Slashdot Mirror


If Not America, Then Where?

Wellington Grey asks: "Often during our heated political discussions on slashdot, several people will mention their desire to leave the country. As an American living in England, which sees much the same problems as the US, I often wonder where these Americans would go. So, I pose two questions for the restless: 1) Where would you live, if not in America and 2) What's stopping you from going?"

2,349 comments

  1. The Netherlands by Sinryc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Netherlands. The fact that I couldn't become a citizen and I can't speak the language stops me. Oh yeah, plus I like America still. :-)

    --
    Yay, I have a sig.
    1. Re:The Netherlands by antifoidulus · · Score: 3, Informative

      According to wikitravel if you can find a job that promises to pay you at least 45k euro then you don't need a work permit, or if you are under 30, then you only need a job that promises to pay you 33k euro.....

    2. Re:The Netherlands by Sinryc · · Score: 1

      I would like to get a way to get permanent citizenship and all that jazz. Plus for my girlfriend as well.

      --
      Yay, I have a sig.
    3. Re:The Netherlands by medtest9 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is my understanding that residing legally in the Netherlands for 5 years or more makes you eligible to apply for citizenship. As mentioned above, if you can find a company registered with IND for knowledge immigrants, who will offer to pay you a sufficient wage (a bit over 43K euro last time I looked), obtaining a visa is a simple process.

    4. Re:The Netherlands by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 2, Informative

      I thought about moving to Italy once. Actually, I lived there for several years while working for an American company. When I looked at my Italian counterparts, I thought about having a go at it.

      Then I found out they pay almost 50% income tax. On top of that, there is a 20% VAT on most items. On top of that, gasoline was almost $5 per gallon (a few years ago...almost certainly more now).

      The high taxes were there to support their social services. Free medical. Free dental. Good unemployment and retirement. Almost no chance of getting fired. 6-hour work days and 30-days of vacation. Virtually no concept of sexual harassment or workplace misconduct.

      Then you realize that the social services suck. Want a painkiller for your broken leg? Tough. Want an annual dental checkup? Tough. Want a cop to investigate repeated break-ins? Tough.

      Europe is great if you are young or unemployed. Europe sucks if you actually want to make something of yourself through hard work.

      Personally, I couldn't live if I worked 6 days a week knowing I'd only get 3-days pay after taxes just so some 22-yo punk could sit in the park all day and smoke pot.

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    5. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the tax rates for many European countries is sort of ridiculous. Japan looks good but it is very difficult to get citizenship. Anything down from Canada in the table in table I linked would probably reasonable for someone used to low taxes in the US. I can't tell you how the immigration standards work though (though Japan and the US still win on the opportunities to earn a boatload of money).

      I'm sort of a patriotic American and I don't think I would ever leave give up my citizenship, but in the hypothetical case that I had to and was able to pick any country to move, I would select Canada followed by Japan.

    6. Re:The Netherlands by Chi-RAV · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If only your hypothesis would be correct (i'd be sitting in the park smoking pot daily). However, most of those taxes go towards creating social constructions to make sure the weakest links in society dont fall through the cracks. These weakest links aren't the young people (in fact in the netherlands its impossible to apply for social security under 24 atm, and it will be raised to 27 within 2-4 years). They are the elderly people (your grandma!) and physically and mentally handicapped people.

      Yes, you pay a SHITLOAD of money to the gov't for the purposes of make sure you never fall very low, BUT if done right, you can have a lot of benefits as well.
      (now if only it were done right)

    7. Re:The Netherlands by cerberusss · · Score: 1
      The fact that I couldn't become a citizen and I can't speak the language stops me
      I don't know about becoming a citizen, but the language barrier simply isn't. Not a single English-speaking white-collar worker I know has bothered to learn Dutch.
      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    8. Re:The Netherlands by Negatyfus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think it's fascinating how many Americans measure happiness in wealth. The key to success is having enough money to support yourself, not making enough money to live a life of luxury and frivolous spending. We do pay a lot of tax in The Netherlands, but there are benefits that you will not find in the US. I also work a government job that allows me to have more free days rather than the big money that I would be able to get in a commercial institution-- I wouldn't trade that in for a higher salary unless I actually needed that money.

    9. Re:The Netherlands by Matje · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think you paint a very true picture of the situation. First of all, the amount of tax you pay increases progressively. You don't pay 50% income tax over the first x amount of income (around 50,000 euro's in the Netherlands). On top of that, there's all sorts of tax reduction rules which mean you don't pay 50% of your income to the taxman. Most people I know that have incomes in the 50% income bracket calculate with 35 - 40% as the effective income tax percentage.

      Gasoline does not really matter because for some weird reason European cars are more efficient than American cars. If you want to compare transportation costs you should be looking at the amount you pay per month. In a country such as the Netherlands you don't travel nearly as much as you would in the US. In the end I doubt you really pay that much less for your car + gasoline in the US compared to Europe. Personally I pay about 400 euros a month for my car, gasoline, maintainance etc driving about 1600 miles per month.

      Interestingly, around the time that gasoline prices went up the dollar vs euro rate went down. Consequently our gasoline prices did not really increase that much. Currently you'd pay a bit less than 5 euros for a gallon of gasoline in the Netherlands, which is about $6.

      Then you realize that the social services suck. Want a painkiller for your broken leg? Tough. Want an annual dental checkup? Tough. Want a cop to investigate repeated break-ins? Tough.

      In truth, they don't suck at all. Need a painkiller? go to the pharmacy and get some (normally you'll have to pay for it unless you get a recipe, then the insurance covers it). Did you know that Europeans spend less per person on health care but get more actual care compared to the US (there was an article about this in the NYT last week).

      Annual dental checkups are covered by the national insurance in the Netherlands, and all dental care is free under 18. However, dental care in general is very expensive so the national insurance covers very little except the yearly checkup and stuff like fake teeth. As for the police, they're doing ok as far as I can tell. I've never heard stories about the police refusing to investigate cases, other than bike thefts in Amsterdam which are considered a fact of life. The differences in crime rates between the US and Europe are well documented I believe. It may have something to do with the prevalence of guns in US society.

    10. Re:The Netherlands by Pienjo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Newsflash: Newcomers need to, no matter what language they speak, no matter where they come from. Yes, this has been differently in the past, but my American girlfriend-soon-to-be-wife has got to to learn the language and whole shebang when she comes here (I'm Dutch). And, quite frankly, I think it's a reasonable demand. If I were to come to the US, people would expect me to speak English too. What's not quite reasonable IMHO is the "You need to do most of this naturalisation thing in the country of origin" thing, but she's exempt from that, being American and all. We found it rather difficult to find Dutch language courses in a civilised (ahem) country like the USA, in mundane (cough) areas like SLC - and learning the language is only part of it. How will this be any different in Botswana?

      On the brigher side, one of my colleagues is from Guatamala. When he came here, he spoke English, but hardly any Dutch. He spoke it fluently, after just a few months. It's doable.

      And before you ask: She moving here isn't a political statement. It's simply the most convenient thing to do, right now, for a lot of reasons - including (But not limited to) immigration laws.

    11. Re:The Netherlands by otie · · Score: 1

      I've only visited the Netherlands only once, but while I was there, everyone spoke excellent English (and I did visit outside the bigger cities, too).

    12. Re:The Netherlands by izzo+nizzo · · Score: 1

      Sounds viable. Don't know that I'd want to change my citizenship though.

    13. Re:The Netherlands by rsidd · · Score: 1

      The fact that I couldn't become a citizen and I can't speak the language stops me.

      You can become a citizen (if you wait) and you can speak the language (if you learn). My aunt and her family (all Indians by birth) did. Mainly because at that time India didn't allow dual passports/nationalities -- but I believe both the Netherlands and the US do, so why not.

    14. Re:The Netherlands by cyclop · · Score: 4, Informative

      As a 25-y.o. Italian, I can assure you that the people you see smokin'pot in the park all day are NOT maintained by the government, but by their parents. There is virtually no unemployment income in Italy (though I know there is in other European countries, often actually higher than my Ph.D. student income).

      Italian social services are not that good, but in the end of the day are actually better than nothing. Having a painkiller is not that tough at all (the E.R. or the doctor will give you a so-called "recipe" to give to the pharmacist, and you'll often have your painkiller for free), an annual dental checkup actually is, yes. But I had wonderful and very professional service at a university clinic when I got appendicitis, without having to pay a cent. I have free basic medical analyses and so on.

      "Virtually no concept of sexual harassment or workplace misconduct." - This is what keeps me at bay from USA. Not that I spend my day slapping my female collegues on the ass yelling them "yo!bitch", but sure no one minds innocent joking or even normal approaches. If you actually sexually harass someone, you're sure to be punished badly and be fired, but the approach to the thing is not as nearly as paranoid as I've read often about the USA. I shouldn't stand working in a lab where I can't talk less than strictly formally to my new female collegues just because they could feel "sexually harassed".

      I like my old Europe. I wish to leave Italy, but to go to some Scandinavian country, probably.

      --
      -- Patent no.123456: A way to personalize /. comments with a sig attached to the end.
    15. Re:The Netherlands by ThousandStars · · Score: 1

      You've addressed none of the substantive criticisms from the grandparent. What he's arguing and what you're arguing are not necessarily incompatible.

    16. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Simple process? Hahahahahaha... I've lived in this cesspit called the Netherlands for almost 10 years. It is if anything an example of exactly how not to run an immigration system.

      Yes you can come here if you find a company willing to hire you for a wage that exceeds 43K Euro - not that hard to do if you're any kind of educated professional... but you also walk into an immigration system that is broken beyond anything you can imagine. It's is simply legislated stupidity run by a government minister who hates foreigners with a passion not seen for decades.

      If you have the misfortune of owning a passport from a non-EU county other than Canada, The USA, New Zealand, Australia or Japan, then you MUST learn Dutch before you enter the country, you cannot bring your spouse or children unless they also learn Dutch prior to entering the country (no learning Dutch after you arrive is not good enough). After you arrive you must go through an integration course (you're generally exempt if you're from one of the "good' countries listed above) where they teach you all the good things about the Dutch way of life.. like how to flush a toilet (yes they taught me that useful skill), how many wheels a car has (yes that was in my course)... how great and glorious the Dutch people are... how superior they are compared to everyone else... you have to answer important questions like... "what are Dutch men best known for?" and the correct answer being "their trustworthiness"

      Trust me... the Netherlands is NOT worth the hassle. Do yourself a favor and go anywhere else in the world but the Netherlands.

      I'm leaving here as soon as I can. I'm tired of not being able to have my family live in the same damn country as me. I'm tired of being told by this same Immigration office that if I want to live with my wife, I should just leave the country - and they tell that to their own citizens too.. not just foreigners. I have a close friend who is native Dutch and married to an African woman. The IND here told him there was no chance at all that his wife of 5 years would ever be able to join him here and that he should simply leave the country of his birth if he wanted to be with his wife, or divorce her and marry a good Dutch woman like he should have done in the first place. Yup, the IND here did tell him that... I've read the letter they sent him.

      Oh, and yes you can apply for citizenship in the Netherlands but ONLY if you agree to give up your other citizenship. Anyone who tells you otherwise (that it's possible to keep your birth country citizenship) hasn't actually tried to do it recently. Used to be the case that you could retain dual citizenship, but now they won't issue the Dutch citizenship unless you've provided proof that you've legally renounced your previous citizenship. The danger here being... that for 12 years after gaining your Dutch citizenship, the IND can revoke your Dutch citizenship for any reason, and without a court order... so for 12 years your citizenship is at the mercy and whim of the IND... and they have proven that they can and will arbitrarily revoke citizenships of people leaving them stateless for no reason at all.

      Don't come to the Netherlands except on vacation, and even then do yourself a favor and give it a miss... go somewhere more interesting.

    17. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Holland. And I'm from Finland.

    18. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      You would be surprised, but drug use among native Dutchmen is among the lowest in Europe. Mostly German and English tourists use it (when I hear/see an Englishman in Amsterdam, I can smell weed too most of the time). Labdrugs are mostly for export. OK, nothing to be proud of, but if you thought everyone and his sister was an addict, you're wrong.

    19. Re:The Netherlands by Alioth · · Score: 1

      I doubt they pay 50% tax on all their income. I suspect the taxation system is progressive in Italy - i.e. you pay no tax at all on the first $X,000, a lower rate of tax on $X000 - $Y0,000 and perhaps some further steps until you get to the top rate of $Z0,000. You're only being taxed at the high rate on earnings above $Z0,000 - not on your entire income. So if you actually calculate the rate you pay on your entire income, you may find it comes out at about 30% even though you earn in the top tax bracket. This is before claiming deductions (such as mortgage/loan interest tax relief, if Italy has those things).

      But then again you take your choices. I sort of like having 30 days of vacation - I work to live, not live to work. If you can move country it's a choice you can make rather than being lumped with a pathetic 10 days.

    20. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gasoline isn't cheap in most countries in Europe due to the simple fact that we don't have an oil reserve comparable to the US (and we don't grab it using force from other countries, but that's a different story). you're out of luck if you're looking for an EU country with cheaper gasoline, but keep in mind that all EU countries are way smaller than the US: there are no such things here as roads in the middle of a desert for a hundred miles or the like. Nevertheless, everything you wrote about Italy is true, but the real problem here is the outrageously high level of corruption in the government: there's no way, and I mean -no way- for your startup to get a contract with the govt if you don't bend over to a bigger corporation or pay a minimum 10% bribe to someone. If you're a good worker and looking for a country that gives back what you pay in taxes in good services I'd suggest you to look at northern EU (Netherlands, maybe Sweden), or come to Italy but be prepared to fight for survival in a slowly sinking ship.

    21. Re:The Netherlands by WarwickRyan · · Score: 1

      I move from the UK (Warwick specifically, this my name here) to the Netherlands. It's a nice place, but reality is far removed from the commonly held picture of the country.

      For a start, it's very very Christian here. Very conservative. So that means that absolutely nothing happens on Sunday. You can't even wash your car. Oh, I lie - you can go to the pub. That's it, though.

      Socially, there are some problems. The country's pretty full. It has a perceived immigration issue, mainly from North Africans. For what claims to be a socialist country, it does tend to swing to the right..

      Trains here are terrible - they're cheap compared to England, but completely unreliable. Roads too - thanks to the Dutch love of tailgating (especially when it's wet), there are regularly huge traffic jams on the major highways. It's as bad/worse than the M25 in rush hour, only it's everywhere.

      Worst of all, there are hardly any Balti houses :-(

      Some things are nice - people are healthier here, meaning the vast majority of the ladies are fit. People are generally pleasent. Beer here is excellent (thanks Belgium!). Retail isn't dominated by the supermarkets as much as it is in UK/US. Internet's dead fast. You can receive BBC 1/2 (so quality TV and news ensured). Oh, and Amsterdam's not far away for all your weed and hooker needs.

    22. Re:The Netherlands by Pooh22 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm a native dutch person and I'm very ashamed to say that the parent is more or less accurate about our current immigration policy :-(

      There's a chance that it will improve again, but currently there's a (grassroots/astroturf?) fear campaign against foreigners, mostly focussed on islamic cultured or coloured people, but americans as well (your current president isn't helping your reputation!).

      My only apology can be that I didn't vote for this government.

    23. Re:The Netherlands by slashbart · · Score: 1

      Holland consists of two of the provinces of the Netherlands. These two contain Amsterdam and Rotterdam plus the majority of the economic activity of the Netherlands, but the country is really called 'Nederland' (the Netherlands).

      Bart

      lived in Amsterdam for 40 years, and has now happily moved to a town in the province :-)

    24. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I just thought you should know that the parent was talking about Italy, not the Netherlands. If you have visited Italy, you would be aware that these social services are not quite as well executed there as in other places. If Italy's tax rates are comparable to the Netherlands, it is no suprise that the parent poster was disappointed.

      If things got done in Italy, the Roman Empire would not have collapsed.

    25. Re:The Netherlands by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      though I know there is in other European countries, often actually higher than my Ph.D. student income

      Yes, I live in one of those countries. The minimum social salary is about 1500€ and if you tell that people in other countries, they think you have it good. Not so. For housing alone, you'd need at least 2/3 of that! If you are unemployed, hope that you get a job within 1 year because after that you are on your own! (=You don't get anything) I know, my brother has been in that situation.

      So, I understand where you come from, but before you say something like that first inform yourself about the conditions in those countries.

      Anyway, my country is pretty attractive for pretty much each foreigner.... I think half of the population is not native ;-)

      As for the sexual harassment: Yeah, I made some pretty nasty remarks and it was done off as a joke. In the US, I'd have lost my job and ended up in prison for the same remark. I'd tell about the situation, but the USies here would be too schocked ;-)

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    26. Re:The Netherlands by Jaden42 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I actually am an American living in the Netherlands. I didn't take the time to read the other posts (sorry!) to see if someone else had posted this information but I thought I'd do it anyway since I have a personal interest.

      I moved here about 6 months ago with the help of the company I work for. Because of my salary I was allowed to get what is called a "Knowledge Migrant" (kennismigrant) visa. This is a special "fast track" visa that is granted to people who make over 45,000 euros if they are over 30 or 32,600 euros if you under under 30. It allows me to bypass most processes for migration (no requirement for degrees, language classes, etc) but does NOT allow me access to the public health or pension system. Because I was able to follow the kennismigrant procecss, it was fairly simple to get settled in. Also, since I will likely be subject to the 30% tax ruling (an beneficial ruling) I will be able to swap my US drivers license for a Dutch one without taking any tests or classes. Being that Dutch driving classes can run into the 1000s of euros this is a good thing.

      Life in the Netherlands is nice and the country is great. They say that 80-90% of the Dutch people speak English which I find to be accurate. I am always able to get around with English and the few Dutch words I know. I am currently enrolled in classes to learn Dutch, but it's an incredibly difficult language because the two languages I already speak fluently (English and Spanish) have virtually no relationship to Dutch besides some common sounding words. The society here is fairly modern and you can get everything you need at any time, except Sunday. Everything is closed on Sundays except for restaurants, which generally open around 4 in the afternoon.

      I found this article of particular interest because often time, especially from Americans, I hear things like "This country is stupid and I'd love to leave". After living in a few different countries now, I can honestly say I'd rather live no where else permanently but the US. The Netherlands and the the UK (the other place I spent considerable time) are great places, but it's not home. Life in other countries is very inconvenient (yes, I know, an American comment) and the people are generally much more orderly and nicer in the US. This may seem like a shock to people in the US (and a shock to people outside the US too) but I truly believe that is how it is. Simple things like standing in a line to wait for services or having a quick meal do not exist here. I know that for some people that is a charm, but for me it's an annoyance.

      As a final note, I recently sent my entire team (10 Dutch guys) back to the US for training on our product. It was in the SF Bay Area and they all had a great time. The weather was perfect, the people were nice, and they all particular enjoyed Starbucks (the Dutch are huge coffee drinkers). When they all came back, each and every one of them pointedly asked me why the hell I would move here and leave San Francisco. It was nice validation for me and the US and makes me even more anixous to one day return.

      I hope this post has given some insight to some people. Until you have truly lived somewhere else you won't understand how lucky we are in the US. Simply visiting a country on vacation does not give you the proper insight. You really need to experience daily life in other parts of the world to understand how good you have it.

    27. Re:The Netherlands by WarwickRyan · · Score: 1

      there should be a D on the end of move :-(

    28. Re:The Netherlands by eihab · · Score: 1

      You could have just said that you're a social worker!

      j/k, no offense, yada dada..

      --
      If you can't mod them join them.
    29. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Every country in Europe is identical to Italy... Just like every asian country is like China.

    30. Re:The Netherlands by nebosuke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Most Americans that I know, myself included, don't measure happiness in wealth. However, wealth is, to a large degree, a measure of your freedom.

      In basically any of the situations in which you find yourself during your life, the amount of wealth you have at your disposal determines what options are available to you. You can be perfectly happy living off of the land in a subsistence society, but make no mistake here, choosing to be happy with your circumstances and choosing circumstances that you'll be happy with are two entirely different things. A penniless environmentalist might feel self-righteous waving a cardboard sign at the one annual rally he can afford to drive to, but a rich one can finance a wind farm and perhaps actually make a difference.

      How much wealth you want to have is basically a measure of how much you care to tolerate the circumstances of your life being dictated to you.

    31. Re:The Netherlands by cyclop · · Score: 1

      I am informed. It's actually higher than the social salary in Italy, that AFAIK is about zero. In the meantime, my Ph.D. salary is 820 Euro/month: life cost is probably lower here, but that's sad anyway (Scientific research is very much underpaid in Italy,sigh). Thanks to my parents I have a small apartment of mine, if I had to pay rent I'd be in real troubles.

      Yeah, I made some pretty nasty remarks and it was done off as a joke. In the US, I'd have lost my job and ended up in prison for the same remark. I'd tell about the situation, but the USies here would be too schocked ;-)

      Go and shock them :)

      --
      -- Patent no.123456: A way to personalize /. comments with a sig attached to the end.
    32. Re:The Netherlands by pubjames · · Score: 1

      Europe is very varied. Your experience is of Italy, so you don't have the experience to generalize about the whole of Europe.

    33. Re:The Netherlands by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Trains here are terrible - they're cheap compared to England, but completely unreliable.
       
      So the only difference is they are cheap? As someone who has had more than there fair share of trains cancelled, because it is too hot or too cold or has snowed (snowing, in the UK, who would have thought!)

      I have some good friends who are dutch, and they talk about the crime problem. I have no idea if it is worse than anywhere else, but they seem to think so. They also whinge about traffic, and these are people who lived most of their lives there, and are comparing it to UK traffic.

      Me, I can't wait to move back to Australia - similarly repressive government (for Western standards anyway), but it is great to get away from the rest of the world, and that is what it feels like.

    34. Re:The Netherlands by pepeperes · · Score: 1

      I was amazed when mostly all of the old sweet looking grannies could give you directions in perfect english...

      --
      ... from the forgotten corner in europe
    35. Re:The Netherlands by cool_number_9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just like the other guy who replied, I have to say that I'm afraid that the whole immigration policy picture painted in the parent post is quite accurate. All we can hope for is that with the coming elections, this government will be different and change its attitude to foreign people who want to live and work in the Netherlands.

      Having said that, there a lot of western countries with these kind of strict or even stricter policies... there seems to be a general policy of only accepting intelligent, high paying people and families.

      However, a lot of the students I've met visiting this university have had a good time over here. So... the Netherlands is a place worth visiting, if only because of its very relaxed attitude and its rich history. Just come quick before conservative right-wing and conservative christian political forces will change that! ;-)

    36. Re:The Netherlands by tuckerteeth · · Score: 1

      "Europe is great if you are young or unemployed. Europe sucks if you actually want to make something of yourself through hard work.

      Personally, I couldn't live if I worked 6 days a week knowing I'd only get 3-days pay after taxes just so some 22-yo punk could sit in the park all day and smoke pot."

      Please stay in America.

    37. Re:The Netherlands by MPolo · · Score: 1

      In Italy, at the high end of the scale, unless you cheat on your taxes, it is relatively easy to end up paying considerably more than 50% off your income considered as a whole. Some Italians have told me that it is possible to owe more than 100% of your income, but I presume they are exaggerating. The situation is bad enough that a highly-placed Vatican official said "off the record" that it was morally licit to cheat on your taxes to bring your total bill down to 50% of your income (but not lower than that).

      This was a few years ago, so maybe Berlusconi reformed things somewhat before leaving office (since he would himself be in that tax bracket)...

    38. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm a native Dutch citizen, just to clear things up from start.

      If you have the misfortune of owning a passport from a non-EU county other than Canada, The USA, New Zealand, Australia or Japan, then you MUST learn Dutch before you enter the country.


      AFAIK, the other countries will be required to do the same thing. Is it bad? I doubt it. You want to live here? Show some effort. Why should we (Dutch) learn English, French, Japanes, Mandarin Chinese, Vietnamese, Bahasa Indonesia just to be able to talk to our new immigrants? I believe learning to speak English is also a mandatory thing for becoming a US citizen.

      After you arrive you must go through an integration course (you're generally exempt if you're from one of the "good' countries listed above) where they teach you all the good things about the Dutch way of life.. like how to flush a toilet (yes they taught me that useful skill), how many wheels a car has (yes that was in my course)... how great and glorious the Dutch people are... how superior they are compared to everyone else... you have to answer important questions like... "what are Dutch men best known for?" and the correct answer being "their trustworthiness"


      Of course it's funny to pick on the silly examples, yet how they also teach you where to get social security, how public transportation works etc. Quite viable if you ask me. How to flush the toilet? Go see some asian toilets (or french for that matter) and come to the conclusion that a lot of people would have no clue. Trustworthiness is bull, I agree, yet what do you want? Of course we're not gonna tell the new immigrants that the Dutch are -besides tall- arrogant pieces of crap who steal bikes and are too affraid to say 'no' to big daddy mr. president of the US. That the Dutch horribly slayed way too many people in the Indonesian colony after WW2 and that we cowardly surrendered to the germans after a 3 day struggle. Yeah, good impression ;-)

      Besides, _we_ don't force you to sing the national anthem when you want to live here.

      Oh, and yes you can apply for citizenship in the Netherlands but ONLY if you agree to give up your other citizenship. Anyone who tells you otherwise (that it's possible to keep your birth country citizenship) hasn't actually tried to do it recently


      It's not possible anywhere in the world, although there are a few examples, like Morocco. The king there doesn't allow to give up Moroccan citizenship, so dual citizenship is possible. Same with Costa Rica, who made it possible to get a Costa Rican astronaut on board of a US space shuttle.

      I can see you frustration with the IND (after messing with them myself to let my wife (Indonesian) stay here), yet I found them rather fair in the end (although utterly stupid to start with).
    39. Re:The Netherlands by pluther · · Score: 1

      "Almost 50% taxes"?

      You don't pay that much in the U.S.? I guess if you're in one of the lower income brackets you don't - but between federal, state, and city income tax, it adds up pretty close to 50%.

      Add on top of that dental, medical, vision, and prescription drug insurance costs (four separate costs for most of us here in the U.S.). Plus, the annual deductible and co-pay if you ever actually use your medical plan, and it's easily over 50%.

      Painkillers for a broken leg? I've been in hospitals in four different countries, and the only place I've ever had difficulty getting needed medication was in the United States. It's also where I've had to wait the longest in emergency rooms and the only place where I've had to prove my ability to pay before treatment, or pay in advance for any medical procedures. First find a doctor on your plan, then, for each treatment he suggests, contact your insurance and ask if they cover it. Now do all that while in severe pain and a fever of 103.

      There's a lot of great things about this country, but anyone who tells you that our medical care is one of them has either never experienced it here, or never experienced it anywhere else.

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    40. Re:The Netherlands by dave420 · · Score: 1
      Marry a European and get an EU passport :)

      My wife (who's from the US) is waiting to get her British citizenship next year, then we'll move either to Canada or The Netherlands. We live in London at the moment, which is a bit hectic, and we'd both like a change.

    41. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what part of .nl you live in, but we're not very christian at all... I'm a life-long dutchie. While a lot of stores are closed on sunday, that's mostly out of tradition and because of labor laws, than out of religion. Employers have to pay you double if you have to work on sunday, or after a certain time, and employee's _hate_ working on sundays, because it's just the traditional day off. A lot of store owners hold to the idea that there's only so much money to spend, and people aren't going to spend more if they can also shop on sunday, because there simply isn't any more money.

      As for carwashing, no one will stop you or even frown or think anything of it, if you grab your bucket and go wash your car. I'm pretty sure the carwashes are open, too.

      Just because we don't value being able to buy everything on sunday, doesn't mean we're overly religious.

      Another positive thing about the netherlands, is that, in general, most dutchies have a positive net worth. After adding and subtracting all assets and debts, on average the dutch person has savings. The average american is in debt, by surprisingly much.

      One last point: While the roads might be clogged at certain times, the most important thing for geeks is communications coverage. The netherlands is one of the best countries when it comes to broadband penetration. Sure, the scandinavians might have faster lines, but not having broadband here is almost impossible. We also have 99.99% cellphone coverage by surface area.

    42. Re:The Netherlands by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, around the time that gasoline prices went up the dollar vs euro rate went down. Consequently our gasoline prices did not really increase that much. Currently you'd pay a bit less than 5 euros for a gallon of gasoline in the Netherlands, which is about $6.

      I just payed $1.979 per gallon, and that seemed too high.

    43. Re:The Netherlands by linuxwebadmin · · Score: 1

      Only one thing to say about the Netherlands...I LIKE GOOOLLLLDDDD!

      --
      Show me packet captures and log entires, or it never happened.
    44. Re:The Netherlands by MAHartman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I live in the Netherlands as well and I am quite shocked and ashamed by your experience. Unfortunately, the general public in Holland is relatively unaware of the horrible circumstances immigrants are facing in our country. Government policy and media coverage only address the 'benefits' of this draconic system. The concept of a global 'terrorist threat' acts like a catalyst in the hardening and closing of Dutch society. And the immigrants that eventually do manage to gain Dutch citizenship face harsh discrimination when honestly trying to integrate. There are a lot of genuine refugees and immigrants, highly educated, that find themselves in a position impossible to get a decent job. I recently had a conversation with an Iranian who was delivering newspapers; the best job he could find in the Netherlands, despite being a qualified doctor. I admit, medical standards are probably lower in Iran, but this man deserved something better than delivering newspapers... Well, elections coming up in november... let's see what happens!

    45. Re:The Netherlands by spike1 · · Score: 1

      Yesss...
      He started talking about italy.
      But by the end of it, he'd lumped the entirety of europe into his gripe.
      Every country in europe has its own tax and social security policies.
      Its own policing policies.
      And its own national health infrastructure.
      In the UK you'd get that painkiller for your broken leg on prescription.
      You would in most european countries.
      (In some, you may have to pay a smaller amount for the drug than it would cost without. In some, you may get the drug free of charge with the prescription. In others the prescription may possibly cost MORE and you'd be better off buying the drug off the shelf if it's available. So saying the whole of europe is crap just because Italyis... That's like saying every single american's stupid because George W Bush is.

    46. Re:The Netherlands by sim82 · · Score: 1
      Europe is great if you are young or unemployed. Europe sucks if you actually want to make something of yourself through hard work.

      The parent was bashing Europe in general. So it's only fair to use the Netherlands as a counterexample.
    47. Re:The Netherlands by MyEyesTheyBurn · · Score: 0

      'Weed' has no addictive substances in it. Any addiction is mental.

    48. Re:The Netherlands by kaysan · · Score: 0
      if you're serious about it, i'll teach you!

      starting with: the Netherlands - Nederland

    49. Re:The Netherlands by Fred_A · · Score: 1
      I just payed $1.979 per gallon, and that seemed too high.
      Petrol has alway basically been free in the US, so you do have a twisted view of the typical prices in the rest of the world. If you travel a bit European prices aren't especially high.
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    50. Re:The Netherlands by Macthorpe · · Score: 1, Interesting

      How does that stop it being addictive and how does that stop people getting addicted to it?

      Just because it's psychological rather than chemical doesn't change a thing.

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    51. Re:The Netherlands by Matje · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I empathize with you. I can remember gasoline costing $1 a gallon when I lived in the US. But on the other hand we would have to drive 30 minutes to get some groceries. Over here it's a five minute bike ride or a five minute drive to get to a shopping mall. So I really doubt you're paying that much less for your transportation if you look at your montly bills.

      High energy prices in Europe are simply a way to encourage people to use energy efficiently. I don't see what's wrong with that, and as long as the tax money is well spent by the government I don't see the problem with it either.

    52. Re:The Netherlands by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      For a start, it's very very Christian here. Very conservative. So that means that absolutely nothing happens on Sunday. You can't even wash your car. Oh, I lie - you can go to the pub. That's it, though.

      I'm sorry, but what neck of the woods did you end up in? Aside from the smaller towns there's plenty to do on Sundays. Shops etc. are closed, but that's pretty much everywhere.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    53. Re:The Netherlands by mondo1978 · · Score: 1

      Europe is great if you are young or unemployed. Europe sucks if you actually want to make something of yourself through hard work. Thats about the most ridiculous statement i've ever read. Its from an American so its not exactly unexpected.

    54. Re:The Netherlands by dargaud · · Score: 1

      I've lived most of my life in foreign countries: Italy, the US, Alaska (is it the same than the US ? I don't think so), France, Antarctica and some others. Between the US and Europe the differences are not that big, cultural mostly. What I personally find truly annoying are the administrative differences. Before the onslaugh of terror bullshit the US had great and quick administration, at the end of my 1st day I would already have most of my paperwork in order (bank account, SSN, driver's licence, bought car, car insurrance). On the other hand it's almost impossible for a foreigner to open a bank account in France or Italy (it takes huge pressure from your company).
      And I know why guns are illegal in Italy, it's to make sure you don't shoot the clerks from pure rage after being turned around for the 7th time for a missing comma in the certificate of proper translation to the official translation of the certified copy of your grand mother's birth certificate. Each time after fighting to stay in line for 4 hours. Or somesuch.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    55. Re:The Netherlands by LilGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Which is exactly why the "war on drugs" is bullshit.

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    56. Re:The Netherlands by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Europe is great if you are young or unemployed. Europe sucks if you actually want to make something of yourself through hard work.

      Based on a few years in Italy, you conclude that the whole of Europe is like that?

      Did you hurt yourself making that jump?

    57. Re:The Netherlands by Fred_A · · Score: 1
      And, quite frankly, I think it's a reasonable demand. If I were to come to the US, people would expect me to speak English too.
      People when you come to the the US expect that you learn the language because you can't expect people from the US to learn another language.
      Which is why they don't whey they go abroad.

      Frankly I don't see what's so difficult about this. ;)
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    58. Re:The Netherlands by klaasb · · Score: 1

      But isn't that true for everyone who moves to another country?

      You might like it there, but it is not home.

      And you know what they say about home...sweet home.

      --
      if your pants fit well, it's not only because of the pants ...
    59. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying the reason that is stopping you is greed?

    60. Re:The Netherlands by Dilaudid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It stops it being a relevant issue. If people can get addicted to line-dancing, grand theft auto, sashimi then it takes all of the relevance away from the term addiction. That's why marijuana is not considered addictive. This doesn't change the fact that medical research does show it has harmful effects.

    61. Re:The Netherlands by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      I expect that it's the same as all of Europe. There probably aren't that many countries on the planet that won't let you become a national if you want to. Of course pretty much all of them will expect you to live there for a while beforehand. And learning the language can be a nice touch.

      The "I can't speak the language" thing always struck me as odd. What's the problem with learning a language ? Learning a handful of phrases to get started and learning the rest locally isn't that hard.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    62. Re:The Netherlands by mwvdlee · · Score: 2, Informative

      As somebody who actually lives in the Netherlands, I can't help to correct some of the lies you posted.

      1. You DON'T need to speak Dutch before being accepted, no matter where you are from. Neither do you need a highly paid job. There is a distinction between fugitives and non-fugitives. If you are not a fugitive, you need to prove you either have a job (without regards for pay) or have some other valid reason to be here (e.g. marriage). If you're a fugitive (i.e. from a country at war or known for oppressing citizens), you're accepted by default.

      2. You do get a specific education with regards to Dutch history, culture but language is not a requirement. P.S. Out of interrest, I took the education too (even though I'm born in the Netherlands). The topics you describe are pure and simple lies. Most of it is about history (what and when things happened) and culture (mostly obvious things to western people, like equal rights for females and such).

      3. I have several collegues and friends who have wifes that came to the Netherlands from different countries (russia, thailand, peru) AFTER they were married with no real troubles. FWIW, none of them spoke Dutch when they became citizens and one of them still doesn't.

      4. Practically every foreigner in the Netherland has multiple nationalities. In fact, it has been the topic of recent discussions to change our laws into what you claim they already are.

      5. You are considered a Dutch citizen if you have stayed in the Netherlands for 6 years. You do have to be able to prove it, though. The 12 year number is complete and utter bullshit. There have been recent cases where people who stayed here for 5 years were required to leave but ultimately could stay as an exception to these laws.

      The fact is that Dutch immigration laws ARE becoming more strict, but they still are a lot more lenient than, for example, US immigration laws.

      But since you posted as Anonymous Coward, you're probably a right wing Dutch person who wants to scare off foreigners from trying to apply.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    63. Re:The Netherlands by WarwickRyan · · Score: 1

      Gelderland. Little village called Lunteren, specifically.

      Pretty much everything here (i.e. within 15km) closes on Sunday. Only pubs are open. I know that in the massive cities you can still buy fuel and some supermarkets are open, but that's hardly countrywide..

    64. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I beg to differ. Freedom from being afraid of failing miserably allows people to pursue the difficult and risky. No great social change has ever been predictable, reliable, and certain. If someone with moderate spending power (which is relative to the people around you, as was stated in the other reply) can produce a wind farm, I feel they'd be more likely to do so if they weren't afraid of being unsuccessful and falling into destitution. My granddad went from being fairly well off to being utterly broke because he attempted to use his moderate power to provide more reliable resources for a nearby native american reservation, an endeavour which was less than successful financially but greatly beneficial. I'd hardly call having to fear that fate every day of my life "freedom". On the contrary, I very much see myself as a wage slave, sacrificing my education so I can earn enough to live the paltry hand-to-mouth lifestyle I do. If that's freedom then please allow me to sign up for a totalitarianism where I can actually use my skills and improve my knowledge to better the world around me. Maybe the people who say freedom isn't free are right. Perhaps it costs upwards half of one's salary.

    65. Re:The Netherlands by Yer+Mum · · Score: 1

      Why are you making a generalisation about a whole continent from one country in that continent?

    66. Re:The Netherlands by insomaniac · · Score: 1

      Hmmmz, I think most of the problems you have are because you moved to a small place. I live in Amsterdam myself and almost everything is open on sunday, hell my local supermarket will even be open on christmas this year... And the big cities in .nl are probably the least religious in the world.

      Trains are indeed a hell these days, consider it a warning how privatization can make things worse really fast. Rush hours are bad I heard but as I cycle everywhere (like most city dwellers do) I never really notice it.

      What are balti houses?

      --
      The way to corrupt a youth is to teach him to hold in higher value them who think alike than those who think differently
    67. Re:The Netherlands by SeaFox · · Score: 2, Funny
      There's a chance that it will improve again, but currently there's a (grassroots/astroturf?) fear campaign against foreigners, mostly focussed on islamic cultured or coloured people, but americans as well (your current president isn't helping your reputation!).

      We know, we said we were sorry for that.

    68. Re:The Netherlands by Ulven · · Score: 3, Informative
      Oh, and yes you can apply for citizenship in the Netherlands but ONLY if you agree to give up your other citizenship. Anyone who tells you otherwise (that it's possible to keep your birth country citizenship) hasn't actually tried to do it recently
      It's not possible anywhere in the world, although there are a few examples, like Morocco. The king there doesn't allow to give up Moroccan citizenship, so dual citizenship is possible. Same with Costa Rica, who made it possible to get a Costa Rican astronaut on board of a US space shuttle.
      If I'm reading you correctly, you are wrong. I myself have both a Swedish and British passport, and "approximately 89 countries in the world officially allow some form of dual or multiple citizenship." (source)
    69. Re:The Netherlands by teal_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The trouble with all of the semi-socialist countries in Europe is that all of the social services that have made them so attractive for so long are now buckling under the strain of un-restrained immigration, forcing the state to cut services and people to turn to privatized businesses. Welfare states where 70% of your income goes to taxes only works if it's a closed system.

      A common strategy among people is to somehow refer to that very sane and logical conclusion as "racist". Uhhhh, ok.

    70. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm an American currently living in Amsterdam. The immigration policy for kennismigrants (literally knowledge immigrants) couldn't be easier! If you've got good IT skills you'll be welcomed with open arms. Oh, and how about making 30% of your income totally tax-free for the next 10 years? The government will pay for you to take 3 years of free Dutch classes (maybe depending on the gemeente, but Gemeente Zuid Amsterdam certainly does as I'm currently in the program). You just trade your US drivers license in for a Dutch one for with no test required. You can import 2 vehicles per person totally tax-free, and your partner (either gender, married or not) will get a work permit from day 1 as well. I think constantly about how Mexicans are treated back in the US, and I honestly have to say I can't imagine that there is anywhere in the world that welcomes immigrants as well as the Dutch welcome high-tech people with valuable skills.

      I've been here 13 months and can't say I've regretted the decision even once. The Dutch are obviously having immigration issues with Muslims not being integrated into the population. But as they tighten the rules for the general population, the rules for IT geeks have gotten much more relaxed.

      I work 40 hours a week, I'm home every day before 17:00. I bicycle or take public transport everywhere I want to go, I brought my motorbike over but just for fun. I get 28 days of holiday plus about 8 public and company holidays. Sure I took about a 40% pay cut from the US, but my quality of life has never been higher (pun intended :)

    71. Re:The Netherlands by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you know, these are some reasons why I'm looking into migrating out of here. Not ASAP - the current regime is not interested in carrying me away in the night just yet, even though it's getting worse and worse every day. But I'm definitely looking. The problem is that I stand much to lose when migrating - going to a freer society would basically force me to renounce the somewhat high standard of living that I'm used to (compared on a world scale). With the USA being out of the question, what's left? Northern Europe, Canada maybe?, certainly Australia, while Japan is close to impossible for me.

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    72. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct, and since I've given two exceptions, the Netherlands probably fall under those 89 countries aswell. To conclude: you don't just get citizinship by walking in the capital and cry for a passport.

    73. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Italy is far from perfect but you are a pack of lies. Personal taxes are not so high. I pay, for a 30.000$ annual payment, 26% of taxes. 50% is pure sci-fi... Italian social services (al least in north of italy) works great. I've been cured from a muscle-cancer, 4 years ago and, in 4 year of cure and follow-up analysis, I just paid the hospital parking... ah, and was a PRIVATE hospital... Try to do this in USA... Italian unemployemnt bonus is very small. No one can live only with that few moneys. People must be registerd in unemployment list and, if your 22-yo punk reject a proposed job, he is automatically removed from the list. I'm wrong or, one of the health-indicator of your econony is then weekly unemployment-bonus?

    74. Re:The Netherlands by WarwickRyan · · Score: 1

      Aie, Amsterdam does rock for that. Worked there for a bit, reminded me of home (but with more obvious weed and prostitution). That's not the norm, though.

      Balti = Indian food.

    75. Re:The Netherlands by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Which European country has 70% income taxes!?

      30% of my income goes to taxes, and I thought Sweden was having among, if not the highest in the world.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    76. Re:The Netherlands by cowbutt · · Score: 1
      The Netherlands.

      According to some Dutch speakers at 22C3, the Netherlands is experiencing the same sort of centralised authoritarian shift as most other western countries, especially in light of the murders of Pim Fortuyn and Theo van Gogh. In fact, this particularly worrying as the Netherlands is frequently seen as a barometer for traditional small-l liberal values. The speakers at 22C3 suggested that it was better to stand and fight for freedom in your own country, rather than bailing out at early signs of oppression, as unless the authoritarians experience resistance, they, they methods and policies will be copied by other states. And by that time, there will be even fewer like-minded international friends to help freedom-lovers with their fight (cf. Niemöller's famouse quotation). Also, if you know you have a viable escape plan, it makes one less inclined to fight vigorously. Finally, as a 'foreigner' in an adopted country, you'll have even less influence if you need to fight authoritarianism in your new country.

      The fact that I couldn't become a citizen and I can't speak the language stops me.

      From what I've heard, if it's discovered that you speak English, it's hard to get the Dutch to speak Dutch with you. Still, it's polite to be able to speak at least some of the local language before you go, especially if you're planning on settling.

      Personally, as a Brit, I'm planning on staying to fight the authoritarians. But, if needs must, then New Zealand is plan A (if I have plenty of time to plan, and move, and I have no family ties), the Republic of Ireland is plan B (particularly if I need to stay in contact with family, at some risk to myself) and Germany otherwise.

      My primary criteria have been a) a fairly firm understanding of essential freedoms (Makes me very dubious about Russia, China especially) b) a certain distance from US foreign policy (rules out Canada, Australia) c) a decent tech industry (rules out Italy, France, Spain) d) English-speaking, or a language I think I can learn fairly easily (rules out Scandinavian states, Russia a bit more, China, Japan) e) a cold-to-temperate climate (rules out India). No offence intended to any nationals and residents of the countries I've mentioned, but if I'm going to go to the trouble of leaving my homeland, I want to make sure I'm not doing the same again a couple of years down the line, even if that fear is based on a somewhat distorted outsiders' view of how things are in those countries.

    77. Re:The Netherlands by cralewyth · · Score: 1

      Well, depends which drugs that this "war on drugs" is aimed at, no?

      --
      "Women are just like ninjas; They lie even when it is more convenient to tell the truth." ~ Unknown
    78. Re:The Netherlands by Aceticon · · Score: 4, Informative
      I'm a portuguese living in Holland for the last 7 years.

      As i progressed in my career and my salary went up i payed an increasing proportion of it as income tax. At this moment i work as a freelancer in IT and i make more than twice as much monthly (after taxes) as i did when i started working here.

      At the moment, and due to the freaky way freelancers are taxed (i'm paying both employer's and employee's taxes and mandatory costs) the total ammount of tax levied on my base rate (the ammount that is payed for my services) is around 55%.
      In other words, for every 8 hours i work a day, about 4h20m of those i'm working to pay the belastingdienst (tax office).

      In two days time i will move to England.

      -----

      So, what are the good and the bad things about Holland (from the point of view of an european):

      Good:
      • Freedom. Freedom to be and do whatever you want. There are few "moral" laws (i.e. laws prohibiting non-mainstream private acts) in Holland and most dutch people follow the principle of "You can do whatever you want as long as i don't have to see it and you don't harm anybody". Thus pot consumption is tolerated, prostitution is lawfull and regulated, non-heterosexuals are not descriminated against and more. Although the current government (conservatives) has pushed a bit on prostitution and pot, they're about to be thrown out
      • Rational work hours. People around here usually work 8h/day period. Even in IT very, very few companies will try to get you to work more than that, and if you push back on those they will give up on it. The interesting fact is that, in IT and by comparisson with sistematically working 10h/day (which i did in another country), working 8h/day is actually more productive (as in, the projects are actually done in fewer days if people work 8h/day). Also a lot of people around here work part-time (not all days of the week and/or less than 8h day).
      • Tax break for foreigners (the 30% rule). There is a tax break for foreigners coming to Holland to fill in a position that requires expertises for which it is difficult to find someone from the local worker pool. This roughly ammounts to having 30% of the income being ignored for tax purposes. The tax discount lasts for up to 10 years and can be lost if you're without work for more than 3 months (i lost mine this way when i was unemployed for 5 months during the recession). The evaluation of suitability for the tax discount is subjective but in practice, when there is a lack of people specialized in a specific area, most applicants for jobs in that area get the tax break. At the moment there is a great lack of people in IT around here
      • No tolls on highways. All highways in Holland are free

      Not so good:

      • Taxes around here are high. The top income tax rate around here is 52% and is levied on the any yearly income above (roughly) 33000 EUR (about $50000). VAT is 17,5% on most things except things like essencials (such as food) and books. Having a car around here is a constant drain in your pocket due to road taxes and expensive insurance.
      • Public services are not public at all. Around here you pay for many so-called public services. Thus, for example, public transportation is expensive, people have to pay for any health services they use (since 2006 every resident in Holland is mandated by law to have at least the basic health insurance) and contributions to private pension funds are mandatory for most people.
      • At the moment, Holland has Swedish style taxes (high taxes) and US style public services (almost none and you pay for everything). In my opinion this is the thing that make Holland a very unactractive country to move to at the moment - during the last 10 or so years the successive dutch governments have been busy tearing down public services while keeping taxes at their original (high) level. Currently people around here are taxed as if they had lots of free public services AND have almost no free public services.
      • Traffic congestion
    79. Re:The Netherlands by teal_ · · Score: 1

      I thought it was a sliding scale based on your income? And what? Only 30%?! I live in California, I pay 33% in federal taxes, 10% in state, and some in social security as well. I keep maybe half of my paycheck. Although I vote democrat most of the time, the one thing I did expect with a republican congress and president is that taxes would go down. tax cut? what tax cut?

    80. Re:The Netherlands by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      And I also wonder, was this education existing 10 years ago as well? I tought it was introduced only recently.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    81. Re:The Netherlands by Jesrad · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't trade that in for a higher salary unless I actually needed that money.

      Wow, way to miss the point !

      What is making the GP cringe is that (s)he has no choice of whether working more or earning more, no say in how things like health, job, leisure and such are prioritized at all, no freedom in conducting life.

      --
      Maybe we deserve this world ?
    82. Re:The Netherlands by noz · · Score: 1

      Bios_Hakr thinks Negatyfus is a chump, and I'm a punk. I think he needs to reevaluate.

    83. Re:The Netherlands by somersault · · Score: 1

      It could be a bit more after paying for fuel, housing and other taxes? Do you have those? Or was that included in the 30%? Not trying to be cheeky, just wondering. I haven't tried to calculate exactly how much money I lose in tax each year here in the UK :(

      --
      which is totally what she said
    84. Re:The Netherlands by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 5, Informative

      Correction: Weed is not physiologically addictive, only psychologically.

      Plenty of things are physiologically addictive (caffeine, heroin, cocaine, etc). Weed is not.

      Psychological addiction is "real" addiction, but:

      1. It's normally not as physically/medically dangerous as physiological addiction, because it's only your behaviour and attitudes which change, not your body-chemistry. Psychological addiction won't damage your body - the worst it'll do is make you carry on doing things that might.

      2. There's no guarantee that anyone will ever get psychologically addicted to anything. Take heroin regularly for more than a few months and (barring genetic freaks) it's more or less certain you'll get addicted. Play WoW for ten years, and it's entirely likely at the end of it you'll be able to put it down at the end of it and never touch it again.

      3. If something's "only" psychologically addictive, we historically don't tend to ban it. Shopping, chocolate, sex and gambling are all psychologically addictive, so banning everything which may cause pysychological addiction is clearly a non-starter.

      Because it's "only mental" this tend to be where we draw the line between "banning dangerous activites" and "not being a nanny-state" - ultimately psychological addiction is merely a question of discipline, determination or strength of character, and most people believe they shouldn't be banned from their hobby activity simply because some people aren't adult enough to know their own limits.

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    85. Re:The Netherlands by SargeantLobes · · Score: 1
      If you have the misfortune of owning a passport from a non-EU county other than Canada, The USA, New Zealand, Australia or Japan, then you MUST learn Dutch before you enter the country

      That doesn't seem unreasonable to me. Alyhough the way you tell it, the immigration-zourse does sound lame (it was supposed to convey our values of emancipation and equality).

      Oh, and yes you can apply for citizenship in the Netherlands but ONLY if you agree to give up your other citizenship. Anyone who tells you otherwise (that it's possible to keep your birth country citizenship) hasn't actually tried to do it recently.
      Dual citizenship isn't possible for any combination. A combination of Dutch and German citizenship hasn't been possible since WWII. Several political parties are advocating completely removing the dual citizenship system for the upcoming election.

      I'm leaving here as soon as I can

      It sounds like you just made a bad choice in coming here, I'm sorry it didn't work out for you. However, if you retain this negative attitude how could things ever work out for you here?

      I was born in Portugal, I've been a Dutchman for about 20 years now and I love my country. I too am frustrated with its people sometimes, but I can't really think of a better place for me.

      I think your exaggerating the situation here just a little. I know for a fact that it is unconstitutional for the geovernment to take away someones passport if that leaves them without a country. The only exception I know of is Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who now has her passport back (which was taken away on a technicality, because she lied about her name).

      --
      I do love "!" but not as much as I love "..."...
    86. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then get the hell out, nobody begged you to come. I'd bet even money where you came from they wouldn't let dutch people live in your country at all. I like how the european countries not opening their doors from everyone on the planet is treated like its proof of genocide. Most countries won't allow anyone in their country except tourists. That Netherlands allows people to to settle makes it one the the MOST OPEN countries in the world. Excuse me if we ask that people who come here have basic language skills to help them integrate, or any education or job skills that means they'd have a hope of getting a job. To prove the netherlands isn't racist, lets invite the entire world to come, and we'll give them all free welfare for life, and let them bring in all their relatives and friends. Let them speak whatever the hell language they want to EXCEPT DUTCH, and if its their culture to cut non-belivers heads off or beat women whenever they get out of line, then we'd be racist to suggest they do anything else.

    87. Re:The Netherlands by mirthe_v · · Score: 1

      > it's an incredibly difficult language because the two languages I already
      > speak fluently (English and Spanish) have virtually no relationship
      > to Dutch besides some common sounding words

      I'm afraid I have to correct you here. Apart from Frisian, Dutch is the most closely-related language to English.

      See Wikipedia: Popular misconceptions about Dutch - Dutch is not the most closely-related language to English
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_language#Dutch_ is_not_the_most_closely-related_language_to_Englis h

      --
      "There is no knowledge that is not power." - Ralph Waldo Emerson
    88. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, ... I thought Vietnam war was "war on drugs"?

    89. Re:The Netherlands by Nutria · · Score: 1, Troll
      The concept of a global 'terrorist threat' acts like a catalyst in the hardening and closing of Dutch society.

      Theo Van Gogh was assassinated in Holland by a radical Muslim. No need for some nebulous GWOT, the /Hofstad Network/ will do just fine.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    90. Re:The Netherlands by mcvos · · Score: 1
      The Netherlands. The fact that I couldn't become a citizen and I can't speak the language stops me. Oh yeah, plus I like America still. :-)

      Not speaking the language isn't much of a problem for a visitor. Most Dutch aren't too bad at English (although they like to think they're fluent at it).

      The real problem is that the country is going downhill almost as fast as the US. No torture as far as I know, but the current minister of immigration and integration would probably feel quite at home in nazi Germany. And before you think this is hyperbole or I'm just invoking Godwin's Law here, I really, truly, honestly do think she is the kind of person who could blindly follow inhuman orders, or give them, for that matter. She's not currently doing any of that, mind you, but considering the stuff she manages to get away with in our current relatively enlightened society (or at least formerly enlightened), I shudder to think of what she might be capable of as part of a more brutal regime.

      To bring this back on topic, she is the main reason I might want to emigrate. She and the fact that she's immensely popular with a surprisingly large part of the population. She's at the same time the most popular and the most hated Dutch politician. Unfortunately, she's not the only problem this country has.

      So where would I go? Not to the US, in any case, but Canada would be an option. I hear rumours that climate change could turn Canada into a really pleasant country. Sweden is also an option for me, although I'm also considering the southern hemisphere: Australia or New Zealand or something. Or perhaps I should just find a quiet, stable country in Africa. It's a beautiful continent, it's just that quiet and stability are hard to find there.

    91. Re:The Netherlands by huge+colin · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Which is exactly why the "war on drugs" is bullshit.
      Um. Correlation does not prove causality.
    92. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      To reply to your obviously UNINFORMED response...

      "You DON'T need to speak Dutch before being accepted, no matter where you are from."

      Sorry bud.. try again. I'm quoting from the Dutch IND website.

      =-=-=
      Civic integration examination abroad introduced

      As of March 15th migrants wishing to settle in the Netherlands for, in particular, the purposes of marrying or forming a relationship are required to take the civic integration examination abroad.

      Many people aged between 16 and 65 who need an authorisation for temporary residence (MVV) in order to come to the Netherlands will first be obliged to complete the civic integration examination abroad in their country of residence. This applies, amongst others, to people who wish to form a family with someone in the Netherlands (for example, through marriage or by forming a relationship) and to religious leaders coming to the Netherlands for employment, such as imams or preachers. In many cases, obtaining the integration examination becomes an additional condition needing to be met before an MVV can be issued.

      The examination tests fundamental knowledge of the Dutch language and Dutch society. The examination is held orally, in Dutch, at the Dutch embassy or consulate general in the foreign national's country of residence. Taking the examination will cost approximately 350.
      =-=-

      So.. read that... it DOES matter where you're from, and YOU MUST SPEAK DUTCH BEFORE YOU ENTER THE COUNTRY. That fundamental knowledge test is administered OVER THE PHONE by a computer voice recognition system. If you have any kind of accent, good luck getting it to recognize your attempts at speaking Dutch.

      So on your first point, you're WRONG.

      On point 2, you're wrong again. Have you actually viewed the video that the IND created for foreigners wishing to come to the NL? Have you? I doubt it. Have you gone to your local Stadshuis and attended the integration courses? I'm not talking the ROC sponsored courses... I'm talking about the MANDATORY course that you have to attend that is administered by the City Council. It's crap. I've gone and done it... and they did teach us important things like.. flushing a toilet and how to make that wonderful Dutch food called stampot. Apparently knowing how to make stampot was more important that learning Dutch history and the place the NL holds in the world community.

      On point 3... that was the case years ago... before Rita Verdonk got her grubby hands on the IND. Now it's pretty much impossible to bring a family here. Go get your copy of the Volkskrant... read it.. there is an article in there.. wait, I'll link it for you
      http://www.volkskrant.nl/binnenland/article360232. ece/Aantal_aanvragen_voor_gezinshereniging_daalt
      For those of you who don't read Dutch, the highlights are... Up to the month August this year, 17,000 family reunification applications were filed. In 2005, there were 30,000 applications, and before that, 42,000. Since the implementation of the new law that you must speak Dutch prior to entering the NL, 1384 people have passed the exam.

      On point 4... check again... it used to be allowed to have dual nationalities here in the NL... not anymore - as of about 5 years ago actually... the Dutch Immigration law states you MUST renounce your birth citizenship.

      Quoting again from the IND website from the section on conditions for citizenship:
      =-=-=
      You are prepared to give up your current nationality. If you do not give up your current nationality even though you are supposed to, your Dutch nationality may be revoked.
      =-=-=

      Point 5... Wrong again. Geez... did you do any research at all on this? You must be a permanent resident for FIVE years, not six. The 12 year number is NOT bullshit. Again, quoting from the IND website:
      =-=-=
      Your Dutch nationality may be revoked. This can happen even as long a

    93. Re:The Netherlands by RickySan · · Score: 1

      No one forced you to come and live here, if you aren't happy here then go back, it's as simple as that, if you can't be bothered to learn the language then there's no use in trying to come and live here. If i don't speak English i can forget about trying to live in the states, would you have me there if i just speak Dutch?, i don't think so..

      --
      "If it's true that our species is alone in the universe, then I'd have to say that the universe aimed rather low
    94. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you have the misfortune of owning a passport from a non-EU county other than Canada, The USA, New Zealand, Australia or Japan, then you MUST learn Dutch before you enter the country, you cannot bring your spouse or children unless they also learn Dutch prior to entering the country (no learning Dutch after you arrive is not good enough).
      Well, it's quite insane indeed. I read in the newspaper that a flemish woman (so from the dutch speaking part of Belgium, the country next to the Netherlands), is required to take exams to prove she speaks dutch. This exam cost somewhere around 600 euro. Thing is, since she's Flemish, she nativily speaks Dutch! She also has several Flemish diplomas for courses (followed in dutch). She actually works as a teacher in a Dutch school. But that's all to no use, she HAS to pass the exam before she can become a Dutch citizen.
      Funny note: Flemish people tend to be better at Dutch spelling competitions than people from the Netherlands.
    95. Re:The Netherlands by Cee · · Score: 1

      So I live in Sweden. And I absolutely don't get why people would want to move here. Salaries are quite low. An entry salary is about 28k in the IT sector - BEFORE taxes (that's 30% off). 51% of BNP goes to the government in taxes. We have quite an ok unemployment insurance, that lasts for 240 days. Then you're basically off to welfare. A visit to the dentist is not free, a checkup would cost you 40-50. I could go on :)

      Did I mention the weather? Or our culture?
      What about the girls then? My response is usually "you watch too much TV".

      Sweden is not a paradise, despite what people said in the 60's when Sweden was within the top-10 richest contries in the world.

    96. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take Madonna as well, we dont want her in the UK as she doesnt speak the language....

    97. Re:The Netherlands by mvdwege · · Score: 1
      thanks to the Dutch love of tailgating (especially when it's wet), there are regularly huge traffic jams on the major highways.

      Tell me about it. I am Dutch, and it is one of my pet peeves. And of course, government seems to think that putting down more asphalt seems to help against the jams, while one ride on the Ring Amsterdam will show you that there is plenty of space for all the cars, if only they'd let each other merge instead of trying to hog every cm of asphalt between them and the car in front of them.

      And of course the police will not patrol the motorways and actually ticket tailgaters and left-hangers, but instead put down speed cameras.

      As for your remarks on Sundays, I see in another post that you live in Lunteren, Gelderland. Enjoy your stay, that's smack dab in the middle of the Dutch Bible Belt. The Western provinces are a bit more easy going on the Sunday rest issue, but the downside is that people in Holland proper are downright rude.

      Mart
      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    98. Re:The Netherlands by Cee · · Score: 1

      Oh well, seems my euro-signs got stripped away. But all figures are in Euros.

    99. Re:The Netherlands by xtracto · · Score: 1

      I think it's fascinating how many Americans measure happiness in wealth

      Remember the saying that goes:

      "Wealth does not makes happiness, it buys it made"

      Cheers,me

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    100. Re:The Netherlands by SnowZero · · Score: 1

      How about gambling? Seems pretty addictive for some people, and certainly not helpful to their lives.

    101. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which European country has 70% income taxes!?

      30% of my income goes to taxes, and I thought Sweden was having among, if not the highest in the world.


      Denmark, around 50% (depending on income) income tax, 25% VAT, 250% tax on cars (including VAT)...

    102. Re:The Netherlands by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      re:" (and we don't grab it using force from other countries, but that's a different story)"

      Oh yes - our prices nearly doubling after the invasion makes that statement so fucking astute I'm beyond amazed.

      Fucking amazing.

    103. Re:The Netherlands by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 3, Informative

      Perhaps, but in that case, this doesn't apply. Quite the contrary.

      Corrolary: Non-correlation disproves causality.

      A & !B => !(A => B)

      Hence the war on drugs is bullshit.

    104. Re:The Netherlands by Ulven · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, you were right on that the first time. The Netherlands doesn't appear to allow dual nationality.

      I was only taking issue with your phrase "It's not possible anywhere in the world..." Perhaps this isn't exactly what you mean to say?

    105. Re:The Netherlands by cerberusss · · Score: 4, Funny
      How about gambling? Seems pretty addictive for some people
      I'll bet you ten-to-one that this thread will devolve into a flamewar!
      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    106. Re:The Netherlands by CaptainZapp · · Score: 1
      Europe is great if you are young or unemployed. Europe sucks if you actually want to make something of yourself through hard work.

      Then pray tell why in independant quality of life surveys European cities take almost all of the first 30 places, while the best US place to live (rank 27) is Honolulu?

      You base your experience on one European country and probably the worst governed European country at that, ignoring the diversity of European countries and cities. Else the that, and for the record, you don't have a friggin' clue.

      There is no need to thank me.

      --
      ich bin der musikant

      mit taschenrechner in der hand

      kraftwerk

    107. Re:The Netherlands by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Which is exactly why the "war on drugs" is bullshit.

      Or not...

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    108. Re:The Netherlands by ErroneousBee · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah? Well, it clearly has not, moron, so hand over the money.

      --
      **TODO** Steal someone elses sig.
    109. Re:The Netherlands by insomaniac · · Score: 1

      Dunno, drug use isn't a problem, none of my friends use, neither do they go to whores... I see this more as a tourist attraction than anything else, especially the americans get off on it, bless their simple hearts.

      And I love indian food and there are enough restaurants for that here.

      But then again I like Amsterdam but to be honest if I would move out of Ams. I would move out of the country...

      --
      The way to corrupt a youth is to teach him to hold in higher value them who think alike than those who think differently
    110. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While immigration cause some problems it is not THAT problematic. There are other issues too that cause problems for the welfare state. Mainly that there are too many older people now and they are getting more of them.

      Btw I pay 28% income tax in Norway. On top of that there is a 7 person pension tax, but that is money that goes to my retirement, so it is money anybody would have had to save up anyway. And Norway has one of the highest tax regimes in Europe. But really, it is not the income tax that is so high in Europe, it is everything else that adds up to a high tax pressure. Cars are taxed more than 100% here. Sales tax is 25%, gasoline is something like 70-80% of the price taxes. But I think it all adds up to slightly below 50% of the economy being taxed. While in the US it is something like 30-40%.

      But then again, healthcare is free (or in the case of physicians the price is heavily subsidized), education is free even at university level, unemployment benefits are 60% of previous salary, and there is a 1 year paid maternity leave and 3 weeks for the dad. Of course all that costs money.

    111. Re:The Netherlands by WarwickRyan · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong - the people here are really nice, it's very peaceful and there's little crime. It's also beautiful - building is so well controlled that everything looks very nice...

    112. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netherlands has signed Schengen treaty. Just take citizenship ina any other EU country with more relaxed policies, and then get to work on Netherlands.
      I think that's simple, no?
      Take Spain, for example, with 5/10 years working here on provisional workers citizenship and you can be spanish pretty well... And you can take your family with you as you have the provisional.
      I think a Spanish provisional citizenship is Ok to work on Netherlands.

    113. Re:The Netherlands by maxume · · Score: 1
      Gasoline does not really matter because for some weird reason European cars are more efficient than American cars.

      Horsepower.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    114. Re:The Netherlands by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      No, this "inburgeringscursus", as it's named in Dutch, is relatively new. According to what I could find, it started in januari 1999, just under seven years ago.(http://www.amsterdam.nl/onderwijs/inhoud/inbu rgering/artikelen_homepage/wie_moeten_er)

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    115. Re:The Netherlands by nanoakron · · Score: 1

      I absolutely agree. I only wish we'd adopt the same system here in the UK where even Americans are turning up to claim asylum, freely admitting it's because of the free healthcare they can get over here.

      http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006480089,00 .html

    116. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying that there's something special about mind-stuff that isn't physiological? Not likely mate. Same principles.

    117. Re:The Netherlands by cyclop · · Score: 1

      Salaries are quite low. An entry salary is about 28k in the IT sector - BEFORE taxes (that's 30% off).

      Probably more than in Italy, surely not less.

      A visit to the dentist is not free, a checkup would cost you 40-50.

      Here in Italy you can theorically have a 30-euro visit to a public dentist. Much better avoiding it. A private (i.e. serious) dentist is about 90-100 euros for a checkup.

      Did I mention the weather?

      I NEED cold places. I hate the constant heat of Mediterranean countries. I hate it, it's 25 October and I have a t-shirt. It's devastatingly hot. And worse of all, air is *wet*, making the climate even worse. Everytime I go to Northern Europe I feel at home -bitter cold winds, that's what I need to awake! No kidding.

      Or our culture?

      What's wrong with Swedish culture?

      --
      -- Patent no.123456: A way to personalize /. comments with a sig attached to the end.
    118. Re:The Netherlands by dajak · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Which European country has 70% income taxes!?

      Not the Netherlands, but we used to have it. Tax brackets, with all social security
      payments (unemployment, disability, pension arrangement, widow and orphan pension
      arrangement, child rearing benefit, collective health insurance for disproportionate
      risks) included, are:

      0 to 16,893 = 33.55% (15,65% for 65+)
      16,893 to 30,357 = 40.50% (22,60% for 65+)
      30,357 to 51,762 = 42.00%
      51,762 and up = 52.00%

      Interest paid on mortgage loans is deducted from your income first (people who rent
      a home get a benefit dependent on taxable income, and profit from very generous
      government price controls). And from the resulting amount you subtract 1895.

      This results in an effective tax pressure of 9.9% on income and profits, compared to
      10.9% in the US and 14% EU 15 average (and in all of them it is the rich and the
      very poor that pay very little at the expense of the middle incomes).

      The real extortion is in consumption taxes, for instance fuel, resulting in 38.8%
      of GDP as tax revenue (compared to US 25.4% and EU 15 40.6%). People in the US on
      average spend nearly 10% of GDP more on privately financed health care, and need
      more additional insurance to have a similar level of protection against risks.
      When you factor this out, the real difference between most western countries is
      within a 3% of GDP margin.

    119. Re:The Netherlands by fishboy · · Score: 1

      My friend, Canada is a long ways from the United States on foreign policy. Sure, we're part of NATO and NORAD but for a long time Canadian Prime Ministers have earned the ire of American administrations for not toeing the line. Anti-american sentiment has been on the rise for the past decade north of the border and Canadian officials are always cautious of courting US favour lest there be a backlash from the Canadian public that is very wary of Us adventurism abroad these days. Canada stayed out of Iraq, believes strongly in multilateral international institutions, the International Criminal Court, the Geneva Convention, and the Kyoto Protocol, just to name a few of the items that the US has turned its back on recently. We are in Afghanistan at the moment but it is a bitterly unpopular mission in Quebec and may even cost the current government the next election as Canadians feel uncomfortable having any part in the war on terror. We have the legalisation of marijuana that almost got brought before the House last year, the legalisation of same-sex marriage, and universal health care. This ain't the land of the free or the home of the brave. Put that in your pipe and smoke it. Sounds like we fulfill all of your other criterion, why not give us a second thought? You'd be surprised at how different things are up here.

    120. Re:The Netherlands by Negatyfus · · Score: 1

      First reply I found worthy to answer. Basically, I have a problem with the way life is conducted these days. I have no solution: I am as dependent on it as any. However, to build up the kind of wealth that provides the freedom you are referring to you have to already give up a lot of your freedoms to society. You have to be an actor in the great play of life, but I despise the role. And as I have (like most) lost all reverence for hardship, it appears to be nigh impossible to break free of these chains.

      Would that I were able to rid myself of the computer, house, job, citizenship, civilization, technology... but I can't. I feel myself being unable to accept this modern way of life and at the same time also unable to choose different circumstances that could work better for me. Thus I hate the meaningless pursuit of material possession, because-- ultimately-- existence is meaningless.

    121. Re:The Netherlands by e.thunder · · Score: 1

      To a certain extend the above story is true. We have a strict policy for foreigners. It is because the majority of the citizens requested it. Why do you think Pim Fortuyn got so many partisans (and got shot by the left-wing). I got to say that I'm very happy we finally have this strict policy cause there are way to many foreigners in this country and among those there a lot who do not want to adapt to our way life. Over 60% of youth in the 4 biggest city in our country are foreigners. We have 1.5 million muslims and our entire population is only 16 million. Christianity is getting less and less and the mosques are popping out everywhere. Everything we've build up has to get adjusted to the foreigners. Unfortunately too many native citizens haven't got their eyes open and actually adjust to the foreigner instead it should be the other way around. Please parent stop complaining, I was actually thinking about leaving the Netherlands and go to America.

    122. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What's wrong with Swedish culture?


      Bork! Bork! Bork!

      Sorry, couldn't resist:-)
    123. Re:The Netherlands by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      I wasn't getting you wrong, don't worry. I'm a provincial boy myself, and the atmosphere can be a bit stifling at times, but I much prefer it to living in the big cities. As you say, the people are nice, it is quiet and restful, and that makes up for a lot.

      Could I get work in my native province (Zeeland, in case you're wondering), I'd go back in a shot.

      Mart
      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    124. Re:The Netherlands by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 0

      And yet a Dutchman (or any other EU citizen) going the other way would have to pay a ton of legal bills, bring all his school reports going back to kindergarten and prove that there's no way an American could do the job he's after. And never mind subsidised lessons, he'd have to speak English to even get considered.

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    125. Re:The Netherlands by nosfucious · · Score: 1

      Try Switzerland for conservative.

      My boss, Scottish, but lived here a long time, WAS told off by the police for washing his car on a Sunday. The car washes ARE closed. Lucky he didn't get a fine. No shops outside of the occasional bakery and some railway stations are open on a Sunday. Even most restaurants that aren't in tourist areas are closed.

      To even be on emergency call service, one time per month on a Sunday, our company needed to jump through plenty of hoops with paperwork for the Canton (state) and have a time/money compensation policy.

      Forget the price of petrol, (I usually take the buses and trains, but have a small motorbike), damn, check out the price of a decent steak, or leg of lamb. No vegemite either, but such is life.

      Most people in other areas just head across the border on weekends. Unfortunately I'm about 1.5 hours from France/Germany, just a slight bit too far.

      On the upside, plenty of spare cash. Great mates, good (enough) pubs, great bike riding and winter sports. Health insurance is compulsory, but doctors and hospitals are excellent.

      No, it's not Australia, but there's plenty to like here. And when it all gets a bit much, Prague/London/Amsterdam are just an hour by plane.

      --
      Q:I was listening to a CD in Grip and it sounded horrible! What's up? A:Perhaps you are listening to country music
    126. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CIA World factbook (https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geo s/nl.html):
      people: 16,491,461
      land: 33,883 sq km


      That might be one of the reasons our small country is trying to limit immigration.

    127. Re:The Netherlands by Analein · · Score: 0
      Europe also sucks when you are young and unemployed. Even the wealthiest european nations are suffering from the growing numbers of socially fully disintegrated layers of population.

      As for taxes: 50% isn't the top, take a look at Sweden. In Germany it is somewhat lower, but bound to your social status. I get to pay a LOT of money for having no children and not being married. Despite that being nonsene bacause women do not particulary like the broke'n'dirty kind for marriage concerns and reproduction issues, it is common here.

      Gas IS pricy, yes. I do not have the latest prices in mind, but it wasn't below 1.00/litre in Germany for a while now or anywhere in Europe. Don't know much about the metric system, but it isn't cheap compared to America I think. However: Every city has public transportation systems, often consisting of trams, subways and busses at the same time. There are monthly tickets and you get them for low money. There are national railways, cheap airlines for national travelling and you get to drive as fast as you want on the Autobahn. Most people use public services in the city and go by car outside. It is convenient. I don't even have a driver's license ;)

    128. Re:The Netherlands by cold+fjord · · Score: 0, Troll

      There's a chance that it will improve again, but currently there's a (grassroots/astroturf?) fear campaign against foreigners, mostly focussed on islamic cultured or coloured people,

      I expect you have no idea why there might be some concern, or what is being done?

      but americans as well (your current president isn't helping your reputation!).

      Oh, please! Back that up, will you? I think you've had a few too many "special" brownies.

      Hmm...Interesting Dutch blog...

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    129. Re:The Netherlands by avasol · · Score: 1

      s/Vietnam/Iraq/
      s/drugs/terrorist/
      .
      w
      q

    130. Re:The Netherlands by advocate_one · · Score: 1
      As i progressed in my career and my salary went up i payed an increasing proportion of it as income tax. At this moment i work as a freelancer in IT and i make more than twice as much monthly (after taxes) as i did when i started working here.

      At the moment, and due to the freaky way freelancers are taxed (i'm paying both employer's and employee's taxes and mandatory costs) the total ammount of tax levied on my base rate (the ammount that is payed for my services) is around 55%.
      In other words, for every 8 hours i work a day, about 4h20m of those i'm working to pay the belastingdienst (tax office).

      In two days time i will move to England.

      hahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      seriously, it's just as bad here in good old blighty...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    131. Re:The Netherlands by maxhead · · Score: 1

      I've lived here in The Netherlands for 7.5 years--in the center of Amsterdam, The Hague, and now purchased a home in the region 't Gooi (something like New England). It's certainly easier living here as an American...there are still prejudices against Muslims (sorry, but mostly deserved based on individual behavior) and Eastern Europeans, but overall the quality of life if you are middle-class or better is excellent. There are problems (customer service is a bad word here...it drives me crazy) but the people are genuine, and the history, architecture, culture, and joy of life is worth it. Mostly, I think, it's the personal freedoms. In the US, I've gone to the end of my rope with tolerating the nanny-state attitudes and "we must protect the children". The red state-blue state is a symptom of the christianists imposing their belief system on the rest of the country and have so far ruined the US foreign policy and domestic culture as well.

      Sorry, was I ranting? Back to work now...Greetings from Holland!
      Hup Holland!
      Go USA!
      Remember people, we're all on this rock together...

    132. Re:The Netherlands by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 0
      I just thought you should know that the parent was talking about Italy, not the Netherlands.
      From the description, it sounded more like France.
      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    133. Re:The Netherlands by WiFiBro · · Score: 1
      Most problems you describe are local. Trains run better outside the Randstad. Christians were pushed back to our version of the Bible Belt. Unfortunately all sorts of irrationalism is popping up everywhere, astrology, christianity has a comeback, islam, etc..

      You can receive BBC 1/2 (so quality TV and news ensured).

      I beg to differ. Imho BBC is hardly ever interesting. That said, what channel ever is for more than 50 minutes a week...

      ...preceived immigration issue, mainly from North Africans. For what claims to be a socialist country, it does tend to swing to the right..

      Antillians, Turks & Arabs also have to face prejudices more than average.
    134. Re:The Netherlands by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Actually, you've proved the GPs point. Those with large incomes (or reserves) are afforded the freedom to take risks. Having a million dollars in the bank makes it easy to go become an artist for a living. If you don't make ends meet in the decorative oatmeal sculpture world, you've still got money to house and feed yourself (and your family). Doing the same thing with $1000 in the bank is inherently risky, 'cause if you fail, you starve.

      Money - either as cash reserves or as steady surplus income - gives you freedom because it removes most of the fears associated with failure (psychological reactions to failure excepted). If you were a billionaire, then pursuing a wind farm generation plant with a few million dollars would be a hobby, not a life's investment. If you had a million dollars in the bank, you could volunteer at a local homeless shelter, giving people a new start in life. With few million in the bank, you could probably build a homeless shelter and start the foundation which would run it in perpetuity. Wealth, what you can "risk", and the rewards to society as a whole are all relative, but having "enough" to take care of yourself means you can pursue opportunities with the extra without the risk that a wage slave would have to take.

      Never underestimate the power of wealth, even if it is only minor wealth.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    135. Re:The Netherlands by rve · · Score: 1

      Dutch isn't very similar to English at all in terms of difficulty to learn.

      This may be counter-intuitive, but for a native English speaker, French comes much closer. Most English words (though not most of the most frequently used words) are derived from French. English syntax is also more like a simplified French than like the other Germanic languages. The only real difficulty is the pronunciation, since English has lost a number of phonemes common in either French or Germanic languages.

    136. Re:The Netherlands by Nephilium · · Score: 1

      Favorite story of a visiting family from the Netherlands (one of my friends was married to their daughter)...

      They're talking to some people discussing what they want to do over the weekend... they decide they want to drive over to the Grand Canyon, since everyone has told them they need to see it while they're in the USA. They were in Ohio... They couldn't grasp the concept that there are parts of the country that put it far outside the idea of a weekend trip. They didn't really get their minds wrapped around it until my friend took them to a library and got a map of the US and the Netherlands to the same scale, and showed them.

      It's like the old Bill Cosby skit on foreign languages... "Sure, in Europe they speak lots of languages. Drive for twenty minutes, and people are talking a different language. Here in America, you can drive for five days and not hear anything other then English."

      Nephilium

      "Tall, aren't you?" she said."I didn't mean to be."Her eyes rounded. She was puzzled. She was thinking. I could see, even on that short acquaintance, that thinking was always going to be a bother to her. --- The Big Sleep (Chapter 1)

    137. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The examination tests fundamental knowledge of the Dutch language and Dutch society. The examination is held orally, in Dutch, at the Dutch embassy or consulate general in the foreign national's country of residence. Taking the examination will cost approximately 350.

      You're mistaken when you said it was taken by a voice recognition system over the phone. If you want to get all high and mighty and accusing people of not reading before they reply, I suggest you take a healthy dose of your own advice :)

    138. Re:The Netherlands by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 0
      We'll leave aside the fact that you forgot to mark the quotation properly. And that your response, that I'm sure you're very proud of, was both a non sequitur and an ad hominem.


      As it happens, I'm a European and I agree with every word of that 'ridiculous statement'.

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    139. Re:The Netherlands by seresy · · Score: 5, Informative

      I had to reply to this. I'm an American living in Noord-Brabant, and have had exactly the opposite experience you apparently have. I moved here to be with my boyfriend under "family formation." I hold an MA degree and have an extensive professional background. I have been here 18 months, and have had nothing but hassles with the Dutch immigration system. The residence and work permits that are legally required to be processed in less than 6 months took 10.5, and when I did receive my first permit, it was good for a whole 6 weeks before I had to have a renewal. The renewal took a further 3.5 months, and I was not allowed to work or even seek work until July of this year (14 months after I moved here.) I am required by law to take Dutch language and integration courses. If I attend less than 80%, I am fined by the government. If I fail to attend, I risk deportation. These aren't facts I picked up from the internet- I was informed of this when I went to my first meeting with the city after (finally) receiving my permits. I could not trade my US license for a Dutch one- though I have been driving since 1988 in the US, I had to take costly lessons, a theory exam, and a practical exam before getting my Dutch drivers' license. The CBR (drivers' branch) informed me of this, and it was long and costly. I am not in IT, and though I have a solid professional background, job agencies tell me that the only jobs they can get me into are at call centers, for about 30% of my last income and less than I lived off of while going through college (gross, not net.) If you're in IT it is a lot easier to deal with the IND, but your company will be your sponsor and if you don't stay with that company, or don't change the paperwork and have your new company become your legal sponsor, you can and will be deported. The man's lucky we have a good relationship, or I would have headed back to the US a long time ago.

    140. Re:The Netherlands by Teun · · Score: 1
      Ah yes, Lunteren, well at least crime was squashed by the endemic Social Control.
      Except when church is on and the streets are empty :)

      Surely when you found out after the first few months you could have moved!

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    141. Re:The Netherlands by Confused · · Score: 1
      Oh, and yes you can apply for citizenship in the Netherlands but ONLY if you agree to give up your other citizenship. Anyone who tells you otherwise (that it's possible to keep your birth country citizenship) hasn't actually tried to do it recently.


      What's the panic? The requirement to give up your original citizenship is very common when applying for a new one and used my most countries around the world, I wouldn't be surprised if even was handled this way in the USA and Canada. The easiest way to get a dual citizenship is to have an entitlement (by birth location or parents) to both. Buying a second passport is usually not easy.
    142. Re:The Netherlands by cowbutt · · Score: 1
      Yes, for a long time I had an ambition of moving to Canada as it has lots going for it, not least its people. :-)

      But I do wonder, simply given its geographical proximity, how long it can remain uninfluenced by US policies (e.g. the case of Maher Arar).

    143. Re:The Netherlands by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Informative

      Okay, it's still a physiological process, but you are taking things out of context. There are drugs that cause addiction by upsetting the bodies natural chemistry - these are considered physiologically addictive. Then there are drugs that cause addiction in the same way that anything pleasurable does. These are considered psychologically addictive. Sure, either way your brain changes - but in one case it is to cope with foreign chemicals, and in the other case it is the "normal" process of making new neurological connections. Both paths can be bad, but consider that going cold turkey off of a physiologically addictive drug, you can die.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    144. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      I'm an American living in Noord-Brabant


      Yeah, first mistake, never go to Noord-Brabant. It's like bragging that you moved to the US when finding yourself living in Alaska (maybe Ohio is an even better example ;-)

      I could not trade my US license for a Dutch one- though I have been driving since 1988 in the US,


      Thank god that finally is reality. The trend used to be for Dutch kids to go to Texas on vacation. Get a driver's license within a week and head back to swap it for a Dutch one. No offense, but I believe driving on a good ol' highway is something different than driving in Amsterdam (or any Dutch city). Besides, do you know Dutch traffic rules? Probably not, for they _do_ differ from US rules. ... and of course you're a female driver, which doesn't help *duck&cover*

      Funny though, 'cause my wife -being an Indonesian who came to .nl to study- has no problems with

      1) requirement of studying (she even wants to take advanced Dutch lessons for she believes it helps with getting a job).
      2) getting a permit or renewal
      3) taking driving lessons

      *You* wanted to move to this country, so *you* should make an effort of blending into society.
    145. Re:The Netherlands by thtolleson · · Score: 1

      You're dead-on about Americans having a paranoid approach to sexual harassment. We're still a puritan land and it imbues sexual politics on both the left and the right. Parents think nothing of their children seeing people eviscerated or being shot and then blown up on television, but anything sexual is straight from hell. We've got a long way to go.

      Anyway, if anybody's reading this, my wife and I are moving to Spain. Not because it's a better nation politically, but we like the culture and the food.

      And I get to play grab-ass at work all day. (kidding!)

    146. Re:The Netherlands by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      Then you realize that the social services suck. Want a painkiller for your broken leg? Tough. Want an annual dental checkup? Tough. Want a cop to investigate repeated break-ins? Tough.

      Erm. Wut. This is complete and utter xenophobic tripe. Who modded this up? This doesn't represent the generally good health services and generally excellent police services you get in most of Europe at all. As for making something of yourself through hard work, you might try telling that to Mercedes, from your rust belt there. What a moran.

    147. Re:The Netherlands by GauteL · · Score: 1

      "Europe is great if you are young or unemployed. Europe sucks if you actually want to make something of yourself through hard work. Personally, I couldn't live if I worked 6 days a week knowing I'd only get 3-days pay after taxes just so some 22-yo punk could sit in the park all day and smoke pot."

      It doesn't seem like you appreciate just how diverse Europe is. There is no single "Europe" that defines how things work, despite the existence of the European Union.

      Also, your stereotyping of benefit receivers is completely biased and unhelpful. Taxation in general is to allow acceptable standards of welfare for as many as you can in case of accidents, illness or unemployment. Most receivers do not try to cheat the system, but unfortunately any system like this will allow some people to take advantage. Where you set the limits is always a tradeoff between allowing a certain number of personal disasters versus allowing a certain number of cheaters. This is complicated by the well established problem that allowing more personal disasters increases the crime rate.

      Of course, some countries suffers from massive corruption that threatens this whole balance and makes it almost impossible to provide acceptable public service compared to the level of taxation. The United Kingdom, Germany, the scandinavian countries, Holland etc. are generally not among these countries, while Italy and Greece are.

      In general it is not the 22-yo punk that sits in the park that threatens your ability to make something of yourself through hard work, although some media likes to portray it that way.

    148. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm looking forward to moving to the Netherlands as soon as possible; it'll be empty of assholes like you.

    149. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe learning to speak English is also a mandatory thing for becoming a US citizen.

      Wrong. English isn't even the official language of the USA - there is no official language.

    150. Re:The Netherlands by udderly · · Score: 1

      thanks to the Dutch love of tailgating (especially when it's wet), there are regularly huge traffic jams on the major highways.

      This is the most bizarre thing that I have ever seen. I'm not sure why, but it seems that the more polite the people in a particular culture are, the more impolitely they drive. As an example, the Mexican people are probably the most polite people on the planet, but they *immediately* lay on the horn when a light changes, tailgate, drive aggressively, etc. Ditto the Lebanese. Ditto the Dutch.

    151. Re:The Netherlands by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

      Please either name a single example of a semi-socialist European country with 70% of income going to taxes and un-restrained immigration or withdraw your statement.

    152. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      *I* live in the Netherlands, I AM Dutch, and YOU are the one being misinformed, sir.

      Just about all the info you posted is based on the OLD immigration rules. The NEW rules are much stricter, and like the original poster outlined.
      If you can read Dutch, which I assume, please go to buitenlandsepartner.nl and READ about the subject before you speak. Don't just have a conversation with some co-workers and then automatically assume that what they say MUST be true and totally updated, and that their info is still accurate *today*.

      I have a lot of trouble getting my white, AMERICAN fiancee in here, and we are considering moving to the States because the rules there are so much simpler. Holland officially has the strictest immigration-laws in the world, bar Denmark.

      Apart from that, the laws ARE racist. If you are a black African male, you can basically forget it. If you're a white American like my fiancee you have a small chance. See the difference???

      And speaking of money; It might be easy for some to make the financial demands (you MUST make 1441 euro netto per month, AND have a year-contract) but this leaves out 60% of the autochtone Dutch population.
      You can bring a partner here if you are RICH, basically. People working in restaurants, teachers, nurses etc aren't allowed to fall in love.
      Getting married, having kids; Doesn't matter to the IND. You must meet the financial requirements.

      You have no idea the pain Verdonk is causing on people, so please inform yourself before you ridicoulously accuse someone speaking the truth of being a right-winger. It's people like you, who make OTHER people think that it's soooo easy, that cause the voters to think we must have even STRICTER laws since "It's soooo easy"

      Sorry for the rant, nothing personal, I can see that you are an intelligent person, but please inform yourself & talk to people going through the immigration process right *now* before you spout opinions.

    153. Re:The Netherlands by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      What are the harmful effects of marijuana? What are they, compared to alcohol and tobacco?

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    154. Re:The Netherlands by stevedcc · · Score: 1

      The Netherlands and the the UK (the other place I spent considerable time) are great places, but it's not home. Life in other countries is very inconvenient (yes, I know, an American comment) and the people are generally much more orderly and nicer in the US. This may seem like a shock to people in the US (and a shock to people outside the US too) but I truly believe that is how it is. Simple things like standing in a line to wait for services or having a quick meal do not exist here. I know that for some people that is a charm, but for me it's an annoyance.

      I can't possibly comment on the Netherlands, but using queuing as an example of why the US is better when the UK is one of the two comparison countries? Come on, we Brits are queuers too.

      --
      todo - The developer's equivalent of confession: "Forgive me Father, for I have sinned..."
    155. Re:The Netherlands by dtosti · · Score: 1

      As an Italian citizen I have to educate you about my country, because your post seems so superficial. :-)

      >Then I found out they pay almost 50% income tax.

      Wrong. Italy has a progressive taxation system. That means you pay a different taxation rate for your earnings. The maximum rate is 40% if you earn more than 100.000 EUR (although current government wants to introduce a new maximum rate of 45% for income higher than 150.000).

      >On top of that, there is a 20% VAT on most items.

      Wrong. VAT for real useful items as raw food (groceries, wheat, sugar and medicinals) is 4%. Not to mention the special VAT for disabled people, that is 4%, too.

      >On top of that, gasoline was almost $5 per gallon (a few years ago...almost certainly more now

      1.22 EUR/litre. Consider that car engines allowed for use in Europe doesn't drink as much gasoline as american counterparts, so the consumption is almost equivalent. Consider also that cars propelled with with methane (0,60 EUR/litre) or GPL (0,50 EUR/litre) are more spreaded in Italy than in your country..

      >The high taxes were there to support their social services. Free medical. Free dental.

      That's a competitive advantage for Italy (and the rest of EU) considering how medicare and medicaid works in USA.

      >Good unemployment and retirement.

      That depends for how long did you work. If you began to work in Italy after 1993, the prospective public pension will not be good as the one currently received by retired people.

      >Almost no chance of getting fired.
      Correct. You're likely to be fired only if you steal money from the company or you fight (as in fight club) with your colleagues. If you don't work as expected, you won't be either fired nor harassed, but simply demoted to unsatisfying tasks, usually as an hint to yourself to get another job as soon as possible.

      >6-hour work days and 30-days of vacation. Virtually no concept of sexual harassment or workplace
      Wrong. workdays are 8 hour or more, days of vacation depends from the collective contract you've signed (in italy people - except managers and salespersons - have all the same rights and all the same pay: the latter of course varies according to your experience level).

      >Virtually no concept of sexual harassment or workplace misconduct.
        Sexual "harassment" in Italy is usually viewed as a nice way to get your career start up, especially from beautiful women (heck, why one would harass an ugly coworker?!?).

      >Then you realize that the social services suck.

      Where did you live when you were in Italy? social services quality varies from region to region. The best ones are usually in North Italy.

      >Want a painkiller for your broken leg? Tough.

      Maybe yours was an example, but painkillers aren't considered as free medicinals, but self-medication drugs and you've to pay for them. You expect social services to pay 5 euro for every aspirin pack used in Italy? nay :-)

      >Want an annual dental checkup?
      Tooth care are considered self medication. but you can get back 19% of all your dental expenses during tax report compilation.

      >Tough. Want a cop to investigate repeated break-ins? Tough.

      I suspect you lived in a big town of center/South Italy, heh? responsiveness from cops varies from region to region also. The most efficient are in North-East Italy.

    156. Re:The Netherlands by SnapShot · · Score: 1

      Technically you only pay a 33% federal tax on your incremental salary over $150k ( 2005 numbers for a single filer ). Your first $30k was taxed at 15% or less just like any poor shmoo who serves you your Egg McMuffin in the morning.

      I real crime is that long term capital gains ends up being 15%. So you can be pissed that you're paying double the rate that Paris Hilton is paying on her income from her various trust funds.

      --
      Waltz, nymph, for quick jigs vex Bud.
    157. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Following this thread with interest;

      No, the guy is not mistaken, the oral test is done over the phone.

      You are connected to the exam-computer and must phone in your answers, this to prevent corruption/embassy people being bribed into saying you did great while you actually did not.

    158. Re:The Netherlands by mrogers · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How many people have been killed by trams since Theo van Gogh was murdered? There's no denying that it was a despicable crime, but one murder shouldn't be the basis (or pretext) for a national policy.

    159. Re:The Netherlands by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      To quote a standup comedian: "This War On Terror's a great idea - remember when they had a War On Drugs... and you couldn't buy drugs any more?".

      The high-profile cash-black-hole that is TWoD is a pointless waste of taxpayer dollars, and quoting a page of misleading, strawman or unsupported arguments from the very people tasked with propagating it won't do a lot to convince anyone.

      "Legalization proponents claim, absurdly, that making illegal drugs legal would not cause more of these substances to be consumed, nor would addiction increase."

      I don't know of anyone who claims that legalising drugs wouldn't (at least potentially) increase their use, but the whole point of drug leagalisation is the recognition that such drugs may be used safely without being abused.

      Increasing drug use and increasing drug addiction (say, "drug use" and "drug abuse") are two completely separate things. It's been empirically proven time and again that it's "It's clear from history that periods of lax controls are accompanied by more drug abuse and that periods of tight controls are accompanied by less drug abuse."

      Again, use of the "mixing of drug use and drug addiction" straw-man. And it's also silent on how the periods of tight controls are accompanied by increased crime, ballooning prison populations, increased power to organised crime syndicates providing the illegal drugs, increased medical risk to users from impure and badly-produced drugs and the criminalization of entire sections (predominently the young and/or ethnic minorities) of the population.

      "During the 19th Century, morphine was legally refined from opium and hailed as a miracle drug. Many soldiers on both sides of the Civil War who were given morphine for their wounds became addicted to it, and this increased level of addiction continued throughout the nineteenth century and into the twentieth. In 1880, many drugs, including opium and cocaine, were legal -- and, like some drugs today, seen as benign medicine not requiring a doctor's care and oversight. Addiction skyrocketed. There were over 400,000 opium addicts in the U.S. That is twice as many per capita as there are today."

      This is an argument for greater education, not against the drugs. Anyone who thinks an addictive substance is harmless and beneficial under all circumstances needs setting right - it doesn't autmoatically mean we should ban the substance, along with all its beneficial properties.

      And frankly, if they went from "opium and cocaine are good for you, and you should take them daily in horse-doctors' quantities" to "opium and cocaine are the devil's candy, and one line or pipe will make your head explode" and only got a 50% reduction in addicts, there are probably waaaaay better ways to spend the WoD propaganda money - like, say, researching treatments or caring strategies for addiction, or funding educational (as opposed to scare-tactics propaganda) campaigns.

      Note also that this is again talking about "addicts", not "users". Sure enough, if something's suspected to be beneficial by the bucketload and then they discover it's addictive, I'd expect people who took it to be a little more careful and sparing with it, and hence avoid addiction more successfully. Hell, at least they know now it's addictive at all, and that alone is going to help avoid accidental addictions (as opposed to addictions caused by over-prescription or user-apathy).

      And that's just the first three paragraphs - there are problems, straw-men and faulty reasoning galore throughout the page.

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    160. Re:The Netherlands by Tolleman · · Score: 1

      VAT(25%) + employment payroll tax,"arbetsgivaravgift"(30%) + Your tax (33%) Not to mention the taxes on electricity(where you get to pay taxes on the VAT?!) and petrolium.

    161. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the rules: "The examination is held orally, in Dutch, at the Dutch embassy or consulate general in the foreign national's country of residence."

      "[I]t was taken by a voice recognition system over the phone."

      These statements are not contradictory. You could go to the Dutch embassy and make a phone call to take the test. Presumably the previous poster has *already done this* and knows that that is how it works. You're simply trying to argue semantics. The poster is telling you how the actual system works. You're misreading the rules to claim that it is incorrect.

      Please, before getting high and mighty with the nitpicking, learn *how* to read.

    162. Re:The Netherlands by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      where they teach you all the good things about the Dutch way of life.. like how to flush a toilet (yes they taught me that useful skill),

      See - it wasn't a total waste after all :-)

    163. Re:The Netherlands by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      The biggest problem with Netherlands is that many millions of people feel just like you do (sigh). Maybe we should stop craving for Netherlands and try to make our own countries a little more "netherlandish".

      Anyway, good luck.

    164. Re:The Netherlands by yesthatmcgurk · · Score: 1

      And a sorrier bunch of assholes I've never seen.

    165. Re:The Netherlands by JonathanR · · Score: 2

      Starbucks to coffee is what McDonalds is to food.

    166. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you don't need the language, amsterdam is bilingual in fact, i am dutch and sometimes dutch people in stores start to me in english, under the Dutch american friendship treaty you can get a residence permit when you start a viable business and invest at least 5000$ or so...

    167. Re:The Netherlands by Ranten_N_Raven · · Score: 1

      Well said.

      Were I to emigrate to France (not likely!) I'd have to learn French. ETC!

      Why is it that the "Ugly American Who Only Speaks English (and that badly)" is a bad thing who should be ridiculed but the "Algerian who only speaks Arabic" or "Mexican who only speaks Spanish" should be protected and understood and cherished?

      --

      READ the US Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the other amendments! http://lcweb2.loc.gov/const/const.html
    168. Re:The Netherlands by jac89 · · Score: 1

      Yeh, thats the sun, i wouldn't be so sure about the validity of that news report.

    169. Re:The Netherlands by GroinWeasel · · Score: 1

      In some cases, sorry isn't enough.

    170. Re:The Netherlands by twistedsymphony · · Score: 2, Informative

      The US doesn't actually have an official language. Most of the population speak english but there is a growing percentage of the population that only speak Spanish.

      Speaking english certainly helps living here, but it's not required.

    171. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Source:

      Applicants for naturalization must be able to read, write, speak, and understand words in ordinary usage in the English language.


      Ah yes ...
    172. Re:The Netherlands by mjpaci · · Score: 1

      Don't worry about speaking the language, they all speak English quite well. Also, Dutch women are, on a whole in my opinion, the hottest European women.

    173. Re:The Netherlands by Oersoep · · Score: 1


      Crime:
      http://www.ad.nl/misdaadmeter/
      (Good luck translating everyone!)

      The traffic jams are caused by lefties who think less asphalt will stop traffic jams. Most of the budget goes to the street lights. Compared to other countries NL is one big street light.

    174. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My wife and I lived and worked in the Netherlands for 2.5 years about 10 years ago. We are both US citizens. We had a more or less positive experience

      Some things we learned.

      We took Dutch lessons nearly the whole time we were there. Spoke it badly, but the fact that we tried to speak it, I think made things easier 99.9% of the time.

      Prices of goods and services appeared to be correct based on need. The basics needed to survive were cheap or even free.

      Americans view the French as absurd - this is not news. What is news (to most Americans) is the US is just as absurd if not more than France, just in another direction.

      Being out of the US for a presidential election is a true treat. Even though we voted by absentee ballot - we did not have to endure the onslaught of bullshit prior to the election.

      The Netherlands (and most of Europe for that matter) has an incredible infrastructure, Trams, Trains busses. What a delight to be able to literally get anywhere, almost anytime for so little.

      Everyone should go away from their homeland for long enough to have reverse culture shock.


      All that said - we did spend an inordinate amount of time at one Dienst (Ministry) or another, and too many guilders and time dealing with the vreemdeling politie and court costs associated with our stay, permits and other general BS.

      Oh yeah and, herring with onions, is without a doubt one of the more fantastic foods we have encountered, and of course "Fish must swim".

    175. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is anyone here a gaynigger?

    176. Re:The Netherlands by randomalias · · Score: 1
      Balti's a very specific kind, basically Southern Indian food cooked and eaten in a Northern Indian/Pakistan style.

      It comes from Birmigham in the English West Midlands, which is near Warwick, hence the GPs love of the stuff.

      See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balti_(food) for more info.

      One of the (few) joys of the UK is the indian food, which is by far the best in Europe. I work for an Indian programming house, and they seem to rate the local variety highly.

    177. Re:The Netherlands by somersault · · Score: 1

      But if that artist wasn't going to starve if they failed, then they could take the risk even only with $1000 in the bank. And how many people do you know that are millionaires? It's not very common. This guy was talking about *everyone*, not just some lucky few with rich parents, or lucky entrepreneurs (like the Google/MySpace/YouTube founders)

      --
      which is totally what she said
    178. Re:The Netherlands by jne_oioioi · · Score: 1, Funny
      but if you thought everyone and his sister was an addict, you're wrong.
      I thought everyone was a pusher and their sister a whore.
    179. Re:The Netherlands by Neph · · Score: 1

      Speaking as a Canadian whose spouse has both Colombian and Canadian citizenship, I can state with certainty that Canada does *not* require you to give up your old citizenship to become Canadian. 5 years of living in the country with resident status makes you eligible, and after that it's just the application, a few months' wait and a really easy test.

    180. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. At least in the US, McDonalds has (some) reasonably priced menu items for what you get.

    181. Re:The Netherlands by somersault · · Score: 1

      Eek. I do agree with your last sentiment slightly (even though I'm a Christian, I still find the concept of life on earth a bit strange), but yeah.. seems like you would enjoy life more if you had to struggle to survive.. wouldn't have time to get so philosophical ;) when your biggest problem is something as pathetic as to what kind of car to buy (mine just now), then you really are doing well in life, and should be thankful.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    182. Re:The Netherlands by Zaphod69 · · Score: 1

      I'm Dutch, and I'll back him up, allong with 90% of the rest of the Dutch. 64% of the Dutch find the American attitude towards other country's frightning 71% thinks the USA exaggerates the terrorist threat for it's own interests. President Bush is a threat to world peace: 56% agrees etc. Source btw, NIPO is one of the biggest poll institutions in Holland and has a very good reputation.

    183. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Name me one Western society that isn't having problems due to Muslim demands? I'd *love* to see the reaction in Medina if a bunch of westerners showed up and demanded churches, set up the Christian Parliament of Saudi Arabia, the Christian Council, demanded non halal meat, insisted on leaving work on a Sunday for church, insisted on banking with interest, insisted on bringing in their own brides from the west, all the while refusing to integrate, crying discrimination and pushing for a Christian state within Saud. How about if the Saudi government said anything against Christianity? Yeah that's right the Christians should take to the streets burning the Saudi flag, burning cars, damaging property, etc. Caricature of the pope? Yep, time for some death threats and rioting.

      Wake up limp wrists in power! Islam is the problem like it always has been. I'm not surprised the Dutch are fed up with it. Theo, Pim, etc knew what was up and have already paid the price.

    184. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      *You* wanted to move to this country, so *you* should make an effort of blending into society.

      When you build a bridge, you do it from both sides.

    185. Re:The Netherlands by fernandoh26 · · Score: 0
      what are Dutch men best known for? ... their trustworthiness

      Trust me...
      Did anyone else crack a smile at that transition?
      --
      Chums up, let's do this!
    186. Re:The Netherlands by somersault · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because sayings are always true. People with too much money aren't really any more likely to be happy than someone who enjoys their job or family life. If I had loads of cash I'd probably still want to work (at least part time, or start my own business).

      --
      which is totally what she said
    187. Re:The Netherlands by Victor_NiceGuy · · Score: 1

      Man.. Netherlands looks like a deep shi*, about that letter of the dutch guy married to an african woman seems to be too damn stupid to be true :\ I'd say why leave US? it's a very nice place to live :) remember Miami Beach? San Francisco oh man, what a joy :D. if you're concerned about Bush creating too many enemies around the world and risking national security I'd move to a place like Australia, Canada, France(those who like french), Monaco(nice :) ), New Zealand, Switzerland and maybe U.K.. yeah, some good choices but I still love Miami :) the best place when you have deeeeep pockets, bahamas is amazing and is just a few hours away by boat. nothing better. My advice is Don't be a stupid dreamer, if you didn't get rich in America so kiss my ass :) because you'll not do it in any other country, maybe live slightly better but not even close to rich(i mean millions of dollars). To achieve wealthy you need first to change your mind radically so stay in US and find a nice place to match your budget. And don't forget You're Blessed! imagine people who born in places like Ukraine, Brazil(from where I came), Laos(have you ever heard it?) and still got insanely rich just by working hard and using their minds towards MONEY, you'd be ashamed, very very ashamed of yourself.

    188. Re:The Netherlands by kria · · Score: 1

      In regard to the sexual harassment, I'm not sure how the stories get so blown out of proportion. I'm a female programmer, and no one has a problem with making jokes around me that fall under reasonable limits. I suspect that if I complained about an off color joke, people would modify their behavior and life would go on. Basically, the guys don't treat the office like a locker room, and I don't care about minor things.

      Now, on the other hand, it's true that the majority of my upper management are grey haired white men, with very few women represented, something that I hope will change over time.

    189. Re:The Netherlands by B'Trey · · Score: 1

      Corrolary: Non-correlation disproves causality.

      A & !B => !(A => B)


      Really? So if we let A be cigarette smoking and B be lung cancer, then the existence of lung cancer in people who do not smoke implies that it is not the case that cigarette smoking causes cancer?

      Hence the war on drugs is bullshit.

      The war on drugs is bullshit for many reasons. Drug use, in and of itself, either causes little or no harm or it harms only the user. The war on drugs, however, harms many innocent people. Remove the prohibition and, just as with alcohol and gangsters, the violence will go away.

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

    190. Re:The Netherlands by Knuckles · · Score: 3, Insightful

      all of the social services that have made them so attractive for so long are now buckling under the strain of un-restrained immigration

      Common disinformation. In fact however they are buckling because due to globalization the companies "opt out" of paying taxes at all, leaving the whole system on the shoulders of their employees.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    191. Re:The Netherlands by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

      Honestly, this kind of propaganda is so transparently bullshit that sometimes I think that the US gov't wants its citizens to take drugs

      I don't know what the grand scheme would be behind that, but c'mon, either that's the case or the US gov't must think its citizenry as pretty low on the intelligence scale.

      "When we gave soldiers free opium in huge doses in a practically mandatory manner, people got addicted to it, therefore the recreational, voluntarily, moderate use of certain drugs of our choosing should be banned"

      The really sad part is that if you live in the US, you're paying to have this page created and maintained, as if spending thousands of dollars each on the war on Iraq isn't enough, you have to pay for this bullshit?

      It's a good thing I wasn't born in the US; the financial cost of moving out of there and the emotional cost of leaving all my friends and family behind would have been a lot to bear, but it would be worth it.

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    192. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, I live in Finland and agree with you 100%. Sweden just blows. ;)

    193. Re:The Netherlands by paulatz · · Score: 1

      Indirect taxes are also high in northern Europe, in France, in Italy and in many other european countries. VAT is about 20% (it's 25% in Denmark)

      --
      this post contain no useful information, no need to mod it down
    194. Re:The Netherlands by elamdaly · · Score: 0

      I suspect those poll numbers are caused less by our President, and more by European stupidity, arrogance, and weakness.
      Europe has a long, long history of slagging America, regardless of who the President is or was.

    195. Re:The Netherlands by Zaphod69 · · Score: 2, Informative
    196. Re:The Netherlands by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I've lived there, both as a child through grade 1 and as a working adult. I do speak and read the language fluently, writing is another story. Living and working there as an average professional was an eye-opening experience (prior to that stint, I had delusions of wanting to move back).

      Why do I say that? Well, suffer through 8 weeks of 32C+ (90F+) degree summer (highly unusual, guess I was lucky) without air conditioning and without screens on your windows, and you'll figure out very quickly that Dutch mosquitoes are every bit as large as those in Texas and with a mean streak to make a serial killer squirm. Not to mention they also seem to have evolved their toxins to maximize welt potential and itchiness.

      Try shopping while you have a job. During the week, most stores close by 6, except for 1 night a week, and are only open 1/2 days on Saturday. Fortunately the mega-box Walmart phenomenom hadn't hit there yet when I lived there, so you didn't wind up shopping on Sat with a few thousand of your fellow workers in the same store at the same time. (This may have changed, there was a move underfoot to allow extended hours, but then I recall something about gas stations which are open long hours being prohibited from selling anything other than gas outside "approved" shopping hours)

      Appliances... you want appliances? They're small, expensive, and in the case of those front-loading washers, just plain horrible. (Yeah, we're going to be graced when them as a requirement soon here in the US too... joy awaits as washing clothes turns from a 20 min task to a 60 min task) Dishwashers? You gotta be kidding! (Yes, they have them, in 1/3 size and 3 times the cost)

      Now for the good - traveling is relatively easy, with or without car. It's relatively safe, the population density is high enough in most places that help is only feet away. Life is definitely slower than, say, in the US. Oh, and on your way home from work you can usually easily and inexpensively pick up some flowers for your spouse, to make up for moving them there. ;)

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    197. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marijuana is physiologically addictive.

      THC is stored in the body's fat cells. When a person that uses marijuana abruptly quits, the stored THC is still slowly released into their system creating a sort of natural weaning process. (If you don't believe the doctors, Google around for 'fat', 'THC' and 'drug test' ;) )

    198. Re:The Netherlands by FST777 · · Score: 1

      Please keep in mind that the parent is true, but that there is a difference between Americans and, say, Marocs. The later probably won't find such a welcome.

      --
      Free beer is never free as in speech. Free speech is always free as in beer.
    199. Re:The Netherlands by elchuppa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you'd sent them to some suburb in Virginia or Ohio, or just about any where else in the country apart from the cultural islands of San Francisco and New York, perhaps they would have felt differently about how wonderful the USA was. Essentially San Francisco and New York are the anti-americas.

    200. Re:The Netherlands by elamdaly · · Score: 1, Interesting

      How about Ayaan Hirsi Ali? A member of Dutch parliament so constantly threatened with her life, she chose to flee the Netherlands.

      The problem isn't violence, it's the threat of violence, from a large segment of the Dutch immigrant community. You don't wait until bombs(or people) are exploding all over the country to realize you have a HUGE problem.

    201. Re:The Netherlands by Sierpinski · · Score: 1

      I think constantly about how Mexicans are treated back in the US, and I honestly have to say I can't imagine that there is anywhere in the world that welcomes immigrants as well as the Dutch welcome high-tech people with valuable skills.

      The part you're leaving out is that the majority of the Mexicans that are "treated unfairly" in the U.S. are the ones who arrived here illegally. There are too many programs for the legal immigrants to count, so the ones "left out" are the ones who technically shouldn't be here. The ones who follow the procedures and attain legal status have a ton of programs and assistance to help them here. As much as I dislike our current presidential situation, nobody can argue that Bush hasn't made it easy on the immigrants, even going as far to propose legislation that will grandfather all current illegal aliens making them legal. While I don't agree with that policy personally, anyone saying that Mexicans are treated bad here is either blind or a fool.

      Most of the bad rep that they get is because they "get the shit jobs" as I've heard it before. The difference there is that they 1) have jobs, and 2) are willing to work for their money doing whatever is necessary, which is more than I can say for all of those U.S. welfare cases, pumping out kids every 9 months to increase their check that us taxpayers are paying for. You want fair? Go ask a welfare mom with 8 kids why she should be allowed to buy filet mignon and lottery tickets when she can't afford to buy all her children clothes (half of them are running around with nothing more than a diaper.)

      A friend of mine recently moved to Canada from the U.S., and said that quite a few steps in the procedure were cut out because he had a technical (engineering) degree and had a job offer letter for a worldwide company with a branch in Canada. Most countries seem to have some kind of policy that doesn't just open the flood gates, but rather screens people who wish to immigrate. Maybe someday the U.S. will join ranks. Maybe someday too they might start requiring the immigrants to learn our language instead of forcing us to see everything printed in both Spanish and English.

    202. Re:The Netherlands by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      *You* wanted to move to this country, so *you* should make an effort of blending into society.

      Funny how when Americans say that about Hispanic immigrants we are called racists and bigots.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    203. Re:The Netherlands by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      Forgive this stupid question, but I've heard that Dutch is the closest major language to English ( I understand technically Frisian is, but it's only spoken by a few people in Germany ). I'm assuming your native language is English. Does that help you with Dutch?

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    204. Re:The Netherlands by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      High energy prices in Europe are simply a way to encourage people to use energy efficiently. I don't see what's wrong with that, and as long as the tax money is well spent by the government I don't see the problem with it either.

      A lot of Americans would say that's interfering with the free market and that we should let the market find an alternative to internal combustion technology.

      Personally I hope oil hits $200 a barrel. It will make the alternatives seem cheap by comparison and people will start investing in them.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    205. Re:The Netherlands by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 0
      Show some effort. Why should we (Dutch) learn English
      Because if it wasn't for the British, you'd be forced to speak Spanish or French?

      Plus it's thanks to them, the rest of their empire and - sure I'm missing someone ... ah, yes - the USA that you're not speaking German.
      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    206. Re:The Netherlands by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      As for the sexual harassment: Yeah, I made some pretty nasty remarks and it was done off as a joke. In the US, I'd have lost my job and ended up in prison for the same remark. I'd tell about the situation, but the USies here would be too schocked ;-)

      Umm, I call bullshit. You aren't going to wind up in prison in the United States for "sexual harassment" unless such harassment involved some sort of threat of bodily harm.

      You'll get fired (rightfully so) but you'd be hard pressed to find a law that was broken.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    207. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My God...I Bushbot on /.

    208. Re:The Netherlands by paulatz · · Score: 1

      Europe is great if you are young or unemployed. Europe sucks if you actually want to make something of yourself through hard work.

      But what does it mean to "make yoursef", once I can eat twice a day high quality food, I can get free painkillers (don't lie! you can), work 8 ours a day (8, not 6) but still spend enough time with my family and friends I have alreay made myself through fair work, I'm happy to leave the rest to some arrogant masochist.

      --
      this post contain no useful information, no need to mod it down
    209. Re:The Netherlands by paralaxcreations · · Score: 1

      Well which is it you want to know?? The harmful effects, or the harmful effects compared to alcohol and tobacco?!

    210. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

      You.

    211. Re:The Netherlands by teflaime · · Score: 1

      think constantly about how Mexicans are treated back in the US, and I honestly have to say I can't imagine that there is anywhere in the world that welcomes immigrants as well as the Dutch welcome high-tech people with valuable skills.

      And what useful skills do Mexicans have? They certainly aren't knowledge workers. And most of them refuse to even learn English. The US has laborers, if the business establishment would just pay enough. The only reason Mexicans are prefered by business is that they work for .25 cents/hour.

    212. Re:The Netherlands by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      In regard to the sexual harassment, I'm not sure how the stories get so blown out of proportion. I'm a female programmer, and no one has a problem with making jokes around me that fall under reasonable limits. I suspect that if I complained about an off color joke, people would modify their behavior and life would go on. Basically, the guys don't treat the office like a locker room, and I don't care about minor things.

      Most of the women that I work with could make jokes that would make most men blush. Women's rights aren't about taking away men's rights -- they are about giving the same rights to females. If you work in an environment where having naked pictures of a chick on your machine/desk/etc is considered acceptable behavior (machine shop/mechanics/etc) then it should be equally acceptable for any female employees to post naked pictures of men. If you work in a different environment then the same rules apply to both genders.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    213. Re:The Netherlands by SomeGuyTyping · · Score: 1
      I think constantly about how Mexicans are treated back in the US, and I honestly have to say I can't imagine that there is anywhere in the world that welcomes immigrants as well as the Dutch welcome high-tech people with valuable skills.


      How are we treating the high-tech Mexican immigrants with valuable skills? I haven't seen that story on any news outlet.
      --
      My posts are definitive. Reality is frequently inaccurate.
    214. Re:The Netherlands by Damek · · Score: 2, Informative
      The Netherlands and the the UK (the other place I spent considerable time) are great places, but it's not home.

      Simple things like standing in a line to wait for services or having a quick meal do not exist here.


      OK, you must be talking about The Netherlands here because I know you're not talking about the UK. Queues are practically a religion in the UK, and every dang drug store has quick packaged foods you can pick up (not to mention other "quick meal" options).

      On that note, there are so many factors that go into how "at home" one would feel anywhere, it ends up being a very personal, very individual decision. This Slashdot story seems tailor-made for a bunch of people who all think the same (usually libertarian technophiles around here) to come up with "the one true solution" for them. Luckily it seems there's more diversity showing than usual.

      For me, an American who's only been to the UK for three weeks over two years, but is a minor Anglophile and hodgepodge history buff, the UK feels more like home than the US or anywhere else I've been.
    215. Re:The Netherlands by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      Isn't life so much simpler when you have a big bad scary demon you can use as the focus of blame for all the ills? It's almost like it makes thinking unneccessary.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    216. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is that psychological addictions are much harder to kick...

    217. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Funny though, 'cause my wife -being an Indonesian who came to .nl to study-
      How much was the postage?


      Seriously, it wouldn't surprise me if she got preferential treatment compared to a Saffer, Brit, American or whatever. Wouldn't want to appear racist, would we?

    218. Re:The Netherlands by operagost · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, if the USA had one like it we would end up being censured by the UN. As it is, we're criticized for trying to enforce of existing immigration laws.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    219. Re:The Netherlands by tade · · Score: 1

      Well yeah but a negative example ruins the hypothesis. If you say that drugs are bad and people would all use them 24/7 without the war on drugs (WOD) then this disproves that.

    220. Re:The Netherlands by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 0
      phone in your answers, this to prevent corruption/embassy people being bribed into saying you did great while you actually did not.

      Now all we need are video phones, to prevent the tiny risk that people might get someone else to take the test for them.
      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    221. Re:The Netherlands by operagost · · Score: 1

      Who are you... Rosie O'Donnell? If the Netherlands change, it will be because of Islamic radicals, not Christians. Theo van Gogh ring a bell?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    222. Re:The Netherlands by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      insisted on banking with interest

      I'm curious, are there actually Muslims insisting on banking without interest, and the banks aren't willing to oblige? I mean, I am quite willing to look after money for them in return for no interest, if they like...

      How about if the Saudi government said anything against Christianity? Yeah that's right the Christians should take to the streets burning the Saudi flag, burning cars, damaging property, etc.

      Here in the UK, we still have blasphemy laws (now joined with laws against "religious hatred"), and it wasn't too long ago that people were prosecuted. Who needs rioting in the streets when you have the law on your side?

    223. Re:The Netherlands by Tango42 · · Score: 1

      You changed your definition of A and B half way through. You started of talking about individuals, then you were talking about everyone.

      (Bob smokes) and (Bob doesn't have (and hasn't had) lung cancer) implies (smoking hasn't given Bob lung cancer)

      That is completely true. However, this is complete rubbish:

      (Bob smokes) and (Bob doesn't have (and hasn't had) lung cancer) implies (smoking doesn't give people lung cancer)

      After the implies, the subject has become "all people" rather than just "Bob" which it was before the implies.

      A & !B => !(A => B) is completely true. It follows directly from the definition of implies.

    224. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm the original AC you replied to. I think the major difference is that I came in under the Kennismigrant program. Seems to be related to, but maybe not the exact same set as the 30% ruling program. Once I had that letter from the belastingdienst saying I qualified it opened all sorts of doors for me. Attached a copy to my drivers license application form and didn't have to take the test, etc. Also the reason why my wife got a work permit on day 1. That's what I mentioned initially -- it's a lot different for us than the usual procedure. I figured a large percentage of the slashdot audience would be interested in and possibly qualified for this program.

      I also found the IND slow, but not as slow as you did. In fact my verblijfsdocument is currently expired and I've been waiting a little over 2 months for my replacement. We'll see how long it takes. My verblijfsdocument is also my work permit, unlike the rest of the immigrants. That means I hold my work permit, not my employer. Big difference!

      As to the language classes, I don't tend to have much sympathy for you if you can't be bothered to go to 80% of the classes that they're providing for free. I work full time, but have only missed classes due to work or pre-planned trips all year. It's important to me to learn Dutch, as I feel it should be. As an immigrant it's my duty to learn the local language and customs. I suspect I'm in the same sort of classes you're in -- most of the people in my classes are not IT people, so it's not just a Kennismigrant class. In fact I had to make several trips to the gemeentehuis and fill out several forms to get my free classes. I did that because it's over 600 EUR per semester per person at university. I suppose the cultural part of the inburgeringscursus will come later? I've heard you have to watch a video of two men kissing or something, we'll see.

      And as to pay, it's definitely a lot lower than the US. I personally took about a 30% - 40% cut and I was in a small town in the US where pay wasn't so impressive. My wife is not working here at all so our household income is well under 50% of the US level. We live a much simpler life, which I feel is a lot higher in quality, as well as a lot more sustainable as a citizen of the planet. In the US we lived in a 2500 square foot house (250 m^2) and had 2 cars and a truck. Now we live in a 75 m^2 apartment and don't own any cars. We eat out maybe twice a month, don't have a TV, don't have any electrical appliances in our kitchen other than an electric teakettle, and use a lot less resources in general. We only produce one small bag of trash a week! I get over an hour a day of exercise cycling to work (although I'm about to quit for the year and take the Metro until March). For me the pay isn't an issue - I learned long ago that money can't buy happiness. I'm definitely happier here although I miss my friends and family dearly.

      The other main thing is that's important to me is that I will legally pay $0 in US taxes this year. Not one penny of what I pay will go to fund those assholes in Washington and what they're doing to the world. I know the Dutch aren't perfect, but they are a hella lot better than the current US leaders! Get rid of Verdonk and things will be even better.

      Also don't forget the fact that the grass here is the best in the world. I've smoked daily for around 15 years (while working as a senior IT consultant -- bite me DEA) and it's a nice feeling to know that I don't have to fear the police. I don't smoke any more because it's legal, in fact I probably smoke less because the quality is so good (and I hadn't smoked schwag in the US for over a decade). I am a lot more relaxed not having to worry that I'm committing a felony just growing and smoking some plants. Since I also don't drive and therefore don't speed, I actually don't have any reason to fear cops for the first time in my adult life!

      All things considered I feel extremely lucky in my situation here. I have a lot less feeling of cognitive

    225. Re:The Netherlands by operagost · · Score: 1

      What's a right-wing Dutch person like? They only smoke marijuana on Mondays?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    226. Re:The Netherlands by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      The huge decrease in corporate taxes mainly over the last 20 years is a fact, like it or not. In any case it makes little sense to say "spending on immigrants is the ruin of the European social security systems" when at the same time huge parts of the income of these systems disappear. Saying so does not make one opposed to globalization.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    227. Re:The Netherlands by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, THC is not stored in your fat cells, the metabolites for it are. That is, the stuff THC turns into after it is metabolized, or used. That stuff doesn't get you high, and it doesn't "wean" you, any more than eating your own feces is just like that steak you had last week.

      THC is not physiologically addictive. I smoke cigarettes, have quit for almost a year, and I know what addiction is. I spent 4 years of my life stoned basically 24-7. Then I got bored of it, and stopped. Since then, I've tolked up about once every 6 months or so, and never had a "craving" before or after. I even spent a week high because I hurt my hands and was bored as hell. At the end, I put the pipe down, no craving.

      I have noticed, however, that for some people, smoking pot makes them flat stupid. I don't understand why it happens to some and not others, but it seems to attack those who weren't that bright to begin with, and as far as I can tell is permanent. Careful.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    228. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. The most common addiction, alcoholism, includes death by cardiac arrest as one of its withdrawal symptom if it is cut cold turkey. That's after the convulsions and halucinations.

    229. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until you have truly lived somewhere else you won't understand how lucky we are in the US.

      Did your workers equally understand that attending a training in S.F. is not living in the U.S.?

      I worked for Johns Hopkins for three years and considered Baltimore one of the urban shitholes of the U.S. Yet I have absolutely no doubt that someone could have a hell of a week-long conference down at the harbor with the shopping, science museum, national aquarium, historic ships like a WW II submarine and an early 1800s sister to "Old Ironsides", food and Fells Point live music bars all within walking distance. What's not to love when surrounded by that?

      Much as I experienced in a week-long training in S.F.

    230. Re:The Netherlands by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Go spend a month smoking a pack a day, or even better, booting heroin, and come back here and repeat that when you've quit.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    231. Re:The Netherlands by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I know someone from the Flemish part of Belgium that had to take a Flemish test to go on a college course held in the Flemish part of Belgium.

      Apparently the exams she'd done (at a Flemish school) weren't valid because about ten words had changed spelling since then and another three had had their gender changed from one kind of neuter to the other kind of neuter.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    232. Re:The Netherlands by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 4, Informative
      What are the harmful effects of marijuana? What are they, compared to alcohol and tobacco?

      Physically, the harmful effects of cannabis result from inhaling smoke. Use of a vaporizer or oral injestion eliminate these and make its use quite safe. (Presuming one doesn't do something stupid like drive a car or operate power tools while high, a problem with any intoxicant.) The effective dose to lethal dose ratio for THC is trendously high; you'd have to smoke hundreds of pounds to die by overdose. (Which isn't to say you can't overdose into an unpleasant "too high" experience; that's distinctly unfun, but doesn't have long-term toxic effects.)

      Psychologically, some people like using cannabis a whole lot, and have trouble moderating or stopping. This can also be a problem with TV, MMORPGs, sex, relationships, thrill sports, music, exercise...

      Of course, no amount of harmful effects would justify the state interfering with a person's choices about their body. But given the safety of cannabis use, its prohibition is particulary hypocritical.

      (Once upon a time, "addiction" was a well-defined syndrome marked by tolerance, withdrawl, continued use in the face of health problems, and repeated failed attempts to quite. When it became obvious that cannabis use and other behaviors that moralists wanted to ban didn't fit this model, the bullshit notion of "psychological addition" was invented.)

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    233. Re:The Netherlands by AGMW · · Score: 1
      Speaking english certainly helps living here, but it's not required.

      Here in the UK we don't insist on English langauge skills, and I think it's a mistake! My godfather (not The Godfather!) was an anglo-indian who immigrated to the UK and he reckoned that if you came to this country you should have some time period (3 to 5 years) in which you should have learned the langauge and applied for citizenship or you'd get sent back. Perhaps a little over-zealous but he was an immigrant!

      We now have the ludicrous situation where an English girl is arrested at school because she asked to be moved from a group of non-English speakers as she couldn't understand them. Now, granted, she may have been less than pleasent, but it does say that she was in a group with only one other English speaking pupil. That's just plain wrong!

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
    234. Re:The Netherlands by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      It is very much physiologically addictive. It's harder to be addicted, sometimes taking decades (or for some people, months). Many people never become addicted despite heavy use. Similar to how many people drink heavily through college or have a drink after work everyday for a decade but only some come out as alcoholics who have to go through a life long recovery process.

      Few people get addicted, but those that do face serious problems going off and do suffer all the difficult withdrawl symptoms. Personally, I see it as not addictive enough to warrant legal issues: there are other legal substances with addictive properties that tend to cause addiction much faster (tobacco) or have harsher recovery issues (alcohol). Plus it has never been shown to cause lung cancer, which kicks it ahead of tobacco in my eyes (emphysema and some other diseases are still an issue).

      Hit some Al-Anon or NA meetings if you question any of this. They are quite friendly and very very frank, employing neither the scare tactics of the "drugs are sin" crowd or the dismissiveness of the "drugs are safe" crowd. Or if you doubt them, read the AMA guidelines and how the diagnostic criteria of addiction and related issues (like obsessive use and dependency) are laid out, although it's been changed recently due to the genetic basis for addiction being more precisely identified.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    235. Re:The Netherlands by jc42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's why marijuana is not considered addictive. This doesn't change the fact that medical research does show it has harmful effects.

      While true, there's a bit of misdirection in such a statement. It's not marijuana itself that's particularly harmful. Rather, it's the fact that people usually consume it in the form of smoke, and breathing smoke of any sort has harmful effects. You'd get similar harm from smoking dried oregano or grass clippings or business records or $20 bills (especially now that they contain RFID chips ;-). And larger quantities of smoke is more harmful than smaller quantities.

      The overuse of the term "addiction" is sorta funny, though. I especially like the concept of people being addicted to sex. All "addicted" really means these days is that you enjoy something. Being against addiction now just means you're opposed to anything that's fun.

      But, at least here in America, we've always had a strong Puritanical faction. This isn't really anything new; we've just found a new way to frame it (as the political crowd likes to say).

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    236. Re:The Netherlands by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Well, depends which drugs that this "war on drugs" is aimed at, no?

      No, it doesn't. A person's right to control their own body is absolute.

      If you want to use drugs in a dangerous way, like injecting heroin into your eyeballs, it's just and reasonable for the state to dissuade you with (accurate) anti-drug education, to put a reasonable "sin tax" on heroin, to regulate heroin for purity and strength, and to ban you from driving under its influence.

      But the sovereignty of the state ends at your skin. Your body, your choice.

      Not only is drug probibition immoral, it's also impractical. It doesn't work. Review the history.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    237. Re:The Netherlands by B'Trey · · Score: 1

      In which case the comment, while true, is irrelevant to this discussion. The context is correlation, which is by definition a phenomenon that occurs in the statistical examination of multiple cases. It may very well be true that A & !B => !(A => B) in the case of a particular B, but that tells you nothing about whether A => C, where C is the same phenomenon (such as lung cancer or drug addiction) in a different individual.

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

    238. Re:The Netherlands by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      Can you suggest then a place to get better coffee than Starbucks?

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    239. Re:The Netherlands by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I am not in IT...

      Read the post you're replying to again. It's about kennismigrants (knowledge immigrants), specifically those with IT skills. What kind of "professional" degree are you talking about? Unless it's an MD or similar, there's no demand and that's why you're getting treated like anybody else and not fast tracked.

      I have to admire the system described there in the Netherlands, as well as the one in Candada. It makes perfect sense to try hard to attract workers with skills that benefit your country instead of those that only break even or drag it down.

      --
      Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
    240. Re:The Netherlands by Djofulinn · · Score: 1
      Just as the sibling poster states, I'm also ashamed to be a Dutchman..

      they tell that to their own citizens too.. not just foreigners
      My cousin is planning to move to Ukraine because there he can live with his wife and kid, although there seems to be some progress for her with moving here. With all these new policies we are actively chasing away our own people. Oh another thing, he asked for a permit (months in advance) for her to stay here from Jan. 1 to Jan. 31. He was granted the request and could pick the permit up on Jan. 27!

      like how to flush a toilet (yes they taught me that useful skill),
      Living in a student dormitory with a lot of foreign students I learned this is actually a good subject to treat. Some of my Chinese floor mates actually did not know how to use the toilet when they first arrived here. Poo all over the place except in the toilet.. However, the test is really bad. They showed it on national television and more than half of the Dutch native citizens failed, I know I failed.

      Some more reasons to not go to the Netherlands: Our biometric passports, our compulsory id, our defunct voting machines. And our 'culture of complaining' :-).

    241. Re:The Netherlands by randito · · Score: 1

      No you would have to learn french, but guaranteed, it would take some time before you were functional in french, never mind fluent, and you would NEVER loose your accent. So after putting years of hard work into learning the local language, you would expect some patience and understanding, and if you encountered xenophobic fury from a local instead of patience when trying to function in their language, that would discourage you from continuing yur studies in that language. This xenophobia exists everywhere with varying degrees of intensity, and under many labels. English tolerance for foreign accents, gramatical structures, and vocabulary is one reason it has such global appeal as a second language. French has the concept of "correct" and "incorrect" grammar, as put for ward by the accademie française. Hearing "Ugly American Who Only Speaks English" , even if voiced by a tiny fraction of the populous, gives you an extremely bad impression of the nationality of the issuer. That is why we discourage expressions like "Mexican who only speaks Spanish". If you want them to learn english, youu have to make them feel comfortable and accepted first. Else you will get ghettos.

    242. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehe, this coming from someone who's name is Dilaudid...

    243. Re:The Netherlands by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      Last time I was in Amsterdam, it was odd to see the blue lights at the walkways to home and business front doors. Someone there explained to me, it was to keep the junkies out. The junkies would sit out of view of the street and shoot up. The blue lights were there, so they wouldn't be able to see their veins, so they couldn't shoot up there.

          I was invited to take a job at good pay there. Then they started going through the issues with me about taxes. I don't remember specifically (it's been a while), but there was something about setting up a shell corporation to send my pay to, who would then pay all of my expenses. Every so often, I would need to fold the company, and start a new one. It was simply a matter of how things worked there, or at least that's what I was lead to believe. In the end, I didn't go, so I don't have first hand experience with doing that.

          It is a beautiful place. I don't say that like most potheads. I don't smoke pot. :)

          I may visit again, but I have no plans of every staying there.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    244. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the current immigration policy is actually a result of The Netherlands not having a decent immigration policy for the last decades, which kind of lead to immigrants pouring in from everywhere and - sad but true - mostly taking advantage of the social system in the Netherlands (at least a considerable part of them did). The wellfare / unemployment system in the Netherlands is such that someone could be unemployed for a couple of years and still have a fair amount of money (especially when compared to the country where they originally came from). Lots of immigrants regarded this as A Great Thing - you don't have to do anything in The Netherlands and the "service" is great; large groups of them didn't even bother to learn Dutch after having lived here for - say - more than ten years. And that simply started to bother a large part of the Dutch population, as a result of which the immigration policy is currently very strict as far as non-"kenniswerkers", i.e., non-"knowledge workers" are concerned. And although you might regard this as bad, the system in the United States isn't exactly great either: as a PhD (i.e., a "kenniswerker"), it's fairly easy to get admitted to the US, but for non-"kenniswerkers" it's still quite hard to get a green card as far as I know.

    245. Re:The Netherlands by 2.7182 · · Score: 1

      This is an old urban legend. And the burden is on you to produce proof, not me, since substance abuse clinics all over the world treat it as a physical addiction.

      Do you also think you can get a cold by going out in cold weather ?

    246. Re:The Netherlands by LWATCDR · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "fear campaign against foreigners, mostly focussed on islamic cultured or coloured people"
      I didn't know that the Dutch where so racist. Maybe we should keep them out of the US.

      Actually I was kidding a little and making a bit of a point.
      You are willing to judge the population of the US by how the current president is represented in your press.
      Frankly all the press is getting to be more and more of a problem. None if it is balanced NONE OF IT.
      In the US the press seems to always want to show on party or the other as STUPID AND EVIL.
      I would suggest to you that in your country that many of the press outlets and political parties are showing the US in the worst possible light.
      The reason is simple. If you want your people to be happy and compliment show them how much better off they are than anybody else. Just look how smart and enlightened you are.

      I am sure your country has many nice people that I would enjoy being friends with. Odds are you might find a place in the US you would enjoy as well. Imagine owning a house with a few hectares of land for what you pay for your home now. Their are places in the US where you could. Imagine living someplace where you could go to the Beach and snow skiing in the same weekend? Oh and a nice drive in the dessert to boot?
      Or try to imagine driving for a thousand kilometers in a straight line and still being in the same country.

      Different places offer different things. It is all what you want out of life. I would love to go your country for a visit if I would be welcome. Would the fact that I am part Native American cause me any problems? Would I have to learn how say, "have a nice day you tiny minded little twit" in Dutch before I went?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    247. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Correction: Weed is not physiologically addictive, only psychologically.

      Brown University (to name one) would disagree with you. http://www.brown.edu/Student_Services/Health_Servi ces/Health_Education/atod/marijuana.htm#6

    248. Re:The Netherlands by oc255 · · Score: 1

      Good post. If anything it tells me I need to travel outside of the US more. We're in a cultural feedback loop here and it's not our fault. But I'm doing my part and trying to visit the Netherlands next year. Lots of places to see and get my own perspective. I met a guy once who was 57 who had never left Florida, USA. I think that's insane.

    249. Re:The Netherlands by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      Funny, I wasn't aware of how poorly Mexican knowledge immigrants with good IT skills were being treated in the US. I was aware of how poor Mexican immigrants that didn't speak English were being treated in the US is only slightly better than how poor immigrants who don't speak Dutch are being treated in the Netherlands.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    250. Re:The Netherlands by Riverman5 · · Score: 1

      I'm an American, what is most attractive about Sweden to me is the education system, I find a lot of bright minds come from Sweden (and many move to America, heh heh).

      Switzerland also has a great education system, from my experience dealing with the younger Swiss generation.

      I don't think the American education system compares to these two countries.

    251. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's sad how most of the things people list as advantages and disadvantages of living in Holland are of a financial, practical, or political nature. They completely omit that the cities in Holland are more orders of magnitude beautiful and simply pleasant to live in than American cities (if you omit the European lack of a subservient/"service mentality" that makes being a consumer more pleasant in America). Most American cities are dirtier, uglier, and more dangerous than Dutch cities. There's also a ton to do in Holland. All the cities are about an hour away from one another (and never more than two), and the Holland makes an excellent base from which to explore the rest of Europe. The variety and quality of restaurants in Amsterdam especially is second to none except maybe NYC. All of the cities of Holland are built with bicycles in mind, and it's completely flat, which makes biking there a sheer joy (especially as the architecture and other sights there are so pretty). Plus, as the parent poster mentioned, you can do pretty much anything you want as long as you don't harm anyone else, which is great.

      I personally find that Dutch cities are really human-scale places, compared to other American and European cities, which might be more grand, with their skyscrapers and gigantic streets. So living in Holland is, minus some minor annoyances, infinitely more pleasant and comfortable than just about anywhere else.

      One last thing I want to add is that I strongly encourage you to learn Dutch and develop an interest in the Dutch culture, history, and people if you want to stay there long-term. Virtually all the Dutch speak English (often much better than many Americans), along with two or three other languages, so you'll be able to get by with just English. However, among themselves they speak Dutch. So if you want to make friends with more than just fellow expats, you'll really need some Dutch. I kind of dreaded learning Dutch myself, because it sounded so harsh and I thought it'd be difficult, but I found once I started learning it I found it was actually a very cute language that had a lot in common with English. The words might look weird on paper, but when you sound them out they're remarkably similar to English words, so learning vocabulary should be easy... especially if you use a method called TPR, which I highly recommend.

    252. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife's friend married a Dutch man. She had to take language lesion before being allowed into the country, even though she was married to a Dutch native. She was not allwed in until she took and sucessfully completed the language class. That was a fact.

    253. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      im confused, I thought everywhere in the EU was 1000X better than the US??!

    254. Re:The Netherlands by Gilmoure · · Score: 2, Funny

      Online gambling is not allowed in the U.S.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    255. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had to take exception. How we treat Mexicans? How does your country treat people who don't follow the immigration process? They are deported. Or they are cowed out of the country, Hirsi Ali anyone. I haven't seen many US documentary makers killed in the streets in these parts either. Mexicans are given more rights and freedoms than the actual citizenry. In-state tuition. Free healthcare. Pulled over for a DUI. Don't make your court date. Big whoop. We love Mexico and Mexicans. We love them more when they immigrate legally.

    256. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What???? Can't be!!!!! I mean, dude you can smoke pot and bang prostitutes LEGALLY in the Netherlands! How cool is that? And EVERYONE knows that European countries are FAR MORE advanced socially than us cowboys here in America. I just can't believe you're telling the truth!!!

      Whiplash

    257. Re:The Netherlands by Riverman5 · · Score: 1

      Errr, I've been to San Fran, New York, I used to live in Long Beach, now I live in a suburb of Salt Lake City, a particularly conservative area. I find people here in SLC are much more considerate, there is less crime, etc. etc, but overall, they are all great places. This attitude that the blue states are the anti-americas is truly insulting and snobbish.

      Now, I went to visit London a year ago. That place is a fucking joke. Me and my wife watched as some gang of hoodlums beat a kid to the brink of death in the street, while everyone around yelled for them to stop, and not a policeman in sight. If that had happened in my town, I think I would have shot one of them ;)

    258. Re:The Netherlands by albyrne5 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Couple of quick points.

      I'm an Irishman living here 2.5 years. The missing out on the 30% ruling must have really kick you in the nads, I am still on it and I pay 28% of my gross (~euro180k) on tax. (It's actually closer to 35% until you factor in the mortgage-interest refund).

      Having lived in Dublin most of my life, and Porto, Portugal for 6 months, and London for 6 months I can say that traffic here is non-existent compared to the other places! I bicyle 15k each-way to work everyday unless it's a lightning storm or I'm diabolically hungover, and I find the public-transport is cheaper than Dublin.

      I absolutely love the vibe in Amsterdam, and the city certainly FEELS a lot safer than Dublin, except perhaps in the Red Light District, but I only go there to show visitors around.

      I'm making slow progress at learning Dutch, but in general most people are receptive to my attempts. For me, and of course it's a personal thing, I cannot see any downside to living here, and I think the whole Muslim issue is being blown out of proportion. Things in Northern Ireland were 1000 times worse for 30 years solid and that never led to WWIII or whatever the right-wing nuts are predicting will happen here.

    259. Re:The Netherlands by BlueStraggler · · Score: 1
      And what useful skills do Mexicans have? They certainly aren't knowledge workers.

      I don't know much about Mexico, but I do know that my company's biggest software contract is in the process of being outsourced to Mexico, and I also know that the Dell computers that were just delivered to our office yesterday had a big fat "Made in Mexico" label on them.

    260. Re:The Netherlands by mrogers · · Score: 1
      You don't wait until bombs(or people) are exploding all over the country to realize you have a HUGE problem.

      Yes you do, because otherwise a small number of people can hijack a democracy just by making threats. European democracy defeated feudalism and survived totalitarism on both the right and the left; it can certainly weather the storm of Islamic fundamentalism, as long as we keep a sense of perspective. Police states have killed millions of people in the last hundred years - terrorists have killed thousands. Which is the bigger threat?

    261. Re:The Netherlands by Chineseyes · · Score: 1

      Yes unless you happen to be black then the immigration process couldn't be any more difficult having two friends who moved to Aruba from Grenada and both ended up marrying Dutch women, I can tell you that both they and their spouses gave up on moving to the Netherlands because of the immigration policies that border on racism. As for comparing the Netherlands immigration policy with US immigration policy there is no comparison. Although many people seem to make the immigration issue in the US about race it is not. Both of my parents are immigrants from Haiti and Jamaica and they are disgusted by the fact that there are people breaking the law to come into the country when we have been working for YEARS, spending thousands of our own dollars to bring many of our family members to the US LEGALLY. While I understand that there are people who are against amnesty in the US because they are racist it needs to be known that there are MANY people out there who are against illegal immigration because it is a slap in the face to all of hard work we have done to do things the right way.

      --
      I think the invisible hand of the market has its middle finger extended

      --A wise old fart named SC0RN
    262. Re:The Netherlands by vertinox · · Score: 1

      I'd hate to say this, but sometimes assimilation is the only route to living in certain countries. It might be a bit paranoid, but without assimilation certain aspects of countries change beyond what the current residents would tolerate.

      Secondly, some cultures tend to be imcompatible especially with they are highly against assimilation when moving to another location.

      While other cultures are really hostile to any other cultures and will refuse to let you assimilate at all no matter what...

      So sadly the best solution is "when in Rome, does as the Romans" or find another one more friendly.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    263. Re:The Netherlands by orderb13 · · Score: 1

      I believe learning to speak English is also a mandatory thing for becoming a US citizen.

      You believe incorrectly. America has no offical language, although there have been several pushes towards making it English.


      It's not possible anywhere in the world, although there are a few examples, like Morocco.

      Once again you are incorrect. I once dated a girl that had dual German/American citizenship. My nephew and niece have both Sweedish and American citizenship.

    264. Re:The Netherlands by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that the U.S. will not recognized dual citizenship. You have to formally renounce American citizenship, and they don't take you back. America is nastier than some other western countries in this regard. They don't play well with other countries.

    265. Re:The Netherlands by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


          s/muslim/christian/
          s/islam/christianity/

          That isn't a new war, it's been going on for centuries.

          How do you think Christianity got to Europe? Have you ever asked what happend to the older religions?

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    266. Re:The Netherlands by QMO · · Score: 1

      Or, conversely, talk to a bunch of former (tobacco) smokers and see that most still get cravings more than two months after quitting. Learning the non-physiological triggers of those cravings might also be instructive.

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    267. Re:The Netherlands by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

      I'm a little confused. You make a statement saying marijuana is physiologically addictive, but then back it up with discussion of alcohol? We've established that alcohol is physiologically addictive, but alcohol has nothing to do with marijuana. What component of marijuana establishes a physiological, chemical dependency in the human body? Don't confuse withdrawal with "man, I really want to experience that again".

    268. Re:The Netherlands by Matje · · Score: 1

      Of course it is interfering with the free market. That's the whole point of the taxation! The problem is that use of gasoline is a sort of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_common stragedy of the commons. The damage to the environment caused by gasoline is not factored into the price a free market will yield because the individuals don't incur any direct cost as a consequence of that damage. The purpose of the taxes is to add the communal damage to the price of the product!

      In the Netherlands it is fashionable to complain about people that drive gasguzzling SUVs. The ironic fact is that, as I'm sure you'll agree, the more people that drive inefficient cars, the higher the price of gasoline, and thus the sooner alternative energy sources will be profitable. So in a sense we should be grateful for the gasguzzle drivers ( as long as you drive a fuel efficient car yourself obviously ;) )

    269. Re:The Netherlands by bjprice · · Score: 1
      Plus it's thanks to them, the rest of their empire and - sure I'm missing someone ... ah, yes - the USA that you're not speaking German.
      You misspelt "Russia".
      --
      v4sw6HPU$hw5ln6pr5$ck4ma8u7LMO$w2m6l7DL$i2e3t4MWb9AHKMRTen5a29s0r1p-5.88/-8.36g5CST
    270. Re:The Netherlands by Ham_belony · · Score: 0

      We have flemish woman living in the Netherlands for 30 years and now she wants to become dutch and although flemish and dutch are pretty similar languages, she needs to do exams for the dutch government to prove she can speak and handle the dutch language. What are they thinking of next over there?

    271. Re:The Netherlands by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      The problem immigrants come from cultures that value high birthrates. Not big on Malthusian population formula. They are religiously conservative, insular, and due to the high birthrate, have permanent, enormous proportions of teenagers, the numbers growing exponentially.

      This leads to unemployment (see insularity, conservatism, and high numbers), mostly for teenagers, who are hormonally supercharged and tend not to have much to lose yet. Inevitably, violence erupts. Religious fundamentalism ALWAYS grows in such a situation. Radical agendas to punish their oppressors, anger, riots, all that.

      Solution would be to control the birthrate, which ain't gonna happen. So, Europe is in the crosshairs of a massive 3rd world population bomb. It isn't racism to say that. It just is a fact.

      There is only so much land, so much water, so much population that can socially be absorbed before breakdown commences. Thomas Malthus always has the last laugh, tho I don't think he was chuckling much. Nothing can grow forever. It can't even grow a little more. Europe can't become one giant Manhattan to absorb the a tiny proportion of the African and Asian population nuke bomb. I have some idea how such a situation might inevitably pan out, and it won't be to the advantage of the European nations. Lots of violence, increasing backlash against the immigrants, refusal to fund social programs, rising nationalism and racism. No one will win. Eventually the two cultures will start fighting -- don't forget Europeans have angry kids too -- and a kind of fascism will evolve to keep a lid on the violence.

      Don't say the population scientists didn't warn ya.

    272. Re:The Netherlands by jonsmirl · · Score: 1

      Capital gains are taxed twice. The corporation pays corporate tax on it profits. The profits that are left after the corporate taxes cause the capital gains which are then taxed again. The sum of these those taxes exceeds the ordinary income tax rate. In reality Paris is paying a lot more in taxes than you are.

      If you want to treat capital gains like ordinary income you would need to eliminate the corporate income tax. But doing that is politically unpopular even though the taxes collected would be about the same.

      Everybody thinks of corporations as separate entities, they are not. The are owned by their shareholders which are people. Ultimately everything is owned by a person. Taxing a legal entity like a corporation is just a different way of taxing the person that owns the shares.

      Lowering the capital gains tax lowers the cost of capital to corporations which gives them more money to expand. Expanding corporations generate a lot of jobs. This was massively demonstrated by the Reagan tax cuts in the early 80's.

    273. Re:The Netherlands by yasth · · Score: 1

      The idea (as I understand it) is total taxes (including VAT corporate etc.). I.e. tax burden as a percentage of GDP

      It isn't 70% though, but Sweden is the highest at 50.06%

      http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/publications/templa te.cfm?PubID=9732

      --
      I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
    274. Re:The Netherlands by graemecoates · · Score: 1
      Life in other countries is very inconvenient (yes, I know, an American comment) and the people are generally much more orderly and nicer in the US. This may seem like a shock to people in the US (and a shock to people outside the US too) but I truly believe that is how it is. Simple things like standing in a line to wait for services or having a quick meal do not exist here. I know that for some people that is a charm, but for me it's an annoyance.

      You have obviously never been to a busy British Post Office - I recommend a large overloaded main post office like the one in Oxford.

    275. Re:The Netherlands by der+wachter · · Score: 1

      Is this not also the same problem most Americans have with Washington D.C.?

    276. Re:The Netherlands by mdozturk · · Score: 1

      I think constantly about how Mexicans are treated back in the US

      Turks in Holland are treated the same way Mexicans are treated in the US, if not worse.

      I'm sure mexican IT people have an easier time moving to the US compared to unskilled mexican workers.

    277. Re:The Netherlands by Atrophis · · Score: 0

      Wow, an anti-Bush post moderated up to 5!

      No liberal bias at Slashdot, move along, nothing to see here.

      --

      i cant seem to come up with a sig.
    278. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats bullshit.One of my co-workers is both a French and a US citizen.

    279. Re:The Netherlands by mfrank · · Score: 1

      Mexicans are high-tech knowledge workers???

    280. Re:The Netherlands by kabocox · · Score: 1

      There's a chance that it will improve again, but currently there's a (grassroots/astroturf?) fear campaign against foreigners, mostly focussed on islamic cultured or coloured people, but americans as well (your current president isn't helping your reputation!).

      Well, it's nice to know that racism is alive and well. I find it highly ironic that those wishing to leave the country for political reasons are being treated bad because the Dutch couldn't do anything against those that really anger them. ;) If the US president came to Holland there wouldn't be any hassle. Of course, he wouldn't be staying for more than a week or two so maybe that's all the Dutch and stand of foreigners. I would think that any high ranking foreigner would be given the red carpet treatment if only because it would be the quickest way to get rid of them.

    281. Re:The Netherlands by Ham_belony · · Score: 0

      ==== Your Dutch nationality may be revoked. This can happen even as long as 12 years after you obtained Dutch nationality. ==== This only applies when commit a criminal offence. They can't just revoke it for no reason.

    282. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for telling me. I just shit my pants.

    283. Re:The Netherlands by jafac · · Score: 1

      b-but, if we stop the War on Drugs, what are we going to do with all those unemployed Prison Guards?

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    284. Re:The Netherlands by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Actually Islamic or Sharia banking is all the rage with the big banks. There are several approved methods (repurchase agreements and leases to joint ventures), but you need an Imam to bless your transaction so it's rather like a food processing plant being approved Kosher by a Rabbi.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    285. Re:The Netherlands by Ham_belony · · Score: 0

      Yeah, really to bad they weren't able to pass German as the official language when they had the chance. Can you see the analogy? Yawol mein herr, said bush :)))))

    286. Re:The Netherlands by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1

      that doesn't stop me, or anyone else i know, from gambling online.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    287. Re:The Netherlands by elamdaly · · Score: 0

      Yes you do, because otherwise a small number of people can hijack a democracy just by making threats.

      Which, ironically, is exactly what Islamist are doing.

      It's Islam and its adherents you have to worry about, not the modern day terrorist( although wait about 15 years, then you you will). The issue shouldn't be whether you want to 'weather' Islamism, but rather do you really want to take the giant steps backwards that this would entail?

      Want to know what a Europe that has weathered Islam looks like? Look to the Middle East.

    288. Re:The Netherlands by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should go back and reread what he said a few times. You don't seem to understand the point he was trying to make.

      And it's a pretty simple point.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    289. Re:The Netherlands by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      That depends on where you live. Why not brew it yourself though. Coffee isn't exactly hard to make.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    290. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> *You* wanted to move to this country, so *you* should make an effort of blending into society.

      > When you build a bridge, you do it from both sides.

      When you eat your Smarties, you eat the red ones last.

    291. Re:The Netherlands by jafac · · Score: 1

      The trouble with all of the semi-socialist countries in Europe is that all of the social services that have made them so attractive for so long are now buckling under the strain of un-restrained immigration, f

      It's not really clear that that's the problem - but there's a simple solution to this:
      Restrain the fucking immigration.

      The solution to the immigration problem, of course, is to fix the fucked up countries the immigrants are coming from. (the problem with Mexico and the US could be solved easily. Most Mexicans would happily stay at home in their native country if they could find jobs).

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    292. Re:The Netherlands by domc · · Score: 1

      It has a lot to do with the different strains of Cannabis. Some are good for body highs (Indica), and some are good for mind highs (Sativa). Most Joe Sixpack type people prefer the body highs, which also tend to dull your mind.

      If you are a geek, and smoking cannabis, seek out a quality Sativa-heavy hybrid that will give you a cerebral high. In California, this should cost between $60-80 1/8 ounce. Also, using a vaporizer will give you a cleaner cerebral high (as opposed to a bong or a pipe).

    293. Re:The Netherlands by MythryN · · Score: 1

      Dutch is actually much easier to learn than English, but is very similar. When you say most English words are derived from French, it's an error. These words are mainly derived from Norman and they are not most. English syntax is not like simplified French at all. Do you speak French? Dutch and English syntax are way more similar than English and French. If there is any major similarity between English and French, it's vocabulary (through Norman, which was related to Parisian French) and that's about it.

    294. Re:The Netherlands by jafac · · Score: 1

      Yeah that's right the Christians should take to the streets burning the Saudi flag, burning cars, damaging property, etc.

      They don't dare. Because these "Christians" are in love with oil, and money. Their "savior" who proclaimed himself "sent by God" is in bed with the Saudi royals. Americans have a choice between two masters to serve. They chose oil and money, while calling themselves Christians.

      When America is prepared to be honest with themselves, maybe there will be change. But the truth is - this whore of a people, has sold itself out.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    295. Re:The Netherlands by EatHam · · Score: 1

      30% to taxes is nothing. Add up all of the various income taxes, and I'm over 40%. And I'm not even close to the highest bracket.

    296. Re:The Netherlands by Xtravar · · Score: 1

      THC binds to fat cells. People who smoked a LOT have gone into rehab and gotten into trouble for testing positive for THC after exercising. They thought these people were sneaking in pot, but were actually just burning their fat cells. Rehab-ers have also reported high feelings after exercising.

      That's why you cook marijuana into butter to make brownies, because THC is fat soluable (whereas alcohol is water soluable and gets flushed out of your system much quicker).

      So I don't know how much I agree to your first claim since it would make my Drug and Alcohol Abuse course irrelevant, but I agree with everything else you're saying.

      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
    297. Re:The Netherlands by jafac · · Score: 1

      So you can be pissed that you're paying double the rate that Paris Hilton is paying on her income from her various trust funds.

      Yeah - but the justice there is - I've seen her naked, and she hasn't seen me naked.
      (/sarcasm - but frankly, this is what's going through the minds of most Americans that makes it all seem okay).

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    298. Re:The Netherlands by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I think immigration is a good thing if done well.

