So would you expect a.net program to contain a complete implementation of.net? A java program to have all the java environment, and so on? How do you manage dependancies without packages? Seriously, how does apple do it then? If you drag a python program and python isn't installed? What does it do?
Speaking of such things, just a quick question. I'm a long time KDE/linux coder which has been forced to use borland c++ at work (I'm sure they're all the same, so continue reading anyway..)
For the properties of, say, a button, there are events. I can double click an event, and it generates the function name for the event ( btnMyButtonClick(Sender*sender) { } ). Say I have two buttons that when clicked do exactly the same thing. (This is more common with events like onExit, but anyway..). Should I let it create the two default functions, then get one to call the other, or get them both to call a 3rd function, or should i make a function, then link the event to that function? They all seem to have their drawbacks.
Actually while I'm at it, another question.. My classes often want to show error/warning/debug messages to the users. At the moment I've got a Memo on the form, then call Form1->Memo->Lines->Add("Printing picture 1") or whatever. But I hate the way my normal classes are directly calling and using the GUI. How do I fix that?:) In QT in linux (to show my experience) I would emit a signal (emit debugInfo("Printing") ) then in the GUI I would catch it and print whatever the string is. Using callbacks for this seems wrong. How should it be done please?
In the UK, Manchester, we didn't use VC++ at all. All programming was done using nedit in whatever language we were learning;) (In finished 2 years ago)
It's not so much the angle, as the polarization. At bruster's angle (around 36 degrees for glass) light polarised in a certain way will all bounce off. Light polarised in the opposite way will all pass through.
er, how would it be religious descrimination if _all_ blogs are banned?? that's like trying to preach in a cinema, then complaining about religious descrimination when people ask you to shut up because they are trying to watch the film.
Indeed. What's interesting is that in the last stage of the atmosphere (I forget the name) it gets technically warmer as you get higher, because the air gets thinner and thinner, and what's there is more energetic.
Hmm, I just reread the post that started this off, and now I feel guilty. I back down from my position. I just got defensive for you thinking all guys were like that, and now I've ended up sounding like the grand parent post.
You're mixing up my post and the parent-parent post (or something). My view is that it's probably a good idea for one person to stay at home and look after the kid while the other person goes to work. I don't care which sex does which. Another idea is for both to work part time. I personally quite like this idea, and would consider it seriously (particulary as I'd quite like to help raise the kids). I guess another is for both to work full time and hire a nanny/servants. One of my ex-gf's was raised like this, but then she was a princess.
Ah Monday morning. I have a coffee in one hand and keyboard in the other.
I do sorta agree with the women getting mad thing, but on the other hand women can hit a guy and scream and yell at him, yet the guy, obviously, can't hit back or anything. And if the women gets mad it's the _guy_ that has to sleep on the sofa. Hardly seems fair;)
And what's worse is that you can't have these conversations without the whole man-beating-their-wife thing comming up, as if all guys are bad and I'm supposed to be all apologetic because of some arseholes. In experience it's the women that cause the most damage by breaking hearts.
My brother is a funny case. He's a big stocky guy, strong and from the streets. He married this small chinese girl last year (he's only 21). He's complaining to me that when his wife gets angry she'll get really angry and a few weeks ago she threw boiling water over him. But of course nobody will believe him because everyone will assume he's a wife beater and so on.
Hmm, 'brats'. Heh. I was being cynical in response to your equally cold version ('the guy has an orgasm and the wife has to support the result' or something from memory) as if the women has to put up with sex just to please the guy, rather than sex being a mutally pleasurable experience for both.
I don't agree with your reasoning about black people (and the analogous husband-beating). It's faulty reasoning. I think that people should use oil less, and I think oil rigs are too dirty, cause too much damage, and so on. Greenpeace agreed with this, but that doesn't mean I condond them blowing up the oil rig. In the same way lots of people in Ireland agree with what the IRA wants (break away from england etc), but that doesn't mean they condone their menthods of killing people.
(btw, my girlfriend is black - I'm not racist at all)
I do agree with not sprouting any hatred, although I find it funny that it's you sprouting the sexual hatred, justified or not, not me. You see it as a "us vs. them" war. You stand up for your side, fight men, and try to win justice by beating men down while looking at the small minority of men who are assholes. You think that men see it as: "a woman is a bitch for standing up for women or supporting a woman and her brat after you've fathered the child". I think you're hatred blinds you. I love women all all races and all kinds. I've never beaten a woman (unless spanking (with consent) counts *grins*) and I've never even gotten angry. If I ever did have kids, then I'd stick with the woman and support them. Yet I have to somehow answer to you for the crimes of other men.
I think you'd come across as less of a 'bitch' and have a better view of like if you took the stance that most men are pretty good and most women are pretty good, but sometimes women end up with bad men, and sometimes men end up with bad women. (And while women don't generally beat men, it's not exactly _that_ uncommon and besides women can dish out pain other than physical). You mentioned that you had a bad experience growing up. Please put that behind you, realise that it's not always like that, and stop attacking guys.
