "The mobile manufacturers aren't just going to redesign and retool for free."

      One might think that they're already redesigning and retooling with *every* new phone, given that they all have different cables?

      --
      I am not left-handed, either!
    3. Re:Mostly good news for consumers by hey! · · Score: 1

      However, always beware the law of unintended consequences. It seems likely to me that the costs for this will be passed on to us, one way or another. The mobile manufacturers aren't just going to redesign and retool for free.


      They retool for new models every year or so anyway. The one thing they wont' have to do is retool because of the connectors. They'll buy their cables, power bricks and car chargers from high volume, low cost OEM suppliers.


      Anyway, the USB port standard is pretty marginal. I've found them not to be all that durable, especially if you have to plug/unplug items frequently - like one will likely do with a phone charger.


      Connectors are the achilles heel of mobile devices anyway. Mini-usb is much more rugged than many of the connectors used in such devices (Motorola is especially bad). In any case it's the "Series A" receptacals (on hubs and cards) that tend to get damaged; the "Series B" and "Mini B" receptacals, which is what you'd have on the device end, are fine.

      Even the series A receptacles would be fine if they weren't made of cheap pot metal you can bend with your index finger. There must be mil-spec versions.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:Mostly good news for consumers by jandrese · · Score: 1
      You are probably right, but most cell phone plugs totally suck in this sense. You can be sure that USB is not worse than most of them. And the advantage of having standard USB cables to pass data is good too. If only they standardize data protocol...sigh.
      The USB port on my phone has held up pretty well to two years worth of connects and disconnect (about 1 per day on each). It certainly doesn't feel flimsy like the charging/data port on my wife's Motorola phone. That thing has this long flat connector that seems to be held on by only two tiny flimsy plastic pieces. The only good news for her phone is that she never remembers to plug it in.

      I really don't understand why there isn't a standard USB to Serial protocol either. It seems like something that the standards body would do, but for some reason it doesn't exist. Go figure.
      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    5. Re:Mostly good news for consumers by Kjella · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Instead (..-) we'll be able to cruise into Wal-Martz and ask for a "cell phone cable." "That'll be five dollars, please."

      Most certainly. But there's definately printer & ink, razor & blades etc. pricing going on here, where they offer you a subsidized price they'll recover through accessories. If they can't count on profits later they need profits now, so expect phone prices to rise. But mostly it's cutthroat on the main item and recovery on all sorts of extras ("extended warranty" anyone?) so it's probably an improvement.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re:Mostly good news for consumers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but if you're buying the chargers anyway the price might as well be rolled into the phone in the first place, and you get the added advantage of being able to charge your phone up at your friend's house without worrying whether he has the same brand/model.

    7. Re:Mostly good news for consumers by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      The mobile manufacturers aren't just going to redesign and retool for free.

      They change their designs several times a year, and obviously this would not be retrospective, so it shold not cost an extra cent. But they'll try to claim it does, of course.

    8. Re:Mostly good news for consumers by eggywat · · Score: 1

      Just as everyone else has noted, they re-tool every five minutes anyway...just for the hell of it and we'll get more features (so they can sell us new phones each year of course) and better battery life if the new features don't eat up the extra juice first :-)

      http://bymyreckoning.com/
    9. Re:Mostly good news for consumers by operagost · · Score: 1

      The "S" in USB stands for "serial", so I assume you mean RS-232.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    10. Re:Mostly good news for consumers by eln · · Score: 1

      Plus if the charger gets lost or damaged, you can replace it for another $5, instead of having to pay another $30 or so like you do now.

    11. Re:Mostly good news for consumers by blugu64 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Even the series A receptacles would be fine if they weren't made of cheap pot metal you can bend with your index finger. There must be mil-spec versions."

      I think it has been downhill since the good old DB-25 days. Now that would be a durable connector for a mobile!

      --
      "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
    12. Re:Mostly good news for consumers by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      In the end, prices will come down, not up. The connector factories will now be turning out only one kind of plugs and sockets for all telephones, not a different one for each phone. That means economy of scale will set in -- it will be cheaper for manufacturers to buy 16000 identical connectors than 4000 each of 4 types of connector.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    13. Re:Mostly good news for consumers by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      Why in the world would you pay that much when belkin makes the same for $10

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
  12. System.. by VojakSvejk · · Score: 1

    But when will South Korea mandate a cell phone system that works
    in the rest of the world? I may need only one charger, but I still
    need one phone for SK and one phone for China (and just about everywhere
    else)...

    1. Re:System.. by Noryungi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, right.

      South Korea uses the GSM norm for cell phones, so you only need to buy a GSM-compatible cell phone and it's highly possible you'll be able to use the same in China... Because (surprise!) China also uses the GSM norm.

      Of course, having a bi- or tri-standard cell phone (3G, GSM 900, GSM 1800) cell phone, and an "international" connection plan may help as well. This being said, I think you have no idea what you are talking about.

      --
      The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
  13. Don't get too excited just yet.... by 8127972 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    .... as there is a ton of money to be made in after market accessories (see the iPod for a great example). It would take a lot of balls for cell phone companies (for example) not to do this in places where these mandates don't exist and cut off the income stream of their accessory companies. So consumers in places where these mandates don't exist still have to "vote with their dollars" as it were to encourage manufacturers to make it happen.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
    1. Re:Don't get too excited just yet.... by kabocox · · Score: 1

      .... as there is a ton of money to be made in after market accessories (see the iPod for a great example). It would take a lot of balls for cell phone companies (for example) not to do this in places where these mandates don't exist and cut off the income stream of their accessory companies. So consumers in places where these mandates don't exist still have to "vote with their dollars" as it were to encourage manufacturers to make it happen.

      I've very mixed feelings on the iPod after market crap out there, but if this sort of thing actually goes through well, then instead of just iPod getting all these 3rd party items sold for it, then all cell phones that follow the standard will be able to use the 3rd party items. Those 3rd party folks should be happy that they now don't have to worry about one maker of an item, as long as the entire industry follows the spec they now have many more possible customers. Now, those over priced 1st party items sold by manufacturers won't last unless they were cheap, popular, or very useful.

      This change will be trival for the cell phone companies to make for new phones as they are constantly changing connectors anyway. I've read lots of notes that data cable generally cost $50-60 and it would be much better to use a $5 "standard" cable. Another thing is that the price would be even less than $5 per cable. Not many can justify a $50 cable that they won't use often. A $5 dollar cable is an easy additional purchase that people wouldn't mind spending the money for the product. Many more will be made and the price should drop due to quantities of scale and different makers of the cables.

  14. an example everyone should follow by egburr · · Score: 1

    I wish we could do this in the US. It drives me crazy that I have to throw away 2 chargers (one at office and one at home), a car charger, and the PC data cable every time I have to replace my phone. Only slightly less irritating is that I have to take all that with me when I travel since I have yet to meet someone with the same model phone I have or even one where the chargers are compatible. Maybe if I could get a phone to last more than two years before going bad, I might not be so annoyed at having to replace everything each time, but I see no good reason for all the incompatibility.

    --

    Edward Burr
    Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    1. Re:an example everyone should follow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I wish we could do this in the US. It drives me crazy that I have to throw away 2 chargers (one at office and one at home), a car charger, and the PC data cable every time I have to replace my phone.
      So stop buying phones that use different cables. I recently switched to Cingular and picked up a couple of Motorola SLVR L7 phones and they just use mini-USB for charging, data, headset, etc. The bluetooth headset also uses mini-USB to charge so I have a lot of options for charging the phone. Either an AC-adapter, a cigarette lighter adapter for the car, or plug it into any modern computer and charge via the USB port.

      My Sanyo was similar except it had a "standard" corded headset port, a flat-style jack for a data cable that could double as a charger port, and a DC-style jack dedicated to charging the phone. The data/power cables for my Sanyo 4900 worked with my wife's Sanyo 8100 and in turn those worked with my Sanyo 8200. It was one of the main reasons I stuck with Sanyo since they used consistent cables between (at least these) different phones whereas you'd go to the store and see dozens of different connectors for other phones. That's just ridiculous.

    2. Re:an example everyone should follow by Calinous · · Score: 1

      I've had two mobile phones until now - the first, an Ericsson T10, was the best. Worked fine, but after the second battery (non-Ericsson) wouldn't hold a charge, I went to a T230 (Sony-Ericsson now). After two years, the battery was used too, so I chose a Nokia 1600 (to standardize on phone chargers with my fiancee).

    3. Re:an example everyone should follow by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered what the logic is for any given manufacturer to change interfaces between their own models?

      <scenario>

      I have a phone of Brand X.
      I also have a desk charger, a car charger, data cable, and a wired headset.

      My phone breaks/dies/needs to be replaced.

      I want to get something that is compatible with the accessories that I have already bought. That means I probably want to buy another new phone from the same manufacturer.

      Except that their new phones aren't compatible with *ANY* of the accessories from my current phone of the same brand.
      So, now since I'm having to buy new accessories anyway, and I have a bitter taste in my mouth about that, I look at all the other brands of phone when I make my selection.
      </scenario>

      I've asked this of reps from Nokia, Motorola and RIM, and none of them have been able to come up with an answer.

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    4. Re:an example everyone should follow by rdoger6424 · · Score: 1

      profit.

      --
      "Hello 911? I just tried to toast some bread, and the toaster grew an arm and stabbed me in the face!"
    5. Re:an example everyone should follow by egburr · · Score: 1

      But how do they profit if I choose a competitor's phone? Not only do they not get the sale of a new charger, car charger, and data cable, they also do not get the sale of a new phone! I have no brand loyalty, mainly because I have yet to find a brand that demonstrates any customer loyalty.

      --

      Edward Burr
      Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    6. Re:an example everyone should follow by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      My point exactly. If they had kept their new model accessory compatible with the old model, they would have sold me a new phone. Since they didn't, I had no reason to not look at their competitors. And since they pissed me off, I had a reason to look away from them.

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    7. Re:an example everyone should follow by rdoger6424 · · Score: 1

      you're putting too much faith in humanity.

      --
      "Hello 911? I just tried to toast some bread, and the toaster grew an arm and stabbed me in the face!"
  15. But the FREE MARKET! by Goaway · · Score: 5, Funny

    But this is BAD NEWS because it's GOVERNMENT CONTROL which is EVIL because the FREE MARKET would produce the BEST RESULT for the CONSUMERS!

    1. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by MindStalker · · Score: 0, Redundant

      :) But its government control in a government controlled country such as China!
      If this HAPPENDS to benefit us through the simple effect on manufacturing cost all the better! ;)

    2. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by anlprb · · Score: 1

      In a few places, Air waves, RCA connectors on TV, etc... It is the government's job to regulate standards, not to regulate competition. Two completely different things. Anyone here remember Ethyl stations? How about the CBS format for broadcasting TV? Just because a standard is mandated doesn't mean that the government is interfering in the free market. Just because the government regulated the size and features of a gas pump doesn't mean that there is no competition in the Gas Station market. Requiring a standard is very different from regulating business models. Just because we use 110V in our house doesn't mean that there isn't competition in power companies. The local monopolies take care of that. But in return for that monopoly is close regulation. The only one who is skirting by this is the Cable companies. I really don't know why that is. They are a common carrier now just like Verizon, why not be regulated as such?

      http://novia.net/~ereitan/Color_Sys_CBS.html

      --

      One Token Ring to Rule them All, One Search Engine to Find Them, One WAN to bring them in, and TCP/IP Bind them...
    3. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      the FREE MARKET

            Oligopolies are not "free market". The current situation produces the best result for the manufacturer :)

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    4. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      The article seems to suggest that South Korea has mandated one standard, and China a different and incompatible standard, which does show why having governments arbitrarily decide these things may not always be a good idea. If you live in China and you don't agree with the government's decision, you have no choice to get some different power connector, even if you're willing to pay for such a phone and someone else is willing to sell it to you.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    5. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by mjh · · Score: 2, Interesting
      So, the government mandates that all chargers must be USB. Which means that no one, not even apple, can create a new innovative power connection for charging things. If you believe that USB chargers are the best solution that anyone could ever come up with, then this is a good deal. But if you think that, I think you underestimate human creativity. The people under this rule will be precluded from freely being able to purchase new technology. And that's good, how?