      It is the only way a country can legally pick its citizens. So pick the best you can get, and at least pick better than your average citizens.

      Big question: what is better? Well hopefully someone is wise enough to figure that out ;).

      But it should be obvious what's below the average.

      --
    299. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think constantly about how Mexicans are treated back in the US, and I honestly have to say I can't imagine that there is anywhere in the world that welcomes immigrants as well as the Dutch welcome high-tech people with valuable skills.
      You MUST be joking. If the illegal Mexican immigrants trying to get into the US were highly educated high-tech workers with valuable skills, do you think they'd be treated the same?

      Hint: The answer is "no". You want to think here of all the highly-educated high tech workers that the US has welcomed from India and China, not illegal migrant workers from Mexico.
    300. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't speak for all Americans, but the people I spend time with see wealth as security . In the US, we don't have the social safety net that other western countries have and we certainly don't have life-time employment. I could be laid off tomorrow and shortly after lose my and my family's health care. Its hard to be satisfied/feel happy when you're in this situation.

      The only solutions that most I know see to this is either
      - to get yours early. If you make it rich and avoid costly illness, you can coast through the economic bad times.
      - get a secure job with the government or a government subcontractor (i.e. defense)

      There are other factors to be sure, social pressure, bad reality TV, etc, but this financial fear seems to be the driving force among my coworkers. Especially thos with young families.

    301. Re:The Netherlands by PowerEdge · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Cause in Canada nothing is printed in 2 languages. Gimme a break. The height of hypocrisy. I don't mind English / Spanish signage. I love America. Hundreds of languages are spoken here. English is the language most people use to do business and is the dominant language here, but that doesn't mean it is the only one. The world is more connected than ever. We have to deal with this new paradigm. The economy is global, health and welfare is global, everything is global. We have nations, that are defined by borders, language, and culture. America is such a nation who's culture is inherently pick and choose, cafeteria culture. We implore people immigrating to our country to bring their talents, bring their language, bring their food, and the best things about their culuture (lore, art, music, philosophy, religion) etc and set up shop here. Leave behind the worst and strive for the best. That is America. Everytime I come back to this country, I literally kiss the ground. I don't care if I get flamed. God Bless America!!

    302. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know I phrased this really poorly, but pot is 100% legal in the Netherlands.

    303. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      As a European living in the US, that doesn't sound very much different how the US treats high tech workers.

      Driver's license was cheap, but I had to wait in line at DMV for 2 hours, study for an exam, do the exam, wait 6 months until I could take a driving test... I was still able to drive legally during this time with a provisional license.

      My visa is tied to my current employer. If I get laid off (without warning, as is the custom here) I have 10 days to leave the country. Getting a visa took something like 6 months, but I could bring my family with me. My spouse can not work at all, not even for charities, for free. The visa is good for 3 years, the renewal taking months, and then good for another 3 years after which I have to leave.

      For permanent residency ("green card") you have to go through a process that used to take as much as 6 years, now you may be able to get it in a year. Costs about $10,000. Incredibly bureacratic process, that includes health exam of all things (don't you think me being here 6 years would have caused me to spread whatever disease I might have?). In my area the final parts of the process include going to wait in line starting at 3 am in the morning, or you will not be able to get in to the office during the day.

    304. Re:The Netherlands by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      It's at least 50% in Canada if you make any decent amount of money. 14% sales taxes, property taxes, fees for blah blah blah, it all adds up, and that's on top of an income tax that tops out at over 60% all by itself.

    305. Re:The Netherlands by DTC · · Score: 1
      Speaking english certainly helps living here, but it's not required.


      Actually, for US Naturalization, you must have the ability to read, write, and speak English.

      from USCIS

              * a period of continuous residence and physical presence in the United States;
              * residence in a particular USCIS District prior to filing;
              * an ability to read, write, and speak English;
              * a knowledge and understanding of U.S. history and government;
              * good moral character;
              * attachment to the principles of the U.S. Constitution; and,
              * favorable disposition toward the United States.


      whether that's enforced or not is a different matter...
    306. Re:The Netherlands by somersault · · Score: 1

      I visited Canada recently and was a bit surprised that tax wasn't included in the prices over there, a nasty shock when checking receipts :p And having just received a pay rise this month without even knowing it, I checked over my payslip and it appears that I get taxed 27% on my income, and then of course add in council tax, fuel tax, VAT, etc as you say, I'm probably paying 40-50% of my wages in tax too..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    307. Re:The Netherlands by leereyno · · Score: 1

      Why on EARTH are you still there then?

      If your relationship is as serious and devoted as you imply, why don't you get married and then you can both move back to the US.

      http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.php?autoco m=custom&page=guides

      Having him move here won't be trivially easy, but it isn't all that hard either. The only real issue is the wait involved.

      I know because my wife is from the UK.

      My sister lived in the Netherlands for a bit when she was going to school. She liked it, but then she was only there as a student. Even so she found their attitude of many dutch people towards Americans to be less than pleasant, especially if you couldn't speak dutch. I reminded her that if it wasn't for Americans they wouldn't be speaking dutch either but German or Russian instead.

      Lee

      --
      Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    308. Re:The Netherlands by Sylvak · · Score: 1

      I totally agree.  Making some drugs illegal creates a black market for these drugs... which makes them more accessible to kids.  When drugs are legal, people will get them from legal chanels (controled quality, less hassle), therefore reducing the need for the black market.  No black market, no easy access to underage people.

      To illustrate my point, when I was in high school, I could get my hands on all sorts of drugs.  However, when it came to alcohol, it was much more difficult to get.

    309. Re:The Netherlands by Dexter+Alan+Ux · · Score: 0

      I did read it a few times, and I still think I understood him just fine. (And BTW, I think whoever modded my remark as flamebait was way out of line). If not, please feel free to explain it to me. It seems to me he was saying that it's counterproductive to apply the lable "addictive" to anything that isn't a pharmacological dependence. Tell me how I misinterpreted him.

      --
      Cheney/Bush '08
    310. Re:The Netherlands by Axelsino · · Score: 1
    311. Re:The Netherlands by Orestesx · · Score: 1

      Really? So if we let A be cigarette smoking and B be lung cancer, then the existence of lung cancer in people who do not smoke implies that it is not the case that cigarette smoking causes cancer? No. The correct interpretation of this particular logic is if "smoking and not lung cancer, then it is not the case that smoking implies lung cancer" Which is true. I've met many people who smoke and do not have lung cancer.

    312. Re:The Netherlands by alienmole · · Score: 1
      that doesn't stop me, or anyone else i know, from gambling online.
      ...yet. But the enforcement efforts in this area are just in their infancy, and ramping up quickly. If you use a credit card or Paypal to pay an online gambling vendor, that's going to become much more difficult. The difference between this and, say, the war on drugs is that there are much more direct lines of communication of both data and money between you and the ultimate vendor, and that's easier for the feds to interfere with. Your tax money at work.
    313. Re:The Netherlands by kbielefe · · Score: 1
      I think constantly about how Mexicans are treated back in the US
      You mean paying thousands per student to teach their children english, printing all voting and other official material in both english and spanish, subsidizing their tuition with state tax money, providing scholarships for minority students, most of which are hispanic here in Arizona, creating special inducements for potential minority small business owners, and providing emergency room care for free if you can't afford it, regardless of if you entered the country legally or not?
      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    314. Re:The Netherlands by pcb · · Score: 1

      Typical eurocrap. Dutch and other northern European counties are going to implode under their stifling and rigid (and boring!) mono-cultures. Ever wonder why the US has such a progressive and creative culture (no I'm not American). How many Nobel prizes has Holland won lately? Or how many new companies have emerged there since the 60s? This also applies to Europe in general. There is a very simple concept that most Europeans don't understand: Origin of birth does not entitle you to be surrounded by people practicing the habits you're accustom too (i.e. your culture, language, etc.). Simply put, you should respect other people regardless of their habits. If people choose to live in Holland and never learn Dutch that is THEIR CHOICE. The majority should NEVER be able to force their culture on a minority. That is racist. But how can you expect immigrants to integrate? You can't. If they want to integrate that is also THEIR CHOICE. Most Europeans don't like (or understand) this idea at all, which is why, despite their liberal pretence, they are generally racist (and don't even know it). Compare Amsterdam to New York. In Amsterdam immigrants are rotting in ghettos (with the Dutch going "oh why, oh why don't they just integrate or leave"). In New York, waves of immigrants have been coming for centuries creating one of the riches cities in the world. Both the US and Canada have problems with racism, but it pales in comparison to Europe. How many 'home-grown' Islamic terrorist attacks have occurred in the US lately? For all you prospective immigrants out there, go to the US or Canada...avoid Europe like the plague.

      PCB

      --
      'Men never commit evil so fully and joyfully as when they do it for religious convictions.' B. Pascal
    315. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's only if you want to become a US citizen. But you can get a work permit or even a green card without knowing a single word in English(er, American).

    316. Re:The Netherlands by uchar · · Score: 1

      Aye le taupin, The so superior beings that are people leaving in the United States, that call themselves Americans (yeah, they were the last to arrive here, but they were so hot, that they took the denomination for themselves), are not Canadians, and therefore are not granted the same privilege in Netherlands, nor most of the world's countries... Their egos (and may be yours) are too much of a pain in the ass !!!

      --
      -I swear by my life-and my love of it-that I'll never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another to live for mine
    317. Re:The Netherlands by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      you have to answer important questions like... "what are Dutch men best known for?" and the correct answer being "their trustworthiness"

      Damn, I would have said "their ability to fly".

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    318. Re:The Netherlands by colmore · · Score: 1

      plus I like America still.

      Hear hear! However rotten our government gets, this is the country that gave the world The Blues and Mark Twain. America is a great weird behemoth and I'm damn proud to call it my only culture (as a Mayflower WASP I don't really feel in any meaningful way hyphenated)

      Plus if every socially mobile person who cares about their society and community more than their investments leaves, then the USA will just be more evil, more horrible, and still around.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    319. Re:The Netherlands by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      Because the guy is saying starbucks is crap. I don't know if thats true or not, but I'd like to hear what he considers to be not crap.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    320. Re:The Netherlands by lamber45 · · Score: 1
      What's the panic? The requirement to give up your original citizenship is very common [...]. I wouldn't be surprised if even was handled this way in the USA and Canada.

      The only similar requirement in the United States is a clause in the Oath of Allegiance that prospective new citizen takes:

      "... I [...] renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen."
      However, there are many people who become US citizens but still maintain at least some of the benefits of their former citizenship; for instance, my wife was naturalized in 1998 but was subsequently able to obtain a Mexican passport. By contrast, service as an officer in the armed forces or with the CIA or FBI requires one to have actually renounced all foreign citizenship and titles.
    321. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right in the fact that they don't recognize dual citizenship. You're an American citizen to them until you renounce your citizenship. That means you can acquire a citizenship from a country that doesn't require you to renounce your previous citizenship and thus become a dual citizen. Just flash your U.S. passport when visiting the U.S. and everything is gravy.

    322. Re:The Netherlands by rjdegraaf · · Score: 1

      The relatively high income tax system is chosen using a thing called 'democracy'!

    323. Re:The Netherlands by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the downside is you refer to 5:00 as "17:00" - you are already losing your American-ness!

    324. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't know what you're talking about. America simply doesn't care about your other citizenship(s). You can have as many as you want (I have three, including the US one, and it's absolutely legal).

    325. Re:The Netherlands by Damvan · · Score: 1

      " If i don't speak English i can forget about trying to live in the states"

      Completely wrong. I know people who have lived in the US for decades and don't speak a word of English. They speak Spanish though, not Dutch. Maybe you could Spanish instead?

    326. Re:The Netherlands by Damvan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I assure you that it is not enforced in any way, shape or form. I know people who have lived in the US for decades and don't speak a word of English. Citizens as well.

      Interesting though, because if there is a requirement to read, write and speak English to be a citizen, why the hell do they print ballots in Spanish?

    327. Re:The Netherlands by Knara · · Score: 1

      I dunno about the OP, but I'd have to say that's mostly correct. "Psychologically addicting" just means "don't have the willpower to stop". Real, physical addiction involves actual changes or damage to structures such as neuroreceptors. You'd have to play a crapload of GTA in order to have your serotonin receptors change so that you never work correctly again without GTA being available. I take GTA away from a subject, they'll bitch for a while, then move on to something else.

    328. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      snip...If you've got good IT skills you'll be welcomed with open arms. .... I think constantly about how Mexicans are treated back in the US,...

      Most of the illegal immigrants aren't bringing IT skills or CISSP certs either....

    329. Re:The Netherlands by fyngyrz · · Score: 5, Insightful
      ....certainly not helpful to their lives.

      That's not for others to judge. What you do on your own time with your own money should be your business, not mine. Arguments about what you may do to your financial standing are specious. You can wreck yourself simply by using a credit card in specific ways, or re-financing your house without understanding what you're doing or even by doing all the right things in unfortunate circumstances.

      As for "addiction", some people get into compulsive behaviors, some get out again, some don't, some don't get into compulsive behaviors. And I'm not talking about gambling -- I'm talking about everything. There is no underlying rationale that can sensibly be used to erode the liberties of everyone based upon the shortcomings of the few. Of course, using the term "sensibly" along with the concept of legislation is a bit of a cognitive disconnect, for which I apologize.

      Liberty is what we are really talking about here, and liberty is on a steep, steep decline in America, subsumed by the "mommy" government's continual attempt to pre-empt anything it wants to one or more levels from it actually occurring, because the underlying rationale these days is that you, an un-indited, non-felon, stand-up citizen, can't be trusted with: guns | votes | free speech | habeus corpus | glassware | drugs | motorcycles | cars | your sexuality | disciplining your children | etc...

      Well, as one wag famously put it, you're getting the government you deserve. Good and hard.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    330. Re:The Netherlands by spun · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Puritans have a strong ethic of moderation. Modern capitalism requires a different ethic, one of conspicuous consumption, in order for the rich to make lots of money. In order to reconcile the basic ethos of the country with the needs of the ultra rich to have herds of sheep-like consumers purchasing everything in sight, certain things or activities need to be defined as automatically showing overconsumption. Therefore, as long as people with this protestant ethic are not doing the prescribed things, they are practicing moderation and can feel good about themselves. Therefore, buying loads of useless crap is not overconsumption, but smoking even one joint is.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    331. Re:The Netherlands by fyngyrz · · Score: 1
      Hit some Al-Anon

      Yeah, because we know they're entirely fact based, considering that they run with that imaginary freind in the sky as a base principle.

      I would no more get advice on addiction from Al-Anon than I would get advice on sex from a priest.

      If you want to know what addiction is, ask a scientist who specializes in the chemistry of the human body. Not some ragged wag in what amounts to a prayer meeting with what can at best be described as rah-rah mutual support for (and by) the feeble-minded. And whatever you do, don't ask a psycho-babbler; they represent fad-based ideas that swing in and out of fashion even faster than hemlines. You'll end up in a primal scream session or filling out a questionnaire detailing your relationship with your mother before you even know what hit you. Psychology isn't a science. It's highly unstable religion.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    332. Re:The Netherlands by dep01 · · Score: 1

      FYI, Cocaine is psychologically addictive, not physiologically.

      --
      "hey, could you pass me a paper towel? er.. I mean... DEPLOY ABSORBTION PANEL!"
    333. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pooh22,

      Don't be such a sniveling wimp! Every country has its pros and cons when it comes to immigration. Countries have a right to control immigration. Resources are becoming scarce and unbounded growth is not a reality. Welcome the real world!

      The level political correctness I see on this subject is ridiculous. The fact is not everyone nor every culture is created equal. We like to pretend this to be so, BUT if it were people wouldn't want to run to countries like The Netherlands or The US now would they? It is completely illogical to blindly accept everyone just because you have some sort of odd guilt or feel you personally owe the world something. That is just down right DUMB!

      At some point the rest of the world needs to start taking responsibility for their own place in life. The West is not a release valve. Resources alone predicate this. Any half way educated person can see this.

    334. Re:The Netherlands by BlackCreek · · Score: 1
      I live in the NL for 4.5 years now. Here are some anecdotes:

      As the IND only gives me stay visa (verblijfsvergunning) for one year, I've already renewed mine 4 times. Every single time, I had to do it. They complained that I had sent the wrong papers and asked to resubmit. Then I send the SAME PAPERS, and they process my request.

      A colleague (from Asia) has had his requests for family reunification "lost". Twice. They simply told him, "oh, what? No, we don't have your papers anywhere. Please send it again" Twice.

      In my experience, meeting a dutch person involves a dance of 3 or 4 questions: 1. Where are you from? 2. What do you do? 3. Do you like it here? and When are you leaving? The last question is always made.

      Often I have found myself in situations where there was one or more dutch person (a friend) complaining (or simply cussing) about something. Then someone has the brilliant idea of asking me if I don't agree something is not good. Many times, when I answered (in very polite terms) that I was also discontent with "whatever it was". I heard (in different occasions) from other dutch people in the conversation things like:

      -- Hey, why don't you just don't go back to your country? You know, I think you should go back to your country!
      -- Why are you saying this?? Don't you come from XXX? Shut up!
      ===========

      I have to go, so I'll be short here (sorry)...

      A big part of the problem seems to be: 1. there are lots of xenophobic people here (most of which are not even aware of the stuff they say). 2. There has been a huge political use of this issue, which just makes the situation worse. Oh yeah, and the IND has gone mad....

      ===========

      BTW, I have lots of great dutch friends. People I like and admire a lot.

      my 2 cents
    335. Re:The Netherlands by irenaeous · · Score: 1

      This is a gross exaggeration. I live in Southern California and I know of no "Mexicans" who work for $0.25 an hour. Most of the "illegals" still work for at least minimum wage or higher. They are often preferred to gringos, because they work much harder -- not uncommon for immigrant refuges from poorer areas of the world. Most Latino children are learning English and assimilating just like past immigrant populations. I regard myself as conservative on immigration issues. I want the border shut-down and to have immigration controlled much more than it is, because of the burden that large scale immigration of poor people to our country is having on our infrastructure and standard of living. Your characterization is a sterotype that gets views like mine catagorized as being racist and is a disservice. I don't think over time that Latino immigrants will be any different than past waves of immigrants and that we will ultimately be a better and richer country for it.

    336. Re:The Netherlands by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

      It's not that different from someone jumping to conclusions about California, Georgia, or Montana based on a few years of experience in New York. :-)

      --
      Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
      The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    337. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sorry, nor will I ever be. Kerry sucks, and didn't even deserve to be a candidate. Other than his spending, I don't see a problem with Bush.

      You're all a bunch of liberal lunatics. I think Micheal Savage says it best - "Liberalism is a mental disorder"

    338. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GTA is a gateway drug to WoW.

    339. Re:The Netherlands by CreatureComfort · · Score: 1


      If you are a typical slashdotter (like me), I bet she would still claim that not only is she ahead...but waaaaaaay ahead.

      You don't want to see your fellow slashdotters naked.

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
    340. Re:The Netherlands by mrogers · · Score: 1
      Which, ironically, is exactly what Islamist are doing.

      It's what they're being allowed to do, by a society that prefers the cheap thrill of confrontation to the long struggle of toleration. (I refer to the West in general, not just the Netherlands.) Changing government policy because of a single murder is hysterical and reactionary, and it plays into the hands of extremists on both sides.

      The issue shouldn't be whether you want to 'weather' Islamism, but rather do you really want to take the giant steps backwards that this would entail?

      I'm not suggesting that we should weather Islamism by giving in to it - I'm suggesting that we should weather it by refusing to modify our open, tolerant, liberal societies in response to a spectacular but statistically insignificant level of violence.

      Want to know what a Europe that has weathered Islam looks like? Look to the Middle East.

      The Middle East has never resembled modern Europe. Are you trying to draw a parallel between Israel, which is surrounded by hostile Muslim countries, and the Netherlands, which is surrounded by secular allies and contains a small Muslim minority, most of whom have made a conscious decision to live in the West?

    341. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of the smaller towns here, actually they are mostly not legally towns but villages, have a very dominant (Reformed) Christian community. This indeed means that on Sundays, nearly everything shuts down and sometimes even pubs aren't open (depending on how much of an influence the Christians have).

      For people that have grown up in such an area it really isn't a big deal, but a car is convenient. You'll be likely to travel at least 10 but practically 20+ kilometers to get anywhere busy. As for groceries, you just get them on Saturday.

      You're not at the neck of any woods, you're just in rural Holland! ;-)

    342. Re:The Netherlands by deadweight · · Score: 1

      Isn't this true many places? I have got lost in the UK and ended up in places I didn't think I would last 5 minutes if I got out of the car. BTW, you are right about Baltimore. If you have the cash to live in the "good part" it is very nice. If you don't, might as well move someplace safe like Iraq.

    343. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. People who make money treating it as a physical addiction consider it a physical addiction! Now if only they could name one physical change that this "physical" addiction causes.

    344. Re:The Netherlands by Sacarino · · Score: 1

      *You* wanted to move to this country, so *you* should make an effort of blending into society.

      When an American says this, they're branded as intolerant.

      --
      -- El Sacarino tiene gusto de la chocha
    345. Re:The Netherlands by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I think constantly about how Mexicans are treated back in the US, and I honestly have to say I can't imagine that there is anywhere in the world that welcomes immigrants as well as the Dutch welcome high-tech people with valuable skills.

      Huh? What do Mexicans have to do with tech workers? Mexican immigrants in the USA are dirt-poor laborers who end up working in landscaping and other jobs for less than minimum wage. There's a good reason they're not appreciated here: they work for less than minimum wage, don't pay taxes (these businesses employ them under the table, hence the lower-than-legal wage), get free healthcare at our expense at emergency rooms, and cause a lot of crime. Countries allowing tech workers to immigrate don't have this problem because high-paid workers add a lot to the economy, rather than taking away from it.

      I've been here 13 months and can't say I've regretted the decision even once. The Dutch are obviously having immigration issues with Muslims not being integrated into the population. But as they tighten the rules for the general population, the rules for IT geeks have gotten much more relaxed.

      Sounds not too different from the Mexicans here; they don't integrate well. It seems self-evident to me that a country would want to only allow highly-educated individuals to immigrate; why wouldn't you want the best and brightest from around the world? But apparently a lot of countries are having to learn this the hard way.

    346. Re:The Netherlands by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      I understand the Tragedy of the Commons argument but I'm still not so sure that I agree with the concept of massive taxes on gasoline.

      In any case, even if they work in Europe, they'd never work in the United States. For one it would be political suicide to suggest it and for two it would cripple our economy and standard of living, which for better or for worse is based around a suburban automobile dependent culture.

      I for one would like to see the Hydrogen economy become a reality. Of course, Hydrogen requires energy to produce and the most obvious (CO2 neutral) energy source (nuclear fission) that we have today is hated by most environmentalists. So it seems our choice is between accepting a reduction in our standard of living or continuing to dump massive amounts of CO2 (coal will be around for quite awhile) into the atmosphere.

      *sigh*

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    347. Re:The Netherlands by jc42 · · Score: 1

      To quote a standup comedian: "This War On Terror's a great idea - remember when they had a War On Drugs... and you couldn't buy drugs any more?".

      Yeah; that's a good one. A similar one, real history rather than stage comedy, was back when the US government declared a "War on Poverty".

      Unfortunately for the politicians, lots of poor people started asking where they could go to surrender. That war was stopped very quickly. But somehow, we still have lots of poor people. I guess the poor people won the war.

      Political metaphors can be fun.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    348. Re:The Netherlands by Matje · · Score: 1

      It's not necessarily political suicide. There was an article in the NYT a couple weeks back from a campaign manager (or something similar) from the Clinton campaign (male version) that reported that based on their latest research, more than half of the US public a foreign policy that will make the US less dependent on foreign oil.

      The thing is raising energy taxes does not imply that you raise the overall tax level. You can easily hand the money back by lowering the income tax or even the VAT. On average this should only create an incentive for people to conserve energy without costing them any money. It is easier said than done but it may just be feasible and sellable if accompagnied by proper middle east oriented FUD.

      I'm not so sure about Hydrogen, but I fully agree with the use of nuclear fission. In today's terrorism fearing climate I think the explosive part about Hydrogen is not a selling point. Bio ethanol seems to be a good candidate. Easily produced and easily consumed in modern engines. It's already in use as car fuel in Brazil (I've been told they switch their sugar cane output from raw sugar to bio ethanol and vice versa depending on world market prices for sugar). The US has a big sugar industry I believe, and so does Europe. Both industries are under pressure to lower subsidies and are in need for new markets, so why not?

      But let's not depress ourselves. I firmly believe the free market will eventually find an efficient solution to the energy problem. And if not then natural selection will eventually have found a way to filter out humans and bacteria will once again command the world Yeah!

      Cheers

    349. Re:The Netherlands by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      The tests they run are for the metabolites, not THC itself, so there is no need to have residual THC in the system to fail a test. It can last a month, or for a particularly heavy smoker even more. Of course, some of the heaviest smokers are clear after a week or less, and someone who smokes once could test positive weeks later. It also takes a while for things to go through your system. I took a test high and passed. People are just different.

      Pot smokers are also more prone to lie like 12-year-olds, for no good reason. I've heard the whole "flashback" BS more times than I care to think of. You don't get pot flashbacks, that's just ridiculous. They also tend to not be particularly familiar with the feeling of exertion, so there's at least two good explanations for claims of a buzz. You also don't really burn fat when you exercise unless you're an extremely fit marathon runner, and even then getting 50% of your energy from fat would be amazing. Us normals are lucky to get 10-20%.

      I'm not saying it's impossible, but it's exceedingly unlikely. Maybe somehow a small amount of THC would get stored in fat, but certainly not enough to get a buzz from even if it was all released at once, which it's not. Not even close. There's a lot of stupid urban myths about drugs, and those courses are often a collection of myths reminiscent of voodoo.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    350. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit, who knew Rush Limbaugh had so many mod points!?

    351. Re:The Netherlands by zerocommazero · · Score: 1

      A part you are leaving out is that illegal aliens don't have SSNs or any records in the "system" so they don't pay taxes on all that money they are earning.

      My wife told me a story about a pair of IAs that were working for an old employer of hers. They both had bought stolen identities here in the states. One day, one of the mexicans almost got caught. Apparently some guy called because he had received a W2 from this company. The guy apparently was in the military and stationed out of the country for a few years. His mom sold his identity while he was away. Then when he finally gets home, he finds out the IRS is hunting him down for backtaxes, all his assets are frozen and he had a warrant for his arrest. The kicker was that the mexican using his identity never paid any taxes the whole time he used it and also put down the maximum exemptions. The mexican never returned to work, vanishing.

    352. Re:The Netherlands by sumdumass · · Score: 1
      . I think constantly about how Mexicans are treated back in the US, and I honestly have to say I can't imagine that there is anywhere in the world that welcomes immigrants as well as the Dutch welcome high-tech people with valuable skills.
      Two distinctions that should be pointed out. First, any high-tech Mexican with valuable skills are generally welcomed with open arms as well as tax incentives and other great programs. My sister is married to a Mexican doctor who came to America, got citizenship and now works in research. The problem arises with non skilled people who might have the same problems going to Amsterdam.

      They are called illegal immigrants for a reason, they don't follow the law coming into the country. Now some people claim if your against illegals, your racist when what they really mean is that business need a labor pool willing to work for less then the state or country claim as the minimum wage required to hire a person. They also use the illegal status to force wages below industry exceptionable norms. I have a personal experience with this (willing top share if your interested) and I'm against illegal immigration just because of it. I'm amazed that Unions and democrats are supporting "illegal immigration" and still claiming to be "for the working man".

      Illegal immigration does equal exploitation of people based in their inability to take actions of recourse. And for the people who think otherwise, they are either pawns in the bigger picture and actually not aware of the more damaging exploitation process or are happy because they got something cheaper because of illegals. And the worst part it that being exploited by big business' or small business wanting to compete with big business is better then what they had before they came here. I think we need to stop the flood of illegals coming over, forget about punishing the ones already here and evaluate if we need a workforce willing to work like the illegals are being treated. Then open legal immigration to these people while at the same time, working with the Mexican government in ways that can improve the situation in Mexico instead of letting them dump their poverty problems on the US (which seems to be the way Mexico is fixing it now).
    353. Re:The Netherlands by dingDaShan · · Score: 1

      Hallucinogens are not banned because they are addictive. Take LSD for example, it is considered non-addictive (in any way). Why is this drug illegal? Because people that are on it have the potential for "bad trips" where they can injure themselves and others. You would argue that Cannabis smokers wouldn't do this, but combined with another drug, alcohol, people can go quite crazy. I live in Ann Arbor(home of Hash Bash), and have seen people do some really stupid and unsafe things that they normally wouldn't do just because they use the two drugs in tandem.

    354. Re:The Netherlands by juan2074 · · Score: 1

      Some are, but not all.

    355. Re:The Netherlands by rthille · · Score: 1

      To join the Navy, my brother had to renounce his Irish citizenship. Of course the Irish don't recognize that he as renouced it, so as far as the Irish are concerned, he's still a citizen, and as far as the Americans are concerned, he's still a citizen. Sounds like dual citizenship to me, but the US Govt. does care in some cases...

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    356. Re:The Netherlands by who's+got+my+nicknam · · Score: 1

      I am an IT worker in Canada. Specifically, northwestern British Columbia. I just pulled up my most recent paystub and here's the scoop:

      Total gross income to date (2006) is $47,795.76.
      Total Income Tax deducted to date: $8561.73
      Employment Insurance deductions to date: $729.30
      Canada Pension Plan deductions to date: $1910.70
      Total Mandatory deductions: $11,201.73, or 23.44% of gross income. My annual salary is in the $53K range.

      I am not including my Municipal Pension plan deductions, since those are not "mandatory".

      In Canada, we pay a 6% GST on most purchases we make. Exemptions include most kinds of food, and a few other goods. Crazy rules surround the charging of GST that confuse the hell out of most of us, and make the accountants happy because they can charge more for their services. In addition, in BC we pay a 7% Provincial Sales Tax, again on almost everything but labour costs. So you can count on pretty much spending 10% to 13% of your cost-of-living expenses in taxes, except on gasoline, which we pay a whole bunch of other taxes on top of the federal and provincial ones. So approximately 36% (and definitely less than 40%) of my income goes to taxes. Cost of living is possibly higher here in the northern, rural areas of the province, but I really doubt it. Housing is a fraction of what people in the cities pay (especially Vancouver!); utilities are the same cost or lower (6 cents per kilowatt-hour for electricity); and there's a lot less fees levied on us for every aspect of life. Quality of life is arguably higher here than most other places on the planet, even for those in lower income brackets than myself. Would I recommend that Americans move to my corner of the world? You bet. There's demand for skilled and industrious workers, even in rural areas. Broadband is quite prevalent, even in rural Canada - thanks to our taxes being spent on widespread communications infrastructure. (Most of the driving force behind broadband expansion is coming from remote First Nations communities, as bridging the Digital Divide is seen as an important step in improving peoples' quality of life.)
      In terms of politics, we've unfortunately seen a shift towards the Right since our last election, as our Prime Minister seeks to shore up his support in the Bush Administration by sucking up. On the other hand, he has a minority government, which means a lot less power. So that's a good thing. Those people emigrating to Canada can expect to find a country of tolerant, laid-back folks who like their beer and hockey, seldom get excited about politics, and feel quite comfortable downloading music over P2P networks. (Naturally there are exceptions to this Utopian image, but most of those are in Toronto, so stay away from there!)
      Immigration is a bit tough at times, but skilled people won't experience any real difficulties. It's mind-numbingly time-consuming, though. It seems from empirical evidence that Texans have the least amount of troubles with our immigration department. I'm not sure why, of course - although they will make you leave your guns at home, which can be a bit of a bummer.
      A bit of information about my social status, just so nobody thinks I'm a recluse or hermit or something: I have two teeaged children, two cars (yes I hate cars, but being rural my only other option is to lock my kids up until they move out!), a wife, and a cat. We own 10 acres of property with a 3000 square-foot house. We travelled to the UK for holidays this year, and will be likely going to France next year. The ratio of computers to people in our household is 2:1, not counting the servers. My children, who are 12 and 13, each have their own laptops (a Dell and a Powerbook), while my wife and I each have a Mac and a PC laptop. Even though we live half an hour from town, our kids have club activities, music lessons, and so on, in addition to school activities. Both of our kids have had extensive orthodontic work (braces) which was paid for by our company's medical insurance. The point is, we have what we consider

      --
      "Apparatus dignosco occultus, satis non supernus."
    357. Re:The Netherlands by eclectic4 · · Score: 1

      Addicted: physically and mentally dependent on a particular substance, and unable to stop taking it without incurring adverse effects

      Some substances (such as cocaine, nicotine, heroine, etc...) actually cause chemical, physiological addiction. Marijuana does not.
      That's why marijuana is not considered addictive, generally.

      --

      "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
    358. Re:The Netherlands by couchslug · · Score: 1

      It is their country, belonging to them, not me or you.
      They do not, therefore, owe anyone else an opportunity to become a Dutch citizen or live there anymore than I owe someone else a bedroom in my house.
      The choice the Dutch and the rest of Europe have is either to be flooded with immigrants from every place that is worse than Europe, or start hurting a few feelings and restrict immigration. Importing the poor, uneducated, and people who do not believe in the fundamental precepts behind ones own country makes no sense. so why should it be allowed?

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    359. Re:The Netherlands by juan2074 · · Score: 1

      Me and my wife watched as some gang of hoodlums beat a kid to the brink of death in the street

      . . . and did nothing? Why not call the police or tackle one of the 'hoodlums'?

      If that had happened in my town, I think I would have shot one of them ;)

      That's one of the good things about the right to bear arms. People always have to wonder if someone has a concealed weapon, and risk getting capped if they start some shit.

    360. Re:The Netherlands by kz45 · · Score: 1

      "That's not for others to judge. What you do on your own time with your own money should be your business, not mine. Arguments about what you may do to your financial standing are specious. You can wreck yourself simply by using a credit card in specific ways, or re-financing your house without understanding what you're doing or even by doing all the right things in unfortunate circumstances. "

      This is true, but legalizing drugs doesn't just effect the people that are going to use them. It will effect society as a whole.

      If anyone can start taking something like cocaine or heroine (even in small doses), addiction will climb and so will the care of the people addicted, which will mean higher prices for health care for us.

      Not only that, but what about the people that decide to drive while stoned/high? There are enough people in this world killing the innocent while drunk..I don't think we need to add even more due to being high.

      If drugs were ever legalized, we would also need a registration program. That registration program would allow potential employers to decide whether or not to hire you based on your legal drug usage.

      Many European countries don't care about such things because they are already paying large amounts of money in taxes due to their public health care system.

    361. Re:The Netherlands by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      see, and that may have been part of the cause of Dutch people not liking Americans much.

      I'm dutch.

      I have plenty of American friends, but they don't seem to feel the need to remind me that I would be speaking German if not for 'them' (they had nothing to do with it, it was a long time ago, probably before you or I were born).

      Having said that I would agree with the fact that the Dutch nation is on the wrong path with regards to immigration, it seems as if the fear factor is taking over. Harassment of Polish people and other former east block dwellers is common, immigration and racism are closely coupled and the IND is bordering on the gestapo in terms of how they do their jobs, for which - as a Dutch person - I apologize to all people from countries where these things are done in a more humane way.

      I have lived in plenty of places and I regret to admit that our country is very bad in this respect.

    362. Re:The Netherlands by CDPatten · · Score: 1

      I take strong offense to that comment about "how mexicans are treated back in the US". Its an entirley different situation. You started out by saying "if you have good IT skills"... well that implies a great deal. Maybe you need to ask them to give you an economics class and not just IT classes.

      Amsterdam doesn't have a third world coutnry to its south with millions of poeple trying to get in to use its "free" services. Its not that the US doesn't want to help... it costs lots of money. Frankly we have serious problems of our own, like the baby boomers about to retire and the medicare costs associated with that... projected to be into the trillions!

      Mexicans that follow the imigration process in the US are welcomed, just like everyone else. Becasue we are the top nation in the world, have many of the best schools, etc. lots of people around the world want to come here. Not everyone can at once.

      The mexican problem the US faces is that there is to many uneducated poverty stricken people who don't speak the language are trying to come in at once. Many of the mexicans who enter the US illegally head straight for the social services and hospitals. Well guess what, someone has to pay for that. They are getting it free, while americans pick up a pretty hefty tab. Even with our tax dollars being drained to those services, hospitals around the border are going under left and right becasue of it. The US (while its a nice thought) can't afford to take care of every sick person in mexico. I iwsh we could, but we can't. Its not because we are greedy either, we give more money to poor nations in the world than anyone other country.

      Even the former preseident of mexico (Vicente Fox) had trouble coming up with reasons why mexicans want to stay in mexico. He listed "tacos" as the first reason to stay in mexico durring an interview a couple of years ago. "They like tacos, they like their families, they like their community, they like Mexico. ".
      http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,108050,00.html

      We simply can't afford to swallow whole an entire nation like that. If we opened up our boarders to mexico tens of millions of poverty stricken people would flood the nation and cripple our economy. Amsterdam just isn't an applicable analogy. Frankly, Amsterdam doesn't welcome poverty stricken people like you imply anyways... you are just being anti-american... a trendy position, but not really a good one.

      Look, its nothing against individual mexicans. I was fortunate enought to be born here not there. luck. That doesn't change the reality of the situation though.

    363. Re:The Netherlands by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Me: I would rather have a larger salary. This enables me to buy lots of stock--leveraged. I expect to not have to work AT ALL by middle age. That is certainly worth sacraficing a few weeks of vacation per year. At 25, I'm jealous of my european coworkers because they seem to be on vacation one-out-of-five times I call them. But they will be jealous of me in 15 years, when I'm on permenant vacation and they have to keep working to live comfortably!

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    364. Re:The Netherlands by HuguesT · · Score: 3, Insightful

      According to the article you link to, a grand total of 5 Americans have sought asylum this year. This is hardly a deluge, and I don't particularly believe the Sun when it says "they freely admit it's for the free stuff".

    365. Re:The Netherlands by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      It's not necessarily political suicide. There was an article in the NYT a couple weeks back from a campaign manager (or something similar) from the Clinton campaign (male version) that reported that based on their latest research, more than half of the US public a foreign policy that will make the US less dependent on foreign oil.

      Yes, but if you think the American public will accept the cost of gas doubling due to a "tax" (remember that tax is an almost inherently bad word in American politics) no amount of explaining to them that it will eventually wean us off foreign oil will matter. They will not accept it. It won't happen. No matter what the merits may be.

      The thing is raising energy taxes does not imply that you raise the overall tax level. You can easily hand the money back by lowering the income tax or even the VAT. On average this should only create an incentive for people to conserve energy without costing them any money. It is easier said than done but it may just be feasible and sellable if accompagnied by proper middle east oriented FUD.

      I don't know if the "middle east" thing would even need to be FUD. The fact is that a lot of the key oil-exporters are oppressive regimes (yes, I'll use that word) that are using their oil revenues to prop themselves up instead of building an economy that will survive the end of the hydrocarbon age. I think that history will view them as having squandered the greatest gift in the history of the human race. That said, I still don't think you could sell a massive gas tax to the American public.

      I'm not so sure about Hydrogen, but I fully agree with the use of nuclear fission. In today's terrorism fearing climate I think the explosive part about Hydrogen is not a selling point.

      Eh, gasoline and jet fuel explode too. Nobody seems overly worried about them. In any case the threat of terrorism will probably diminish (it will never be eliminated) as we move away from hydrocarbons. We will have less and less reason to meddle in the Middle East when our economy isn't completely dependent on them.

      Bio ethanol seems to be a good candidate. Easily produced and easily consumed in modern engines. It's already in use as car fuel in Brazil (I've been told they switch their sugar cane output from raw sugar to bio ethanol and vice versa depending on world market prices for sugar). The US has a big sugar industry I believe, and so does Europe. Both industries are under pressure to lower subsidies and are in need for new markets, so why not?

      Well I just picked Hydrogen because it would seem to be the easiest power "storage" device to "create" using electrical power. Hydrogen is also advantageous because the byproduct is H20 -- not CO2. But in the end I suppose it doesn't matter which fuel we use. We will need an energy source for the grid and with current technology I don't see that being anything other then fission. Renewables aren't going to cut it unless we are ready to accept a cut in our standard of living. We'll also need a mobile energy source for cars/ships/aircraft/etc.

      But let's not depress ourselves. I firmly believe the free market will eventually find an efficient solution to the energy problem. And if not then natural selection will eventually have found a way to filter out humans and bacteria will once again command the world Yeah!

      The only I'm depressed about is that the free market seems to be more interested in short term profits then in long term survivability. Kinda blows the Libertarian theory of private ownership (they allegedly have an incentive to make sure the land/resource/etc is productive in the long term) out of the water :( I'm not depressed about the human race. One way or another we will solve the energy question. I think the future lies in the atom. In 25-50 years I'll tell you if I was right.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    366. Re:The Netherlands by Negatyfus · · Score: 1

      Dude. I don't even plan to be alive when I hit 50. Why stretch it?

    367. Re:The Netherlands by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      scared of foreigners ? America is full of them :)

      Think of it like this: the Netherlands has been raping and pillaging the world at large for hundreds of years and it's time to pay the ferryman.

      No, we do not have a 'god given right' to our riches, and nobody ever became less from sharing their wealth.

      Verdonk and her infantile policies have done our society more damage than many years of 'bad' immigrants have done, and on top of that she has discouraged many 'good' emigrants from coming here.

      In the 60's and 70's the Dutch bootstrapped this immigration wave themselves by inviting guest workers from Turkey, Marocco and elsewhere to come to our country to do our 'dirty work'. This because a fairly lazy generation of dutch people felt that they were too good to do this work, they'd rather sit back and have their 'uitkering' (welfare).

      Don't blame the 'foreigners', they took the chances we gave them with both hands and are to date for the most part pretty hard working people. Sure there are exceptions, but it would surprise me if for every 'bad' foreigner I could not find 2 'bad' dutchmen. And those are the ones that vote for Verdonk.

    368. Re:The Netherlands by AkaXakA · · Score: 1

      Actually, you were right on that the first time. The Netherlands doesn't appear to allow dual nationality.

      They do. I have it.

    369. Re:The Netherlands by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Nice deranged rant. While I won't dispute the incentive for producers to increase consumption, the capitalist system also requires and enforces moderation. Consistently consuming above one's means leads to bankruptcy. This is true for everyone, unlike socialist systems where consumption is largely checked only by political power. "Consume only what you need" is vague, and those with pull always end up "needing" more than those without. On the other hand, "consume only what you can afford from your income" keeps economic activity in check--if one overconsumes, with the help of abundant credit, then one soon loses their credit, wealth, assets, and purchasing ability when the repo man comes to take their property away and Best Buy cuts up their credit cards. (If you genuinely need more than you can afford from your income and you can't anticipate any increase in your income to justify borrowing now and paying later, as students do when they borrow to pay for university expenses, then there is perhaps a flaw in pure capitalism for your situation. Most capitalist economies have systems, public and private, to care for these people.)

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    370. Re:The Netherlands by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      Brilliant... in which case you go to the AMA, just like I suggested as a second option. Or does pointing out several venues with various backgrounds now count against a point?

      In fact, the specific reason I cited both was because had I cited the AMA only, somebody would have ranted against the scientists as being part of the medical-industrial complex that denies our connection to nature or some such crap. Interesting how you just pick the one you disagree with, apparantly just to be disagreeable. I hand you both practical and spiritual *and* science and medical based sources and you choose the one you disagree with and ignore that I suggested the other as well.

      --
      Evan "Married to a quantum chemist, and she's not part of any religion or conspiracy, nor are her fellow researchers".

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    371. Re:The Netherlands by spun · · Score: 1

      Nice theory. If true, why are so many citizebns and our Federal government so deeply in debt? Why are we consuming over 1/4 the world's resources with about 5% of the world's population? Just because you choose not to look at the intricacies of our socio-economic system does not make it black and white. I'm not denying that there are incentives not to over spend. I'm talking about the subtle incentives that keep people striving for more and more material things when research shows that human connections, not material things, increase happiness. These social incentives benefit the owning class.

      You have called what I wrote a deranged rant, but you haven't refuted any of my points. Why the ad hominems? Does discussion of these types of issues cause you cognitive dissonance? Is it hard to hear theories that contradict your world view? Perhaps you identify strongly with the owning class and hate to see their favored paradigm called into question?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    372. Re:The Netherlands by rthille · · Score: 1

      I'm too lazy to properly attribute this, but...
      "Evil happens when good men do nothing"

      Sounds like you're just as guilty as everyone else, at least they were yelling, you were just watching, right?

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    373. Re:The Netherlands by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      How about the fact that there is fetal marijuana dependency? If it is solely a compulsive issue, why do newborn babies go through withdrawl?

      It's hard to find a good non-JAMA citation for dependency (i.e., not a scare-monger site run for the "War on Drugs"). JAMA is not online without a login; if you have a decent library or University nearby, I'd use their resources. There is some information, however, in the AMA's report on medical marijuana, which is online:

      Depending on the measures and age group studied, 4% to 9% of marijuana users fulfill diagnostic criteria for substance dependence. Although some marijuana users develop dependence, they appear to be less likely to do so than users of alcohol and nicotine, and the abstinence syndrome is less severe.4,188,190 Like other drugs, dependence is more likely to occur in individuals with co-morbid psychiatric conditions.

      Note that the article is not anti-marijuana. It dismisses the claims that marijuana is a gateway drug and questions several of the health effects such as it being an immunosuppressant (it may be, but the studies are not conclusive, and many other drugs are immunosuppressive and in common use). 4) Joy JE, Watson S Jr, Benson JA Jr, eds. Marijuana and Medicine. Assessing the Science Base. Division of Neuroscience and Behavioral Health, Institute of Medicine. National Academy Press: Washington, DC; 1999
      188) Hall W, Solowij N. Adverse effects of cannabis. Lancet. 1998;352:1611-1616.
      190) Anthony JC, Warner LA, Kessler RC. Comparative epidemiology of dependence on tobacco, alcohol, controlled substances, and inhalants: basic findings from the National Comorbidity Survey. Exp Clin Psychopharmacology. 1994;2:244-268.

      That's pretty much as deep into this argument as I'd like to get on Slashdot, but there's plenty there to spend an hour or three digging at a local library if you'd like to know more. Like some other hotly disputed topics (gun control, abortion statistics), Google isn't much use here unless you're simply looking for quotes to support your own preconceptions. Personally, I've read about cannabinoid dependency in reputable journals and am fairly satisfied it exists and isn't a major problem, even among users. Some of the receptors have been identified; it's quite possible there will be withdrawl medications, although dependency is fairly rare even in active users (as I've stated several times) so there's the question as to how useful a withdrawl drug would be. A much more likely outcome of the research will be a class of medications that use the cannabinoid receptors to produce beneficial effects without the adverse side effects or dosing issues related to marijuana use.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    374. Re:The Netherlands by fyngyrz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is true, but legalizing drugs doesn't just effect the people that are going to use them. It will effect(sic) society as a whole.

      Certainly it will; because the law being in place has raised the crime level hugely, removing it will drop the crime level the same degree, if not more. Because the law has raised the prices, drug users spend more on drugs than they would otherwise, and those of limited funds tend to steal, which they would have to do less if drugs were priced like any other commodity. Cops would lose a lot of justification for their jobs and have to do real work, like patrolling the neighborhood, the DEA and several other TLA's would have to be disbanded, taxpayers would save billions of dollars in taxes (and drug prices), jails would be relieved of a huge burden of inmates... yes, legalizing drugs will certainly have an effect on society, I agree. :/

      On the other hand, responding to the argument that society should have the right to regulate drug use, I would say that it does not as a clear matter of personal liberty. However, should I stipulate that this was a reasonable thing to regulate (I reiterate, it is not), this does not produce any possible rationale that it is also reasonable to regulate glassware that has other uses besides drug use, even if the only other uses might be artistic. If drug use is to be banned, then ban it. Don't ban speech about drugs, don't ban bags that could carry drugs, glassware that could prepare or route drugs, don't ban research into drugs. These things are perversions of liberty brought about by... irrationality. Today, drug use is already illegal. That's enough (it's too flipping much, in point of fact.) There is no need to go on a rampage and make peripheral law. If someone uses drugs, bust them. Done. End of story. You've already trampled on their liberties, punished them for their pursuit of happiness, why not be satisfied with that? Why go and litter the legal landscape with ridiculous peripheral activities that are not punishment for drug use?

      If anyone can start taking something like cocaine or heroine (even in small doses), addiction will climb and so will the care of the people addicted, which will mean higher prices for health care for us.

      Anyone can start taking heroin. Which completely destroys your argument. I'm about 3 minutes from a dealer I know I can get heroin from. It isn't the law that prevents me from going there; it is a personal choice.

      Additionally: Drug laws don't (can't!) stop such behaviors. They punish them, which is something else entirely. Regardless, the taking of heroin is no reason to outlaw the use of needles, the purchase of spoons, matches, plastic tubing, and band-aids. Taking heroin is already illegal. Be satisfied with that. You can punish the poor sap for exercising his pursuit of happiness. That's what you wanted, and you surely do have it. Leave the rest of society alone, would you?

      As for the "higher prices for health care for the rest of us", if you elect to pay for said poor sap's addiction, then you are a fool, frankly. I would never, ever support such an idea.

      Self-inflicted injuries are clearly one's own responsibility. If you stab yourself with a rusty nail, cut your finger off by hacking at it repeatedly with a knife, or dive into an empty swimming pool, I would simply laugh and let you expire, or otherwise suffer. If you can pay for your care, that's fine. But I would not attempt to legislate knives, pools, or nails out of the realm of legal to possess items just because you are an idiot. Again, we're back to the problems with a mommy government. If mommy insists on fixing every injury, no matter how it is acquired, by stealing our allowance, as it were (taxes) then she is forcing us to either glue everyone to a backboard so they cannot under exercise of free will injure themselves or even take a chance of

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    375. Re:The Netherlands by Starholmer · · Score: 1

      What kind of "American" uses the term "motorbike"? Sounds like a plant from a Canadian or some pro-EU crazy.

      They are called motorcycles.

      "28 days of holiday", sorry that is called vacation in "America".

      If you are going to post as if you a transplanted US IT worker, at least get the vernacular right.

    376. Re:The Netherlands by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1


      Driver's license was cheap, but I had to wait in line at DMV for 2 hours, study for an exam, do the exam, wait 6 months until I could take a driving test... I was still able to drive legally during this time with a provisional license.

      They're just trying to give you a taste of live in the US hoping you'll change your mind and go back.

    377. Re:The Netherlands by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Research seems to suggest that you will change your mind once you are 50.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    378. Re:The Netherlands by Carnildo · · Score: 1
      The overuse of the term "addiction" is sorta funny, though. I especially like the concept of people being addicted to sex. All "addicted" really means these days is that you enjoy something. Being against addiction now just means you're opposed to anything that's fun.


      Actually, what they're discovering is that psychological addiction is an abnormal reaction to any pleasurable stimulus: you really can get addicted to anything that's fun. Physical addiction, where the body's biochemistry incorporates a substance into its normal operations, is an entirely different matter. Drugs tend to activate both mechanisms, which is why they're so easy to get addicted to.
      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    379. Re:The Netherlands by Prien715 · · Score: 1

      I believe German is.

      Consider:

      Ich trinke Bier.
      Ich tranke Bier.
      Ich habe Bier getrunken.

      (I drink beer.
        I drank beer.
        I have beer drunk
      (ge + verb + t is like the english verb + ed. "Bier" btw is pronounced "Beer".))

      It's no accident that English and German have irregular verbs in common. Dutch is similar to German, but I believe German is more similar.

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    380. Re:The Netherlands by somersault · · Score: 1

      I always thought that Canada would be one of the places that I would move to if I ever left Scotland. The other would be Japan, just because they tend to get the cool technology first, but it's rather expensive. My girlfriend is Canadian but she wants to be a tourist for a while, so it could be a while before I get to live there. Hehe.

      I assume that Texans get in easier because they're working in the oil industry? I work in Aberdeen, which is probably the oil capital of Europe, and a lot of companies here tend to have branches in Houston too, so I assume that's the oil capital of the US.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    381. Re:The Netherlands by writermike · · Score: 1

      Simply visiting a country on vacation does not give you the proper insight.

      How true.

      It's really the same with everything -- a house, a city, a relationship. You never know what it's going to be like until you're in it day-to-day. Most people seem to experience that early euphoria that comes with most new situations and believe it will hang around for ever. "This is the best job I've ever had" "What a wonderful woman. There's NOTHING wrong with her."

      But usually it really doesn't hang around. The happy feelings subside and fade away into the mundane. That's how it's SUPPOSED to be, though. People who continue to charge after that euphoria again and again usually wind up with addictive personalities and destroy their lives.

      --
      If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
    382. Re:The Netherlands by fyngyrz · · Score: 1
      I hand you both practical and spiritual *and* science and medical based sources and you choose the one you disagree with and ignore that I suggested the other as well.

      I disagreed with the (cough) "spiritual source" because I think it is a harmful suggestion. It would be somewhat silly for me to disagree with the AMA, and sure enough, I didn't.

      I could say "well, you could go to a voodoo man or a doctor to get your cold cured", and I would expect derisive laughs at (a) the suggestion to go to a voodoo man, (b) the stupidity of holding them up as solutions of apparently equal value, at least equal enough that I felt it warranted mention without further qualification (like, select voodoo if you aren't the least interested in being cured), (c) the very mention of voodoo.

      How does this apply in your case? This way: You brought up AlAnon. I'm laughing at you, because you were clueless to do so, IMHO. The only relevance of the AMA in this context is that you thought to juxtapose them as if they were actually comparable, and yes, I'm laughing at you for that as well. Oh yeah, and because you mentioned AlAnon.

      By the way, why did you leave out the voodoo man? I'm just asking. :)

      ...does pointing out several venues with various backgrounds now count against a point?

      No, not at all. Pointing out superstitious venues counts against you. You could have said "AMA or your local doctor" and I wouldn't have thought to make a remark at all.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    383. Re:The Netherlands by teflaime · · Score: 1

      I lived in LA for several years and didn't notice Latinos being harder workers. In fact, the janitorial staff at my office was almost all Latino and they never did their jobs. The office was often filthy, the simple tasks required of a janitor going undone. Furthermore, of the 30 some janitorial staff that were Latino, all had been there for at least 5 years, and yet only 1 of them had bothered to learn English. Furthermore, at least in LA, there was a massive backlash from illegal latinos against their children learning English. There were charter schools popping up all over the place that taught Spanish language cirriculum so these people who only wanted American money, but didn't want to become a part of America, could send their children to some place more fitting their designs. Not to mention the large number of Latinos who regard themselves as Mexican and Southern California as part of Mexico. I see no good in allowing these people who refuse to integrate and become Americans, rather than Mexicans living in the US, to continue to come unchecked and work as they please.

    384. Re:The Netherlands by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Interesting post. I especially liked the link to TPR. You'll probably never read this response, but if you do, please consider not posting anonymously. It's such a waste of good posting material!

    385. Re:The Netherlands by gronnsak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "This is true, but legalizing drugs doesn't just effect the people that are going to use them. It will effect society as a whole."

      Of course, more on that below.

      "If anyone can start taking something like cocaine or heroine (even in small doses), addiction will climb and so will the care of the people addicted, which will mean higher prices for health care for us."

      Do you have any evidence that supports that addiction rates will climb? Seem like run-of-the-mill anti-drug hysteria to me.

      "Not only that, but what about the people that decide to drive while stoned/high? There are enough people in this world killing the innocent while drunk..I don't think we need to add even more due to being high."

      People drive under the influence of drugs right now. Legalizing won't make any difference. Irresponsible drivers are the real problem here, drugs and alcohol are just what they use.

      "If drugs were ever legalized, we would also need a registration program. That registration program would allow potential employers to decide whether or not to hire you based on your legal drug usage."

      How would you like it if you were denied a job because you're doing a perfectly legal activity in your own free time? A registration program? WTF? Should it include race, sexual orientation, hair color, religion, sports team preference, film taste, music taste etc. too? Wouldn't want to hire any unsavory elements.

      Here are some benefits from legalizing drugs:
      - Police resources would be freed up to go after other criminal activity
      - Border police could use more resources checking for weapons, terrorists etc.

      - Prices of drugs would drop, which would lead to...
      - Lower crime, since people don't have to commit crime to support their habits
      - The breakdown of the drug cartels and other organized crime
      - No more funding of civil wars in various drug-producing third world countries

      - Increased quality of the drugs, so less overdoses and other health problems
      - People being allowed to do what the fuck they want with their own bodies

      So you see, in addition to GP's point that using drugs is a personal issue, there are also economic and moral arguments for the legalization of drugs. The only arguments I see against legalization is that there *might* be more people using drugs. Well, that a few more people use cheap, clean drugs is easily outweighed by the fators outlined above.

    386. Re:The Netherlands by BlackCreek · · Score: 1

      Frisian is actually the second official language of the Netherlands, but is mostly restricted to the (surprise surprise) Frisian province.
      Dutch indeed is *very* close to english. So speaking English as first language, definitely should help. The trick to learn Dutch (I did) is to find ways to force the dutch to talk in dutch with you, and no that is not easy.

    387. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I like Dubya, it's about time we had a President that didn't change his position to match the current polls. I'm not surprised that Europeans have a low opinion of us, we now have a President that will do something other than make nice sound bites.

      Besides, if Europe was really all that, and a bag of chips, there would not be an America. Liberalism is the core of all of America's problems; from oil dependancy, terrorism, welfare, etc. And now, we have them screaming about giving terrorists constitutional rights, rights that only apply to US citizens. Very odd that the Left Wing Democraps would want to give terrorists such access to our courts as the terrorists are not US citizens and are specifically not protected by even the Geneva Conventions nor the Hague Convention (Hague convention which the US is not a signatory to provides for protection of uniformed military forces and use of soft-point, NOT HOLLOW POINT, ammunition. http://www.thegunzone.com/hague.html )

      We need the Republicans to stay in power and continue hunting the terrorists down and delivering some good ole fashioned Cowboy Justice!

    388. Re:The Netherlands by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      This chart claims that Dutch is closer to English.

      Have you seen any Dutch? To me, it looks like English with a lot of 'j's thrown in.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    389. Re:The Netherlands by AnotherDaveB · · Score: 1
      I'm a native dutch person and I'm very ashamed to say that the parent is more or less accurate about our current immigration policy :-(

      I don't see that you've anything to be ashamed of, the system described in the original post sounds fine to me.

    390. Re:The Netherlands by AnotherDaveB · · Score: 1
      The government will pay for you to take 3 years of free Dutch classes (maybe depending on the gemeente, but Gemeente Zuid Amsterdam certainly does as I'm currently in the program).

      I've always heard that dutch is supposed to be very difficult to learn, how have you found it?

    391. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read your post, and thanks for replying.

      I've been on Slashdot nearly since it started. If I had an account it would have a very low user number. But I've always chosen to post anonymously, simply because I value my privacy. If my posts get ignored because of it, so be it.

    392. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think it's worth noting just how difficult it is to get into a country and how many social services it can afford to offer. Do you think the Netherlands would be able to sustain all it's social programs if it had the same influx of illegals the US does? Or, would the US be able to offer more to its citizens if its borders were sealed to legal immigrants only?

      Great thread, btw.

    393. Re:The Netherlands by n0nsensical · · Score: 1

      Yes, it does, Dutch and English are definitely similar. As for whether English or German is closer, I'm not entirely sure, but I think it's right in the middle, except with pronunciation rather unlike either one. I'd also say that Dutch is becoming MORE like English because of vocabulary assimilation. Pronunciation is the biggest challenge, but I don't think any major language is much closer in that either. Again maybe German, but there are big differences between German and Dutch pronunciation too, and I think the Dutch are likely to be more friendly to someone with an English accent than a German one. ;p

    394. Re:The Netherlands by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      yes, these things happen when people (tourists included) think the only way such a thing can stop is by waiting for the police to act.

      What did *YOU* do ?

    395. Re:The Netherlands by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      By the way, why did you leave out the voodoo man? I'm just asking. :) [I assume you meant "didn't"]

      I specifically said why: because in this discussion, somebody would have jumped in with an appeal that scientists don't know what they are talking about because they are part of some sort of anti-drug conspiracy. As an example: the concept that because marijuana is natural it has to be harmless. This is a common mantra of what I refer to as "woo woo" thinking. I lived in Northern California for a time, and I've learned to quickly toss a point or two in to block off those lines of debate.

      You may not be superstitious, I may not be superstitious, but assuming that everybody in a public forum is rational and trusts the scientific process is not logical either. I tossed in a group that is not "The Man" for the people who aren't rational. Particularly when there is quite a bit of wishful thinking and questionable sources regarding the subject, citing multiple unconnected sources is a good idea. "AMA or your local doctor" would have generated a slew of comments about how the medical profession is purely interested in keeping people paying them.

      Perhaps we're both cynical, just in different ways. Regardless, we're polite about it. :)

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    396. Re:The Netherlands by Prien715 · · Score: 1

      I don't see how the chart does this; it appears to me that both modern German, Dutch, and English all have the same common root in West Germanic language family. While dutch is no farther from English than German, it is also no closer (according to the chart).

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    397. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone please mod this up!

    398. Re:The Netherlands by yusing · · Score: 1

      How much wealth you want to have is basically a measure of how much you care to tolerate the circumstances of your life being dictated to you.

      So ... are you living in America then? And if so, how well are you tolerating how you're being dictated to?

      The point of the questioner is that lesser wealth somewhere else may be preferable to living here. And while I agree with you that wealth will let you be more effective at some things, how does that make up for the time you lost gaining that wealth? Trickles wear down rock, not floods.

      --

      "You must try to forget all you have learned. You must begin to dream." -- Sherwood Anderson

    399. Re:The Netherlands by rthille · · Score: 1

      In some parts of LA, in Santa Barbara, Ventura, and SF, there's a place called 'Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf' that just burries Starbucks in quality.

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    400. Re:The Netherlands by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      I thought that the chart had meaning in the horizontal relationships -- that because English was next to Dutch, it was closer to Dutch than German, because German was seperated from Dutch by English. But you're right, the chart doesn't say whether or not horizontal spacing means anything.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    401. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As an Italian citizen I have to educate you about my country, because your post seems so superficial. :-)


      Superficial? I'd call it plainly ignorant :-\
      Someone please mod up, these are the correct figures.
    402. Re:The Netherlands by elamdaly · · Score: 0

      I'm not suggesting that we should weather Islamism by giving in to it - I'm suggesting that we should weather it by refusing to modify our open, tolerant, liberal societies in response to a spectacular but statistically insignificant level of violence.

      Again, I'm not referring to violence, but the threat of. Since the murder of Theo van Gogh, everything is judged against the risks of offending Muslims, be it with the Mo-Toons or the utterings of the Pope. England, at one point, was considering extending religious hatred laws to cover Islam, ignoring the fact that Islam is an idea, not a race(did this pass?). This is, imo, the response your saying you wish not to have. You're modifying your liberal societies so you won't be harmed.

    403. Re:The Netherlands by fishboy · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, I worked on freeing Maher Arar with his wife Mounia Mizigh a couple years ago when I was living in Ottawa. I happened to be teaching a university course on North American Geopolitics that comprised of twenty Canadians and twenty Americans from all over the continent and we met with the American ambassador Paul Celucci for a question and answer. Among other crap that fell out of his mouth, he said that global warming was 'bad science' and that if it was true it would probably be good for America anyway. I countered that the state of Florida, barely abover sea level probably didn't share his enthusiasm to which he replied that he wasn't running for office in Florida so why should he care. We lobbied the ambassador for information that led to Arar's release. The result of the Maher Inquiry is that the American administration acted solely outside of diplomatic channels and the State Department lied to Canadian officials throughout the entire rendition. Canada issued a formal diplomatic letter this month to protest the unilateral action that took place despite long-standing treaties on the issue, the highest form of diplomatic complaint. You are correct in certain respects to be wary of Canada with respect to US policy of course. There aren't two economies on earth that are more integrated than ours. Over 80% of Canadian goods flow south. Our best known Prime Minister, Pierre E Trudeau, once quipped after a poor meeting with Nixon that "when you sleep beside an elephant and the elephant sneezes, you catch a cold". Nixon berated Deifenbaker, "don't you come down here and piss on my rug." American interests own the rights to many Canadian resources and companies, a phenomenon that accelerated greatly during the nineties when the Canadian dollar sat below 70 cents for a long period of time. It would be impossible for us to be completely independent of US policy. We are vulnerable on trade issues because we are the smaller partner in the largest trade alliance in the world. Many industry policies are harmonised across the border. In the post-war period Canada had its own automobile, food, and appliance manufacturers but all were bought out by huge American corporations. But we have a staunchly independent parliament that isn't afraid of turning down US overtures on missiles defense, GMO food, drug policy, border issues, and wins NAFTA panel arguments regularly. You can't pack a handgun here. Violent crime, the murder rate, and the incarceration rate is one-tenth per capita south of the border. If you want a real contrast, go live in Quebec where views on justice, the role of the state, foreign policy, sexual orientation, and drug addiction treatment are all wildly different than in the United States, not to mention the linguistic nuances (you can exist completely in English in many parts of the province including Montréal, the second-largest french city in the world after Paris). Canadian cities rate much higher on the livability scale and have not been prone to the real estate bubble that will soon wipe out trillions of value off the US market. Don't get me wrong, it ain't paradise up here or anything. But many of the big problems the US has run into we have learned from. I don't lock my doors of my house or my car. Government policy has placed the collective good above individual rights while protecting minorities. Toronto is the most multicultural city on the planet. Canada doesn't have a Vietnam or a Bay of Pigs or an Iraq. Mistakes have been made-- it's an egalitarian experiment that has its good and bad moments. And make no mistake, it is not America up here.

    404. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, you dutch bastards owe the world having yourselves ethnically replaced by high-breeding muslims, as penance for the genocide of the original britons, along with your saxon cousins. Please defeat your nationalistic politicians, you don't deserve anybody fighting for your continued existence. In fact, kill yourself now, and if you have a wife give her to a muslim migrant, and castrate your male children. I'm sick of your existance, and rejoice with glee at the prospect of people like you giving your lives for muslims, eradicate your nation ;)

    405. Re:The Netherlands by d.valued · · Score: 1

      My choices on where to go would be:

      1. Canada. Already have a citizenship there, enjoy the smoke-easies, sane media, friendly culture, and much less likely to get whacked.
      2. A major city in Western Europe. Already have a citizenship there (well, in an EU country, anyways), understand enough of most of the languages to get into a barfight (though, of course, the true test of fluency is getting *out* of one), (usually) good food, very urban (sorry- couldn't get used to being on a farm), no need for a car, less chance of natural disaster, tons of football on TV.
      3. Australia or New Zealand. English speakers, Christmas barbeques, New Year's in shorts and bikinis, close enough to HK to get new Jackie Chan films quickly (on a weekend trip up there).
      4. Shanghai. Cheap living (in US dollars by western standards), tons of expats, chance to learn Shanghainese if I have the lack of life I do here (the only "dialect" of Chinese that is the least tonal (like most languages, it's bitonal).

      Why don't I leave?

      Mainly, the reason's fiscal. I'm up to my ears in debt, which I am slowly but surely working off. It takes money or a set job to pick up and move halfway around the world. American dollars don't stretch as far as they used to, either. For example, at the Sydney Olympics, USD 1 was roughly AUD 2. Now, it takes USD 0.75 to buy an Aussie dollar. When the Euro was finally unveiled, I went to my bank and bought EUR 35 of uncirculated banknotes for under $32; I wish I had bought more, since the current exchange rate is roughly USD 1.25 to EUR 1 (as opposed to the USD 0.85 to EUR 1 of four years ago).

      Next, I haven't given up on America. Granted, the past six years have been marked by a rubberstamp Congress and a Supreme Court which is unstable in its decisions, but assuming the people who voted the wrong way (as in "against their own best interests") wake the f*** up and punch a different number on the ballot, we stand a chance of fixing some of the more egregious problems.

      I'm lucky in that I have at least the theoretical escape hatches my foreign citizenships give me, but unless this country gets really bad, I'm not going to give up.

      Until the draft starts up and they ban the HOPE conferences, in which case me and my Volvo-driving, New York Times-reading, green-tea-drinking, Wal-Mart-hating, organic-eating, hemp-wearing, homebrewing, long-haired, antifundamentalist liberal ass shifts into fifth and hightails it outta here.

      --
      I used to be someone else. Now I'm someone better.
      Real life is underrated.
    406. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Psychotic breaks. My brother smoked dope (and did nothing else), on a daily basis. Several times a day. One day we came home and he was guarding the house with a cricket bat, because he thought that a next door neighbour from our childhood was coming to arrest him. This went on for several days - with several other paranoid delusions, until he was admitted as an inpatient. Counsellors, psychiatrists, etc all pointed to the abuse of marijuana.

      Anecdotal, will scream defenders. Sure.

      I smoke marijuana too. Occasionally. So I know it's not all bad.

      But I'm really fucking sick of the "not one person has ever ever died as the result of marijuana" crap. People die when they crash cars drunk. People do things they would not (or would be less) inclined to do on any "altering" substance (clue there: name).

      "Use it responsibly". Good start. "Should we ban alcohol because people get drunk and die?" No. We shouldn't. But we shouldn't act like ostriches with heads in the sand, because there is no way to more easily rile a certain group of people than to even faintly hint that their might be the slightest possible negative consequence to using their wonderdrug, THC.

    407. Re:The Netherlands by dcam · · Score: 1

      As a final note, I recently sent my entire team (10 Dutch guys) back to the US for training on our product. It was in the SF Bay Area and they all had a great time. The weather was perfect, the people were nice, and they all particular enjoyed Starbucks (the Dutch are huge coffee drinkers). When they all came back, each and every one of them pointedly asked me why the hell I would move here and leave San Francisco. It was nice validation for me and the US and makes me even more anixous to one day return.

      But clearly not discerning coffee drinkers.

      While I haven't been to the US, all of the people I have spoken to about have complained about lack of good coffee. Starbucks is terrible coffee.

      --
      meh
    408. Re:The Netherlands by rtechie · · Score: 1

      Funny how when Americans say that about Hispanic immigrants we are called racists and bigots.

      This is because the situation is different. Most hispanic immigrants *DO* make serious efforts to blend into society. The white power crowd simply doesn't like the fact that latinos are rapidly pushing out whites as the majority population in the USA. These people are idiots and will never accomplish anything. Personally, I think we should deport THOSE people, preferably into the sea.

    409. Re:The Netherlands by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      I dunno about crap, but they do lay on the trendiness pretty thick.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    410. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the thing that stops from the moving to Holland is a) the money to move and b) it is harder to get permits when you are over 45.

      If you are looking in to moving to the E.U., do it before you get old!!!!!!!!

      I loved America.

      I do miss it so.

    411. Re:The Netherlands by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      That's one of the good things about the right to bear arms. People always have to wonder if someone has a concealed weapon, and risk getting capped if they start some shit.

      Yes, but the downside is that every fist fight turns into a shootout.

    412. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything you just said is bullshit.

      No one is going to legalize highly adictive drugs here. Grass is fine. Accept it and deal with it because it's will eventually be legalized.

      Driving on Sudophed is as bad or worse for many than driving while high. (not that driving while high or intoxicated in any way should be discouraged.) It makes it very difficult for me to even function.

      If laws do change, people will not. Most of the people who want to use drugs are using them already. Society will not change all that much...except we won't be filling prisons with bullshit "offenders" and we can concentrate on our more violent problems.

      Shove your registration program. Thats all we need is another program to track what we do.
      Yes, privacy is still a big deal to many. If yours is not important then I suggest you go live somewhere else.

      We are supposed to be guaranteed life, liberty, and the persuit of happiness in the U.S. (yea right) That basically translates to "the right to be left alone".

      If you want to feel all safe and cozy then go away and live by yourself. I'll take choice over your "right" to feel safe everytime.

    413. Re:The Netherlands by xpherion · · Score: 1

      if you are a cracker you can live any where in the world.

    414. Re:The Netherlands by FishinDave · · Score: 1

      Didn't I read somewhere that immigrants to the Netherlands must take a tutorial on public nudity? Might be worth the other indignities! ;-)

    415. Re:The Netherlands by fferreres · · Score: 1

      The problem with Hispanics is that they are not allowed to that country, nor allowed to blend into society. They re tolerated because they are needed...

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    416. Re:The Netherlands by couchslug · · Score: 1

      If a tourist gets involved, they take the extra risk of being a foreigner going against a local. From what I read in the US, there is essentially no right to intervene with force if one is a civilian in the UK. If I'm over there and see a similar incident, I'd quietly leave. Why take an ass-beating and a trip to the slammer for being stupid?
      Back home, I know there is strong support for lawful intervention, and if necessary I can use armed force. In the US, many police would like to see civilians shoot violent felons, and privately give tips on smart use of firearms.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    417. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Virtually no concept of sexual harassment

      I was following along with you, but had to think twice about this. Italian men sexually harrass all women. I think your "no concept" part means, you can get away with rubbing your crotch on a girl when she's at a drinking fountain. Perv.

    418. Re:The Netherlands by Impotent_Emperor · · Score: 1

      His mother sold his identity?! Man, that sounds like the shittiest mother in the world.

    419. Re:The Netherlands by kz45 · · Score: 1

      "Why? Because you think drugs aren't a good thing? Well, then we need a registration program for those who pursue religion, so employers could decide to hire you if you depend on an imaginary friend for advice... great idea, huh? Not! If an employee can do the job you need them to do in the manner you want it done, and they do not interfere with your operations otherwise, where is your justification for denying that person work? I mean, other than blatant favoritism and prejudice? "

      No, because as an employer, I don't want to have to hire someone that won't be able to do his job properly because he just got done smoking a joint, shooting up, or snorting some coke (even though it may seem like you are doing okay when you are high..you probably aren't). Not to mention the added health care issues involved with drug use (costing an employer more money than someone that is not using drugs).

      If drugs are so great and safe..why should this be a problem?

      "People do this all the time. The fact that they are rarely arrested for doing so should tell you something."

      hmm..now who's pulling figures out of his ass. Care to back this up?

      "Did you know that the world market for illicit drugs is not only larger than the market for alcohol, it is larger than the oil industry?"

      I will clue you in on something. Anything deemed illegal will have a large market. Because it is so difficult to obtain, the price will also be very high (simple economics here). This has nothing to do drugs. I bet the market for counterfeit money and child porn are also very high..should they be legalized too?

      "Why is it then that the HUGE number of evil pot-smokers aren't being pulled over left and right? Could it be, just possibly, that smoking pot does not result in a loss of the ability to drive at an average level of competence?"

      It could be because the people that smoke pot are the same type of people that have had their licenses suspended (and not driving) or they are kids that don't have a license yet.

      "Could it be that people who are on acid, heroin, and other "big guns" are so far out of it that they generally couldn't drive if they wanted to?

      Or could it be that alcohol has the unusual characteristic of tossing one's inhibitions to the winds along with one's abilities to be competent physically, whereas many (most) other drugs do not?"

      No, more people are pulled over for drinking because it's legal in every country in the world. 99% of the population over the age of 21 in the US most likely has been to a bar and gotten drunk at some point in time (and possibly even younger).

      A percentage of those people have driven drunk.

      99% of the population certainly hasn't tried an illegal drug. Just on statistics alone, you can see that there are less people that would have been driving while on that illegal drug.

      "I mean, it's not the law, is it? Because the penalties for drunk driving are getting right up there these days (as they certainly should.)"

      Not sure where you were even headed with this. Are you on drugs right now?

    420. Re:The Netherlands by Ulven · · Score: 1

      Must... do... more... research... before... posting...

    421. Re:The Netherlands by unitron · · Score: 1
      "Addicted: physically and mentally dependent on a particular substance, and unable to stop taking it without incurring adverse effects"

      A definition that broad covers your paycheck, or air.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    422. Re:The Netherlands by kz45 · · Score: 1

      "How would you like it if you were denied a job because you're doing a perfectly legal activity in your own free time? A registration program? WTF? Should it include race, sexual orientation, hair color, religion, sports team preference, film taste, music taste etc. too? Wouldn't want to hire any unsavory elements."

      You use the drugs at home, yes. But the effects don't wear off right away. This is why there should be a registration program. As an employer, I don't feel I should have to hire someone that is costing me more money through health care, a liability to me (if they come in high and damage something), or a liability to others (if they come in high/paranoid and kill/hurt customers/co-workers).

      Companies that have a health insurance policy many times make you go through drug tests (and will drop you if you fail). This would be no different.

      Here are some benefits from legalizing drugs:
      "- Police resources would be freed up to go after other criminal activity

      - Border police could use more resources checking for weapons, terrorists etc."

      The resources that were freed up would soon be gone due to all of the new addicts going through our hospitals.

      "- Lower crime, since people don't have to commit crime to support their habits"

      people would still commit crimes. Even if drugs were very cheap..a person addicted will eventually use all of their money and still need to commit crimes to get more. We might actually see more drug related deaths as a result, because you can get a lot more for a lot less.

      "- The breakdown of the drug cartels and other organized crime"

      There will always be organized crime around. If the big drugs were legalized, I'm sure there would be new synthetic drugs that were made illegal and the cycle would start again. Also, organized criminals don't just focus on drugs. You would have to make everything illegal legal to stop organized crime. This is why it is called crime and not a business.

      "- People being allowed to do what the fuck they want with their own bodies"

      If it were just about your body, it would be fine..but it's not. The fact that you don't see this is astonishing to me.

      "So you see, in addition to GP's point that using drugs is a personal issue, there are also economic and moral arguments for the legalization of drugs. The only arguments I see against legalization is that there *might* be more people using drugs. Well, that a few more people use cheap, clean drugs is easily outweighed by the fators outlined above."

      Basically, it seems like you just want a way to get your drugs easier. Also, you need a history lesson. Every illegal drug was once legal (hell..in the US, there was cocaine toothpaste and doctor's prescribed ectasy in the 80s). They were all made illegal for a reason..you should put the bong down and pickup a book sometime.

    423. Re:The Netherlands by mrogers · · Score: 1

      I agree, we're making more changes than we should (including the religious hatred law), and if the goal is to avoid conflict with extremists then it won't work.

    424. Re:The Netherlands by caluml · · Score: 1
      But they will be jealous of me in 15 years


      It'd be a shame if you were dead in 10 years, and you'd wasted all this time on this earth.

    425. Re:The Netherlands by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      I've spent several years reading up on this topic (New Scientist, journals, web), and I've never, once, ever seen an article that showed evidence for a physiological cannabis dependency that wasn't subsequently trashed (for poor experimental procedure) or that wasn't unsupported by follow-up studies.

      I'm not saying you're provably wrong here, but the mainstream medical opinion of health professionals around the world is that cannabis is physiologically totally non-addictive.

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    426. Re:The Netherlands by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      Mainstream medical opinion agrees with me, though.

      And besides:

      "No one would argue that marijuana is as addictive as alcohol or cocaine. However, it's wrong to say that it is not at all addictive. More and more studies are finding that marijuana has addictive properties."

      Doesn't discriminate between physiological and psychological. Common when people who disapprove of it are talking about cannabis, since saying "it's as addictive as shopping or chocolate" doesn't have quite the same scary edge as implying "it's addictive like heroin".

      "Both animal and human studies show physical and psychological withdrawal symptoms from marijuana, including irritability, restlessness, insomnia, nausea and intense dreams."

      Indeed. However, physiological withdrawal symptoms after a prolonged bout of heavy use != physiologically addictive.

      I've known "addicted" people who got restless, irritable and had sleeping problems when they were denied the opportunity to gamble or go shopping for long periods of time.

      Oh, and since cannabis is an proven nausea suppressant it's entirely possible that it was just masking whatever else was making them feel nauseus. Take two paracetamol every day for a year then stop, and see if it doesn't "cause" you to start having headaches.

      Hell, I get cranky and restless if I can't code for a few days. Does that mean I'm physiologically addicted to coding? How, exactly?

      "Tolerance to marijuana also builds up rapidly. Heavy users need 8 times higher doses to get the same effects as infrequent users."

      Metabolites of TCH and other cannabinoids also stay in your system in appreciable amounts for as long as several days (and in detectable amounts for a month or more), which might explain why tolerance builds up.

      Happily, with a break of as little as a few days your tolerance drops right off again, to the point if you don't smoke for a couple of weeks to a month you can regress right back to the "first-time giggling stoner" stereotype again.

      Or so a friend told me. Right? Right.

      "For a small percentage of people who use it, marijuana can be highly addictive. It is estimated that 10% to 14% of users will become heavily dependent. More than 120,000 people in the US seek treatment for marijuana addiction every year. Because the consequences of marijuana use can be subtle and insidious, it is more difficult to recognize signs of addiction."

      Doesn't distinguish between psychological and physiological addiction. Again.

      And from anecdotal evidence I'd strongly question the figure of 10-14%. Strongly question.

      "Cultural and societal beliefs that marijuana cannot be addictive make it less likely for people to seek help or to get support for quitting."

      I think this says it all - "cultural and societal" beliefs. Not "myths", "urban legends", "common misconceptions", but the mainstream belief in our society and culture.

      IE, the mainstream opinion in our culture and society, informed by scientific study in the area, and in spite of a constant government-sponsored factually unsupported propaganda campaigns over the last few decades... is that pot is non-physically-addictive.

      But don't believe doctors, scientists and the entirety of the educated world in it. Listen to us. We're telling you on our website that everyone else is wrong. And providing no evidence to back it up. Trust us.

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    427. Re:The Netherlands by Nutria · · Score: 1
      It's what they're being allowed to do, by a society that prefers the cheap thrill of confrontation to the long struggle of toleration.

      ?????????????

      I'm not suggesting that we should weather Islamism by giving in to it - I'm suggesting that we should weather it by refusing to modify our open, tolerant, liberal societies in response to a spectacular but statistically insignificant level of violence.

      Statistically insignificant levels of violence grow into statistically significant levels of violence if you tolerate it.

      Tony Blair said the right words: if you imigrate to the West, you are generally expected to live by the West's values; otherwise, GO HOME!!!!!

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    428. Re:The Netherlands by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      I've seen people jump off bus shelters, break their knuckles fighting with a lamppost, piss themselves or make out with someone not of their preferred sex, under the influence only of alcohol.

      What's your point?

      LSD is a strong hallucinogen, even in small quantities. Cannabis has mildly sense-altering effects: visual artifacts only really kick in at astronomically high doses, by which point the user is too wasted to do anything anyway.

      Hell, you'll get better hallucinations form Absinthe or good Tequila than you ever will from pot.

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    429. Re:The Netherlands by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      Heh. Employ them growing hemp to make clothes, houses, paper, you name it.

      Mmmmm... irony.....

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    430. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I was following along with you, but had to think twice about this. Italian men sexually harrass all women. I think your "no concept" part means, you can get away with rubbing your crotch on a girl when she's at a drinking fountain. Perv.


      This happens all over the world, OTOH we are not (yet) so dumb to take seriously every other phrase when it's a joke and thanks God we do not fire people for stupid things. It seems to me that you guys are hostages of your own propaganda to be politically correct even at cost of looking plainly dumb.
    431. Re:The Netherlands by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      Any decent Italian place that knows how to make a decent Espresso, for example. (hint: decent Espressos come in shotglass-like serving sizes, not in an 8 oz. cup).



      Anyway. Starbucks is good for coffee-flavored deserts. For real coffee, go somewhere else.

    432. Re:The Netherlands by htd2 · · Score: 1

      Don't move anywhere that is less than 35 feet above current mean sea level. That rules out Holland.

    433. Re:The Netherlands by mrogers · · Score: 1
      Tony Blair said the right words: if you imigrate to the West, you are generally expected to live by the West's values; otherwise, GO HOME!!!!!

      What would "go home" mean for the London bombers, who were all born in Britain?

    434. Re:The Netherlands by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      The problem with Hispanics is that they are not allowed to that country, nor allowed to blend into society. They re tolerated because they are needed...

      Not allowed? That's the issue that most Americans have with Latin American immigration. A lot of them don't bother to do it legally.

      I have a friend from Canada who wants to immigrate to the US. She has a masters degree, speaks three languages and has a promise of employment. When it takes her 12 months just to go through the red tape while a Mexican day laborer is allowed to sneak across the border and work under the table -- all the while the Government refusing to do anything about it -- we have a serious problem.

      I don't have a problem with Hispanics or anybody else retaining their own culture. Historically speaking assimilation is a two-way street. I do have a serious problem with them breaking the law to get here in the first place.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    435. Re:The Netherlands by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      This is because the situation is different. Most hispanic immigrants *DO* make serious efforts to blend into society. The white power crowd simply doesn't like the fact that latinos are rapidly pushing out whites as the majority population in the USA. These people are idiots and will never accomplish anything. Personally, I think we should deport THOSE people, preferably into the sea.

      Bullshit! You are blaming the hostility towards illegal immigrants on "white power"? That's offensive and completely out of line. I don't care about how fast they blend into society. Assimilation is a two-way street and they will influence us just as much as we influence them. There's no problem with that. What I do care about is the fact that most of them are here illegally.

      How can I have any respect for somebody that breaks the law to get here? I don't care what color they are. If they broke the law to get here then they need to be deported. And if they get amnesty for doing so then I would like the chance to commit a "free" crime and escape punishment.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    436. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry Jacquesm you are completely wrong.
      In the 60's and 70's several industries had difficulty hiring people because they couldn't pay a decent wage.
      Which is when the government allowed these companies to hire so called guest workers who were prepared to work for much lower wages then the working Dutch population.
      It wasn't because Dutch people were lazy, or because they didn't want to do the "dirty work".
      It's one of those myths that keeps getting floated about to somehow justify these guest workers utter backwardness and unwillingness to integrate or give back to the society which so graciously offered them a job and a decent way of life.

    437. Re:The Netherlands by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      No, because as an employer, I don't want to have to hire someone that won't be able to do his job properly because he just got done smoking a joint (etc.)

      That is ridiculous. Simply set a company rule, no intoxication at work. Coming to work drunk is already a firing offense, which is perfectly reasonable. As an employer, I'm sure you already have this in place, do you not? I do — I run a software company, a literary agency, a martial arts studio, a recording studio and a lingerie outlet. I have lots of employees that run the gamut from scientists to artists to kids still in high school. I know for a fact there are numerous drug users in the bunch, with a strong bias towards drinkers, but there are quite a few stoners as well. No one is allowed to come to work high, drunk, or hung over, with the single exception of the musicians who hire the recording studio, and who are not, technically speaking, my employees, but rather my clients. Such a compromise is a firing offense, and I have zero tolerance for it. I've never had to exercise the rule, and I've never experienced degraded work product I could attribute to drugs. In other words, I have reasonable policies, and I obtain reasonable performance, all without having to act as arbiter of anyone's pursuit of happiness which strictly impinges on their own time.

      Today, people drink legally. There is no "registration" for these people, and "as an employer", there is little doubt that you have hired people who drink (unless your business is so small that you basically have no turnover.) As alcohol has far more deleterious effects than most drugs, particularly with regard to medical care costs, I'd say your concerns about medical care are misplaced when you try to use them as justification to lock out pot smokers, for instance. Especially if said pot smokers are forbidden to indulge while working, or work while high.

      The proper respect for liberty demands that we, in our interactions with other citizens, cease our activities where those activities begin to materially step on someone else's toes. In the case of work and work product, an exchange has been agreed upon. Make it clear that what you are offering money for does not include work or work product strained through intoxication of any kind, and there are no ethical problems for you.

      As for medical care, if you aren't willing to offer it, then don't. It's as simple as that. Your offer of care (or insurance) is part of the exchange. If you choose to devalue the exchange, you'll generally cut down the ranks of who might be willing to work for you, same as if you drop your monetary compensation. Your choice.

      If drugs are so great and safe..why should this be a problem?

      Exactly. It's not a problem. It's a hypothetical situation you made up. It has not been demonstrated to be a problem, nor would I expect it to be, any more than we have to commonly replace alcoholic's livers today. I addressed it as a hypothetical. I doubt it would ever be a significant problem. It is a lot worse problem to lose an employee to overzealous legal action when that employee was a perfectly effective and useful part of your organization. Now that is a real, current problem.

      hmm..now who's pulling figures out of his ass. Care to back this up?

      Oh, please. Are you telling me that you think people don't drive cars stoned? What planet do you live on? Do you even know what pot smells like? Do you even drive? Please — try not to be absurd. The fact is, being stoned isn't much of an impediment to driving. I'm not saying it is advisable, any more than talking on a cell phone is advisable, but it certainly isn't a compromise on the same order as driving while drunk. In terms of personal experience, I've only observed perhaps a few tens of drunk drivers, but I couldn't even begin to count the number of times my schoolmates were out driv

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    438. Re:The Netherlands by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      Thats true. But I think its equally trendy to hate Starbucks...

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    439. Re:The Netherlands by Aceticon · · Score: 1

      If you stick to living inside one of the bigguest cities, then public transportation is not that expensive - in truth, it's the trains that i find expensive. Similarly, traffic is not such a huge headache inside the cities ('cause people living inside the cities mostly use their bikes). The traffic problems are concentrated in the highways (and byways) to and from the cities (i should know, i've faced more than my fair share of traffic jams around here).
      [Maybe there's some relation between the trains issue and the traffic to and from cities???]

      Amsterdam is a great place but is quite an atypical dutch city - in my experience from living and working in several places in Holland, Amsterdam is not only the most turistic of cities (as measured by the number of foreign turists one see walking around, especialy in the Dam and in the Red Light Distric), but also seems to be the one with the greater percentage of foreigners living there. I suspect this is both the cause and the consequence of the Amsterdam "vibe".

      Having only lived in Amsterdam for the first six months i lived in Holland, and then having moved to a close-by smaller town (Hilversum), and judging from the sea of cars each day stuck in traffic jams at rush hour on the way to and from Amsterdam, my experience probably reflects the typical experience of the dutch themselfs and of those immigrants that moved here for reasons other than the Amsterdam nightlife (no criticist on those that came for the Amsterdan vibe here).

      Maybe i made a mistake all those years ago when i moved out of Amsterdam to save on the rent i was paying ...

      It's a good thing that you're learning the dutch language - i know one or two foreigners *cough* english *cough* which have been living here for many years and hardly speak any dutch.
      In my experience dutch is a very hard to learn language, but when you do it opens a couple of new doors, especially on the job market (where, at least in IT, about 2/3 of the positions are either for dutch speaking people or consider the ability to speak dutch very important).
      Besides, dutch is a fun and unusual language to know and only about 15 million people speak it ;)

      Just as i know several expacts that eventually moved out of Holland, i also know several that made their lifes here (married here, got kids a house and a mortgage). In the end it all boils down to one's answer to the question "Are you enjoying it?".

      So good luck to you and keep enjoying it!

    440. Re:The Netherlands by sandarB · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more! Also, I respect The Netherlands desire to protect thier language and culture. I lived in Den Haag from 1987-1989. I visited again in 1997, and it had changed in many ways. One of the most surprising changes was that when I walked into a store, people said, "Hello" in English, rather than "Goedemorgen" or "Goedemiddag" in Dutch. The Dutch people are generally accepting of other cultures and speak many languages. This may be why the Dutch language is being replaced by English. And in response to English taking over, the Dutch are requiring immigrants to learn Dutch so it does not disappear entirely.

    441. Re:The Netherlands by sandarB · · Score: 1

      I lived in The Hague from when I was 13-16. Some people I knew smoked pot, but I was never interested. Not until I got back to California did I smoke. :) Kids in the US do it to rebel, show their independence, show they are cool. None of that applied in Holland.

    442. Re:The Netherlands by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Blast. trapped!

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    443. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's fascinating how many non-Americans measure Americans' happiness.

    444. Re:The Netherlands by Riverman5 · · Score: 1

      No, there is never a fist fight to begin with. You'd see a shootout as often as you'd see a knife fight. Pulling a weapon in a personal dispute is some serious jail time. I'd risk jail time shooting a gun in the air to break up a gang beating.

    445. Re:The Netherlands by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm not sure I think that Americans need to worry about "protecting our culture" because our culture is a collection of the best of the cultures brought over to the New World. I do not worry about Hispanic culture displacing American culture because historically speaking American culture has assimilated the best of new cultures. Immigrants assimilate into American culture and both sides benefit.

      Take where I live as an example. Italian culture and cuisine dominates. I would not be at all surprised if Mexican/Latino culture did the same in the coming decades. I do not see this as a problem. We will only benefit.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    446. Re:The Netherlands by Riverman5 · · Score: 1

      There were 6 or 7 of them, all big thugs, I certainly would have had no effect and probably would have been seriously hurt. One thing that sucks about U.S. law though is there is no protection if I decide it best to fire a gun in the air to break up the violence. You're only supposed to fire the gun at someone you intend to kill, and it wouldn't feel right firing randomly at the gang of thugs, but that's the law in the U.S., I'm justified shooting them, but shooting a gun in the air is just breaking city ordinance and I would spend a day in jail for it.

    447. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever thought that it's not about wanting, it's about needing? Have you ever seen in which conditions they have to leave?

      They don't risk they lives just because they are outlaws, but because they are desperate. It's very easy for rich countries to build walls, even if it's called walls, to protect them from their poor neighbors.

      Insisting on building these kind of barries is not only useless, it's also selfish!

    448. Re:The Netherlands by Nutria · · Score: 1
      What would "go home" mean for the London bombers, who were all born in Britain?

      Moving to a society that their belief system is more in tune with.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    449. Re:The Netherlands by kz45 · · Score: 1

      "The license suspension is eliminated as a possibility by the sheer number of smokers out there. The idea that pot smoking is limited to pre-driving age people is eliminated by numerous surveys; pot use is common among young people, certainly, but if you simply look for the information, you'll find there are many in other age groups who are users. I suggest a visit to NORML for more information. If, that is, you have any urge to replace your illusory preconceptions with actual facts."

      I don't think so. Show me some evidence by a non-biased research group (not for the legalization of pot). Then I might start to listen to you.

      "Oh, please. Are you telling me that you think people don't drive cars stoned? What planet do you live on? Do you even know what pot smells like? Do you even drive? Please -- try not to be absurd. The fact is, being stoned isn't much of an impediment to driving. I'm not saying it is advisable, any more than talking on a cell phone is advisable, but it certainly isn't a compromise on the same order as driving while drunk. In terms of personal experience, I've only observed perhaps a few tens of drunk drivers, but I couldn't even begin to count the number of times my schoolmates were out driving while stoned. And those are just the ones I know about"

      Yes I do and I know people drive stoned. I just don't want people on speed or other harder drugs to be driving and kill me or my friends or family. When you make something more available, more people will be doing it.

      "No. I direct you to the fact that the global (and American) illicit drug market is larger -- much larger -- than the global alcohol market, about 400 billion dollars last I looked it up. Illicit drug users are all around you. You're just blind to them, which is not surprising, because much illicit drug use isn't often very obvious, unlike alcohol use, which is very obvious"

      You say this is the case, but I see no evidence/research to back this up.

      "Thanks for your reply. It is always good to have someone trundle out incorrect and poorly reasoned arguments so they can be beaten down in public. You've done the community a service, and I, for one, thank you"

      heh. So you tell me I look foolish in front of a bunch of stoners..and they agree because they don't agree with the fact that I don't want hard drugs legalized (I'm shocked!). hmm..I think you better look again at the current situation.

      If you notice, the only people agreeing with you are also recreational drug users...which will never give you your drug laws passed in the United States. You are going to have do a better job convincing the american public as to why drugs should be legalized (which will never happen, because we can just look at our history..when it was legalized..and see all of the problems).

      I think if we really want to help the american public, we should concentrate on using less drugs (anti-depressants are over-prescribed and have very bad side-effects) not allowing more.

    450. Re:The Netherlands by Monkelectric · · Score: 1
      :-) Actually, I share your belief ... I believe starbucks over-roasts their beans to get a really *STRONG* taste, that sacrifices a lot of the depth and character. But everyone seems to like it, and I admit now and then I do to ... so then I think that leads to a whole more epistemological debate about is something really "burned" if thats how everyone likes it? Yea i dont know either :)

      Anyways, it was a pleasure having a conversation with someone on slashdot that didn't start or end with swearing or insults.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    451. Re:The Netherlands by Dilaudid · · Score: 1
      Lots of research over the last 10 years has shown a strong relationship with psychosis and schizophrenia. It was always argued that this was due to "self-medication" by people with mental problems - but the Dunedin study (a huge "longitudinal" study - looking at people over their whole lives) showed that if you control for people with mental health problems who smoke dope, there's still a correlation.

      Other researchers identified a genetic pattern, which is carried by a quarter of the population, which combined with cannabis use gives the carrier a five-times higher likelihood of developing psychosis. So in essence it might make you crazy.

    452. Re:The Netherlands by Upphew · · Score: 0

      http://www.dailyfueleconomytip.com/?p=208
      "According to an article posted on Yahoo! Finance, Exxon Mobil's third quarter revenue of $99.59 billion is greater than the annual gross domestic product (GDP) of both the United Arab Emirates ($98.1 billion) and Kuwait ($52.76 billion)."

      So its not about normal people why US nowadays fight for: business, the other kind of people.

    453. Re:The Netherlands by albyrne5 · · Score: 1

      Cheers dude! I'm doin' my best! =)

    454. Re:The Netherlands by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      53k is a lot less than most experienced IT people in Vancouver make, and we get dinged for a lot of transit taxes and stuff, too. Your marginal rate at 53K is already over 40%, so imagine how much more taxes people pay as they make more.

      Does make we wish I could find good Linux work outside of Vancouver, though. My condo probably costs as much as your 10 acres :( I grew up living lakeside in northern Ontario, and I really miss the peace and quiet.

    455. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Psychological addictions do involve neruological pathology. Your statement to the contrary indicates a profound ignorance of the latest research (latest in the sense of the last decade or so).

      There are a lot of "addictions" being bandied about for political purposes, and these do not in any way affect the existence of actual psychological addictions (which are distinct from compulsions or strongly reinforced habits). However, you are still the blind leading the blind. Please stop.

      And yes, psychology is my field of expertise.

    456. Re:The Netherlands by fferreres · · Score: 1

      I was impling that they are *never* allowed legally, not that Hispanics should sneak. Of course, you canadian Friend should be allowed inmediately. So never mind.

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    457. Re:The Netherlands by AkaXakA · · Score: 1

      Must... do... more... research... before... posting...

      You must be new here. ;)

    458. Re:The Netherlands by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Actually, I don't own shit, and tend to agree with you that most people buy useless crap. I also agree with you that producers tend to encourage higher consumption. That doesn't mean capitalism favors overconsumption--even if some capitalists do--because the capitalist system means that if you overconsume, you go broke. It's ironic, in a way--here you are saying capitalism favors overconsumption. This is perhaps the only useful criticism left of capitalism in our era of abundance, as the criticism used to be that capitalism kept an underpaid working class from being able to afford everything they need. You can't have it both ways. You can't say "capitalism encourages people to overspend" while at the same time saying "capitalism prevents poor people and retired grandmothers from being able to afford doctor visits and prescription drugs".

      As for your question, many people are deeply in debt because they own things like homes and vehicles that are sometimes worth borrowing money to purchase. I'm deeply in debt because I'm a college student--but I don't waste money and I have every intention of getting out of debt as soon as I can. Debt in itself is not always a bad thing. Too much debt, however, and the repo man (capitalism's check on overconsumption) takes everything you own away.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    459. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep.. that runners high, that's not from the THC 8-).

    460. Re:The Netherlands by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be surprised at all to learn that psychological addictions lead to physical changes in neurological structure. The brain is a physical, chemical and electrical device, and we already know that learning and developing skills and behaviours changes the brain's physical structure.

      However, there's a big difference between that and physiological addiction. In particular you'll note that nowhere did I state that psychological addiction didn't cause physical changes, merely that the addiction is centred around the brain and the behaviour, not around every individual cell and organ exposed to the addictive substance. It's a "state of mind" addiction, not a basic biochemical need in every cell.

      I'm gratified you believe I'm in some way "leading" people by posting an opinion on a website. But if I'm "blind" why don't you "enlighten" and correct me, instead of standing on the sidelines carping and contributing nothing of value to the conversation?

      "And yes, psychology is my field of expertise."

      Great - so weigh in with your expertise and educate us, providing links to article or media that back up your argument so we know you aren't just talking out of your arse.

      Or keep out of the discussion.

      Either way, standing on the sidelines shouting "you're wrong" is neither constructive nor entertaining, and when combined with posting as an AC indicates that you are, in fact, just a troll.

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    461. Re:The Netherlands by rtechie · · Score: 1

      What I do care about is the fact that most of them are here illegally.

      But I notice you're not complaining about all the illegal Russian or Chinese immigrants, are you? Because they are not changing the demographic mix. You're the same sort of asshole that turned away Haitian refugees because they were black (and they spoke French!) and were, more importantly, poor. If you want, you COULD say you just hate poor immigrants (like all the Europeans that came here earlier, I guess they don't count), but it amounts to the same thing.

      And there are certainly different classes of crimes. Do you think illegal parking is the same as mass murder? Overstaying a visa/undocumented work is a minor procedural crime, like a traffic ticket. The kind YOU commit every single day. Are you a moral reprobate for not disposing of your batteries properly? Have the jack-booted thugs kicked down your door yet? Should they? Saying "it's illegal" isn't a moral argument for anything.

      And as for your Canadian friend (probably white), the fact that it takes her 12 months to get a visa says there is something screwed up with the SYSTEM, not with your friends. Shockingly, the US immigration system is far from a model of efficiency. This is deliberate. Want to make life easier for your friend? Get the white power anti-immigration types in Congress (mostly Republicans) to reform the immigration service to make the process both more open and easier. Have them impose real enforcement and penalties (very large fines) on the large corporations that employ illegal immigrants. How about fines against Home Depot for running an illegal employment service? They're a lot easier to track down that 12,000,000 illegal immigrants.

      But I'm not holding my breath since the white power-types don't actually want to STOP illegal immigation, they just want to pander to racism.

    462. Re:The Netherlands by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      I love it! I'm opposed to illegal immigration so I'm automatically a racist white power asshole that's afraid of changing demographics! You didn't bother to read a single one of my posts about American culture, how immigration has influenced it (positively) or any of them. You just assume that I'm a racist because this particular conversation started over Hispanic immigration. I'm opposed to all illegal immigration.

      You're the same sort of asshole that turned away Haitian refugees because they were black (and they spoke French!) and were, more importantly, poor.

      And you are the same sort of asshole that busts out the racism card in the debate about immigration, thus preventing a rational conversation about anything.

      And there are certainly different classes of crimes. Do you think illegal parking is the same as mass murder? Overstaying a visa/undocumented work is a minor procedural crime, like a traffic ticket.

      Did I advocate deporting/throwing in jail people who overstay a visa? I'm talking about people who are completely undocumented and who are here illegally. There is no reason to pander to them. They aren't American citizens. There is no reason to give them a pass for breaking the law.

      And as for your Canadian friend (probably white), the fact that it takes her 12 months to get a visa says there is something screwed up with the SYSTEM, not with your friends. Shockingly, the US immigration system is far from a model of efficiency. This is deliberate. Want to make life easier for your friend? Get the white power anti-immigration types in Congress (mostly Republicans) to reform the immigration service to make the process both more open and easier.

      Again, thanks for inflaming opinion with "white power" comments. Both parties have failed us. Republicans want to pander to big business that wants cheap labor and the Democrats are afraid of being called racists by assholes like you.

      Have them impose real enforcement and penalties (very large fines) on the large corporations that employ illegal immigrants. How about fines against Home Depot for running an illegal employment service? They're a lot easier to track down that 12,000,000 illegal immigrants.

      That's how I'd go about solving the problem. There needs to be a system in place to heavily fine businesses that employ illegal immigrants. Unfortunately every time it's attempted (on a local or state level) people cry racism. Kinda like what you are doing now. Since when did it become racist to want to enforce existing laws? I'd be as disgusted if we had millions of illegal Anglo-Saxon immigrants as I am over millions of illegal Mexicans.

      But I'm not holding my breath since the white power-types don't actually want to STOP illegal immigration, they just want to pander to racism.

      And I'm not holding my breath since assholes like you cry "racism" every single time somebody tries to have a rational conversation about this. Blow it out your ass. I know how much my country depends on immigration. I know how it influences us for the better. That doesn't mean I have to be happy when my elected officials start talking about giving a free pass for breaking the law.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    463. Re:The Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked in Amsterdam for 7 months recently. Once you get past the drugs and prostitution, it really doesn't have much going for it. ymmv

    464. Re:The Netherlands by RiotXIX · · Score: 1

      Yeah that's probably because America's the result of invading another country and taking it over, burk. Don't forget that.

      Seriously though, I don't live in America but I have noticed that being a country that is the amalgamation of many other cultures of the world is done no where better on earth than in the US - and it's probably to do with the fact that everyone is an immigrant from somewhere else. New York is one of the most colourful and enjoyable places I've been - that's some people's thing, other people hate it. You're always going to have a hick backbone (or some form of Nationalist party) in the population who don't want people to travel over the earth, but people don't get as much social grief for maintaining another culture in the US as they would in parts of Europe. And that is a good thing I think. That said, I also appreciate that it's annoying when you have sects of a town just maintaining it's own ethnicity and not mixing (that's a form of racism in itself). But I think that people are more entitled to do that in the US (I reckon). Just check your roots if you disagree.

      It varies from person to person. I myself would rather be in NY or SF because of it's diversity (I like that) - but some people hate new people coming into their town, and only want to mix with their own. They think they own parts of the earth because they've had some ancestory in it.

      --
      "You know you don't act like a scientist, you're more like a game show host." Dana Barret
  2. Hell...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    1) Hell
    2) Hell :-)

    1. Re:Hell...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      So you want to stay in Texas then?

    2. Re:Hell...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is hot as hell there, but not has hot as Iran. ;-)

    3. Re:Hell...... by cralewyth · · Score: 1

      Which hell are you talking about?

      I mean, for Hell, Michigan or Hell, California (in Riverside County), you're still not moving from the U.S.A...
      ...or do you mean Hell, Norway? I'm sure that's a nice place to be.

      Actually.... Could I interest you in "Hell Hole Gorge National Park", a park in Queensland, Australia?

      See Hell @ Wikipedia

      --
      "Women are just like ninjas; They lie even when it is more convenient to tell the truth." ~ Unknown
  3. The future by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I always kinda liked the idea that I get to live in the future just by staying alive.

    1. Re:The future by cooley · · Score: 1

      Well, you can tell by the way I use my walk,
      Im a woman's man; no time to talk.
      Music loud and women warm,
      I've been kicked around since I was born.

      --
      Just then the floating disembodied head of Colonel Sanders started yelling Everything You Know Is Wrong!-Weird Al
    2. Re:The future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...Stay'in aliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiive, OW!

    3. Re:The future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The future is China.

    4. Re:The future by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I don't understand that comment? :-/

      Living in the future compared to which modernized country exactly?

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    5. Re:The future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He means that just by waiting for it we all get to live in 2040 eventually. I bet they have rocket cars and all kinds of great shit there!

      I wish cryogenics worked, I'd probably only live 1 year in 3 just so I could get there 'faster'.

  4. Obvious by eclectro · · Score: 5, Funny

    Warm beach with girls. Money.

    This thread is now closed. Please submit next Slashdot story.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    1. Re:Obvious by cooley · · Score: 2, Funny

      Related to parent:

      Although I love living in the USA and have no plans to leave any time soon, I've always thought that the city of Merida (the capital of the Yucatan state in Mexico) would be an excellent place to retire. Cheap, lovely weather, p nice people, pretty girls, low crime, I could go on and on....

      As much as I hate to say it though, anyplace I move has to have one thing for sure: BANDWIDTH, and plenty of it.

      --
      Just then the floating disembodied head of Colonel Sanders started yelling Everything You Know Is Wrong!-Weird Al
    2. Re:Obvious by MikeFM · · Score: 2, Funny

      Girls that date for money? Heck, can get all that in Mexico and be within a short drive of the US. I think a tropical island with a secret volcano lair is more my thing tho.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    3. Re:Obvious by IANAAC · · Score: 2, Insightful
      So you're a Brit in the south of Spain. Great. And I suppose since you can't speak the language, you'll just create your own bars/restaurants and only hang out there. You realize you're every bit as bad as us Americans, right?

      I'm only half joking.

    4. Re:Obvious by benplaut · · Score: 1

      Well, go ahead and rule out Hawaii. I live there, I should know!

    5. Re:Obvious by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Hey, I lived quite close to Merida for 15 years (Campeche city). I dont know when did you go to Mexico last time but nowadays you can find lots of services (cable, DSL, etc) not very expensive (for a poor Mexican POV) in there. Besides, I just read about a company called "Fourth Source" which is trying to promote outsourcing to Merida with the idea that "to go to India you need 10 hours in a plane whereas to go to Merida you need 2 hours from Florida (direct flight)".

      Merida is a great place to live (even for Mexicans), there are 2 other places: Xalapa which is one of the most culturally active city in Mexico, it is home of the LANIA (Advanced Informatics National Laboratory) . In fact it is the place where I am aiming to work if I cant get something here in Europe after finishing my PhD.

      Then I know lots of people love beach.There is a great place called La Paz where you have beach at 5 mintues from anywhere. And of course all of these places are cheap (for an American) and you have broadband (cable or ASDL mostly) access. And, at least in La Paz there is a HUGE community of americans, mostly hippy type and old people that go there for retirement so even if you dont speak Spanish, you wont have a lot of trouble (in Merida and Xalapa you would have to stay in the "touristic" zones).

      Anyway, this is really interesting for me as a Mexican, I know a lot of us dream on going to USA (not me personally as I dont like your current foreign policies) or Europe (yay! I am in UK w00t) in order to be "successfull".

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    6. Re:Obvious by cooley · · Score: 1

      Hey buddy, thanks very much for this good info regarding bandwidth and such. I do speak Spanish, rusty right now but a little "immersion" always brings it right back.

      Part of the reason I liked Merida was that it wasn't filled with Americans. IIRC there is a small community of us there, but not too many. I agree that it seemed like a nice place for Mexicans to live too, that's part of what I liked about it. The people there seemed like they enjoyed living there, and seemed like they were proud of their beautiful city.

      Hope you enjoy your time there in the UK, but remember: don't drink the water! :)

      --
      Just then the floating disembodied head of Colonel Sanders started yelling Everything You Know Is Wrong!-Weird Al
    7. Re:Obvious by bitt3n · · Score: 1

      beaches and girls are just fine, but I'm moving to Iraq. After all, I paid for their democracy, so I might as well show up there and reap what I've sown.

    8. Re:Obvious by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Well, thanks a lot. I am ready to help you (or any other geek :)) to go to that place. Mostly if you do appreciate the culture and dont go only for the "cheap beer, women and policeman" like Cancun or Los Cabos tourism.

      I know some people there and I can make contact with IT people that live in Merida (good friends from high school). And hey there is always a good chance to do a nice project.

      Anyway, if by any chance you need some info or help about Mexico just write me an email mynick@gmail.com

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    9. Re:Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      As much as I hate to say it though, anyplace I move has to have one thing for sure: BANDWIDTH, and plenty of it.
      Indeed. I plan to retire to World of Warcraft.
    10. Re:Obvious by nytes · · Score: 1
      Mostly if you do appreciate the culture and dont go only for the "cheap beer, women and policeman" like Cancun or Los Cabos tourism.
      People go to Mexico for policemen??? From what I hear, USians are better off avoiding any contact with police in Mexico.
      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
    11. Re:Obvious by chochos · · Score: 1

      Parent is absolutely right... I am a mexican living in Mexico City, but I lived in Xalapa for 2 years and it was incredible. Nice weather, lots of things to do for such a small place... the only downside for me was that I was there managing a software factory for a Mexico City-based company, which suddenly decided to close shop and bring me back here. I tried to get a job over there but I didn't have enough time. I did look at LANIA, but it's one of those academic places where a degree can outweigh experience (I've been developing and designing software since 1994 but since I didn't have a master's degree I didn't have a chance there. It's stupid but it's the way it works).

      The problem I saw in Xalapa was that everything is cheap (you can go to a nice italian restaurant downtown and have a big dinner with wine or beer and spend $25 USD, for TWO PEOPLE), but salaries are also very low. We were paying software developers around $1200 USD and it was a very good salary that the developers wouldn't be able to get fresh out of college in any other place; in some other place they could maybe get $600 USD. And there aren't many jobs there, unless you work in government but that's usually hard because you practically have to inherit the job from someone or know someone who works there to get it, and then your job depends on them staying there and moving up, not so much on your skills (as is the case for any government job in this whole country).

      As for La Paz, I would prefer San Jose del Cabo, but that's just me (and a whole lot of americans who seem to live there).

  5. I know, it's old fashioned and out of date by Hawthorne01 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But I'm in America by choice, and will be for a loooooong time. I friggin' love it here, warts and all. Lived in Latin America, raised in Canada, and there's no place I'd rather be.

    --
    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
    1. Re:I know, it's old fashioned and out of date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Traitor.

    2. Re:I know, it's old fashioned and out of date by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

      We tend to forget that the warts have always existed, and always will. Specific problems are exaggerated by their contemporaries and forgotten within a generation or two.

      I was born here, so I didn't have a "choice" in that, but I can't imagine leaving permanently. Canada sounds like a nice place, though.

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    3. Re:I know, it's old fashioned and out of date by thegamerformelyknown · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've lived in Canada all my life, and I've seen many good things, with near 100% of the bad things coming from or influenced by the US. It's a great place to live, and things can only get better from here :)

    4. Re:I know, it's old fashioned and out of date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like my little brother. Everything he did was wrong was my fault too.

    5. Re:I know, it's old fashioned and out of date by fyonn · · Score: 1

      I think part of the problem is that the grass is always greener on the other side. from wherever we are, elsewhere has benefits we don't, and we fail to see the benefits of where we are because we're so used to them.

      personally I like iceland, it's a beautiful country. I'd love to visit it to see what it's like. if it comes up to my hopes then I have this vision of running it and moulding it into the country I'd like to live in (no offence to any icelanders here, I'm sure you wouldn't vote me in anyways, but a guy can dream can't he?)

      dave

    6. Re:I know, it's old fashioned and out of date by kjart · · Score: 1

      You sound like my little brother. Everything he did was wrong was my fault too.

      It's hard to be a good kid when your older brother is a thug - and yes, I believe this applies to the original point as well.

    7. Re:I know, it's old fashioned and out of date by fairbanksd · · Score: 1

      I've lived around the world, in some pretty nice places too. But, no matter how wierd things get, I still love coming back to the best country in the world. Yes, we have stupid people directing our government most of the time, and taxes can be crazy. Let's think about the fact that the U.S. is only 200 years old and still maintains a high level of freedom and confort that other countries still can't touch, it's worth it to me to stay.

    8. Re:I know, it's old fashioned and out of date by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      What about Rush and Kylie Minogue? You can't blame EVERYTHING on us ;)

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    9. Re:I know, it's old fashioned and out of date by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      Anywhere in Alberta, Canada!
      Scenery, English, cost of living, cheap prescriptions, etc.
      Why am I not there? I honestly can't tell you.

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    10. Re:I know, it's old fashioned and out of date by Hawthorne01 · · Score: 1

      P.E.T. was from the U.S.? Who knew? :-)

      --
      "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
  6. Link? by HoosierPeschke · · Score: 1

    Not sure if the link is broke or if it's my work proxy but here's the Google Cache.

    More on topic, most people won't/don't leave due to funds of moving. The closest place I'd venture most would move to is Canada.

    --
    Mr. Universe: "They can't stop the signal, Mal. They can never stop the signal."
  7. It's obviously the best solution by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's obviously best to simply give up and leave, rather than actually stand up and do something about changing your country.

    1. Re:It's obviously the best solution by fj3k · · Score: 1

      I quite like living in my country (Australia); it's got a lot going for it. The government is trying to wreck this, of course, but we've had just enough good leadership in the past to make this a difficult task.

      Much more relevant, though, is that I've always said two things:
      1) I'd always choose not to live in the U.S.
      2) No matter how rotten it is I'd rather be my home country fixing it than running for the nearest exit.

      I don't know where those rules leave you guys.

      --
      Two men claimed to have walked into a bar. Only one had the bruises to prove it.
    2. Re:It's obviously the best solution by stony3k · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What you do need to remember is that in some countries, staying back and trying to fix the system in an easy way to land up in jail or even dead. Be thankful that you live in America or any other civilized country - you could have been living in much worse places.

      --
      Freedom is not worth having if it does not include the freedom to make mistakes. - Mahatma Gandhi
    3. Re:It's obviously the best solution by dafoomie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Mexicans do it all the time. But if I dare criticize them, I'm a racist.

      I fully agree with your statement, by the way. Mexico would be a far better place if more stayed and tried to make it a better place. By leaving, they only ensure that their corrupt government stays in power, this is why they encourage it so much (not to mention remittances). Not that I can blame them, leaving is certainly the path of least resistance.

    4. Re:It's obviously the best solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Would you call America civilized? It seems to put more emphasis on the armed forces and less on healthcare and education than other civilized countries

    5. Re:It's obviously the best solution by Infernal+Device · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've thought about that, but it all boils down to: the more things change, the more things stay the same.

      The advantage of moving to a foreign country is context. You live somewhere else, you can be someone else. You practically have no choice.

      Would I bail - sure. I'm only going to live another 40-50 years. Why not enjoy it someplace where I'm discovering new things daily, rather than stuck here where I'm pretty sure of my surroundings.

      Why do I stay - same as everyone else. Money. Inertia.

      --
      "My God...it's full of trolls!"
    6. Re:It's obviously the best solution by SPQR_Julian · · Score: 1

      You know, it's really annoying to have moderator points and see something like this already at 5. Dammit, we need to be able to go to 6. or 11. ;)

    7. Re:It's obviously the best solution by schnitzi · · Score: 1

      Because we all know it's absolutely impossible to change a country unless you live there.

      --



      I object to that article, and to the next reply.
    8. Re:It's obviously the best solution by Knutsi · · Score: 1

      Also remember that the US has an old and string democratic tradition, a tradition of press freedom and grand ideals that have worked in the past. Some of the other places on this list has not, and I would for that simple reason alone guess they are more dangerous places to stay long term.

      If you feel something is wrong in your nation, you fix it. If you cannot, I think it's fair to take your ambitions where they will be appreciated. Most people take their ambitions not away from the US, but to it.

      Regards from Norway (that you may want to look to for inspiration on how to run a healthcare system, and try to fight poverty. Oh, and if you do, look in the history books, cuz it's not going stellar at the moment) (:

    9. Re:It's obviously the best solution by jimhill · · Score: 1

      Thing is, I'm not interested in returning America to its God-mandated place as The World's Greatest And Awesomest Place. I'm not interested in dedicating my life to busting my ass to the goal of trying to make the place not suck as much forty years from now as it does now. I've got one time around the carousel we call life and it's damn near half over. I just want to live the remaining half in a place that has different priorities from what my countrymen have decided they want. You can call that "giving up" if you like. I consider it "living life on my terms, not someone else's" -- a quintessentially American notion.

      And for the record, as soon as I retrain so that I'm more desirable to the NZ immigration folks, I'm outta here.

      --
      Learn to spell: nickel, missile, lose, solely, amendment, speech, kernel, probably, ridiculous, deity, hierarchy, versus
    10. Re:It's obviously the best solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the short-sighted view. Make the world a better place by adding your voice to a better nation.

    11. Re:It's obviously the best solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, how /can/ you change your country? Exactly.

      I'm planning to leave Germany some time, maybe for America or Ireland (the French are too Socialist, the Spanish too Authoritarian). But now you guys start talking emigration too (well duh, America was an immigration target because it used to be free; now it's turning fascist, no wonder people start leaving again).

      IMHO you can only leave and wait till the country disintegrates enough so that people /will/ vote for change. Then you could return. But I never really loved my country anyway (it's just another country!), so I won't shed a tear when I'm gone.

      The question is: what free countries are left, and how do they let you in?

    12. Re:It's obviously the best solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, are the USA and Mexico too broken to fix? Are their political systems too broken?

    13. Re:It's obviously the best solution by majid_aldo · · Score: 1

      i agree with you. but here is the 'commons' problem; if eveyone says why should i try to change it when america is already better; people will go to the usa. everyone is acting in their (self-)interest.

      furthermore, it's really hard to expect change within a lifetime.

      --
      --- widget evolution: enhanced, plus, super, ultra, extreme, exxxtreme, ultra-extreme, ..etc.
    14. Re:It's obviously the best solution by Wellington+Grey · · Score: 1
      It's obviously best to simply give up and leave, rather than actually stand up and do something about changing your country.


      Leaving is a form of voting with one's feet.

      -Grey

      P.S. You do realize that American can still vote overseas, don't you? We damn well better be able to, since we still have to pay U.S. taxes.
    15. Re:It's obviously the best solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the situation is so drastic that the only thing that will change it is a bloody revolution. This country now belongs to the Fascists, and they like it that way. Whatever you foreigners do, don't buy the hype that it's the evil government and the innocent American people. Down to the humblest redneck heartlander, not one of them wouldn't gladly torture you for being the wrong color with their own hands, because they all think you're terrorists. Don't believe the smoke cloud about highjacked elections; they wanted Bush and they don't care if he was elected - they would gladly vote Vlad the Impaler in. They LIKE the torture and killing. It's not happening to them and it makes them feel safe and makes their stock rates soar, so who cares?

      Rather than fight a pointless war against psychopaths over a piece of dirt, yes, I will move. I have already moved my family to one of the decent spots left, which is close to an escape route.

      In the meantime, I consider myself only a citizen of the Internet. I telecomute anyway. Once you're independant, a country is simply where you store your stuff and plug in. I now have no more regard for one country over another than I have for a rented storage garage.

      In the future, many will feel this way as well.

    16. Re:It's obviously the best solution by Amouth · · Score: 1

      "The question is: what free countries are left, and how do they let you in?"

      New Zealand - and they don't..

      i looked into posiably moving there but. it is nearly imposiable to do... sure you can visit.. but they don't want you to live there

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    17. Re:It's obviously the best solution by dave420 · · Score: 1
      +5, Completely missing the point

      Those Mexicans send back a LOT of money to help their families back home. It's not as if most Mexicans are sitting on piles of money, wondering which political cause to champion - many Mexicans are struggling for survival. Rule #1 of existence is to feed you and your family. That's what they're doing. Frivolous stuff like who's in power is next on the list. It has to be in that order - Iraq's rules have all been turned around, and the people are fucked. (We think Iraqi freedom is ahead of Iraqi food/water and security...)

      Just look at how many Americans there are in America, and there's a shitty president there - clearly numbers do not make political change on their own.

    18. Re:It's obviously the best solution by Altima(BoB) · · Score: 1

      Hooray for absentee ballots!

      (Dual citizen here, Born and lived most of my life in the states, now I'm living in Ireland. Lot of problems here, but they're different problems than in the US)

      --
      Yup...
    19. Re:It's obviously the best solution by red3dwarf · · Score: 1

      Iraq?

    20. Re:It's obviously the best solution by pipatron · · Score: 1
      What you do need to remember is that in some countries, staying back and trying to fix the system in an easy way to land up in jail or even dead.
      Isn't it illegal these days to criticize the government of the United States?
      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    21. Re:It's obviously the best solution by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1

      PLEASE stay at home and do whatever you need to do, or whatever you can still do, to take back your country.

      Because quite honestly the way America is behaving right now scares the shit out of me and most of the people I know. More than Iraq. More than North Korea. More than anywhere else in the world.

      America is powerful, nuclear armed, being run by corporate greed and a president who is completely batshit insane, and there's not a god-damn thing we can do about it without risking becoming the next country to be 'liberated' by America.

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    22. Re:It's obviously the best solution by shani · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I moved away, just to live abroad for a bit.

      But after a few years I realised that my worldview is more similar to the country I live in (the Netherlands) than the country I'm from (the USA).

      Why should I try to convince 300 million Americans to have the life that I enjoy, when I have found 16 million people who already do? Americans like their country the way it is.

      Holland is crowded, expensive, and the weather sucks. But it's got way more actual freedom than the US, there is almost no poverty, violence is low, and people care way more about enjoying life than working. It works for me.

      One of my friends just returned from the USA, and he misses it. He misses his cars, the hundreds of channels on the TV, the cheap food with good service. He misses being able to pay money to have his problems go away. He misses people who are excited about starting businesses. These things matter to him, so I expect he'll be back sooner or later.

      No country is perfect. I don't think it's so bad to want to move to a place where life is more like you want it to be.

    23. Re:It's obviously the best solution by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      ``It's obviously best to simply give up and leave, rather than actually stand up and do something about changing your country.''

      Sometimes, yes. Arguably, the political system in the USA doesn't give you a lot of choice. Realistically, you have only two parties to choose from. Both of these parties have a vested interest in keeping things that way. Make a comparison with parties in a true multi-party democracy, and you will find that the two parties you can pick are also very similar. Both politics and media are a big money circus, where those with money run the show, and it's hard to gain entry, unless you're rich.

      On the bright side, Americans (more than other people) have a strong tradition of being critical and distrustful of the government, and a lot of noise is being made about decissions that are seen as wrong or as threatening civil liberties. The question is: is it helping? The government still spies on its people, lies to its people and the world, starts wars that kill thousands, imprisons people without due process, etc. And people support that government! In 2004, the majority even voted for more of that! At least, that's what I believe; other poeple say the elections were rigged, and, frankly, I think we can't be confident that they weren't.

      In short, you're confronted with a broken political system, a government that spends your money to make the world an unsafer place, and a public that loves things this way. In that situation, do you really believe the best course is to change the country from the inside? Or might it be better to leave, which could improve the climate you're in, send a statement, strengthen the country you're moving to, and perhaps give you more convincing arguments to tell to the people in your former country?

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    24. Re:It's obviously the best solution by mshiltonj · · Score: 1

      What do you mean by "something," exactly?

      Vote? Protest? What?

    25. Re:It's obviously the best solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i looked into posiably moving there but. it is nearly imposiable to do... sure you can visit.. but they don't want you to live there

      Maybe they would've let you stay if you knew how to spell.

    26. Re:It's obviously the best solution by devonbowen · · Score: 1
      It's obviously best to simply give up and leave, rather than actually stand up and do something about changing your country.

      And you can't do both because...? The Americans I know over here all vote and many of them contribute to political organizations and write letters to Congress. In other words, they're more active in American politics than the people I know over there. The only thing I find difficult to do from here is to actually volunteer to work for a political organization come election time.

      Devon

    27. Re:It's obviously the best solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      in some countries, staying back and trying to fix the system in an easy way to land up in jail or even dead


      Anywhere in the world, if you don't land up in jail or dead trying to fix the system, then either you are not meaning it, or perhaps the problem is nonexistent (if it so easily gives in, can it be proclaimed "problem"?).

      America is not an exception to that rule. Look at the list of political assassinations and history of various human rights struggles in America and you'll see. Besides, as of recently, some freedoms have been taken away from you and awaiting in your future you have very long, hard, bitter struggle against what is gradually becoming matrix-like "the mother of all secretive oppressive regimes" to win them back. By the time when it starts tainting the majority of population, any activism against it will already be outlawed as "grand treason".
    28. Re:It's obviously the best solution by IO+ERROR · · Score: 1

      Some of us are standing up and doing something, by moving to New Hampshire as part of the Free State Project, and working to restore liberty to the state and become a shining example of freedom in this less-than-free country.

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    29. Re:It's obviously the best solution by erick99 · · Score: 1

      Really? I think folks like you throw out these fantastic statements with absolutely nothing to back it up other than sheer idiocy. You are, of course, free to leave.

      --
      http://www.busyweather.com/
    30. Re:It's obviously the best solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not illegal per se. But:

      1) You for sure are un-patriotic
      2) You must root for the terrorists
      3) You might end up in some CIA prison somewhere in Europe

      As for option 3: cheap way of getting out of the country!

    31. Re:It's obviously the best solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't believe in government. I believe that power -- this "right" to employ coercion as a means which all governments hold by definition -- is the true root of all evil. I'm 32 years old and I've never voted, and I'm damn proud of that. I refuse to participate in a process which I genuinely believe is immoral and unjust.

      You don't have to agree with my view of government, but you do have to acknowledge that I exist, and that my view of government exists. You cannot deny my existence.

      You can see that no matter what I do, I get the short end of the stick. I don't want anything from government; I don't want anything from anybody except voluntary association. But I can't vote for that! At the voting booth there is no option for "voluntary association" or "eliminate this position of power". The only choice is coercion.

      I am clearly not in a position to "get up and do something about it". Just what do you suggest I do, besides evaluate my options and move to a country where my god-given right to freedom and self-ownership is slightly less oppressed?

      If you think you can "do something about it", then great, go do it. But don't you DARE criticize me for exercising my god-given right to abstain from taking part in something I believe to be evil.

    32. Re:It's obviously the best solution by 14CharUsername · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Many third world countries are de facto provinces of the American Empire. To be able to make any change in the American Empire you have to change America. And its hard to change America from one of its minor colonies.

    33. Re:It's obviously the best solution by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "By leaving, they only ensure that their corrupt government stays in power, this is why they encourage it so much (not to mention remittances). Not that I can blame them, leaving is certainly the path of least resistance."

      If everybody felt the way you do, the United States would not exist. Everybody who came to North America from elsewhere did so because things were "broken" back home. And yet, those people did leave, did come to to what we now call the United States today, and the people who you seem to describe as weak cowards and their descendants went on to build a globe-spanning empire whose reach and power are what prompted this discussion to begin with.

      As for the specific example of Mexico, yes, the government is attempting to quell dissent through emmigration, but when has that ever been a viable long-term solution? The English convince the Irish to leave, they do so, make good in the US, and start to bankroll Irish independence movements, and today most of Ireland is an independent republic. Who are the people most adamantly opposed to normalizing relations with Cuba? With Vietnam? Who were the people most in favor of invading Iraq? What will happen when Mexican expatriates start to make their presence known in the US electorate?

    34. Re:It's obviously the best solution by mqsoh · · Score: 1

      "Mexicans do it all the time. But if I dare criticize them, I'm a racist."

      ...but you just did it. What are you, now that you criticize them with abandon and mock oppression?

    35. Re:It's obviously the best solution by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      It's obviously best to simply give up and leave, rather than actually stand up and do something about changing your country.

      It is what the US was founded upon, people leaving their own countries to go somewhere better where they could practice their insane religion, or simply get away from the oppressive governments.

    36. Re:It's obviously the best solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's obviously best to simply give up and leave, rather than actually stand up and do something about changing your country.

      Worked for the Jews. I'm just waiting for the liberal round-up.

      Remember that Germany was the most advanced country of its time. Who would think that a republic would give their leader the ability to detain indefinitely on his whim and torture out a confession to a "just" execution?

    37. Re:It's obviously the best solution by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      I've said this before, and no doubt I'll say it again: if you have a friend whose boss yells at her and openly flirts with her, should she stand up and do something about it, or should she just quit and go somewhere else? if you have a friend whose gun-happy husband beats her, should she stand up and do something about it, or should she just leave? if you have a friend who is living in a country that has decided it can kidnap its own citizens, revoke their citizenship, secretly accuse them of crimes they can't defend against, torture them, try and execute them secretly, should they stand up and do something about it, or should they just leave?

      The ideal person should, indeed, stand up to it, but actual people will know that they will personally lose far more than they'd gain. Just like how you don't walk out into a crosswalk when a speeding semi is racing towards you, even though the law says they have to yield to you, you don't start a fight you're going to lose with very significant personal harm, just because it'll make the world a better place.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    38. Re:It's obviously the best solution by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1
      It's obviously best to simply give up and leave, rather than actually stand up and do something about changing your country.

      This has been my position for a long time: you fucked it up, you fix it. Kindly refrain from exporting your problems to other countries. We have our own problems, thank you, and we do not need yours.

      Whenever I visit other countries I always try to get an idea of what it might be like to live there. This includes a trip to the supermarket, which can be most illuminating.

      My results range from "I like it here and would like to get to know it better" (e.g. France, Australia) to "Not even on a bet!" (U.S.A.). After a day to pick up the accent I pass for a native in England. In total I've been to 10 countries, and they have all been interesting.

      I'm planning a trip to Russia in 2008, and am looking forward to it. Brushing up on my Russian, with sometimes interesting results in the shower in the morning ("Ya prodolzhayu prostiye dvizhen'ya..." Oops. Blush.)

      ...laura, proudly Canadian

    39. Re:It's obviously the best solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > It's obviously best to simply give up and leave, rather than actually stand up and do something about changing your country.

      "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
      -Ed Howdershelt

      Three down, one to go. Personally, I'm getting the fuck out of Dodge before someone opens the fourth box.

    40. Re:It's obviously the best solution by Exocrist · · Score: 1

      http://www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/fy07/pdf/budget/ tables.pdf
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_spending

      The U.S. spends much more on Defense (a little less than half of the budget) than on education, "health and human services", energy, and science combined. I don't think most 1st world countries spend half of their budget on the military. North Korea is the best example of another country that does that, that comes to mind. Thus, there is data to back up such "fanatical" statements. We are also free to try to change things for the better.

    41. Re:It's obviously the best solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spelling? That's unposiable!

    42. Re:It's obviously the best solution by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

      It's obviously best to simply give up and leave, rather than actually stand up and do something about changing your country.

      Isn't that how things pretty much started in America. Got fed up with the king, came over? Hmmmm....

      --
      ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
    43. Re:It's obviously the best solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm also an Aussie... and a Yank, for that matter. Dual citizenship. I completely concur with what the Aussie above said about the healthcare system here in the U.S. The only reason Americans tolerate it is because they don't know what a real healthcare system is.

      The fact that it's common for people in the U.S. to be financially crippled by healthcare costs is completely unacceptable. The fact that when you change jobs, you almost always have to change healthcare plans and perhaps your doctor as a result, is completely unacceptable. The fact that it's uncommon to get an ordinary, same-day appointment with your doctor is completely unacceptable. The fact that hospitals have been known to dump homeless people back into the streets is completely unacceptable. Above all, the fact that some people just can't get healthcare because of their financial situation, which is often the result of a disability that was caused by lack of healthcare in the first place, is completely unacceptable. And then there's the nightmare of dealing with health insurance companies here... I'm about to ditch my fourth, because they were bumbling idiots who don't understand their own cryptic and excessive paperwork, just like the other three.

      The healthcare system here is one thing I've been motivated to try to improve, but it's difficult, because the voting system here is also broken. And quite honestly, the Detainee Bill that Bush signed last month makes me think twice about speaking out. Bush and Co. may say they'll only use these frightening and inhumane new laws for terrorists, but with organisations like Greenpeace already being labelled as such, it's clear where this is going. This issue has tipped the balance enough for me to be making plans to go back to Australia. The Government there may have broken a lot of the things I used to be glad to have, but at least Australia still have habeas corpus.

      Mik Scheper. (Not an 'anonymous coward'; just not inclined to sign up with SlashDot.)

    44. Re:It's obviously the best solution by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Australia is a wonderful place to live, even with Howard in power. Every time I travel overseas, it simply reinforces this point back to me - thank god I'm living here. Right now I actually have a job to go to in the States if I want it, but having visited that country last year there's no way (short of unemployment) that I'd consider it - I've travelled and lived in a lot of different countries in my life, but the US is one of the worst I've ever seen.

      So, in answer to the original question, I'd say anywhere else in the OECD. Dear god, why anyone would want to live in a country where fundamental religion controls the government, where violence is seen as a justifiable answer to practically everything, where racism seems entrenched and where the outcome of at least one supposedly democratic election was controlled by the family of the ruling power ... well, it's completely beyond me.

    45. Re:It's obviously the best solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was good enough for our founding fathers.

    46. Re:It's obviously the best solution by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      And for the record, as soon as I retrain so that I'm more desirable to the NZ immigration folks, I'm outta here.

      My friend, if NZ immigration doesn't want you, then your problems aren't going to be solved by training; they'll take anyone with a pulse. Their newspaper ads around here are just a shade shy of saying "DESPERATE" in big red letters.

      If you did your own point calculation, you might want to spend a few bucks on an immigration consultant. They can explain to you where you failed to give yourself enough credit.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    47. Re:It's obviously the best solution by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      Some of these problems, including America's beligerent foreign policy will change as soon as (the current) Bush is gone. None of the people pegged to replace him, and I'm talking about republicans here seem to be nearly as myopic and radical.

      Yes, many of our problems will remain, but we should look better to the world.

    48. Re:It's obviously the best solution by thrashaholic · · Score: 1

      you fucked it up, you fix it.

      I'm 23. What exactly have I fucked up?

      My grandparents got lazy after the war, and started fucking it up.

      My parents blew the perfect chance (i.e. the 60's/70's) and fucked it up royally (i.e. the 80's-present).

      Why should I have to deal with cleaning up their messes for my entire life?

      --
      militant gun owning 'liberal'
  8. Moon by NosTROLLdamus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Van Allen Radiation Belt

    1. Re:Moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      1.Moon
      2.Overly long commute for a cyclist.

    2. Re:Moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gravity

    3. Re:Moon by esteeven · · Score: 1

      The moon is rubbish. No atmosphere.

  9. I moving to central america in ten years by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not because of this pipe dream bullshit of leaving the US because it "sucks", but because I can retire 20 years earlier than I could if I stayed in the US. I've even bought land. Better than my $400K house in the city now at 1/100th of the cost.

    1. Re:I moving to central america in ten years by greenguy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I lived in Nicaragua for five years. The people are wonderful there - engaged, genuine, passionate, warm. They're also dirt poor, and many (not all) treat you more as a resource than a person.

      The government is a rag doll for the US to play with, and petty corruption is rampant among cops and bureaucrats.

      Would I go back there to live? Definitely maybe. For now, I'm going to throw myself into undoing the damage done by the W regime, but it remains a fallback option. You know, when things get really bad, and they start doing things like repealing habeas corpus or something.

      --
      What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
  10. Visa, borders, etc. by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In almost every case it comes down to visas and border controls that stop humans freely moving around their planet. On the surface it looks like a good idea, but it's absolutely ridiculous that a human shouldn't be able to freely roam the public spaces of their own planet!

    I'd rather go live out in the nowhereness of Canada or Australia or something and get out of the way, but there's no hope for any of that in the near future as countries have lots of quirky requirements, laws, and rules for gaining entry :)

    1. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      I'd rather go live out in the nowhereness of Canada or Australia or something and get out of the way, but there's no hope for any of that in the near future as countries have lots of quirky requirements, laws, and rules for gaining entry

      Alaska could be a good bet. You wouldn't have any more (nominal) freedom, but at least there'd be fewer goons around to enforce the latest order from Herr Bush.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by Who235 · · Score: 1

      And have Ted Stevens for a legislator??

      Forget it.

    3. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you lived there, though, you could not vote for him. You'd be doing the country a service.

    4. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't get it...the pork he creates goes to create jobs in Alaska. If you live there, that's a good thing. The Alaskan voters aren't stupid, they know that he's bringing money to them.

    5. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by drsmithy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In almost every case it comes down to visas and border controls that stop humans freely moving around their planet. On the surface it looks like a good idea, but it's absolutely ridiculous that a human shouldn't be able to freely roam the public spaces of their own planet!

      No more ridiculous than you not being allowed to walk into someone's home, eat their food and sleep in their bed without their permission...

    6. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the insult with Herr Bush? I used to call my old German teacher Herr Keller.

      Oh, I get it! Anything that has to do with any trivial part of German culture can also be used to imply someone is a Nazi, as if all Germans currently are or were Nazis. 95% of those who were involved with the Nazi Party are dead. And the population of Germany has almost doubled. That means that there is a shitload of people who have never had a damn thing to do with the Nazis that you are demonizing. Get over yourself and show some respect for Germany.

    7. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      In other words, they're whoring themselves.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    8. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by zCyl · · Score: 4, Insightful
      In almost every case it comes down to visas and border controls that stop humans freely moving around their planet. On the surface it looks like a good idea, but it's absolutely ridiculous that a human shouldn't be able to freely roam the public spaces of their own planet!

      No more ridiculous than you not being allowed to walk into someone's home, eat their food and sleep in their bed without their permission...

      A better analogy would perhaps be being unable to buy a new house or move into the neighboring town without the people in that town deciding as a whole that they will permit you to live near them. It sounds silly, exclusionary, and backwards when we think of it in terms of a town, but most people still find it reasonable in terms of nations. In reality, the difference is only in the distance of our worldview and the scope of our self-identity, and in time and with increased communications, these are both broadening. Therefore it is likely that there will come a time when restricted migration across national borders will be largely regarded as backward, restrictive, and even oppressive.
    9. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      But think of all the lovely internet tubes he'd bring with his pork barrel spending. Won't someone please think of the tubes!?

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    10. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by StarWreck · · Score: 1

      "Herr" is just German for "Mister", so you effectively just called him "Mister Bush"... Sir, don't you realize that its considered proper to call the president "Mr. President" and not "Mr. Bush"? If you were trying to imply some sort of nazism, you should have said something along the lines of "Sieg HEIL BUSH, MEIN FUHRER!" oh, btw. Sieg Heil Bush, MEIN FUHRER!

      --
      ... and in the DRM, bind them.
    11. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Yes, sorry -- I couldn't think of "führer" at the time. However, it does have a nice "sarcastic insincerity" tone to it, I think, when used in this particular context.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    12. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      "Herr" is just German for "Mister", so you effectively just called him "Mister Bush"... Sir, don't you realize that its considered proper to call the president "Mr. President" and not "Mr. Bush"?

      Right, so failing to call him by his proper title conveys a lack of respect that's entirely appropriate to this context!

      On another note, long time no see, David! How's it going (but reply by email or phone instead of cluttering Slashdot)? I like the sig, by the way.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    13. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sieg heil, Mein Fuhrer!

    14. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by Nanpa · · Score: 0

      They do have that sort of thing, where people wont let you in or out of a town. It's called quarantine, and it's quite useful.

    15. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 3, Interesting
      On the surface it looks like a good idea, but it's absolutely ridiculous that a human shouldn't be able to freely roam the public spaces of their own planet!
      Absolutely. The passport is nothing more than the evolution of the Lord's Chit, from back when most people were serfs/slaves/property and needed their lord/master's permission to leave his demesne.

      Every international criminal on earth has a valid passport. Their only purpose is make governments feel like they are still our lords and benefactors.
      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    16. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by mgblst · · Score: 1

      ...without the people in that town deciding as a whole that they will permit you to live near them.
       
      Except that rather than the people as whole, it is one or two people who decide whether you can live there or not. If people as a whole decided, at least I would feel that there is some democracy involved.

    17. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      it's absolutely ridiculous that a human shouldn't be able to freely roam the public spaces of their own planet!

      I take it then that you don't support the concept of private property?
    18. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IF there was a vote right now in the USA on who to let in, do you think we'd allow any immigrants from any middle eastern or muslim country?

    19. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by Gabrill · · Score: 1
      Therefore it is likely that there will come a time when restricted migration across national borders will be largely regarded as backward, restrictive, and even oppressive.
      And that time will be when ethnicity, religion, language, and other elements of culture are universally abolished and/or unified. Immagrants almost always create exclusionary (Your Group Here)-towns because they are not welcomed to the existing establishment and frequently can't speak the language. Then there's that whole "governments jealously guarding their tax-base" thing . . .
      --
      Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
    20. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you missed the "public" bit. I don't feel any more entitled to Yosemite, Yellowstone, Crater Lake or the Salt Flats than anyone else on this planet. They're neat places, and I'd be rather rude to deny entry to anyone because they weren't born here. What entitlement do you have to that?

    21. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by Propaganda13 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People tend to forget that America is the 3rd largest country in area with the 3rd largest population. This means that there's a wide variety of different areas to live within the country. Sure, not everything is different, but there are huge cities and small towns, a vast countryside, jerks, nice people, places with no sales tax and some with really high sales tax. You can pay over $2K a month for a one room studio or under $10K to own a house(I have a coworker who bought a couple of them). There's lots of variety.

      Most people don't move because they've never lived in another country(or even another state) for a year or more to see if they like it or because of family ties. Sure I could move to another country, but everyone I ever knew won't be in that country that includes parents, siblings, nieces and nephews. Hell, whole families never move out of certain parts of a city because that's where the family is.

    22. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      I would hope that the majority of Americans wouldn't be the xenophobic sheep like morons their government appears to be and able to make up their own minds as to whether a particular person can bring added value to their community or not based on more than prejudicial attitudes based on religion and misinformation about the whichever country they are hoping to emigrate from.

    23. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Unrestricted migration between nations is one of the ambitions of the European Union.

      Note that the EU does have certain requirements for nations before they may join.

      Also , the current systems as in place are not quite perfect yet.

    24. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by raduf · · Score: 1

      It's very interesting to read your post in the light of the earlier corruption discussion.
      Corruption is probably the enemy of the 21 century. I was born in an ex-communist country, and I've seen up close how having a world of possibilities means nothing if the ruling class thinks only of its pockets. I don't blame them, as persons - they did whatever was best for them, and they were allowed to do it. I can't blame the people either - they were so naive right after the Revolution. It take lots and lots of years to learn how to vote right, and the political class has always stayed two steps ahead. Even now I don't know who I should vote for to change things...
      After all, corruption is not evil. It's simply the absence of civilisation, of collective wisdom, of a better system. There is nothing to fight against, only things to fight for.

      Returning to the subject at hand, imigration. All those "new neighbours" as you call them don't live in your bed, don't eat your food, don't take anything for you. They are however using a system that took lots of time and effort to build. Now, there's nothing wrong with that, righs? Actually it isn't :) on the contrary. But there is something to keep an eye for: what influence the newcommers have on the system. Personaly, I do believe the system will influence the people much more then the other way around. After all, how many first-generation imigrants enter politics?

    25. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you have never moved to New York City...

    26. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1
      Therefore it is likely that there will come a time when restricted migration across national borders will be largely regarded as backward, restrictive, and even oppressive.

      That will only be true when and if all nations provide equivalent levels of basic public welfare services. By "basic" I mean things like housing, health care, police, fire/rescue, national defense, etc. And by equivalent I don't mean to imply that all nations will have to provide these things, merely that if one nation doesn't provide it then the nations who do provide it can't possibly allow unrestricted migration from that nation.

    27. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by kiwimate · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In almost every case it comes down to visas and border controls that stop humans freely moving around their planet. On the surface it looks like a good idea, but it's absolutely ridiculous that a human shouldn't be able to freely roam the public spaces of their own planet!

      Actually, by and large if you have a passport you can "freely roam". You just can't arbitrarily decide you're going to move there permanently, taking up residence and enjoying the good fortune of benefits attached to that country.

    28. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by sjames · · Score: 1

      That will only be true when and if all nations provide equivalent levels of basic public welfare services. By "basic" I mean things like housing, health care, police, fire/rescue, national defense, etc. And by equivalent I don't mean to imply that all nations will have to provide these things, merely that if one nation doesn't provide it then the nations who do provide it can't possibly allow unrestricted migration from that nation.

      That is not necessarily true. According to U.S. Republicans, it's great when a company can pay low wages in one country and make high profits in another. Why is it worse to let individuals make high wages in one country and enjoy the low cost of living in another?

      Realistically, it would just mean a system where you get the benefits of whichever country you pay your taxes to.

    29. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by douglips · · Score: 1
      Every international criminal on earth has a valid passport. Their only purpose is make governments feel like they are still our lords and benefactors.

      I'm pretty sure that if Osama Bin Laden has a passport, the government that issued it either revoked it, or is no longer in power.
    30. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      I've read that passports were introduced into the U.S. by public demand, because U.S. citicens had problems in other countries that demanded passports.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    31. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by einar2 · · Score: 1

      First, I was outraged by this silly post then realized that your society is probably different.

      Here is why we do not want you to live with us before we checked your background:
      In my country, everybody who does not have a job receives unemployement money. Everybody receives excellent health service. When you are old, you receive a pension from which you can live. Nobody starves here, everybody has a roof over their head. There are no beggars in the street; nobody sleeps in boxes in dark backstreets. I can walk through my hometown at three o'clock in the morning without getting mugged or killed.

      Now, how does this work: The huge majority of people pay taxes. Everybody pays unemployement insurance and deposits money into the retirement fund. If you arrive here with the age of 30 you probably are already 100K behind with retirement payments.
      Us, the ones who payed into the common retirement system, do we want to give you a freebie?
      Infrastructure and public services have a price tag. Welcome to the world of insurance math where you are just a number...

    32. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      First, I was outraged by this silly post then realized that your society is probably different.

      Here is why we do not want you to live with us before we checked your background:
      In my country, everybody who does not have a job receives unemployement money. Everybody receives excellent health service. When you are old, you receive a pension from which you can live. Nobody starves here, everybody has a roof over their head. There are no beggars in the street; nobody sleeps in boxes in dark backstreets. I can walk through my hometown at three o'clock in the morning without getting mugged or killed.


      Um, I'm from the UK, which has most of the benefits you list above. I was talking from an idealistic point of view of "why borders" rather than a self-serving "I want to go take other people's free stuff" view.

    33. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      For the record, I didn't post the parent post, even though it reads as if I did. I do agree with him/her, however.

    34. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by demachina · · Score: 1

      "The passport is nothing more than the evolution of the Lord's Chit"

      This is probably the most insightful comment on this topic so far. Its the simple answer as to why more people haven't left the U.S. as its tilted to Fascism.

      The fact is it is pretty hard to emigrate from the U.S., renounce your citizenship, and the process creates such high barriers most people wont run the gauntlet unless they are desperate. Most people instead opt to sit and wait and hope the country comes to its senses some day. Never underestimate the stupidity of American voters though, or the ability of the malevolent powers that be to manipulate them in to doing stupid things using fear mongering, propaganda and wedge issues.

      Only 403 people renounced U.S. citizensip in 2002 and most were people who had immigrated to the U.S. and decided to return to their homeland.

      Here is a somewhat humorous and sad article on why its a pain to kiss your U.S. citizenship goodbye. When this article was written there were still a few Caribbean islands selling citizenships for dollars but the U.S. has been using political and economic pressure to shut them down mostly to prevent wealthy Americans from escaping U.S. taxes.

      Fact is, as long as you are a U.S. citizen you are owned by the U.S. government and you can't escape that fact unless you consent to be owned by some other country, it usually takes years to do that, you cant have a criminal record or HIV, and you usually have to clear years worth of hurdles that are usually more painful than just staying where you are and hope things get better. If you ever commit a crime, even a relatively minor one like drug offenses, you are pretty much enslaved to the U.S. because chances are no one else will take you unless you are rich enough to grease some palms or willing to be an illegal alien.

      If you still choose to emigrate note you have to file IRS tax returns every year until you renounce citizenship, and hope tax treaties keep you from getting taxed in both your new home and the old one. The IRS may not leave you alone even after you renounce if they think some of your wealth belong to them.

      You also cant legally emigrate or renounce your citizenship to escape military service. So if you joined the military before 9/11 to get that college education and not to fight an ugly illegal war in Iraq you are stuck until Uncle Sam lets you go. If the draft comes back you also wont be able to emigrate to escape it. It could be political suicide for whomever institutes a draft, but it could well happen since Uncle Sam will need more cannon fodder if Iraq continues to go south, and the U.S. opts to "Stay the Course", or if places like Iran or North Korea go south too. The U.S. barely has the cannon fodder for the current wars, fewer people want to volunteer, so if they need many more targets at all the draft will be back.

      So it usually takes years, is usually not easy, and you wont be free of Uncle Sam until you've succeeded in gaining citizenship elsewhere and renounced U.S. citizenship. During this multi year process a myriad of things can go wrong that derail the whole process, a minor scrap with the law in your new home, can torpedo the whole process for example. Somewhere during the process, or worse right after you renounce your U.S. citizenship, the U.S. could come to its senses, elect a moderate sensible government, while your new home could go off the political deep end. Take comfort that the chances the U.S. will elect a moderate, sensible government look to be pretty low lately.

      Unless you are attempting refugee status, and no country is going to given an American refugee status, chances are you need to be either very affluent or you are going to need a company to sponsor and employ you. If you have a nice employer and a job you like this isn't so bad, but there is a wicked catch. Your residence in your new country is often almost completely dependent on that employer, they know

      --
      @de_machina
    35. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nowhereness? Didn't know I was living in nowhereness? All the cities and people must have thrown me off.

    36. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by demachina · · Score: 1

      "Only 403 people renounced U.S. citizensip in 2002"

      Thought I should it will be very interesting to see if this number starts spiking soon. It usually takes years to establish new citizenship and renounce your old one, so we probably wont know until we see numbers in 2006-2010 how many people have opted to flee the insanity that is the new Fasco-Republican party.

      --
      @de_machina
    37. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that visas and border controls don't pose a very large obstacle, but I think the biggest obstacle to uprooting your life and moving to a foreign country is the social circles you have to leave behind. I would love to live and work in any number of places, but I know I can't convince everyone in my life who I know I can't live without to make the move with me.

      IANAL, but I know I could pour over every law, regulation, whatever of the country I would be moving to and find some way to make the visa/work permit situation possible. But it's all pointless if I have to leave the people I care about behind.

    38. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by jc42 · · Score: 1

      According to U.S. Republicans, it's great when a company can pay low wages in one country and make high profits in another. Why is it worse to let individuals make high wages in one country and enjoy the low cost of living in another?

      Actually, I've finally started hearing a few economists point out that this is at the heart of the problems with "internationalization". We now have a situation where corporations are free to move across borders, but labor isn't. This puts labor at a serious disadvantage. Your employer can move wherever the cost is cheapest, and sell where there's a good profit. But you and I can't do this.

      It doesn't take a great genius to understand the results of such an imbalance.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    39. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A better analogy would perhaps be being unable to buy a new house or move into the neighboring town without the people in that town deciding as a whole that they will permit you to live near them. It sounds silly, exclusionary, and backwards when we think of it in terms of a town, but most people still find it reasonable in terms of nations. In reality, the difference is only in the distance of our worldview and the scope of our self-identity, and in time and with increased communications, these are both broadening. Therefore it is likely that there will come a time when restricted migration across national borders will be largely regarded as backward, restrictive, and even oppressive."

      There are many VALID reasons to keep foreign people out, Immigration controls are for both political and economic reasons. That and there is the IMMIGRANT FREELOADER FACTOR. Also the ability to absorb massive amounts of people can destabilize economies, and stress already stressed, public and private resources.

      1) Desperate immigrants depress wages of lower ends of the economic spectrum and the already poor people
      2) They reduce the standard of living of the whole nation as a whole and up the competition for public resources they most likely have NEVER payed a cent of tax to benefit from.

      Illegal Immigrants deserve to be looked down upon when they are creating all kinds of new social problems that cannot be effectively dealt with in a timely manner creating all sorts of economic and political havoc.

      The truth is americans have every right to be pissed off at the illegal immigration taking place, if I was american I'd give serious thought to using the military to patrol the border and shoot to kill. You can't give the message to everyone that wants to come to your country they can just run in illegally, just imagine what havoc it would cause of 150+ million people migrated to the US within a few years. Fact is 15 million plus people crossing illegally into the US is a hell of a fucking lot of people, consider the fact that there are already 34 million people in poverty, enduring much misery and stress.

