Slashdot Mirror


Westerners Migrating to India for Jobs

shonagon53 writes "The BBC reports that quite a few young European tourists stick around in India to work for eSolutions companies who contract outsourced work from European companies. The salaries are mediocre, but you get free housing, great food, snacks à volonté and a free taxi ride to work each morning. Is this the first wave of the much anticipated reverse-migration which will be a hallmark of the 21st century?"

499 comments

  1. Work Visas by Hamstij · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So how does that work as far as work visas are concerned? Does the company also arrange for the correct visas or are the "tourists" technically working there illegally?

    1. Re:Work Visas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Getting a work visa in India is simple: you apply and if you are not on Interpol wanted list and have a employer's job offer, you should expect it in a month.. No other certification or verification is required.

      Welcome!

    2. Re:Work Visas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You have to go to you local indian embassy, and bring a letter from your employer. If you stay in India for shorter than 6 months, then it is somewhat easy. If you plan to stay for longer than 6 month's, then you have to report to the local police commisioner when you get to India.

      Do remember to bring a local to while going to the police commisioner. The police commisioner can be somewhat can be cumbersome. (I only know Bangalore)

    3. Re:Work Visas by Trejkaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm curious about wages. Presumably one of the reasons people were outsourcing to India in the first place was because of lower wages (and expenses in general.) Wouldn't moving to India then, mean taking a paycut? And would the paycut be lower or greater than the savings in expenses? :-/

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    4. Re:Work Visas by wwwillem · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sorry to say, but if you're asking this type of questions, you're probably not made up for that type of move. BTW, I've lived in Europe, Far-East, now Canada, always "local contract", so I know what I talk about. Back to a good answer, the thing is that if you're young (or young-of-heart), what only matters is that the job pays enough to pay for a decent living. I suppose you read the article, and all those Europeans in India clearly lived well. No hunger, lots of curry, :-) what do you want more!!

      When living overseas, the question is most often not about pay, but more if you can get affordable housing. I lived in Singapore, with a typical rent of 5000 per month. So, it becomes important that an employer is helping to overcome that hurdle. Next thing, what are the taxes. For example, I took in Singapore a big pay cut, but taxes were 10-15%. Oh, did I mention that a good dinner outside would set you back less than 5 bucks?

      I hope you get the gist. Wages or pay cuts say nothing!! It's about income versus cost of living. And when that works our reasonable enough, you should of course have a little mentality of "carpe diem" and not too much worry about your mutual funds, stocks and such. If the latter is important to you, better stay home. But .... you'll miss a lot.

      --
      Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    5. Re:Work Visas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you plan on ever moving back.

    6. Re:Work Visas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5000 dollars a month to live in Singapore!?!?! Wow, you must have been living in a mansion.

    7. Re:Work Visas by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are signs that 'staying home' may not be the economically 'safe' thing to do anymore. This has nothing to do with outsourcing or offshoring, and everything to do with the imminent collapse of the debt-bubble in the US.

      The DOW, as of yesterday, is up one-half of one-percent from the beginning of the year. Investors are starting to look elsewhere. Meanwhile, some fairly respectable economists are starting to see only a 10% chance of avoiding a coming economic meltdown - I don't just mean the little recession we just had, I mean a serious change in the standard of living.

    8. Re:Work Visas by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Of course I get the gist, that's why I asked the question in the first place!

      If I take a pay cut of $50K/yr, and it ends up saving me only $40K/yr, then I've lost $10K/yr which I could have saved. The quality of living would want to be a damn lot better than what I have now, if I were going to give up that much money.

      On the other hand, if the pay cut was $40K/yr and the savings were $50K/yr, it would be like getting a payrise for almost no effort, and almost a no-brainer (unfortunately I'm married.)

      But to really make a decision, one needs numbers.

      I'm making the same decision on a smaller scale right now, thinking of moving from one city to another. I would save about $20K/yr, but my paycut might be $10-15K/yr. This doesn't seem bad to me based entirely on wages, but the quality of living might be lower (since I'll be within range of family, which can be a pain. LOL!) and my wife isn't entirely convinced yet that we should move. :-)

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    9. Re:Work Visas by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you are unemployed, a low-paying job is not a pay cut.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    10. Re:Work Visas by citog · · Score: 1

      Possibly, if you have a look at his site (under career) you'll see that he was there from '95 - '98. Not sure what things in Singapore were like overall then but I know people who were here around that time and their companies were dropping a shitload on rent.

      Oh yeah, landlords in Singapore are bastards. Unbiased of course and nothing to do with finding cockroaches in the place I move into over the weekend.

    11. Re:Work Visas by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      another benefit of living in Singapore is the they big brother government is so effective at stopping dissent and crime it is very peaceful for those who fit the model of a good citizen.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    12. Re:Work Visas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wipe my ass with singapore dollars. THey are worth nothing here.

    13. Re:Work Visas by Trackster · · Score: 1

      Yep, exactly. Of course it means you take a pay cut. That's exactly what they point out in the writeup: Pay is low but housing, taxi rides to work and such are free.

    14. Re:Work Visas by wwwillem · · Score: 1

      Yep, I remember my share (a few hundred) of cockroaches. We had to break all the cupboards out of our appartment to get rid of them. Not to forget the fight required to convince our landlord for getting that done. Don't remember shitloads of money for rent, it was more shitloads of cockroaches :-). But we fought ourselves out of that... Don't think that those folks in India, portraited in the article have it different. Lots of challenges, but in the end a great time. If you (not talking about citog!!) can't stand those challenges, better stay home for turkey. But you'll miss the curry...

      --
      Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    15. Re:Work Visas by wwwillem · · Score: 1

      If you're so focussed on numbers, I'm not sure you understand "quality of living". Better listen to your wife, she seems more to 'get it'.

      --
      Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    16. Re:Work Visas by Desiderata · · Score: 1

      Living abroad really depends on what kind of contract you have. If you're employed as a local, you don't get many perks. But if you're an expat, your company probably pays rent AND employs special people to do all the visa paperwork for you. Singapore is expensive, and India can be (real estate, not food), depending on where you live.
      But the thing with expats in India is that they're being replaced by competent locals. There's no need to employ an expat and pay for benefits etc. if you can get someone local to do it for you. And housing can be really cheap overseas.

    17. Re:Work Visas by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Now you're contradicting yourself.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    18. Re:Work Visas by bheer · · Score: 1

      > some fairly respectable economists are starting to see only a 10% chance of avoiding a coming economic meltdown

      Stephen Roach is known in investment circles for being bearish. And one ecomist, even ignoring his reputation, != "some ... economists". This is not to say that he is wrong (and in his line of work it's useful since he can play an effective devil's advocate) since even the boy who cried wolf was right once, but that statement of yours was classic scaremongering.