      The free market DOES produce the best results for the consumer. To quote one of my favorite bloggers:

      Economics is a science. Willful ignorance or emotional rejection of the well-known precepts of this science is at least as bad as a fundamentalist Christian's willful ignorance of evolution science... In fact, economic ignorance is much worse, since most people can come to perfectly valid conclusions about most public policy issues with a flawed knowledge of the origin of the species but no one can with a flawed understanding of economics.
      - Warren Meyer
      --
      Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
    6. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by Goaway · · Score: 1

      The free market DOES produce the best results for the consumer.

      Like it did up until now until the government stepped in and RUINED everything?

    7. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The type of mains power plug that is used in the USA is certainly not the best connector, but would you really want to buy power cords according to the connector type that you use in your home and carry an adapter set for mobile devices? Sometimes it is better to standardize on an available design that is not perfect than to have several designs compete. Standardizing on a USB type connector for small mobile devices could mean that you don't need to carry a charger when you travel: Just use the cable that the hotel provides for you. No hotel can do that when there are several dozen connector types on the market.

    8. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by Goaway · · Score: 1

      applause

    9. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by mjh · · Score: 1

      If you're asking what I want to do, then I want a free market which allows me to choose what's important to me. But the market that exists in china is NOT free. So I don't get a choice as to what kind of connecter I get.

      As soon as you ask the question "do you want...?" then the answer has to be a free market. Because that's the only thing that allows EVERYONE to get what they want instead of being subject to someone else's will.

      --
      Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
    10. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by fossa · · Score: 1

      Define free market.

    11. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm sorry. You thought you were the consumer? That's a good one.

      --
      -
    12. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      While I agree that USB is probably not the best, it is currently a widely desired option. Plus, is there anything that states there cannot be a second power adapter that is optional? I can see Apple (stealing my idea and) making desk chargers (cradles) that use the second power adapter hookup to do the charging, since navigating a phone onto a desk-charger usb connector is never fun. And I will thank them when they steal that idea.

      Oddly enough, it was just the other day I looked at my Palm and was pissed that the charger connector was right next to the usb (proprietary) connector, instead of being part of it, so I couldn't charge it off the data cable instead of having to plug in the block, too.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    13. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by BroncoInCalifornia · · Score: 1

      But this is BAD NEWS because it's GOVERNMENT CONTROL which is EVIL because the FREE MARKET would produce the BEST RESULT for the CONSUMERS!

      Industrialists love the "FREE MARKET". That is why they put so much effort in to avoiding and evading the free market. Locking customers into proprietary cables and chargers is just one example of free market avoidance.

      --

      Religion is the main cause of atheism.

    14. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by blugu64 · · Score: 1

      Gonna play devils advocate for a bit here.

      Could it not be argued that the money that the producers make from selling accessories that they now won't recieve from the stanardized cables is/was used to pay workers and thus is put back into the economy anyway? So doesn't this make the question into something like is it better for customer A to buy charger cheaply and have a few extra bucks to spend, or is it better for Worker B to get paid a little more and have a little bit more money to spend?

      Then again it could be argued that the company would keep the money, which they would but they would ultimately (if acting rationally) spend the money to make more money, as simply hoarding money isn't a smart business decision, thus putting that money back into the economy anyway?

      --
      "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
    15. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by Goaway · · Score: 1

      How about I punch you in the nose and take all your money, and spend it on candy? That's good for the economy, isn't it?

    16. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by Goaway · · Score: 1

      I think you're confusing the "free market" with "magical dreamland where everything is the way I want it".

      Not to worry, it's a common enough affliction among your kind. Many grow out of it, so there is still hope.

    17. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      quite right VIOLENCE is the answer to all problems. People should be FORCED to obey whoever is in charge, whether they LIKE IT or NOT. The right to buy and sell uncoerced is EVIL. Down with FREEDOM! Hurray for being BULLIED into submission. Give me EFFICIENCY* or give me DEATH! (*as defined by the group of people with the most guns).

    18. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by nelsonrn · · Score: 1

      A free market is one in which government intervention is limited to enforcing property rights. Some people add contracts to that. Other people add tort law (since it applies equally to everyone, it might not be a market intervention; on the other hand, governments have been known to write legislation which is designed to apply only to one party.)

    19. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only a Linux user would think that consistency is oppression.

    20. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      There's nothing preventing a manufacturer from providing a proprietary connector for charging and data transmission in addition to a standardized USB connector. The newest mini USB connectors can easily coexist with other connectors on a cell phone. This is more important as a means of guaranteeing a standard data interface rather than one for power. The proprietary USB dongle cables are just silly in this day and age.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    21. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by nelsonrn · · Score: 1

      Er, well, and some of us know enough about economics to realize that free markets manage society better than politicians. Some day you'll learn enough about economics to realize that political markets aren't magical dreamlands where everything is the way you want it.

    22. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

      Which is a great thing, because ... no manufacturers ... no phones. Which is exactly what the free market is about.

    23. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by spitzak · · Score: 1

      Considering that USB is designed to transmit data as well as power, I don't think a manufacturer will have any trouble designing a new innovative power supply where both the phone and power supply check each other for compatability and then switch into new innovative mode. If the cable needs to be thicker (perhaps to carry high current) then the cable can be attached to the power supply. If the connecter needs to be beefier, engineers have been very clever with adding such details while remaining compatable with the old plugs.

    24. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by Goaway · · Score: 1

      So to jump back to the topic of the article, is the reason we haven't gotten a universal standard for chargers government interference in the market, or that nobody actually wants it and just think they do?

    25. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by Myself · · Score: 1

      I'd rather leave the money in the consumer's pocket so they can spend it on something possibly worthwhile, instead of on something provably redundant, like another wallwart to replace the existing wallwart that was made obsolete before it failed.

    26. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by Myself · · Score: 1

      I should also mention this in the "power connector next to the USB connector" department. You can do that on the host side too. :)

    27. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by mjh · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that people want it. I paid a premium for my bluetooth headset because the one that I got uses the same charger as my cell phone. But it isn't enough that people want something. They have to express that want through their choices. They have to be willing to say to the laptop manufacturer: "no, I won't buy that new laptop because it won't work with my old charger". If they buy the laptop despite not being charger compatible, then some new feature of the laptop is more important than using a universal charger. And that's what the laptop manufacturer will sell.

      Compatibility is clearly important in some areas of computing. For example, how many people compare the features of Mac OSX to Windows when they purchase a computer? Not many. Most simply ask whether the new computer will run their old software. In other words, compatibility matters, and a (mostly) universal OS is provided. Almost every PC manufacturer supports Windows, because the consumer demand for software compatibility is high.

      I would argue that the expressed consumer demand for universal chargers just is not high on most people's lists. Most people (as opposed to the technorati) don't have 17 things that need charging. They have one: a cell phone. And the one charger they've got is fine.

      --
      Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
    28. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by Goaway · · Score: 1

      So basically the free market didn't produce what's best for the consumers.

    29. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      That's interesting, but a few things come to mind:

      USB is a standard, and that's not part of it.
      I've never seen a port like that.
      I've never seen a device that uses a port like that.
      I've never seen a hub that has ports like that.
      There are 2 different ports there. USB is as awesome as it is because all of the ports are the same. Would it REALLY have been so hard for them to put both 5v and 12v on the same plug, especially considering that all the molex connectors have that anyhow?

      The last one is my biggest concern. It also concerns the second-to-last, as making a hub do the 12v and 5v would require 2 usb cords and that's just stupid.

      Interesting, though. Like power-over-ethernet to run your electric razor. Geeky and neat, but useless.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    30. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by mjh · · Score: 1

      The market produced exactly what the consumers wanted through expressed demand. If the market produced something that consumers didn't want, they wouldn't buy it. Things that the market doesn't yet provide are not market failures. They're either one of two things: oppurtunities to fulfill unmet demand (which is always profitable) or unprofitible ventures (which implies insufficient market demand).

      --
      Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
    31. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by Goaway · · Score: 1

      So when you said,

      As soon as you ask the question "do you want...?" then the answer has to be a free market. Because that's the only thing that allows EVERYONE to get what they want instead of being subject to someone else's will.

      You actually meant to say that the free market is the only thing that allows some people to get something kind of like what they want as long as there's not more people who want something else, or people don't care enough?

      Because, you know, there are a lot of people here in this Slashdot thread who keep saying they really want this, but apparently the free market didn't give it to them, so I guess they're not part of the EVERYONE you were talking about?

    32. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by mjh · · Score: 1

      I can see where the confusion is now. The thing that I meant to be emphasizing in that statement is that there's a contrast between a free market (which puts no one in control) and an engineered economy (which subjects most people's wants to the ideas of a few who decide what's good for them). The *ONLY* alternative to a free market is to tell people (whether they want it or not) this is what you're getting. Say what you want about the evils of a market, but the latter seems worse to me.

      That being said, yes a lot of /.ers seem to be saying that they want universal chargers. But talk is cheap. What are they doing about it? They're continuing to buy devices that don't have universal chargers. They must not want the universal charger as much as some other feature of that device. So the slashdot folks are getting exactly what they want most - new features, and not getting what they don't appear to want very much - universal chargers. So when I say everyone gets what they want, I mean it. It doesn't mean they get everything they want. But with free markets, individuals prioritize for themselves whats important and get the things at the top of the list. The wealthier they are, the more things on the list they get. But no one, not even Trump, gets everything.

      That being said, I would suggest this to you: if you believe that there is such large unmet demand for universal chargers, that's simply a market oppurtunity. I bet you could build a business retrofitting electronic devices for a universal charger. I find such a business to be foolish because I don't think the demand is high enough. But you seem to. Go for it, dude! If you're right, there's a fortune to be made. Good luck.

      --
      Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
    33. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by Goaway · · Score: 1

      So basically, the free market works perfectly as long as people don't act like they normally do? Sounds like a real recipe for success!

      And not just that, there don't exist any universal charger standard, because none of the manufacturers are interested in making one, as the current model is more profitable for them. There simply is no way to buy one and "vote with your dollars" or whatever you like to call it.

    34. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by mjh · · Score: 1

      Ok. So let me understand the alternative. A universal charger is mandated through some sort of government action. You're telling me that this is the choice maximizing alternative? You're telling me that the cool new apple magnetic power connection should not be offered because it doesn't meet the mandated standard. You're telling me that every other new idea for a power connection should be summarily dismissed - even the ones that we can't think of right now. You (and a small number of people) don't have the "universal charger" that you so covet. But you'd rather that it be forcibly made available so that all other options can't be chosen. And this is the choice maximizing alternative that you have? If so, you and I don't agree on the definition of either "choice" or "maximizing".

      I never intended to suggest that the free market "works perfectly". But it's significanly better than the alternative of government mandated solutions. The only reason that people are diluded into thinking that governmentally mandated solutions actually work is because they happily ignore all of the unforseen consequences of mandated solutions (e.g. reduced innovation, fewer choices).

      --
      Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
    35. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by Goaway · · Score: 1

      You're telling me that this is the choice maximizing alternative?

      No, I have no interest whatsoever in "maximizing alternative". It does not benefit me in any way. I do not choose my cell phone based on how innovative a charger it has - as a matter of fact, it would be very hard for me to even find out what kind of charger it has.

      However, having a standard for chargers allows many new innovations, as third parties can now much more easily make chargers that work with a large segement of the market. Thus, I can much more easily get a new charger, a charger for my car, a solar-powered charger to use on the road, a charger that is not an ugly wall wart but instead, say, built into my desk, and so on. All of these are much harder for third parties to manufacture and distribute if they have to deal with a large variety of charger connectors.