      There is no right for anyone to illegally INVADE another country, not to mention the complex economic and political problems of non-natives bring upon those who did not ask for it. You illegally come to a new country and as a CRIMINAL, then ask for help and that you be allowed to stay? Illegals are ballsy criminals.

      Unfortunately as much as people might want to welcome the illegal immigrants in that the want a better live, they are also making life worse for a lot of the natives, the issue of illegal immigration is not so cut and dried as "helping out".

    40. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by zsau · · Score: 1

      I don't know about Canada, but in Australia we have a perpetual skills shortage in the bush/outback. You won't get high-tech slashdot jobs, but if you say you want to teach or be a doctor in the middle of nowhere, you'll have a much better chance than getting in if they think you want to live in Melbourne or Sydney.

      --
      Look out!
    41. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1
      According to U.S. Republicans, it's great when a company can pay low wages in one country and make high profits in another.

      Great for who? Do you have a quote from a Republican making this argument?

      Why is it worse to let individuals make high wages in one country and enjoy the low cost of living in another?

      Huh? What does that have to do with immigration? The problem with immigration doesn't come from people making high wages, it's comes from people who move into a country and then make no wages.

    42. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1
      Realistically, it would just mean a system where you get the benefits of whichever country you pay your taxes to.

      Sorry, I missed that comment when I first replied.

      Your "realistic" solution isn't very realistic. When I get into a car accident, I don't want the paramedics checking my birth certificate to see what level of care to provide me. Ditto after the paramedics take me to the hospital, when I call the police about burglar breaking into my home, or when my house catches on fire. Besides, even if this solution was realistic, it would be far too cruel. Sorry, buddy, the country you were born in doesn't have a fire service, we're going to have to let you burn.

      And as for national defense, that's not even something that could be separated, even if it was a smart thing to do so.

    43. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1
      We now have a situation where corporations are free to move across borders, but labor isn't.

      What does it mean for a corporation "to move across borders"? Corporations are not physical entities, so the comparison can't possibly be that meaningful.

      Your employer can move wherever the cost is cheapest, and sell where there's a good profit. But you and I can't do this.

      Huh? Sure you can. You don't have to be an employer to sell stuff to people in other countries. I've done it, and you can too.

    44. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Preventing the Iraqi army from waltzing into Kuwait and installing thier government by force(or the US army into Iraq) would be 'oppression' of those young men who just wanted to see the world.

    45. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silly human.. too much graft in skimming off backs of illegals and immigrants.
      Think of it this way, somebody has to be at the bottom, and if it aint me, thats OK in my book.
      thats the mentality you're dealing with.
      Its stupid, its sad, and it sucks.

      Black market/illegal is the only way to go.
      MOD ME UP.

    46. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "On the surface it looks like a good idea, but it's absolutely ridiculous that a human shouldn't be able to freely roam the public spaces of their own planet!"

      Explain that unsupported assertion, if you can.

      Exclusivity prevents other humans from taking advantage of resources in my bit of planet, so why should I want to give that up? It is like the construct of property rights.

      I want MY property which I worked for, and I have no reason to give it to you.
      I want the benefits that go with MY countrymen restricting access to MY country, and have zero logical reason to want everyone else to have unfettered access to it. I would not benefit by an invasion of the poor and desperate.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    47. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      My whole point is that the arbitrary definition of a 'country' isn't particularly helpful. You could argue you don't want anyone from outside of your *town* getting the benefits available in your town. Or how about your county? Or how about your state? These are all arbitrary definitions covering areas of space. I don't see why we need to say that 'country' is the resolution freedom operates at. Why not 'planet'?

      There are plenty of 'poor and desperate' people in every country, what makes them any better than poor and desperate people elsewhere? There are also lots of rich people overseas who could benefit your country / town.

    48. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by sjames · · Score: 1

      Your "realistic" solution isn't very realistic. When I get into a car accident, I don't want the paramedics checking my birth certificate to see what level of care to provide me. Ditto after the paramedics take me to the hospital,

      If you live in the U.S. you should already be familiar with the first question asked at ER admission, "Do you have insurance"? The answer to that question will determine the course of your treatment. Prior to admission (the paramedics) or if you're too unconscious to answer questions, the standard would remain the same. Stabilize first, ask about insurance later. If insured, admit for observation, physical therepy, etc. If not, find excuse to discharge with a huge bill and a payment plan. Many countries that do consider health care important provide their citizens with an 'insurance card' that entitles them to covered treatment abroad.

      In any event, one of the tasks performed early in emergency treatment is establishing the identity of the patient and determining who to call. As long as someone is going through your personal effects to figure that out, it's no extra problem to determine your nationality as well.

      when I call the police about burglar breaking into my home, or when my house catches on fire. Besides, even if this solution was realistic, it would be far too cruel. Sorry, buddy, the country you were born in doesn't have a fire service, we're going to have to let you burn.

      If you own a home in the U.S. you pay property taxes. If you rent, your landlord pays property taxes and passes the cost on to you. That should entitle you to fire and police protection.

      In short, if taxes are restructured appropriatly, it can work without requiring any of the scenerios you mention. Certainly that makes at least as much sense as setting up barbed wire at the border.

    49. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by sjames · · Score: 1

      What does it mean for a corporation "to move across borders"? Corporations are not physical entities, so the comparison can't possibly be that meaningful.

      It's a simple matter of where you pay your expenses and where you reap your profits.

      An example of a more fair organization would be if workers were free to earn first world wages and then pay third world prices for food, clothing, and shelter. That is the equivilant of international corporations that sell product for first world prices and pay third world wages and benefits.

      What that would actually amount to is that economic disparities would equalize much more quickly and the advantage of "offshoring" would disappear.

    50. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by sjames · · Score: 1

      Great for who? Do you have a quote from a Republican making this argument?

      They are legion, Google "globalization politics Republican". It isn't strictly limited to Republicans, various Democrats in name only have also been advocates.

    51. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "There are plenty of 'poor and desperate' people in every country, what makes them any better than poor and desperate people elsewhere?"

      Why should I sacrifice for them, too? To what specific end?
      The abstract construct of "betterness" is not relevant to my situation. Resources and opportunity protected be exclusivity sustain my situation better then surrendering to an open border policy.
      What would _I_ get from that? If you wish people to support a notion, demonstrating concrete benefits is better than the subjective constructs of "right, wrong, better, worse".

      "There are also lots of rich people overseas who could benefit your country / town."

      They are not being completely excluded, but filtering them helps me too. When the rich overwhelm a neighborhood (let's use northern New Jersey as an example) they drive out the less-prosperous. That is why I took advantage of the options in our protected society to move elsewhere.
      If we had open borders, it is reasonable to excpect that we would be flooded, and my choices would be constrained by the population pressure.

      Tell me what open borders will do for me, not what they might do. That is not good enough.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    52. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1
      Your "realistic" solution isn't very realistic. When I get into a car accident, I don't want the paramedics checking my birth certificate to see what level of care to provide me. Ditto after the paramedics take me to the hospital,
      If you live in the U.S. you should already be familiar with the first question asked at ER admission, "Do you have insurance"?

      To be honest, I've been to the ER a few times and I don't remember that being the first question, which is not to say that it wasn't. But one thing I do know, for a fact, is that the ER isn't going to deny someone treatment because they don't have insurance. I have a few friends who don't have insurance and have been to the ER on more than one occasion. In fact, a friend of a friend of a friend has some mental problems and goes on a somewhat regular basis (when things get really bad) and gets medication. The ER sends a ridiculous bill to him, and he never pays it.

      In any event, one of the tasks performed early in emergency treatment is establishing the identity of the patient and determining who to call. As long as someone is going through your personal effects to figure that out, it's no extra problem to determine your nationality as well.

      You seem to not understand my point. The problem isn't them figuring out my nationality, the problem is having to prove a particular nationality in order to be treated. Just stabilizing someone and keeping them alive costs lots and lots and lots of money. To only provide such services to certain people would cause two problems. 1) What about people who don't have ID on them, do we let them die? 2) Letting people of certain nationalities just die is utterly cruel and in any case would never be accepted by the populace.

      If you own a home in the U.S. you pay property taxes. If you rent, your landlord pays property taxes and passes the cost on to you. That should entitle you to fire and police protection.

      Fair enough, as far as those costs which can be directly tied to property ownership. Most fire services and some police services would fall under that. OTOH, many fire services and most police services aren't tied very well to property ownership.

      In short, if taxes are restructured appropriatly, it can work without requiring any of the scenerios you mention.

      It's probably possible, and if decently planned out I'd support it (open borders). But I definitely wouldn't say it's inevitable, or even likely.

    53. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by sjames · · Score: 1

      You seem to not understand my point. The problem isn't them figuring out my nationality, the problem is having to prove a particular nationality in order to be treated. Just stabilizing someone and keeping them alive costs lots and lots and lots of money.

      In the U.S., that money doesn't come from taxes anyway. It gets tacked on to everyone else's bill. Treatment beyond keep 'em alive comes from insurance or the patient.

      I included the question of nationality since in many cases the patient's home country will pay medical costs incurred abroad much like insurance claims are filed. Sorry I wasn't more clear on that point.

      Of course, I seriously doubt anyone is going to come to the U.S. to get cheap medical care anyway (particularly not emergency care).

      I imagine that in countries where medical care is provided, they might do for foriegners what U.S. hospitals do for the uninsured, provide critical care, and send a huge bill.

      I do agree that some restructure would be necessary. I also agree that moiving to open borders is unlikely.

    54. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      Tell me what open borders will do for me, not what they might do. That is not good enough.

      That is impossible. Open borders, like outsourcing, is one of those things that looks bad from the point of view of the majority, but that would pay dividends to the world as a whole in unpredictable ways. Just because it might not be a good idea for you or me or any particular person doesn't mean it's not of benefit to mankind as a whole. Recycling doesn't really benefit any one personally, but people still do it because it results in a better world.

    55. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by einar2 · · Score: 1

      Hello Peter,

      it was not meant as an personal attack. I am sorry if it appeared like one. It is just so that I heard your arguments too often. Borders are to protect resources. Plain and simple. Although most of us would invite the rest of the world with open arms, it becomes suddenly different when you realize the price tag.
      There is social tourism. Several of my friends who worked for the state in the area of immegration changed my viewpoint quite drastically. I do not doubt that there are refugees visiting your country out of sheer necessity. However, most of them don't. Compared to some second world countries, the UK looks like a shopping mall without security cameras.
      Nothing against your idealistic point of view. But the borders you complain about are not to lock you in, they are there to lock the rest of the world out.

      regards,

      einar

    56. Re:Visa, borders, etc. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1
      You seem to not understand my point. The problem isn't them figuring out my nationality, the problem is having to prove a particular nationality in order to be treated. Just stabilizing someone and keeping them alive costs lots and lots and lots of money.
      In the U.S., that money doesn't come from taxes anyway. It gets tacked on to everyone else's bill. Treatment beyond keep 'em alive comes from insurance or the patient.

      That is a good point, and it's true to some extent (some parts of treatment, such as paramedic services, fire rescue jaws of life type services, etc. do come at least in part from taxes). But even if it all just got tacked on to everyone else's bill, it still wouldn't be fair, and it would still present an enormous burden on the economy.

      I included the question of nationality since in many cases the patient's home country will pay medical costs incurred abroad much like insurance claims are filed. Sorry I wasn't more clear on that point.

      For the non-third-world countries, which provide equivalent services, this is a reasonable solution. It's what I was thinking when in my initial statement I suggested that this is only a problem as long as different countries offer drastically different services of this sort.

      And maybe just opening the borders wide open would help fix the discrepancies. Right now the average American doesn't care very much about the health conditions of the average Mexican. Open up the borders, and watch the Mexicans start pouring in, and now it's quite clearly in the best interests of the United States to help Mexico solve its problems. In that sense I really like the concept, I don't like living in a world where Americans look out for Americans and Mexicans look out for Mexicans and we put up a big fence to keep the two as separated as possible. But at the same time I just don't see a solution to this happening any time soon. It's comfortable living here in America and enjoying all the free services the government provides, while at the same time paying relatively low taxes for them (speaking for someone in my income bracket with my family size anyway). Opening up the borders would likely seriously disturb that, certainly in the short term, and while it's something I'd personally be willing to do I don't think a majority of my fellow Americans would agree with me.

      Of course, I seriously doubt anyone is going to come to the U.S. to get cheap medical care anyway (particularly not emergency care).

      Maybe they won't come for that reason in particular, but I think people do come in part because it's safer to live here, and a big factor of that safeness is emergency care. Another big factor is national defense, which is one of the biggest expenditures of the federal government.

      I do agree that some restructure would be necessary. I also agree that moiving to open borders is unlikely.

      We're probably close to being on the same page, then. My initial comment on the matter was more toward how likely moving to open borders was going to be. My idea of a Utopian society would certainly involve open borders (really no borders or governments at all), but it's hard to imagine how to get there from where we are today.

  11. Everywhere and anywhere by antifoidulus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, not really, but by the time I was 25 I have had tech jobs in both Japan and Germany(I'm currently in the fatherland). While there certainly are some good aspects to living abroad, being away from home can kind of suck. My mom was hit by a car recently, she is ok but the feeling that you are so far away never helps the situation.

    My advice to Americans is to learn another language and to not rule anything out. Though I would suggest Asia, because that seems to be where the future is headed. I plan on going back to the states for a few years to get my PhD then heading out somewhere in Asia(probably not Japan because although they have had some nice growth recently, the sun is setting. Plus white fanboys give foreigners a bad name there).

  12. Oddly enough - Austria by Salvance · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I love America, and don't want to leave; however, I see multiple reasons why I may be 'forced' to leave: the impact of our massive debt on the future economy, the shift to a stronger executive branch (and what this might yield), and the impact of a swelling unsupported lower/debtor class. If in a situation where I felt I had no other options, I'd move to Vienna, Austria. Every time I've been there, I've been enthralled by the people, the cleanliness, the relatively hands-off government (at least compared to some European and particularly Scandinavian countries), the wealth of job opportunities, the high proportion of English speakers, and the area's focus on health and fitness. It has always seemed like a home away from home.

    --
    Crack - Free with every butt and set of boobs
    1. Re:Oddly enough - Austria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am presently living in Austria, I moved here about a year ago from Seattle... and I agree in whole to your views. Health, Fitness, and general well being are at the forefront, and let's be honest... German isn't that hard, hell, old english and old german are kissing cousins of each other...

    2. Re:Oddly enough - Austria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What's with the fixation on the English speakers? Is it not quite obvious (and let alone respectful) to learn the language of the country of your residence? English is not mandatory everywhere around the world and besides, where there are enough speakers of the local language, people often do not bother to learn others. Enough people to talk to, you know.

      I started frequenting in Hungary in 1998. I was blindly hoping people would speak English there. Well, it was quite an arrogant hope, granted, and not too many did. It has indeed changed recently and many Hungarian people under the age of 40 speak English on a palatable level. What's also changed is that I started learning Hungarian and believe me you, it is SO MUCH easier to be part of the "own" people. See, in a room full of locals, you'll just not be participating in the conversation. You'll always be an outsider. I am slowly getting "in" and it's cosier there.

      Now, off to learn Latvian. That would make my sixth language that I can order beer in.

    3. Re:Oddly enough - Austria by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      I never had an interest in Europe. But this past spring, I had to go to Germany. Absolutely loved it. While I noticed a number of minor issues ( shops opened only on thrs night, and I was quite surprised when I tried to get cleaning over a holiday weekend :) ), I would love to spend more time there. I would not classify the ppl as the warmest, but they were very polite. There were so many things about it that somewhere down the road, I will try to spend a year there.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    4. Re:Oddly enough - Austria by ex-geek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As somebody from Vienna, Austria, I must say that your observations astonished me.

      hands-off governement in Austria? This has probably to do with sloppy/pragmatic enforcement of laws in comparison to Germany. We do have many laws, but are not crazy enough to actually implement them.

      Cleanliness? We don't think of ourselves that way, since we are not as obsessed with cleanliness as the Germans are.

      There are many god reasons to move to another country: climate, women, food, jobs, etc.
      It is however not a good idea to move to a country because you are feed up with the politics of your own. People are feed up with their governements and politicians, because of the many bad experiences they had. Since they had mostly exciting and good memories from vacations and business trips to outher countries, they can get the wrong impression that everything is better everywhere else.

      But some actually do move for that reason. There are Germans who come to Austria, because they hate german politics. Some Austrians move to Greece, because they hate ours and so on. These kinds of expatriates then continue to obsess with their native country and never stop badmouthing it.

    5. Re:Oddly enough - Austria by Bromskloss · · Score: 1

      Heh, I would have said you were European, judging from the spelling in your sig. :-)

      --
      Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
    6. Re:Oddly enough - Austria by jabster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's with the fixation on the English speakers? Is it not quite obvious (and let alone respectful) to learn the language of the country of your residence?

      I am curious...what is your take on illegal Mexicans coming into the US and not learning English? What do you think about US schools teaching kids who don't speak English in Spanish (as they do in CA)?

      I'm hoping you will say, they should learn English....but, this being slashdot, I'm not holding my breath.

      -john

      --
      Slashdot: you'll not find a more wretched collection of villainy and disreputable types...
    7. Re:Oddly enough - Austria by DieNadel · · Score: 1

      I've lived in Germany twice and I can say that I love it. Recently I got a job position there, kind of a dream job, but with the Nokia-Siemens partnership, my position had a great chance of being jeopardized (since they have a 6 months "Probezeit" and are looking to cut costs).

      I've had the chance to visit/live in several different countries now (South America countries, most of western and some of eastern Europe countries and Japan). The country I love the most is Germany.

      Once you know the language you can get a pretty warm response from Germans (I don't think they are cold at all), they are always helpful and polite.

      ICH Herz DEUTSCHLAND!

      The only thing that really sucks is the amount of taxes you have to pay on your income, but on the other hand they social programs really seem to work.

      --
      Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant!
    8. Re:Oddly enough - Austria by Salvance · · Score: 1

      I don't have a fixation on English speakers, it just makes the transition a little easier. I would fully intend to learn the language ... but if I'm fumbling for the right word, it's a lot easier to say "how do I say 'one beer for me and two for my lady'" than to point and use my fingers like the dumb American that I am ;)

      --
      Crack - Free with every butt and set of boobs
    9. Re:Oddly enough - Austria by nutshell42 · · Score: 1
      Cleanliness? We don't think of ourselves that way, since we are not as obsessed with cleanliness as the Germans are.

      IOW, don't stereotype us, join us in stereotyping others instead =)

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    10. Re:Oddly enough - Austria by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      I have been amazed at the number of ppl that have commented on it. I have had several ppl chase me to get me to explain it them (Americans no less). I figure that if an American does not get the double meaning, then even my explaining it to them means they will never get it.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    11. Re:Oddly enough - Austria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and don't forget all those kangaroos!!

    12. Re:Oddly enough - Austria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In fact, yes, they should learn English. Must, even. As much as I know, English is actually a mandatory subject in Mexican schools, but in all probability most of them don't take it too seriously. I've only met Mexicans that have spoken impeccable English, but I guess that can be attributedto the fact that I've only met the world-travelling kind. Then again, I have never been to either Americas (or to any English-speaking country, for that matter).

      So there's no need to be condescending, do hold your breath. (I am, in fact, only posting as an anonymous coward because I can't remember my password - Seamonkey's password manager does it for me - and I am not at home.)

      But "what really grinds my gears" is the hefty supply of imported top level executives who live some ten years in some country, won't ever learn any more than "thank you" in the local language, show contempt for anything local - culture, people, etc - and cash in on the natives' behalf. Believe me you, I have seen more of those than I ever wanted.

    13. Re:Oddly enough - Austria by parc · · Score: 1

      Have you spent any extended time in the US? Government touches you absolutely everywhere, all the time.

      Compared to many US cities, Vienna is spotless. But judging a country by a single city is a particularly flawed method for chosing a country to live in. New York looks nothing like the rest of the US, as an example. Vienna really looks nothing like the rest of Austria.

      My big reason for wanting to move to Austria? Every single place I've visited in Austria feels like home. Sure, my german is pitiful and I sound like Tarzan to the locals. But absolutely every single one of them welcomed me to their shop, home, or restaurant because I really try to speak with them. Nothing felt foreign there, even after my poor german-fatigued brain stopped trying to translate the signs. The only time I had a problem was when I couldn't manage to get my Golf to go up a hill from a stop (I wasn't a good stick driver at the time). The guy behind me came up and angrily asked if I could even drive. Of course, in hindsight, he was actually asking me if my car was broken.

      To make a long-winded story short -- love the place you want to move to. I love Austria not because of the skiing, culture, or politics. Nor am I looking to escape my own government -- that's a handy side-effect. I love Austria because it feels like home, more so than where I've lived my entire life.

    14. Re:Oddly enough - Austria by NerveGas · · Score: 1

      "It is however not a good idea to move to a country because you are feed up with the politics of your own. "

          You've missed the fact that the "freedom of exit", or the ability to leave for a better country, was one of the greatest forces that made Europe what it is today. When people got up and left, it did far more than staying around... unless they stayed around for an armed revolution.

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    15. Re:Oddly enough - Austria by ex-geek · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying that you shouldn't move out if death squads are chasing you.

      But if you are living in the free world, where by and large problems of similar magnitude exist, it isn't a good idea to move just because of this reason, because soon, you will find out that the grass isn't that much greener on the other side after all.

  13. Come to the World Next Door by Bieeanda · · Score: 5, Funny

    Living just to the north of much of the United States, I often offer Stateside friends crash space in my basement in the event that things go completely pear-shaped where they live. Sure, we could be violently annexed in a depressingly short amount of time (and our supplies of uranium, oil, fresh water and lumber might make us a delectable target), but it's a relatively short trip. Besides, beyond Canadian Bacon, there hasn't really been any real effort to add us to the Axis of Evil.

    1. Re:Come to the World Next Door by gbobeck · · Score: 1
      Besides, beyond Canadian Bacon, there hasn't really been any real effort to add us to the Axis of Evil.

      What about South Park: Bigger Longer & Uncut?
      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
    2. Re:Come to the World Next Door by Bieeanda · · Score: 1

      Dude, that's just a cartoon. Everyone knows that cartoons aren't real.

    3. Re:Come to the World Next Door by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dude, that's just a cartoon. Everyone knows that Canada isn't real.

    4. Re:Come to the World Next Door by Ubergrendle · · Score: 1

      We aren't even a real country anyways.

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    5. Re:Come to the World Next Door by joecr · · Score: 1

      I guess you missed out on "'Weird Al' Yankovic's" "Straight Outta Lynwood" album. Track three in the USA is "Canadian Idiot".

      I think it is a type of humor, as Canadian Bacon is as well.

    6. Re:Come to the World Next Door by woodsrunner · · Score: 1

      No effort to add you to the axis of evil? Is that what you believe up there in Soviet Canuckistan? Why do you think we're always firing on your troops? One word: Pre-Emptive Strike!

      Just wait a few years when Nevada runs dry. We'll be up there for your water to support our desert casinos, eh.

    7. Re:Come to the World Next Door by Brickwall · · Score: 1
      Besides, beyond Canadian Bacon, there hasn't really been any real effort to add us to the Axis of Evil.

      Obviously, you missed the South Park movie.

      But on a serious note, as a Canadian who has lived and worked in the US, I have to say: I think America is a great country, and Americans are great people, but I would rather live in Canada. It's not as crowded, violent, insular, or dangerous as the US, even if economic opportunity is slightly more limited. Pop culture is much the same, with the added benefit that Canadians can actually see the puck on a TV screen, and understand curling.

      Part of it is a "Broken Windows" phenomenon. In May, I visited my company's HQ in New Jersey. Wandering around the streets, I noticed that the boulevards were full of unmown grass and weeds, and that vacant lots were common and decrepit. And I've seen that in Detroit, Cleveland, Pittsburgh, NYC, Chicago, Orlando, etc., as well. I think that leads to a perception of "if it's not mine, who gives a f***?". On the other hand, in Toronto, the streets are neat and clean, and I think that leads to a perception of "we have a nice place here, let's keep it that way".

      In the words of G.H.W. Bush, we are a "kinder, gentler America". Yes, not as rich. Yes, not as important. Yes, militarily impotent. But I think there is less day-to-day strife in our society, and I think we live richer lives on balance. YMMV.

      --
      What was once true, is no longer so
    8. Re:Come to the World Next Door by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1
      we could be violently annexed in a depressingly short amount of time (and our supplies of uranium, oil, fresh water and lumber might make us a delectable target)

      Free trade makes this notion pretty much senseless.

    9. Re:Come to the World Next Door by gx5000 · · Score: 1

      "violently annexed in a depressingly short amount of time (and our supplies of uranium, oil, fresh water and lumber might make us a delectable target), "

      Where were you when they passed the FTAA (Free Trade Area of the Americas) aggreements ?!
      They already took our fuel and power resource reserves...
      there's not much else left but our health system and our Flag...
      They just walked in as Politicians do.
      Happy Cinquo de mayo !

      --
      End of Line.
    10. Re:Come to the World Next Door by Rayonic · · Score: 1

      Even if the U.S. annexed Canada (through force or diplomacy), it'd still be a bunch of oil/lumber/etc. companies selling stuff to the U.S. market. Hell, most likely it'd be the exact same companies. All this invasion paranoia is cute.

      Frankly, unless Quebec secedes (a possibility), you won't see Canada and the United States merging.

    11. Re:Come to the World Next Door by Orphic_Egg · · Score: 1

      Fantastic !! Thank you!! Now where do I put my gun vault ???

    12. Re:Come to the World Next Door by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows that cartoons aren't real.

      George Dubya doesn't, and Ron Reagan didn't.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    13. Re:Come to the World Next Door by CantStopWondering · · Score: 1

      I guess you don't know about the Canadian Conspiracy. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0285470/

  14. Welll..... by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If it were not for the money, language, and responsibility issues, I'd move to a Scandanavian country in a heartbeat.

    As it is, I believe that America is exporting its culture at an incredible rate, and the best way to stop what I see as an unbelievably bad world situation is by attempting to modify it from within the States. I'm not doing a great job, but just being here and dissenting my little piece has more of an impact than living outside the country and bitching to other people that aren't there about how much my country sucks.

    I lived overseas, and found that there were a few things true about me personally - 1) wherever I went, I was the same person. Ergo, I was pissed off and unhappy because that's what I started out as. I've attempted to change that. 2) wherever I went, I was followed by the influence of the things I had left the country to avoid, one way or another. Thus I am back here to attempt to modify the things about both me and the world around me that irked me so much when I was not living in the States. I don't know if I'll manage to change the world enough to make any sort of difference should I leave again, but by the time I can afford to leave again for any extended period of time, I will be able to say that I'm at least trying to alleviate certain negative influential factors that result from our social structure.

    1. Re:Welll..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      How many kebab stores do you find in Paris?

      How many McDonalds, KFC and Burger King (combined) do you find in Paris?

      I find the notion that 'Americans are destroying world food culture' with demonstrations destroying McDonaldses quite interesting - if you want to burn a store for infringing on your country, burn a kebab store. Except that would be racist, of course. So if you want to stay 'amongst the company of good men', break a McDonalds instead.

      Even better - 'McDonalds out of the Middle East' - count the number of McDonaldses in Riyad versus the number of kebab stores in Paris. Whichever there is more of, burn them. Is this acceptable to you?

    2. Re:Welll..... by iogan · · Score: 1
      If it were not for the money, language, and responsibility issues, I'd move to a Scandanavian country in a heartbeat.
      Don't worry about the language, at least not if you are qualified in IT. Nobody will care if you speak the language. Money? Not sure where you're coming from there. The ticket costs almost nothing, and as long as you get a job before you go, why do you need money? Responsibility issues I'm not sure what you mean by, though. Other than that, you're welcome. See ya.
    3. Re:Welll..... by iogan · · Score: 2, Insightful
      How many kebab stores do you find in Paris? How many McDonalds, KFC and Burger King (combined) do you find in Paris?
      Not to feed an obvious troll, but the reason people hate McDonalds is not that they're American. It's because of what they and corporations like them are doing to the workforce, the environment, and our health. That's why people burn them down. Kebab shops, are not owned by multinational companies. They are locally owned, locally managed small businesses, and help the local economy by proving jobs etc. And the food is not that unhealthy either.

      So that's probably why.
    4. Re:Welll..... by cyclop · · Score: 1

      I find the notion that 'Americans are destroying world food culture' with demonstrations destroying McDonaldses quite interesting - if you want to burn a store for infringing on your country, burn a kebab store. Except that would be racist, of course.

      Applause. Really. I have never thought it this way, but it is damn true -and I'm not American.

      Kebabs are damn tasty, however :).

      --
      -- Patent no.123456: A way to personalize /. comments with a sig attached to the end.
    5. Re:Welll..... by badger.foo · · Score: 1

      > If it were not for the money, language, and responsibility issues, I'd move to a Scandanavian country in a heartbeat.

      huh? anything with alcohol in it is expensive here, but language is no issue. Most Norwegians at least (and AFAICT Danes and Swedes too) will be more than happy to 'practice their English' at you any time.

      --
      -- That grumpy BSD guy - http://bsdly.blogspot.com/
    6. Re:Welll..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to feed (pun not intended) an obvious troll, but it is strange that the main objection against fast food chains is 'what they are doing to the workforce, the environment and our health' when the main argument that is spoken against them is that they are American. I must just assume that people in general suffer from a strange duality whereby they say what they don't intend to say.

      As for the workforce - I think your average McDonalds has far better procedures in place than your average kebab shack. This applies to security of payment, of training, of advancement structure, and the level of pay in general. They also pay taxes. If comparing most kebab shacks in Europe against McD's, kebab shacks lose.

      As for the environment - I think your average McDonalds is far less likely to buy 'rainforest meat' than your average kebab shack. They are watched far more closely and must buy in bigger quantities. Bags are always recycled paper bags, unlike many kebab shacks who give out plastic bags, and use styrofoam boxes. McDonalds also pay tax.

      As for the health - I think your average McDonalds has far healthier food than the average kebab shack. For cleanliness, a single poor health inspection will hurt 1000s of stores, while a single poor health inspection at a standalone kebab shack will hurt 1 store - giving high resource incentives for cleanliness. For the nutrition level - I am not sure, to be frank. But from what I can see and taste, I would bet on McD and Burger King. I would however be extremely interested in what your source is for strongly affirming that kebabs ARE healthier than McDonalds-burgers, as you state with supreme confidence.

      Let us for a moment indeed pretend that it is workforce, health and environment as reasons why people destroy McDonalds and want them out of the Middle East and any other country, in spite of what they are outwardsly saying, that they are American. In this case I can only attribute to people a massive misguidedness and irrationality bordering on craziness, since facts obviously does not support their conclusions. Myself, I promise to support "McDonalds out of the Middle East" once "Kebab out of Europe" has taken place.

    7. Re:Welll..... by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      The difference is that kebabs are lovely, the shops are usually owned by families, not huge multinational organisations, the staff and owners will give you the time of day and kebab shops usually offer some fairly healthy food.

    8. Re:Welll..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As another Scandinavian, I'm as perplexed as you are. What responsibility issues is he talking about? Doesn't the government take care of everything?

    9. Re:Welll..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are also some interesting arguments as to explain the duality in reactions (aside from double standards and racism, that is).

      - Kebabs are lovely: I kind of like burgers myself. If you destroy the stores with food I like, then I can destroy the stores with food you like, is that a fair deal? It is also an interesting argument in light that most people would say "we don't like this foreign food, throw it out of our country" is supremely racist and bigoted. But you have no problem saying it apparently, hence the duality.

      - Shops are usually owned by families: Granted, this can be an argument. But how much weight do you place on this? Quite often (according to surveys I have seen, but that was a long time ago) the profits are sent abroad in any case, and no tax is paid either. On all other workforce factors I'd say McD scores better.

      - Who can tell you the time: They tell me the time at my Burger King. I also particularly like to destroy the stores of unfriendly foreigners.

      - Usually offer some healthy food: I am still looking for a reference to (a) cleanliness and (b) nutrition levels benchmarked for McDonalds/BK versus kebab stores. I find it surprising that McDonalds-fries would be so much more unhealthy than kebab store fries, and that a Quarter Pounder is so much more fatty than a kebab. PLEASE provide benchmarks, I think everyone reading this thread would be quite interested. It is certainly repeated as an argument by two people here, so facts are greatly appreciated (unless you suddenly want facts about that to stop matter, of course).

    10. Re:Welll..... by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      Mmmmm.. Kebab..... Damn you - since I moved house last year to a village I haven't had a single kebab and I miss them. Badly.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    11. Re:Welll..... by Cederic · · Score: 1


      And the food is not that unhealthy either.

      You clearly haven't visited some of the kebab shops I frequent.

    12. Re:Welll..... by fj3k · · Score: 1

      McDonalds may take care of it's management, but I don't see kebab shops refusing to hire/give shifts to people for the shop front because they're over 18 and therefore entitled to full adult wages.

      --
      Two men claimed to have walked into a bar. Only one had the bruises to prove it.
    13. Re:Welll..... by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      People bitch about how a company is growing larger and more powerful (Walmart, McD's) but it is to simple to defeat them if that is really important.

      Don't give them your money.

      That's the beauty of capitalism, it is 100% democratic and you vote with your dollars. Even when a company has a monopoly (MS), you can choose something else (Linux).

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    14. Re:Welll..... by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      Kebab shops, are not owned by multinational companies. They are locally owned, locally managed small businesses, and help the local economy by proving jobs etc.

      I can't claim intimate knowledge of the global workings of fast food chains, but aren't most of the individual resterants franchises? If so, boycotting/burning/whatever is probably hurting local small business people more than it hurts the corporation....

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    15. Re:Welll..... by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      The instances I have heard of involving McDonalds stores being wrecked have been during various anti-capitalist demonstrations a few years ago.

      You ask "Why McDonalds ? Surely, oh surely it is because they are American and all the world hates America."

      Leaving aside the other shops, businesses and properties also vandalised during these demonstrations I think that unless you have any convincing evidence to the contrary it's likely that McDonalds weren't especially singled out for destruction for being American as being an example of the kind of multi national capitalism which a local Kebab shop is not. That and the fact they had the misfortune to be in the protestors path.

      I think you mentioned earlier on McDonalds being destroyed in the Middle East, it's quite likely a lot of people there don't have any love for America and destroying McDonalds may seem like a good idea to them but I am unaware of the details of any such activity so can't really comment.

      - Kebabs are lovely, you prefer burgers. No you can't come around and destroy my local kebab shops. Most people I know do not say things like "we don't like this foreign food let's throw it out of our country" they say "Oh good, a new food shop. Let's try it". Maybe you're different, I don't know.

      - Who cares where the sent, most of the ingredients will be bought locally, the shops lease will be paid for, utilities such as gas, electricity will be bought and in many cases the owners will live somewhere in the community with their family.

      - Who can tell the time ? You obviously failed to understand this phrase. In general Kebab shop owners seem to work in the shop, they interact with the shops and businesses next to them, they are friendly to their customer because they have a personal, genuine interest in them returning and the service they provide is more personal and more genuine - they are more likely to be willing to stop and chat with you. As for you wanting to destroy "unfriendly foreign food shops", you are an idiot and with that attitude it's not surprising you find people to be unfriendly.

      - Kebabs and Falafels certainly seem to be healthier and better for you than McDonalds food, not to mention often being tastier and better for you to boot. You want facts, go and visit one and see for yourself if you can bring yourself to enter a "Non American Business".

    16. Re:Welll..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the truth you speak... we are unhappy because of what is inside of us. I took this meditation course and that has changed my perspective quite a bit.

      http://www.dhamma.org/

    17. Re:Welll..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Not sure if you'll even see this, but I figure I'll ask, everyone talks about how easy IT people have it, but what about Engineers? I would move to Europe in a heartbeat once my school loans were paid off, if I were to just find a job there. Currently I've worked for a private Engineering firm in the States for 2 years (I graduated in '04), but I've never looked into trying to find a job overseas. Is Engineering a harder field to move into overseas as compared to IT?

      Language I thought would be a barrier, but some of you guys make it sound like it's not a big deal. I'm fluent in Spanish, though, so I guess Spain is always an option. I speak a little French, but it's basic - although if I were to live in France again I'm sure I could pick it up fairly quickly considering its similarity to Spanish.

      Shoot, I'd even take a lower paying job than one in Engineering (until I found a real one, of course), that's how bad I want to move out there. And for the record, yes, I've visited Europe several times (UK, Germany, Switzerland, Italy and Spain on short trips; lived in France for a summer) so I know how much I've loved it there.

      I've also lived in Vietnam for a summer, and I was raised in Mexico until I was 10. So yes, I've been around, for me it's more of a personal desire to move to Europe rather than one of trying to get out of the US.

    18. Re:Welll..... by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      As it is, I believe that America is exporting its culture at an incredible rate

      Just Hollywood. Recently realized that I get my favouritest music (UK, Japan, India), sports (Europe: soccer, F1), tech droolery, even fashion, from outside the US. The American softpower was the primary discourse in the 1990's, but is no longer dominating our airspaces here.

    19. Re:Welll..... by iogan · · Score: 1

      A lot of my friends are engineers, and pretty much all of them got jobs right after finishing school. Some took two -three months, some already had jobs lined up before leaving school. Depends I guess on what field in engineering. But I don't think not knowing the language would be a huge disadvantage, people in engineering generallt know English (at least here in Scandinavia) and the language is actually similar enough that you will pick it up fairly quickly if you put your mind to it. It's not like learning Japanese.

    20. Re:Welll..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm ok but if you ever go then I really really really recommend going to Sweden as we Norwegians are sort of the unofficial 50-something-iest state of the U.S. :) (we're not even really a part of the EU but Sweden is!)

      p.s. would it help if I say please? With sugar on top?

      p.p.s. could I preemptively scare you away by pointing out that the next-largest and fastest growing norwegian political party is sort of a GOP Light(TM)? They'll be in power soon too... I'll vote for them (again)

      p.p.p.s. we love importing US culture here! Lots of it please! We even go as far as importing the US anti-US trends although that is arguably a bit lame and the domain of the stupid and/or immature, however you should feel right at home in Sweden - I promise, really! :)

      p.p.p.p.s. if you ever want to go to scandinavia because you dream of that winter wonderland utopia everyone thinks exists around here please do everyone a favour and choose Sweden. I beg of you! On my knees!!! They've got meatballs! IKEA! Volvo! Pretty blondes with big tits! PLEASE!

  15. Canada is Full! Go home! by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 5, Funny

    To immigrate to canada you must speak french, eat poutine and KD, and watch HNIC. It snows all year long and sorry we're full!

    --

    ----
    Go canucks, habs, and sens!
    1. Re:Canada is Full! Go home! by farrellj · · Score: 1, Funny

      So, what's the problem?

      ttyl
                Farrell

      --
      CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
    2. Re:Canada is Full! Go home! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Canada relies on immigration in order to keep its population from declining. So, I don't think you are full. :)

      Cheers

    3. Re:Canada is Full! Go home! by corychristison · · Score: 2, Informative

      As funny as this comment is, it's not in the least bit true. Canada is actually struggling to keep it's population up. Saskatchewan and northern parts of prairies is pretty well empty. Lately there have been studies and our current birth rate is 1.1 per couple. Which is WAY below where it should be.

      Although, the part about Poutine is very true. If you don't enjoy it, get the f*ck out of my country.

      Last time I was in the USA, I couldn't even find anywhere that offered gravy in a side dish for my fries! Seriously, what the hell is wrong with you people!?

      As much as this looks like flamebait, it is all in good fun. :-P

    4. Re:Canada is Full! Go home! by p0tat03 · · Score: 1

      "Last time I was in the USA, I couldn't even find anywhere that offered gravy in a side dish for my fries!"

      I honestly don't know what other use we would have for cheese curds if not for poutine.

      Mmmm... Slight plug: If any of you are ever in Ottawa, you might want to drop in on La Maison Acadienne (corner of King Edward/Somerset) - it's got the craziest, awesomest, most heart-attack-inducing poutines in this world.

    5. Re:Canada is Full! Go home! by Viv · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean:

      To immigrate to canada you must speak "french", eat poutine and KD, and watch HNIC. It snows all year long and sorry we're full! ;)

    6. Re:Canada is Full! Go home! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, in order to qualify for your driving license, they make people drive a challenging Zamboni obstacle course test every year. C'est tres difficile.

      Oh, wait. That's just normal winter driving. :-)

    7. Re:Canada is Full! Go home! by pixr99 · · Score: 1

      Last time I was in the USA, I couldn't even find anywhere that offered gravy in a side dish for my fries! Seriously, what the hell is wrong with you people!?

      No poutine? That _is_ terrible. You didn't visit the right part of the US. Here in northern New Hampshire, poutine is *usually* on the menu. Some might argue that we have more in common with Quebec than the rest of the US. Around here, you'll hear French spoken just about anywhere you go. Come visit us in May when the snow begins melting (started snowing Monday).

    8. Re:Canada is Full! Go home! by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      Area: 9,984,670 km Population: 32,623,490 Density: 3.2/km If this is your definition of full, you should come to Europe some day.

    9. Re:Canada is Full! Go home! by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      Sorry about the linebreaks (or lack thereof), I forgot to switch off the html formatting.

    10. Re:Canada is Full! Go home! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Area: 9,984,670 km Population: 32,623,490 Density: 3.2/km If this is your definition of full, you should come to Europe some day.

      But you have no mooses in Eu.
      Mooses take up a LOT of room!

    11. Re:Canada is Full! Go home! by LordEd · · Score: 2, Funny
      But you have no mooses in Eu.

      Wi nøt trei a høliday in Sweden this yer?

      See the løveli lakes

      The wonderful telephøne system

      And mani interesting furry animals

        Including the majestic møøse

          A Møøse once bit my sister ...

          No realli! She was Karving her initials on the møøse
          with the sharpened end of an interspace tøøthbrush given
          her by Svenge - her brother-in-law - an Oslo dentist and
          star of many Norwegian møvies: "The Høt Hands of an Oslo
          Dentist", "Fillings of Passion", "The Huge Mølars of Horst
          Nordfink".

          We apologise for the fault in the
          posting. Those responsible have been
          sacked.
    12. Re:Canada is Full! Go home! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Lately there have been studies and our current birth rate is 1.1 per couple.

      Unless you're an Indian (bison not curry Indian). They breed like flies and live on welfare.

    13. Re:Canada is Full! Go home! by s20451 · · Score: 1

      If any of you are ever in Ottawa, ...

      And don't forget the Beaver Tails! (it's not what you think.)

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    14. Re:Canada is Full! Go home! by Shanoyu · · Score: 1

      TBH i've been selling you people travel packages for years and i just don't get Canadians.

      1. What's so freaking great about Niagra falls, and why the heck do you want to go to the American side?
      2. Why can't you ever hang up the stupid phone when you don't want to talk anymore?

    15. Re:Canada is Full! Go home! by blugu64 · · Score: 1

      Oh man, it's been a long time. Thanks!

      --
      "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
    16. Re:Canada is Full! Go home! by CylanR77 · · Score: 1

      "To immigrate to canada you must speak french, eat poutine and KD, and watch HNIC."

      I thought that being a Rush fan was a requirement as well?

      --
      http://cylan.deviantart.com/gallery/
    17. Re:Canada is Full! Go home! by MrCranky · · Score: 1

      Only Americans like Rush.

    18. Re:Canada is Full! Go home! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot... must also play hockey, watch hockey, live hockey.

    19. Re:Canada is Full! Go home! by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      I love HNIC! There's nothing quite like seeing Horny Nymphomaniacs Inhaling C... you get the picture! Then again, this is slashdot.

    20. Re:Canada is Full! Go home! by johansalk · · Score: 1

      I had no idea what poutine was till I looked it up. This thing looks disgusting.

  16. Hows about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    * a country where the media and the politicians don't do their best to induce fear and unrest from relatively minor threats (lightning, I believe is still a bigger threat to the average american, than terrorism)
    * a country where the most popular news feeds are actually independent
    * a country that wouldn't embarras me with a completely selfish and brutally violent foreign policy

    1. Re:Hows about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's keeping you hear? Put some effort into it. I am sure you could be gone by the end of the week.

    2. Re:Hows about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Then how about Germany?

  17. Quebec by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

    I follow world politics carefully and am generally politically active. While it frightens me to see what's been happening in Canada lately (closely mirroring the US), we in Quebec have managed to avoid a lot of the nonsense using French as a form of natural encryption (allowing us to talk about things we're not supposed to talk about in English). I'm not kidding.. :) Our media here is much more aggressive.

    We have a strong local economy (despite the reports you may happen to read in Ontario and Alberta) and relaxed attitudes about work and "sins" (quickest declining religious affiliation in North America).

    Good, polite, and fearless Americans: come visit Montreal, meet a Quebecois girl, and enjoy a multicultural, free and well educated people.

    --
    A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    1. Re:Quebec by j-pimp · · Score: 1
      We have a strong local economy (despite the reports you may happen to read in Ontario and Alberta) and relaxed attitudes about work and "sins" (quickest declining religious affiliation in North America).

      Ok I'll give the religious/sin argument some merit. However, what is wrong with wanting to work. I want to be found dead in my cubicle (hopefully office by then) at 80. Now, a 40 hour work day is a good idea because it allows you time to start your own business and do non traditional work (charity and open source projects). However, anything less than that is just damn lazy IMHO.

      Now, if you don't want to work, and can do so without costing me money, its your right as a human being. If you can find a company that gives you 6 weeks of vacation, and can stand being away from the office for more than a week, by all means go do it.

      I'm not saying don't enjoy your leisure time. I can get piss drunk like the best of them and just got back from 12 days in the Phillipines. It would have been 5 days, but the g/f put her foot down. She gave up 2 weeks of pay to stay down there a whole month herself. Thats her choice and she paid for it, rightfully so.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    2. Re:Quebec by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

      Ok I'll give the religious/sin argument some merit. However, what is wrong with wanting to work. I want to be found dead in my cubicle (hopefully office by then) at 80. Now, a 40 hour work day is a good idea because it allows you time to start your own business and do non traditional work (charity and open source projects). However, anything less than that is just damn lazy IMHO.

      Well there are two things here - one is a question (what is wrong with wanting to work?). Of course, nothing is wrong with that. I work a good 40-50 hours a week on average as a sysadmin. I know a few coders who work 70. You can work to your heart's content.

      But the other is a statement. "Anything less than that is just damned lazy" Well.. everyone has the right to their own opinion. But in general here, we don't frown upon people who choose to do things other than work their asses off (unless they become a burden on society). My boss works 30 hours a week so he can spend more time with his family. He makes a decent living. Can't complain about that, and he's the last person in the world I would call lazy.

      --
      A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    3. Re:Quebec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, a 40 hour work day is a good idea because it allows you time to start your own business and do non traditional work (charity and open source projects). However, anything less than that is just damn lazy IMHO.

      So the best reason to restrict the work week to 40 hours is so that people can do more work? Hey, I think I recognize you!

        (I kid, I kid!)

    4. Re:Quebec by QuebecNerd · · Score: 1

      I've never lived outside Quebec so I can't realy comment on other countries than Canada.

      Quebec is a good mix of the US and Europe. Even compared to the rest of Canada; Quebec's people are alot more open and understanding (less prude). Just for example, we have a humoristic FM radio program in Montreal (among others) that is prime time, from 15h30 to 18h00, and would make Howard Stern look like Cinderella. Seriously; it's been running for like 10 years, they swear, talk about sex with animals, completely humiliate celebrities with great details and people want more! The CRTC (FCC equivalent) let it run because it is encoded in French and it's under the cover of humor.

      Granted we do have our share of terorists like Revenue Quebec and others who wants our hard earned money; They also exist elsewhere in the world in most developped countries.

      JF

    5. Re:Quebec by j-pimp · · Score: 1
      So the best reason to restrict the work week to 40 hours is so that people can do more work? Hey, I think I recognize you!

      That cartoon sums up my core belief system perfectly.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    6. Re:Quebec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're actually a robot? Wow. I've never met one before. What are you doing on slashdot, you lazy fucker? There's work to be done!

    7. Re:Quebec by TheLink · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Now, a 40 hour work day is a good idea "

      40 hour work day?

      I strongly disagree. I would recommend working smarter and not harder ;).

      --
    8. Re:Quebec by Principal+Skinner · · Score: 1

      Now, a 40 hour work day is a good idea because it allows you time to start your own business and do non traditional work (charity and open source projects).

      So that's my problem... the 40 hour work day.

      --
      one hundred twenty
      is just enough characters
      to write a haiku
  18. Is going back in time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to Bill Clinton's America an option?

  19. Obvious really. by Frogbert · · Score: 5, Funny

    Amsterdam and you know damn well why.

    1. Re:Obvious really. by A-Rex · · Score: 1, Funny

      I know. The tulips smell great!

    2. Re:Obvious really. by JamesTRexx · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the question if I'd been in or near Amsterdam in the last couple of days when I entered the US for a short vacation.
      Seeing how I had to get very close to it as the airport is a couple of miles from Amsterdam I thought that was a very silly question. Also because I spend the night before in Haarlem, also a couple of miles from that place.
      I thought it be best to not say anything about me living in the south, well away from Amsterdam, yet have a coffeeshop withing a 30 second walk. After all, only in Amsterdam do we have drugs.

      --
      home
    3. Re:Obvious really. by MPHellwig · · Score: 1

      Thats obvious, Amsterdam is Netherlands or Holland as some other strange people call it, the rest of the country is Germany [or any other country you know that is there somewhere].

    4. Re:Obvious really. by zobier · · Score: 1

      It seems that you can get that stuff pretty much anywhere considering that it's the world's biggest illicit market. The main problem is getting good outdoor grow (not everyone can grow their own).

      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
    5. Re:Obvious really. by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      I'd rather just wait until Question 7 passes in Nevada. Get my hookers, blackjack, and weed in one fell swoop. Plus a lot prettier terrain.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    6. Re:Obvious really. by salmacis2 · · Score: 1

      Canals?

    7. Re:Obvious really. by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      No no.. it's the windmills, wooden shoes and huge dikes!

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  20. Well... by BrynM · · Score: 1

    I've given this a lot of thought and time over the years actually. The conclusion? I don't know. There's either too many trade-offs or differing but equivalent moral quandries for every destination I've thought of. At least some of the most obvious countries (the UK, Canada et al) are starting to suffer some of what we've seen here in the US. Misery, company and all that.

    Good question. If you find an answer, let me know.

    --
    US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
  21. well duh by Wizzerd911 · · Score: 0

    you have to buy your island, dude ;) Then you can do whatever you want with nobody to bug you.

    --
    Is it just me or is it not going to upgrade to Vista in here?
  22. Don't come to Australia by caitsith01 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We do everything America does, only we do a worse job, less efficiently, and with none of the individual rights in our Constitution* that you enjoy in the United States which allow the courts to pull the executive and congress back into line every now and then.** Although we have no president or equivalent, our parliament is a virtual dictatorship at present and crossing the floor on the basis of principle is almost entirely unheard of and considered to be little better than treason. We lack media diversity, and general awareness of political and human rights issues is virtually non-existent in the wider populace even by US standards.

    In addition we are extremely poorly placed in relation to the most likely theatre of any future world war, and we have large quantities of uranium and natural gas which makes us an important strategic target.

    * disclaimer, before someone who knows about Australian law attacks - we arguably have freedom of religion and a right to vote, and a limited right to freedom of 'political' speech, but all can be infringed on by federal laws with a legitimate other purpose

    ** yeah yeah, I know how politicised the courts are, but every now and then you DO get a decision like Hamdan in which the Supreme Court clobbers the executive for overstepping the line

    --
    Read Pynchon.
    1. Re:Don't come to Australia by kestasjk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Having moved from England I love it here in Australia, and I've found the people here to generally be much better informed than those in England.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    2. Re:Don't come to Australia by MikShapi · · Score: 5, Funny

      Shush you idiot! Don't you understand what parent post is doing?
      Don't bloody tell everyone on /. the truth! They'll start coming here en-masse!

      --
      -
    3. Re:Don't come to Australia by fj3k · · Score: 1

      I have to agree, we're not that bad yet. And all we need to stem the flow of further decline is a decent opposition party, unlike other places where a head of state has influence over the direction of the government's decisions.

      --
      Two men claimed to have walked into a bar. Only one had the bruises to prove it.
    4. Re:Don't come to Australia by riprjak · · Score: 2, Funny

      And, frankly, we would rather have a pom who loves the country than the whinger who rekons life here is soooooo bad. Frankly, this is the side of the fence where the grass is greener.

      Come to Australia, we have plenty of land; though we could stand some more water. But, please, only if you dont plan to sit around on your fat arse and whinge about everything. Cant stand bloody whingers. We all have to vote here, so any problem you have with your own reality is entirely your problem.

      If you dont like it, fix it, if you cant fix it, deal with it, if you cant deal with it, piss off :)

      err!
      jak.

    5. Re:Don't come to Australia by TheSeer2 · · Score: 1

      There is one bad thing.

      In Australia we only have only have an _implied_ right of free speech.

    6. Re:Don't come to Australia by scoot80 · · Score: 1

      Surely our PM is a puppet, and even coucils in Sydney are starting to be called "precintcs", but Australia is still a great place to be. I would not go anywhere else - especially America.

    7. Re:Don't come to Australia by Sputum · · Score: 1

      Truer words never spoken. *applause*

      --
      "What we imagine is order is merely the prevailing form of chaos"
    8. Re:Don't come to Australia by TekPolitik · · Score: 1

      Come to Australia, we have plenty of land; though we could stand some more water

      <div class="bogan" id="jwh">
      Unless you're a reffo or towelhead. They you can bugger off 'cause we got no room for you.
      </div>

    9. Re:Don't come to Australia by Nocterro · · Score: 1

      Oh, and don't forget that our Dear Leader has decided to "reform" our media ownership laws, dissolving any requirement to have competing viewpoints. But it's okay, Senator Coonan has denied that any of the recent manouevering by media moguls has anything to do with the new media laws. They just happened to prepare for massive take-overs and the conglomeration of the market by co-incidence.

      --
      [clever sig]
    10. Re:Don't come to Australia by kevinadi · · Score: 1

      Also, bashing vegemite in public is not considered free speech.

    11. Re:Don't come to Australia by McDutchie · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You're able to say all that you wrote in Australia without risking arrest for political subversion? Yes? Can't be that bad, then. Count your blessings.

    12. Re:Don't come to Australia by MikShapi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      US vs Australia? Let's have a go.

      1. Australia is by-large not religious (I'm not talking about the institutions. I'm talking about the people). Most of the issues that spark heated public debate in the US because of their religious ("""ethical""") implications are non-issues to start with here or minor issues at best. Not because people don't care but simply because religious nutcases don't have anything that even comes close to their US lobby. Oh, and our president doesn't do things because God told him to.

      2. The mentality is not a complete (at least to the limited extent of my experience from living in the US and.. well.. TV), utter shitpile. Apologies to whomever lives in the pockets of educated and civilized society in the US (which I acknoledge exist yet are somehow not nearly influential enough when it comes to interacting with the outside world). In Australia, the vast majority of people, both the ones on TV and the ones you meet, don't live in this "my-business-is-none-of-your-business" and "that's-not-my-problem" mindset.

      3. Australians don't get forcefed with propaganda dumbing them down and telling them who is good, who is bad and what to think (I think Americans call this "Fox News") and don't view the world through a bipolar "everything is either black or white" oversimplified good-vs-evil prism.

      4. While the government is often accused of having its tongue too deep up the royal American Hiney, the government gets things done, and lining up what the country has accomplished and what services (social, educational etc) it provides its citizens - up against any other country you care to name, Australia is world-class and in the lead. The vast majority of things that get done here get done right, and when you ask something along "why did the government do that, there is always a simple and logical solution behind it. Things just make sense. Our policies are made listening to scientists, not celebrities or industry cartels (most of the time, at least).

      5. Most aussies don't winge about problems. They sort them.

      6. The only two things Australians worship religiously is nature and quality recreation.

      7. We don't block vegemite imports (bad, bad folate! vit B12 makes you stupid!) after they make films like "Supersize me!" about what we do consider legal (and by the same coin, not bad for you I guess) to import and/or sell as food. Anyone for an extra-fat supersize cheeseburger and a 5-gallon coke?

      Expensive? somewhat. It's the price one pays for living in modern society.

      Australian mentality is all the good traits of the American mentality pooled in with all the good traits of some European ones, minus most of the bad stuff of either side. That alone is worth spending one's life here.

      Ok. I'm done. Mod me to hell, American fanboys!

      --
      -
    13. Re:Don't come to Australia by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 1

      It's true, yes, but it's a fairly heavily implied right. See this paper from the parlimentary library of Australia - http://www.aph.gov.au/Library/pubs/rn/2001-02/02rn 42.htm

      Unlimited freedom of speech isn't as great as what you might think. Have a look at all the unpopular cases the ACLU defends because of it. The right of freedom of speech has to be weighed against the responsibility to keep good social order, and that's what happens in Australia.

    14. Re:Don't come to Australia by mgblst · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We do everything America does, only we do a worse job, less efficiently,
       
      Wow, I hate the Australian government just as much as the next true blue Aussie, but the fact they do a worse job enforcing their stupid laws is a bonus, and we are way more efficient than the Americans - you have obviously never been to the US, or read an article on the US federal government wasting money.

      I can't wait to get back to OZ, there are so many good things, most of the time you can forget that the so called Liberals (who are really the conservatives) are in power, and hope that they won't be for much longer.

    15. Re:Don't come to Australia by natrius · · Score: 1

      That's not a blessing. It's an inalienable right. Settling for mediocrity just because it's better than nothing is silly.

    16. Re:Don't come to Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm all up for skilled migrants from anywhere. Family migrants from anywhere, also good.

      Refugees? Sorry, you get out of trouble, but you don't win the lottery. Refugees should be taken in by neighbouring countries, or failing that, countries with a similar culture. Australia took refugees from Europe after WWII, and the majority of them became productive members of society. We'd expect European or North American nations to take us in in case of dire national peril, but we wouldn't expect Indonesia to.

      In Australia we hear stories of boats filled with Afghan refugees arriving after living in Indonesia for a year or so. I'm sorry, but you should have stayed there. You have the same religion and a similar culture. Refugees from random nations coming to Australia doesn't help us and it doesn't help you. I had no problems with sending arriving refugees to Nauru or Papua New-Guinea for re-settlement. Like I said, claiming refugee status isn't supposed to be like winning the lottery. Not everywhere can be a first world nation, and a only slightly tin-pot dictator is better than a total tin-pot one.

    17. Re:Don't come to Australia by vivian · · Score: 1

      Also, bashing vegemite in public is not considered free speech.

      Actually they dont even let you enjoy the wholesome goodness of vegemite in the US - thats the best reason to leave. Its illegal to import Vegemite into the US now, and they are searching people at the border for the stuff because it contains folate, which under US food laws is only allowed as an additive in breadstuffs for some reason.

    18. Re:Don't come to Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, and our president doesn't do things because God told him to.

      No, your president does things because our president told him to.

      That moral high ground you're occupying is a slippery place indeed. Enjoy your censored Internet access and your lack of anything resembling a right to self-defense.

    19. Re:Don't come to Australia by Kangie · · Score: 0

      Actually, Australians tend to have a much wider view of the world when compared to Americans. Although I do agree with you on the point of not coming here; Our broadband SUCKS! Try somewhere a little further north... where you can get gigabit to your house.

    20. Re:Don't come to Australia by htnprm · · Score: 1

      Sorry. I don't have any mod points to give you. (Score:5, Too bloody right).

      You Aussies are a bunch of cheating wankers though...:-P

      Long story...;-)

    21. Re:Don't come to Australia by Tonik,+the · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey but you guys drive on the left, WTF?

    22. Re:Don't come to Australia by hate_this_nick · · Score: 0
      We all have to vote here, so any problem you have with your own reality is entirely your problem.
      Actually with Australia's unique political system most people end up voting for the party they hate the least, and people moving to Australia from other democratic countries often find the Australian system somewhat undemocratic.

      In Australia all adults are required to vote. Australia uses the Single Transferable Vote system, and a candidate needs to get 50% of the vote to be elected. Using this voting sytstem, combined with no proportional representation in the lower house means the 2 party system is very entrenched.

      To make matters even more interesting, once elected there is no way for voters to force an issue. There is no system of forcing issues to referendums and for decades people have grown used to this. Ideas such as proportional representation, coalitions forced to work together to govern, smaller parties being elected etc are not only unheard of in Australia, most people don't care as they tend to think this is how politics should work.
    23. Re:Don't come to Australia by ian-live · · Score: 1

      Here's a POM, and I'm HEeeeerrrreeee! HAHA I'm not going back to England in a hurry, Adelaide has me firmly in its grasp, have a decent job, now need to find a house...and a lady.

      --
      Born, to clone
    24. Re:Don't come to Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. You already know you're going to Hell and it's just a few kilos from Alice Springs.

      2. You've never wandered out from your secluded little suburb have you?

      3. Rupert Murdoch made Fox News possible by starting out in Australia

      4. Who is your Lebo hookup for those drugs that you're on? The government does nothing but bugger anything and everything it touches. The sheeple will gladly take whatever is dished out to them.

      5. See #4

      6. What about beer? That list isn't complete w/o beer.

      7. valid point.

    25. Re:Don't come to Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like what?
      Horrid telecommunication tied in with support from Indians that can hardly speak a word of English. Horrid stupid laws that has kept the country in a sorry state? Constant regulations to keep us down from competing against the British? Queensland water problem could have been seriously avoided if it wasn't for a ban from collected rain water or if they even bothered to rectify the problem by creating larger dams, but nope. Oh, how about the poor aristocratic poor society in the cities which feeds off the people that live inland who get no benefits from insane taxes? It took us long enough to even pave a highway, yet we have enough money to put 20 different idiotic signs and speed cameras in a 1km span. A government that treats every Australian citizen as a petty criminal. Sporting a gun ban that is utterly failing and cops that are too afraid or lazy to answer calls from homes inland. Yeah, Australia is awesome compared to the US! I think I'd rather stay in the US than go back to Australia, at least they can still build stuff in the US, while our stuff is seriously going ass backwards instead of forward. Hell, my old home still has horrible telephone service, yet alone a reliable 56k modem service, now the telephone doesn't even work anymore when it rains and they won't fix it. Don't get me started on electronics, we are like 1-2 years behind and get all the stuff Americans or Europeans returned refurbished for the Australian market sealed in "FACTORY TAPE" being selled at FULL PRICE, thanks a lot!

      There's one thing Australia is great for, and that's for old people. Retirement center of the world while the rest of us have to suffer. If you enjoy Australia, you must either be a foreigner who's getting benefits from all the wonderful welfare we pay you or old and retired.

      Thanks,
      A pissed off Australian

    26. Re:Don't come to Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5 reasons why australia is better then america, if you dont agree, i dont care, glad u wont come here!

      1) our news is not like fox news
      2) we eat better ( at least a little bit )
      3) public health ( getting worse but still better then the usa )
      4) Howard at least can tie his own shoes and doesnt mumble when addressed
      5) beer is better in oz

    27. Re:Don't come to Australia by Ritontor · · Score: 2, Informative

      Our "censored internet" is a joke. That entire piece of legislation, with the benefit of hindsight, smells suspiciously like something that was passed as a back scratch for some cranky senator to get his vote on another bill. I don't have any specific proof of this (and yes, I realise how stupid I sound), but how else do you explain the fact that this so-called censorship doesn't actually seem to censor anything? The AMCA seems completely uninterested in actually blocking any content, and despite a couple of vague attempts to utilize the laws that were quickly shut down, it doesn't seem like anything is going to happen in the future either. Oh, and for the real kicker, the filter itself isn't applied at the border routers, it's voluntarily installed on a home user's PC.

      I understand some people disagree with the way politicians play the game, but this is exactly how it's done. "You wanna pass your bill? Well this is what I want...". It's far more prevalent in the US that it is over here - look at the number of irrelevant amendments that get tacked on to every bill that gets passed in to US law. Is it a morally corrupt system? Arguably so. I don't see any other real-world examples of a perfect democratic utopia to which we can all strive though.

      --
      Perhaps the answer to the problem of teenagers dropping bricks from motorway and railway bridges is to sue Tetris.
    28. Re:Don't come to Australia by lordperditor · · Score: 1

      I agree with most of this post. Australia is a good place to live mainly because they are deadly serious about how they spend their freetime.
      Put a shrimp on the BBQ, crack a stubby and relax with friends.

      Ahhh yes the only problem is they are the most unsporting nation I have ever come across (and I have lived in Europe, Asia and America). Their national identity is founded on sporting success and thus they are soo focused on winning at all costs it has made them real bad sports.

    29. Re:Don't come to Australia by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      >We do everything America does, only we do a worse job, less efficiently
      Maybe it just looks worse because you have nothing to compare to? I'm in the UK and in the last ten years about a dozen friends have emigrated to Australia and without exception they love it and have thrived very quickly - good jobs, great homes etc. A couple now refuse to even come back to the UK to visit they hate it that much in comparison to their new home.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    30. Re:Don't come to Australia by Circlotron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "The vast majority of things that get done here get done right, .... Things just make sense. Our policies are made listening to scientists," --> I heard recently that successive governments have been talking about what to do about the Murray-Darling basin soil and salinity problems since ==1917==...

    31. Re:Don't come to Australia by Circlotron · · Score: 1

      We're celebrating 30 years of electricity here, you know.

    32. Re:Don't come to Australia by scum-e-bag · · Score: 2, Interesting
      They just happened to prepare for massive take-overs and the conglomeration of the market by co-incidence.

      I think its got a bit to do with young James Packer selling off nine. James pulls a lot of strings within the government. He knows there is a major correction comming in the next year or so. I think he is trying to emulate his late father, same deal as when Kerry sold nine, only to buy it back again after the crash of '87. James has been lucky enough to find a sucker willing to take on nine after he intentionally wrecked it by allowing eddie loose at the helm for a while. I just wonder if we will see James try to buy it back in a couple of years for a quarter of the price for what he sold it. This wouldn't be the first time we have seen James try and emulate his late father... remember super league and how similar that attempt was to world series cricket????
      --
      Does it go on forever?
    33. Re:Don't come to Australia by Cederic · · Score: 1


      Heh, I'm considering getting my next job in Australia. I'm British, I don't want to emigrate, but a 6 month contract in another country would be fun, different and interesting.

      I just need guarantees on broadband access, Liverpool matches on TV and no overlap with the Ashes.

    34. Re:Don't come to Australia by mpesce · · Score: 1

      As someone who just received Permanent Residency visa status in Australia, I can tell you why to come here: the people, and the weather. The people are marvelously laid-back, happy, engaging and - for the most part - very open minded. The weather is normally just beautiful. (Note, that's also a bit of a problem, as we're in the midst of the worst drought in recorded history. But then, that also means lots of cloud-free days.)

      I'm an American who has consistently found better opportunities to do better work with better folks than I could ever find in the US. It's not perfect - nor would any Australian every say that Australia is - but Aussies do know how good they have it here. And if you come to have a look about, you'll see how good it is...

    35. Re:Don't come to Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't Fox News owned by an Aussie? Let the blame game begin! ;)

    36. Re:Don't come to Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have prawns here, not shrimp. And no one in their right mind would spoil a good BBQ with them.
      Some people here like their sport, but most don't take it too seriously.

      Oh, and our national identity is founded on the dole cheat, not sporting success.

    37. Re:Don't come to Australia by fj3k · · Score: 1

      We don't have a president, they have too much influence. We prefer our constitutional monarchy where the head of state has absolutely no say whatsoever (though that's probably not technically how it's supposed to work, I don't know).

      --
      Two men claimed to have walked into a bar. Only one had the bruises to prove it.
    38. Re:Don't come to Australia by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      The attitude to Muslims is worse in Australia compared to US.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    39. Re:Don't come to Australia by Megaport · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm an oz boy, Irish/catholic heritage. I lived (and raised my children) in the US for about four years and by coincidence my daughter is going to visit our friends in Texas in just a few days time. My family's links to the US are strong but we don't have a doubt about our choice to live here in Australia.

      Every single thing the parent post said is correct. My only criticism is that the parent was not harsh enough on the topic of Vegemite. The American government seems hell bent on creating terrorists out of even the fun loving aussies. Give me vegemite, or give me death. You don't want to piss us off this way. Make nice with the Vegemite and we'll stop whinging so much about Iraq, OK? Keep the ban and we'll stop making our stupid fscking excuses for you on the world stage and start fingerprinting your citizens when they arrive in the country like you do to us instead.

      You are forcing a generation of young Australians to have to smuggle vegemite illegally into your country in order to fulfill their cultural and culinary needs. You might as well ban musilm women from wearing a scarf or force the amish to use ipods. We will resist your government, and we'll be aided by your people who love freedom of breakfast spread as much as we do. This tyranny will end.

      And you know the French will side with us too, right? You guys are screwed.

      -M

      --
      # grep slashdot access.log | grep html | sort | uniq | wc -l 2604
    40. Re:Don't come to Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australia's government are particularly bad at addressing problems such as salinity and water (basic bloody needs afaik) due to constant bickering between state and federal government. The entire NSW region is in the biggest drought in 100 years and if they take any longer in making a decision then the entire of NSW is completely screwed (rural AND metropolitan).

      The major problem facing Australia imho is the american free trade agreement. I say this because not only is it affecting all of the TV, news and products, it is also killing off local producers of culture (films and TV), food and technology. The WORST part of this is that it effectively means that US Copyright laws techically apply in Australia now, and the stupid allowances for copyright in the US is hampering everything we do here.

      People don't realise how much animosity there is against the US Government in Australia atm just because of their effect on the way our country runs - not in our interests.

      Australia is a GREAT place to live, but if everything continues as it is currently going, we will just be another corrupt consumer whore for the US

    41. Re:Don't come to Australia by smcdow · · Score: 1

      8. F.ckin' awesome beaches.

      --
      In the course of every project, it will become necessary to shoot the scientists and begin production.
    42. Re:Don't come to Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes and no.

      Yes we have a bad attitude, but it is not to muslims in general. For instance, some of the animosity is due to the more dangerous muslim-oriented gangs doing driveby's and the like in sydney streets. Another reason is the continued problems we have with the Indonesians (such as East Timor), which is at heart a Muslim Theological society, and we have had major problems with muslim based terrorist groups from our neighbouring country (Bali bombing).

      I wouldnt say it is WORSE, I would say that at least if there are those in the community who have a poor attitude against muslims, then they can give a decent explanation of why it is so. Most dont (I for one, dont - my best friends are all muslim).

      To say that the attitude is worse is to say that we are all alike here, which isnt the case.

    43. Re:Don't come to Australia by fj3k · · Score: 1

      I love this arguement, it's so stupid. The only thing that is really known about the salinity issue is that some farming areas have become unusable. It has been deduced that this is due to the farming because it started after the farms were planted; a fair enough point. But nobody actually knows either why or can tell you how to fix it (I saw this on Landline on the ABC last year I think, one of those farming shows at least). With the biggest drought on us, is it impossible to that this could be a natural event caused by something else though? We don't know. We don't know the cause or the solution, only the problem; so what on earth is the government supposed to do?

      --
      Two men claimed to have walked into a bar. Only one had the bruises to prove it.
    44. Re:Don't come to Australia by klogg_siebentag · · Score: 1

      Having moved from Australia to England, I concur with you. People in Australia are generally more well informed. I don't think it's a people issue though, it's the media. I usually have to resort to reading the Sydney Morning Herald to find out whats going on in the world, and in some cases London itself (eg/ 7/7 London bombings).

    45. Re:Don't come to Australia by FirmWarez · · Score: 1
      We do everything America does, only we do a worse job, less efficiently,
      I dunno, you're government seems very efficient at disarming the populace...
    46. Re:Don't come to Australia by klogg_siebentag · · Score: 1

      Let me guess... You're a kiwi?

    47. Re:Don't come to Australia by klogg_siebentag · · Score: 1

      Yes, Australian's are focused on winning at sport. I've lived in Europe and America too, where the focus seems to be on money, advertising, having affairs, more money, product endorsements and getting drunk and going home to beat the missus when you lose (ok, last point may be more for English football nut jobs). It's just not cricket.

    48. Re:Don't come to Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but what do you do if someone can't be returned to their country of origin? Leave them in a prison camp for a decade or more? Not in any bloody country I'm living in, mate.

    49. Re:Don't come to Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's an American citizen now... and you're welcome to him.

    50. Re:Don't come to Australia by mcsestretch · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Spent 2 weeks in Australia for work in 2000.

      Would live there in a heartbeat.

      Everyone I met was really nice and the food was great!

    51. Re:Don't come to Australia by JuzzFunky · · Score: 1

      "I usually have to resort to reading the Sydney Morning Herald to find out whats going on in the world"

      But isn't that what /. is for?

      --
      Unexpect the expected!
    52. Re:Don't come to Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll start by saying I like Australia. However, every time
      I've been there, I have been struck by the obvious political
      propaganda in the media. It's been blatant: radio DJ's
      saying things like "of course everyone believes X", and
      obviously scripted "discussions". I can't believe anyone
      would say Australians don't get forcefed with propaganda,
      it's impossible to miss.

    53. Re:Don't come to Australia by mgblst · · Score: 1

      OK, have you ever lived anywhere else? The whole world is like this, these are normal problems that exists in some form of very country. Try living somewhere really crap for a while, like the UK.

    54. Re:Don't come to Australia by htnprm · · Score: 1

      Howdja guess? :-)

    55. Re:Don't come to Australia by CrankyOldBastard · · Score: 1

      You're correct, that Bill was passed to appease Senator Harradine in return for him supporting the "Anti-terror" laws.

    56. Re:Don't come to Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Australia took refugees from Europe after WWII, and the majority of them became productive members of society.
      I assume by majority you mean everyone except the wops and the yugoslavians?
    57. Re:Don't come to Australia by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      A government that treats every Australian citizen as a petty criminal.
      Perhaps it's just an old law they they forget to repeal.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    58. Re:Don't come to Australia by ChrisBush · · Score: 1
      we arguably have freedom of religion and a right to vote, and a limited right to freedom of 'political' speech, but all can be infringed on by federal laws with a legitimate other purpose
      Umm, this sounds about the same as the U.S., except U.S. citizens explicitly do not have a right to vote in presidential elections - see Bush v. Gore.

      Can the Australian P.M. name a group of cronies and give them the power to eternally imprison and torture anyone they choose? The President can.

    59. Re:Don't come to Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The attitude to Muslims is worse in Australia compared to US.

      Well they do tend to not intergrate and rape Australian girls. That might have something to do with it.

    60. Re:Don't come to Australia by krugg234 · · Score: 1

      Any room for a seppo who likes a cold Toohey's New and a warm meat pie while watching the Swans game?

    61. Re:Don't come to Australia by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      Well, Australia had a race riot against Arabs/Muslims last year. I'm happy to hear it's not all that bad, but still worrisome for any country.

    62. Re:Don't come to Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By that logic, American refugees should live with Mexicans. Same religion and similiar culture, right? German refugees shouldn't have gotten asylum in other non-European countries?

      Have you forgotten racism?

    63. Re:Don't come to Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why didn't you say "THE US SUCKS AND AUSTRALIA RULES"
      you would have saved alot of typing and got the same point across.
      No one is going to beleive you when you say "our government just makes sense"

      NO POLITICANS anywhere do things that make sense.

    64. Re:Don't come to Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok. I'm done. Mod me to hell, American fanboys!

      Why should we bother? We've been called worse things by nicer people.

    65. Re:Don't come to Australia by rs79 · · Score: 1

      "That alone is worth spending one's life here"

      Modulo the fact every form of indiginous life form is highly lethal and wants to kill you. Bad.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    66. Re:Don't come to Australia by Internet+Ronin · · Score: 1

      Meh, you may be right, but I just can't stand the thought of eventually serving a ruling class of cane toads...

    67. Re:Don't come to Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Australian mentality is all the good traits of the American mentality pooled in with all the good traits of some European ones, minus most of the bad stuff of either side. That alone is worth spending one's life here.


      That's a joke. People who complain about racism in the US haven't been to Oz and spoke to the locals about Aborigines or Asians. Give it up: white aussies are generally a bunch of bigoted fucks that rival USians in their fervor.
    68. Re:Don't come to Australia by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Shush you idiot! Don't you understand what parent post is doing?
      Don't bloody tell everyone on /. the truth! They'll start coming here en-masse!


      So has this entire thread's secret context been to keep most slashdotters in the US rather than slashdotting another country?

    69. Re:Don't come to Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno, you're government seems very efficient at disarming the populace...

      Thank fuck for that!

      If you're a "right to bear arms" NRA loony, we really don't want you here.

      (We encourage all of our local gun nuts to join the army in the hope they'll "die heroically" overseas fighting whichever third world nation the US is losing a war against this week.)

    70. Re:Don't come to Australia by static0verdrive · · Score: 1

      your lack of anything resembling a right to self-defense

      I LOVE how "The Right To Bear Arms" (originally intended to aid you in protecting yourselves from an overly-opressive government.... hint hint... you know, like the English used to be when you left? Like your government is now?) has somehow been altered through the various devices of said government (media, movies, etc) to mean "the right to protect yourselves", as if you can't protect yourself without a gun. Now you're happy with a gun but don't use it to save yourselves from Bush and the eventual trouble his administration is getting you into with the rest of the world. Canadians and Australians alike are allowed to own guns, you moron. We just don't live in fear... and bring them to the mall in case someone tries to bum change but "it goes all wrong".

      --
      ========
      77 77 77 2e 6d 65 6c 76 69 6e 73 2e 63 6f 6d
    71. Re:Don't come to Australia by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Having visited England and talked to people in Speaker's Corner, I can say there is good reason for this. People in England as a whole are uninformed and most of your "newspapers" are what would be called tabloids in the US.

    72. Re:Don't come to Australia by fitteschleiker · · Score: 1

      I am an australian who got sick of our fascist ass-licking government, and majority stupid apathetic sport and alcohol addicted populace.
      I always complained and people always said "If you dont like it, why don't you move somewhere else, like afganistan or something, if you complain over there they'll chop your toungue out or something" One day I was told this for the hundreth time and I stood up and said fuck you, I will then.
      I now live in norway getting paid double what i got paid before.
      The various levels of government here resemble nazi germany and/or Stalin's russia at times, and the bureacracy is slow enough to sprout lichen, but at least they generally mind their own business, don't have brown corn chunks in their beards and are not hypocritical and terminally braindead.

      Australia will be a banana republic as soon as they finish selling off their raw natural resources at bargain basement prices (hey at least we got the contract!) and selling off all our biggest companies to singapore and others.

    73. Re:Don't come to Australia by labnet · · Score: 1

      I for one with respect your low user ID 9693, if you make to Australia.
      (Lots of Jobs going for skilled people at the moment)

      --
      46137
    74. Re:Don't come to Australia by Cederic · · Score: 1


      Yeah, it's almost getting to the stage where adding "I have a four digit Slashdot ID" is worth adding to your CV.

      My skillset is currently very much in demand pretty much everywhere, which is nice. But there are some specific jobs being actively recruited for in Australia at the moment, so it's a shame I'm not ready to move just yet :)

    75. Re:Don't come to Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think our government is "overly oppresive" then you obviously haven't lived here and just believe whatever propaganda you hear on the news. To furthermore compare it to the pre-revolutionary war British government? How silly of you!

    76. Re:Don't come to Australia by riprjak · · Score: 1

      Always room for a seppo who doesnt mind the footy :) Course, we have to work on your questionable taste in beer, allow me to introduce you to the idea of "Coopers" :)

      At least you didnt ask for a bloody fosters :)

    77. Re:Don't come to Australia by riprjak · · Score: 1

      oh shit! didn't think of that...

      Bloody hell, we cant take a step without moving 46,000 british backpackers as it is. dammit! :)

    78. Re:Don't come to Australia by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      I think you've just proved that you've never been to the States! Mate, can I seriously recommend you do some overseas travelling sometime in your future? You just don't realise just how lucky we are down here in Australia until you've seen what other countries are like ...

      Sure, Howard is a disaster ... but do you really think it's better in the States??? Our media diversity is streets ahead (although maybe not for long, considering the appalling new media ownership laws ...) - compared to Europe and the States, we have an incredibly international and unbiased news service here. I don't know what you're talking about about the judiciary not having power over the executive - separation of powers is still alive and well here, afaik. And as for our parliament being a virtual dictatorship right now - well, you're absolutely right, but that's because the morons voted Howard control in both houses. No form of democracy can cure the innate stupidity of the populace ...

      You know, if you really think the US is a better place to live you're completely free to emigrate ...

    79. Re:Don't come to Australia by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      Pah, Boag's is the only true beer ...

    80. Re:Don't come to Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only a bloody drongo from taswegia would say that!! :) spose things taste different with 2 heads :)

    81. Re:Don't come to Australia by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      Victoria, actually ... but VB is crap :)

    82. Re:Don't come to Australia by ksheff · · Score: 1

      and the Aussie gun owners that I've communicated with absolutely loathe the current gun laws and hated the government "stealbacks" of a few years ago. The only bright spot of the latter was the govt paid well over market price for what was collected, but it didn't help much since only the law abiding blokes turned their weapons in.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    83. Re:Don't come to Australia by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      8. Australian beer rocks!

      9. Your TV shows might be shite, but you guys have a great sense of humour.

      10. You guys have the coooooolest set of local fauna anywhere on the planet, except Kanha.

      11. You drive on the right side of the road, spell 'colour' normally, and, most important:

      12. YOU GUYS ACTUALLY PLAY CRICKET!

    84. Re:Don't come to Australia by paedobear · · Score: 1

      Spoken like someone who has never been to a pub in London...

    85. Re:Don't come to Australia by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

      We're working on it. My husband has been trying to convince me for 4 months, and I'm just now starting to warm up to the idea. He's been in contact with immigration officials, and with my skills, Pffffffffft, it ain't a problem. :) My kiwi friend says, go, go now while you have a chance. *sigh* I just don't know. I don't *do* water. I love nature and animals more than humans though. I have no family keeping me here in the US, and no ties at all.

      So, we've been watching as many documentaries as possible. The latest Discovery Atlas one was incredible in high-definition, and I am so in love with Mowry (sp) people. BUT. I'm a boob. A big fat Rebel Redneck (ok, no, I'm not fat, I'm 5'11" and 150 pounds of solid girl curves in all the perfect spots... and a redhead). I like NASCAR, Bull Riding and NFL, hate basketball and baseball. Both of my parents were from the South though, and tried to impose on me their redneck ways. I've done pretty good to rise above them, and am certainly NOT a racist, and love other cultures.

      I fear that the rising religious animosity in this country is going to destroy it, and I don't like the way things have been trending so much towards hate and intolerance. And this is from a Conservative Republican!!!!!! However, I am not a Christian or an Evangelical, but a pagan in all the best ways. I also have health problems such as asthma and chronic severe pain that I am worried about treating. After 5 years of severe pain and no treatments working, they prescribed me marijuana! I understand that that is verbotten Down Under, as are firearms, and there goes my collection. SO *blah*. I've got a lot to work through, yet.

      But I'm doing my research, beginning to poke around some career sites to see if I could even get a job doing Disaster Recovery/Backups/Systems Engineering. It will take time, and time is something I've got. I'm not too worried about the remainder of the Shrub's presidency, but I'm terrified of what is to come after. I told D that we would do preparation and investigation, and pending the outcome of the 2008 election, GO. Cuz I tell ya what, if Hillary gets elected, I'm so fucking gone, it's not even funny. Either that, or I'm hiding in a cave until she self-destructs. ESPECIALLY if she puts Bill on the VP ticket, which has been discussed by several US Papers. It's possible, but not likely. We'll see how it goes.

      Mostly though... I've never been out of the US (Canada & Mexico don't count), but was born in Guam. I could use some world travel exposure here at 33 years old. But...that begs the question. I'm getting ready to have kids in the next 2 years. I have to throw that into play too. *sigh* It's a lot for a girl from my background of poverty to work out. We'll have to see how it goes.

      --
      Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
    86. Re:Don't come to Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      England has more newspaers than the rest of the English speaking world put together. I've got no problem with decent Australian papers, but Syndney and/or Melbourne isn't London, for fuck's sake.

    87. Re:Don't come to Australia by donnz · · Score: 1

      "5. Most aussies don't winge about problems. They sort them."

      You obviously haven't read about your league boys recently, even winning they're winging :-)

      --
      -- Free software on every PC on every desk
    88. Re:Don't come to Australia by Joel+from+Sydney · · Score: 1
    89. Re:Don't come to Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the dingos will eat my baby!

  23. To the moon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bang zoom.

  24. Austria by bhima · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I moved to Austria.

    I'll admit that the problems in the US weren't the only reason but they were a big motivating factor.

    --
    Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    1. Re:Austria by heroofhyr · · Score: 1
      I moved to Austria. I'll admit that the problems in the US weren't the only reason but they were a big motivating factor.


      I received a residence visa to live in Vienna a little over a year ago, and other than occasionally wishing there was a Taco Bell, I have no intention of going back. Glad to see there are other expatriates here as well.

      I thought I was the only one who moved to Austria.
      A pain I know all too well.
      So this is what it feels like...when doves cry.
      --
      brandelf: invalid ELF type 'KEEBLER'
    2. Re:Austria by bhima · · Score: 1

      I hear you on the Mexican food thing, this maybe the sole advantage of being forced to return to the US a couple of times year on business.
      I am convinced that my friends that remain in the US have become dulled to the myriad minor offences they are bombarded with on a daily basis. Every time I return to US I am shocked and pretty much stay that way until I get back on the plane.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    3. Re:Austria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats all well and good, but there are no Kangaroos in Austria!

    4. Re:Austria by parc · · Score: 1

      So how hard is it to move there and find a job? I've been contemplating moving there for wuite some time (not neccessarily Vienna). The big stopping factor is my pitiful german and a lack of understanding of the procedures. It seems a lot of people spend a lot of time discouraging people from moving there.

  25. In general by JanneM · · Score: 1

    Countries and societies differ from one another (this is generally a good thing). So do people. Even without dissatisfaction with current events there's nothing strange about perhaps fitting in better in some other place than where you happened to be born. Just like a country boy may be happest in a major city or lifetime city dwellers can find their true life on a farm, so can people find that they're happier in some societies than in other.

    Me, I have lived in several countries, and found myself happiest in one of them - and that's not where I was born and raised.

    If you want to move, do move for a year or two only at first. You can't know what a place really is like to live in after just a few weeks or a month. The best way to get the opportunity is probably to get a serious education. Many countries welcome specialists like scientists or health-care workers even if they're very closed otherwise. And once you're "in" it becomes easier to stay permanently if that's what you want; a lot of countries will give you a permanent residency or similar if you've been there long enough, have steady empleoyment and so on.

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  26. Off of Earth! by antdude · · Score: 1

    Off of Earth on another habitable planet or place. Of course, that's not easily possible for us people to do that at this time. ISS (not the one from MS) is not suitable. :P

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:Off of Earth! by schmilblick · · Score: 1

      I believe the one from MS is called IIS? (that one is almost never suitable either :))

      I already live happily (sort of) in Sweden, and I have 2 coworkers that have moved here from the US. They love it... but, they find it hard to cope with the weather (they're obviously not made of swedish steel) and the darkness.. we get very little sunlight during the winter period.

  27. France by GiovanniZero · · Score: 1

    I know people think its silly but I love France. It's a nice place, I've lived there before and I like it. I mean, Paris is beautiful and chicks dig my accent.

    Whats stopping me? I like America, my family is here, my job is here, my studies can't be carried over right now. Oh yeah, and I'm really poor :)

    --
    Mod me up, mod me down, do your worst you modding clown.
    1. Re:France by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      I mean, Paris is beautiful and chicks dig my accent.

      Ah, you must be the inspiration for the song!

      People say I'm a geek, a moronic little freak
      An annoying pipsqueak with an unfortunate physique
      If I was any dumber, they'd have to water me twice a week

      But when the Mademoiselles see me, they all swoon and shriek
      They dig my mystique, they say I'm c'est magnifique
      When I'm in Par-ee, I'm the chic-est of the chic

      They love my body odor and my bad toupee
      They love my stripey shirt and my stupid beret
      And when I'm sipping on a Perrier
      In some cafe town in St. Tropez

      It's hard to keep the fans at bay
      They say, "Sign my poodle, s'il vous plait"
      "Sign my poodle, s'il vous plait"

      ~ "Genius in France" - Weird Al Yankovic

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  28. Canada by bunions · · Score: 1

    > 1) Where would you live, if not in America

    Canada.

    > and 2) What's stopping you from going?

    Immigration Canada is pretty slow, and they want a TON of paperwork. Seriously, a letter from every employer I've ever had? Are you kidding me? I'm looking at about another 3 years before I get in.

    --
    there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    1. Re:Canada by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      Move to California instead. We have a more reasonable social safety net -- if you can't afford it, they'll help you, but otherwise you need to take care of yourself, better weather, lower taxes, prettier women and men, and we have carnitas fries, which is far superior to poutine in every way. Plus, you're a short drive from Nevada if you want to get your vice on.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    2. Re:Canada by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 1

      As a Canadian who was recently forced to move to this god forsaken country (work, girlfriend)... I am very interested in what these carnitas fries are, and where I can get them. The thing I miss the most about my home on a daily basis is the food. McDonalds was once edible, KFC had the world's most awesome gravy, I could get a poutine at most fast food places, I could buy Cheezies, Coffee Crisp, O Henry, Smarties, Liquorice Allsorts, and lots of other things...

      I've discovered that In-N-Out burger is a quite acceptable replacement for McDonalds. They serve good burgers for good prices. I do rather like Abba Zabbas, which you can't get in Canada. But generally, I find the food quality down here fairly unacceptable. Wendy's seems to be largely the same as it is in Canada, so I eat there fairly often, but there's a reason I never ate there when I lived in Canada. Walking by the meat rack at Safeway makes me want to gag every time. (It smells rotten). So I've begun shopping at Raileys. Basically, what I'm trying to say is that I am very much looking for American replacements for Canadian foods.

      Really, I hate the political situation here in the US, but the food situation is far more troubling on a day-to-day basis. I am not a rich person by any means, so I can't afford sit-down restaurants very often. I do make food at home, but I am not a great cook, and I actually really like fast food, which accounts for about 50% of my diet normally, as it's cheap and tasty.

    3. Re:Canada by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      Basically, carnitas fries are french fries with refried beans, carnitas, guacamole, sourcream, etc on them. Think of them as nachos, but far tastier. It's hit and miss as to where to find them. They're much more common down in San Diego, but in the LA area, the Alberto's chain seems to have them. Northern California, you're on your own. Groceries, you're best off looking for a Trader Joe's. Small stores, not the myriad of choices as you'd find in a larger supermarket, but damn good stuff; their philosophy is to pick one brand and do it damn well. Fast food, again, is a matter of preference, and taking some calculated risk. I've found some really good small fast food places down here in Orange County, but again, you sound like you're in Northern California, and it might as well be Canada as far as food advice. Were you right around the corner, I could tell you some good inexpensive places, but I have to disclaim this with YMMV.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    4. Re:Canada by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 1

      Hmm... that doesn't sound very appetizing at all (I hate guacamole), but I'll see if I can find that at some point. I am not particularly fond of Mexican food, but it's the most prevalent food around here it seems, so I am developing a taste for it. And you're right, I am in Northern California. :) But thanks a lot for the advice.

      I really just wish that someone would open up a Tim Hortons here honestly. :P That would make all my troubles go away.

    5. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > 1) Where would you live, if not in America Canada.

      What? Canada just moved to Africa, or something? Last time I checked, Canada was still in America.

    6. Re:Canada by bunions · · Score: 1

      The food I miss most from Canada (I lived in Vancouver for 4 years) is pepperoni sticks. Why the hell can you not get pepperoni sticks in American supermarkets?!? Yeah, you can get these four-packs of greasy little twigs for $900, but that's not the same.

      But generally I miss the overall Canadian culture, where the idea of politeness is not a joke, the concept of striving for the greater good is not met with scorn and an education is something to be sought out, not tolerated.

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    7. Re:Canada by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 1

      You can't get pepperoni sticks down here? I hadn't discovered that yet. =( But speaking of pepperoni sticks... There was this place in Lethbridge, where I went to school, called Green's Pop Shop. I worked there for a semester. They had "Pepperoni Wraps", for $1.35, which were a pepperoni stick (your choice of hot, mild, or honey-garlic), wrapped in a kind of dough. They were amazingly good, and I miss them. But I think that they were a thing specific to that particular store. I also really miss Hot Rods. Slim Jims just aren't the same.

      And yeah, I miss my culture every day. I am having a really hard time adapting down here.

    8. Re:Canada by bunions · · Score: 1

      > And yeah, I miss my culture every day. I am having a really hard time adapting down here.

      Maybe these guys could help?

      http://www.digitalmooselounge.com/

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    9. Re:Canada by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      Guac's kind of an acquired taste, so most places will honor your request when you say to leave it off. Though the question of your fondness leads into the next one, are you getting Mexican food from chain places, or are you going to the (slightly more risky) small hole in the wall places? Quality is a bit more sporadic in the non-chain places, but conversely, you will get places that are really damn good. The chains are pretty much universally mediocre as far as quality goes.

      However, I can't help too much with the Tim Hortons thing other than to say try some of the local storefront doughnut shops. Again, sporadic quality, but there are some pretty good ones out there.

      Doing some poking, though, I found this document, which seems to be a pretty decent list of good places in the SF area in general, including a food section. If I misjudged and you live somewhere other than SFO area, find whatever the free alt tabloid in the area is and try googling for the paper name "best of". All these papers have something similar; reader voted reviews of various categories. Should help you find pretty good places.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    10. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But... Canada IS in America!

    11. Re:Canada by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

      Have you tried 7-11? Ours has some sort of peperroni stick snacks...

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
  29. Mars by Kingrames · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mars.

    it will take your breath away.

    (No, seriously, that's the reason why NOT to go)

    --
    If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    1. Re:Mars by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      If I could take a one way trip to Mars with no hope of returning to Earth, I would do it in a heartbeat, no regrets, no second thoughts. Stick me on a rocket and get me the hell off this planet, please.

    2. Re:Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're crazy.

    3. Re:Mars by bgarcia · · Score: 1
      Mars.
      Hey, I live there! Zip code 16046 (look it up).
      --
      I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    4. Re:Mars by jbridge21 · · Score: 1

      With you on that.

      Email me if you want some ideas.

  30. Its the goods by Gay+for+Linux · · Score: 0

    I am currently living in Japan but looking forward to going back to the US once my school term is over. The lack of Wild Cherry Pepsi here is atrocious and I could never again live in a country without it.

  31. I don't run by bky1701 · · Score: 0

    Only cowards emmigrate. I have been TOLD to leave the US by many a neo-con, but there are only a few places I would move, and I do not desire to do so. But to answer the qustion...

    Sweden
    Norway
    Japan

    All I can think of really, and in that order.

    1. Re:I don't run by iogan · · Score: 5, Insightful
      [...]Only cowards emmigrate.[...]
      Dude don't say that, it's really kind of offensive to people who at some point or another HAD to leave their country. Even if you're not being tortured, or anything really bad like that, who wants to have the police hassle them on a regular basis, not be able to work in their chosen profession, etc. Just little things which make your life suck, when it really shouldn't have to.

      I support everyones right to emigrate if they feel like they need to. Emigrés have also often been the deciding factor in overthrowing an oppressive government, in fact I'd say it's almost a prerequisite to have a strong expat community if you need to overthrow the government. These people need their freedom and ability to work, in order to help raise awareness about what is wrong with the way things are being run, and make changes. Someone being in jail for political reasons cannot really do much to change anything.

    2. Re:I don't run by bky1701 · · Score: 1

      "Dude don't say that, it's really kind of offensive to people who at some point or another HAD to leave their country. Even if you're not being tortured, or anything really bad like that, who wants to have the police hassle them on a regular basis, not be able to work in their chosen profession, etc. Just little things which make your life suck, when it really shouldn't have to."

      So, insteed of trying to fix those issues, it's ok to pack up and leave? From a personal point of view- sure, it's probably a good idea, but in the long run and view of others, it's going to be rightly looked down on. If everyone used that type of thinking for everything, we would have nothing but people who run at the slightest issue. At one time the US was a place no one wanted to live- but coming eventually paid off. Same for California. There are many examples.

      "support everyones right to emigrate if they feel like they need to."

      So do I. But I don't support their right to immigrate elsewhere just because they feel like leaving. However, that is aside the issue.

      "Emigrés have also often been the deciding factor in overthrowing an oppressive government, in fact I'd say it's almost a prerequisite to have a strong expat community if you need to overthrow the government. These people need their freedom and ability to work, in order to help raise awareness about what is wrong with the way things are being run, and make changes. Someone being in jail for political reasons cannot really do much to change anything."

      But this (the topic of leaving the US) is not an issue of not being able to fight the government but rather one of not wanting to. There are many ways here to fight it still, and until those are gone, anyone leaving isn't doing a blasted thing to help.

      Sure, voting is pointless for the most part. That doesn't stop you from running just to say you got X number of votes. Sure, the media is controlled by companies, but you stand a much better chance changing people's minds with billboards, going door to door and handing out fliers then you do setting up a website in X country run by an ex-American yelling about the US. Hell I wouldn't pay attention to him.

      If you want to run, then go. Better now then on the battlefield. But I chose to stand and fight to the last breath.

    3. Re:I don't run by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Only cowards emmigrate.

      You are from US, right? Maybe you are aware that the majority of the current US population are either immigrants or descendants of immigrants. You are basically saying that most US citizens are cowards or at least their ancestors were cowards. Wow!

    4. Re:I don't run by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the Puritans that emmigrated to north america in 1617

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    5. Re:I don't run by Zeek40 · · Score: 1

      So which one of your coward ancestors emmigrated to the US? ;)

    6. Re:I don't run by paralaxcreations · · Score: 1

      I take it you have no kids. Having kids tends to make one a little more concerned about their person rather than their nation. You know, the whole "if I can give them a good life now" thing...

    7. Re:I don't run by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless your are a full blood Native American then you are the product of emmigration. By your reasoning, you must be a decendent of cowards. I'm sure your family would be proud.

    8. Re:I don't run by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Unless your are a full blood Native American then you are the product of emmigration. By your reasoning, you must be a decendent of cowards. I'm sure your family would be proud.


      Oh, I get it: you're one of the "Indians were always here" dumbfucks.

      No, they weren't.. ergo, they were cowardly too.
    9. Re:I don't run by ep3123 · · Score: 1

      overthrowing opressive governments...who gave americans the mandate to be judge, jury, and executioner.

    10. Re:I don't run by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only cowards emmigrate.

      I emigrated after marrying my trans-atlantic wife.

      Pick a window, you're leaving.

    11. Re:I don't run by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, just a side note, but USA was kinda founded by people who ran.

      Ran for a better life, elsewhere.

      They then stood up and fought for that better life.

      But the USA was founded by "cowards." (I don't think so - for example worshippers belonging to minority religions in a state which mandated another religion was probably SOL due to having both state and other people against them.)

      The conditions are not the same - there is no "undiscovered country" to exploit, but there is also not nice to say "fuck no, you shouldn't run you whiners."

      People that do decide that they will not likely make a difference locally - even by choice - and can live better elsewhere should probably do so. In this we seem to be in agreement.

      Where we do seem to disagree is that in a nation where intentional non-participation in the voting process is seen as "laziness," voting with your feet - feet moving you elsewhere - might be the only recourse left to people who will not (for their own reasons) participate in the political process.

  32. Easy one. by deepb · · Score: 1

    I decided years ago that if I ever had to leave (for whatever reason), I'd head for Belize -- a beautiful, low-key, English-speaking country -- can't go wrong as far as I'm concerned.

    I have been told to avoid the drug cartels in Belize City, but that's certainly not a deal-breaker.

    Belize Motto: Sub Umbra Floreo ("Under the Shade I Flourish")

    1. Re:Easy one. by dlc3007 · · Score: 1

      I'm right there with you. Beautiful country, tropical weather -- and English is the official language!
      The main issue is that you can't get a job there unless you're a citizen and you can't become a citizen unless you live there for seven years. There are loop-holes, but you have to find them.
      They're happy for foreigners to go there and spend money. Not so happy for foreigners to come take jobs.

    2. Re:Easy one. by GuruBuckaroo · · Score: 1

      Just don't take any CDs when you go. There's a bacteria down there that eats the foil and turns your CDs into windowpanes.

      --
      Poor means hoping the toothache goes away.
    3. Re:Easy one. by deepb · · Score: 1
      The main issue is that you can't get a job there unless you're a citizen and you can't become a citizen unless you live there for seven years. There are loop-holes, but you have to find them.
      I would definitely telecommute to a job in the US .. probably (under the table) computer-related contract work. As much as I would love to repair shoes or pick fruit for a living, I don't think it would be wise to waste my current job experience just because I had to flee the country.
    4. Re:Easy one. by fdiskne1 · · Score: 1

      I agree completely, but be quiet! Stop giving away the secret!

      I'm considering heading down for two weeks in January but I can't decide between San Pedro or Placencia. Isn't it quite expensive to live there compared to other Central American countries or is it much better once you get away from the tourist areas?

      Pass me a Belikin and watch for falling coconuts!

      --
      But why is the rum gone?
  33. nippon by theNetImp · · Score: 1

    Japan, I love being able to take a train where ever I want to go, and think it's absolutely wonderful there. I know it has it's problems, but at least as a noncitizen I know I'd have no control over it anyway, so it wouldn't bother me so much.

    The reason why I have not gone there yet is simple. There's this thing called a work visa, and I don't meet the requirements for it. It requires a 4 year degree or 10 years of work experience in the field that you are going to work in, in Japan. I have 1 year to go before I hit 10 years. I've been working on collecting documentation for that.

    1. Re:nippon by Gogo0 · · Score: 1

      I dont know if youre just chiming in or if you are actually considering leaving the US because of whatever irks you, but if you have no qualms working for the US govt then there are lots of opportunities in Japan that dont require a degree (though that always helps during the hiring process). I've been throwing my resume all over the place: dept of the navy, dept of the army, US consulates, etc (I currently enjoy working for the govt, and a lateral to another country is somewhat easier that way).

      I just got back from a month-long vacation in Japan and made the horrible mistake of coming back. I'm not a bitter liberal, I just loved japan(ese girls) so much.
      Even if you cant get a work visa, at least visit. It was by far the best month of my life.

    2. Re:nippon by theNetImp · · Score: 1

      I've been to Japan 4 times. Spending 3 months living in Aichi perfecture studying Japanese language (girls. ;-)).

      Part of the problem is not knowing where to look for these jobs. Also I don't want to get stuck in Okinawa, I want to be on the mainland and don't know what kinds of opportunities would be there with govt Jobs. I have no problem working for the gov, cause jobs are usually rather secure. I just don't agree with the idiots who run the gov. Japan is quite wonderful.

    3. Re:nippon by Gogo0 · · Score: 1

      http://www.usajobs.com/
      http://cpol.army.mil/
      http://www.federaljobs.net/

      There are more than a few army/navy/air force posts (and consulates) on the main island. They're mostly around Tokyo, to boot (usually across the bay). I would prefer not to be in Okinawa either (too many white people for me to be special), but at least it would be a foot in the door over there.
      Most posts have enlisted personnel working overseas rotations, so after two years they cycle people out. They're almost always looking for new blood to bring into the federal system (as DoD civilians), so that is always a good time to go into overdrive when youre searching. It just so happens that there will be a large rotation this coming May, so set up some bots on the above sites to email you when a relevant job gets posted, kick back, and keep your eyes open ^_^

  34. O Canada by eastbayted · · Score: 1

    Were I to move, I'd head to Canada. My girlfriend's a Canadian citizen, and she has family and friend there, plus she's hankering to move back eventually. Also, it's an absolutely beautiful country; the people seem nice, friendly, and well-educated; it's safe; and I prefer their form of government to that of the U.S. The fact that it's a neighbor to the U.S. is another plus; I'd certainly miss my own family and friends, so being just north would make visits easier.

    1. Re: O Canada by Futaba-chan · · Score: 1
      I did move to Canada, and my partner and I love it here. I grew up in the Snow Belt (Toronto's winters are less severe), we've both been fond of the country for years, and I had a great job opportunity here, so I moved here as much or more to move to here as I did to move from the US.

      "What's stopping me?" Nothing.

      There are some encouraging signs that things might start to get reasonable again after the election, but even if they do, we'll probably stay here just because we like it.

  35. California by Goldsmith · · Score: 1

    I'm here already.

    1. Re:California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen!!

      Just waiting for the big quake to make us an island now!

    2. Re:California by bitbucketeer · · Score: 1

      Oh, good. That gives me reason to vote for every fucked up proposition this election just before I move to Wyoming.

    3. Re:California by ocelotbob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Absolutely. Great weather year round, good people, good activity, and if you don't like the culture of a place, move 5-10 miles and it's completely different. Plus some of the most scenic spots on the planet. Watching a sunrise in owens valley is quite possibly one of the best ways to begin a lazy morning.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

  36. Aotearoa by Aurostion · · Score: 1

    New Zealand and money (but I'm working on that). I've actually wanted to move their since I was a young boy, so it seemed the logical choice when politically motivated to start looking elsewhere. It has one of the most transparent govnerments in the world. Further, and more importantly in my mind, land is cheap there, and as soon as I have enough saved I want to purchase enough to have a vineyard/farm. I am, after all, part of the "technofreak-hippie" culture (or I just want to live away from teems of humanity, and be as self-reliant as possible.)

    1. Re:Aotearoa by Aurostion · · Score: 1

      Apologies for the spelling errors.

    2. Re:Aotearoa by Velocir · · Score: 1

      Don't come to New Zealand. Our gov't spends all their time arguing pointlessly among themselves, unless they're talking about pay raises for themselves, which they don't have any trouble agreeing on. There are already craploads of vineyards (I've worked on at least 20 of them) and there's no money in growing grapes: The money is made by the wineries. Also, your skin will fry because of the high UV levels caused by the ozone hole (itself caused by the USA). There are laws against foreigners buying land etc (eg, Shania Twain wasn't allowed to build a house on land she'd bought). Plus we're already sick of Americans, unless they're celebrities. Sorry...

    3. Re:Aotearoa by Aurostion · · Score: 1

      Isn't that all government? As it stands I have 120 points on the immigration quiz, which is more than enough for an expression of interest. A job offer adds something like 50 points, and around there is a magic number which will get me a skilled migrant visa. As far as work goes, in meat life I have some actual business skills which might land me something decent (currently work for and am partial owner of a consulting company focused on IT standards in pharmaceutical industry,) that has to count for something. As for being a foreigner, the goal is citizenship. I don't know how realistic that is though. I'm a bit sick of Americans myself. I won't come into your country and mess with your dudes.

    4. Re:Aotearoa by taniwha · · Score: 1
      don't listen to him - moved my family back to NZ after 20 years in silicon valley - and we're very glad we did. Mind you it was easier since I'm a kiwi - if you are interested check out the NZ consulate web site they have a quick online form you can fill out to see if you score enough to get in - do it sooner rather than later as we have a public health system that assumes you pay in (ie taxes) when you're young and well to pay for when you're old and not so well - just like an insurance scheme - the points system gets skewed against people as they get older so you pay your way and don't screw up the demographics.

      On the other hand if you compare everything (state/fed taxes, social security, cadi/acc sales taxes/gst etc) I figure I'm paying 8-10% less tax in NZ than in California (I'm in the top brackets in both places) - which is pretty amazing considring in the US my boss pays for my medical ahd here I do (thru my taxes) - hooray for a small army

      Politics in NZ is definitely a contact sport - but it happens out in public where everyone can see in a way that one could only dream of in the US

    5. Re:Aotearoa by htnprm · · Score: 2, Funny

      Stay away! Don't come to New Zealand! It sucks! The people are mean! The education system is awful! Health care is a joke! The environment is rubbish! The pay is crap! The quality of living is substandard! Everyone hates us, and we're at war with the world! Stay away! *please*...:-)

    6. Re:Aotearoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm I think you're really talking about the US right?

    7. Re:Aotearoa by dafing · · Score: 1
      You forgot to mention we all have to speak Maori except when trying to recruit people to join the Cult of Gods Own!

      Seriously d00ds, NZ blows! When you first arrive they lock you in the gulags of Helengrad (I shudder to say the name) with She-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named, where its foggy all the time and smells like rotten eggs, which in NZ is pronounced "Ro-ta-rue-a".

      --
      --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    8. Re:Aotearoa by kaffiene · · Score: 1

      That's rubbish. Our government compares well to others (transparancy, lack of corruption).

      And Shania Twain *was* allowed to build her house, it was only an issue of how it effected the landscape that was debated.

  37. Mod down troll by zaxios · · Score: 2, Informative

    "our parliament is a virtual dictatorship"

    If by "dictatorship" you mean elected body, then yes.

    "crossing the floor on the basis of principle is almost entirely unheard of and considered to be little better than treason"

    The last time a member of the ruling Coalition -- and not the opposition parties, which vote against Coalition legislation frequently -- crossed the floor was about a year ago, but internal dissent scuppered some immigration laws this year. Anyway, since when was the measure of a democracy the lack of discipline of the ruling party? What's undemocratic about an elected ruling party voting for its own legislation? On the contrary, if, after being elected with a majority in both houses, the government were unable to make new laws, that would be a failure of democracy.

    "with none of the individual rights in our Constitution"

    Our constitution may suck, but Australia is still a free country. Freedom House rated us a 1 1, meaning we have an excellent record on both civil liberties and political rights.

    Come to Australia. Our GDP per capita is higher than the major European countries', and our Human Development Index is third in the world -- behind only Iceland and Norway.

    1. Re:Mod down troll by caitsith01 · · Score: 1, Informative

      The last time a member of the ruling Coalition -- and not the opposition parties, which vote against Coalition legislation frequently -- crossed the floor was about a year ago, but internal dissent scuppered some immigration laws this year. Anyway, since when was the measure of a democracy the lack of discipline of the ruling party? What's undemocratic about an elected ruling party voting for its own legislation? On the contrary, if, after being elected with a majority in both houses, the government were unable to make new laws, that would be a failure of democracy.

      What an absolute load of nonsense. If it is a 'failure of democracy' for members of the ruling party to vote against the government from time to time, then why have members of parliament at all? Why not just count the votes, and if one party has an absolute majority, let them pass whatever they want until the next election? At least it would save us some money. And yes, there was one very unusual instance of crossing the floor recently. But perhaps you should educate yourself about other democratic nations and the way their parliaments work - in the UK and US, which have somewhat similar parliaments, crossing the floor is not only common, it's actually expected, and as such has a constant moderating effect on legislation. Others, such as Germany and New Zealand, are proportional and thus actual consensus is required most of the time to get laws passed. In other words, these countries all have systems where 51% of the population are rarely, if ever, going to be able to pass laws to the detriment of the other 49%. We do not.

      Our constitution may suck, but Australia is still a free country. Freedom House rated us a 1 1, meaning we have an excellent record on both civil liberties and political rights.

      ASIO agents could come to your door right now and take you away for detention and interrogation, without ever identifying themselves or accusing or even suspecting you of a crime. You would be unable to tell anyone where you were, and might not even be allowed a lawyer in some circumstances. Afterwards you would face severe penalties, including lengthy jail terms, if you spoke to any other person about your experience. Anyone else reporting on your experience, such as the media, would be similarly exposed. It may also interest you that there is a criminal offence in Australia of 'possession of a thing' which is or may be used in relation to a terrorist attack, and the burden of proof is reversed - you must prove that you don't possess the 'thing' in question. All of this is real. It's all in the ASIO Act and related legislation right now. If that's your idea of a free country then you don't know what freedom is.

      Our GDP per capita is higher than the major European countries'

      Our per capita GDP is within a whisker of almost every country in western europe, and substantially behind the scandinavian countries. In any case, what exactly does this prove?

      --
      Read Pynchon.
    2. Re:Mod down troll by hisstory+student · · Score: 1

      "Come to Australia." Ha! You say that like you don't know how difficult it is for us to do that.

      --
      Heard any good sigs lately?
    3. Re:Mod down troll by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      "Come to Australia." Ha! You say that like you don't know how difficult it is for us to do that.

      What's hard about it? Australia is recruiting.

      Better question is why you'd want to. Boring as hell; you get to choose between two seasons: Winter and Flies; prices are shocking (generally 2x what you'd pay in the US).

      There's a whole world out there, don't just get stuck on the places from the movies.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    4. Re:Mod down troll by hisstory+student · · Score: 1

      Well, it's a big place, isn't it. Like anywhere else, there's good parts and there's bad.

      --
      Heard any good sigs lately?
    5. Re:Mod down troll by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      That's true. There's a lot of natural beauty, it's got that going for it. There's nothing like being able to get to the beach in 15 minutes from any major city in the country. But if you enjoy an intellectually stimulating fast-paced urban life, you'll be disappointed. Melbourne's the only place that comes close, and it's on par with an also-ran American city like San Diego or Seattle. Sydney, aside from a few semi-lively immigrant communities, is a vapid nest of wine bars and not much else culturally.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    6. Re:Mod down troll by hisstory+student · · Score: 1

      I see. Well, thanks for the information. My original comment was based on an experience of quite a few years ago when I was responding to an offer for employment. As I recall, there was an unacceptable amount (for me anyway) of 'red tape' back in those days. I'm glad to hear that they're recruiting again, and hopefully they've made it easier. I realize now that I should have done some research before I made that comment.

      --
      Heard any good sigs lately?
  38. Costa Rica by budword · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Costa Rica. They don't hate Americans. You can drink the water (if you were wondering).Great weather. No army. Easy immigration. Democracy. Universal health care. I'm leaving because I was arrested and held in jail for 2 days for not having my dogs licensed in a town they didn't live in. Yes, you read that right. I had already been convicted of not having my dogs licensed, with no notice even of any infraction, much less a trial. Had no right to appear before a judge, or even call a lawyer. That's for people who haven't already been convicted. Welcome to the law for and by bored small town cops. Northern Wisconsin, for any who were wondering.

    1. Re:Costa Rica by eric76 · · Score: 1

      I know someone who actually did move there.

      According to him, a few months after he arrived, the government emptied out his bank account and he's been trying to get it back ever since.

    2. Re:Costa Rica by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow... you really must have pissed someone off to get thrown in jail for not having your dogs licensed. Around here (Southeastern Wisconsin) you get... maybe a nasty look for not having your dog licensed. If your dog ends up in the pound, you have to pay the license fee and a late fee, as well as proof of rabies or a slip showing that you prepaid for a rabies vaccination. Otherwise you might be told "Yeah, you should really license your dog" unless there are major complaints against you by other residents of the neighborhood who are willing to testify in court that your dogs present a nuisance.

      Oh wait... you said Northern Wisconsin. That's just hick USA's way of saying "we don't like your kind 'round here, boy." Or you are the proud owner of a pit bull or rottweiler and live in an area where people have bought into the sensationalism brought about in a few news reports.

    3. Re:Costa Rica by CharAznable · · Score: 1

      I'm a Costa Rican expat. I'd have no problems going to live back there.

      Pros:
      -Beautiful weather. 75F all year long.
      -The overwhelming presence of nature.
      -Hot women
      -Wildlife
      -Growing tech industry, with lots of good paying jobs.
      -No army
      -Cheap public transportation.
      -Coffee literally grows on trees :P
      -People are fascinated by foreigners.


      Cons:
      -Cronyism and corruption.
      -Telecom monopoly with shitty service.
      -Rising crime.
      -Clueless government.
      -Guinness is expensive and hard to find.
      -Crumbling public infrastructure.

      --
      The perfect sig is a lot like silence, only louder
    4. Re:Costa Rica by DrPeper · · Score: 1

      "Stable Government
        No Army"

      With no Army there is no promise of governmental stability.

    5. Re:Costa Rica by ltbarcly · · Score: 0, Troll

      Except here where we live... Reality.

      There is more on earth than is accounted for in your stupid political theories.

    6. Re:Costa Rica by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guinness isn't that hard to find anymore, but it definitely isn't as cheap as local beer.

    7. Re:Costa Rica by WearyVulture · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's myopic. Costa Rica has actually had a stable governments in the 57 years since we abolished the army. Not a single president has been assassinated nor has been forced to resign in that time. And while costarricans might not have always chosen the best people for the presidency, the elections have always been fair, with no claims of adulteration.

      Not every country needs to hold their own people at gunpoint, nor thinks that the neighbors are going to invade the moment they look the wrong way.

    8. Re:Costa Rica by DrPeper · · Score: 1

      Please, show me a country in history which has had no army (or even had a weak army) and was not eventually taken over by a stronger power.

      The world is not a safe place. Not everyone believes in free love and peace. There will always be an agreesor. By not preparing yourself for the eventual said aggressor you only set yourself up for your own eventual demise. It's basic societal evolution.

    9. Re:Costa Rica by CharAznable · · Score: 1
      Please, show me a country in history which has had no army (or even had a weak army) and was not eventually taken over by a stronger power.

      Costa Rica?

      Seriously, not having an army has worked great for us. As for military threats? Panama has no army either, and Nicaragua isn't invading us any time soon. Also, we don't have oil, so the US won't be invading either.
      --
      The perfect sig is a lot like silence, only louder
    10. Re:Costa Rica by WearyVulture · · Score: 1

      You may want to just check Wikipedia:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_wit hout_an_army

      How many of those countries like Liechtenstein or Panama have been invaded since they abolished their armies?

      I agree: Not everyone believes in free love and peace. That doesn't mean that if you don't have an army you're just asking to be taken over. Moreover, having an army doesn't guarantee anything: if the Israel-Lebanon conflict proved something, it was that being "second best" in the army race is just as well as not having ran at all. Meanwhile, the Lebanese people could have enjoyed the benefits of those hundreds of millions of dollars yearly expenditure in something that actually benefited them, such as education and health.

      Costa Rica has done well enough defending itself the very few times it has been invaded in the past, by using volunteers and police. We'd much rather not starve our people or tax them even further because of hypothetical wolves in the forest.

    11. Re:Costa Rica by evronm · · Score: 1
      With no Army there is no promise of governmental stability

      Well, they've managed to remain stable for 120 years. That's only 20 less than the U.S. (since the civil war). As such, they've become an important banking/business/trading center and have the explicit support of every military in South America.

      This is a country which, in its entire existence, has managed to piss of nobody. In my mind, that makes their future stability much more likely than that of the U.S., which has managed to piss off over a billion muslims.

    12. Re:Costa Rica by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just be careful of the dinosaurs.

    13. Re:Costa Rica by mfrank · · Score: 1

      Well, to be fair, it doesn't take much to piss off Muslims. Hell, just a cartoon'll do it.

    14. Re:Costa Rica by evronm · · Score: 1

      To be fair, yeah, that's true. Nonetheless, the facts I stated about Costa Rica remain salient. I've done my homework, and it seems to me as close to the ideal place to live as exists on the planet right now.

      Of course, we'll see if I still feel that way after living there for a few months :).

    15. Re:Costa Rica by doktor-hladnjak · · Score: 1

      It's my understanding that Costa Rica has started to crack down somewhat on its lax immigration policies towards expats from places like the US, Canada, Australia and Europe. I was in Nicaragua in January and there seemed to be a lot of expats moving there from Costa Rica. Unfortunately, every expat I've ever met in Central America seemed to be a pedophile, somebody with a substance abuse problem or somebody with little money that wanted be treated rich in a poor country.

  39. wait for the '06 elections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The United States will be having Congressional elections in a few weeks. Hopefully the dems will get control and do something about the White House.

    1. Re:wait for the '06 elections by Truekaiser · · Score: 0

      don't bet on it. the dems are just as corrupt as the repubs, just bought out by different people.
      the third party's are no help either because they aren't allowed in the big leagues unless they sell out too.
      at this stage of the game it's best to lay low and let the storm pass rather then stand up and get hit by a flying billboard/

    2. Re:wait for the '06 elections by polar+red · · Score: 1
      just bought out by different people.

      Oh really ?
      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    3. Re:wait for the '06 elections by RedneckJack · · Score: 0

      Keep the dems out because of high taxes and nanny state laws like motorcycle helmets, 55 mph national maximum speed limit. Also get rid of the repubs because of the Real ID Act, Patriot Act (namely because of bully Sensenbrenner).

      So what is the alternative ? Time for 3rd parties like Libertarian, Constitution, Green.

      A better system would be to draw names of people out of the phone book and go serve a term in the House or Senate and then go back home. Their employer will be required to keep their job while their employee is serving in Congress. The person serving in Congress would have their salary be based on 150% of their pay from home. The additional money would help on housing plus time away from home/family. This would take care of imcumbency and people from elitist ivy league schools would have much less influence. Hopefully, there would be people with more common sense making the laws instead. Also to keep cost down, Congress is in session for 90 days in the Winter time. There might be some flaws in this idea but it is a start.

    4. Re:wait for the '06 elections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can wait for the 06 elections, but I'm already making plans to get out before World War III starts.

    5. Re:wait for the '06 elections by vox+humanna · · Score: 1

      Anonymous coward fits your profile well.

    6. Re:wait for the '06 elections by Eccles · · Score: 1

      don't bet on it. the dems are just as corrupt as the repubs, just bought out by different people

      Yes, but the Hollywood types are less likely to want a war than the Halliburton/Bechtel/defense contractor crowd.

      Also, if we don't have House/Senate/Presidency all held by the same party, then the most ridiculous stuff tends not to get advanced, and cronyism is somewhat less rampant. I hope I never see all three held by the same party again in my lifetime, Dem or Republican.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  40. Relevance? by jasonla · · Score: 1

    Since when did Slashdot become a political forum? Questions like that are usually somehow related to technology. This seems more like a baited question.

    1. Re:Relevance? by jazir1979 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      News for Nerds != Nerdy News

      Politics can be, and should be, news for nerds.

      --
      What's your GCNSEQNO?
    2. Re:Relevance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a low six-digit ID and you never noticed all the political geeks and politics stories here before now?

  41. All talk, no action. by imstanny · · Score: 1

    My parents emmigrated here when I was seven. I am almost 24 now. There's a reason why America is so diverse; people from all over the world want to live here. There are two types of people that don't like it here; either they are Americans who are ignorant about life outside of America or they are ignorant because they don't live in America (government censorship/propaganda). Don't get me wrong; there are many things wrong with they way our government is run. Nevertheless, in response to the original post, I wouldn't want to live anywhere else. Vacation; well, that's a different story.

    1. Re:All talk, no action. by CGP314 · · Score: 1
      There's a reason why America is so diverse


      I take issue with the America-is-so-diverse argument. According to Wikipedia, we are 70% white and 88% Christian. You must not forget that most of this diversity is in the cities, and mostly New York. I spent my summer on a road trip circumnavigating the country and let me tell you, the terrain changes, but the people and the towns are exactly the same, one to the next.
    2. Re:All talk, no action. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think a lot of people forget just how good we have it here in the United States of America. Sure, a growing number of people may not agree with the policies of our elected leaders however, because we live in a democracy, after 2008 we will never be governed by George H. W. Bush ever again. He will have reached the end of his term in office, and the number of terms he can serve will be up - and we can thank the Republicans for that after Roosevelt won four consecutive elections. Compare this to Venezuela's president Hugo Chavez who is currently rewriting his country's constitution AGAIN in order to let him serve an indefinite number of terms in office.

      We live in an exceptional country in which anyone can succeed financially, as we have a low tax rate, low inflation, and plenty of investment opportunities. Compare this to our neighbor to the south where poverty is so bad that immigrants come to the USA just to earn minimum wage because compared to what they could earn at home, this is a fortune! Poverty is relative. If you had a choice, where would you prefer to live? In poverty in an Appalachian community, or in poverty in a Calcutta slum?

      Does the USA have the greatest record on civil liberties? Unfortunately, no - however I believe it is only because of recent events that we have lost ground in our standing, and that the pendulum will eventually swing in a more favorable direction. Education is encouraged, and our collegiate standards are some of the best in the world. We encourage free thought, free speech, and free exchange of ideas.

      Many of the destinations mentioned by other posters are places where governments have enacted legislation where the community holds more importance that that of the individual. While that idea deserves merit and is being adopted in certain areas of United States governance (such as public health), the individual spirit of most Americans provides a political climate where the individual is more important than the community. While I would enjoy visiting some of the mentioned areas, I could never see myself leave the country I love. I fear that it is with ignorance that many have rashly posted and would willingly flee the country which has provided them with so many opportunities for a concept of a location whether real or unreal that tempts them so.

    3. Re:All talk, no action. by ivano · · Score: 1

      Second most multicultural country in the world is Australia. The first being Israel.

      America does overhype itself a bit too much on the diversity and democracy fronts. Sure it has both but it isn't necessarily the best at either.
      Though 10 out of 10 for your Constitution and Bill of Rights. We all want them!

      Ciao

    4. Re:All talk, no action. by donutz · · Score: 1

      "According to Wikipedia, we are 70% white and 88% Christian."

      According to Wikipedia, there are hundreds (about 300 listed) of branches of Christianity. As far as the 70% white, people with all kinds of different backgrounds have come to the US, whatever their color. Is someone from Czech the same as someone from France? Don't get diversity confused with how they want to use the word on college campuses (where "diversity" == more black people).

  42. Will be more interesting after the election by FreeIX · · Score: 1

    I for one am eagerly awaiting the Nov. 7 elections to see what this country's future is going to look like.

    Some are predicting 1994 all over again -- I at least am fairly confident the Dems will get the House.

    But regardless, I will not be leaving America because I am committed to the FSP

    --
    My UID is bigger than yours.
  43. Why is it? by wdr1 · · Score: 1

    Often during our heated political discussions on slashdot, several people will mention their desire to leave the country.

    Off the cuff, I can think of specific names of prominent lefties who've said they want to leave the country (generally based on condition -- e.g., Bush winning again in '04), but I can't think of any people on the right.

    Is it just I can't think of them/haven't heard of it? Are there prominent conservatives who declared they'll leave the country if ______ happens?

    -Bill

    --
    SlashSig Karma: Excellent (mostly affected by moderatio
    1. Re:Why is it? by reflector · · Score: 1

      Is it just I can't think of them/haven't heard of it? Are there prominent conservatives who declared they'll leave the country if ______ happens?


      i can imagine maybe a few ultra-right wingers have that attitude, but for the most part they are the america - love it or leave it! crowd.

      they are flag-waving buffoons that sit on the couch, guzzle their beer and wave their flags while chanting rah! rah! go america, we're #1, while watching american tanks rolling into iraq and other oil-rich countr^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H totalitarian dictatorships that threaten america with weapons of mass desctuction.

    2. Re:Why is it? by acb · · Score: 1

      Weren't there some Libertarians talking about establishing a floating anarchocapitalist utopia on the high seas a while ago?

    3. Re:Why is it? by Banner · · Score: 1

      Notice also that all the ones who said they'd leave didn't.

      Why is it the people who say they're going to leave never keep their promise to us?

    4. Re:Why is it? by wdr1 · · Score: 1

      I don't think Libertarians really are the same as Conservatives. While they are similar on the fiscal side, there's a lot of differences on the social side (e.g., legalization of drugs).

      -Bill

      --
      SlashSig Karma: Excellent (mostly affected by moderatio
    5. Re:Why is it? by wdr1 · · Score: 1

      Heh. I, for one, was willing to kick in for Alec Baldwin's plane ticket.

      -Bill

      --
      SlashSig Karma: Excellent (mostly affected by moderatio
    6. Re:Why is it? by acb · · Score: 1

      Though haven't they tended more towards the don't-tread-on-me branch of the Republican Party than the Democrats?

      Anyway, as far as traditional religious-values conservatives leaving goes, there were the Mormons who founded Utah. Not sure about any more recent examples.

  44. No doubt redunant - but... your back yard. by awehttam · · Score: 1
    "a-new-home-for-the-free-and-brave dept."

    If American's are so free and brave, why don't they step up to the plate and fix the problems in their own back yard?

    Seriousley. You live in a democracy. You have a lot of problems. Fix it yourself. Not sure how? Ask for help.

    Those of us in our own home regions have our own problems, and every country and collective of residents faces problems of their own.

    1. Re:No doubt redunant - but... your back yard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If American's are so free and brave, why don't they step up to the plate and fix the problems in their own back yard?"

      Maybe because we're too busy fixing other people's problems for them...

  45. Israel by Yonkeltron · · Score: 1

    I would go to Israel.
    Problems? You bet. Worth it? For sure.
    I'd go if I could be guaranteed a lifestyle comparible to one obtainable here in America. I love my countries but I do wonder sometimes...

    --
    Keep the faith, share the code
    1. Re:Israel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Israel rocks. I went there on holiday last November and loved it. Great country, great food (which caught me by surprise), great people.

    2. Re:Israel by htnprm · · Score: 1

      "Israel rocks"...Just don't ask the Palestinians...Oh wait. They're throwing 'rocks' at the Merkavas. Maybe that's what you meant.

    3. Re:Israel by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Israel rocks. I went there on holiday last November and loved it. Great country, great food (which caught me by surprise), great people.

      Yeah, great, if you ignore the whole ground-zero of the apocalypse thing.

      I'd be getting out of Israel before I'd leave the U.S., and I'd certainly not want to be in the U.S.!

      Seriously. Israel is a giant ghetto designed to lure all the Jews into one place for convenient and easy processing. If you are a Jew, Israel is perhaps the least safe country on the planet. Take a moment to note which way the wind is blowing!


      -FL

    4. Re:Israel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure way to go antisemitc in no time. Sorry, but I like my kind too much to go to Israel. :)

    5. Re:Israel by scrote.sac · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah? And whose land would you steal? Whose water? Whose freedom?

    6. Re:Israel by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      I phoned the Israeli embassy in NY and asked how I can immigrate. If you're not Jewish, married to a Jewish person, or a convert to Judaism, you can't immigrate.

      Of course, there's also many of the same problems over there as here, only compounded by the fact that its Palestine instead of Iraq.

    7. Re:Israel by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Except that, as far as I know, Israelis maintain all of their civil rights. For the Israeli government to oppress you, you must actually be Palestinian. That's better than America, where giving to the wrong Muslim charity can now get you locked away and tortured.

    8. Re:Israel by ppc_digger · · Score: 1

      I've been living in Jerusalem my entire life. The lifestyle in most major jewish Israeli cities is very similar to the one in major American cities.

      --
      Of all major operating systems, UNIX is the only one originally meant for gaming.
    9. Re:Israel by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1
      Except that, as far as I know, Israelis maintain all of their civil rights. For the Israeli government to oppress you, you must actually be Palestinian.
      That's not quite true. A former coworker of mine went to Israel for a wedding. She is a US citizen, but is originally from Latin America. Apparently, she looked Palestinian enough to be detained at Ben Gurion and questioned for hours while they rifled through her luggage. Eventually, they let her go, but then the same thing happened when she tried to leave!

      Great sig, by the way. Could use a little cleaning up, but it made me laugh.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    10. Re:Israel by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      That's not quite true. A former coworker of mine went to Israel for a wedding. She is a US citizen, but is originally from Latin America. Apparently, she looked Palestinian enough to be detained at Ben Gurion and questioned for hours while they rifled through her luggage. Eventually, they let her go, but then the same thing happened when she tried to leave!
      Point. They really need to understand that dark skin + Non-Jew != Palestinian.

      Great sig, by the way. Could use a little cleaning up, but it made me laugh.
      What cleaning up does it need? If it's the conjugation of alef-mem-reish (I've heard before that my imperative conjugation is wrong.), could you fully explain how to conjugate paal verbs to imperative?

  46. Japan Hates You by dorpus · · Score: 1

    I've talked to Westerners on the net who defend the "right" of Japanese establishments to put up signs forbidding foreigners from entry. You could become the spineless conformists like them.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCeK0Trz9E0

    1. Re:Japan Hates You by bitbucketeer · · Score: 1

      Don't necessarily assume xenophobia when not being willing to deal with a non-Japanese speaking customer is the more likely explanation. After a night of heavy drinking in Tokyo, I never had a problem getting a cab at 3am because I can speak enough Japanese to give directions even when very drunk. And I always tipped the cabbie.

    2. Re:Japan Hates You by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 1

      As a foreigner living in Japan, I must say this neither surprises or upsets me. So many of the other foreigners I see here are crass, rude, and have little regard for Japanese customs.

      Besides, this Ask Slashdot entry is about Americans who value freedom and want to find it abroad. Since the right of a person to allow and disbar whom he wants on his own property is not of any value to you, I suggest you're not the sort of person this entry is aimed at.

      --
      He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
    3. Re:Japan Hates You by dorpus · · Score: 1

      So what we have are a bunch of whiny apologists who can't get real jobs back home. If American shops put out signs saying that foreigners are only allowed in the company of an American, Filipinos aren't allowed, would people be as passive?

    4. Re:Japan Hates You by McFadden · · Score: 1

      As a foreigner in Japan who has managed bars and nightclubs here, I sometimes wish I could do the same. The proportion of foreigners (by which I largely mean white Europeans/Americans) who lack even the most basic understanding of manners or how to *not* behave like a prick most of the time, sometimes seems like it's in the minority. In a 12 month period 2 years ago (before I changed by job) in a nightclub with a mixed customer base, I had to deal with 9 fights, 4 of which required police intervention (yes, I keep track). 9 of them involved foreigners getting drunk and fighting with other foreigners. Exactly zero involved Japanese.

      There's no excuse for discrimination, but there's even less for acting like a fucktard everywhere you go.

      Amongst almost every foreign bar owner I know, the general perception is that foreign customers are a pain in the ass. We've got no reason to make that up. It's just the reality of the situation.

    5. Re:Japan Hates You by rxk14007 · · Score: 1

      Although some Japanese cannot accept foreigners properly, we already accept Slashdot in Japan.

    6. Re:Japan Hates You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give me a break. You're saying your experience in Tokyo, one of the biggest cities on earth, represents the general sentiment among the Japanese people? Did you ever go to the yasukuni shrine and read how Japanese think they were "forced" into ww2 by the west and don't think they did anything bad? Including the convicted war criminals who raped and murdered in china and korea? You, my friend, are a japan fanboy.
      I lived in japan for 2 years, realized how much it sucked, and moved right back to America.

    7. Re:Japan Hates You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On behalf of Japan, toodles!

      On behalf of every other country in the world, never move here. You're better suited for the "objective" right of the U.S. than anywhere else.

  47. ... where would I move? by remembertomorrow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Finland: Land of metal, IRC, and hot chicks speaking a really strange language

    --
    Registered Linux user #421033
  48. Changes by Wellington+Grey · · Score: 1

    It's always interesting to see how the Slashdot Editors modify story submissions. In this case they left out my link to a boing boing story that might be useful for those trying to get out of America. What's the matter guys? Do you think of boing boing as a rival?

    -Grey

    1. Re:Changes by Wellington+Grey · · Score: 1

      Whoops, I'm a moron. Didn't see the link because it wasn't in a second paragraph that I had. Apologies to our Editor Overlords.

      -Grey

    2. Re:Changes by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 1
      In this case they left out my link to a boing boing story that might be useful for those trying to get out of America.

      That wasn't a useful story, it was just an advertisement for a book. The link in the advert even has referral kickbacks from Amazon. I have no idea why this got approved by the Slashdot editors.

      And advertising links aside, the whole question should have been modded as flamebait.

  49. What a coincidence... by ShinyBrowncoat · · Score: 1

    I just happened to see a post the other day about a guide to leaving America with stories and advice from expatriates around the world

    --

    "They've canceled the show but we're still here. What does that make us?" "Big Damn Junkies, Sir!" "Ain't we just"
  50. Please don't come to Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's horrible up here. You Americans would hated it here. Don't come up here. There's nothing here and it's cold as ice. And our official language is French. You won't understand a word we say. Oh and we make new immigrants wear silly beaver hats for the first year so we can identify and ridicule them. It's all very horrible. No human rights at all if you know what I mean. You Americans should head down to Mexico. There's already tunnels in El Paso dug for you by poor Mexicans. Just pack up and you are ready to go.

    1. Re:Please don't come to Canada by DarthBibble · · Score: 0

      If I had to decide between coldness and random acid rain, I believe I would choose the cold country.

      --
      I like you, do you like me!?
  51. Not Australia by tezbobobo · · Score: 1

    In Australia we've just passed a law yesterday putting the burden of proof on the parent that they've not abused their children. That's right - presumed innocence is gone. I you're arrested for sedition you aren't allowed to tell anybody. If you do, they can be arrested as well as anyone they've told.

    I would - and am - moving to a lesser developed country. I've decided not were yet, I am to become a missionary. The money is building in the bank as I write and I'll be leaving when my lease runs out in July '07.

    1. Re:Not Australia by txw · · Score: 1

      Actually i think the law states that if the courts have already removed a child due to abuse or neglect, the authorities are able to remove other siblings from the same house. At that stage the burden of proof is on the parents to prove that they have can provide a safe environment for the children to be raised in.

      In the last year I think we (Australia) have had 5 cases of children dying while in the custody of parents that have already had children removed from the household... you can't tell me that this law isn't a good thing!

    2. Re:Not Australia by tezbobobo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that doesn't make me wrong. The majority of people in prison are repeat offenders but we don't capture people a year after they been in front of a magistrate and threaten to lock them up unless they can prove their innocence. 95% of people in Australian prisons are males - we don't lock up all males unless they can prove they are innocent.

      Presumed legislative guilt is a VERY dangerous thing. It if fitting more of Machievelli than John Stuart mills.

    3. Re:Not Australia by nathanh · · Score: 1
      Yeah, that doesn't make me wrong.

      Well, no, but it doesn't make the law stupid either. If the court has established as fact that a parent has abused one child, then it's plain common sense to get any other children out of the household until the parent can prove they're responsible enough to look after children.

      I don't see that law as bad. Nor do I see it as "presumed guilt". The guilt has already been established with the first abused child. Finding a safe home for the other children is simply avoiding a repeat incident.

    4. Re:Not Australia by tezbobobo · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying the law is stupid. I'm saying that the law is both unethical and immoral. The correct term is not "presumed guilt", it is presumed legislative guilt. It is not something I made up on the spot, it is actually a legal phenomena.

  52. I'm not telling by Heir+Of+The+Mess · · Score: 4, Funny

    Because I don't want a bunch of Americans following me, and I'm leaving just a soon as I tidy up a few personal things. Adios Amigos. But hey, you could always try Australia.

    --
    Australian running a company that does C# / C++ / Java / SQL / Python / Mathematica
    1. Re:I'm not telling by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Taiwan with your Taiwanese wife Jasmine. You put on your web page which you advertised on slashdot.

      I guess America will be heartbroken to lose someone with your logic skills.

    2. Re:I'm not telling by Riley+Holmes · · Score: 1

      Owned.

    3. Re:I'm not telling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a serious question: I'm in a similar fix, with a Taiwanese wife and a desire to live in Taiwan. How did you get through the paperwork required to move there? We couldn't even manage to register our marriage there.

  53. India or Scandinavia by Riley+Holmes · · Score: 1

    I'm just sticking out a few more years in the USA to finish college (and become legal). I've put essentially all my life towards answering the question in this post, and I'd say either India or Scandinavia (if I had to choose one, it would be one of those). I don't want to settle down on one place though. I do RentACoder work and make enough to survive in a foreign country, so I plan to do that (but most likely move on and start getting clients independent of RAC). So my work will allow me to be completely mobile and see the world. When I turn 18, I'll be 2 years through college, and might just say "screw it" and not finish my education. I plan to at least see India for that summer, but I might just stay and never come back to the USA.

    1. Re:India or Scandinavia by chreekat · · Score: 1
      When I turn 18, I'll be 2 years through college, and might just say "screw it" and not finish my education.

      Bad idea!

      Getting your degree gets you so much more than a line on a resume and a better income bracket. Note, however, that it does get you a nice line on your resume, and a better income bracket. ;)

      Honestly though, those 2 extra years will save you 10-15 in the work experience people will want to see if you don't have a degree. That's a decade of opportunities passing you by. And for what? Skipping the chance to have the 2 best years of your life so you can "get on with it"?

      -chreekat

    2. Re:India or Scandinavia by Riley+Holmes · · Score: 1

      If they're the two best years of my life, why would I want to quit that and get a real job? I know it sounds naive, but I just can't see myself ever having a traditional career. But I see your point and it is duly noted. I realize that finishing college will open a lot of doors ... I'm just not at all sure that I'll ever need to go through those doors. I have to figure myself out more and get a better game plan before I can make a real decision.

    3. Re:India or Scandinavia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best years of your life should never include being forced into close quarters with complete strangers who are all high on various drugs, writing papers and sucking up to professors, and spending the 8 hours a night you should be sleeping going to work to pay for all of these "good times".

      If this is as good as it gets, please, kill me.

  54. News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters. by Infonaut · · Score: 1

    Since when did Slashdot become a political forum?

    Politics has always been part of Slashdot. More than a few of us think politics is just as important as technology. After all, a topic like the EU's actions against Microsoft is rife with politics, and Microsoft can't put you in jail, make war on another country, or tax you.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters. by slightlyspacey · · Score: 1

      Shhhhhhhhhhhh. Don't give M$ any ideas.

  55. Australia by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1, Informative

    Firstly, I don't live in the US, you insenstive clod. I'm an aussie, and I thoroughly recommend Australia. It's not just jingoism - I've lived in Australia, Canada and Thailand and travelled widely in the US, UK and throughout Asia and Australia still holds my heart. It's warm, pleasant and the people are kind. Canada is a close second, being cold but also with kind people. The government isn't quite so far along selling our rights to the highest bidder and there isn't rampant patriotism about anything but sports. The standard of living is high and we have abundant natural resources. Our tech sector is doing well and the market is screaming for engineers. We have real beer. No, seriously - real beer. I recommend starting out with a light 'training beer' before moving on to the regular stuff. We have roads where you can legally drive as fast as you want without the risk of running into anything but sand. We also boast some of the most lethal wildlife, anywhere. Our vernacular is colourful, distinctive and fun. Ninety per cent of all Australians live in cites, so you're always close to infrastructure and services. The other 10 percent don't count to anyone but politicians hoping for over-represented marginal electroate votes. Most of the world does not hate us. It is important to wear a small aussie flag on your stuff when traveling abroad. Most people have figured out that anyone wearing a huge Canadian flag is a yank in disguise and no American could ever impersonate an Australian without years of training and beer. Very little of our public space is wasted on flags, pennets and patriotic material. We don't need to constantly remind ourselves of which country we live in. We have rampant multi-culturalism. Not melting pot, but multi-culturalism. All sorts of people living together in relative harmony. This means good things in the food court. You can walk down alleyways in the dingiest parts of the city and reasonably expect not to get mugged. We use metric. We speak real English. Most of us can spell. Yes, we can teach you, too. Most importantly, you can live on an island thousands of kilometers away from the rest of the world, in relative secluded harmony, concerned only for who will win the cricket and whether we can fit in another beer before the barbeque.

    --
    Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
    altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    1. Re:Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > You can walk down alleyways in the dingiest parts of the city and reasonably expect not to get mugged.

      You might get bitten by something exotic, though.

    2. Re:Australia by zerobeat · · Score: 1

      You make that sound like it has to be a bad thing!

      --
      What other people think of me is none of my business
  56. What about the 565 we border? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe these united States of America border 565 different nations. Wouldn't it be as simple as choosing from one of those? I would imagine that at least one of them has a lax immigration policy.

  57. Stay where you are.... by RationalRoot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you are going to mess up your own country, and then leave, what makes you think we want you to come to ours and mess it up to.

    This applies to pretty much anyone who

    a) Wants to come here and change things to make here more like the place they just left.

    b) Wants to come here and moan about why it's not like home.

    c) Wants to come here and try to create a little bit of home, only talk to / socialise with / work with expats from their old country.

    And especially

    d) Wants to tell us that the way we live is ungodly and imoral, and change our laws to the way they think.

    If you actually like the way we live, and you want to come here, learn our languages, go to our schools, live our lifestyles, and in short become one of us, then we'll pick you up at the airport.

    Have a nice day all y'all.

    D

    --
    http://davesboat.blogspot.com/
    1. Re:Stay where you are.... by tomjen · · Score: 1

      While I agree that you should not expect to export you culture to a new country you will properly end up taking some of the old one with you and thus end up with a mix.

      But the most likely people to move out of the US is those who can stand republicans and I tend to like them.

      --
      Freedom or George Bush
    2. Re:Stay where you are.... by xtracto · · Score: 1

      GREAT Comment.

      That is something I hate about USA people. I do not like to generalise so the disclaimer is that this might not be true for all of them and I might be very lucky to always manage to find the bad americans.

      The issue is that every non english spoken country I have been (Mexico, France, Germany and even UK) I always manage to find an American who is tried to be "noted" in the bad way. They get to this country and try to make everyone serve them and expect everyone to speak their language. It happened a lot of times in Mexico (I am from there), lots of americans go there on vacation without knowing A WORD of spanish, and they get ANGRY when you dont speak them in English or when you dont understand them.

      Then, in Paris, I went to a McDonalds and although I dont speak french I tried to ask for a hamburger with "Je voudre un ...", of course the girl at the till did not understand me and she answered "Sorry?", then I repeated in english and Voila!. Just at my side (at the same moment) an american (yes after 2 years in UK I can identify the accent of an american, australian [my supevisor is australian] and british) lady just went to the next ill and said "I'd like 2 big macs and 2 cokes and large fries for them", in some *strange* way assuming that the girl at the till spoke english (no, she didnt hear my conversation with the other girl). The girl at the till just stayed with a WHAT? face and answered "Sorry?" in french and the american got angry and started to yell again IN ENGLISH.

      And some time after that I went to the Madam Tussade wax museum (in London) and while we were enjoying all the artists etc, suddenly a big fat guy with its "New York Cabs" (or whichever baseball team) cap started yelling something like "OMG what is this, terrible terrible, are they crazy, get out people".

      I know not all americans are like that, I met an american lady who was doing a masters here who is really nice (still maintain contact with her and she might come visit in November) and just now the guy at the desk in my side (at my PhD office) is an American who bought Corn Flour for Tortillas (pretty difficult to find that in UK) and we had a great chat talking about food and we might join to make tortillas :).

      But the majority of people in USA seem to be really annoying.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    3. Re:Stay where you are.... by mdarksbane · · Score: 1

      I'm going to bet that, in a random crowd in a foreign country, you'll only notice the annoying ones :(

      And the conservatives aren't the ones who would emigrate right now. They're the ones in power, true, but their current mentality is much more "stand up and make a difference for God and your country" rather than "whinge about it and talk about leaving" like the majority of the current crop of liberals :(

      (not much room for moderates around here)

    4. Re:Stay where you are.... by RationalRoot · · Score: 1

      It was not directed wholy at Americans, there are many nations whose people flee their own self perpetuated problems and then try to set up the same set of problems all over again where ever they arrive.

      Ever Seen British people looking for a full english breakfast on holidays in thailand ? - Try the local food, don't ask what it is, it doesn't kill the locals. Fish does not need batter.

      Ever Seen Irish people looking for an Irish pub in any city in the world ? - Try the wine bars or the cafes, really. Hell take up a sport.

      Ever Seen People from radical cultures arrive in "free" countries and want to have religious laws implemented ? - Some of us don't believe in your superstitions, why should we obey you're superstitious laws.

      D.

      --
      http://davesboat.blogspot.com/
    5. Re:Stay where you are.... by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      That is something I hate about USA people. I do not like to generalise so the disclaimer is that this might not be true for all of them and I might be very lucky to always manage to find the bad americans.

      Wow, it's too bad you don't like to generalize. You seem to be really good at it, and you must have really suffered through writing this post....

      The issue is that every non english spoken country I have been (Mexico, France, Germany and even UK) I always manage to find an American who is tried to be "noted" in the bad way. They get to this country and try to make everyone serve them and expect everyone to speak their language. It happened a lot of times in Mexico (I am from there), lots of americans go there on vacation without knowing A WORD of spanish, and they get ANGRY when you dont speak them in English or when you dont understand them.

      And should I rant about the number of Mexicans who actually move to the U.S. without speaking English? Careful with those stones neighbor, your house looks kinda glasslike. Living near N.Y.C., I run into many tourists, and a fair number of them don't seem to speak any/much English. Should I take the opinion that they shouldn't be welcome here?

      Then, in Paris, I went to a McDonalds and although I dont speak french I tried to ask for a hamburger with "Je voudre un ...", of course the girl at the till did not understand me and she answered "Sorry?", then I repeated in english and Voila!. Just at my side (at the same moment) an american (yes after 2 years in UK I can identify the accent of an american, australian [my supevisor is australian] and british) lady just went to the next ill and said "I'd like 2 big macs and 2 cokes and large fries for them", in some *strange* way assuming that the girl at the till spoke english (no, she didnt hear my conversation with the other girl). The girl at the till just stayed with a WHAT? face and answered "Sorry?" in french and the american got angry and started to yell again IN ENGLISH.

      And some time after that I went to the Madam Tussade wax museum (in London) and while we were enjoying all the artists etc, suddenly a big fat guy with its "New York Cabs" (or whichever baseball team) cap started yelling something like "OMG what is this, terrible terrible, are they crazy, get out people".


      Okay, so you found a few Americans who behaved badly. Do things like that happen? Of course they do. Do Americans have that market completely cornered? I don't think so. Traveling through Europe and the Caribbean with a few friends who, between them, speak Russian, German, French, Chinese, Japanese and Spanish (plus a few others that I'm forgetting) was pretty eye opening for me. It's amazing the things you find out people are saying when they don't think they'll be understood by those around them. Of that group, I think Japanese is the only language I've yet to hear (first hand) obnoxious behaviour in.

      I know not all americans are like that, I met an american lady who was doing a masters here who is really nice (still maintain contact with her and she might come visit in November) and just now the guy at the desk in my side (at my PhD office) is an American who bought Corn Flour for Tortillas (pretty difficult to find that in UK) and we had a great chat talking about food and we might join to make tortillas :).

      Interesting, two specific stories about people behaving badly, and two about ones you like, yet ultimately your opinion is that most Americans are like the former.

      But the majority of people in USA seem to be really annoying.

      Okay, and thanks for not generalizing.
      Here's a little experiment though. Try sharing that opinion with the nice guy sitting next to you. Don't be surprised if he doesn't bring you any more corn flour though. Does he know your low opinion of his homeland? Would you be okay with him having an equally low opinion of Mexico?

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
  58. Where? by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

    (1) Australia, and (2) I did.

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  59. AFRICA... I'm already there! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AFRICA.. I'm allready there.. it's technologically advanced!

  60. Come to Austmerica by Boomshanka · · Score: 0

    Why leave america? consider moving to the other america... Austmerica! We are just south of the equator and kinda upside down. We have some new states for you to add to your national map, New South York, Queensfornia, Western Alabama, Northern Arkansas, Texmania, South Alabama, Vicgina. While your here you are welcome to eat all the fine unique foods we have here, things like KFC, McDonalds, Burger King, Pizza Hut, still not feeling at home then how about the some Pepsi, Coke, Mountain Dew. You can play baseball, ice hockey, and even grid iron (but you will have to look hard for that one). Also feel right at home as you get processed by virtually the same legal system as the USA we try to make you feel right at home by allowing the MPAA and RIAA virtually do what they like....

  61. Where? Many places. Why not? Life. by NNland · · Score: 1

    Where to move? Vancouver, British Columbia (because it is beautiful), Winnipeg, Manitoba (close to my relatives in Northern and Southern Minnesota), Toronto, Ontario (close to my wife's relatives in Michigan, and to NYC), London, UK (to get the hell out of North America and to a place where understatement is appreciated), Singapore (who wouldn't want to live in a clean city?), The Big Island, Hawaii (a guy can hope for them to cede, and it's f-ing beautiful). Maybe Stockholm, Sweeden; but only during the summers.

    Why not move? My wife works for Obsidian Entertainment as a designer, I'm still working on my PhD in Computer Science Theory, our combined job prospects in the short term are better exactly where we are, my wife would *kill* me if I made her quit, moving off the continent would make it just about impossible to visit relatives, etc.

  62. I'll stay here by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    and keep trying to fix the system from the inside instead or running away.
    Isle of Mann seems interesting, but it can be difficult to get a work permit there.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  63. Answers by mpieters · · Score: 1

    1) Norway
    2) Nothing. Moving this December, in time for Scandinavian Christmas.

    --
    "The truth shall make ye fret" -- The Truth, Terry Pratchett
    1. Re:Answers by ThJ · · Score: 1

      So where are you moving? Just wondering, since I'm Norwegian.

    2. Re:Answers by mpieters · · Score: 1

      To the vicinity of Tønsberg.

      --
      "The truth shall make ye fret" -- The Truth, Terry Pratchett
    3. Re:Answers by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      Snakker du Norsk?

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    4. Re:Answers by mpieters · · Score: 1

      Ja, jeg snakker Norsk.

      --
      "The truth shall make ye fret" -- The Truth, Terry Pratchett
  64. Switzerland by abshnasko · · Score: 1

    Every time I see an article like this [cnn.com], I truly feel as if I do not belong here.

    1. Re:Switzerland by degola · · Score: 1

      I've to agree - have moved to Switzerland 5 years ago from Germany (so language is only a minor hazzle) and never regretted it. Very high standard of living, great people, low taxes, high wages.

    2. Re:Switzerland by dawiz · · Score: 1

      I live in Switzerland and have been wanting to emigrate to the US for years. This year, my wife's name was drawn in the Green Card lottery. I was so happy, I almost jumped to the ceiling. But then I got sick at the worst possible time and couldn't pursue the immigration process - nothing serious, but I'll probably need minor surgery and a couple of weeks of recovery which would have prevented me from claiming my visa within the designated period of time and which would have meant that I probably wouldn't have been been able to get health insurance in the US for a while.

      Anyway, now I'm still in Switzerland - it's not like I hate life here, but after having spent quite some time in the US it's just shocking how isolated we're here. And there's no Mexican fast food.

  65. Where ever there's a Fry's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    :p

  66. Finland! by DarthBibble · · Score: 0

    Best education, and the most freedom of press in the world. Unfortunately I'm not yet fluent in Swedish.

    --
    I like you, do you like me!?
    1. Re:Finland! by kaffesumpen · · Score: 1

      Most people in Finland speak Finnish, you know.. But there is a minority with Swedish as mothers tongue, to whom I proudly belong. Surely you will also get around by only speaking English too. =) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finland

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with catsup.
    2. Re:Finland! by DarthBibble · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yep! I've been to Finland. My great grandfather was a Swedish-speaking Finn. That's why I'm learning Swedish. I plan to learn Finnish too, though. And when I visited I found that almost everyone spoke English, but for citizenship I need to know Swedish or Finnish.

      --
      I like you, do you like me!?
    3. Re:Finland! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Education is probably pretty good, but it's quite hard to apply for a uni. As an example, in Sweden one can apply to an education with an exam, a test, and some merits which all add up to the result, none of them subtracting the other.
      In comparison, here one would have to choose one of these, and decide which could have the most benefit with the line of study in question. And you can choose wrong.
      The finnish methods are different from the swedish, this is only an example.

      You can easily get along with english. As a finnish, I'm quite sure that our education in english is of good quality.
      And what made you connect Finland with swedish, we haven't even been the same country for 200 years ;)

    4. Re:Finland! by DarthBibble · · Score: 1
      And what made you connect Finland with swedish, we haven't even been the same country for 200 years ;)
      My great grandfather was in the 5% of Finns that speak Swedish. It seemed only natural to learn that, since he didn't know Finnish at all.
      --
      I like you, do you like me!?
  67. It's the neocons who want dissentors to leave... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's worth noting that the majority of the time, it isn't people who say that their country sucks and they want to leave, it's the patriotic goosesteppers who yell at anyone with any criticism and tell them "America, love it or leave it!"