      And oh, several respectable posters on Slashdot are starting to see that BSD is dying.

  2. Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...so now I've got to listen to a European stoner when I call my bank :-(

    1. Re:Great... by Morphix84 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Could be worse, could be tech support. Oh Wait....

    2. Re:Great... by frankvl · · Score: 1

      Yes, here in Europe, we're all stoned all the time, just like your countries' propaganda machine told you

    3. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, here in North America we live blinded by evil propaganda machines in a neo-fascist climate of fear and terror, just like your enlightened continental propaganda machine tells you.

      You condescending fuckwit.

    4. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that sounds horrible. Good thing I'm european, being stoned is kinda sweet.

  3. I'm Australian. by torpor · · Score: 5, Interesting


    I've worked in the U.S., Japan, and now Germany. In a few years time, I hope to move to India to work for a little while, then head back to Australia to do what I can to build up the national market for technology ...

    Globalization is a reality, folks. You can either:

    a) pretend it doesn't exist,
    b) complain about it, or
    c) live in it, as a globalist individual

    I chose c). If big-corp's are gonna go multi-national, so am I. The days of stick-dwelling are over .. this is the Era Of The Nomad, in my opinion.

    Move or die.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    1. Re:I'm Australian. by zx75 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you completely. I graduate from university in a couple of months and I'm already pursuing opportunities overseas as well as locally (Canada).

      --
      This is not a sig.
    2. Re:I'm Australian. by ilyaa1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Good point. Globalization is here, and it is actually a really good thing for virtually everyone.

      There is plenty of reactionary opposition in virtually any "western" country around the world; same applies for the ex-USSR countries. It's likely that nothing can be done about those people; but when students pick up the same reactionary banners, I start to wonder...

      I, for one, am learning Chinese. Hopefully, me and my partnet are going there in a few years...

    3. Re:I'm Australian. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The problem with your theory is that while capital is free to move across borders, workers are not. Some countries have very strict immigration laws. If this was the Era of the Nomad then one billion Chinese would have already moved to America.

    4. Re:I'm Australian. by zzyzx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's great as long as you don't actually want to do anything other with your life other than work. Don't put down any roots or try to make friends or anything.

    5. Re:I'm Australian. by o1d5ch001 · · Score: 1

      You are assuming all countries will treat citizens (residents) fairly... I wouldn't be so quick to throw out ideas like state and culture so quickly. I'll make a prediction, this is the hight of globalism, the upcoming oil shortage (thanks China!!) will dominate the next years of conflict and struggle.

      Choose wisely is all I have to say.

      --
      Q. What is Calvin's monster snowman called? A. The Torment Of Existence Weighed Against The Horror of Non Being
    6. Re:I'm Australian. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You forgot to list what all the actual countries are doing, which is

      d) increase the country's power through economics.

      This is what China is doing. This is what India is doing. Practically every country on Earth is doing this except for maybe Canada, who doesn't have to, and some smaller European countries. India is really in a competition against Pakistan to become the most advanced first, so they don't have to worry quite so much over their border. China is building up their knowledge base so that they can make a real run at controlling the East.

      You're playing at being a citizen in a global nation, but most everybody else is preparing for war.

    7. Re:I'm Australian. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about

      d) improve my skills and agressively pursue a better position in my country with a decent salary

      This is what I chose. I guess the three options you considered are not enough for other more competitive folks.

    8. Re:I'm Australian. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Globalization is a reality, folks. You can either:

      a) pretend it doesn't exist,
      b) complain about it, or
      c) live in it, as a globalist individual


      I too choose c).

      So very true. Even if you return to your local country later and get a nothing job your better off as you get to see the world and hone the skills along the way.

      I left, and a friend stayed. I came back in 9 years to find he has spent the last 4 years unemployed as his skills lapsed with the last employer. Other friends also did not fair much better.

      The best part is a sysadmin that knows C/C++/Java, the OS architecture and how to troubleshoot applications can get a job here. North American companies do not invest in their people and the result is if you want to get the experience you must go to get it.

    9. Re:I'm Australian. by GoofyBoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How about d) Realize it is there but deliberatly decide to not live my life according to economics.

      Sorry, but life is too short to have my life dictated by some politician/multi-national company.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    10. Re:I'm Australian. by Walkiry · · Score: 1

      >Don't put down any roots or try to make friends or anything.

      My father has had us (as in all the family) trotting around the world since I was 3. Lybia, Italy, Venezuela, Colombia, Argentina, Brazil, and of course several parts of Spain.

      My parents seem to have developed a nice social life and don't seem to lack friends. As for a family, well, here I am (along with my siblings).

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    11. Re:I'm Australian. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the U.S. with its idiotic fascination withfull sized vehicles such as the SUV or pickup would have absolutely nothing to do with any future oil shortages.

    12. Re:I'm Australian. by iamacat · · Score: 0
      Be it only that human rights and labor laws were globalized. Governments and companies will take every chance to stiff you otherwise. US is not exempt of course, but does have laws on the books that sometimes work.

      • Want to do some chores for your boss which are not related to your job description - getting groceries at best, sexual favors at worst?
      • Say you have a heart attack. Think your job provides health insurance that would cover bypass surgery? Will your job be still waiting for you after you recover?
      • Will your office building have asbestos? Unsafe ceiling that can fall on your head and kill you? Lack of A/C and temperatures bad for human health?
      • Will you fired once you are 30 for younger more, energetic workers? Or because you got married, had/fathered a child and so on?
      • Say you went to a nice christian workshop or spiritual excersize group. Want to spend the next 5 years locked up in a government re-education camp with hard labor because it happens to be some church/philosophy not approved by the government?


      I say stick around and fight for your job - be it through politics, civil disobedience or being a more valuable employee. There is still lots to lose.
    13. Re:I'm Australian. by mizhi · · Score: 1

      You're being a bit myopic.

      "Improving your skills and aggressively pursuing a better position" may mean you have to move to another country in order to continue to work for your company. If you work for a small company that doesn't do any international business, then you might be fine... until it moves overseas.

      Most large companies, on the other hand, have significant international presences and in order to advance you may have to be willing to move to a foreign country and work for a period of time.

      --
      Humorless sig goes here.
    14. Re:I'm Australian. by Garbonzo+Pitts · · Score: 1

      OR

      d) Exercise the power we have in democracies, and stop it (at least our participation in the labor arbitrage aspect of it).

      I never cease to be amazed at people's fatalism and lack of imagination

    15. Re:I'm Australian. by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      I have moved cities once every 3 years since graduating high school 10 years ago. I travel a lot for my work now. I keep in contact with past friends over internet and phone. If you have to be in the same city as your friends to stay friends, well, I feel bad for you.