      The "free market" does nothing to help me here, because cell phone manufacturers have no interest in helping these third parties do their business, and would much prefer to sell their own overpriced chargers.

      I never intended to suggest that the free market "works perfectly".

      You did say this, though: "As soon as you ask the question "do you want...?" then the answer has to be a free market. Because that's the only thing that allows EVERYONE to get what they want instead of being subject to someone else's will."

      But it's significanly better than the alternative of government mandated solutions.

      Having a big pile of chargers taking up all my sockets is better than having one standardized one? In what way, exactly?

    36. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by mjh · · Score: 1
      No, I have no interest whatsoever in "maximizing alternative".
      Oh. So you don't like people having alternatives. This belies a fundamental difference which I see no way to get beyond. I believe that individual freedom should not be impinged. You seem to be seeking to take that away.
      You did say this, though:
      And your inability to understand how both of those statements are true, does not make them false.
      The "free market" does nothing to help me here...
      The complaints of someone willing to take away others freedoms are worth less than nothing. There is nothing further to be gained from continued discussion with you. You may have the last word if you like. I'm done.
      --
      Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
    37. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by Goaway · · Score: 1

      It's always good to have dogmatic fallbacks to use when you need to pull out of a losing argument, isn't it?

    38. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by nelsonrn · · Score: 1

      Neither have governments; if you'll notice both governments are specifying different standards.

    39. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by nelsonrn · · Score: 1

      The "free market" does nothing to help me here, because cell phone manufacturers have no interest in helping these third parties do their business, and would much prefer to sell their own overpriced chargers.

      I'm not sure this is exactly what is happening. It's much more likely that cell phone manufacturers are in the habit of doing things the way they currently doing things, and don't have sufficient reason to change. Why should they change? The other guys should change to match them! That's part of the problem with every standardization effort: what do you standardize on? If you standardize on a poor design, then everyone suffers. If you don't standardize, then the poor designs get weeded out because the manufacturers suffer from higher costs. If any one of the designs was obviously better than any other, everyone would switch. They haven't, which implies that the benefits are lower than the cost.

    40. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by Goaway · · Score: 1

      If any one of the designs was obviously better than any other, everyone would switch.

      "Better" is not the same for consumers and producers.

    41. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by Goaway · · Score: 1

      So... Because SOME people standardized and not ALL people, this is the same as NO people standardizing? That's some pretty shaky logic you've got there.

  16. Not a bad idea now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not a bad idea now, but when USB chargers are supplanted and eventually replaced by something that makes USB look like old-fashioned serial ports (yay COM1) I wonder how long it will take for them to get with the times.

  17. sad.... or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now every one who will say open source, free software, and open standard, will be called commies!!

    What the hell, it is a good move :)

  18. now let's get them in cars! by jspectre · · Score: 4, Interesting

    now this is very nice news. would be even better if car companies put usb plugs right in a car. maybe one for data to play mp3's thru your radio, and a few just to charge various devices. who uses a cigarette lighter socket for cigarettes any more??? do we really need that huge socket plus a usb adapter?

    --

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

    1. Re:now let's get them in cars! by planetmn · · Score: 1

      Most car DC power ports supply 10A of current to devices. This is much, much more than a USB connector is capable of.

      There are devices other than phone chargers that people use that power port for (fridge/cooler, inverter for laptop, etc.).

      -dave

      --
      /., where "Apple and Google provide Iran with nukes" will be refuted with "But Microsoft is a convicted monopolist"
    2. Re:now let's get them in cars! by Technician · · Score: 1

      do we really need that huge socket plus a usb adapter?

      Powers the $15 inverter so I don't have to buy a $100 12 volt laptop power supply.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    3. Re:now let's get them in cars! by gradedcheese · · Score: 1

      The current doesn't matter here: your device will draw as much as it needs (up to 0.5A for a USB device), not as much as the car 'supplies'. The problem is that it needs to be at 5.0V or so, not 12V. Also a typical car's '12V' supply is (ideally) more like 13.8V or so because the alternator charges the battery as the engine runs. That '12V' in a car is also very nasty for devices that don't do a lot of regulation: big spikes, etc.

      Want your own USB charger port in your car? Grab or build a good DC/DC converter for ~12V->5V with some filtering and spike suppression (as 12V zener diode should do), connect it to the same circuit as the 12V cigar lighter plug, and run its 5V output to a USB connector pigtail (just cut up a spare USB cable, the wires are color coded, ie: red and black). It's not particularly difficult to do.

    4. Re:now let's get them in cars! by Jzor · · Score: 1

      Car DC power sockets are not constant current sources. They are voltage sources at around 13V.
      Also, they are capable of sourcing more along the lines of 20A. Atleast, that is the value of the fuse in-line with mine.

    5. Re:now let's get them in cars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What he meant is that there is still a need for the current sockets used for power in cars. The OP suggested that they were obsolete and should be replaced by USB, but they provide much more power than USB would, which means many people still have a use for them.

    6. Re:now let's get them in cars! by planetmn · · Score: 1

      My point, like the AC above me said, is that there is still a use for the DC sockets in cars.

      -dave

      --
      /., where "Apple and Google provide Iran with nukes" will be refuted with "But Microsoft is a convicted monopolist"
    7. Re:now let's get them in cars! by jspectre · · Score: 1

      personally i don't want a huge converter brick shuffling around the floor of my vehicle or even a socket-wart just to charge up my cell phone. i'd gladly pay a few extra bucks for these to be built into the car, hidden away, and only a few usb plugs under a cover in the dash/armrest/where-ever.

      ok, people who want to power their fridges, you need the 12v socket, but does that even need to be so large? i seriously doubt it.

      --

      abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

    8. Re:now let's get them in cars! by blugu64 · · Score: 1

      "maybe one for data to play mp3's thru your radio"

      I know I've seen this in a factory radio. i think it was a VW. You basically copied mp3s on a thumb drive and plugged it in either on the dash or the center console, can't quite remember. Automagically you could then play music off that drive.

      --
      "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
    9. Re:now let's get them in cars! by dourk · · Score: 1

      who uses a cigarette lighter socket for cigarettes any more???

      I do, and I'm not alone. The last thing I want to fumble with is a USB-sized cigarette lighter.

      --
      Wake up.
    10. Re:now let's get them in cars! by Z00L00K · · Score: 1
      Last time I used the lighter was to check if there was any power in the outlet or if I had blown the fuse. Figured out that it was the cable from the lighter socket to my device that had blown the fuse...

      And in general - the cigarette lighter outlet isn't a really good power outlet anyway - it's far to unreliable and often placed in a location that makes it inconvenient whenever a device is connected. A slightly better connector exists (at least here in Europe). It doesn't have the tendency to silently slowly crawl out of the jack, but it could have been better.

      Anyway - standardizing the device connectors is generally a good idea. Same should be done with all connectors in use. Too many connectors exists that are either unsafe or unreliable or both. Standardizing on the USB connector seems to be a good idea, only catch is the current limit of the USB connector of 500mA but that's a minor problem. A lot of phone USB cables actually provides charging through the USB cable today - the only difference is the connector in the phone.

      Another annoying detail is that there are too many variants of USB connectors already on the market. It started with two rather large connectors the A and B connector. Two different connectors for the same thing was a stupid idea already from the beginning, and then there are a large amount of high density USB connectors for cameras etc. just to make things worse for consumers.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    11. Re:now let's get them in cars! by powerlord · · Score: 1

      There are only three types of USB connectors that I know of, and you mentioned all three.

      You're right that the USB A and B types were ridiculous, but they're there so deal.
      The 'mini' USB port makes lots more sense. Its a compact, data only (no power), connector.

      FireWire has the same thing with a 'mini' connector that leaves off the power pins and just provides the data connection.

      This is great for something like a camera, or other device that has its own internal power supply, and that you just need to connect to the computer momentarily (especially if you are trying to save the space the larger connector would take up).

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    12. Re:now let's get them in cars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      who uses a cigarette lighter socket for cigarettes any more???


      Probably the 70 million(approximately) addicts in the US.

      http://www.drugabuse.gov/Infofacts/Tobacco.html
    13. Re:now let's get them in cars! by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      It has to be large, because I want to plug my cigar lighter into it. Have you seen how big the tip on a cigar is?

    14. Re:now let's get them in cars! by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      I have one that plugs into the cigarette lighter socket on the dashboard of my Ford truck. An SD card or a USB drive with MP3 files can be plugged into it. It broadcasts the music/sound through the FM radio. It's pretty neat and self contained.

    15. Re:now let's get them in cars! by jspectre · · Score: 1

      what? they never heard of lighters? matches?

      --

      abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  19. I Concur by ehaggis · · Score: 1

    Standardizing cables is a great idea. Now I can plug my 8-track or phonograph into my computer without finding the right adapter or cable. Someone will certainly complain about too much gov't invasiveness, but anything to get rid of those piles of wires I have hanging around with no known device to power or connect. It's nirvana!

    --
    One ring to bind them - should probably have more fiber and less rings in their diet.
    1. Re:I Concur by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      I've only ever seen adapters that plug into the 8-Track slot in the dashboard to allow you to play a cassette. But I'll readily admit that I got one for the sole purpose of rigging it (and probably voiding the warranty) to allow me to instead play my 7" reel-to-reel tapes in the car.

  20. Why not expand this to other products categories? by ivi · · Score: 0

    I've been wanting this kind of policy for yonks!

    Now that it's come - at least to cel.phones -
    I'd like to see it generalised to other products,
    as well.

    (OK, so maybe my Electric Vehicle will has an
    atypical charger & connection to the car... ;-) ...preferably with no need to install software
    for all the different types of devices, too...

  21. wait.... by holywarrior21c · · Score: 0

    'In Korea only old people use cell phone and universal cables to charge them.'

    -Me, the real Korean-

  22. Yea by failedlogic · · Score: 2, Informative

    I looked into getting a Data cable from my cell phone provider for a two-year old phone. They want $50! (I know eBay, etc). It goes to show that the proprietary cables cost a hell of a lot more money for nothing.

    And I'll bet with these standard cables, Monster Cable will develop a super-editition with gold-plated connectors, etc, etc! Only $100! LOL.

  23. Waiting for the same for laptop chargers by vidarh · · Score: 1

    I probably have 6-7 old laptop chargers. They're all using slightly different voltages etc., but they're close enough that it's trivial to get universal chargers that can handle the full span. The problem is that the plugs are all different. If you look at the "universal" laptopchargers you can buy, most of them come with a large selection of plugs... How hard could it be to ensure the laptop can handle an input voltage up to a reasonable maximum, and use standard plugs?

    1. Re:Waiting for the same for laptop chargers by iangoldby · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see a standard low voltage DC supply that could be used to supply laptops (amongst many other gadgets).

      One important criterion though: It must use a magnetic connector (like the Apple MacBooks). People won't want to settle for the lowest common denominator.

      Or maybe this is one reason no such standard exists.

    2. Re:Waiting for the same for laptop chargers by TerranFury · · Score: 1

      >Or maybe this is one reason no such standard exists.

      Nah. Magnetic connectors are cool, but nine out of ten (incompatible) chargers are just plain old plugs -- and I doubt anybody ever bought or decided not to buy any laptop (including a Macbook) just because of the charger.

  24. Summary is wrong by Tim+C · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The summary says that phones "must use USB for charging". The fine article, however, says that "handsets sold there should be able to charge via USB".

    There is a lot of difference between those two statements; the former makes absolutely no sense, as not every mobile phone user has a computer (or one with a USB port). The latter is a wonderful idea that frankly should be implemented as soon as humanly possible.

    1. Re:Summary is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the former makes absolutely no sense, as not every mobile phone user has a computer

      Step one: Make phone with USB connector for charging.