    Just thought I'd point that out. Frankly, one answer to this question could be: (1) Anywhere but here. (2) American psychopaths who pass themselves off as patriots.

  68. Political Science by MonoSynth · · Score: 1

    Asia's crowded and Europe's too old
    Africa is far too hot
    And Canada's too cold
    And South America stole our name
    Let's drop the big one
    There'll be no one left to blame us

    We'll save Australia
    Don't wanna hurt no kangaroo
    We'll build an All American amusement park there
    They got surfin', too


    #

  69. Scandinavia, if it was not for their COLD by unity100 · · Score: 1

    Yea. DAMN insane cold they have, compared the mediterranean. civil, but icy.

    1. Re:Scandinavia, if it was not for their COLD by iogan · · Score: 1
      Yea. DAMN insane cold they have, compared the mediterranean. civil, but icy.
      You get used to it.
    2. Re:Scandinavia, if it was not for their COLD by orzetto · · Score: 1
      Scandinavia, if it was not for their COLD

      Pick the Norwegian coast. Because of the gulf stream it's much warmer than the same latitude in Finland or Sweden. The lowest temperature in a normal year for as north as Tromsø is just -4 C. Bergen rarely falls below zero.

      --
      Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
    3. Re:Scandinavia, if it was not for their COLD by unity100 · · Score: 1

      You know, even this what you said is like a fairy-tale to me.

      The lowest i know is 10 c. the highest i know is 40 c.

    4. Re:Scandinavia, if it was not for their COLD by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      Well then most of the world is going to be too cold for you ;)

      I'm in Australia and I'm still no stranger to temperatures less than 0.
      Admittedly I'm in Canberra, but we still get the 40s though.

      Sounds like you need somewhere in Queensland or the Northern Territory.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    5. Re:Scandinavia, if it was not for their COLD by unity100 · · Score: 1

      Hmmmmm. i heard good things about australia.

      however that it is a standalone continent in the middle of 2 oceans is rather irritating.

    6. Re:Scandinavia, if it was not for their COLD by Upphew · · Score: 0

      Ten you are not into sailing? ;)

    7. Re:Scandinavia, if it was not for their COLD by unity100 · · Score: 1

      no

  70. That's how we got here by Sithech · · Score: 1

    Every person in the US either got here because they came from another country, or because their ancestors came here from another country. That includes the Native Americans, who got here over the land bridge. Americans have a long history of deciding to leave to go someplace better - including the westward migration, right up to the present day.

  71. I for one, would like to try the US by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

    Because Belgium, sorry to say it, sucks. A country with a single language and no violence or complete hostility because you don't speak french would be very nice. Americans actually react positively when you say you speak 4 languages, instead of making a sniping comment about how your french is not perfect. (sorry I'm frustrated on this topic)

    Also the wide open spaces in the US seem kinda nice. The US actually still has a countryside.

    But need to finish lots of stuff here, then get a job, apparently some sort of "sponsor" etc (?). so it will not be for at least a few years.

    I also kinda like the culture of personal responsability that there seems to be in the US. That you actually can and should take charge of yourself. In Belgium it's not the fault of a killer that he murdered, it's "the system". So they let guys like this go see football (no joke), and obviously, this idiocy does not reduce violence, it increases it massively. We sue more cops for brutality than thieves, and yet this does not seem idiotic for some reason.

    But to see this culture I guess I'd have to stay in the US for a number of years, and I'd also like to live in Japan for a few years. Just to explore the life of these people, and in Russia, because I've met many Russians and I don't understand anything they do. And I still want to ask how to drink an entire bottle of vodka without losing conciousness.

    1. Re:I for one, would like to try the US by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      I agree with the Russian comment, except perhaps the bottle of vodka thing. I have also wanted to live there or in Japan for some time, but neither cultures are accomidating enough of outsiders to consider them for a perminent place to stay (and I'm not sure I'd want to).

      You are right that the US still values personal responsibiltiy and individuality, if you like that it's a great place to come - and you are right that there is still much in the way of open countryside, especially in the middle of the US (and even to some degree on the edges). Mountains you've probably seen but Utah is a pretty amazing place.

      Good luck and may you have a bright future.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    2. Re:I for one, would like to try the US by polar+red · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      In Belgium it's not the fault of a killer that he murdered, it's "the system".

      Bullshit. Te veel naar het vlaams belang geluisterd zeker ? Happy to see your kinf go away.
      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    3. Re:I for one, would like to try the US by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

      First ... this is an english forum, so be tolerant and use english

      Second ... make a visit to Leuven Centraal before you say idiot statements like this. You haven't, or you wouldn't be making these statements.

    4. Re:I for one, would like to try the US by polar+red · · Score: 1

      I'll take your bait:

      (1)A person(his beliefs, personality, and the actions he takes) is allways the sum of his environment, his experience and his genes. So YES, a murder doesn't come from nowhere, and is a result from the system, otherwise murders would be spread evenly around the world.
      don't believe you are independent You are NOT.
      (2) compare the crime-statistics between the US and belgium.

      But I add to that : you are still responsible for every action you take, even when you are 'made' by the system, but when you fail, the system has to be blamed as well.

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    5. Re:I for one, would like to try the US by polar+red · · Score: 1

      And currently the systems is based on materialism and egoism ... ever wonder what that leads to ?

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    6. Re:I for one, would like to try the US by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

      I'll take your poisoned comments :

      1) who is Laurette onckelinkx' ex-husband ? Where is he working ? What has he done ? Look it up.
      2) a) brussels : 1 violent death per 10.000 inhabitants per year
            b) new york : 1 violent death per 25.000 inhabitants per year

      I completely agree that a person's environment is very important. For example, showing that criminals are punished is VERY important, to convince people you cannot profit from criminal actions (obviously). This climate has not been there in Belgium for a very long time. I find it has created flaws even in my own character. Belgium is slowly devolving in a lawless state, and, frankly, I REALLY don't like it, for a very very very clear example, look up the answer to question 1.

    7. Re:I for one, would like to try the US by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

      I actually missed your comment "happy to see your kind go away"

      In a minute you're gonna tell me you're a "tolerant" individual, right ? Obviously you have some introspection to do.

    8. Re:I for one, would like to try the US by polar+red · · Score: 1

      Deaths by source in 1997, to put things into perspective :
      (absolute numbers; http://statbel.fgov.be/figures/d364_nl.asp )
      total : 103800
      murder : 1400
      traffic deaths : 1453
      CANCER : 28041

      AAAARGH ! LOOK BEHIND YOU ! a cancer is going to shoot you !!!
      So belgium is a lawless country ? Not by a long shot.
      On onkelinkx/PS : give it time, and the walloon's democracy will improve, i see the facts in charleroi today as great opportunity.

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    9. Re:I for one, would like to try the US by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

      You comment - let me quote -

      "We don't want your kinf here"

      Makes me wonder ... what party are you for ? Because I'm fearing more for the Flemsish democracy.

    10. Re:I for one, would like to try the US by polar+red · · Score: 1

      That's called 'sarcasm'

      and I vote green

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    11. Re:I for one, would like to try the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      and I vote green


      Ah, so you're a socialist/communist then...
    12. Re:I for one, would like to try the US by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

      Ah the idiots' party ... that figures ... I had pegged you more for an S-PA "we just take over other parties' agendas" voter.

      (for those of you in america : S-PA is the pro-religion anti-government influence "socialist" party that's currently in power, and before you ask, no they don't see any problem with those viewpoints in a socialist party)

      - if you happen to be offended by it "polar red", just think it was "sarcasm"

    13. Re:I for one, would like to try the US by polar+red · · Score: 1

      Troll.

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    14. Re:I for one, would like to try the US by polar+red · · Score: 1

      socialism is NOT communism. And when i say green, i mean ecology.

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
  72. I'll stay, for now. by misleb · · Score: 1

    Before I moved to Oregon, I was itchin' to move abroad. As many others have mentioned, Austria is quite attractive. When I was backpacking around Europe a few years ago, I was SOO tempted to take a job at the hostel in Salzburg and just stay. I speak some German. So that would have made it easier. But I chickened out.

    Canada is another option, but it doesn't really seem all that different than the US.

    Now that I have moved to Oregon (Portland) from Chicago, things have changed. I have no desire to leave the US other than for travel. I've found the perfect mix of urban livign and the Great Outdoors. I think that is what I was really looking for while I was living in Chicago. It wasn't a cultural or political problem. I just needed to get outdoors more... lush old growth forests and all that.

    It also helps that Portland is pretty liberal. It also has a healthy Open Source community. I live like 10 miles from Linus Torvalds. :-)

    -matthew

    --
    "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    1. Re:I'll stay, for now. by rs79 · · Score: 1

      "Canada is another option, but it doesn't really seem all that different than the US."

      You're out of your fucking mind. Just drive across the border. The Detroit/Windsor one is most noticable but any one will do.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    2. Re:I'll stay, for now. by misleb · · Score: 1
      You're out of your fucking mind. Just drive across the border. The Detroit/Windsor one is most noticable but any one will do.


      Well, duh, that is Detroit. I hope you don't take that as representative of the US.

      What differences should I notice going from Seattle to Vancouver?

      -matthew
      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
  73. Delicious, delicious irony by caitsith01 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Thank you for ably demonstrating another aspect of Australian life - a frighteningly anti-democratic attitude to dissent.

    And, frankly, we would rather have a pom who loves the country than the whinger who rekons life here is soooooo bad.

    Who is this 'we' you speak of? Am I part of 'we'? I thought I was. I guess not.

    Come to Australia, we have plenty of land; though we could stand some more water.

    Actually, we have an absolutely chronic water problem and can't sustain our current population. We have 'plenty of land' in the same sense that northern Africa has 'plenty of land', i.e. it's mostly uninhabitable desert and the rest is fast approaching its natural limits in terms of water use.

    But, please, only if you dont plan to sit around on your fat arse and whinge about everything. Cant stand bloody whingers. We all have to vote here, so any problem you have with your own reality is entirely your problem.

    Hitler was democratically elected. A society should be judged on how it treats its worst and weakest, not on whether a bare majority can dictate terms to a bare minority. As it so happens, I can't stand arrogant fools who attempt to stifle legitimate discussion of socio-political issues, so please don't come if you're one of those either.

    If you dont like it, fix it, if you cant fix it, deal with it, if you cant deal with it, piss off :)

    Funny, I thought discussing the issues was the way to 'fix it'. Apparently I should just stop 'whinging' though. What is intriguing about your ranting is the assumption that you are the one entitled to make these decisions - what gives you any more right than the 'whingers' who 'can't deal with it' to decide who should remain in the country? And do you, by implication, believe that there is no place for dissent in Australia?

    --
    Read Pynchon.
    1. Re:Delicious, delicious irony by Nanpa · · Score: 0

      There's only a water problem in the sense that there's been little investment in new dams or systems to procure more water. Hell, even flooding a decent part of the inland with the ocean would greatly solve that.

    2. Re:Delicious, delicious irony by fj3k · · Score: 1

      Whingers are bad not because they see problems, but all they do about it is whinge. Even for a minority there is always the option of provoking a politician into a stupid 'politically incorrect' remark and then forcing his hand into doing what you want. Gotta love democracy.

      --
      Two men claimed to have walked into a bar. Only one had the bruises to prove it.
    3. Re:Delicious, delicious irony by riprjak · · Score: 1

      I got no problem with dissent. I'd rather avoid becomming one of the wankers i'm trying to take the piss out of, myself; our first Prime Minister was called toby the tosspot for good reason... when you present a negative and frankly rather american sounding soapbox position and push that stereotype, I see exactly the same irony and lack of inclusiveness as you seem to in my own ridiculous stereotype. However, I'd rather a world that resembled my stereotype than yours.

      Im rather pleased to note that at least one moderator saw the humour in my response... since you appear to have missed it. Hell, I even included a smiley at the end of my gross generalisation!! this wasnt a clue?

      Oh! yeah, I never said I had a right to anything. No one has a right to do anything other than not being a dickhead to other folks IMHO, everything else is up to you. Not my place to tell others what to do, Ill just let you know my opinion... Im just making MY (you know, mine, not yours or anyone elses...) point. You are as free to ignore that as you are to turn down the beer I'd offer you if we were having this arguement in a pub (bullshitting about crap you cant influence over a beer being another aussie passtime I thorougly enjoy). Course, turning down a beer would make you a piker and even less of an aussie :)

      aaaaaand Commence OT rant...

      Mate, seriously, relax a little bit; you are absolutely right about our chronic water shortage and massive abuse of arible land. Focussing on that doesnt help fix it though, perhaps working on convincing those who count that very little infrastructure and basic grey water recycling would solve all of our capital city water issues. Problem is whingers (who dont want to drink recycled water). See, there is my issue, whingers create problems... you can complain all you like if you are being constructive.

      Now, if you are so concerned that a bill of rights is important (ignoring the fact that we can use precedent all the way back to the Magna Carta if needs be), then run for office on that platform. Id also ask if you had read our constitution, but Im not one for futile gestures :)

      Perhaps, though, this isnt the horrific place you would like us to infer that it is; you haven't left for somewhere better, so perhaps there are things about this land you love too? what about throwing in some good with the bad... Dont tell us whats wrong or what we cant do, tell us what we can do if we quit piking and pull our weight.

      I had as big a whinge as the next man about the new counter terrorism laws stifling free speech, then I realised that it probably wasnt useful and got a bunch of mates to sign a reasonably written letter and sent it to a few ministers. It may do bugger all, but short of overthrowing the government; there is nothing to be done until the next election. Personally feel better about it if I take an approach that involves a little humour and doesnt get all defeatist and negative; you dont have to BE serious to do serious things, IMHO its better if you have a bit of fun, no one gets hurt...

      OT rant over, sorry folks! :)

      Seems *I* need to relax more too, might go do that...

      err!
      jak.

  74. South by robpoe · · Score: 1

    Souther than texas or florida..
    norther than antarctica

    and not for a while .. have responsibilities here

    --
    = Grow a brain...
  75. We used to say Australia... by aaaurgh · · Score: 1, Troll

    When we moved here from the U.K. some ten years ago, it was a case of "The Aussies will be ok, they've never pi**ed anyone off, who'd want to bother them".

    These days, however, we have good old Johnny Howard getting up close and personal with Shrub and Blair, pi**ing everybody off and making us almost as big a target as all the other Iraq invaders. Nice one Johnny.

    These days the Kiwi's islands are looking a far better and safer bet.

    --

    Go permanent? In your dreams and my worst nightmares.
    1. Re:We used to say Australia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, don't bother with Australia! We have far-right governments at Federal and many State levels (eg. Queensland -- nominally Labor but kicks the shit out of Aborigines by, amongst other things, denying them payment for enforced labour from the 1930's to '70's). The population, outside of the inner cities, is farther to the right than the governments.

      Australia is also a cultural and political peon of the US, so if that's what you want to get away from, don't bother here. The economy is rocking, though, so if you want to make some money, fly in to the mines, and get out with the loot ASAP. It's also an astonishingly beautiful continent, but is being buggered up at lightning speed, so get here soon if you want to see it.

      My wife and I are going to try NZ for a while, and if that doesn't pan out, go back to Europe.

    2. Re:We used to say Australia... by Petrushka · · Score: 1

      No! No! Stay away! The weather's pretty bad, there are no flat bits for cycling, and we're bound to have a far-right coalition after the next election in 2007!

      Ah, well, OK, come on then. We're pretty good about taking in political refugees :-)

      Actually, seriously, one thing that might put you off NZ is the lower wages. Check things out first, as you would before moving to any country. Cost of living's a bit lower than Oz in many ways, and a lot lower than Europe, but wages are a lot lower too. I'm pretty comfy here, but YMMV.

    3. Re:We used to say Australia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, am apprised of the wages situation, but it's no worry as we're cheap folk, with few material demands other than decent coffee. It's likely Wellington we're going to, and, as a commuter cyclist, I do feel mildly daunted by the thought of the hills, wind & rain (it rarely rains in Brisbane these days). But I hope it comes off, as NZ looks spectacular, and I've always liked the Kiwis I've come across. It's possible of course that you send the best ones overseas ;)

    4. Re:We used to say Australia... by vox+humanna · · Score: 1

      And I guess when they get attacked and decide to fight back you'll have to go somewhere else too.
      When are people in the west going to figure out that running and cowering is exactly what Osama and his cronnies want. They have stated their goal as world conquest. What part of forced conversion to Islam do you not understand. You all complain about the religous right in America, but I bet you'd find it a little more difficult living in an Islamic state to the jihadis liking now wouldn't you. Stand up, get some backbone already.

    5. Re:We used to say Australia... by __aaltii7299 · · Score: 1

      Yep same here, my dream has always been moving to New Zealand.

    6. Re:We used to say Australia... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      These days, however, we have good old Johnny Howard getting up close and personal with Shrub and Blair, pi**ing everybody off and making us almost as big a target as all the other Iraq invaders. Nice one Johnny.

      Do you have any ideas about what sort of thing might have caused this? Has it been going on since the 2003 Iraq Invasion? Is it an on-going problem in Australian society? Any idea what the grievance is?

      Maybe New Zealand is a refuge from the trouble you see in Australia.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    7. Re:We used to say Australia... by kaffiene · · Score: 1

      FWIW, I used to work with a Brit who thought the wages looked crap in NZ when doing a currency conversion but when in NZ thought that the purchasing power of the NZ$ in NZ was better than the exchange rate would have suggested. Having worked in the UK previously, I think he might be right. But anyway, YMMV.

  76. The Ringer by tempest69 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    So Really if you want to go and smoke pot daily, you need to get citizenship, then have "traumatic brain injury" so that you are mentally handicapped, then you can smoke pot all day. As long as you share with your sitter. So sure it's the best of both worlds, lots of pot smoking time, and low taxes.

    Really though, even faking mentally challenged would be a total drain on my life.

    Storm

    1. Re:The Ringer by somersault · · Score: 1

      if you smoked enough pot I'm sure you wouldn't have to fake it.. :p

      --
      which is totally what she said
  77. EU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful


    That's easy,

    Europe! I know it's not a country, but if you actually want to live abroad (forever, or for a few years to get a taste of a different lifestyle), then the obvious answer is somewhere in Europe.

    Why? Because after a couple of years (it varies country to country), you can grab a passport and become an instant protected member of the EU. Now you don't have a choice of one country, but 25, (27 in a few years, and hopefully 28 with Turkey in a few more years).

    And you get a choice of countries like Sweden or Denmark (consistently ranked as the most well educated, crime free, peaceful utopias on the planet), liberal countries like Germany or Amsterdam (there is no city in the WORLD like Berlin, it is just the most alive, party party, drug liberal place on Earth, no question), economic tigers like Ireland or the newer Eastern european countries (where jobs are easy to come by and the cost of living is low), or just places where you could live off a few grand and take it easy, like Portugal or Greece.

    25 countries, most of them not requiring a second language (For sure, if you move to Scandinavia it'll be you that has the lower standard of English, I moved here 3 years ago and it's embarrassing to have an inferior grasp of my mother-tongue than do the locals). In some countries like Sweden, if you have a girlfriend here you can pick up a passport in 3 years.

    And of course, Countries that are not in the EU (such as Switzerland or Norway or Iceland), will still be open to you because of the Schengen agreement.

    Good luck! And wherever you decide to move to, just DO IT. It doesn't mean that you never have to go home, it doesn't mean you are running away from America's problems (you can retain your American citizenship and vote from abroad), it just means at a minimum that you are exploring how life in a much more liberal society would be like, and if many more people in the USA decided to live abroad in Europe for a few years of their youth, I very much doubt the country would be experiencing the problems it is having at the moment.

    1. Re:EU by tehcyder · · Score: 2, Insightful
      In some countries like Sweden, if you have a girlfriend here you can pick up a passport in 3 years.
      You must be new here.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    2. Re:EU by AlXtreme · · Score: 3, Informative
      liberal countries like Germany or Amsterdam
      Amsterdam is a city, not a country. It's the capital of the Netherlands, and even tourists coming here don't know the difference.

      I think mistakes like these show the problem with most 'mericuns: clueless when it comes to anything outside the States. No offense, but your president thinks Africa is a country. We don't call Miami a state, or Florida a city. Get your facts straight before you come over here. That's all.

      --
      This sig is intentionally left blank
    3. Re:EU by ainsoph · · Score: 1

      How did you go about moving there?

    4. Re:EU by mambru · · Score: 1
      and hopefully 28 with Turkey

      I, for one, expect that Turkey won't join the EU in a long time. At least, enough to improve MUCH socially, economically, human-rights wise.

      Anybody heard of Cyprus (a member of the EU) or Greece and the conflicts they have with Turkey? Turkey doesn't even recognise Cyprus as an independent state!

      As much as I personally enjoy going out with my turk friends, their political class scares me, and some turks I've talked with agreed (of course some didn't).

    5. Re:EU by gronnsak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      GP is living in Europe and is enthusiatically praising it and you have to critizise him for one slip-up. Thanks for giving us other europeans a bad name and confirming the "snooty european" stereotype. Asshole.

    6. Re:EU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who gives a toss what Yanks think about Europeans or anyone else? America is now almost universally hated, as a dangerous terrorist state threatening almost everyone.

    7. Re:EU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> In some countries like Sweden, if you have a girlfriend here you can pick up a passport in 3 years.

      You're despicable...

    8. Re:EU by doktor-hladnjak · · Score: 1

      If only it was as easy as "grabbing" a maroon passport... I lived in Germany for two years (and no I wasn't in the US military). I enjoyed my time there, but one thing I realized is that culturally I would never be German. No matter how long I lived there, I'd always feel at least somewhat like an outsider. I think now it's something like 7 years of permanent residency to become a citizen but it used to be something like 20+. Moreover, many of us don't have the luxury of "finding a girlfriend". Even with broad domestic partnership laws, immigration policy isn't always the same as with married people.

    9. Re:EU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahem...http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200610 /s1764870.htmthis BBC wire article refers to the "US state of Philadelphia". People make mistakes; ignorance is universal. Time to climb off that "Americans are dumb" high horse.

    10. Re:EU by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      Europe is now a country, the 'countries' there are really just states now.

  78. where to, why not by l3v1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1) Where would you live, if not in America and 2) What's stopping you from going?

    Easy. 1) New Zealand, 2) Money (or the lack thereof).

    If you think hard, probably two things are keeping people to go where they think (or know) their lives would be better (for them, since this is as much subjective as objective):
    - people: family, friends, neighbors, you name it, people can become very attached to others,
    - financial resources: if you have to work 10-16 hours a day for living, paying mortages, etc., schooling your kids, its not that easy to just stand up and leave.

    Until the average level of living throughout the planet won't reach a certain level, most people will just be stuck to places, all their lives long, give or take a few travels.

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
  79. been doing the math by ecoshift · · Score: 1

    If I can sell my house here and by a house in Brazil for 1/4 the price that's twice as nice, and if I can live in Brazil comfortably for 1/3 the cost here. How long can I live on the difference and how young do I have to die to retire now and move to the beaches and music... I'm 54, so I might be getting close if I figure I'm only going to make to 75 anyway...

    1. Re:been doing the math by Zaphod2016 · · Score: 1

      There are quite a few "perpetual investment" products out there. If the real estate price difference is what you say it is, this sounds very do-able to me.

      See you on the beach.

  80. Why not skip the middle step for us immigrants ? by BurningTyger · · Score: 1

    Being a second-gen immigrant of Canada, I still know bunch of people back in the Asian countries that want to move to North America.

    So why don't I tally up your votes of places that American want to move to. Then I can tell my friends that, "hey, if you guys want to move to America, and the American wants to move to say Panama, then why don't you just skip the middle step and move to Panama instead" ~

  81. If it's so bad why does everyone want to live here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always find it interesting that I know a lot of expatroits living in the US and most boast of how much better it is in their home country yet they live in the US. I've lived in Europe and New Zealand for extended periods. I like both places but there were negatives as well. Really all you are doing is trading one set of problems for another. The US has changed a lot and not for the better. There was no doubt that it was the best place to live in the 60s and 70s, when I was growing up. Now it's more of a flip of the coin. The US is no worse than any other place but we have lost our place as the best place to live. What we risk is starting to fall behind other countries. Yes there are already places with more personal freedom than the US, our current government seems to consider most of the Constitution to be a list of amusing suggestions, but they also have negatives as well. What I really see happening is the world itself is becoming a not nice place to live. Too many people know what's best for the world. Guess what folks it worked really well before Homo Sapiens came along so we don't know all the answers. If you think you do it's a safe bet you are wrong. Arrogance may be the worst human trait.

  82. As a Scandinavian... by Zo0ok · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As a Scandinavian who just visit USA occationally I guess I can tell why I hesitate to move there... From the European horizon USA looks really cool. You have the greatest companies, the greatest sports champs (except in soccer), you are the center of entertainment, modern culture and research. You have... so very much.

    However, when in USA I feel that I am so far away from everything. Manhattan is the exception. In LA I have an hour in a car to anything. In Las Vegas it takes a day to get anywhere else.

    So even if I am closer to many things when in USA, there are fewer things that I am really close to (walking distance). If it takes 5h or more to get there by car, the Atlantic ocean doesnt make a huge difference anyway.

    1. Re:As a Scandinavian... by ocelotbob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It really depends on where you live in the US regarding the feeling of proximity. My thoughts here are going to be pretty southern California specific, because that is where I have the greatest experience, so YMMV. And especially within the LA area, 5-10 miles makes a huge difference regarding culture and accessibility. North Orange county is perhaps one of the best kept secrets for walking distance accessibility. There are a lot of neighborhoods that are built really close to shopping centers, so you can get most major goods by walking -- within two blocks of me, there's everything but a grocery store, and that's about a 5 minute bus ride in near any direction, or I can just have all my food delivered, save the hassle of even going out. I'm also on a pretty major transit corridor, so getting around without a car is pretty viable; I am within a few minutes of an all night bus line that'll get me to sporting venues, amusement parks, and the train station, and from there, pretty much anywhere else. I personally love my current apartment for that very reason; I don't need to go out to have a good time, things are already right here.

      I will cede the point regarding Las Vegas, though. It's like a lot of desert towns, in order to get to anywhere else, you have to go through a whole lot of nada. A lot of this is by design, though. As it's a lot harder to manage resources in the desert, it's only natural for people to live closer together to better pool their resources. Cities like Phoenix and Albuquerque are very similar in that aspect. However, that relative isolation offers a lot of opportunities for outdoors activies. If you enjoy hiking, etc, it is damn convenient to have nature on your doorstep. It's a trade off, really. Figuring what you like to do, and where you like to go.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    2. Re:As a Scandinavian... by superdude72 · · Score: 2, Informative
      However, when in USA I feel that I am so far away from everything. Manhattan is the exception. In LA I have an hour in a car to anything. In Las Vegas it takes a day to get anywhere else.

      I would say this is true of the American West, even in the big cities on the coast. I feel disconnected from the rest of the country out here in San Francisco. Maybe it's because the population is stretched out along the coast. Inland it's just... farmland... then about 1,000 miles of nothing until you get to someplace with enough water to support civilization. If you've ever driven coast-to-coast on I-80, about 9 million of those miles seem to be in Nebraska.

      I felt more connected when I lived in Chicago. Although Chicagoland no longer has as large a population as LA, it's the hub in a wheel of fairly large cities. Something like fifteen percent of the US population lives within 200 miles of it. This is also where (if you're traveling West to East) it becomes possible you might encounter something resembling public transportation and walkable neighborhoods. Cities east of here were mostly planned before the invention of the automobile--a really good thing.
      <troll>
      Chicago also has the best pizza and hot dogs in the world. Suck it, New York.
      </troll>
      The Eastern seaboard is more dense yet. Still, it's not quite like being in continental Europe and being able to visit another country with a couple hours of travel (via train! We lack those too.) Surely the US East Coast--not just Manhattan--is more dense and varied than Scandinavia, though. Just no fjords.

      I guess I could have saved a couple of paragraphs by just linking this satellite image of North America at night:

      http://worldmapsonline.com/SatPosters/NorthAmerica Night.jpg
    3. Re:As a Scandinavian... by Zo0ok · · Score: 1

      It feels great I could make my European-point-of-view comment without starting a flame-war :)

      I have unfortunately never been around Chicago (just in Minneapolis airport). It is a pity that next time I visit USA will be to Orlando...

    4. Re:As a Scandinavian... by Skraeling2 · · Score: 1

      Try Boston, you can walk the entire city in 40 min (from Brookline to the harbor). The subway is pretty good, people are friendly, and there is a huge population of university students. Its very European, compared to Chicago, Milwaukee, and a few other cities I've been to in my 2 years in America, but has all the conveniences of America.

    5. Re:As a Scandinavian... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Try living in Canada!

      When I was going to university in Ontario I had a funny converstaion with a bloke from England. I mentioned to him that I was going to drive home to my parents who live in Nova Scotia in the summer. When I told him that it was about 2000km he was astounded. I had done it several times in the past (it takes about 20 hours to do), so not a big deal. He said in comparison that he could probably drive to like Poland or Russia in that same distance, transversing several entire contries along the way. The really funny thing, is that in relation to the entire contry of Canada, going from Ontario to Nova Scotia is't even close to halfway across...

      So I think if I ever lived anywhere in Europe I would find it a bit freaky that everything is so close together. Just a different perspective I guess...
          Cheers!

    6. Re:As a Scandinavian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for highlighting why Americans 1) Dont speak half a dozen languages 2) have a VASTLY diffrent concept of size when it comes to pretty much anything 3) Don t understand why you would have to go to a diffrent country for a diffrent flavor of civilization.

      Just in TEXAS, you can go from tropical beaches to mountains, hill country, plains, and big forests. (of course, it nearly 800 miles from one end to the other, what do you expect?)

      If the rest of the world treated our states like countrys, they may begin to understand us a little better. There are dozens of diffrent dialects of English spoken in America, Just try following a converstation between a New Yorker, some one from San Jose, and some one from Houston... While it's not as extreme as the diffrent languages the EU speaks, it also allows us to BE a single country spread accross an entire continent.

    7. Re:As a Scandinavian... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Without those thousands of miles of farmland, you wouldn't be eating that Chicago hot dog. Or much of anything, for that matter.

      In fact, Chicago exists primarily as a shipping point for farm products. The rest of the city grew up around the stockyards and railyards.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    8. Re:As a Scandinavian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If you've ever driven coast-to-coast on I-80, about 9 million of those miles seem to be in Nebraska.

      Ha ha. I grew up in Nebraska and now live in New England. In New England, if something is 2 hours away, people will pack an overnight bag. In Nebraska, cities like Denver, Minneapolis, Chicago and St. Louis are popular destinations because they're an "easy 7 hour drive."

      It all seems like Nebraska, because Nebraska is really sort of the mid-point of a very long stretch of the country that is more or less the same. Once you get out of the Rocky Mountains you hit the Great Plains (in the 1800's known as the Great American Desert, until they realized that you could dig up the prarie grass and grow just about anything, plus raise livestock on the parts that you couldn't). In your mind you think by the time you hit Chicago you're done but really, most of Indiana, Ohio and Pennsylvania are similar enough that it really drags.

      But if you think I-80 is boring, try the Denver to St. Louis stretch of I-70. I-90 through South Dakota also ranks up there, but at least that is liberally sprinkled with kitchy tourist traps for some good Americana (Devil's Tower in Wyoming, through the Black Hills, Wall Drug, Mt. Rushmore, and the Mitchel Corn Palace!).

      On the other hand, sometimes it's nice to just wander out into the middle of Montana for a little solitude.

    9. Re:As a Scandinavian... by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      You want to know boring, take the Amtrak through eastern Montana and North Dakota, nothing but flat, barren land, an occassional highway crossing, and a bunch of car dealerships. I've never spent 18 waking hours of my life being more incredibly disintersted in America.

    10. Re:As a Scandinavian... by TopherC · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting perspective. Yes, I guess cultural things are more spread out in the US. But I like that. Every city has its own culture. And I like the abundance of national parks that are relatively undisturbed by people. Relatively being the operative word. I've known other people from large European cities that have described the US in a similar way, as a few interesting cities but large vacant distances in between.

      I don't think the US has the corner market on athletes. There seems to be much better sportsmanship in soccer, and that's a better measure of an athlete.

      And I don't know about the corporations. The intensely competetive US market has created a lot of good companies -- I think the quality of restaurants in NYC are a testament to this -- be exceptional or fold. But pressure on companies from stock holders to constantly expand seems to squeeze ethics and common sense out of the boardrooms. Good enough is never enough. Either compete unfairly or get bought out by someone who will.

      And as for science, the US is no longer the best place for that. Science policy for the last decade, really, has been an exit strategy. This present year is an exception to the trend, but it's too little, too late. Most long-term (20-year) projects have been aborted, and the momentum has shifted to several European nations, Japan, and (slowly) China.

    11. Re:As a Scandinavian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spot on. I live in the English home counties and work in central London, and very few places seem able to offer more to me. Manhattan could well be the place, but I always find the US strangely old-fashioned when I visit. Seattle or SF might be good, but I haven't spent enough time in either to be sure.

      Then again, I've never been to Shanghai, so who nows?

    12. Re:As a Scandinavian... by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      However, when in USA I feel that I am so far away from everything.

      Agreed, when you're used to going to pretty exotic neighbour countries in car (i'm french), and that you suddenly find yourself a few thousand miles away from the closest (real) foreign country, that hardly anyone around speaks a foreign language or has been to another country or even to more than 5 different states, and that when you turn on TV you see 5-minute long commercials of a local brand of cosmetics, you get the feeling of being lost on an island, in a bubble, well isolated from the rest of the world, geographically, geopolitically and culturally.

      That's why I want to move to the Bronx, I want to live in NYC because that's probably the place in the USA where you get the less that feeling, but I don't want to live on a friggin island, the USA being already enough of an island to me, couldn't live on an island's island, if we can put it this way, so yeah, the Bronx sounds like the best compromise.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    13. Re:As a Scandinavian... by can'tthinkofagoodnic · · Score: 1

      If I had mod points, I'd mod this up. I think it is a pretty good parallel to think of our states as European countries. All the more so since that's what the founding fathers originally intended--most of the governing was supposed to be done by the states, thus you could pick whichever kind of government you want and still be in the same country. Now, everybody seems to want things to be the same everywhere.

    14. Re:As a Scandinavian... by can'tthinkofagoodnic · · Score: 1

      5 hours? That's a standard commute to work, right? Seriously, though, I regularly drive 5 hours to the beach just for a weekend. 5 hours in a car is no big deal to me. You get used to it. I can't stand sitting on a subway car for 30 minutes, but I'm sure I would get used to it if it were available where I live.

    15. Re:As a Scandinavian... by ottothecow · · Score: 1

      As a native Minnesotan going to school in Chicago I can certainly affirm this. I will leave off chicago since it has already been discussed (but its true...at least where I live, the fact that I dont own a car has not hurt me at all--my friends with cars dont even used them once a week). Minneapolis/St Paul has that huge scandinavian population which is quite nice and its also a place where things are easily accessible. The public transit isnt as good as chicago but they are working on it.

      --
      Bottles.
  83. Japan by usmc1944 · · Score: 1

    Language barrier though, but hopefully one day I'll overcome that.

    1. Re:Japan by xstaytruex · · Score: 1

      this is the one place that i want to move,I've been fascinated by the culture but hopefully after i finish collage i could find some work there or something...how would i go about doing this though...do i just call a number and say hey i want to move to your country or what, im not all into immigration laws and stuff.

    2. Re:Japan by rhythmx · · Score: 1

      I feel the need to second this as an American living and working in Tokyo.

      Although it wasn't my intention to leave the country for political reasons (I did it for the awesome job), I was often one of the ones who said they would leave the states because of the US political system being so far disconnected from reality.

      Now that I am here I love it. I'm not sure if the language barrier is a contributer to that or not. It could very well be that all the same political bullshit is still there and I am just not hearing it.

      All in all, I like it because Japan seems to be missing that "spoiled child" attitude that is so prevalent in the United States.

    3. Re:Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 for Japan. I love Tokyo. But I have a girlfriend who hates sushi and who won't go with me because it's too far from her family.

    4. Re:Japan by bmajik · · Score: 1

      What line of work are you in, and what was the process for getting employed in japan? Did you go there first and then find a great job, or did you find a great job and then go there? Did you apply for a new position at a new (to you) company in japan, or did you have a pre-existing arrangement with an opportunity to move to the japanese branch/office of your pre-existing employer?

      What things do you especially like about living/working in Tokyo? What do you dislike?

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
  84. Vienna by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I left the US for good a few years ago for Vienna, and will never go back to the Imperial Homeland. Life's too great here.

  85. Please, come to Germany. by Analein · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's been sixty years since we stopped invading foreign countries. Professional help needed.

    1. Re:Please, come to Germany. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's been sixty years since we stopped invading foreign countries. Professional help needed.

      As an american I wish my country would learn from your example. The US is currently ruled by a fascist that wants to control the world.

    2. Re:Please, come to Germany. by Analein · · Score: 1
      This was more of a joke. I wouldn't say Bush is a brilliant politician, I'd say there have been some wrongdoings in your external policitcs. But: I do NOT hate the US in any way. We are a free country because of US decisions in the past, living in southern Germany I am used to this freedom since birth. This is something I do not want to miss and want others to experience.

      A liberal administration would be nice for you, I guess. This is a damn complicated subject. I really do not want to discuss WWII, neither Vietnam nor anything like this. I personally think invading Iraq was done wrong, advertised with the wrong reasons and has been a failure overall. However I think it was necessary, believing in the question of a greater evil arising every now and then, not being naive enough to agree with arguments like "90 percent were living peacful, there". Ninety percent were, here. You all know what happened (and it is btw still a problem, in some regions).

      Do not hate your country, do not move away. That is plain wrong. Use the means of democracy to change something. It is a lot harder, sure. It may seem impossible. But that's the way to achieving all the good things in life. I do not mean to sound pathetic and whiney, but I think some of the american citizens have long forgotten what their country stands for in some or most parts of the world. Especially in Europe.

    3. Re:Please, come to Germany. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now it's your country that's being invaded. Maybe you haven't noticed.

  86. And it's not like Dutch is hard. by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 1

    Dutch is probably the easiest language for an English speaker to learn (well, Frisian and Afrikaans might have something to say about that, but still...).

    I'm currently making a life for myself in Japan and learning Japanese (and getting pretty good at it), so I have little sympathy for anyone who thinks Dutch is a problem. :)

    --
    He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
    1. Re:And it's not like Dutch is hard. by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity, how did you get started in Japan career wise?

    2. Re:And it's not like Dutch is hard. by sg_oneill · · Score: 1


      I always felt portugese to be the easiest, kind of like a spanish thats easier. But others disagree.

      Meh.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    3. Re:And it's not like Dutch is hard. by klaasb · · Score: 1
      I am Dutch, and our language is probably one of the hardest languages to learn (when you are not born here).

      I learned Korean a few years ago. I was easy and very consistent. (we should all switch to hangul ^^ )
      What actually makes it difficult to communicate are the huge cultural differences between the West and East.

      [not to be taken serious]
      How many Americans do you know that can speak Dutch?
      How many Dutch have you seen in this thread alone that speak English??
      It is the better educational system in the Netherlands that took care of that ^^.
      So give your kids the best, and come here.
      [/not to be taken serious]

      --
      if your pants fit well, it's not only because of the pants ...
    4. Re:And it's not like Dutch is hard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      our language is probably one of the hardest languages to learn (when you are not born here).

      I am Dutch too and am getting tired of this self-loathing argument. The language is no harder than English, Swedish, Norwegian or heck, Indonesian. I've seen _many_ immigrants who picked it up (and got fluent) within a year.

      But for some reason the Dutch always try to pat themselves on the back claiming to have a really hard language to learn ...
    5. Re:And it's not like Dutch is hard. by kaysan · · Score: 0

      Went to a lecture on Noam Chomsky once. (Many know him from his books but don't realise he is actually a cutting edge linguist). Now according to standards set out during the lecture, dutch isn't really a language. He meant in the way that most languages obey certain grammar rules, where Dutch somehow combined English and Japanese grammar in a rather arbitrairy fashion. Conclusion: Dutch is not really a language, and you can't really ever learn it!

    6. Re:And it's not like Dutch is hard. by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Japanse?! This is the first time I've heard of that. Dutch steals a lot of words from English (like we stole lots of words from French in the past), but we try to adapt them to our grammar, which definitely does exist. At least more so than English grammar exists. Perhaps Dutch is easy for English speakers because it has a similarly flexible grammar? (Dutch grammar is actually a lot tighter, but possibly not as much as that of other languages.)

      Speaking of Chomsky, I actually encountered his work in linguistics and theoretical computer science before I discovered he allso wrote lots of good stuff on politics. Very interesting guy.

    7. Re:And it's not like Dutch is hard. by kaysan · · Score: 0
      I didnt mean to imply the Dutch language incorporates words taken from the Japanese language, much to the contrary, there are a lot of Dutch words and 'Dutchisms' in Japanese language. What i meant was, that chomsky defines language as 'obeying' a certian set of universal rules. Languages have 'rules' for where to put verbs, nouns, etc. However, in the Dutch language, these 'rules' are applied in such an arbitrary fashion and so randmly, that the closest to defenition of Dutch as a language would be: "something combining english and Japanese grammatical rules" :P

    8. Re:And it's not like Dutch is hard. by Pienjo · · Score: 1

      Dutch is probably the easiest language for an English speaker to learn
      My girlfriend is convinced it's merely a matter of slipping in random J's at the right places.

    9. Re:And it's not like Dutch is hard. by bhiestand · · Score: 1
      I am Dutch too and am getting tired of this self-loathing argument. The language is no harder than English, Swedish, Norwegian or heck, Indonesian. I've seen _many_ immigrants who picked it up (and got fluent) within a year.

      That's funny, I'm getting really tired of this "let's rank languages by difficulty while ignoring the important variables" game. Dutch is one of the easiest languages to learn if you are a native speaker of a Germanic language, such as English or.. German. Dutch is also going to be one of th hardest languages for a native speaker of, say, Japanese.

      In the first case you have very similar languages, where most of the grammar and word order is fairly similar when not identical.

      When you start learning radically different languages, it gets much more difficult. You have to learn to not only recognize, distinguish, and differentiate between, but pronounce entirely different sounds and/or tones. The grammar seems highly illogical and vastly different from your current way of thinking. You have to learn to think, read, and write in a new alphabet without trying to convert any of the characters in your head. Hell, if you're learning Chinese you really just have to start memorize entire "words" visually rather than having an alphabet to build from. This is extremely difficult for anyone.

      So, I say again, everyone please quit whining about languages being easier or harder for "everyone" to learn. Not even taking into account culture or aptitude, some people are going to have more or less difficulty with a different language based on the differences between the two, especially if it's their first foreign language.
      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
  87. seen the freedom of the press index? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Australia has slipped from 12th (2002) to 35th (2006) on the Reporters sans frontières list. How much further will we slip after the new media ownership laws come into the calculation?

    The fact is that the media moguls control so much of what people do, think and vote here, simply cos we have such a small market with little media diversity. Its so easy for the elite to push an agenda. Australian democracy is on the wane in a BIG way.

    BTW I have to type "escaped" to submit this :)

  88. Easy Answer Here... by fuzzybunny · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1) Switzerland. It's clean, tidy, cosmopolitan, safe, has low taxes, great restaurants, beautiful countryside, a reasonabl educated population, a strong economy, 20% foreigners so fairly limited xenophobia in the parts that matter compared to many other European countries, isn't part of the EU, and is a few hours from Paris, Milan, Venice, Munich and other cool spots.

    2) What's keeping me from moving there? Well, nothing--I already did. I've lived on 3 continents, and it's by far the nicest country I've been to (barring Canada, but brrrr.)

    I moved for personal reasons (girlfriend), but I can see 100% where people frustrated with the way the US is moving are coming from. I have two remaining, ageing family members in the US whom I visit whenever possible, and every time I come here I notice what seems like a general decline in civility and reason. From the whiny nasal-voiced stewardesses on every US air carrier (and the $5 drinks charge on international flights--WTF?!?) to the screechy populist media, intrusive laws and lowbrow politics, it all gets a bit tiresome.

    I often catch myself feeling guilty about having such an arrogant attitude, but to be honest I'd rather enjoy the good bits from afar whenever I can, for at least as long as the US is "staying the course."

    Friends of mine have also moved to Ireland, Japan, Australia and various other countries--they all like wherever it is they moved. The most important part is doing your research and, if possible, spending some time there--I know plenty of expats who are miserable because they just didn't check their new home country out before going.

    --
    Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    1. Re:Easy Answer Here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't check out Switzerland before moving there. Heck, I didn't even ask how much I'd be earning, which is not nearly enough given the high prices. Oh yeah, and in many ways, its corporate welfare policies make the US look benign (ever hear of a country with higher pharmaceutical prices than the US?). Other that that, it's a great place, as long as you stay away from those German speakers. (shudder)

    2. Re:Easy Answer Here... by einar2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I am sorry to bring the news but most probably you will not get a work permit. The work permits have a quota per district. Naturally, the more interesting districts where the multinational companies are sitting that would hire an "only English speaker" are over their quota.
      For EC citizens it is rather easy to get here. The rest of the world is more or less locked out.

      Yes, I am Swiss.

    3. Re:Easy Answer Here... by elohim · · Score: 1

      1. where would i move to? switzerland as well

      2. what's keeping me from doing it? still in residency training.

      what's the market like for young doctors?

    4. Re:Easy Answer Here... by dawiz · · Score: 1

      "what's the market like for young doctors?"

      not good. Over the last couple of years thousands of medical specialists came over from Germany, because there they don't make any money. Now the market is saturated to the extent, that young doctors are legally denied the right to open new medical offices because there are simply too many.

    5. Re:Easy Answer Here... by dawiz · · Score: 1

      einar2: I don't know if you noticed or not - we just voted in favor of that foreign worker mobility thing as part of the new immigrant law. Starting in January 2007, it doesn't matter anymore where (qualified) foreigners apply for a work permit - they can subsequently move wherever they want in Switzerland. Unqualified workers from extra-EU states will find it close to impossible to get into Switzerland at all now, though.

    6. Re:Easy Answer Here... by dawiz · · Score: 1

      "as long as you stay away from those German speakers. (shudder)"

      which would be kind of hard, considering the fact that 2/3 of the population speak German. If you hate 2/3 of the population, you might want to find yourself another country.

    7. Re:Easy Answer Here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a German descendant (althought I've not learned the language) living in south america. I'm kinda ending my degree in CS (in a few years!); do I have a chance there?

    8. Re:Easy Answer Here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The're so tidy (the Swiss) that after a while it will drive you crazy!

    9. Re:Easy Answer Here... by zwaedi · · Score: 1

      ...hey,

        and in Switzerland you will get away with no ticket being stranded in a higway tunnel with no more fuel left ...

      cheers

    10. Re:Easy Answer Here... by orderb13 · · Score: 1

      It isn't German. It is some horrible, horrible psuedo-German.

    11. Re:Easy Answer Here... by babbling · · Score: 1

      Friends of mine have also moved to Ireland, Japan, Australia and various other countries--they all like wherever it is they moved.

      Australia is worse off than the US, perhaps not in terms of enforcement, but laws. The US has a bill of rights, whereas Australia has sedition laws, for example.

    12. Re:Easy Answer Here... by dawiz · · Score: 1

      Well, believe it or not - High German is really the pseudo-language, not Swiss German. Swiss German (at least as manifested in the dialects spoken in the northernmost parts of the country) is a lot closer related to Old German (and Old English, for that matter) than High German.

    13. Re:Easy Answer Here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it really cold there though? I was talking with my wife and she said she would rather move to France or Spain because Switzerland is too cold. She has a lot of animosity about their actions during WW2 as well.

    14. Re:Easy Answer Here... by simpl3x · · Score: 1

      The Swiss can be a bit strange. But, I am planning on going to school there for a Master's and would very likely consider staying thereafter. But, first things first... As you say, spend some time considering the option!

    15. Re:Easy Answer Here... by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1

      It's not. In a place like Zurich, if you can get your foot in the door with a major company, you're pretty much set--I have a number of friends who've done this. College degree or equivalent is almost indispensable though. I wouldn't honestly aim for a small district/community regardless. Quotas are a pain but irrelevant if you can make yourself wanted enough--we've gotten about 8-10 good people in that way who've settled. These are the kind of immigrants they want; educated, taxpaying, intending to settle. But yes, EU does have a far easier time.

      I'd check the British recruiting boards--they seem to have a lock on a lot of European IT position for some reason.

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    16. Re:Easy Answer Here... by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1

      ...but on the flip side, you have to work with people who tell you every morning about the ferret shitting on their brand new Mercedes.

      Arsch! :-)

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    17. Re:Easy Answer Here... by doktor-hladnjak · · Score: 1

      Moving from the States to almost any other developed foreign country is practically a non-option for a few reasons:

      1. Permission to practice medicine is specific to a given country. In some places it's easier than in others, but in general education in one country is not recognized as equivalent to education in another. Sometimes you can make up these deficits with exams or further coursework, but other times it's just not practical.

      2. Wages for doctors are often quite a bit lower. In many countries, the cost of a medical education is paid for in large part by the government. Because of this, doctors there don't have as astronomically high student loans as most new doctors do in the States, which means doctors are willing to work for lower wages. Combine that with the socialized or heavily regulated aspects of most European healthcare systems and you've got low wages.

    18. Re:Easy Answer Here... by paedobear · · Score: 1

      Thatcher REALLY pushed IT training in the early 80s (one of the very few things she did) - the difference in the level of IT knowledge in the UK and Japan - for instance - is amazing. We have a huge number of programmers, though that's going to drop off over the next few years it seems.

  89. Brasil by Ham_belony · · Score: 0

    Just for the weather and those fine ladies.

    1. Re:Brasil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you crazy???? You don't know what Brazil REALLY is. Believe me, I live here..... (I'M BRAZILIAN)

  90. California ;-) by mingrassia · · Score: 1

    But seriously ... the way of thinking out here is so drastically different from the rest of the US that it might as well be it's own country.

    --
    OS X, Linux, Tivo, Amiga, my fascination with cult-like technologies would intrigue any psychiatrist.
  91. Spineless Conformity, or... by patio11 · · Score: 1

    ... you could just go to the shop right next door. In three years in this country I've had, lets see, two and a half times where a denial of service actually influenced my course of action. Once I was clearly unwelcome in an establishment (still got to eat there, didn't go back though), once I got the same reaction but was let in because I was in a group of 25 Japanese people and they said they would take their $2000 drink bill elsewhere if I wasn't drinking with them, and once we knew ahead of time not to go to any of three popular clubs because only the fourth allowed foreigners on Saturdays.

    Life is short and I have rather little desire to waste my limited amount of it complaining or acting against abberations that the market does a perfectly servicable job of sorting out. I'll pick my battles, like the one time a coworker got asked to translate a letter from a school to a Peruvian family saying "We're very sorry but, well, we don't serve your kind here. But don't worry, we're reasonable: here is a letter to get you out of trouble should your child be picked up for 'playing hookie' at the train station during the school day". (I should note that I'm a card-carrying Republican and am honestly ambivalent on whether a private business should be able to be racially discriminatory. If a hospital won't treat you because your skin color is wrong, thats more than worrisome but I've never heard of an issue with it. If a bar doesn't want to serve you drinks, well, it's the idiot's property, he can run it into the ground if he wants to. The market will sort it out. When the government starts doing it, thats when I think it is time to go all NAACP on the issue. I'm opposed to state schools not treating Koreans the same as everybody else, regardless of whether its Japanese or blacks/Hispanics who are benefitting from the discrimination. In Japan that makes me progressive, in America that makes me "a dittohead white-robe-wearing Nazi". Ahh, the fun little ironies of life.)

    Japan, incidentally, doesn't hate you, any more than France hates you, any more than America hates you if you're Muslim, any more than Chicago hates you if you are a White Sox fan. There are, shockingly, many types of people here, the same as anywhere else. Many Japanese people have issues in dealing with foreigners, ranging from the trivial (they think all foreigners speak English or that all Americans own a gun) to the moderately serious. A small portion of Japanese people are serious bigots. And the majority of the population treats you like a person (Japan even has some America fanboys -- cowboy cosplay is some creepy stuff! ;) ). The situation has improved markedly over the years -- its noticably better today than it was 5 years ago and I live in Japan's answer to rural Georgia. Plus with the shrinking birth rate and increasing immigration bringing folks closer together, I'm pretty confident that Japan is on the same trend of decreasing societal discrimination that America is.

    1. Re:Spineless Conformity, or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent points ...

      BUT everyone from the USA **should** own a gun! If our crime rate were as low as anywhere in japan, then we wouldn't need to. I live in a city in Georgia where owning a gun is required by law. The gun patrol has never come to my house checking however. Not much crime here and we teach our kids about gun safety and actually let them shoot too! Kinda like teaching your child to swim as insurance against drowning if you ask me.

      I've been to Japan more than a few times, the folks i was working with were very nice and wanted to learn everything I was there to teach them, but business is their new conflict. Make no mistake. Perhaps business is the same here and I just don't see it. I'm clueless that way. I miss western food when i travel - not steak, but the common little things. Chicago pizza, a good hot dog, a greek salad, chinese food that hasn't been japanized, etc...

      I've never seen a drunk in Japan be nasty - stupid, falling down, in poor taste, YES. Downright mean? Nope.

      I had an offer to live/work in Tokio and decided against it. I love different cultures ... to visit. Guess I'm not ready to live overseas yet. At least, not without my guns.

      I'm still looking for a place to retire outside the USA. As Boortz might put it, there's too many stupid people voting to take my money here. Definitely need an exit plan so I can keep the money I've saved all these years.

  92. Switzerland by tecnopa · · Score: 1

    Switzerland. And nothing is stopping me as Ive already transfered. I cant speak the language, but I dont need to (at the office) as the business language is English. As for citizenship... well Im lucky enough to have an EU passport and a US passport so thats trivial.

  93. Greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I mean like, how cool is a country that made their language and alphabet using all those math symbols!!!

    1. Re:Greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They certainly get their geek props! And it is easy to misspell Greek and Geek. Coincidence? I think not!

      An honorary nerd badge for every Greek!

  94. If not somewhere else, why America? by htnprm · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Note. Not flamebait, so don't mod me as such...

    Yes, well try living in one of those countries with "ridiculous tax rates". Free or cheaper heath care. Free or cheaper tertiary education. Lower crime rates through a restorative justice system, as opposed to just "Lock 'em up". Decent public transport. But you are a "patriotic American", which from experience equals "Get a brain morans. Go USA!". So you stick with that. The rest of us are enjoying you staying right where you are.

    "If money is all you love, then that's what you'll receive" - Princess Leia

  95. I would only leave if forced...Or on vacation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will be sad if I have to leave the country and things don't turn away from the Hardliner-Right-Wing politics soon... cause right now there are so many people in jail, the police are trying to provoke me into committing crimes just to justify their own jobs. Hell, there's nobody left on the street anymore to commit crimes so why do we need cops anyway?

    (especially since this is possibly the third time they have tried to injure me to see if I will fight back, just because I am the only one who isn't afraid to walk around town at night)

  96. New Zealand by vaccum+pony · · Score: 1

    Clean(er), beautiful and hungry for IT professionals. The english that's used here is a mix of Brit, Ausie and American. Decent free health care. Decent economy (81st largest economic entity according to a recent something or other I saw on the web). A very open, tolerant society. Great place to raise kids. I moved here from the pacific northwest and haven't regretted a moment.

    1. Re:New Zealand by duncan+bayne · · Score: 1

      I would seriously consider changing your mind ... I live in New Zealand, and the country is in something of a death-spiral at the moment. The Government has just passed retroactive legislation to legalise election campaign overspending & to squash a private lawsuit. Violent crime is on the rise, taxation is ridiculously high (the Government is running an $11 billion surplus - unprecedented by NZ standards). We're also turning into a cotton-wool wrapped safety-society - forget bungy, think a proposed ban on fireworks and a tax on fatty foods. As much as I love this country, it has some serious issues right now ...

    2. Re:New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but he's coming from the UK - given we are twenty years behind the UK in most things, that gives him time to find somewhere else while we slowly turn into the North Korea of the South Pacific . . .

    3. Re:New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a big shortage of IT staff here in NZ. But most IT companies are small.
      The drawback for some will be the low pay. If you enjoy the outdoors, this will balance the equation. It is a safe(ish) out of the way place to be when WW3 starts.

    4. Re:New Zealand by smasm · · Score: 1

      Oh come on.. The campaign overspending is a typical NZ small politics and typical, perhaps, of a party in power too long. It certainly doesn't indicate a death-spiral. 46 murders in 2003/2004, 42 of the resolved. This is truly low by international standards, even if it is rising (though this isn't at all clear). http://www.police.govt.nz/service/statistics/2004/ fiscal/stats-national-20040630.pdf The increase in safety regulations are the same as in many places. I do miss double happies and bumblebees though...

    5. Re:New Zealand by Hairy1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      New Zealand rules. Sure the Telecom companies have us over a barrel, the Govrenment wants us to pay several times for the same service, the health system is falling apart, public transport and roading is a joke, but on the flip side we have a Government who isn't in the pocket of big business, have the best natural scenery, a pretty relaxed way of life. I can recommend New Zealand; except that Americans arn't really that popular right now. For god sake stay and vote the Republicans out so the US can start to heal the damage the Republicans have done.

    6. Re:New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NZ wages are low .. like 80% of Aussie ones......

    7. Re:New Zealand by Kovac.anar · · Score: 1

      But it does have the advantage of not being surrounded by Australians. Easily worth it.

    8. Re:New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For god sake stay and vote the Republicans out so the US can start to heal the damage the Republicans have done.

      Trust me when I say this, the Democrats (remember, the US is a two-party only system) are no better. Most of them supported the war in Iraq until it became clear they could use it as a partisan wedge issue. Many of the foreign policy issues that annoy non-Americans are supported by both Democrats and Republicans.

      Basically, the two parties are identical except for a couple of "wedge" issues that they use to divide people. (Those are typically abortion and taxes.) Otherwise they're identical.

    9. Re:New Zealand by Ham_belony · · Score: 0

      What are double happies?

    10. Re:New Zealand by kitanai · · Score: 1

      I'm a New Zealander and I work in IT. It's pretty damn easy to find an IT job - especially if you are a Network Admin or Microsoft DBA or Developer. What will shock you is the pay though - I only earn about one third more than the average weekly wage. It's definitely a lifestyle decision, you will not make money to take home. The bank won't even loan me the money for a house.

    11. re: New Zealand by climbing · · Score: 1

      Please mod parent up.

      Thanks for the post. Well said. I've come to the same conclusion: new zealand but the details of life and general complacency always get in the way.

      Here are some additional criteria that make we want to move to NZ: first world, good health care and general infrastructure; nice tolerant liberal people; same langauge; mild/cool non-humid climate; pretty; clean; not in the firm grip of the USA; recreation; oh and the sheep of course. Mmmm sheep.

    12. Re:New Zealand by gronofer · · Score: 1

      An $11 billion surplus is one of the reasons why the country is in a death spiral? Are you old enough to remember the Muldoon years?

    13. Re:New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, THANK YOU for finally proving that there's one other human on Earth who understands "actual" politics.

    14. Re: New Zealand by Velocir · · Score: 1

      Technically yes, we're first world. But we have second-world roads. Health care is ok, but you have to wait ages for anything, even for things like cancer, and some procedures aren't allowed here (you have to ho to China or Australia). There are plenty of intolerant people, just look at the Destiny Church. Auckland (biggest city in NZ by as factor of 2) is humid as hell in the summer. Pretty - yes, clean...in some places. Recreation is good. And sheep are fricken annoying.

    15. Re:New Zealand by toddestan · · Score: 1

      First, he said vote out the Republicans, didn't say a single word about Democrats. And even if he did, the rest of the world has a better overall impression of Democrats than the current crop of Republicans. There has to be something to that.

    16. Re: New Zealand by kaffiene · · Score: 1

      The Destiny Church are hardly even a significant minority.

    17. Re:New Zealand by la-editor · · Score: 1

      My understanding (as a business owner here in NZ) is that there is huge demand for IT professionals; I certainly find it difficult to find good people here. Depending on where you're emigrating from salaries may not be as high as you've enjoyed at home, but the lifestyle advantages are huge. Are you willing to sacrifice income for quality of life? If you are, then by all means come here, but if income is what matters then you probably need to look at Dubai or SE Asia. It's a shame that NZ'ers are criticising NZ on Slashdot. I can honestly say that almost all of what they're saying is fallacious nonsense. This country isn't perfect, but it's certainly much better than the place I emigrated from (the UK), and I get the impression that it's a lot better than a lot of other places. The only place that's comparable to NZ I think is Australia, although you do have the ignominy of living in Dubya's "deputy sheriff in the South Pacific" if you choose Oz, but Melbourne in particular is a nice place. So - please come, we're happy to have you here!

    18. Re:New Zealand by baker_tony · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if stating that NZ is behind the UK in most things (especially 20 years) is very accurate (at all). Banking in UK is shithouse for example, the UK has only just introduced chip and PIN (EFTPOS) recently for example (what been in NZ for 20 odd years now?). Things like Internet in UK is well ahead of NZ though from what I've seen (hardly 20 years though) and one of the reasons I won't be going back to NZ in the near future.

    19. Re: New Zealand by c0reboarder · · Score: 1

      After living on the south island for 6 months I can say it beats the hell out of Wisconsin :) I do like NZ's government better for the most part, but the lack of a written and entrenched constitution scares me a little bit.

    20. Re: New Zealand by Velocir · · Score: 1

      I know, but they're public and easily researchable from overseas.

    21. Re: New Zealand by limegreenman · · Score: 1

      If 50% of the population didn't vote (ala the US), then I could see the need for a written constitution. However, having things entrenched in consitution is more of a hinderance than a benefit. Want to give women the vote? Done. Get rid of a silly "right to bear arms? Done. Not with a written constitution and embedded Bill of Rights.

    22. Re:New Zealand by Domstersch · · Score: 1

      Double happies were a form of firework. They were lit in the hand and then thrown a safe distance away, as opposed to sky rocket (American dialect: bottle rocket) or light and run fireworks. They had problems in that, if you held them a little too long, they'd go off in your hand. They packed quite a wallop too, and could do some serious damage. There were also problems with them being thrown at people/pets/property.

      They were banned in New Zealand in the '90s. There's a sky rocket ban too, except for people with fireworks licenses (for public displays, generally). And, based on behaviour this year, a full private fireworks ban is being considered. Pretty funny: ban fireworks in celebration of the thwarting of the gunpowder plot.

      --
      =w=
    23. Re:New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone in NZ need an Infosec guy? I get my CISSP soon.

      Actually I'll do anything, just get me out the Uk before Tony finds something else to tax me on.
      I just got a pay rise so I must be due to be taxed on something else.

  97. The Developing World by kavandje · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Disclaimer: not actually American, though I did live there from 1981 until 1988.

    Not always the easiest place to live, but rewarding a lot of the time: Southern Africa. And I am not referring to "We'd like to be State 51 please, if only you'll bring back the 1980s" South Africa, I am referring to southern sub-saharan Africa.

    Whether you're here on a volunteer basis or you have a 'proper job' (like myself), there is a definite need for clued-up tech people to share their knowledge, and to help pull this place out of its rut. No need to be a charity: I get a salary and everything...

    And do your research: not all sub-saharan countries are corruption-plagued dictatorships. Well, no more than the US anyway ...

    1. Re:The Developing World by Builder · · Score: 1

      And do your research: not all sub-saharan countries are corruption-plagued dictatorships. Well, no more than the US anyway ...

      Ok, I can think of about 4 off the top of my head... Namibia (although government incompentence and corruption is simmering quite nicely), Malawi, Botswana and possibly Zambia. Did I miss any? Pretty much everyone else in that neighborhood fits the 'tinpot african government' stereotype quite nicely, and yes, I include South Africa in that list of wholly corrupt countries.

    2. Re:The Developing World by kavandje · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, more or less, albeit with reservations.

      I live in Namibia myself, and there's no denying the fact that the government is run by a certain proportion of ne'er-do-wells and scallywags, but I have to say a majority of the people here do try to do well by themselves and others as best they can. And government incompentence and corruption is simmering quite nicely could just as easily describe the current US administration, no?

      These places have potential -- Zimbabwe, too -- but in order to realise that potential, the population needs to be pulled out of the rut they're in, whether it's self-imposed or not. Lots of people around the world have empty bellies, and people like that, who have nothing to lose, are more likely to strap themselves to something unfortunate than someone who's got something to go home to, even if it is as simple -- and hollow -- as hope.

      Something as simple as being here, working here in a 'normal' job, paying my taxes and -- above all -- raising expectations makes a small, but cumulative difference. Other people can purchase all the [product]red iPods they want; I occasionally give free rides to malaria-stricken ovaHimba for hundreds of kilometres. What makes more difference? To the Himba in my truck, the free ride to the clinic.

      Or something. Mod me sappy. But don't knock it till you've tried it.

      And another thing: 3rd-worlders have a strange perception of the 'developed' world. Nothing is more effective at reminding them that '1st worlders' are people too -- and dispelling certain Nike and Coca-Cola-fuelled myths -- than being prepared to get our hands dirty and treating them as equals. 'Cause like it or not, they are.

    3. Re:The Developing World by Builder · · Score: 1

      And government incompentence and corruption is simmering quite nicely could just as easily describe the current US administration, no?

      No, it couldn't. The US pot has boiled over. They're brazenly corrupt and evil.

      I tried making a difference, I really did, but I couldn't take it any more so I left. I was tired of being racially discriminated against for work because of the sins of my father and his father. I was tired of living in a country where the minister for law and order says 'If you dont like the crime, leave'. I was tired of living in a place where the proposed government cure for aids is to eat your vegetables and have a shower after raping an HIV positive woman. You might recognise this country as you live right next door :)

      As for places like Zimbabwe, I don't believe there is hope for the simple reason that the people don't fully understand democracy. Same goes for SA really. A lot of people (and I've seen this first hand, doing education and charity work in rural areas) believe that democracy means you are free to vote for the guy who you're told to vote for by your local chief. Until true individual democracy is understood and embraced, these people can't change their fates. Hope can only exist when the people you trust to provide things actually come through. All the sales of red ipods in the world don't mean jack shit when the government spends the money on Sarafina 2.

      Something as simple as being here, working here in a 'normal' job, paying my taxes and -- above all -- raising expectations makes a small, but cumulative difference. Other people can purchase all the [product]red iPods they want; I occasionally give free rides to malaria-stricken ovaHimba for hundreds of kilometres. What makes more difference? To the Himba in my truck, the free ride to the clinic.

      Don't even get me started on red shit. This weekend I got in a row with some sales tart who was trying to convince me that buying a red motorola would make so much difference to people in africa. The dumb bitch had a nice set of sanitised statistics but didn't know a damn thing about aids in africa. She didn't know the good old SA health minister, she didn't find a thing wrong with Pope John Paul II's actions in the arena (the new bloke wants to canonise him - I want him posthumously tried for genocide!), she didn't know shit. I ended up telling her that learning about about the conditions and actual problems in Africa would make far more difference than standing their in her whore skirt selling red phones for profit.

      Me? Bitter? Fuck yes!

    4. Re:The Developing World by kavandje · · Score: 1
      And government incompentence and corruption is simmering quite nicely could just as easily describe the current US administration, no?
      No, it couldn't. The US pot has boiled over. They're brazenly corrupt and evil.

      No arguments there ...

      I tried making a difference, I really did, but I couldn't take it any more so I left. I was tired of being racially discriminated against for work because of the sins of my father and his father. I was tired of living in a country where the minister for law and order says 'If you dont like the crime, leave'. I was tired of living in a place where the proposed government cure for aids is to eat your vegetables and have a shower after raping an HIV positive woman. You might recognise this country as you live right next door :)

      Believe me, I recognise the stupid. Our particular former president is not much of an improvement, and he's not altogether gone yet either; the current guy is doing an *okay* job -- nothing stellar, and no Nobel Prizes.

      The racial stigma you're referring to is the one that bugs me most; I came here; the sins my forefathers committed are not even applicable here. I had to fight for my job, but i got it in the end on the strength of being willing and able to train 'native' Namibians, which I am doing in addition to my main job.

      Crime's an issue here too, but it's being taken seriously, and while I can't see great strides yet, they will come. Or not.

      As for places like Zimbabwe, I don't believe there is hope for the simple reason that the people don't fully understand democracy. Same goes for SA really. A lot of people (and I've seen this first hand, doing education and charity work in rural areas) believe that democracy means you are free to vote for the guy who you're told to vote for by your local chief. Until true individual democracy is understood and embraced, these people can't change their fates. Hope can only exist when the people you trust to provide things actually come through. All the sales of red ipods in the world don't mean jack shit when the government spends the money on Sarafina 2.

      ... and that is a function of education. The governments of developing countries -- including Namibia and SA -- need to get serious about spending on education, and about attracting knowhow. That realisation is sinking in, but it will take a while. Europe had to go through several bouts of the black plague and the 30 years' war to get where it is now.

      Don't even get me started on red shit. This weekend I got in a row with some sales tart who was trying to convince me that buying a red motorola would make so much difference to people in africa. The dumb bitch had a nice set of sanitised statistics but didn't know a damn thing about aids in africa. She didn't know the good old SA health minister [sackmanto.co.za], she didn't find a thing wrong with Pope John Paul II's actions in the arena (the new bloke wants to canonise him - I want him posthumously tried for genocide!), she didn't know shit. I ended up telling her that learning about about the conditions and actual problems in Africa would make far more difference than standing their in her whore skirt selling red phones for profit.

      Hehehehe. I've personally phrased it less harshly, but I'm right there with you.

      But coming back to the point: I'd still rather live in Namibia than New Jersey.

    5. Re:The Developing World by Builder · · Score: 1

      Believe me, I recognise the stupid. Our particular former president is not much of an improvement, and he's not altogether gone yet either; the current guy is doing an *okay* job -- nothing stellar, and no Nobel Prizes.

      What worries me is that the man who raped, er, had consensual sex* with this woman with no protection is very likely to be SA's next president. His long time accomplice is currently doing a healthy stretch for corruption. And yet his party still actively support him.

      Even if you drop the corruption charges, you're still talking about a man who believes it's ok to have unprotected sex with aids carriers as long as you have a shower afterwards. I mean really, WTF? What hope is there for the masses with this kind of mind in charge?

      But coming back to the point: I'd still rather live in Namibia than New Jersey.

      5 years ago, I would have traded anything in the world with you to get your place in the USA. Hell, I even quite like Jersey from what I've seen of it :) Today, I don't even go there on holiday any more :(

    6. Re:The Developing World by rs79 · · Score: 1

      "Did I miss any?"

      Cameroon. I have some Dutch friends that go trapzing all over Africa and South America to collect weird little fish (killifish) and these are not short trips. They tell me Cameroon or Uruaguay are the places they'd most like to retire to.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    7. Re:The Developing World by kavandje · · Score: 1
      What worries me is that the man who raped, er, had consensual sex* with this woman with no protection is very likely to be SA's next president. His long time accomplice is currently doing a healthy stretch for corruption. And yet his party still actively support him. Even if you drop the corruption charges, you're still talking about a man who believes it's ok to have unprotected sex with aids carriers as long as you have a shower afterwards. I mean really, WTF? What hope is there for the masses with this kind of mind in charge?

      Oh, we're on the same page here; the Z-man must not become president. But on a purely anthropological level, I find the level of fanatical support he enjoys in the face of overwhelming evidence that he is a loony fascinating.

      Sort of like That Other Guy.

      5 years ago, I would have traded anything in the world with you to get your place in the USA. Hell, I even quite like Jersey from what I've seen of it :) Today, I don't even go there on holiday any more :(

      Ach, NJ is nice enough to look at in certain places. Just being a foreign teenager in blinkered middle class suburbia sucked. There are now other things I object to about the notion of living in the US.

  98. Yes, and... by SuperKendall · · Score: 0

    The key to success is having enough money to support yourself, not making enough money to live a life of luxury and frivolous spending.

    I totally agree, which is why I'm happier in the US where lower taxes permit me to keep more money so that I don't have to make as much to be able to support myself without excess.

    Actually really the key to success is doing something you love, the monetary component should be secondary but has to be enough so that you can keep doing the thing you love.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Yes, and... by killjoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do you really pay lower taxes? By the time you add up federal, social security, unemployment, state and local taxes you are probably paying close to 50% if not more. Add to that things like health insurance, tolls, and thousands of fees that you pay for services that other countries provide for free and you may actually be worse off.

      Oh I forgot to add the extra weeks of paid vacation to that mix too.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    2. Re:Yes, and... by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      >..I totally agree, which is why I'm happier in the US where lower taxes permit me to keep more money so that I don't have to make as much to be able to support myself without excess...

      --- ...and when you have to undergo any complicated surgery you'll have to give up your house and/or pension to pay for the bill.
      In Europe doctors don't make as much per year as US doctors have to pay for their malpractice insurance alone.

    3. Re:Yes, and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually with all of my taxes AND my % I give to my 401k my paycheck is only down 28% and I make about 42k a year(just so you dont get the idea that I make burger flipper wages).

    4. Re:Yes, and... by maxvalery · · Score: 1

      You can't possibly be serious. I live in Texas. There is NO state tax, ALL related federal withdrawals amount to 19% out of every paycheck, tolls are fairly cheap AND can be avoided most of the time.

      As far as health insurance, unless you live in Scandinavia, free health coverage by definition cannot be better than the one you pay for. Besides, in the US there's a flexible system of payment for health - employer matching, etc. You can trust me on the superiority of "bought" social services over the "provided free" ones - as an immigrant from Eastern Europe, I should know.

    5. Re:Yes, and... by drsquare · · Score: 1
      --- ...and when you have to undergo any complicated surgery you'll have to give up your house and/or pension to pay for the bill.


      As opposed to waiting for years on the NHS, or getting an infection whilst in hospital and dying because they're not cleaned properly?
    6. Re:Yes, and... by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      waiting for years on the NHS, or getting an infection whilst in hospital and dying because they're not cleaned properly?

      What are you talking about? European clinics are in general just as good as in the US with the possible exception of some very expensive, very specialized treatments (which land you in the gutter if you need them in the US anyway, private insurance or not.)

      What many US people posting here seem to miss is that private health insurance is an option in Europe too. If you are not happy with what the state system provides, you can add on top whatever you want, and many employers offer packages. At the same time if you can't afford that, you get decent care anyway. I see this as a good thing.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    7. Re:Yes, and... by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can't possibly be serious. I live in Texas. There is NO state tax, ALL related federal withdrawals amount to 19% out of every paycheck, tolls are fairly cheap AND can be avoided most of the time.

      As far as health insurance, unless you live in Scandinavia, free health coverage by definition cannot be better than the one you pay for. Besides, in the US there's a flexible system of payment for health - employer matching, etc. You can trust me on the superiority of "bought" social services over the "provided free" ones - as an immigrant from Eastern Europe, I should know.


      I spent a considerable amount of time in Europe and I would gladly pay 15% more tax than I do now to have all the services and care the government provides. I don't know about Eastern Europe, but I do know a bit about Belgium and the Netherlands.

      Even the most conservative of Americans stand by a common definition. When the economy can't provide services, Government MUST. This seems to fall on deaf ears of the modern conservatives.

      BTW the quality of health care in the US in not even in the top 10 in the world.. Go look it up. We have horrible infant mortality rates and many other things because of people NOT having ANY access to health care.

      There also is NO flexible system of health - employer matching available in the US. Hillary Clinton proposed one in 1993, but before the public even took time to read the system, the Republicans had it discredited on false arguments. Incidentally, her system was very close to the Beligum health care system that actually is a 'flexible system of payment for health that is truly employer matching' and works quite well.

      I can understand your love of America, as there are some really good things, the whole melting pot of people and ideas, etc. But in social terms there are many things in America that are on the level of 3rd word countries, and Health Care is one of them, not only in terms of accessiblility, but in terms in the quality of medicine.

    8. Re:Yes, and... by jafac · · Score: 1

      The other bit of Tax that's left out of the equation is the Tax most Americans don't measure.

      Most Americans don't measure the Tax they have to pay, in the form of increased interest rates, due to the massive amounts of money their government borrows, as a "smoke-and-mirrors" trick to spend money without having to raise taxes. Only - instead of this revenue (due to increased interest rates) going to public investment like infrastructure or schools, it goes to the bottom line of the financial industry.

      The other Tax is paid by consumers of Energy - who suffer under an energy policy that dates from the Victorian age: pay your extortion money to the oil barons, and nobody gets hurt.

      Another Tax is paid by consumers of Intellectual Property - who pay vastly more for cost-less digital copies of information than would otherwise be dictated by "a free market" - these surcharges being levied out of legalized bribery by lobbyists, rather than out of sound policy.

      But Americans are content to believe that these charges are not "Taxes" because they are not paid to the government. And they're content to believe that money paid to other private interests somehow benefits them more than money paid to the government (which, in America, consists of Americans).

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    9. Re:Yes, and... by GalionTheElf · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but the NHS is not at all like any other decent "free" healthcare system and thank for that. Personally I live in Belgium (3rd or 4th on the list of taxing a few posts up) and here you walk in to a hospital and normally have little to no waiting time, referrals from your GP to a specialist take about a week. Our healthcare is not free at POS though (in many cases), eg you go to your GP, pay 15-20EUR but can then take your receipt to your health insurance and get 12-14EUR back. Recently the government also introduced a "maximum invoice" that hospitals can give you, being 500 back (note that this is also largely paid back). Works fine for me thanks and no dirty hospitals to boot!

      PS: WTH does /. swallow the euro symbol?

      --
      I'm going over here and I don't know why!
    10. Re:Yes, and... by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      As opposed to waiting for years on the NHS, or getting an infection whilst in hospital and dying because they're not cleaned properly?
      --
      Don't know for the U.K, I live in Luxembourg and there's no waiting at all.
      I pay around 170$ additional per year for the full family for so called 1.class treatment,
      which means 1 bed room with bathroom/toilet. (instead of 2bed rooms) + extra dental stuff and chief treatment and whatnot.
      Almost 80% of the population pay that extra, no idea why they don't include it with the 'normal one' that everybody has.
      I have to undergo a colonoscopy next week under full sedation, full blood-labs requested for the sedation,
      for which I will have to pay around 25$ (my part for the full thing), unlimited internet and phone access included.

      PS. And my doctors come to my home too if I call them, costs me around 5$ extra, ditto for the physical therapist.

    11. Re:Yes, and... by Riverman5 · · Score: 1

      Uuuuuuuuhhhh.....

      Increased interest rates? I don't think you understand American monetary policy. The government decides what the prime interest rate should be in order to regulate the amount of money floating around. Lower interest rates mean lower unemployment and higher inflation.

      If you're talking about our national debt, that interest payment is included in the federal budget. Furthermore, a lot of that debt goes to the bottom line of other countries, and american upper and middle class.

      As for our energy policy, the United States has some of the lowest tax on energy, and yet we are the innovators developing novel forms of solar power and what not, the stirling engine. Our energy policy has always been free trade, to the extent that the oil cartels provision it.

      If it weren't for intellectual property law, there would be no intellectual property at all.

      I take it you're an anti-capitalist. There is no argueing with an anti-capitalist. You'll just have to see for yourself the difference.

  99. Nigeria, of course. by kevinadi · · Score: 1

    They have a shitload of money in their banks that can be yours for just $100.

  100. Don't Worry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Telstra alone is enough to keep me away. ;-)

  101. Barcelona, Spain by remolacha · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I came to Barcelona because I met a Catalan woman who was studying in the US. That was in 2000. As with anywhere, there are pros and cons. I've also picked up some different perspectives on the US living outside of it. To sum up:

    living in Barcelona: pros

    1. the flow of time is different, slower somehow. people have more time outside of work and seem to make spending it with each other a priority. It's not that the work hours are so different, it's more of a cultural thing- work is usually not the center of one's life, or something they use to define themselves. for instance, you can get to know someone over months and never find out what they do (this may be related to con #1, see below.) most people get a month of vacation each year, plus innumerable long (3 and 4 day weekends). there's a big emphasis on getting together for long, tasty meals and laughing and drinking good wine. we lived in new york for 6 months a few years ago (ending a 1-year stay 6 months early) and I felt like I was running all the time, never had time to be with my family.

    2. it's easier to be middle class. healthcare is free, education is cheap, public transit is cheap and excellent (the latter is for barcelona, not necessarily the rest of the country.) we have two little kids (9mos and 5yrs) and no car and it's not an issue. on a salary of us$60k we live well, even with the dollar worth .79 euro cents.

    3. the level of education and knowledge about the world of the average person on the street is pretty high, compared to the US. people have travelled, speak at least two languages (spanish and catalan and usually bad english, and french). the public schools start earlier here (3 yrs old) and are a lot more rigorous than the public schools I went to in washington DC.

    3. you are close to a wide range of different cultures, should you like exploring. if you travel the same distance from say, new york to cleveland, you can be in much of north africa, most of western europe, a bunch of eastern europe. turkey is a stone's throw away. even within spain there are seven or so regional languages and cultures that are strikingly different. western europe is slowly mixing and homogenizing due to the european union effort, but it still seems like an adventure every time I get on a train or a plane. maybe this is just because I'm not from here.

    cons:

    1. the work opportunities and work culture suck. education being cheap or free, you have a lot of really well educated people and not enough jobs requiring their skills. thus employers are used to paying bad salaries, paying late, not treating employees too well, etc. maybe this is a holdover from the years of dictatorship that only ended in the 70s. higher-ups generally fuck with those under them and it's not pleasant. getting a job often has more to do with whom you know or are related to, rather than what you can do (this is a cliche, but it is _really_ true here.) these negatives may be changing slowly, I'm not sure. I came on with a US company and started telecommuting about a year ago and now work for spanish firms only as a consultant, which gives me a certain amount of freedom and leverage.

    2. speaking spanish isn't really enough, to really integrate you have to learn some level of catalan (the regional language in which government and local business is conducted), which is sort of like learning portuguese- similar, but still another language (not a dialect). even if it were only spanish one had to learn, it's was a part-time job for a me for a few years to get good at a language. classes, etc. Some people learn can languages faster of course.

    on living outside of the US:

    one thing you realize is that the US is a good place for work and earning money (if you're educated and posess certain skillsets - if you aren't, it looks like wal-mart, doesn't it?) and that the fact that you can often be evaluated for what you are able to do, rather than your connections, is damn nice.

    you also see a lot of things in press that

    1. Re:Barcelona, Spain by hnile_jablko · · Score: 2

      Amen on all accounts. My closest friend lives in BCN and suffers the same isolation and work woes as you only slightly varied in that he was sent by his employer to establish a spanish branch. Worse still he has the great misfortune of not having a Catalan partner and finds after 2 years that despite being one of the most remarkable people I know, he is alone most of the time and feels ostracised by the Catalans. He loves the place and them, but is growing bitter about it. As for Israel... I broach this subject constantly when I am back home in Missouri. Criticising Israel in any regard immediately catagorised as anti-semetic. Further, I try to point out that Israel is a racist religious state which is exactly what my US friends fear with Islamic states. Anyhow... keep well.

    2. Re:Barcelona, Spain by reydelamirienda · · Score: 1

      The issue with the language is starting to change. Traditionally our parents and grandparents studied French (sometimes even IN French) at school as France was regarded as the "power", and also because Spanish, Portuguese, Italian and French are quite similar and we more or less understand each other. In the 70s the we were falling behind and the education system was changed and now all children study English at school and we have to pass a written English test to enter University studies (although you can fail and compensate with other subjects). So you will be able to speak with younger people in English.
      One of the advantages of living in the EU and being a student is that you can study one year in another university from another country of the EU, at the same price of your home country (1 year in a spanish uni costs $1000, and in other EU countries can be like 10 times more) while receiving a small pay to cover the costs of living abroad. It's called the Socrates-Erasmus program.

    3. Re:Barcelona, Spain by jimmy_dean · · Score: 1

      Very interesting and informative...thanks for the post! I did however want to ask one thing. How can you say that the healthcare is free? Don't you pay for it in your taxes? Someone has to pay for it as it doesn't just appear out of thin air.

      --
      -> Sometimes, you just gotta break free from the shackles of proprietary code.
    4. Re:Barcelona, Spain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, spanish people pay healthcare in their taxes, but everybody, spanish, european or not, has free and complete medical attention if needed.

    5. Re:Barcelona, Spain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You pay in your taxes, yes. And it's usually a pat on the back until you really can show without doubt that you are bleeding to death, or something like that.

    6. Re:Barcelona, Spain by remolacha · · Score: 1

      That's a good question. You do pay for it in taxes, but taxes aren't noticeably higher than in the US. how can this be? I believe it's mainly for two reasons: (1) med school is very cheap, so md's don't gradudate in debt, and thus can charge much less, and (2) there's no tradition of malpractice suits or lawsuits to recover medical costs (since they are low or nil), so doctors don't have these costs to cover either.

      Besides the govt health program, which is pretty good, you can also get private health insurance for about 70 euros (today that's US$100, in 2000 it was US$50, the exchange rate fluctuates so take your pick) a month per person. Under both systems doctors come to your house if you're sick (this is especially useful when you have kids), at no charge.

      We have the private insurance, since it has a few perks, like a beautiful hospital nearby, choose any doctor, etc. It cost us a total of 5 euros for each childbirth, and the hospital gave me room and board, along with my wife, for 3 days and nights both times! When you have something really serious though, like a major car accident, you go with the public, because they have the most advanced equipment and trauma centers.

      This is probably a gross oversimplification, but I have the feeling that the government here spends its money on things that actually help the citizens, like healthcare, garbage collection (that's free too), schools etc, with far less emphasis on defense and (currently) wars than the US does.

    7. Re:Barcelona, Spain by remolacha · · Score: 1

      I neglected to add that, as I understand it, if you graduate from a state med school you are required to work at least part time in a state hospital. Many doctors split their time between private practice and the public system.

    8. Re:Barcelona, Spain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a spanish i must admit your oppinion is quite right. Just i don't really know how to manage with Catalan as in my region we only have Spanish as language.

      I only want you to know that, if you like people's mood here and the proximity with other's you can experiment here, you'll probably love southern Brazil. IT jobs can be quite good there. I really really want to go back.

    9. Re:Barcelona, Spain by obdulio · · Score: 1

      Missed the most important: RONALDINHO

      --
      PENAROL: Seras eterno como el tiempo y floreceras en cada primavera.
    10. Re:Barcelona, Spain by Rayonic · · Score: 1
      we haven't said anything to israel (to my knowledge), which has had undeclared nukes since the 60s or 70s, is not a signatory

      You just said it - Israel never signed the non-proliferation treaty. Iran did.

      Thus it's not hypocritical to try to hold Iran to the treaty.
    11. Re:Barcelona, Spain by remolacha · · Score: 1

      tell your friend if he wants to get a beer sometime, jjmerrow@yahoo.com

    12. Re:Barcelona, Spain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      big con: pollution.

      You may not notice, but it is really bad. I can't spend more then 2 days there without having a sore throat and red eyes - not as bad as big US cities but still much much worse than here (Switzerland).

    13. Re:Barcelona, Spain by ViVeLaMe · · Score: 1

      And Iran will just "unsign" the NPT, and voilà, no violations anymore!

      --
      i had a sig, once..
  102. Sure of your surroundings!! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Would I bail - sure. I'm only going to live another 40-50 years. Why not enjoy it someplace where I'm discovering new things daily, rather than stuck here where I'm pretty sure of my surroundings.

    I am almost sure you are not really so "sure of your surroundings" as you think.

    I have been overseas, and also driven or at least visited much of the US. There is as much mystery within a fifty mile radious of your house as there is whole continents away.

    If you want to discover new things daily, all you need do is seek out one new poerson daily - for it is from other people that we truly learn things, here or abroad.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  103. France! by dmayle · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I recommend France to anyone looking to make the plunge. It's what I did, and you really can't beat it. Good food, beautiful women, nice people.

    I think that the primary differences between France and the U.S. is that the citizens actively participate in their government. There are some things I'm not entirely happy about. Police here can ask you for ID on the streets (though it's never happened to me), and speech is limited in certain ways (hate speech is not protected speech).

    In spite of this, though, there isn't the feeling of distrust that exists in the U.S. with regards to the government. Something that impressed me was back during the vote for the European constitution, a book that explained the version of the constitution being voted on jumped to number one on the bestseller list during the weeks/months preceding the vote. It made me proud to be living here.

    For the French, the government is THEM, and everyone gets up and shouts when there is something they don't like, You may hear jokes about the French striking, because there is often some group in the news, whether it be the postal service, trains, air traffic controllers, on strike, but I think it's a healthy sign that not only are people working for change, but there's someone on the other side listening. Most strikes are resolved in less than a week, and life goes back to normal.

    For Americans looking to make the plunge, you don't need to know any French to get started, if you want to work either in Paris, or in southern France near Nice (Sophia Antipolis is a huge office/science/tech park 20 minutes outside of Nice), but it's good manners to try. When I arrived, I didn't speak a word of French, and have since learned it well enough that I work entirely in French.

    Also to note, you normally have to find a French company willing to hire you before you come if you are not a student. However, it's not too hard to find American or International companies who will hire you in the U.S. (pay you in dollars) to work in France.

    If you want to date the locals, you will have to learn French. However, as long as your accent isn't too horrific, it's considered cute, and just as American women go gaga when French men say "enchanté" (nice to meet you, or literally enchanted), French women seem to go gaga over the phrase "my pleasure" when used to demur after having done something nice.

    1. Re:France! by slashbart · · Score: 1

      I agree!

      I'm from Holland, so legally it's a piece of cake to move to France.

      We love the French attitude to life, and are also impressed with their being involved in the state/country/politics. Especially during the EU 'constitution' referendum we've had heated discussions while being at the foot of a rockclimbing cliff :-)

      The french are a lot more polite than us Dutch which is another thing I like about them.

      En moment je prends un course a l'Alliance Française en Hollande pour mieux apprendre la langue. Çe n'est pas une langue tres difficile, mais je ne suis pas sure :-).

      Au revoir

      Monsieur Bart

    2. Re:France! by rkcallaghan · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if you will know the answer to this, but if you do or know where I could ask; I'd appreciate it. I've been considering France within the next 5 years, and I have at least a bad-french-101 classroom level of the language.

      Anyway, do you know if I were self-employed with a proven record for making a sufficient amount (how much?); could I dodge that employment requirement? Assume that my self employment is largely unaware of wherever I happen to be living.

      ~Rebecca

    3. Re:France! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      French women seem to go gaga over the phrase "my pleasure" when used to demur after having done something nice.

      Because it sounds very like you're saying "I'm orgasmically happy [to have helped]" :-)

    4. Re:France! by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Your best bet is probably the local French embassy. Maybe their website has some information.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    5. Re:France! by dmayle · · Score: 1

      Actually, I sort of know the answer to this.

      The answer is a resounding yes! It is possible to dodge the the employment requirements if you are creating a company in France (even if it's just for self-employment). However, in order to do so, you have to demonstrate that you have a certain amount of money saved, and demonstrate the viability of your business. However, I don't know the specific details. Things are really busy at work right now, but if you send an email to france aerobase mayle point org, I'll try and direct you to a website with the details.

    6. Re:France! by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      The french are a lot more polite than us Dutch which is another thing I like about them.

      Not all that difficult, considering the Dutch, and yes I am one of them, are about the rudest people one can find...

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    7. Re:France! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell no !

      France (Paris region especially) is only nice if you are there as a tourist or expat. If you are there on your own, you will see a very different France. I changed my status (from expat/"travailleur temporaire" to resident) 3 years ago, when the choice (remining and changing status or returning to my country) was offered to me. I'm still not sure I did the right thing.
      The problem is that most french people expect that the state solves their problems, and they become very suspicious when they meet people thinking otherwise. Changing jobs - not something that you'd like to do very often. Renting an appartment - hell on earth (you usually have to prepare a file containing copies of: ID/passport delivered by french authorities, last 3 payslips (french ones), letter (in french) from your (french) employer, very often last "avis d'imposition" or a number of other privacy-invading documents). Buying one - you don't really want to (horrible qulity/price ratio). Taxes - ha ! To get 3000 EUR cash (very good salary) the employer has to spend 6000 EUR. Then you pay income tax on the remining, "haxe d'habitation" on your living place, VAT of 19.6% on almost everything and car fuel is 80% taxes (~ 1.3 EUR/liter). Food is pretty expensive (at least on US standards), entertainment too. At least in Paris, traffic is horrible.

    8. Re:France! by Jesrad · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In spite of this, though, there isn't the feeling of distrust that exists in the U.S. with regards to the government.

      For the French, the government is THEM, and everyone gets up and shouts when there is something they don't like

      Surely you must be living in a parallel-universe France, instead of the one I've been living in for a quarter century. Defiance regarding the state is rampant, there are whole cities out of reach of the police power, people distrust the government with a passion. In fact being critical of the executive powers is the national sport here. Yet there is a constant obsession with politics, which I think is symptomatic of a country fast sinking into fascism (be it of the collectivist or corporatist kind), where people are paralysed into believing salvation can only come from the very same people they loathe and curse at everyday. It's simply not healthy at all, it's like a pervasive mental disease that permeates everything, from friendships to work relations and even down to simple shopping interactions.

      And there also is a fact that anyone considering moving to France should consider: french people are emigrating fast, at a rate of 100,000 to 200,000 each year, and it has been going like this for years already (2+ million people left the country, compare this with Cuba). This is the most massive exodus this country has ever known since the French Revolution ! There are reasons behind this continuous stream of people, reasons for fleeing this country.

      --
      Maybe we deserve this world ?
    9. Re:France! by maxume · · Score: 0

      There's good food and beautiful women pretty much everywhere, along with the bad food and ugly women.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    10. Re:France! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      people distrust the government with a passion. In fact being critical of the executive powers is the national sport here. Yet there is a constant obsession with politics, which I think is symptomatic of a country fast sinking into fascism (be it of the collectivist or corporatist kind), where people are paralysed into believing salvation can only come from the very same people they loathe and curse at everyday. It's simply not healthy at all, it's like a pervasive mental disease that permeates everything, from friendships to work relations and even down to simple shopping interactions.

      America? Is that you?

    11. Re:France! by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 1

      Probably the greatest (or at least the tallest) French leader of the last century, Charles De Gaulle, said that the french people are sheeps, and he was right.
      As long as they can quietly play on their horse races and watch crappy TV, most french people are wanting civil order at all cost, and some will even do whatever is needed to make sure that the France stays white, catholic, right-winged and pork-eating while complaining that Algeria is no longer a french colony. And of course, everyone is complaining about the government either for doing things or not (or not enought, or not how they want).

      The result is simple: the country is almost ready to accept a dictator as long as the police will continue to focus on non-whites, half of the new laws are written in reaction to the last headlines and can be resumed in "this kind of crime will be more punished when done in xxx situation".
      For the next year presidential election, the left side is into a kind of popularity (or even beauty) contest where we don't hear many ideas and on the right side, a key member of the goverment (who was in charge of economy and police during the last 5 years) saying that the goverment has done things wrong (somehow, he is right, he dismantelled the "proximity police" in favor of more riot control units because they were doing too much prevention and not enough repression (those b.ards even talked to the population and organized football competitions during the holidays to keep an eye on the kids). As a predictable consequence, both the crime and police violence numbers rose) and he will of course do better, but without explaining too much how, except from the parts he stole from the xenophobic candidates (did I mentioned his father is an immigrant).

      We used to say that were always doing the same mistakes the americans did 20 years ago, but I would say we are already ready for our GWB, except our one will probably be far more mean than stupid.

    12. Re:France! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recommend France ... beautiful women ...

      ...with smelly armpits and suicidal/homicidal attitudes to road safety.

      Why not come to Scotland and be bored, frozen to death, rained away, and harassed by drunks?

    13. Re:France! by Anne+Honime · · Score: 1

      [french] Food is pretty expensive (at least on US standards)

      Now, you know why we're slimmer on average than our US counterparts. It's my understanding that's healthier too.

      As of red tape and taxes, well... at least once it's paid, you don't have to be hypocritical and pretend being part of whatever community you're supposed to bond with in order to secure your 'privacy'. In the USA, I was stunned by the constant level of scrutinity you're exposed to, from everyone. Maybe you don't have to show ID and payslips at home, but do you think your neighbours know more or less about you ? I think that's the main difference between us and you : in the US you basically have more trust in your neighbours than in your governement, in France we trust more our administration (on which the gov't has basically no power) than our neighbours. And mind you, I prefer it this way. Especially considering that a constant in criminology, regardless of the country, is that 80% of crimes are committed by relatives, friends and neighbours.

    14. Re:France! by langelgjm · · Score: 2, Informative
      As an American student currently living in France, I thought I'd add my two centimes.

      I recommend France to anyone looking to make the plunge. It's what I did, and you really can't beat it. Good food, beautiful women, nice people.


      Hm. I live in Nice, and if your idea of a beautiful woman is one that chain-smokes and has more piercings than fingers, come on over. I know it's not like that everywhere (Nice is particularly bad in this respect), but still. At least the smoking in public places will be going in 2007-2008.

      There are some things I'm not entirely happy about. Police here can ask you for ID on the streets (though it's never happened to me)


      It happened to me twice in less than two months. I have a theory about why, too - I think it's because I'm brown. Seriously, though, in over 20 years of living in the US I have never been stopped by the police. Be prepared for it here - _always_ carry ID.

      In all, I really can't recommend France as a place to live for disenchanted Americans (and yes, I do speak French). It's a blast to visit, but I'd never want to live here.

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    15. Re:France! by terrymr · · Score: 1

      Hm. I live in Nice, and if your idea of a beautiful woman is one that chain-smokes and has more piercings than fingers, come on over.

      Have you been back to the USA lately ?

    16. Re:France! by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1
      Good food, beautiful women, nice people.

      ... riots, burning cars, a large angry underclass.

    17. Re:France! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would love to move to France. I'd much rather move to a nonEnglish-speaking country; if I'm going to change countries, then I want it to be a major change (which is why I rule out Canada, England and Australia). Also, the politics there are much more enlightened than here in the US (with more parties to vote for than just the tweedle dee/tweedle dum Demopublicans/Republicrats we have), and the people are more educated and cultured. Seriously, the US population is getting stupider at an alarming rate, across the entire socio-economic spectrum.

      I've taken 2 semesters of French at a local college and am currently taking a 3rd semester course. I figure after I finish the 4th semester I should know enough to get by in France. The one thing my French prof told us is that it's very difficult for an American to get a job there. So I'm very interested in the details about getting work there. I work in IT (programmer/sysadmin, I could do either) and I would like to do that in France. In the meantime, I'll keep playing with my French Linux system I set up on a spare ordinateur, complete with a French AZERTY keyboard. :) There are things I still like about the US, but things are going down the toilet here. I always thought that it would get better here, but I've given up on that. The country is being run by a group of total bastards, and it doesn't look like that's going to change, so I definitely want out.

    18. Re:France! by David+Off · · Score: 1

      > france aerobase mayle point org

      he means "at" as in "@" not aerobase - dontcha just love these expats who are oh so immersed in the French culture zey eeer cannot speek zee English no more?

    19. Re:France! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi,

      Do you have any source for the emigration numbers? I'd be interested to know, as a Frenchman who left his own country, if that is really true...

    20. Re:France! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like South Central LA.

    21. Re:France! by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1
      Just like South Central LA.

      One reason people might want to move away from the US.

    22. Re:France! by SysKoll · · Score: 2, Interesting

      french people are emigrating fast, at a rate of 100,000 to 200,000 each year, and it has been going like this for years already (2+ million people left the country, compare this with Cuba). This is the most massive exodus this country has ever known since the French Revolution ! There are reasons behind this continuous stream of people, reasons for fleeing this country.

      Parent is right, we are witnessing a mass exodus of Frenchmen with marketable skills. To give you an idea, when the 18th century Kings of France offered 40 acres and a mule to French farmers accepting to go colonize the New World, less than 50,000 Frenchman ever accepted and left the country. We aren't talking Ireland here: The French historically never emigrated massively. If they are suddenly doing so, there must be a problem.

      Indeed, engineers and scientists are fleeing to England and the US, mostly. This is not good for a country that heavily spends on public universities and has low tuition. It means that the French taxpayers are subsidizing foreign countries to the detriment of their own.

      Also, there is a massive level of illegal immigration in France, and the illegals are, in their majority, unable to occupy a high-tech job for lack of qualification (by definition, immigrants with marketable skills don't need to be illegal, they will easily go through the work permit procedures). Most of the illegals end up in either low-paid jobs or on the dole, thus requiring social services paid by the taxpayer.

      Conclusion: This means that France is effectively swapping highly qualified workers for unskilled immigrants. French taxes are quite high as a result, and more importantly, the country's future is bleak: this continuous brain drain cannot improve an already bad situation.

      When President Chirac was challenged by journalists about this problem, he said that skilled workers leaving the country are "making room for unemployed people". This clearly shows the French elites are clueless: high tech jobs are hard to fill, and retraining unemployed people to take these jobs is rarely a solution. Especially when they arrive from a poor country and lack even basic skills.

      The OECD has nice little graphs showing the level of general government spending in various countries, which is to say, how much of the country's production ends up in the government's pocket. Right now, France is at about 54% and still growing: Out of 8 hours, you work 4 hours and 20 minutes for the government in France. As a comparison, the US is at 26%, The UK at 34%.

      I fail to see why a Slashdot reader would want to move to a country that will tax him/her so highly in order to support such a disastrous policy and such moronic, disconnected elites.

      --

      --
      Mad science! Robots! Underwear! Cute girls! Full comic online! http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/

    23. Re:France! by MichelP · · Score: 1

      I have often considered France. I'm originally French, but moved to the US when I was 1 yr old back in '64. What is stopping me? I married an American woman and have children - it would take a mutual decision to go. Other than my immediate family, all my family is back in France. The importance of family is much stronger in France than in the US - the US has a material worth issue, and I suffer from it as well. On the flip-side, I know a French man who decided to move to the US - he got a high paying job, but he will miss out on the cheese, corner bakeries and small cafes that you can walk to from your house. Michel

    24. Re:France! by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1
      "Police here can ask you for ID on the streets"

      The police here in the U.S. technically can't, but they lie about it to intimidate you. I've been threatened with arrest simply for not having an ID on my person. The truth is that if you're suspected of a crime, they can detain you until you're positively identified. And of course, all they have to do is lie about suspecting you of a crime. As everyone knows, pigs here don't think twice about filing false reports and lying in court.

    25. Re:France! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just for you to improve your language (which seems pretty good) :

      En ce moment je prends un cours à (maybe you don't have any keyboard with accents) l'Alliance Française en Hollande pour mieux apprendre la langue. Ce n'est pas une langue très difficile, mais je ne suis pas sûr :-).

    26. Re:France! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't worry about the French emigrating, there's a constant stream of Brits willing to populate the deserted countryside. Give it another 50 years and the Duchy of Normandy will be back in all but name.

    27. Re:France! by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Do you have any source for the emigration numbers? I'd be interested to know, as a Frenchman who left his own country, if that is really true...

      I second that, as a Frenchman who's planning on leaving his own country within the next 2-3 years, mostly since I hardly could find any figures.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    28. Re:France! by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      In fact being critical of the executive powers is the national sport here.

      Best example of this was how a few years ago at the beginning of a soccer match, we whistled at our own national anthem as Jacques Chirac was there (he didn't really appreciate, to tell you the truth). Just imagine americans whistling at their own national anthem at the beginning of an american football game, in presence of George Bush.

      Anyways yeah I agree that we too have more and more reasons to flee or own country, these reasons being quite comparable to the reasons why left-wing americans want to flee the USA, the loss of freedoms, a libertarianism only getting wilder and wilder (although americans and others have quite some advance on this), and a smell of new-formula facism in the air.

      I think things will change quickly tho, next may comes the presidential election, and things will seem either much better if Ségolène Royal wins, and even much worse if Nicolas Sarkozy wins.

      We'll soon literally play "double or nothing"

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    29. Re:France! by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      The result is simple: the country is almost ready to accept a dictator as long as the police will continue to focus on non-whites, half of the new laws are written in reaction to the last headlines and can be resumed in "this kind of crime will be more punished when done in xxx situation".

      I think that it's a too one-sided analyse of the situation. The people you're talking about match more to the right-wing half of the country than anything else, because if you look at things on the other side, you'll see that people on that side have quite some fear and hate for both Sarkozy and Le Pen, whichever fits the descrption of the dictator you were talking about.

      And I think you're pretty much right to compare Nicolas Sarkozy to George Bush, because although Sarkozy is as you said fairly meaner and smarter than George Bush, both get much love from the right-wing voters, both get much hate/fear from the left-wing voters, both are somewhere between classical conservatism and neo-facism, and thus both makes people from all sides wantr to vote either for them or against them.

      Funny tho how your post is mainly all about Sarkozy, and you won't even mention his name once. I'm sure I'm not taking much chances by guessing that you're on the side of those who hate/fear him? ;-)

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    30. Re:France! by Stiefel · · Score: 1

      Hi Dmayle, do you have any good way to find jobs listed in Sophia Antipolis? I am a IT Professional (R&D) looking for a new job...

    31. Re:France! by G-funk · · Score: 1

      America not free enough? Move to France! That way you can be free! So long as you don't want any freedom of speech. And you're happy to move again in 30 years when the majority population instigates sharia law and your sister's no longer allowed outside with her face showing.

      "Wow I'm really out of controll on this France thing... For a minute there I nearly left the building and took Jerry Lewis hostage"

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    32. Re:France! by slashbart · · Score: 1

      Merci beaucoup!

    33. Re:France! by Jesrad · · Score: 1

      According to this Figaro article, french living abroad have increased in number by 40.5% over the last decade, reching over 2 million. The proportion of engineers leaving the country to find a job has doubled. There are already over 300,000 french living in London, making it one of the largest french cities by comparison.

      There is also this Time article dating from 2000 but which simply calls this emigration "the french exodus".

      If you can read fench, then this french Senate report on emigration has a lot of numbers although it's from 1999. Its conclusions leave little doubt:
      - french emigration has accelerated a lot
      - this emigration concerns people with a high level of education, the number of french studying abroad has doubled in a decade
      - the number of french fleeing the ISF (taxation of high net worth) has increased dramatically though it only concerns a small fraction of this emigration
      - the number of french people staying abroad instead of coming back has tripled over the 16 years the study spans

      --
      Maybe we deserve this world ?
  104. my answers: by Goeland86 · · Score: 1

    1) In Europe, wherever I find a suitable job. Or in Japan. Doesn't have to be someplace where I'm a citizen, just where I'm happy with what's going on, and where I have a chance of making a happy living, not necessarily rich, but at least enjoying my lifestyle.

    2) Haven't finished my degree in school yet. Don't want to bother transferring to a foreign country.

    --
    ---- I am certain of only one thing : I know nothing else.
  105. In the words of Horace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wherever I went, I was the same person. Ergo, I was pissed off and unhappy because that's what I started out as. I've attempted to change that.

    Coelum non animum mutant qui trans mare currunt.

    "Skies, not their souls, are changed for those who cross the sea". Horace, Epistulae I, 11 v.27.

    Now you can say it in Latin :)

  106. hmm by locksmith101 · · Score: 1

    well I got 2 questions for you: why did you go to England? and what made you leave America?

  107. So True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mexico really should be a wealthy country. They have a wealth of natural resources. They are a member of OPEC after all. They are next door to one of the wealthiest nations on Earth.

    Mexico's problem is really corruption. Massive amounts of it. I mean you may complain about the US and well the UN, but Latin America is trying to Silver Medal in the Global Corruption Olympics (Africa is the out and out Gold Medal winner.) And this creates Mexico's problem. Why do anything if corruption is just going to take away your hard work? So, you are left with two choices (a) be lazy, or (b) leave.

    You'll notice anyone near the US border that has anything resembling ambition has left for the US. Those left are just pathetically lazy. Now you get far enough away (Mexico City) and it becomes easier for the ambitious people to work within Mexico than to flee. But the areas close to the border are drained of ambitious people.

    For the record, race doesn't matter. Culture does.
    To figure out the good cultures from the bad, figure out where people are moving from and to. Americans aren't making rafts out of '57 Chevys to get to Cuba. Americans aren't crossing a dessert and selling themselves to human traffickers to get to Mexico.
    But of course if you do this kind of analysis you are a racist.
    We can't judge. All cultures are equal, except for the US which is bad. Developing a cure or at least way to make a manageable disease out of AIDS and stoning an woman to death for not wearing a veil; those are morally equivalent. We can't judge. Just part of the diversity that is the strength of our multicultural society.

    1. Re:So True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Monterrey "is the third most populated city and the second most important metropolitan area in Mexico. The city is ranked as the highest GDP per capita and the most secure in Latin America."
      It is just 3 hours away from the USA border, and you're just a racist asshole.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monterrey

    2. Re:So True by xtracto · · Score: 4, Informative

      Mexico's problem is really corruption. Massive amounts of it. I mean you may complain about the US and well the UN, but Latin America is trying to Silver Medal in the Global Corruption Olympics (Africa is the out and out Gold Medal winner.) And this creates Mexico's problem. Why do anything if corruption is just going to take away your hard work? So, you are left with two choices (a) be lazy, or (b) leave.

      Although the other poster disagreed with you (calling you racist) I completely agree. People wont understand how deeply is corruption mixed in Mexican's mind. I am a Mexican and I can see it. It is when you live or visit other countries were you find out that in my country corruption has become a natural way of life.

      I marked in bold the statement you wrote which has been my feeling a lot of times in ACADEMIA. The first time it happened to my mom who is a teacher at a Mexico's university, she is the founder (and was the coordinator) of the Biology career in certain University. Everything was allright when she founded the career (with the backup of the maximum authority of the university called the "Rector" in Mexico). Then as soon as this person was changed, the department director started to make things hard because he thought that my mom wanted his place. My mom would NEVER going to be department director because that purely administrative.

      The other was when I was in the bachelors degree; one of my teachers was daughter of the Rector (in another university). The department was basically divided in two groups, one where the Computer Scientists were and the other where the Soft. Eng. people where (this groups is where the daughter was).

      I had a lot of problems in the last years because I used to talk and meet a lot with the Comp. Sci. people. The Soft. Eng. people were trying to get some permanent positions in the department (called "plaza") and they made a very dirty war against the Comp Sci. people.

      Anyway, corruption is frustrating in Mexico, but as I stated in another post, it is that way because most people have learnt to live with it and to get something from it.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    3. Re:So True by capc75 · · Score: 1

      Mexico corruption is really bad, I lived in Mexico for 29 years and now I live in USA working hard so I can apply for residence. I'm glad to live in the US, with the recent events in Mexico City with all the political battle and Lopez Obrador causing major problems to the city. I really miss my family, culture, and a bunch of things. It has been hard to adapt to US culture but quality of life is a lot better.

      As a kid you learn that when the police stops you for speeding you give them 50.00 pesos and they will let you go, that is what we see everyday, of course when you are older you do the same, unless you study an re-evaluate your principles you stop doing that kind of things. Now I understand why police men are so corrupt, they have to pay for the car tires, bullets, uniforms, and some other stuff, with the money that the city pays they can't afford that and support their families. Some years ago the city paid a ridiculous amount of money to Rudy Giuliani to give some advice so solve the increasing crimes in the city, on of the first suggestions was to pay a decent salary to the police men.

      The only solution to the corruption in Mexico is education so future generations learn not to bribe public workers, but that will take a long time and a lot of money.

      I think Mexico could use a lot better the relation with the US and the closeness, why so many IT firms outsource projects to India, if the government, universities and businesses invest more on IT staff and teach English to their employees a lot of the outsourcing could go to Mexico, easier for managers to go to Mexico to see the progress, similar time zone, easier to flight people, etc. Now it's too late, India has done a really good job.

      I think Mexico is wasting some opportunities, the government should gice incentives to some big transnational companies to open research centers, and not just sell products, that leaves nothing in the long term. That will help a lot to universities and in the long term to make our own technology instead of just manufacturing, that is good for now but at any time they could move to other place.

      If I could get a decent job outside the major cities, and that place had a decent infrastructure I would go back to Mexico, but I don't think that is going to happen any time soon.

      If you want to live in one of the most exiting dynamic cities in the world go there, people are usually nice.

    4. Re:So True by cromano · · Score: 1

      For an AC, you attracted a lot of varied, interesting responses. Good for you. 8-)
      Some ramblings from another ex-pat Mexican (not in the US):

      Mexico really should be a wealthy country. They have a wealth of natural resources. They are a member of OPEC after all. They are next door to one of the wealthiest nations on Earth.

      Mexico is not part of OPEC. Although production levels fluctuate, it is generally considered the largest non-OPEC oil producer, and the largest producer of silver, amongst several other things.

      Mexico's problem is really corruption. Massive amounts of it. I mean you may complain about the US and well the UN, but Latin America is trying to Silver Medal in the Global Corruption Olympics (Africa is the out and out Gold Medal winner.) And this creates Mexico's problem.

      Not incorrect, but oversimplified. First, Latin America is big and varied - corruption and similar issues are very different in Mexico, Chile, Bolivia or Costa Rica. But yes, there is a lot of corruption in Mexico. About this, three thoughts:

      • The low-level corruption of bribery-for-everything, double books, unbridled abuse of bureaucratic authority, is way down. Still too high by any "expectations", but certainly not what it was in the 70s or 80s. I remember. More people today do take a personal stand on "doing the right thing", if there are ways of doing it legally.
      • The armed corruption of all kinds (cops, armed forces, federales, unnofficial shock groups) is as bad or worse as it used to be. This, in my opinion, is the biggest problem: abuse of power through intimidation and repression, including beating people to death, raping female prisoners, and essentially disappearing people. The worst incidents do happen less often (only three or so this term), but you always know that anyone with a gun is not your friend, regardless of badge or paperwork.
      • The greatest increasing corruption nowadays is first-world, US-style corruption of institutions and lawmaking. The concentration of wealth at the top has increased drastically, as have the amount of "sold-out" legislation, giving away media, farms, control and sovereignty to "the few", either local "old money" families or overreaching multinational interests (the usual suspects). These few tend to control several of the armed groups noted above.
      This third point is at the root of the increased migration issue. Thanks to overreaching legislation, special interests & US farm subsidies, vast amounts of farms are closing, and farmers losing their livelihood. Sure, it would be convenient for you if they just starved to death quietly in their ghost towns, but some of them start walking to where there seems to be stuff for them to do.

      It's like wallmart. Big wallmart opens in a small town, all mom&pop shops can't compete, are forced to close, and work for slave wages & conditions at wallmart. Such is the wisdom of the invisible hand, just different people find different wallmarts.

      Of course, it's way more complicated than that.

      Why do anything if corruption is just going to take away your hard work? So, you are left with two choices (a) be lazy, or (b) leave.

      There are more choices. The adage for the US used to be "love it, leave it, or change it". You can also change it from afar.

      Cheers,
      Random Lurker.

    5. Re:So True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Americans aren't crossing a dessert and selling themselves to human traffickers to get to Mexico.

      The Federales would just confiscate the dessert anyway....

    6. Re:So True by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I think Mexico could use a lot better the relation with the US and the closeness, why so many IT firms outsource projects to India, if the government, universities and businesses invest more on IT staff and teach English to their employees a lot of the outsourcing could go to Mexico, easier for managers to go to Mexico to see the progress, similar time zone, easier to flight people, etc. Now it's too late, India has done a really good job.

      It is hard to sell us on better relations if the result is yet more offshoring of IT jobs. I've seen IT people driven from their homes due to offshoring.

  108. singapore! by laggist · · Score: 1

    we've got sun, sand, sea, and 2 new casinos coming up!! =)

  109. Nigeriaz Department of Immtegration by Phoinix · · Score: 1

    Here in the Nigerian Peninsula, we have lots of money and business opportunities for you to harvest; yes, here money grows in the fields and you can come to harvest it.

    Send us a check and we will grant you an exclusive citizenship.

    Act now, citizenships are limited.

    Send all yourZ checks and moneyZ to meez...

  110. New Zealand by Tainek · · Score: 1

    As a UK Dweller my whole life me and my girlfreind have made the decision to move to New Zealand in a few years time.

    After a trip over there last summer to stay with family, we decided the quality of life over there is fantastic, the nation as a whole is more open minded and free thinking (doesnt have americas hangups on sex, or The UK's hangups on violence for example) House prices are pretty reasonable, and of course, cant forget the scenery (Remember LOTR)

    So as soon as ive finished my uni degree, its off over there

  111. Socialists by duncan+bayne · · Score: 0, Troll

    With all the socialists here on Slashdot, I'm surprised China, North Korea and Cuba haven't been mentioned as potential destinations.

    1. Re:Socialists by Broken_Ladder · · Score: 0

      Hah! Yeah, that's what keeps me in the U.S. As a Libertarian, I sometimes get insanely sickened by this country on social issues, and our fondness for horrible suburbia, religion, creationism, etc. But we are pretty capitalist, with a lot fewer tax-funded social services than most any European country (at least that I know of). We have freedom of speech in our constitution. We drive on the right side of the road (which is why I could NEVER live in Australia)!

      You show me a place with more constitutionally guaranteed freedoms, and lower taxes, fewer social services, and a more socially liberal culture, and I'll consider moving there. As far as I can tell, we are by far the free-est country there is. And with the free state project (lots of Libertarians moving to the state of New Hampshire) we might eventually have a state in the U.S. where there are virtually no state taxes, or laws which unfairly restrict personal freedom or property rights. Drool.

    2. Re:Socialists by Colonel+Angus · · Score: 1

      Not to nitpick, but:

      Cuba - communist
      DPRK - communist
      China - communist

      Countries like Canada and many European countries might be labeled socialist with their vast social safety nets that are funded through increased taxes. The countries you mentioned are not socialist, they're communist and they're lead by dictators.

    3. Re:Socialists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "our fondness for horrible suburbia, religion, creationism, etc"

      "You show me a place with more constitutionally guaranteed freedoms"

      Sounds to me like you'd be happy where everyone thinks how you think, and would outlaw those that thought differently. You want more freedom, but outlaw that religion stuff? Remind me not to live where you live.

  112. Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know why I haven't seen more plugs for Japan. Language issues and tacit exclusionary tactics to ward off foreigners aside, Japan is a fantastic country. It values hard work and education, people are immensely considerate in public places, and the political sphere is boring (because they debate relevant political issues, and don't construct abstract notions of a culture war). The middle class may be declining, but there is already growing sentiment that the government should help do something about this.

    Oh, and yeah, with an aging population Japan needs immigrants.

  113. Definitely NOT New Zealand by GreatDrok · · Score: 2, Funny

    Seriously, stay out. New Zealand doesn't need Americans. You wouldn't fit in! Believe me, the best place for Americans is America. Nowhere else is as suitable for you so just stay put.

    (for the humour impared *JOKE*!)

    --
    "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
    1. Re:Definitely NOT New Zealand by sallgeud · · Score: 2

      It's funny you say that... I felt more welcomed in NZ [as an American] than anywhere I've ever been. The hospitality is phenominal, and the number of things to do is just amazing. Beach today glacier tomorrow? Done.

      In one of my first trips to the country I found a house I loved on the Whangarei area, north of Auckland. I ended up purchasing the house after I returned to the US. Unfortunately, due to circumstances in my life, I was unable to move and had to sell the house. I still dream of moving there one day as it's the most beautiful place in the world (IMHO).

      It seems as though Wellington is more of a Tech center now days, from what I hear. I noticed more big names on buildings in Auckland and was wondering if that's true. Really, I'd take living anywhere on either island, just so long as I could stay further north in the winter.

    2. Re:Definitely NOT New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I at least visit? I won't stay long, I promise. Please advise.

    3. Re:Definitely NOT New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was that really a joke? Maybe I'll go somewhere more witty instead (what the ..! hey your post worked!).

    4. Re:Definitely NOT New Zealand by GreatDrok · · Score: 1

      As someone who lived there for 8 years and then moved to the UK I have to say that NZ is *THE* place to be for sure. I went back on holiday last year and did all the fun stuff I could think of. Met up with old friends and had a brilliant time. Came back to the UK with the burning desire to move back to NZ and have put it into action. Currently in the last stages of getting a skilled migrant visa. Not decided where to live, its all good. Quite keen on the South Island though. Took up flying recently and there is some serious country down there :-)

      Whangarei is really nice though. Heck, I wouldn't mind Wellington to be honest. You really really should do your best to make the move. Everyone is welcome. Even Brits although we do get a lot of stick :-D

      --
      "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
  114. anoland! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i dream of a place (probably in the Spratly Islands since its warm and unclaimed still) where nerds are free to rule, it'd be a place without badgering politics but it would also be an information haven without political agenda. everyone would have a fiber connection, live in teepee huts and have a quantum computer, that nations income will be solely based on IT as like isl of man is based on banking, think of it as Eureka of a free nation. but then again it doesn't have to be an island, we could hijack a cruise ship in international waters and keep it there creating our own 'sealand' for the masses, discuss the deteriation of free speach and write 'bush sucks' emails every day, and have a tradable currency based on experience for those out of anoland trips. remember, peace not war!

    thats just my dream :( talk to me on anonet if interested, oh the part thats stopping me is the initial capital, i am open to suggestions or donations.

  115. Name one by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    What "personal freedom" have you lost since the 70's?

    Honestly.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Name one by rkcallaghan · · Score: 1
      SuperKendall wrote:
      What "personal freedom" have you lost since the 70's?

      I'm not the original AC, but I will answer this. I am not allowed to work within the United States anymore. I'm not a criminal, my most severe crime is a traffic violation. I'm not a leper, or carrying any contagious diseases. I am not physically disabled, and fully capable of performing all normal activities. I am a natural born citizen, born from a white, christian family of financial respect.

      I have a legal dispute with the Social Security Administration; one that I have already settled once in court and the SSA continues to refuse to honor the court order to fix up my records. Long story jammed in to a slashpost here: SSA's records on me are screwy. I didn't find out until I left the job I had pre-9/11 and went to get a new one later. I've since been to court, where everyone of merit spoke on my behalf, doctors, friends, relatives, even my bank manager. The court agreed with me and issued an order to repair the records. SSA is refusing to comply, citing un-named legal restrictions "ever since 9/11". The ultimate effect on this is that anyone who does a now required "employment eligibility verification" (or something to that effect) gets told that my ID doesn't match the records they have and thus I am a fraud and am not eligible.

      I haven't worked since 2002. I've lost the "personal freedom" to have a job. Before you tell me to get an attorney or go to some organization for free help -- realize I've been doing these things for 4 years now, and its mighty difficult with no income. The ACLU doesn't want my case (not high profile enough) and no attorney wants to do anything that involves security changes after 9/11 pro bono.

      ~Rebecca
  116. down under by revolu7ion · · Score: 1

    Australia is swell, just look out for stingrays

    --
    Jesus Saves
  117. Nice try by tinkerton · · Score: 1

    Nice try in scaring us away and keeping everything to yourself.

    But we're not falling for it :) We're coming!

  118. Lots of places by bm_luethke · · Score: 1

    Of course, given that I am part of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy (or, rather, if there really was one I would want to be a part given my political ideals) I'm not really one you are interested in hearing from. But, I will answer anyway. It may also tell you where you do not want to go (even though my list is similar to left wingers).

    My first choice would be Canada. While there have been places there I detested there are also places I've felt more at home than most places in the US (I'm from East Tennessee). It was true in both geography and culture - plus there is some *great* hunting and fishing in the more remote areas that would be open to me. Canada is more like us than not (and is, thus, a really bad place to move is you decide you hate the US - you have a VERY similar split based on geography and the right wingers will one day take over - just as the left wingers will one day get power back in the US).

    I suppose next would be Australia. Having never been there I can only go by what I have seen on TV and there is a lot to like. Nice people and enough technology to be happy with a lot of wilderness to have fun in.

    I've known quite a few Italians and they were almost all people I liked. I like the food and what I know of the culture. Though I would most likely choose the more rural parts than the cities - though I would choose one of their large cities over ours.

    Next would be much of the Netherlands. It's just looks like a nice place to live. Again, almost no experience to speak of - just what I have seen on TV.

    After that - dunno. Germany, Britain, Spain, and other major western countries I either do not like or know next to nothing about (though, since I have not been in most of the countries I can not say definitively - I have to go by TV and that is a horrid source for information). South American and African countries fall into the same category - I see places I would love to be and places I would hate and they are in the same state so I can not make an accurate estimation. Eastern countries are still mostly not nice places to live.

    The far east (like Japan) are so different culturally I do not know what to think or how I would fit in but I suspect many would be places I would like.

    --
    ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
    1. Re:Lots of places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've known quite a few Italians and they were almost all people I liked. I like the food and what I know of the culture. Though I would most likely choose the more rural parts than the cities - though I would choose one of their large cities over ours.


      It used to be a great country but nowadays the population imported too much US culture.
      Not recomended right now. I'll move for Italy Switzerland or France any day.
  119. Immigration by dJOEK · · Score: 1

    I'm seeing a lot of Aus/NZ answers here, and boy am i ever tempted now!

    the Big question is, how do you get in? How are immigration laws? Have you ran into trouble immigrating to NZ?
    have you had any trouble INTEGRATING there? Is there an F1 button once you're there?

    --
    Exercise caution when modding this message up: the author acts like a jerk when his karma is excellent.
    1. Re:Immigration by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      No offence intended - the main tip to integrating in Australia is to STOP BEING SO ANNOYING.

      I guess not all of American culture translates to Australia. We are generally more laid back and less demanding/arrogant. "No worries" is a common philosophy. Service levels are lower (no tips) and thus you'll have to be more patient. Consumerism isnt quite so rampant in the sense that shops may have limited trading hours, competition isnt as fierce as the US etc.

      The visa arrangements between US and Australia are pretty good, but I'm not sure about Immigration. Typically if you can be sponsored by your work or can demonstrate you are a skilled worker then it's OK.

  120. Re:... where would I move? Not Finland! by bananaendian · · Score: 1, Funny

    Finland Sucks!

    Don't come to Finland

    It's an ice desert here where polar bears have fled from because it was too cold. In fact its so cold that people write things like Linux just to get out of the country or invent mobile phones so that they can heat their brains with the radiation.

    If you think your foreign policy sucks, well we don't have a foreign policy - we just agree with everybody. Our press and media is free in away - free to be utterly boring. And our country's economy and social well being are so strong that nobody really cares one way or the other anymore.

    If only the Russians would attack us again so we could beat the hell out of somebody - sometimes its very therapeutic to have a fight...

    PS: go to Sweden instead - they are very 'friendly' there...

    --
    www.tribalnetworks.org - helping tribal people around the world to own their own means of high-tech communications
  121. Why would I want to leave? by Rakishi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First of all I'm a dual US-EU citizen and lack much nationalism for any country.

    Honestly, I don't see any country which is better than the US for an intelligent, sometimes driven individual in terms of opportunities. While there has been some erosion of personal freedoms and various systems are fucked (patent system, copyright, social security, etc.) I keep reading similar problems in other countries. England is going big brother on its people, France and Germany has a screwed over society in term of work, Eastern Europe is just a cluster fuck.

    At worst I'll make my money and wait till the shit is flying at the fan and then leave, the joy of having dual citizenship.

  122. I can answer one of those questions... by krotkruton · · Score: 1

    Answer to question 2: question 1

  123. england or latin america by flamelord · · Score: 0

    i probably will move at some point. But it's a big thing, a big move, not just sort of pack some suitcases and off to the airport we go. you have to find the spot and the people first.

  124. New Zealand by TheBiGW · · Score: 1

    For the fact that if you pick your spot right you can have beaches and snowboarding right on your doorstep. However, the things that stop me from going are that it is a bit of a one-way trip if you do move out there (I live in England at the moment and moving back home again if I chose to do so would be very expensive), and also it's damn far away so I wouldn't be able to stay in touch with friends and family as easily as I do now. Also I've heard that IT jobs are few and far between. Can any residents there comment?

    --
    Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for an hour. Set him on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
  125. You get used to Not Cold, too :-) by billstewart · · Score: 1
    I used to live in upstate New York, where the winter temperatures were regularly 0-10F/-10--20C in the daytime, and grew up in the mid-Atlantic where it's usually cold though not usually that cold in the winter, and hot and humid in both places in the summer. You do get used to it, and it really is pretty in the winter sometimes.


    Now I live in Silicon Valley, and except for two months of rain during the winter, if I don't like the temperature I can drive a short distance and find whatever temperature I'd prefer, though it's never really too hot or too cold, and the mountains and ocean are nearby. You get used to that too, surprisingly bloody fast - it's annoying to be a wimp about it, but hey, it was cold enough today that I wore a long-sleeved shirt. (My real problem with going to cold places these days is that most of my really-cold-weather clothing has worn out, so I don't have a decent ski jacket any more, and there's no reason to buy one around here.)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  126. Do It Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm an American who has been living in Europe for 12 years now. I love it here and would never go back. While it was hard to adjust the first year, but it was one of the best decisions I have ever made. I've lived in Berlin and Prague and currently I live in Zurich, Switzerland. I can recommend any of these. If you can't speak a foreign language, then the Scandanavian countries are best, but it's also possible in most other countries, such Czech and Switzerland, as well. Ask around: There are American expats in every country you might be interested in.

    Up until recently, I would have said that someone emigrating from the US for political reasons was being a bit silly -- administrations change. The only valid reason to emigrate was if you enjoy the culture and lifestyle of your selected country. If you're running away from something, rather than being pulled toward it, you're going for the wrong reason.

    Everything's changed now. When the Military Commissions Act was signed, legally allowing Americans to be denied habeus corpus, the right to a trial, everything changed. I would actually recommend any U.S. citizen to emigrate immediately. This is no longer question of political ideas, left vs. right, liberal vs. conservative. It's not even a warning sign. It's the first lightning strike of a very bad storm. Those that get out of a storm's path early are always ok. It's only those that wanted to stay (or had to stay), for whatever reason, that get hurt. Just do it, and do it now.

  127. If only they would by Sir+Runcible+Spoon · · Score: 1

    I think it was Phil Collins that said that if Labour ever got into power he would go to live in the States.

    Yoo Hoo! Go on Phil, push off!

    1. Re:If only they would by paedobear · · Score: 1

      I thought he lived in Switzerland now, for tax reasons? Then again, he's a man with bad taste enough to tell his wife he was asking for a divorce by fax.

  128. Thats easy... by Roy+van+Rijn · · Score: 1

    Second Life, forget the first :)

    1. Re:Thats easy... by Petrushka · · Score: 1

      Considering the mountains and mountains of problems involved in moving across real-world borders, it's slightly scary to say I find that a somewhat insightful answer.

  129. Vancouver is really cool by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Back in the 70s, when I was having to think about options to the Vietnam War draft, the only parts of Canada I'd seen had been the Frozen North, i.e. Toronto and Montreal Sudbury and other places within 50 miles of the US border and east of the Rockies. It was ok, but not attractive - when I visited Vancouver as an adult, I realized there'd been a whole other range of options I'd have been happy to have known about :-) Fortunately my lottery number was safe, and it was the last year of the draft, so I never had to explore it.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Vancouver is really cool by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      ...but not as cool as Edmonton! :-)

  130. Chicago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chicago has a VERY good public transport system. DC is okay.

  131. Belgium by euroBob · · Score: 1

    I am an American living in Belgium. I have been ever since Bush took office in 2000.

    Free health care, education, broadband everywhere, soft drugs tolerancy, non massive biased media, a government that works, people who care about one another... Ohhh yeah I am missing the states for sure :)

    --
    try { println( SigString ); } catch( Exception e ) { println( 'Who cares?' ); }
    1. Re:Belgium by DiscoFreq · · Score: 1

      I see you worked for a department that a lot of countries need: "Dienst Voor Administratieve Vereenvoudiging": service for administrative simplification :)

      As you live near Leuven (like me), you can also add the efforts they do for cultural events, the number of pubs,... :)

    2. Re:Belgium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      soft drugs tolerancy
      I wonder if there is any country in the world where a person could grow marijuana in their front yard without persecution?
    3. Re:Belgium by Ham_belony · · Score: 0

      Well you can't grow it in your front yard in Belgium, that is for sure. But you can grow a plant behind the kitchenwindow as long as the window is not facing the street or anything public. For tolerance, you won't get prosecuted for being in possesion of less then 5 grams of marijuana but if you are caught, they reposses the marijuana and they will give you an administrative fine, which is just a piece of paper and that is it. But if you get caught driving a car while smoking or having smoked marijuana, you will get prosecuted and you will get a penalty similar to drugposession.

    4. Re:Belgium by Ham_belony · · Score: 0

      A goverment that works? Depends which of all the goverments we have you mean. I only see only goverment work right now and that is the flemish government. The federal government is a joke! The Walloon Government is a Joke! Once going to the more southern part of Belgium, the walloon region, you will see that even democratic countries were some governments work, there is still way too much possibilities for politicians to get corrupted, especially like the PS where they have been in power for way too long.

  132. If not America then... ? by Eden.Inc · · Score: 1

    If you happen to reside in the USA or in Canada then the natural choice (with regards to language and for some of you, climate) is Australia. Should you balk at such a response, then you've got to ask yourself what you want from a country. Do you want beach? *tick* Do you want beer? *tick* Do you want babes? *tick* If you happen to choose your "cushy and well paid I.T. job in the USA" in favour of any or all of the above, please consult your local physician. Enough said. :-)

  133. I've already left by C4st13v4n14 · · Score: 0

    I wasn't born in the US but my parents were so I gained citizenship at birth. We lived in several countries before I finally moved there, though I was too young to remember most of it. I remember living on a boat in Amsterdam (Steiger 13), and a little bit about Nepal and India. I don't remember New Zealand or Iceland, though I've been back to Iceland several time since and lived there for several months. Despite this, I grew up for the most part in the States just like anyone who was born there. My parents were different than most of the other upper middle class and I learned much about the outside world and had important lessons like not to hate homosexuals and people who were "different," unlike most of my high school classmates. It wasn't until my senior year of high school and first year of university that I woke up. My mind had matured and been opened sufficiently to introspection by then that when I travelled abroad, I knew I couldn't go back. I visited London and Paris (and many things in-between) on a trip organised through a teacher at my high school. That was the starting point of my awaking. The final point was a few months later when I visited Montréal, Québec with some friends from my university (I went to RPI, a couple of hours from the Canadian border). It was then that realised how different I am from most Americans and why I never felt like I fit in there. To make a long story short, I travelled to Canada and to Europe quite a bit during my university years. I finished my undergraduate degree and moved to Cambridge, MA to further my studies. After obtaining the level of education that I wanted to seek there, and after experiencing all the America I could stand, I finally moved back to The Netherlands where I sought entrance to medical school. So many things in my life have gotten better since that decision to leave, and nothing has gotten worse. I've since moved away from NL to better places but I regret nothing, I've not looked back, and I would do it again in an instant. In retrospect, I can see now that it helped to be the person I am and be from the family that I'm from to make easier what people would call a drastic change in life. However, I would like to emphasise that I did this all myself without financial assistance from my family. In all modesty, even if I didn't possess the qualities of determination and intelligence that I do, I would have still found a way to make it happen. One could argue, though, that experience and intelligence are what helped me to realise all of this in the first place. To answer your question, I've felt most at home in Scandinavia and I believe it is here that I will spend the rest of my life. I am currently training as a radiologist in Norway. If I do decide to go somewhere, then perhaps it will be somewhere in the UK. Scotland, Wales, and Ireland are fantastic. I come to slashdot everyday to read the news and it is partially do to this that I have absolutely no desire to go back to the States. It might be interesting for you to note that my brother, who was born in the States, has finished school and is living in New York City. He possesses the same desire to leave that I did and once I get sufficiently settled into my new career, I will move him over.

    1. Re:I've already left by C4st13v4n14 · · Score: 0

      I had this formatted nicely into many paragraphs but forgot to change the format settings below. My apologies.

      I wasn't born in the US but my parents were so I gained citizenship at birth. We lived in several countries before I finally moved there, though I was too young to remember most of it. I remember living on a boat in Amsterdam (Steiger 13), and a little bit about Nepal and India. I don't remember New Zealand or Iceland, though I've been back to Iceland several time since and lived there for several months.

      Despite this, I grew up for the most part in the States just like anyone who was born there. My parents were different than most of the other upper middle class and I learned much about the outside world and had important lessons like not to hate homosexuals and people who were "different," unlike most of my high school classmates.

      It wasn't until my senior year of high school and first year of university that I woke up. My mind had matured and been opened sufficiently to introspection by then that when I travelled abroad, I knew I couldn't go back. I visited London and Paris (and many things in-between) on a trip organised through a teacher at my high school. That was the starting point of my awaking. The final point was a few months later when I visited Montréal, Québec with some friends from my university (I went to RPI, a couple of hours from the Canadian border). It was then that realised how different I am from most Americans and why I never felt like I fit in there. To make a long story short, I travelled to Canada and to Europe quite a bit during my university years. I finished my undergraduate degree and moved to Cambridge, MA to further my studies. After obtaining the level of education that I wanted to seek there, and after experiencing all the America I could stand, I finally moved back to The Netherlands where I sought entrance to medical school. So many things in my life have gotten better since that decision to leave, and nothing has gotten worse. I've since moved away from NL to better places but I regret nothing, I've not looked back, and I would do it again in an instant.

      In retrospect, I can see now that it helped to be the person I am and be from the family that I'm from to make easier what people would call a drastic change in life. However, I would like to emphasise that I did this all myself without financial assistance from my family. In all modesty, even if I didn't possess the qualities of determination and intelligence that I do, I would have still found a way to make it happen. One could argue, though, that experience and intelligence are what helped me to realise all of this in the first place.

      To answer your question, I've felt most at home in Scandinavia and I believe it is here that I will spend the rest of my life. I am currently training as a radiologist in Norway. If I do decide to go somewhere, then perhaps it will be somewhere in the UK. Scotland, Wales, and Ireland are fantastic. I come to slashdot everyday to read the news and it is partially do to this that I have absolutely no desire to go back to the States. It might be interesting for you to note that my brother, who was born in the States, has finished school and is living in New York City. He possesses the same desire to leave that I did and once I get sufficiently settled into my new career, I will move him over.

  134. Selena by ceeam · · Score: 1

    I guess I'd like to live on the Moon. In a free self-governed colony of course. But maybe I had read too much sci-fi in my teens.

    1. Re:Selena by doktoromni · · Score: 1

      Well... Water would be a problem there. Why not Mars, where you can mine oxygen and water directly from the (thin and unbreathable) atmosphere? And with prospects of terraformation the value of your property would skyrocket!

    2. Re:Selena by Stardo · · Score: 0

      Careful... from what I hear, the moon is a harsh mistress!

  135. Re:Aotearoa? You won't make it a year...! by Yahnz · · Score: 1

    Yeah yeah. Most American's who come here don't make it a single year. Really.

    Between a really wet climate, confusing seasons (try Thanksgiving in the spring and Easter in the fall for a bit), horrendously under-insulated houses lacking central heating (at 50-55 degrees in the morning you can see your breath while eating breakfast), a customer service standard that just reeks of mother england, and, well, all the POM's (that's Brits for you yanks), it's a small wonder.

    Other than that it's a great place. Oh, yeah, and there is the beetroot they insist in throwing on burgers. Kid you not - beetroot.

    It's definitely a try-before-you-buy kind of thing, and if anyone tells you otherwise, they're trying to sell you something.

  136. For all of you saying Japan...Forget it by Starcom8826 · · Score: 1

    Japan lets practically no foreigners in. Amongst if not practically the most homogenous population in the world.

    1. Re:For all of you saying Japan...Forget it by paedobear · · Score: 1

      If you've got an Engineering qualification (I think a pure IT degree counts) getting in is a piece of piss - and I found Italy to be more homogenous when I lived there.

  137. Norfolk Island by eric76 · · Score: 1

    Norfolk Island looks like a good place to live.

    Not too sure how to get permission to move there, though.

  138. Real poverty is less than average, not just less by CarpetShark · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, the amount of wealth relative to others is what determines your freedom. Poverty is generally measured, not by how little you have, but by how much less you have than average.

    It's no good having low taxes and a moderate salary, if everyone else has low taxes and a moderate salary. That way, you just get lots of people working, and spending selfishly to compete with each other. In a more socialist system, by contrast, higher taxes and moderate salaries means that everyone is working for each other, contributing to a community. They still have the same average spending power, which means that no one is "poorer" for their lack of resources. But they're happy, and together, they've built something: a society, where people feel wanted and protected and cared for, so that they don't feel the need to sleep with guns in the drawer, or shoot their classmates.

  139. It's not possible to save America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    As an American who is in the process of expatriating for the second time and has no qualms about it, I ask of the parent: what makes you think that one ordinary citizen out of three hundred million (or even one citizen in a movement of several million) is able to make a difference against the cultural banality and global-stability-threatning myopia of the United States? That battle is lost.

    To answer the question posed by the article, I found Germany to be lovely. The cost of living is low due to a depressed housing market, the people are educated and sincere, there are lots of beautiful women, the politics is reasoned, the public transportation system is excellent, the cuisine is formidable, and the night life was great. The taxes are high, but you have to expect that in countries which understand that social programs need to actually be funded in order to function. I also found Belgium and the Netherlands to be great countries for similar reasons.

    My next assignment is taking me to Sweden. I'm looking forward to seeing the country about which Osama bin Laden said the following:

    Contrary to what [President George W.] Bush says and claims -- that we hate freedom --let him tell us then, "Why did we not attack Sweden?"
  140. Hong Kong Rocks by integra_antennas · · Score: 1

    Choose to move to Hong Kong (part of China, not Japan) about 12 years ago and work here as an enginerr on local terms (not expat extravaganza). I can safely say I will be here the rest of my life.

    There are many advantages to living in HK:
    1. Beautiful City with mountains ringing the downtown
    2. Best public transport in the world: subways are safe and run every 1 to 3 minutes, buses and trains get you everywhere else
    3. Safety: I can go anywhere and anytime of night without fear for my life or mugging (I cannot think of a single american city with population > 1 million that can match this)
    4. Taxes: Some of the lowest in the world with a maximum of 16%, no capital gains taxes
    5. Food: Awesome selection of food at cheap prices (HK is regulary listed as one of the world's most expensive cities to live in, but that only applies if you try to live like the Trumps, as a regular person, I find I save as much money in 1 year in HK as I did in 5 years in USA)
    6. Language: English is widely used both as the language of law and daily usage
    7. Freedom: It is more free than Singapore, and even more free than USA (especially now)
    8. Sports: Some of the best hiking in the world. Excellent cycling on weekdays. Wake-boarding, surfing, paragliding, mountain climbing, scuba diving, etc all within 30-45 minutes of your apartment.

    And I could go on and on....

    1. Re:Hong Kong Rocks by Analein · · Score: 0
      Nice to know that :)

      I'm starting to study Philosophy/Political Science in Vienna next spring, and have been considering moving to Hong Kong for a year or two during my studies, attending a local, english speaking college. I do not really plan on learning Cantonese, but I think I'll get to do it there if possible.

      I like my cities big - who wouldn't, growing up in suburban Germany? -, so I guess HK would fit. I've been to Singapore and was overwhelmed.

      Now to some real questions: On how much would you estimate the monthly expenses in HK for let's say a 2-3 room appartment fitting regular standards, riding the subways etc., having dinner from time to time and do some partying on the weekends (ok, does anyone actually think of Cantopop as something even closely related to the thing we happen to call music?), at a decent not to yuppie-ish level? The kind of life one leads while attending college, in western standards. I think my written English is ok so far, getting a job in a firm with English/German as their main languages shouldn't be that hard. But this is a question I always thought to be best answered by people actually "living there".

      Thanks in advance.

    2. Re:Hong Kong Rocks by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      I went to Hong Kong a couple years ago for a consulting gig and was absolutely blown away! I am white and had no problem fitting in with the british crowd down there. Though the local chinese people there are awesome! Ultra hot chicks too! They just want to live life everyday 24x7 and don't have any of that American-take-over-world ego. Best restaurants in the world with the best blend of europe, asia I have ever seen. Subways and taxi service are the best I have ever seen. NY should step aside. HK = Entertainment galore.

      The only thing keeping me away is the insane real estate prices. It makes manhattan look like walmart pricecuts. Lets just say I was crying on my way back from Hong Kong cause American lifestyle don't remotely compare. US is not even in the same league. I would have cut my US passport in half if I could afford HK housing.

    3. Re:Hong Kong Rocks by Analein · · Score: 0

      I am currently paying 300 for an appartment about 55m in size, two rooms. On the outskirts of a city with 300,000 in population. I often heard US rents were cheaper, how are HK rents?

    4. Re:Hong Kong Rocks by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      From what I saw when I was consulting. The government housing are available to people with HK citizenships/people born there. Me being a US citizen need to whipout some serious cash to even consider 800sq ft apartment. But you can travel there and stay at a nice hotel. Until you start shopping for the most rare of animes, robots and gizmos. Then youll realize there is no room to store anything.

    5. Re:Hong Kong Rocks by Noodles_HK · · Score: 1

      Hong Kong does Rock, indeed! However, as a HK born Chinese, it's only so good... 1. Beautiful City, that is pretty filthy. Blow your nose and you'll see. 2. It's a city with a huge social divide. The Have's have TONS, the Have-Not's scrapes by. 3. It's free, until the Beijing say it's not. That happens whenever they feel like locking up journos. I could go on. Having said ALL THAT, it is still a place of laissez faire businesses. I should find a job in HK!

    6. Re:Hong Kong Rocks by integra_antennas · · Score: 1

      Real Estate here is expensive in the expat districts. If you can stomach living in the new territories or lantau island, it is not bad and with the train/ferry links. Plus, it is nicer to live outside the city if you like sports--can live right on a paved bike only trail, or right next to the ocean for 500 USD a month. As for the pollution in HK, it is no worse than LA, and far better than any city in China. And I would take pollution over the politics in USA. In addition, despite the pollution, HK usually competes with Sweden for the number one position on the longest lifespan list and is number one in the highest IQ list (average here is 116 compared to 100 in USA).

  141. Re: Italy equals europe?? by mikkelfunck · · Score: 1

    It says a lot that you think Europe is the same from scandinavia in the north to the mediteranian in south or eastern europe would be identical western parts of europe. Like i guess not all of USA is like California (the only place i have been). Europe has very different cultures, different work ethics, different social security. Its like comparing handgranates and horseshoes. Try travel a bit - there are lots of places in europe that you wouldnt find identical to Italy on a cultural or social level. mikkelfunck, Denmark

  142. Canada Doesn't like Older Immigrants by billstewart · · Score: 1

    A few years ago, somebody posted the point system rules for immigrating to Canada. If you're young, educated, and speak French and English, it's really easy. If you're 50 and educated but not bringing large quantities of money, you'd better start learning French now, and maybe throw in a First Nations language for good measure. If you're 70 and not educated, you'd better have immigrant kids or a lot more money. (Sorry - French *was* my second language, but only a little bit of it, and Canadian Immigration doesn't view Really Bad German as useful. Basically I'd have to learn French from almost-scratch and my wife would have to learn it also, even though Chinese would be more useful in Vancouver.)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Canada Doesn't like Older Immigrants by bunions · · Score: 1

      Yep. I'm trying to hurry before I turn 40, when I lose 3 or 4 points. The big deal for Canada is that they have a rapidly aging population which apparently has little desire to reproduce, so they fill the need for new Canadians via immigration. Canada is apparently a desired spot for retirement because of the liberal social services, and without young people making taxable income, it becomes hard to support that kind of socialist utopia.

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
  143. Easy. by Tavor · · Score: 1

    Ireland or New Zealand.

    Ireland, because the language is mostly English, the land is beautiful, the people are wonderful, and the laws are similar to pre-Bush America.
    New Zealand, because the language is mostly English, the land is spectactular, the people are wonderful, and the laws are much more progressive than America (pre-Bush, post-Bush, or otherwise.)

    --
    Windows has detected an undetectable error.
  144. Re:New Zealand - VISIT IN THE WINTER FIRST! by Yahnz · · Score: 1

    Definitely, definitely don't base any decisions on a two week summer trip. Most Americans don't make it here longer than a year - it is VERY different from the US, despite the language being somewhat similar. The place is very wet, and most housing lacks insulation and central heating - you'll end up scraping mold from your walls in the winter while desperately trying to keep the house warm. Having breakfast while you can see your breath is no fun.

    The country is also FAR away from anywhere, really. A trip back to the states for the whole family will set you back a BUNDLE - as you might imagine carriers aren't exactly killing themselves to lower fares.

    Make sure you see the place in the winter (August is GREAT!) to get the whole experience...

    And if you do make it - well, good on ya, mate... :)

  145. Sorry, there is nowhere for you to go... by droopycom · · Score: 4, Funny


    I'm sorry, but look around what your choices are:

    1) Americanized countries (eg: England, Australia) : Same crap, different accent = Might as well live in the USA
    2) Countries which hate America (eg: Middle East, France and most of Europe, Brazil, even Canada....). They dont want you, and will make your life miserable.
    3) Third world countries (Africa, part of Asia, ...) : Bye bye Slashdot.
    4) Developed Asian countries (Japan, Taiwan, HK...) : You cant take the cultural change...
    5) Sealand : Good luck getting a visa.
    6) Tropical paradise: You dont have enough money to retire there...

    1. Re:Sorry, there is nowhere for you to go... by tomstdenis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Canada doesn't hate the states.

      There is a habit of saying "at least we're not like the states" but in fact in many regards we have the same bad habits as they have [e.g. polution, right wing movements, etc]. I think if Canadians hated the americans so much we wouldn't be visiting them so much.

      That said, I wouldn't mind a big influx of Americans to Canada. Two words: "Melting Pot".

      Canada prides itself on the pluralism and "mixed salad" style of immigration. You know what that gives you? Places like Toronto. Where none of the residents share any common values and the quality of life takes a sharp nose dive. I lived there for a while and honestly it's like you moved to another country. I'm all for respecting other cultures, but this is Canada, not a gathering place for everyone and their brother who want to change the land from under me.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:Sorry, there is nowhere for you to go... by Rivabem · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Brazilians dont hate America, neither americans.

      We just think the average ones are a little stupid and paranoid.

      But if you're willing to leave USA, you're far batter the average one! Congratulations!

    3. Re:Sorry, there is nowhere for you to go... by Rivabem · · Score: 1

      I meant better!

      The spread of the "american way of life" al over the world is getting me "fat-fingered" :D

    4. Re:Sorry, there is nowhere for you to go... by JasonBee · · Score: 2, Informative

      Whaa??

      I know nothing of this: "none of the residents share any common values and the quality of life takes a sharp nose dive."

      My immediate circle of friends and acquaintances includes people of these backgrounds:

      Tanzanian (my wife wife whose family is Goan Catholic)
      Mauritanian Chinese
      Hong Kong Chinese
      Chinese; Jamaican (black)
      Jamaican (German descent)
      Trinidadian (pick a colour and background - it's hilarious seeing five different types of people speak in the same Caribbean patois - chinese/indian/white/mulatto/etc)
      Czech
      English Canadian
      French Canadian
      Acadian Canadian - not the same thing as Quebecois (New Brunswick)
      English American
      Scottish
      Irish
      Irish Canadian
      etc...

      My neighbors are Persian and Serbian.

      You get the idea. What you may be seeing is your own sad shortsightedness. And you must be panhandling on the street if Toronto has this purported "low standard" of living. I'l remember to toss you a few extra quarters next time.

      I've traveled the planet and except for a few countries that admittedly "look" like mine (NZ, AUS, Japan (well maybe not so similar but fun), Sweden, Norway, etc.), Canada has always been my preferred stop. It feels like home because it feels like home to so many others as well. Toronto's major strength is something that some people fear: multiculturalism. My wife and I have been mulling a move out west for some time, and may yet still do so, but the one major thing we can't tear ourselves away from is the Variety (with a capital V) Toronto exhibits. Seeing people whop have risked life and limb to get here may be a detraction for you, but hey, even Holocaust deniers have their day every once in a while. I on the other hand like to know a little bit about what the world is like, and in doing so find that my neighbors may have lots of things in common with me.

      Having lived 7 years in the US and traveled to every corner of the country, I know too, that the US is not so homogeneous, as is Canada. I say don't abandon your country, just find a nice corner that is more comfortable. If you're being driven out with pitchforks and firebrands, then I guess you're welcome to pitch a homestead here.

      JB

    5. Re:Sorry, there is nowhere for you to go... by tomstdenis · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I lived near 401/Weston. My neighbours were of all regions of Earth. Barely spoke any English, generally were trashy [e.g. litter on their lawns, in the street], those who had cars were in horrible repair, not clean, probably not emission checked. They drove REALLY bad where I lived, as in going right through stops and red lights. The corner stores were almost all chinese or korean. They stocked shit food that often made me sick [when I first moved in I didn't know better] and are horribly unhelpful people.

      Then you have the nutcases on the bus ... but that's another story.

      Just "living together" is not culture. I used to have real neighbours in Ottawa [and I do now...]. you know, people you could up and talk with without getting the stares from all the other ethnics. We would have common values of decency and co-operate.

      I'm not saying it's peachy perfect everywhere. There are assholes in any city. My point is places like Toronto which are largely immigrant built are really uncanadian.

      Generally i think we ought to impose more limitations on immigrants, and society as a hole. you want to run a corner store? Fine. Stock real food. Not this shit crap you're used to in your third world nation. You want to immigrate here? Fine, learn French or English. Otherwise you're a useless fucking tool and I have no desire to know you.

      i'm so tired of Canada being the worlds dumping ground. How about we seek and encourage talented or otherwise desirable people to immigrate here?

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    6. Re:Sorry, there is nowhere for you to go... by Gruneun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I can't fathom where you get off with this assessment, so I have to assume you're not very well-travelled and you base your entire opinion on what you see on CNN. I think it's quite asinine, not to mention insulting to Europeans, to assume that every non-American is incapable of recognizing that politicians don't always lead as expected or represent the will of the vast majority. Do you think their politicians have a 100% approval rating?

      I have yet to visit a European country where the people weren't open and inviting, even after learning I was an American. In fact, most Europeans are quite the opposite of what you described. When we lived in Italy, most of the locals were excited to talk about everything (With French and Spanish being so popular in US schools, I think Italians are especially excited and supportive when we attempt their language). When my father visited relatives in Bavaria and mentioned to a local that he was born in a nearby, small town, he couldn't have paid for drinks that night if he wanted to. A few years ago, my brother spent a week in Norway, skiing, drinking, and hanging out with complete strangers. A co-worker went on several, recent trips to Germany, Austria, France, and Switzerland. The only political conversation she had was with a couple Canadians who were only asking if her nationality had been an issue. Obviously, it isn't.

      I think even the Middle East assessment isn't completely fair. Ask some of the US soldiers and they'll tell you a large portion of the people are happy to have them, even if they won't yell that fact from a street corner. At the same time, I have friends in Jordan who have told us that it's really not a good time to visit, so I'll take them at their word.

    7. Re:Sorry, there is nowhere for you to go... by kavandje · · Score: 1
      3) Third world countries (Africa, part of Asia, ...) : Bye bye Slashdot.