You have good points, and I agree with you, but I feel sorry for your husband if you're like this all the time. "You've _only_ been working all day have you?! That's nothing!"
Also from a guy's point of view: you make one mistake by not pulling out in time and end up supporting a woman and brat for the next 18 years with her yelling at you for not doing enough because you've 'only' been working all day and then kept up all night by some brat screaming.
I do hope, for your husband's sake, that you're not bitchy all the time and you're just in a bad mood at the moment.
Actually it's pretty simple. I still have a Dr Dobbs where they made such a pair of headphones using just a digitial compass and by increasing the lag in the left or right channel as appropriate. It was straight forward electronics and they claimed it worked pretty well.
You could use polaroides. They are self processing. (btw, I make RGB lasers for my job. Just uh thought I'd throw that in. I use them to print holograms.)
You seem to be complaining because you don't like what you hear, without actually refuting it. What mainstream liberal media gives as much misinformation as fox and o'reilly does? Or do you think that fox etc really are good news sources?
I'd be interested in specific examples please. The last time we had a wikipedia article, someone complained that their valid complaints about an article were just removed and ignored. When I actually tracked it down, it turned out they were blanking the page and putting their complaints right in the actual article. The fellow wikipedians undid this, and even moved the complaints to the talk page where it should be and added a comment to their talk page saying so.
So while some people do have valid complaints about such things, do excuse me for starting off as a bit sceptical.
I have a 16:9 display, and I also like the dock on the side. So click and hold on the dock, and drag it to the side. Nice and easy;) You can also configure it in the options if you don't like dragging.
Slashdot Mirror
> Is the explanation of the second scientist not science simply because it fails to make predictions, but only explains data?
Yes.
It is a necessary one.
For linux individuals there's LUG, webpages and the biggest of all - irc.
As opposed to windows where Microsoft give help to the end users??
Ah, like being forced to pay taxes which go to the needy? That sort of commie forced? I think you can get prison for refusing to pay taxes. Not sure.
So would you expect a .net program to contain a complete implementation of .net? A java program to have all the java environment, and so on? How do you manage dependancies without packages? Seriously, how does apple do it then? If you drag a python program and python isn't installed? What does it do?
How can you possibly say support is ignored, when there's companies like Novel, Redhat, IBM and so on providing support??
Speaking of such things, just a quick question. I'm a long time KDE/linux coder which has been forced to use borland c++ at work (I'm sure they're all the same, so continue reading anyway..)
:) In QT in linux (to show my experience) I would emit a signal (emit debugInfo("Printing") ) then in the GUI I would catch it and print whatever the string is. Using callbacks for this seems wrong. How should it be done please?
For the properties of, say, a button, there are events. I can double click an event, and it generates the function name for the event ( btnMyButtonClick(Sender*sender) { } ). Say I have two buttons that when clicked do exactly the same thing. (This is more common with events like onExit, but anyway..). Should I let it create the two default functions, then get one to call the other, or get them both to call a 3rd function, or should i make a function, then link the event to that function? They all seem to have their drawbacks.
Actually while I'm at it, another question.. My classes often want to show error/warning/debug messages to the users. At the moment I've got a Memo on the form, then call Form1->Memo->Lines->Add("Printing picture 1") or whatever. But I hate the way my normal classes are directly calling and using the GUI. How do I fix that?
Thanks
In the UK, Manchester, we didn't use VC++ at all. All programming was done using nedit in whatever language we were learning ;) (In finished 2 years ago)
It's not so much the angle, as the polarization. At bruster's angle (around 36 degrees for glass) light polarised in a certain way will all bounce off. Light polarised in the opposite way will all pass through.
er, how would it be religious descrimination if _all_ blogs are banned?? that's like trying to preach in a cinema, then complaining about religious descrimination when people ask you to shut up because they are trying to watch the film.
Indeed. What's interesting is that in the last stage of the atmosphere (I forget the name) it gets technically warmer as you get higher, because the air gets thinner and thinner, and what's there is more energetic.
Actually torture is pretty ineffective. People will just say what they think the torturer wants to hear.
> Do you have ANY IDEA how large a memory table it takes to filter out KNOWN .COM porn sites? It takes a LOT of memory.
Since you asked, I created a ternary tree of 1 million words/phrases - that took up 30MB.
My dad used to be able to crush those travel locks in his hands. Was cool to watch :) Used to be a kickboxer and bodyguard.
I think you'd be far better, price wise, in buying a librie http://www.sony.jp/products/Consumer/LIBRIE/ and ripping the screen out of that :)
Hmm, what's with the surge of attacks on open source lately? Not even particulary good attacks.
I'm getting paranoid I think.
