Anything that will impart a small amount of the right sort of momemtum to it at just the right point in its orbit (which will be somewhere far from Earth). A bomb detonated the right distance a way, a chemical rocket shoving on it, an ion rocket shoving on it for months, even something exotic like painting one side of it white.
This program tells me nothing about the tsunami resulting from an ocean strike. I would guess that the collapse of a 4 mile diameter "crater" in 1000' of ocean would do something unpleasant, but what?
I suspect that a land strike would be preferable: much easier to evacuate a 200km circle than thousands of miles of coastline.
> I hardly blame Microsoft for this with people > uneducated enough to open a.hlp file attachment, > or any random attachment that reaches their > inbox.
Why can you not blame Microsoft for distributing an MUA that executes attachments when they are "clicked" on?
One place on the Secunia site claims Firefox 1.0 is vulnerable while in another it says it isn't. I'm running Firefox 1.0-3 on Debian/Unstable and I do not appear to be vulnerable. Perhaps it is because I am also running Privoxy?
> Speculation on reasons for the difference in > click rates range from Firefox's integrated > pop-up blocking to seeing the average Firefox > user as more tech-savvy the average Internet > Explorer user.
But did it include the possibility that most of the intelligent ones have switched to Firefox?
Of course, the really smart ones never used IE to begin with.
Federal licensing, of course. Only licensed ISPs using licensed software and employing licensed admins would be allowed to connect to the Net. Large companies would obtain licenses and be their own ISPs. The ISPs would be required to monitor and filter their customer's activities.
>..SCO's intellectual property that is apparently > present in Linux distributions...
It most certainly is not. Despite two court orders requiring them to do so The SCO Group (which is _not_ the Santa Cruz Operation) has failed to produce a single line of infringing code.
The reason for denaturing industrial ethanol is to make it non-potable and therefor untaxed. The usual agent is something that makes you vomit but is not toxic. Adding benzene or methanol would be a bad idea as you know someone is going to try to drink it. There used to be a myth among winos that denatured alcohol could be made drinkable by filtering it through bread.
Slashdot Mirror
This is true. The safest place for the moon would be off to one side, not "downstream" of Earth.
Anything that will impart a small amount of the right sort of momemtum to it at just the right point in its orbit (which will be somewhere far from Earth). A bomb detonated the right distance a way, a chemical rocket shoving on it, an ion rocket shoving on it for months, even something exotic like painting one side of it white.
This program tells me nothing about the tsunami resulting from an ocean strike. I would guess that the collapse of a 4 mile diameter "crater" in 1000' of ocean would do something unpleasant, but what?
I suspect that a land strike would be preferable: much easier to evacuate a 200km circle than thousands of miles of coastline.
Doesn't follow unless the moon is directly behind Earth and so shielded at "impact" time.
About movies? Not me. However, 33.5G is room enough for all of Debian on one disc.
The DBadmins already know about them, and they won't result in the creation of another 100,000 spamming zombies.
> I hardly blame Microsoft for this with people .hlp file attachment,
> uneducated enough to open a
> or any random attachment that reaches their
> inbox.
Why can you not blame Microsoft for distributing an MUA that executes attachments when they are "clicked" on?
> Apparently there are issues...
What has become of the word "problem"? "Issue" is marketdroid-speak.
A corrugated-steel wall produces this effect quite distinctly.
> Is this just a pork-barrel project, or something
> Europe really needs to break the reliance on U.S.
> space technology?
It's something the world needs. Choice is good.
> Write back when you know what you're talking
> about.
He does. You don't.
> Pu for example is not a natural element...
...and quite wasteful.
Plutonium occurs naturally in uranium ore. It is generated when U238 atoms absorb neutrons emitted by fissioning U235 atoms.
>
Plutonium is quite useful as reactor fuel.
> ...the grey period set to 24 hours!
That is a ridiculously long delay. I'd dump an ISP that delayed my mailing-lists for a full day.
One place on the Secunia site claims Firefox 1.0 is vulnerable while in another it says it isn't. I'm running Firefox 1.0-3 on Debian/Unstable and I do not appear to be vulnerable. Perhaps it is because I am also running Privoxy?
> BTW did he even hear a sonic boom?
Did you even read the article? The picture was taken by an automated camera. He wasn't there.
> But Churchill would never have tried to pull a
> fast one by disingenuously describing Linux as
> "Red Hat's Linux"
Of course he would have had he thought he could get away with it. A statesman is just a dead politician.
> Speculation on reasons for the difference in
> click rates range from Firefox's integrated
> pop-up blocking to seeing the average Firefox
> user as more tech-savvy the average Internet
> Explorer user.
But did it include the possibility that most of the intelligent ones have switched to Firefox?
Of course, the really smart ones never used IE to begin with.
Not so fast. First there is the matter of DC's legal expenses...
Chrysler bought a UNIX license from AT&T many years ago.
> Is it possible that the usefulness of TV has
> decreased...
I suppose that it may have gone even more negative.
> However, he admits that future sequels may
...similar to the James Bond series
> feature a younger actor....
Why not use computer graphics to put Ford's face on a younger actor? (Eventually, of course, they won't need the actor at all).
>
> post-Connery.
There were no James Bond movies post-Connery. Just pitiful imitations.
Federal licensing, of course. Only licensed ISPs using licensed software and employing licensed admins would be allowed to connect to the Net. Large companies would obtain licenses and be their own ISPs. The ISPs would be required to monitor and filter their customer's activities.
> ..SCO's intellectual property that is apparently
> present in Linux distributions...
It most certainly is not. Despite two court orders requiring them to do so The SCO Group (which is _not_ the Santa Cruz Operation) has failed to produce a single line of infringing code.
> Is this the first wave of the much anticipated
> reverse-migration which will be a hallmark of
> the 21st century?
The BATF. The FDA has no jurisdiction over booze.
The reason for denaturing industrial ethanol is to make it non-potable and therefor untaxed. The usual agent is something that makes you vomit but is not toxic. Adding benzene or methanol would be a bad idea as you know someone is going to try to drink it. There used to be a myth among winos that denatured alcohol could be made drinkable by filtering it through bread.