      Au contraire ... I live in Africa, and I get my /. fix every day. Sittin' right here on my 64k backbone ... all that bandwidth humming away...

    8. Re:Sorry, there is nowhere for you to go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you moved to a low class area, tough shit on you.

    9. Re:Sorry, there is nowhere for you to go... by doktoromni · · Score: 1

      2) Countries which hate America (eg: Middle East, France and most of Europe, Brazil, even Canada....). They dont want you, and will make your life miserable. Hey, that's untrue at least for Brazil. I would say that it is fair to state that Brazilians hate America, as in "the idea of a world-domination evil empire" (yes, that is the image in our collective unconscious ;-). However, we do not hate *americans*. I have seen and assisted many Americans coming here in business travels (my city is a industry-techie-mining backyard with no touristic attractions) and I never saw any Brazilian making their lives "miserable"; actually the general attitude is of hospitality. Heck, one of those visitors even married a Brazilian girl that was one of my co-workers... In short, I would say that there is a sharp distinction between the political entity "America" and the *people* called "Americans", as we see it.

    10. Re:Sorry, there is nowhere for you to go... by kaoshin · · Score: 1

      I'm not from Africa, but isn't it a continent and not a country? You are all high.

    11. Re:Sorry, there is nowhere for you to go... by talson · · Score: 1

      With every respect, I just couldn't disagree with you more strongly with your characterization of Toronto. It is an increasingly dynamic place because of multiculturalism. It is richly cosmopolitan, providing a great opportunity to explore the many cultures that comprise the Canadian identity.

      Canadian civil society and its institutions focus on peace, order, and good governance. This has provided a strong basis for the development of cultural values such as tolerance, incusivity, moderation, and mutualism. So long as citizens are practicing those values, upholding the institutions, and participating in the public discourse, they are sharing in the creation of a nation that reflects the realities of contemporary globalization in a peaceful and mutally beneficial manner.

      And there is no where in the world I would rather go out to eat. I love this town. Vive multiculturalism!

    12. Re:Sorry, there is nowhere for you to go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask some of the US soldiers and they'll tell you a large portion of the people are happy to have them

      This is correct. I worked with Iraqis and Turks at the same time, and it was interesting how much they trusted us. They would always leave their things with us because they did not trust the Iraqis or the Turks not to steal their stuff. And if I could describe their feelings about the invasion, the most common was probably embarassment, especially around the Turks.

    13. Re:Sorry, there is nowhere for you to go... by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      It's not multiculturalism when all you do is displace the natural inhabitants.

      I'm sure the aboriginal people didn't look to the europeans as plurialism....

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    14. Re:Sorry, there is nowhere for you to go... by Anomylous+Howard · · Score: 1

      Ha! That was a Freudian slip if I ever saw one. We all know that Brazil still has cannibals...Don't try to deny it. You want us Americans to come down there so you can dip us in batter and fry us up for dinner. It's eating all those deep fried Americans is what made your fingers fat!

    15. Re:Sorry, there is nowhere for you to go... by bigokro · · Score: 1
      2) Countries which hate America (eg: Middle East, France and most of Europe, Brazil, even Canada....). They dont want you, and will make your life miserable.

      You can definitely leave Brazil off that list. The people here are extremely friendly, even to foolish gringos like myself. Yes, that's right! I'm a living, breathing American who has outsourced himself to Brazil! And I must say, it's going very well. I'm working as a Java architect for a small American technology company, and loving it.

      Taxes, or at least income taxes, are relatively low (27%), especially if you work as an independent consultant (~11%). On the other hand, sales and VAT-like taxes are so high, that prices for imports (which is anything high-tech, or just tech) are doubled... and the fact that your money is worth only half makes it absurd.

      All in all, I'd say that I'm just a little worse off here financially than I was in the states. But I did it all wrong - I moved here first, and then got a job. The real trick is to get a job in the states, then convince them to send you here with an "international compensation package"!

      Anyway, no complaints here - Rio is all the compensation I need.

    16. Re:Sorry, there is nowhere for you to go... by hashlnx · · Score: 1

      "2) Countries which hate America (eg: Middle East, France and most of Europe, Brazil, even Canada....). They dont want you, and will make your life miserable." Hey, im brazilian and i lived in US for about 2 years. We brazilians do not hate americans. But in the other hand, americans hate everyone else :( The way immigrants (specially mexicans but not only them) is sad, they (we too) are treated like simple slaves to serve you well. Don't complain about how americans are dealed in Netherlands, look at the mirror befora start saying that.

    17. Re:Sorry, there is nowhere for you to go... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I can't fathom where you get off with this assessment, so I have to assume you're not very well-travelled and you base your entire opinion on what you see on CNN.

      You know, I just assumed he was making a joke.

    18. Re:Sorry, there is nowhere for you to go... by talson · · Score: 1

      I would have to disagree that contemporary Toronto is undergoing something comparable to the displacement experienced by aboriginal peoples. Their populations were decimated by disease or removed by force of arms or law irrespective of their culture.

      Canada's immigration policies are the product of our society, both its cultural institutions and economic needs in response to voluntarily decreased birth rate in the Canadian-born population. Immigrants predominantly arrive in response to an invitation from the state and are hand-picked to fill roles in the culture as defined by the status quo. In a very real sense, those that gain citizenship do so in service to the culture and have their lives and identities profoundly shaped by it. That our culture will, likewise, respond to them is the unavoidable. Over all, the imperatives of operating in Canadian society tend, over the course of a generation, to be "Canadianizing".

      I am not certain if there are parts of the Toronto experience you feel are not reflective of Canadian culture. Personally, I find the diversity of cultural presence hugely enriching but not without conflict and negotiation. I feel that there have always been a plurality of cultures within Canada, but that their voices and visibility are increasing as a result of refinements and improvements in our practice of social democracy over the past 50 years. I believe that, for many years now, Canadian identity could perhaps be best described as a dialogue about "what it means to be Canadian" and that we on the whole are interested in all Canadians' input. And I would contend that the practice of democratic inclusion better prepares us for the realities of the increasingly small globe and is perhaps the greatest Canadian cultural achievement.

    19. Re:Sorry, there is nowhere for you to go... by thrashaholic · · Score: 1

      the way immigrants (specially mexicans but not only them) is sad, they (we too) are treated like simple slaves to serve you well.

      Horseshit. They pick those jobs. We don't kidnap them, bring them here, and then force them to clean our toilets at gun point. They WANT to do this, we PAY them to do it, and most of us don't give a shit if they're illegal or not.

      Slaves? Most of the Mexicans I see are driving nicer cars (trucks, actually) than me. Hardly what I'd call slavery.

      Let's not even bring up how you guys treat your natives.

      I'm all for open borders and equal work and pay for all (I even think that English and Spanish should BOTH be taught in American schools), and do realise that there are a lot of problems with immigrantion policies, but saying that we treat them like slaves is offensive and incorrect.

      --
      militant gun owning 'liberal'
  146. Well? by wirefarm · · Score: 1

    Where is this place of which you speak?

    --
    -- My Weblog.
  147. One reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Between high school and college, I got a job and took 6 weeks to visit Italy and Britain.

    Every conversation in hostels began pleasantly enough, but after hearing my "accent" for a few minutes*, my new acquaintence looked at me ascance, as if he had just noticed a growth on my neck and feared I was contageous. Not wanting to give offense, I'd be privileged with a couple more minutes of cautious, pointed banter before his voice would change again. It's an incredulous tone typically reserved for questions beginning with "Did you step in...": not exactly accusing, willing if not eager to accept an alternative explanation, but demanding that the detected offense be explained. I'd answer. Then the conversation would be over. If I was lucky, I wasn't excoriated for the death penalty, drunken fratboy idiots, and whatever else was wrong with the US. Usually it was Bush, though he had been in office all of four months and probably hadn't even finished unpacking.

    I was 18, travelling with my girlfriend. We didn't drink, we've never been loud; we were invariably reserved and respectful. In Italy, we tried to pick up phrases so to avoid regression to pointing and grunting. I had never voted or had any opportunity to influence anything, but I was despised... and I was not even permitted the lattitude of ignorance: they wanted a 18 year old kid to know they hated him.

    There were, of course, exceptions. Exceptional people whose kindness I still recall with warmth and gratitude. And even the meanest European has the unconditional affection of a Golden Retriever compared to the average resident of East Coast of the US, a region that, were it to break off the continent and sink into the ocean, I would morn with confetti and streamers.

    Where was I? Oh, yes. There are no options, as far as I can tell, for Americans seeking a new home. Everyone actively hates us. Not the country or its policies: they hate us. It doesn't seem to matter that, whatever pisses them off about the United States, millions of us agree. I don't want to spend my life apologizing, faking an accent, or listening to sanctimonious, butchered Chomsky... so I remain.

    And I love my country.**

    *Oregonians' affect is almost indistinguishable from standard, American newscaster English
    ** Defined as North of San Jose, South of Canada, west of the Cascade Range

  148. Gasoline does not really matter because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Gasoline does not really matter because for some weird reason European cars are more efficient than American cars."

    I believe it's because European countries are smaller and more "efficient" than huge America where one often needs to drive great distances just to buy groceries.

    No weirdness involved.

    1. Re:Gasoline does not really matter because... by Ihlosi · · Score: 2, Interesting
      No weirdness involved.

      It's also because you don't really need air conditioning in most parts of Europe, most of the engines use higher-grade fuel instead of huge displacements, manual transmissions are far more common, Europeans would rather drive a station wagen than a SUV, Diesel engines aren't (mistakenly) believed to be dirty and just for trucks, etc.

      Really, there is no weirdness at all.

    2. Re:Gasoline does not really matter because... by Ulven · · Score: 1

      I don't quite understand your point.

      If you are saying "In America cars drive further to do anything so of course they use more fuel" then fair enough, they will use more fuel. But it was always my understanding that longer journeys are more fuel efficient than shorter ones.

      The only other thing I can think you are saying is that because the countries are more efficient than the USA, it follows that the cars are too. By magic?

      The point of the parent was that though fuel might cost more in Europe, you'll go further per litre, and so the same distance per $. It's close, but not quite that even.

      From wikipedia: The average fuel efficiency of European cars is over 40 mpg, of Japanese cars 45mpg, and North American cars 20.4 mpg.

    3. Re:Gasoline does not really matter because... by somersault · · Score: 1

      I think the gp was being sarcastic. I hoped so at least.. American cars make no sense (well maybe they do in america where all the roads are straight, but it would be funny to see a muscle car trying to compete with even a semi sporty German/Japanese car around a UK country road, especially if it was wet :)

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:Gasoline does not really matter because... by TheGreek · · Score: 1
      But it was always my understanding that longer journeys are more fuel efficient than shorter ones.
      Longer journeys at highway speeds are more fuel efficient in terms of MPG, yes, but if I'm only driving one mile to my destination instead of fifteen, I'm still going to burn less fuel.
    5. Re:Gasoline does not really matter because... by Rayonic · · Score: 1
      it would be funny to see a muscle car trying to compete with even a semi sporty German/Japanese car around a UK country road, especially if it was wet :)
      I spent about 2 weeks driving around England in a large BMW sedan. It wasn't very funny from my end. :(

      Seriously, even the twistiest of American roads (here in Boston) are wide compared to your average UK road. And then people park on the side! Good god, Brits, improve your roads. Where does all that fuel tax go to anyway?
    6. Re:Gasoline does not really matter because... by somersault · · Score: 1

      lmao.. I went to Canada recently and the roads are pathetically easy to drive on - about twice as wide as they need to be. I guess since you have the space you may as well use it, but really it encourages lax driving ;)

      --
      which is totally what she said
  149. Resources by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    "Therefore it is likely that there will come a time when restricted migration across national borders will be largely regarded as backward, restrictive, and even oppressive."

    Unlikely. There are limited resources in any area, as people arrive they are seen to consume those resources at the expense of the indigenous population. There is therefore always going to be resistance to people moving into an area.

    e.g.
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6082194.st m

    The only time when it's possible that the borders will be relaxed is if all of the countries in the world are equally economically developed and peaceful and there's little economic reason for migration.

    --
    Deleted
  150. Leaving isn't running, or if it is, that's fine to by billstewart · · Score: 1
    The type of people who used to say "Love it or Leave it" always got really really pissed off if you did leave.


    But I left the North American East Coast and moved here to California, and came five times as far as some farmer from Mexicali who lives down the block. And one main reason I live in the town I live in is that the main street has restaurants from a dozen different cultures, either run by people who got off their butts and left the country they grew up in, or by children of people who did that, except for some of the Mexicans and Chinese who've been here a lot longer.


    Some people came because this was the Land of Opportunity and the place they were living wasn't. Some people left their homes because a bunch of evil insane people wanted to kill them. Some were just bored, or had friends out here, or their families were hard to deal with, or they just considered some fairly large chunk of the world to be enough like home to move there, or there was a babe involved, or there was a school that sounded good, or they wanted to see the world and liked what they saw here.


    For a while it looked like America had been taken over by Pod People. A lot of the country has at least started to wake up, but even after Bush, Cheney, and Rove get tossed out for incompetence (and term limits) it's going to take a long long time to fix America, get rid of some of the appalling laws and government-run lawlessness, and try to get rid of some of the surveillance infrastructure that's grown synergistically with the military-industrial complex. I doubt we'll get it all back, which sucks.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  151. You're reading the exceptions which make the news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never encountered such a horror story personally, and engage in lots of "NSFW" joking when people are feeling up to it. There is a certain required sensitivity, of course; you don't make jokes when someone is feeling genuinely hurt or vulnerable. But other times, people are feeling rambunctious and there's lots of fair game. I've forgotten the exact circumstances when I suggested that a co-worker "needs a Playboy and a bathroom break", it was enjoyed by all at the time with no hard feelings.

    There are lots of OTHER reasons I'd recommend avoiding the USA, of course.

  152. Re:Where is this Australia? by htnprm · · Score: 1

    LOL. Why is this flamebait? Not like most Yanks would know (Wish I could find a link to the video on YouTube with the Yanks identifying Australia as France...).

  153. Madrid, Spain by nikes111 · · Score: 1

    I've been studying abroad here for almost 2 months and I really want to move here. I have found that despite America being so "free", it's really not. Everything in Europe to me has seemed a lot more open and free. I don't know too much about the government yet, but so far I've liked what I've seen.

    The only thing keeping me from moving here is college, i still have one more year. After that, however, it'll depend on what kind of work I can find.

  154. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by nebosuke · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most of what you say is true, but none of it really addresses my post. I'm well aware that socialism provides better average economic circumstances in return for less economic freedom. That is really the whole point of socialism, because it stems from a philosophy that tips the valuation scale towards socioeconomic safety as opposed to socioeconomic freedom.

    My point was that many Americans do not value wealth so much as they place much more value on socioeconomic freedom as opposed to socioeconomic safety than the ggp and apparently you do. It's true that there are higher rates of violent crimes in many areas on the US (not where I grew up, even though it was a very poor area where everyone owned guns (all hunters)), but it's also true that, if I so choose, I can exercise far greater control over my socioeconomic standing than someone from a more socialist country.

  155. Wanna trade? by Ireneo+Funes · · Score: 1

    I'll trade you my Portuguese nationality for your American citizenship, that's it, a free pass to the whole european union and every sardine-lover's dream.

    --
    Three tings I hate about stars: -Wars -Treks -Gates
  156. Visas and borders by Project2501a · · Score: 0

    In almost every case it comes down to visas and border controls that stop humans freely moving around their planet.

    Borders and visas are a 19th century invention. So, it all cases it comes down to the ritch of each region of this planet playing divide and conquer, so they can restrict movement of trade (and hence people) from anyone without enough capital to be characterised as ritch him/herself.

    --
    ----
  157. It takes 3-5 years to get a Canada residence visa by kt0157 · · Score: 1

    Canada is shut because it takes 3-5 years to get a skilled worker residence visa. Go somewhere else.

    K.

  158. You are aware of the history of America? by iion_tichy · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you have forgotten that your ancestors also were people who left there country, trying to make their luck elsewhere.

  159. Re:Aotearoa? You won't make it a year...! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Plus we dont really like Americans. They're often loud, obnoxious and boastful all of which are characteristics that many of us despise.

    confusing seasons (try Thanksgiving in the spring and Easter in the fall for a bit),

    It's called the Southern Hemisphere pillock-features, of course it's going to be different.

    You sound like one of the ignorant Americans that we despise, please fuck-off home because we don't want you here.

  160. Costa Rica does have serious corruption by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Don't expect it to be problem-free - the same kind of small-town cops you disliked in Northern Wisconsin and I disliked in New Jersey and California have cousins in Costa Rica and just about everywhere else. There's a serious cluelessness about economic policy, so the government tries to "help" various industries by giving monopolies to their friends and relatives and the highest bidders, and bureaucrats are much more open about wanting bribes than they were back in New Jersey. And there's a lot of poverty and crime, though it's better than much of Central America.


    And it'll take you a while to get to know locals and local culture well enough to be accepted, but that's sort of the same everywhere I suppose. Meanwhile, it's absolutely gorgeous, lots to do, high mountains and wide beaches and jungles and decent coffee, and it's relatively friendly to American expats.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  161. Um. and other countries? by puntloos · · Score: 1

    Hah, kinda amusing that basically the -only- answer to the original question seems to be the 'the Netherlands' post and its replies.

    But as a native dutchman, I'm interested in someone suggesting something else.. South Africa, Japan, Canada, Russia (moscow?) seem interesting places to be, but how are they if you plan to live there?

  162. Italy vs. Norway by orzetto · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I thought about moving to Italy once.

    Hi there! I am an Italian who never worked in Italy and moved out as soon as I finished education. Almost thirty and not a day unemployed yet :-)

    Then I found out they pay almost 50% income tax. On top of that, there is a 20% VAT on most items. On top of that, gasoline was almost $5 per gallon (a few years ago...almost certainly more now).

    Though you will hear Giovanni Birramedia ("Joe Sixpack") and populist politicians complain about high taxes, those are quite standard rates in Europe. Except for the 50% which is simply untrue (though it is a popular stereotype, you might have heard it said). Gas is currently at about 1.2 euros/litre. Anyway, I will take high taxes over social inequality any day: a bit because of I have a sense of justice, a bit because I do not like getting mugged.

    The high taxes were there to support their social services.

    Well, it's no news there is a high and endemic level of corruption in Italian politics. Again, every country has the politicians it deserves, and the current Zeitgeist is such that a former minister can be sentenced to six years in jail for heavy corruption charges (Cesare Previti was sentenced for having basically bought the whole courthouse in Rome) and half the population will still believe that it is a persecution of communist judges. Tolerance for corruption is so high that we have boss and vice-boss of the military secret service under investigation for kidnapping and torture, and no one seems to care. I mean, no one has actually asked them to resign.

    Virtually no concept of sexual harassment or workplace misconduct.

    That surprises me. Either you got a wrong impression, or the situation in the US must be similar to the jus primæ noctis. The lower layers of society (illegal aliens and such) are regularly mistreated at the level of downright slavery. I suppose it depends a lot on the branch you work in.

    Want a painkiller for your broken leg? Tough.

    That has something to do with catholicism—you have to achieve sanctity through pain. That's not really what the doc is thinking, but just because it is unusual to give painkillers doctors are not used to that. This has been subject of debate in recent years, so maybe it has improved.

    Europe sucks if you actually want to make something of yourself through hard work.

    Italy sucks for that. If you want to be successful in Italy you must play much more politics at work and in the larger sense than in other countries, and you must be "blackmailable": the system rejects noncorrupted, as the system is built on a gigantic Mexican standoff where everybody must be able to trash anybody else in a sort of mutual-assured-destruction way. That's what comes out of endemic corruption. Of course there are bunches of honest people, but they are far away from power and kept there.

    Now, I live in Norway. The main disadvantage I have found is that locals always talk their dialect rather than standard Norwegian, which is kind of irritating. Of course, you get that if this is the main problem I could find, there aren't really that many. The Norwegian tax level is sometimes indicated as the highest in the world, but I never paid more than 25% of direct tax (income tax, social security, fortune tax and so on). VAT is high (25%) and so are food prices because of protectionism (for some reason Norwegian think of themselves as a people historically of farmers, instead of pirates (Vikings) in the past and oil exporters (North Sea) now. Wages are fairly high (especially for Italian standards: a PhD student turns in over 2,300 euros/month. That's

    --
    Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
    1. Re:Italy vs. Norway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no such thing as "standard Norwegian" ;)

      You're right about the protectionism though. You see, most people here don't know very much about what goes on outside of the country's borders. It's a shame, really, that we continue being so isolated and selfish. I only have to drive a couple of hours in to Sweden to notice a dramatic change in attitude towards the rest of Europe (and the world in general).

    2. Re:Italy vs. Norway by xtracto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      the system rejects noncorrupted, as the system is built on a gigantic Mexican standoff where everybody must be able to trash anybody else in a sort of mutual-assured-destruction way. That's what comes out of endemic corruption. Of course there are bunches of honest people, but they are far away from power and kept there.

      Hey Amigo! Salud!

      Haha, that has been the best description of corruption I have read in some time. It is interesting to know from where did you got the "Mexican standoff" corruption idea. Not that it is not true, it is as truely as it gets in my Mexican opinion :)

      cheers,

      A mexican

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    3. Re:Italy vs. Norway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Anyway, I will take high taxes over social inequality any day: a bit because of I have a sense of justice, a bit because I do not like getting mugged.

      You don't like getting mugged, but you don't mind turning over large percentages of your income voluntarily? What's the difference? Can't you just hire a body guard with the money you're saving in taxes?

    4. Re:Italy vs. Norway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Norway is a horrible place to live if you want to have a career and be successful. It is great if you want to sit on your ass and collect benefits. The system is totally screwed up there - it rewards the lazy non producers and punishes any hint of success.

      It is a horrendously expensive place to live. Cars are incredibly expensive. Even a beer costs you about $9. I lived there for several years before moving to the United States. I am *very* happy here now. Sure, there are people with no insurance, but if you are a professional and have skills/talents, you will prosper here like no where else.

      In Norway, on top of incredible income taxes, you also essentially pay a 25% sales tax (well, technically it is VAT but the effect is the same for the consumer).

      On top of it, the government services, such as medical, are not really as good as Norwegians would have you believe (not their fault, most have never lived anywhere else). There are long waiting lists for specialists, and even if you go for a regular checkup at the doctor, it is over in 5 minutes. They don't even check your blood pressure or anything. And, there is no dental coverage if you are over 18 (it might be 21, I do not remember). Here in the USA, I have full medical, dental, and vision insurance. I pay nothing to go to the dentist or for a vision exam. A visit to the doctor for a checkup costs me $15 (~90 NOK).

      The people are nice there. It is a fun city. But the country has a serious problem with its social system. You can more or less decide for yourself that "you know what? Working isnt for me, I would rather stay home and drink beer" and the government will basically pay for your apartment, and give you money each month - even though you are perfectly capable of working.

      If you like working for below average salaries, and then giving over half to the government in the form of taxes so they can give it to lazy bums, then Norway is the place for you.

    5. Re:Italy vs. Norway by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      "Mexican standoff" has nothing to do with Mexico. It's an idiomatic expression for a "mutually assured destruction" scenario; it involves two or more people aiming at each other with loaded guns, in a tense situation where the first to move can easily cause a bloodbath. Think of the last sequence in "The Good, The Bad and The Ugly".

      Otro mexicano ;-)

    6. Re:Italy vs. Norway by Magada · · Score: 1

      It's a recipe used in latter-day western movies...

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
    7. Re:Italy vs. Norway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot another disadvantage about Norway. The weather. Apparently, you don't have to go further south than Scotland before they close schools if too much snow falls. We couldn't do that. Look forward to six months a year with snow (this was tedious, but not shocking, where I'm from in -southern- Norway) and the highest standard of living in the world (according to the UN's HDI).

      But the media ran a couple of stories a few months ago about how difficult it is for western immigrants to socialise in Norway, since we'll look suspiciously at you until you go away if you attempt any friendly small talk. An American exchange student at my old high school told me that "people look at me like I'm crazy if I smile to someone who walks past". Very true. But most of us are nice if you give us a few years to warm up.

      And we DO think we're vikings.

  163. New York City by opencity · · Score: 4, Funny

    We have less to do with the rest of the US than with Europe and Asia. All the worlds cusines cheap and delivered. Don't need a car so take that off your balance sheet. My part of town is covered with hot European expatriate chicks and all the cool kids from fly over country. Plus we still get to use the Constitution and Bill of Rights! (sort of-insert Bush joke) 24 hour subways so take that, London. Cheapish beer and taxis. More live music than is doable. Tall buildings and not too many crackhead bums.

    Actually Rome probably has better food but that's just me. And Beijing is cool but there are always visa problems.

    --
    Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it.
    1. Re:New York City by Mr]-[at · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Lived in NYC the last 14 years. Everything you describe is fairly accurate but I want to add two things: 1) Cost of housing is f'd up. How about $1,500 for 300sq feet 'closet'? Good luck trying to find something affordable close to work... http://newyork.craigslist.org/search/abo/mnh/135?m axAsk=1900 2) I don't like confining myself to the city, and renting every time I want/need to be out of the city doesn't make financial sense. - Look up car insurance rates for NYC. - Try looking for parking in Manhattan (below 90th st). I'm 27, my girlfriend's 26, I'm in IT, she's in finance, both make decent money yet still can't really afford anything decent (housing) in the city we've lived most of our lives in, went to school/college, work in. She has an EU citizenship, so if/when we marry we'll think long and hard indeed about moving to an EU country.

    2. Re:New York City by Xentor · · Score: 2, Informative

      You missed a few things, mostly specific to Manhattan

      CONS (First, because I'm a pessimist)

      1) Crowded, crowded, crowded.
      2) VERY high cost of living.
      3) No nature (There are parks, but landscaping != nature)
      4) No stars. I'm talking about the ones in the sky, not the ones on the screen. Too much light, so you can't see many. Maybe I just miss my telescope...

      PROS

      1) Everything is here. Everything. Most things are within a few blocks of you.
      2) Anything breaking rule #1 can be delivered.
      3) There are GOOD pizza places everywhere (None of that Dominos/Pizza Hut garbage)
      4) 24-hour subways (I know the parent said it, but it's worth repeating)
      5) And the kicker....

          Over 80% of us voted AGAINST Dubya in 2004.

      --
      "The amount of intelligence on this planet is a constant. The population is growing." -Cole's Axiom
    3. Re:New York City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I'd nix cons #3 and #4. Yeah, the *city* doesn't have much in the way of nature, or much in the way of stars, but just hit the Hudson line for a half hour trip north, and you'll have all the stars and nature you want!

      Goddamn if it isn't expensive though... T_T

    4. Re:New York City by tylernt · · Score: 1
      Plus we still get to use the Constitution and Bill of Rights!
      Not really. The 2nd amendment is pretty well neutered in NYC.

      Just sayin'.
      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    5. Re:New York City by opencity · · Score: 1

      > The 2nd amendment is pretty well neutered in NYC.

      Having lived in NY when it wasn't - 1970s -> 1980s - I actually prefer it this way. You can keep, just not bare and conceal.

      There's been some issues with public assembly, too.

      --
      Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it.
    6. Re:New York City by niteshad · · Score: 1

      Having lived in NY when it wasn't - 1970s -> 1980s - I actually prefer it this way. You can keep, just not bare and conceal.

      Correct me if I'm wrong here, but I seem to recall handguns being banned in New York, unless one was involved in the diamond trade. As for the rest, New York (the state) has some of the most restrictive, and quite frankly unnecessarily, gun laws in the USA.

      --
      To email me,subtract my nick from my email address, starting with the second character. (hint: adto.uiuc.edu is wrong)
    7. Re:New York City by opencity · · Score: 1

      NY's had the handgun law - Sullivan Act - since around 1911 - however the NYPD surrendered portions of the city during the 70s and 80s and it was a pretty spooky situation, like parts of LA today. You can get a carry permit through a judge for various reasons and we have occasional scandals with some movie star getting a permit through a friend on the cops.

      Note the Sullivan act only applies to guns small enough to hide. You can buy/own rifles etc ... As this isn't car culture and we are face to face with each other all day the handgun ban licensing isn't IMHO a bad idea. The rest of the US everyone is in their cars and it's different. I'd hate to be worrying about some psycho on a packed subway car with a nine - criminals use thier guns for business not drunken arguments. It's weird enough driving around the US and having road rage guys wave their guns around - though I'm not a gun control guy.

      --
      Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it.
  164. UK is best, but many good alternatives by expatriot · · Score: 1
    I left the US years ago (1979)and have lived in Denmark, Italy, France, Belgium, Netherlands and England.

    Everywhere has pluses and minuses.
    • Denmark: strong community feeling, cold and high taxes
    • Italy: amazing beauty, lots of bureaucracy
    • France: great food, French
    • Belgium: good location for travel (sorry), everything else
    • Netherlands: modern, difficult language and high taxes
    • England: sophisticated humor and best TV in world, weather (food is a lot better now)
    A lot of people emphasized freedom. That's a good thing, but also important are:
    • truthfulness in goverment (Blair tries to lie, but there are a lot of people pointing out the truth, unlike in US)
    • equality of opportunity
    • compassion (that means paying more tax so someone does not die because they can't afford basic medical care like in US)
    • culture, having art and literature valued (US dumbing down is creeping in however)
    You pays your money and takes your chances
    1. Re:UK is best, but many good alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree with this.
      As a Brit living in the US, I cannot wait to come home; I plan to leave USA next year.

      Downsides of USA:
          * high cost of medical cover (I have none)
          * amazingly biased media coverage
          * TV in general is poor quality with few good exceptions
          * cannot debate with some americans, if you critic the US the just switch off & ignore you
          * lack of quality newspapers & magazines
          * chain restaurants
          * the little citys (towns) all look the same
          * high cost of air travel
          * banks charge money for everything
          * bland supermarkets
          * junk mail
          * no privacy laws
          * reducing freedoms
          * seems to ignore the homeless, unemployed
          * everything seems dumbed down to an almost child-like level
          * all this ra-ra USA is the best crap :-) (who cares who is best)
          * bad beer in general, best west coast beer is good

      Good things about USA :
          * "paper or plastic"
          * respects the customer more
          * large large area = larger homes, larger stores
          * entrepreneurship

      I've never understood the thing about UK food. UK is a class structured place, maybe people in some circles have encountered bad food, but that place would be closed and shutdown today. Watching TV in the UK you'd see the world class chefs & tons of cooking programs, it's more a thing people do at home rather than eat out. My favourite restaurants are in the UK, the little Italian, French & Thai places actually run by those natives are great, smaller tastier portions.
      London is regulary voted on of the best places to eat in the world along with Paris and New York. (It got the title last year as voted by a New York magazine).

      I miss the sophistication of the UK and Europe. It's a place for adults whereas US seems like a place for minors with regard to dumbing down and TV coverage.

  165. Altough not an north american I would say... by mlopes · · Score: 1

    ... if I were one and I wanted to leave USA I would probably go for one of the North European countrys, Netherlands, Denmark, Sueden, etc... What would stop me? The same reason that keeps me stranded where I am... The fact that I've a job and wouldn't leave it for incertainity just cause I feel like it, the fact that those countrys speak strange languages, and beeing in a zone where the weather is warm I wouldn't easely leva for those very cold countrys, but that's a problem that part of the north americans don't have!

  166. You are aware that your answer is beyond trite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course the current illegal immigration problem is unlike anything this country has faced before, but a big historian like you would know that, right?

    Our ancestors came here legally and created a melting pot.

    Current illegal immigrants come here and live in self imposed enclaves and many have a notion of someday annexing the Southwest back to Mexico.

    To summarize: you are a fuckhead.

    1. Re:You are aware that your answer is beyond trite? by CmdrGravy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Muppet, so far as I have been taught in history lessons America was colonised by people from Europe who were seeking a better life for themselves in "The New World". They sailed over there and set up a small colony which then exploited the local environment to send back profitable goods to their backers in Europe.

      I think it's fair to say that these colonies mixed far more with themselves than they did with the native population and would have seemed very insular to any native on lookers.

      Time passes and the colonies grow in size annexing more and more land which was once the property of the native people.

    2. Re:You are aware that your answer is beyond trite? by mollymoo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Our ancestors came here legally and created a melting pot.

      I thought a melting pot in this sense was when cultures mixed. The white Europeans who invaded America killed and opressed the locals and imported slaves to do their work, there wasn't much in the way of cultural exchange. The US may be culturally diverse now, but that's a recent thing. For most of its history the US was entirely dominated by white people; there wasn't a whole lot of mixing going on unless you count plantation owners raping their slaves.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    3. Re:You are aware that your answer is beyond trite? by jackbird · · Score: 1
      Our ancestors came here legally and created a melting pot.

      Current illegal immigrants come here and live in self imposed enclaves and many have a notion of someday annexing the Southwest back to Mexico.

      Self imposed enclaves like the Chinatown in every major US city? Little [name of European country] in every major US city? Irish South Boston? Pennsylvania Dutch country? South Asian Jackson Heights in New York? The German/Scandanavian rural upper midwest? The Jewish neighborhoods of 20th c. New York? The Vietnamese neighborhoods in every west-coast city?

      Every new immigrant group in the US has formed enclaves in cities to survive, been discriminated against and reviled, and called un-American before being regarded as quintessentially American. It's not a great American tradition to be cherished, though.

    4. Re:You are aware that your answer is beyond trite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our ancestors came here legally and created a melting pot.

      All that land annexation wasn't legal by the laws of the original inhabitants.

    5. Re:You are aware that your answer is beyond trite? by _damnit_ · · Score: 1

      Are you arguing that Mexicans are COLONIZING the United States to establish a mercantilist economy in Mexico? You are supporting the parent's argument!

      Besides, there are many differences between the present immigration wave and previous immigrant groups. Those other groups were people who wanted to become American. The Irish saw themselves as establishing a new home here and worked hard and fought to become integrated into the American society. The same with the Italians, Poles, Greeks, et al. Their cultures enriched ours as they became American. A large portion of Mexicans do not want to assimilate with Americans. They see their stay here as temporary -- a kind of sharecropping without permission of the farmer. A percentage of the fruits of their labor are transferred back to Mexico and Central America as cash instead of staying in the US as taxes, investments and savings. They form societies within our cities which have no intention of folding into the fabric of the surrounding communities and actually harbor a small percentage of radicals who espouse Mexico retaking the southwest.

      I hope to someday have a prosperous neighbor to the south with strong trade and cultural ties to the US and Canada. Mexicans are a fun, energetic, intelligent and industrious people who deserve a better government and economy then they have at present. Their abundant natural resources should allow them to succeed without colonizing the US. Mexicans need to stay in Mexico and work hard there to make it a better neighbor and place to live.

      --


      _damnit_

      It's my job to freeze you. -- Logan's Run
    6. Re:You are aware that your answer is beyond trite? by _damnit_ · · Score: 2

      Are white people incapable of being different from one another. You imply that all white people are the same. I'm pretty sure there is a huge difference between a Bosnian and a Swede. There were different cultures in this country for many years. The differences have magnified over the years from a difference between English Puritans and the Danish to the current Mexican/Vietnamese/Cuban/Croat/Indian mixture we seem to have now. Cultural differences do not exist only where the skin pigmentation differs.

      Plantation owners were a very small portion of the population. In the same way that billionaires are a part of the American population. The rich always fuck the rest of us. No matter who we or they are. Most people in colonial America didn't own slaves and certainly didn't screw them. I'm sure there were a few but that hardly defines a culture. Most cultures prior to then also had slaves. A lot of them had defined laws and customs regarding trade in sex slaves (American colonies had no such trade). No one seems to dwell on slave fucking when referring to Egypt, Rome, Spanish, Ottoman and Persian societies.

      As for the "Europeans came and stole the land from peaceful people..." Get over it. Every piece of land in this world was once occupied by some other group of people. Why don't we start protesting that the English get out of England? Give it back to the Welsh. They were there first! Native American cultures were hunter gatherer societies. Very romantic in theory to live off the land, but ultimately a few thousand years behind Europe, Asia and parts of Africa. I feel bad about the Aztec and Inca being decimated because they had a fairly advanced culture, but even they were insular and technologically inferior. Had they invented the wheel? Sailing boats for commerce? Stopped sacrificing people to their Gods?

      Advanced and healthy societies generally replace other societies. Stronger groups of people take the land from others. That's how the world has always worked. Stop feeling bad for the Native Americans, the victims of the Vandals, Mongols and Anglo-Saxons and everyone else who got their ass kicked by stronger populations. This guilt over our cultural dominance has to stop. You can't put the Buffalo back on the prairie and you can't have Oklahoma and Nebraska back. Get over it.

      --


      _damnit_

      It's my job to freeze you. -- Logan's Run
    7. Re:You are aware that your answer is beyond trite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Advanced and healthy societies generally replace other societies. Stronger groups of people take the land from others. That's how the world has always worked. Stop feeling bad for the Native Americans, the victims of the Vandals, Mongols and Anglo-Saxons and everyone else who got their ass kicked by stronger populations.

      Bullshit. That whole line of reasoning is called Social Darwinism and it has been thoroughly discredited.

      The Native Americans were beaten by disease (biological warfare) and technology, two events that are accidents of history and not functions of society. If another accident of history causes an alien invasion force to find Earth and kill us all, that would not mean that their social system is "better" than ours. Similarly, China's rise to economic world pre-eminence does not mean that we should adopt their entire model of civilization.

      This guilt over our cultural dominance has to stop. You can't put the Buffalo back on the prairie and you can't have Oklahoma and Nebraska back. Get over it.

      I don't have any guilt over history I wasn't part of. But I have plenty of anger at idiots like you who didn't learn from it.

    8. Re:You are aware that your answer is beyond trite? by Blink+Tag · · Score: 1

      You're suggesting the Irish, Portuguese, and Italians (to name only a few) all had similar cultures? That's a rather daft summary American immigration.

      Even in the years before the U.S.A., the religious difference among the otherwise similar people from the British Isles were significant.

      Put aside your hatred for a moment and realize culture != race.

    9. Re:You are aware that your answer is beyond trite? by apeeira · · Score: 1

      The how about the civil war in the incan empire before Pizarro arrived? Are they the product of an inocent culture? And who did the Aztecs sacrificed? Their own citizens? Nooooo!!!! captured soldiers and civilians. technology may differ , but the human heart has remained constant.

    10. Re:You are aware that your answer is beyond trite? by _damnit_ · · Score: 1

      No sir, I do not subscribe to Social Darwinism. I never stated that "better" societies prevailed. I said "Advanced and healthy" and "Stronger" groups prevailed. To deny that European civilization was not more technologically advanced at the time than Native Americans would be absurd. To believe they were not stronger would of course deny the outcome. Just because disease played a major role in the outcome doesn't mean it isn't part of the equation that determines a healthy society. Cultures who were exposed by war and commerce to many other cultures and consequently their diseases had their populations strengthened eventually as in the case of measles and chicken pox. Measels became much less deadly over generations. Many people now are immune to the pox and I would consider that an enhancement which protects them.

      Regardless of what you call accidents of history. The results of those accidents formed societies. Remember, I never said "better". China's rise to economic power does not mean we all bow to them. That's non sequitur. I certainly don't think everyone has been adopting the American society model (though some presidents seem to try and impose it). My discussion was about displacing entire peoples from their lands, not adopting Free Market Communism.

      --


      _damnit_

      It's my job to freeze you. -- Logan's Run
    11. Re:You are aware that your answer is beyond trite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep in mind that "white" used to mean "Protestant", and mostly "Episcopalian". There was once a time when Irishmen were not even considered "white".

      dom

    12. Re:You are aware that your answer is beyond trite? by mollymoo · · Score: 1
      Are white people incapable of being different from one another. You imply that all white people are the same. I'm pretty sure there is a huge difference between a Bosnian and a Swede.
      [...]
      Cultural differences do not exist only where the skin pigmentation differs.

      To refute the notion of a melting pot I only needed to illustrate that there were significant cultural divisions, not write a detailed breakdown. Yes, there were lots of different kinds of Europeans, with different languages and cultures, but compared to Native Americans or Africans or Japanese those Europeans were (are) pretty damn similar to each other - culturally and racially. In middle of the last millennium, similar race did indeed imply similar (not identical - significant differences did exist) culture. If you can't see that all European cultures are and were comparatively similar you've probably not encountered much in the way of non-European culture.

      Cultures and races co-evolve. The evolution of different races is the result of groups of human beings isolated from each other. When people mix they trade, they fuck and they exchange ideas. Different races implies almost no interbreeding, which implies little mixing, which implies little trade or cultural exchange. The same race implies the converse - recent interbreeding and thus cultural exchange. At least, that is the case given enough time. Culture changes faster than race. Race is no longer as reliable an indicator of culture as it was before the advent of global travel and population mixing, but that's only because in evolutionary terms global travel is very recent and hasn't yet had a major impact on genetics. The early signs are there - there is an increasing number of mixed race people to go along with our mixed cultures. With time, the cultural and racial differences will be eroded further as people travel around the world exchanging ideas and bodily fluids. The largest cultural differences do indeed exist between people of different races, though there are of course cultural differences however you divide the population.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    13. Re:You are aware that your answer is beyond trite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You're suggesting the Irish, Portuguese, and Italians (to name only a few) all had similar cultures?"

      But they DID. It was called Roman Catholicism.

  167. New Zealand by Rupert · · Score: 1

    Moved here a year ago after 10 years in Minnesota. Definitely a better place. Unless you like things like customer service, or a choice of more than one of each type of product.

    Or disposable income.

    But apart from that it's bloody fantastic.

    --

    --
    E_NOSIG
  168. Like in the movie "Thank You For Smoking" by lord+sibn · · Score: 1

    The (badly phrased) question: "What makes america the best government in the world?"

    Asking "what prevents you from leaving" is obvious beyond comprehension. Let's start with Emigration/Immigration laws. Go from there to customs, and probable equipment incompatibility. And this is even before you start talking about money, which pretty much everybody I have ever met seems to have in such dreadfully short supply. Ok, so I am a political activist working at Burger King (neither is true, but hypothetically speaking)... I have no money, I have no rights, and you want to know what's stopping me from leaving?

    Duh?

    Oh, sure. I could go to college, and get a high salary job (Hah! Getting through college does not imply actually LANDING that job!), but then I'm that much closer to the elite "wealthy" class (which also always seems strapped for cash). Once I make the big bucks, I have more freedom to do what I want. But if I still want to leave, if I play my cards well, I could be out of this country within the next 15 years!

    So now it's a cost/benefit analysis. Which is better? 40 years working here, or 15 years of truly intensive effort to trade one set of problems for another?

    My point is, You can do the dance. But that does not mean that you win he trophy. Not everybody can grow up and become the President. Similarly, not everybody who wants to leave is capable. Nor are all of those capable actually going to make the effort. And making the effort does not imply success.

    What's stopping me? What isn't stopping me? I'm not prepared to invest 15 years of my life training myself to try to leave. Losing 15 years is just about half as much longer as i expect to live, so you want to know what's stopping me? In one word, perhaps? Beauracracy.

    Ultimately, I suppose my point is that the people who actually can leave generally do not. Being able to leave requires not only knowledge, but also money, time, and to some extent, power. The less you have of each, the more that stands in your way of leaving.

  169. Politicians Promoting Fear by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Yeah, tell me about it. A friend of mine lived in Yugoslavia before the wars of the 90s, and said it was really scary watching the local politicians whipping up ethnic hatred and fear because they got political power by doing it. The US during the early Bush presidency was starting to look that way, and then 9/11 happened; so much for a decent decade after the end of 40 years of Cold War global nuclear terrorism.


    On the other hand, I've *been* hit by lightning, and was almost hit by it another time; comes with hanging around on tall mountains. Some commentator in September 2001 was asked what Americans could do to protect themselves, and replied "Quit smoking and wear your seatbelt".

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  170. Pfff .. come live in Ireland by Joh_Fredersen · · Score: 1

    1. Fantastic economy 2. Good prospects for 20-30 years of high economic growth 3. Easy to become a citizen if you are European/American 4. The only English speaking country in the Euro (a currency). 5. Good academic research funding http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19225720.400 -the-lure-of-the-celtic-tiger.html 6. Investing large amounts of money (finally) in public train systems http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luas http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dublin_Metro 7. Free travel area with the UK. 8. Right beside the UK, so we get all of the British TV stations. 9. Militarily neutral - constitutionally enshrined, virtually impossible to go to war. 10. Full employment, leading to massive migration to Ireland http://www.heritage.org/research/worldwidefreedom/ bg1945.cfm Ride the tiger baby !

  171. Beware of Canuckistani Beavers and Flying Pucks by Cordath · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Soviet Canuckistan the Beavers eat *you*! Seriously, watchout for the little bastards. They'll smack you with their tails until you fall over and then gnaw off your limbs. You do have to be pretty drunk for them to catch you, so the real danger is when you're new to the country and only just getting used to Canadian beer, which is about 3 times stronger than kentucky bourbon. (Don't even touch Canadian whiskey. Canuckistani airlines sometimes uses the stuff as aviation fuel even though it's murder on the fuel lines.)

    You'll also have to get used to keeping a continual guard up against flying hockey pucks. This skill comes naturally to native Canuckistani's who grow up dodging pucks from an early age, but newcomers to the country often suffer a few concusions before they pick up the knack of knowing when 170 grams of vulcanized rubber is rocketing towards the back of their heads at upwards of 150kph. You should also realize that global warming may soon cause a massive housing shortage in Soviet Canuckistan as temperatures rise too high for igloos to survive the summer. Truly, the country is going to become a madhouse when people's 3000sq foot 4 level split igloos with attached garages melt into ponds.

    If you do still decide to emmigrate to Canada, be sure to talk to Phil from Vancouver. He can get you set up with your government issue starter snow-shovel and official toque with genuine saskatchewan sealskin bindings and special patriotic pom-pom. (very important) Be sure the pom-pom is firmly attached. If you lose it, rest assured that a mountie will spot it. (Don't even try to run. They always get their man.) Losing your pom-pom will get you exiled to newfieland, which is a fate many consdier worse than death by poutine!

    1. Re:Beware of Canuckistani Beavers and Flying Pucks by LordEd · · Score: 1

      In Canada, you must also understand sarcasm. A good study reference is here

    2. Re:Beware of Canuckistani Beavers and Flying Pucks by cgreuter · · Score: 1

      That's exactly the sort of propaganda that keeps Canada down. Seriously, don't listen to him. These are all lies or exaggerations. For example:

      In Soviet Canuckistan the Beavers eat you! Seriously, watchout for the little bastards.

      This is ludicrious. There are five, maybe six beaver attacks a year and they're almost always against the weak, infirm, elderly or small children. They can't take down a healthy adult human. Sure, the tail slaps sting, but no worse than an LA driveby.

      Besides, since the grizzley bear population exploded, the beaver population has gone way down. (Those bears can be nasty too, but you're usually safe if you keep your doors locked.)

      You should also realize that global warming may soon cause a massive housing shortage in Soviet Canuckistan[...]

      Once again, this is an exaggeration. Canadian housing is perfectly summer-proof with a good air-conditioner and a coat of spray-on insulation.

      If you do still decide to emmigrate to Canada, be sure to talk to Phil from Vancouver.

      Actually, you should avoid Phil. A lot of immigrants don't realize that the snow shovel, toque and pom-pom are free from the Glorious People's Revolutionary Immigration Department and Towing Service so Phil, the non-nice Canadian, makes a profit by selling them to the naive.

      In short, Canada is a great place to live. Just make sure your server room is air-conditioned in the summer.

    3. Re:Beware of Canuckistani Beavers and Flying Pucks by Psychotic_Wrath · · Score: 0

      MY grandpa got his nipple bit off by a beaver. True story. Watch out for em, He lives in Alberta

      --

      Doctors do Massage in Longview WA now, who knew?
  172. Too cold by teal_ · · Score: 1

    Canada sounds like a nice place, though.

    Yeah, it's lovely in July and August but forget about it the rest of the year, brutally cold. I spent some weeks in Quebec City back and forth a few times, and it was freezing in June, amazing. It's the most beautiful city I have ever been to though, seriously, Napoleon's dream. I'd live there in a heartbeat if the weather were northern california-ish. I guess it helps that I speak French :) In Montreal you can get by with just English, but further north or east and you pretty much have to speak some French. Much nicer language anyway :)

    My employer also thought it a nice joke to send me to New Brunswick for a few days in January once too, and I used to think Chicago was cold in the winter. Yikes! Where's that global warming I've been hearing so much about? :)

    But seriously, free health care sounds great, until you actually need something. Need a knee surgery? Waiting list for five years. OR, if you have the cash, cross the border and have it done. The only reason Canada's system even half works is because the U.S. is next door to fulfill needs of that sort. I think I'll stay here for now. It sucks, but it sucks less than everywhere else.

    1. Re:Too cold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You won't have to wait that long for global warming. Its alreay arrived here in Canada South (Maine). Every year there its warmer and there is less and less snow...time for me to head north I think.

    2. Re:Too cold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's lovely in July and August but forget about it the rest of the year, brutally cold.

      Cold in Quebec City in June? Really? Maybe that's a matter of perspective: for example, I wouldn't call 21 C (70 F) cold. That said, southern Ontario or Vancouver are considerably warmer than Quebec City or New Brunswick.

      Need a knee surgery? Waiting list for five years. OR, if you have the cash, cross the border and have it done.

      Eh? I had knee surgery last year to repair a torn ACL, and it happened within four months of me being put down on the list. I waited for less time than I did for the MRI!

    3. Re:Too cold by oudzeeman · · Score: 1

      I live in Maine, and travel to Quebec City farily often. In the heart of the city you can definately get by with minnimal or no French

    4. Re:Too cold by Abcd1234 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude, seriously, stop dispelling these myths! If people suddenly realize Canada isn't actually a subarctic wasteland, and that all the stories of people waiting years for operations are overblown or outdated, we'll never be able to keep people out!

    5. Re:Too cold by sjames · · Score: 1

      But seriously, free health care sounds great, until you actually need something. Need a knee surgery? Waiting list for five years. OR, if you have the cash, cross the border and have it done. The only reason Canada's system even half works is because the U.S. is next door to fulfill needs of that sort. I think I'll stay here for now. It sucks, but it sucks less than everywhere else.

      Meanwhile, here in the U.S. if you need knee surgery and have the cash, just get it done. If you don't have the cash, there's a waiting list fo....no, actually if you don't have the cash, you're just screwed. Note that if you have a life threatening condition and no cash, we do have a convieniant social program for that (Bush says so). Just camp out in the hospital parking lot until your condition reaches a crisis and they will treat you immediatly. You can file the bankrupcy papers later.

    6. Re:Too cold by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      IOW, if you're in Canada and too poor to go to the USA for treatment, you're screwed (imagine what will happen to your poor knee in 5 years). If you're in the US and poor, you're screwed (you might get your knee fixed, but you're bankrupt).

      Conclusion: unless you have money, you're screwed in either country.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    7. Re:Too cold by Shadarr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We could use another wave of American left-winger immigrants. Stephen Harper got elected, ffs.

    8. Re:Too cold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      silly people can't handle sub-zero (C) temperatures...I happen to like the cold though. Seriously, -10 is a nice warm day...provided you have a decent coat on, but still.

      and yeah, Quebec City is a really nice place, but that's not just people I happen to live there.

    9. Re:Too cold by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, the flip side is that it's a minority government. Really, that's the people saying "you know what, all you parties suck", and in the end, that's probably true.

      Frankly, I think this is the best government we've had in a long time... so paralyzed, they don't have the opportunity to screw anything up! And anything they *do* manage to pass must be built on consensus, meaning more Canadians end up represented.

      Sure, that means they also can't do anything controversial (eg, decriminalize marijuana), but I still rather that than a solid liberal or conservative majority, capable of passing anything they like.

    10. Re:Too cold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, temperatures can be surprisingly diverse across Canada.

      Living in Edmonton, the summers can get scorchingly hot during July and August. 30+ Celsius for consecutive days, easy.
      As for surgery and other pricy medical treatment, I needed a MRI done, I was in and out within a week(*).

      (*)The MRI was performed to eliminate the small, but still very real, threat of an brain aneurysm due to some exhibiting some "interesting" precursors. You will get pushed to the head of the heathcare line in Canada when so warranted. If I needed neurosurgery, I would have been in the OR the very same day if it were detected (It's something on the order of a $500,000 surgery, from, what I've been told. YMMV.).

      So, yes, non-lifethreating things are delayed to cover the ones which are of greater risk.

      Oh yeah, our beer is better.

    11. Re:Too cold by sjames · · Score: 1

      If you're in the US and poor, you're screwed (you might get your knee fixed, but you're bankrupt).

      In the U.S., unless you can make your knee problem into a life threatening condition, you won't get it fixed at all unless you can fix your poverty problem. Even if the wait IS 5 years in Canada, you will get it fixed in 5 years no matter how poor you are.

  173. Several friends moved to Belgium by billstewart · · Score: 1
    An American-born former coworker of mine moved to Belgium for a decade or so for a job, and he and his family tried to move back to the US and just couldn't readjust to the lifestyle here. They moved back; I think he was about 50 when he left.

    Another friend of mine moved there to go to school after the Computer Boom busted, and liked it, though he's met a girl over here and moved back.


    I think the vodka thing must be a combination of genetics and extensive practice, combined with living in Russia.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Several friends moved to Belgium by Reverend528 · · Score: 1
      he and his family tried to move back to the US and just couldn't readjust to the lifestyle here.

      I don't think I could leave a country known for making the worlds best ales.

  174. If not america then where? by yidele · · Score: 0

    1) Almost anyplace in Europe. I've spent roughly half my life in the US, the other half in Europe; from my perspective there are alot of places that are alternatives, it all depends on what you're accustomed to.

    Misconceptions about what its like to live here or there abound. Most western EU countries offer an average standard of living superior to that in the US ( a fact most US-ians aren't aware of ), likewise most places in the US aren't staging areas for running gun battles. That being said, I'd prefer to live in a place with minimum government interference into personal affairs & a maximum of personal freedom including a plurality based political system. This pretty much leaves the US out.

    - The scandinavian countries are great, if you don't mind the high taxes & the all-pervasive social support systems. You'll likely never get rich there, but you can live happily to a financially secure hale old age in ergonomic comfort & beautifull surroundings.

    - Germany is a bit too much like the US. I like Baden Wurtemberg / Bavaria for the high standard of living & income. A bit too authoritarian & germs are totaly anal when it comes to formalities.

    - Italy - specifically north italy, more specifically Lombardy,Piemonte, Veneto are very cool. Income sucks - roughly 1/3 - 1/2 of what a germ or a Brit makes for the same effort, but you can't beat the people, the vistas & the atmosphere. I would take a paycut to work there ( and have ).

    - Greece is great if you cab find a decent job, I have known people who gave up careers to work as tour guides & hoteliers in Greece, especially the south.

    - Netherlands. Great place to work, great place to visit, the wether sucks, but the people & places make up for it ( mostly). A very multi-culti place, recently tightening social permeability sphincters, mostly because of coloured muslims doing naughty things.

    - Chech republic - Great place to live ( inexpensive, relatively high standard of living), dynamic economy, friendly people & the best pilsners in the world

    - Poland, Hungary, Lithuania, Latvia - Steady economic growth, little govenmental control, a bit xenophobic & progressively turning toward authoritarianism, these countries host a great many western expats making oodles of money on local markets and the accession to the EU

    - Belgium. Beer, chocolate, trade acumen & high cost of living. Language sounds like a throat infection. The best beers in the world, unqualified.

    2) Nothing is keeping me, I don't live in the US

  175. I already went by Frodrick · · Score: 1

    1) Where would you live, if not in America and 2) What's stopping you from going?

    1) Australia!

    2) Nothing. I went - and never regretted it!

    I must admit, however, that it was a whole lot nicer place before John Howard came to power, took away everyone's rights and then stuck his nose up dubya's backside...

  176. Re:Aotearoa? You won't make it a year...! by htnprm · · Score: 1

    Wet? Well, at the moment, Yeah. Thanks La Niña...:-(

    Under-insulated houses? So fix it. Get some Pink Bats or that spray in stuff.

    Customer service? Nothin wrong with it...

    Beetroot...And don't forget the egg.

    I moved to NZ from Washington State almost 20 years ago. I talk with family in the US, and they're always stressing out about one thing or another. Me? I'm outside havin a barbecue...:-)

  177. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by Sqwubbsy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I call bullshit. Poverty is not "generally measured, not by how little you have, but by how much less you have than average." Poverty is the inability to sustain a way of life.
    What my neighbor makes has no bearing on how free I am. We use the same tax schedule but there are boatloads of folks in the U.S. who make more than me but who manage it poorly. Thus, they pay more to the common weal, may have more in the bank, but are constrained about what they can do in terms of family trips/home improvements.
    You sound like a socialist in terms of everyone being on a level playing field and no one being '"poorer" for their lack of resources. But they're happy...' Christ, you sound like a Communist.
    People are happy when they have political and economic self determination - regardless of how much they earn or who their President is.
    I hated Clinton and I'm not enamored of Bush, but I'm not going anywhere because I get a say. My ancestors did not have that luxury.
    True story: My great-grandfather went back to Italy that he left when he was 16. He was in his 80's. He was supposed to be their two weeks. They were so excited to show him their new toilet. First one the family ever had. He left after two days. All his kids, including my grandmom, glamorized Italy (and I know it's got some great stuff and having studied Latin, I know the deep heritage) but not everyone has it great and no place is all it's cracked up to be.
    Finally, as for keeping guns in drawers - the primary reason for this right in the US is to kill government types who overstep their bounds. It's less about neighbors and hunting and more about preventing idiocy in the ruling class. The risk, of course, is that unsupervised children are going to harm themselves or others which is on the adults who facilitated their gun acquisition.

  178. DO *NOT* COME TO BRITAIN by Avant+Gardener · · Score: 1

    I'm 25. My income tax rate is 40% (top bracket) (bear in mind that this comes into place at the relatively low threshold of roughly £34,000). On top of that, everyone pays NHS tax at around 11%. So right away, 51% of my pay cheque is obliterated by tax.

    Add to that 17.5% VAT (sales tax), petrol at £0.90/L ($6/US gal.), insane council (property) tax.

    I get private medical insurance from my company. If I actually use that, instead of it being a tax break because I did not burden the NHS, I would be taxed on THAT TOO as a "benefit in kind." I cannot opt out of paying NHS taxes; if I could, I would. I broke my arm recently and was forced to wait in the ER for SEVEN HOURS before I was seen.

    I am tired of working my fucking arse off only to get totally gouged by the government day in and day out.

    Time to find myself a Craigslist wife. Any takers?

    1. Re:DO *NOT* COME TO BRITAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree with the statements about the UK. Blair and Brown (plus Bush) have ruined this country. Taxes will have to rise significantly in 2-3 years to pay for Brown's profligate spending. New Labour's chickens will come home to roost very soon. Financially, the UK is in a far worse state then in 1997 and us dumb taxpayers will have to cough up lots to pay again and again.
      So, I am in the process of selling up and moving to Southern Chile. Yep I'm dropping out of this corrupt society. I was a local councillor but resigned in protest at the huge annual reduction in the amount of money we get from central covernment. If this trend continues in 2-3 years my local council will have to PAY the Government from its income rather than the other way round.
      I have bought 30 acres of land that has a Pacific Beachfront and mountains behind with a Glacier less than 10km away.
      With all the money I will make on my House I will be able to build a very nice place indeed. I will be almost self sufficient. Power will be supplied by Wind and PV. There is a small stream running through the property which is unpolluted. I will grow my own food and enjoy life. Access is by boat only.

      Will I get bored? Nope. I am a Landscape Photographer and the countryside near where I will be living is lovely. I am also a budding Author. I will have time to complete the two novels I have already started.

    2. Re:DO *NOT* COME TO BRITAIN by paedobear · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of countries where 34 grand is a NICE amount to be earning at only 25, including Japan - but hey, I'm not here for the money (my sister works in the City, in a lower position than I do, and makes about twice the money)

  179. Gone - Nothing stopped Us by UpAndMoved · · Score: 1

    I read Slashdot for years, but this article actually made me create an account. Our story is we wanted to leave as early as January. February: We decided to "go for it." March: I started browsing for IT recruiters in Europe. April: Telephone interviews May: Face-to-face interview in Prague, Czech Republic; Got job. June: Packed, sold home, shipped goods, found apartment July 3, 2006: On site and been happy ever since Sure, America's great, and I'm sure we'll come back, ...at least to visit.

  180. Re:... where would I move? Not Finland! by htnprm · · Score: 0, Troll

    I LOL'd...

  181. Come to Dublin... by Joh_Fredersen · · Score: 1

    Fixing up previous post

    Move to Ireland for the following reasons

    1. Fantastic economy
    2. Good prospects for 20-30 years of high economic growth
    3. Easy to become a citizen if you are European/American
    4. The only English speaking country in the Euro (a currency).
    5. Good academic research funding http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19225720.400 -the-lure-of-the-celtic-tiger.html [newscientist.com]
    6. Investing large amounts of money (finally) in public train systems http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luas [wikipedia.org] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dublin_Metro [wikipedia.org]
    7. Free travel area with the UK.
    8. Right beside the UK, so we get all of the British TV stations.
    9. Militarily neutral - constitutionally enshrined, virtually impossible to go to war.
    10. Full employment, leading to massive migration to Ireland http://www.heritage.org/research/worldwidefreedom/ bg1945.cfm [heritage.org]


    You could go to London and in fact I'd be quite tempted to do that myself but... I suppose being Irish... I'm required to say move here anyway.
    Until Dublin finishes building it's tram system though... the London tube is just too excellent to reasonably discount London as an amazing place to live.
    Really though Dublin or London are ideal places to move to especially if you don't speak French/German/Italian/Spanish/(Norsk|Dansk|Svenska )

    Ride the tiger baby !

    1. Re:Come to Dublin... by reaktor · · Score: 1

      What about Guinness beer? That should be at least number 1 or 2 on the list!

    2. Re:Come to Dublin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >1. Fantastic economy

      Being the most expensive place in the EU to live.

      >2. Good prospects for 20-30 years of high economic growth

      For cheap labour.

      >3. Easy to become a citizen if you are European/American

      Actually no it isn't anymore.

      >4. The only English speaking country in the Euro (a currency).

      I am not sure how that is a bonus

      >5. Good academic research funding

      Again how is this a bonus for living in the country.

      >6. Investing large amounts of money (finally) in public train systems

      You must be kidding me. We have one of the worst transport systems in the world.

      >7. Free travel area with the UK.

      Normal visa restrictions apply going to the UK. Its a different country.

      >8. Right beside the UK, so we get all of the British TV stations.

      Which you have to pay 150 euros a year minimum to watch. Actually owning a device capable of getting a signal means you have to pay for TV license. Recent changes to the laws means owning windows media player on a CD only in your house = pay.

      >9. Militarily neutral

      This is not actually true. There is already complaints from the locals over the Irish government helping US troops refuel in Shannon and military bases and also rendition flights.

      >10. Full employment

      Most of the new employment is for cheap labour. While Ireland is at its lowest unemployment rate ever doesn't mean your going to get a good paying job. IT sector for example doesn't pay well at all in comparison to the UK (factoring in cost of living).

      Price of houses are through the roof and recently Ireland won an award in the EU of how not to design an Urban infrastructure. For example 3 new housing estates where I live in the last 8 years (200-300 houses) yet children have to go onto a 4 year waiting list to get into the local school.

    3. Re:Come to Dublin... by paedobear · · Score: 1

      Guinness is a mix of a Stout and a Porter - bit of a curate's egg. Then again, I take it you're American so it's to be understood you've never had good beer.

    4. Re:Come to Dublin... by Joh_Fredersen · · Score: 1

      Gah...

      Guinness is piss !

      You'd have to be an *extreme* nationalist to even pretend to like that.

      Now Erdinger.... there's a real beer !

    5. Re:Come to Dublin... by paedobear · · Score: 1

      I've been plenty of places where, sadly, Guinness is the best beer on offer - Italian beer makes Budweiser look good, and the staple beer in "English" pubs over here IS Guinness (the other beer being Budweiser...)

    6. Re:Come to Dublin... by UpAndMoved · · Score: 1

      Take caution in how you use "Budweiser" when speaking of beer... The original Bud is Budvar, the Czech beer...and most Europeans will acknowledge that Czech beers are a superior beer to most if not all the world's beers. If you're talking about the American "Bud"...well, then you're not talking about beer. :)

  182. I'll tell you what: by crhylove · · Score: 1

    We go back to:

    1. The Constitution
    2. The Bill of Rights
    3. The Geneva Convention
    4. Habeus Corpus (sp?)

    And I'll stay right here, thank you very much.

    The food is awful in the english speaking part of europe. Have you had Black Pudding? Seriously, I thought MCDONALD's was bad.

    rhY

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
    1. Re:I'll tell you what: by handelaar · · Score: 1

      Um, you no longer have either numbers 3 or 4.

      But good luck with holding onto the other two.

    2. Re:I'll tell you what: by crhylove · · Score: 1

      Actually, we haven't had numbers one or two either for quite some time. I'd say since the CIA whacked Kennedy, actually.

      rhY

      --
      I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
  183. Ethiopia by AbsentMindedProf · · Score: 1

    Actually it wasn't my first choice.... my wife couldn't get a visa to the U.S. (we weren't married when I decided to leave; we had met in India and summered together various places in India and Africa) and it seemed easier for me to get a job just about anywhere than for her to get a U.S. visa. Ethiopia isn't exactly high-tech or democratic, but people with high skills are in demand and for the salary of a Starbucks cashier you can live quite handsomely here. Anyway, now I'm in Addis and enjoying the sun.

    Most of the rest of my friends from New York have left for Asia -- Hong Kong, Bangkok, Dhaka -- and I have to agree it's a more happening part of the world. But we're all trying to sample different places and we'll probably report back to each other about how things go. And maybe we'll all end up in the same place.

    As I said above, I didn't leave the U.S. because I had given up on the political system, though the reason I left does very much have to do with politics. I would like to come back and work for change, and I expect the next decade of my life will be spent shuttling in and out of the U.S. But the political climate does make the U.S. less alluring, and the salaries that highly-skilled workers can get abroad seem pretty alluring right now. What's one to do?

  184. I am a Mexican outsider :) by xtracto · · Score: 1

    Gosh I got so many comments to answer to on this thread!!!

    I will only give you my point of view of course. There are several problems with Mexicans. I can summarise it like "The Mexican is its own Enemy" which is the name of a really nice book (in Spanish) which shows different stories that would *only* happen in Mexico.

    Mexico would be a far better place if more stayed and tried to make it a better place. By leaving, they only ensure that their corrupt government stays in power, this is why they encourage it so much (not to mention remittances).


    The problem in Mexico is this as follows: half of the population is poor, from this half, the 20% is in misery. The other half of course is not rich, you have a *really big* "medium class" which I think (from the deepest of my ass of course) it is something like 40%. The medium class are the families in which the father works from monday to friday (sometimes saturday) from 7 to 4 (sometimes 7) to get food for the 3 children in the house. Of course, the income of these people is among $1,000 monthly and that is a GREAT salary.

    Now, what does this have to do with what you said?, well, usually people in Mexico are VERY BUSY working to feed their family to make something about corruption.

    The other problem is corruption itself, I had a discussion with another Mexican friend who also came to do his PhD (he know a lot about current Mexican situation, his PhD is in "sustained development" and is expert in Chiapas issues Chiapas is a state where the poorest people lives, where the Comandante Marcos is from and a state with HUGE natural resources).
    So, the main problem is that Mexicans like corruption. Really, we are always whining about corrupt government and corrupt police and whatever, BUT when the policeman stops you because of speeding or whatever, it is the PEOPLE the ones that should enforce the police to give them the ticket and leave. Of course they preffer the "dame pal café" exit and give US$5 to the policemen.

    Now, about the ones that get out of there. Believe me, as me, there are other (at least) 4 or 5 hundred Mexicans who are doing some postgraduate course funded by the Mexican Science Council. A lot of us have the desire to return to Mexico and do something for our country. But the reality is that I, as a "Computer Scientist" can not do too much besides doing my work RIGHT. Then there are politicians (I met a guy who is doing his PhD in some social thing, he is son of one of the helpers of Luis Donaldo Colosio, a president candidate who was murdered some years sago in Mexico), now he is one that can make a difference *in politics*.

    We love our country, lot of us. I dont know if you are aware but, there is an exception which is the people in the border that go to USA and try to "wash out" their Mexican status, the funny thing is that they are neither accepted by the USA people (what we call gringos) and they become "hated" by Mexicans. This is the people that lives in the border (usually in the USA side). Of course NOT all of them are like that, just a fraction.

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  185. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by CarpetShark · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can exercise greater control over your socioeconomic standing? Honestly? (no, really, I want to know). It seems to me that, if people have less taxes to pay, then people who don't value their social security or health cover will work for less, because they don't factor those things into their living expenses. As such, the average person is probably paid an effectively lower wage. Almost by definition, add-ons like health care would seem to be expensive "extras" to most workers. So... with an average (mode, not mean) salary, how much can you HONESTLY change your lifestyle? Are you saying that people can lift themselves up, into better neighbourhoods and lifestyles, just by giving up their healthcare for a while? I doubt it. Even if they could, I'm not sure that's a fair way to judge, when some people may have illnesses that require healthcare, and those individuals should not be dismissed, but rather treated as equals in every way.

  186. Romania by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There wasn't anything to stop me. I just moved here one year ago.

    The economy is growing rapidly, which presents all kinds of opportunities. (In addition, you -as the American- are uniquely positioned to start-up a trustworthy outsourcing firm, if that sort of thing appeals to you.) The people you meet are extraordinarily friendly. Social change is everywhere, which makes for exiting times. Political changes give opportunities to influence the future, for those who are so inclined. It's just now joining the EU.

    And, yes, Slashdot, most of the Romanian women tend to be far sexier, less materialistic, and less self-centered. Even a pasty geek like yourself could manage to find a gorgeous, educated partner.

  187. Depends who's chasing you out.... by cralewyth · · Score: 1

    If the RIAA or MPAA are after you, try Sweden. They like pirates there.

    --
    "Women are just like ninjas; They lie even when it is more convenient to tell the truth." ~ Unknown
  188. New Zealand or Bust by outcast341 · · Score: 0

    1) New Zealand
    2) Nothing already here, it did take some cash though.

    --
    --end of line--
  189. Vote by kevin+lyda · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you do leave, vote: http://www.votefromabroad.org/

    --
    US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
  190. Wellington NZ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We actually didn't let anything stop us.
    Put in applications in the first week of November 2004; it took a while but we finally got cleared.
    I've been here about 6 months now; finishing up contract projects for a San Francisco area software company.
    What do I miss? Big bowls of salad, and avocado sandwiches. Mmmm. Salad.
    What do I appreciate? The consumer DVD players are apparently region free BY LAW. Or so I was told/sold by the floor sales dude. Sadly the DVD-ROM drive I got locally seems to have the same-ole region crap. This may seem like a silly thing but given the variety of regions and formats that show up here it's pretty important.
    Waiting for the SUMMERTIME now to see what that's like.

    Why NZ?
    a) they speak english here
    b) opposite summers - working in video games means sacrificing _every_ july and august to the crunch [working backwards from Christmas, that's just how it works out]
    c) girlfriend wanted to see hobbits
    d) economic bet hedging against the US$
    e) cheaper than the bay area without being nebraska

    Anyway so far so good. Ask me/. again in a year and we'll see.

  191. Peru at home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey Gringos don't worry, you don't need to move anywhere. We can bring Peru to your state in a bliz. Just make a free visa for Peruvians who want to live in your state for a week, and You will have a New Country delivered directly. If you want Machu Pichu we the new inmigrants would construct one for you, or Nazca Lines, no hay problema, we will need some desert terrain for that.
    and finally
    "Visite el Peru primero, antes que el Peru lo visite a usted."
    gracias amigos. Wating for your response.

  192. Germany, (not that different really...) by pdxdada · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well I currently live in Germany, I have lived on 4 different continents so I can say with some experience that this magical utopia of which I hear doesn't exist. Possibly due to a lack of actually ever having traveled or learned another language, when I was last in America I used to hear a lot of liberals talking about leaving the country as though the rest of the world was a bastian of free thought, moderation and reason. Guess what, you'll make some hefty compramises anywhere you live. Germany for example has some of the worst customer service and burocracy on earth. On the other hand it has good health care and the people are ver straight forward (yes I came here for that world famous German charm). My advise to everyone would be take some time and see the world, every country has at least a few good ideas.

    --
    Don't mess with the bunny, outsideworld.org
    1. Re:Germany, (not that different really...) by Milton+Waddams · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm from Ireland but I go to Germany lots. I lived there for a year when I was in college. To me it feels like home away from home. The Germans sure know how to live. Great health service, public transport is a dream (both of these are complete nightmares in Ireland), everything's cheap enough (compared to Dublin anyway), great beer, some great food (kebabs, sausage etc.) beautiful women (they look after themselves!).

      In fact everything in Germany is much better than in Ireland except for one thing. The people. Don't get me wrong. I think the Germans are great but when living there for a while, I start to really miss the friendliness of the Irish and also the pubs are great. I like the way Dublin's crammed full of people. It's really alive.

      I suppose the grass is always greener on the other side but that other cliché, "There's no place like home" is also true.

    2. Re:Germany, (not that different really...) by donatzsky · · Score: 1
      Germany for example has some of the worst customer service and burocracy on earth.

      Now, I don't actually know how it is in Germany, but I don't think it can beat France when it comes to bad service and bureaucracy. It's simply astonishing, especially when you, like me, come from Denmark.
    3. Re:Germany, (not that different really...) by dkrug · · Score: 1

      I am an American living in Germany for more than 32 years. There are many, many American expats here, probably more than in just about any other country in the world. Its probably one of the best places to live, even though it has its share of problems. I disagree with a previous post about burocracy in Germany. While it certainly exists, I would say that it is less problematic than the U.S. in many cases, and for sure better than in most other European countries. I now own and operate my own business here, and foreigners have essentially no restrictions on owning property. Taxes are lower than in most other European countries as well. If one has professional skills, it is not that hard to find work here either. However, I will say that when I retire, it will not be in Germany. I am targeting Thailand as the place I will go for that. The key will be to have property, a home and a car purchased prior to retirement (not really that expensive by U.S. or European norms), and then I should be able to live fairly well on the pittance I will get from Social Security, my 401K and my personal savings. Oh, and medical insurance is cheap and high-speed Internet access is readily available and inexpensive. What more could one want?

  193. my preferred countries (and remarks): by tarscher · · Score: 1

    Sweden: Beautiful nature and politicians that think ahead. Althuig the klimaat sucks. Belgium: perfect mix between Calvinistic mentality and Bourgondic lifestyle. Probably my prefered country. Especially Flanders which is among the richest regions in the world.

    1. Re:my preferred countries (and remarks): by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      The only thing Belgium mixes perfectly is malt and hops.


      Excessive taxation, bureacracy, immigration problems, corruption at all levels of government, even more bureacracy, a political system where the prime minister loses an election but is still prime minister ... need I go on?

      P.S. And bureacracy. Lots of it.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  194. You could come to Denmark by allanj · · Score: 1

    If you can live with the high taxes and the (mostly) bad weather, there is negative unemployment here right now and a serious economic boom. If you're good at something (almost any profession, and certainly all aspects of engineering and medicine) you can have a job in no time. In fact, if you're into power engineering and/or advanced process regulation my company would consider hiring you for our R&D department (where I work, BTW).

    Most danes are good english speakers and only a few radicals are seriously anti-american. If you avoid glorifying your home country too badly and can live with an almost entirely non-religious society, you could have a really good time here. Immigration laws are sort of tough these days, but it's not impossible at all.

    If you're a gun nut, then forget about going - weapons permits are very hard to obtain and, for all practical purposes, limited to highly regulated hunting weapons that require a hunting license.

    On the good side, we've got some of the best-looking women in the world, IMNSHO ;-)

    --
    Black holes are where God divided by zero
    1. Re:You could come to Denmark by easter1916 · · Score: 1
      On the good side, we've got some of the best-looking women in the world, IMNSHO ;-)


      Yes, and we'd like you to return them to us, thanks.

      Sincerely,
      The Celts.
    2. Re:You could come to Denmark by neurox · · Score: 1

      Are the Celts in short supply? ;-)

      --
      "Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for they are subtle and quick to anger."
    3. Re:You could come to Denmark by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      YES! You d@mned Vikings! You stole the best-looking ones!

  195. It's called "rationalization" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The key to success is having enough money to support yourself, not making enough money to live a life of luxury and frivolous spending."

    Wow. This is like a dictionary definition of "rationalization". Seriously.

    It's not owning expensive things that's a big deal, it's the ability to start from nothing in the U.S. and end up in that situation. I'm the son of a coal miner. We lived in a 2 room house with just a fire in the kitchen (no joke). We have kids who are about to graduate from high school. And today my wife and I are directors in large organization and we make a lot of money. We have a big house with pool and land, expensive cars, we have everything in life, we use our spare time to contribute to the community, working with children especially, and we find time to go to improve our bodies and minds.

    Money may not bring fulfillment, but it sure gives us the ability to not worry about the mundane things in life.

    I'd rather this system than any other, because it rewards people who work hard, and provides a minimal safety net to those who don't. It doesn't promise equality of result, it does provide equality of opportunity.

    Good luck to you in your life.

    1. Re:It's called "rationalization" by Marcus+Green · · Score: 1

      Is it really the hard work that gets rewarded? I got the impression that there were millions of people in the US who work very hard indeed and are still relatively poor.

    2. Re:It's called "rationalization" by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      If a hundred guys work their asses off and one gets rich, it is used as a proof that hard work pays off. The other 99 are conveniently forgotten.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  196. Easy to find better places... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the top: Norway, Iceland, Australia, Luxembourg, Canada, Sweden, Switzerland, Ireland, Belgium. (taken from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Development_Ind ex)

    Im not from the US myself but one thing I could imagine is stopping people from moving from there is the fact that anywhere you go these days, you get people confronting you about your country's disastrous foreign policy. But then again, you can always pretend to be Canadian.

  197. high taxes in Europe etc by localoptimum · · Score: 1

    OK Folks, I see a lot of comments about this, and I'd like to make a few points based on my own experience. I grew up in the UK, where taxes are relatively low. I was unemployed for a few months after finishing a PhD in physics. Unemployment sucks, but it especially sucks when you have to grease up to some retard and fill out a hundred forms just so they give you enough money to buy half a loaf of bread. It took me a few months to find work, and now I am working as a physicist in Berlin. Here, taxes are pretty much 50% all in, and if you end up unemployed here then you find that you get something like 60% of your last salary for a while. Indeed - as one person put it - this seems to result in 20yo punks sitting in the park and smoking weed. I tend to notice the naked women sunbathing more than the punks, but never mind ;-) However, I'd take that social-security and high-tax life any day over the s**t consumer-driven life I had in the UK. I have not seen one violent crime in Berlin in the last 2 years I've been here. When I lived in Leeds, during one year gangs tried to steal my bicycle on THREE separate occasions WHILST I WAS RIDING HOME ON IT; a dealer was gunned down at the bottom of my ex-girlfriends street whilst he was buying a pizza; and the local cinema was robbed at gun point four times. I read a statistic the other day that claimed you are 6 times more likely to be robbed in London than in New York. In summary: high taxes are OK and Britain sucks donkey balls.

    --
    This message was scanned by European governments and contains no terrorism.
  198. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by dk.r*nger · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Actually, the amount of wealth relative to others is what determines your freedom. Poverty is generally measured, not by how little you have, but by how much less you have than average.

    Yeah, and that's wrong. That is a totally corrupted perception of freedom.

    If you ride a bike to work, live in a small house, feed your family and are happy, and I drive one of my BMWs to work, live in a big house, feed my family and am happy, does that make you less free that me?

    Only if you tie your happiness to materialism. Ironically, leftists seem to claim that capitalists are only concerned about money, while when it comes to defining relative freedom, the only valid measure is monetary wealth.

    What if you have a wife that loves you, and I don't? Doesn't that make us un-equal, and you more free than me? What if I'm a idiot with no friends, and you are a great guy with bunches?
    Happyness comes form so many other factors than money, and I said that, me, the (economic-)freedom loving, high-tax hating capitalist.

    I live in Denmark, with one of the most ridiculously high taxation rates in the world, so I'm not just talking from theory, this is everyday life for me.

    In my family there is a guy, an academic, whom today is unhappy with his work, because he over the years declined career advances because the extra responsibilities would in no way be compensated by the exra money earned in 60+% top tax bracket. No, he is not exceedingly rich for being in the top taxbracket, about halft of everybody with a fulltime job is in it.

    In a more socialist system, by contrast, higher taxes and moderate salaries means that everyone is working for each other, contributing to a community. They still have the same average spending power, which means that no one is "poorer" for their lack of resources. But they're happy, and together, they've built something: a society, where people feel wanted and protected and cared for, so that they don't feel the need to sleep with guns in the drawer, or shoot their classmates.

    Cue violins. This is bullshit. That is how Marx imagined it on paper, but it never happened in real life. A recent study in Denmark showed that the average citizen is not working for the common good, but has become a spoiled welfare junkie, always expecting more and better from the government, a vicious circle..

    I don't have a problem paying taxes (I'm not an anarchist), but I do have a problem with the government spending my taxes to keep 1/5 of the workforce out of the labormarket.
  199. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by dajak · · Score: 1

    Actually, the amount of wealth relative to others is what determines your freedom. Poverty is generally measured, not by how little you have, but by how much less you have than average.

    The market is not the only solution to scarcity, or to put it differently: the wealth, power, and freedom dimensions are different things, and societies differ in what aspects of power and freedom are tradable on the market. To give a simple example: a society consisting of a million subsistence farmers that eat their own produce and never exchange anything as a matter of principle, strictly speaking has a GDP of $0 but a lot of freedom. If the government prohibits eating your own crops because it wants to have a tax base, the GDP suddenly grows to whatever the world market value of the produced crops is, but freedom decreases. They not only have to start paying taxes, but they also lost their immunity to competitors in the world market. An embellishment: in this society land may be considered untradable (for instance because everyone holds it in fief from the king), and the people with the biggest parcel of land will always have the biggest parcel of land, and therefore usually the biggest crop.

    A lot of countries in the world are actually "wealthier" relative to the US than their GDP suggests, in the sense that they could boost their GDP at the expense of existing methods of distribution of power and freedom. The existing methods are not necessarily more equitable, but they usually are more static and give some relief from the rat race. I don't think this really has much to do with being "more socialist".

  200. Parent gets the facts wrong on Italy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [i]Then you realize that the social services suck. Want a painkiller for your broken leg? Tough. Want an annual dental checkup? Tough. Want a cop to investigate repeated break-ins? Tough.[/i]

    What are you talking about? Italy's health care system is rated second in the world (after France) by the WHO. If you break a leg, you'll get a full treatment paid by the national health service, not just "painkillers". Annual dental checkup? I do one every six months, free of charge, at a private dentist studio (no, there is no insurance or anything, they offer it for free).
    I've never had a break-in, so I can't comment on that, but I'll point out that, for historical reasons, we have two parallel nationwide police forces in Italy: if you're disappointed with the State Police, try asking the Carabinieri, and vice versa.

    I agree that the taxes are too high, however.

  201. It's possible to get gravy for your fries here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gravy for your fries is actually pretty easy, just visit the South (/Southeast). Of course it might be cream gravy instead of brown, but it still tastes good in that "oh god oh god my heart!" sort of way. ;) [Specifically, go to any whataburger and order combo meals #6 or #8 iirc.]

  202. Substantive criticisms... by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1
    You've addressed none of the substantive criticisms from the grandparent. What he's arguing and what you're arguing are not necessarily incompatible.


    I take it you mean this?

    I thought about moving to Italy once. Actually, I lived there for several years while working for an American company. When I looked at my Italian counterparts, I thought about having a go at it.

    Then I found out they pay almost 50% income tax. On top of that, there is a 20% VAT on most items. On top of that, gasoline was almost $5 per gallon (a few years ago...almost certainly more now).

    The high taxes were there to support their social services. Free medical. Free dental. Good unemployment and retirement. Almost no chance of getting fired. 6-hour work days and 30-days of vacation. Virtually no concept of sexual harassment or workplace misconduct.

    Then you realize that the social services suck. Want a painkiller for your broken leg? Tough. Want an annual dental checkup? Tough. Want a cop to investigate repeated break-ins? Tough.

    Europe is great if you are young or unemployed. Europe sucks if you actually want to make something of yourself through hard work.

    Personally, I couldn't live if I worked 6 days a week knowing I'd only get 3-days pay after taxes just so some 22-yo punk could sit in the park all day and smoke pot.
    --
    I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.


    The Italians have their own culture that works for them and I respect that but Italy is not exactly the country that sets the standard for the rest of Europe. Another thing to consider is that most European countries do not have an income tax percentage of 50%, it's usually between 30-45%, at least in those European countries with a sane government but there are exceptions such as Sweden where they tend to take taxing to extremes. The sales tax varies according to the type of product you are buying, it is usually higher for luxury goods and it is not always 20% plus. I have lived in 5 European countries and nowhere was a working day of 6 hours the national norm. Myself I usually work 9 and occasionally 10 hours per day and sometimes on weekends as well. As for there being no concept of sexual harassment that is also not true, most European countries have legislation for this but once again Italy is not the best country to take as an example if you are the type of person who takes the slightest hint of sexual harassment as deadly seriously as I know many Americans do. As for there being fewer cops per crime committed than is needed in European countries, it seems to me this is not only a European problem since my American friends manage to complain about the apathy of their own American police forces with just as much vigor as my European friends. There is a core of truth to what the OP says, taxes in Europe are usually higher than in the US and gasoline taxes are levied for environmental reasons which is a concept that doesn't seem to exist in the USA these days but that post is is also wildly exaggerated in some places. Basically, if you want to live abroad you had better get used to the fact that the entire rest of the world is not like the USA. If you can't get over the fact that foreign cultures are not 100% carbon copies of the USA and that not everybody speaks and writes flawless American English you should stay at home and wrap your self in an American flag.
    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
    1. Re:Substantive criticisms... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow way to completely miss the point of the guys arguement! Try stepping back and stopping your American biases/hating/bashing for a minute and read over what he said. He lived there he didnt like the system so he decided not to move there. How hard is that for you to see? Instead you want to throw in some ever prevelent american bashing as has been the norm in the majority of the media etc from the European countries I have been to.

    2. Re:Substantive criticisms... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wow way to completely miss the point of the guys arguement! Try stepping back and stopping your American biases/hating/bashing for a minute and read over what he said. He lived there he didnt like the system so he decided not to move there. How hard is that for you to see? Instead you want to throw in some ever prevelent american bashing as has been the norm in the majority of the media etc from the European countries I have been to.

      I quote:

      Europe is great if you are young or unemployed. Europe sucks if you actually want to make something of yourself through hard work.

      Personally, I couldn't live if I worked 6 days a week knowing I'd only get 3-days pay after taxes just so some 22-yo punk could sit in the park all day and smoke pot.

      Firstly the guy exaggerated the disadvantages of living in Europe. Secondly, with the above statement he applied whatever parts of his exaggerated criticism that may have been true of Italy to Europe in general which is no only unfair but pretty stupid. Amazing as this may sound to you it is possible to unfairly bash more things that just America. I'll reiterate: 'If you don't like fact that the rest of the world in not a carbon copy of the USA accept it and if you are going to whine about it at least don't exaggerate'.
  203. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    as for keeping guns in drawers - the primary reason for this right in the US is to kill government types who overstep their bounds
    Yeah, right... we've seen that in the news. Some guys put that right to the test and FBI put them out, including some of the kids (they blamed that on killed guys afterwards). You do that, you're done for it.
  204. Shameless advertising spam by heikkki · · Score: 1

    What kind of article is this? Just a little wrapper around your buy-my-book-on-Amazon link. Slashdot please moderate your postings such that spammers like this don't get in.

  205. For some. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Charlatan!

    I suppose that the "stay and fight, you pussy" mentality appeals to those TV-numbed people who fall for emotional ploys.

    If only all those weaklings hadn't "given up" and left their nations, then the United States would still rightfully belong to the native kingdoms that once ruled the land. If only all those wusses had actually stood up and did something about changing their country, then the state of Israel would have never been a modern point of contention. If only the Magyars hadn't moved their tribes... If only...

    Perhaps you feel like quibbling over the fine points.

    But then, all the spurious nits and lice we could bicker about have no effect on me. The fact is the concept of a state --let alone artificial loyalty to a non-person entity-- is not more important that the concept of doing what is best for myself as an individual during the very brief time I have on this dirt ball.

    The rational person sees this may be a very good time for a number of intellectuals to leave in search of a better life that does in fact exist elsewhere. The world at large is better off with the spread of these people, also, as they help germinate global growth of the various ideals of liberty (which is often the impetus for moving in the first place).

    Most of the "stay and change" folks I've spoken to are merely gleeful gloaters, happy to see the current changes that are happening in the United States. They use frivolous quips about "giving up" and other supposed challenges to your manhood as you're walking out the door as a shaming device intended to keep all the other prisoners dutifully in line.

    I'll not allow you or anyone to attempt browbeating me.

  206. So what is the problem??? by abdulwahid · · Score: 1

    Considering the US and the UK are the countries trying to shove their lifestyle, through a barrel of a gun, down the throats of the rest of the world....it is interesting that so many people feel they need to leave. Why is that? It seems to me that if the US and the UK have so many problems then perhaps they should fix their problems first before forcing others to follow their way.

    I come from a different angle....perhaps not many here would understand where I am coming from....but here goes. I am a British Muslim. I left the UK after being fed up of being hassled because apparently being a Muslim working in IT Security fits a particular profile. After being hassled a few times by the police including being held for 3 days (without charge) for questioning and being scared who I talk to when I go to the Mosque (you don't know who is a gov. agent spying on you). I decided that I should move to a country where I can pratice my religion freely without being harrassed. I now live in Sudan, which I know is not everyones cup of tea, but I can now go to the Mosque every day, study my religion etc. without being harrassed. I still work in IT security without special branch bursting into my office and making me out to be a terrorist in front of my co-workers.

    My advise to Muslims living in the West is to get out. Go and live in a country where you can pratice your religion and don't fall for the false "freedom" that is put forward by Western propaganda. Out of my fellow Muslims collegues from my time at University in London..... I think now over half have left the UK due to similar reasons to me. That should say something about the false freedoms of the West.

    --
    perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10);'
    1. Re:So what is the problem??? by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Sudan, such a shining light of religious freedom. Tell that to the people in Darfur.

    2. Re:So what is the problem??? by abdulwahid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What ever problems there are in Darfur - they are not religious. In fact, the problems are to do with nomadic tribes taking their livestock onto lands which are owned by non-nomadic farming tribes. The conflict has been going on for generations - with both sides claiming right to the land. Both sides are Muslim so there it has nothing to do with religion or religious freedom. The situation is also greatly exagerated by the West for political purpose (mainly oil, gold and uranium which are all present in Darfur). I am not saying there is not a problem - just that living here and knowing many people from Darfur - the problem isn't the one portrayed in the West and is defintely nothing to do with religion as you claim.

      In fact, if you visit Sudan you will see there are many churches with a large Christian popuplation. There is also generally repect amongst the Muslim and Christian communities - especially in Khartoum. There are a number of Christians working in our company and many have attested their peaceful co-existance with Muslims to me.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10);'
  207. Not cost effective by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 1

    Canada has an active capalist economy, free trade with the USA, and demonstrates no existential threat. Why would the US attack? Occupation costs would wildly exceed the cost of just purchasing the raw materials. Not to mention the political upheval, of all the families that live on both sides of the border.

    It is arguable that every war since the revolution (including the civil war) was faught over one or more of these things. (Spanish American war was faught over a percieved existential threat, Monroe Doctrine etc..)

    side note: It would have been MUCH cheaper to buy the oil from Iraq, rather than fight either Gulf War 1 or 2. Oil is fungable so trade bariers are irrelevent. Either I'm wrong in my (hasty) cost analysis or some existential threat must have been percieved.

    1. Re:Not cost effective by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      It's happened before: look up "Fifty-four forty or fight".

    2. Re:Not cost effective by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Why would the US attack? Occupation costs would wildly exceed the cost of just purchasing the raw materials. ... It is arguable that every war since the revolution (including the civil war) was faught over one or more of these things.

      With one possible exception: It's a common theory that the reason the War of 1812 started was that the US leaders saw that England, France and Spain were bogged down in the Napoleanic War and thus couldn't defend their New World colonies. So the US attacked Canada and Florida, with the intent of annexing them.

      Unfortunately for the US, the war in Europe ended. England, France and Spain sent troops to North America, Washington was occupied, the government was hiding out in the countryside, and the US sued for peace. The European countries still had big problems at home, so they accepted.

      Of course, since then we've heard repeatedly from many US politicians that the US has never lost a war. Heh.

      I've also read in several tomes that this incident was the main reason that France sold Louisiana and Spain sold Florida to the US soon thereafter. Their politicians argued quite reasonably that it was better to sell the colonies to the Americans than to lose it all to them during the next European war.

      OTOH, this might just be a post-hoc explanation that gives credit for too much foresight to the politicians.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  208. Scotland by filthWisard · · Score: 1

    Come to Scotland, IT'S NOT ENGALND. Although our foreign policy is still decided by the parliament in Westminster and so have the same problems there, we have our own parliament that deals with domestic stuff, and although it has no powers over such matters, is in constant disagreement with Westminster. In fact I believe one of the articles on Slashdot the other day was by Mark Ballard, a Green member of the Scottish parliament.

    1. Re:Scotland by DrScotsman · · Score: 1

      Err...yeah, what he said.

    2. Re:Scotland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's spelt "Ing-er-land", surely?

  209. What? So you want to Cut-and-Run? by nakedforjesus · · Score: 0

    Why can't one live in America? It's a truly great country that people should feel privliged to live in.

    IANAY but if you're thinking of leaving because of the current political situation then you really shouldn't. This is a really hot topic that many people are very passionate about and it would be a real shame if they all just gave up and left, leaving the country to those whom they think are ruining it.

    An interesting question then to pose is what happens when your new country goes down the same path? Do you emmigrate again? When do you make a stand? People have had it easy for a while and have not had to do anything for their basic human rights. Now these rights are being chipped away at and you're going to have to do something.From what I see and hear, many people, if not the majority, feel the same on the important issues such as civil liberties. Something can be done about it and even if one doesn't feel like they are able to, there are many people who do feel able and need your support.

    But really people.... If you have enough energy and patience to get a passport, plane tickets, pack up your things, find a place to live, navigate through a country's immigration laws(in itself a sometimes Herculean task), get a job, learn a new language, adopt to a new culture, etc... you can attend/organize a few local meetings and educate yourself in what needs to be changed and how best to go about it. You can do what little it takes to make yourself heard.

  210. New Zealand - Watch out for the sheep by Kovac.anar · · Score: 1

    Come to New Zealand. We have a relatively free country with decent prosperity and friendly welcoming people. That and it is a pretty darn nice place to live. I happen to think that it is quite the advantage that there are very few animals that will bite/poison/maim you, so aside from other humans and your own stupidity it is also a pretty safe place to live. And to be even more specific, Wellington is the best city to live in.

    1. Re:New Zealand - Watch out for the sheep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wellington is overdue to be leveled by a massive earthquake. And it gets cut off from the rest of the world every winter when it gets windy. Australia and California have sent their poisonous spiders to NZ hidden in fruit. And it is hours of flying time to get to anywhere else.

    2. Re:New Zealand - Watch out for the sheep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah and one of the reasons New Zealand's a fabulous country to live in is that it's not crammed to the gills with too many people and we haven't had as long to mess it up (though we are gaining fast).

      As a Kiwi currently living in the UK (and having lived, travelled and worked in about 14 other countries) I can tell you that high-density housing SUCKS ASS. Overheated housing markets where you pay top dollar(pound) for shoddy, tiny little cookie-cutter houses that aren't big enough to swing a cat in. Every goddamn street looking exactly the same as the one you just turned out of (I swear to god, if I ever see street after street of stone-chip, brick-and-tile, terraced bloody housing in NZ I'll start shooting property developers). The congested roads suck, (way worse than Aukland) and the social services are run abysmally by a cancerous, bloated, orwellian bureucacy. Many of my American friends have the same complaints about the big cities they live in.

      Last time I was home in NZ I kept thinking to myself - why, oh why do my countrymen INSIST on repeating the mistakes their cousins in the northern hemisphere made a generation ago? NZ's lifestyle is already suffering from those wanting to run away from "terror" (real or imagined) and just about everyone else who wants to run away from whatever overcrowded, congested city they inhabit. More people arrive in NZ and then we proceed to replicate all the same problems!

      Ever heard of killing the goose that laid the golden egg? Sure, let people come to NZ but come up with better, sustainable solutions to burgeoning population than just building more houses of lower quality and more roads that just fill up with more cars - all that's already been done everywhere else and it's already failing everywhere else.

      [end rant]

  211. Don't come back to Europe! by Golradir · · Score: 1

    Don't come back to Europe! You guys left the civilised world in the 16th century and you should stay there. And besides, who would like to leave the land of the free?

  212. Re:... where would I move? Finland has it all! by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Finland, Finland, Finland,
    The country where I want to be,
    Pony trekking or camping,
    Or just watching TV.
    Finland, Finland, Finland.
    It's the country for me.

    You're so near to Russia,
    So far from Japan,
    Quite a long way from Cairo,
    Lots of miles from Vietnam.

    Finland, Finland, Finland,
    The country where I want to be,
    Eating breakfast or dinner,
    Or snack lunch in the hall.
    Finland, Finland, Finland.
    Finland has it all.
    You're so sadly neglected
    And often ignored,
    A poor second to Belgium,
    When going abroad.

    Finland, Finland, Finland,
    The country where I quite want to be,
    Your mountains so lofty,
    Your treetops so tall.
    Finland, Finland, Finland.
    Finland has it all.
    Finland, Finland, Finland,
    The country where I quite want to be,
    Your mountains so lofty,
    Your treetops so tall.
    Finland, Finland, Finland.
    Finland has it all.

    Finland has it all.

  213. France by rightgit · · Score: 1

    I moved to France last year with my wife and 3 young children. The services are incredible. We receive ~$500 a month from the govt just for having 3 kids. We even received ~$800 for back to school supplies. We have health care, free education with bus service, nicely maintained public services - everything that you don't have in America. We are even receiving the "minimum revenue for societal insertion" until I get my business off the ground. It's like getting paid minimum wage so that you remain a viable part of society and aren't pushed into the margins. Imagine tax dollars actually being put to good use!

    I had deep reservations about leaving my home country. I love America and everything it used to stand for. However, as previously stated, I have 3 children, and I really don't see any viable future for them in the NEW American. So I decided to cash in on my wife's Frenchness and give it a shot. So far, it's working nicely. I even took 6 months off to do nothing to make up for all the lost vacation time corporate America imposed on me. My last few years' vacations have been job seaching after getting laid off.

    Good luck to all the Americans who remain. Vote for some real change - and hope the election doesn't get stolen again.

    Impeach the whole lot of the neocons, try them and imprison them. Then try to recup some of the looted booty - good luck there!

  214. Panama by aapold · · Score: 1

    Somewhere up in the highlands where its nice and cool, away from the heat. I should caveat though, I speak spanish and lived there from '72 to '86, and again from '90 - '92 I'll probably go back there when I retire.

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
  215. Same reason as everywhere else by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    It's not so much that you wouldn't want to leave. It's more that no country worth going to lets you in without you having a job or SO much money that you don't need one.

    In that sense, US citizens are in the same boat as the people from developing countries...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  216. Typical of posters, far easier to bitch by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    Get real.

    It is typical of people who post on these online sites to bitch about something and never do anything to correct the problem. A million and one excuses will come up as to why can't actually do what they claim they will do/should do.

    Move to another country? Hell no. Regardless of what Administration is running this country there isn't another I would rather live in. Hell for all the talk about how bad its here, and only because of who's in office - gotta love that hidden angle - why are people from all these countries that supposedly hate Bush/USA still coming?

    If all you can do is bitch please don't have children. Hell we'd still be British.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Typical of posters, far easier to bitch by rs79 · · Score: 1

      "Move to another country? Hell no. Regardless of what Administration is running this country there isn't another I would rather live in."

      Just out of curiosity have you lived anywhere else?

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
  217. Slashvertisement by samj · · Score: 1

    While this book is probably fairly interesting, this is yet another slashvertisement. Notice the similarity between the two URLs?

    http://www.boingboing.net/2006/10/23/getting_out_y our_gui.html

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0976082276/ >/

  218. Switzerland! by rbannon · · Score: 1

    Fact is, as an American citizen, I am welcome nowhere. It requires a God awful amount of money to leave the USA, but few places would accept us anyway, and usually only if we're wealthy.

    Once while visiting a German speaking section of Switzerland, I approach someone to ask ```Sprechen Sie Englisch?'', and the response I got was, ``I speak English, but I don't speak American.'' That about says it all.

    1. Re:Switzerland! by mbone · · Score: 1

      In much of Europe they distinguish between "English" and "American" as spoken tongues - you can study either.

      Makes a lot of sense to me, actually. If you don't speak a language well, it can be hard to understand a dialect.

  219. Beyond Repair by nilsthegreat · · Score: 1

    This may be true, be for some people (including me, in America) the country of citizenship is 'beyond repair', so it's time to start somewhere else.

  220. Tax Burden is well under 50 percent in US by MyNameIsFred · · Score: 2, Informative

    In the US, the tax burden is well under 50 percent. Local taxes of all kinds - income tax, property tax, sales tax (aka VAT), etc. - are around 10 percent, max of about 13 percent. It varies from state to state. The average federal tax rate is under 12 percent. The average tax burden is around 22 percent in the US.

    1. Re:Tax Burden is well under 50 percent in US by Overzeetop · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not so sure you're correct. The average federal income tax rate is, indeed, around 12%, though for working professionals it is likely closer to 14-16%, and for executives (those making 200k or more per year) it is around 25% (check the tax returns of politicians...they bounce between 21% and 26%, depending on their deductions). What isn't mentioned is that there's a 15% tax for social security and medicare. If you're a wage slave, you only see half of it, but your employer is paying the other half, and that affects your salary. Health care and other benefits do too. If you lose 30% of your "income" to taxes and benefits before the first line on your paycheck, is it really part of your taxes/salary?

      Anyway, I'm not giving up on the US. It's filled with idiots, and there are "better" social support systems elsewhere, but if you're willing to take responsibility for your own future, it's the place to be. I plan on never seeing a dime from Social Security, so I invest for my retirement. I pay for my own healthcare, so I get to choose what level of care I get. I don't think the general human population can handle being on their own, or perhaps it's simply that having large social nets to fall back on makes standing by yourself seem too hard.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:Tax Burden is well under 50 percent in US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Anyway, I'm not giving up on the US. It's filled with idiots[...]


      Our first step toward a better future is to somehow get past the self-appointed intellectual snobs who, despite their self-proclaimed higher levels of reasoning, do not realize their statements sound to an outsider like rehashed wounds from grade-school torments. Do you really think the US is filled with idiots? When you walk down the street, or sit on a bus, or eat in a restaurant, is that really what you think of everyone you see? For a mental experiment over the next few months, make the logical assumption that perhaps you really are not as smart as you think you are, and everyone else is not a stupid as you think they are, just because they make different decisions or assumptions as you do. Bigotry likes to hide and change forms with each passing generation; that's how it survives, by fooling the next generation. Be careful, or you will be one of its recent victims.

    3. Re:Tax Burden is well under 50 percent in US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      12% average chop + 3% state (Pennsylvania) + 1% local (county, higher elsewhere in the state, such as Philadelphia) + 15% medicare/medicaid etc. (note that ~7% is paid by you directly, the other half is paid by your employer and yes, it is budgeted out of your income when they prospect new hires) + 6% sales tax (food, clothing tax free, almost all else taxed) + property & school tax (roughly $1,300 a year I think, if you rent, your rent is determined also by the tax rate) say 3% for a $40,000 annual income = ~40%

      At 22% average, you're talking 52%.

      Add fees and fines (from an escalating attempt to criminalize people by making every damn little thing finable or a summary judgment; Philadelphia does wonders with their parking enforcement, the PA police love the VASCAR and laws that make any read legitimate based solely as the cop as "witness"), it goes up.

      And we don't have health care included--most reports attribute that to about 25% of income apparently. With health care, most people are unaware how much that takes away from their income since their employer pays it (if they have health insurance), so you could consider it a hidden expenditure much like the 7% the employer pays per employee for medicare/medicaid.

    4. Re:Tax Burden is well under 50 percent in US by Logic+and+Reason · · Score: 1
      I don't think the general human population can handle being on their own,
      Funny, because that's exactly what they did for most of human history.

      or perhaps it's simply that having large social nets to fall back on makes standing by yourself seem too hard.
      Now you're getting it.
    5. Re:Tax Burden is well under 50 percent in US by sallgeud · · Score: 1

      I thought I would reply to this with a bit of info. The company I work for, when they make offers, will always share the total cost of your yearly employment, both in actual dollars and potential dollars. Actual being guaranteed cost on their end, potential being items like 401k matching, cell phone costs, etc. It's nice, because it helps the individual understand exactly what they're actually being offered. It's also a shock to some, who've commented they didn't know "shit cost that much".

      A worker making 50,000 US a year will typically cost 40-50% more in additional expenses [not including things like capex (laptops, desk, etc)]. A worker making 100,000 US a year will typically cost 30-40% more. There are several fixed cost items that everyone gets, even the person making 25k a year. This has been the same, in my experience, almost everywhere I've been, though it's slightly more than 5-10 years ago.

      Fortunately, at certain levels of income, you no longer have to pay some taxes... which means you bear almost zero additional cost to the company by your raise. The number is right around 90k, currently.... so every dollar above the SSI income cap costs much closer to one dollar to the company than the same dollar above 50k.

      Technically, I'd consider benefits income that's taxed at 100%. It's a much larger dollar benefit to those making lower wages, but a much larger tax [on whole] as well.

      Someone should build a true conversion tool that calculates the required salary for similar income in another nation, based on benefits, social programs, etc. I'd be more interested in knowing where I can retire sooner, and live comfortably.

    6. Re:Tax Burden is well under 50 percent in US by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

      You're confusing average tax rates (total taxes / total income) with marginal tax rates (tax rate on last dollar earned). The previous poster was talking about the latter, you're talking about the former.

    7. Re:Tax Burden is well under 50 percent in US by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1
      I don't think the general human population can handle being on their own, Funny, because that's exactly what they did for most of human history.
      So every single person throughout most of human history grew their own food, made their own clothes, never traded for anything, ran their own court system, policed their entire country and secured their own borders all by themselves?

      If not, you've got a funny definition of "being on their own".
    8. Re:Tax Burden is well under 50 percent in US by Logic+and+Reason · · Score: 1

      If you had read the rest of my post (in particular the second blockquote), you might realize that "being on [one's] own" in this context means living without safety nets like social security, welfare and medicare. It does not mean being a hermit.

    9. Re:Tax Burden is well under 50 percent in US by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Oh, no, I've got the tax rates right. I have looked at the tax returns of (say) President Bush, Vice PResident Cheney, Teresa Heintz, John Kerry, and others (John Edwards, BTW, did an amazing tax job the year before the 2004 election, managing to deduct somthing like a 1/3 to 1/2 of his entire income). I also know what, as a middle class weenie, pay in taxes. Combining Federal and state gets me in the low teens, as a percentage of gross income. Then I add 7.45% for SS/Medicare. Plus the 7.45 I pay from my business to cover the employers version.

      If I were talking marginal tax rates, I'd tell you that if you make over $166,000, you'd pay 33% tax. Which is, of course, false - that's the marginal rate. If you make $200,000 this year (2006) in adjusted gross income (giving you your mortgage interest, donations, and personal deduction), you'll pay $36,548 in taxes, or about 18% (source: IRS 2006 Tax Table. If you happen to live in, say, Virginia, you'll pay $11,243 in income taxes (VA's income tax is pretty low, compared to those states which have income taxes). So just in income taxes, my $200,000 executive will pay 23.8% in income tax alone. Remember - there's still SS/Medicare to pay for, along with local sales, personal property, real property, specialty (restaurant/hotel) taxes that we haven't discussed.

      Nowhere near the 50% number, but not exactly minimal.

      Oh, and in case you feel that $200,000 is "rich" - which by the numbers it is in the top 1% of earners - I know folks in this category (I'm not one, btw), and they are solidly convinced they are part of the overtaxed middle class.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    10. Re:Tax Burden is well under 50 percent in US by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      I'm not the smartest guy in the room. I think you're ready to believe me on that.

      I am, however, pretty open minded, and I've got a smattering of knowledge in a bunch of technical fields, and a reasonable amount of walking-around sense. The more I observe people, the more I'm amazed at how many people haven't a handle on I would consider to be "basic" skills. Math (by which I really mean simple arithmatic - not diffeq's), reading comprehension, common logic - these things seem totlaly foreign to such a large portion of the population. Since I'm in the building industry, I have contact with a lot of tradespeople. These are the real middle class: $40k/year household incomes (suprise: that's median!). The stuff most folks here on /. take for granted just doesn't come naturally to these folks.

      I keep my sig because it's true. It's sad and, honestly, disappointing. There are just a lot of people out there that don't "get it."

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    11. Re:Tax Burden is well under 50 percent in US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (posting as AC for obvious reasons)

      Based on my gross versus my take-home, I pay over 70% in taxes and deductions, which admittedly includes the max 401K contribution (which is theoretically my money some day). Why? S-class corporation ... in Massachusetts ....

    12. Re:Tax Burden is well under 50 percent in US by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      You can't count 401k as a tax - it's your money from the start to the finish. I own an S-Corp as well. Depeding on circumstances, it's 10-15% to the Feds, 5% to the state (excluding personal and real property taxes, which aren't based on income), 15% combined to SS (to be spent by the feds on non SS programs), or about 30-35%.

      Now, if you want to count my HSA, cafeteria deductions, and retirement, I'm sure I'd top 50% in a heartbeat; maybe 60%. But all that money says in my name and doesn't get distributed for the common good. I amd the greatest good my IRAs will even know.

      With the exception of the SS/Medicare (aka "Welfare For The Elderly"), I'm okay with my overall tax rates. The government provides valuable services for which I am willing to pay. It also wastes money like nobodies business, but that's another arguement. I don't think that doubling my taxes would really add benefit to me, even as a tertiary benficiary of an improved welfare, medical, or security program.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    13. Re:Tax Burden is well under 50 percent in US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think the general human population can handle being on their own, or perhaps it's simply that having large social nets to fall back on makes standing by yourself seem too hard.

      The only people who can handle "standing on their own" are subsistence farmers and hunters. The instant you want a lifestyle that goes beyond eating charred meat and pulling weeds you need some kind of social order to exchange goods, including the massive "social net" called policing and contract enforcement.

      I pay for my own healthcare, so I get to choose what level of care I get.

      Glad to see you're supporting the huge medical safety net. It would be nice if everyone else who is paying for the police protection and courts that enable you to enjoy your healthcare would be able to get their own healthcare too, but as it is they are forced to stand a little more on their own than you.

    14. Re:Tax Burden is well under 50 percent in US by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      When I say "stand on their own" I mean not relying on welfare and other social programs as their primary source of income, not shit-in-the-woods and eat berries.

      As for what I pay for, I pay more for police, fire, national defense, research, social services, and other government programs than most americans so (I'm above average in income, I pay more than average taxes...it's just numbers, but it's not like I'm getting off scott free).

      Healthcare, as it is can be practiced today, is too expensive to afford for everyone. Healthcare, as practiced 50 years ago would be very doable. Except that people expect to get today's technology for yesterday's dollar. Why is it so fucking expensive? Recordation, liability, manpower. That last one is the real killer - it costs a lot of money to keep an army marching, and healthcare is all about bodies. There is no Moore's Law for increasing the efficiency of nursing care. How about paying for all the marketing (excuse me "research") that the drug companies spend on each sucessful drug. The system has its problems - it's inefficiencies - but part of good healthcare is the one-on-one time you get with people. Ask any cattle-car HMO PCP from the 80s (or today for that matter) how hard it is to support an office when the reimbursement rates hover at 10-15 contact minutes per patient. As a professional service provider (engineer) in provate practice, I can tell you that people are amazed at how much services cost. Even with all the technology I have to minimize the time I spend on design and anaylsis, it still takes a fixed number of hours to gather the data, review the design with the owner, and get lines on paper.

      As for my healthcare - I have hit-by-a-bus insurance. In other words, I pay out about $2 grand a year and I don't see a dime of reimbursement until me or one of my family racks up $6k in medical bills. No prescription coverage. No annual physicals. No Dental. No Optical. In return, I get to put away $6k of my own money each year into a tax sheltered savings account, which can be used to pay for my medical needs (though not the premiums). What's the benefit? After a couple years of $8000 investment, I can handle a catastrophic event. Maybe two. In a decade, I'll be pretty well covered as long as I can keep a major-medical plan in place. If I wanted a co-pay and good coverage, I'd end up dumping $6k down the insurance monster each year and have nothing the next year to show for it. Most people, even those that could make the payments (most would spend that cash on a new DLP if they got the extra $300/mo in their paychecks), don't even know the plan exists.

      By the way, I once thought that the best way to get healthcare to the people of the US would be to open up the Federal heathcare system to all legal residents. Then I found out that it would cost more than the entire years wages at the federal minimum wage to pay for that coverage (about $9,000-$10,000/yr) for a family plan. If you figure 100 million "family groups" for insurance cost purposes, that comes to just about 1 Trillion dollars a year. That would require more than quadrupling the budget for US Health and Human Services (the largest spender in the federal government, which just edges out Defense and Debt Service). Since we're currently spending $500B more than we take in in revenue (that includes the deficit and the SS raided money that isn't currently counted as deficit, but adds into the Debt), you're looking at needing to DOUBLE the tax revenue of the US from all sources just to add health care comparable to what federal employees get (which is pretty good, all things considered).

      I find it interesting that everyone who proposes healthcare seems to want to offer all the services available. Nobody seems to be up on providing basic preventative care and low level services, while excluding most pharmaceuticals and operative procedures. Most of that wasn't available when we were born, what makes you think it should be free today? I say no operative care, no emergency room visits, no

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    15. Re:Tax Burden is well under 50 percent in US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not the correct US tax rate. Check your tax tables. It is about 30% for the average US citizen. That is just federal income tax. State tax, sales tax, property tax, and social security tax almost doubles that. Oh, then you have to pay another 1/3 of your income for health insurance, if you are lucky enough to have it. If you don't just hope you don't get sick. If you get sick then its bankruptcy.

    16. Re:Tax Burden is well under 50 percent in US by Julia+Cameron · · Score: 1
      It's filled with idiots

      It most certainly is, and you are a perfect example of the thoughtful, reasoned, smug all-American idiot.

      Picture this: one day, in the fail-safe little world you you have created for yourself, you are taking your usual morning shower, when you discover... THE LUMP. You dash off to the doctor, who sends you to the specialist, they do tests, scans, more tests, more scans, and a biopsy. Yeppers... it's malignant. Surgery. No biggie that. However, you are not working during the recovery, and the recovery takes a bit longer than you expected. (You expected the Big Hit. You had planned for that. The co-pays, and all those little things that aren't covered add up to far more than you expected. The medications are a damned fortune. Unbelievable. Well, you can handle it.)

      Then they start you on chemo. You thought you could get back to work, well, at least part-time. Forget about it. What you discover is that if you don't take it easy on your 'good days', your 'bad days' are horrendous, and you have many more of them. You become depressed, emotions in the pits, caused in part by other people's attitudes toward you. (You would be amazed how many people you thought were good friends stop inviting you and your wife to parties, barbeques, and such. Even if you can't go, or can only go for an hour, it's important to feel you are still as welcome as you were when you had hair and weighed more than an Auschwitz survivor.) People haven't forgotten you though, since you receive Mass cards from neighbours and acquaintances and you are on the prayer list over at the Baptist, UCC and Methodist Churches.

      You develop anaemia. It's not unexpected, but it's nasty all the same. That calls for Procrit. (We all saw those Procrit ads a few years ago. Older man too weak to photograph his grandkids until he takes PROCRIT. TA DA! And the other man who was certain he would have to give up his pretty Bed and Breakfast, until... TA DA! He took Procrit. Anaemia can be dangerous. Procrit can cost up to $2K per injection, which was once a week back in those heady days. (We were fortunate. It only cost us $780/injection for Procrit. The total costs of the meds and non-covered expenses were high... very, very high.) You discover you are spending in three months what you used to save in a year.

      You worry about your job. You may even miss it. Your income has either dried up entirely or is greatly reduced, depending on your insurance. However, as you said, your meds aren't covered. (Cancer meds are a fortune.) You watch as your nice pile of green bills diminishes.

      Your daughter needs braces on her teeth. I mean, they are seriously crooked and misaligned, so much so she will have difficulty eating if the problem isn't corrected. She may even require surgery. None of this is covered under your insurance plan, by the way.

      Christmas, New Year, and you are out another $2K and $6K. The expenses keep mounting, and the bills keep rolling in. The $6K you used to save is gone by the end of the first week in February.

      You develop secondary problems. Stuff like infections and ulcers. They aren't usually life-threatening. But they are painful, and they make you miserable. More doctor visits, more meds, more expenses. Embolism stockings,

      The usual expenses that come with living your life continue. Kids grow. They need new clothes and shoes. Everybody requires normal dental care.The car needs a timing belt.

      Setback. They have discovered cancer along your kidney. You go back on chemo and quit work again.

      Your wife discovers that she has a low thyroid, and early osteoporosis. These are common problems. Meds can handle it. (Oh yeah? Have you taken a look at the costs of Fosamax?) When she has her yearly mammogram they see shadows. Her doctor feels lumps in her breasts. They do a scan which shows cystic breasts, not cancer. However, the doctor wants to order a mammogram twice a year, and it is likely that each m

      --
      Julia Cameron
      Oich ù agus hiùraibh éile
  221. How about mainland China? by cornelius1729 · · Score: 1

    Certainly no problems with invasion of privacy there...

    --
    1729 = 9^3 + 10^3 = 1^3 + 12^3
  222. Cuba by trendzetter · · Score: 0

    I suggest moving to Cuba. Help build the new humanity.

  223. Amsterdam by zorglubxx · · Score: 1

    Come to Amsterdam, lovely town. Forget about the stereotypes of coffeeshops and drugs, the canals and houses are very nice. There's a good market for IT people and plenty of foreign companies to work for where you dont have to learn Dutch. Plus if you come over and are hired by a foreign company you can benefit for 10 years of the "30% tax ruling" which means that the first 30% of your salary is tax free. The rest is taxed at the normal rate but then you come in at a much lower tax rate. I've been taking advantage of that although it's ending for me in 3 months unfortunately. It sucks that it rains a lot but when it's sunny it's a beautiful town. Do like the locals, buy a small boat and cruise around the canals drinking some beers or bbq'ing. And plenty of small bars and lovely beer - lots of micro breweries in NL but you also get everything that Belgium has to offer. And in Amsterdam you are in a quite central location. Only 2 hour train to Cologne, 3 to Brussels (2 next year with fast train), 5 to Paris (4 w/ fast train). The airport is close by and plenty of low cost airlines for weekend trips all over Europe.

    1. Re:Amsterdam by RKBA · · Score: 1

      I've checked into living in Amsterdam as much as I can from afar, and get the impression that real estate is astronomically priced and homes are tiny, even compared to Southern California. Also, I believe I read somewhere that the Netherlands is the most populous country in the world (people per square mile or some such measure). I would love to retire in Amsterdam but am not sure I could afford the cost of living. Just how bad is it?

  224. I actually DID immigrate to... by clokwise · · Score: 1

    ...Australia. On the very day that Bush was "appointed" to office I purchased my one-way ticket from Seattle to Sydney. After a few years and a few dollars I got my citizenship, and am now in the process of revoking my US citizenship. I could not be prouder to be a citizen of Australia, and it's amusing to watch the US self-destruct from a distance. Ironically, I'm living and working in Thailand at the moment, which is not a bad place to be. I'll only be going back to the US for weddings and funerals.

  225. Croatia, Austria, Germany or France... by PenguinBoyDave · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Having been all over the world in each direction, my family and I have adapted well to the European lifestyle, and if you were to come to our home, you'd see we adopted the best of everything -

    * Daily exercise (a good portion of Europe values daily exercise)
    * Lunch is our main meal (taken from the French)
    * Red Wine with Lunch and / or dinner
    * Use of the Sauna & hot tub several times per week
    * Lack of bathing suit when we swim

    What we discovered in our travels, and through our friendship with many Europeans, is that our lives were filled with so much stress that when we did it the European way, the stress level really went WAY down. Europeans are relaxed about simple nudity whereas Americans are so hung up about it. Europeans take time and enjoy their food (as does a large portion of the rest of the world) and Europeans have long discovered the health benefits of the sauna several times per week.

    Now...that doesn't answer the original question, so I'll answer it this way. If I was moving to Europe to work, I'd probably go to Austria, Germany or France. If I was going to retire, I'd go to Croatia. Since it is MUCH harder for an American to move to Europe than for a European to move to the US...I'll probably be here until I can get my company to transfer me.

    --
    I'm not a troll, but I play one on Slashdot.
    1. Re:Croatia, Austria, Germany or France... by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      It's actually quite difficult for a European to move to the USA legally. I know, I've been through it. Even though I was married to an American, it still took a year of paperwork. Without that marriage, it would have been nigh impossible.

    2. Re:Croatia, Austria, Germany or France... by PenguinBoyDave · · Score: 1

      Thanks for clarifying that. My wife (Asian) took three months to come here, but it was pre 9/11. Sorry to hear it was tough. For those who come here legally, I think they should not have to put up with the BS that they do. I don't know when you came, but welcome. Glad you're here!

      --
      I'm not a troll, but I play one on Slashdot.
    3. Re:Croatia, Austria, Germany or France... by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Thanks Dave! This was 1998. It was complicated by the fact that I spent time in the Irish Army, and that I'd lived in a number of EU countries since I was 16 -- had to get police reports from each nation stating that I had never committed any crimes, get my Army records, get everything translated into English (fair enough), etc. It was a lot of paperwork... but then I arrived and discovered how easily H1Bs move in and out and it really annoyed me. Just didn't seem fair.

  226. Yeah but... by N8F8 · · Score: 1

    You Aussies got some hot chicks!

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
  227. From another Italian: you're full of it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I don't know where in Italy you come from, but you're full of shit. You're just spewing around the typical Italian self-loathing, constantly fostered by the left wing in this country.

    Your allegations could be countered point for point, but nobody reads AC posts, so it would probably be a waste of time. Your incredibly ignorant comment about catholicism speaks volumes about your credibility.

    If you had ever worked in Italy you would know that the "office politics" are no worse than what you would find in any other capitalist country; they merely appear magnified through the lens of prejudice againt their own country carried by most Italians, or in the eyes of spoiled youths who take everything for granted and see any obstacle in their path as an evil plot to rob them of the golden future that they feel they deserve by birthright.
    But that's not the way it works: it's the hard work of past generations that made Italy one of the major economic powers in the world.

    Unfortunately, you'll never know. You took all you could from this country, you received an education, paid for by taxpayer money, that allowed you to go on and be successful in another country, and then you left, never giving anything back, and carrying your bag of prejucides with you.

    Good riddance.

    1. Re:From another Italian: you're full of it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi. This post proves that people read AC posts. :)

      A lot of people will stop reading this post after this sentence, but as a Catholic I agree that his remarks about Catholicism were incredibly ignorant. I wonder if they colored your reply.

      If it is possible, I wish someone would counter the GP's post point for point, but based on the post I'm replying to I don't think I would have given it much credibility if you had posted it in that post. Better yet, an honest, balanced appraisal of life as a middle-class, working single male (would software engineer be too much to ask?) in Italy would be nice.

    2. Re:From another Italian: you're full of it. by orzetto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're just spewing around the typical Italian self-loathing, constantly fostered by the left wing in this country.

      What was I saying about people blaming the communists all the time...?

      Your allegations could be countered point for point,

      ... which you do not. Strong arguments, Anonymous Coward.

      Your incredibly ignorant comment about catholicism speaks volumes about your credibility.

      Forgive me, father. From now on I will listen more carefully to the pious voice of Pope Germanus I.

      [...] spoiled youths who take everything for granted and see any obstacle in their path as an evil plot to rob them of the golden future that they feel they deserve by birthright.

      Oh yeah, today's brats, no respects for the elders...

      You took all you could from this country, you received an education, paid for by taxpayer money, that allowed you to go on and be successful in another country, and then you left, never giving anything back, [...]

      At what point exactly did I sign a contract with the Italian state? Don't get me started on the education I received, no well you have already:

      • First thing, at age three I was regularly beaten by nuns at the kindergarten. I kept having nightmares and falling from the bed for months, until my parents got the cue and relocated me to an institution not run by nuns. I still hate nuns.
      • In elementary school, I had to endure five years of a blatantly fascist teacher, an old bitch of the old school. She was so obnoxious that, when WW2 broke out, her husband immediately volunteered for the African front if only to get away from her, one of her sons shot himself, the other is kinda weird, and her niece will not let her anywhere near her grandson. That's the sort of people that used to take care of children in school. I used to be beaten regularly by other children, and when I asked her to do something she would say "Give'em a good kick in the legs!"; never mind I was 1 against 20. She also praised regularly Fascism for bringing bananas from Somalia and order and many other nice things.
      • At age 9 my father slams in a truck with his car. That's not something I blame on the state of course, I blame it on my father, who drove (and still drives) like an idiot and without seatbelts. However, he got hospitalised with three broken ribs and an insane pain in the right foot. The medics say the foot is no problem. After a few weeks, he relocates to a new hospital and, Voilà, here is the problem with the foot: the Cuboid bone is, well, missing. It was not really difficult to notice as the shrapnel after its explosion fracture was all over the foot's tissue and an X-ray looked like ground zero. Thanks to the incompetence of the first doctor, my father is still walking weird almost 20 years afterwards.
      • General preparation of teachers in high school... well, one example: the IT-course teacher could not format a floppy disk at the first lecture we had. She knew the command was format a:, she only missed the "Enter" key. Another example, the impressive inverse correlation between skirt length and marks in physics for girls. Too bad I'm not a Scot, I would have given it a shot. In the last year, we arrived at about Italy's unification a few weeks before the end of the year. We had WW1, fascism and WW2 in one hour of lecture, the very last one, when it was already known history would not have been an examination subject. Not a word on post-WW2 history, which I know only because I was interested. To top it off, our teacher for history and philosophy was actually the best one in the whole district.
      • University: not from Milan? Need a place to stay? Tough luck. At least teacher preparation was a bit better than in high school, on the other hand sup
      --
      Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
    3. Re:From another Italian: you're full of it. by Ignorante · · Score: 1

      Amen!

      You are totally right about Italy. I lived 6 months in this country, and I cannot stand it anymore. I prefer UK to work and Spain to live (I am Spanish native).

  228. Easier than you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are an enterpreneur working with IT and highly educated they have great services for talent importing and may find a place for you, plus a lot of assistance about relocating etc. My firm used to run a global business from Italy but have moved to Switzerland and don't regret it. No more 60-65% off your gross income to finance Italian debt.

  229. The Netherlands? nah: Belgium! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Upsides:

    (Almost) everyone in the northern part of Belgium speaks English, including city administration/officials.

    Immigration laws are lax and you're allowed to retain your US citizenship even after you've been given Belgian nationality.

    Cable internet and cell phone coverage everywhere.

    Traffic law enforcement focused on parking fines and speeding (you can do whatever you want as long as you're not speeding and pay for parking)

    Best medical care in the world.

    Doctors make house calls.

    Lots of jobs for someone with a US accent and cultural background.

    Very few terrorists.

    Reasonable legal system.

    Downsides:

    lousy weather.

    You're taxed to death: 50-55% income tax, 21% VAT (but you can maybe get an expat thing going and pay far less income tax).

    Lousy weather.

  230. The United Arab Emirates (Dubai) by Seven+Sided+Snowflak · · Score: 1

    I moved to Dubai almost two years ago because I wanted some foreign work experience and my wife, who's Indian but grew up here, was sick of Boston weather. We chose Dubai because English is spoken everywhere (my French is OK, but a linguist I am not), we have family connections here (my in-laws), the economy is booming, and we thought we'd be able to save money (there are almost no taxes at all). We've stayed because the economy is indeed booming, it was easy to make friends, and you can hire a full-time maid/nanny for nothing. There are plenty of drawbacks, to be sure: overwhelming materialism, the difficulty of saving money when rent eats up half your pay, the knowledge that you're hired help and not a citizen. I doubt I'll live here for 30 years, but my father-in-law said the same thing back in 1976.

  231. Sorrier than you can imagine by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When we "said we were sorry" (see parent), we didn't know just how sorry we would become.

    And sorrier still if you fat techie douchebags don't get up and vote two weeks from now.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Sorrier than you can imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      WHAT!?! It's 2008 already? Fucking Warcraft...

    2. Re:Sorrier than you can imagine by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Remember, though, we want congress split - so don't go voting all one-party! In America, a divided legislature is a good legislature... they only get things done that have broad support. I can't be the only one that loved the government shutdowns during the Clinton administration. Oh, we should decide which house needs to go Democratic. I guess even if both go, you still have a Republican president... so go vote straight Democrat if you must.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:Sorrier than you can imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Midterms.

      The emper--- sorry, the president may be doing his very best to do away with such pesky institutions as the Congress, and may be able (and willing) to veto most of what they say, but they do still exist and matter.

      Unless this European's knowledge of US politics is outdated...

    4. Re:Sorrier than you can imagine by topical_surfactant · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Vote out incumbents. If we keep shifting out the hatemongering idiots every two years, perhaps some of them will get a clue.

    5. Re:Sorrier than you can imagine by Damek · · Score: 1

      Um, a divided legislature is a "good one" because it's a powerless legislature, which is only "good" by certain criteria, under certain circumstances (like, say, when the rest of government is pretty much fine and you don't want a lot of changes - e.g., during the Clinton administration).

      If you have a corrupt executive branch that has acquired more power than it should have and is doing things you don't like, then the one thing you do not want is a powerless legislature.

    6. Re:Sorrier than you can imagine by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      That's actually a pretty good strategy, except that some of the incumbents are actually preferable to their challengers. I fear that a lot of moderates will get booted out in this election. As much as I want the Democrats to at least take one of the houses, many of the Democratic candidates are just as far to the left as the "far right" Republicans are to the right. IMHO, that's not really an improvement.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    7. Re:Sorrier than you can imagine by MightyYar · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That might be what YOU want, but I pretty much want a paralyzed government - a la the Clinton administration. It seems to be the only way to keep the idiots from spending more money. I really don't see where the Bush administration has usurped much power from the legislature. He mostly gets what he wants because of the alignment he has with the legislature. Watch Bush's "power" melt away without a co-operative legislature.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    8. Re:Sorrier than you can imagine by NeuroAcid · · Score: 1

      Definitely not the only one that loved the government shutdowns. I think that is why the 90's turned out so great, the government didn't do anything.

      --
      "I don't need drugs to enjoy this, just to enhance it" - Otto
    9. Re:Sorrier than you can imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's comments like this that WILL make me get out and vote...just not how you want me to :)

    10. Re:Sorrier than you can imagine by gt_mattex · · Score: 1

      That's Mr. Fattechiedouchebag to you sir!

      --
      "No doubt one may quote history to support any cause, as the devil quotes scripture." - Learned Hand
    11. Re:Sorrier than you can imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been saying this for years and totally agree.

    12. Re:Sorrier than you can imagine by crush · · Score: 1

      Speaking as a fat, techie douchebag I'm interested in who you suggest I vote FOR? This leads on to the question as to what exactly we're all supposed to be sorry about?.

      Because if your answer is that I should vote for one of the Democrats and the reason is supposed to be that they'll stop invading and occupying other countries and stop spying on us then I call bullshit.

      The Democrats have the clearest possible record of voting (with a couple, and I mean two or three) for and proposing and crafting the exact same war-mongering, state-enabling, anti-citizen, freedom-curtailing measures that the Republicans do.

      I'll lay odds that you're going to deny this vigorously and come out with some Lesser Evilism hypothesis, possibly even citing Chomsky's support of the war-criminal John Kerry during the last presidential elections.

      So don't bother. I've heard it before and it doesn't convince me. The Democrats are every fucking bit as bad as the Republicans http://www.counterpunch.org/frank10232006.html and the only way to change this country is to vote for actual, committed anti-war candidates and people that are serious about environmental rectitude.

      For everyone out there spluttering and sneering I issue the following challenge:

      1. Draw up a minimal, simple list of say 4 or 5 policies you feel are essential for national well-being
      2. Stick it up on the corkboard in your cubicle
      3. Try to find a candidate that promises that s/he'll work to make them happen (and give you a blowjob)
      4. Sit back and watch their voting record over the next term.
      5. if slow witted {repeat steps 1 - 4 for several elections} else break;
      6. Wake up and realize that this system isn't designed with you in mind.
    13. Re:Sorrier than you can imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Normally, I would agree with you. However, I'm hoping for a successful impeachment.

    14. Re:Sorrier than you can imagine by MightyYar · · Score: 1
      6. Wake up and realize that this system isn't designed with you in mind.

      As a WASP, I must respectfully disagree!

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    15. Re:Sorrier than you can imagine by jafac · · Score: 1

      A split congress is good, yes.

      But when did they legalize drawing-and-quartering?

      Not that I'm opposed to that, mind you. It's just that I thought it was forbidden by the Constitution or something like that (not that that matters anymore).

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    16. Re:Sorrier than you can imagine by bazaarsoft · · Score: 1

      Not exactly a great motivational speech for this board...

    17. Re:Sorrier than you can imagine by Dr.+Transparent · · Score: 1

      Kudos I totally agree! Split gov't doing nothing is definitely the best for everyone in the end.

    18. Re:Sorrier than you can imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Homer: I don't vote, and I think anyone who does is a little Fruity

    19. Re:Sorrier than you can imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that what third-parties are for? You need to have a few fuck you races where you don't vote for either.

    20. Re:Sorrier than you can imagine by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1

      Vote against the incumbent. Give someone new a chance to completely betray you!

    21. Re:Sorrier than you can imagine by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I generally vote for a third party when the race is not close. In NY State Hillary is going to win "for sure", so I will vote for a third party. I also vote third party if I know nothing about the candidates who are running... I refuse to make an uninformed vote that will actually have any impact. I do this because in most areas, a third party needs a certain number of votes to get on the ballot the next time 'round. I think third parties are valuable and would like to encourage their growth.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    22. Re:Sorrier than you can imagine by azimir · · Score: 1

      And sorrier still if you fat techie douchebags don't get up and vote two weeks from now.

      I'm not fat and I've already voted. Let's hear it for not even getting up to vote via the use of mail in ballots. Of course, given enough not getting up to vote, I guess I'll be fat someday.... that cake does smell good.

    23. Re:Sorrier than you can imagine by jasko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You've gotta be kidding. We need a Democratic Congress _now_ if you want any sort of oversight on the last two lame-duck years of the Bush administration. We can worry about splitting Congress again in '08 or '10. Geez. We're on the freaking Titanic and you're encouraging everyone to tidy up his cabin before filing out to the lifeboats.

    24. Re:Sorrier than you can imagine by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Well, like I said, it wouldn't be the end of the world to have a slight Democratic majority in both houses since there is a Republican president. '08 or '10 will be too late - the medium-term trend in this country is toward Republican control of the government. This election will be an interruption of that trend due to the war in Iraq. The only things that will change that are either a massive change in the Democratic party itself or the eventual rise of the Hispanic voting block... which of course assumes that Hispanics will continue to vote Democrat.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    25. Re:Sorrier than you can imagine by louisadkins · · Score: 1

      It occurs to me that insulting a group is not the best method for motivating them.

    26. Re:Sorrier than you can imagine by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      Don't bother trying to scare people into action. They tried that for 4 years and and it still didn't get lazy college students out to the polls. -A college student who voted even if it was for a third party

    27. Re:Sorrier than you can imagine by DevilDoc · · Score: 1

      Why isn't this post and all the replies considered off topic? Oh thats right (I mean left), as long as its anti-America, anti-Bush, anti-Republican it is right on topic. I bet most of you American libererals have never been further outside the US than the all inclusive beach resorts of the Caribean and Mexico. If you are so apologetitic for America's actions why don't leave America and help undo all the wrongs we cause. I'll tell you why, because you couldn't get your Starbucks, or check your so self righteous posts on the internet, or drive your Prious around town to show you love the environment and display your Fuck Bush stickers. Hell, you might even get hurt or in trouble and the USMC might not be able to save your ass. Go ahead, move to Europe with its high unemployment and inflation. Good luck keeping your head in the middle east unless you want to convert and pray 5 times a day. I hear Africa is beautiful this time of year, especially in Darfur (where the US government spent half a billion in aid in 2005 http://www.usaid.gov/locations/sub-saharan_africa/ sudan/darfur.html) Central, South America, the south Pacific are all beautiful unless you want clean water, don't mind bugs, socialists and or muslim terrorist and drug lords, or want a job. The sad truth is that most of you whiners lack the cahonnes and strength of conviction to give up your nice comfortable lifes here in the good old USA to move to even a civilized country. You would miss your mommy or your girlfriend or your favorite pizza or hanging out and bashing America. I know I am going to hear that there are all sorts of places that an American can and have moved without dire consequences and I am sure there are a lot of nice spots. But you will do it because it too easy to tell me I am wrong when you don't have to put up or shut up. I have been all over the world and I leave soon for South America (hooray for chloraquine, thats antimalarial medication for you whiney liberals who haven't been farther south than Cancun) but I always come back to the greatest nation in the world and you could not pay me move anywhere else. God Bless America And God Bless the President of the United States (whom ever it may be, now and forever)

      --
      --DD

      "All it takes for evil to triumph in the world is for good men to do nothing." Edmond Burke

    28. Re:Sorrier than you can imagine by J053 · · Score: 1
      Vote out incumbents. If we keep shifting out the hatemongering idiots every two years, perhaps some of them will get a clue.

      IAWTP

      Really, people - this (along with getting all your lazy-assed friends out to vote in the first place) is the single best thing we can do - and we should do it for at least the next 4 election cycles. Let all the politicians know (or remember) that they work for us, and we will fire them if they continue doing such an incompetant job as they've been doing for the last 20 years or so.

      As an aside, if we are only going to get one Democrat House of Congress, it needs to be the House of Representatives - they are the ones that control the purse-strings, and that is the House in which an action for Impeachment must be started. OK, I know that if the Republicans control the Senate (or even close) any Impeachment trial would result in a not-guilty verdict, but the threat of being Impeached (as Clinton was - just not convicted) might get Dubya and co. to straighten out a bit.

  232. I fail to see how it is trite by iion_tichy · · Score: 1

    I would have thought that their history would give Americans some respect for people leaving their home country, trying to make their luck.

    I can't understand how you can bash Mexicans, if your own history is just the same. But anyway - I think people from other countries wouldn't try to come if there weren't jobs for them. It's not like you can steal yourself into a country and then live on it's wellfare.

    One step further: I think Americas strength is precisely the influence of the diversity of immigrants. So if the US try to shut out Immigrants, it is merely cutting it's own flesh.

    1. Re:I fail to see how it is trite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      One step further: I think Americas strength is precisely the influence of the diversity of immigrants. So if the US try to shut out Immigrants, it is merely cutting it's own flesh.


      The United states doesn't shut out immigrants. On the contrary, immigration is encouraged, but our immigration policies are based on need. We don't need more poor people in the US. Especially not when they're increasing crime and because they don't pay taxes, get free healthcare, welfare and their children can attend school (k-12). The cost is devastating. http://immigrationcounters.com/index.html

      What good is diversity if everyone is piss poor?
    2. Re:I fail to see how it is trite by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      We do have respect for people who do that. We just want them to respect our laws and do it legally.

      But I guess that is too complicated for you.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    3. Re:I fail to see how it is trite by jafac · · Score: 1

      Employers sure as hell NEED more immigrants. Especially illegals. They can pay them less.

      America does not have an illegal immigration problem.

      America has an illegal employment problem. Bust some illegal employers, and this problem will go away. By the way - enforcement of illegal employment has dropped 95% since 2000. (Enforcement of law is an Executive Branch function. Draw your own conclusion).

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  233. Me: France. My brother's in the Netherlands by JavaRob · · Score: 1

    My brother and his wife moved to the Netherlands a few years ago; he had worked for a Dutch company in California, and arranged to be transferred. They still don't speak Dutch fluently -- but everyone in the Netherlands studies English in school (and many are perfectly fluent), so it's easy for them to get by.

    They moved out of the US mostly to be closer to his wife's family in France.

    I moved out of the US this summer. My wife and I now live in rural southern France, in the corner near the Mediterranean and the Spanish border. We both speak French, more or less; my wife's completely fluent, and mine is pretty good. I bought a car here (a diesel 1994 Renault Clio that gets 45 miles to the gallon, which good since diesel is almost $5/gallon... regular gas is even more expensive).

    I'm still working for the same clients (doing web development) back in the US, plus running a few sites of my own; I'm paid in US dollars, and pay US taxes, with a US address that's technically a mail-fowarding company. I call into conference calls using Skype.

    But I live surrounded by vineyards, and weather is lovely. The food is good, and the people I've met are warm and friendly.

    We moved to try something different. We'd lived in the northern US for long enough, and wanted to move someplace that would never get 4 feet of snow, but most parts of the southern US seemed unappealing in the extreme. The paperwork to move to Europe was a pain, but in the US we'd been through the process of getting my wife a green card after we married, and this was easier *plus* pretty much everyone was very friendly and helpful (is the INS friendly in the US? No.).

    It's nice to be distanced a bit from all the political $#!# in the US, too. It's not like we're hiding our heads in the sand, and I'm still voting, but I simply don't check the news more than a few times a month. France has their own elections coming up, and their own political problems, but at least they're *different* problems. And at least we can escape the non-stop hypocritical religious rhetoric, which is what I hate the most about US politicians. The problems don't go away, but I'm not doing any *less* about them and I sleep better at night.

    Think about it -- watching people argue on television doesn't do a damned thing for any cause, it just gives you that sick feeling that doesn't go away.

    So anyway, it's possible.

  234. WoW by Mikya · · Score: 5, Funny

    Play WoW for ten years, and it's entirely likely at the end of it you'll be able to put it down at the end of it and never touch it again.

    You had me up until then.

    1. Re:WoW by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      He speaks the truth. I'm sure within 10 years the sequel will be out and I won't want to touch WoW 1. :)

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    2. Re:WoW by kbielefe · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know. I still play Oregon Trail four hours a day. Do you think I need help?

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    3. Re:WoW by fyngyrz · · Score: 1
      Do you think I need help?

      Um... are you winning?

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  235. Central/Eastern Europe by nowhere.elysium · · Score: 1

    Perversely enough, the countries that have been subject to Soviet rule for most of the 20th century are the ones that are looking most attractive to me at the moment. Obviously, they're not without their flaws: there's no question of it, but there are some benefits to it too: not least of which is the fact that unlike the UK, these countries admit that technicians are very useful people to have around.
    It may seem like a small and silly thing to say, but it's quite a significant thing when you see the attitude firsthand.
    I work in a British univeristy, and I get some serious flak a lot of the time from students, staff, senior managers, and sometimes even visitors, because I'm a technician. I've beena teacher prior to now, but I'm a technical boy through and through: there's no way that I'd give it up for anything.
    However, since the 80s, there has been this awful attitude that only academic people in educational institutions are of any real use, and only money-driven people in the private sector are worth keeping around. I know that I'm not the only one that's noticed this: the 'yuppie' era is what caused this, and has left it in perpetuity since.
    I was in Prague not so long ago, on a course in virtual environments and artificial life, and the attitude and approach to thier technical support staff was unbelievably different to what I'm used to. It was understood that these people require just as much respect as their managers did, and for the same reason: you go to them for *help* - you don't 'just get', you have to *ask*. This is a thing that many people in the UK seem to be forgetting these days, and this fact makes me sad.
    As it happens, I fell in love with Prague a few years ago, on my first visit there. The country's not perfect - nowhere is, but I like it. However, the fact that there's a place in the world which has the same feel as a cross between London and Edinburgh, is much cleaner, and the people are generally (or at least seem to be) politer, is a real selling point for me.
    Once I've taken my PhD, I'm going there.

    --
    http://xkcd.com/313/
  236. Non-whites need not apply! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, that pretty much exclude anyone of a non-Caucasian persuasion. There's mention of the Netherlands, Australia, Spain, Japan and the like, but it seems like the only ones who want to leave the U.S. are well off white people for the most inane of excuses ('My goodness Buffy! A dark skinned couple just moved in next door!' or 'Woot! Japan makes anime, and worship white people! Let's move there!'). I don't think any non-white would be welcomed yo an any of those countries. Pretty much, if you're white, you have the gamut of choices like jobs, travel, welcomed in any country (just ask Japan), etc. If you have black friends (which I really doubt considering this is Slashdot) ask them what their options are about leaving the country. Heck, some will tell you they have a hard time just moving in a decent neighborhood much less another country!

    1. Re:Non-whites need not apply! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Caution: troll feeding ahead. I'm a black American (forget that African-American crap; after 10 generations I have no allegiance to Africa) that considered emigration quite seriously. Not strictly for political reasons, but those were a consideration. I've been to Australia, New Zealand, the UK, France, Canada and Germany. I was within a hair's breath of moving to Australia, but allowed my parents to "guilt" me out of doing so. Australia welcomed me with open arms, and race was not an issue. It wasn't anywhere else, either, although I didn't pursue emigration quite as far with any other nation. The parent poster should recognize that all black people are not the same. Just because your friends have problems in their region of the country and can't envision leaving doesn't mean it's the same for everyone, everywhere. If a black or minority American has in demand skills and the will to leave the US I think they'll find plenty of countries willing to admit them.

  237. Cut and Run ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would anyone want to cut and run instead of staying put and fixing whatever problems you percieve ... spoilt brats ... most countries are infinitely worse off then the US I can assure you.

    That being said, I'd avoid Europe - they're more overtly racistthan the average US/Canadian white. Australia/NZ is good, as is India, China, Japan. SE Asia, Peru, Any of the Island nations ...

  238. Iceland. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My own stupidity and lack of money.

    Simple question; simple answer, hey?

    Actually, I still hold out a slim hope that the US isn't on a path to destruction. I'm not entirely ungrateful; I mean, while the services provided to me thusfar in my life (education, ability to get a job, et cetera) are in everyone's interests (obvious for me, prevents me from being a burden to society for the gub'ment), I feel it's my duty to try to vote some theocratic bastards out of office first. Not all is yet lost. :P

    Can't vote in US elections when you've migrated to another country, hey?

  239. Re:... where would I move? Not Finland! by remembertomorrow · · Score: 1

    Thank you for the insight lol

    --
    Registered Linux user #421033
  240. Norway by Eivind · · Score: 4, Informative
    It depends on your requirements really, and your reasons for wanting out of the US in the first place. Different people will have different priorities.

    For some, I think Norway is a good choice.

    • It has a good standard of living.
    • It has good education.
    • Wages are high, but more equal than in the US. (meaning the very richest earn less, while the poorer/average people earn a lot more.
    • Taxes are progressive, for high-earners they're higher than US, for low-earners they're lower than US. When comparing, it's important to remember that "taxes" here include such details like universal healthcare, free education (all levels), pentions that one can actually live from, unemployment benefits, a full year off with 80% of your normal wages when you get a child, government-sponsored childcare, the works. For this, I consider the taxes quite acceptable. (for example, I earn on the order of $70K and pay 29% taxes)
    • Pollution is low. Nature is beautiful. Climate is mild on the coast. Not very warm summers, but neither very cold winthers. (unless you live way inland or way up north, which basically noone does anyway)
    • Worker protection laws are good. You're actually allowed a life beside work, even as a 25 year old programmer. You can actually reasonably provide for a family with a single normal job. (though most women work anyway)
    • Unemployment is at less than 3%, and falling. Enough said.
    • Our social security is dead-simple, and very good. Rules for membership fit on a single line: You're legally in Norway for a (planned or actual) period longer than a year ? Member, all benefits ! There's no fee for membership, it's financed trough your taxes.

    There are drawbacks.

    It's not the place for those of you who love the big metropolis. Our biggest cities, Oslo, Bergen, Trondheim and Stavanger are only in the 100.000s, not in the millions.

    Immigration can be tricky, unless you're married to a norwegian, from the EU, or have a desired qualification. Immigration also takes atleast 3-5 months for the paperwork (non-EU people, EU-people can come first, apply after), and you get only a 1-year work-and-stay permit which you need to renew yearly. After 3 years you get a permanent permit.

    95% of the population speaks varying levels of english, most educated people speak it fluently. Nevertheless you'll be at an disadvantage until you learn the language. The language is in the same language-group as english and german though, so it's not very hard to learn. (80% of the words are recognizably similar for example)

    Parts are rainy. The west-coast in autumn can be a shock (depending on where you're from). Normal rainfall in Bergen is like 2000mm/year. (less than half that in Oslo though)

    Living-costs are high, especialy services are expensive. This is a result of the fact that your waitress, your hairdresser and your burgerflipper earns a decent living.

    1. Re:Norway by Eivind · · Score: 1

      Oh, and I forgot: the women/girls are hot :-)

    2. Re:Norway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you completely out of your mind?!

      What exactly do you think you're doing? Do you really want the most desperate, whiny, self-inflated, delusional, trouble-making americans to actually move here?

      Stop posting this at /. you obviously don't understand where you are!

      Ffs man, get a grip!

    3. Re:Norway by irchans · · Score: 1
      > Living-costs are high, especialy services are expensive. This is a result of the fact that your waitress, your hairdresser and your burgerflipper earns a decent living.

      I believe the minimum wage in Norway is approximately 20 U.S. Dollars per hour.

    4. Re:Norway by Eivind · · Score: 1
      There is no minimum wage in Norway.

      But in practice, your guesstimate comes pretty close to what you'll need to pay to get an actual adult reliable person for a job, even one that requires little formal training or expertise. If not $20, then certainly $15.

    5. Re:Norway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, no minimum wage. But at the age of sixteen I was sorting letters at the post office earning $15 an hour. Jobs don't come with lower wages than that in Norway. Provided you're in the country legally, of course. As everybody else who's rich, we happily exploit poor foreigners. There are many stories in the news every summer about Polish workers (construction workers and farm workers, mainly) being mistreated and extremely poorly paid. Poorly paid in the Norwegian sense, of course, the wages are obviously better than in Poland.
      But as long as one is Norway legally, one shouldn't have much trouble making a living. As we speak, I'm in college, which is completely free, and buying my books and food and paying rent with money the government throw at me. (Well, I have to pay back half of it. But not until I get a job after college.) I think this is to prevent us from leaving a country where it's snowing heavily in October...

  241. Secession? by misfit815 · · Score: 1

    Actually, I'd be in favor of my home state, Indiana, seceeding from the union. Then maybe we could get rid of that stoopid Daylight Savings Time thing again. And the Republicans wouldn't try so hard to get one of their cronies elected as governor (it's Indiana, after all - all he had to do was win the primary, beating a much better but far less endorsed candidate). And I wouldn't have to keep trying to vote my inept U.S. Rep out of office every two years. Oh, and maybe we could finally declare war on Kentucky and get all their whiskey as spoils.

    Seriously, I'd prefer a whole lot of control moved from Washington to the individual states. Once upon a time, that was the case. Then politicians used the civil war and the great depression and other catastrophes (hmm... terrorism?) to consolidate power.

    --
    Jesus told him, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one can come to the Father except through me. - John 14:6 NLT
  242. Recently moved to Sweden by jrl · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I owned an operated a small company out of Orange County California for a number of years before recently having my company purchased by a Swedish firm in the same field. I've been here for about 6 months now and am VERY happy for the change of pace. The taxes are higher here, but they actually do a lot to help the people. There are fewer extremely rich folk, but there are also fewer poor people. There is a happy medium where everyone seems to have enough to be happy.

    Sweden so far seems like one of the best places I could have ended up after leaving America. We'll see if I still feel that way after 5+ years :)

  243. Off Planet by ananamouse · · Score: 0

    Asteroid belt probablly.

  244. Make plans to leave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From personal experience.

    Make plans to move to the US within about 2 to 3 years, and stay the hell away from Amsterdam. I know a lot of Americans living in Holland, and all of them bar none have the same story: The first couple of months you have a 'holiday feeling', everything is different and exciting. Then slowly the frustrations start to take over, and after about two years they will curse the day they made the decision to move here. Relationships break up as the American half will eventually have to choose between going back or going postal. If you wait that long, you won't have time to arrange moving back to the USA, because honestly getting into the US legally is a slow and difficult process.

    The ones worst hit are the ones who once had a nice vacation in Amsterdam before, and think Amsterdam is the whole country. It's only when you live there, you start to realize it is an impoverished, dilapidated and deeply troubled town with a tacky commercial veneer over the downtown area to turn it into a tourist trap.

    I personally like this country (except Amsterdam) a lot, but realize that for an american a move to this country means a move to a country where the average family income after tax is HALF that of the US, while the cost of living is comparable to downtown New York. Such a drop in standard of living causes too much grief for most people to deal with, even if they think of themselves as liberals who don't care about material things.

    1. Re:Make plans to leave by Pienjo · · Score: 1

      Oh, I wasn't even remotely interested in moving to Amsterdam. I wouldn't want to live in Amsterdam myself, truth be told.

      I can imagine where the frustration comes from, but, unfortunately, there's not an awful lot I can do about it. The chances of me being able to move to the US are slim, if not negligible, as things are right now, so it's not as if I have an awful lot of options. And that's without making *any* financial considerations, let alone personal opinion. What my personal stance in all of this is, seems to be the least of all concerns.

      Right now, it's either "She moves here" or "nothing happens". I'm obviously not going to accept the last option, so I'm more than willing to take a risk with the first.

  245. Marginal Tax Rates by lseltzer · · Score: 5, Informative

    See the OECD Tax Database for lots of data (in Excel format) on comparative tax rates in various countries. The US is relatively low-tax.

    This table shows top marginal tax rate, factoring in social security-type contributions if they are separate. The actual definition for the number is "The all-in (top marginal) tax rate, calculated as the additional central and sub-central government personal income tax, plus employee social security contribution, resulting from a unit increase in gross wage earnings. The all-in rate takes account of the same aspects as the combined rate, but does in addition include employee social security contributions and if they are deductible in central government taxes etc." This table is for 2005.

    Hungary 69.5%
    Denmark 63.0%
    Belgium 59.3%
    Sweden 56.6%
    Finland 56.5%
    Netherlands 52.0%
    Poland 51.8%
    Norway 51.3%
    Greece 49.6%
    France 48.6%
    Australia 48.5%
    Ireland 48.0%
    Luxembourg 47.9%
    Japan 47.9%
    Switzerland 47.9%
    Portugal 46.6%
    Canada 46.4%
    Spain 45.0%
    Germany 44.3%
    Italy 44.1%
    United States 42.7%
    Austria 42.7%
    Turkey 41.1%
    United Kingdom 41.0%
    Czech Republic 40.5%
    Iceland 40.2%
    New Zealand 39.0%
    Korea 38.2%
    Slovak Republic 29.9%
    Mexico 24.6%

    1. Re:Marginal Tax Rates by laurieknight · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd be willing to bet that table is completely meaningless. Does it take into account local taxes? Transportation taxes? In the UK we have pretty low income tax but the tax burden as a whole is massive, thanks to what is known here as Stealth taxes, pretty much all introduced in the last 9 years by Gordon Fucking Brown. (The scumbag).