      It's a great vacation to go see my friends or meet them in other vacation destinations. I have some friends who I chat with daily online and have only met them in person the first time we met.

      It seems we have different ideas of what "roots" and "friendship" are, I just suppose mine are less superficial.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    16. Re:I'm Australian. by paulydavis · · Score: 1

      "deliberatly decide to not live my life according to economics"

      That is impossible by definition ... Do you have any idea what the "dismal" science is? It studies scarcity and resource allocation and other things... You giving up eating? The point is if you go live in a cave and forage for your food that is a economic choice.

    17. Re:I'm Australian. by zzyzx · · Score: 1

      I'm currently dating a woman who lives 1000 miles away from me. I'm active on many online communities. I understand how you can maintain friendships across distance.

      However I also have learned the difference between friendships that are net/phone based and those that in person based. It's much easier to let the former be friendships of convenience, ones where you don't have to sacrifice and drop out of them when things get rough. Also when you can't go out and see a show or have a drink with your friends, there is an important element missing.

      There is a difference between online friendships and real life ones and I prefer the latter.

    18. Re:I'm Australian. by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      I am meaning I'm not living my life according to some economic min/max game.

      If I do live in a cave, its going to be for reasons other than economic. Just as I won't live in India just so I can have a job.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    19. Re:I'm Australian. by teetam · · Score: 3, Informative
      I can understand your xenophobia, but most of your worries are irrelevant to India at least.

      In India, medical insurance is only needed for real emergencies. Most people don't have them because most don't need them. Unlike the US, India (and many other countries) have a "radical" approach to medical treatment: You get sick, you visit a doctor or hospital in your price range immediately and they treat you! I believe this approach is called free market or something like that.

      Labor laws in India are far stricter and biased towards workers than in the US (India used to be a full-fledged socialist country, remember).

      Religious freedom is guaranteed in India. It has been that way for millenia. India has the second highest Muslim population in the world and the highest Christian population in Asia! It is officially a "secular" country with no state religion.

      When you are apprehensive about a foreign country, it is a good idea to do some reading up about it.

      --
      All your favorite sites in one place!
    20. Re:I'm Australian. by benzapp · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Globalization is a reality, folks. You can either:

      a) pretend it doesn't exist,
      b) complain about it, or
      c) live in it, as a globalist individual


      You do realize WWII was primarily about this issue don't you. In those days, Globalism was called Internationaism. Modern propaganda today may belittle nationalism as being nothing more than flag waving, but the real issue was national economic sovereignty in the face of growing international financial power.

      Thus, you have forgotten a major part of Option B, you can fight to preserve your way of life.

      Further, only in decadent societies like Australia are people desiring the destuctrion of their historical ethnicity and way of life. The people of India don't want you there, and they don't want to be part of your global vision. The same is true for practically every other non-European country in the eastern hemisphere. It is true right now in the middle east, where the US is desperately trying to impose your vision on a hostile populace.

      Move or die.

      I think you meant "fight or die". Such cowardice. The future is going be far different than you ever imagined.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    21. Re:I'm Australian. by torpor · · Score: 1

      Don't put down any roots or try to make friends or anything.

      Sorry, but rubbish. I have many very, very good friends, who are close to me, all over the world, an utterly diverse group. I stay in regular touch with them, and we frequently travel to exotic and interesting places together.

      Compared to burb-dweller homogoneity, I'll take International Lifestyle anytime.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    22. Re:I'm Australian. by torpor · · Score: 1


      Actually, option d) isn't an option, in my life, its a reality anyway.

      Every single place I've worked has improved my skills, and my salary is decent enough, believe me ..

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    23. Re:I'm Australian. by torpor · · Score: 1

      Fatalism? Democracy? Aren't they one and the same?

      Nationalist pride in 'systems' are irrelevant when multi-national corps can demolish an entire economic system in a moments bank-wire ..

      The New World Order is upon us. The only thing we can do about it is construct another one, right on top of it.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    24. Re:I'm Australian. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a world of difference. I don't know where people get off that they think virtual reality friends are some how identical to real friends. There's no equivalence.

    25. Re:I'm Australian. by zx75 · · Score: 1

      I'm looking to do something similar for awhile, and the reason isn't economics. The reason is that I want to spend time in other countries and travel. My life is too short to spend at home until I'm too old to travel.

      I want to go abroad, work for awhile, see the world, and appreciate what it has to offer before I choose to settle down. I'm not living my life according to economics, although economics may determine the opportunities available to me and where I decide to go.

      --
      This is not a sig.
    26. Re:I'm Australian. by zx75 · · Score: 1

      Damn, and I think I might have just totally misinterpreted what you wrote. I wrote thinking that you were using 'slave to economics' as a reason not to travel... but I just realized that you might have been using it as a reason TO travel, at which point my above post makes absolutely no sence.

      --
      This is not a sig.
    27. Re:I'm Australian. by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      Sorry, you still mis-understand my post.

      It is an offer for free, non-commital sex to any hot looking blond chicks with big honkers.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    28. Re:I'm Australian. by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 1

      In those days, Globalism was called Internationaism. Modern propaganda today may belittle nationalism as being nothing more than flag waving, but the real issue was national economic sovereignty in the face of growing international financial power.

      AKA the "global Zionist conspiracy." I do remember the nationalism vs. internationalism fight. I also remember your side losing.

      --

      I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
    29. Re:I'm Australian. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sound you hear is this guy dancing to the tune of his corporate masters.

    30. Re:I'm Australian. by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      I used to travel quite a bit and made friends in a lot of different places. I still stay in touch with a lot of them, but it just really isn't the same. Being able to have an evening out with a friend is a lot more satisfying than just having pixels on a screen.

      For me, being able to talk to them on the phone is a little more "real" than online, but it still doesn't compare to being face to face.

      Yes, I still stay in touch with them, but there are times that I miss them a great deal even while we chat on im.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    31. Re:I'm Australian. by 2old2rockNroll · · Score: 1

      Unlike the US, India (and many other countries) have a "radical" approach to medical treatment: You get sick, you visit a doctor or hospital in your price range immediately and they treat you!

      Ah, yes. I'll have the K-Mart diagnosis, and the Sam's Club discounted surgery please -- to go -- I can't afford the inpatient stay. Just dump me in the alley after the operation. Certainly, U.S. health care has problems, but selecting your treatment based on your "price range" is flying in the face of you-get-what-you-pay-for.

    32. Re:I'm Australian. by Guillermito · · Score: 1

      You do realize WWII was primarily about this issue don't you. In those days, Globalism was called Internationaism. Modern propaganda today may belittle nationalism as being nothing more than flag waving, but the real issue was national economic sovereignty in the face of growing international financial power. Thus, you have forgotten a major part of Option B, you can fight to preserve your way of life.