Hmm, I just reread the post that started this off, and now I feel guilty. I back down from my position. I just got defensive for you thinking all guys were like that, and now I've ended up sounding like the grand parent post.
Oh well
You're mixing up my post and the parent-parent post (or something).
My view is that it's probably a good idea for one person to stay at home and look after the kid while the other person goes to work. I don't care which sex does which. Another idea is for both to work part time. I personally quite like this idea, and would consider it seriously (particulary as I'd quite like to help raise the kids). I guess another is for both to work full time and hire a nanny/servants. One of my ex-gf's was raised like this, but then she was a princess.
Ah Monday morning. I have a coffee in one hand and keyboard in the other.
;)
I do sorta agree with the women getting mad thing, but on the other hand women can hit a guy and scream and yell at him, yet the guy, obviously, can't hit back or anything. And if the women gets mad it's the _guy_ that has to sleep on the sofa. Hardly seems fair
And what's worse is that you can't have these conversations without the whole man-beating-their-wife thing comming up, as if all guys are bad and I'm supposed to be all apologetic because of some arseholes. In experience it's the women that cause the most damage by breaking hearts.
My brother is a funny case. He's a big stocky guy, strong and from the streets. He married this small chinese girl last year (he's only 21). He's complaining to me that when his wife gets angry she'll get really angry and a few weeks ago she threw boiling water over him. But of course nobody will believe him because everyone will assume he's a wife beater and so on.
Hmm, 'brats'. Heh. I was being cynical in response to your equally cold version ('the guy has an orgasm and the wife has to support the result' or something from memory) as if the women has to put up with sex just to please the guy, rather than sex being a mutally pleasurable experience for both.
I don't agree with your reasoning about black people (and the analogous husband-beating). It's faulty reasoning.
I think that people should use oil less, and I think oil rigs are too dirty, cause too much damage, and so on. Greenpeace agreed with this, but that doesn't mean I condond them blowing up the oil rig.
In the same way lots of people in Ireland agree with what the IRA wants (break away from england etc), but that doesn't mean they condone their menthods of killing people.
(btw, my girlfriend is black - I'm not racist at all)
I do agree with not sprouting any hatred, although I find it funny that it's you sprouting the sexual hatred, justified or not, not me. You see it as a "us vs. them" war. You stand up for your side, fight men, and try to win justice by beating men down while looking at the small minority of men who are assholes. You think that men see it as: "a woman is a bitch for standing up for women or supporting a woman and her brat after you've fathered the child". I think you're hatred blinds you. I love women all all races and all kinds.
I've never beaten a woman (unless spanking (with consent) counts *grins*) and I've never even gotten angry. If I ever did have kids, then I'd stick with the woman and support them. Yet I have to somehow answer to you for the crimes of other men.
I think you'd come across as less of a 'bitch' and have a better view of like if you took the stance that most men are pretty good and most women are pretty good, but sometimes women end up with bad men, and sometimes men end up with bad women. (And while women don't generally beat men, it's not exactly _that_ uncommon and besides women can dish out pain other than physical). You mentioned that you had a bad experience growing up. Please put that behind you, realise that it's not always like that, and stop attacking guys.
Peace.
You have good points, and I agree with you, but I feel sorry for your husband if you're like this all the time. "You've _only_ been working all day have you?! That's nothing!"
Also from a guy's point of view: you make one mistake by not pulling out in time and end up supporting a woman and brat for the next 18 years with her yelling at you for not doing enough because you've 'only' been working all day and then kept up all night by some brat screaming.
I do hope, for your husband's sake, that you're not bitchy all the time and you're just in a bad mood at the moment.
Actually it's pretty simple. I still have a Dr Dobbs where they made such a pair of headphones using just a digitial compass and by increasing the lag in the left or right channel as appropriate. It was straight forward electronics and they claimed it worked pretty well.
I'm guessing that you are an "oldie" that has forgotten how 'hippie'-like youngsters are. It was the philosophical side that I liked the most.
You could use polaroides. They are self processing.
(btw, I make RGB lasers for my job. Just uh thought I'd throw that in. I use them to print holograms.)
You seem to be complaining because you don't like what you hear, without actually refuting it. What mainstream liberal media gives as much misinformation as fox and o'reilly does? Or do you think that fox etc really are good news sources?
I'd be interested in specific examples please. The last time we had a wikipedia article, someone complained that their valid complaints about an article were just removed and ignored. When I actually tracked it down, it turned out they were blanking the page and putting their complaints right in the actual article. The fellow wikipedians undid this, and even moved the complaints to the talk page where it should be and added a comment to their talk page saying so.
So while some people do have valid complaints about such things, do excuse me for starting off as a bit sceptical.
I have a 16:9 display, and I also like the dock on the side. So click and hold on the dock, and drag it to the side. Nice and easy ;) You can also configure it in the options if you don't like dragging.