      Step two: Supply USB cable for data access.

      Step three: Supply charger with USB connector, using the two 5V (power) pins of the USB cable.

    2. Re:Summary is wrong by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      My Blackberry recharger plugs into an outlet on one end and the other end plugs into the USB-receptacle on the Blackberry. I think that's what they meant. By the way, I can also use the same recharger on my iPod, because the part that plugs in has a female USB connect that I can plug my iPod cord into.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
  25. Motorola is already doing it by wannabgeek · · Score: 2, Informative

    At least most of the new phones of Motorola the A-series, the RAZR, SLVR and PEBL etc all come with USB ports for charging as well as data-transfer.

    --
    I'm much more funny, interesting and insightful than the moderators think
    1. Re:Motorola is already doing it by clonmult · · Score: 1

      This is one of the best moves that Motorola has made for a while, but with one caveat.

      You cannot charge a RAZR from being flat via PC/USB, you have to use the mains charger. Maybe only a slight inconvenience, but a point none the less.

    2. Re:Motorola is already doing it by clonmult · · Score: 2, Informative

      Should also add that Motorola have been shipping USB to their proprietary adapters for quite a few years - I got one with my HS820 headset, and can charge it from my PC.

    3. Re:Motorola is already doing it by Technician · · Score: 1

      At least most of the new phones of Motorola the A-series, the RAZR, SLVR and PEBL etc all come with USB ports for charging as well as data-transfer.

      Too bad many of their FRS radios don't use a standard handsfree headset cable. Radios such as the T6200 series use the M6 plug which is very close to a standard hands free headset but not quite.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    4. Re:Motorola is already doing it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like your razr may need service. Mine charges perfectly over USB with linux and openbsd.

    5. Re:Motorola is already doing it by Count_Froggy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Two caveats: You cannot charge a RAZR from a USB port on a laptop without buying Motorola's 'Mobile tools'. The port on my ACER laptop will not supply power without an active driver in WinXP - and Motorola doesn't include drivers with the phone (or allow them to be downloaded later). Another reason to not buy another Motorola product. Crippled USB port. Would you buy a usb-equipped music player if you had to pay extra to get the usb port to work???

      --
      If I am not for myself, then who will be for me? If I am only for myself, what am I? If not now, when?
    6. Re:Motorola is already doing it by blugu64 · · Score: 1

      Do tell me you are kidding, Are there drivers for OS X? I was looking into buying a RAZR (trite I know) and one of the neato things I liked was the USB port.

      --
      "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
    7. Re:Motorola is already doing it by Count_Froggy · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I don't know. You may want to find out from other Mac users or your friendly Apple store if it is so. I do know that when I am in Linux, the same computer and same cable works.

      --
      If I am not for myself, then who will be for me? If I am only for myself, what am I? If not now, when?
    8. Re:Motorola is already doing it by thebosz · · Score: 1

      The drivers necessary to charge your RAZR (and I assume other mini-USB equipped Motorola phones, they work with my V3 and V3m) are easily found and downloaded off the web. A website I like is: Moto-V3M Wiki. They've got some good easy step-by-step guides with links to download the software.

      --
      The Kerr Divine: My wife's battle with a mysterious illness.
    9. Re:Motorola is already doing it by Count_Froggy · · Score: 1

      Thank you!

      --
      If I am not for myself, then who will be for me? If I am only for myself, what am I? If not now, when?
    10. Re:Motorola is already doing it by thebosz · · Score: 1
      Oh, you're quite welcome. Glad I could help.

      I also want to point out that there's a lot more out there than just charging your phone. I use some free software linked from that site (BitPim in particular) to transfer songs and videos to my 1GB microSD card that I got for $25. I use the phone (a V3m) as a music and video (got Season 1 of "The Office" on there right now!) player. Granted, it's not as feature-packed or nice as an iPod, but it gets the job done, and I got the phone for free!

      --
      The Kerr Divine: My wife's battle with a mysterious illness.
    11. Re:Motorola is already doing it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need drivers. Moto4lin works on OS X - or should. I use it on my linux box with no problems. There seems to be other software, too.

    12. Re:Motorola is already doing it by Count_Froggy · · Score: 1

      Charging is now working, although BitPim doesn't transfer information (reports an error switching modes. It is a v3c.). That is okay, if I really wanted to transfer info, I probably would have bought the Mobile Tools anyway. This thread is mainly about charging anyway.

      --
      If I am not for myself, then who will be for me? If I am only for myself, what am I? If not now, when?
    13. Re:Motorola is already doing it by PPGMD · · Score: 1
      The port on my ACER laptop will not supply power without an active driver in WinXP - and Motorola doesn't include drivers with the phone (or allow them to be downloaded later).

      I have an Acer, and no it will not provide power to recognizable USB device without a driver. But it does allow the pulling of power without a driver, I use a USB powered light, and speakers on my TravelMate 8100.

    14. Re:Motorola is already doing it by aap · · Score: 1

      Docs for my V190 said roughly the same thing... imagine my surprise when I plugged a 3rd-party cable into the phone and a laptop running Ubuntu dapper, and the phone said "charging..."

  26. seconded! by cyclomedia · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now in europe please, oh and make sure they're all able to charge off of a sensible range of voltage and current and more importantly use the SAME USB socket, because let's face it there are twelve of those two.

    --
    If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
    1. Re:seconded! by Spokehedz · · Score: 1

      What? USB is USB. 1.1 and 2.0 use the same voltage and can source the same amount of amps. And the socket is the same, at least from the computer side--and there is only one device USB socket that supports charging and data... So I really have no idea what your talking about.

    2. Re:seconded! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      They're probably talking about the fact that we have USB A, USB B, Mini-USB, and we've all seen those Kodak USB cables. Of course if they had been paying attention they'd know that any phone with a USB connector only has room for a mini-usb (even the Kodak one is longer and has to go farther into the device than Mini-USB.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:seconded! by solitas · · Score: 2, Informative

      FWIW:
      according to Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB) the spec for ports is 4.35-5.25 VDC @ 500mA max.
      IEEE1394 (Firewire) ports (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firewire) can supply up to 45 watts @ 30 VDC (1.5A).

      --
      "It's time to take life by the cans." ~ Bender ("Bendin' in the Wind", ep. 3-13)
    4. Re:seconded! by shaitand · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if both are rated for charging but there are also 4 pin and 5 pin mini-usb connectors. Some phones/cameras have one or the other and some have neither.

  27. New Samsung by thpdg · · Score: 1

    I've spent the last 2 weeks trying to find accessories for my new Samsung, and it's impossible. It has a single proprietary connector for charging and headset. Worse, it's not the connector they've been using all along. It's new for Blackjack and Sync and all of the phones from the past 6 months. WTF!
    No store carries anything, but if you're willing to wait, plenty is coming over from Hong Kong.
    USB would be very nice!

    --

    -Patrick

    "They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we."

    1. Re:New Samsung by maxume · · Score: 1

      Be sure to check:

      http://boxwave.com/
      http://gomadic.com/

      (but maybe not in that order)

      Gomadic has connectors for dozens of Samsung phones, maybe they have yours.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:New Samsung by thpdg · · Score: 1

      I love Boxwave, and they were one of the first places I checked when I got my phone on 1 December. Checking back now, I see they have added some items.
      Thank you for the reminder!!

      --

      -Patrick

      "They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we."

  28. Finally! by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    This might not be good for cell phone accessory makers, though. Chargers are big business. I have three just for my phone. One for the office, one for the home, and one for the car.

    Motorola has already using USB. It started with the RAZR and SLVR and KRZR. But their older cell phones still have proprietary cables.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    1. Re:Finally! by Barleymashers · · Score: 1

      I agree, the only problem is when I ordered my RAZR and Mototola Bluetooth headset, they had different chargers! The RAZR had the USB and the headset still had the old one used on the v60s... I was so annoyed. Now I have two chargers for home, and two chargers for the car. They should standardize all of the phones and accessories.

  29. Take it one more step by ZOMFF · · Score: 1

    It's great that they are standardizing on the connection to the device. It would be even better if now there could be a standard for wall AC power. Needing to bring 6-8 adapters when I travel overseas is a bit crazy.

    --
    Launch every sig.
    1. Re:Take it one more step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never noticed a problem with this as most adapters seem to support a range of voltages, e.g. 110 to 250. Are you travelling to places with particularly exotic voltages?

    2. Re:Take it one more step by ZOMFF · · Score: 1

      The voltage ranges are not the issue, but rather the design of the plug. Example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Mains_power_ connectors

      --
      Launch every sig.
    3. Re:Take it one more step by Technician · · Score: 1

      Needing to bring 6-8 adapters when I travel overseas is a bit crazy.

      If you are not out of the country much, forget the adaptors and just pick up one of the emergency power adaptors that take a couple AA batteries and leave the adaptors home. In my case, I just travel with 12 volt adaptors and a pocket inverter. Charge up in the rental car and forget AC adaptors. The pocket inverter can charge the laptop while wardriving for a free net connection.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    4. Re:Take it one more step by mastercylender · · Score: 0

      Um... Why not do what I do... take your US adaptor and just plug it into the razor plug that is 110V in most hotels? Or just take a universal plug adaptor and do that...almost all the wall warts I have work from 100-240VAC. I travel all the time and I dont carry all that much with me at all....

  30. USB? by gelfling · · Score: 2, Insightful

    WTF does that mean? I have an iPod aftermarket charger that plugs into the wall and accepts the iPod's standard USB cable. Is that what they mean? Because at the least that would mean I could use a cheap wallplug unit for all my phone regardless of what stupid unique connector they use on the phone end. Of course that means that USB cables will triple in price.

    Otherwise if they mean that all phones have to be charged by a USB port to a computer alone that would make less than zero sense. Considering, as others here have pointed out, not all USB ports draw enough current, it doubly makes less than zero sense.

    1. Re:USB? by dillee1 · · Score: 1

      USB supplies flat +5V and GND in 2 pins. No bus protocol is required for gadgets drawing power from a port. Using simple "aftermarket charger" is always possible, so charge_by_computer_only_act is unenforceable; a long as they are talking about the USB standard as the world know of.

    2. Re:USB? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      WTF does that mean? I have an iPod aftermarket charger that plugs into the wall and accepts the iPod's standard USB cable. Is that what they mean? that's exactly what it means. no funky delicate plastic clips with 3 spring loaded wafer contacts (motorola, damn you!), just industry standard device-side USB connectors supplying industry standard USB power. The other end can be either a regular usb plug, so you can plug into a computer, or a wall wart supplying the power a USB port would. My guess is that the latter will be what comes with the phone.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    3. Re:USB? by gelfling · · Score: 1


      But I don't care what's on the phone side if all I have to worry about is a cable. That is, if I take the wall side out of the equation altogether then who cares? There is no need to put the same connector into the phone side of all phones where the onlt removeable part, as such, is a cable. I could get a USB out-splitter and plug one adapter into the wall and have multiple cables out to any kind of phone. If it's a weird Nokia or a Samsung or a more common pole type, then so what?

    4. Re:USB? by spitzak · · Score: 1

      But if you lose the cable then you will need a special Nokia/Samsung-only cable with a patented connector, replacements available for $55 or whatever price they can get away with.

      Standards should be required for every connection to the phone that can logically be assummed to be removable by the consumer. Otherwise the above scenario happens, just like it is happening now with the wall warts.

    5. Re:USB? by gelfling · · Score: 1

      A lost cable is a lost cable. Whether it's a standard prong or not, still has to be replaced. I don't see Best Buy for instance charging a fair, e.g. cheap price for either.

    6. Re:USB? by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Yes, but a lost cable is a piece of wire. You shouldn't have to pay a ransom to Best Buy. It should be something you get at Dollar General or any gas station for $6.