      Exactly. And globalism won the war. The cold war that came after WW2 was fought in order to decide which kind of globalism would prevail. Both communism ("proletarians of the world unite") and capitalism ("capital should be allowed to move freely across borders") are internationalist ideologies. We know which party won that world too.

    33. Re:I'm Australian. by kraut · · Score: 1

      It's even better - you can have friends all over the world. Which is very nice indeed.

      Of course, it's not for everyone - I also have friends that have never really left the small town we grew up in; if that's what they want to do, let them do it. Personally I prefer to travel, and would love to work in yet another country for a couple of years.

      As for having kids, that would actually be one good reason for moving abroad: We'd be able to afford a full-time nanny. It only potentially becomes a problem once they get to school age, and even then there are plenty of good international schools these days. Although from what I hear a good Indian school is probably better than most European or American schools these days ;(

      --
      no taxation without representation!
    34. Re:I'm Australian. by kraut · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Silly me, there was me thinking that WWII was about Germany and Japan aggressive empirebuilding, not to mention pursuing their racist policies.

      Time to rewrite those history books.

      As for
      >The people of India don't want you there, and they don't want to be part of your global vision. The same is true for practically every other non-European country in the eastern hemisphere.

      Funny, it always seems to me that most people want a western livestyle, a nice house, tv, fridge, car, internet access, and lots of money wherever I've travelled. Including India. Preserving local customs comes way behind clean water,

      --
      no taxation without representation!
    35. Re:I'm Australian. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does Globalization really make sense-when it isn't fueled by $.75 Trillion in US trade deficits? All I see is that globalization has done is enabled Austrailia to become Japan's quarry and the US to be the world's biggest debtor nation. I don't see those as stable situations. Japan has done ok-by being an intensely nationalistic country with strict immigration rules. Japan will be seen as the success story of globalization--and the USA as the chump.

    36. Re:I'm Australian. by bruthasj · · Score: 1

      Who needs that?! We got slashdot.

    37. Re:I'm Australian. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, ideally you'd go to the doctor before you're sick enough to end up in the hospital. Health insurance makes prevention cheaper.

    38. Re:I'm Australian. by tho+1234 · · Score: 1

      And what's wrong with increasing power through economics? Why WOULDN'T a country want to increase the living standards for its people?

      The only country that's sacrificing their living standards, running up massive deficits, to prepare for war is the US.

      Only to a Neocon does economic growth = threat to the US that must be eliminated. Instead of improving living standards for its own people, they're willing to reduce their own standards as long as they can prevent anyone else from becoming catching up to them.

      Unfortunately, if there is a world war 3, it will be this aditude that causes it.

    39. Re:I'm Australian. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you even read the post you replied to? Read it again.

      And what's wrong with increasing power through economics?

      Nothing, and I suggested no such thing. The post you replied to was a refutation to the assertion that the world exists as a global entity first, when this obviously isn't the case, and you can tell by how so many countries are jockeying for advantageous positions.

      Why WOULDN'T a country want to increase the living standards for its people?

      It wouldn't. Since this doesn't make sense as a response to a point in the post you replied to, it could only be setting up your next statement:

      The only country that's sacrificing their living standards, running up massive deficits, to prepare for war is the US.

      Untrue and simplified to the point of idiocy. The United States is currently engaged in a conflict at the end of which we'll have an inroad to the Middle East and we'll have the head of the group that poses the greatest threat to our safety. Many things could've been done better, but you make it sound like there's a great conspiracy to bankrupt the United States. You must be daft to believe that such a thing could be carried out without a patriot finding out about it and telling the world. Daft, or an anti-American mouthpiece, indoctrined to repeat what you've been told.

      Only to a Neocon does economic growth = threat to the US that must be eliminated. Instead of improving living standards for its own people, they're willing to reduce their own standards as long as they can prevent anyone else from becoming catching up to them.

      This drivel is not even applicable to anything you're replying to.

      Unfortunately, if there is a world war 3, it will be this aditude that causes it.

      I rather think it will be caused by poor spelling. The Russians, worried about China attacking India through international spelling bees in the east, and by proxy through essay writing contests in the northwest, will side with India so as not to be left alone on Asia with China occupying most of the usable farming land. The Russians will also do so because moving their armies south and east, will be in lands that once belonged to the USSR; perhaps at the end they'll occupy those lands and be the USSR once more?

      A united Vietnam, Laos, Thailand, and Myanmar will group to attack China from the southeast so that China can't concentrate all of their forces to the West. Japan, as part of a European/American effort, will take that opportunity to attack China from the Yellow Sea, and in doing so will isolate North Korea in order to drive the madman out of power as well as gain a foothold to enable Taiwan to declare independence.

      Meanwhile, the Muslim countries of the Middle East will move to retake Iraq, solidifying Muslim rule in the area. A previously unknown will be chosen as Caliph, and declaring himself to be Jesus Christ returned, he'll move against Israel to take Jerusalem while America and Europe are occupied in the East.

      The Israelis, alone and facing an unending army of Muslims, will use their Nuclear arsenal almost simultaneously with Pakistan, who had no choice with no Muslim reinforcements from the Middle East.

      The rapture that the Christians kept saying would occur will occur, and unbelievers will be left to handle the mess.

      So when World War Three and Armageddon occur, we will know that bad spelling and nothing else will be to blame.

    40. Re:I'm Australian. by MacDork · · Score: 1
      ...not to mention pursuing their racist policies.

      Time to rewrite those history books.

      You're not kidding. America fought WWII in part because of racism? The same America that used the word nigger in newspapers regularly until around the 60's? The same America that exiled Japanese Americans to internment camps? What? There was no civil right's movement or Jim Crow laws? Ya don't say.

      We didn't have satellites feeding us realtime pictures of German concentration camps and mass graves back then. Most Americans didn't hear about the Holocaust until the war was mostly over. America fought WWII because the Japanese bombed the shit out of Pearl Harbor.

      Fought WWII over racism my eye. What shiny new history book fed you that tripe?

    41. Re:I'm Australian. by MacDork · · Score: 1
      Both communism ("proletarians of the world unite") and capitalism ("capital should be allowed to move freely across borders") are internationalist ideologies. We know which party won that world too.

      Yep, the Russians went bankrupt and America won.

    42. Re:I'm Australian. by servognome · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, you can move to follow the job you want, or accept a job where u are.
      This isn't too different than the issues people had in previous centuries in the US (and probably other countries). Jobs within the country moved to cheaper areas, or high growth areas were in less populated states. People would complain that they didn't want to move cities because they had roots in their hometown/state for X generations.
      Its much more acceptable now to change cities or states to accept a job, in the future I would suspect the same would be true of changing countries.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    43. Re:I'm Australian. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why America? It really isn't so great there.
      Didn't your hear about all the democrates trying to leave after that last election. I rather live in a number of other western countries myself. (if I had to choose a western one.)