      There is /NO Fsking way/ that the UK is so far down the table in terms of taxes as a whole...

      So whats the point of quoting a table which lists only ONE type of tax??

    2. Re:Marginal Tax Rates by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

      Top Tax rate is irrelevant to most people. At one point in the UK the top rate was 90% (or more?), but that had no effect to most people (other than getting subsidized my multi-millionaires!).

      For a fair comparison you need to show total the tax rate for the same salary level in each country. For the US you need to minimally add Social Security to your taxes paid.

      US taxes are actually pretty high if you do an oranges and oranges comparison... even more so if you note that in many countries healthcare is covered by taxes, while in the US it costs (a lot) extra. In many countries your taxes also provide a good quality national train system vs the US where it's not really a viable means of casual travel.

    3. Re:Marginal Tax Rates by alexo · · Score: 1

      The marginal tax rate does not tell the whole story.
      Consider the following contrived example of tax rates:
      $0 - $9,999,999: 0% tax
      $10,000,000 and up: 99% tax.

      What is the total disposable income for various salaries?
      What is the cost-of-living adjustment, if any?
      Etc., etc., etc.

    4. Re: Marginal Tax Rates by bigrespect · · Score: 1

      Are these averages? I don't think they are very useful numbers because they don't give a sense of how steep the tax bracket steps are. I've lived in Japan for four years and never paid more than 10% in taxes, including local and central. Granted, I am not in a high bracket. I make about US$40,000. In the U.S., people in lower tax brackets pay a much bigger chunk of their income whereas the wealthy pay a much lower percentage compared to Japan. Here, the poorest pay zip and the richest pay over 50%.

      Another factor besides taxes is cost of living. Contrary to its reputation, it's entirely possible to live quite cheaply in Japan. One of its big advantages is the public transport system. Even though I had paid off my car loan in the U.S., had a little Toyota that never broke down and hardly used any gas, it still cost about twice as much to pay insurance and maintenance and fuel for that car than it costs me to take trains and buses in Japan. I made about twice my current income when I lived in Silicon Valley, and I'm probably saving at least as much in Japan now.

      There are plenty of other advantages to living in Japan. Cleanliness, great service, respectful people, almost nonexistent crime, and gorgeous, unabashedly feminine women unburdened by the legacy of Puritanism, who absolutely adore gaijin....

      But seriously, I think the most important factor in deciding where to live is culture. What really matters is whether you feel at home in the culture, whether you feel that you belong. If you don't, then it doesn't matter how superior the tax rates or the job opportunities are, or how convenient and efficient the train system is; ultimately you're going to be unhappy, and you'll want to go home.

    5. Re:Marginal Tax Rates by Damek · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I don't think I would mind living in any of those countries, save the U.S., Mexico, Korea, Turkey and the Slovak Republic. I guess it ain't taxes that has much of anything to do with anything regarding how nice or not nice it might be to live somewhere.

    6. Re:Marginal Tax Rates by plopez · · Score: 1

      RTFP

      calculated as the additional central and sub-central government personal income tax, plus employee social security contribution,

      sub-central refers to state, county and other regional taxes.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    7. Re:Marginal Tax Rates by lseltzer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Lots of folks are objecting to a focus on marginal rates (I do think they're important, but whatever). From the same database, here's spreadsheet (Excel) that looks at "All-in average personal income tax rates at AW" (AW=average wage). And remember the US doesn't have a VAT.

      Some data excerpted: "All-in less cash transfers: The combined central and sub-central government income tax plus employee social security contribution, less family benefits (in respect of dependent children) paid by general government as universal cash transfers, as a percentage of gross wage earnings. " These numbers are for a one-earner family with two children.


      Turkey 30.4%
      Poland 30.3%
      Denmark 29.2%
      Sweden 23.7%
      Finland 23.6%
      Germany 22.3%
      Belgium 22.2%
      Greece 22.1%
      Netherlands 21.7%
      Norway 20.4%
      United Kingdom 19.4%
      Hungary 18.4%
      France 17.1%
      Austria 16.7%
      Japan 15.3%
      New Zealand 14.5%
      Italy 13.7%
      Spain 13.0%
      Canada 12.3%
      Australia 10.9%
      Switzerland 9.6%
      Portugal 9.1%
      Korea 8.6%
      Mexico 7.9%
      Iceland 5.9%
      United States 5.0%
      Slovak Republic 3.0%
      Czech Republic 1.5%
      Luxembourg 0.3%
      Ireland -1.8%

    8. Re:Marginal Tax Rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you figure all the mandantory fees, duties, and other government rakes then the USA tax rate is higher than 50% for most people. I know, cause I've kept track of it for myself. Couple that with the USA financing it's imports with foreign debt and the situation is only go to get far worse.

    9. Re:Marginal Tax Rates by b0bby · · Score: 1

      This is quite a misleading table, since it doesn't take into account tax deductions etc. Your tax burden in the US, for state & local taxes, is likely to be closer to 16% (10% state & local + 6% Federal):
      http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/TaxFacts/overview/f amily_rates.cfm
      http://www.retirementliving.com/RLtaxburdens.html
      I just looked at my tax returns from a couple of years ago - my effective tax rates were 5% & 4% rather than 10% & 6%, because I deduct mortgage interest, have kids, etc. If you add property taxes my total tax burden would be around 11%. Sales tax here is 5%, compared to 15%+ in most of Europe I believe. I have lived in the UK & I can tell you that the taxes are a lot lighter in the US, despite what the top marginal rates are. From my experience, from a financial perspective, I would want to be earning almost the same in pounds as I do in dollars to have about the same purchasing power, despite the pound being worth $1.87 today. Now, from a quality of life perspective, there are plenty of arguments in favor of living in Europe, but taxes aren't one of them ;)

    10. Re:Marginal Tax Rates by Trifthen · · Score: 1

      If the US is listed at 42%, it obviously doesn't include property tax, sales tax, state and local taxes, etc. We don't pay all of our taxes up front, but oh hell yes, we pay them. I'd be willing to wager we're much higher on the list when the real rate is considered. And many of the countries on that list have national health care for their dime... we don't.

      --
      Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
    11. Re:Marginal Tax Rates by cvmiller · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As an American living in Canada, this listing of tax rates is still not an apples to apples comparison. For example the US and Canada top rates:
      Canada 46.4%
      United States 42.7%

      for less that 4%, I get free healthcare in Canada.

      And don't forget, for all the American's who do want to leave the US, there are still US taxes to pay (unless you renounce one's US citizenship) as the US taxes its citizens regardless of where they live (which in the end just increases one's tax burden).

    12. Re:Marginal Tax Rates by uujjj · · Score: 1

      2 big pitfalls in your table:
      1. this is just the top marginal rate. very few people pay this rate. the marginal tax rate payed by most taxpayers in the US is much lower.
      2. does this include state income taxes? those are usually about 5%.

    13. Re:Marginal Tax Rates by fitsy · · Score: 1

      Those comparisons don't tell you the full story. Ie, in most of the EU you get free healthcare, in the US you have to pay for it. So whilst country A might be "lower taxed" than country B, it doesn't mean you will be better off financially in country A.

    14. Re:Marginal Tax Rates by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1
      If you figure all the mandantory fees, duties, and other government rakes then the USA tax rate is higher than 50% for most people.

      I severly doubt your claim that it's 50% in the US, but one thing to keep in mind about the tax-rate lists for other countries is that they include government health care whereas Americans pay for that through their employers or out-of-pocket (plus, Americans pay inflated prices for drugs and services compared to other countries). You need to factor in how much you get to how much you pay to make any meaningful comparisons.

    15. Re:Marginal Tax Rates by Thunderstruck · · Score: 1

      These numbers are enlightening, but I wonder how accurate they really are with respect to the United States. I notice that EU members are stated separately, but indiviudal united States are not. Does the United States figure account only for taxes at the federal level? (Some states have no income tax, and very low taxes on consumption. Other states have high taxes in both categories.)

      --
      Trying to use sarcasm in text-based forums does not work.
    16. Re:Marginal Tax Rates by badmammajamma · · Score: 1

      One thing it doesn't take into account is the fact that adherance and enforcement vary wildly from country to country. The US is pretty serious about both but in Mexico most people pay far less than the 24.6% tax specified in the list.

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
    17. Re:Marginal Tax Rates by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      I think the US might be wrong, or the list is at least a little bit inaccurate.

      Top marginal tax rate is 35%. (2006)
      Social Security is 12.4%*
      Medicare is 2.9%*

      Now, there's some funny math here, 'cause by the time you hit the 35% bracket, you no longer pay the 12.4% OASDI (Social Security) payment. So, in reality, the top bracket occurs when you are in that no-mans-land at the 28% level, and you add the 15.3%, to get 43.3%, which I suppose is close enough for government work.

      It is interesting that the highest earners will likely pay only 37.9%, while those two income brackets below will pay 43.3%, but that's not really true. Those who make the big bucks usually get a large portion of their income from "capital gains," which are only taxed at 15%, and are not subject to SS and medicare taxes. Don't you just love America!

      *Only half of this is taken out on the paycheck, as the employer must match this amount - but the tax is still based on the gross income.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    18. Re:Marginal Tax Rates by Jonny+do+good · · Score: 1

      "And don't forget, for all the American's who do want to leave the US, there are still US taxes to pay (unless you renounce one's US citizenship) as the US taxes its citizens regardless of where they live (which in the end just increases one's tax burden)."

      I don't know where you get your information, if you live outside the US the first $80K (this may be higher now, the last time I checked though it was this) is completely tax exempt (unless you work for the government). Also any taxes paid overseas are used in total tax burden and if you have to pay higher local taxes than the US would require you won't pay anything.

    19. Re:Marginal Tax Rates by alcmaeon · · Score: 1

      The actual definition for the number is "The all-in (top marginal) tax rate, calculated as the additional central and sub-central government personal income tax, plus employee social security contribution, resulting from a unit increase in gross wage earnings. The all-in rate takes account of the same aspects as the combined rate, but does in addition include employee social security contributions and if they are deductible in central government taxes etc."

      Then the figure for the U.S. is incorrect. The top Federal Tax bracket is 33%, plus 15% for social security, plus state tax, let's say another 7-10%, plus local tax, let's say another 3-5%. That totals 63% on the high side. This doesn't include all the taxes on goods, services, and commodities, not to mention utility taxes, property taxes, personal property taxes, etc. It also doesn't include unemployment tax and workers compensation tax. I figured this up once and the actual nominal tax rate for a U.S. citizen in the top tax bracket is something like 83%.

      And the poor American slob doesn't even get national healthcare.

      So, as an American, I think that if I am going to be taxed shitless, then I might as well move to some country where I actually get a benefit for all the tax money I pay.

    20. Re:Marginal Tax Rates by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

      Some of us in the US get our healthcare for free too thanks to the companies we work for.

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
    21. Re:Marginal Tax Rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, "free health care". That is why workers in Ontario are now having 20 dollars Canadan taken out of each paycheck to pay for their free health care. This is more (even once considering the difference in currency values) then I pay for US health insurance, and I have a lot more choices on doctors and hospitals. This is on top of the high taxes, high sales taxes, and high gasoline taxes. Also, in Canada if you do not like the government health care, it is too bad, it is illegal to pay for your own health care.

      Some other items about Europe. Not only do the Europeans pay high income taxes but they also pay high gasoline taxes, high sales taxes, and high taxes (fees) to register vechiles. To register a BMW 540 (every year) in Belgiuum would cost you around 5,000 USD! This is based on engine size and horsepower.

      If the European "free" health care system is so great then why is private health insurance a BOOMING BUSINESS in Europe?

      Also in many places in Europe free speach is allowed but not "hate speach". Who defines hate speach? Could questioning your government become hate speach?

    22. Re:Marginal Tax Rates by Joey7F · · Score: 1
      In many countries your taxes also provide a good quality national train system vs the US where it's not really a viable means of casual travel.


      No need for a national train service (for people) it is much more practical, and cheaper to fly.
    23. Re:Marginal Tax Rates by cvmiller · · Score: 1

      You are absolutely right! If you happen to be lucky enough to live in a country that the US has a tax treaty with (which Canada does). But that exemption only applies to money one makes outside the US, and not investments, one might have in the US.

      But you are right, there is some help. Alas with the weakening US Dollar (or strengthening Canadian Dollar, depending on how you look at it) that 86k is getting less and less.

    24. Re:Marginal Tax Rates by Jonny+do+good · · Score: 1

      Well, investments in the US are income earned in the US.

      The weakening dollar is helping our balance of trade (it is cheaper for other countries to buy US products and more expensive for us to buy theirs), while our purchasing power parity is not changing within our boarders (this actually bodes well for speculators betting on the USD).

      If an American chooses to move to a country that the US doesn't have a tax treaty with (not really that many anymore), than that is your prerogative, don't blame the US government, our tax system is relatively fair. You can debate the fairness of it, it is progressive although probably not a progressive as it should be due to the way Social Security is taxed (only on the first 86K or so).

      I think it is ridiculous how people want to trash America when we have the highest number of immigrants fleeing to our country. Many countries people talk about leaving here for are countries with the exact opposite problem. Yes, we are far from perfect, but name a country that is. We have a high per capita GDP (not the highest, but good), low and stable inflation, low unemployment (and don't give me some crap about the way it is calculated, I used OECD stats which are standardized), a stable currency (yes it has depreciated relative to other countries but the EURO is relatively new and the world is hedging its bets, plus our low interest rates are driving FDI down by a modest amount), and a relatively free society. We allow people to voice their opinions, anyone can run for office (if they have the guts and determination), vote (well you do have to be a citizen without a felony... although a number of recounts have shown non-citizens voting as well as convicted felons).

    25. Re:Marginal Tax Rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "And don't forget, for all the American's who do want to leave the US, there are still US taxes to pay (unless you renounce one's US citizenship) as the US taxes its citizens regardless of where they live (which in the end just increases one's tax burden)."


      This is patently false. Or at least it is only sometimes true. Countries have tax treaties with each other for a reason, y'know, and that's to prevent double taxation as much as it is to prevent tax evasion. For example, as a dual national (UK/US), living in the UK, I only have to pay UK taxes. This is true for all US citizens resident in the UK, thanks to the joy of tax treaties.

      Even if no such treaty exists between the US and the country that you are living in, you are still entitled to claim back some portion (in some cases all) of the tax on up to $80,000 worth of income, if you spent the entire tax year (minus a set number of days) in that country. You just need to file a lot of rather unpleasant forms when you file your tax return.
    26. Re:Marginal Tax Rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To New Zealand's figure you need to add our compulsory "accident insurance" tax (another 1.3%). You have to pay to insure yourself against any accidents you might have at work, you see. We can't possibly have people suing their employers just because they were negligent.

    27. Re:Marginal Tax Rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a) tax rate

      b) taxed income

      You get a fair tax rate when you look what the average citizen pays, not what the maimum tax looks like.

      Social taxes or health insurance are a kind of consumption, no taxe

  246. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by Eivind+Eklund · · Score: 1
    Could you please argue for that viewpoint? I'm genuinely interested in arguments in favour of it, as I'm in favour of increased effective freedom - I just don't see any sign that the present US is overall better than the present Europe in the area, and arguments would be interesting for getting a better opinion.

    Eivind.

    --
    Doubting the existence of evolution is like doubting the existence of China: It just shows that you're uninformed.
  247. What's important to you?? by Yahnz · · Score: 1

    First a couple of "credentials": I left the US with my family a bit over five years ago. Wife is American as are the kids - I'm originally from Europe but have gone through the US school system and spent fifteen years in the IT workforce (i.e. this was not my first migration!)

    Our home is now New Zealand. It is now definitely home - you know that feeling when the plane touches down and you sort of exhale & relax on the familiar grounds?

    We moved here for a number of reasons - the dotcom disaster was looming, kids were getting to be school age and we weren't too happy about the prospect of schooling in the US, the right-wing politics of the US were starting to look scary (we flew over the night Bush scammed the election).

    The short of it is that if you have good IT skills you're marketable pretty much anywhere in the world. Really.

    The reality is that any move will be a tradeoff, and it's knowing about these that will decide how miserable you're really going to be. Because there is plenty of misery to be had regardless of where you're going - you can count on that.

    If you're young and don't have kids - go live someplace like London, Amsterdam, Hong Kong, Tokyo, etc. Move downtown, and live it up. These are not the places you will want to live in once you have kids - your choice will be a commute from hell or raising kids in an apartment - both choices suck, and you'll end up doing the commute anyway.

    Once you have kids your priorities will drastically shift. You won't be going on ad-hoc ski trips Fri after work, and having a back yard and a GOOD school will become paramount. If your salary is more important than your lifestyle the family won't matter anyway and you'll do what your boss demands, so I'll skip that one...

    So why New Zealand? Because it's the BEST PLACE TO RAISE KIDS. It's safe, it's clean, the schools are EXCELLENT, and you're far away from most world events. The country is small. It's so small that on a number of occasions I've flown behind or next to various ministers including the prime minister! Seriously - commercial flights - she gets on and puts her bag up into the luggage compartment like anybody else.

    When I first came out for interviews here some group of dissatisfied NZ expats in London bought out full page ads in the local newspapers demanding that the govt. improve the economy or they will not be returning. What struck me was the response of the prime minister, who dismissed the whole thing by saying that the country will focus on making sure it is the best place to raise kids - and that they will return when it's their turn to raise kids, not because of some short-term economic play. Having now seen our kids though five years of (public) schooling here I can say that the school system is very, very good. Well-funded, with good teachers, with a fundamentally different approach to teaching - my kids look forward to going back to school after breaks!

    The political system is like anywhere - politicians are like anywhere else, but the scales are much smaller and so the "scandals" are a whole lot funnier (i.e. not billions of dollars at stake!) There is a huge degree of transparency in most areas of government, to the point where a few years ago a police cruiser was pulled over for speeding. As long as you're not too far to the right you'd be very happy with the elected govt here - it is principled, reasoned, and liberal by US standards. Some will of course disagree, but it's all opinion at the end of the day.

    It's great to feel your kids are safe and well-cared for, and that you can have some pride in your government (no, really. It does feel that way!), but the BEST part is that we're far enough away from the rest of the world to not give a damn. If I don't want to worry about what's happening in Iraq or wherever I simply don't look at the international news. With time you gain the ability to see a lot of these (very stress-inducing) news items with a sense of distanc

  248. North Korea of course! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Strong leadership, no worries about trying to affect things politically (you can't), member of the nuke club - home from home!

  249. Where would I live... by Nichole_knc · · Score: 1

    Well I have lived in a couple of different countries in my life... I really like Germany... Not to fond of the old UK...
    But I would say I would continue to live in America... It ain't perfect and at least the haven't started shootin ya for speaking your mind... A least not yet they haven't... And IF it gets headed in a direction that looks like they might start... Well then it would be time to have a new American Revolution then wouldn't it.....

  250. Five miles away by cool_st_elizabeth · · Score: 1

    1. I live five miles from Canada. 2. The reason I don't move there? My husband would lose his VA benefits & healthcare eligibility.

  251. AMSTERDAM by Jerry520 · · Score: 1

    I'd go to amsterdam....:D I'd be a happy boy....;) What's stopping me, is I'm a broke bastard...lol

  252. the nowhereness of Canada ... ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yup, it's so terrible living in the great white nowhere

    it's really hard kickin back and enjoying free health care

  253. Another (mostly) English speaking country by gelfling · · Score: 1

    So that would include

    Belize, South Africa, India, Israel, Oz, NZ

  254. Japan by Zadaz · · Score: 1

    1) Japan

    2) I have, but for the time being it isn't permanent. Getting citizenship in Japan is very difficult (I've met people who are the third generation born in Japan and who still don't have citizenship) To even get a proper visa to stay in the country more than 3 months I need to find a guarantor to be legally responsible for me as I lay down about $25K to create a corporation and hire myself. (As I own my own business and I want to keep it legal.)

    Though I'm not sure I want citizenship, an American passport is incredibly valuable.

  255. Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We live about 90 miles from the Canadian border, and many of our friends are Canadian. While we're muttering about our politics and worrying about the cost of health care they're having nice, clean, sane elections and enjoying free health care.

    What's keeping me from moving? The economy. I can barely afford to pay my bills as it is. I've got friends in Canada who make more working at Wal-Mart than I'm making here as a technician. I'd love to move, but there's no way I could afford the associated expenses right now.

  256. I would move.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would but I don't want to be victimized by American foreign policy.

  257. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by crazy_monkey · · Score: 1

    I agree with most of what you're saying, but add that if you look up something like "non-linear intergenerational earnings", the free market model of socioeconomic freedom seems to, !rightly or wrongly!, result in less socioeconomic movement.

  258. Move to Iceland by jujuchef · · Score: 1

    I would move to Iceland. I'm an American living in the U.K. and find it tolerable. There's things I'll never get used to like having speed cameras, fines in the post/mail for having garbage out on the wrong day, oh yeah and GETTING FINGER-PRINTED JUST TO GET IN TO A PUB!. As recently posted on /. and the register http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/10/20/pub_finger prints/
    I live near this part of the country in the UK but have yet to experience. I personally will stop frequenting pubs when this happens UK-wide.
    Iceland has some of the best overall education, best health, and geographically is sat on top of 'free' electric and gas. A population of 300,000 might take some getting used to, but the Icelandic people I have met are wonderful. Their alcoholic drink (I can't recall the name) might take some getting used to.
    The only downside I can see is that it's an island state and only so much room.
    It's not as easy to go there though if you are not an EU citizen...

    --
    Truth is realized, not told...
    1. Re:Move to Iceland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1. It's called "brennivin".
      2. Lack of space really is not a problem. Monaco is much smaller and has a lot more people. Reykjavik (with roughly 120.000 people) is actually one of the most spread out cities you could find (from wikipedia the population density of Reykjavik is 413/km^2, while for example Paris is at 24,672/km^2 and NY has 10,292/km^2, and Reykjavik has 2/3 of the Icelandic population).
      There is much discussion though currently on setting some restrictions on immigration so that might be your biggest problem if you want to move here. Well, that and the language... and getting used to brennivin of course.
  259. All I can say is by Hubbell · · Score: 1

    If you don't love your country, then get the fuck out. If you talk about leaving the US cause you don't like things here, then you have no right claiming you love your country and want things to get better in it but on the other hand cry about how you're running away to another country. Too many people are claiming to be patriotic Americans who love their country yet run off to other countries while still spouting the same things in some vain attempt to save face to other Americans. I used to think like you guys, when I was 15. Then I grew up, and realized if you actually love your country, you don't run away like a little girl, you stay and do what you can to fix it. You put your heart into the things you believe in and do what you can to make things in your community or on a larger scale county, state, or even the nation itself better for those around you. I'm personally joining the US Army at the end of this semester, cause I love my country, not to mention the job training and benefits will be great. If you don't agree with the current administration, so be it, but don't try to claim you are an American who loves their country if you're running away.

    1. Re:All I can say is by superdude72 · · Score: 1

      I *like* my country, but I can't afford the health insurance.

      I'm personally joining the US Army at the end of this semester, cause I love my country, not to mention the job training and benefits will be great.

      Oh hell no. I don't want to pay for your job training, benefits, enlistment bonus, or PTSD counseling when you come home with your legs blown off. I have sympathy for people who enlisted years ago and might have been misled into believing we had responsible civilian oversight of the military, but not for you. If you join the Army now, you're just a dick. Go get a real job and be productive. Stop sucking on the teat of the US taxpayer.

    2. Re:All I can say is by Hubbell · · Score: 1

      MOS25b, Information Technology Specialist. That's what I'm going in for. I'm sorry if you don't want your tax dollars going towards the men and women who give you the right to free speech, who give you the right to live in a country where you aren't jailed for voicing any form of criticism against the government, who give their lives when it is asked of them for you. Sympathy for those in the military? They volunteered to serve their country, and to give aid to their brothers and sisters in the military when the time comes that they are needed.

    3. Re:All I can say is by superdude72 · · Score: 1

      If the Mahdi Army ever manages to occupy the United States without benefit of a Navy, Air Force, more than a few thousand regular troops, or really, any reason to want to occupy the United States, I'll be happy to head to the hills and fight them guerilla-style, ala Red Dawn. (I've got my Rambo survival knife with the sawblade edge, compass, and toothpick ready. Wolverines!)

      Until then, I think the half a trillion dollars a year we spend on the military, plus the trillion extra we're likely to spend on the Iraqi occupution, is just too damn much. We should just admit that the military is a big Keynesian jobs program and spend the money on park rangers or something. We'd have the most awesome system of National Parks in the history of the world, and it would be a lot less counterproductive than the rathole we're throwing the money down now.

  260. Perspective of a Muslim by mapkinase · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a Muslim, I would definitely prefer to live in a Shari'a country. The problem is that there is none in the whole world.

    Paradoxically, the religious rights of Muslims in USA are more protected than in many Muslim countries.

    Your Muslim sister can freely wear headcover, veil or burqa anywhere in US, while this right is officially denied in Turkey (schools, parliament) and Tunisia (all public places). In fact, in Tunisia, a policeman might ask her to remove her headcover on the street and make her sign affidavit that she will never where it again.

    Your Muslim brother can grow a beard of whatever length (at some point he might be confused with a ZZ top fan), while this right is unofficially denied in Uzbekistan and many other Muslim countries.

    Muslim organizations that are banned in Muslim countries such as Egypt, can operate freely in US.

    As a Muslim you can read, watch, listen to any Islamic literature, video or CD (a book abd-ul-Wahhab - no problem, Hizb-ut-Tahrir booklet - no problem), while in almost all Central Asia post-Soviet republics you would likely to be targeted by police if they found out that you own this literature.

    I am quite often called a Wahhabi, an extremist, a fundamentalist, and generally very-very-very bad person. By whom? In 100% cases - by people who call themselves Muslims. I was never called or referred to as such by my fellow Americans.

    There are many bad things that US is doing now to Muslims, like, eh, killing them, for example (Muslims out of the country), by thousands, harassing them in the airports, jailing them for life for being in the wrong place at the wrong time with wrong people (inside the country), referring to them in general (not to confuse with personal attitudes of Americans) as bad people of various flavours (fascists, etc.), supporting dictatorships. On the moral level this poses really tough questions of whether Muslims can live in US and pay taxes.

    At this moment I feel like an old Jew from Odessa, who was given freedom of travelling in the dawn of post-Soviet times, went to the travel agency and after incessant queries about wide range of possibilities to travel to different countries picked by rotating the globe model, asked: "Do you have another globe?".

    But that is ok. It does not really matter where a Muslim lives as long as he can practice his religion. This world is just a test anyway. My real nationality is Paradise (Muslims believe that all people's souls originated from Paradise), and THAT nationality I would definitely would not like to lose.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    1. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I have been told by Muslims that as a Muslim, one of your fundamental beliefs is that killing infidels is condoned. I'm sorry, but I simply can't agree with any religion whose basic beliefs include condoning the killing others for their non-belief. As a Christian, this is purely unholy, ungodly thinking. Christians teach to love and pray for those who do not believe, not to kill them.

      Oh, and don't lump me in with the "Crusaders" bunch, because as an Independent Baptist, I draw my church lineage from original, New Testament, apostolic churches who were persecuted and martyred, not from the corrupted Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant churches.

    2. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I see. So your *particular* brand of christianity is fine, even if there are a bunch of other, nastier christian sects out there who like to fly under the same banner (like, say, the abortion clinic bombers). Meanwhile, to you, all muslims are the same.

      How very stereotypically hypocritical...

    3. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not a Muslim, but I'm really excited to live under Sharia -- I mean, the next time my wife sleeps with another man, it would be quasi-legally, but socially acceptable to KILL her for dishonoring my family. How exciting. I have been waiting for this opportunity and freedom for so long.

    4. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      You were told this by misinformed Muslims. The word "infidel" is a Christian word and doesn't appear in the Quran. Jews and Christians (and arguably zoroastrians too) are referred to as "People of the Scripture" in the Quran, and as citizens, they are granted equal protection as Muslims under the laws. As fellow citizens, Muslims are supposed to risk their lives in to protect them, Muslim or not. The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) said "Whoever kills a [Christian or Jewish citizen] will never even get to smell Paradise." Money from the government is actually supposed to finance the upkeep of churches and synagogues, as well as the mosques, because all 3 religions worship the same God.

      The Quran says "Let there be no compulsion in religion" (2:256), and murder is a hellworthy sin.

    5. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      My impression is that you would still enjoy these rights in places like Canada, but with far less chance of being thrown into Guantanamo for having a name similar to a "known terrorist."

      And for what it's worth you arguably can't practice biblical Christianity in much of the world either. Christianity is based on love, and there is nothing remotely loving about torture, wars of aggression, tax-slavery, or imprisoning anyone not sufficiently like the "majority." But there are few places where one is not forced to participate in those activities, at least indirectly (through taxation and such).

    6. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The above post is an example of taqqiya.

    7. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by vox+humanna · · Score: 1

      Where are Muslims like you today? Your voice of reason and temperance is comforting. I, like seeemingly everyone else had heard horrible things about people of the "Wahabbi" sect. Perhaps if persons such as yourself had a greater voice in the Middle East we could find a way to fix this festering wound between Western Culture and Islam.

    8. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny
      As a Muslim, I would definitely prefer to live in a Shari'a country.
      As a non Muslim, I'd prefer it if you did too. Would you like some help packing your bags?
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about apostacy? What is the penalty for that?

    10. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what if your daughter is raped while under Shari'a law and becomes pregnant? She'll be stoned to death for adultery unless she can find four witnesses to support her version of events (at least in some places under Shari'a).

      Thanks, but no thanks. Shari'a may have been liberal and an improvement on existing law in distant historical times, but not today. Justice is never perfect, but it shouldn't have to rely on having connections, being male, or relying on a benevolent judge.

    11. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to live under Shari'a just so I can divorce my wife with a text message. How cool is that??? Do I have to convert to Islam to do this, or can we inferior Dhimmis do it too?

    12. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Muslim world is the poorest, most illiterate, backward, unhealthy, unenlightened, deprived and weakest of all the races. Don't ask me to justify or back this up because it wasn't me that said it. Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf did, a few years back.

      So you want to live under Shari'a. Is this an informed choice? Have you spoken to people who have had experience of life in a country where this is a goal (I have FYI.)

      If this is the case and if there is an afterlife and a god (there probably isn't) then be assured that the last place you are going to is paradise.

      Don't pack your swimming costume my friend.

    13. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by fonetik · · Score: 1
      No, because then when he gets asked that question: "Did someone unknown to you pack your bags?" ...he would have to say yes! (And before you say it, he's a Muslim, and they can't lie)

      As an atheist, I don't really care for either the parent's or the grandparent's mythology and superstitions. I hope they all stick around in America. Diversity, including the diverse varieties of people that hate diversity, is what makes America great.

    14. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be so simplistic. If the actual foreign policy of the United States was "kill Muslims", then there would be many million more dead. Like, almost all of them.

    15. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn right she'd be stoned to death -- premarital sex is a serious sin. In fact, I'd probably kill her first to save the family honor, before handing her over to a mob, er, I mean a Shari'a court.

    16. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of a viewpoint in some of the literature I read when trying to learn more about the Islamic world.

      More than a few dissidents in majority-Muslim countries used to say the US was more Islamic than their home country. Islam has these ideas about trial before punishment and equality of all men before God that aren't particularly honored by some Middle East governments.

    17. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by mapkinase · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, if you agree with me that the war that US is leading against Muslims is evil, then yes I am "voice of reason and temperance".

      So called "Wahhabi" sect is nothing more than a label applied to people like myself who try to get away from centuries of innovations in religion (like celebrating Prophet's, sal Allahu 'alaihi wasallam, birthday or building mausoleums on graves) and return to the original Islam of the Prophet, sal Allahu 'alaihi wasallam, his Companions, and two generations after them (called otherwise Salaf).

      And yes, I support every single harsh punishment specified in Shari'a (that was actually in the first sentence of GP post), as well as gender separation, gender-based roles in society, strictly modest dress for men and women, stoning of open homosexuals, etc... given that it is applied in a country ruled by Muslims.

      Pretty much everything of it is covered by traditions and laws of Abraham, Moses and, yes, Jesus, which, alas, modern Jews and Christians, somehow forgot. So, please, if you one of the crowd of liberals, take back your words calling me voice of "reason and temperance", because that term is usually reserved by non-Muslims to "progressive Muslims", which I am not. Let my criticism of "Muslim" governments do not fool you, a Western person, because I am not criticising them from a Western point, but from the opposite point.

      People hear horrible things about someone ELSE just because (a) they like to hear something exciting and that is the nature of journalism, and nothing excites more than "horrible" and (b) because it is someone else, and when someone else is "horrible", "un-normal", "weird", "outragious" it sends your satisfaction centers in the brain the waves "I am not horrible", "I am normal", "I am modest and moderate", "I am in the middle of the people".

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    18. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Then why the FUCK do so many Muslims kill Jews and Christians in the name if Allah? I have yet to hear mainstream Muslim leaders come out and condemn the acts of the "fringe". Sorry to say it, but until then, I'll have to view ALL Muslims as the maniacal killers that they are.

    19. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by metamatic · · Score: 1
      Paradoxically, the religious rights of Muslims in USA are more protected than in many Muslim countries.

      It's not a paradox at all.

      The cluephone is ringing, why not pick it up?

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    20. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The tame muslims that live in the U.S. are not maniacal killers.

    21. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      Well, do not get me wrong. We still cannot judge among ourselves according to our law, we cannot call to the prayer loudly (the privilege of loud call to prayer that Christians have). So, if you are picking on the word "rights" and thinking that US is holding a world record on protecting them, then you are wrong.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    22. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what about the "tame" ones who lived in the U.S. who flew planes into the World Trade Center buildings? I call them "tame" because from all outward appearances, they were "normal" citizens.

      And of course not every Muslim is a maniacal killer, just as not every Christain is a radical whacko, but to deny the threat is putting your head in the sand. Yes, a minority are taining the perceptions of the majority, but the fact is that we have sick, twisted Muslims who are promoting disgusting violence. Just do a Google simple search on beheading videos, force yourself to watch one completely, and you'll see what I'm talking about.

    23. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

      Damn straight you can't judge yourselves by your law, because if your did you would have the right to execute anybody who decided they didn't want to be a muslim, or wanted to marry an infide.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    24. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "People of the Scripture" refers only to Muslims.

    25. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      You have no idea what you are talking about, right, Fujisawa-san?

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    26. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by labnet · · Score: 1

      So what religion are the claimed 'Muslims' who in North Africa, Indonesia, Sothern Philipines, many of the 'stan countries, specifically seek out to main, murder, rape Christians on a regular basis?

      --
      46137
    27. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      going secular was the thing that europe done right back then - it insured much freedom and prosperty.

      turkey did the same thing and it has a very high standard of living for a muslim country without oil.

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    28. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharia#Marriage_laws

      The Muslim woman who is not currently a fornicatress can only marry a Muslim man who is not currently a fornicator.

      Since they cannot be legaly married they're commiting adulty and may be executed.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    29. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      What can I say? You are right. If you devote your life to the material world like there is no afterlife, yes, statistically you are going to be richer.

      But Muslims do not believe in that. They believe they are created to worship the Creator, not Creations, not the golden calf, not their free will(ing), not Social Contract, not the constitution of us of a, just Him.

      You can call it stupid in XXI century, you can call it irrational, you can call it backwards - I have heard all of that.

      Look, "if" (just for the sake of the argument) you are right about death from your agnostic point of view, and I am wrong, I lose nothing. If I am right, then you are doomed for eternal fire. Rationalize that.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    30. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Velocir · · Score: 1

      Parts of Somalia are working under Shari'a law: They just got rid of piracy by threatening the pirates with amputation/beheading if they were caught. The port is operational again. Of course, there's still all the anarchy and warlords to deal with.

    31. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      WHy they are cannot be legally married?

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    32. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      The only reason why those warlords even exist is support of United States - the bastion of democracy, the flagship of freedom. Those medieval theatrical puppets would be gone in 45 seconds if not the support of US.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    33. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      As a Christian, this is purely unholy, ungodly thinking. Christians teach to love and pray for those who do not believe, not to kill them.

      My father used to be beat up every day after school because by "Christians" because he did not participate the "voluntary" "student lead" prayer that his public school had in the 1940s. Most Muslims do not want to kill Christians. Most Christians do not advocate violence. What you are saying is that "muslims are violent, christians are not" - you are sorely mistaken. Christians "talk" about being so "loving". Try being an Atheist (like my family) around Christians - you will find out that Christians can be just as violent.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    34. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      Look, "if" (just for the sake of the argument) you are right about death from your agnostic point of view, and I am wrong, I lose nothing. If I am right, then you are doomed for eternal fire. Rationalize that.

      1. An all powerful Creator has no need for worshipers as He is all powerful.
      2. If an all powerful Creator wanted worshipers and decided to create them they would be perfect beings who would worship him without question.
      3. No person on earth is perfect and not everyone believes in one faith.

      This being said there are only three possibilities about the motive of the Creator:
      1. We were created for a purpose other than worshiping the Creator.
      2. There is no Creator.
      3. The Creator is not all powerful.

      I do not profess to have all the answers but I do know that given the facts about humanity today worshiping a Creator is a waste of time. If there is a Creator he didn't make us for that purpose or he is not all powerful and therefore has no say about our afterlife.

    35. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for that little insight into lunacy.

    36. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      The problem with your statements is that you are making assumptions about the Creator which come from your material experience. They are based neither on science nor on trustworthy religious revelations.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    37. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by juan2074 · · Score: 1

      I have been told

      I have been told that the girl was over 18 years old.

      That doesn't make it true.

    38. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's hardly paradoxical that you have more freedom in America, because that's the founding principle (if not always the reality since Bush Jt has been in office).

      I find it bizarre that you enjoy the freedoms of America, and complain about the more restrictive laws of a number of Mulsim countries, yet simultaneously assert that you'd like the most oppressive form of Muslim government possible - Sharia!

      To each their own, but if you like freedom to choose then Sharia is hardly the way to go! ;-)

    39. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      No, I am making no assumptions at all and relying on pure logic. I see that you are a person who has no use for logic. Keep believing in your imaginary friend like a child. When you are ready to join us in the 21st century let us know.

    40. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      You convinced me.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    41. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, "if" (just for the sake of the argument) you are right about death from your agnostic point of view, and I am wrong, I lose nothing. If I am right, then you are doomed for eternal fire. Rationalize that.

      On the contrary, if there is no god then you lose a great deal. You will have lost a life free from the fear, superstition and hatred that your belief causes you. You lose all the goodness for the sake of goodness, with no need for reward.

      But lets say for the sake of argument that you are right and there is a god up there. Well it seems that there are a number of different gods on offer, and they seem to have mutually exclusive views of what you'd have to do to get past those pearly gates. E.G. some of these gods have told their followers that its not the slightest bit naughty to be an open homosexual, and some of these gods have even chosen homosexuals as their representatives here on earth.

      What if it is this particular god who stands at the doors of paradise? How will he feel about someone turning up who thinks it is a good idea to stone to death his priests? Who will be rationalizing as they fall into the bottomless pit of hell then?

      Sure you can drone on all you like about the 'one true god', but don't you think that all gods followers say the same thing?

      Again, i ask you - what if you've chosen the wrong one?

      Good luck with your decision!

    42. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suuuuure, every Muslim lies, huh? Seems I remember they said that about Jews, something happened to them on a major scale as a result of the accusations, say 60 years ago, what was it again?

    43. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Ender_Wiggin · · Score: 1

      People are dumped via text message in America, too. Nice try, making it seem like the 1.5 Billion Muslims all do it, and your link to an extremist website doesn't do you any wonders.

    44. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by mr100percent · · Score: 1
      Spoken like someone who never even bothered to ask a Muslim. Is it my fault if CNN never invites Shaykh Hamza Yusuf or Imam Faisal Abdur Rauf on? I guess they assume Muslims opposing terrorism isn't newsworthy, and it isn't per se, because the vast, vast majority of Muslims condemn terrorism. Here's some links in English.

      Listing of Muslim leaders who Condemn Terrorist Attacks

      Fiqh Council of America makes fatwa forbidding Terror (PDF)

      Sunni and Shia clerics release joint fatwa forbidding sectarian violence

      What is the Islamic stance regarding kidnappings killings in Iraq?
      Shaykh Faraz Rabbani

      Recapturing Islam from the terrorists
      Shaykh Abdul Hakim Murad

      Islamic Spirituality: The Forgotten Revolution
      Shaykh Nuh Ha Meem Keller

      Peace and Justice in Islam
      Imam Zaid Shakir

      Tolerance in Islam
      Muhamamd Marmaduke Pickthal

      Wahhabism: Imam Muhammad Abu Zahra Explains
      Shaykh G. F. Haddad

      Does Quran teach violence?
      Dr. Muzammil Siddiqi

      ISNA denounces terrorism in the name of Islam
      Statement signed by 72 nationwide Imams, Muslim scholars, leaders and activists.

      Against Terrorism and Religious Extremism: Muslim Position and Responsibilities
      Fiqh Council of North America

      Are Violence and Extremism an Islamic Phenomena?
      Shaykh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi

      IslamDenouncesTerrorism.com
      Harun Yahya

    45. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6-7 Million Muslims in America, and you act like 19 illegal immigrants somehow represent them all. Did you know there are thousands of Muslims in the US military? Working with and in the FBI and police? Dude, you'll find more Christian terrorists like Eric Rudolph than violent Muslims in America. The Muslim community largely condemned 9/11, we lost hundreds of people in the towers too. it's been 5 years since 9/11, and the American Muslim community hasn't committed any more terrorism, and even calls the police on other Muslims (like Lackawanna).

    46. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      "Muslim" and "Muslimoon" are how the Quran refers to Muslims. "People of the Scripture" are known as "Ahl ul kitaab" in the Arabic (sometimes written "People of the Book" in some english interpretations), and are clearly defined as people of the Abrahamic religions and believe in the same God.

    47. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Ender_Wiggin · · Score: 1

      Yay, a troll. So what religion are the claimed "Christians" in America, UK, Serbia, Chechnya, Kashmir, Europe, Africa, etc, who specifically burn down mosques, assault women wearing headscarves, and oppress Muslims on a regular basis?

      Seriously, judge a religion by what its scriptures say, not what some of its uneducated followers and hoodlums do.

    48. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      if you prefer to live a life in fear - be my guest, as long as you don't force it to others.
      i don't see any reason for myself to believe in a deity - especially in a so childish deity.

      but, as you have written, for the sake of the argument:

      if i am an atheist and am right (and this is the most probable outcome) i have a better life now - and it is not even about money, it is about freedom of thought.

      if i am an atheist and wrong it depends on the deity then. i still could have it better than you for worshipping no deity instead of a wrong one. or even if you are worshipping the right deity but in a wrong way - imagine (just for the sake of the argument) that jews are right and mohammed was an imposter.

      and all that only if infidels and heretics are punished by the deity.
      it could also be that the deity prefers atheists to those who chose to artifically worship it because of fear of hell because the deity dislikes people who worship it for a personal gain.

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    49. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      if you prefer to live a life in fear - be my guest, as long as you don't force it to others.Did I force it on you? If I did, my apologies.

      i have a better life now How can you make that judgement? I cannot make that judgement about me and anyone else... Is it possible to know enough about the other human being to make that call? How can the information you will obtain in the future is affecting the life now?

      According to my religion worshipping the Creator in a wrong way still better than rejecting him.

      Again you are making assumptions about the Creator that are not supported by science or religious revelations.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    50. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, we now have a good definition. So then why is there so much hatred of an killing of Jews and Christians by Muslims in the name of Allah?

    51. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

      No offense meant, as I really do respect your human rights to believe what you wish. But here in America, I also have that right and the right to speak my mind. And ya know, you just confirmed everything I have learned about the Wahabbi Sect of Muslim, and am saddened to see how MUCH more extreme it is than the Islam that my Muslim friends practice. INCLUDING those who are Shia. *wow*

      I won't say it sounds like you're a whack-job, as I'm sure that is my own narrow-minded prejudices talking. But I do praise you on your moderate tone, and I think that is something that is SORELY lacking in the Muslim world. Sometimes I wonder if the Madrasas are any better than the brain-washing Scientology Cult. I get the feeling that some of the misplacement that your brethren feel is because of the 13th Century Values trying to cut it in the 21st Century World.

      One question I would ask, as I believe I know the stance that they have on Christians... What about Pagans? I'm a witch, you see...Not Wiccan, no, but a witch nonetheless, from the oldest of Irish times, my knowledge passed from my forefathers to me, and been rekindled through modern day knowledge and communication. Does that make me the ultimate infidel? Honestly... I'm just asking out of curiousity. Not that I blame them for their stance on the Christians... I've got way more than my share of issues with them. But that said, what about being a FREE WHITE WOMAN, making all the money, supporting the home and NOT having children yet at the age of 33? Hey... I've always been the black sheep, why not some more.

      Finally, I want to thank you for speaking out on this forum. I know far too many that dwell in silence and isolation, and I half thing that is what drives them mad and to do the things that they do. I have no doubt that Mohammed was a wonderful prophet just as Jesus was... but they were merely good men who wanted good things for their people. We have no evidence that there IS a God, let alone God-creatures come to Earth. So that's a paradox for me, you see. I just think that the entire world needs a whole lot more love and tolerance, and a lot less hate and violence. Don't we all, though?

      And as time goes on, you will find you place in this world, the place you are destined to live in peace and harmony with man. I firmly believe that we *all* have that destiny as human beings.

      --
      Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
    52. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      you just confirmed everything I have learned about the Wahabbi Sect of Muslim
      There is no such sect. There are people who call themselves Salafi, means following first 3 generations of Muslims.

      nd am saddened to see how MUCH more extreme it is than the Islam that my Muslim friends practice. There are two questions. First, who is practicing Islam correctly, those who "adapt" the commandments of The Creator to "modern times", "environment", "West" or those who stick to those commandments no matter what? Second, what is extreme is subjective, right? I find it quite extreme to expose a human body Western men and women do, I find it quite extreme that Westerners get drunk in pubs and bars and expose their drunkedness to the public, but I am ok with that. I understand why they behave like that, and I am living in a Western society. Now understand that countries like Afghanistan have their own notion of what is extreme, what is decent, what is acceptable and what is not acceptable. So your statements is actually translate to "I saddened to see how MUCH more different it is from Western culture than the Islam that my Muslim friends practice."

      About Pagans. I do not know what deities or Deity your cult believes. Islam recognizing magic and witchcraft as a reality, but involvement in those practices is considered a sin, see more here. Pagans associating The Creators with any kind of partners, helpers, etc. are indeed strongly condemned in Islam, because that is the greatest and only unforgiveble sin. The person who dies in the state of Shirk (associating partners with The Creator) will be hold in Hell eternally, while all other sinners will eventually will become purified in Hell and saved from the Hellfire.

      Does that make me the ultimate infidel? Infidel, yes, but not ultimate, since your life is not over yet and you still have a chance to recognize the Creator as such. Right now you are just a sinner.

      But that said, what about being a FREE WHITE WOMAN, making all the money, supporting the home and NOT having children yet at the age of 33?

      What is "free"? As a human you have a free will granted by Creator as anyone else. "White" or "black" has no relevance in Islam, Prophet, sal Allahu 'alaihi wa-sallam, said it in his famous Farewell Cermon. "Woman": men and women have equal religious responsibilities in worshipping Allah (but different roles in society in accordance with His commandments). "Making all the money" is not prohibited for a Muslim woman. "Supporting the home" is also a responsibility of a woman, meaning that she needs to support her parents and siblings if she has means. "not having children YET" - well, this depends on your free will from one side and the health granted to you from the Creator. If you are married, then the only case when Islam allows to use prevention is poor health pf the would be mother. If you are not married, then you would be committing a major sin by having sexual relationships. You are responsible for your actions only and as long you have a free will in performing those actions. I am not sure I am answering this question.

      We have no evidence that there IS a God, let alone God-creatures come to Earth. We do not have unequivocal scientific evidence, that is true, but certainly all kind of signs are there, you just have to look at them with unbiased eyes. There are tons of beauty and harmony in this world which is quite different from anything that humans ever have done or are capable of doing. There is also a remarkable logic and unity in the whole world structure on all levels of organization, that many physicists were amazed at. We are showered with miracles in our everyday life being quite ungrateful by not recognizing them as such.

      I just think that the entire world needs a whole lot more love and tolerance, and a lot less hate and violence. Well, you a

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    53. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

      Because under your beloved Sharia Law the Quoran is the law and the Quoran says they cannot be married.

      And it goes further to say the adulterers should be stoned. I take you find stoning to be an acceptable punishment?

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    54. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      I thought by "they" you are referring to muslim and non-muslim. Actually, Muslim man can marry a pious Christian or Jewish woman. It is a Muslim woman who cannot married to a non-Muslim. In the latter case, yes, they are fornicators (well at least a Muslim woman). In this case the prescribed punishment is lashing, I guess. Stoning is prescribed only for adulterers (that is cheaters)

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    55. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

      There is no such sect. There are people who call themselves Salafi, means following first 3 generations of Muslims.

      Thank you for clarifying that. You must realize that what I know is limited to working closely with Pakistanis and Saudis, as well as having two dear friends, one Iraqi and the other Iranian. :) Not to mention, it is all very tainted by Western Media, as I'm sure you know.

      There are two questions. First, who is practicing Islam correctly, those who "adapt" the commandments of The Creator to "modern times", "environment", "West" or those who stick to those commandments no matter what?

      Well, there you are... that is a very interesting way to look at it. I would say that those who live by the teachings of Mohammed and the will of The Creator are looked upon as practicing Islam correctly, where those that adapt the system to their own world are more what we call, fallen. Does that make sense? Like, we have Jack Jews and Jack Mormons, those that were raised to be faithful and pious, but have left their church and background - but still come back for holidays.

      Second, what is extreme is subjective, right? I find it quite extreme to expose a human body Western men and women do, I find it quite extreme that Westerners get drunk in pubs and bars and expose their drunkedness to the public, but I am ok with that. I understand why they behave like that, and I am living in a Western society. Now understand that countries like Afghanistan have their own notion of what is extreme, what is decent, what is acceptable and what is not acceptable. So your statements is actually translate to "I saddened to see how MUCH more different it is from Western culture than the Islam that my Muslim friends practice."

      Absolutely. I can understand that. And honestly, I don't disagree with your viewpoint. It seems that there is a lot of 'face' in your culture, um... like other Asian cultures, and keeping that face is very important. It seems that a lot of that went out with the times here in the West, and no one tries to be their very best anymore. You are accurate in your understanding... and I continue to be amazed with how crass some cultures have become, including American. It's the "I Don't Care What Anyone Thinks, I'll Do What I Want" attitude taken to the limits.

      Pagans associating The Creators with any kind of partners, helpers, etc. are indeed strongly condemned in Islam, because that is the greatest and only unforgiveble sin. The person who dies in the state of Shirk (associating partners with The Creator) will be hold in Hell eternally, while all other sinners will eventually will become purified in Hell and saved from the Hellfire.

      I can completely understand that, and I would have massive issue with anyone that did that. There are those that choose to mix Christianity and Magick, and it ends up creating adversity for them, because of the opposition between the faiths. I am offended by that, because I *DO* respect the World Religions for all their history and teachings, but choose my own path, handed down by my forefathers. By the same token, seeking conversions (I don't know how else to put it) or pushing one's faith or ideology upon someone who is against it, I also find hateful and intolerant. Sure, I will share knowledge and information with those who seek it of me, but never would I force someone to try to believe as I do. I think that is where a lot of misconceptions come from about Islamic Faith. For years it has been taught in the West that Islam teaches that all must be converted to the faith or die. All the while, they deny that the Christian and Catholic Churches committed the VERY SAME ACTS OF EVIL FOR CENTURIES! (Can you tell I have a real problem with hypocrisy?)

      What is "free"? As a human you have a free will granted by Creator as anyone else. "White" or "black" has no relevance in Islam, Prophet, sal Allahu 'alaihi wa-sallam, said it in his famous Farewell Cermon

      --
      Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
    56. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1
      http://dictionary.reference.com/search?r=2&q=forni cator

      fornicator

      n : someone who commits adultery or fornication [syn: adulterer] WordNet ® 2.0, © 2003 Princeton University

      Still you never answered the comment on stoning as a punishment.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    57. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there A God? If yes, is God a he or a she or an it? How do you know God is a he? Have you checked out God's genitalia?

      Why is it that there is only 1 God? Given that the world is so f*cked up, what if the Romans and Greeks are right and the world is actually run by endless bureaucratic committees of Gods and Goddesses who debate endlessly while the world kills itself?

      Why is it that Israel or Saudi Arabia are holy lands? What if an alien civilization exists and claims spot (x,y) on their planet as the holy land because who they think is their prophet took a dump on spot (x,y)?

      Why is it that God would want to accept only believers and not unbelievers? Would God reject a truly upright atheist who lives a noble life, while accepting a lying, cheating, swindling believer? Or as in the case of your religion, accept an unbeliever-killing believer (kafir-killing momeen) and reward him with 70-odd virgins and 30-odd prepubescent boys?

      If there is a God, that God has be independent of religion. Because if the world gets wiped out, humanity will get wiped out and religion thereby will get wiped out. And if God is indeed independent of religion, why even have religion?

    58. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      Insasmuch as WordNet or Britannica or Wikipedia can have perfectly correct definitions of English words "adultery" and "fornication", in Islam they are used for two quite different things:

      - adultery is reserved to the act of illegal sexual relationship committed by a married person, while
      - fornication is similar act committed by an unmarried person.

      Hence, different punishment for those sins. First one is punished by stoning, second one is punished by certain number (40, I do not remember exactly) lashes.

      If a Muslim woman marries an infidel, my opinion it qualifies to fornication, since this marriage is not recoginzed as legal in Islamic system, and, Islamically, she is not married.

      If a woman embraces Islam while being in marriage to an infidel, she must deny sexual relationships to her husband until he converts up to 3 months after which she has to abandon him forever.

      I hope I answered your question.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    59. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

      okay, so by your definition she deserves 100 lashes.

      Not quite stoning.

      But you still think those are appropriate.

      What about the laws that require the execution of people who decide they don't want to practice islam any more?

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    60. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      There is such a law. Apostasy is punished by death.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    61. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are failing to get the point once again; you and you your disgusting views are not welcome in the West. Never will be.

      It may well be a warzone over there but why should that bother you, you'll have your sharia. The truth is that if you weren't such a coward then you'd be packing your bags. Prove otherwise you filthy coward.

    62. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      As an atheist, I don't really care for either the parent's or the grandparent's mythology and superstitions.
      You think that being an atheist would make you immune from having Sharia law imposed on you?
      I hope they all stick around in America.
      As a person who doesn't live in the US, you're more than welcome to keep them.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    63. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

      So you indeed believe that the laws of Islam should be enforced on those who do not share those beliefs.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    64. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      Some of them, yes. There is a big difference between a person who was not raised a Muslim and an apostate. You simply cannot qualify them in the same category. Apostate rejects the light shown to him, while unbeliever have not seen it yet.

      Where are you going with that? Every society, every state enforces the laws against the will or beliefs or ideology of some of its constituency.

      What is your point?

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    65. Re:Perspective of a Muslim by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

      No its exactly the same, they are both humans who have decided that they do not wish to follow or believe in Islam. Yet Islam claims that its laws should apply to a former follower. In effect the followers are help prisoner of the religion under threat of death if they should decide to leave.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
  261. Comments on this thread & my own experience by david.emery · · Score: 1

    1. It's a heluva interesting set of questions, with lots of interesting responses, as well as the usual set of flamebaits and displays of ignorance. (Such is free speech...)

    2. However those who talk about a country that they have NOT lived in should indicate so. That particularly includes non-US residents who talk about all the problems with living in the US.

    3. Me, I've spent 2 1/2 years in Canada (Vancouver, BC). What I've found most disturbing about the experience was the inaccurate knowledge of the US held by most Canadians. One incident particularly stands out. A Canadian said "I bet you feel a lot safer here than the US, with all the crime there." I responded, "No. Actually, in the sample-set of 'people I work with', the crime rate is MUCH HIGHER here. Where I worked before coming to Canada, in 9 years with that company I had my car stolen once and broken into once, and one other co-worker had his car broken into once, both car break-ins were at the same meeting. Here in Vancouver, in 2 years, about 10-15 people have been victims of property crimes, including having their homes broken into."

    Unfortunately, it seems that most non-US residents gain their impressions of the US from TV shows and their own media (mis-reporting).

    4. WIth respect to cost-of-living, it's difficult to compare. But I did the numbers in Canada. Because of the high housing costs in Vancouver, the high income tax rates, the high sales tax, etc, when the Looney was at .72 to the USD, I needed 2x US income in CAD to have the same disposable income. (I did this calculation by taking my after-tax US paycheck, subtracting housing costs, converting that to CAD, and then adding back in housing costs and CAD taxes.) By the way, one thing I learned is that the Canadian Health System is NOT free. It's paid 100% by your employer. I was offered either a salary or an hourly contracting contract, and was surprised to learn how much I'd have to pay for the insurance, just like I would as an hourly contract employee in the US.

    There are good websites that do cost-of-living comparisons, I wish 10 years ago I had known some of what those sites tell you.

    5. So when you factor out the money, you're left with a whole bunch of intangibles, and those become a lot harder to evaluate. The most interesting stories in these threads have been those that provide both good-points and bad-points on the intangibles.

    6. Even though the US was a 30 minute drive away, I will tell you that particularly my wife got homesick and lonely. And in Canada (at least discounting Quebec:-) there's not the linguistic differences that you get elsewhere. So if you're really serious about this, don't discount that as a factor, particularly on family members. We both knew the Vancouver job wasn't 'forever', but we left earlier than I would have at my wife's insistance.

                      dave

  262. Back to Japan by earthbound+kid · · Score: 1

    I lived in Japan for two years. I wouldn't mind going back. The stuff about Japan being "crazy" and wacky is crap caused by people believing what they see on TV/YouTube, but Japan is fun, at least if you don't have much responsibility (Ie. You're not Japanese yourself).

    Number two on the list is maybe New Zealand. It seems to have a good nature vibe going. (Plus the people speaking English is sometimes nice.)

  263. Taiwan by Vermyndax · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would live in Taiwan. I've been there three times, loved it each time. The rich culture and history just astounds me with each visit. My wife is from Taiwan, so it would be a relatively easy move.

    What stops me from going? Until recently, the foreign spouse could not work in the country (that's changed now). Now what stops me from going: my children. I have a 13 year old daughter who would stay here and a 2 year old son who did NOT get along with Taipei very well. He was panicked and hard to control, thanks to all of the people and busy lifestyle. The wife and I decided that Taipei just wasn't a kid-friendly place... our small backwoods town in the southeast is sufficing just fine.

  264. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1
    Actually, the amount of wealth relative to others is what determines your freedom.

    I don't think wealth and freedom are that tightly related. Sure, wealth can sometimes buy freedom, although sometimes it can't, and you really need a whole lot of it to buy your way into freedom.

    It's no good having low taxes and a moderate salary, if everyone else has low taxes and a moderate salary.

    I'd say that'd be the perfect situation. Whether or not it's possible is something I'm less sure about.

    That way, you just get lots of people working, and spending selfishly to compete with each other.

    It's perfectly possible to be on a moderate salary, work little, and spend little. I've spend years of my post-college days doing so, and I was more free then than I am now. This is not to say that freedom is everything. I am much happier than I was then. Wealth does not equal freedom. Freedom does not equal happiness. And happiness does not equal wealth. The three are related, but not directly (or inversely for that matter).

    In a more socialist system, by contrast, higher taxes and moderate salaries means that everyone is working for each other, contributing to a community.

    That really all depends on how those taxes are spent. It's possible in theory, I suppose, that the taxes will be spent on "contributing to a community", but I haven't ever seen it in practice.

  265. What about health care costs... by Andy+Davies · · Score: 1

    If we're going to compare taxes, you've also got to include the health care costs - in the US you pay it directly whereas in the EU it's included in our taxes...

    And even with our universal heathcare I'm sure we could cope with plenty of tax cuts in the UK

    1. Re:What about health care costs... by albyrne5 · · Score: 1

      But not in The Netherlands, since the start of this year.

  266. american geocentrism by 2TecTom · · Score: 1

    the truth is, it's not where you're at

    it's what you make of it

    oh, and home is where the heart is

    --
    Words to men, as air to birds.
  267. Not Norway by DJCouchyCouch · · Score: 1

    There aren't any lions there.

    DJCC

    1. Re:Not Norway by lidvin · · Score: 1

      > There aren't any lions there.

      Yes there is. The Norwegian shield even have two of them. Both wielding axes though.

  268. What are you looking for? by houghi · · Score: 1

    The answers I see are mainly countries that have much similarity to the USofA anyway. The same sort of lifestyle. So first determine what your goal is.

    Do you want to have an exact copy of what you already have? Then stay. Otherwise look at what your goals are. If it is quality of life, perhaps a less developed country will bring you much more, because the pay (even if it is much less then what you get) will take your further.

    Also regarding the high taxes you pay in Europe. Don't look at wether you pay 10% or 60% or whatever as you won't see it anyway. Just concentrate on what you get in your account.

    And if you plan on going, plan on going for a year. That way you will have a plan to go back after a year. That is if you don't stay wherever you end up. Leaving your country and try out another for one year is a good idea for everybody. A break from all that you know will be an experience you will never forget and it will help you grow and perhaps meet people you normaly would never even talk to.

    And it realy does not matter what you do in that year.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  269. Go work for Uncle Sam overseas and see the world. by chuckfee · · Score: 4, Informative

    The U.S. Department of State is recruiting IT people RIGHT NOW
    to work in the Foreign Service and support the work of our diplomatic
    corps at embassies and consulates overseas. The recruitment period
    ends on 11/3/06 - less than 10 days from now.

    Working at a US Embassy has some major perks. When you work for the
    government overseas they pay all of your housing and utilities. Embassy
    housing ain't like Army housing. Think mansion in the 3rd world and
    downtown apartments in the first world. Cost of living pay to help
    afford life in London, danger pay for Kabul or Baghdad, hardship pay
    for subsaharan Africa. Uncle Sam takes care of his own.

    Sure the work is boring, the coworkers are annoying, and people
    like to blow up your workplace. On the plus side, you move every
    2-4 years, sometimes to very very nice places. You get USA and
    local country holidays off (15-20 holidays per year) plus vacation
    and benefits like every other USG employee.

    Besides, how cool would it be to have a Diplomatic (Black) Passport?

    Check the Department of State recruitment page here:
    http://www.careers.state.gov/specialist/opportunit ies/infomanage.html

    The pay band quotes on the page doesn't seem too high, but remember
    that the pay listed doesn't include all the freebies like housing,
    utilities, cost-of-living, hardship, etc - many of which are tax-free.
    I'd pay the numbers by $30,000 to get a real approximation of the value
    of overseas benefits paid by Uncle Sam.

  270. to quote Warren Zevon... by mumblingrepublican · · Score: 1

    "I wanna live all alone in the desert I wanna be like Georgia O'Keeffe I wanna live on the upper east side and never go down in the street"...

    --
    If it can't be done wrong... it can't be done.
  271. Re:Where is this Australia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly, the USians don't know their ass from a hole in the ground. They think the Vietnam war was fought in Korea, Austria and Australia are interchangeable, and don't even know where Mexico is. Shit, they usually think that their own nation's capital is either in the middle of the US or in Washington State. Most are lousy at math. The reason why for all of this? They are more interested in sports, etertainment, fucking, and better ways to kill others, yet don't give a fuck about thinking. No wonder why every country has surpassed those fucktards.

  272. Israel! by Kranfer · · Score: 1

    1) Israel... 2) Money unfortunately.

    --
    -- Josh
    "Whoopie! Man, that may have been a small one for Neil, but that's a long one for me!" - Pete Conrad
  273. Re:Go work for Uncle Sam overseas and see the worl by chuckfee · · Score: 2, Informative

    Make that ' pad the numbers ' by $30,000. The tax-free housing and free utilities are h-u-g-e.

  274. Not in any country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1) Where would you live, if not in America

    Not within a country, which probably means somewhere on the high seas.

    2) What's stopping you from going?

    No ship, no army, and I haven't yet convinced my wife to come with me.

  275. The Netherlands- MUCH better reasons! by meburke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That page is full of half-truths and poor statistics.

    I don't drink, smoke or use drugs. There are numerous reasons not to indulge, and I found them all when I used over 20 years ago. False anti-drug propaganda is not necessary in the light of the real reasons for not using drugs.

    However, the arguments for not using drugs do not support the case for making war on drugs, which is an entirely different issue. IMO, the consequences of our drug war far outweigh the harm caused by what would be legal drug use.

    A couple of factoids (not sufficient for decision-making): The UK had almost NO drug-related crime when drugs were available from the National Health Service. Since Thatcher joined Reagan's War on Drugs, the incidence of of violent drug-related crime has shot up astronomically. http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/philosophy/drugwa r.html

    I heard a lecture by an economist at Rice University (I forget his name), and he claimed that if we stopped our War on Drugs, the price of a hit of crack would drop to about the price of a couple of aspirin. (His argument was that with costs so small, violence and theft would not be worth the risks.)

    Now that I've said that, remember that the original question was,"Where would you go?" Drug availability should not be the deciding factor.

    At this time, the USA is still a slightly better place to live than almost anyplace in the World, especially eonomically. It is deteriorating, but it is still better. According to the "Pocket World in Figures" (2003 is my latest), only the citizens of Luxembourg have more purchasing power than the average US citizen. Our purchasing power is higher than Japan, Germany, France, England and Canada. I correspond every day with friends who live in Sweden and Norway. They all love it, but it's only a good place to live; not to make money. Things are scarce, money is scarcer. (They have incomes of approximately $3000/mo USD, and this is GOOD income in Sweden! But it buys a lot less than the USA.) This seems to be true of Denmark, also. A friend of mine (Chinese-American with law offices in Houston, Singapore and Rotterdam) says that taxes in the Netherlands take about 75% her income there, prices are high, and services are slow. A friend of mine in Italy said it took her 6 months to get a dial-up internet connection in Rome two years ago, and it costs 4 times what she'd pay in the States. (She met a lot of nice friends in internet cafes, though.)

    Although the Pocket World in Figures somehow calculated that Canada has the highest quality of life (the US second), I have relatives in Regina who had to come to the US for heart surgery because they couldn't get it in Canada; they were too old. Even if you are young enough, it may take 3 months or more to get a bypass or heart transplant.

    I have friends who live in Japan and teach English (earn about $50,000/yr USD), and one who is a CPA working for an American firm, and they all say that the money goes a lot further in Japan, but most Japanese don't earn proportionally equivalent incomes.

    It will change shortly: Those of us who are baby boomers will be retiring shortly. Social Security and Medicare represent about $50 TRILLION dollars of unfunded liabilities. Figure about $250,000 of debt for every man, woman and child in the USA, or about $1,000,000 per household of 4. (These liabilities are reported off-balance-sheet. If the US Government was Enron, Congress would go to jail.) The only way to fund these liabilities will be to raise taxes and create inflation, because it is such a huge amount of the GDP. Since most retirement funds are in the stock market, withdrawals will probably cause the stock market to decline rapidly and deeply. The repercussions will be felt all over the world, and places that might seem a great place to live today will not be so attractive when they can no longer sell their stuff to the USA and the USA is no longer a good place to invest. We

    --
    "The mind works quicker than you think!"
    1. Re:The Netherlands- MUCH better reasons! by hevenor · · Score: 1

      It's a good place to LIVE, not to make money? This skew in values is one of Americas downfalls. Whatever, you can always take the time to live when you're a fat rich corps. Also, you may have to wait for a surgery in Canada but at least you'll get it, wether or not your rich or poor.

    2. Re:The Netherlands- MUCH better reasons! by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1
      claimed that if we stopped our War on Drugs, the price of a hit of crack would drop to about the price of a couple of aspirin.
      that just a guess, according to facts presented on Penn and Tellers Bullshit program the price of things like LSD have become 10* cheaper since the war on drugs started (same Qty costs more, but is 50* stronger now)
      If legalizing would increase demand, then it would increase the price (initily). Especially if we followed Spain/etc in not allowing import, sale. but allowing consumption and only allow small personal qty's to be grown/produced/possesed, their wouldn't be a very quick increase in supply, especially since their would always be risk of a new ban, new lawsuits every year.
    3. Re:The Netherlands- MUCH better reasons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      According to the "Pocket World in Figures" (2003 is my latest), only the citizens of Luxembourg have more purchasing power than the average US citizen.
      You are probably reading too much into per-capita GDP. GDP is only a measurement of financial transactions. The US has a much larger gap between rich and poor than almost all other rich or medium income countries; if you exclude the top 10% of earners and spenders from the statistics, the average standard of living in the USA will appear far closer to that of other countries. It is far worse to be poor or sick in the USA than in most other developed countries.
    4. Re:The Netherlands- MUCH better reasons! by thetbone · · Score: 1

      You'll get it, if you live long enough. And this isn't a joke, there are lots of people who don't make it. Lots of Canadians (like Americans) are now flying overseas for surgery at their own expense, due to both countries broken medical systems.

    5. Re:The Netherlands- MUCH better reasons! by nodrogluap · · Score: 1
      I was just going to say this myself! It is engrained in America's social values that making more money leads to happiness.

      I correspond every day with friends who live in Sweden and Norway. They all love it, but it's only a good place to live; not to make money.


      This means you value money over happiness! Some wires got crossed along the line.

      FYI, the US government spends as much as Canada, per capita (according to The Economist) on public healthcare, but doesn't even have a universal public system (it's just to cover Medicare & Medicaid). Even given as a percentage of GDP, Amercians spends 1.5x as much overall on healthcare. All of these anecdotal stories about having to go to the U.S for treatment, are, well, anecdotal. If you have an urgent condition, you get treated right away (my 60 year old father-in-law got a quadruple bypass the day after they discovered how blocked up he was). There is a problem of waiting lists for painful, but not critical surgeries, such as knee and hip replacements...
    6. Re:The Netherlands- MUCH better reasons! by jax9999 · · Score: 1

      too old to get surgery? WTF? No, that isn't how it works. they probably had to wait for surgery, or were told it was inadvisable for someone at their age. But simply told no becasue they were old isn't possible. As a matter of fact it would be illegal.

    7. Re:The Netherlands- MUCH better reasons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blatant falisty about someone being "too old" for heart surgery. More likely, doctors felt the risk was too high. My father waited TWO DAYS for a bypass, I waited three months for a NON-CRITICAL option heart procedure myself. There are different kinds of surgery.

      Different provinces have different waiting times however.

    8. Re:The Netherlands- MUCH better reasons! by lhbtubajon · · Score: 1

      Incorrect. The price of currently-illegal drugs is already *artificially* inflated, due to the corruption, risk, and difficulty involved in trafficking illegal drugs. The "Spain" example is not what we're discussing.

      If you remove the risk associated with the manufacture, distribution, and sale of drugs, then the price becomes:

      Cost to manufacture + competitive profit margin ...because suddenly drug manufacturers must price their product to compete with other manufacturer's offerings.

      For example, let's be outrageous and say a kilogram of cocain might cost $50 to make, though, since it's just an agricultural product with some processing, I bet it's more like $10. Fifty dollars per kilogram implies 5 cents per gram. Tack on some additional distribution and sales costs, and we'll say $0.25 per gram, on the VERY high side.

      Right now cocaine sells from between $40 and $80 per gram on the street, according to Wikipedia. That's 40 to 80 thousand dollars per kilo.

    9. Re:The Netherlands- MUCH better reasons! by Colde · · Score: 0

      An income of 3000$ a month is at most a mediocre pay in Denmark.

      For IT professionals 4500$ is fair but still not a _great_ salary.

    10. Re:The Netherlands- MUCH better reasons! by LeftOfCentre · · Score: 1

      I don't have an opinion on your overall view, but would just like to make a couple of minor clarifications regarding Sweden (where I was born and live).

      1) $3000 / month (about 21 - 22 000 kr) is considered acceptable but not that good. It's at or below average, particularly for a major city where the average income is bigger. Skilled professionals (such as good developers, who are in demand right now) often earn significantly higher incomes.

      2) I'm not so sure about the individual rights thing -- in general, I think Americans (for example) and more aware of civil rights and the importance of safeguarding them. For example, a controversy erupted in Sweden over a Christian preacher sentenced to jail for hate crime (preaching against homosexuals in a sermon). The reaction of most people I discussed it with was that the preacher was an idiot and that he deserved to go to jail. Comparatively fewer considered the case that although the preacher may have held unpleasant views, he should have a right to express them. Ultimately the sentence was struck down by a higher court, referencing the European convention on human rights -- which, again, was an unpopular decision.

    11. Re:The Netherlands- MUCH better reasons! by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      You just predicted the near-term destruction of the US stock market. That is one hell of a claim. Do any economists, professional weath managers, or others with more credibility than "random /. guy" feel that the impact of one generation's retirement will destroy the stock market?

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    12. Re:The Netherlands- MUCH better reasons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      o. A friend of mine (Chinese-American with law offices in Houston, Singapore and Rotterdam) says that taxes in the Netherlands take about 75% her income there, prices are high, and services are slow.
      She should sue her accountant, really!

      Following is in Dutch, but the percentages are eerm, well, understandable:
      Box I (inkomstenbelasting): Inkomsten uit werk en woning (income from work and house) - progressief belast, 4 schijven: 33,55%, 40,50%, 42% en 52%
      Box II (inkomstenbelasting): Inkomsten uit Aanmerkelijk Belang (dunno what that means) - tarief is 25%
      Box III (inkomstenbelasting): Inkomsten uit Sparen en Beleggen (income from saving and investment) - tarief is 30% over 4% (effectief 1,2%) - dit is de vermogensrendementsheffing.
      I do NOT believe that she is willing to pay 75% income tax in a country where the highest percentage is 52%. She could movethe office to Belgium, percentages are lower there (I'm told).

      Regards, Gerrit

    13. Re:The Netherlands- MUCH better reasons! by meburke · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, she has great tax advice. She's out of the country right now, but I'll check with her when she gets back since I'm fuzzy on the details. (I think part of the problem was that she's a partner in a small firm, and the partnership pays a good-sized tax bill before she gets her cut, then she pays a good-size bill on top of that. In the USA, profits are passed directly to the partners, and they only get taxed once.)

      Incidentally, since she only spends about 3-4 months a year in NL, she has a tax liability in the USA, also. There are adjustments made for taxes paid to NL, but I'm not privy to her financial status so I have no idea what the overall effect is.

      --
      "The mind works quicker than you think!"
    14. Re:The Netherlands- MUCH better reasons! by meburke · · Score: 1

      A funny thing happened on the way to finding a resource for your question: http://finance.yahoo.com/columnist/article/richric her/2844

      I used to know Robert Kiyosaki very well. I wouldn't use him as a authoritative source, but I know some of the people he gets some of his ideas from, and they are pretty savvy.

      Although you can google for yourself, here's a starting point: http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-11-14 -fiscal-hurricane-cover_x.htm

      --
      "The mind works quicker than you think!"
  276. London by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

    I would like to live in London. It was great when my wife and me visited. What stopping me is that 1) America has it's problems, but it's not to the point of leaving, I still like it here 2) I don't have the money or job to move there 3) My dogs would have to go into quarantine for like 6 months. If we moved to London it wouldn't be because we wanted to get away from America, it would be because one of us got a really great job there.

    --
    Can I bum a sig?
    1. Re:London by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The quarantine for your dogs is avoidable. There's a UK program called the Pet Travel Scheme (used to be called passports for pets) that lets your pet avoid the quarantine by getting a tiny (externally scannable) ID chip injected under the skin and then getting vaccinated for rabies (has to be after the chip insertion). It will require you to plan ahead by 6+ months, though.

      The website is here:

      http://www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/quarantine/index.h tm

      The chip is harmless - it's about the size of a grain of rice, and your dog won't notice. We had our cat done, and it showed no reaction/behavior afterwards of being aware of it.

    2. Re:London by mikeplokta · · Score: 1

      The USA is on the list of countries for which you can get an exemption from the quarantine requirement when importing dogs into the UK that have been vaccinated against rabies. So strike reason 3 from your list.

  277. India. by oyenstikker · · Score: 1

    India.
    My family.

    --
    The masses are the crack whores of religion.
    1. Re:India. by oyenstikker · · Score: 1

      Actually, thats not true. My student loans are keeping me here. I could earn enough to live in India. I could probably not earn enough to make my student loan payments.

      --
      The masses are the crack whores of religion.
  278. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by rohan972 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You can exercise greater control over your socioeconomic standing? Honestly? (no, really, I want to know).

    Yes. Most of America's millionaires are first-generation rich.

  279. What do you mean by legally? by iion_tichy · · Score: 1

    Our ancestors came here legally and created a melting pot.

    What do you mean by legally? It was "legal" because they had the guns, therefore they got to lay down the laws. I don't see how this has any bearing on the morality of it. As for the melting pot, others have already answered you on that part.

    Of course the current illegal immigration problem is unlike anything this country has faced before

    And in what sense would that be so?

  280. And tipping is not compulsory by Traf-O-Data-Hater · · Score: 1

    I just can't imagine living in a society that doesn't pay enough basic wage that you have to give someone additional money for them just doing their job. As an australian I'm glad we don't have to tip people, although this americanism is becoming more common these days.

    1. Re:And tipping is not compulsory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The idea of tipping was originally to provide someone a bonus for an exceptional job well done. That business interests in the US turned it into an excuse to pay people a couple dollars an hour isn't a problem with tips themselves. Nor is it a problem with tips when companies start forcing the staff to turn over all their tips into a big pot to divvy them up.

      I no longer tip on my credit card, and carry a stack of $1 bills for this purpose. I'll give out $1 to $3 (for a $10 lunch) depending on how good the service was, if the person is smart, they'll pocket a buck and turn in the rest.

  281. Goodbye America by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    Unfortuantely changing the US is probably not going to happen until after it crumbles. There are to many people who think the US is the best, because it's the US, and therefore perfect. These are the same people who tell you that if you don't like it then you should just go somewhere else. The US is probably one of the best countries out there but I can't help but feel that it's quickly falling. Lack of morality and responsibility are destroying us. We're very self-centered with everything being about personal freedom and gain. Simple statements such as saying that we need to balance capitialist greed with some intelligent social programs or that or our freedom to live our lives has to be limited by the negative impact we have on other lives are attacked as being un-American. The vocal minority of the country doesn't want change. The majority is to stupid and short-sighted to see that we need change. Those intelligent enough to see we need change and to see that the basic problems are social are to lazy, to scared, and to unsure what to do to make any significant difference. Simple fact - voting, by itself, isn't going to improve things. To really make things better is going to take getting involved. Form or join committees to decide what needs to be done and then use your own time, energy, and money to get it done. Inspire others to do likewise through your own actions.

    I get mad that I see so many groups focusing on the needs of people in Africa, Asia, South America, etc when our own country is falling apart. Why don't people want to give to make America a better place? Some parts of the US are almost as bad as the third world countries we see on tv. Both rural and intercity areas of the US have a lot of violence, poor living conditions, and little chance for upward mobility of future generations. I can understand why these issues are largely ignored though. Nobody wants to face their own problems - it's easier to fix other people's problems. It's more glamorous to help starving HIV infected children in Africa than it is to help hard working but uneducated and poor hillbillies in the Appalachians or even kids born to meth addicts. It's just easier to look elsewhere - I can fight militant African tribesmen off with my bare hands easier than I can convince people in the US to even agree that a problem exists let alone get them to fix it.

    I'd rather start over from scratch than fix the problems in the US. That is really how America came to be so it is a plan that can work. Unfortuantely there isn't a lot of wide open empty spaces left any more unless we're ready to colonize the oceans or space. I'm up for that challenge but would have to find enough others that felt the same way to make it plausible. In the meantime I'd love to make the US a better place and am doing my small part towards that goal all the time. I just don't think those small efforts are going to make a real difference unless others also act.

    My basic premises are that every American needs to have decent health care, education, a place to live, utilities, food, transportation, and a job. There is no excuse for any American not to be able to have these things. The system now is not providing these things equally to every citizen and when it does provide these things they are wrapped in red tape and rules that are just plain stupid. Of course none of that will work unless you fix the social problems first. You have to give people some solid morals and a sense of responsibility for themselves, their family, and their community.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  282. It's not just America. by sam991 · · Score: 1

    I am 18, living in the UK and seriously considering trying to move to Canada before the year is out. I'm not the only one of my peers who is attempting such a thing. I've heard talk of France, New Zealand and Japan.

    Since the British government seem to be intrinsically linked with the US now and that's something that doesn't look set to change for a long time, i think a lot of people - especially those of my age who still can make a clean break - don't like the way the country is going and so are looking elsewhere. While i don't think we're quite at the same level as the US yet, major governmental decisions have left me questioning what right we have to impose upon people at the local level, let alone on an international scale.

    Whether it is right or not to turn your back on the country that raised you i do not know. What i do know is that as someone who has seen the last decade of change and will be looking to start a family in the next one, i really am thinking of the children.

    /p.s. So awesome that my sig applies for the first time ever.

    --
    "No, no, no, don't tug on that! You never know what it might be attached to."
  283. Re:if you carefully add up all the taxes in pay in by Eccles · · Score: 1

    The phone bill add-ons are called "fees and service charges" insterad of taxes because they *aren't* taxes, the phone company is just trying to disguise them as such. It should be (but apparently isn't) prosecuted as fraud if they're advertising a service price and then adding on to it.

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  284. America Rocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most people that spout that gibberish about leaving the US have never been out of the country - nor will they ever go. I've been to serveral places in various parts of the world - for the most part, you don't want to live there. We, as Americans, take SO much for granted. EVERYONE should be required to visit at least three countries in various parts of the world - if for no other reason than to get perspective. A lot of people seem to think these other countries have no problems. Get a clue - we have VERY few problems other than a pretty much broke political system. But compared to 95% of the world, it ain't that broke. Everyone is dealing with an immigration problem (I'll take the mexican invasion to the muslim invasion anyday - at least they aren't trying to force everyone to convert into Catholics (and I'm a Catholic before you start flaming) ) Most people have no idea just how GOOD healthcare is here - if a bit expensive. It's not an accident that people come HERE for major healthcare from those little 'universal health plan' countries. Pick your issue - you'll find that in reality, if you DO manage to find a country that is better about that issue, you'll just be exchanging it for some other issue. You think your liberty is limited HERE? You ain't seen NOTHING til you start traveling the rest of the world.

    So wake up and smell the roses. Don't like it here? Change it - don't flee like a coward.

    1. Re:America Rocks by reaktor · · Score: 1

      So wake up and smell the roses. Don't like it here? Change it - don't flee like a coward.
      Kind of hard when we live in a fascist-republic and not a democracy. I wouldn't say that the people who fled Germany under Hitler were cowards.

    2. Re:America Rocks by vox+humanna · · Score: 1

      Kind of hard when we live in a fascist-republic and not a democracy.

      You are a pinhead! We do not, and have never lived in a fascist republic. The fact that you can spew your garbage on this blog speaks volumes about what rights you have and how well garanteed they are. (Try this in China for example!) Get a grip on reality, and of course remember to vote, even idiots like you need a voice.

  285. Culture by Britz · · Score: 1

    I am very interested in culture things. I am German and went to the US (Northern California, halfway between Sacramento and Frisco) for a high school year.

    I also saw most of Europe through extensive traveling, but have not lived anywhere except the US and Germany. I would say that you really need to see for yourself. Personally I have some very good friends that I met during my stay in the US and I really liked my hostparents. At first I thought everything was different and after a week I discovered that everything is pretty much the same (people eat, talk, love, sleep...). It took me about a year to work out some of things that actually are different.

    First of all I really like the "can do" attitude. If you want to achieve something the general feeling is that you can do it if you just work hard enough. While this actually is very untrue (for many things it might even be easier to achieve them in Germany than in the US for example, other things might be easier to achieve in the US) the attitude towards it is very positive I think. It makes you try, while in Germany people might not even try, because of the different attitude. I can think I can summon this up in one word: Entrepreneurship

    There were also many things I did not like. After a year I decided I am a European and would rather live somewhere in Europe than in the US (or Asia or Africa) if I had to choose where to settle and have children. But I would always go anyplace for a year or two. I really like different places. But Europe is my home.

    Maybe you should try it out. You might even like it. And there are many places where I think the culture is much closer to the US. Australia and Canada come to mind.

  286. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by drsquare · · Score: 1

    That's incorrect, if everyone has lots of spare money, then everyone has the freedom to live their own life. The more of your income you put into the socialist black hole, the more you're trapped in your current circumstances, and this has nothing to do with anyone else.

    For example if after taxes and expenditure I'm left with one five a year, I'm effectively trapped in my current lifestyle. I don't have the spare money to risk doing something else, if it goes wrong I'm broke. However if after expenditure I have thirty grand left over, I can then use that money as a buffer to risk doing something else.

    Governments love socialism as it keeps everyone in their place. Citizens who are sick of them can't clear off to another country/state if their income has been taken to pay for stadiums and public art, can they? No, they have to stay there and keep putting up with the crap.

  287. Where? by TimTerrific · · Score: 1

    I would probably choose either Canada--only 20 miles away from where I am sitting--or Australia.

    Unfortunately, as an unemployed, 57-year-old paraplegic, I doubt I would be welcome in either country. No matter how far the United States descends into a fascist police state--I am stuck here!

  288. Hell by briancnorton · · Score: 1

    Because it will be a cold day there before I move out, and I don't care for the heat. Anybody else who wants to leave (for ideological reasons) can go there too.

    --

    People who think they know everything really piss off those of us that actually do.

  289. Germany all the way! by larix517 · · Score: 1

    I'm moving to Germany in August and I can't wait! I was accepted to graduate school there. This is the perfect vehicle for my escape! I haven't been able to before now because I'm at university in New Hampshire. At least I'm in a blue state!
    Germany is the perfect place for a person like me - green party member, metalhead, general misfit...
    (let me say as a disclaimer that I am marrying a German citizen in July and I have always loved German culture)
    First of all, I will be much closer to the hot metal scene in Northern Europe, which is great for me. :) (but not for everyone)
    Second, I will be moving to one of the most environmentally friendly countries. They have a country-wide composting and recycling program! Not to mention the widespread implementation of sustainable forestry practices and alternate power derivations (wind, mostly).
    Also the speed-limitless pieces of the Autobahn, de facto decriminalization of Marijuana, and beer, beer, beer.
    This is also a great position for international travel. I'm going to be smack dab in the middle of europe (just south of Berlin, actually). I already have plans to travel around.
    Also, Germany is a powerhouse for my profession (landscape architecture) and my fiance's profession (electrical engineering/computer science). We read somewhere that Dresden has been called the Silicon Valley of europe. Perhaps...
    Germany has a variety of climates as well, from the cool dry alps in the south to the warmer humid maritime climate in the north.
    The graduate program is prime, too. It was created since reunification, so it's only about 10 years old. It's an English-spoken program and it's FREE. :) I already speak some German, but it's nice to know that language won't be a barrier to my success. I bet there are others out there like it.
    Clearly this is a very good choice for us, maybe for others too.

    1. Re:Germany all the way! by paytheprice · · Score: 1

      I moved over here in September 2004 to go to grad school, and I have to say that it has been great. The university system is like a social welfare system for the young and you end up getting a degree in the end.

      Go for it!

    2. Re:Germany all the way! by 32771 · · Score: 1

      That is amusing. I moved back to Germany from NH in February (to Dresden actually). But don't kid yourself, that life free or die thing is not a German invention. Germany might be looking better these days but it is not the US. You probably have a lighter view of German drug law than would be a good idea, but the Netherlands are close by american standards. That beer part is true though.

      There is a good chance that you have to get a german drivers license, plan to pay some money for it, hundreds of euros, this isn't a piece of cake as it was for me in NH. You might even fail the test.

      If you actually go to the east you might need more German, I have a colleague who is trying to get around on english right now, I wonder how he will fare. We mainly learned russian in the east and english only if we wanted. Younger people might be better at english I would guess.

      You will possibly earn 50%-70% of what you earned in the US before taxes, and on top of that you might pay 40% tax, but renting might be much cheaper (30%) than in the US where it is a rip off. If you are staying in Western Germany this might be different.

      If you need to see mountains nearby (not that we have the exact White Mountains) you can have a look at Saxon Switzerland which is a sort of small canyon (green and pretty, made out of sandstone). Then there are those hills between Germany and Czech Republic, which are interesting for their mining history (notice that they still have trees on them, planted by hand and in perfect order, quite unlike NH).

      Anyway, I wish you luck, I hope it all works out for you.

      --
      Je me souviens.
  290. Wow! Re:Marginal Tax Rates by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    Wow! UK and New Zealand have lower taxes than US???

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    1. Re:Wow! Re:Marginal Tax Rates by plopez · · Score: 1

      It's easy when you don't have huge corp. handouts and you aren't supporting a bloated military to prop up a crumbling empire. Over half the US budget is military related and corporations pay little, if any, federal taxes.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    2. Re:Wow! Re:Marginal Tax Rates by lseltzer · · Score: 1

      The US doesn't have a VAT, which explains most of the difference between them and European countries that seem to be reasonable by comparison.

    3. Re:Wow! Re:Marginal Tax Rates by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      UK and New Zealand have lower taxes than US???

      No, they have lower top marginal tax rates. Which is meaningless.

      If you want to understand the tax burden, you need to look at the percent of GDP that ends up as taxes. Forbes calls this the "misery index"; I think the fact that Mexico ranks as "less miserable" than Japan tells you the degree of BS in that label, but the data is informative nonetheless. The U.S. is near the bottom of the list, with a low tax burden.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    4. Re:Wow! Re:Marginal Tax Rates by twiddlingbits · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Typical liberal drivel without facts. Go look at http://www.taxfoundation.org/news/show/1321.html and see that the Oil Companies (your favorite target) paid 41% income tax in 2005!!! Also look at http://www.irs.gov/taxstats/article/0,,id=102886,0 0.html which shows the corporations pay a LOT of FEDERAL tax, don't forget the Employment Taxes (i.e. Witholding) are also 50% paid by corporations and State Income Tax. Lots of taxes are treated by Accounting rule as an expense which affects profit, and not on the line that says Income Tax Paid. In addition when the corporation distributes dividends to investors that money is taxed at the individual level so it's DOUBLE taxation. Our military is hardly bloated, if it was bloated why would they still be recruiting and not letting people retire or calling back those they formerly let out? And don't attack the higher earners either, the top 50% of taxpayers pay 96% of income tax. Are you implying the US "Empire" is crumbling? LOL..far from it, we are the only super-power left. We don't have and never had an "empire", we had protection agreements (i.e. NATO) against communism which allowed US Troops in Foreign nations. That's not an empire, and with the fall of the Communists that foreign deployment has been cut back tremendously.

    5. Re:Wow! Re:Marginal Tax Rates by VdG · · Score: 1

      But don't you have state purchase taxes in most places?

    6. Re:Wow! Re:Marginal Tax Rates by rossifer · · Score: 0
      the corporations pay a LOT of FEDERAL tax
      About 7% of the total federal tax revenues come from corporations. Most is from individual income taxes. You're right that 7% is still a lot of money. You're wrong that corporations are paying their fair share.

      don't forget the Employment Taxes (i.e. Witholding) are also 50% paid by corporations
      actually, it's only the social security witholding that's 50% paid by the employer. All other taxes are paid entirely by the employee. The employer simply helps the employee to make sure they're paid by collecting them for the government.

      Lots of taxes are treated by Accounting rule as an expense which affects profit, and not on the line that says Income Tax Paid.
      Many of these tax strategies get accountants and their clients jail time. You do not owe US taxes on income used to pay foreign taxes. There are other similar rules that may generate credits. Many of these rules are used by corporations to evade US taxes (foreign tax credit claims are the most common mechanism for multinationals). Sometimes they're caught (Enron, the oil companies in the article you mention, etc.).

      And don't attack the higher earners either, the top 50% of taxpayers pay 96% of income tax.
      That's a very interesting way to divide things up :) Lump the 90% of the middle class (the actual taxpayers) in with the extremely wealthy to show that wealthy people pay their way... Were you by any chance a statistics major in college?

      We don't have and never had an "empire"
      You're fooling yourself with semantics. We don't have an empire in the same sense that the British or Spanish had an empire. We decided that was too much effort and that we had to differentiate ourselves from the USSR, which definitely was empire building. The US "empire" is a cultural and economic hegemony. We don't have to put a regent in power over you as long as your leader "plays ball" with the hegemon.

      In summary, you're completely and utterly full of shit. But thanks for playing.

      Before I go, I had to respond to your opener:

      Typical liberal drivel without facts.
      You should be aware that the facts have a pervasive and overwhelming liberal bias. It's a shame, but there it is.

      Regards,
      Ross
    7. Re:Wow! Re:Marginal Tax Rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our military is hardly bloated

      Bloated? More like it's got fat in all the wrong places while it's been cut to the bone in others and hamstrung where it counts. Take the newly commissioned USS Texas attack submarine: we've spent how many millions of dollars on this? At least now we finally have the technology to sink bin Laden's massive navy, I've been so worried about that! Meanwhile we're losing soldiers because they're going into so much debt they're losing their security clearances. Vietnam and Korea should have been wakeup calls to a military behemoth of a dinosaur that should have gone extinct after the last world war.

      The irony is that when it comes to sticking broomsticks up people's asses, thats "the way war is now", but when it comes to actual military operations, the government shows no sign of adjusting to "the way war is now".

    8. Re:Wow! Re:Marginal Tax Rates by Knara · · Score: 1

      Dude. Paragraphs. Comeon, now.

    9. Re:Wow! Re:Marginal Tax Rates by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Employers also have to pay unemployment taxes as well as Medicare tax (matching) plus any State versions of same. It adds up to another 10-15% tax that doesn't show up anywhere but expenses. Interesting Math, strictly INCOME tax it's about 9%, and you forgot the taxes buried in the expense column. nice try, thanks for playing "I got a strawman". And yes I have a lot of statistics with a BSCS and an MBA from a Top 15 school. I can pull out a hell of a lot more evidence if you want. The top 1% pay over a third, 34.27% of all income taxes. (Up from 2003: 33.71%) The top 5% pay 54.36% of all income taxes (Up from 2002: 53.80%). The top 10% pay 65.84% (Up from 2002: 65.73%). The top 25% pay 83.88% (Down from 2002: 83.90%). The top 50% pay 96.54% (Up from 2002: 96.50%). The bottom 50%? They pay a paltry 3.46% of all income taxes (Down from 2002: 3.50%). The top 1% is paying nearly ten times the federal income taxes than the bottom 50%! And who earns what? The top 1% earns 16.77% of all income (2002: 16.12%). The top 5% earns 31.18% of all the income (2002: 30.55%). The top 10% earns 42.36% of all the income (2002: 41.77%); the top 25% earns 64.86% of all the income (2002: 64.37%) , and the top 50% earns 86.01% (2002: 85.77%) of all the income. Same foreign income break works for you. You want to go to Iraq and make 250K a year pretty much tax-free go for it. You got a problem with that kind of tax plan talk to the GAAP folks and the IRS. Enron didn't get busted about foreign taxes, it was about off the book "creative" financing schemes to inflate income and assets and make the company look like it was kicking ass. Thats all very illegal by GAAP, SEC and IRS rules. It was you who brought up the term Empire. When one says Empire the British Emprire instantly comes to mind and thats never been the US intention. Did we prop up those who were anti-communist even if they were just as bad in a another way..we sure as hell did and I would hope we would do it again since it worked. Speaking of shit..personal insults do not make me take your argument seriously. In fact quite the contrary. They are an attempt to make someone upset and therefore remove thier ability to think correctly. Liberal "facts" are written by the liberal media and are bought into by those who cannot be bothered to think for themselves or do thier homework.

    10. Re:Wow! Re:Marginal Tax Rates by rtechie · · Score: 1

      Oil Companies (your favorite target) paid 41% income tax in 2005!

      No they didn't. Exxon Mobil theoretically might have paid 41% gross on one quarter's earnings. Neither you, nor I, knows wheter they actually paid these taxes, got rid of them through subsidies or deductions, or deffered them somehow. There are ways to make deferred taxes disappear too.

      Many corporations (like Microsoft) pay absolutely nothing (or a pittance) in income taxes because of shady "profit sharing" deals, like stock options.

      This is beyond the fact that almost all corporations engage in outright tax fraud. Since there are no penalties (look into fraud enforcement on business for a minute), why should they pay taxes? It's not like they'll be audited. And even if they are, they can probably soak up the cost of the audit and any fines (which are incredibly unlikey).

      Lots of taxes are treated by Accounting rule as an expense which affects profit, and not on the line that says Income Tax Paid.

      This is part of that "tax fraud" I'm talking about. This happens when they don't report the income. The fines they get from doing this is part of those "expenses".

      In addition when the corporation distributes dividends to investors that money is taxed at the individual level so it's DOUBLE taxation.

      Like the sales tax you pay on most of the items you buy. Isn't that "double taxation"? On some products (like cigarettes) you have multiple taxes, is that "quadruple taxation"?

      Our military is hardly bloated, if it was bloated why would they still be recruiting and not letting people retire or calling back those they formerly let out?

      It is not bloated in terms of staff, but in terms of expenses. The US military spends more money than the entire rest of the world's militaries combined. And most of that money is very badly spent. Remember that $600 toilet seat? It's now a $5000 toilet seat. The military has simply gotten much better at hiding the waste from Congress and the American people by hiding under the "classified" banner. Virtually all procurment in the military is now classified, especially anything particularly expensive. Don't get me started on the money pit that is Joint Strike.

  291. Re:Robots don't pay taxes. by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    Don't give them any ideas. Next, they'll want to vote as well.

    And its not like they can't afford a long strike to get it - they don't have to worry about putting food on the table for little Johnny-bot and Janie-bot.

  292. I'm sorry, but you are full of shit. by hummassa · · Score: 1
    Our ancestors came here legally and created a melting pot.
    Legally? Not from the POV of the indians (native-americans, if you will) that were the rightful owners of the land, just like the USofAns consider themselves the rightful owners of the land nowadays.
    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:I'm sorry, but you are full of shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Land ownership in the early colonial period is an incredibly complex issue. Indeed, the town where I live was originally purchased lawfully from the native inhabitants at a time when they were arguably more powerful than the colonists. Many indigenous communities saw the sale of some of their land to what they may have assumed to be nothing more than temporary settlements as a great way to improve their own living standards and make alliances which would increase their prestige and power. However, by some time before King Phillip's War, land acquisition by colonial settlements had become a matter of using intimidation backed up by force to enforce a developing policy of what nowadays we'd call ethnic cleansing, and the indigenous communities had caught on that English settlement in America wasn't simply a matter of a few big trading posts being set up on their shores, but a massive migration.

      Besides, *everyone* is guilty of being descended from people who displaced *somebody*. In England, chances are very good that your Saxon ancestors displaced the previous Brythonic inhabitants. In Scotland, chances are very good that your Pictish ancestors did so. In Spain, that your Moorish or Visigothic or Roman ancestors displaced Celtiberian inhabitants. And don't get me started on Romania (which one of those Brythonic monarchs made a great point of thrashing a Roman ambassador over nearly 2000 years ago). The difference in America is that the displacement (and frankly, genocide) was recent, and in a culture where literacy was nearly universal. Fortunately, it also was less complete than those earlier displacements.

      That said, unless you have seen your ancestors' naturalization papers, do not assume that your ancestors came to America legally.

    2. Re:I'm sorry, but you are full of shit. by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      Most land was nicely shared and trade was common in the early days (there are horror stories early on, but there are horror stories like Powelton Village/West Philly, Stonewall, Kent State and others in the "peaceful" current day). That sort of fell apart when they sided with the Confederate States of America rather than the United States of America. After the earlier issues with other tribes assisting the French, the Civil War destroyed most relationships between the European Americans and Native Americans. The Trail of Tears and the Indian Territories were the horrible and over-vindictive repercussions for the Native Americans, much like the burning of the South and highly questionable trials and massive ad-hoc jails with high death rates were the repercussions for the CSA. Remember, Lincoln was the first and most recent president to suspend Habeas corpus and declare citizens enemy combatants. Something about a righteous war always abhors liberty.

      --
      Evan "Those who have failed to learn history..."

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    3. Re:I'm sorry, but you are full of shit. by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      Of course the Trail of Tears was 30 years before the Civil War and was only for one single tribe... I need to proofread, which would mean I wouldn't post during the work day, which would be a Good Thing for all concerned. I was writing that with three interruptions. What the heck was the name of the relocation after the Civil War? Any CW buffs in the crowd?

      I seem to be reliving history due to having failed to learn it. Oops. :)

      --
      Evan "Too much Roman study"

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  293. Stay home by supachupa · · Score: 1

    I am someone who left America in 2002 as I was disgusted with Bush and pals. I reasoned with myself that if I leave the country, I am not paying (as much) taxes and therefore I'm not contributing to the new world order of evil (okay, hot aussie girlfriend may have influenced me to move here as well). I suppose my actions are better than just sitting around complaining, but since I've left I've seen the bill of rights become the 'bill of right' (seeing how there's only one right left preserved now), and our country now resembles what I was taught to despise as a schoolboy. Now more than ever, it's important to stand against what is happening. Perhaps the question is not what country to move to, but what state? Maybe if enough people moved to the same state, it would create enough influence on the government to make a difference. Also, please don't come here, because you guys are really nasally sounding and loud. ;)

  294. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by kerrbear · · Score: 1

    Poverty is generally measured, not by how little you have, but by how much less you have than average.

    If the average person in a communtiy cannot feed their family, I would still call that poverty.

  295. Mexico... by pointbeing · · Score: 1

    Spent a couple weeks in Cancun in the winter a few times. Would love to live on the Mexican Riviera except for the hurricanes, so I'm looking at Mexico's left coast instead.

    When I was a kid I spent three months in Mazatlan with two other guys - rented an apartment, had a maid and a cook and spent long, lazy days fishing, laying out on the beach and abusing the local substances. I spent a total of $600 on that trip not counting airfare but that was 30 years ago.

    Looking at Mazatlan now the town is big enough to have its own Wal-Mart, has a fairly large community of American expatriates and you can still get a three bedroom house within a couple blocks of the beach for less than $100k. Average temperature doesn't vary by more than ten degrees year round - with an average high of 80 to 82 in January and 90 to 92 in June.

    --
    we see things not as as they are, but as we are.
    -- anais nin
    1. Re:Mexico... by bajahank · · Score: 1

      Mazatlan is one of my favorite places on the west coast of Mexico- Unlike a lot of the other big touristy beach destinations, Mazatlan actually has other industry (brewery, shipping, fishing) and is more of a "real" city. My wife and I visited there a few months ago, and love the old-town section. Beautiful neo-classical tropical architecture with all the various colors on the building facades. The internet connection might not be as good as what we have here in the States, but the cost of living and pace of life might make up for that.

  296. God Bless the USA by tsunamiiii · · Score: 1

    Here is the rub. There is no place like the USA and without places like America and England all of the Netherlands and Canada's will cease to exist. The point would be moot because there would be no place to go. The libs don't realize their passion for our enemy is not reciprocal and they would be in the front of the execution lines when the extremist get their hands on them. As an American and proud of it I could care less what the rest of the world thinks. Unlike most places the US has the ability to be self sufficient. Albeit not to the extent that we are without alternative fuels but if we rolled up our carpet and went back to a Pre WW2 view of the world. Europe and the rest of the world are in for it. Without your Big Brother (I don't care how much longer your Country has been around, you were surpassed and yes we are the Big Brother to the world) watching your back it will be all out chaos for you.

    1. Re:God Bless the USA by kook44 · · Score: 1

      Hey everybody-
      Toby Keith posts on slashdot!

      Where you from, pal? My guess: you're form the south or midwest and you've never left the town you grew up in...

    2. Re:God Bless the USA by Ilmarin77 · · Score: 1

      Here is a newsflash for you: United States public debt

  297. Re:Aotearoa? You won't make it a year...! by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

    >beetroot they insist in throwing on burgers. Kid you not - beetroot.
    I had a burger with beetroot once (served up by an aussie chef in London) and though it was fantastic. I'd never have thought of it myself but once tried, I was hooked. Total burger content was burger, cheese, bacon, mushroom, beetroot, lettuce, tomato. It was lovely.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  298. The Netherlands should sink into the North Sea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'd move to the Netherlands circa 1700 or so... but now it's even more of a moral cesspool than New York. Recently the Dutch courts upheld the right of the "Brotherly Love, Freedom, and Diversity" Party to campaign on their platform of pedophilia, access to child pornography, and zoophilia.

    So sad that they have gone from one of the most upright and decent societies in Europe to one of the most depraved in the world!

    1. Re:The Netherlands should sink into the North Sea by tomcres · · Score: 1

      I wonder if that means that if they gained power, it would be easier for pedophiles and zoophiles to migrate there. That would really tick off the posters here who have had trouble with IND! Then again... given the stereotypes about slashdotters......

  299. Oh Canada! by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

    I'd defintely head north to Canada (considering I grew up in Buffalo, its not that far a stretch). Why haven't I left yet? Believe it or not, health insurance. Canada has "Free" healthcare, but since I have a pre-existing medical condition (Cancer, but in remission) I'm prohibited from imigrating there - they don't want a drain on their national health care system. That pretty much keeps me out of every country in the world. (If someone knows of one that will take me, I'm all ears!)

  300. Here is what I want, what do you have... by thebdj · · Score: 1

    Here is what I want from my country, does anyone have a good choice:

    1. No censorship. Preferable a country without "hate speech" laws, because those things are laughable.
    2. Low Taxes. I am a Libertarian, and hate my money being spent on social services.
    3. Citizenship. If I am leaving here, I want to have the right to be a citizen elsewhere. I have one and a half languages (not enough Spanish to call it complete). So, it would be preferred that I can get buy with English (to some degree). (Note: I would probably learn the language, but I would need time.)
    4. Job Availability. I obviously need work anywhere I go. So, the country should have a well established industry for Electrical/Computer Engineers.
    5. Sanity in Copyright. I want fair use, and I want to avoid the MPAA/RIAA equivalents harassing me at every turn. I should be allowed to backup DVDs and CDs. I should be able to transcode them to digital formats for use with my PC or MP3 player.
    6. More rights than the police. You know: not having to produce IDs at random, protection from illegal search and monitoring...you know, the rights currently being eroded in the US.

    Those would be the bigger ones. I am big on individual freedoms. So, does anyone have any countries that combine all or most of the above requirements?

    --
    "Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb."
    1. Re:Here is what I want, what do you have... by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      Hate to break out the bad news, but I don't think ANY country fulfills your criteria.

      You're not going to like living in the United Kingdom. Over there, the censorship laws are actually stricter (thank to the Official Secrets Act), and given the fact many British cities are installing cameras everywhere, privacy could be a problem, too.

      You might like Denmark, but you need to be pretty fluent in both Danish and German to live there long term, in my humble opinion. And of course, you'll have to deal with Value Added Tax and breathtaking taxes of motor fuels common in Europe.

  301. Please stay at home! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No need to leave America. Please stay in the good old US of A. We have enough yanks overseas already, it's embarrassing. Some of the US guys living overseas are ok, but they're not the majority. The majority are arrogant, over-confident, naive, uneducated, fat, ignorant and full of themselves.

    The US is great! Stay there!! Enjoy the police state, the erosion of your individual freedoms, the RIAA, the MPAA, the BSA, the Feds, your "elected" President, the constant warmongering, the obsession with stupid ball games, the weirdo religious nutcases, the industrialized processed food, the highest % of any population behind bars, the low IQ, the appalling education system, the rich vs. poor, the white vs. non-white, the silly shows on TV, the politically correct everywhere, the government debt, the stock market, and all those little things that makes America what is it - a decadent country full of complacent people who live in their past glory.

  302. Ireland, happiest place on earth! by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 4, Informative

    Seriously, we have a young population (of a mere 4 million for a reasonably large country), theres no sectarian violence, people are well known for their friendliness, and its very easy to get in with an IT qualification. Also, you can say what you like about the Germans, Netherlands or Scandinavian countries, but lets face it; they have no sense of humour. Ireland won the "happiest place on earth to live" award not so long ago, we have a great deal of wealth, and employment is in good shape. You wouldn't bat an eyelid to see politicians and leaders ambling down the street buying groceries, although the downside is crazy property prices, which by all accounts are soon to collapse. Emigrants come home!

    1. Re:Ireland, happiest place on earth! by RasputinAXP · · Score: 1

      I've considered returning to County Clare several times; my great-grandmother left when she was in her 20s.

      Unfortunately I don't qualify for automatic citizenship in either Ireland or Italy, I miss out by a generation.

    2. Re:Ireland, happiest place on earth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your parents will qualify. Just ask them to try and then you would automatically qualify (in other european countries it works)

    3. Re:Ireland, happiest place on earth! by sallgeud · · Score: 1

      Not only that, the overall tax burden, which includes corporate taxes, is significantly less in Ireland than in the past... and is the lowest in all of the EU. This is often the reason cited for the tremendous job and income growth that's happened in Ireland recently, relative to the EU and US. With my red hair and freckles, I think I would consider Ireland among my top 2 [ with a forthcoming post on my #1 ]

    4. Re:Ireland, happiest place on earth! by Jett · · Score: 1

      The only way you would automatically qualify is if you were born AFTER your parent was given citizenship. It's also taken into account if you are a minor applying for citizenship, but isn't officially an automatic qualifier. If you are an adult it makes no difference if your parents were granted citizenship under the right of return after you were born.

    5. Re:Ireland, happiest place on earth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man what the hell are you talking about? The weather is shite. Ireland has the worst roads in europe. Dublins public transport system is a total joke, its overpriced, overburdened and never on time. The cost of living in Dublin is outrageous: A crappy single person apartment in a mediocre part of the city center costs between 600-1300 euro a month (add + 20% for usd). The quality/variety of food in Dublin is shit, any resteraunt thats half way decent costs twice-three times as much as a comparable place on the continent. Groceries in Ireland are also about twice as expensive as they are in Spain or France.

      Also, their aren't that many good tech jobs in Ireland, aside from havok and a few other companies. Google, yahoo and others have a presence in Ireland but it isnt that significant compared to their presence in the USA. Oh yeah and Irish women are muck (low end of the euro gene pool)..

      The good things Ireland has: A relativly good music scene for the size of the country, pubs with good a athmosphere and free (sort of ) education if your Irish. Apart from that its all down hill.

    6. Re:Ireland, happiest place on earth! by stsp · · Score: 1
      people are well known for their friendliness, and its very easy to get in with an IT qualification.

      That's true. I would not mind living in Ireland again (in spite of the fecking rain), but I would not like to have my (potential future) kids in an Irish school, having spent a year there myself as an exchange student from Germany. Very conservative and strict teachers. They don't get along with the kids at all, which creates a really bad environment for them to learn. Not to mention that there are (yuck) single-gender schools (I was in a mixed one).

      I fondly remember one incident when I had to sit in the library during a class we had off (this does not happen at all in Germany, where you can go out during free classes), and a first year student came up to me telling me that I was sitting on "his chair". Before I could reply anything the teacher was at the table and furiously yelled at him Don't you talk to a sixth year like that! When I mentioned to her that it was no surprise that he'd treated me with disrespect since he was being treated like that all the time himself, she asked me out of the room. The other students in the library chuckled, expecting me to get into trouble. Once the door was closed she told me she knew I was right, but it was just the way they did things there. She kept repeating this as an answer when I asked her why she was doing it even if she knew it was wrong...

      I have to admit that the German school system is very, very bad for other reasons, namely that it is badly funded and the kids are seperated into several different branches of schools (and thus into social classes) very early on, with very bad job prospects for those with a low degree. But the teachers tend to be much nicer. Scandinavian schools sound best from what I've heard.

      Also, you can say what you like about the Germans, Netherlands or Scandinavian countries, but lets face it; they have no sense of humour.
      Yeah, but you have to admit that the Irish are only funny when they're drunk :)
    7. Re:Ireland, happiest place on earth! by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you have to admit that the Irish are only funny when they're drunk :)

      Ah no you have it back to front, we're only drunk because the rest of Europe isn't funny!

    8. Re:Ireland, happiest place on earth! by fyngyrz · · Score: 1
      theres no sectarian violence

      Um... what about the religious wars you folks were / are having? Not sure I'd be happy to be caught in any of that, frankly.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    9. Re:Ireland, happiest place on earth! by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      Um... what about the religious wars you folks were / are having? Not sure I'd be happy to be caught in any of that, frankly.

      Three words for you. Read. A. Newspaper.

    10. Re:Ireland, happiest place on earth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only you had some culture...

    11. Re:Ireland, happiest place on earth! by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      I do read newspapers. They only carry bad news, because that's what sells. I presume this is good news. Why be reticent in that case? Out with it! Have you people stopped bombing each other over whose imaginary friend is better, or whatever silliness was going on? I confess, I don't know the whys and wherefores, I just remember the pictures of dead people lying in the streets and the clear implication the cause was religious in some way, shape or form.

      Don't get mad at me for not knowing; I didn't start that mess.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    12. Re:Ireland, happiest place on earth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you people stopped bombing each other

      "You people"? Classic.

      Since the newspapers don't seem to have done you any good, here are a couple of links:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_Ireland

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_Ireland

      (Hint: they're not the same place.)

    13. Re:Ireland, happiest place on earth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if only you didn't have to enjoy getting buttfucked to live in England. Rum, sodomy, and the lash, my son!

    14. Re:Ireland, happiest place on earth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got to be kidding me. I'm Irish, but I'm very happy to live just about anywhere outside of Ireland. I've travelled fairly extensively and I can say that practically any other country in Europe has cheaper housing, food, drink. More to do, less rampant alcoholism. Better weather. It's a myth that Irish people are friendly. There is a deep culture of random violence in the place, witness the riots on O'Connell street earlier this year. Irish women are unattractive and so stuck up its a joke. The 'tech boom' in Ireland is a marketing scam. I make three times as more here in San Francisco than what I'd make in Dublin, and the cost of living is (incredibly) lower.

      Everybody with the slightest bit of ambition I know in Ireland would rather be somewhere - almost anywhere - else.

      While I think the Irish Tourist Board does an incredible job of making the place seem amazing to outsiders, its really an extremely mediocre place in every aspect conceivable.

      Man, I'm so happy to be out of Ireland. Maybe when I'm old, have a ton of money and feel like being bored I'll move back.

    15. Re:Ireland, happiest place on earth! by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Read your links, got it, I think. Northern Ireland is literally a different nation, with the British making a mess out the last vestiges of their colonial mucking about and the acceptance of this split along religious lines, probably because Protestants are more represented in the English population and Catholics in the Northern Irish population, I'm guessing.

      Ireland, on the other hand, is a bonny (though rainy) land which, probably because the English are not involved, is not directly or obviously embroiled in any such conflict.

      You were stumping for bonny Ireland. Not war-weary Northern Ireland.

      Does that about cover it?

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    16. Re:Ireland, happiest place on earth! by AnotherDaveB · · Score: 1
      Also, you can say what you like about the Germans, Netherlands or Scandinavian countries, but lets face it; they have no sense of humour.

      Not my experience.

    17. Re:Ireland, happiest place on earth! by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      I went to ireland twice.

      The first time was when the foot and mouth epidemic was at it's highest. I did the tour around ireland (North and South) and I loved it.

      The second time I went to Dublin and stayed there for a week. I really hated it. Dublin has got to be the most expensive city I've ever stayed in - and I grew up in London. I would go into a restuarant and order Lasagna for example at an extraordinary price, and they would serve just Lasagna. That's it - no salad, no vegetables, nothing.
      There was also a large number of homeless sleeping everywhere in the middle of the day!

      Still, I did manage to get the train a few times and escape Dublin which was good fun.

    18. Re:Ireland, happiest place on earth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And three for you, you fenain cunt: fuck the pope.

  303. hahah , its even harder to get into usa by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    I have a friend whos Australian and is having a damn hard time getting a usa citizenship even tho
    he is married to an american lady and has been living in usa for >5years on a green card etc...

    Its like the american govt folk are trying to make 50x extra work for themselves to justify their jobs.

    If those immigration rules were used on actual citizens, 90% would be deported.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    1. Re:hahah , its even harder to get into usa by mdozturk · · Score: 1

      I'm a US citizen; I sponsored my wife who is a Turkish. At the time we got married she was legally in the US as a student. She got her travel and work permit in three months. She got her green card in 6 months. She will apply for her citizenship soon, 2.5 years after she got her green card. We expect that she will become a US citizen soon after she passes her 3rd year mark as a permanent resident. An interesting note about immigrating to Turkey: you have to change your name to the Turkish phonetic spelling. For example if your name is Nancy you would have to change your name to Nensi, Jonathan would become Cantn, etc.

  304. Ireland! by 1evilmonkey · · Score: 1

    I'd move to Ireland. It is clean and they have great beer.

    --
    crap
    1. Re:Ireland! by Ham_belony · · Score: 0

      And the women drink more then the men.

  305. Yes by everphilski · · Score: 1

    I make over 50k a year and pay just under 25% of my paycheck to taxes/health insurance/401k/etc. I will also get a good double-digit percentage of that back on my tax return next year (I didn't set my allocations up properly... and we had a child and purchased a house. There are lots of ways in the US to mitigate taxes and build wealth.)

    Parent made the point of how "its interesting that Americans find happiness in wealth" ... I wouldn't say that, what I would say however is that money is a freedom, the freedom to pursue things.

  306. Why Do You Want to Move? by BingeFolder · · Score: 1

    I can't say that I am in line with the current administration, but I have never desired to move away from America. I continue to calmly debate people online daily and it seems that the tide is turning. The country seems to be moving in a more rational direction in terms of war and privacy. It would be my opinion, that the weaker among us are the ones who want to move. This country grants each a voice and an opportunity to convince others of their ideology. If your ideology or debating skills are so weak that you feel you must leave the country rather than fight for what you believe in, then so be it. I, on the other hand, will stay here and make America an even better place. I am sure Europe is a nice place to live, but I prefer a less socialized country. It probably works for some, but I like the various choices America offers its citizens and the ability I have to move several social classes in my lifetime. So, if you feel you must leave for some political reason then more power to ya, but I hope most of us will stay to fight the good fight. Politics are an ever changing aurora. Don't make a rash decision or statement that you will be regretting once the political tides change again.

    1. Re:Why Do You Want to Move? by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Social mobility? Greater in Europe these days, per The Economist. The middle and lower classes in the USA are the greatest victims of globalization these days.

    2. Re:Why Do You Want to Move? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Social mobility? Greater in Europe these days
      Generally downward.
      The middle and lower classes in the USA are the greatest victims of globalization these days.
      It's mainly because they don't speak English in Europe. Oops, some countries do, don't they? The Indians undercutting your call centers just as the EU decided the polacks needed their handouts more than you did will start to bit soon, bog-boy.
    3. Re:Why Do You Want to Move? by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Really? Apparently you don't know much about economics. Check income levels and standards of living in the English-speaking, European country I'm from (Ireland). You're way off base. Also, I see no reason for you to resort to insults, Anonymous Coward.

  307. Non-correlation does not necessarily disprove by benhocking · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Non-correlation does not necessarily disprove causality, but it is a strong argument. (Stronger than correlation implying causality.) For numerous examples, consider the book "Why Things Bite Back". Here's a hypothetical: assume that helmets save lives. Specifically, if you're in an accident the helmet will "cause" you to live 90% of the time. Also assume that otherwise you live 0% of the time. (These numbers are completely made up, so just accept them for the sake of this example.) Now, also assume that people only wear a helmet when they're driving on certain roads, and that these roads have a 50% chance of resulting in an accident. Other roads have a 5% chance of resulting in an accident. So, in this purely made up example, every time you drive you have a 5% chance of death when you wear a helmet, and a 5% chance of death when you don't wear a helmet. No correlation, even on the assumption of causation.

    Now, I want to repeat that non-correlation is a strong argument against causation. It just doesn't disprove it.

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
    1. Re:Non-correlation does not necessarily disprove by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting point.

      Here's a point worth considering in the case of the Netherlands & drugs: we're talking about basically the only stable country in the world where drugs are, in effect, legalized. It would be quite a coincidence that it would happen to be an outlier in this respect. If it were an island in the middle of the pacific ocean, thousands of kilometers away from other civilizations, with a specific culture / diet / environment ... but here we're talking about medium size country, which resembles very much its many neighbours in all respects.

    2. Re:Non-correlation does not necessarily disprove by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "we're talking about basically the only stable country in the world where drugs are, in effect, legalized"

      What do you mean? Drug consumption is not illegal in Spain and, AFAIK, the same is valid in the rest of the EU.

    3. Re:Non-correlation does not necessarily disprove by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      Here's a hypothetical: assume that helmets save lives. Specifically, if you're in an accident the helmet will "cause" you to live 90% of the time. Also assume that otherwise you live 0% of the time. (These numbers are completely made up, so just accept them for the sake of this example.) Now, also assume that people only wear a helmet when they're driving on certain roads, and that these roads have a 50% chance of resulting in an accident. Other roads have a 5% chance of resulting in an accident. So, in this purely made up example, every time you drive you have a 5% chance of death when you wear a helmet, and a 5% chance of death when you don't wear a helmet. No correlation, even on the assumption of causation.
      You've failed to isolate the factor you're trying to test - in particular you've failed to account for the difference in the roads used. If your point is that flaws in methodology invalidate results then fine, I doubt anyone here will disagree. But you have not given a convincing example that a lack of correlation doesn't mean a lack of causation. Simple logic dictates that a true lack of correlation does imply a lack of causation. If A causes B then there must be a correlation between the two. If there is no correlation (meaning that A occurs whenever B occurs) then A cannot cause B.
  308. Where? Australia of course. by cheater512 · · Score: 1

    From Australia you can just sit 'down under' watching the rest of the world bickering. :)

    1. Re:Where? Australia of course. by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      There's tons of entertainment in Australia anyway. Like race riots. Or listening to John Howard blather on like the snotty, arrogant little man he is.

    2. Re:Where? Australia of course. by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      Yeah I suppose watching Bush try and read a childeren's book upside down is more entertaining than John Howard.

      Who in their right mind would want a smart person governing their country?

    3. Re:Where? Australia of course. by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      My point exactly. I'm not from the USA, by the way.

  309. Re:Aotearoa? You won't make it a year...! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even McDonalds, when they first opened in NZ back in 80s had to sell a "Kiwi Burger" with the beetroot, pineapple, fried egg etc. Sadly they've stopped selling them now

    I'm a Kiwi who's been living overseas (South America) for well over a decade, and must admit that New Zealand looks more and more attractive to me. The things that we New Zealanders complain about (and we're often a whiney bunch) are NOTHING in comparison to the social, political and economic issues that I've seen overseas (ok, admitedly South America is one of the most screwed up places on the planet).

    So..... for those who could, I'd certainly recommend New Zealand.

  310. Afghanistan! by mnmn · · Score: 1

    The answer depends a whole lot on your background.

    I've a background from Afghanistan and have been very curious about recent job postings between $150,000 and $230,000 USD (tax free apparently) for an MCSE and someone who is a US citizen for Afghanistan. It also required secret security clearance. Its probably one dangerous country for a white American especially if you get into frequent contact with locals and have to leave the protected military compounds. But its home to me. A friend of mine was a salesman for Alcatel for 2 years in Afghanistan and travelled all over giving handsets for free to rocket-launcher-wielding warlords and the like. Telecom companies are fighting hard to gain the first monopoly and yell FP!. He was making $50,000 and probably would make $100,000 as a US or Canadian citizen (who are given better posts and paid and trusted better regardless of skill or certification).

    In fact the only thing stopping me is I'm not a Canadian citizen YET, and I'll have to get the secret security clearance before embarking out. Hopefully the gold rush will not end in Afghanistan.

    However, you couldn't pay me to go to Iraq. I'm as likely to get shot there as an American soldier.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  311. As long as its easy to make 'tax free money' by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    Seriously, if its easy to make tax free money on the side then its ok to have a medium job.

    I see nothing wrong with any one have the ability to say , do 3 hrs work and get 'cash' tax free money of say $30/hr. ie, the same
    as doing taxed 8hrs work, but for 3hrs.

    Nobody loses, the person has more money, which will 100% get spent on local products, like BEER, phone bills, or paying the home loan or rent, or
    more NICE FOOD, not 20cent noodles.

    Its more honorable to make 3hrs of tax free money, than being a politician getting paid $150k + expenses and $50k of free things, and 3hr lunches.

    Trade is trade.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  312. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by Loundry · · Score: 0

    Actually, the amount of wealth relative to others is what determines your freedom. Poverty is generally measured, not by how little you have, but by how much less you have than average.

    This is a ballsy revelation that your politics are centered around wealth envy. This underpinning value gives you a much different spin on reality than I see. For instance:

    In a more socialist system, by contrast, higher taxes and moderate salaries means that everyone is working for each other

    Actually, they're working for the government.

    contributing to a community.

    Actually, they're "contributing" to the government. ("Contribution" implies a voluntary donation, whereas government operates by force.)

    But they're happy, and together, they've built something: a society, where people feel wanted and protected and cared for, so that they don't feel the need to sleep with guns in the drawer, or shoot their classmates.

    Christians and Muslims also paint gushing, rosy portraits of utopian society if everyone were just FORCED to obey what they thought was right. When will you admit that your world view is very much like theirs but with different mystical beliefs? Never! After all, Christianity and Islam, being totalitarian world views like yours, are your direct competitors. But this won't stop you from some enemy-of-my-enemy-is-my-friend opportunism, which is why we see alliances between Muslims and "progressives".

    --
    I don't make the rules. I just make fun of them.
  313. Try Sweden by Guerito · · Score: 1

    I lived 15 years in the US and have now lived 4 years in Sweden. Couldn't be happier despite having spent 6 years previously living high life in NYC. Me and my wife loved NYC but got offered a within the company to the headquarters in Stockholm, Sweden. We wanted to start a family and Sweden is by far the most family friendly country on earth. i have a nice job and had a very high compensation package in NYC. I earn about the same here with a little higher taxes. But my income is considered obscenely high over here. Taxes are a bit higher than NYC but not significant. I paid around 40-45 % in NYc and pay a few percent more over here. For that money I got noting in the US, except of course living in lovely NYC. Some of the things i like over here: -One of the highest living standards in the world. And not only for the rich. -High life quality. People here work to live, not live to work. Combining family, children, career,and life in general works very well. -6 weeks vacation. Do I need to say more? -Free health care forever. I can afford to pay for private insurance but most people can't. I now have kids and really like to see that everyone has access to top notch doctors -Parental leave. 480 days PAID leave per child. My company even pays above the government ceiling and gives me 85% of my real salary. This has enabled me to take 5 months off with my first son and I plan on doing the same with my newborn daughter. I can't tell you what a difference it makes to spend time early on with your children. If you don't have kids you'll probably think this item is stupid:-)) -Free and great education. Everything from day care to university is free (day care has a small cost but you get it back in a check from the government) That means even the average person is fairly well educated and the difference compared to the US is unbelievable. People unable to read or write here is unheard of. 99% here speak good English, in addition to Swedish, which makes it easy for any foreigner to fit it. -Safe, beautiful nature, gorgeous women, high tech society. There is no such thing as a downtown or ghetto in the country. Everything is clean and high tech. No buildings falling down, there's a bike lane on virtually every road, and the air is ridiculously clean wherever you go. -Income taxes are a little higher than NYC and so are other consumer taxes. Gas, tobacco,and alcohol taxes are high. Not high enough I think. If the price of gas doubles I won't complain. Because gas is more expensive we've learned how to live with it and are not as stupidly dependent on oil as US. I have a very high income and do pay some extra for those less fortunate but I think it's worth it. It leads to less problems in society in the long run when people are less needy and desperate When you have kids and family things change a bit. If you're single and 25, NYC is probably the place to be. Great city. But a little later you might want to be able to combine your career with seeing the kids and have a high quality life. Sweden is then the place. Other good choices would be Norway and perhaps Denmark. AD http://www.adventuredad.com/

  314. Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd move to British Columbia in Canada. I'm not moving because my partner isn't fully convinced yet. I want to move for several reasons. Honestly, free health care is a nice draw. They speak english (at least in BC they do). I can get married there, legally. Their economy is not screwed up like the US. The latest Bush fiasco, suspending writ of habeas corpus even for US citizens, is a total disgrace. I am embarassed about this country and it's so-called leader.

  315. Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So many people complain about the stuff going on in the US and while it is a problem what they don't realize is that other countries are generally worse. You don't hear a lot of complaining from other countries because they have always been that way. That is, worse than the US.

  316. America the Beautiful....or something by donnie5 · · Score: 1

    I would love to leave the country, at times. America is like that co-worker you love and hate. You know great things can come out of this co-worker, but sometimes he or she can be a real bastard. Knowing of the great things keeps you from leaving for good. And the cost of moving to a different country.

  317. Re:The Netherlands - incorrect! by moz25 · · Score: 1

    You're making some rather blatant errors:

    1. VAT in The Netherlands has been 19% instead of 17.5% for years.

    2. The 52% bracket starts at EUR 52.229, where did you get your 33k figure from? (btw, the exchange rate is a lot lower than 1.50!). If we do some calculations, we find out that the effective (box 1) income tax for a EUR 100k income is about 45.3%.

    My guess is that you haven't gotten proper tax advice. It's not impossible to lower the effective rate to about 35-40% max if you know how to navigate the rules and business forms.

  318. alternative idea by psbrogna · · Score: 1

    Let me preface my comment by saying that I'm probably the most irresponsible citizen on the planet as far as participation in the process of being a citizen. That being said, I suspect if more people invested as much effort into participating (ie. self-ducation on the issues, voting responsibly, providing feedback to politicians and our government agencies) as would be required to transplant to an alternate country/culture, it's likely that we could fix whatever bothers us about our own country and remain in our native countries.
    To bring it home for our listening audience, perhaps it's analagous to the difference between doing the work necessary to learn & support some inherited code base versus taking the easy route and replacing it with something we wrote ourselves.
    I was at a technology conference in San Jose a few years back and happened to share lunch with a South African who was in America to get an education so that he could return to his own country and use that education to contribute for its betterment. His conviction was very impressive to me and something I think is rarer in the my own country.

  319. Nowhere by kalidasa · · Score: 1

    I'm staying here till the bitter end. Anyone who wants to leave America because they don't like the Republicans or the Democrats or whoever can go - good riddance to them. One is an American not because one was born on a particular patch of land, but because one believes in certain principles, and that those principles are worth fighting for. We CHOOSE to be Americans. The unamerican (dare I say antiamerican) bunch running things now has already overplayed their hand, and those of us who choose to stand our ground and say we're not going quietly will reap the rewards of the freedoms we defend.

    And the best part about being American? Most of the time, defending our freedoms at home means using a ballot and our voices and our pens: not standing in front of tanks.

    1. Re:Nowhere by xutopia · · Score: 1

      I think the problem isn't not loving the Reps or the Dems, it's hating the way people are fooled to believe that black and white are the two colors of the rainbow. You see in most other countries there are more than 2 contenders for office, and the second place is often close to the third player. It's sad to see how the US government and media fools all of you. I'm glad I live in Canada, where of course we aren't perfect but at least our media is honest enough to point out what's wrong instead of making the problem worse.

  320. venezuela by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Venezuela-they are building a social safety net after generations of shafting the poor in favor of some rich elite, and they have *huge* reserves of energy, a critical factor for any nation in the years to come. Nations that have to import energy will be experiencing declines, unless they have something critically important to trade, in abundant enough surplus that they can afford it. Recently we just had an article about Iceland, which might be another good choice, as a country that has abundant energy now that they are going mostly geothermal and hydrogen.

    1. Re:venezuela by hswerdfe · · Score: 1

      Canada, We already have a social safety net (health care, EI, CPP), and a large energy reserve, (Oil Sands, Hybernia, Wind, Tidal, BioMass).

      --
      --meh--
    2. Re:venezuela by sydres · · Score: 1

      in venezuela chavez takes away your rights

    3. Re:venezuela by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      In Venezuala where Chavez is King and it is illegal to talk bad about him.

  321. Wealth != happiness by iamcadaver · · Score: 1

    Last year I told my employer they aren't paying me enough to work five days a week.

    I took a 20% pay cut, and gained a three days off - four days on work week.

    It takes a little tweaking of the financial priorities, but I found it advantageous. My life is better all around, and my co-workers envy the lifestyle. They wonder how I did it. The answer is simple: Negotiate your time to your employer like you mean it. Trust me, it is in a business's interest to squeeze you. Consider yourself a business of one, and squeeze back!

    Remember the labor movement? No, of course you don't. Labor day is just a day off f labor, right? This is what it was all about: Better living standards. How many consecutive years have Americans reported 5% or better productivity growth? How many times does that have to happen before twice the output per unit of work is achieved? How long will the workers tolerate 4% raises during 9% inflation and 5% productivity growth? ... That's why I told my employer they aren't paying me enough to not have 3 day weekends.

    Of course, having idle time to read and learn and travel has opened my awareness to the labor movement, American history, current movements and disgruntlement. The result so far? Libertarianism and joining the Free State Project. http://www.freestateproject.org/

    If you are in America, and looking for something better, look to New Hampshire.

    --
    Before I part with'em: two pennies weigh ~4.996+/-0.014g, have a zinc core, and the face of Lincoln. You can keep 'em.
  322. Sweden by dr_d_19 · · Score: 1

    Come to Sweden. Honestly.

    I've been to a lot of countries (not working, but visiting friends working and/or studying) and although I wanted to move to other countries for a long time, I've simply come to the conclusion that Sweden is probably one of the best countries of which to be a citizen.

    The taxes are high, but considering what they will give you (among the best welfare in the world) it's worth it. People are nice, almost everyone speaks english very well (in fact, my friends from the UK/NZ has had trouble learning english seems everyone here is so keen on speaking english that they will switch from swedish in five seconds if the realize that you'd rather speak it).

    Our IT industry is going very well at the moment, the country is beautiful and so are the people living here (honestly, everytime I travel somewhere and get back to Sweden I get amazed of how good people look here).

    And as a bonus -- since there's a shortage of apartments (at least in Stockholm) you will end up living in a basement highly comparable to that of your parents, so you should feel at home right from the start!

    1. Re:Sweden by JoeGee · · Score: 1
      And as a bonus -- since there's a shortage of apartments (at least in Stockholm) you will end up living in a basement highly comparable to that of your parents, so you should feel at home right from the start!


      This is the funniest thing I have read in here in a long time! Tak skal du ha! But you're right about your country. Sweden is a lovely place, full of lovely people. :)
      --

      Get off my virtual lawn, you damned virtual kids!
    2. Re:Sweden by pcb · · Score: 1

      Come to Sweden. Honestly.

      If you're white...otherwise don't bother!

      PCB

      --
      'Men never commit evil so fully and joyfully as when they do it for religious convictions.' B. Pascal
  323. Southamerica anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess South-America is still a well kept secret, there are several places down there were you can enjoy, not only weather but good food, which is something I miss being in the US.

    On the other hand, republicans can go to Venezuela.

  324. Butt never got into gear by stuntpope · · Score: 1

    I've wished to move away from the Eastern USA seaboard, and even USA itself, for a long time. Yet here I still am. For a while I thought Norway. But I've heard about tremendous barriers for foreigners (at least, non-EU ones) getting employment. Other Euro countries like Switzerland, Netherlands, Belgium are on my list. Lately, New Zealand has been on my mind, mainly due to the physical beauty, and it would be closer to my wife's home country. But I know nothing about IT job prospects there.

  325. Southern Germany by kenlars99 · · Score: 1

    I moved to southern Germany (Bavaria, in a small town about an hour from Munich) about 5 years ago, and there are some really nice things about it. It is clean, safe, and beautiful in a way that nowhere in the U.S. is. We have 2 small children and I can't think of a better place to raise them.

    I did't leave the U.S. because of any dislike of the U.S. The differences, big and small, between any two countries, are so numerous, that you spend years noticing and talking about them. A few notable things:
    1. In the U.S., you have to generally either pay for an expensive private school, or buy an expensive house to be in a good school district, to ensure that your kids get a quality education. In general, the disparities between the haves and the have-nots here are not as vast, so these kinds of issues don't cause so much stress.
    2. Similar issue for crime and safety. As far as where you live in the U.S., trying to buy your house in a place that is safe is also hard. I have a fairly nice house in the U.S., but still, one of my brothers was robbed at gunpoint on my streetcorner there. In bavaria, I accidentally left my bike unlocked on a busy street for a week, and it was still there when I went back to get it.
    3. I never liked the way there are so many places and things that are dirty and ugly in the U.S. That always bugged me even as a kid, even before I had been outside of the country, I guess I'm a little compulsive. The ugliness of strip malls, cookie-cutter subdivisions, billboards, mobile homes, ratty power and phone lines, trash, "fake" things like a ghetto apartment complex called "Innsbrook Estates" (actually, Innsbruck has some pretty ugly stuff built during a socialist era, so maybe the name is OK), You have pockets of niceness in the U.S., but you can never go more than 1 mile without encountering ugliness. In Germany you have to try pretty hard to find ugliness.
    4. I guess because Germany is a bit more homogeneous, you don't have the political correctness that is rampant in the U.S. still. I've come to see that while Germans do not have all of the constitutional freedoms that are guaranteed in the U.S. (for example, Germany does not have an absolute freedom of speech, and the church is supported by the state), there is a culture of libertarianism when it comes to personal behavior that makes you feel more free. There are coed naked saunas. You can buy and drink beer anyhere, anyplace, anytime. And nobody thinks any of it is a big deal.

    But no matter how many pros you list about non-US countries, there are a few undeniable facts: the U.S. is the center of the world in many ways, politically, culturally, and economically. There are exciting things going on in the U.S. Most of the cool startups, successful businesses, prestigious universities, cool technologies, etc etc - are there. Of all the places people want to move to, from other places in the world, the U.S. is still #1, because it is still the land of opportunity. I think that perhaps the chaos and inequality in the U.S is the flip side of the coin. In the U.S., you can be poor as dirt and have nobody care about you or take care of you (look at some new orleans footage from katrina, of the darwinian processes at work), or you can become the next Bill Gates.

    So I think it is hard for me to say to everyone to leave the U.S. and go to Germany or anywhere else - places are different, and leaving gives you a new appreciation for how some some things can be done better, and also for things that really are great about the U.S.

  326. Re:The Netherlands - Lenient? by fury88 · · Score: 1

    ... but they still are a lot more lenient than, for example, US immigration laws. Immigration laws here?? What laws?? es imposible!

  327. All bark, no bite. by serial_crusher · · Score: 1

    I said it in 2000, I said it in 2002, I said it in 2004, and I'm saying it again in 2006. If the republicans win, I'm moving to Canada.

  328. An observation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is funny that while generally a lot of American people I know think that Holland is a great country, the politicians or higher-ups or whatever you like to call them seem to think we're doing it all wrong. A pretty damn bold example is Bill O'Reilly, who literally said his worst fear would be America becoming The Netherlands (you can find the clip here: http://dump.geenstijl.nl/mediabase/5070/14fc156b/i ndex.html). This made a lot of us think "who the hell does this guy think he is?"

    So my question to working Americans is: why? Sure, if you only visit Amsterdam Zuid-Oost, de Wallen, and some desolate trainstation at 3am you might get the impression that this country is a genuine mess. If you walk through the tulip fields, sightseeing windmills and gazing at happy people with wooden shoes and funny hats, your impression will be completely different...

    How come some supposedly "leading figures" in the United States are like this? Why exactly are they afraid of becoming - a bit more like - Holland? I think it'll be good for American citizens to gain some of the freedoms and perks that we have. Because from a Holland point of view, people in the US are pretty much strained by their government in whatever they want to do.

  329. Anywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why Not America:

    - no minimum annual vacation
    - Quality of life is measured against the price of gas
    - George Doubleya
    - Intelligent Design is considered a bona fide science in some areas

    Why anywhere else:

    - The shopping mall is not a cultural icon
    - Most employers don't expect you to work more than 8 hours a day
    - The environment is important
    - Being pulled over for speeding isn't likely to get you shot
    - Personal time isn't an antiquated concept

  330. Leaving the US is a bit extreme by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

    While I can understand how someone might find current political activities so deplorable they might want to leave the USA, I think that is a really big leap. Call me crazy but I would think about moving somewhere withing the USA first. It is a lot easier-no immigration hassle, no learning a new language. While it is all the same country, there is a lot of variation between different parts of the country. There's more to the US than the coasts and cities. According to wikipedia, Europe is 10 400 000 square kilometers in size, while the US is 9,631,420 square kilometers in size. I find it hard to believe that in a country nearly the size of Europe, even if parts of it are largely uninhabited, you couldn't find a place where you could be happy.

    --
    http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
  331. Re:Robots don't pay taxes. by 'nother+poster · · Score: 2, Funny

    But I bet they are adicted to that electricity they abuse. Damned robots always jacking in.

  332. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    Please reply to this comment.

    Come on man, can you with a straight face really claim that any amount of ordinance you could possibly have would win out against the government? You and your shotgun or handgun against an entire police department? The FBI? National Gaurd? State Police? US Military?

    So just how effective could you be against the government I ask you?

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  333. Moving to england once I graduate by StuBeck · · Score: 1

    I'm moving to england once I graduate at the end of the spring. I'm going to go to grad school there so it will be easy for me to get in the country. Then I will get a job there so I can stay and eventually become a citizen in 5 years.

  334. Re:Marginal Tax Rates - factor in their economy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When posting tax data, you should really factor in their economy. Mexico has really low taxes, but their money is worth less than Monopoly money. If taxes are higher, but their economy allows an "average income" to live at a higher level, is their tax really that much higher?

  335. I'm not going anywhere by rob1980 · · Score: 1

    As if anybody else's shit doesn't stink.

  336. Not enough NUDE BEACHES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    unless they are govt army owned land, how ironic hey!!!

    re Swanbourne

    Stupid prude local councils that are full of fat employees that are jealous of the skinny big titted sexy local chickies.

  337. My List, US Won't Let Me Go All That Easily by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 1

    I would go to nations that are more economically free than the United States, that also have comparable levels of personal freedom. These nations are Singapore, Ireland, Estonia, Australia, and possibly Denmark. I have not left the United States out of sentimental loyalty to my State, not the entire Empire, and out of fear of making such a drastic change in my life. Also, the national government of the United States cruelly and unjustly prevents an American from voluntarily discharging their citizenship for a period of seven or so years, I believe, in which the US insists on the power of taxation and control over that individual.

    --
    Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
    1. Re:My List, US Won't Let Me Go All That Easily by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      I would go to nations that are more economically free than the United States, that also have comparable levels of personal freedom. These nations are Singapore, Ireland, Estonia, Australia, and possibly Denmark.

      What measure are you using to make these comparisons? I think the best measure of economic freedom is tax as a percentage of GDP, and that is pretty low in the US compared to most countries.

    2. Re:My List, US Won't Let Me Go All That Easily by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 1
      --
      Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
    3. Re:My List, US Won't Let Me Go All That Easily by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Interesting.. of your list I'd cross off Singapore (freedom of speech) and Ireland (censorship, abortion, birth control) and Iceland, Estonia (too cold). So that leaves GB and Australia.

      Not sure that either are really much different from the US.

  338. where to? by allforcarrie · · Score: 1

    Canada.

    what is stopping me? I am in the US military.

  339. Only in America by franksands · · Score: 1

    Someone that criticizes his country is called an-american and starts hearing "love it or leave it" or "oh yeah, why you still here?" kind of speach. It is perfectly normal to hate a lot of things about your country and still live in it so you can see/help things change. Everytime I hear this "you do not love your coutry" story I remember of this episode of Boston Legal.

    1. Re:Only in America by franksands · · Score: 1

      By "an-american" I meant anti-american, sorry for the typo.

  340. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by TopShelf · · Score: 1

    You're seeing only half the equation - by economic freedom, we're talking about the ability in the US to more easily relocate and start an entreprenurial business or a new career, than is typically the case in many other countries. The American economy does a pretty good job at constantly reallocating capital and labor to the more dynamic and productive industries, and away from those that are declining. In countries where more of the economy is tied up with the state, there are political obstacles to such restructurings that hamper long-term productivity growth.

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  341. Re:There has to be limits... by Knuckles · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why should the dutch have 50% africans / arabs in their country? It wasnt like that in the past, why now?

    Sucks not to have stayed home in the first place, huh?

    --
    "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  342. actually by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

    Yes.. if I go to a DMV or supermarket then yes -- I consider pretty much everyone in there to be an idiot. 99%.

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  343. ALERT ! by Ihlosi · · Score: 4, Funny
    Really? So if we let A be cigarette smoking and B be lung cancer, then the existence of lung cancer in people who do not smoke implies that it is not the case that cigarette smoking causes cancer?



    *BZZZZZZT*

    Your geek license has been temporarily suspended.

    Please review the truth table for logical implication.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_implication


    1. Re:ALERT ! by Ihlosi · · Score: 2

      You still haven't reviewed the truth table. There is no fallacy to point out.

      "A implies B" is always true if A is false. "A implies B" is only false if A is true and B is false. If A is false (People don't smoke), the implication is true.

    2. Re:ALERT ! by B'Trey · · Score: 1

      Sigh. You're conflating the truth of the logical assertion with the truth of the statement. They aren't the same thing. In other words, the question of whether or not an implication is logically valid is completely independent of whether or not there is any truth to the implied causation. If I say "The sky is blue, therefore water is wet," both A and B are true and the implication is logically valid. That doesn't mean that the implied causation - that water is wet BECAUSE the sky is blue, is true.

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

    3. Re:ALERT ! by versiondub · · Score: 1

      your understanding of logical implication still needs some improvement. Your proposed corollary- "the sky is blue" does not truth-functionally imply "water is wet"-- because while the sky may be blue, water may not indeed be "wet" (ie. when it is evaporated, and present in the air that humans commonly breath, it is not perceptably 'wet'). Now, onto your previous statement-- Logical assessment using truth functional logic of the argument whether or not you get lung cancer from smoking is problematic from any point of view because there is no simple way to account for 1) second-hand smoke, 2) alternate causes of lung cancer such as asbestos, etc. So in effect, your original statement is without much truth or falsehood to it, because it simply does not try and address any lingering question. In essence, your first argument about smoking is much the same as your "the sky is blue, therefore water is wet" argument-- they are both entirely irrelevant.

    4. Re:ALERT ! by B'Trey · · Score: 1

      Sheesh. Now we're getting into semantics. Neither the term "water" nor "wet" were precisely defined. For that matter, neither was "sky" or "blue." That path is an endless loop with no hope of resolution.

      As for my first "argument," I didn't make the argument you seem to be attributing to me. I made no statement about smoking causing or not causing cancer at all. I asked a question. Specifically, I asked whether it was true that the existence of someone with lung cancer who did not smoke was evidence that smoking did not cause cancer. Any other inferences or implications you may have taken from my post were unwarranted.

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

    5. Re:ALERT ! by DoctorFrog · · Score: 1
      Sheesh. Now we're getting into semantics.

      Good. It's the single most important field for understanding and communication.

      Specifically, I asked whether it was true that the existence of someone with lung cancer who did not smoke was evidence that smoking did not cause cancer.

      The existence of someone with lung cancer who did not smoke is evidence that smoking is not a necessary precondition for contracting lung cancer. That doesn't prevent it from being a sufficient condition.

    6. Re:ALERT ! by B'Trey · · Score: 1

      Correct. The real semantic issue is what we mean by "cause."

      (BTW, your name isn't Rex, is it?)

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

    7. Re:ALERT ! by DoctorFrog · · Score: 1

      Yes, "cause" often gets unconsciously limited to "sole and necessary cause" I think; that's a source of much confusion. It's a good example of why the phrase "that's just semantics" is foolish; if you don't have a grasp on the semantics then you don't know what you're talking about, literally! :)

      No, I'm not Rex.

    8. Re:ALERT ! by B'Trey · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't agree that saying something is semantics is always foolish. It certainly can be foolish, but so can useless bickering over terminology.

      "Sole and necessary cause" is often meaningless, for a number of reasons. We often group multiple events into a single statement, such as talking about the cause of the War in Iraq. The War in Iraq, while conceptially a single thing, is actually a great many events and there is no single cause. Too, if we isolate our consideration down to a single event (although the very definition of "single event" can be problematic), then we often end up with a Rube Goldberg like sequence of events. The "sole and necessary cause" depends a great deal on how far back you're willing to chase the chain. Additionally, there may be multiple necessary conditions where the failure of any single condition is sufficient to prevent the event. There's no way to identify any one as more important than the others, and thus no sole cause.

      (I have an e-friend named Rex who's quite fond of distinguishing between necessary and sufficient conditions.)

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

    9. Re:ALERT ! by DoctorFrog · · Score: 1

      All right, I'll buy often foolish rather than always foolish.

  344. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
    What my neighbor makes has no bearing on how free I am. We use the same tax schedule but there are boatloads of folks in the U.S. who make more than me but who manage it poorly. Thus, they pay more to the common weal, may have more in the bank, but are constrained about what they can do in terms of family trips/home improvements.

    ...

    I hated Clinton

    Obviously...
    Finally, as for keeping guns in drawers - the primary reason for this right in the US is to kill government types who overstep their bounds. It's less about neighbors and hunting and more about preventing idiocy in the ruling class.
    Oh yeah? How many people lived (or stayed free) after shooting "government types who overstep their bounds"????
  345. ISP in France by Brome · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Oh, and since we're on /. and the vast majority of us are computer geeks, maybe you should also consider this : in France you can have what is probably the best offer for Internet providing in the western world. From what I've seen, only Japan and Korea can top that.

    For 29.90 euros per month, you get triple play : 25 Mbit/s internet access (with 1024 Kbps upload), a phone line with free calls to 28 foreign countries (including USA), and television (100+ free channels, and VoD). Plus a TV box that can record shows, much like a Tivo, and stream video from and to your computer through MIMO wifi.

    That may sound strange and out of proportions, but the internet service providing is what I would miss the most if I had to move from France.

  346. just shut up and leave already! by jdcllns · · Score: 1

    I wish everyone that keeps shooting their mouths off about this would just shut up and leave already! Get the hell out of my country! All you do is piss and moan anyway. Renounce your US citizenship, move to another country and enjoy the glory of not being an American. And BTW: the guys at boing-boing are just a bunch of freakin morons!

    1. Re:just shut up and leave already! by Procrastin8er · · Score: 0

      I couldn't agree more. If you don't like living in the USA then leave, simple as that. No one is making you stay. I do believe that many of the people talking about leaving are just blowing smoke, they have no intension of really leaving, they are just trying to make a political statement. I wish more of the people that say theu are thinking of leaving would go.

      --
      Slashdot - Where the slash is most definitely to the left.
  347. Canada or Belgium by pruckelshaus · · Score: 1

    I'd move to either Canada or Belgium; moving to Belgium would be pretty difficult unless we (wife & 2 kids) decided to just sell it all and move with nothing but suitcases and memories.

    I would move to either country because the weather & countryside isn't too different from what we have here in PA, because the people in both countries are very nice and are accepting of well-behaved foreigners, and because people generally seem to have their priorities more in line with enjoying life.

    The thing that gets me about the US is the level of paranoia that our society has reached that just doesn't seem to exist in Canada (at least in the places where I have been, mainly around Montreal).

    My wife is a clinical pharmacist, and I am a developer/dba who is also a certified English teacher, so I think we would both have pretty good options as far as jobs go.

    The thing is, I really DON'T want to pull the plug on living in the US, but this is no longer the country that I was born in (mid 60's) and took an oath to protect (10 years in the Navy as a submariner). It just feels...different now. Sleazier, slimy, with an easily mollified public that hasn't been raised to ask questions of its leaders and demand cogent answers.

  348. Not So Bad by Ginnungagap42 · · Score: 1

    America is shifting back toward the Center and will start to look like a nice place again. Now is the time to not leave the country - America needs you more than ever!

  349. a Canadian view point by VEGETA_GT · · Score: 1

    I have to admit this is defentlay a very interesting topic. But its actulay interesting as people do move out of here. For good example, Bush has not been the most populer presedent, when he wone and when he started the second gulf war, there where large increases in the number of US citizens moving to Canada. I am in a interesting situation being a Canadian but I am working in the US. I would rather live in canada, but as I a not that long out of university, my computer experence on paper is only a few years. In canada witht he flood of comuter people, its hard to get a job, so I am here. but to be honest, this is tempary, as I do plan on moving back to Canada. It may have higher taxes and defentlay have its own problems, every countery dose, I still prefer it to the US.

    Now as for where I would go if I where a US citizean, well Canada is defentlay a major choice. Why, well the standard of living is there, and its very similer to the US style of living, but politicaly ther eis a decent amount of diffrences on how thigns are run. Other places I can see US people moving to would be England, Australia, and places that generaly speak english. Majority of the Us speak english, so odds are they would try and move to a location they could atleast communicate in. Now why don't people leave, there is always the money thing, its not cheep to move, and even more fun to move across borders, experence talking here. Second great you don't like how th US is being run, thats fine but what aobut these other palcess, how much information can you relay gather on them from here. More these days thanks to the Net, but still not as much as most would hope as a lot of thigns come from just plane experence and word of mouth. So is the serpent you know any worse or better to the one you don't know.

    1. Re:a Canadian view point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      defentlay, actulay, populer, presedent, wone, "there where," experence,
      "comuter people," tempary, "countery dose," citizean, similer,
      "politicaly ther eis," cheep, experence, aobut, palcess, relay, thigns
      "plane experence"

          There might be other reasons why you're having difficulty finding a job in
      Canada. :o)

  350. deal with the problems, don't run away by oohshiny · · Score: 1

    Running away is the wrong reaction. First of all, there is nowhere to go: many of the ills that afflict the US are exported sooner or later anyway. Secondly, if everybody who doesn't like the way things work, it will only get worse, first in the US, then for the rest of the world. You only need to look at the Palestinians and Israel to see how bad things can get: most sensible and moderate people have said "who needs this shit" and moved to the US or elsewhere.

    Americans citizens have a lot of power to change things: don't throw yours away or make yourself politically irrelevant by running away. Oppose the religious nuts, the pork barrel dealers, the hate mongers, the zealots, the nationalists in public and in your personal life, and the hawks and participate in the political process.

    1. Re:deal with the problems, don't run away by emagery · · Score: 1

      There is wisdom in this, and this covers the 'why haven't I' segment of the question. America is/was an excellent country, but it is heading down the tubes... and, honestly, it doesn't have to. Overpopulation due to unrealistic immigration levels, the recent suspension of habeas corpus, eery similarities now to pre-wwii germany, etc. You can't not be nervous AND be aware of what's going on around you (awareness not necessarily being equivalent to understanding, admittedly). But if the country is gonna be saved, the people have to save it. But then again, the people who fled germany before wwii, who fled vietnam (got an uncle of that persuasion who fled as a teen just before war), etc.. turned out they're probably still alive because of it. How do you know when to fight and when to flee?