    7. Re:USB? by gelfling · · Score: 1

      Depends on what you think cheap is. I just bought a 'cheap' 1/8th inch stereo plug on both ends 6ft cable for $6 from Radio Shack. I think that's overpriced. but I see your point. I guess if everyone had a prong power plug it would sort of standardize things.

      But I tend to think that phone companies are all corrupt bastards who want to nickle and dime you to death so what they'll do is stop including any form of charger with the phone at all. I mean I have a bunch of phones now with some form of data port for which that phone manufacturer themselves doesn't even make a cable to mate to it.

      And all Samsung phones that I see have two power ports - one for the jazzy flat connector and one for a pole connector. I wonder why the complexity?

  31. They get to charge you £40 for a cable by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    It's quite deliberate. You have to buy the cable from them so they can charge you several thousand percent margin on it.

    --
    Deleted
  32. Great idea by jim9000 · · Score: 1

    One of the reasons I bought the phone I have (RAZR V3c) is that it was the only reasonably priced phone on my carrier that had a mini USB interface. I picked up a cable for $5 instead of $40 so I could hook it up to my computer and charge using that. I use the same cable for many other devices and don't have to carry a charger around with me.

  33. The good with the bad... by geekmux · · Score: 1

    Guess I have to take the good with the bad. Good news is no more searching for the "right" sync/charging cable for phones, makes IT support easier. Bad news is the market is now flooded with useless crapola (ala iPod) that my phone plugs into now. Hey, who can't say no to desktop speakers in the shape of dog poo? C'mon!

  34. Not only positive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Nokia gets the credit for using the same connector for all it's phones.

    I got bitten by exactly that. I had a Nokia phone that ran out of power, but the charger was at home. So I borrowed a Nokia charger from someone else. I looked for a voltage rating on the phone, but couldn't find any, so in the end thought "ok, both phone and charger is Nokia, and the plugs fit, so let's give it a try".

    Took half a year before the battery could hold power for more than a day. Charging a 15 volt Nokia phone (when I got home, I checked the voltage of my own charger) with a 3 volt Nokia charger is very bad for the battery.

    Of course, the other way around might be even worse.

  35. Re:Summary is wrong and so are you by bananaendian · · Score: 3, Informative
    makes absolutely no sense, as not every mobile phone user has a computer (or one with a USB port).

    You are so wrong.

    You do not need a laptop to 'USB-charge'

    You can pick up a USB Mains Charger for as little as 5 USD.

    --
    www.tribalnetworks.org - helping tribal people around the world to own their own means of high-tech communications
  36. This is great for people in S Korea and China, but by MiniMike · · Score: 0

    What are the chances that things made in China and South Korea would make it to the U.S. (where I am, I'm being insensitive)?

    What's that?

    Oh....

  37. interesting related factoid: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those of you who have samsung's razr wannabe; my roomate has one. I have an el-cheapo Samsung SCH-a630. He lost his charger for a bit, and I let him borrow mine. it worked.

    After he found his, i lost mine, and tried to borrow his: didn't work. there were extra grooves that prevented plugging in.

  38. In Other News... by LikeTheSearchEngine · · Score: 1

    Sony CEO throws temper tantrum, claiming their proprietary interfaces and formats actually benefit consumers...

    1. Re:In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I very much doubt it. The PS3 charges its controllers via USB. So save your Zonk fangirlism for elsewhere.

    2. Re:In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, one device out of hundreds that actually use a standard format. You think all the other hardware Sony makes have standard, inter compatible power bricks?

      You're stupid.

  39. Motorola are good at this by jonwil · · Score: 1

    Pretty much every GSM, UMTS and CDMA motorola (so not wierd stuff like that IDEN thing) currently available has a mini USB port which is used to charge the phone.
    You can use a wall-wart charger or a car cigarette lighter charger or whatver. It also uses USB for data transfer and if the USB port is powered, will charge whilst sending data. There is the negative that you cant charge and do data at the same time if the USB port cant provide enough juice but the answer is to charge and then transfer data, transfer data and then charge or build/buy a cable that the USB charger plugs into as does the phone and the computer such that the phone draws power over the power pins from the USB charger whilst communicating over the data pins with the computer. (I am surprised that such a cable doesnt already exist :)

    1. Re:Motorola are good at this by alexj33 · · Score: 0

      I have a Motorola RAZR. Funny thing is, when I plug the phone + charger into one outlet in my bedroom, it works fine. But if I plug it into my kitchen outlet, I get a message that says "Unauthorized Charger" on my phone's screen.

      Why, o why, IS THE ELECTRICITY IN MY KITCHEN NOT GOOD ENOUGH FOR MOTOROLA??

  40. Re:Summary is wrong and so are you by Tim+C · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, I'm not wrong about the article summary being wrong, and I'm not wrong about not everyone having a computer with a USB port (and I never even mentioned laptops), so at best I'm wrong about the need for such a computer in order to charge via USB, which was implied. So, I'm 66% right; not entirely sure that constitutes being "so wrong".

  41. not enough ooompf... 0.5W guaranteed max by chiark · · Score: 1

    You can 'officially' only guarantee that a USB port will give you 100mA at 5V - 0.5 Watts. A device can ask to increase power consumption (to up to 500mA) in its descriptor following initial power up, but it should not do that until it's been allowed to. In practice, lots of devices just say, "aah, I'm ok to do this" and try to pull the full 500mA.

    Other devices use more than 500mA, and they work in some instances and not in others.

    But either way it's gonna take a long time to charge your 4460mAh/14.8V battery (237KJ of energy) on .5W - over 130 hours, excluding losses due to stepping up the voltage from 5V to something useful to charge laptop batteries. Even at 2.5W, that's still over a day of constant charging.

    And that's excluding the fact that stepping from 5V to something useful to charge laptop batteries will not be a lossless operation ;-)

  42. USB chargers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope they mandate also clean USB chargers.
    USB does not allow to simply use the power. Power is part of the bus protocol so the USB device has to fulfil several requirements.

  43. There is a point to the free market screamers by hellfire · · Score: 1

    The problem with technology is that quite often we either end up with one standard that becomes outdated after years of use, or way too many standards that are highly incompatible. There are times a happy medium is achieved, but not always. Many times a standards body is created to create oversight over an industry standard and help regulate change so that yesterday's connector is compatible with today's PC/laptop/camera/phone/etc.

    My concern about any government doing this is that these are 2 governments out of 190+ in the world imposing a standard. What if the US, canada, UK, France, Germany , Russia, or anyone else impose another standard different from USB? And what happens when USB is 20 years old and needs to be replaced. All you people decrying the current state of things will turn right around and decry that the government isn't doing it's job. Well sometimes that's the point of the free market, to do something the government doesn't do well and should not be doing at all. A standard imposed by the entire industry, rather than a few countries, would be a lot better, and the standards body would regulate change throughout the industry.

    As for USB, there are at least 3 USB connector ends I know of. The most familiar to everyone is, in my opinion, too large for most phones. USB made connectors and cables better but they didn't make it "one size fits all." Does the law distinguish between the three connectors? If not, we will still have some problems with not having one connector to rule them all.

    It would be nice if the US government put pressure on the industry to come up with some universal connector scheme that provides power and data transmission. Cell phone companies want something as small as possible. If they base it on the USB standard, great. I just want one connector for my bluetooth, my handset, and be able to bum a charge from the guy next to me or buy any old connector for $5 if I forgot mine at home.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:There is a point to the free market screamers by Detritus · · Score: 1

      I have several portable devices that use mini-USB connectors. The connector is small enough for cell phones, and it is standardized.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  44. Two stupid laws? One week? It can't be true! by screeble · · Score: 1

    Great, where exactly am I supposed to plug in my USB-powered powered USB hub so that I can recharge my USB-powered phone? I can't connect it to my USB-powered laptop because I can't find a PC with a free USB port to recharge and my battery is dead.

    All these laws did was kick an aftermarket of USB-connectored wall-warts into overdrive. I've got two of these devices already for iPod recharging when travelling. Griffin makes a nice one with a flexible dock cable. I just leave the cable plugged into the wall wart and wrap the cord around it when I am not using the charger. I keep the other charger as a backup as the Griffin has enough available current to charge two video iPods if I use a cheapo brain-dead USB 1.1 mini-hub as a Y-splitter.

    This is extremely short-sighted legislation and moves the proprietary device issues to the connector on the phone. Right now, we've already got a dogs breakfast of devices with cables that are USB on one end and device unique on the other. I've got three different usb cables on my desk right now and none of them have the same connector. One of them is a standard USB mini jack but the other two are Frankenconnectors from the depths of product design hell.

    Using these types of cables to plug my cell phone into a USB port would be handy but I just happen to have a Dell laptop at work. Since my laptop bag is already full of proprietary USB cables it's going to be a lot of fun trying to dig through the spaghetti. I'll have to upgrade the powered hub I use, too. Although the newer 610's are better about USB than some of the older models I still have to connect to "shore power" to plug in some of the hungrier devices I own. The Dell just doesn't put out enough juice to supply USB juice to multiple devices appropriately. Neither does the keyboard USB port on my iMac, come to think of it.

    Good thing I have a stack of chained powered hubs at home.

    1. Re:Two stupid laws? One week? It can't be true! by Steve+B · · Score: 2, Informative

      Great, where exactly am I supposed to plug in my USB-powered powered USB hub so that I can recharge my USB-powered phone?

      You can get a USB power adapter that plugs directly into the wall and provides power to a USB port, or a portable unit that powers a USB port from 4 AA batteries (one version called the "JAVOBooster" has a built-in flashlight as a bonus). Both are likely to be cheaper than the outrageously marked-up proprietary power bricks (even before taking into account the fact that you need one total, not one for each device).

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    2. Re:Two stupid laws? One week? It can't be true! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but do they provide power to a USB-powered powered USB hub so you can charge your USB-powered laptop?

  45. Because they don't care enough to pay by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1, Informative

    Ah, everybody should be equal the world should be fair.

    I get a charger for free with my phone. I don't get gas for free with my car. If people really really cared that they had the same charger for everything they would have insisted on it years ago. They don't care so it's a non issue. Given that it's a non issue why should I pay the extra cost for the design of phones which have to use USB?

    You want it? You put it on the list of criteria of features for your next phone and you pay for it.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Because they don't care enough to pay by Kickersny.com · · Score: 1
      I get a charger for free with my phone. I don't get gas for free with my car.
      I guess a more accurate analogy would be if your car came with a hose and nozzle unique to that make, model, and year, and you plugged into the pump.
    2. Re:Because they don't care enough to pay by cgenman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You pay through the nose for the non-standard charger when you have to replace it in a few years, generally between 30 and 50 dollars for a part with a materials cost of at most a dollar.

      You pay for it in phones that get thrown out because the non-standard charger tax in a few years makes it more feasable to dump the phone than replace the hideously unstandard wall-wart. Hence, more landfill costs, more materials costs, and a depressed to non-existant secondary market.

      You pay for it in electricity, in the trickle costs of the many, many different chargers plugged in but idle in any given household.

      You pay for it in brainspace, trying to keep everything clear in your head. Those times you fail to take the proper charger with you on a trip and you have to buy another one when you get there.

      And on the other end of the spectrum, all of this is because the hardware companies want to bury hidden costs in the device to make a higher profit. There is no benefit to the end consumer at all. The manufacturers are just trying to raise the barrier of entry of selling replacement parts to keep those prices artifically high.

      Well, guess what? The consumer does have a voice in making things fair. It's called the government. That's why you elect them. It doesn't always work, but that's what it's for. And in this case, the free market has had years to fix the problem, and it has only gotten worse. The amount of cheering on this thread is evidence of the animosity towards this purely profit-taking process.

      This is people, seeing a problem and taking an action to improve the end-consumer experience and reduce overall costs. And good for them. It's nice to see a government that isn't kow-towing to every exploitive commercial process within its borders.