    44. Re:I'm Australian. by benzapp · · Score: 1

      America fought WWII because the Japanese bombed the shit out of Pearl Harbor.

      Let's not forget that the Japanese bombing wasn't just a random act of violence. American foreign policy in the far east was far from egalitarian. The American occupation of the Phillipines was brutal to say the least, and officially justified due to the so-called inferiority of the filipino people.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    45. Re:I'm Australian. by benzapp · · Score: 1

      Silly me, there was me thinking that WWII was about Germany and Japan aggressive empirebuilding, not to mention pursuing their racist policies.

      It is rather silly. I mean, Germany was the size of Texas when WWII started. Great Britain declared war on Germany for retaking parts of its coutnry seized after WWI. Millions of Germans lived in this regions.

      At the same time, Great Britain controlled 1/3 of the entire planet, with garrisons in dozens of countries.

      Who was building the empire? By what right did Great Britain get to decide who could build an empire and who could not?

      I am sorry, but your post reeks of indoctrination. WWII had absolutely nothing to do with Germany building an empire, absolutely nothing. To think otherwise is foolish and ignorant of the obvious facts of the day.

      Your racism theory is also quite wrong, as another poster mentioned. Germany had hundreds of thousands of volunteers from non-European countries like India, Persia, and even places like Tibet, far more than the British and Americans combined. Then of course there is the obvious: Germany's strongest ally was Japan! If racism was their goal, I don't think they would have worked so closely with a people they considered inferior by default.

      American propaganda during WWII clearly painted the war as a racial struggle, demonizing the Japanese as vicious animals.

      Dig deeper. Look at how WWII began at the end of the Great Depression. The world was in turmoil at the time, and it had nothing to do with building empires or racism.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    46. Re:I'm Australian. by Silburn_Luke · · Score: 1
      Who was building the empire? By what right did Great Britain get to decide who could build an empire and who could not?
      Germany was. Or rather rebuilding an empire - their previous one having been taken away from them in the prior bout of great power nonsense they got involved with. Britain (and France) already had empires and by the 30s they weren't in the market for new colonial posessions. Great Britain's right to dispose of affairs in the concert of nations is the same one that the US has now, they were the bigger and badder than anyone who might have been inclined to object.

      Your racism theory is also quite wrong, as another poster mentioned. Germany had hundreds of thousands of volunteers from non-European countries like India, Persia, and even places like Tibet, far more than the British and Americans combined.
      Ummmm no. Non-European combatants on the allied side far outstripped the pathetic fragments Germany mustered. Himmler managed to scrape together what, one SS regiment of Indians? The Commonwealth had more Nepalis under arms than that... part of an entire *army* from the subcontinent, plus significant formations recruited from elsewhere in Asia, Africa and the Caribbean. Same goes for France (SE Asia and North Africa) and the US (chiefly Filippinos).

      Then of course there is the obvious: Germany's strongest ally was Japan! If racism was their goal, I don't think they would have worked so closely with a people they considered inferior by default.
      Racisms come in many flavours and are culturally determined. The Nazis particular thing was mostly focused on Jews, Slavs and Gypsies (with a side helping of anti-black African prejudice but then pretty much everyone who is racist has it in for Africans, even other Africans) - strange to tell these were precisely the three ethnic 'others' that most Germans would have encountered with any kind of frequency in the first part of the C20th, so its entirely predictable that a political movement with race at the centre of its ideology would fixate upon them. I'm not sure where in the contorted hierarchy of Nazi racial theory the Japanese fell but they were sufficiently high up the totem pole (and more importantly, didn't pose any kind of geopolitical threat to the regime) that their non-Aryanness could be overlooked at least for the duration (all bets would have been off if the Axis had managed to win WW2 IMO). All this demonstrates however, is that Nazi racism was contingent, contradictory and that even the senior figures of the regime understood "my enemy's enemy is my friend".

      Racism may well have had little to do with why the allies decided to go to the mattresses in WW2, but that doesn't mean that Nazi Germany wasn't a vicious racist dictatorship or that its viciousness and its racism (the one following from the other for the most part) weren't powerful factors in mobilising and cementing the alliance against the Axis once a war policy had been decided upon. So your argument that the racism of the Nazi regime had nothing to do with the causes of WW2 is a peverse misreading of history.

      Regards
      Luke
      --
      #include witty_one_liner.h
    47. Re:I'm Australian. by metlin · · Score: 2, Informative

      India used to be a full-fledged socialist country, remember

      No it wasn't.

      India leaned towards Russia, and had a middle-road-economy, a combination of public and private sectors - that is hardly socialist.

  4. Numbers are too small by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The numbers of westerners moving to India is statistically insignificant. What is significant is that people are willing to relocate to a third world country inspite of all the general problems there like bad internet connectivity, bad roads, power problems etc.

    1. Re:Numbers are too small by mikael · · Score: 1

      What is significant is that people are willing to relocate to a third world country inspite of all the general problems there like bad internet connectivity, bad roads, power problems etc.

      You haven't tried living out in rural England :)

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:Numbers are too small by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      With an influx of smart westerners how long do you think India will stay a third world country? They're getting all the jobs from those western countries while the best workers from the western countries flee to India in order to have jobs. If India plays this right they could easily become a world power while the arrogant western countries slowly slide down the tubes.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    3. Re:Numbers are too small by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      The best workers flee to India? I think the best ones will be the ones the American companies keep. They will be letting go of the bad to middle of the road ones and only keeping the cream of the crop. (In most cases that is. I know how office politics go and sometimes the good worker will be let go while some suckup stays).

    4. Re:Numbers are too small by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you understand what "statistically insignificant" means.

    5. Re:Numbers are too small by cloffin · · Score: 1

      I seriously doubt that the quality of life is bad in India. Every country has beautiful areas, and every country has rich people.

      Indians go to the west to move up from a comparatively middle class life to a upper class life back in India. They seem like they are very unlikely to settle down in the west.

    6. Re:Numbers are too small by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're living in a dream world, Neo. If you think that your "mad programmer skills" are going to keep your job in the US, talk to many of the very skilled textile workers who thought the same thing. Indians aren't stupid and America doesn't have a monopoly on information. America's corporate-sponsored government is using all sorts of purchased Visa regulations to make sure that that knowledge is transfered as efficiently as possible and that the American worker is punished for making too much money. Is your job in high demand and short supply? Here, have 85,000 new 3rd world compmetitors. In case you haven't heard congress just increased the H-1B visa count by 20,000 new visas.

    7. Re:Numbers are too small by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or even brixton...

      =)

    8. Re:Numbers are too small by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      In some cases that might happen but what I think usually happens is very different.