      I guess, if the decision had been made, I'd probably go to New Zealand... they speak something resembling the same langauge, very low population (barely over 4 mil), out of the way not but technologically backwards, etc.

      Dunno what the right answer is, just that the question is important.

    2. Re:deal with the problems, don't run away by rs79 · · Score: 1

      "Running away is the wrong reaction."

      What about that Mayflower/King George thing?

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    3. Re:deal with the problems, don't run away by oohshiny · · Score: 1

      What about that Mayflower/King George thing?

      That was then, this is now: (1) those people weren't leaving a democracy, (2) there were places to run to, and (3) a lot of the early immigrants didn't come out of some noble political or religious ideals, they were simply bankrupt or running away from the law.

    4. Re:deal with the problems, don't run away by Ilmarin77 · · Score: 1

      So, the message is: fellow American, wait until it becomes unbearable in the USA, then run away - bankrupt and chased by authorities.

    5. Re:deal with the problems, don't run away by oohshiny · · Score: 1

      So, the message is: fellow American, wait until it becomes unbearable in the USA, then run away - bankrupt and chased by authorities.

      No, the message is the following: You can't run away again, since there is no place left to go. But the good news is that the US is a democracy, so if you stop behaving like morons, lazy bums, or headless chicken, you can, in fact, make things work here.

    6. Re:deal with the problems, don't run away by Ilmarin77 · · Score: 1

      > But the good news is that the US is a democracy. Good, I feel safe and warm now. Is it a kind of democracy like this?

    7. Re:deal with the problems, don't run away by oohshiny · · Score: 1

      Good, I feel safe and warm now. Is it a kind of democracy like this?

      You aren't supposed to "feel safe and warm" now, you're supposed to be concerned for the future of US democracy because it is at risk. But, for the time being, it still is a democracy and it can remain one if people like you stop making cynical remarks and instead roll up their sleeves.

    8. Re:deal with the problems, don't run away by Ilmarin77 · · Score: 1

      Well, then you already lost, because I am writing this from Montreal. It seems funny, though, when your government takes bits and pieces away from the 'democracy' (like Patriot Act) what's left is still called democracy.

    9. Re:deal with the problems, don't run away by oohshiny · · Score: 1

      t seems funny, though, when your government takes bits and pieces away from the 'democracy' (like Patriot Act) what's left is still called democracy.

      It's not so funny that people like you reduce democracy and participatory government to platitudes and sound bites. If you want to know why governments can take bits and pieces of our rights away, look no further than to people like yourself.

      And, don't kid yourself: Canada isn't called the 51st state for nothing.

    10. Re:deal with the problems, don't run away by Ilmarin77 · · Score: 1

      >It's not so funny that people like you reduce democracy...
      There is a good movie on american 'democracy': Why We Fight
      >Canada isn't called the 51st state for nothing.
      Enlighten me, then. I was under the impression that UK was called 51st state.

  351. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
    If you ride a bike to work, live in a small house, feed your family and are happy, and I drive one of my BMWs to work, live in a big house, feed my family and am happy, does that make you less free that me?
    By riding a bike and having a small house, you're not held by the balls by the finance company and your mortgage so you can SAVE more and have a less-paying job that is much more interesting and rewarding that doesn't send you home with ulcers and stress. Now THINK at how the latter will do wonders to your health in later years, those years where you precious private medical insurance will dump you because you're no longer profitable...
  352. War on Drugs - the American example by MECC · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The 'war' on drugs best illustrates how the US government works. One group of governmental entities confiscates illegal drugs, and another, the CIA, imports them. At one point in time, the CIA (cocain importing agency) was smuggling 21 tons of cocain into the USA per year. This during the administration of George Bush Sr., who supported/declared 'war' on drugs to the public. Now his kid, not nearly as smart as he is, is making a mess of Iraq the the USA will need to spend the next 15 years cleaning up and all but publicly soiling his shorts to the rest of the world.

    Right now, the USA is a good place to live, economically speaking. That's because most people work hard as dogs (most, not all). As the population ages and declines (we're all too busy to reproduce and can't afford it anyway), how exactly can a government turned against itself and run by a bunch of hippie neo-cons help a situation like that? The fall of the roman empire comes to mind.

    --
    "We are all geniuses when we dream"
    - E.M. Cioran
    1. Re:War on Drugs - the American example by Rayonic · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yeah, because if a couple CIA employees get caught dealing drugs, then they're all evil commie drug traffickers who want to steal your bodily fluids. The fact that they got caught doesn't prove anything because it was all a show and AL QAEDA IS FAKE AND CIA 9/11 ZIONIST PEAK OIL DRILLING IN MY TEETH.

    2. Re:War on Drugs - the American example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You did not just combine the words "hippy" and "neo-con" in one sentence. That is an oxymoron, like "you're a genious."

      You cannot possibly believe that the CIA was smuggling drugs. That's just retarded.

      And to say we will spend 15 years cleaning up Iraq is dumb, the most pessimistic projections by anyone who could be considered knowledgeable indicate Iraqis will be able to take over all security in their country within two years.

      Please pay no attention to the moonbat.

    3. Re:War on Drugs - the American example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting that you chose to respond anonymously, while the poster had the "courage" (this being slashdot, that's a relative term) to use a real ID.

      I also disliked the juxtaposition of "hippy" and "neo-con", since they are so dissonant with one another. And while I'd like to wish that the US could leave a stable Iraq in 2 years, it seems rather unlikely. I never though that Bush 2 would be called worse than "the most pessimistic" in anything related to this debacle, but he has said in the last week that he did not think the US would start pulling out of Iraq before his term ends -- in more than 2 years. Maybe you're claiming that he is not knowledgeable?

      15 years does seem like a rather pessimistic estimate, though. And yes, I'm posting anonymously -- but then, I'm not calling anyone a moonbat in my post.

    4. Re:War on Drugs - the American example by MECC · · Score: 2
      You did not just combine the words "hippy" and "neo-con" in one sentence. That is an oxymoron, like "you're a genious."

      You cannot possibly believe that the CIA was smuggling drugs. That's just retarded.

      And to say we will spend 15 years cleaning up Iraq is dumb, the most pessimistic projections by anyone who could be considered knowledgeable indicate Iraqis will be able to take over all security in their country within two years.

      Please pay no attention to the moonbat.


      Ad hominem, anyone? Click the link and try reading it before freaking out. In case you can't read or are afraid to, the then head of the DEA Judge Bonner has pointed out that the CIA was smuggling drugs - the DEA has caught them on more than one occasion. Bonner must have been a moonbat. Pay no attention to those annoying facts ... just move along.

      As for 15 years to rebuild Iraq, look at the job we've done so far. How long did it take to rebuild countries with relatively stable societal underpinnings like those in Europe and Asia after WWII? 15 years, given the history of nation-building, is highly optimistic. Or is it the idea that we'll be able to build a nice calm democratic country out of diametrically opposing violent factions in a few quick years retarded? We might be able to rebuild some of the buildings and bridges, but the country?

      The idea that in less that 15 years we'll be able to resolve differences that have a violent history going back nearly 1500 years more qualifies as 'retarded'.

      As for the term 'hippie neo-cons', neo-cons want a little isolated society all to themselves and reject the norms of a democratic society - not entirely unlike hippies back in the 60's who also wanted a society to themselves. The difference is that neo-cons want to take society captive, and hippies wanted to separate from it. That, and neo-cons are organized and aggressive. So yeah, in retrospect, 'hippie neo-con' doesn't fit nearly as well as 'sociopathic neo-cons', although that's redundant.

      --
      "We are all geniuses when we dream"
      - E.M. Cioran
    5. Re:War on Drugs - the American example by Pictish+Prince · · Score: 1

      You mean THEY'RE NOT???!!!

      --
      Only his tendency toward a dazed stupor prevented him from screaming aloud.
    6. Re:War on Drugs - the American example by Copid · · Score: 1
      And to say we will spend 15 years cleaning up Iraq is dumb, the most pessimistic projections by anyone who could be considered knowledgeable indicate Iraqis will be able to take over all security in their country within two years.
      Are these the same knowledgeable peoplle who failed to predict the total meltdown of law and order in the country to begin with?
      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    7. Re:War on Drugs - the American example by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      "You did not just combine the words "hippy" and "neo-con" in one sentence. That is an oxymoron,"

      Indeed. From a followup post it appears he was being metaphorical, but it was still a badly-expressed sentiment.

      "like "you're a genious."

      Ah, right. Straight in with the ad-hominem attacks, then.

      "You cannot possibly believe that the CIA was smuggling drugs. That's just retarded."

      I think you'll find there's quite a lot of evidence the "retards" are actually right. IIRC the DEA has even caught CIA operatives and assets red-handed in the past. And there are many more reports (eg, "Air America" during the Vietnam war era) which were never conclusively proved[1] but are highly suspicious.

      "And to say we will spend 15 years cleaning up Iraq is dumb, the most pessimistic projections by anyone who could be considered knowledgeable indicate Iraqis will be able to take over all security in their country within two years."

      Actually, the most pessimistic projections indicate the entire country collapsing into civil war within two years, with the danger this would lead to an Iran-supported Islamic Fundamentalist theocracy. This has been advanced as a serious possibility by both US and UK military leaders, but I don't suppose you get those inconvenient little details on Fox News, do you?

      And FWIW, being able to reconcile the sunni and shi'ite ethnic groups (two diametrically opposed factions whose enmity goes back generations), and then getting the kurds (a group historically oppressed by both) on board, and then getting them to agree long enough to set up a stable government, in spite of Iran, Syria and the other surrounding nations with a vested interest in keeping Iraq unstable and making the US look bad, when everyone out there already hates you and blames you for the present conflict... well, taking only 15 years to set up a stable, secure nation under those circumstances would be quite an achievement for the best foreign diplomats the world has to offer.

      And we've only got the ham-fisted neocons trying to do it at the poin of a gun. Yay!

      "Please pay no attention to the moonbat."

      Mmmm, delicious ad-hominem for dessert, too.

      So did you have any factual objection to his post, or did your knee just jerk and you went with it?

      [1] You know, CIA pilots and aircrew being discovered having large amounts of heroin and cocaine on their plane, which has just flown straight from the main Air America base in Vietnam. That kind of "suspicious". I can't go searching for references since I'm at work, but the material's out there if you look for it.

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
  353. At Sea, Yaar. by Garrett+Fox · · Score: 1

    On a floating colony in international waters, of course!

    --
    Revive the Constitution.
    1. Re:At Sea, Yaar. by Garrett+Fox · · Score: 1

      [Messed up and submitted just the first sentence; here's the rest.]

      On a floating colony in international waters, of course! (Yaar. =) ) I'm in the middle of researching a long paper on aquaculture and wading through the murky legal aspects of it, making me think it'd be best to operate an aquaculture facility as a seasteading project outside the 200-mile Exclusive Economic Zone claimed by the US and signatories to the current UN Law of the Sea Treaty. I'm also influenced by having read an unpublished SF novel series by a friend about an uber-libertarian sea colony.
      Realistically, if I were in a position to work in such a place I'd consider it, but I wouldn't want to give up my citizenship.

      --
      Revive the Constitution.
  354. Australia turns authoritarian by acb · · Score: 1

    Under the present conservative government, Australia has been gradually becoming more and more authoritarian. The Office of Film and Literature Censorship has been banning increasingly many films (mostly art-house titles, though; good for populist point-scoring) and video games ("Getting Up" is banned in Australia, as are any games not suitable for children). There is a new sedition law on the books which criminalises any speech likely to cause dissatisfaction with the government or institutions. Journalists have been arrested by the Attorney-General's Department, who have "sanitised" their computers with sledgehammers. And as for not having a US-style religious right, that's in the works; the government has been putting a lot of resources into building up a conservative religious power base, funnelling resources to fundamentalist groups like the Hillsong Church, and a hardline Christian party (Family First) came within a hair's breadth of holding the balance of power (had the government gotten one fewer seat, they would control the Senate and be in a strong position to influence legislation). With no bill of rights, things look rather precarious.

    Also, the fabled laid-back Aussie lifestyle will soon be a thing of the past. New workplace relations laws passed by the government shift the balance of power towards employers, meaning that Australians are soon going to enjoy long US-style working hours, two weeks of annual leave a year (down from four), and the ability to be sacked on a whim.

  355. UK here we come! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are moving to the UK on 12-21-12. Have always wanted to experience immersion in non-US culture and the UK seems to be a good home base for exploring The Netherlands, South of France and the EU in general.

    Other places we've considered include, Vancouver, Montreal, Australia and India.

    America is a great place despite its issues. I'm ready to be someplace else however.

  356. Nice dodge there. by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

    Typical.

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  357. I'm serious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok dude, seriously. What are we voting for in two weeks, and how do we register to vote.

  358. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by dk.r*nger · · Score: 1
    By riding a bike and having a small house, you're not held by the balls by the finance company and your mortgage so you can SAVE more and have a less-paying job that is much more interesting and rewarding that doesn't send you home with ulcers and stress. Now THINK at how the latter will do wonders to your health in later years, those years where you precious private medical insurance will dump you because you're no longer profitable...

    And GOD FORBID that people should get to make that kind of choices for themselves. You obviously know better.
    And even worse: that good, high-paying jobs might exist.
  359. The problem with TFA by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1

    TFA is about a book that purports to list the top 50 foreign countries among U.S. emigres (sp?). But if I'm fed up with America, then why in heck would I want to move to a country that is full of U.S. expatriates?

    --
    "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
    1. Re:The problem with TFA by emagery · · Score: 1

      Probably because they all left for similar reasons and likely have not only a langauge, but a frame of mind in common with you. =)

  360. A house (of pancakes) divided by FacePlant · · Score: 1

    The Senate, due to their responsibility to confirm officials such as Supreme Court Justices should be the one that goes Democrat, simply to avoid the High Court being too heavily stacked to the right, enabling an undoing of all (not just Row v. Wade) of the social justice that has been ruled in tha last 60 years.

    I do agree that the legislature should be split, however that will probably mean that very little will ever get done, because nothing (except for "protecting the children" and "congress needs a raise") ever has broad support.

    The party without power waits to simply derail the plans of the party woth power, in order to prevent them from being seen as effective leaders, and therefore garnering any support from the people in the next election cycle. Its all about power and money. Money and power.

    Also, if the house goes Dem, they will spend the next 30 years burying the memebers of the current adminstration in subpoenas. Which may or may not be deserved, entertaining, justified, necessary, or even reasonable. But it will probably happen in retaliation to the whole Clinton impeachment mess, which itself was a retalliation for the whole Nixon impeachment mess.

    I predict (and I'm certainly not going out on any limbs here) that either way, our politics will continue to become considerably more ugly and devisive.

    Pro is to Con as Progress is to Congress.

    --
    My Heart Is A Flower
  361. 25% married, ~33% single by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I make over 50k a year and pay just under 25% of my paycheck to taxes...

    I make a little over $70K/yr (in Texas where we have no state income tax), but because I'm single, my total annual combined tax load is closer to 33%. If you're a (head of household) married and have children, the (federal income) tax portion drops significantly.

  362. only a nice place to live? by beaverfever · · Score: 1

    "They all love it, but it's only a good place to live; not to make money. Things are scarce, money is scarcer."

    Although I understand the need to save money for a rainy say and retirement, there is more to life than purchasing power. Saying "they all love it, but it's only a good place to live..." seems to be missing the point.

    "Although the Pocket World in Figures somehow calculated that Canada has the highest quality of life (the US second),"

    Perhaps they somehow included things such as quality of education, infrastructure and (yes) healthcare.

    I will not get into the experiences of your relatives in in Regina as I do not know the specific facts, but I do know that many of these "can't get healthcare in Canada" stories are years old or are blown out of proportion. In the past five years there has been more federal money made available to the provinces for healthcare, and some overall reform too. Each province runs its own health care system, so there are differences in each province.

    Besides that, if there are shortcomings to the healthcare system (as there are in every country), at least they are spread across the board, not suffered exclusively by uninsured or poorly insured people. I have experienced health care in California and three Canadian provinces. I will take the Canadian model any day.

    Considering all the problems the US has with its healthcare system, it still amazes me that the US spends the most per capita on health care. Where is the money going, and who is benefiting?

    'The study estimates that medical bankruptcies affect about 2 million Americans annually -- counting debtors and their dependents, including about 700,000 children.

    Surprisingly, most of those bankrupted by illness had health insurance. More than three-quarters were insured at the start of the bankrupting illness. However, 38 percent had lost coverage at least temporarily by the time they filed for bankruptcy.

    "The paradox is that the costliest health system in the world performs so poorly. We waste one-third of every health care dollar on insurance bureaucracy and profits while two million people go bankrupt annually and we leave 45 million uninsured" said Dr. Quentin Young, national coordinator of Physicians for a National Health Program.'

    1. Re:only a nice place to live? by megaditto · · Score: 1

      The upside is that if you are very rich in the US, you get the best healthcare in the world. You get the best equipment, best doctors, the best supplies, and you don't have to wait in line.

      But even if you are very rich in Canada, you are still stuck getting the same healthcare as some bum nextdoors (unless you fly to US)

      So poor people would prefer the Canadian system, while the very rich people would prefer the US system.

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    2. Re:only a nice place to live? by beaverfever · · Score: 1

      "The upside is that if you are very rich in the US, you get the best healthcare in the world. You get the best equipment, best doctors, the best supplies, and you don't have to wait in line."

      Still more tired old clichés. Unfortunately this is not so much the case as some would like you to believe. Some Americans get the best health care, equipment, waiting times etc. Also, this argument suggests a huge gap in base quality of equipment, staff, doctors, etc between the US and Canada and Europe. That is not true.

      Sometimes Canadians are sent to the US for treatment, not just because of waiting time or whatnot, but because of the economies of scale: it simply doesn't make sense for areas with a low population density to maintain certain equipment and staff. It can be more cost effective for the province to pay for a procedure to be performed elsewhere. It is not unheard of for US citizens to be sent to Canada for treatment.

      "But even if you are very rich in Canada, you are still stuck getting the same healthcare as some bum nextdoors (unless you fly to US)"

      Unfortunately, even in the US, the "bum nextdoors" is 95%+ of the population. Arguing in favour of one system for the sake of the "very rich" is shallow and silly.

    3. Re:only a nice place to live? by megaditto · · Score: 1
      Arguing in favour of one system for the sake of the "very rich" is shallow and silly.

      Oh yeah? Then why do Americans keep electing people who do exactly that?
      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
  363. An answer backed by research ... by SickLittleMonkey · · Score: 5, Informative

    I can't believe no-one linked to this:

    "The world's top cities offering the best quality of life"

    Since half this thread debated the Netherlands, I'll point out that the top 12 cities are not in the Netherlands, but in these countries:
    - Switzerland
    - Canada
    - Austria
    - New Zealand
    - Germany
    - Australia
    - Denmark

    Almost pointless at the end of such a long thread, but hopefully some lucky soul reads this.
    SLM

    --
    main() {1;} // zen app
    1. Re:An answer backed by research ... by SickLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      Since some kind souls modded my post into view, I'll complete it by answering the questions posed by the OP, even though I'm not American. I was born where he's living, though, in England. Of course, everybody has their own preferences, and cirumstances differ, but ...

      (1)

      As the OP lives in England, he has no doubt seen articles about Britons considering emigrating in record numbers. Like many of them, I plan to reside in New Zealand, which is (coincidentally or not) where I grew up. Australia would do nicely too.

      The reasons are many, but mostly simple, and related to my "Breeding" stage of life.
      - Real democracy please. More than two parties in government to represent diverse opinions.
      - No guns, thanks. The US has done us a favour by showing just how bad things can get.
      - Healthcare etc for everyone. Even losers, lest I (through misfortune) become a loser someday.
      - Live and work. In that order. Currently I work and live in Japan. In that order.
      - Others: Good jobs, childcare, education, access to nature, lifestyle, lifestyle & lifestyle!

      Of course, there are cons as in any country, and you choose the ones you can live with.

      (2)

      I'm married. ;-)

      Cheers,
      SLM

      --
      main() {1;} // zen app
  364. Somewhere? by LiquidEdge · · Score: 1

    1) Spain 2) In-N-Out Burger

    --
    Saving the World: One Drink at a Time
  365. One favor before you go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I would ask is, wherever you end up going, please stay there. And if you wouldn't mind, please take Michael Moore, Nancy Pelosi, Cindy Sheehan, and most of Hollywood with you. Thanks.

  366. Well by Real_Reddox · · Score: 1

    England is quite different from america.
    Anyway, you should all come to Norway

    --
    I spent five minutes stealing cool sigs and all I got was this.
  367. Some Possibilities... by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    There are a number of islands in the Caribbean that could be pretty cool. Curacao looks pretty neat and I've been led to believe that their immigration policy is liberal. Just give me a beach with wifi and a telecommuting contract somewhere in the world and I'd be set.

    What's to keep a bunch of American companies from descending on Mexico, buying up a few miles of beachfront property and starting a little silicon valley south of the border?

    You could always just buy a sailboat and muck about in International water most of the time.

    Japan's always a possibility, if you don't mind the imminent threat of being nuked by North Korea on a daily basis.

    Or you could hang out in eastern europe. I really liked Romania when I visted -- people were friendly, wine and food were good and the exchange rates were excellent. Dunno what their immigration policy is like though...

    Puerto Rico might be cool too.

    Or if you don't mind a fixer-upper, how about North Korea or Cuba? Sure you have to topple an inconvenient government before you can really get settled in, but once you do the people will greet you as liberators (Yeah, right) and you'll have your pick of some choice real estate.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  368. Speaking for others... by belligerent0001 · · Score: 1

    Personally, I have no desire to leave the best country on this rock. However, for those Rosie O'Donnell/Alec Baldwin types, who are so disgusted with the freedoms that we have, I really don't care where they go...so long as they go. Perhaps their frustrations would be elevated in China, I am sure that their opinion on how things are run there would be welcomed. Or, perhaps France, this option will make it all the better when it becomes time to create that glass parking lot for Euro-Disney. Addressing the question as to why they haven't left yet I submit this observation. They lack the courage and conviction to act out their threats. They do not want to leave because they know that they will not be able to voice their opinions elsewhere, or earn the kind of money that they do here. They will not have people who will listen to them because, unlike here, no one wants to hear what they have to say. This would destroy the very fiber of their being. Additionally, those who claim that this country is evil, or the administration is committing some evil plot (Buwahaha) really have no concept as to what being an American is. It is every Americans duty to speak out against what they feel is wrong or corrupt, but, after the democratic process has been completed and the MAJORITY of your fellow countrymen have disagreed with you, it's time shut the hell up. Those who would rather leave are free to do so, however in doing so they should loose their citizenship as it is apparent that they disagree with the fundamental principles of The Constitution.

    --
    "...a civilian some of the time, a soldier part of the time and a patriot all of the time." -Brig. Gen. James Drain
    1. Re:Speaking for others... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It is every Americans duty to speak out against what they feel is wrong or corrupt, but, after the democratic process has been completed and the MAJORITY of your fellow countrymen have disagreed with you, it's time shut the hell up."

          No, there's no time-limit on speaking one's convictions.

  369. England or Japan by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

    I would live in England (for the culture) or Japan (I speak the language). If I did not have to have a job, I'd live in Japan. I couldn't put up with working in Japan, though. Norway would be nice, too, because of their freedom of the press and low government corruption.

    What's stopping me is that someone has to stay in the US and fight for what's right. If everyone who was against the direction America is going, America (which has so friggin many nukes) would go into the ground and eventually be run by war-mongerers and idiots, with no chance of ever replacing them at the polls.

    1. Re:England or Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Polls don't matter in America. Too many christians. They don't care about anything other than their religion.

  370. iMoral by shis-ka-bob · · Score: 1

    Apple is selling morality? Is everything for sale? ;-)

    --
    Think global, act loco
    1. Re:iMoral by RationalRoot · · Score: 1

      >>> Apple is selling morality? Is everything for sale? ;-)

      Pretty much.

      However, iMorals will have DRM and you won't be able to share or copy them....

      Now there's an idea, imagine if people couldn't share or copy their morals.

      No more being told what feel and think by people that believe that the world was, in spite of any and all evidence to the contrary, created in seven days.

      By the way, on which day was light created ?

      How do we measure days before that ?

      Disclaimer: If you want to explain the answer to the above questions, then I fear you have missed the point....

      D

      --
      http://davesboat.blogspot.com/
  371. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by Knuckles · · Score: 1

    Which only means that the US system creates more opportunities to become rich. However these opportunities can be distributed rather randomly, in which case the individual's power to will him/herself into a higher socioeconomic class (i.e., control) is not affected.

    --
    "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  372. I love the USA by J05H · · Score: 4, Funny

    But really the old USA that never quite existed. If it was all Liberty, this place would be great. I'm going to put my fist in the face of the next "love it or leave it" twit I hear, they're the ones turning this beautiful land into the New Soviet.

    With what's been going on the last while, yes, moving crosses my mind. The place I'd go would be to one of several South Pacific or equatorial islands: Kiribati, Palau, Tuvalu, etc. The reasons I haven't left include friends, family, finances, and that I haven't assembled my ninja army to take one of those islands over. No, I'm not talking about being an American ex-pat who smokes and does the local hotties, I'm talking about going someplace and conquering it to live out my libertarian-anarchist fantasies. Anyone know where I can get a crate of AK-47s and a cheap hydrofoil?

    Josh

    --
    gigantino.tv - Heavy but weighs nothing.
    1. Re:I love the USA by vox+humanna · · Score: 1

      Vote then, you twit! Quit complaining! If your side gets out voted, except it and be a good citizen. If you believe so strongly that you are right and the majority are wrong. Then, I suppose you can either move to that island, (Unlikely) or check yourself into the mental health clinic (more likely).

      In a civil society you accept the view of the majority. You don't belittle the majority and call them sub-humans. That type of behavior is what is turning this country into your "New Soviet". You're the twit.

    2. Re:I love the USA by J05H · · Score: 1

      Dude, you need to lay off the caffiene.

      I don't agree with the entire Washington system, I don't really have a "side" in the game. The Repubs and Dems are just about the same thing, I loose in every election. I don't need mental treatments, nor do I think the majority is wrong, I just disagree with them. I didn't call anyone subhuman, either, shit head.

      Tommy Franks giving the inaugural Homeland Security address with ranks of shaven-head stormtroopers in gray uniforms scared the crap out of me. Almost as much as the assault on Waco. The USA uses tanks against it's own civilians, and you call me a twit? Piss off, your user number is over 1 million, troll.

      Josh

      --
      gigantino.tv - Heavy but weighs nothing.
    3. Re:I love the USA by vox+humanna · · Score: 1

      Tommy Franks giving the inaugural Homeland Security address with ranks of shaven-head stormtroopers in gray uniforms scared the crap out of me.

      Sounds like a reference to sub-humans to me. Any other questions? I guess the way the current political parties treat you would be consistant with your comment about me being a "troll" and a "*&%&head". I think I have proven my point and will now move on.

  373. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by Damek · · Score: 1
    ...many Americans do not value wealth so much as they place much more value on socioeconomic freedom as opposed to socioeconomic safety...


    Really? Or have they just been told repeatedly by self-appointed "experts" that the best way to get the socioeconomic safety that they desire is through socioeconomic freedom?

    ...if I so choose, I can exercise far greater control over my socioeconomic standing than someone from a more socialist country.


    Perhaps. If you've been granted via education the proper tools to do so. Including an adequate understanding of the legal system, business structures, lending rules and how to initiate the ideas you may have. Without that, you do what most Americans do, collect a paycheck (a salaried one if you're lucky).

    What you describe is the "American dream" which is more a myth than a reality. Someone (perhaps you) mentioned in this same thread that most American millionaires are first-generation. That sounds neat until you realize how few there are.

    The thing about socioeconomic safety is that some people, like you, worry about how much lower the ceiling is in more economically-left countries. "Freedom is hindered," is what you observe, as you note the less-rich nature of the very rich over there.

    But only one kind of freedom is being hindered - the freedom to have more money. The thing is, the ceiling may be lower, but the floor is much higher, and all of those people have more freedoms through their economic safety than the average American enjoys through their imagined opportunity to become one of the few millionaires.
  374. Muslims would be treated much better if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...they would simply stop following and promoting the belief that killing infidels is condoned. Fundamental Christians believe in loving and praying for those who do not believe, not killing them. And I'm not talking about corrupted Catholics, Orthodox, and Protestant Christians. I'm talking about fundamental, Bible-believing, traditionalist Christians who have been persecuted throughout history from the time of Christ. Go read your history, and you will see what I mean....

  375. Cut and run! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Libs must be jumping for joy. A whole article dedicated to their overwhelming desire to cut and run at the first sign of trouble. Sweet!

  376. Oh Canada, Oh Iceland, Oh Sweden, my home and ... by grgcombs · · Score: 1

    ... native lands!!!

    Canada sounds perfect. Iceland sounds pretty awesome too with a 2-to-1 female-male ratio. And Sweden has chocolate and snow skiing.

  377. GET YOUR ASS TO MARS... GET YOUR ASS TO MARS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will change my name to Quaid, start the reactor, and FREE MARS!!!

  378. The only places by teflaime · · Score: 1

    I would consider moving to are Toronto, Canada, and Scotland (I lean towards somewhere in Islay). However, I am not inclined to move because Canada has terrible speech abridging laws and Scotland has the horrible UK "Kill you pets" quarantine laws, and I'm not leaving my dogs behind. So, I'll stay in the US. And support centrist candidates.

    1. Re:The only places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya dude. No crazy free speech abridging laws in Canada. Though I think of the Bill Mahr incident when he said some insensitive stuff right after 9-11, then office of the president mentioned we should "be careful", then the guy lost his show. Then the President passed all these wire tapping laws, and the ability to hold people he considered a terrorist without proof or charges, and there are all these voting irregularities that always work out in favour of the republicans... There really isn't any free speech, indeed very few remaining liberties at all.

      Enjoy Witchhunting/macarthisim II America!

  379. I Used to Want to Leave by ReadParse · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I was younger (late teens), I had feelings about leaving the country to live in Europe or somewhere. Then I joined the Air Force and had the good fortune to visit 14 countries and to live in one of them for 3 years. Nothing made this American prouder of his own country than visiting others. I'll take America, thanks.

    Moderate me as patriotic troll, I guess.

    1. Re:I Used to Want to Leave by orzetto · · Score: 1

      It would actually be interesting to know which 14 these were, in which one you lived three years, and what you disliked about this.

      Though it does sound you were stationed in France, there should be no foreign troops stationed there, so I wonder...

      --
      Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
    2. Re:I Used to Want to Leave by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1
      I'll take America, thanks.
      Well where else are you going to get your fix of Krispy Kremes, Twinkies and Velveeta?
      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    3. Re:I Used to Want to Leave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think people sometimes forget just how big the USA is. If you don't like the particular locale that you're at you can move to somewhere more conservative or liberal, warmer or colder, more or less populated, etc. There's also a huge strata of economic well being, from the venture capitalists of Silly Valley to the fruit pickers in Florida.

      If I were going to move somewhere else my motivation would primarily be job related in moving to where the cool stuff was happening in my field. This means centered around a big university or tech center. All the first world countries are great places to live and that would be less important to why I'd make such a choice.

  380. Re:Robots don't pay taxes. by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

    I suppose that beats a robot that's always jacking off.

    --
    disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
  381. Panamanian in the US by r00t-69 · · Score: 1

    As a Panamanian living in the US, and also visited other countries around the world, I have to say this is the best country ever.. I think all those tree hugger liberas hippies that complain about the government should just suck it up, shut up, try to better themselves and stop crying about the government, it could be a lot worse.

  382. Red Green is over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, but the Red Green show aired it's final episode back in April. There's no longer any reason to go to Canada, as we have all the reruns already now.

    1. Re:Red Green is over by SilverJets · · Score: 1

      Corner Gas!

  383. I love England! by Jekler · · Score: 1

    I went to London a few years back (2001) and it was terrific. Probably the best week of my life. I would have stayed there if I spoke the language. I called a "lift" an "elevator" and got a serious beat down, so I came back to the U.S. in a medical helicopter. Don't even get me started on the fries/chips incident.

  384. Re:Oh Canada, Oh Iceland, Oh Sweden, my home and . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having a high female to male ratio is not always a good thing. One major city I lived in had a fairly even number of women to men, but had a huge male gay population which effectively made there be many more straight women than straight men. If you think men are too aggressive when it comes to finding a mate, you haven't seen anything.

  385. Cuba, Yes, Cuba. by wonkavader · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But not this moment.

    Castro is (probably) going to die soon. When that happens, there will be an escuse to open the doors up, and end the insane blockade of the place. Before Castro, we'd made it an extension of the United States, where the people lacked the privilidges of US citizenship. Look around: we're actually much better at doing that now. When the doors open, it's going to happen FAST. There will be a huge growth curve, lots of wealth to be made, and the country will explode with success.

    They have something we don't have: a large educated populace. We will be exploiting that.

    They are also a vacation paradise, by their position on the globe, and an easy hop from florida. Your dollar will go very far, for a long while, there, so you can get established with a mansion and some servants. Look to see an explosion of all-inclusive resorts and right behind them (physically, a half-mile from the beach), an IT industry.

    So wait. Don't bail yet. You can be an American in another country, be on the top of the economic food chain, be close to the States and family and friends, and make a lot of money.

    Besides, you don't have to learn Dutch, French, Japanese, etc. It's Spanish -- a language you already know a little of, and it's arguably the easiest language to learn short of Esperanto.

  386. Vancouver, if only there were work by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd take Vancouver CA over almost anywhere else in the US, if I had enough $$$ to buy an expensive-enough home to qualify for expedited citizenship. GREAT sushi, though they're way too indulgent on DTES riffraff, they really should just suck it up and hire a Giuliani for mayor.

    And if there were enough good tech jobs that didn't involve Windows.

    To be honest, taxation in the US is not _that_ much lower, considering what we get back in services compared to Canada. It used to be much different, but I'm finding that very near 50% of my paycheck goes to government in one form or another (local, state, federal) and I, as a single middle-class male of European descent, don't get fuck all back. At least in CA if I were paying 50-60% of my check in taxes I'd get "free" healthcare, and as I'm not elderly or suffering from chronic medical issues at this phase in my life I don't care about queues or rationing.

  387. Middle Earth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's stopping me.. Despite what most Slashdot readers believe, it doesn't actually exist.

  388. Oh Caaaaanada by supabeast! · · Score: 1

    I came pretty close to moving to Canada a few years ago. But I ended up falling in love with a hotshot Washington lawyer who would have a hard time moving and doing the same work in Canada, so I ended up staying here in Washington until 2008, at which point if Americans of both parties haven't made a serious effort to get their heads out of their rectums, we're packing up and shipping off to Europe for while.

  389. Try Quebec by msobkow · · Score: 1

    Try immigrating to Canada and moving to Quebec if you don't speak French.

    Why do people consider it so onerous to learn the language of a nation they claim to want to live in? It's the least you could do if you're not a political refugee.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:Try Quebec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Try immigrating to Canada and moving to Quebec if you don't speak French. Why do people consider it so onerous to learn the language of a nation they claim to want to live in? It's the least you could do if you're not a political refugee.

      Since when is Quebec a nation?

  390. To all those thinking Scandinavia. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    As a Swede living in Stockholm, but having been around the world quite a bit, I can see why many people think of the scandinavian countries are utopias; it's clean, orderly, safe, we are at the top in all rankings of quality of life and freedom, and everyone speaks decent english. And the people are, of course, probably the best looking in the world. ;)

    There is, however, another side of the coin, and that's cultural differences. On the surface, there's of course not much difference between people from the western hemisphere; we listen to similar music, eat the same crappy fast food (in varying degrees) and watch the same movies. But there is a difference in attitudes that's larger than people think. I've heard about lots (and known a few) of foreigners who've moved away after living a few years here, because they couldn't get a real grip of swedes. There are of course lots of good things to say about us, but there are a few things you have to at least be able to stand, if not appreciate, if you want to live permanently here. Swedes (and Scandinavians in general) put a lot (if not conciously) into the concepts of "vemod" (Bergman-style not-quite-depression), "lagom" (just about right, but not to much) and jantelagen (an unspoken rule saying that you should not think that you're better than other people). Those concepts are of course not all-encompassing, but they are there under the surface, and people will frown at you if you break them too flagrantly (but not say anything to your face, of course; that would be most unswedish!).

    1. Re:To all those thinking Scandinavia. by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      To get a trial run of these attitudes, I'd suggest spending a little time along the northern US border (in Montana, North Dakota, or Minnesota) which have been strongly influenced by Scandinavian culture.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  391. Sooner or Later by DrugCheese · · Score: 1

    Many of my hippie friends want to move to South America to get away from USA's government. I think they're just avoiding the inevitable, sooner or later you're gonna have to deal with the people that are vying for one world government.

    --
    *DrugCheese rants*
  392. I would love to live on Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I could go anywhere to live, it would be Mars.
    The only thing stopping me are those oppressive slavery politicians that want to keep humanity as slaves on earth for all eternity...
    They only care about health-care and making sure their slave minions are required to pay for it and barely afford it.

  393. Tejas by jamesmcfadyen · · Score: 2, Funny

    If I left the United States of America I would move to the independent and progressive country known as Texas..

    1. Re:Tejas by spamchang · · Score: 1

      well, come to austin, at least, before paint the whole state red. no state income tax, liberal politics in austin, tech jobs, culture, and local eccentricities...all in a laid-back setting. but don't come here since we'd like traffic to get better, not worse.

  394. Instead of Emigrating from US, move within US by ubuwalker31 · · Score: 1

    Emigrating to a different country is a serious decision and shouldn't be made lightly.

    Here are some valid reasons for leaving a country:
    1) Your racial or religious group has been a target of systemic discrimination and/or widespread violence
    2) You're a refuge
    3) You can not practice your religion freely.
    4) You can not express your beliefs freely or participate in the political process.
    5) Efforts to cure 1, 2 or 3 through lawful action, such as elections and courts, have failed.
    6) You can make more money or have a higher standard of living in a different country.
    7) You like the culture, language, food, and people of a different country and wish to live there.
    8) You hate your current country for whatever reason and want to leave.

    I think an honest assessment of the US, at present, eliminates reasons 1 through 5. While there is violence and discrimination against minorities, it is no where near the levels where a move is necessary. If you are a law abiding citizen, you are not going to be carted away in the middle of the night to Guantanemo or a secret prison. (I'm not saying that this isn't a problem, just that it is only happening to a very tiny minority of individuals, perhaps a 1000)

    Frankly, most of the problems described between 1 and 5 in the US can be solved by moving to a different part of the United States.

  395. Re:The Netherlands// one step futher by pitu · · Score: 1

    I do agree with the parent post, but the problem with wealth is that
      most often it is gained with 'exploatation' of those that do not have
    many options left. Which makes that gaining wealth & independence is indirectly involved with 'stealing' a part of someone elses independence

      In the context of choosing the right country that would appease my conscience I would say it would be the one that:

      a. does not exploit other nations (wars, neo -colonialism)
      b. allows equal rights of acces to the labor market to any individual on its soil (foreigner or not)

      I think Swiss does fulfill the 'a' part...

  396. another empire? by Corson · · Score: 1

    there are number of similarities between the u.s. and the roman empire that virtually ran the world 2000 years ago, which i'm not going to mention here. what happened to the people living in that empire? i am not aware of any mass exodus from rome in those times, probably because 1) romans didn't know much about life outside their borders; and 2) they thought they had the best possible life anyway; and 3) they were too busy or afraid or lacked the means to try something new that also involved making major sacrifices. a friend of mine, born in the u.k., once told me that "most americans think that exotic travel is eating other than in macdonalds, or visiting a country where their lawyer doesn't have priviliges". he was joking, right? but if you bother to travel to the capital city of another country, take the time to walk by the u.s. embassy and you'll notice it looks pretty much like a fortress; then wonder why... so, what happened to the roman empire? now it's just another country on the world map and a major tourist attraction. and they passed on the eagle to somebody else. that's a pretty happy "ending", isn't it? ;)

  397. Costa Rica by evronm · · Score: 2, Interesting
    And I'm actually doing it. My wife and I have been planning it for about 7 months and we're finally moving next Tuesday. The reasons we chose Costa Rica:
    • Stable Government
    • No Army
    • Great weather (where we'll be living, parts have terrible weather)
    • Very low cost of living
    • Availability of most services, including high speed internet, in the central valley
    • Very nice people, for the most part
    • Large, established expat community
    • Close to the U.S. so it's easy to visit friends and family
    We will, of course, be blogging about our move (see my sig for the URL). If you're looking to ditch the States, I don't blame you one bit, and I highly recommend you look into Costa Rica. It's got most of the comforts of home, plus rainforests and monkeys and stuff.
  398. Amen by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 1

    That describes part of why I stayed in Bavaria. This January I'm going to apply for German citizenship, and though it means losing my US citizenship I feel good about becoming more active in the community where I live. I'm already in the local SPD political party, and with a little luck will actually be a candidate in the next local elections.

    It has less to do with not loving America, but loving the community where I live and wanting to play anactive role.

  399. Yes we do pay lower taxes, that is the point by Riverman5 · · Score: 1

    Karl Marx may have been wrong about communism, but he was right about the proletariate rising up and all that. Half the world wants to kick back and smoke a doobie, but then there are people like me who's only goal in life is to buy a 2 million dollar sailboat and a few hundred acres of ocean front property, so the US is the best place for me to realize my dream (some countries don't even allow you to own land, I understand).

    I met a guy from Algeria a couple weeks ago who moved to America, starts small businesses, runs in triathlons; over-achiever. And he comes to America to fulfill his dream. He works like a machine and I have a lot of respect for him.

    You'll notice most of the people who want to move to the Netherlands are seeking a low-stress lifestyle, that's great, the Netherlands is for you then. I would like to see these people realize their dream of smoking doobies and working 30 hours a week (hey, reminds me of my college days). I just hope there is always some place on earth the over-achievers can go to work hard and get paid well.

  400. HELLO MODERATORS LOL by remembertomorrow · · Score: 1

    He may have been sarcastic, but he certainly wasn't trolling... unfair karma hit there. :(

    If someone would fix, I would be most appreciative. :D

    --
    Registered Linux user #421033
  401. FSP by Wellington+Grey · · Score: 1

    from the a-new-home-for-the-free-and-brave dept.

    Sounds like we should have a Free State Project on a national scale.

    -Grey

  402. Canada by 22_9_3_11_25 · · Score: 1

    It is freezing up there!!

  403. Crime in Vancouver by Rorgg · · Score: 1

    Actually, I was considering a move there a year or two ago and looked into it. While property crime is moderately high in Vancouver, violent crime is exceptionally low (save for the odd cannibalistic pig farmer).

    So it's entirely possible that you could have a greater incidence of crime around you and still feel safer.

    1. Re:Crime in Vancouver by david.emery · · Score: 1

      I submit that in particular violent crime tends to be limited to bad areas within the US. One learns to not go there.

      I do "concede" that within those areas, things can be appallingly bad, and I'm not sure quite how government should go about fixing this (if the people won't report who did the shootings, then it's hard to catch the perpetrator.)

              dave

  404. Re:The Past by coastwalker · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I spent a few years working in Sweden recently and enjoyed every minute of it.

    However the future is grim I can tell you, I used to look forward to it but bitter experience has taught me that its rubbish.

    Here in the UK every year the state demands more of you, especially money. Its not just money they want, they want you to fill in a form for everything you used to be able to do without interference. They want you to eat particular things, they want you to give up your sports, they stop you from smoking, they want you to carry an id card, they charge you for parking outside your house, they give you a criminal record if you put the wrong thing in a recycling bin, They use speed cameras as a source of revenue and don't spend any money on making the roads safer. they have building planning committees that tell you what is tasteful and make you pay for it. All the roads have lower speed limits to reduce the death statistics, none of the hazards that cause the crashes have been fixed. Every road has roundabouts on it, all the roundabouts now have traffic lights. Gasoline taxation is the highest in Europe but theres no tax break for fuel efficient diesel engines. I didn't mind being afraid of my teachers either, at least stealing sweets was the worst thing that the yobs in my school would do, rather than todays arson, gun crime, knifing and happy slapping. The lodger I took on so I could buy food when I was unemployed (and you don't get any state benefits until you have sold all your assets) quit his teaching job because it was too stressful and now lives comfortably on state benefits with apparently no interest in working ever again.

    Sweden wasn't much better mind you, I realized that it wasn't for me when my girlfriend explained that you had to get permission from the state for the names you wanted to use if you had children.

    I prefer the past myself when I was free to live my own life free of busybodies and people wasting my money - I could have spent the money on something useful like a decent pension for example.

    I like a decent society with libraries sports halls etc, but the slobs in power today want to charge extra to collect the rubbish - which I had always thought was the primary reason for their existence. I do hope that the soul sucking irritation and misery they have dealt other people will be their fate to endure in hell.

    --
    Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
  405. If NOT the U.S., then WHERE? by iviagnus · · Score: 1

    Australia. The desire to be close to my remaining family (mom, sis, and the woman I love).

  406. Answered by eclectic4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "1) Where would you live, if not in America"

    In any of the more free countries. Canada, Switzerland, New Zealand, Netherlands, etc...

    and 2) What's stopping you from going?"

    I'm sorry, but that's the dumbest question evah. Friends? Family? The notion that we still live in a country with the greatest "potential" to do the most good and would like to help in that endeavor? The very idea of people leaving in frustration is quite sad, especially in a country where the collective ideas from a wide range of perspectives is what should be the avenue for change (in our pseudo "democracy"), which this country needs. Maybe it's a sign of complete apathy due to special interest groups with the most money (corporations, etc...) gain the most influence, or maybe it's the want of a xenophobic state. Both are worth leaving, but we should just attempt to change it.

    --

    "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
  407. Hungary by krajo · · Score: 1

    Pros: Incredible number of different (blond, dark, short, tall, Nordic, Greek, Asian looking, etc...) beautiful girls. And, hmm, well, nothing else really, which kind of sucks...

    --
    Learn to separate truth from illusion. Because in this world, it's the hardest thing to do.
    1. Re:Hungary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gorog Zita FTW!

  408. Where the summer never ends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Costa Rica, baby. I'd surf, drink, and generally have a ball being an ex patriot.

    The only thing that holds me back is lack of a job that would allow me to telecommute (or a sizable enough nest-egg to stop working altogether).

  409. I'm moving... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what: I've already attained citizenship in Canada through inheritance. I have all the needed paperwork.
    when: I move out in 2008. The only thing stopping me from moving out earlier is money. I want to make sure I have enough saved up for a good year's worth of expenses in the event that I can't get work.
    why: GWB and his neocon cronies are pricks. So are the democrats. The entire country is running on corporate interests. It's unhealthy. I'm making a conscious choice to live in a more socialist country whose government is more likely to serve my interests.

  410. I guess the most important question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when you all leave, can I have your stuff?

  411. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by The-Bus · · Score: 1
    Actually, the amount of wealth relative to others is what determines your freedom.


    What a bunch of crock. That's a really backwards way of looking at it. I don't gain freedom by being better off than others. Maybe in war, you "win" freedom by having more wealth (weapons) than the opponent, but I'm not a nation-state, I'm an individual. And the comparison still doesn't ring true.

    The amount of wealth relative to you (and/or your family's needs) is what determines your freedom. If you have enough to cover you basic needs: food, health, shelter and you're not obsessed with collecting trinkets or sportscars, you can live a very free life. When your wealth begins to be siphoned off to expensive vacations and other unnecessary wants, your ability to cover your needs is jeopardised.

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  412. The proof is in the pudding by Riverman5 · · Score: 1

    I read about a study a while back, I can't find it as I don't remember the name and no success googling. It went something like this.

    There are two subjects, one is given $100 and told to split it any way he/she wishes with the other person, who is sitting behind a one-way mirror. The catch is, the other person is able to refuse the offer and neither subject gets their share in that case. So you see, if it is split perfectly evenly, there is a great chance the other will accept it, but if, for example, you give them $10 and keep $90, they would probably be insulted and reject the offer.

    So they did this tests on subjects from different cultures to get at the question "Are capitalists more greedy?". It turns out that people from capitalist cultures (I believe the group closest to 50/50 were American farmers) were more likely to split the amount evenly.

    So take this example into consideration. Working and spending selfishly to compete with each other actually means a fair distribution of wealth. There is a marked difference between EQUAL distribution of wealth, and FAIR distribution of wealth. Me, I like to work hard and sleep with a gun on my nightstand :) (btw, I don't see what any of this has to do with guns)

  413. Speaking as a Canadian by whoisearth · · Score: 1

    Which, as you know has no relevance on this topic, I can't imagine why one would want to move out of their country.

    Granted, Canada hasn't gotten too bad over the years (We'll see in 10 more). If you don't live in the "belly of the beast" as it were, how do you expect to affect change? It's a catch-22. Bitch about the country all you want, but move and you're doing nothing to stop that country becoming what it is. If anything, you're aiding and abetting the country in getting worse. Continue living in it, and bitch and become active. That's how you affect change.

    Empires collapse from within. If you're an American and want to move away because the going get's tough then IMHO, you're weak of character. Running away from problems doesn't make them go away.

    1. Re:Speaking as a Canadian by smchris · · Score: 1

      If you don't live in the "belly of the beast" as it were, how do you expect to affect change?

      How quaint. I read a similar sentiment with my fledgling French in LeMonde online to the effect that "The American people must see some advantage to Mr. Bush's policies or they wouldn't let him continue."

      There is no "letting". This is a government out of control run by and for the corporations. It is only the lobbyists and the campaign PR experts who get listened to by Congress. Some specialty interests get "pandered" to but that isn't the same thing.

      Unfortunately, there is almost no living history of effective protest in the U.S. Before people howl about Vietnam, ask yourselves, "How many of your parent's neighbors were walking arm-in-arm with you at the anti-war rally? The U.S. did a wonderfully effective propaganda effort of separating the "hippies" from the "patriots". And the "hippies" were draft age students for the most part who had a direct interest in the war.

      The last effective age, gender (and perhaps at least worker and lower-middle-class)-spanning protest movements were in the early decades of the 20th century over workers' rights. And any of those remaining activists are probably 90+ years old by now. The idea that Mr. U.S. Suburbanite is going to take a day off work to drive his SUV to a rally to walk around clogging the streets around his capitol protesting is crazy talk. Anything who envisions something like that must surely live in France.

  414. Perfect thread to read as I am moving to France :) by zedwards · · Score: 1

    I have an aunt who has never even left the state she grew up in. I NEVER wanted to be like that. So I have done work trips all over the world, but still lived in the US. I just needed something different. So... I got a volunteer job (room, board, stipend, food, insurance covered) to work in France doing technical support and am leaving this monday. Most of the comments here seem to state that things are not really that different in other places. In my opinion, it all comes down to enjoying ones experience. I am going to be living in a chateau in France, yes, it will have funky plumbing and probably things wont work like they do in the US, but hey, I'm living in a chateau! Yes I am going to struggle with the language and get snubbed for being an american, but I am living in a different culture! ANYONE (americans that is) can have a cool little tech job living in some cool city, so I wanted to do something that not everyone does (at least any of MY friends). Even if you are broke and struggling to get by, it all comes down to experience. Just ask any new yorker!

  415. An interesting discussion ... by constantnormal · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ... and largely civil, something that doesn't happen much anymore on Slashdot.

    I thought the comment about money not buying happiness, but rather freedom (a larger pallet of choices in life), was spot-on.

    The table of marginal tax rates was pretty interesting as well, recognizing with each country, that tax rate comes with a completely different set of "features" -- take the U.K., which has a LOWER marginal tax rate (41% vs our 42.7%), and yet has national health insurance (something I am increasingly aware of, as my wife nears retirement and we lose her employer health insurance). OTOH, in the U.K., one has FAR fewer civil rights as compared to the U.S., and bureaucratic nonsense with permits and regulatory claptrap for many other things that are freely available here in the USofA.

    Another example? South Korea. They have marginal tax rates of 38.2%, and one of the best national telecom networks on the planet. But would you REALLY want to live with Kim Jung Il next door?

    Or Mexico, with a marginal tax rate of 24.6%, yet widespread crippling poverty (thus giving the lie to the theory that the path to prosperity lies solely with lower tax rates) and wholesale corruption that makes our "finest government that money can buy" just that. You might pay less in taxes, but you would end up having to finance your own private militia (and health care system, etc, etc) to have the security that one has here, and unless you get off shopping via the web (and losing much of your merchandise along the delivery chain), I think you'll wind up missing the shopping malls. There's a reason all those Mexicans come streaming across our borders, and it's not to live under the rule of our whacked-out politicians. And I don't see a flood of millionaires streaming south, renouncing their U.S. citizenship in order to live like billionaires in Mexico.

    OTOH, there's no torrent of Scandinavians clamoring to enter the USofA, despite crushing tax rates and generally socialistic governments. They're better educated and have a very free and open press, so why aren't they eager to get out of the cold?

    I think it's pretty tough (and pointless) to try and distill national comparisons down to a single number. A life experience isn't so easy to classify, and each of us has a different scale that we evaluate our life experiences by.

    All this is not to say that the USofA doesn't have it's drawbacks. Things like a widespread (and growing) intolerance of others, massive corruption in a government that grows without limit and a permanent legislative class (about 90% are reelected, term after term), a health care system that is increasingly expensive, and an educational system that largely fails to deliver spring to mind.

    The best option is to become a billionaire, buy one's own island and become your own monarchy.

    1. Re:An interesting discussion ... by InfraredEyes · · Score: 1

      With the single exception of gun ownership, I can't think of any area of civil rights that is significantly worse in the UK than in the US. In fact, as a UK citizen living in the US, I would be inclined to argue the contrary, especially given the recent demise of habeas corpus in the US.

    2. Re:An interesting discussion ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An Arizona man did this once by dredging in shallow waters in the South Pacific until he had built up enough land for a small island. Although he was well within international waters, it was promptly annexed by Fiji. As you might have guessed, other governments didn't care.

    3. Re:An interesting discussion ... by Blue+Fox+USA · · Score: 1

      "... and largely civil, something that doesn't happen much anymore on Slashdot."

      It's civil because people are actually afraid...

      Fight fear with knowledge...

    4. Re:An interesting discussion ... by Luminary+Crush · · Score: 1

      Or Mexico, with a marginal tax rate of 24.6%, yet widespread crippling poverty (thus giving the lie to the theory that the path to prosperity lies solely with lower tax rates) and wholesale corruption that makes our "finest government that money can buy" just that. You might pay less in taxes, but you would end up having to finance your own private militia (and health care system, etc, etc) to have the security that one has here, and unless you get off shopping via the web (and losing much of your merchandise along the delivery chain), I think you'll wind up missing the shopping malls. There's a reason all those Mexicans come streaming across our borders, and it's not to live under the rule of our whacked-out politicians. And I don't see a flood of millionaires streaming south, renouncing their U.S. citizenship in order to live like billionaires in Mexico.
      Obviously you have not actually BEEN to Mexico. While there is the poverty you speak of, there is no shortage of shopping malls filled to the brim with modern luxury goods. You do not need a 'militia' to protect yourself as you might in some latin american countries. It's not a paradise, but if you have money or the means to make it there, it's not a bad place to go. You will not find many opportunities for business (unless you are 'connected') but if you bring your own you could succeed.
      A friend of mine is a telecommuter/programmer living in Mexico City and living incredibly inexpensively while pulling down a nice US wage.

  416. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by vox+humanna · · Score: 1

    "Workers of the World Unite!!!!"

    Hey wait a minute, didn't we try this last century? This whole "Workers Paradise" and "Dictatorship of the Proleteriat". Didn't the people who lived under it absolutely hate and dispise it? Didn't they rebell aginst and finally caste of this opressive dehumanizing system in the late 80's and early 90's? It seems to me that the only believers in Socialism / Communisim are people here in the west who never lived under it. Get a grip and take some personal responibility and take care of yourself. Don't expect the government to do it for you. Self reliance is a lost art for some people it would appear.

  417. To Cuba by mvfuentes · · Score: 1

    Land of intellectuals, kindly people and happy children...

  418. Oh really. . ? by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2
    Muslims would be treated much better if... ...they would simply stop following and promoting the belief that killing infidels is condoned.

    Been listening to the propaganda again, have you? I don't blame you. It's almost all which IS being broadcast today.

    Just happens that I live in a community which includes numerous Muslims. One of my room mates is even Muslim. From everything I've seen and heard discussed, these are people are some of the nicest, least murderous people I've had the pleasure of meeting.

    When it comes right down to it, the three major religions are all kind of twisted. I wouldn't waste my time on any one of them. --The Koran has those nasty, "Kill the Infidel" spots. And the Bible is filled with, "And you shall kill your enemies and pull down their cities and carry away their women and children, etc." The Talmudic stuff is even worse. But guess what? Whether you act like a blood-thirsty lunatic or not is entirely up to YOU. Sadly, no one religion has a monopoly on insanity. --A good reason to reject all three. Just look at all the trouble they stir up! We have a lunatic born again president bent on dreams of empire and turning the U.S. into a fascist state, a lunatic Jewish government bent on committing genocide, and lunatic suicide bombers.

    And out of the three, I can't help but think that the Christians and Jews have somewhat more to answer for at the moment. Not that that means much. The underdog always turns mean on the rebound. Humans suck.


    -FL

  419. Move to Alberta by TrogL · · Score: 1

    We're screaming for qualified workers in practically every field.

  420. Vanuatu by Uninvited+Guest · · Score: 1

    Vanuatu, site of the ninth season of Survivor and home of Kazaa, WinMX, and the ill-fated anonx.com. Ranked #1 nation on the "Happy Planet Index." Vanuatu has strong privacy and disclosure laws (hence the reason for anonx.com, etc. locating there). There are no income, withholding, capital gains, or inheritance taxes. It's a lush, tropical, mountainous place. Offshore financial services guarantee plenty of bandwidth to Port Vila. For better or worse, you are only allowed to immigrate there if you have a business, investment, or demonstrable employment interest there, and you must submit and pay for an annual residency application of 20,000 to 26,000 Vatus (about $200-$260 USD). So long as you don't mind the occasional volcanic eruption or typhoon, it's a paradise.

    --
    Sometimes I worry that I'll develop Alzheimer's disease, but no one will notice.
  421. Ireland - disregarding its own laws by Quietti · · Score: 1

    Sorry, all the IT and language skills in the world are not enough to get into Ireland.

    I'm Canadian, married to a Finn and, despite Irish laws that let outsiders married to an EU national walk in, no questions asked, even without their EU spouse, recruiters and employers still turn me down on the basis of citizenship - even after an insider has recommended me. I've had tons of friends give my CV to their boss or to HR, received extremely enthusiastic calls from them essentially welcoming me onboard, only to abruptly end the interview the minute I reply to the citizenship question with "non-EU". Countless friends lost juicy hiring bonuses because of that.

    --
    Software is not supposed to be about how to work around a useability issue. - Ken Barber
  422. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  423. America II: Consitution Restored by scorp1us · · Score: 1

    As a tax history enthusuast, I san certainly say that the moment the consitution doed was in 1913. We questioably ratifies the 16th amendment, and established the Federal Reserve, which is neither Federal nor a Reserve. The income tax propoents were the populists (communists) and democrats. The fact is they wanted to tap into the 1% of the population that had 80% of the country's wealth. In reality this "ability to pay" is nothing more than communism's "each according to his ability". In fact, the public should have no right to any portion of my lawfully earned money. (Prior to the income tax, the Federal government was paid for by tariffs, emergency finding was doen inthe form of bonds, or, as they did once after the civil war, direct taxation of property) On top of the income tax fiasco, the Federal Reserve allowed for fiath based lending. Eventually in the 70's Nixon fully pulled us off the metal backed currency. Your "Federal Reserve Notes" (FRN) (not a "Dollar" as many call them) are only of value when people agree to the number printed on them. If confidence in the American economomy was to fall, so would the value of a dollar. (your FRN today is actually woth $0.04 of a 1913 dollar) There are alternatives though like the liberty dollar (a silver backed currency), legal tender). Many people don't know that up until the federal reserve there were many local currencies and it was not such a problem because people to do so lived locally. "Notes" were often traded which were representations of metals on hold at the bank. Whomever held the note could get an equivelent amount of metal. This concept then went from 100% backing to 85% to 0%.

    I have learned that you cannot trust governments. They are concentrations of power and wealth, and make themselves targets for those who which control or attain power & wealth. As such, governments must be of very limited control Nothing, no matter how remote it seems at inception, will eventually be leveraged to its fullest extext, and most likely you. We all know torture is wrong, that everyone has a right to a speedy trial. But we deny those for "terorists" How long until you are a terrorist too? We passed the income tax on income when americans made $500-$1000/yr. We taxed incomes over $4000 at 5%, with exemptions of $1000 and $2000 (unmarried, married). Who today is not touched by the income tax? Only those making less than $600. And the first bucket is 15%!!!. And so ens my case that government should be one of absolutes, and that that can be no slippery slope "it doesn't affect me" engaged in.

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
  424. Toronto isn't Canada by TrogL · · Score: 1

    as much as it would like to think it is. I'm not aware of any laws abridging speech in Canada other than blatant hate speech.

    1. Re:Toronto isn't Canada by teflaime · · Score: 1

      The blanket hate speech laws are applied extremely broadly and with predjudice. Criticize a Jews or Isreal, and you are beloved. Criticize a muslim or muslim theocracy, and you are fined and threatened with jail. At least in my experience.

    2. Re:Toronto isn't Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange.

      I routinely say that the entire area should be nuked, paved over and turned into a parking lot for Eurodisney.

      Haven't had a 'legal threat' yet.

      Your statement has the odour of something that might fall out of the back end of a male bovine.

  425. SARS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hong Kong is closer and was doing the same thing.

  426. Sweden, where TV fees = big scandal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sweden. Everyone speaks English. Much cleaner than the US. 13 months of paid parental leave for everyone. Caps on daycare costs, prescription drug costs, and out-of-pocket medical costs. 5 weeks of vacation. Oh, and the big scandal in the newly-elected government has been that some of the cabinet ministers didn't pay their $50/year TV license fees. That's the sort of political scandal that doesn't make me worry about the fate of the world...

    Why don't I move? Simple. We haven't finished our Ph.D.s yet. When we do I'd say there's about a 50% chance that we'll move. (Of course it will depend on where my Swedish wife wants to do her post doc.)

  427. Re:Ireland is not the happiest place on earth by C4st13v4n14 · · Score: 0, Informative

    Actually, Denmark is the happiest place to live with the happiest people so bollocks to Ireland at #11.

    http://www.le.ac.uk/pc/aw57/world/sample.htm
    http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-07/uol -uol072706.php

    And that's completely false what you're saying about Germans, Dutch, and Scandinavian people having no sense of humour. The Dutch are pioneers of hilarious commercials and when you go out in the evening anywhere in Scandinavia all people are doing are telling jokes, funny stories, and laughing. Germans might not laugh very much, or smile very much at that, but it doesn't mean they don't have a sense of humour. They laugh at the fact that so many people in Ireland died of starvation during the "potato famine" of 1845-1849 when Ireland is completely surrounded by water. All they had to do was go fishing.

  428. correlation versus cause? by QMO · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I have noticed, however, that for some people, smoking pot makes them flat stupid. I don't understand why it happens to some and not others, but it seems to attack those who weren't that bright to begin with, and as far as I can tell is permanent.
    When I think of pot-smoking and stupidity I tend to believe the correlation, but question the cause/effect. Your experience doesn't help me resolve the question.
    --
    Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    1. Re:correlation versus cause? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I don't get it either. Some people become utterly brilliant when stoned, others become completely stupid. I've never been able to predict which way someone will go. For a lot of people you can't really tell they are stoned unless they are REALLY stoned.

      I can also vouch for the non-addictiveness of pot. I used to smoke pot regularly, many of my friends as well. Quitting was easy - you just don't buy anymore and that's it. I've smoked a few times since I stopped smoking it regularly and felt no urge to go back to smoking it regularly afterwards. I would have a harder time ending my Battlestar Galactica "addiction".

    2. Re:correlation versus cause? by QMO · · Score: 1

      Mr C, I'm sorry to have to tell you this.

      You misunderstood my post.

      Don't worry. The Moderators (at this writing, just +1 Interesting) didn't seem to understand either.

      (but I don't mind the karma boost)

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
  429. Re:Aotearoa? You won't make it a year...! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    horrendously under-insulated houses lacking central heating (at 50-55 degrees in the morning you can see your breath while eating breakfast)
    Haha this is so true. Central heating is rare in New Zealand and few houses built today have fireplaces. Air conditioning in homes is almost unheard of. Probably 55% of houses have little to no insulation, and many more aren't insulated heavily. But insulation means being fried during summertime, and no insulation means being frozen during winter, but even having insulation means being cold during winter as few houses have central heating. New Zealanders think it's normal to sweat it without aircon during summer, and wear heavy winter outdoors clothing inside during winter in single digit room temperatures, with very high year round humidity which soaks everything in dampness and condensation. It's just a cultural attitude.

     
    Other than that it's a great place. Oh, yeah, and there is the beetroot they insist in throwing on burgers. Kid you not - beetroot.
    And fried eggs!
  430. ITALY by bindo · · Score: 1

    MOD DOWN, maybe some reality check could help, I'll waste mod points just because your comment is at +5 now,

    please mod the parent down. (troll, liar or ingnorant, you choose)
    There are a lot of GOOD reasons to come live in Italy. Especially if you like and want the good sides of this country.
    There are also a lot of reasons to go somewhere else, I personally am thinking of relocating...

    But here we go in demolishing your dreams :

    Free medical (YES)
    And it works, go look statistics for health and age and you WANT to live here... Maybe its beaurocratic maybe a little rude and maybe we struggle to reform as much a we could. But we are healthier than most people in the planet.
    The system delivers.

    Free dental. Huh?? no such thing in italy except for serious medical conditions.
    you have probably never lived here... Or you never went to a dentist....

    High taxes. Yes too high.... BUT we don't pay for a lot of services that the state provides....
    You may like it, you may not. (I don't) But at the end of the month things aren't very different from most european countries and the states.

    Good unemplyment as in NONE... Right, you have never lived here.
    YOU ARE MAKING IT UP....
    Only a very small percentage of the workforce has some temporary unemplyment.

    Good retirement. It was. Degrading fast, it was financially non sustainable.

    Almost no chance of getting fired. Mostly true, *slowly* changing.

    6 hour work days.
    UTTER NONSENSE.
    most people put 40 hours a week. Hospital workers or IT staff ridicoulously more as in the STATES.
    Why do you post if you don't know jack? Bored at work ??

    30 days of vacation. Depends. No simple generalization here, depends on your industry and on how many years you have worked. But it is way more than in the states. Comparable to other parts of Europe I guess.

    Social services suck. ?? subjective. It depends A LOT on where you lived (A LOT) But in some parts of northern italy they are WAY better than most of the experiences I have heard from the states or other parts of Europe.

    Want a painkiller? Have it. Buy it if you like ??? Troll

    Want an annual dental checkup? Tough.
    Hahhahaha Somebody in your relocation department LIED to you.... There is no state dental service. That is why you got no check up. Last I checked the dentist around the corner was VERY happy to check me for a nice "check"

    Repeated break-ins ???
    You have never lived here. Or you chose a very strange area for an american to live in.
    Crime here is not even in the same league as in some place of the US. To much TV, perhaps ???
    but yes often it is difficult to get the attention of the police. Which is mostly a feature. Nobody lands in jail here because of a wrong attitude if you know what I mean...

    You couldn't live working 6 days a week because for 80% of the workforce this is forbidden. (liar)

    'so some 22-yo punk could sit in the park all day and smoke pot.'
    SADLY there ISN'T, and never has been, any kind of social policy in italy to transfer money to young unemplyed people, even in the relatively rare cases where it's useful. Mostly it ends up in overblown pensions.
    But I never happened to see 72-yo punks smoking pot in the park.

    TROLL

  431. New Guide to Leaving America by Catbeller · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.amazon.com/Getting-Out-Leaving/dp/09760 82276

    [All of the following is quoted from the Amazon book description]

    Book Description

    Had enough?

    Whether you find the government oppressive, the economy spiraling out of control, or if you simply want adventure, you're not alone. In increasing numbers, the idea is talked about openly: Expatriate.

    Over three hundred thousand Americans emigrate each year, and more than a million go to foreign lands for lengthy stays.

    But picking up and moving to another country feels like a step into the void. Where to go? How to begin? What to do?

    Volume 2 of the Process Self-Reliance Series, this smartly designed two-color guidebook walks you through the world of the expat: the reasons, the rules, the resources, and the tricks of the trade, along with compelling stories and expertise from expatriate Americans on every continent.

    Getting Out shows you where you can most easily gain residence, citizenship, or work permits; where can you live for a fraction of the cost of where you're living now; and what countries would be most compatible with your lifestyle, gender, age, or political beliefs.

    So if you've had enough of what they're selling here and want to take your life elsewhere-well, isn't that the American way? At any rate, it's not illegal. Not yet, anyway.

    About the Author
    Mark Ehrman is a frequent traveler and freelance writer whose work regularly appears in the Los Angeles Times, Playboy, Travel and Leisure, and numerous travel magazines city guidebooks.

  432. Canada by mike3k · · Score: 1

    I work for a Vancouver-based company, so I'd be able to keep my current job. I've visited Vancouver a few times and I really love it, unfortunately it's much too expensive. I own a condo now & I'd never be able to afford anything as nice in Vancouver. I don't want to go back to renting an apartment.

  433. Listen to him! ^^^ by TheAxeMaster · · Score: 1

    Best voting advice you could be given. My opinion is the same, the less they agree, the less likely they are to screw anything up. The important things still get through and we don't lose freedoms in the process.

  434. Why to move by mhollis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I very quickly summarized the commentary here on why one would move from the US to several flamewars based on a lack of understanding of the culture in various non-US countries to arguments about tax burdens and arguments about what constitutes an addictive drug.

    These are side-issues.

    The reson one might be interested in leaving the US relates to something that my father shocked me by saying just some weeks ago.

    He referred to the current administration in the US, along with their supporters in Congress at fascists.

    Now, I respect my father. I'm not just out of his house and I'm not still reacting to the "awful way he treated me" when I "turned insane" shortly after puberty. My father has consistently earned my respect by tending to be right and by letting go of a lot of his own personal garbage. I also know that he lived through a time in which fascism was considered a viable political system in three countries in Europe -- with other countries admiring the "benefits" of a totalitarian regime that gives itself a pass for criminal activity. This is a serious and very shocking statement from a man who watched as the entire world fought against fascism and managed to win.

    The US government is fascist due to several factors:

    The Military Commissions Act of 2006(PDF Alert), which was signed by Bush on October 17, 2006 suspends the writ of Habeus Corpus in a time that is definitely not a national emergency.

    This preserves the "Law-Free Zone" set up in Guantanimo. These detainees are kept in isolation from US Courts who, if there is adequate proof would be all too happy to confirm that these people are dangerous. Camp X-Ray also serves as a zone where the Geneva Conventions on the treatment of Prisoners of War may be utterly ignored. We broke off relations with North Vietnam (and later, Vietnam) due to their treatment of US prisoners in a manner that ignored the Geneva Conventions.

    The act also pardons everyone and anyone for all acts that violate the Geneva Conventions, including the procedure of Extraordinary Rendition and backdates that exemption from prosecution to September 11th, 2001.

    The President and his Executive Branch are given full reign in defining what an "enemy combatant" is. I recall that Hitler regarded Jewish persons within Germany and the territories acquired by Germany, as well as allied countries as enemies of the state. Also, anyone giving material aid to any enemy was branded with the same. There was no Habeus Corpus in Germany and the courts were puppets of the state.

    What I'm saying here is that we have a very serious situation in the US where civil rights have been nullified by a political party that considers self-examination wrong and unpatriotic (there have been no committees in either the House of Representatives or the Senate to examine the conduct of the "war on terror") and are fully prepared to negate the entire Bill of Rights in order to maintain their grip on political power.

    Many Americans aren't aware of how their rights have been suspended. Those who are find it hard to continue to live here.

    Countries who honor the rights of their citizens and who do not give their executive branch the right to run roughshod over the rights of minorities and persons who hold political beliefs that may differ may look a lot better than the US today for a citizen concerned with our present government.

    --
    Gods don't kill people, people with gods kill people.
    1. Re:Why to move by gothzilla · · Score: 1

      "with my elitist, fearful, and hateful attitude."

      fixed.

    2. Re:Why to move by donak · · Score: 1

      I was enlightened by your analysis, and congratulate your father on his clear observation.
      I'd say, come to Australia ... but we have a citizen (just one, David Hicks) who is in Guantanamo Bay, and our Government is not doing a damn thing to get him out. So, it seems to me that our government is tarred with the same brush, a disturbing thought to this laid back Aussie.

      If he can't get justice at the hands of your government, and can't get justice at the hands of our government, what's he to do?

      His only defence is his military lawyer, Major Michael Mori who was interviewed recently on a chat show here in Australia
      http://www.abc.net.au/tv/enoughrope/transcripts/s1 709428.htm

      --
      Don't blame me, it's usually 2 in the morning when I post ...
    3. Re:Why to move by mhollis · · Score: 1

      Apparently, a foreign government may protest his unlawful detention under the Geneva Convention. Of course the USA doesn't seem to think the Geneva Convention applies.

      I thought the interview was great. It's a clear analysis of how the military tribunals have no relationship at all whatsoever to the civilian jurisdiction other than to agree with the political ends of the civilian jurisdiction. Recently, several prominant detainees were moved to Guantanamo in order to give the Bush administration "cover" for his proposal for the bill on these tribunals. Our contact at the CIA leaked a great dissatisfaction with this move, as torture is not the usual and customary treatment at Guantanamo and it is in the "black prisons" run by the CIA elsewhere.

      Bush refers to the war in Iraq as part of the "War on Terror." But Iraq consumes 7 times the number of US troops as Afghanistan, which is where Osama bin Laden was living at the time of the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center. And the US is completely disinterested in putting more resources into Afghanistan.

      I therefore conclude that the "War on Terror" is not an actual war. It is a re-election campaign designed to play on fears and uncertainty in the American public created by one actual event and a whole host of other phantoms created by a brand new Department of Homeland Security in order to perpetuate its existence.

      Republicans supposedly stand for lower taxes and less government. The DHS is the largest increase in our bureaucracy since World War II. And it has to be paid for. The war in Iraq is costing our treasury $1 Billion monthly. It is entirely being debt-financed. Sooner or later that debt will have to be paid and there will be no dividend for the US taxpayer to help soften the blow. Last time we debt-financed a war, we had horrible inflation. That war was Vietnam and the inflation took the price of an average family sedan from $2,500 to $3,000 to over $10,000. The average family home grew in cost from $36,000 to $250,000. It used to be that if you made $35,000 yearly, you were doing great. (Please note, all of these prices are quoted in US Dollars).

      This false war is being used to strip Americans of their rights, give the Executive Branch dictatorial power and rack up huge deficits. It has allowed one political party to "redistrict" the entire United States so that all members of that party have "safe" districts and almost never face any competitive elections.

      In the meantime, military lawyers who question this military tribunal process find their careers sidelined and the road to promotion ended. Americans who question the conduct of the war (because nobody in our Congress will -- unless it is to whitewash the policies of this administration) are attacked for being unpatriotic, "partisan" or, at best, misinformed. Our administration classifies everything which leads any thinking individual to wonder what they have to hide.

      Fascism, indeed.

      --
      Gods don't kill people, people with gods kill people.
  435. to naturalize... by mzs · · Score: 1

    it is required to be able to speak English unless certain conditions are met. For example there is a form N-469 (I believe that number is correct) required to be filled-out by a licensed medical practitioner to the effect that due to disability (such as mental disorder) you are unable to learn English.

  436. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by merchant_x · · Score: 1

    One angry man with a gun cannot hope to stand against the government. An angry majority of the population with guns certainly stands a good chance of toppling an oppressive regime. Especially if that regime's military is manned by the angry population's sons and daughters.

  437. india by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    15 official languages, >700 dialects, all religions, tasty food, cheap, beautiful climate, awesome culture. whats keeping me here? breathing space.

  438. Tried Quebec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did try, but Bombardier didn't even say merci (thanks) for submitting a résumé.

  439. EscapeArtist by ml10422 · · Score: 1

    There's a very good web site and magazine, EscapeArtist, with lots of information about becoming an American expat:

    http://www.escapeartist.com/

    I was considering getting out, but decided I belong where I am. I'm gonna stay and do whatever I can to oppose the creeping fascism.

    1. Re:EscapeArtist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard the same stupid stories about "creeping fascism" during Clinton's administration and during Bush Sr.'s administration. Hell, during Reagan I remember my parents talking occasionally about how our privacy and freedoms are in so much danger! You're still allowed to march down the street wearing an American flag with a swastika painted on it carrying a sign that says Bush=Hitler just as long as you're not comitting vandalism or anything like that. You voluntarily give up far more privacy signing up on MySpace and FaceBook than the government could ever even dream of taking from you forcibly. It doesn't matter who the President is. There will always be some nutjob claiming facism is right around the corner.

      Your "creeping fascism" is sure creeping awfully slowly. I guess conspiracy theory nutcases need something to keep them busy too. You're just like those "The end is near!" people that have been chanting that phrase for thousands of years. What exactly does "near" mean when thousands of years later still nothing has happened? Paranoia is a treatable problem you know.

      There is nowhere you can move to where you can escape your own imaginary fears. Just remember to leap off the bed so the boogeyman doesn't grab your feet. ...posting anonymously so big brother can't find me......

  440. Please leave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please go live overseas, you liberals with your heads so far up your butts that you can't tell what you're taking for granted. We'll help you pack. When you get a dose of reality and you finally want to move back, we'll happily accept you. We will know you're ready to return when your absentee ballots start coming back republican.

  441. Canada, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is not as wealthy as its southern neighbor and you have to get used to the idea of having a queen (yeah, right...). The main perk is that moving to Canada would not present any sort of cultural shock to an American. But the best professional opportunities are still in the US. You would probably have to settle for a lower salary and get used to paying more taxes.

  442. inburgeringscursus by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 1

    Ahhh... The Dutch vocabulary. :-)

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
  443. I like America! (little late to the party, but...) by OakDragon · · Score: 1

    There are about 1200 posts already, and growing. But I have to say it: I like America, I like the way she is now, we have a good president, and our liberties are not in danger. At least not from the president.

    I would enjoy visiting just about all the countries mentioned in this thread, and yes I may enjoy the lifestyles. But I don't think I could ever be "comfortable" as a voluntary non-American.

    What'cha think 'bout them apples? :)

  444. I'm not leaving by Guffy9 · · Score: 1

    I don't want to live outside of the US. But, if I were forced to, Canada would be my first choice, and then Ireland and England as second and third choice.

  445. Czech Republic by Seto89 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I live in Czech Rep, the land of tall people with large feet (I'm serious, I know many kids around 15 that are over 190cm and wear feet size 53 - sorry for the EU units :P). You get treated as shit, cause Czechs not only hate foreigners, but also other Czechs (as weird as it may seem), so you'll hang out with English speaking peeps anyway, by which I mean other foreigners, cause people here expect you to know their funky language... Also as an Economics student I can see that there is something wrong with this country's economy and if you think your government is corrupt, you haven't see the one here. If you ask me, avoid coming to Czech rep for other reason that tourism...

    --
    There are two kinds of people - those who are radioactive and those who have already decayed..
    1. Re:Czech Republic by vox+humanna · · Score: 1

      Being an American of Czech decent. Seriously, both mother and father had 100% Czech immigrant parents. (My grandparents came over in their childhood circa 1920's) I never relaized we were all tall and had big feet. I wear a size 12 US and am 6'0". Is that considered tall with big feet? It is a funky language though, "Yak-si-much" ~ "Hello, how are you" "Dobe-shay" ~ fine.
      That's the extend of my knowledge of it.

    2. Re:Czech Republic by Seto89 · · Score: 1

      I live here for 10 years now and I just get the impression that people around me are tall. Most of the girls I know are taller than me, and it's not like I'm short... Maybe it's connected with local cuisine and all the beer people here drink. Also about technology: If you compare this country to Germany, where I saw tonnes of magazines about Linux and php just sold everywhere, here however the closest you get is a magazine about freeware/shareware stuff you can find on internet and one called "How to handle PC" (in one of the issues there was a three page article about adjusting you START menu on your windows 95/98. First page and a half explained how to right-click it and select properties :S

      --
      There are two kinds of people - those who are radioactive and those who have already decayed..
  446. Would you like some cheese with that whine.... by j_zero · · Score: 1

    If you do not like the country you are a citizen of, either work to change the system, or just leave. It is that simple. There is no, "Well, it is sooooo difficult to go anywhere else," or "The average person can't change anything in this country." It is exactly that type of apathy that leads to dictator style governments. That said, if you feel that strongly about your dislike of your country, or anything else for that matter, it should not make a difference how difficult it is to change it: You should have the determination and will to see it through. If not, you are a big part of the problems that make you dislike this country. BTW, would you like a nice brie, or perhaps a wheel of extra-sharp cheddar?

  447. Oz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Australia, probably in Sydney or Melbourne where I'm more likely to be able to get a job. Visa request/processing costs have prevented me from pursuing it at this juncture. I would prefer Australia because when half of them are stupid wankers, that's only 10M stupid wankers instead of 150M stupid wankers. 10M is so much less depressing to live with than 150M.

  448. Vitos in St-Jean sur Richlieu by DG · · Score: 1

    In St-Jean sur Richelieu, just south of Montreal, is a place called Vitos.

    Find the military college, go out the front gate, turn right, and walk about 1.2 km - it's just inside downtown. Go past the railroad spike monument and you're almost there. Big orange sign.

    Hell, we've got Google Earth now.... I'm going to go with 45 18'16.88" x 73 15'06.26" Right around there.

    Best. Poutine. Ever.

    Order a "grosse poutine avec viande" and be prepared for a glutenous mass of pure heaven.

    Tell 'em that a former CMR cadet sent you (un ancien eleve officier du College)

    DG
    18145

    --
    Want to learn about race cars? Read my Book
    1. Re:Vitos in St-Jean sur Richlieu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just up from St-Denis on Mont-Royal there is a wicked place for poutine, little pizza joint that I can't remember the damn name of.. but right on the corner of Mont-Royal and St. Denis is Pizza Madonna up above. Best god damn spinish pizza in the entire city.. 18" for 15 bux, you can't beat that..

  449. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1
    That's incorrect, if everyone has lots of spare money, then everyone has the freedom to live their own life.
    If everyone has lots of spare money, inflation ensues, and soon everyone does NOT have lots of spare money.

    Though for some reason inflation does not shoot up after the minimum wage is raised, like the right-wing loves to say it will. Curious.
  450. Antarctica by 1337sysadmnFTW · · Score: 1

    I would move to Antarctica. Right under the giant hole in the ozone layer. Fucking Bush and his green house gases... I told him the other day that he has got to stop producing them. I just can't get him to realize that carbon dioxide and CFCs are not marketable products, he just doesn't listen. Oh, better yet. Move to Sealand! I bought Absinthe from them once. That makes it a cool place, right?

    --
    OMG 1337sysadmnFTW pwnt j00!!1one!!1!eleventy! (Seriously, it's all in jest. I swear.)
  451. What about a black person? by EComni · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't expect to get a reply at all, but what's the best place for a black person? I hear all these "the people are so nice" comments for various places, then I see read news reports about rampant racist soccer hooligans, that rampage that happened in Australia not too long ago, and these other snippets of news that suggest that not all everyone is nice and accepting, at least not to darker-colored people.

    So, my question is, how are the race relations in all these suggested countries (Holland, Sweden, Norway, Australia, etc.)?

    Somewhat related question: Are black people still "in vogue" in Japan?

    1. Re:What about a black person? by suparjerk · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points right about now.

      --
      I caught the Mountain Wumpus! He gave me his treasure chest ($100) to let him go free again.
    2. Re:What about a black person? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      uhhh, ever hear of Africa??


      But they prol won't have you either bro.. being an American 'Niga'.. lol



      -- Hi everyone this is 'Halvy' ;) .. 3 year contributing member of /. ...Well I just judiciously used the last of my 2 posts that I am 'aloud' from /. managment because of my 'Terrible Karma' rating! Sooo now I am off to post under other various means (like this AC post) in order to make /. management look even more ridiculous!!

    3. Re:What about a black person? by Optic7 · · Score: 1
      I would say look for a place that is very racially mixed to begin with, and good racial relations will probably come along with it. Read up on Brazil. There might be other places that fit the bill, and I know that it's not in Europe, and it's a developing country, but it generally has better race relations than the US. It's also not as corrupt and messed up as most of Africa, and it's a major economy (9th largest in the World if I'm not mistaken).

      I also saw in a BBC documentary that in many ways old African customs (music, dance, food, religion, etc) is better preserved in Brazil than in African countries themselves. It isn't the racial utopia that it is sometimes portrayed as being, but it is very racially mixed (much more so than the US), and I think it's significantly better than the US in racial matters, particularly in daily interactions among people.

      At least go visit if you ever have a chance - I would recommend the state of Bahia and the city of Salvador (the capital of the state, and former national capital), because that's the center of African culture in Brazil, and a beautiful colonial city. But the country in general has a wonderful mix of European, African, Indigenous, American, Asian, and all other peoples and cultures.

      Regarding Scandinavian countries, in the past I would have said that they would be cool too, but seeing this movie (it's called The Celebration in the US, and it shows on IFC once in a while) it kind of gave me a different perspective on racial relations there (at least in Denmark).

    4. Re:What about a black person? by lahi · · Score: 1
      Regarding Scandinavian countries, in the past I would have said that they would be cool too, but seeing this movie (it's called The Celebration in the US, and it shows on IFC once in a while) it kind of gave me a different perspective on racial relations there (at least in Denmark).


      I suppose we Danes are guilty of the same error very often. And I admit I haven't seen the movie. But forming opinions on all Danes (or Americans) based on what you see in a movie isn't really being well-informed, is it? There is no doubt that we have our share
      of bigots and racists, but our bigotry (and I also speak for myself here, I can't say I'm entirely without prejudice) tends more to be directed against cultures rather than races. Being American, I doubt there would be any problem.

      -Lasse
    5. Re:What about a black person? by Optic7 · · Score: 1

      Hi Lasse,

      You're absolutely right that forming opinions on all the people of a country based on a movie is wrong. And I didn't do that. I think what I was trying to say was that the movie gave a little reality check of some utopian ideas that some people tend to have about Scandinavian countries. I think a lot of people tend to idealize those countries as Meccas of openness, tolerance, and understanding, (a perfect paradise of liberal ideas) and forget that humans are humans wherever they are, and different cultures just have varying degrees and mixes of those qualities, just some are better than others, but none are 100% one way or the other.

      Shenan

    6. Re:What about a black person? by lahi · · Score: 1

      We agree, it would seem.

      Still, I like to think that we are as close to a practical Utopia as realistically possible. :-)
      Even the Swedes and Norwegians envy us! :-)

      -Lasse

    7. Re:What about a black person? by Optic7 · · Score: 1

      Yes, it seems we do. And I think you are right that guys are close to it, in many ways. I certainly want to visit the area again to get to know it better. I've been to Norway (Bergen), but not to Sweden or Denmark.

      Shenan

  452. Actually, this would be my choice by TheAxeMaster · · Score: 1

    I have a brother there, and have visited and enjoyed the country. And with an education and experience in the aerospace industry, I doubt I'd have a hard time finding a job there.

    But that would be giving up on America, which I'm not ready to do quite yet.

    1. Re:Actually, this would be my choice by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      don't.
      germany sucks more and more every year :-(

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
  453. After having visited Ireland... by emil · · Score: 1
    • I'd rather not live in Dublin or Belfast. After I saw children singing and begging on Grafton Street, I was rather turned off. The hostel that my tour group rented also was a surprise - the front desk clerks were high on hasish constantly. I also flew into Belfast in marching season, and that was interesting, to say the least.
    • After traveling Donnegal, your roads are terrible.
    • I don't think there is any natural gas anywhere in Donnegal, although I don't know for other counties. Homes are heated with "turf" - chopped up bog grasses that are burned in miniature fireplaces. Quaint, but I'll take my Trane furnace.
    • No natural gas makes hot water interesting. Don't simply assume that you will have hot water whenever you want it if you are visiting.

    I do regret skipping the daytrip to Derry, but on the whole I like Iowa.

    1. Re:After having visited Ireland... by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      # I don't think there is any natural gas anywhere in Donnegal, although I don't know for other counties. Homes are heated with "turf" - chopped up bog grasses that are burned in miniature fireplaces. Quaint, but I'll take my Trane furnace.
      # No natural gas makes hot water interesting. Don't simply assume that you will have hot water whenever you want it if you are visiting.


      I don't know why you didn't just stay somewhere with electric showers. The use of turf is mostly a rural thing, and it's free; families go out cutting turf during the summer and lay in a stockpile for the winter. Next time pop down to Galway or Cork, theres as much difference between Donegal and Galway as there is between Iowa and New England, or California and New York.

  454. US protectionism, duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most European countries don't spend much on the military because they don't have to. The umbrella of US military protection allows them to skip that. Take it away and much of Europe will have to make some serious decisions about where their tax money goes.

  455. Finland's good. by eBunny · · Score: 1
    Agree with parent, except for the silly rhyming part.


    I've been there and heard heard students and researchers praise their (semi-permanent) place of residence up, up and away. It was particularly fun to hear the Dutch post-doc talking about how it seemed a way better deal to her (as a part-time working mom scientist) than the Netherlands.


    Finland has got a great attitude toward scientific achievement (primary levels of education are some of the best in busines), and just plain _doing_ things with great force and enthusiasm.


    It's basically Scandinavian, except for some of the stupidest parts found in other of the nordic countries.

    1. Re:Finland's good. by OneoFamillion · · Score: 1

      As a Finn I agree with the OP (Original Python), except for the lofty mountains part ;)

  456. That's right, give up. by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So this is what it has come to, has it?

    You quit.

    That's it?

    It's over?

    You're going to let your country expire because you're too lazy to get up off your asses and take it back? The US is (or was) the perfect example of a country. You were oppressed by some ruling class that wanted to tax you with representing you, take away your rights, and treat you like the lousy commoners you are. Instead of leaving to go to other countries, your ancestors said, "Hey, that's not right. We can do a better job." You overthrew the government and made the biggest, roughest, smartest country that the world has ever known. You invented electric lights, developed flight, split the atom, and you walked on the fucking moon. You showed the world, "This is what we are capable of as human beings when we work together. Man and woman, rich and poor, white and black, side by side."

    Yeah, you've had some rough times. A few dickheads have metagamed and bent the rules towards their own sociopathic ends. It's hard to stage a revolt and take back your country when there are laws preventing you from doing so.

    But you know what? There were laws against revolting from England, too. I'm sure that your founding fathers would have been hanged (lethal injection not being around at the time) or sent to The Tower (Gitmo not being around at the time either). Yeah, you might die. You might have to go to war. You've done that before - twice, and internally! - so that the side of freedom would prevail.

    I am not an American. I think that for the most part, you're a bunch of arrogant assholes. But you know what? You deserve to be arrogant. A large part of the hostility you get from foreigners is jealousy. Yes, jealousy. You're a young country. You're less than 300 years old. How does that make a 3000 year old country look when you completely surpass their technology, human rights, and standard of living? Yeah, they'd look stupid for just sitting around in the desert when they could have been using the tools that were just lying around. You are the most powerful nation in the history of the planet. There is nothing in this universe that you cannot do. All you require is the will to do it.

    If you leave, if you give up, that jealousy will turn to hatred - hatred that you threw out one of the best things that's happened to the world. And you are. Yeah, sometimes the US is a belligerent force. You've made some mistakes - and we all know what they are. But when there are earthquakes, the US is there. When there is starvation, the US is there. When there are floods, tsunamis, or hurricanes the US is there. Sometimes you go to the wrong places or have misguided or corrupt leaders. For the most part, you are a force for good. At least, you try to be.

    We all make mistakes. Mistakes can be forgiven.

    Don't give up.

    If you don't like what's happening to your country, then don't quit it. Fight it. Fight to keep your country safe and secure. The only threat to your country comes from within.

    Be strong. Stay and fight.

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    1. Re:That's right, give up. by Hubbell · · Score: 1

      If I could use my moderator points in this discussion, they'd all go to my good man.

    2. Re:That's right, give up. by Halvy · · Score: 0, Insightful
      Be strong. Stay and fight.


      You sound JUST like a polititian.

      Always nice things to say.. but all lies.

      First of ALL the accomplishments by *Americans* were either done by original immigrants (ya know-- those people who leave their own countries!) or with the help of foreigners.

      You also assume that America will be here for people to: "stay and fight" for..

      Did it ever cross your over-psychological-book-read mind that many if not most Americans feel this country is not going to be around very much longer?

      WHY would anyone want to stay in a land that they believe is totally evil and dieing quickly?

      The ONLY reason people are still comming to America (mostly Blacks & other non-whites) is because the White Man has given his woman over to any non-white who would have her.

      However the pool of available white woman who are going along with this is quickly running dry..and it ain't gunna be pretty when these last fumes fueling our economic & social engine run out.

      What YOU say is straight Goddless 'Jewish' propaganda that is taught to all children in the USA-- until they are old enough to search and speak their own minds instead of 'everyone elses'.

      All the 'good' things you list.. are JUST NOT TRUE-- and whenever they were-- they were done with ill intent.

      You simply fluffed over how America, right from the beginning, was nothing but a bunch of murderous and arrogant bullies (including the 'un-civil' war) who did whatever they could get away with.. until stopped (sound familiar)?

      I sympathize with those who want to leave this HELL.. because no other country wants us.. nor will believe that we hate America and want no part of it any more..

      Countries like Canada have governments that are arse kissers to the USA.. so I suppose the citizens there are just as frozen as 'good' Americans.. when it comes to 'doing something' about all the problems.

      EVERYONE in America agrees on one thing though..

      It will ONLY take severe violence, or massive migration..to end both the current strangle hold that the Jewish Mafia has on America.. and to prevent the forthcomming horror of horrors that lie in way for this ultimate cespool of humanity.

      --
      I will gladly loose all of life's battles.. in order to win the war..
    3. Re:That's right, give up. by jamesshuang · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You bring up an EXCELLENT point. I completely believe in your message - most people should try and stay to fight. But I also pose another question - how? During the American Revolution, the American "patriots" had guns - and if they did not, they could actually build an industry around the British-controlled one and produce their own guns. Obviously, hostile overthrow today is politically WAY out there, but it's also technically impossible as well. What liberal American "patriot" now can build a Tomahawk missle? Better yet, how would he build a missle DEFENSE system for when the government decides that he's a big enough threat?

      The United States in 1700 is very different from the United States now. A "revolution" like in 1700 is completely impossible because military/violent action is obviously far outstepping the very idea of the country. Also, the controlling country is now itself, not some distant government on today's equivalent of another planet. The country's own government has been pretty damned efficient at brainwashing its citizens. Just to imagine... half of the population actually voted for the guy who said "I like your wife and I've watched your children" during a nationally televised debate.

      IMHO, the entire CULTURE of the nation is slowly being perverted to these socipathic ends. Science is to be distrusted - God will give you the answer (such as which countries to invade). Not only is there a new branch of fanatical religion to fight against, we're also fighting the entire capitalistic culture of short-sighted goal-seeking, an ideal even the educated have become indocterinated in. Even the scientists try to stamp out research papers, regardless of whether they're crap or not just so they can have a nice list on their CVs.

      I know that I will most likely be staying to "fight" as you suggested (partially because my dad would disown me if I left the country, haha), but increasingly it seems like we're fighting a losing war. The biggest difference today and in the 1700's is that the American population is effectively fighting itself. They hate what they've become, but they can't help continuing in their own one-dimensional path. What would you suggest as a good way of fighting this strange internal war?

    4. Re:That's right, give up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You are the most powerful nation in the history of the planet. There is nothing in this universe that you cannot do. All you require is the will to do it."

      Can America microwave a burrito so hot that it can't eat it?

      (thanks Homer S.)

    5. Re:That's right, give up. by jaypaulw · · Score: 1

      If you are really interested in a violent overthrow, I know some places where you can learn some tactics that seem to be quite effective against the world's military superpower e.g. iraq, somalia, vietnam.

      Just hole up in a civilian neighborhood and use IED's/roadbombs etc and you'd be good to go.

      My opinion is that America is virtually identical to every country in europe except where they have a conservative population of 48% and the US has one of 52%. Also, the business universe is completely interdependent throughout the world and there is no meaningful differnce between what left-wing or right-wing business leaders believe whether they are in Belgium, the US or India. The "capitalstic culture" you mock provides your food, shelter and security and is happy to do it.

    6. Re:That's right, give up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to American propaganda, why did immigrants leave their countries for America? Do your arguments apply to your immigrant ancestors?

    7. Re:That's right, give up. by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know why I bother sometimes, but hey, you took the time to respond to me.

      First, I'm not sure where you're getting your information. It's not what I'd call "accurate".

      Yes, most of America's achievements were performed by immigrants. Everyone except the First Nations are either immigrants or descendants of immigrants. (And even that is only in a temporal context, as the First Nations walked over from Siberia.) So all the stuff that America has done, for good and for ill, is done by people who wanted to get rid of the oppressive bullshit that their homeland stank of.

      That's my point. America shows the world what people are capable of when we all work together.

      People don't come to America to get on with white women. That's... delusional. People come to America because America is The Land of the Free. You can worship whomever you want. You can watch whatever TV you want. You can work in any field you choose. You can go to school. You can buy food and it is plentiful. There are hospitals. There is a very low risk of invasion.

      These are things you take for granted. That's one of the things that piss people off. There's no global conspiracy.

      And even if there was, I would MUCH prefer to be run by Jews than by corporations. At least I'd get Sundays off.

      And yes, Canada kisses the US. We're brothers.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    8. Re:That's right, give up. by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Violence is not the answer. It's not possible to physically overthrow a government that has nuclear weapons and a standing army. It's not physically possible. That assumes that you'd have no support from sympathetic branches of your government, which is a valid assumption for a worst-case analysis.

      Even assassination would be pointless. (Let me be clear - I am not advocating the following.) Let's assume you assassinate, say, Bush. (Even though he's no longer legally able to be president any more.) He's dead. The control would pass to his VP until another election. That VP would appoint another VP to take his place, and apart from a few days of turmoil and the footage being shown nonstop on CNN, there would be almost no difference to the running of the country. The same is true of any building. Destroying a building would have roughly the same effect - a few days of turmoil, a few new hastily passed laws, and nonstop footage on CNN.

      What can possibly be done? Well, the easiest thing to do is vote. Currently, 60% of the American population is so disillusioned with the electoral process that they don't get off their asses. Those people are throwing away something that most of the world doesn't get to do. Through complete apathy, they are allowing the small minority to control their actions. Now, that's because to most people, there's no difference in their lives no matter who is in office. Politicians lie, so it doesn't matter which set of liars gets elected. For the most part, that's true. No matter what rhetoric you may have seen spewed, 9/11 would probably have still happened if Gore had been in the white house. It wasn't Clinton's fault - what happened was a culmination of many, many factors - far too numerous to list here. The cold fact is, you guys got sandbagged. We all did.

      You can also restrict who gets to run. We've seen this before in scores of novels, internet sites, and movies. We could say that only veterans get to run, or only people with an IQ greater than 190,
      or left-handed acrobats, etc. The fault with all of these systems is that they place restrictions, and the people that want power more than anything else will find a way around those restrictions. Bush and Kerry are both veterans. Look at the difference in record, and look at how each side will justify their guy's experience and discount the other guy's.

      The hard part is that the people who get to make the laws are the people who are regulated by these laws. (A raise for us? Well, first it has to pass the acid test of being voted on by us!)

      Take back the media. That's supposed to be what regulates the government. You should find it embarrassing that The Daily Show is a better source of news than the news. Expose all the lies that they've told, in the same way TDS does.

      Start a new party. If you can get just one in three Americans to get off their asses and vote for you, then you'll get elected. It's going to be next to impossible, but remember that there is no reward without effort. Your prize is nothing less than the recovery of America.

      Hell, if half the /. readers vote for you, you'd win.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    9. Re:That's right, give up. by tsanth · · Score: 1

      People have the right to choose to quit.

      I will not deny them that right.

    10. Re:That's right, give up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're going to let your country expire because you're too lazy to get up off your asses and take it back?

      I protested the illegal invasion of Iraq before it happened. All that was accomplished was that Bush emasculated the UN.

      The US is (or was) the perfect example of a country. You were oppressed by some ruling class that wanted to tax you with representing you, take away your rights, and treat you like the lousy commoners you are. Instead of leaving to go to other countries, your ancestors said, "Hey, that's not right. We can do a better job." You overthrew the government and made the biggest, roughest, smartest country that the world has ever known. You invented electric lights, developed flight, split the atom, and you walked on the fucking moon. You showed the world, "This is what we are capable of as human beings when we work together. Man and woman, rich and poor, white and black, side by side."

      None of this is true. What actually occurred was that wealthy white Americans wanted to get wealthier faster and decided to break away from England. The rest of the inspirational patriotic junk was a cover.

      We annihilated the natives. 200 million dead during our drive to extend from "sea to shining sea". We were one of the LAST industrialized nations to eliminate slavery. We dragged our feet on giving women the vote. We traded with Hitler while knowing full well what he was doing to the Jews. We invaded the USSR in 1918 and lied about it in our history books for the next 70 years.

      I am not an American. I think that for the most part, you're a bunch of arrogant assholes. But you know what? You deserve to be arrogant. A large part of the hostility you get from foreigners is jealousy. Yes, jealousy. You're a young country. You're less than 300 years old. How does that make a 3000 year old country look when you completely surpass their technology, human rights, and standard of living? Yeah, they'd look stupid for just sitting around in the desert when they could have been using the tools that were just lying around. You are the most powerful nation in the history of the planet. There is nothing in this universe that you cannot do. All you require is the will to do it.

      I am American, and living in the South. Frankly, you don't know what you're talking about. If other countries envy us, it's merely because they don't know us. Y'all think we're great just because we survived WWII? Look at Russia which beat back THREE TIMES the best armies in the world, once in the middle of their own revolution! Yes, we have freedom of speech, but that doesn't do much good when 95% of us believe that the world is going to end because the Bible says so.

      If you leave, if you give up, that jealousy will turn to hatred - hatred that you threw out one of the best things that's happened to the world. And you are. Yeah, sometimes the US is a belligerent force. You've made some mistakes - and we all know what they are. But when there are earthquakes, the US is there. When there is starvation, the US is there. When there are floods, tsunamis, or hurricanes the US is there. Sometimes you go to the wrong places or have misguided or corrupt leaders. For the most part, you are a force for good. At least, you try to be.

      Read your history again. Hurricances and tsunamis you say? New Orleans is still uninhabitable in the poorest areas and much of that tsunami money hasn't materialized.

      We held out a powerful dream to the world, especially during the Cold War, a dream of individual freedom combined with collective strength. But it was just a dream. If you are angry to find out that it was a fabrication from start to finish then you have only yourselves to blame for falling for it. The French said in 1789 that they would be a shining democracy and they begat the Reign of Terror followed by Napolean; USSR said it would create a laborers paradise and begat Stalin and the gulags.

      We all make mistakes. Mistakes can be forgiven.

      As

    11. Re:That's right, give up. by Blue+Fox+USA · · Score: 1

      That's a great post with some good points. I supported the admin until Katrina. then I wanted to throw up. Putting US citizens in steel shipping containers on U.S. soil as temp. housing is not good enough. We still have people hurting down there. I left the exec. branch of gov't after that. It's just too much. Vote Democrat and demand more than a few investigations. (Imagine having to work with people who are drunk womanizers and they just cover it up, DUI's and all.)

    12. Re:That's right, give up. by Cantus · · Score: 1

      La-di-da.

    13. Re:That's right, give up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading parent's post gave me nausea.

      Pretentious junk.

    14. Re:That's right, give up. by JhohannaVH · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm with ya. That's why I'm about to bap my husband in the nose for pushing me to live outside the US. He thinks I need the 'exposure'. But, I love this country. My ancestors have fought and died for it for 400 years. Why the hell would I leave? I want my kids born here, and I'm almost too old to even have them! Sure, I'd love to go live in Australia, but not at the expense of losing my citizenship and way of life. I've spent 15 years fighting for what I've got... I don't want to risk it.

      Not to mention the fact that I'm terribly political outspoken, active, and reactive. I couldn't send a hundred faxes and letters a week if I expatriate. No way. What right would I have to tell people how to run a country I don't live in? But Gods Help Us All if Nancy Pelosi becomes Speaker of the House or Harry Reid the Majority Speaker. {shudder}

      --
      Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
    15. Re:That's right, give up. by Funksaw · · Score: 1

      Why not give up?

      The problem is not America - it's the American people. We're no longer a force for good - and the American people no longer want us to be a force for good.

  457. Absolute right? by QMO · · Score: 1
    No, it doesn't. A person's right to control their own body is absolute.
    Not only is that not true, it shouldn't be true, because all our lives intersect. I would accept that a person generally has a right to control their own body, until they show that they are incapable (murder, theft, public intoxication?, etc.) of self-control.

    If you want to use drugs in a dangerous way, like injecting heroin into your eyeballs, it's just and reasonable for the state to dissuade you with (accurate) anti-drug education...
    I would agree with that.

    ...to put a reasonable "sin tax" on heroin...
    I strongly disagree with that.

    ...to regulate heroin for purity and strength, and to ban you from driving under its influence.
    Both of these seem to contradict the word "absolute" in your initial statement of faith.

    Not only is drug probibition immoral...
    I disagree, but you're entitled to your own belief system.

    ...it's also impractical. It doesn't work.
    I submit that the truth of that depends on: 1-Is it true, in spite of extensive experience with banning other products and pretty solid economic theory, that legal prohibition doesn't decrease drug use? 2-If there is any illegal drug use, does that mean that drug prohibition has failed, or is only partially successful?
    --
    Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    1. Re:Absolute right? by Roger+Wilcox · · Score: 1

      ...to put a reasonable "sin tax" on heroin... I strongly disagree with that.

      Do you also disagree with the ridiculously higy taxes on cigarettes and alcohol? Because making them out to be a "sin tax" is essentially how the government rationalizes these taxes to the people.


      I submit that the truth of that depends on: 1-Is it true, in spite of extensive experience with banning other products and pretty solid economic theory, that legal prohibition doesn't decrease drug use? 2-If there is any illegal drug use, does that mean that drug prohibition has failed, or is only partially successful?

      Don't forget that prohibition also results in the creation of a black market, which will mean products are of questionable origin and composition. Because it is under no supervision, products purchased on the black market run a serious risk of turning out counterfeit or of poor quality - and there is no warning or recourse for consumers. In the case of drugs, this lack of quality control makes them many times more dangerous to use.

      Black markets also lead to increased incidence of other types of crime as illegal firms compete and attempt to keep themselves in operation.

    2. Re:Absolute right? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Informative
      I would accept that a person generally has a right to control their own body, until they show that they are incapable (murder, theft, public intoxication?, etc.) of self-control.

      Non sequitor. Murder, theft, and disruptive public behavior are not examples of controlling one's own body.

      Obviously one can lose rights by engaging in criminal behavior. I took that as an unspoken axiom, but in case there's any ambigutity: competent adults have certain absolute rights, including self-defense, controlling their own bodies, freedom of belief, etcetera. People who demonstrate incompetence by engaing in behaviors that significantly violate the rights of others, or credibly threaten to do so, may be placed under close supervision (including incarceration, probation, and parole) and have those rights restricted to the degree necessary to protect the rights of others. Since they are not "competent adults", this does not alter the proposition that "competent adults have certain absolute rights".

      Both of these [drug purity and anti-intoxicated driving laws] seem to contradict the word "absolute" in your initial statement of faith.

      Not at all. Threatening my safety by getting behind the wheel when you're not fit to drive is not an example of controlling your own body. Nor is fraudulantly selling impure drugs (or food or anything else).

      Is it true, in spite of extensive experience with banning other products and pretty solid economic theory, that legal prohibition doesn't decrease drug use?

      Drug use, sitting home getting drunk/high/stoned/tripping/whatever once in a while, it ain't nobody's business if you do. Extensive experience and pretty solid economic theory shows that drug abuse is increased by prohibition; prohibtion drives people towards more concentrated (easily smuggled) drugs, removes assurances of purity (increasing the risks of poisoning or overdose), encourages unhealthy usage patterns, and shackles the free-market forces that would lead to the development of more pleasant and less harmful drugs.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    3. Re:Absolute right? by fyngyrz · · Score: 1
      competent adults have certain absolute rights, including self-defense, controlling their own bodies, freedom of belief, etcetera.

      Not in America, they don't. Did you mean to say, "competent adults should have certain absolute rights, including self-defense, controlling their own bodies, freedom of belief, etcetera." ?

      Because in that case, I'm with the program. Otherwise, you're simply not paying attention.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    4. Re:Absolute right? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      Did you mean to say, "competent adults should have certain absolute rights, including self-defense, controlling their own bodies, freedom of belief, etcetera." ?

      It is entirely possible to have a right and not have it recognized by the state. The whole theoretical basis of American government is that these rights exist a priori, and that governments are supposed to recognize and secure them; the rights exist even if governments fail to recognize them.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    5. Re:Absolute right? by QMO · · Score: 1
      Do you also disagree with the ridiculously higy taxes on cigarettes and alcohol? Because making them out to be a "sin tax" is essentially how the government rationalizes these taxes to the people.
      Yes. I also disagree with "sin" taxes on alcohol, cigarettes, gambling, etc. I think making them sources of revenue is additional security for the continued existence of those industries.

      Don't forget that prohibition also results in the creation of a black market...etc.
      I'm aware that prohibition results in a black market, but that doesn't mean that prohibition is impractical, just imperfect. I still think it's better than the alternative.
      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    6. Re:Absolute right? by QMO · · Score: 1
      Non sequitor. Murder, theft, and disruptive public behavior are not examples of controlling one's own body.
      But, they are, unless one murders, steals, etc. with someone else's body. My point, which you've declared agreement with, to some extent, is that my right to control my own body shouldn't extent to the point where it interferes with the rights of others.

      Where I think we disagree is the extent that each person's actions affect other people. You seem to think that basically nothing you do in your own home affects me if I don't know about it. If you think about that a little more, I think that you'll find it isn't true. If you can't see that, then we have a fundamental disagreement about the way societies and the universe function.
      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    7. Re:Absolute right? by fyngyrz · · Score: 1
      It is entirely possible to have a right and not have it recognized by the state.

      Of course, if they exist, but are not recognized by the state, they have no function other than as a call to action. And, as is the case in the USA, if there is no means for said call to action to have any effect once the judicial arm (supreme court) has ruled that those rights are illusory, superseded by some state "interest" or otherwise to be ignored... then I rather think that any such existence is moot.

      Many things codified by the constitution have been abandoned, either in "special" cases or outright. For instance, ex post facto law, punishment and judicial proceedings are all SOP, and have all been through the supreme court and "validated", meaning, no one can turn them around now. There is no recourse whatsoever. So while I take your point that it can be said that such a right exists, but has been trampled, I'm fairly convinced that this is the proverbial distinction without a difference.

      You (or some other reader) may be thinking that revolution is an available remedy; however, I don't think that is actually the case. The US isn't structured in such a way as to make revolution possible. Way back when revolution was more common, the revolutionaries had weapons at least on par with the authorities. This is no longer true; in fact, the authorities have such a devastating advantage in both firepower and tactical control of the air, that I do not think a "revolution" would accomplish anything more than getting the revolutionaries dead or incarcerated in very short order indeed.

      Then there's the issue of complacent citizens who support the government because they do not (perhaps cannot) understand that the government is operating illegitimately. My impression is that such people make up a decisive majority of Americans. Viva la revolucion? No. La revolucion es muerte.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    8. Re:Absolute right? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      But, they are, unless one murders, steals, etc. with someone else's body.

      Murder, theft, etcetera require actions that occur outside of a persons body, actions that violate the rights of others.

      You seem to think that basically nothing you do in your own home affects me if I don't know about it.

      The question is not whether you know about it, it's whether it violates or threatens to violate your rights. Sure, there are things I can do that others don't know about that violate their rights - secretly dumping toxic waste in my basement so that it seeps into my neighbor's well, for instance.

      But here we're not talking about something that happens just within my own home, but within my own skin. If I - hypothetically - stay home and shoot heroin into my eyeballs Friday night, it neither picks your pocket nor breaks your leg., and it's wrong (practically and ethically) to point guns at me to stop me from making such a private choice.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    9. Re:Absolute right? by QMO · · Score: 1

      So, funding an industry (by buying heroin) which agressively markets brain damaging substances to minors doesn't appear to you to be integral to shooting up your eyeballs? (I freely admit that the tobacco and alcohol industries are also guilty.)

      It appears that we do have a fundamentally different view on how the universe functions, so I'll be done.

      -End of Line

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    10. Re:Absolute right? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      So, funding an industry (by buying heroin) which agressively markets brain damaging substances to minors doesn't appear to you to be integral to shooting up your eyeballs? (I freely admit that the tobacco and alcohol industries are also guilty.)

      Drug prohibtion makes it pretty difficult to pull out your copy of "Shopping for a Better World" to find a more ethical heroin dealer, those I do know some soft-drug users who try to trace back their sources of cannabis or psilocybin mushrooms back to a bengin source.

      At least when I buy a beer, and can (and do) take business practices into consideration. And I know some people who try to purchase their cigarettes from more responsible companies (like Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company ("American Spirit") before their takeover by R.J. Reynolds takeover).

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  458. Australia, Canada, England; Job and money by Troutrooper · · Score: 1

    Where: Oz, Canada, England. I only speak English, I have family in Minnesota (close to Canada) and Oz, and I like the parliamentary system in England. Germany is a possibility, too: more than 2 political parties sounds like fun. Why not: Jobs and money. I've applied for several jobs in Canada well within my range of skills, but never heard back. I think employers see the out-of-country address and toss the resume. I don't have enough money saved to simply pull up the stakes and plant them elsewhere in the US, let alone another country. My parents recently moved to Australia, and though it was a corporate relocation, the move cost them at least $5000 in accidental expenses (doctor visits, application fees, dog vet visits, insurance, time off work, etc). They said that if they were to return, it would cost them upwards of $25,000. Ouch. Ultimately, as appealing moving sounds, there's just too much effort involved to leave on political grounds. Ending one's support of a sports team because the players are criminals is an easy use of principle overriding emotion. Leaving the country is not. Besides, the best way to affect change is to vote. How many of the people who say they'll leave have voted recently?

  459. 1. Australia 2. Deadly wildlife by scoser · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I'm not sure how anyone survives to the age of 50 there. But that just might be the discovery channel's "Australia's deadliest X" specials talking.

  460. there are plenty of barriers to leaving by buddyglass · · Score: 1

    For one, most Americans don't speak a second language, so we're limited to countries where English is the native language. So, Ireland, the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and possibly some former territories (Jamaica, British Virgin Islands, etc.)

    Problem is, none of these countries want Americans to immigrate. They're extremely protective of their local economy. As an American you're free to travel in Canada and spend your tourism dollars, but don't try moving there to live and work unless you're specialized in a "hot" industry.

    The other issue is standard of living. While those countries may have a higher across the board standard of living than the United States, the standard of living for "a mid-level programmer" may be substantially lower. (Note that I said "may"). If that's the case, then many Americans who might otherwise emigrate could be dissuaded from doing so because it would mean they'd have to live in a smaller house, drive a smaller car, etc.

  461. Asia by inetd · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen too many posts about most of Asia other than Japan. Why not Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Seoul, Jakarta, KL, Beijing, Shanghai, Delhi, Dubai, etc. All these places are cities, and they all have unique cultural identities with most things you would want. I have lived out here in various countries for about 3 years, and if you can get over the language barrier issues, most of Asia is a fantastic place to live.

          Singapore is a great place to start as it is primarily English (although singlish) speaking country. Hong Kong is a major city with lots of culture and an enormous amount of English history. As for most other major cities in the region most things you would generally want are available and your average cost of living is fractional compared to the US.

          Besides, 1/5 of the world is basically Chinese, and almost 65% of the population is in Asia Pacific, it might be good for people to take this view once in a while.

  462. why is this on slashdot and why are you so naive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not slashdot material, just political spin. CmdrDildo is showing his true colors yet again. Too bad he doesn't leave the country.

    But beyond this, these people who say they'll leave have no intentions of leaving. They simply would like to think that we care if they stay. Actually, I do care if they stay. I see them as a detriment to the American way of life and I'd love to see them get the fuck out. Fucking faggots.

  463. A private nation by The+Man · · Score: 1
    The OP and many of the responses focus on the things that are wrong with other countries, many of which are the same things that are wrong with the United States. This is of course no coincidence since the US is a behemoth whose influence spans the globe and whose bullying of other nations, even allies, has become just another unpleasant fact of life in the last 20 years. The answer, then, is not to find some other nation and hope it will somehow be less corrupt, less greedy, or less repressive. All the world's nations are in a race to the bottom in these areas and there's no reason to think that will change.

    Instead, my plan is to purchase sovereignty over part of another nation from its government, in a manner similar to that in which the US itself purchased most of its current territory from France and Russia. For military reasons, it will be best if the part I purchase is small and defensible, likely an island or mountainous territory. For financial reasons, it will have to be small. For economic reasons it must be capable of producing food and must have a reliable supply of fresh water. There are many other considerations that must be made, but the gist of it is that I'm looking for a small piece of land over which I will rule absolutely. Since there will be no other inhabitants, whether this form of government is democracy, autocracy, or theocracy is a meaningless distinction. My freedom will be absolute, and my responsibility for my own well-being absolute as well.

    What's stopping me? Lack of funds. Although I save over 50% of my net pay, buying sovereignty over even a small, unwanted island is not going to be cheap, nor will the military hardware I'd need for defense or the basic infrastructure I'd need to survive (one or two wells or a reservoir, a septic system, livestock and equipment for farm work, machine tools, a storm-survivable shelter, one or more boats, etc.). I expect it will be a number of years before I'm in a position to achieve my goal; there's a real chance that by that time the US will be so repressive that it will be nearly impossible to leave alive. But I see little hope in any other nation extant today, so really my game's the only one in town.

  464. Peruvian Amazon by Pictish+Prince · · Score: 1

    I'm currently living in Chicago and I want to move to the Peruvian Amazon. I want to have an opportunity to catalog a new species. I want to see a jaguar in the wild. I want to try ayahuasca. I want to raise tegus for profit. I will go as soon as I can get an effective malaria vaccine and broadband.

    --
    Only his tendency toward a dazed stupor prevented him from screaming aloud.
  465. Svalbard by indy_Muad'Dib · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svalbard/

    no vista needed and if you stay 7 years your automatically a citizen of norway.

  466. Erratum by crush · · Score: 1

    I wrote: The Democrats have the clearest possible record of voting (with a couple, and I mean two or three)
    I meant: The Democrats have the clearest possible record of voting (with a couple of exceptions, and I mean two or three)

  467. Come to India .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not ?

    If you are the type who craves for money, then being techie-nerds, you have the chance of shooting to the top 1% of the population ( 1 billion and counting ) very easily ... and believe me the top 1% has a lifestlye that is (purchase-power-parity) comparable to anything that you can get in the US ( think of a chauffear, two maids and a cook at home).

    On the other hand, if you are the high-thinking type, who does not care, or pretends not to care, for money, then you can engage in a whole spectrum of activities from himalayan yoga to communist hypocrisy.

    The government is corrupt but if you know-who ( as opposed to know-how) you can make things happen and believe me we have super-efficient systems of touts to insulate you from the worst of what the government can do.

    But why should you come to India ? To experience the sheer diversity of the country is so vast that you could spend years and keep finding something new and interesting everyday.

    So do come and help us on the way to becoming the most populous country .... ahead of the Chinese

  468. I pay it 2x actually by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

    Medicare is 2.9% plus my own health insurance.

    Guess which costs me more? Medicare to the tune of 4X as much.

    --
    Bring back the old version of slashdot.
  469. There is no vegemite ban... by Iberian · · Score: 1

    Wikipedia: In October 2006, the Melbourne Herald Sun reported that Vegemite is banned in the USA, with Customs officials going so far as to even search Australians for Vegemite when they enter the country, but later reports cast doubt on the claim. The Food and Drug Administration later stated there was no import ban on Vegemite, and that it was never pulled from American supermarket shelves.

  470. Leave? No way! by amper · · Score: 1

    I have only this to say to everyone in the world who dislikes the current state of affairs in the United States of America--if you are a US Citizen, VOTE. If you are not a US Citizen, you are more than welcome (notwithstanding the current immigration regulations) to become one and VOTE.

    As for myself, you will find me organizing the Third Constitutional Convention, or at least attempting to do so, peacefully.

    Soap box, ballot box, ammo box. In that order. Be sure to read my .sig.

  471. Greener Grass by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    I moved from Scotland to the US and i'm perfectly happy with it.

    There are good well paying job prospects in the tech field. When you are young, at least, healthcare isn't that expensive, salaries are much higher and taxes are much lower.

  472. Wha? How? WTH? by Sgt_Jake · · Score: 1

    MATH! OMG! (%^#(&^ - what did all that mean? That you make more in the Netherlands and get more benefits, or that you'll lose half (52%) of your paycheck to taxes?!

    1. Re:Wha? How? WTH? by dajak · · Score: 1

      A summary:

      It means that you pay 52% on the amount earned in the highest bracket, and less on the money earned in the brackets below that. Tax bracket means the same here as it means in the US. "Losing half of your paycheck to taxes" is impossible, and just cheap rhetoric for dumb people who don't understand taxation and will probably never earn money in the highest bracket anyway.

      As I also pointed out, the actual amount paid on average on income and profit (capital yield) is 9.9% in the Netherlands, making it actually a fairly attractive place to live for wealthy people. The tax pressure just isn't distributed very fairly, as it feels more like 30% for the average middle income, just like anywhere else. This is unfortunately hard to avoid, since it is harder to evade taxes for employees than it is for billionaires.

      The third thing I pointed out is that if you count the various ways in which governments tax their citizens (when you earn something, make profit, buy something, sell something, live in a house, drive on a road, take a shit, etc. etc.), and compare it to what you pay in the private market for the basket of comparable services (mostly various insurances, etc.) you get back for it, the differences between western countries are not as big as they sometimes seem. They are roughly equally good (or bad, if you prefer) in delivering things in return for the amount of taxes paid. They just make different political choices on whom to tax, what services to provide in return, and how and in what direction to misrepresent how much of your income they actually take.

  473. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by ktappe · · Score: 1
    I call bullshit. Poverty is not "generally measured, not by how little you have, but by how much less you have than average." Poverty is the inability to sustain a way of life.
    Not surprisingly, because of your U.S.-centric vision, you missed his point.

    If you have $50000 and a guy in Costa Rica has $50000, the guy in Costa Rica is considerably more wealthy than you. This is because the average net worth and income in Costa Rica is so much lower than the U.S.

    $50000 in Costa Rica will buy many more meals (I regularly paid under $3/meal in restaurants there), groceries, services, and property than it will in the U.S. That is all he was trying to say. Try to think outside the U.S. borders every once in a while. The U.S. is not the end all be all of human existence.

    -Kurt

    --
    "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
  474. Do you care about a reverse opinion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've moved to the USA in 2000. I could have moved to any country in Europe as I'm an european citizen, but I really thought that for my line of work (IT) this is the place to be. I don't regret my choice. Well... Sometimes when I see the state of our foreign policy I do a little, but that is it.

    I've gained:

    a) Decent employment, at a decent salary point for my experience
    b) Decent working hours, I rarely - if ever - had to work overtime
    c) Quality of life: good housing at good financing, good education for my children, decent entertainment opportunities
    d) A legal system that mostly work (though, right now, is overtaxed by frivolous law-suits)

    The immigration policy is not as though (at least in my experience, coming here legally and following the letter of the law) as it could have been. I'm now a green card holder and, in time, I might apply for citizenship with the intent of being able to vote and contribute on not having history repeat itself.

    All countries have problems. Most of the problems are the same. It is the scale in which the problems happen that are different. I see poverty in the US as much as in my native country, but not as endemic (smaller scale). I see corruption in the US in levels that even my country doesn't seem capable to produce (larger scale). Europe has the same problems too. So does Australia.

    Why?

    Because most of the problems are born of human nature. And that is the same everywhere.

    Quick, get us a B-Ark...

  475. Best place to live? Easy. by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Well right off I can give you my short list (in no particular order):
    Finland
    Norway
    Switzerland
    Netherlands
    Sweden
    Australia
    Perhaps UK somewhere (England, Ireland, Scotland)

    of course I live in Canada so I can't pick that (and no I would NOT move to the USA)

    The main disadvantages that many might have with the scandinavian countries are A) the cold weather, B) the taxes, and C)relitive remoteness and smaller urbanized areas.

    Well Canada is A) Cold, B) has high taxes also, and C) unless you live in Toronto, Vancouver can be somewhat remote and smaller urban areas. So not so different really, certainly not so much to cause distress.

    I picked Australia pretty much because as far are warmer countries go it seems pretty nice. Also I hear girls down under dig the Canadian accent :) . The one thing that sort of bothers me is that everything seems to be poisonious. I have also read some stuff about their current conservative government... of course these things come and go... Currently we have a like problem, though Harper isn't so bad as far as robots go, you just have to get to know him...

    Another great thing about Australia and the UK is I don't need to learn a new language (though I know that most of the Scandinavian contries seem to have an absurd rate of english speaking also like 80-90%, but I would feel bad living there without learning the native tounge). The other great thing about the UK is all the shared heritage between them and Canada. Lots of relations on both sides, shared culture. Being from Nova Scotia (New Scotland), there are a lot of shared traditions with the British Iles, more so than central, or western Canada.

    Also just to illistrate how great my choices are, here are some links to stuff like UN polls etc...

    http://www.economist.com/theworldin/international/ displayStory.cfm?story_id=3372495&d=2005

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9085910/

    I was looking for the actual UN list of top 50 or whatever, as I remember Canada used to be at #1 for many years, until Norway finally de-throned us Canadians. Though I suspect it had more to do with Norway's expansion of oil production in the North Sea, and the smart way they are using the funds for the future (Canada has oil as well, but it doesn't seemed to be handled in as intelligent way, too many competing interests).

    http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/10/04/eui.sur vey/
    http://www.citymayors.com/environment/eiu_bestciti es.html

    apparently some of the best cities to live in are in Australia and Switzerland.

    Also these countries have a robust Hockey culture as well. I have friends who love Soccer, but I am not one of them.
    Finland
    Norway
    Switzerland
    Sweden

    So I think this is the difinitive choices of where to live!
    Finland
    Norway
    Switzerland
    Netherlands
    Sweden
    Australia
    Ireland

    And of course Canada, if you are not already there! :)

  476. fine with me by brainspank · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you want to leave the greatest country on the planet (my arrogant opinion, but easily debated), I'll do my best to buy you the ticket. I'd be happy to see you go, considering you're probably destructive while you're here. Do you: want constitutional rights for terrorists? not think we're at war? think terrorists will forget about us if we quit "provoking them" (9/11 anyone)? think more taxes are good for citizens? think we shouldn't spy on phone conversations of terrorists? think the social security system is viable long-term? think we should let anybody walk across our borders and get benefits paid by us? get lost and remember not to take your finger-nail clippers on the plane.

    sorry for the venomous response, but I'm sick of this anti-patriotic crap. I fully expect to get burnt to a crisp on slashdot.

    if you're foreign to the US and want to immigrate, welcome aboard. just follow the rules and I'll buy you a beer.

    --
    It's only a model.
    1. Re:fine with me by vox+humanna · · Score: 1

      No flame just the addition of a question.

      If the U.S. is so bad, then why is it still the #1 immigration destination on the planet?

      Any ignorant flame responses to that? I think not.

    2. Re:fine with me by petrus4 · · Score: 1

      Not being American myself, I could be wrong about this...but I get the feeling that the reason why a lot of Americans are migrating right now is not because they hate their country, but because their country has a *government* currently which is causing them to fear for their lives.

      In the opinion of a lot of people, the Bush administration has recently been working overtime to destroy as many of the legal protections that Americans apparently used to have as he can, to the point where many people are feeling that he could have them killed arbitrarily whenever he chose to and there would be nothing they could do to save themselves whatsoever, if they stayed in the country. Even if not for that itself, people want to live in a place where there is decent health care, where their government is not spying into every single thing they do, and where they can use the Internet without being legally crucified due purely to corporate greed. More than anything else though, as I said, the one thing any people need is to feel safe. The Bush administration is a menace.

      I understand that your perspective may still be one of support for Bush, but I am predicting that if you're someone who is capable of any introspection at all, that that perspective will grow increasingly more difficult for you to hold as time goes on.

      Bush is not good for anyone. He is not good for Americans, he is not good for people outside the country...the man isn't even good for himself.

    3. Re:fine with me by fonetik · · Score: 1
      Bravo! I couldn't agree more, providing you have a magic terrorist detection system. Otherwise, I kinda like the idea of habeas corpus, being able to confront your accusers, right to a speedy trial, and all the other concepts that make this country great. I can't get behind the unlawful detainment with secret charges and classified intelligence. It's a provably dangerous concept and it's far too easy to exploit. I understand that revealing that intelligence might compromise the way that intelligence is gathered. I think the trade off is worth it, and it would appear the the writers of the bill of rights and constitution would agree.

      Who would have thought that quoting the constitution would be regarded as "Anti-patriotic"? What strange time we live in.

      As for the rest of it unrelated to terrorists: I know we are at war all too well, I'm paying for it. More taxes would be great, if it were for the top 1% and large corporations. I think social security's viability has more to do with the high cost of health care and the profits of drug companies. And the border (And borders in general, historically.) is a problem that isn't going to be solved by a wall or some other countermeasure. I'd like nothing more than to get every person here illegally a social security number and get them in the system and paying taxes just like me.

      I guess the difference is that I'd rather all of those people that disagree with me to be right here in the USA, and I don't want them to leave. People like you, people on FOX news, people on Air America, reds, blues... whatever. I've never learned much from people I agree with. Diversity is a good thing, including the people that don't value diversity.

  477. Lack of Canadian Coverage by keenada · · Score: 1

    There is a surprising lack of Canadian replies to this post, so I thought I should get the ball rolling.

    Canada is nearly identical in a lot of ways to the U.S. We have a lot of the same principles, goals and opinions. My opinion is based that of someone who has lived in a small town, mid-size and large cities.

    Where Canadians and Americans are similar:

    1) An industrious hard-working workforce. Which translates into a very strong economy, which currently relies very heavily on U.S. trade. But our economy is also rapidly diversifying globally. Workers believe in long hours and a strong work ethic. Especially in IT.

    2) A commitment to bring "peace and prosperity" to the world. Only we tend to stay the course with the UN/NATO as opposed to unilaterally attacking sovereign nations. We too have a flair for intervening in global events.

    3) Family values, with a more liberal twist. We also believe very strongly in our social safety net (universal health care, employment insurance, etc). This philosophy helps redistribute the wealth, keeping the middle class more stable.

    4) A strong Information Technology sector. There are numerous technology companies that were founded or are based in Canada (ATI, EA, etc). Through NAFTA these companies have done very well in North America as a whole.

    Despite all of these similarities, we have some distinct differences that we are proud of:

    1) Productivity and skill are rewarded with higher salaries, while keeping the social safety net in mind. Yes, some small percentage of what we make go towards keeping those on welfare happy and fed, but the social programs also enable those who truly want to contribute. It puts them back on their feet. You can argue that this rarely happens here, but I see it regularly.

    Unlike the concerns listed above regarding Europe - there is very little nepotism here. It's more about what you know, than who you know.

    Therefore, you may see developers make 75% of what the same American developer will make. But if s/he's unemployed, or must help someone who is critically ill, he is able to utilize the programs available. This is part of "quality of life" and we're all about it.

    2) Less partisan. Yes, people have tendencies towards conservatism or liberalism. But a bad leader will cause his party to lose leadership, irrespective of party affiliation.

    Politicians who blatantly lie (i.e. we never said "stay the course") will be outed. Publically. It will literally be the topic for conversation for days. As opposed to being ignored by the media. The politicians here are scrutinized. There is more of a "participatory democracy" mentality.

    3) A more "level" interaction. You will find that the class boundaries between upper, lower and middle class are more blurred. Canadians are less afraid of being mugged (or shot) by their fellow citizens. This is a property of the social safety net that helps to keep people from those extreme survival measures.

    4) Biased media. There is definitely a slant on our media organizations, but this plays less of a role in the reporting. For instance, when the Liberals went through their corruption allegations last, there was not a single paper or news show in the country that did not cry bloody murder.

    If you were to pick a spot to live in Canada, I would recommend Ottawa, Toronto, Vancouver or Montreal (the big 4).

    If you are an IT worker, choose Ottawa, due to the more friendly attitude and because it is "Silicon Valley North". I currently work in Markham, near Toronto, and would recommend it as well.

  478. Canada - because I'm a dual citizen by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I always have the option of moving three hours north to Vancouver BC - Canada - as I'm a dual citizen of both the US and Canada - and by birth, so is my son (since I'm Canadian).

    But I live in a very Blue city in a Blue state. We have strong constitutional protections here to keep the fascists out of our private lives.

    And, as a former Army Sergeant, I've never been one to back down from a fight for my rights.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  479. Answers by kmhebert · · Score: 1

    1. the Moon 2. the cost Having typed that, now I get to wait for the arbitrary time delay... ...is it time yet? I guess I'll find out.

    --
    Regular Meta Moderators are not more likely to get mod points.
  480. Cannabis Effects by Pictish+Prince · · Score: 1
    This doesn't change the fact that medical research does show it has harmful effects.

    ... and has also shown its beneficial effects.

    Not only did a study in Madrid in 2000 show anti-carcinogenic properties of cannabis, but a similar project in Virginia which showed similar reults was squelched by the DEA under Reagan .

    --
    Only his tendency toward a dazed stupor prevented him from screaming aloud.
    1. Re:Cannabis Effects by Pictish+Prince · · Score: 1

      Sorry, that was the Ford administration. Maybe they are right about cannabis after all....

      --
      Only his tendency toward a dazed stupor prevented him from screaming aloud.
  481. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by ktappe · · Score: 1
    Poverty is generally measured, not by how little you have, but by how much less you have than average.
    Yeah, and that's wrong. That is a totally corrupted perception of freedom. If you ride a bike to work, live in a small house, feed your family and are happy, and I drive one of my BMWs to work, live in a big house, feed my family and am happy, does that make you less free that me?
    You compared two citizens within a single country. Your example is invalid because within a single country they are compared against the same average. We are comparing different countries now, not within a single country; that is the only way you can have two different averages. Get it?


    Compare a U.S. citizen to a Turkish citizen. Each makes (the equivalent of) $60000 per year. The American buys a BMW and takes out a 30 year mortgage on a big house. Because the average income in Turkey is lower, the Turk, with that same income, can pay off the mortgage on an equivalently large house in a few short years or could actually afford an entire small house with no mortgage at all. As a result, the Turk is considerably more free because he is not shackled with debt like the American is.


    -Kurt

    --
    "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
  482. Go to Panama by Pepebuho · · Score: 1

    Yep, like in Panama Canal. It is right at your doorstep, you can go anywhere else in the world, the culture is quite similar to USA culture and we are a dollarized economy riding a commercial boom right now. When you retire you get quite a lot of perks just for being retired (or older than 65).

  483. Already planned departure by heresyoftruth · · Score: 1

    The husband and I are already planning on going, and have narrowed it down to either Australia or Canada. We live quite close to BC, and love it, but have friends down under that really want us to go there. We are waiting for another year, as the husband is still attending college, and will be eligible to take his CPA exams upon graduation. If we go to Canada, which is more likely, it will take two years, that you must live outside the country, to complete the process. We both like larger cities, and are leaning towards Vancouver BC, as it's still close enough to his family in Washington state to get to in an emergency.

    For us, it's just a countdown of time. After nursing in the US for years, it is obvious that time is running out for my husband and I to get health care coverage that is functional to us. That was part of my decision on the countries that we looked into. There are other countries that do offer socialized healthcare, but are not as easy for us to get to.

    The things that influenced out decisions? Health care options, views on same sex couples (although a het couple, it's a good yardstick on the subject of tolerance and diversity.) and the view on poverty and drug use. We are also non drug users, but the 'War on Drugs' hasn't worked out to well here, and I don't want to go to a place where they are using public funds for the same behavior. I also don't like the idea of abandoning those that are unfortunate enough to find themselves in poverty, as we are all just one series of events from the same fate. As a nurse I have seen it.

    So, we are going, as soon as the husband is out of school, and we get through the paperwork. We could go now, but with him in school, we can't afford the fees to start the process.

    --
    Nothing hides evidence like a stew. -Gus Pratt
  484. I had to leave America to truly love it...... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 1

    I thought that leaving America might be for me too until I DID leave it. Fact is, you can't throw away everything that the United States has done all because of this current asshole administration.

    It is still the greatest country on the planet....period......

    I have been to 41 countries in my travels as a travel writer and if you live here and don't wake up every day happy you are here then you are seriously fucked up.

    And Europe? . PLEASE......

    The majority of conflicts that we've been involved in as a country in the last 100 years have been due to either...
    A. Europe not getting along
    B. Failed European colonial policy

    Yeah yeah, Europe likes to talk like they're some kinda of different animal but they're not. Compare the EU in population and economic output to the US and they are pretty much the United States of Europe. They have envy issues because they used to be the center of power and the U.S. took it. (Much like the U.S. is going to feel when we have to welcome our new Chinese overlords)

    I absolutely cannot stand this administration but the beauty of American is that the government DOES bend to the will of the people ultimately.

    And Iraq? I would suggest Europe take a look at it's own colonial past before throwing stones. France and it's occupation of Algeria in particular.

    If you don't like America bitches, then reclaim it.

  485. America is the worst country in the world... by orichter · · Score: 1

    To Paraphrase Winston Churchill...

    America is the worst country in the world... Except for all of the other countries in the world.

    And another gem from Churchill...

    You can always count on the Americans to do the right thing... After they've tried everything else.

  486. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by EatAtJoes · · Score: 1

    What my neighbor makes has no bearing on how free I am

    Of course, this depends on how you define "freedom" which for you is apparently freedom to spend some money on a family trip or an extra garage.

    How "free" are you to actually help your poor neighbor? What if he/she is disabled and has been denied health insurance? What if he/she is the victim of pollutants in the local water supply, which don't affect you and your bottled water? How free are _you_ to continue your gun-totin' ways if you lose your job/health insurance/house?

    I love how you right-winger/libertarian/anti-Commie (what's up with the Commie label anyway? Can't handle a little political diversity?) types always define freedom as a _individual's_ right to do things. What you fail to see is that in life, everyone needs help at some time or another, and some need a lot more help than others. Your response would be to leave them to die, or mumble about letting the Church/their family help them out. Anything but god forbid yourself or society consider the welfare of their fellow citizen.

    Fortunately for humanity there are other, less shortsighted people than yourself, and yes, there are societies unlike the US where they see through the selfishness. They're not perfect, but they are more _humane_.

  487. This table is misleading by leereyno · · Score: 1

    At first glance, someone might assume that the taxes in a country like the UK were lower than in the US.

    Nothing could be further from the truth.

    You see in the UK they have what is known as VAT, or Value Added Tax. Here in the US we call it sales tax. The VAT rate for the UK is 35%. Now some people will say I'm wrong and that the VAT is only 17.5%. Some people say this because that is what the government of the UK has told them. The official story over there is that when you buy something, you pay 17.5% VAT, and the seller pays the other 17.5% VAT. Well where does the seller get the money that he uses to pay that VAT? That's right, from YOU.

    What makes it worse is that this VAT is charged for EVERYTHING including things like FOOD. There are a handful of token exemptions for things like sanitary napkins and baby clothes, but not for anything that would make a significant impact to a struggling family's finances. In addition to this the minimum tax bracket applies to EVERYONE. If you're struggling to get by on minimum wage, you still have to pay income tax. I don't remember what the rate is, but its not low. My wife could tell you and I'll probably ask her and come back here with the answer.

    For the sake of argument lets assume that the lowest income tax bracket is 20%. This means that 55% of the income of someone who scubs toilets for a living is being paid to the government. This is what is known as regressive taxation.

    The result of this is that in the UK, at least where my wife is from (Stoke on Trent), the average person will work anywhere from 60 to 80 hours a week just to make ends meet. The prices are high, the wages are low, and the taxes are eating everyone alive.

    What are these taxes going towards? Welfare money for people who won't work, and to prop up a socialized medicine program that is broken and on the verge of collapse. A lot of the laws and state policies in the UK are perfect examples of what NOT to do. People complain here in the US about illegal aliens invading the country and causing problems. Well those who complain should count their blessings. About the worst you can say about illegals here is that they MIGHT bring the root causes of Mexico's socioeconomic malaise with them when they move here. Illegal aliens in the UK bring islamic terrorism with them. The UK has become Al Qaeda's number one target, in no small part because of how many current and future terrorists have poured into the country. What attracts them to the UK? Illegal aliens there are allowed to sign up for the dole, especially if they're from the middle east. The idea being that refusal to pay non-citizens for not working is "racist." The stuff that goes on over there is nothing less than kafkaesque.

    So while the top INCOME TAX bracket in the UK may be slightly lower than in the US, that does NOT tell the whole story at all. You have to look at the whole picture. When you do you'll find that while the US is not a perfect place, it is so much better than just about everywhere else that leaving here is patently insane.

    Lee

    --
    Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    1. Re:This table is misleading by VdG · · Score: 2, Informative

      What a load of ignorant nonsense.

      VAT is 17.5%. If a business is VAT registered it does not pay VAT on the materials and services which it buys, specifically so that consumers don't get charged twice. A small business may choose not to be VAT registered, (although there's a maximum turnover, above which they don't get a choice). In that case, their customers are effectively paying VAT twice, but the company saves the effort of dealing with HMC&E. The threshold is quite low, I believe.

      Some categories of goods have a reduced rate, e.g. domestic fuel. Some goods are zero-rated, e.g. food, (although that doesn't include snack foods, restuarants and a few other things). The full details are available on the Customs and Excise site, here: http://customs.hmrc.gov.uk/

      Your knowledge of our income tax is also clearly quite flawed. Everyone gets a tax-free allowance of about £5k - more for married people and the elderly, plus there are other allowances available for various things. Starting rate on income above this is 10%, on the next couple of thousand income. Basic rate is 22%. Then you pay 40% on income above about £40k. You don't pay income tax on pension contributions, and a bunch of other stuff paid directly from your sallary. Nor do you pay income tax on the returns from certain types of investments, (ISAs).

      There's National Insurance, too, which is not paid by the lowest earners, (effectively those on less than the £5k income tax allowance), then at 11% on upto £645 per week, and 1% on anything above that. This is specifically to cover the state pension and other social benefits, so once you reach the state retirement age you stop paying it - even if you're still working.

      Tax is complicated stuff - perhaps needlessly so - but I'm prety sure those details are correct, since I just looked them up on http://www.direct.gov.uk/. (And I must remember to complete my tax return soon.)

      Your comments on illegal immigrants are just as ludicrous: the sort of misleading garbasge spewed out by the most reactionary tabloids.

      For a start, you're probably confusing illegal immigrants with assylum applicants - or more likely don't understand the difference. Illegal immigrants won't be getting any handouts because they're not known to the system! Assylum applicants don't have an easy time of it and certainly don't get "dole", if by that you mean job-seeker's allowance, (what used to be Unemployment Benefit). They do get some social security payments, because we're not the sort of country that would let them starve to death whilst their application is considered - nothing to do with being racist or not. Some will be accepted, some will be kicked out, (the majority). Being a bureaucratic process it takes a while.

      There are quite a lot of perfectly legitimate workers coming in from outside the UK, but at the moment most of those are from Eastern Europe - new members of the EU like Poland - and they're providing valuable services to the UK economy, and paying UK taxes. Plenty of good Polish builders around at the moment, which is great for us homeowners who need roofs fixing and the like.

      I'm glad you're happy in the USA, and I don't care too much what you think of the UK, but please, if you're going to slag us off take the trouble to make your claims at least vaguely resemble reality.

    2. Re:This table is misleading by leight_p · · Score: 1
      VAT is 17.5%. If a business is VAT registered it does not pay VAT on the materials and services which it buys, specifically so that consumers don't get charged twice. A small business may choose not to be VAT registered, (although there's a maximum turnover, above which they don't get a choice). In that case, their customers are effectively paying VAT twice, but the company saves the effort of dealing with HMC&E. The threshold is quite low, I believe.
      Just a small point, If a small business is not VAT registered (limit is £60k p.a. for taxable supplies), the customers do not pay VAT twice, as the unregistered business can not collect VAT for HMR&C. VAT on the supply is only suffered once (on either the end EU consumer or an unregistered business if earlier in the supply line). The Grandparent does make a good point about the reliability of using top marginal income tax and social security rates, given the revenues of indirect taxes such as VAT (sales tax) and stamp duty, as well as capital taxes - It is wrong to say that the UK is low tax compared to the US. However, the UK Government does provide strong support in health, education, and old age that is rarely matched in other countries: - NHS - Decent healthcare whenever I've needed it. It's size allowing it to purchase and maintain an extensive range of equipment, which can't be matched by private alternatives in the UK (they refer paitients back to the NHS for many operations). - State education. Fees are only necessary at University level (still free in Scotland), and these are small when compared to the US. - State pension. Although small does provide support for the elderly. The effect on immigration - a lot of people want to live in the UK. Is this a bad thing? I say it reflects the opportunities and open minded views present in the UK. The contribution provided by Sub-continent and Polish migrants shows that it can work.
  488. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
    And GOD FORBID that people should get to make that kind of choices for themselves. You obviously know better.
    Yup, I know that some people are absolute wimps who can't stand by themselves and have to bow to peer pressure and have to do what makes them look good in the eyes of others rather than doing what's good.
  489. Where to go? by Reeses · · Score: 1

    1) Australia.

    1a) Wander aimlessly around mid-Eastern Europs, not really living anywhere.

    2) School.

    2a) Money.

    2b) Citizenship. (which I can get in Oz, just haven't filled out the paperwork.)

    --
    Reeses
  490. Question Concerning Healthcare Issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been curious about leaving the US as well, but am not sure it's a viable option in my situation. I have a health condition that unfortunately requires fairly expensive treatments at the moment. My condition is nothing debilitating, I am perfectly capable of working any type of job, but the treatments keep me healthy. If I moved to another country, my concern would be maintaining the ability to receive the treatments. I know healthcare varies by country, but realistically could I move to another country without interruption of my treatments? i.e. is it possible to move and immediately receive healthcare coverage (via a job or government provided) without some sort of transition period?

    1. Re:Question Concerning Healthcare Issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go somewhere with free healthcare!

    2. Re:Question Concerning Healthcare Issues by daverabbitz · · Score: 1

      There is very few places with free health care for non-citizens.

      We have state-subsidized health-care in New Zealand, but it is only available to New Zealand (and NZ protectorates) and Australian (some kind of bi-lateral agreement) citizens.

      --
      What could be better than a jet powered motorcycle? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8l6GTHLSWE
  491. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by EatAtJoes · · Score: 1

    don't feel the need to sleep with guns in the drawer, or shoot their classmates.

    Unless they're Canadian ...

  492. I've always said, by Bluesman · · Score: 1

    If I ever leave the U.S., I'm moving to Texas.

    But seriously, the U.S. is huge and diverse. Maybe a move to a different state would be easier and have just as good a return as a move to another country.

    --
    If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
  493. I do not think that word means what you think ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Christianity is based on love

    And slaughter. And ritual blood sacrifice. And slavery -- including the practice of keeping sex slaves called "concubines".

    Read the tenth commandment again; you know, the one where "God" claims a wife is a husband's property, just like his cattle or his mules. Read about how a slave owner could beat his slaves to death; and would only have to pay a fine if the slave died within 48 hours of the beating.

    Read again where Jesus said "I come not to bring peace, but a sword".

    He also said not only supported, but had been heaven-sent to fulfill all the policies of the Old Testament; you know, like slavery, and the slaughter/enslavement of non-believers.

    Christianity is based on love in the same way that vegetarianism is based on vegtables.

  494. Re:Go work for Uncle Sam overseas and see the worl by Tsunayoshi · · Score: 1

    I worked for the State Dept (Marine Corps Security Guard Program) at US Embassies and most of what the parent said is right on. Just make sure you are the kind of person who will like living in the local economy. I met too many State personnel who would never leave their little island of America and missed out on tons of unique experiences and always bitched about what they were missing from the US. I almost went the same route at my first post until I met a really cool Finnish woman (this was in Pakistan) who showed me that there was a ton of stuff to do if you would just get off your ass and go look for it.

    And about the housing, here is how one State person described it to us before we went overseas:

    "Take a country that has an extremely rich upper class, no middle class, and a large lower class. So you have really nice neigborhoods with large houses where everyone has a house staff, and then you have the slums. Where do you think the State Dept is going buy housing for the US staff?"

    We had 12 Marines in one house in Peru and did not at all feel crowded. If you have kids, you will most likely get at least one bedroom per child, and in most places you will be posted you can easily afford a house staff (cleaning, laundry, cooking) to free up a lot of your time. Now some places are unique, such as Beijing or Hong Kong (I forget which) where the embassy basically rents out floors of apartment buildings (NICE apartments, but still apartments) and houses all of the staff there.

    --
    "Get a bicycle. You will not regret it, if you live." - Mark Twain, "Taming the Bicycle"
  495. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by ahodgson · · Score: 1

    They still have the same average spending power, which means that no one is "poorer" for their lack of resources. But they're happy, and together, they've built something: a society, where people feel wanted and protected and cared for, so that they don't feel the need to sleep with guns in the drawer, or shoot their classmates.

    Interesting fantasy world. In the socialist country that I live, we have a significant percentage (probably 25%) of the population who basically choose to do nothing, instead leaching off the rest of society, who in turn feel increasingly resentful of the money being stolen from them to support the leeches.

    Oh, and every few weeks the leeches go out and protest that we aren't giving them enough for doing nothing.

    And all the while, everyone's standard of living continues to slip.

  496. Kennis Migrant and Dutch Lesson (?) by james968 · · Score: 1

    I'm waiting for IND to approve my KM app. (4 months, so far) I'm in Amsterdam ZO also, how do those free Dutch lessons work?

  497. No Way I'm Leaving . . . by ZiggyJay · · Score: 1

    Why not?

    Two Words:

    Metric System

  498. Wow! by vox+humanna · · Score: 1

    Sounds like we all need to get together and kick the SSA beauracray in the backside to fix this. What exactly happened to your SSA record?

    1. Re: Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      email me on gmail, same ID.

      ~Rebecca

  499. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by nebosuke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes, I can. Earning more does not significantly increase your need for health care, state education, etc., yet socialist policies require you to contribute progressively more to public works the more you earn. The reason, like I said, is that the philosophy behind socialism places more weight on the side of socioeconomic safety for all than socioeconomic freedom.

    As for whether or not this translates into better circumstances in reality, take my personal situation as an anecdote. Neither of my parents holds a degree, and neither have ever held a job that paid higher than 150% of the minimum wage, despite the fact that my father has kept the same job for nearly 20 years. We live in a very poor area, and my HS was rated among the worst in the state—and rightly so. I'm currently earning my degree through a scholarship to Harvard. I'm taking some time off from school to help manage the family expenses, and can put far more of the $2000/week that I'm earning as an IT/resource management contractor to paying off family loans than I would have been able to in a more socialist country.

    On the other hand, I had to study until 3am basically every night for the last 3 years of high school to make up for the non-education I was receiving from the state, and I regularly work 14 hour days right now. It's definitely not easy, and perhaps I should just kick back and relax a bit more like some of my friends, but at least here I have the option to work hard and see real returns.

    I don't believe socialism to be evil—or even wrong—to be honest, it's just that as one of those people who are willing to work hard, I prefer to see proportional compensation for my efforts.

  500. It's your country, fix it, don't abandon it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think of the two hundred plus years of struggle. First for our independence, then for our union. The struggle for emancipation, civil rights, sufferage....

    The memory of those who gave their lifes for your prosperity today should make you ashamed that you are talking about leaving it when the going gets tough. As miserable as this administration is, it is a hang nail compaired to the cancer of institutionalized bigotry and hatred that is segregation, and late night lynchings.

    You aren't being asked to stand up to men with hoods and nooses. You aren't being asked to put on a uniform and fight your countrymen in an age where field dressings lead to gangrene, and anesthetic doesn't exist. You are being asked to organize, speak out, and talk back. Donate your time and money to candidates who represent you and your progressive interests.

    I am a US Army Ranger who firmly believes it takes just as much courage to stand and protest when your community is against you, or when there is a chance you will be jailed for your convictions as it takes to pick up a firearm and enter a battlefield. Cindy Sheehan is just as much a patriot as Pat Tillden. Silence and escaping to foriegn soil is cowardace.

  501. Only an insane person would want to leave the US by Supercooldude · · Score: 1
    Why in the world would anyone privileged enough to live in the US want to leave it? Thousands of people risk their lives to get here. The only reasons any American would have to leave the US is because:

    1) He is a liberal leftist freedom-hating jihad-supporting communist who thinks the US is "too religious" or "too capitalist" or some nonsense like that, in which case I say good ridddance, America already has too many people like you, and you don't contribute anything to make this a better country anyway.

    2) He is especially lazy and doesn't like to work, in which case he will probably have a better life in some welfare state like Sweden. In this case I also say good riddance. The US is a great place to live if you are hardworking, but welfare and other type of social services are not as easy to get as in some other countries, so the lazy would be better off someplace else.

    3) He is neither of the above, but is seriously naive and honestly believes that he will have a better life in some other place, in which case I hope he comes to his senses before he makes this terrible decision, because he'll regret it.

    I moved to the US from Canada to get the benefits of lower taxes and greater personal freedom (ie the right to bear arms) and would never want to live anywhere else. Sure there are less government-funded services than in Canada, but for someone who very rarely uses them anyways (I haven't seen a doctor in years), I am willing to sacrifice them if it means I get to keep a significantly larger portion of my income.

  502. INCORRECT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The United States entry should be 36.9%. The top tax rate is 35%, and SS contributions are 7.65%. But once you exceed the social security max at $90,000, you only pay into Medicare at 1.9% (there is no max for Medicare) That 42.6% figure was calculated by adding the top tax rate to the SS contribution rate. I guess someone who didn't know there was a limit compiled that.

    The net result is that $89,999.99 has a higher marginal rate than $90,000 and above. State income taxes may change this, for states that charge income tax.

    One can of course argue that the other half of the SS tax that businesses pay is really a tax on the individual (if they eliminated it and made you pay it, you'd (hopefully) get a 7.65% raise and just have more withheld. I guess they do that to hide just how much SS & Medicare costs us. So make my 36.9% figure 38.8% if you want to be fair. But realize that your marginal tax is over 50% in most states until you max out your SS contributions!!

  503. Here's the link... by mjbkinx · · Score: 1

    LOL. Why is this flamebait? Not like most Yanks would know (Wish I could find a link to the video on YouTube with the Yanks identifying Australia as France...).

    Oh, you must be talking about this little gem. There is another good one, too.