    3. Re:Because they don't care enough to pay by maxume · · Score: 1

      I'll chime in by agreeing that (enough) people clearly don't care or phones would already be this way. A good cross example is digital cameras, they tend to come with usb cables or such that are easy to hook up to a computer, simply because the idea of a digital camera that doesn't connect to a computer is silly. Most people I know, when they get a new phone, simply wait for someone to call them before adding their number to the phone book, they have no interest in making regular backups or shit like that, and don't care very much about ring tones or address books.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:Because they don't care enough to pay by recoiledsnake · · Score: 1

      "I get a charger for free with my phone."

      Do you also get a battery and a small mike, speaker, and a number keypad free with your phone?

      A charger is an essential *part* of a cell phone, not a free optional accessory. When was the last time a new cell phone package came without a charger? Hence, we pay for the charger and if you go asking people if they want a similar charger for their device, you will notice that they care about it.

      --
      This space for rent.
    5. Re:Because they don't care enough to pay by timeOday · · Score: 1
      I get a charger for free with my phone.
      Sucker!
    6. Re:Because they don't care enough to pay by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 1

      The consumer does have a voice in making things fair. It's called the government


      You were doing reasonably well up to that point.


      One of the last things I need my government to trouble themselves with is cell phone chargers. I would prefer they concentrate on sitting on their hands so they don't kill any more people who don't need to be killed. I'd rather they point their brains toward figuring out how to extricate themselves from the quagmire of special interest they are now mired in, so that they could actually govern instead of spending their time pandering to whomever contributed to their last campaign.

      Propose cell phone charger legislation and you'll have 1000 cell phone charger industry lobbyists knocking on every lawmaker's door across the country. Committees will be set up to study the various bribes to determine which one merits further consideration by the secondary consideration committee. Trips will need to be taken. Drinks will need to be bought. Undisclosed sums of money will have to change hands before a specific charger design can be settled upon and a list of approved suppliers chosen up from the list of approved lawmaker-brother-in-law owned shell companies. In the end I'll have a go to the license branch to get my cell phone charger and my cell phone bill will have a Federal Cell Phone Charger Cost Reclamation Fee line added to it.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    7. Re:Because they don't care enough to pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>I get a charger for free with my phone.

      I am sure you are equally thankful to them for letting the sound come out of the speaker of your phone. In fact, I am sure you were on your knees when they give you the shiney new phone which would LET YOU MAKE A CALL!!!!!

    8. Re:Because they don't care enough to pay by berashith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would agree with this if I got a free car charger also. Every time I buy a phone, I have to spend the extra $30 - $50 for this accessory.

      Getting extra batteries to charge during the occasions that I am home would be an option I guess, but those are even more non-standard and expensive.

      My last option is just suck it up and stay locked in to a single vendor, until that vendor decides to again change all the charger ports, no matter how inferior the product becomes.

      Creating a standard pin and having a built in cost of a few pennies per phone seems to be the best option on the table.

    9. Re:Because they don't care enough to pay by winomonkey · · Score: 1

      Wait, you are saying that all of this is because the Chinese government is listening to its people?! The article, in its full paragraph length, says that one of the key factors here is the Chinese import market and the desire of the Chinese government to lower costs (and, I would imagine, be able to create their own chargers that meet the standards, as opposed to having to fight with patents over someone else's product).

      Also, how many cell phones do you take on a trip to actually have it eat of brainspace? This only applies to handsets for phones. Laptops, mp3 players, PDAs, shavers, etc are not covered by this.

    10. Re:Because they don't care enough to pay by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Uh, the end of the hose that plugged into the pump would be standardized, then.

    11. Re:Because they don't care enough to pay by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      I would agree with this if I got a free car charger also. Every time I buy a phone, I have to spend the extra $30 - $50 for this accessory.

      You can go to many retailers and get a little stunted 'inverter' device for your car with a cigarette lighter plug (yep, kiddos, that what they used to be used for) input that will output the tiny amount of AC your charger needs. One time purchase. Done deal.

      Thought you might want to know. And they're usually around ten bucks. Spend your money wisely...

  46. THANK YOU! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't quite know what to say. That is excellent.

    1. Re:THANK YOU! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, you're welcome.

  47. Fixed for you by tacokill · · Score: 1

    Oligopolies are the result OF a free market if those markets are not regulated and made fair.

    Like Highlander, there can only be One (or 3-4 in this case)

    1. Re:Fixed for you by nelsonrn · · Score: 1

      Okay .... you name one oligopoly created by free markets, and I'll name a monopoly or oligopoly created by government. First person to quit loses. If you don't reply, you grant my point that government is the cause of *opolies, not free markets.

    2. Re:Fixed for you by tacokill · · Score: 1

      Well, we are getting pretty deep here, philosophically but I'll play. It's hard to define the boundries of "free market" and "government" -- they both play very close to one another and affect each other. Governments have the ability to pass laws and regulations that the free market must absorb and account for. Sometimes this has good consequences and sometimes it has bad consequences. So, it's hard to determine where a given oligopoly "came from". (note: before we begin, full disclosure: I am an avid capitalist. Hate socialism. Generally think the free market works - but not in all cases.)

      Oligopolies created by free markets, also known as natural monopolies, are plentiful*. See Standard Oil. See AT&T. See Microsoft. Yes, there are govt created oligopolies (govts can create just about anything they want) but to say that the free market WON'T create oligopolies doesn't match what we see in the real world. Maybe that's because our definitions of free markets are different - but that's a question for another day. In any case, go to any "free market" country and you will find many many industries that only have 1-5 players and furthermore, those 1-5 players are doing everything they can to make sure it only remains 1-5 players (rational business decisions). That is the very definition of oligopoly. Since it happens in almost every single free-market in the world, it's hard to argue that free markets don't create some oligopolies.

      Now, throw in a splash of patent protection, trademark protection, and dubious copyright laws -- and you have a system that is RIPE for the creation of oligopolies. If free markets produced LESS oligopolies, then how come the USA has so many industries that at totally dominated by 1-5 players? Why is that? I'll tell you why: because the free markets - by definition - are not regulated. And some regulation is required to keep markets fair. (even the most capitalist of capitalists recognize the need for some regulation - telcos, for example. See my previous disclaimer.)

      A good illustration is AT&T and phone rentals. Way back when, AT&T decided that the ONLY devices allowed to be used on their system were phones you rented from them. That was the only (artificial) option. Of course, it's obvious, that this is in the best interests of AT&T and not consumers, right?

      In a fair market, the consumers have other alternatives if they don't like what AT&T does. However, back then there were NO competitors in this area -- so consumers could take it or leave it. Some would argue that has not changed and is still the case in 2006. I point out this example because this happened in a free market (right here in the US) and at the time, there was very little regulation. And lastly, we all know what happened after that (AT&T ruled a monopoly, broken up)

      Another interesting market is the world-wide market for diamonds. As you already know, DeBeers is the oligarch here. Now, nobody would claim that the market for diamonds, worldwide, is regulated. It most certainly is not as consumers have plenty of choice (or so it would seem). So answer me this: if the market is almost 100% unregulated, how does an oligarch like DeBeers come about? They don't have any worldwide government sponsorship and I am certain the S. African government is not powerful enough to force DeBeers on anyone. So how did they get into a oligarchy situation?

      The bottom line is this: free-markets need some regulation. But often, if the regulation is not done correctly, the regulations themselves create an oligopolistic opporunity. It's not strictly the government that creates oligopolies. It's not strictly the free markets that creates them either. It is a combination of both that creates oligopolies.

    3. Re:Fixed for you by nelsonrn · · Score: 1

      The regulation that free markets need is to keep violence out. Governments purpose is to prevent theft, murder, rape, and the threats of same. Any regulations beyond that makes the market less free.

      Okay, you've named Standard Oil. I name AT&T. You named AT&T. Oops, that one counts for me, since its monopoly (and guaranteed profits) was granted by the federal government in exchange for universal service. You name Microsoft. I would point out that Microsoft has been unable to prevent Linux from entering its market so I have to question whether it's really a monopoly. But let's grant that one to you. I name National Grid, which is a monopoly provider of local electric service (At least in New York State, you can buy your current from competing suppliers, but the wiring is still a government-created monopoly). Your turn.

      (sorry for the delayed response; holidays).

  48. Let the free market decide this one by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 1

    The reason that his has not happened naturally is because the real consumer demand for common chargers and data cables does not exist to a large degree. If it did then the free market would have already responded. Don't put too much stock in the shrill anecdotes here in Slashdot praising the heavy hands of authoritarian governments who consistently think the elites running those governments know better than consumers and manufacturers.

    1. Re:Let the free market decide this one by Catbeller · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The free market has failed us for twenty years on this one. The free market says: buy a proprietary cable, or don't buy at all.

      The free market dictates that nothing works together, so that the businesses maximize profit. This is an automatic collusion. Smith said that no two businessmen ever met that didn't immediately collude to fix their market; he might have added that some markets require no actual collusion, that some exploitation is just obvious.

      This is one of the reasons we have governments. It's also why we don't have dozens of different power companies and dozens of power connectors in our home.

      Present businesses have failed us, so now some other nation's government will step in and impose some order, as we are ideologically incapable. Profits will diminish for the manufacturers, but spending power will increase for the consumer, the Broken Window fallacy refuted.

    2. Re:Let the free market decide this one by nelsonrn · · Score: 1

      Don't neglect the transaction costs of the coordination problem. It's quite possible that consumers desire common chargers and data cables, but the costs of expressing that desire exceed the value of the chargers.

  49. Mandates by pkcs11 · · Score: 0

    We have freedom of commerce in the US, so to mandate this would be to tell people how to run their businesses.
    We do have many regulations, so I understand that even in the US we have standards to comply with, but to do something like that might run some companies out of business. There is a pretty large secondary market in the phone charger & accessory markets.

    --
    "I have an odd craving to whisper about those few frightful hours in that ill-rumored and evilly shadowed seaport of dea
  50. Redundant Power Bricks by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
    I've always thought that having to find enough space on your surge protector for all your gadgets' power bricks is just stupid. We need a system where you can just buy one "brick" (one brick to rule them all), and manufacturers just provide the DC power cable which plugs into one of the many standardized ports on this brick.

    If we could use a system like this to consolidate our gadget power requirements, we could save a lot of money in electricity every year by reducing the number of wasteful DC transformers. (And yes, I know about universal power bricks with an assortment of plugs. Not what I'm talking about.)

    The closest approach to this would be one of these AC to USB connector gadgets. Of course this is no good for devices without the capability to charge over USB.

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  51. Where's the source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, so I looked at the article which was about a paragraph and linked me to another article which was about four lines long and linked me to another article, again about a paragraph long, linking to a "full story which gives a 404 error.

    Of course, this being slashdot, I know better than to be suprised by this.

    The chinese article is only three links deep and is actually online. It says "Under the new standard, all mobile phones, regardless of the brand, will be able to share one charger with a USB access, allowing users to charge handsets through laptops." - so it's still pretty ambiguous.

    Also, though the Chinese effort seems to be government-mandated, the South Korean program is being requested by carriers, with no government involvement.

  52. In your face, free market! by Catbeller · · Score: 1

    Woo-hoo! Laws made for consumers! It makes me want to tear up.

    1. Re:In your face, free market! by nelsonrn · · Score: 1

      You should distinguish between a law and legislation. A law is something which people create by their behavior. For example, the legislated speed limit in the USA is 55 MPH (for most roads). The law regarding speed limits is that you can drive from 5 to 10 MPH over the speed limit and no policeman will pull you over. If one does, you feel a sense of injustice .... as if a law had been broken.

      Laws are created by people. Legislation is created by politicians.

  53. Re:not enough ooompf... 0.5W guaranteed max by Goaway · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see what kind of phone you use that needs a 4460mAh/14.8V battery. What does it do, bounce signals off the stratosphere to call over the horizon?