      Case A: company has programmers overqualified for what they need done. These employees cost far more than their coworkers.
      Solution: fire overqualified workers.

      Case B: company needs highest qualified workers. These employees cost a lot. Equally qualified employees can be hired in India for 1/10th the cost. Company can force current employees to train their replacements.
      Solution: train new employees then fire existing employees.

      Case C: company has morals and keeps all it's employees and pays them well. The competition hires cheap Indian labor. The competition's profits sore, they spend more money on marketing, and everyone and their dog starts buying the cheaper and better advertised products of the competition. Your company goes out of business.
      Solution: none - again you're unemployed

      So unless you have a skill that just can't be replaced you're probably screwed by the economics of the situation. It might not happen today but unless things change it will happen eventually.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  5. Recently heard in downtown Mumbai by o1d5ch001 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Recently heard in downtown Mumbai: "Those damn foreigners are taking our jobs!!"

    --
    Q. What is Calvin's monster snowman called? A. The Torment Of Existence Weighed Against The Horror of Non Being
    1. Re:Recently heard in downtown Mumbai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dunno where I heard this (or a version of this): When a group of foreign students came out of Dallas airport, one of them exclaimed: "Look at this! There are so many foreigners here" :)

    2. Re:Recently heard in downtown Mumbai by theundead · · Score: 1

      Ha, thats one thing you wouldn't hear for a long time. I am not saying Indian are absoulutely nice and tolerant or anything, but realistically, the chances of a large number of Westeners moving to India for work is remote because of obvious reasons - the money earner in India wouldn't go too far back in the West
      - the amout of Indian engineers looking for work, and will be looking for work in coming years will keep the salaries down for a good few years.

      Well, good to see new faces anyway, I welcome you all to Incredible India! :)

    3. Re:Recently heard in downtown Mumbai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recently heard in downtown Bangalore: "If India is so bad, why do so many people want to come here?"

    4. Re:Recently heard in downtown Mumbai by maniac_inside · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know what you make a hell of a sense, what I reckon is that if even say 1000 indians realize that they have lost job, you won't be surprised that Indian govt. will pass a regulation banning such intakes.

      I remember some time back there were riots in india when migrant labour from other states{within india only} had started to come into Bihar. Many were killed.

      So I just hope these european guys know what they are getting into.

    5. Re:Recently heard in downtown Mumbai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recently heard in downtown Mumbai: "Those damn foreigners are taking our jobs!!"

      This does sound familiar.

      There are alot of people in the tech business that shouldn't be in the tech business on both sides of the ocean. It will not hurt this industry to loose the unskilled and big talk hype types.

      These are the typical whinners.

    6. Re:Recently heard in downtown Mumbai by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      When a group of foreign students came out of Dallas airport, one of them exclaimed: "Look at this! There are so many foreigners here" :)

      I use to escort people at SeaTac airport sometime in the 1980s, mostly people in transit to Canada without visas for America (TWoV). Other countries' airports have international areas for people just going through were SeaTac does not so these people just get an escort. But from students from the Far East, they did comment on how it was different then they expected in the fact that everyone didn't have blond hair and blue eyes. I explained in simple terms that America's population is mixed and this city was 70% caucasian and about 30% something else.

      So yea, I could see someone coming to America and be surprised at the number of foreigners, or rather people with non-european roots.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    7. Re:Recently heard in downtown Mumbai by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      That's Bangalore. Go to Mumbai and say that.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  6. Re:A Shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You are so wrong. I work as a manager in a "cheaper" country of "unskilled monkeys" who are actually well trained, speak several languages fluently, work normal hours, develop IP instead of just taking outsourced work, win international awards for interesting products (two so far) and in no way do the "button pushing" you refer to. Frankly anyone who thinks like you is in for a big big shock in the next ten years.

  7. You know by cubicledrone · · Score: 0

    It's almost past the point where it matters any more. People seem to be willing to allow companies to squat and shit all over their neighbors to save a few dollars on salaries.

    What I'd like to hear is exactly how our payment-based economy is going to work when there is no longer any such thing as a paycheck, or even better, when education has been devalued to the point where nobody cares about going to school any more.

    I wonder if companies think about that as they are wiping their ass on the tablecloth.

    --
    Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    1. Re:You know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah that doesn't make sense. I own a web design firm that outsources most of its work to the Philippines. We produce high quality apps and graphics for our customers at a low price. Who loses? Not the filipinos, they get a very good wage (by their standards) and they get to do what they enjoy doing.

      Unemployment over there is rife, so before anyone starts spouting on about it being exploitation, think about it like this - if we didn't give them work, they would have no work. So they don't lose and sure aren't complaining. So where does that leave local web designers and programmers? Frankly, I don't care. My business is a for-profit entity, and that suits my customers too.

      Also its essential to remain competitive in the current business environment. But as for westerners going there to work, thats a bad joke. The pay you would receive would be enough to live happily over there, but don't think about moving out anytime soon. India is even cheaper, btw, but I prefer to deal with Filipinos cos thats where my girlfriend is.

      Oh and another thing, many of the cartoons you saw growing up were made in the Philippines, as well as a lot of the anime which are supposedly made in Japan.
    2. Re:You know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frankly, I don't care.

      I think you just made his/her point.

    3. Re:You know by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Of course the Filipinos don't suffer. They get a well paying job relative to other available work in the Phillipines. The one who suffers is you, as the people you put out of work will no longer be able to buy your product and you will go out of business.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    4. Re:You know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, if you are going to break it down, lets go all the way with it. The people I don't employ locally would have an insignificant economic impact as opposed to the online shops and websites that I make for my customers (who don't have the option of outsourcing, due to the brick and mortar nature of their businesses). Furthermore, these websites bring in a lot of foreign sales, thus impacting the economy overall in a positive way. So yeah, I'll happily trade off one negative for a much greater positive. You want to put things in perspective, son.

    5. Re:You know by MikeFM · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Very good points. The problem is that capitalism hasn't got any checks and balances. People, as a whole, are to short-sighted to realize what they are doing to themselves until it is to late.

      Everyone wants cheaper stuff so companies find ways to make cheaper stuff which requires them either reduce the quality, reduce their own profit margins, or pay less to produce the same items. To some degree they do reduce the quality but that can only go so far before people don't want the items anymore. Those in charge can't reduce their profit margins because if they do they'll be removed from control of the company and someone else will be put in their place. That means they have to reduce the cost of producing the items. That means more automation and cutting back on the wages they are paying. So, to simplify, lower prices mean fewer jobs and lower wages. Sure, we can't all afford to buy a Porshe but you should think about the companies that make the products you buy when comparing products. The Walmart-economy will cut all our throats. You'll notice that they no longer mark everything at Walmart as 'Made in the USA.'. There is good reason for that. Demand more locally made products and demand that more of the companies you buy from pay fair wages to their employees. IMO it's okay if a product is made in India, if I can't get the same product made locally, but I want to know the people making that product are earning a comparable living wage to those that live in the US.