  504. Oh well by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    See ya. have fun.

  505. Switzerland by yanowhiz · · Score: 1

    Switzerland! A. They have a direct democracy. So I wouldn't have to worry about which person was elected president. B. Economy is within the top 10 of the world. C. No laws against sharing anything on the Internet *cough*RI*MP*AA*cough*. D. Always neutral! Never picks sides. :)

  506. Canada by mcocke · · Score: 1

    I'd love to move my family to Canada. From what I can tell from watching the news, Canada is much more civilized than America, and America is becoming worse every day. The only thing stopping me is employment for my wife and myself. If I could be assured of finding work, I'd leave tomorrow.

  507. Somalia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simply because there is no government to be found. By mear technicality it wouldn't be hard to see if a few larger companies started moving in the entire country could be the corperate morass of my dreams. /likes Jennifer Government //Dave Berry is a bad writer

    1. Re:Somalia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you miss the news that the Islamic Courts have taken over most of the (british somaliland part of the) country?

  508. Where I'd live, and why I don't by Wolfger · · Score: 1

    Well, I used to think I wanted to move to Germany... but since I've started paying attention to their laws and government, I'm not sure it'd be a huge improvement (although they do lead a more laid-back lifestyle, and I like that). From what I understand, the Netherlands have a nice government with decent laws. Haven't really looked into that.

    What keeps me from moving there? Lack of a job, lack of a house, moving expenses, inability to sell my current houses in this horrible economy, and I'd miss my friends.

    Canada would do away with most of these issues... I'm a half hour drive from the border... I'd be able to keep my friends and my job, and moving expenses would be negligible, but there's still the matter of two unsaleable houses (one I've been trying to sell for 5 years now), and buying a new house. And Canada is better in some ways, but worse in others.

  509. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by Azure+Khan · · Score: 1

    Nice thought, but incorrect.

    First of all, not everyone CAN have lots of spare money in a capitalist model. To put it bluntly, the "have mosts" who control and direct the capitalist markets are largely unwilling to part with their own money, so any increase in spare money (ie, wage increases) to the "have leasts" is turned into price increases (inflation) that is paid for by the "have somes" (ie, the middle class). What this induces is a state in which the upper levels of the "have somes" scramble to join the "have mosts" ranks in order to escape the situation, while the bottom and middle sections of the "have somes" slowly drop off into the "have leasts" because of these inflated prices. The capitalist system is designed to allow some mobility between the stratas, but was designed to ensure there would ALWAYS be stratas, and that the lower strata would likely never live a much better life than they already do.

    Which is why, despite what some may think, "Capitalism" is a system of economy, NOT a system of government.

    --

    --- I'm going sane in a crazy world.
  510. Re:New Zealand - VISIT IN THE WINTER FIRST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bah. Every self-respecting Kiwi knows that the houses aren't insulated because:

    * If you get cold, you're "soft".
    * You should be out working on the farm, anyway.

    But seriously, we just re-did our kids room and there was drywall and then exterior weatherboards. Most (pre 90's) houses have insulation in the ceiling, just not the walls or underfloor. Modern houses have good insulation, which introduces other problems that the contractors down under aren't too experienced with though.

    I can't fathom why there's none - it's not like it just started getting wet + cold last year...

  511. far far away by Sharkeys-Day · · Score: 1

    Actually, many us who live in the American West consider being far away from everything one of greatest advantages. "Nowhere" (near-wilderness) is 5 to 15 minutes away.

    Try to find that in Manhattan.

  512. America Vs. The World by Revenge_of_Solver_Ta · · Score: 1

    I'm an American who has traveled through a LOT of countries. Drank, ate, and had a goodtime with the locals just about everywhere. I'm not your typical 'Yank' as I can wear many different skins and blend in with the surroundings quite easily. But those are stories for another time....

    Like it or not, generally this is what's happening:

    A)If you wanna make money, there is no place in the world like the USA. Far and away, this is the place to be for business and capitalism. People say India and China will take us in that aspect...hmmmmm... Anyway, if you want opportunity and have even a tiny bit of entrepreneurial spirit, the US is your place. If you do the work and play it right, you can get whatever money and success you are looking for here. Might take a little while, but it CAN be done easier here than anywhere else in the world from what I can see.

    B)If you wanna have fun, go elsewhere, especially Europe. The US isn't even in the top 30. Nightlife, goodtimes, adventures: this place is pathetic. Ya, I can hear you 'but what about LA, what about NYC'...puhhlease. Maybe there was a time when these fabled locations were decent (Note to fellow Americans: we had 1 1969, the rest of the world never left that year), but living in a Police State doesn't do much for excitement. Then again, a country founded on religious principals shouldn't be expected to be that wild to begin with.

    Overall, it just depends on what you are looking for. I like going abroad for my fun. But I'm also glad to have US citizenship for the overwhelming business opportunities.

  513. I did by PrinceAshitaka · · Score: 1

    I was american. I did emigrate. (to Switzerland) I love it here am I am not going back. Not that we don't have our problems but it is definatly greener over here.

    --
    quis custodiet ipsos custodes
  514. Speaking of insane persons... by alienmole · · Score: 1
    He is a liberal leftist freedom-hating jihad-supporting communist

    Jesus Christ, are you serious? Talk about being part of the problem, and not the solution. Do you see no danger in this labelling of everyone who doesn't think like you as "freedom-hating", "communist", etc.? Have you ever heard of Senator McCarthy? In the end, do you really think there's any significant difference between your extremist position and that of a jihadist who wants to blow up your city? Actually, there is a difference: you're talking about your fellow countrymen as though they're the enemy - in fact, you're directly identifying them with who you perceive as your enemy. There's a serious problem with that, and it's located inside your head.

    1. Re:Speaking of insane persons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > In the end, do you really think there's any significant difference between your extremist position and that of a jihadist who wants to blow up your city?

      Yes. The parent just thinks that you're an idiot. The jihadi wants to kill you. If you can't see a difference, then you are an idiot.

    2. Re:Speaking of insane persons... by alienmole · · Score: 1

      No, the parent thinks that his country would be better off without people who think differently than he. Jihadists think the world would be better off without people who think differently than they. The parent seems perfectly willing to use the same kind of measures that were used during the 1950's communist purge in the U.S. I'd rather deal with the occasional terrorist attack on a city, planted by foreign enemies, than with my countrymen systematically trying to exterminate the point of view of those they don't agree with. Both he and the jihadists are exhibiting an extreme form of intolerance, and whether you use bombs to perpetuate that intolerance is an implementation detail. It's the corruption of the human spirit that is the true evil here, and that's exhibited by the OP as much as by any jihadist.

    3. Re:Speaking of insane persons... by serbanp · · Score: 1

      Please don't feed the troll (or is he just brain-dead?) It looks like this AskSlashdot's subject is bringing up jingoistic urges in one too many posters...

  515. Japan baby by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 1

    1) Japan
    2) I'm allready in the process of moving there.
    3) Hey, I lose jury by trial and a few other things, but at least the government is slightly more honest.

  516. Quebec by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

    This one is an apparent no brainer:

    Quebec

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
  517. Thank you by rs79 · · Score: 1

    A Sala'am Alakim.

    Thank you for one of the most human, inspirational and poignent posts on slashdot ever and for pointing out in this crazy world that we know nothing from the rubbish that pretends to be news and that is is possible to find peace. Good for you. I'm impressed.

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
    1. Re:Thank you by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, but I'd qualify that; there's plenty of info on what's going on in Darfur specifically, and Sudan in general, out there. You just need to choose a range of sources of information and use your critical thinking to determine which is accurate and which is propaganda or shabby reporting.

  518. Go! Hurry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Be fine with me if those folks actually put their money and lives where their mouths are. I say leave as soon as possible. Hurry! Of course, there ARE some issues (aren't there always? Damn!)

    1. In most places taxes are higher, like WAY higher.

    2. Umm, you'll very likely have to learn a new language. Until you do, fluently, your job opportunities will likely be limited. And you'll be made fun of, at best, while you're struggling through it.

    3. Discrimination? You better believe it. "Equality of opportunity" is not always in the vocabulary.

    4. Wanna pack? Forget it. You'll be lucky to get mace.

    5. Crime? Pick any city. Petty crime is rampant. Watch your wallet!

    6. Drugs? Lots, and more openly. Think Denmark.

    7. Homeless? The deal is, get a baby, stake out your place, and beg what you don't steal. Enough of this 'bearded man with a dog, God bless.' Let's get serious. Best Place? Rome.

    8. Arrogance? You think Americans are arrogant?????? You've never been abroad.

    9. Big Brother? Will meet you as you step off the plane.

    10. Employment? See #2, and that's just the first hurdle. Who wants to hire an American? Are you a citizen? No? Are you eligible to become one? How long does it take? What if they say "No!"?

    11. Bureaucracy? Let's just say the EU is not a threat to anybody. They are way too busy deciding who can sell snails under what name and measuring for the corner office of the sub sub sub Director for carpet cleaning specifications.

    12. Immigration? There ain't no border patrol, Bucky! And the suburbs of Paris? It's not like Broadmoor. Count the burned out cars abandoned on the streets to find out where you are.

    13. Kind gentle people? Been to a football game in England lately?

    So hey, if you want to leave, go. Enough bitching. Just do it.

  519. Where would I move? by dodongo · · Score: 1

    Canada. Of course, that assumes Harper doesn't end up doing too much damage.

    Why not move there? Immigration really looks difficult. I don't have any of the special skills where they just sort of shoo you in at the border. And nobody has offered to sponsor me. Feh. I'm moving far away in December, anyway.

  520. Re:Ireland is not the happiest place on earth by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

    Actually, Denmark is the happiest place to live with the happiest people so bollocks to Ireland at #11.

    The Economist begs to differ...

    Germans might not laugh very much, or smile very much at that, but it doesn't mean they don't have a sense of humour. They laugh at the fact that so many people in Ireland died of starvation during the "potato famine" of 1845-1849 when Ireland is completely surrounded by water. All they had to do was go fishing.

    See what I mean? Not so much as a chicken crossing the road in there. Sigh.

  521. Re:Ireland, good and not so good by An+dochasac · · Score: 1

    Indeed, Ireland changes its immigration laws (in fact all of its laws) almost as often as it rains here. The current mood is isolationism, even though immigration, tax amnesty lured multinationals and international trade created the celtic tiger in the first place.

    Despite what the Irish believe, Ireland is a beautiful, prosperous place where people enjoy life without as much government interference as you'd have in the U.S., France or ex Soviet states. Here are some pluses and minuses:

    The amount of vacation is the least in the E.U., but is still several times what you'd have in the U.S.

    The personal tax rate averages about 8% more than the U.S.

    Driving is expensive, intense, and dangerous similar to what you'd see in New York City, Rome, Paris, and yet other aspects of life are more relaxed than in the U.S.

    Do your own research before buying property, Ireland is propsperous but methinks not prosperous enough to maintain this bubble. Prices are higher than most of the major cities of the world and nearly all of the United States.

    IT isn't growing as fast as it was, it may be decreasing, the construction boom (associated with the property boom/bubble) is taking up the slack... for the time being.

    The people are generally very friendly, but I see a growing level of racism and anti immigrant sentiment.

    Considering the prosperity, high tax rate and extremely high take by the government, the infrastructure is terrible. Roads are narrow and dangerous, public transportation service in much of the developing world is better. The public health care system has disimproved since Ireland was the one of the poorest countries in the E.U.

    Law enforcement is weak.

    There isn't a clean separation between church and state. When you are choosing a school, a prime consideration is whether you are protestant or Catholic, with the implication that others needn't apply.

    Speech isn't quite as free as in the U.S. A political figure or wealthy famous person can sue you for libel or slander quite easily.

    The cost of living is extremely high compared to wages.

    And yet, I choose to live here because you don't have to drive a car everywhere, villages are self-sufficient, people are generally very well educated and have good intentions, jobs are available.

  522. Switzerland by Control-Z · · Score: 1


        It's sort of like where I live but cleaner, the landscape is more majestic, and the history is amazing. A castle on every hill.

        What's stopping me is kids and family.

  523. I have a better idea... by Garse+Janacek · · Score: 1

    Alright, I didn't see this thread till it hit 1500, but maybe someone will see this:

    If 1% of the people who joked about moving to Canada after the last election instead moved to, say, Florida and Ohio, we could fix this whole mess.

    I don't intend to leave, and if you're thinking of leaving, please don't. There's still a chance to improve the situation. If everyone who dislikes the state of the country leaves, then there really will be no one left to keep the most powerful military in the world (for now :-P) from doing whatever an unstable pseudo-fundamentalist leader wants. As depressing as it seems, the presence of even a small opposition is still keeping Bush from doing a lot of things...

    --

    I am the man with no sig!

    1. Re:I have a better idea... by Blue+Fox+USA · · Score: 1

      1. Ohio's economy has been beat to a pulp and there's not much left. Good luck finding a job.

      2. If "everyone" leaves, there wouldn't be enough people to maintain the military.

      3. Once SkyNet comes online, then 1 & 2 won't matter.

      May whatever god you believe in (or not) help us...

  524. Denmark! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to create anti-Islamic cartoons!

  525. Slashdot poll`maybe? by Z00L00K · · Score: 1
    Well... as a song goes "wherever I lay my hat, that's my home". And you may actually consider that even though the grass may look greener on the other side it may be due to the fact it's painted.

    If anything - take an evening with The Notebooks of Lazarus Long and come back later.

    And you may have to know the system well in order to also know how to circumvent it's flaws so moving to another country may not serve you.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  526. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  527. Any number of places. by Shag · · Score: 1

    After not leaving the ol' US of A at all for the first 33 years of my life, in the last 24 months, I've spent time (not in the airport) in Beijing, Kampala, London, Mexico City, Meppel, Montreal, Nairobi, New Delhi, Paris, Rome, and Vienna. I'll add Dundee to that list in a few days.

    With few exceptions, all those places have everything I need. New Delhi's air quality isn't good enough for me to live there for more than about a week. Beijing's is better, but it might still be an issue long-term, although the Chinese government plans to spend huge amounts of money on improving the environment leading up to the 2008 olympics, which could put it back in the running. Mexico City's is better than Beijing's, but still a little smoggy.

    If I had to pick a single one off the list, it'd probably be Kampala. The climate is very close to that of Hawaii, people there are friendly, and we're nearing the point where Malaria vaccines will become available. Plus, the currency is devalued, banks pay double-digit interest rates, and anyone with IT skills can probably scrounge telecommuting work that pays amounts the average Ugandan would be shocked at. One can live on about $7000 a year there, so you can imagine what a western paycheck would get you.

    If I wanted seasons, Rome or Meppel or maybe even Dundee might be nice... and Beijing favorably impressed me when I was there, too.

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  528. Not a paradox at all by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    See here's the problem: You seem to want a country that enforces YOUR viewpoint on everyone. When you say you are interested in a country that has Shari'a Law, you seem to mean that you want it as you understand and would choose to practise it. That's understandable, but the problem is that barring you running the show, you aren't going to find a place that everyone agrees with your views. I'm not an Islamic scholar and I can't claim to understand all the intricate differences but even my cursory level of research has revealed some major differences in opinion as to what Shari'a Law ought to encompass and how it ought to be enforced.

    So, if you want to live your life according to the beliefs you have, the best bet for that is a nation that is tolerant of all beliefs. While they won't force others to conform to what you believe is right, they won't tend for force you to conform to what they think is right.

    There's really no paradox here. If you go to a country like Iran that's run by Ayatollah, well you get THEIR version of Islam which might not mesh with your own. You also tend to run in to the whole "All power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely," thing. If you go to a country like this US that's very free you are going to see all kinds of people doing all kinds of things you don't like, but they aren't going to tell you that you have to join in for the most part.

    1. Re:Not a paradox at all by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      See here's the problem: You seem to want a country that enforces YOUR viewpoint on everyone.

      (*) it is not only my viewpoint, for such country to exist it needs to be a point at least of majority of the population of that country
      (*) historically, minorities in Muslim countries had much more political freedoms than any minority has now in a Western country. In Khalifats of previous times, Jewish and Christian communities exercised their own laws on the members of their communities. Even in tsarist Russia of the XIX century, Jews excersized Mosaic law in their shtettls.

      The rest of your post is nicely explaining in different words my position. The other side of every paradox
      is the triviality of it, take Zeno's paradoxes, for example.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    2. Re:Not a paradox at all by mfrank · · Score: 1

      As long as you're a Christian that didn't used to be Muslim, you mean. Or one who wanted to build a new temple or church.

    3. Re:Not a paradox at all by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      According to Shari'a, apostasy is punished by death. I do not know what does Shari'a says about building a new temple or church. I guess, in the limits of the community that should be fine.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    4. Re:Not a paradox at all by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      (*) it is not only my viewpoint, for such country to exist it needs to be a point at least of majority of the population of that country

      I don't care what you believe, no two people are ever going to believe in exactly the same things.

      (*) historically, minorities in Muslim countries had much more political freedoms than any minority has now in a Western country. In Khalifats of previous times, Jewish and Christian communities exercised their own laws on the members of their communities.

      Not true, Canada for example allows native peoples on reserves and the Inuit of the extreme north to have self governance on their lands. This frame of mind that you have however lets you completely miss the point of democracy. Whereas you wish every little community to have their own laws and self governance simply because they purport to be of a certain faith democracy brings everyone together, with no regard to religion, to make laws of the land for everyone.

      It seems to me that Muslims are a very divisive people. They think in terms of "us" and "them" instead of "all". It's a very selfish mindset to have and instead of dividing everyone against each other perhaps Muslims can grow up and join us here in the 21st century and get involved with the rest of civilization.

    5. Re:Not a paradox at all by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      no two people are ever going to believe in exactly the same things. and you think of course that Islam does not allow for that...

      you completely miss the point of democracy Of course, because there is only One True Democracy.

      It seems to me that Muslims are a very divisive people. They think in terms of "us" and "them" instead of "all". I am sad that you see the world in black and white. People share some common things and people are different in some things, that is why Allah addresses in Qur'an sometimes to Muslims, sometimes to the whole humanity.

      In general Muslims view all people as Bani Adam, progeny of Adam, 'alaihi salaam, united by the common purpose of existence. Trust me, I do not wish even my worst enemies to go to the Hellfire, such a horrible place it is. But I cannot make you a Muslim, you have to strive to become a Muslim yourself.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    6. Re:Not a paradox at all by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      Trust me, I do not wish even my worst enemies to go to the Hellfire, such a horrible place it is.

      I refuse to worship any "God" who would cast its own creations in to an eternity of suffering simply because it didn't worship "Him".

    7. Re:Not a paradox at all by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      But it is not only that, you are also rejecting His existance. Otherwise, you would worship Him at least out of fear if not out of awe.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    8. Re:Not a paradox at all by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      But it is not only that, you are also rejecting His existance. Otherwise, you would worship Him at least out of fear if not out of awe.

      There is no proof "He" exists. Even if there were I would no more worship "Him" or be in awe of "Him" or be fearful of "Him" than I would my own parents who are also my Creators. While I respect my parents I do not worship them or fear them. Fear is the reaction of the ignorant.

      A parent who creates a child and tortures the child deserves no respect no matter what the child has done. The parent should correct the child. A Creator who casts any of His creations into "eternal hellfire" deserves the same lack of respect.

    9. Re:Not a paradox at all by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      You comparing a human to the Deity. Deity is not human. The analogy does not work. Deity is above human. It is so much above that we cannot possibly comprehend Him other than what He tells us about Himself. All the human words we are using to describe Him are bleak approximations.

      Most important is what He tells us to do and what He might do to us if we won't behave.

      Please try to think more abstract than parent-child analogy. I know you are capable of that.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    10. Re:Not a paradox at all by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      You comparing a human to the Deity. Deity is not human.

      Oh, I see, so a deity which is so far beyond humanity that we cannot comprehend it requires human worshipers? That is like saying humans need ants to worship them. It is ridiculous. Have you ever even thought about why a deity so far beyond humanity would even care about humanity at all?

      This goes back to:

      1. An all powerful Creator has no need for worshipers as He is all powerful.
      2. If an all powerful Creator wanted worshipers and decided to create them they would be perfect beings who would worship him without question.
      3. No person on earth is perfect and not everyone believes in one faith.

      Most important is what He tells us to do and what He might do to us if we won't behave.

      Propaganda written by the ruling class at the time to seize power over the masses and subdue them. To fill them with fear. Fear is the mind killer. The west has been waking up and realizing this truth about religion which is why we have secular societies which you yourself admit are more free.

      Please try to think more abstract than parent-child analogy. I know you are capable of that.

      Open your mind to the possibility. Do not dismiss it out of hand. Think logically. I know you are capable of that.

    11. Re:Not a paradox at all by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      I think at this point I can just repeat my arguments again, since you seem to be applying again antropomorphic arguments to Creator. Such as "need". He does not need anything.

      Besides, other kids are calling me to join them at the playground.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    12. Re:Not a paradox at all by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      Finally, some rational thought. Agreed, an all powerful Creator doesn't need anything as He is all powerful. So that turns us to WANT:

      2. If an all powerful Creator wanted worshipers and decided to create them they would be perfect beings who would worship him without question.
      3. No person on earth is perfect and not everyone believes in one faith.

      I think at this point I can just repeat my arguments again, since you seem to be applying again antropomorphic arguments to Creator.

      No, I am not. I am applying basic logic about needs and wants which are consistent to all beings.

      An all powerful Creator would not need for anything as He would be all powerful. Therefore if we were created to worship him he WANTED us. If an all powerful Creator WANTED worshipers he would create perfect beings who would all worship him, remember, he is all powerful, he could do this! Nobody on earth is perfect, and not everyone believes in the same Creator, some people don't even believe in ANY creator, therefore we were not created by an all powerful Creator for the purpose of worshiping him!

      If the Creator is the one described by Islam then he is a cruel being playing a game with the lives of his creations. "Worship me or be in pain for eternity". This is not the kind of Creator who deserves any worship or respect.

    13. Re:Not a paradox at all by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      No, I am not. I am applying basic logic about needs and wants which are consistent to all beings.

      Well, here is your assumption you denied having in your previous comments: "needs and wants which are consistent to all beings.". In my religion this assumption is not valid. Logic is a way to link A and B. It always has ifs statement A: "if A is true then B is true (or not true)". That is logic.

      Take, for example, geometry. It has theorems, lemmas, conjectures, to which mathematical logic applies and it has axioms which comes outside of the field of geometry as a generalization of human experience. In fact, the example of Lobachevsky and Euclidean geometry or Lebesgue and Riemann's integrals shows that one can develop perfectly useful systems using substantially different axioms. The usefullness of such systems cannot be determined in the scope of geometry or calculus they are defining, it is determined by applying this sciences to a sphere of human activity outside their scopes.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    14. Re:Not a paradox at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One should never worship God out of fear. Yes, God is something to fear, but if you understand your place in relation to God, you can only worship God with awe. Unless, of course, you insist on worshiping Allah, which is merely an offshoot of the old pagan god Baal, not the God of Abraham--look up the history for yourself.

    15. Re:Not a paradox at all by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

      I refuse to worship any "God" who would cast its own creations in to an eternity of suffering simply because it didn't worship "Him".

      And that would get you cast into that eternity of suffering anyways. So... might as well convert, right? :P :P :P That's a JOKE! I'm the same way. EXACTLY. Christianity and Islam are but both creations of MAN, thereby inherently flawed as such. I'll stick to my old ancient ways of spirituality, predating these creations by eons. :)

      --
      Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
    16. Re:Not a paradox at all by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      Well, here is your assumption you denied having in your previous comments: "needs and wants which are consistent to all beings.". In my religion this assumption is not valid.

      I see, so in your religion the definition of words change meaning to suit you? A human NEEDS air to breathe. A human WANTS to find happiness. A NEED is a requirement, a WANT is a wish. The words NEED and WANT do not change meaning depending on their subject. This is not an assumption.

      Let me break it down further for you, I see you are having trouble with logic:

      1. An all powerful Creator has no NEED for worshipers as He is all powerful.
      This guy is all powerful and in your words "so far beyond humanity". He can do anything he wants. He doesn't need air, food, sleep, anything. Why would he need worshipers? He doesn't.

      2. If an all powerful Creator WANTED worshipers and decided to create them they would be perfect beings who would worship him without question.
      Alright, so if he doesn't need worshipers lets assume your religion is correct and we were created to worship Him. That means he must have wanted worshipers. Well if an all powerful being wanted worshipers he would make the best worshipers he could, not a bunch of ragtag people like us who can't agree on anything. He wouldn't make a salad, he wouldn't make an airplane, he wouldn't make people who disagree about everything, he would make perfect worshipers who would all believe in him.

      3. No person on earth is perfect and not everyone believes in one faith.
      Well, we know that nobody here is perfect and not everyone believes in the same deity or even any deity at all so this baloney about us being created as worshipers is just that, baloney.

      This being said there are only three possibilities about the motive of the Creator:
      1. We were created for a purpose other than worshiping the Creator.

      Maybe we were created not to simply be worshipers but to experience life? Maybe we were created as entertainment for this creator? Islam and Christianities option: Maybe we are part of this huge cruel game in which we follow a set number of ridiculous rules or are tortured for eternity? The guy who set that up doesn't seem like he loves us very much so I refuse to play that game. It is impossible for us to know the real reason we were created if indeed we were created.

      2. There is no Creator.
      Maybe there is no invisible friend, he sure hasn't made himself known to us.

      3. The Creator is not all powerful.
      Perhaps this creator isn't all powerful but draws its power from our worship? Maybe the creator is another race of beings not of this world? Who knows.

      Continue to deny logic all you wish, that is your choice. Do not tell me I am making assumptions as I am not.

    17. Re:Not a paradox at all by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      As I said, this conversation is stalled.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    18. Re:Not a paradox at all by Stanistani · · Score: 1

      >Fear is the mind killer.

      Bene Gesserit proverb... Orange Catholic?

  529. Look, things are bad, but not that bad by doom · · Score: 1
    What's preventing me from leaving the country? Patriotism. Who's going to fix the problem if the only people who can see that there's a problem leave?

    It's like that line in the song "My Strange Nation": "I will not change this stance/I will not move to France".

    That's by Susan Werner, by the way, and it's highly recommended: http://www.susanwerner.com/ (warning: flash site... their non-flash alternative is broken).

  530. Brazil!!!! by TheeBlueRoom · · Score: 1

    I would go to Brazil, Belo Horizonte is a major tech city. Beautiful place, people and culture...

    --
    I wish I was clever!
    1. Re:Brazil!!!! by fczuardi · · Score: 1

      I would not recommend Brazil to anyone, not only because of the giant bureaucracy and very high taxes(without any benefit, trust me, you can't count on any public service), but mostly because of the people.

      The culture of taking advantage of others (aka "jeitinho brasileiro", "malandragem") is something they are proud of, the dream of most of the population is to become part of the bureaucracy by achieving a public job where you don't need hard working and have guarantees of receiving the paycheck without any chance of being fired, needless to say that they hate America(and capitalism in general), don't value respect, honor, knowledge, freedom and things like that.

      Being a Brazilian myself, temporarily living in the US, it is difficult not to compare the enormous cultural differences and be ashamed of my country, you may dislike Bush, DRM, Microsoft, Michael Moore, Democrats, Republicans, SUVs, Richard Stallman or whatever, but you live on a nation, with principles, values and educated people. Stop whining.

  531. Go! by Orig_Club_Soda · · Score: 1

    I am tired of all the empty threats (promises) to leave the US. Get the F out! What we need is constructive criticism - not girly-man, usually liberal, bitches complaining left and right that the government isn't giving them enough money or taking care of personal issues. A "man" wouldn't succumb to the humiliation of government assistance unless circumstance were dire. Look around Americans: there is practically nothing dire about our lives. We live like kings compared to most of the world.

    Just like everything else, they never take action. Never leave. ...Bitches in every aspect of the word.

  532. Vegemite is readily available "as is" in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Odd... not sure where you get your information. We have brought over Marmite (from UK) and Vegemite (from Oz), declared it, no problem, et. al. Also, you can run down to any Whole Foods grocery store and purchase both - in their original folaticious formats.

  533. Re:Go work for Uncle Sam overseas and see the worl by Dr.+Donuts · · Score: 4, Informative

    You might want to take a bit of caution when applying for this kind of work. I speak of this from first-hand experience.

    Dealing with classified information is very high risk from a personal standpoint. The penalties of a security breach due to personal negligence is *very* harsh. And by the job description, you'll be up to your ears in it.

    Also, an Information Management position isn't strictly IT work. It's a hybrid position consisting of both IT work and your rather mundane office-assistant paperwork shuffler.

    Government employment has very nice benefits, and provides a very stable work environment. However, keep in mind that whenever you work with classified information there is a lot of risk/stress involved.

  534. SOMEONE MOD PARENT UP!!! by hummassa · · Score: 1
    AC:
    Besides, *everyone* is guilty of being descended from people who displaced *somebody*. In England, chances are very good that your Saxon ancestors displaced the previous Brythonic inhabitants. In Scotland, chances are very good that your Pictish ancestors did so. In Spain, that your Moorish or Visigothic or Roman ancestors displaced Celtiberian inhabitants. And don't get me started on Romania (which one of those Brythonic monarchs made a great point of thrashing a Roman ambassador over nearly 2000 years ago). The difference in America is that the displacement (and frankly, genocide) was recent, and in a culture where literacy was nearly universal. Fortunately, it also was less complete than those earlier displacements.
    That said, unless you have seen your ancestors' naturalization papers, do not assume that your ancestors came to America legally.

    Actually, as a native-american + african + white Portuguese + white Italian person, I can say that my ancestors were probably those who where displaced from time to time. :-) But you have a point, and a wonderfully well-worded one. Kudos.
    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  535. Do Not Go To Norway! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do not go to Norway if you have any ambitions.

    Norway is a horrible place to live if you want to have a career and be successful. It is great if you want to sit on your ass and collect benefits. The system is totally screwed up there - it rewards the lazy non producers and punishes any hint of success.

    It is a horrendously expensive place to live. Cars are incredibly expensive. Even a beer costs you about $9. I lived there for several years before moving to the United States. I am *very* happy here now. Sure, there are people with no insurance, but if you are a professional and have skills/talents, you will prosper here like no where else.

    In Norway, on top of incredible income taxes, you also essentially pay a 25% sales tax (well, technically it is VAT but the effect is the same for the consumer).

    On top of it, the government services, such as medical, are not really as good as Norwegians would have you believe (not their fault, most have never lived anywhere else). There are long waiting lists for specialists, and even if you go for a regular checkup at the doctor, it is over in 5 minutes. They don't even check your blood pressure or anything. And, there is no dental coverage if you are over 18 (it might be 21, I do not remember). Here in the USA, I have full medical, dental, and vision insurance. I pay nothing to go to the dentist or for a vision exam. A visit to the doctor for a checkup costs me $15 (~90 NOK).

    The people are nice there. It is a fun city. But the country has a serious problem with its social system. You can more or less decide for yourself that "you know what? Working isnt for me, I would rather stay home and drink beer" and the government will basically pay for your apartment, and give you money each month - even though you are perfectly capable of working.

    If you like working for below average salaries, and then giving over half to the government in the form of taxes so they can give it to lazy bums, then Norway is the place for you.

    1. Re:Do Not Go To Norway! by Jeld · · Score: 1

      > You can more or less decide for yourself that "you know what? Working isnt for me, I would rather stay
      > home and drink beer" and the government will basically pay for your apartment, and give you money each
      > month - even though you are perfectly capable of working.

      And what exactly is wrong with that? Why is it that everyone assumes that work is mandatory for everyone and not working is somehow a crime? Wake up, we are not living in stone age anymore. All the more or less developed countries gather enough taxes to feed a LOT of non working people. Unfortunately the money is spent on all the stupid stuff. Just imagine if all the US military budget was spent on social assistance programs, just how many people can you feed on that?

      --

      Everybody Lies. But it doesn't matter since nobody listens.

  536. Other reasons by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    There are many people (veterans, DoD employees) who have sworn to defend the US Constitution against all enemies, domestic and foreign. Hard to do that from another country.

    1. Re:Other reasons by Hawthorne01 · · Score: 1

      There are many people (veterans, DoD employees) who have sworn to defend the US Constitution against all enemies, domestic and foreign. Hard to do that from another country.

      Tell that to those poor bastards up in Thule. :-)
      --
      "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
  537. Japan by vrillusions · · Score: 1

    1) Japan, no brainer. I went there on vacation earlier in the year and to say I was impressed is an understatement. The politness there was just astonishing. People didn't just point you in the right direction, there were a few times where someone would actually walk with us a couple blocks to where we can actually see where we had to go. The public transit system for the areas we were in (from Tokyo down to Hiroshima) was amazaing. Even in what seemed like rural towns you could get anywhere by just knowing where the nearest train station or bus station is. And akihabara

    2) Language barrier, although if I really studied it for a few years I could have good enough conversational skills that I could get a job there. Although I do see IT jobs over there, they all require conversational japanese proficiency, both written and verbal. Also Japanese are not very accepting of foreigners. Yes, I mentioned above they're extremely polite, so polite they won't insult you to your face, but may mention it later. Getting a decent place to live can be difficult as well as there isn't any "equal opportunity" rights there. If you're not Asian, don't know Japanese enough, or the rentor is having a bad day, they don't have to rent a place to you, deal with it. About the only ways that you could live in Japan are a) sponsorship from a business in Japan (possible, but good luck), b) marry someone with japanese citizenship (any hot ladies out there with japanese citizenship feel free to contact me), or c) enroll in one the teaching programs, but that isn't a permanent thing (unless you achieve method b while teaching over there).

    So yeah, while it would be great if I could live there, I'm not too hopeful about it. Although who knows what could happen.

  538. Mexican high tech? huh?? by JonTurner · · Score: 1
    I think constantly about how Mexicans are treated back in the US, and I honestly have to say I can't imagine that there is anywhere in the world that welcomes immigrants as well as the Dutch welcome high-tech people with valuable skills.
    I'll inform the masses of high-tech, skilled Mexicans pouring across our border. What? Oh, that's right. There really aren't any. Instead, we have millions of uneducated, poorly skilled welfare candidates. But thanks for that nice bit of America-bashing.

    The Dutch are obviously having immigration issues with Muslims not being integrated into the population.
    Are they high-skilled, or are they like the unskilled, poorly integrated Mexicans in America? See a parallel?
  539. Let the conservative move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I say let the neo-cons and the evangelicals leave. They hate our freedoms, they want a religous oligarchy, let them move to pakastan.

  540. Iceland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I want to move to Iceland. It's small and beautiful. The only thing that I am aware of that pisses me off about the country is the whaling. I'll be visiting this summer to get the full experience. I'm currently a student at an American university so I won't be moving for some time now, but it should be a nice visit.

  541. Pax Americanna by vox+humanna · · Score: 1

    Thanks for your post. You have encapsulated my beliefs entirely.
    By your mentioning "The Tower" so prominiently I can deduce that you are probably
    British? Am I right?

    1. Re:Pax Americanna by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      By your mentioning "The Tower" so prominently I can deduce that you are probably
      British? Am I right?


      Close; I'm Canadian.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  542. Re:About US immigration by Jeld · · Score: 1

    Well, if you lived in Mexico, you would not need to fear deportation. And if you like to live in US, just find a company that will sponsor you a work visa. Don't complain that it is uncomfortable to do something illegal, it is supposed to be. Mind you that in this instance the question of weather the immigration laws are reasonable is not relevant, the laws are what they are and you are breaking them.

    --

    Everybody Lies. But it doesn't matter since nobody listens.

  543. Try moving around in America First! by twifosp · · Score: 1
    Ugh. This article pisses me off.

    I don't like how America has been headed for the past 6-7 years either. I don't like this government and I don't like our media. I don't like most of the TV watching drone population and I don't like our rampant consumer whorism.

    That said, if you pussies want to give up on this country then fuck you very much and get the fuck out.

    If your city is full of bible thumping conservatives and you want to go live among your own kind TRY A NEW CITY! You'd be suprised at how different cities in this country are. The majority of people in this country live and die less than 40 miles away from their birthplace. Yea, that's really getting the full American experience.

    Move around. Here is a suggestion: Austin, TX: My current home town. Very liberal and wacky. Lots of intelligent folks. Very active and health conscience town. Fair share of hippies and potheads (if that's your kind of thing). Lots of good disc golf. The night life (my favorite part) is fair. I DJ electronica so I'm kind of annoyed by Austin's overall music scene (people like to just sit down and play guitar badly) but that's my problem. I actually prefer going to Dallas for nightlife, but that's just me. The cost of living here is fan-freaking-tastic. Your dollar goes a long way here. Austin is a lot like San Fran only much cheaper, less stuck up, but way hotter in the summer. The Weather here rocks during the fall and winter and some of the spring. It absolutely sucks balls during the summer unless you love heat.

    Don't give up on this country just yet. Move around, find a better place to live, and help change this country back into something good.

    1. Re:Try moving around in America First! by Blue+Fox+USA · · Score: 1

      True, change from within. If more liberals would move to the places where conservatives live, then change might happen really fast in this country... Just a thought...

  544. Again, with Askewed Questions by WheelDweller · · Score: 0, Troll

    The question isn't "where would you go, if you got too mad at America?" the question is "Why are you mad at America?"

    If you hate Don Rumsfeld, but can't state why, you're programmed.

    If you remember the Clinton years fondly, but you can't remember which of his policies was so good, you might be programmed.

    If you think America has a long history of torture and taking over distant countries, you're programmed.

    If you despise Fox News, but haven't watched more than seconds of it this year, yep...programmed.

    If you think Rush Limbaugh is a bigoted fat man, you're both programmed AND bigoted; he's lost 100+ pounds...about 5-10 years ago.

    During the Clinton Administration, we hit (I think it was) 11,000 on the Dow. Unemployment was low like now, and the ABC (and most other legacy networks) touted this as a superb thing- tantamount to throwing a parade. The other day when it hit 12,000 only one of these networks mentioned it, and they couched it as "While the economy is doomed, the stock market hit a new high today". (Yeah, paraphrased.)

    The point is, if you don't pay any attention to the actual news, you're gonna get programmed. Listening to the old-world media is a guaranteed lock on this, and feeling depressed.

    The Democrats, favored incredibly by the legacy media, need the economy to look bad, the war to go horribly, etc to regain office. So despite and almost duplicate of the glory years of Clinton is sold to us as doom-and-gloom. The economy is every bit as good as it was under Clinton, and this war is loosing about the same number of men if they had stayed home (about 1200/year accordin the Pentagon). It's no disaster- it's just taking longer than we want.

    Democrats aren't just bad at foreign policy- they're deadly at it. Hammas was catapulted to what it is now because President Carter **begged** the terrorists to return our people when they were captured by Iran.

    Clinton (and Albright) wanted to quiet North Korea, keeping them from doing anything nuclear during his shift, so they GAVE them two nuclear reactors, a bunch of money AND the promise that we wouldn't go checking on them for five years. So they put Il in the dark with a nuclear erector-set. Now they claim that not talking with them is stupid.

    Think I'm just a right-wing wacko? Look these up. If you don't, don't bother leaving the USA; you'll get ticked wherever you go, because you don't pay attention. If you do, you might just be surprised how much information you're missing.

    Do you think Limbaugh (for example) manages to have such huge audiences, merely by lying about the Liberals/Democrats? Of course not. So why not listen for yourself and hear the information he cites; he's rarely wrong, unless it's about computers. :)

    In short, if you hate America...you're not paying attention. Please do, and shut up.

    --
    --- For a good time mail uce@ftc.gov
    1. Re:Again, with Askewed Questions by ericbrow · · Score: 1

      Let's take this one by one.

      I hate Donald Rumsfield now because he is one of the major pushers of the agenda for the millitary-industrial complex, just as he has been since the Nixon years. He does not work for the American people or the American government, nor does he look after the interests of the millitary. He is interested in getting as many of our tax dollars to manufactures of defense products and services as possible.

      I remember the Clinton years with some fondness because someone had a plan to improve America and it was working. If it weren't for the facist propaganda telling America that he was corrupt every single day of his 8 years, he could have done so much more. The most investigated president ever in history, millions of dollars spent, and the ONLY thing that anyone could come up with was he lied about cheating on his wife. That was an affair with a consentual adult (+21). I was not fond of how the republican members of congress chose to waste their time or my tax dollars.

      Let's see, there was Panama, Grenada, Viet Nam, Korea, multiple central American Countries....where weren't we trying to control their government? And what happened to all those countries in danger of being affected by the domino effect. As for torture, wheather or not the US has been doing it, it has been scientifically proven that torture does not provide good intelligence. This is recent American History as taught in any high school or college, not programming.

      I watch Fox news nearly every day, until they tell enough half truths and lies that my blood pressure hits ciritical levels. Then I surf through the remaining news channels. I like to know what kind of propaganda the fascists are putting out there. It's a good thing to try to understand how the enemies of the constitution think.

      Rush Limbaugh, Lora Ingrahm, Bill O'Reilly, and all the other lying fascist pigs will eventually suffer the same fate as the traterous Americans that they are.

      Let me help define fascism for you. It's not whatever Rush or Lora or Bill say. A compairson was done of 4 or more known fascist governments in the past (Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, Suharto, and other smaller countries). They all had these defining charistics, which incidentially, are exactly what the Bush administration is committing right now:
      1. Excessive Nationalism - extreme use of national symbols like flags.
      2. Distain for Human rights-ie torture, indefinite detention
      3. Identification of Scape goats - today Muslims
      4. Supremacy of Millitary-spread of millitary activity
      5. Rampant sexism and anti-gay rehtoric
      6. Controlled Mass Media - Fox news
      7. Obsession of National Security - pick any 5 minutes of any Bush speech
      8. Religion in Government - done in Bush's first term
      9. Protection of Corporate Power - immenent domain giving family property to Wal Mart and other corporations
      10. supression of labor unions - you win. I can't think of a quick example for this one.
      11. Distain for intellectuals and arts- No child left behind, shrinking government dollars for education
      12. Obsession with crime and punishment-more executions in Texas than anywhere else in US while bush was in charge
      13. Cronyism and Corruption-Harriet Meiers, Abrahmhoff, and all those who go with it.
      14. Fraudulent Elections-diebold, Broward county Florida was actually requiring 3 pieces of photo id's from african americans in the 2000 elections. And yet they still couldn't fix it right.
      (see source http://www.rense.com/general37/char.htm)
      Even if you can rebutt 3 or 4 of these, its still fascism.

      To answer the original post, I will not leave. I took an oath when I joined the army to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. I will stay here and do what I can to make sure that these criminals and trators are held accountable for their actions.

      If you dismiss everything I said just out of hand, you are programmed. Just tell yourself black is white, war is peace, and go back to watching Fox news.

    2. Re:Again, with Askewed Questions by WheelDweller · · Score: 1

      Thank you for being such a good example: I'm only going to invest the time to cite the first remark:

      "I hate Donald Rumsfield now because he is one of the major pushers of the agenda for the millitary-industrial complex, just as he has been since the Nixon years. He does not work for the American people or the American government, nor does he look after the interests of the millitary. He is interested in getting as many of our tax dollars to manufactures of defense products and services as possible."

              This diatribe describes about a million people in Washington, DC; however not a single hint of *WHAT*HE*HAS*DONE*.

              It's all attitude; there's no tangible problem. And people don't get thrown into jail for having attitudes, especially by the 'enlightened and open minded' liberals.

              Slow down; think where you heard, what. You're programmed. And don't both with a reply, I'm not comin back to this thread- no point.

      --
      --- For a good time mail uce@ftc.gov
  545. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by acsinc · · Score: 1

    Your doubt is misplaced. I did exactly what you described and now live in an excellent neighborhood and have much better health care than I did before.

  546. The US MUCH better beatings! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I heard a lecture by an economist at Rice University (I forget his name), and he claimed that if we stopped our War on Drugs, the price of a hit of crack would drop to about the price of a couple of aspirin. (His argument was that with costs so small, violence and theft would not be worth the risks.)"

    Hmm. If this is true? Then Wal-Mart is doing the US a favour by lowering the costs of all goods. Burglary and Theft should drop.

  547. My experience working in a cannabis club by spun · · Score: 4, Informative

    I did computer security for one of the best clubs in San Francisco. We had city supervisors and official from the Department of Public Health visit our club to see a model of how it should be done right. We also had a federally funded critical care hospital contract with us to deliver cannabis to their AIDS patients. We gave away free food, had free counselling services and support groups for people with HIV, cancer, and hep-c as well as groups for people trying to get off harder drugs.

    We taught harm reduction techniques, and in fact everyone that worked there had to take a class in harm reduction. Everything Mr. Slippery is saying is true. Smoking is the problem, not cannabis. We sold many varieties of baked goods and tinctures. We also sold several brands of vaporizers, and every new member was told of the dangers and options during their hour long orientation.

    You can not smoke enough cannabis to kill yourself. You would pass out first. You would have to eat several kilos of high grade hash to do the job. Cannabis is mildly physically addicting, having withdrawal symptoms ranging in severity from coffee withdrawal to nicotine withdrawal (only without the intense cravings.)

    The main danger of cannabis is demotivation, which generally only happens with people who smoke it to escape anyway. People who smoke it as a medicine for pain or appetite stimulation do not generally suffer from amotivational syndrome. But if you are smoking pot as an escape, as with any other escapist behavior, a lot of life can pass you by while you are engaging in that behavior.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:My experience working in a cannabis club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearing the cloudy memories: Marijuana

      You may be one of those people who feel that a few tokes of marijuana are
      what you need to mellow out after a stressful day. If so, it's time to reconsider
      the facts.

      It was my generation, which came to age during the 1960s, that promoted
      marijuana as a safe and even healthy alternative to the most popular drug of our parent's generation, alcohol. To this day, some people still argue that it is just an herb. To complicate matters, researchers from my generation hesitated do serious research on the harmful effects of marijuana until recently.

      Just as considerable evidence about marijuana's destructive effects finally
      did come to light, the "medical marijuana" debate broke out. Soon, patients
      suffering from cancer, glaucoma, and chronic pain were seeking a "prescrip-
      tion of marijuana." Medical marijuana initiatives emerged on state ballots.
      When I try to explain to patients who use marijuana how it clouds their
      memory, they sometimes say, "Yeah, sure, then why are doctors prescribing
      it?" I explain that some cancer patients are using it to increase their appetite
      during chemotherapy, or glaucoma patients take it because of the buildup of
      pressure in their eyes, but that marijuana doesn't spare their memory.

      Marijuana is notorious for causing short-term memory deficits and difficulty
      in maintaining attention. People who smoke marijuana regularly have a great
      deal of trouble maintaining clarity of their thought. They experience cloudy,
      confused, and often befuddled memories.

      If you smoke marijuana on a regular basis, chances are you'll become irrita-
      ble, mildly depressed, and prone to lack initiative and motivation. Each of
      these problems fuels the other. As your motivation drops, you gain fewer
      rewards from your actions and you find few reasons to feel good about your-
      self and become depressed.

      Over the years, I have seen many people who wish to be tested for attention-
      deficit disorder (ADD). The ability to pay attention is a key component of
      forming a memory. During my initial interview with patients, too often I find
      that they smoke marijuana on a regular basis. I tell them that marijuana
      causes the very symptoms that they are complaining about. Often, they don't
      believe me and feel threatened that I am taking away their way of relaxing.

      They say, "I've done this for years."

      I ask, "How long?"

      "Since I was 17."

      "And how long do you think you've had ADD?"

      "Well -- ah -- since my late teens."

      "I rest my case."

      If you smoke marijuana, quit. A word of caution, however: THC (tetrahydro-
      cannibanol), the primary active ingredient in marijuana, is stored in your fat
      cells and will take weeks to leach out. Therefore, you won't experience relief
      from the symptoms until weeks after quitting. Some people make the mistake
      of saying to themselves, "Well, I quit and I still have the same problems, so I
      may as well go back to smoking." You need to give yourself the time for your
      entire body to clear out the THC that you've stored up. (See the related side-
      bar titled, "THC and exquisite doorknobs," later in this chapter.)

      THC and exquisite doorknobs

      The chemical found in marijuana, referred to as
      THC tetrahydrocannibanol), mimics a chemical
      in your brain called anandamide Unlike neuro-
      transmitters that affect brain cells directly,
      anandamide is a neuromodulator It orches-
      trates the activity of several neurotransmitters
      at the same time.

      If your brain is flooded with THC, the anan-
      damide effect will temporarily "enhance" (or
      distort) your perception. This virtual novelty may
      make a simple doorknob seem like the most
      exquisite doorknob you have ever seen. You'll
      look at that same doorknob several hours later
      and wonder why you thought it was so special
      (that is, if you even remember thinking about it),

      To make matters worse, many of the neuro-tr

  548. CHILDREN RUNNING AWAY FROM HOME! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just useless whining, like the child who threatens to run away from home. Do they really mean it? In most cases no, it's just a plea for attention or change of behaviour. I recall around Bill Clinton's election, a lot of these comments. But they died off after a few months when people came to their senses and realized:

    1) They were just being whiny babies and not serious about their threat
    2) Somehow the republic survives whatever dolt is in office.

    This process repeated itself when Bush came into office. I expect many of the same comments when Bush is replaced with a Democrat. The best thing you can do is ignore these comments just like you do with a child. Pat them on the head and help them pack their things and watch them decide to stay.

  549. Same here by metamatic · · Score: 1

    Definitely Vancouver BC.

    However, the 3 problems are 1) getting a job, 2) finding affordable housing, and 3) getting permanent residency.

    If I could solve those, whoosh.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  550. Re:Aotearoa? You won't make it a year...! by Aurostion · · Score: 1

    I've had a few friends who have moved to Australia and encountered this attitude about central heating as well. While the fact that it's not standards there is a bit odd by American standards, the notional that they'll be cold is. I have my thermostat set between 55 and 60 degrees most of the winter. I'm comfortable at that temperature in pants and a tee-shirt, when you consider that it's well below freezing outside on any given day during a New England winter, it's positively balmy indoors. I know you acclimatize after a while, but I can't imagine ever thinking 50-55 degree weather is cold. I don't own an AC either. What with the average summer day here being around 86 F it's just never seemed a necessity.

  551. Hypocrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like you and you're hubby plan to use the "System" to it's utmost and then once you have great skills (Husbands CPA your nursing Cert) and the ability to actually make and influence things. You plan to bail. Wow, that's great. Are you still planning to pay for those student loans once you leave? If you are so concerned about poverty and the like, have you every considered joining an NPO and helping those in need? Is it that you are just accustomed to the "Culture of Complaint". i.e. Offering a whole lot of complaints and not a single solution. Rather than, GASP! Actually doing something about it. This is a country of "Doers" not "Complainers". So, Bon Voyage! Don't let the door hit you in the backside.

  552. That's rediculous by Atroxodisse · · Score: 1

    That's like saying calling a pipe bomb a bomb takes away the relevance of calling a nuclear bomb a bomb. Some addictions are chemical dependencies, some are not. Some are easier to control than others. You tend to gravitate towards situations that you enjoy. If you can't control yourself it becomes an addiction.

    addiction (-dk'shn) pronunciation
    n.

          1.
                      1. Compulsive physiological and psychological need for a habit-forming substance: a drug used in the treatment of heroin addiction.
                      2. An instance of this: a person with multiple chemical addictions.
          2.
                      1. The condition of being habitually or compulsively occupied with or involved in something.
                      2. An instance of this: had an addiction for fast cars.

    --
    Read my short stories - You won't regret it.
  553. Re:Robots don't pay taxes. by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

    It's "jacking on", not "jacking in".

    Damn young'ns screwing up the Futurama references...

    *mumbles something about blackjack and hookers*

    --
    I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
  554. The other California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would move to California. There are two of them, after all.

  555. Detroit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea, cuz we got...uh...we have...er...well, our Tigers beat the Yankees!

  556. already been there by ep3123 · · Score: 1

    My parents moved to the US when I was about 7. I really don't like the US, not because of anything other than the American culture. It's too materialistic - too xenophobic -- too fast-paced -- too uninteresting. I've been thinking about moving back for the last 6 years of my life but the following are the main things holding me back. 1) Not sure how I would support myself without starting my own software consulting firm 2) The murder rate continues to spiral out of control thanks to US and Cuban intervention in the 70s that resulted in a flood of guns entering the country. An ample supply of guns in the wrong hands resulted in the establishment of neighbourhood mafia dons and drug gangs. Looking at things from that stand-point, I realise that sometimes it's best to live within the strongest, evilest, baddest country around. That way you can live without having to worry about instability from outside invaders and meddlers in your country's affairs. Afterall, the country that does the most meddling and mayhem is the country you live in! Sad isn't it.

  557. I don't think that means what you think it means by Bryansix · · Score: 1

    I don't think Hippie means what you think it means.

  558. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

    Actually, the amount of wealth relative to others is what determines your freedom. Poverty is generally measured, not by how little you have, but by how much less you have than average.

    Yeah, and that's wrong. That is a totally corrupted perception of freedom.

    "Wrong" in what sense? Are you saying it's wrong in the sense that it's not really like that? Are you saying that it's wrong in the sense that only a few greedy moral reprobates would begrudge someone additional wealth?

    Either way, you're the one who is wrong. By defending this idealized notion of how people ought to feel under a capitalistic system, you're simply illustrating the naivete of some of your cherished free market principles.

    A rather famous poll of a group of Harvard students asked whether the students would prefer to live in a town where they made $100K and everyone else made $200K, or a town where they made $50K and everyone else made $25K. Roughly 77% responded that they'd prefer the latter situation. If you consider this fact tantamount to saying, "77% of Harvard students are idiots," then maybe your economic theories aren't taking human nature into account.

    For better or worse, we are tribal creatures. For millions of years, our ancestors have fought for the position of top monkey. The top monkey got the best food, got to mate with the top girl monkeys, and eventually left descendants who were happier being top monkeys themselves. Thus, we are acutely aware of our position relative to other monkeys, and desperately seeking to improve it. To deny that, and insist against all reason and all evidence that we should evaluate our happiness and our material comforts in a vacuum, is absurd.

    Allow me to make the case for the correctness of the "Idiot Harvard" position. If you choose the $100K salary, you're going to be able to buy more stuff. According to the homo economicus theory, this should make you happier. But all around you you'll be seeing people owning and doing things that are beyond your resources. You'll send your children to a school where everyone has the latest clothes, where every child lives in a house with a pool (except yours), etc. When they come home, they'll have questions about why they can't have as nice of possessions as the other kids. When it comes time for your kids to compete with all the other kids for a place at the most prestigious universities, guess who can afford the better tutors? Hint: Not you.

    In short, if you choose to live in the first town, you'll get the benefit of looking your surroundings and thinking, "My life is pretty good." If you choose the second town, you'll look at your surroundings and fight down the feeling that you should have a lot more.

    "Relative freedom" is nothing more and nothing less than the perceived ability to fulfill your own desires. If you live in a society where your desires are being constantly inflated by the perception that everyone is living better than you, then you're not going to feel terribly free. Adam Smith himself recognized that many of your needs are dictated by your social surroundings. He defined the necessities of life as those things which were necessary for being a "respectable member of society", not just the things that delay your physical death. His own example: If no respectable person would ever be seen in public wearing a dirty shirt, then having a clean shirt is a necessity.

    Contrary to your argument, this isn't saying that happiness is tied to materialism, per se. It's saying that a person's perceived happiness is strongly correlated to his perceived place in society. The fact that so much of our perceived place is tied to material consumption is regrettable, but strongly encouraged by the free market crowd.

    Which brings me to my next point, which I'll call "social pollution via overconsumption." When a person moves into town and builds his family the biggest house in the county, he has a re

    --

    You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  559. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by Riverman5 · · Score: 1

    It's the same old story. I was walking through home depot with my friend one time, he was about to do some home improvements and I was offering helpful advice, and out of the blue he snaps at me "You think you're better than me!" Needless to say we couldn't be friends after that, because my mere presence brings his mood down. News of my advances were always seen as "bragging". It's the lesser-man's syndrome. He just wants you to in the same boat as him because he can't keep pace. He grins when you trip and fall. He doesn't see a difference between fairness and equality.

  560. Re:The Netherlands - incorrect! by Aceticon · · Score: 1

    1. VAT in The Netherlands has been 19% instead of 17.5% for years.

    I knew it was in the high-teens but wasn't sure of the value. Since i have no receipt lying around (which usually have the VAT rate) i looked via google and used the first value that looked familiar.


    2. The 52% bracket starts at EUR 52.229, where did you get your 33k figure from? (btw, the exchange rate is a lot lower than 1.50!). If we do some calculations, we find out that the effective (box 1) income tax for a EUR 100k income is about 45.3%.

    I mistakenly used the GBP (pounds) value for the start of the top-most tax bracket (40%) in the UK.

    In a similar vein i used the EUR-GBP exchange rate (which is roughly 1 pound per 1.5 euros).


    My guess is that you haven't gotten proper tax advice. It's not impossible to lower the effective rate to about 35-40% max if you know how to navigate the rules and business forms.

    It's possible to set-up my own company around here, and if i obbey a number of conditions i can declare my taxes via it. In this situation i can discount many expenses as company expenses. Unfortunately, my expenses beyond food, clothing and rent (all non-deductable) are a very small part (maybe 15%) of my after taxes income - most of the money i earn i save. Thus the company trick would add some requirements and limitation to the way i work, introduce a number of issues and save me very little.

    Beyond this, the only big tax break for income tax is house morgage. Given the current status of the housing market in Holland at the moment (highly inflated, stagnating) i have refrained from buying a house.

    Hence, i'm paying 55% income tax.

    ---

    As far as i can tell, being single, childless, working as a freelancer and renting a house is pretty much the worse possible tax situation for a person here in Holland.

    ---

    Anyways, all this does not detract from the fact that for specialized professionals (earning 3 times or more the average salary), Holland is a high-tax country with little in the way of public services.

    Until either taxes go down or more public services are available (ie, the liberalization of the last years is partially reversed), anybody living in Holland which is not on the doe (Holland being a place where its very easy to get a disability pension for the smallest of things) will continue to pay high prices for sub-standard public services.

    From what i've been seeing, i'm only one of many highly-mobile, highly-paid specialists that is choosing with his feet and leaving the country.
    In the same way, most of the expats i personally know that recently moved to Holland have moved back or are thinking of moving back.

    If this is a trend (and not just anedoctal evidence), it would go part of the way in explain the current lack of IT specialist of my area in Holland (which i can easilly gauge by the ammount of proposals in my e-mail box even though i'm listed in most job sites as not available).

    ---

    The bottom line is that i cannot in good conscience sugest Holland as a good country to move to for anybody but those who value personal freedom above all.
  561. America First by jamej · · Score: 1

    I have lived on three continents USA is the best country going. If I couldn't live in the USA then Japan is the next best place. USA totally rocks #1 in fun and opportnity. Japan is its equal but not my home of origin and the language thing is a bit tough for a non native speaker. Although, I'm working on the language.

  562. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by cartman · · Score: 1, Insightful
    In a more socialist system, by contrast, higher taxes and moderate salaries means that everyone is working for each other, contributing to a community. They still have the same average spending power, which means that no one is "poorer" for their lack of resources.

    But the problem is, in the socialist countries of Europe, they don't still have the same average spending power. Quite the opposite, the average salary is higher in the U.S. and the difference has grown steadily over the past 25 years.

    For example, in the late 1970s the German average salary was rapidly approaching U.S. levels; but now, the average U.S. salary is ~35% higher and the gap continuously widens.

    In fact, the U.S. economy grows about 2%/capita/year faster than the economies of W. Europe. At that rate, in ~25 years the average income in the U.S. will be double that of W. Europe. At that point, the European countries will be unable to provide their poorest members with a lifestyle anywhere near equivalent to the poorest Americans.

    But they're happy, and together, they've built something: a society, where people feel wanted and protected and cared for

    It's not clear that people in socialist countries are happier on average.

    In fact, it's not clear that the socialist interventions of European economies have benefitted even the lowest strata of those societies. The minimum wage may be higher than in the U.S., but the chances of employment are much lower (chronic unemployment among the poor is extremely high in W. Europe). Health care may be free, but that is accompanied by long lines and denial of health care to people who aren't imminently dying (at least in the UK and Canada). People may have job protection, but nevertheless they feel only slightly more secure in their jobs than in the U.S. (according to surveys) and much less certain of finding another job should they lose their current one. There may be less wealth inequality, but that has been accomplished primarily by reducing high wages, rather than raising low ones. Higher education may be free, but neverhteless, higher education is far more common in the U.S. than in Europe.

    It appears that the socialist interventions have accomplished very little, other than to reduce the growth rate by a few percentage points, increase unemployment significantly, and reduce the salaries of top wage earners. The reduction in salary for top wage earners may reduce the sense of envy and of relative deprivation, but it does not increase anyone's well-being absolutely.

    ...All of that said, I will grant that the transportation infrastructure is superior in Europe, which clearly is a function of government spending. And I will also grant that Europeans work fewer hours per week and take 2 more weeks of vacation per year, which accounts for part of the salary reduction compared to Americans.

    so that they don't feel the need to sleep with guns in the drawer, or shoot their classmates.

    On the other hand, Americans don't feel the need to light on fire 100 cars on an average night in their capital city, out of protest over poor treatment.

    Probably gun ownership is more dependent on cultural factors than economic ones. The right to own a gun is guaranteed by the U.S. constitution, which is a document that is almost considered divinely inspired by Americans.

    In fact, there are a few rural towns in the U.S. which require gun ownership. In towns like those, guns are often given to children as gifts (although not out of economic protest).

  563. Six months in Sweden by aapold · · Score: 1

    So, its October now, that would mean you got there in April. Forget five years, lets see how you feel after spending November-March in Sweden ;) FWIW, do you speak swedish? I know a lot of people there speak english, but my cousin who moved there feels alienated, even though she has learned to speak swedish it is still with an accent and feels discriminated at in job interviews and such for not being a native speaker...

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
    1. Re:Six months in Sweden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually there was a report in the news a week ago here in Sweden where they had recorded people with different accents. They introduced themselves, and then Swedes were asked if they wanted to work with them, if they seemed competent etc, and the one with the American accent came out best.

    2. Re:Six months in Sweden by aapold · · Score: 1

      Well my cousin isn't from America. She speaks english well, but spanish is her native language. I don't know if that plays a role.

      --
      "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
    3. Re:Six months in Sweden by jrl · · Score: 1

      Lucky for me (as I said in my original post), I came here with a secure job in hand. After the swedish firm purchased mine, I was relocated in order to manage the new team. My position is at the same level as the CEO, and for a company of 50+, that comes with a measurable amount of city wide respect.

      I don't speak Swedish, which has made some of life here .. well, entertaining :). For example, today I closed on a house. Dealing with the bank and the real estate broker, etc would have been damn near impossible without my CEO coming to the meetings and helping with the negotiations and translating.

      Also in my advantage is the 3 other americans that came with me during the purchase. I'm also relocating a close friend and a girlfriend. Without them, I would certainly understand feeling alienated.

      As for the weather, I'm in Karlskrona, which is the south east part of the country. We are more tempurate than the north :). Our weather is not that different than Colorado/Utah, which are places I lived before being a beach bum in Orange County :). I was here for visits in the winter last year and found the snow to be enjoyable :).

      I am planning on learning Swedish, but my company has English as the main language. The younger generation all speak English quite well. It's the older generation that struggles with it. Somewhere around 40+ years old seems to be the cut off point.

      What part of Sweden is your cousin in?

    4. Re:Six months in Sweden by aapold · · Score: 1

      Its near Landvetter.

      --
      "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
  564. Re:There has to be limits... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    2. Just accept it, you cannot mix too many different kinds of people, it doesnt work, humans are a PACK ANIMAL, they need similar
    kinds together, mixing people is a scam to divide a populace so that voting can be controlled.


    I don't know about this. I think some people from diverse backgrounds can get along together very well. The problem is that a lot of people don't. One thing I see here in the USA and in other Western countries is that immigrants come over, but then make absolutely no effort to integrate with the rest of the population. Then you wind up with factionalism, instead of unity. Here in the US, we have tons of Mexicans coming into the country, but many of them completely refuse to learn English (really, it isn't that hard to learn it at a conversational level), and keep doing all the dumb stuff here that they were doing over there which made Mexico such a crummy place.

    I think immigration is a good thing in limited numbers, and with select people. Highly-educated people are usually a good bet; they're more likely to be open-minded, and adapt better to their new environment. They also contribute more to the economy. Immigration is a bad thing when you have human waves coming over, and they end up settling in ghettos, separated from the rest of society.

    3. why was your old country crap? bad govt, corrupt govt, evil govt? then join a rebel group and do a coup.

    This is something that bugs me a lot about all the Mexicans we have here. They're very nationalist, always talking about how great Mexico is. So why did they come here?

    It's weird; a lot of people seem to think that immigration is some sort of human right. It's not. Groups of people have possession of pieces of land. If they allow you to move in with them, it's at their whim, and you need to make the effort to get along, instead of insisting that they bend over backwards for you. They didn't have to allow you in at all. As an analogy, think of it like your house. Should you be required to open your door to anyone that wants to come and live in your house? Of course not. It's your house: if you want to live all by yourself in a huge house, that's your right. If you want to invite certain people to come live with you, that's your right to, and it's your right to decide which people you want to invite. Just because you like someone else's house better than your own doesn't mean they have an obligation to accept you; if you don't like their terms, stay in your own house and fix it up.

  565. Canada or New Zealand by Malakusen · · Score: 1

    Helps to be married to a nurse, and to be a trained and experienced diesel generator technician. Nowhere in the world we can't work.

    --
    Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to conviction
  566. 1) Thailand 2) Nothing, we already moved there! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was really burning out at my programming job for a medical device company in the states when my wife got an offer to teach at a large university in Thailand for a year. That was about 8 mos ago. We packed up our condo and rented it to some friends, packed one backpack and one laptop bag each, and took off for a year.

    It. Is. Awesome. We live in the north, far from the English language centers of Bangkok and Phuket, but Thai people are about the most relaxed, patient, and indulgent people on the planet, so it's still very, very easy to get around. On ~800 USD/mo we're living pretty high on the hog. The cost of living (food, transport, rent, entertainment) is extremely low in this part of the country. You can get around easily, and the food is _incredible_, with restaurants in overwhelming supply and diversity. I can't say enough good things about Thailand, and will be sad to go when my wife's contract expires.

    The only bad thing I can say about the experience is that the school gave us terrible information on how to deal with the visas, which required a trip to Laos to fix. Hey, kids: do all of your own research about exactly what kind of papers you need when you hit the ground *before* you head over there--and not just the minimum papers, make sure you understand all of the long-term visas.

    Things that held me back at first:
    1. Owning a house. Solved by renting to friends. A rental agent would have been more profitable, but I didn't like the idea of strangers living there (neither did the condo association). Also allowed us to leave a lot of stuff in our unit.

    2. Giving up the security of a large salary and a very cushy work environment for totally unknown living circumstances.
    I was hating my particular job at the time due to an extremely risk-averse department, but I honestly could have transferred to Japan or Belgium or a number of other places if I really wanted to keep working for the company. Leaving ultimately encouraged me to start a business with some friends writing the software my former employer was too risk-averse to pursue, and it's been a lot of fun so far (aided greatly, again, by Thailand's extremely low living costs on my end). Lesson learned: there's always another opportunity right around the corner.

    3. Lack of interest in learning to speak Thai.
    Solved: No matter how good my Thai becomes, most people around here have better English than my Thai, and they usually like to try their English on me anyway. Oh well, I certainly don't complain ;)

    4. Friends.
    We're getting along really well with email, VoIP, and IM. We're even geeky enough to whip out the webcams and play boardgames online. Having a blog helps too, but damned if I'm posting the URL here on slashdot ;)

    5. Worrying about my cat. Ha! See, I planned this one well: those friends from up on #1? I made sure they were cat lovers so they'd take care of our cat for a year while they're renting. We still miss her, but at least she's being well cared for.

    Addressing the tone of your question overall: We left the states to have an adventure, not to run away from something or start a new life--run as far as you want, there you'll be. Don't leave the states because you feel alienated by politics or culture: MOVE TO A DIFFERENT STATE OR CITY. It will likely be more profitable and less stressful--face it, in that situation you'd likely be moving to get rid of stress in the first place, and heading to a foreign country can be fraught with challenges at first.

    Good luck!

  567. Re: Not informative by Bryansix · · Score: 1

    Mod the parent interesting but not informative. The lack of facts plus the gross missuse of generalizations make this post almost useless. For one thing, the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) in the US actually encourages Folate to be added to flour thereby adding it to almost everybody's diet. In addition they did not ban vegemite but the stuff tastes so much like feces smell that I can't understand why you would want to take it when a normal dietary suplement in a pill form works and you don't have to taste it.

    Secondly, I don't live in the pockets of educated and civilized society; I live in California. The state is the size of Iraq and home to the largest University System in the world from which I graduated. Get a clue and stop making generalizations.

  568. Don't come to Australia As A Woman by cmholm · · Score: 1

    That caveat is based on the rap I've heard from a number of expatrate ozi-women over the years, the claim being that male attitudes towards women in Oz is about 20 years or so behind the US. This may be a result of the relatively high beer consumption, but that's just a guess based on years of personal experimentation.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  569. I really have no idea. by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

    I don't know if there's another country that I could stand living in.

    Pretty much everywhere in Europe and Asia is out due to the cars. If I couldn't pick up a used car with a V8 putting down at least 250HP through the rear wheels for under the equivalent of $3000, I'm not interested. Front wheel drive econoboxes seem to dominate the selection in those areas.

    It's just too risky for an American to live in the middle east right now, so that's out too. I don't want to dramatically lower my standard of living or be in fear for my life on a daily basis, so that knocks out a good chunk of Africa and Central/South America.

    The remaining countries that come to mind are Canada and Austrailia. Driving in Canada is just like driving here, except for the whole metric thing, so that's easy. Austrailia seems to be even better than here in the US, having vehicles like the Falcon and Monaro (which we finally got as the GTO) as well as those great B&S Utes that just sing to the redneck in me.

    The problem with both of those is bandwidth. I've heard so many complaints about internet access in Austrailia being total garbage and Canadian complaints (particularly invisible bandwidth caps) seem to be increasing. I have 8mbit completely unrestricted here, and while it's not amazing in light of FiOS and some of the crazy direct 100mbit/1gbit to the home solutions I've heard of in Europe and Asia, it seems to be far above the average on Canada or Austrailia.

    If anyone has some suggestions, I'm all ears. Tell me where I can find cars that would be fun to someone who loves the Mustang, at least 5mbit true unlimited internet, a less crazy government (no nanny states), and could survive speaking only American English for however long it takes to learn the native tongue.

    --
    I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
  570. Sounds like my dream... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Although with a small nuke, or the right conventional HE, the island im looking at leaves me the option to hold the east coast and much of europe hostage and take over the rest of the world...

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Sounds like my dream... by mfrank · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered why they haven't made a Bond flick about the Canary Islands.

    2. Re:Sounds like my dream... by J05H · · Score: 1

      OMG dude! That's the premise behind a trilogy I've partly written! Except they actually DO it.

      If you're talking about the island I'm thinking of, it's going to collapse soon naturally and we really should be building seawalls.

      josh

      --
      gigantino.tv - Heavy but weighs nothing.
    3. Re:Sounds like my dream... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      If your story includes using this as leverage to take control of the HAARP array and via that take over the rest of the world, get out of my head!

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    4. Re:Sounds like my dream... by J05H · · Score: 1

      Sorry, bro. In my story the world wakes up to walls of water flooding the Atlantic basin and a cackling maniac from Denver on the TV. It is more revenge than hostage situation and there is Hell to pay afterward. I'll have the first book finished soon, which leads into the described situation.

      --
      gigantino.tv - Heavy but weighs nothing.
  571. From "Leaving the US to cannabis by Dreben · · Score: 1

    I'm slightly bewildered as to how a thread on a story about leaving the US digressed immediately into "becoming addicted to cannabis." I guess that goes to demonstrate just how bad things are really getting in the US. "Can't deal with bushit so let's bake."

    Oop, gotta go, it's twenty after four already...

  572. Several options. by Rotten168 · · Score: 1

    Move somewhere else in the US, vote (or otherwise become part of the process to change things), or leave the country. Whatever you do, don't sit around and impotently whine. I have no respect for whiners.

  573. Merry Olde England by xtheunknown · · Score: 1

    I would go to UK, Cardiff, Wales to be specific.

    Why? I love the country, its history and all things British. Plus, my mother lives in Wales so I would have at least one family member within visiting distance.

    Why not? Without being sponsored by an American company with a UK subsidiary, it's very hard to legally work in the UK as an American.

    --

    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
  574. Re:Robots don't pay taxes. by 'nother+poster · · Score: 2, Funny

    Kiss my shiny metal ass, meatsack!

  575. CANADA!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sorry, had to say it :)

  576. Re: If Not America, Then Where? by DotNetFreak · · Score: 1

    Well, from where I'm looking, there are plenty of nice countries to live in. I live in a country where people are not always very nice towards each other. In fact, it's nothing out of the ordinary to read about elderly people who get beaten to death with bricks or stones. It's quite commonplace to hear about people who are hacked to death for their shoes. My country, I believe, holds the record for the most violent crimes on the face of the earth. Does it scare me ? No, it doesn't. I'm used to it. For me, most other countries on earth would be quite pleasant to live in, raise children and enjoy freedom. I suppose it's all a matter of perspective, really.

  577. I still believe in the constitution by Bitmanhome · · Score: 1

    (Sigh, noone's gonna read my post way down here, but whatever.)

    As corrupt as our laws seem to be getting, the constition is still more powerful. All of our "problems" (however defined) can be solved with new amendments. Intellectual property in particular needs an amendment. And maybe we need one more that restates the bill of rights in 21st-century terms so the courts stop misinterpreting it.

    I'd rather create new amendments than leave the country. I'm even tempted to run for office, but y'know, I'm a lazy nerd on Slashdot.

    --
    Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
    1. Re:I still believe in the constitution by DotNetFreak · · Score: 1

      People who hate living in America should spend some time in Africa. They will fall in love with America all over again. :)

    2. Re:I still believe in the constitution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read it - intentionally clicked "newest first".

      And I think the idea to leave comes from the opinion that those amendments will just not happen. Everybody would rather amend them than leave.

    3. Re:I still believe in the constitution by Blue+Fox+USA · · Score: 1

      Actually, we could create a new party based on scientists, engineers, and other intellectuals. Considering the Slashdot readers probably maintain the critical systems, we could have more power than you think. Just a thought.

  578. Re:That's right, give up. = yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sorry but YES. after 10 years of steady decline in the things that makes staying worth it, i am finally getting serious about leaving. i wish the next generation goodluck. i've had enough. 10 years isn't a long time in the history of a country, true, but it is a long time as a portion of my potentially fun filled life. i'm not willing to wait another 10 or 20 or 30 for the pendualum to (maybe) swing back.

    every man for himself. besides... wouldn't leaving be the ultimate micro-economic capatalistic equalizer?

  579. Hmm... by jeckil · · Score: 1

    I am also a Computer Scientist that left Mexico. I partial offense on the statements about the border, the great majority of us love our country as much as people on the center/south parts of Mexico do, the thing is, that when we look out on our window we see an American Flag and Clean Streets, everything in its rightful place and job opportunities all just a few miles away... Although I do Agree with the statement about 'washing out' the Mexican status, some of it is done by shame about their home nation, and the shame they could not do anything about it. I actually understand their psyche on that level but I would not consider them Mexicans anymore. They are Americans and there should not be anything wrong with that. If The U.S. was next door to Europe we would see the same pattern emerge. The comment about liking corruption is not really completely accurate. It is more related to liking a 'status quo' mentality that arises thanks to the national political noise. Thanks to a broken bureaucracy and biased system of laws, social and cultural burdens, Mexicans are left to their own devices to survive. When a corrupt cop or official approaches you it uses Mexican laws and processes to make sure you comply in giving him a bribe. For example I recently went to a open source conference in Mexico City when I mistakenly borrowed a vehicle that had an 'illegal tag', (In Mexico City you can only drive your car in certain days to curtail pollution and a broken transit system) anyways I was stopped by a policeman and then I was told that I would go to jail and lose my vehicle because 'that is the law in Mexico' when I refused to pay him right there, another police car came in and also said the same thing. They made me leave my vehicle and made a big scene about how I was going to spend several days in jail (because supposedly the courts/bail bonds are off on weekends) since I am a stranger to Mexico City I got really scared (hey, I watched Red Corner :P ) and was forced to pay them a large amount just to get away from there. Just like the above post said, The main problem is not really that we like corruption; is that instead of making something about it we have more pressing priorities such as well... 'living'. Now with the fact that we have a completely different ideology next door to Mexico you can only assume that many Mexicans hate their country because of the unfair comparison between a country that reached stability over a century ago with one that has not even reached 100 years since its last civil war. I am also one of those people that would like to make a difference in my home country. I see a place that can be so much better if people really cared and be knowledgeable about changing it, but until more people actually roll up their sleeves and realize that change is more costly and worth while than their own self interest, we will see more of the same. An in the end, the tragedy will be regarded as the 'country whose people never grew up'. Many regards to all The best book on this matter is 'The Labyrinth of Solitude' (El laberinto de la soledad) imho the best book ever written about Mexico. (Written by Octavio Paz, who got the Nobel price in literature for this book)

  580. Vermont by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh sorry, Vermont's still part of the US.
    -Japan is nice, but you pretty much have to teach English to live there. I'd rather just visit when I want to.
    -Canada -- too cold. nice to visit
    -Dominican Republic, other carribean islands -- Permanent vacation could be nice, but if you want to work, you will work in the tourist business. Scuba instructor, Boat crew, etc...
    -Five or six of my friends think they are going to move to India and live there. The other ones who have been there for a few years now have tuberculosis and some of them also have hepatitis. Their great plan is to live somewhere in the East (Thailand or India) where they think it won't be necessary to be gainfully employed because 'everything is so cheap'. Their primary motivation seems to be laziness and their unwillingness to find work that suits them in the US.

    If you put aside its ignorance, arrogance and bad foriegn policy, the US has a lot to offer.

    America, no one wants your portly masses.

  581. Re:There has to be limits... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've been in America too, but not very many Americans here..

  582. Two answers. by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1

    1. Canada, Iceland, Cascadia, or my own secessionist cult compound.
    2. Family ties and the fact that it's not quite a police state yet.

  583. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah,
          We see how effective they are in North Korea and Iran --
          Oh, wait. They're waiting for someone to come liberate them....

  584. Pity poor Canada by SombreReptile · · Score: 1

    Americans keep snowshoeing across the border and buying up our graphics card manufacturers!

  585. Mainland China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm moving to Beijing as soon as I graduate with my masters. The goal is to become a PhD student at Tsinghua, which has good AI and crypto researchers.

    Everyone on /. loves to hate the mainland, but its IP laws are still weak so by moving there I enhance my chances of successfully becoming a robber baron. From what I can tell, one way to construct a successful business is to grab as much as possible in fuzzy legal waters. Hopefully, by the time laws harden, you are powerful enough that they harden around you and not against you.

    As for the privacy issues, they don't really bother me. I don't have any big qualms with the CCP (hey, they support Red Flag ;) ) and when I need to be stealthy on the web I just use proxies and cryptography.

    Plus, the food's great and living is cheap.

  586. Patriotic eh? by msimm · · Score: 1

    Sounds a little more myopic. What about that whole globalism thing? What about wanting to broaden your understanding of the world? We see electronic and trade barriers go down all the time, yet outside of the EU we seem to cling ever more strongly to our boarders.

    There will always be people who are dissatified, but I can think of a whole lot of other reasons to consider leaving the reservation. 20 years from now what do you think things are going to look like? Is globalism just a fad without broader repercussions?

    As for your political views on the 'war' on terrorism, we'll just have to agree to disagree (part of what ideally makes this country so great!). I *do* think we are at a low point, but its not like this is the first or that there is any reason it should be the last. The political climate changes. Its a fact. But personally I'd love to expatraite. You can buy me that ticket. I don't think the US is a bad place, its just I'm not going to live forever and I've seen a lot of it already. I'd like to see a few other things before I hit the dirt. Call me crazy, but I love the diversity, languages, cultures we are surrounded with.

    Ciao!

    --
    Quack, quack.
  587. Re: If Not America, Then Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah well, viva Chavez!

  588. Canada not worth the hassle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canada is a good place to live if you have an English last name, otherwise you'll be discriminated against. I know, I was BORN here and see/experience it all the time.

    Another major problem is over the last decade there has been a big push by the Feds to bring in Asian immigrants, mostly from India and Pakistan, and increasing numbers of them are fed up and moving back. Many complain that they are forced to work menial jobs for less pay than back home. These are not bums, these are professionals in fields like business, IT, law, etc... and they can't find positions in their field of expertise over here (most of them are dumped in the GTA area). Many of these professionals are forced to work stereotypical 'Asian jobs' like running convenience stores and driving taxi cabs just to support their families because no one will hire them to do what they're trained to do. This used to be a good deal for many people a while back when countries were much poorer, and even driving a taxi here gave a better standard of living, but with the drop in standard of living in Canada and the relative rise in places like India, many have chosen to simply go back out of economic consideration, if you can believe that! Basically the Feds keep on bringing in more people, claiming a need for persons with certain skill sets to fill certain voids, yet the reality is there is an abundance of people there to do the work, the competition is stiffer than the USA, and having an English last name gives you a definite edge over the rest of us. BTW, I am not of Asian descent, I come from the much older generation of European immigrants to Canada. Europeans don't even bother to come to Canada anymore for the most part, even from the poorer former socialist eastern bloc nations.

    Other problems with Canada:
    -much higher tax levels on average in relation to USA (Alberta have the lowest tax rate, anywhere else, especially Ontario, and you're screwed).
    -significantly higher gas prices than USA (especially BC, and yes it matters, because public transport sucks, even in Toronto, so you will need a car)
    -politicians are just as much, if not more crooked than their American counterparts. In fact they are for the most part American puppets (esp. Conservatives), so why settle for an imitation when you can have the real thing?
    -services like health care are rapidly going down the tubes and privitization of heath services is quickly approaching.
    -people here are on average more retarded than their American counterparts (Canadians are just as accepting of crap American culture than Americans are, so who is more stupid, the leader or the follower?).

    If you want a general impression of how English Canadians view anyone who is not English, take a look at old episodes of Coaches' Corner on HNIC (seriously). Whether people here like it or not, Don Cherry and his sentiments towards foreigners more or less personify the feelings of the rest of English Canada. And take note that he's somewhat forced to tone it down a notch and hold back for public-supported national television. Many are much more outwardly and staunchly xenophobic (and sometimes downright racist) than he is.

    (All of the above might not necessarily apply to Quebec (never been there). It's more like a country within a country and I'm not sure how the French feel about the rest of the country.)

  589. In America, you can usually find what you want... by Banner · · Score: 1

    This is one of the greatest things about America, if you look around you can probably find what you want somewhere else in the country. Part of this is because the Federal Government really isn't as strong as people think it is, and our perception of it tends to change with each President.

  590. Unwilling to make a change for the better? - Leave by Punker22 · · Score: 1

    It's mainly all the hippies that want peace love and harmony but don't have the understanding to grasp the fact that some people hate us just because we(USA) are a western civilization and certain actions have to be taken to not have 9/11 happen again or anything near that. Instead of sitting on your ass complaining and threatening "I'm going to move to Canada!!" either GO! or do something about it! It's pretty plain and simple, everyone in this country would be much better off if you would just leave or if you could help make a change for the better rather than just protesting or, doing some other lazy hippy activity(This means you Hollywood). A bit off topic but; I mean come on.... over a million illegals from Mexico flood the streets with MEXICAN flags and shut down businesses.... that is the most counter-productive way to get your point across... Last time I checked a bunch of people coming into your country without permission from another is called INVASION and they can be shot dead....Stop protesting a fence/border.

  591. Narnia by MookMan · · Score: 1

    I'd like to move to Narnia. Or maybe Rivendale. Stupid Travelocity has all flights booked until 2097...

  592. Let's look at history. by bersl2 · · Score: 1

    When people have had major disagreements with the culture and laws under which they live, finding continued inhabitation unacceptable, and they know of no other acceptable sovereign nation in which to live, they usually go somewhere where nobody else can bother them: the frontier.

    However, there is no more frontier on land on Earth! All ground is claimed by some sovereign nation, who would be not very happy if some large band of American squatters showed up and claimed independence, even if the land were purchased beforehand (see Israel); and Antarctica is practically uninhabitable.

    There are two solutions: international waters, either on or under the surface; or space, whether on a satellite or a planetary body. On a large enough scale, and with enough probability of safety, that isn't happening for quite some time.

    Unless some country out there is willing to cater to the politics of this vocal crowd, for a long time, there is nowhere to go. Our best shot still rests in educing slow, gradual change by convincing the people of this country and of the world (including the politicians---yes, they're people too, though it's hard to tell sometimes) that our arguments are valid and worth pursuing. So stop complaining and start working to effect change. Even if it's just small things (e.g., politely, concisely explaining to an unaware but open-minded individual the concept of the public domain and why it's important), do something to bring about what you feel is right.

  593. Tried France? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have yet to visit a European country where the people weren't open and inviting, even after learning I was an American.

    Been to France? What an arrogant bunch of pr**ks! They are jerks even before they find out where you're from. Exception: the crepe vendors are moderate and the hostel staff are indifferent.

    Germany? Beautiful and friednly. Same for England, Scotland and Wales. Netherlands? Nice place to visit.

    FAR AND AWAY the friendliest, happiest, most helpful people people I've met are the Egyptians. Hot but I'm used to heat. Haven't seen the rest of the middle east though.

  594. IT's more then that... by geekoid · · Score: 1

    The current republican administration and congress has gont way to far and they nede a slap in their face to help remind them who is really in charge.

    Normally I say vote for the person, not the party, but this election I am saying vote democrat.

    A clean sweep is the only thing that will make them think twice next time.

    The republicans in the administration are not representitve of republicans at all.

    They should ahve run under a corporist party.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  595. Moving to the US by movingtous · · Score: 1

    Actually doing the opposite: moving to the US east coast because of job offer. Going because the job looks interesting. I wouldn't otherwise move to the US and certainly not the east coast (hubris and abrasiveness of those on the east coast US I've worked with so far - I'm so hoping they are not representative!), but perhaps Oregon or Northern California (having lived on Canadian west coast for last few years)

    1) Where would you live, if not in America
    Canada (west coast for the climate or the Prairies for the great people and lack of barriers to taking up new jobs/careers)
    London UK (for the great multicultural culture that has developed there in the 90s, negatives are the outrageous cost of living) or Southern England (southern counties for the beautiful countryside), but the high cost of living and the difficulty in getting UK to recognize my foreign qualifications and experience have mitigated against that, so far
    Baja California, Mexico for retirement (warm - year round, dry, easy going place) but probably not work (would first have to develop strong Spanish skills in order to understand the country better - for working life purposes)
    Oman (older, stable, Arab country with UK connections, opportunity to experience the Arab world)
    Other stable and calm Arab countries e.g. UAE, but not Saudi
    Southern France or Northern Italy (for beautiful countryside and mild climate)
    Spain... maybe... haven't spent much time there yet, in order to assess it
    Scandinavia.. maybe.. but haven't yet spent anytime there

    2) What's stopping you from going?"
    Employment/pay/job security: hard to get find work in other countries and hard to live without the money that comes from work. Having lived in UK and Canada so far and about to add the US to that, I'll probably move again in a few years time. So finding work and the current poor timing (i.e. currently moving to US) are the barriers for me

    p.s. advice re moving to the US appreciated: blog at movingtous.wordpress.com

  596. irrational winging - tax is low by daveb · · Score: 1
    Oh come on. There's a huge amount of moaning and gnashing of teeth about high tax in NZ. And for a while I believed it. But as another poster has pointed out NZ is about 27th in the 2005 OECD tax database. We are waaayyy down the list - which contrasts with the FUD being put around about us being way higher than the US, Aussie and (if you believe the critics) every nation that has ever existed. Do we get value for it, could/should it be lowered - I dunno. But saying we have a high tax rate is simply FUD and ignorance

    BTW spell checking in Firefox 2.0 is fantastic - first time I've used it. First time I've noticed it really, I was wondering what the red dots were for a few mins.

  597. Troll? by msimm · · Score: 1

    Its your opinion and its cool that you shared it. Personally I think America is too big to be properly representative of the 'public' which is probably my biggest complaint. But culturally I'd simply like to see more. Sounds like the Air Force was a good experience for you.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  598. AMERICA?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you would stop seeing America as a Country.
    America is a continent that has so many countries in it.
    Your country has a name, use it, love it.

  599. One word: by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

    One word: poutine.

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  600. America caught that Euro Flu by archiDORK · · Score: 1

    As an American living in Europe for the last 12 years, it seems to me that the US has become more European than ever.

    A corrupt elitist government.

    Lack of class mobility.

    State controlled Media.

    Sliding incomes.

    The list goes on and on....

    I live in Norway and I have to say that N. Europe is not all it is cracked up to be: It is not all bad, but there are some things to consider: you have that 50% tax rate, and some of the highest suicide rates in the world ( we don't talk about that ). One in three people are involved in a dispute with their neighbors. Dont even think about starting a tech company - It is like beating a dead horse. New ideas, are not good ideas.

    However let us not dwell: There is a list to be had here somewhere.

    Sweden - where good Germans go when they die.

    Denmark - somehow they are some of the happiest people on the earth but even more taxes and serious racial problem.

    Finland - I have not been there too much but it seem all potatoes all the time, liquid and solid. Then there is Nokia too. Not to mention Snow.

    Netherlands - well enough has been said about NL already. A bit dull outside Amsterdam.

    German - you know about that already - Berlin is pretty normal.

    France - Massive disregard for the State and an enviable ability to make the best of it.

    Italy - I heard it said once, "That the genius of the states is the separation of Church and State. The genius of Italy is the Separation of the State and the people."

    England - Cool, kind of stiff, but cool: As long as you don't mind the paper work and décor.

    Spain - is cool just don't try to work too hard.

    Don't get me wrong. I like all these countries - I like Europe and the States. I have a great time in both places. Europe is just different from the States: Europeans are romantic about their homes and countries. Americans are romantic about possibility. Europe invented America to give vent to those that seek possibility amd freedoms. That is what you are doing in this thread, seeking new horizons.

    If I were going to move again I would look at the regions in the EU: Amsterdam, Catalonia (Barcelona), Lombardy (Milan), and London. This is where W. Europe is on the go - or look east to the "New Europe" that might be more like the States. Might...

    As someone else noted you are, whoever you are, where ever you go. To this I would add that there is no where that is problem free. Get involved and change the thing you don't like.

    Cheers -

    1. Re:America caught that Euro Flu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I live in Norway and I have to say that N. Europe is not all it is cracked up to be: It is not all bad, but there are some things to consider: you >have that 50% tax rate, and some of the highest suicide rates in the world ( we don't talk about that ). One in three people are involved in a >dispute with their neighbors. Dont even think about starting a tech company - It is like beating a dead horse. New ideas, are not good ideas.

      Yeah, its bad, and although people keep killing themselves all the time, the suicide rate is actually lower than most other countries:
      http://www.who.int/mental_health/prevention/suicid e_rates/en/index.html

      And regarding neighbor fights, those activities seem to be very common in America as well, at least thats the impression one gets when reading about Donald Duck.

  601. Happy to hear from someone HAPPY with their choice by Mr+Thinly+Sliced · · Score: 1

    Mate thats cool and we need more people with your perspective that have seen the outside world, taken on board the differences, but still find the grass greener on the side you choose.

    Problems arise when the arguements about exactly what "shade of green the grass is" on both sides amounts to speculation.

    I am a brit who has now lived abroad in Belgium for 6 years. It is my second time here in Belgium - first time I hated it. I went back to the UK and realised that, actually, it wasn't Belgium so much as it was that I discovered that pretty much all countries suck, just in different ways.

    For me, England sucks (not totally, but comparatively too many ways for me) and I like the Belgium lifestyle more.

    Happy to hear you discovered that your home lifestyle was your zen :-)

    Cheers,

    Dan

    P.S. Over here in Europe almost all of us love the Americans (many immigrants here have anti American feelings, its to do with the scapegoat syndrome) - the issue a lot of us have is with the US foreign policy. Please drop Bush and get rid of religion in the White House - be the America your founding fathers promised to you!

  602. New zealand and I like America. by geekoid · · Score: 1

    I like america. Yeah, the current wadministration sucks, but we get a chance to overturn that every few years.

    I like living in a ciuntry where a streeet corner can have a different house of worship on each corner and the people don't get into a fire fight when they go to church.
    I like have pretty much every type of land one can imagine.
    I like not being dragged away for being outspoken.

    Yeah, some things need to change, but that applies to all countries.

    Oh, If I had to move, I'd aim for New Zealand.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  603. Don't leave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a non American, I repectfully ask that you don't leave.

    If the Moderate/Technorati leave, then the nukes will be more and more in the hands of the extremists. This will be bad for eveyone.

    Stay and help the the rest of the world.

  604. NAFTA blocks water exports from Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe that NAFTA has a proviso banning the shipment of water from the great lakes to other states/provinces. Several states are hurting for clean water and dont want to decontaminate the water they have. This is probably the first reason for the USA to invade Canada. And when you consider the no-bid contracts Haliburton got in Iraq for the Iraq oil... I wonder if wood, oil, and hydro electricity also wouldn't be good reasons from an american point of view.
    -dan

  605. Answers ... by multimediavt · · Score: 1

    1. Belize, New Zealand, Australia, Costa Rica
    2. I haven't left because I have credit card debt to pay off. Once that's gone ... I'm most likely gone. Unless the startup I'm involved in kicks off, then six more years and then cash out and gone.

  606. Use that text :full page open letter from Canada by HotBlackDessiato · · Score: 1

    Yes, yes... Oh just yes. Oh god, yes. I'll keep to myself the unpleasant extent of my personal agreement organism but up front: I wish I hadn't mod'ed my last point on the bloody fedora core 6 review.

    As a fellow Canadian(bloody hell, Victoria too), I'd pay a good slice to see that running full page in an American newspaper prior to the midterms.

    It sums up much, in the right tone.

    --
    "If you don't have eyes you shouldn't have wings" -- Carl Pilkington
  607. expat by neurosine · · Score: 1

    I moved from Jonesboro, Ar to Australia where I was a network engineer. I don't work harder but I get much more recognition, and am no longer raped by conservative Christian nazis. Yay!

  608. dude, I feel your pain by sofar · · Score: 1


    for this very same reason me and my wife (I am dutch, she is american) decided to give up after 3 years and we are living happily in the USA now.

    FELLOW DUTCHMEN: GET OUT WHILE YOU CAN!!

    (wegwezen!)

  609. I have the solution: Partition Project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's time for the old maxim: "divide and conquer". The Federation outlived it's purpose.

    The US it's a continent not a country, that's the European view.

    Why not have the Republic of California, The Republic of Texas and so on. It would be easier to manage. Also you could more easily attract people to this partition project by enticing them with the power they could have or the money and land in these new countries.

    1. Re:I have the solution: Partition Project by jamesshuang · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you would be a proponent of the Free State Project. But as with all movements like this, it's very very hard to get people to move from their current home to a new one that's as remote as New Hampshire....

  610. Somalia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should consider Somalia: A country without a government, hence *no* taxes and *no* social services. Since there's no state to threaten your freedoms, there's no need for a constitution or constitutional guarantees in the first place. A socially liberal culture isn't something a Libertarian should demand either since you should respect other persons' freedom to hold different, socially illiberal opinions. Even security and defense are completely privatized in Somalia and within the hands of some non-governmental, non-elected warlords. You might negotiate with them what it's worth to you if they protect your life. (I.e. if they don't kill you.)

    So all Libertarians should go to Somalia. It's the most minimalist state on the Earth, the country of their dreams.

  611. Japan by Omega037 · · Score: 1

    I would move to Japan...which I did. Though I don't plan to stay here forever. After a few years, I will pack my things up and maybe move to Australia, Taiwan, Phillipeans, Croatia, Dominican Republic, or somewhere in South America. After all, why do you have to stay in one play your whole life. It is like computers...you could still be running a 486 with Windows 3.11, but I prefer to upgrade every few years. Same with countries.

  612. Walmart by r_jensen11 · · Score: 1

    Aisle 5, between the Dayquill and Nyquill. You might want to open up a bank account there too, I hear that they're planning on being able to cash cheques sometime soon.

  613. My reasons for not leaving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have discussed this with my wife.
    Going to another country has a large number of hardships that can't be avoided.
    We do love the US (or at least our side of the country), but if this Nazification continues, we will have no rational choice but to leave.
    I am both of jewish and american indian descent, while my wife is also american indian. Both groups have been through persecution and worse. We can't let our baby grow up in a place like where the white house hedge is taking us.
    When we feel the course can't be changed, we will have to find the american dream someplace else.
    The ideals the USA was founded on are a jewel of inspiration to the whole world. It is a tragedy that the current "leadership" has apparently never read them...

  614. Sweden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Göteborg, Sweden. On the down side, we have lame and provincial politics and
    high taxes. Winters get pretty dark too.

    On the up side, I can ride a bicycle to just about anywhere I need to go, or take a tram
    if the weather is lousy. I have the symphony orchestra, theatres, opera, jazz and rock
    stages at walking distance. 10 minutes on the bike to work. 20 minutes to kayaking waters
    and 30 minutes to wilderness. 30 minutes to the interantional airport, which does
    international checkin up to 45 minutes before the flight. Domestic is shorter.
    You can fish in the moat, 3 blocks from my house, or go 2 blocks in another direction
    if you want to do the pub rounds.

    I have an American friend who is working on imigrating. He comes here for the Salsa scene.

  615. Yeah But.... by TheLastUser · · Score: 1

    But 9,901,010 km of it is a frozen frikin' wasteland. Basically like Australia except with more ice and fewer road warriors. Nobody lives in the north of Canada. We all congregate, shivering, as close as possible to the US. Truth be told, we'd all be in Florida or California if we could breach the fortress America they got going on. I guess at some level, Mexicans must be just plain tougher than Canadaians, or more bulletproof. Maybe its just easier to walk 50 miles in the desart than 50 miles in snow.

  616. Here's a simpler, but mathematical, example by benhocking · · Score: 1

    X and X^2 are not correlated if X is a random number chosen uniformly over the interval [-1,1] (or [-2,2], etc.). I think you're confusing the rather technical term "correlation" with its less technical brethren. Of course, I contributed to that by giving a rather wordy non-exact example, but one that a layman can understand.

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
    1. Re:Here's a simpler, but mathematical, example by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      They're not correlated because you've chosen to allow negative values for X. That doesn't really apply in the real world.

      What it boils down to is whether or not you accept that if A causes B then A and B must be correlated. If you do then you cannot fail to accept that a lack of correlation disproves that A causes B. It may not be possible to disprove a correlation between A and B (if, as in your first example, you can't separate A from some other factor, or if A is not the sole cause of B and B is also caused by other factors), but that doesn't disprove the fundamental logic.

  617. Where Would I Live? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would only leave the US if they made marijuana possession a capital offense or banned all guns or the only decent jobs are elsewhere. You see, I'm a classic libertarian. And I've been a few places and studied a few more so here blows the hot air...

    What I Like About the US --

    1) More stuff open 24 hours a day than anywhere else, except maybe Tokyo, but I only have hearsay on that.

    2) Where else can you legally own a machine gun without pledging fealty / giving your sister to the local warlord?

    3) Police normally don't bust you unless you're obviously doing something illegal or stupid. Unless you're a female, then they might try the "Driving while barefoot" infraction to get into your pants. But I hear that happens everywhere.

    4) Generals have to retire BEFORE they're allowed to run the country (unlike a certain Pakistani dude), unless you consider the new NSA guy to be running the country. At least neither the Fed chairman nor the IRS commish was ever a general.

    What I dislike about the US --

    1) Monetary policy is making the dollar go the way of the Roman denarius. We'll be 1:1 with the Russian ruble (with commensurate living standards) if current trends continue.

    2) Nothing is ever REALLY done politically for moral, ethical, or health reasons, despite what we are told. Smoking banned in restaurants for health reasons? Nope, it's so mommy and daddy and bratty junior don't have to wait for a non-smoking table at the local chain restaurant. It's all about convenience, power and money.

    3) People here are experts at finding others to cover the costs of their needs. I ran for office (state house) a couple of years ago, and I'd love to share some of the questions I was asked, e.g., "To cover indigent health care, would you support raising diesel (notice the question didn't mention gasoline) taxes by 25 cents per gallon?"

    About some of the other countries I've lived in or have considered moving to I will render opinion.

    Germany -- Good = Beer at McDonald's, they love cars like we love guns, it's socially acceptable to drink beer at 10am; Bad = Rainy and cold except July, then it's just rainy. Though this summer I hear was an exception.

    France -- Good = Everyone I met was very courteous -- this was in the south of France during the Reagan era, though; Bad = They drove hideous cars.

    Spain -- Good = The Med coast is like the Panama City of Europe with lots of cheap fun, and lots of Brits / other Euros in good humor; Bad = It's the Panama City of Europe architecturally and weather-wise.

    Netherlands -- Good = Easiest place in the world to score dope, except maybe the projects here or Kaiserstrasse in Frankfurt (BTW, if you're the redhead I met in Amsterdam back in '99, you still want to come to the States?); Bad = Weather similar to Germany's, and if the sea walls ever cave in, Katrina x10.

    Scandinavia -- Good = Long summers. Used to live in Alaska and I miss them; Bad = Long winters. Don't miss them so much.

    Australia -- Good = The girls all sound like they're ready to jump your bone; Bad = Lots of poisonous critters. They shoot cats too though I understand the necessity (and maybe the pleasure).

    UK -- Good = More like the US than anywhere else save Canada; Bad = Maybe too much like the US.

    Switzerland -- Good = Cultural influences from France and Germany without the historical baggage; Bad = What's more likely, an avalanche in Switzerland or a tornado in Oklahoma? Not eager to find out.

    Canada -- Good = Maybe the best of US, UK, and France in one place; Bad = Maybe the worst of US, UK, and France in one place. Will also be conquered, (*cough*) I mean "integrated", with the US in the future -- moving there is just delaying the inevitable.

    Most other places (i.e. Third World) -- Good = They're not in walking distance (save Mexico); Bad = Everybody is out to separate you from your money and/or your head. Might as well paint a target on your back.

    Now I go make baby.

  618. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're confusing freedom with happiness. The essence of freedom is choices. Happiness is in large part dependent on relative wealth; that is, how wealthy you are compared to you neighbors. Wealth makes available more choices. So, all things being equal, a wealthy person is freer than a poor one.

  619. Fr...Freedom by SimonShine · · Score: 1

    > However, wealth is, to a large degree, a measure of your freedom.
    > How much wealth you want to have is basically a measure of how much
    > you care to tolerate the circumstances of your life being dictated to you.

    So wealth gives you freedom and dictates the circumstances of your life. How do you define freedom, again?

    --
    Take off every 'ZIG' !!
  620. Ummm. Yeeeeaah. Austin. by heroine · · Score: 1

    My greatest fear of Austin is the work environment. Your bosses are the living incarnation of satan. You have to come in on Saaaaaturday and umm, yeah, on Sunnnnnnnnday. You live in dumpy apartments where your construction worker neighbors hear you breath. You drink coffee at Chotshkies every 5 minutes.

  621. OT: Liberal and Conservative by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

    ...most of the time you can forget that the so called Liberals (who are really the conservatives) are in power...

    Not really on topic, just a pet peeve of mine: the antonym of "conservative" is not "liberal", it's "progressive". Neither "conservative" not "progressive" have any particular ties to liberty. During the emergence from medieval times to modern times the two were closely associated, but if now (in some places at least) the newer ways are less free than the old, then those who are still liberal become framed as conservatives. In the future, if socialism comes to be seen as old and stodgy, then modern "labour" parties may be considered conservative.

    The association of "progressive" with "liberal" continues in America, despite our so-called "liberals" being little more concerned with liberty than our "conservatives" (who are not particularly liberal either). Mind you that personally, I'm not a huge fan of the nearly unrestrained liberty - or rather, lack of social responsibility- that classical liberals (now called libertarians) favor, any more than I'm a fan of the various flavors of authoritarianism that contemporary progressives and conservatives are both driving us toward.

    Back on topic: I <3 Australia and would prefer to move there if for any reason things got nasty enough for me here that I felt it necessary to move.

    --
    -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
    "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
  622. really? by alexandreracine · · Score: 1

    And you are posting that information on /. solder? You don't seems to be too stress.

    --
    No sig for now.
  623. Why US sux by heroine · · Score: 1

    This article isn't about where we would move and why we don't but why US SUX. Let it out. Welfare state and institutionalism are the biggest problems with IT. Canadia would probably offer a better standard of living, but it's really cold up there. Kuwait and United Arab Emirates have the highest standard of living in the world but have terrorist problems. Europeans have even more welfare problems than US. Russians keep tripping over themselves and never finish anything. Japan is almost as crowded as Silicon Valley. Antarctica is too cold. Everyone's trying to escape Mexico.

    Indeed, US is the peak of human civilization, but a civilization is only as good as the human condition allows it to be. Human nature always leads to the mindless worship of a few strong leaders and our own enslavement. We can only do so well in the limitations of the human brain.

    1. Re:Why US sux by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Hahhahaahahahahahahahahaahahhaa! Peak of human civilization? Ahhahahahahahahahah! That's funny.

  624. Re:Aotearoa? You won't make it a year...! by lahi · · Score: 1

    But insulation means being fried during summertime, and no insulation means being frozen during winter, but even having insulation means being cold during winter as few houses have central heating.

    How stupid. I believe we have a somewhat comparable climate in Denmark (to NZ, that is.) But since the 1973 oil crisis, Danish houses have been built with more and more insulation, to the point that many houses built today are "zero-energy" houses. This means they are insulated so well, that in winter, the body heat from the inhabitants, together with the heat from lighting and cooking is sufficient to heat the house.

    So you will fry in hot summers, right? No of course not. Keep the door shut and the windows closed during the day, and the insulation will keep the inside temperature well below that outside. Why is it that noone can understand that insulation works just as well keeping heat out? No need for air conditioning either (another energy-waster.)

    -Lasse

  625. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For some reason a lot of them would like it back.....after Capitalism was reintroduced liberalizing prices meant that the elderly and others on fixed incomes suffered a severe drop in living standards and people saw a lifetime of savings wiped out, but thats their fault for not taking care of themselves. They get democracy, the chance to vote and they keep whinging about is 'I haven't got enough money to pay the rent, buy food or heat the flat'. They have freedom now for christ's sake

    Thats the problem with commies....almost as bad as the Iraqis. We marched into their country, freed them from an opressive dehumanizing system and what happens, they hate us

    I'm with you on this one. It's a tough old world out there and everyone should look after themselves. Those commies who keep bleating on about making sure all those who can't look after themselves like the mentally ill, those unable to work due to illness like cancer and so need to be looked after by the rest of society make me sick.

    If any of those commies try taking anything from me I've got a gun

  626. Australia = Less Tax than USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've worked in Australia at > $100,000 a year and in the USA on the same wage.

    Dollar for dollar, I pay _more_ tax in the USA than in Australia by somewhere between 3% and 5%.

    While Australia may have a higher income tax level than the USA, somehow it works out differently.

    Oh, some other things that are pro-Australia:

    * visiting a doctor in Australia is 1/10th of the price in the USA
    * doctors visits are subsidised by a medicare system that works
    * the price you pay is the price on the sticker, no per-state/county sales tax added at checkout
    * you don't encouraged to divulge your tax identification number to every man and his dog
    * nice places to live don't suffer from air pollution problems on even a regular basis
    * the chocolate varity in 7-11 and similar stores is *much* better (I can't believe the absolute crap you have in these places, in the USA) ...and so on...

    BUT...

    1) various car makes such as BMW/Mercedes are much more expensive in Australia, relatively speaking
    2) I can live and work in America, renting here and paying a mortgage in Australia...can't do it the other way around!

    If I could choose?

    I'd live and work in Australia any day.

  627. Love it or Leave it NOT by oldstrat · · Score: 1

    1. I considered leaving and abandoned the idea.

    2. I could live elsewhere, lots of elsewhere's
    - but if America goes as bad as it could there won't be an elsewhere that matters, being there would be as bad as being here, at least here I know the country at an inimate level.

    This is my home and I fought for it there, and I'll fight and even die for it here if need be, I won't be driven out by neofacists that hide behind veils of false piety and false flag waving.

    If the rest of the world finds us a danger to them, thay have the same rights any nation does to protect themselves.

  628. Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pick a random patch of inhabited land on the globe. Move there for five years. Then come back to America and use what you've learned to make America better. Talk to people about the differences between there and here, and what was better and worse in each place. See if some of the stuff that was better over there can be adapted for local use.

    If only two million Americans did this every year, how much cooler would America become?

  629. Do politics the safe way! Dont get a kicking! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love what America could be. Stand up and fight for your country. Germany is a nice country, but before I left, I stood up for honest elections, running a one man political campaign in Oxford (UK), with all its Close circuit cameras and policing measures.

    I suggest you protect your self by joining a political party before you campaign for democracy. You may get a kicking like I did, if you don't.

  630. San Francisco, California. I already live there. by j+h+woodyatt · · Score: 1

    I know. You think that's still inside the United States. I thought so, too-- until Bill O'Reilly told me the plain "No Spin Zone" truth. I'm living in a completely foreign country. My neighbors and I are, apparently, all terrorists and enemies of the United States--though, I'm not sure what we did to be so designated.

    There could be a downside, however-- all it takes is one look at a contour map and you'll see that San Francisco will fall to an American invasion faster than even Montreal. Plus, we really don't have much of an army or a navy. Our defense strategy against foreign invaders is pretty much: dude, put away the nine if you want to get laid around here; and, if you can help with the rent, then you're welcome to hang out--otherwise, good luck finding another roommate.

    --
    jhw
  631. Beautiful Horizon :P by ThiagoHP · · Score: 1

    Have you ever lived in Belo Horizonte? I live there, oops, here. :) When I lived in the UK, nobody I talked to had ever heard of Belo Horizonte, just Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo.

  632. Re:Why to move - I LOVE THIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...where civil rights have been nullified by a political party..."

    I love it when people say "A" political party did this or that and how the EXECUTIVE branch did it all on their own. It evolves from a complete misunderstanding of government. THE U.S. Congress passed this law "THE OTHER" party voted for it to.

    AND don't ever kid yourself into thinking these laws wouldn't have been passed if the other party was the majority.

  633. Childish name calling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look, all this business of going back and forth and criticizing each others religion is going to go nowhere. After all, we are all human, and it is humans who commit crimes in the name of religion. Let us get away from this childish name calling.

    One AC said that all the raping and killing is going on in north africa and is being done by muslims. However, Christianity is not without blame either. In the name of spreading "gods word", the western powers invaded other countries, and nearly wiped out native cultures. A case in point - children of Australian aborigines were snatched from their parents so that the children could be raised as "good christians". I dont have anything against christianity, I am just pointing out that a lot of harm has been inflicted on people in the name of religion or ethnicity just because they didnt confirm with the majority. This by no means is limited to muslims, jews, christians killing each other. There have also been situations where muslims, jews and christians have caused harms to people of their own religion as well (Iraq: shia vs sunni, Ireland - Protestants vs Catholics etc).

    So, ultimately, let's remember that it is humans that are causing this. And also, remember that unless you read up on the other religions, it doesnt make sense to quote some lines from the other people's scriptures and try to make a point.

    1. Re:Childish name calling by lahi · · Score: 1
      I would like to share my disagreement. At least if you by:

      Look, all this business of going back and forth and criticizing each others religion is going to go nowhere.

      mean that religion should not be criticized.

      All religion is irrational. Now, there's nothing wrong with irrationality per se, and I suppose it is a fundamental condition of human existence to have irrational beliefs, and even atheists - like myself - have sometimes to act on basis of argumentation for which there is no complete rational backing: in other words based on irrational beliefs.

      However, such irrational beliefs should be abandoned whenever they are no longer required - because in the meantime better argumentation has been found, or the argumentation has been shown to be invalid after all.

      The trouble with irrational beliefs which are institutionalized into religions (whether "proper" theistic religions of scripture, or other forms of institution, such as the personal cult surrounding Kim Jong Il in North Korea, or Stalin in the Soviet Union), is that such institutions tend to be self-assertive and self-preserving. In other words they force the participants in such belief institutions to give up the rational behaviour of abandoning an irrational belief when no longer useful.

      Now, this does not itself imply that religion should be criticized. After all, irrational beliefs which are not useful could be just like the large amount of inactive DNA in our genes - it doesn't matter much that it's there. There is obviously little harm done if you don't want to eat pork for irrational reasons. Alas, not all the beliefs, and the further auxiliary beliefs which have been institutionalized to form and support the religion itself, are necessarily harmless.

      This is problematic in particular with religions of scripture, because with just an oral tradition, rejection is easier to achieve. This is seen - and even considered deplorable - with "primitive" cultures such as those in Amazonas, and various places around the Pacific. The problem here is that along with the irrational beliefs, the cultural *history* (which is considered interesting and worth preserving) is also lost.

      With religious books, however, there is a great risk that the text becomes static. In case of the bible, the old testament (shared to some extent with the jews) is an adaption of far older mythology, and probably some new stuff added. (By Moses?) The Christian texts were transscribed and retold - and edited - over the first millenium.

      Then the formalized ortodox churches established a culture with a huge hierarchy and bureaucracy (for example the Vatican), which maintains the "canon", and revises what is current church policy - and thereby current "right" irrational belief. This maintains a fairly static text, while still allowing a degree of flexibility. Therefore Christianity can at least to some extent cope with the continuously evolving rational explanations of reality. In that light, Lutheran reformation was not as much a religious transformation as it was a political transformation, allowing more and more rational and secular "nations" to reject the hierarchical control with the pope at the top. The resulting competition between reformed and orthodox church ensured that at least a sufficient sense of reality would prevail, and gave room for rationalistic movement: if not causing renaissance, then certainly supporting it.

      The problem remains that the flexibility of these religions isn't enough - after all they are still fundamentally irrational institutions. Therefore they continue to hold unreasonable views on "modern" phenomena, like evolution, birth control, sexuality, to name just a few important examples. As they are today balanced by a strong rationalistic tradition, they have to accept facts - though reluctantly - as they are discovered, if they want to continue their coexistence with the rational side of modern society. Still, where there is an obvious conflict, the rational side is

  634. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tend to think that in a purely capitalist system, value is determined by productivity. In a socialist system, where everyone gives their earnings to the government to be redistributed "fairly," value is determined by need. I think that leftist/socialist thinking is to take care of those in "need" right? Take welfare for instance. A person can't (or won't) find work and needs to feed their children and have thus generated "need." The government then places a value on that need and supplies it. The more children, the more "need" the more value. In this kind of system, productivity doesn't determine your worth, need does, so what would motivate a person to be productive when they have more value by creating "need." This is why a socialist system cannot work in the long run and why free markets are the only viable economic solution. Admittedly, a completely hands free approach by the government will see corporate mega giants screwing everybody they can to make a buck, but then, would people force themselves to become more business savy to protect themselves?

  635. In a nutshell... by Blue+Fox+USA · · Score: 1

    We have a ruling class raised in a conservative religious ethic. They never had enough fun in their lives and have need to deprive others of fun rather than fixing the problem and LOOSENING the conservative religious ethos in this country. We can't even talk about sex and intimacy unless it's in an r-rated movie or a dumb talk show. Hello! Is anyone listening? I should not have to go to Europe to have good clean fun in a party with people my own age. We're repressed to the Nth degree in this country and it's way past juvenile at this point. I work hard and I want to enjoy my time off when I actually have some.

    BTW, reason to stay here: South Park, Drawn Together, Robot Chicken...

  636. You've got this totally wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of the freest people I've ever met make, and have, almost no money. They just don't need it! They have time to travel -- like 18 months at a stretch -- and mentally they've gone places and learned wisdom that seems inaccessible to people that are focused on money, and don't understand other mechanisms for getting things done. Similarly some of the most enslaved people I know have lots of money. They're so afraid to let go of their lifestyles that they might as well be in jail.

    Myself, I didn't even know myself until I semi-retired, and got something more precious than money -- lots of unstructured time.

    Academics have studied this issue, BTW. They find that the first $20K/year or so *really does* buy happiness, and then the law of diminishing returns sets in hard and fast. This helps explain why Americans are no happier than they were in the 1970's, as measured by surveys, than they are now, even though per capita GNP is up a lot -- 80% maybe, I'll not take the time to look it up. And it turns out that a lot of us are miserable about what we've done to mama earth to get that "wealth", and that people in other countries -- mainly Latin ones -- really *are* happier even though they're a lot poorer.

    Money ain't everything, baby, once you've got a little.

  637. Free? Hardly. by magnamous · · Score: 1
    services that other countries provide for free

    Free? No no no. Governments provide services to their citizens by levying taxes on those citizens. Let's not get caught in the misconception that the government is capable of providing anything for "free" - one way or another, the citizens pay for every last bit of the services provided by the government.
  638. Already Left by Narcogen · · Score: 1

    I left the U.S. in 1999 and have lived in Kazakhstan ever since.

    No, I'm not joking.

    Since I'm not a citizen of Kazakhstan, I don't have any access to the political system. So one can argue that I am no more free and have no more influence on national politics than I did when I lived in the United States.

    But at least nobody bothers to pretend that I do. It's refreshing, in a way.

  639. Answer by Blue+Fox+USA · · Score: 1

    1. United Federation of Planets - an empire with real American values circa 1960's...

    2. Time - you have to wait until the 23rd century... Only two more to go!

    Immortality would help with the wait... Anyone checking to see if they're immortal lately? ;P

  640. Norway by Jahf · · Score: 1

    I'd pick Australia for the fun factor, but their politics are as messy as ours here in the States.

    Norway.

    I loved Norway, the people were awesome, the scenery was like being able to walk from San Francisco to Colorado and the language was starting to click with me in a few days. Food was good too, and multi-cultural enough to keep variety going (I'd miss Mexican food though). I very much liked the eco-friendliness of all the Scandinavian areas. It wasn't flakey, it was a way of life.

    What's keeping me from going? Family, lack of money, worries of employability and naturalization issues. In that order. Same thing as I'd suspect for 99% of everyone else.

    BTW, I love my country. We get many things right. Unfortunately the last 6 years of politics and war hasn't been one of those right things. Instead of me moving, can I just exile Bush?

    --
    It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
  641. The land down under by Brain+Damaged+Bogan · · Score: 1

    Australia:
    It's like America, only without the schoolkids toting guns and the crowded cities, plus we have better weather and you can spend Christmas at the beach.

    We don't have a political dictator like Bush, just a funny looking midget with big fuzzy eyebrows

    We have a booming IT industry (at least in Perth at the moment, more jobs than people)

    Oh, and we drive on the correct side of the road...

    --
    -- Sex is the antonym of pringles. Once you pop it's time to stop.
  642. Rats on a sinking ship... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do not stay and fight, do not try and seal the planks.

    The US is in decline. I know, I've seen where its heading. Dumbass population, no money (crap for wages), bankrupt social security tax system (high tax rate), nasty ass government (read: they tax u for everything, and then anally rape you on your disposeable income), overpriced trash (can u say plastic, veneered, disposeable crap), no health insurance, crappy health insurance when u do have it, nazi republicans, nazi conservatives, have I *mentioned* the incredibly ignorant dumbasses who could reason their way out of a paper bag? I tell everybody DONT MARRY somebody from the US, they suck _horribly_ and not in a good way. Cancer clusters, toxic sewage dumps, highest per capita of lawyers, financial institutions that make judas look good, RUNRUNRUN!

    personally I go for Austria, Canada, New Zealand, Phillipines but really I'm just looking for the most bandit-infested, ass-backwards, isolated mountain range and set up shop there.

  643. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by jadavis · · Score: 1
    Finally, as for keeping guns in drawers - the primary reason for this right in the US is to kill government types who overstep their bounds.

    Another reason is that you have the right to protect yourself. Otherwise, the government can arbitrarily punish people by denying them any form of physical protection. "Oh, this neighborhood didn't vote for me. Well, I'll just release all the murderers there, give the cops a paid vacation, and see what happens."
    --
    Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
  644. Thailand by AndyCanfield · · Score: 1

    Cold beer, warm sunshine, hot ladies. Smiles. Laid back; casual. Imagine a country where you are respected and admired. Imagine a country where 8 year olds drive motorcycles and 80 year olds live with their children. No Homeland Security, no CNN. I've lived in Thailand for sixteen years, and never regretted a minute of it.

  645. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by rohan972 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you would like reading the book. It seems its actually much more linked to habits you develop and choices you make. Frugality has a lot to do with it. Working your own business (a matter of choice in the US) gives you a better chance.

    If you read the article I linked to, you'll see that there is a higher proportion of millionaires from Scottish descent than most other nationalities. Why? They are frugal and teach their children to be frugal. I quote: "Thus the same $100,000 income-producing household of Scottish descent saves and invests at a level comparable to the typical American household that annually earns nearly $150,000." and "No other ancestry group has such a high concentration of millionaires from such a small concentration of high-income-producing households."

    So, even if you can't make a high income (opporunity) your habits will be a very influential factor in your net worth. Another quote: "Many of the types of businesses we are in could be classified as dullnormal. We are welding contractors, auctioneers, rice farmers, owners of mobile-home parks, pest controllers, coin and stamp dealers, and paving contractors." indicates that it's not some special, rare stroke of luck. It's just the right to be in business for yourself.

    Chance events happen to everyone, good and bad. The parents question was "You can exercise greater control over your socioeconomic standing? Honestly?". Yes, you can have greater control, probably better called influence. But, in a very real sense, you are right, chance happens, so you do not, by the strength of your will, get control as in absolute control.

  646. Stupid question after all by Mondor · · Score: 1

    Although I am not American, it's easy to answer this question as it is universal.

    The reasons someone may want to leave the country is not because he doesn't like the country, but the reason he doesn't like the government. So wish to change the country usually means the wish to change the government, and taking into account the personality of American president, this is a normal wish.

    And the reason why people don't leave their countries is simple - this is against the human nature. We fight for our place, not changing it because of some jerk(s) trying to make our life worse. If everyone who opposes the regime of G.Bush would leave America, he would rule forever, so leaving the country is a kind of selfish act. For most humans, leaving is like retreat. The same is for every country.

    I wonder if Antarctic penguins have the same problems...

  647. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by Knuckles · · Score: 1
    Let me start with saying that I didn't necessarily dispute that an individual has more control over his/her economic future in the US than in most other places. I just disputed that this can be deduced from the fact that most rich americans are first generation.

    That being said:

    I haven't read the article (login required) and "the book" (which book?), but I have a few objections to what you said.

    First, frugality. I'm sure that has an effect, but why this would be bigger in the US than anywhere else I cannot see. Plus, while frugality will pay off under specific circumstances (possibly the majority), there are many business endeavors where it is bad for you. Dunno what this says about the control one has, but my gut feeling is again that this still does not mean that hard working equals rich any more in the US than in other places.

    "We are welding contractors, auctioneers, rice farmers, owners of mobile-home parks, pest controllers, coin and stamp dealers, and paving contractors." indicates that it's not some special, rare stroke of luck. It's just the right to be in business for yourself.

    There exist however many hard working rice farmers and pest controllers that are not rich. Again, I am not completely convinced.

    Chance events happen to everyone, good and bad. The parents question was "You can exercise greater control over your socioeconomic standing? Honestly?". Yes, you can have greater control, probably better called influence. But, in a very real sense, you are right, chance happens, so you do not, by the strength of your will, get control as in absolute control.

    Appreciated. An honest question: what about failure? Don't you have to take into account when juding about control over your life that in Europe there is a social safety net? If in the US your business goes wrong in spite of hard work and other good qualities you have (say, you had no health insurance and got sick), what about the influence over your life then?
    --
    "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  648. Please mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is absolutely 100% correct and we are busily working on lowering the temperatures even further.

    If you do not feel like living in a place which makes Canada look like Bahamas then Norway is not your choice of destination (if you do decide to come please wear at least two sets of long wooly underpants - do not walk off the plane without them!).

    Ignore the crazy people from Bergen who talk about their mild climate resulting from the Gulf Stream etc. without mentioning their 359 days a year of falling ice-shards (as victims of a harsh environment one of their survival strategies is to insist on calling it 'rain').

    Norway - cold, cold & wet, freezing yet wet, freezing & very dry, freezing & very dry except for your sweaty long underpants, so cold you think it might be getting warmer: we have it all! :)

    If you are so inclined please take personal responsibility for your limbs, toes, and fingers: we will under no circumstances waste time trying to find their blackened frostbitten remains upon your departure.

  649. Melting pot?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't know you could freeze it in the first place.
    -T

  650. Wealth != Freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wealth is, to a large degree, a measure of your freedom.

    Not really, it might be part of it, but only a small one(as lot of rich people who end up committing suicide find out the hard way)

    Having lived in the US, I know that most people work night and day with a lot of overtime. Even many of those who are rich. And not because they like it so much, but because if you don't, you have a real chance to lose your job and spend weeks/months finding a new one. And meanwhile worrying what your family will live on! Unless fun or freedom=work for you, or you're in the upper 1% that doesn't have to work, the above quote doesn't hold true.

    Freedom is really about having enough time off from work to spend with your family. In the US, you start with a week, and might go up to a months in 4 years, unless you change jobs. In almost all European countries(afaik) and New Zealand(where I live) you start with 6 or more weeks(I wonder if there's a comparison of this worldwide...) and you can even take a year off(unpaid of course) and still be guaranteed your job.

    Another issue with the US that's quite blatantly obvious is the middle class is slowly being eroded. Money in the _billions_ being spent on foreign wars, which really only benefits the rich oil companies. Sad what W has done, it really is.

    Other countries have their own disadvantages, as anyone who has travelled will tell you "There's no perfect place", it's always give and take. If you live in the US and have never travelled outside of it, you probably think it's the greatest cause that's what you've been taught.
    -T

  651. Norway by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

    Jeg vil gjerne gå på Norge! At least once I learn the language. It's nice and close to home so I wouldn't be too far away from family, and because they're in the EEA I wouldn't even have to apply for citizenship.

  652. Re:religious rhetoric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > at least we can escape the non-stop hypocritical religious rhetoric

    so there aren't many muslims in your area, then, eh? and it's ok for the froggies to ban religious practices (the headscarf thing)

  653. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by drsquare · · Score: 1

    It doesn't work like that. Inflation happens when there is more money about. Empowering people with lower taxation merely changes where the money goes.

  654. Returning to the UK by Julia+Cameron · · Score: 1

    After decades in the US I'm returning to the UK and taking my American-born kids with me. The UK is far from perfect, but I have developed such a hatred for the US I can't live here anymore. I never believed it could happen.

    --
    Julia Cameron
    Oich ù agus hiùraibh éile
  655. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by dk.r*nger · · Score: 1

    "Wrong" in what sense? Are you saying it's wrong in the sense that it's not really like that? Are you saying that it's wrong in the sense that only a few greedy moral reprobates would begrudge someone additional wealth?

    Wrong in the sense that the freedom I cherish is freedom from oppression, freedom of speech, free ownership of property, freedom of doing pretty much whatever the hell I want with my own life, while not limiting the same freedom of others - the socalled negative freedoms - not the "freedom" to buy whatever I want, whenever I want, a positive freedom. Of course wether or not is wrong depends on your definition of freedom.

    Either way, you're the one who is wrong.

    Well, thanks for clearing that up.

    A rather famous poll of a group of Harvard students asked whether the students would prefer to live in a town where they made $100K and everyone else made $200K, or a town where they made $50K and everyone else made $25K. Roughly 77% responded that they'd prefer the latter situation. If you consider this fact tantamount to saying, "77% of Harvard students are idiots," then maybe your economic theories aren't taking human nature into account.

    No, 77% of Harvard students think relative wealth will make them happier. I tend to agree with them. Luckily they (and I and you) are free to decide for ourselves. My theories aren't about economics, they are about freedom.

    When a person moves into town and builds his family the biggest house in the county, he has a reason: maximizing his own happiness. But he doesn't have to account for the loss of happiness inflicted on everyone around him. People who were living happily in their small houses suddenly become dissatisfied, because they've perceived themselves to lose relative standing.

    If you take that argument to the extreme, you could never allow any kind of improvement in anything, anywhere, since this will inflict loss of happiness. How about the first guy that build a house with brickwall next to the log-cabin? So what's the limit? You can't build anything that more than 10% better than what is already build in that neighborhood?

    In order for capitalism to be perfectly accurate, we have to assume that when one person gains economically without eroding another person's material wealth, everyone is better off.

    No, capitalism is about the simple idea that trade creates value. Whenever something is traded, both parties to the trade consider themselves richer (in a total sense, which includes percieved happiness, not monetary) than before.

    Say you have to choose between doing the job you love for $40K/year and doing a job you dislike for $100K. A substantial number of people would take the second job, believing that the additional $60K will bring them enough happiness to make up for the difference between the jobs. But if the government steps in and says that all income over the $40K mark will be taxed at a rate of 50%, then suddenly you're deciding between a $40K job and a $70K job. Now you're more likely to take the job you actually wanted to do, which could be seen as a correction.

    If could also be that I want to work the $100K job for 5 years to save up some money, then settle down and make less money in the nicer job after that. Or it could also be that the $100K job is actually the better one. Or maybe I'm trying to put my children through college at the expense of my own happiness.
    In all cases you got to decide for me, and make me less happy.
    If somebody wants to work a bad job for more money and become miserable because of it, I firmly believe that they should be allowed to do it. It is none of mine or your business.

    Or say you're choosing whether to take on additional responsibilities at your job, or spend more time with your family. High taxes on the revenu

  656. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    Majority of the population? You mean those folks currently evenly divided between Democrats and Republicans? And what exactly would the marjority of the population be angry about? The country's extremely low unemployment rate? The high standard of living? Please what would get folks angry enough to get them to miss their TV shows and come together as one.

    I'm all ears.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  657. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    Yeah because thats going to happen.

    Have you figured out yet that you hurt the pro-gun cause when you come out with bullshit excuses for owning guns? There ARE legitimate reasons you know....like simply wanting one.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  658. Here's an example with positive values only by benhocking · · Score: 1

    X and (X-1)^2 are not correlated when X is chosen uniformly over the range [0,2]. There are literally an uncountably infinite (specifically, Aleph_2) amount of curves Y=f(X) where X and Y are not correlated, even when f is deterministic. Many of these apply in the "real world". I like that you're extremely confident in your beliefs, but I think it's time for you to re-examine those beliefs. Of course, as you point out, it's also important to realize that in the "real world" nothing is the sole cause of any other thing.

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
    1. Re:Here's an example with positive values only by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      Many of these apply in the "real world".
      Then produce a real world example. I'm not convinced that f(x) is caused by x in the way that you are implying. We're talking about philiosphy and statistics here, not pure mathematics. I'd like to see a rebuttal of the logical argument I put forward rather than more examples of functions that are related to their inputs but not correlated.
  659. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by rohan972 · · Score: 1

    I just disputed that this can be deduced from the fact that most rich americans are first generation.

    Point taken. The question I was answering was "You can exercise greater control over your socioeconomic standing?" If most or all rich became rich by inheritance, it would be evidence that you cannot. Most rich americans being first generation allows (but doesn't prove) that you can influence your socioeconomic standing.

    I haven't read the article (login required) and "the book" (which book?)

    My bad, the first time I looked, from a google link, it didn't require a login. You can get a login here: http://www.bugmenot.com/ . The book is "The Millionaire Next Door: The Surprising Secrets of American's Wealthy", which is why I've used american millionaires as an example. It's well worth a read from what I hear. I've only read the webpage.

    First, frugality. I'm sure that has an effect, but why this would be bigger in the US than anywhere else I cannot see.

    I agree entirely. I just don't know of a similar book about other countries.

    Plus, while frugality will pay off under specific circumstances (possibly the majority), there are many business endeavors where it is bad for you.

    I took the frugality to be applied to the personal income rather than a business practise. Don't have a lifestyle of senseless consumption, rather than don't invest in your business.

    Dunno what this says about the control one has, but my gut feeling is again that this still does not mean that hard working equals rich any more in the US than in other places.

    If we could use the word influence rather than control so we are clear what we are talking about. I think there are many other factors than hard work involved. What I mean is, having influence, but not control is that you don't have a guarantee, but you have a reasonable chance of obtaining the desired outcome. It's not hopelessly futile. Hard work does not guarantee rich, but laziness is pretty close to a guarantee of poor. Hard work is not the key, but it's a key.

    There exist however many hard working rice farmers and pest controllers that are not rich. Again, I am not completely convinced.

    My question is: are there any significant differences between the ones who do and do not become rich. Specifically, what is different about the rich that someone else could implement in their own lives, which pretty much comes down to habits, attitudes and beliefs.

    An honest question: what about failure? Don't you have to take into account when juding about control over your life that in Europe there is a social safety net?

    If you don't have control, failure is possible. Learn, start again, don't give up. Or depend on charity I suppose. Get a job. Something. In the end, every country has a 100% fatality rate. If you haven't become part of that statistic yet, do whatever you can. What you can't change, learn to live with. Failing in business or finance is not the end of the road in most cases. Plenty of successful people have failed first. In any case, I'm an aussie, not an american. We have a safety net. Several years ago, my wife and I came to the conclusion that the safety net will probably not survive the retirement of the baby boomers. We decided it was best to learn to live without it now, before everyone else did too. I used to do casual work, taking less than two weeks to find work after a contract finished. After refusing the safety net, I got to the point of finding work usually within 3 hours, not more than 2 days. I find that I become a lot more resourcefull if it is possible for me to fail. Now I have full time employment.

    If in the US your business goes wrong in spite of hard work and other good qualities you have (say, you had no health insurance and got sick), what about the influence over your life then?

    Indeed, that is exactly what it means to have influe

  660. Why we spend so much on healthcare? by beakburke · · Score: 1
    Considering all the problems the US has with its healthcare system, it still amazes me that the US spends the most per capita on health care. Where is the money going, and who is benefiting?

    I'd really suggest you take a look at a book called "Crisis of Abundance" by Arnold Kling. It talks about why Americans spend so much on healthcare, what we do and don't get for it, whether our higher level of spending is necessarily a bad thing, and some possible reform type ideas. It's one of the better books I've seen on the subject. It's a truely TANSTAAFL look at healthcare.

    --
    ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
  661. Government Funded Trip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently the author of this treasonous garbage has a yearning to spend a few years outside the good ol' USA, in a little island paradise, called Guantanamo Bay. Just give Fatherland Security a call with your contact details and the nice men in the black helicopters will take care of all your travel and accommodation requirements.

  662. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by Knuckles · · Score: 1

    You have good points, I appreciate you took the time. And sorry for having said "control" instead of "influence" again, it was not on purpose :)

    --
    "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  663. Australia by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

    My husband and I have kicked around going Down Under for a while, and my friend, a kiwi, tells me to go if I have the chance. I've been researching it for a while now, and well, every since I saw the Discovery Atlas program on it, I'm *so* excited. But... of course, it may take a while. A permanent decision is pending the 2008 elections. If Hillary gets elected, I'm so gone, I don't care where I gotta go.

    --
    Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
  664. Re:Unwilling to make a change for the better? - Le by ViVeLaMe · · Score: 1
    Nothing really wrong with all those dead american soldiers in Iraq, then, i take it?
    i mean,
    Last time I checked a bunch of people coming into your country without permission from another is called INVASION and they can be shot dead
    --
    i had a sig, once..
  665. Waiting for medical treatment by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1
    I still hear Canadians talking about waiting for 6+ months for an MRI. I can't imagine busing up my knee and waiting 6+ months to even get an MRI, nevermind that I can't walk. How long does it take in Canada to get a wheelchair?

    My wife needs non-emergency MRIs from time to time, and she gets same-day appointments. I can't imagine how long she'd have to wait if she were in canada. I guess it wouldn't be so bad because she knows a year in advance when she's going to get them. She could just get on the list with everybody else, wait her year, and then get an MRI.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  666. Re:Go work for Uncle Sam overseas and see the worl by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

    Wow... I'd love to, but damn. Uh, no. *sigh* I'll just keep hoping the CIA returns my calls. :P

    I'm JOKING! :)

    I'm also hella-over-qualified for those positions, so I'm out. :)

    --
    Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
  667. Re:Aotearoa? You won't make it a year...! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are you assuming houses are as well built in New Zealand as in Denmark?

  668. Value Added Tax by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1
    Ahh, but in the US, we don't pay 14% Value Added Tax. Don't forget to include that when you're doing your "free" healthcare victory dance. My family's health care costs about $5000/year. How much does yours cost you?

    If I lived in Canada, my "free" health care would cost over $30,000.00 in higher taxes. Thanks, but no thanks.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  669. bizarre by Stu+Charlton · · Score: 1

    There is some bizarre behaviour in France -- a weird mix of distrust of government, yet 3/4 of students want to be civil servants for some reason....

    --
    -Stu
  670. Since when by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1
    Since when did the highest marginal federal income tax bracket become the official measure of a country's tax burden?

    Think about how much you enjoy your "free" healthcare every time you pay that 17.5% VAT, Mr. Armchair Economist.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  671. Re:Why to move - I LOVE THIS by mhollis · · Score: 1

    I note that anonymous cowards are the only persons who tend to reply to these posts.

    The coward posting the parent has obviously not read any history. Similar things have happened in the US and we have teetered on the edge of outright dictatorship a number of times. I would point out the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 that were passed by the President's party and signed by the President in a time of "crisis" where it was felt that the United States would soon have to defend itself in a war with France. The Sedition Act of 1918 was passed by the President's own party and signed by the President during a time of actual war.

    What you are assuming is that I am arguing for a Democratic or Republican cause. I suppose I could say I have never been a Federalist, having not lived back in the 1700s. And I am not sure if I am a Woodrow Wilson Democrat, not having lived in World War I and knowing that the Democratic Party back then stood for things that today's Democratic Party does not stand for, including racial segregation, Jim Crow laws in the South and other beliefs not tolerated in today's society.

    What I am talking about is how a particular party overreaches when it sees no impediment to its power. In this case, the Republican Party has given the Executive Branch incredible power to violate the individual civil liberties of any person, whether citizen or non-citizen for its own ends without any check from another branch of government, including the Judiciary. In fact, if you read the law setting up the tribunals, these military courts have no relation to civilian courts and there is no provision for an appeal to any civilian court (something that an ordinary private or seaman does have under our military court system -- though rarely used).

    Furthermore, when I speak of a political party, I am also referring to my father's comment, equating the actions of one political party in power in the US with the actions of one political party in Germany in the 1930s and 1940s. When it comes right down to it, John Adams was handed the same extraordinary power to go after anyone he didn't like with impunity -- just as Hitler did. This gave Adams absolute dictatorial power over Americans as well as foreign nationals living in the country in the same way that the law currently gives GW Bush absolute power to imprison, detain, torture and hold any person he can lay his hands on and call "enemy combatant."

    I am as troubled by this as I am of Woodrow Wilson's powers as stated in the Sedition Act of 1918 and for the same reason: It is an agressive challenge to the Bill of Rights in our Constitution -- something these Presidents and the members of Congress who passed these laws have sworn to uphold, protect and defend.

    Now, I realize the poster was just "shooting from the hip," but a clear, dispassionate consideration here is urged.

    --
    Gods don't kill people, people with gods kill people.
  672. Amen to Austin! by jrwillis · · Score: 1

    So much to love here. Burgers at Casino el Camino, The Flametrick Subs at Beerland every month, SXSW, no dress code ANYWHERE, migas for breakfast, Honky, Grady, The Elephant Room, The Continental Club, hell I could go on forever.

    --
    Keep Austin Weird!
  673. I strongly disagree. by Kiyooka · · Score: 1

    I'm all for respecting other cultures, but this is Canada, not a gathering place for everyone and their brother who want to change the land from under me.

    First, we "Canadians" stole the land from the first nations after we slaughtered them. Your righteous protectionist stance is hypocritical here.

    Secondly, don't try to cover your bigoted intolerant stance with a tolerant tone: you're effectively saying: "i'm not racist, but i just don't think certain people should gather here".

    Maybe if you don't like Canada's multicultural policy, YOU shouldn't gather here and should move down the US, instead of the US moving up here. Why should the entire country change for you?

  674. Re:Why to move - I LOVE THIS by Malakusen · · Score: 1

    As a student of American history, I realize that there are times in our past where things have been as bad as some of the things now are. The difference, I would argue, is that what we've got right now is all the isolated problems from American history, and they're all happening again, at once, and we were supposed to have gotten past all them at this point. Not only that, but back for those old problems, even with the old problems, we were still far and away better then anywhere else. That's not the case anymore. There's countries out there with better health care, better opportunities, better education, better civil rights, better diplomacy, better economy, and the list goes on. America is not the best country anymore. It may still be marginally the big dog, it may still be marginally the most powerful in terms of it's military (which I'm a part of), but in a side by side comparison there's a lot of better places.

    --
    Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to conviction
  675. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by Criton · · Score: 1

    Yes real wealth is what one can do with their money ie it's buying power.
    Even dealing with different regions in the US a person with 100K in the midwest is far more wealthy then a person with 100K in LA or NYC.
    Also money with out freedom is worthless as what good is it if you cannot use it as you please?
    Though on the freedom issue someone brought up earilier in the US it seems more wealth does often mean greater freedom ie you can afford a laywer if the government tries to over step it's bounds.

  676. The American diaspora by BearRanger · · Score: 1

    Other countries have had large numbers of people emigrate over the past few centuries, for a number of different reasons. Maybe it's just the Americans' turn?

    There's one major difference, though. Most of the people who talk about leaving seem to be among the best and the brightest. That's not a good sign if you want your country to remain an economic power. If political instability is really the driving force behind this desire to leave you certainly have it in your power to do something about it. So get cracking!

  677. How are you defining real world? by benhocking · · Score: 1

    First of all, in the "real world", everything has a correlation (either positive or negative). The only question is whether or not that correlation is statistically significant. I started off with a "real world" example that was trivial enough to understand, but you started trying to get technical on whether I was really talking about correlation or not, so I went to the mathematics to give you an example.

    But, alright, I'll try to give you an example that is (a) "real world", (b) simple enough to easily understand, and (c) mathematically precise. Assume I throw a ball in an arc. Would you argue that its height is correlated with its forward position?

    Also, we're talking about statistics, which is a branch of mathematics, and not philosophy.

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
  678. Thanks for the reply by EComni · · Score: 1

    I'm not overtly concerned with being with people the same color as me, and I'm not bound to African culture (above all, I'm just an ignorant American :) I don't mind if the population is mostly white, but I am concerned with being viewed fairly and being able to say hello or hail a cab without being viewed as a either a threat or a beggar. Europe has disturbed me lately. Racist chants at soccer games? I can't even fathom what it would be like if the MLB Playoffs had people chanting racial slurs at black or Latino players. I'm still interested in the Far East, but I've heard stories and accounts about how racist they can be there with foreigners and minorities. Even in Japan, where I heard blacks are (were?) the "it" thing, it's still racism based on stereotypes and such.

    I appreciate the advice and the reply, and I'll keep my eye out for that movie.

    1. Re:Thanks for the reply by Optic7 · · Score: 1

      No problem. I didn't mean to imply that you were looking to be with people of the same color. I was just trying to illustrate that I think that a culture with a lot of blending of races would generally be bound to not be as conflicted about race as some countries are.

      I know, I was shocked about those soccer stories in Europe too - unbelievable. As far as Japan, I've also read comments here on Slashdot that there's a lot of racism (or perhaps xenophobia instead) there. I think your best solution would be to visit a few candidate countries and observe for yourself how people treat you and others in minorities there. I hope you keep Brazil in your list because I think you would like it there. Good luck in your search!

  679. Some insight on this story by Funksaw · · Score: 1

    Here's my story.

    In 2004, I swore I was going to leave the United States. At the time I was in graduate school, and utterly convinced that I was planning to leave the country upon completion of my degree.

    It's 2006, and I'm still here.

    The problem, it will come as no surprise to many of you, is money. After getting out of graduate school, I had no savings and tried to find full-time work. Unfortunately, there just wasn't any full-time work - the best I could get was contract work and freelance work, without benifits, and in my best months, I could make rent. In my worst months, I couldn't.

    My problem was mostly caused by the fact that I'm smack-dab in the middle of a nasty job area; jobs that require Master's degrees are typically very hard to find, are very rare, and are very specialized if you've got a M.A. in any liberal art. I did try to apply for temp jobs and full-time "joe jobs" but they weren't hiring either, I kept getting rejected, as I was overqualified - and flat out told this, in many cases.

    Eventually, I had to start traveling across America - I was based in Williamburg, VA, and interviewed for jobs in Richmond, VA, Washington DC, Philadelphia, PA, and Bennington, VT; phone interviews included several in San Francisco (including Wired Magazine, actually - I applied for the Gadgets internship and got up to the interview stage.)

    I lined up an interview with a company in Austin, TX and agreed to fly in (on my parent's dime) - then hurriedly applied for other jobs, informing them I'd be in Austin during a short time period. The job I applied for kept me waiting but another position I applied for finally paid off. I am now fully employed, making a salary of $45k/yr, working in my field. But if you count the times I was contracting and freelancing and couldn't make ends meet, I've been unemployed for about a year and a half...

    I've got some "golden handcuffs" on me right now - my sign-on bonus goes bye-bye if I leave before two years are up. That's fine, I figure it'll take about 2 years for me to save up enough money to leave. I still intend to do it, and hopefully I'll have enough money to visit places before deciding on a country. But I think it's a bit depressing - and sad - that Bush will (presumably) be out of office by the time I plan to leave.

    I still plan to leave, though. This country got broken during the 2004 election, and once something gets broken like that, you can't put it back together.

    My top choices are:
    New Zealand (best government, but I'm worried about there being not much to do - I'm an urban guy),
    Germany (Perfect if it wasn't for the language barrier - I can learn the language but I'm better off learning through immersion,)
    The U.K. (Yes, they're U.S. lite, but even though their government is screwed up as ours is, the -people- there aren't as screwed up as ours is. The U.S. has the government it's people want, generally, while the U.K.'s government is mostly based the flukes of the 3-party FPTP system,)
    Canada (Really an obvious choice, but if you could live anywhere in the world...)
    Australia (John Howard's government sucks, but the people have bicameral proportional electoral system that makes sense... sort of the flip-side of the U.K., really.)

    I'd like to get your feedback on this.

  680. American expatriates by cahalsall · · Score: 1

    I've known quite a few Americans that came to my country to live with intentions of remaining here the rest of their lives; never to return to America. Well, most of them, except for a very small percentage, eventually return.

    The ones that remained always send their teenage daughters and in rare cases a few teenage sons back to states; using education as an excuse. The kids never come back.

    Ps: Our kids, on average, graduate form high school around the age of 16 and score much better than their American counter parts. They graduate from junior college at 18 and can enter the work force at this time fully prepared. I know this from first hand experience, I have 8 American nieces and nephews.

  681. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1
    No, 77% of Harvard students think relative wealth will make them happier. I tend to agree with them. Luckily they (and I and you) are free to decide for ourselves. My theories aren't about economics, they are about freedom.
    I think that's missing the point. The question is, why is there such a strong tendency to want relative wealth, even if (from a rarified economical standpoint) it seems to be against the best interests of the people who answered the poll?

    None of us get to choose our position in the hierarchy. We can choose to compete very hard, but that's no guarantee of a successful outcome. We can choose to try and feel satisfied with what we have, but that's no guarantee either. But because it's a zero-sum game (you cannot improve your standing without demoting someone else), an infinite amount of effort can be consumed in the pursuit of relative positioning without ever delivering a net benefit. This is an example of a situation where trading a little bit of personal freedom can achieve a net social gain. It's hardly the only one.

    Skipping down to your last paragraph, my argument wasn't "for the children," but simply "homo economicus is a heartless bastard." I interpreted your original post as claiming that it's unreasonable to feel bad that someone is better off than you. It might be nice if that were the case (jealousy can be very damaging to the social fabric), but that view struck me as very similar to the homo economicus view of humans as rational agents who always evaluate decisions in terms of economic benefits.

    I never said that, given the same amount of money to spend, everyone would spend it in the same way. Nor did I say that everyone would derive the same amount of happiness from their choices. Nor did I say that we must stop anyone from ever choosing to do things that are against their own better interests (though as a society we sometimes do exactly that). Finally, I've never said that an ideal society is one wherein everyone has exactly the same amount of wealth. From a practical standpoint, I recognize the need for economic incentives. From a personal liberty standpoint, a society that could distribute wealth so equally would have to be utterly totalitarian.

    But I also believe that extreme inequities of wealth are poisonous to a democratic society. They breed resentment and unhappiness, make people far too eager to consume, and turn us against each other. It's not a matter of one person choosing the simple house and the fancy vacations while another chooses a huge house and simple vacations. We live in a world where one person has the huge house, the fancy vacations, the top-notch health care, the personal trainer, the butler, and the Ferrari. The other person lives on Ramen, splits a cramped two bedroom apartment with three friends, and scrubs the first person's toilet. Worst of all, the first person can more easily get the ear of our elected representatives, and therefore can rewrite the laws to keep themselves entrenched in their privileged position.

    The only thing that holds the system together, I believe, is the "American Dream": the promise that, if we work really really hard, any of us can have the good life. But by objective measures, wealth inequity is increasing and class lines are increasingly stratified. Once people give up on the dream, things could turn very ugly very quickly.

    But that's a rant for another day. Today, let's just leave it at this: freedom and equality are orthogonal. They're not always in sync, they're not always in tension, and just about all of us value both. It's unfair of me to paint you as someone who doesn't care about the poor, and it's unfair of you to paint me as someone who wants the government to micromanage our everyday decisions. We're really just arguing about where to draw which lines.

    Now excuse me while I go pat myself on the back for being all deep and nuanced in my reasoning. Yay me.
    --

    You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  682. Re:Aotearoa? You won't make it a year...! by lahi · · Score: 1

    I am not. I am mocking the kiwis for not having well built, insulated houses when their climate obviously makes them desirable.

    -Lasse

  683. Re:New Zealand - VISIT IN THE WINTER FIRST! by taniwha · · Score: 1

    it's because traditionally people heated only 2 rooms in their houses in the winter and th houses were built with this in mind (living room and kitchen). We have a 100 year old house in Dunedin that's been mostly retrofitted with insulation (just finished the last floor a few weeks ago) some of the tall ceilings have been lowered too which helps a lot - we have US-style central heating (gas) and a wood fire which keeps us very toasty in the winter

  684. I left by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I left the USA 60 days ago. I moved to Canada on a work visa. I plan on staying at all costs.

  685. Canada, of course! by americanincanada · · Score: 1

    I moved to Canada 5 years ago. I'm not currently a citizen but I don't want to vote or run for office anyway. I'm content here and sadly I don't miss not living in the U.S., it's getting creapy there.

  686. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    Nicely put. Perhaps a bit too subtle for the average gun-wielder though ;)

  687. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    I think the idea is that people are naturally busy and creative, in some way. By providing for immediate human needs such as food and heat and shelter, you prevent animalism, such as theft in order to survive, etc. You also (according to Maslow) free people to think about loftier things such as science and helping humanity.

  688. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by CarpetShark · · Score: 1
    Many people believe that what goes around comes around. Who knows?


    This is exactly why more socialist countries help citizens more. Because, by helping the members of the society you live in, you help yourself to live in a better environment.
  689. Giving up is traditional in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes.

    The Americans are as free to leave their country to live elsewhere as the people who CAME to America was free to leave their corrupt and evil parent-nations.

    Of course, there's no new unexplored land to move to, but to require Americans to stay and clean up "their" mess is to hold them to a higher standard than the people who willingly moved there in the first place; and I am loath to do that.

    After all, mine (Sweden) was one of the nations who suffered from the people fleeing to the states, and we've done kind of okay since. Not that great, not that bad.
    We've had to do things that are not really nice (trading with both sides in a war that threatened to engulf us).
    We no longer have the military/economic power to force others to bend to our will - or else!
    We're still giving aid (indirectly) to tinpot dictators, and probably should stop being so darn smug about our social system.

    You'll survive the émigrés. A bit poorer perhaps for the people you loose, but possibly learning a bit of humility - that there are places elsewhere that some consider better than your current place, and that you may have to change or people will continue to go elsewhere.

  690. Re:Real poverty is less than average, not just les by Sqwubbsy · · Score: 1

    Wrong. Wealth is wealth. 100K is 100K. That's like saying a ton of bricks weighs more than a ton of feathers.
    Buying power is different from wealth. Wealth is a measure of accumulated resources. Buying power is a measure of how you can use it.
    This should be obvious.

  691. NPT by Seriocomical · · Score: 1

    That's absolutely right! Just like N. Korea did. I notice that Uncle Sam's not complaining about them at all. What's that? You're now trying to argue that there's some big, principled difference between (legally) renouncing a previously-signed treaty and never having signed it in the first place? I suppose you weren't looking when the U.S. renounced the ABM Treaty just a few years ago. No, there's no hypocrisy going on here at all....No sir!

    --
    I used to be convinced that there are two sides to every question, but I'm not so sure anymore....
  692. If not America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New Zealand. Why not? Because it's too far away from family

  693. Re:Go work for Uncle Sam overseas and see the worl by Ericof99 · · Score: 1

    Hey chuck, I read your post, went to the URL, and decided to apply =). Thanks for the heads up.

  694. Re:religious rhetoric by JavaRob · · Score: 1

    You know in America something like 43% of the population believes the Earth is around 10,000 years old? The politicians all play to that. Even the supposedly less-right-wing dems talk about God all the freakin' time. God must be blessing America so often He has no time to do much of anything else.

    Europe isn't like that. Politicians do stupid things, they trick people by manipulating their fear or racism, etc. etc., just like in the US, but at least the huge "if you vote against me you're going against what God wants" manipulation doesn't come up. They have to at least pretend to use reason.

    About the headscarf thing... they were trying to keep the schools a secular institution (which I agree with), but screwed it up by not being consistent, and also picking something that's almost impossible to really nail down. Does letting students wear a headscarf really endorse religion? Can they reasonably ban everything that's remotely connected to religion? Yeah, not so much.

    But that's simple stupidity with maybe a little racism mixed in, not preaching.

  695. As an american living in america by bratwiz · · Score: 1


    I can say first and foremost the biggest obstacle to emmigrating to England/UK are your immigration policies. You all are apparently okay with letting practically the whole world into England __EXCEPT__ for Americans. They're good for Yankee tourist dollars and then they're supposed to go home. I'd like very much to live and work in England. Maybe not for the rest of my life perhaps, but definitely for 5-10 years.

    From the British Embassy website: http://www.britainusa.com/sections/articles_show_n t1.asp?i=41118&L1=41011&L2=41124&a=28578&d=4

    These guidelines are intended for US citizens wishing to work in the United Kingdom.

    Employment Requiring Work Permits
    Before entering Britain to take up employment, American citizens must have a work permit. The Immigration & Nationality Directorate administers the Work Permit Scheme. Exceptions are made only for the categories of permit-free employment outlined below.

    Application for the work permit must be made by the prospective employer in Britain. Individuals cannot apply for a work permit on their own behalf. Applications must be made by the Britain-based employer.

    Here are the immigration rules from Immigration and Nationality Directorate: http://www.ind.homeoffice.gov.uk/lawandpolicy/immi grationrules/