  54. But will gov't interference prevent innovation? by Zeek40 · · Score: 1

    While i do like the idea of being able to use the same charger for any mobile phone ( I've actually purchased a proprietary adapter for my brothers phone to keep at my place, since he never remembers to bring his when he comes over, and we have different phones ) I have to wonder if such government mandates on design will prevent such innovation as Apple's MagSafe power adapters.

  55. "asolutely no sense" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But you just said it makes 33% sense, which is absolutely NOT "absolutely no" which you referred to.

    so you ARE absolutely wrong.

  56. Re:not enough ooompf... 0.5W guaranteed max by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    I think he was replying to his parent post, which was something along the line of "what about laptops?"

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  57. question by tef · · Score: 1

    Do not S.Korea and China use the same type of cell phones as North Americans? I mean, I'm sure that Nokia or motorolla aren't going to create two types of the same cell phone just so that they have 1 proprietery charger, and 1 without for China. So hopefully North America should see more and more cell phones with the same adapters now I would think.

  58. Wagging the dog by HangingChad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is the second example, but certainly not the last, where China has set a defacto standard for us. Here's what they did with DVD formats.

    When a country owns all your manufacturing capacity, you can't really tell them no. Who else is going to make stuff for you? Plus we owe them billions on the trade deficit.

    And this is only the warm up act. DVD formats and cables, little stuff. Wait until we start rolling over on the big stuff! ROFL! Maybe we'll wake up to obvious one of these days.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:Wagging the dog by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      The article you refered to covers a proposed successor to DVD, not one that already exists. China avoided the DVD alliance and associated licensing fees by developing SVCD to serve their domestic market. They certainly haven't foisted that format upon the rest of the world.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    2. Re:Wagging the dog by demastri · · Score: 1

      Actually, we don't "owe" them anything on the trade deficit, any more than you owe your supermarket something because you have a trade deficit with them. Trade partner A pays an agreed cash amount $x for goods and services to trade partner B. If we just stop here, there's a trade deficit because there's a cash flow in one direction. It's still not an issue in itself because goods and services of an equal value flow in the other direction. There isn't any additional expense "owed" because of it.

      Goods are manufactured where they can be most efficiently, and, for those products, there should be a net cash inflow to producer countries. For cheap manufactured goods, it's a GOOD THING(tm) that the US has a net cash outflow. There are other goods/services where there are net cash inflows. It isn't even necessarily a good thing to have a trade balance or surplus, either. For a trading partner with extra USD, all of that foreign currency has to (eventually) be traded or invested back in the US, which is exactly what would happen if these products were sold internally.

      Now, the budget deficit - that's a real deficit, and a real problem, but the trade "deficit" is simply little more than a scare idea. It still potentially applies to strategic/national security type availability reasons, NOT purely economic ones, but that's never the context it's raised in.

    3. Re:Wagging the dog by evilviper · · Score: 1
      This is the second example, but certainly not the last, where China has set a defacto standard for us.

      That's 100% crap.

      First, they are TRYING to set a standard for everyone, which they've done many times in the past, with ZERO results.

      China likes to roar about what a major world power it is, but very, very little ever comes of it.

      Here's what they did with DVD formats.

      No, that's what they're TRYING to do with DVD formats. EVD has precisely a 0% chance of replacing DVD, as the video codec is well below the quality of MPEG-2, and the processing power required is much higher. So EVD players will be more expensive, incompatible with the installed base, etc.

      SVCD had a better chance of replacing DVDs, and how many SVCDs do you own?

      Maybe we'll wake up to obvious one of these days.

      Most people know where things stand. You're the one living in some imaginary world where China is going to take over.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:Wagging the dog by Derf+the · · Score: 1

      I think that USD's, once out of the US, can be used internally within some countries and certainly internationally for between country trade without the US being ever involved again.
      So a negative trade balance(summed over all your trading partner countries and all financial instruments) will eventually weaken your economy as although you have more "things" you have brought, your net worth and ability to buy is decreasing; and eventually foreign ownership increases.

      IANAE

      --
      No. You can't look at my Sig; it's mine, and I'm not showing you.
    5. Re:Wagging the dog by demastri · · Score: 1

      if you include _all financial instruments_ and trading partner countries, your trading deficit will be exactly ZERO. the trade is offset exactly by the financial instruments. by definition.

      for the three cases you cite weakening the economy:

      the "things" you have bought - in any case, whether you buy them to add value or if it depreciates, it doesn't necessarily lower your net worth, and the result would be the same regardless of who you bought from.

      your ability to buy decreasing - this makes no sense. who you buy from makes no direct difference on your "ability to buy" - if you mean net worth, covered above, if you mean cash flow, then it doesn't matter TO YOU who you bought a particular product from (except for price)

      foreign ownership increases - how? by them reinvesting in US companies like any other stockholder. you can't complain on both sides of the transaction -> USD leaving country = bad, USD entering country = good. If the company doesn't do PROFITABLE things with the equity money they've been given, it's their fault. If they buy other raw materials, etc in the US, that's the point I was trying to make - USD eventually get invested in our markets, so a trade deficit has NO impact from that perspective overall. It comes down to getting out of industries where we have no competitive advantage, and maximizing those where we do.

  59. Can we get them to work on laptops, next? by Chris.Nelson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We have 4 laptops and, I think, 7 types of laptop chargers in our household. Wouldn't it be nice if the laptop chargers were all the same?

    1. Re:Can we get them to work on laptops, next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Not really practical. Different laptops have different power consumption requirements. My Thinkpad only needs a 72W brick while my old "desktop replacement" Compaq with a DTR Athlon64 and large LCD needed a 140W power brick.

      Those of us with smaller, more efficent laptops shouldn't be burdened to carry around a power brick that is designed to handle the most power wasting of laptops.

  60. Re:not enough ooompf... 0.5W guaranteed max by maxume · · Score: 1

    The gp poster was dreaming about charging his laptop with usb, and the parent was pointing out that it was absurd.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  61. About Time! by daivzhavue · · Score: 1

    I finally hit the nerdvana of my phone, my mp3 player, my wife's phone, my GPS, and Camera all charging/data transferring off of a Mini-USB connector. That means ONE car adapter plugged in and only ONE 3 foot usb cable to toss in with the laptop and leave the wall warts at home.

    If I didn't have to factor the charging form-factor into purchase decisions, it would be much easier. It isn't a deal breaker, but it was the deciding factor on my current phone.

    --
    "A REAL computer has ONE speed and the only powersaving it permits is when you pull the power leads out of the back!"
  62. Motorola by DrinkDr.Pepper · · Score: 1

    Its funny. My Motorola razr phone looks like it charges from a mini-USB port, but if you plug it into a generic usb power supply (like the one for my ipod) the phone reads "Unauthorized Charger". Bastards.

    --
    0xfeedface
  63. Re:not enough ooompf... 0.5W guaranteed max by ajlitt · · Score: 1

    According to the USB spec this is true. However, I have yet to see a USB host that does the power per the spec. That is, a programmable current limiter and overcurrent detector for every port. These are costly, and most USB host devices are cost sensitive (PC mobos, consoles, set top boxes). Most often the best you can hope for is a self-resetting fuse for every socket module (2 ports), such that your current limit is 1A per 2 ports. If you don't plug anything into the second port then that's a full 5W available for charging your cell, warming your coffee, or powering your your toys.

  64. Do the same with printers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey why stop with handys, just do the same with printer ink tanks. I am sick of paying more for printer ink than for channel No. 5 for my girlfriend :-)...

    I mean if every printer producer had to build at least one model with standard ink containers consumers would win big time.

  65. Worldwide Standard by rjungbeck · · Score: 1

    I'm travelling a lot (for business and leisure) and currently carry a charger for the notebook, the camera, the pda, the phone, the mp3 and the racer. All of these also need (different) converters for different power outlets (although most chargers can cope easily with different voltages and ferquencies) in different countries. A standard (WORLDWIDE including airlines) for AC power could remove all of them from my bag (because this standard power including cables would be available everywhere). Also I usually strongly oppose any government interference in technical designs, but I really love this one, because it really opens up the market and saves the environment.

    1. Re:Worldwide Standard by wikinerd · · Score: 1

      By comparing your travel destinations to world electricity maps you can minimise the clutter in your travel bag by taking only the absolutely necessary adapters and chargers.

  66. USB charging port by phorm · · Score: 1

    It makes sense depending on your point of view. My girlfriend's camera charges by the USB port with a standard male USB->mini-usb cable. For when you aren't around a PC it also has an AC adaptor with a female RCA plug, so you can still plug your standard USB cable into the phone and then the wall-wart.

  67. Re:Motorola is already doing it - ALMOST by dlim · · Score: 3, Informative

    That's only partially true. While the phones use a standardized USB port for connection, some of them (at least the Verizon RAZR V3C and V3M) will give a message "Unauthorized charger" if you hook up a generic mini USB charger. There may be some kind of handshake required that only the $30 Motorolla chargers are guaranteed to perform. The article summary only mentions standardization of ports. I wonder if software control mechanisms will be eliminated as well...

  68. Marketshare by chewablefood · · Score: 1

    Maybe, maybe not. According to this http://www.businessweek.com/technology/tech_stats/ cell060223.htm Motorola and Nokia still own the biggest chunk of the market and could still sway adoption of standards. Still, who doesn't want to sell in China?

  69. I just wish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just wish that the plugs for different voltages were different; I would really like it if someone could not plug a 12 volt power supply into a 5 volt router.

  70. Re:Summary is wrong and so are you by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    Well, I'm not wrong about the article summary being wrong,

    I submit that you are wrong about the summary being wrong. Though you pointed out an inconsistency from the article, I believe that the relations make the statements both correct, and you wrongerer. The phone *must* accept USB as a possible charging method. The user *may* use USB to charge the phone. Those are adjustments to the statements in question to remove any ambiguity. You may object to the specific meaning I've given them, but I submit that both are reasonable interpretations of the statements made and they are both consistent. One was looking at it from a user standpoint of what that can/should/must do, and the other from what the phone makers can/should/must do.

    And as for your assertion that not all computers have USB ports, I would challenge you to find any consumer-aimed computers from Apple, Dell, HP, Gateway or sold in any Best Buy, CompUSA, or Circuit City that doesn't have a USB port. If you are correct, you should be able to find a single computer that doesn't have USB on it. Otherwise, I would put you in the 100% completely wrong with no possible correct percentage at all. Sorry, I don't consider my 15 year old XT sitting in the garage running DOS 3.3 (the best damn DOS) as a reasonable example of a modern computer without USB.

  71. Where is TFA? by dlim · · Score: 1

    This may be kind of off topic, but I followed the link to an article summary on Techdirt, which incidentally links to 2 other article summaries on Techdirt and one on another news site The one about South Korea and Japanese mobile providers deciding to standardize had a "Full Story" link leading to a 404.

    I know we're not all inclined to RTFA, but shouldn't there at least be a FA?

  72. Sprint already standardized with their phones by thule · · Score: 1

    All SprintPCS phones all use the same connector. I bought a Sprint Treo phone that didn't have the right connector built-in, but a cable was included in the box to adapt it to the Sprint style power connector.

  73. I for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our new USB overlords

  74. Free market? by TheLink · · Score: 1

    Q: How many free market economists does it take to change a light bulb?

    A: Free market economists don't change light bulbs. They sit in the dark waiting for Adam Smith's invisible hand to do it.

    As for authoritarian governments.

    Seems you can have democratically elected authoritarian governments. At least the western media does like to call a number of democratically elected governments authoritarian.

    Such governments aren't that bad if they are actually interested in improving things in the country. Could be better than regularly switching between one of two parties, where both aren't interested in improving the state of their country.