      I think the US needs to boost it's education system too. Highschool degrees have become almost worthless because highschool graduates aren't required to know anything. We don't pay our teachers enough so we don't have enough teachers and many that we do have are not that well educated. Also I think that as long as highschool degrees are worthless for getting jobs that the government should make free public colleges for getting your Bachelors degree. There should be no extra paperwork or requirements - it should be as easy as signing up to highschool. We should make it easier for everyone to get advanced degrees also.

      Without correcting those problems we're going to have our asses kicked by globalization. A lot of people think the US will always be a world power but that is just arrogance. It's all to easy to fall from greatness if you don't make an effort to maintain that position.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  8. Where do i sign up? by RagingChipmunk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Where do i sign up? Last summer I was looking for a consulting position to liason between India and the States. No luck, and I'm sure the biggest part of my flopped idea was not reaching the right people in India - I went through Monster.com's listings for positions in India. Any suggestions on how I would reach organizations looking for ppl who would be willing to travel between the two countries?

    --
    The only PT Boat Journal on the web: http://www.PT171.org
    1. Re:Where do i sign up? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      I hear American Airlines have a great daily service.
      You could become a trolley dolly!

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Where do i sign up? by xmpcray · · Score: 3, Informative

      Check out these other big Indian Job sites-

      http://www.naukri.com/
      http://www.timesjobs.com/
      http://www.jobsahead.com/

      --

      --
      I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer.
    3. Re:Where do i sign up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what makes you think the millions of highly qualified Indians in the US don't have the same idea? At the really famous three-letter university I went to, all the Indians hoped against hope that upon graduation they'd get sent to India occasionally on a project working for an employer sourcing from India.

      Why would an employer prefer a farmboy from Indiana who thinks India is a country to check out because it rhymes nicely with his home state, when there are scores of Indians with Master's degrees from American universities wanting to go back to India only every so often?

      For once this /. thread on India witnesses a dramatic low in racial slurs. I don't think the reason needs explaining. Shame on you /.

    4. Re:Where do i sign up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, dont be surprised when that farmboy academically outclasses that overvalued MIT H1B and gets that job, and then drops it when he sees something far better in the states.

  9. Good.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe they'll drive salaries up over there and they'll be forced to outsource the jobs to the U.S.

    1. Re:Good.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny or not.. it is what is currently happening in Banglore... Rent prices are going up and people need larger salaries to afford things... eventually things will get too high and they WILL be outsourced to some other 4th world country... speaking as a consultant to Wipro!

  10. Not necessarily. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's terribly biased, perhaps even racist to think that someone is unskilled just because he hails from a country like india.

    IMO outsourcing is itself a marriage between the very technology that tech-jobs produce, and capitalist drive for maximum profits at minimum expense. The Internet has made telecommuting feasible, even across continents and as a result we end up with a rather unbalanced situation.

    If anything, perhaps outsourcing will help the global economy attain a little bit more homogenity.

    1. Re:Not necessarily. by ATN · · Score: 0

      Perhaps but more fish in the tank means less resources for all. The world can only sustain so many people at the quality of life we enjoy. Capitalism in general is not a good distributor of wealth. It is pretty sad to think that we live at such a high qaulity of life on the backs of the poor, but such is the reality we live in. The point being homogenity won't be achieved. Poverty will jus t be a little bit more spread out across the continents, and a select few (not necessarily the most deserving) will get most of the wealth.

  11. Re:A Shame by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

    more jobs will be retained in the west for skilled personnel.

    Like doctors, lawyers, radiologists, etc. all of whom are being outsourced as fast as middle management can complete the paperwork.

    --
    Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
  12. Hippes by GuyZero · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It just seems like a bunch of 20-something "kids" who are backpacking around the world and trying to stay solvent. It hardly seems any different from the fact that every youth hostel I stayed in during a brief trip to Australia was also staffed (nearly 100%) with non-Australians. Oddly, there was fairly little outcry about the loss of hostel-desk-clerk-jobs to those damn Europeans.

    I doubt they're making a huge dent in the overall world of outsourcing. Here in Canada more than 10% of the company where I work is people from outside of Canada, but that's not considered odd. Why would it be considered odd for there to be foreigners working in India? There's probably a lot going for those Indian cities. And has anyone ever eaten out in Switzerland? The food alone would motivate me to leave the country. I like cheese, sure, but come on - a whole meal consisting of cheese? No wonder all those Swiss kids are going to India.

    1. Re:Hippes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, there is more than cheese in it. The only valid point about eating out in Switzerland is that it is increadibly expensive.

    2. Re:Hippes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oddly, there was fairly little outcry about the loss of hostel-desk-clerk-jobs to those damn Europeans.

      Given the number of Aussies working behind bars and in hostels in Europe (Lots in London, but I've also sighted them in places such as Dublin and Barcelona), I should hope there's no outcry.

      It's a two way street.

    3. Re:Hippes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hippies? Better than Mods on Crack.

    4. Re:Hippes by 10seconds · · Score: 1

      And has anyone ever eaten out in Switzerland? The food alone would motivate me to leave the country. I like cheese, sure, but come on - a whole meal consisting of cheese? No wonder all those Swiss kids are going to India.

      This is off-topic but... You don't now what you are talking about regarding the food. There is excellent food in Switzerland, being a country right in the middle of French and Italian influence, in particular. Also, places like Geneva are extremely cosmopolitan and you see all sorts of international cuisine there.

      As for the cheese fondue... You like it or not, but it's not like you have to eat it everyday.

      I suspect the German-speaking part of Switzerland is less interested in what other people call good food, but give a chance to the French- and Italian-speaking areas ;-)

  13. Expatriates, this is nothing new by ites · · Score: 5, Interesting

    True story:

    A friend of mine, a Rwandese educated at Harvard, worked for a US legal firm. One day he was asked to go on a long-term mission to Nigeria for an oil firm client. He balked, quoting Nigeria's reputation for danger. He was offered a nice bonus, travel costs, and so he went. When I visited him in Lagos, he had installed himself in a nice house, with a cook, driver, security guards. He played golf twice a week, spent the weekends at the beach, and too many evenings at the clubs in Victoria Island.

    Every few months he would return to head office, and make a report. His report would inevitably end with remarks about the insecurity in Lagos, the need for constant armed protection, the power cuts and the lack of facilities. Since his work was bringing in lots of money, his firm inevitably gave him a pay rise and extended his mission.

    Expatriates tend to suffer from diseases of luxury. They don't pay taxes, their savings go 10-100 times further, they get privileged positions, and if good, they are valued for their expertise and cultural baggage.