    Being regularly given a chance to pick one out of a hand of preselected cards by The Magician isn't that wonderful. I suppose it's good to let the audience participate in the show. Makes them happy and is good entertainment.

    --
  75. wow!!!! by deadstatue · · Score: 1

    thats the best thing to come out of korea since our troops

  76. I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our non-proprietary cell phone charging overlords.

    (Sorry)

  77. More power to them by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

    I hope they are prepared to inflict appalling torture on offenders. I for one am quite happy to overlook human rights record on this matter.

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  78. AC on the Road by Chris+Tyler · · Score: 1

    I'm annoyed that car chargers aren't standard with phones, too. But I bought a $20 75W mini-inverter plug (12 vdc -> 110 vac) that lets me connect my cellphone charger (or laptop, or self-inflating airbed, or ...) to my car's accessory outlet. It's great having AC on the road.

    1. Re:AC on the Road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It's great having AC on the road.

      You have anal coitus on the road? That was YOU I saw out on Elm St. yesterday? You made the goatse guy look like an amateur!

  79. China's also obsoleting plug adapters. by Shag · · Score: 1

    I've been in nice (4-star) hotels in 3 cities in China in the last couple months, and all of them have had relatively "universal" power outlets. 250ish volts, mind you, but most electronics can handle that nowadays. The simplest ones had 2 outlets, one of which could handle US 2- and 3-prong and international 2-round-prong plugs, and the other of which could handle 2- and 3-prong slanted plugs (Asia? Australia?) The more sophisticated ones, in for example the Beijing Continental Grand Hotel, looked like the female end of one of those "universal" plug adapters... all the different holes just blended together. I haven't needed a single plug adapter in all those cities, and I hope China exports these things to everywhere else in the world.

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  80. I was just thinking about this stuff this morning. by Big+Boss · · Score: 1

    I was irritated at having to find room for ANOTHER wall-wart outputting 5V@300mA to a propriatary plug..

    I figgure we need about 3 connectors....

    #1 - Mini USB for small power devices, phones, ipods, PDAs etc. Dishonorable mention here goes to Palm for the Zire72 that has mini USB AND a barrel connector on the bottom. The power supply it comes with outputs, you guessed it, 5V@500mA. Yet the Zire72 will only trickle-charge from USB. Interesting since a $5 cable from Ebay that breaks out the power lines into that barrel connector can charge it at full rate.

    #2 - A higher wattage plug for high-drain devices like laptops and high power battery chargers. Something like the larger port from one of those old universal power adapters from the 80s would get the job done. 24V@5A should be enough. The Dell I'm on now (Core Duo, 2GB, 100GB@7200 RPM) is 19.5V@4.62A, so that leaves some headroom. Perhaps bumping to 10A would be usefull.

    #3 - An in-between port. Something smaller than the big plug from #2 so that they can't be confused or connected to the wrong things. 12V@5A should be plenty.

    Those would cover every small device I've ever seen use a power supply. Most everything that needs more power than that goes to 120V/220V directly, perhaps with an internal power supply, and isn't portable. And yes, I included iPods in that list. While I don't mind the dock connector overmuch, it would be nice to have a mini-USB on there as well to charge and sync with so that I don't need a special cord just for the iPod. It would also cost Apple next to nothing to include on future iPods.

    I've only covered the device plugs here, the connector on the other end could be a standardized 4-pin. One for each + line and a ground. One could then use whichever voltage you wanted, or all of them.

    I don't know if it's the best idea for this stuff, but it summs up my mussings from this morning. It would result in a standard connector and voltage for every device and a single power supply to drive them. Something I would love to see. It also doesn't cover data, but I would add that I would require devices charging from mini-USB can NOT require any handshaking to block the charger like some Motorola phones do.

    Data is a little tricker, but it should be possible to create a standard interface profile for all phones, for instance.

  81. I want it here... by mikelang · · Score: 1

    I wanted EU to mandate the same. It's such a pain to forget your charger anywhere...

  82. I want it here... by mikelang · · Score: 1

    I wanted EU to mandate the same. It's such a pain to forget your charger on a trip...

  83. Zero-sum game by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    Standard responses:
    1) YAAAAAAAAaay! Consumers have always wanted this. Go China!!
    2) BOOOOOOOOooo! How come the evil nations had to do this first?
    3) BOOOOOOOOooo! Regulation = bad.

    This demonstrates a fundamental problem with today's markets. Every company tries their hardest to keep things proprietary and cut-off other companies. HD-DVD -vs- Blu-ray, proprietary connectors, closed-source drivers, DRM, Copy-protection, EULAs, etc. Companies still haven't realized that standardization leads to better acceptance and more profits than lock-in. (Ex: IBM lost the PC market because they lost their vendor lock-in, but it resulted in an exlposion of PC sales.)

    And it isn't just the companies to blame. Imagine if a company created an ISO standard power adapter, but it cost 10 cents more - consumers would probably buy another company's phone to save 10 cents, then complain about paying $50 more to replace the power adapter.

    We are in a game where each player is trying to win for themselves, which means everyone loses. This whole thing just reminds me how sick I am of the human race.

  84. 2A over 26AWG wire = bad idea by daniel422 · · Score: 1

    Ever run 2 amps through 26 guage wire (typical USB wire crap) -- and DC current no less? Not only are we talking significant line loss because of the small wire guage (and distances, of course. That guage is barely capable of 500mA. 22 guage will get you close to an amp. 2A, while not yet running the risk of a fire, is a BAD idea...

  85. Re:Summary is wrong and so are you by fuzznutz · · Score: 1
    Well, I'm not wrong about the article summary being wrong,

    The subtleties of the English language... "Phones must be chargable through USB" does not preclude another charging method. Since the summary did not say that phones "must use only USB for charging," the summary is essentially correct. A quick glance at the reference article at "The People's Daily Online" verifies that this is the intent of the new "rule". (And it is described as a rule in the article at Techdirt, but is described as a standard in The Peoples Daily Online.)
  86. Comes with a converter by Comboman · · Score: 1

    My Nokia 3155i uses the smaller charging socket, but it came with an adapter so I can use older chargers.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
  87. Relocatiing to S.Korea/China? by rossy · · Score: 1

    This is a good thing! Amazing what countries will do to boost immigration. The good news is, I won't need such a large cargo container to ship all my household goods now that my cellphone chargers don't need to come along. The bad news is... I don't OWN a GSM phone.

    --
    Ross Youngblood
  88. I love this Idea by thorkyl · · Score: 1

    Give me one data/charging cable with a USB connection to my laptop or wall wart and let me charge my devices from the laptop or the wall wart. (thinking a powered usb hub).

    Now how to deal with the different voltages.

    US = 115 volts 60Htz
    EU = 240 volts 50Htz

    --
    -- I am the NRA, enough said...
  89. Re:not enough ooompf... 0.5W guaranteed max by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try Firewire, then. You can push 45W over Firewire just fine, which is enough for many laptops.

    Ever since I got my iPod (in 2001), I've wanted to be able to use a single AC adapter with a Firewire cable for everything. Sadly, nobody's done this.

  90. from the copy dept by hey · · Score: 1

    Notice Techdirt has the dept as:
    from the five-year-plan dept
    Now where have the seen dept's like that before?

  91. Ever tried to charge a USB phone with a PC ? by droopycom · · Score: 1

    Universal, my ass...

    I tried that both with a Motorola Razr and a L6.

    If I plug it in a linux (debian) PC, its charging.
    If I plug in the windows PC, its not charging.
    If I install some appropriate driver on the windows PC, its charging.
    If the battery is so low that you cant even turn it on anymore, then it wont charge, no matter if its the windows or linux PC.

    More:
    I have a Ipod charger, the plug on the block is just an USB plug. I can charge my ipod either by plugging it in my USB port on a PC, or in the charger block. Tired the same thing with my phones: didnt work.

    I bought a no-name car charger, with a mini usb plug, supposed to work for blackberrys. Didnt charge my motorola phone.
    Bought the motorola/Cingular brand car charger: Worked fine, even though the battery was completely dead.

    So the USB charging interface is far more complicated than just a 5V power supply. I bet its not going to be that simple...

  92. I thought this wasn't allowed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The link in the article points to Techdirt : http://techdirt.com/articles/20061219/092747.shtml ... which links to another of it's own articles : http://news.techdirt.com/news/wireless/article/622 8 ... which finally links to the actual article on PhoneScoop : http://www.phonescoop.com/news/item.php?n=1502

    Is someone from Techdirt trying to increase their hitcounter?

  93. Who cares? Anyone with more than one device! by Kelson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Buy a phone, it comes with a charger, you charge it. Who cares if your neighbor has a different charger??

    When my wife and I travel, we have to carry the following chargers:

    1 for my phone
    1 for her phone
    1 for the laptop
    1 for the PDA
    1 for the camera

    Sure, it means we can recharge everything at once if we have to. But it also means we have to carry 5 items that do the same thing. That's wasted clutter.

    Now, if each device used the same connectors and voltage, we could cut that down to one charger. That would be very convenient.

    I'm not saying government mandate is the way to go. I'm just pointing out that there's a valid reason people might want those common chargers.

    On another note, I think you're getting North Korea and South Korea mixed up.

  94. Motorola E770 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just for anyone who is interested, I have the Motorola E770 (UMTS) It has a couple of nice USB features:

    1/ It takes a standard (cheap) mini USB lead (as used by some cameras) and connects to a PC as if it was a memory stick. This allows easy upload and download of pictures and MP3 files. I use it as an "iPod" on bus trips. I only have the standard 64M microSD card but you can put in a bigger one, I know 1G is available and there might be even bigger ones by now. You can also use it for all the same things you would normally use a memory stick for, including I suppose booting linux, if you have a big enough uSD card.

    2/ While plugged in it charges from the PC

    3/ You can use your own MP3 as the ringtone...why pay money when you can record your own!!

    4/ My sons are a bit into coding and have figured out how to load java to the phone and run it.

    Bit of a caution though...some operators may disable some of those features. Then you need to find someon who knows how to unlock it...

  95. I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Well, guess what? The consumer does have a voice in making things fair. It's called the government. That's why you elect them."

    Please remind me who won China's last democratic election.

  96. I have never had to replace a charger. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    You pay through the nose for the non-standard charger when you have to replace it in a few years Never. Not once. As such it's a non issue for me. I strongly suspect my experience is the norm. If people had to replace the chargers regularly there would be a demand for a standard and we would have one already. They don't, therefore there is no demand for standardised chargers. The free market has spoken.

    --
    Deleted
  97. Story from Nokia (at work) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work at Nokia. The charger formats have been something I constantly complain about whenever I do user-level phone testing. I would really like to see a standard format, too. For the most part, I like the fact that our phones usually have one of three fairly standard connections (DC large, DC mini, USB). And before you get too touchy -- not all Nokia-branded phones are made by us, and the OEM phones don't use our standard connectors.

    However, not too long ago we designed a low-end phone. It's shipping to many carriers around the world (under different names and plastics), and it was originally designed with the DC mini charger. The version of this phone that is being sold to Verizon was MANDATED to have the DC mini socket removed. Why? Well, I never got a sufficient answer when I asked that question, and believe me, I complained. I was told by someone (although I can't prove this) that Verizon is worried people would stick paper clips or something like them in the charger socket and short the phone, but I call b.s. on that. So instead of having a "standard" socket (by our standards at least), the phone uses the pop-port (Nokia proprietary) connector to charge.

    So even if we have recommendations from industry or government, the carriers might end up sticking it to you anyways... I guarantee you they make a HUGE profit on accessories.. because I know how much everything is at cost.

    Same phone, but different features:
    http://www.nokiausa.com/phones/2366i/
    http://mobileburn.com/review.jsp?Id=2235

  98. What I want by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    What I want: Portable devices that use ultra-capacitors, with a standardized instant-charger. For example, a phone with a 1-day battery that takes 10 seconds to charge.