    The only problem: they tend to die divorced and alcoholic. Decadence is too cheap in some places!

    --
    Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
    1. Re:Expatriates, this is nothing new by westlake · · Score: 1
      The only problem: they tend to die divorced and alcoholic.

      There is another. The airlift out when everything turns sour and your bodyguards have fled.

    2. Re:Expatriates, this is nothing new by sean@thingsihate.org · · Score: 1

      "Expatriates tend to suffer from diseases of luxury. They don't pay taxes, their savings go 10-100 times further, they get privileged positions, and if good, they are valued for their expertise and cultural baggage."

      Uh... that's funny. I've American and have been living in Germany for two years now and the German government seems to think I should pay them taxes. My savings also do not go 10-100 times further. Nor do I have a priveleged position.

      Maybe you're not clear on the definition of expatriate?

      --

      One of the many things I hate. thingsihate.org
    3. Re:Expatriates, this is nothing new by ites · · Score: 1

      Here's how I see it:

      Expatriate = rich person living in poor country.

      Immigrant = poor person living in rich country.

      Foreigner = person living in country matching their own standard of living.

      An American coming to work in Europe would be an expatriate for 1-2 years (until their tax free status ran out), and then becomes a simple foreigner.

      Hey, I _know_ an expat when I see one. In Brussels, they're the people paying 4-6 times the normal rate for appartments.

      Actually, with the sliding US Dollar, I hope you're paid in Euro or you risk becoming an immigrant!

      The story was, anyhow, about India. Thusly the context for the word "expatriate". Gin and tonics and polo, old chap.

      --
      Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
    4. Re:Expatriates, this is nothing new by sean@thingsihate.org · · Score: 1

      What on earth are you talking about with this tax-free status? I am American living in Germany and I have to pay taxes.

      --

      One of the many things I hate. thingsihate.org
  14. Re:A Shame by chameleon3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    We've been trying to outsource lawyers for ages. No one else wants 'em.

  15. Not for long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article does not mention an instance of anyone staying for a period greater than a year. My guess is that foreigners like working in India only for a short while. The snack coupons, transport to and from work, free accomodation and the works are fine - only for a short while. After that, the fact that they are away from their own people (family/friends), culture and other such things would weigh in more and they would leave. Like someone has already pointed out in one of the posts, the number of such foreigners is statistically insignificant and I expect it to remain that way even in the future.

  16. Needs some codification by Sai+Babu · · Score: 4, Interesting



    I've sugested on /. before that international trade agreements might benefit from some sort of reciprocity in work visas. For example if 20,000 Indian workers are allowed into to USA then an equal number of USA citizens should be allowed to work in India.

    I for one could go for a summerhouse in Kashmir.

    As the article points out, raw salary isn't everything.

    1. Re:Needs some codification by TheGavster · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because its not like two nuke-club members are fighting over Kashmir, or anything. Pretty vistas, sure, but the chance of one day seeing a sunrise way off schedule and shifted deep into the gamma spectrum just kinda kills it for me.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    2. Re:Needs some codification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      India isnt an entity or something .. The INDIVIDUALS who come here are different thatn the ones who are there .. I dont see what recip[rocity applies or should apply..

      india doesnt want people leaving and helping foreign economies.

    3. Re:Needs some codification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a westerner it is probably best to stay out of Kashmir. It's a dangerous place. Aim for a summerhouse in Kerala instead.

    4. Re:Needs some codification by XopherMV · · Score: 1

      That only makes sense if they pay the same amount in India that they pay here. Unfortunately, we all know that isn't the case.

    5. Re:Needs some codification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That does't do much for outsourcing, though.

    6. Re:Needs some codification by Sai+Babu · · Score: 1

      No. Pay parity doesn't make sense. If one is willing to work for the same wage as an equally qualified local, reciprocity of work visa's makes sense. I'm not saying borders should be open, but if a guy from Hong Kong can get a job in USA cooking Hong Kong style, some bubba who might want to cook BBQ in HK should be able to apply for a reciprocal work visa slot. Hell, a good BBQ restaurant in HK might pay better than one in rural USA.

  17. Re:No Way by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    How is it different now?

    (I am in Canada, and I see no difference except that it's impossible to live on $10/month, so the salaries are higher.)

  18. Free snacks!?!?!?! by deft · · Score: 0

    Well, I guess they are more valuable than stock options.

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    1. Re:Free snacks!?!?!?! by tomcio.s · · Score: 3, Funny

      Of course.. You can eat snacks.. Stock options are only useful for after-snacking :-)

    2. Re:Free snacks!?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      money saved on food is money in your pocket. If you had to buy the food, you'd end up spending more. Plus options are worth less than the paper it's printed on these days.

    3. Re:Free snacks!?!?!?! by YetAnotherDave · · Score: 1

      with 2/3 companies I've gotten options from, they are.

      I've gotten far more value in free lunches at my current job than in stock in my previous...

  19. Re:A Shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget the plumbers, electricians, housekeepers, landscaping folks, and construction workers.

  20. I'd go.. by LilGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'll go whereever there's work. I can't seem to get a break around here (houston), so I'm ready to go anywhere I can get a piece of the pie. As of late I've been wanting to get out of the US anyways, not soley due to the election.

    --

    You're nothing; like me.
  21. I would move in a heartbeat by Diclophis · · Score: 1

    Seriously... here is my resume

    1. Re:I would move in a heartbeat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Word template? Yikes.
      'Background' isn't a relevant resume section, 'Languages' generally refers to languages you can *speak*, and what's with the 'Current Focus' page?

  22. pay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what does a "local indian salary" work out to?

    1. Re:pay? by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      You work for your entire life, in exchange for some coins. On return to the US, you can put these worthless coins in a sock, to use as a club in defense of your shopping cart.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    2. Re:pay? by MikeFM · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A lot of the jobs I've seen there were between US$2-$5/hr which sucks until you've been downsized here in the US and you're unemployment runs out. You could work for $5.75/hr or whatever minimum wage is here and be unable to pay for a house and food or you could move to India and work for a similar wage and have a house and food given to you. My rent for a small one bedroom apartment in Las Vegas is $1000/month. Having a comparable place for free would make the rest of my money go a lot further.

      I'd be curious is to the quality of housing and food they have. My apartment is expensive IMO but it really isn't very nice. The buildings are cheap and probably don't even meet the legal standards of saftey. There isn't much space. Short of dirt floors and lots of bugs I doubt that the free places in India could be much worse.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    3. Re:pay? by militiaMan · · Score: 0

      Can you say Propane. Their housing sucks for 90% of the country, but 10% live like U.S. citizens making 50k in Dallas. On $15/day for most of India you can live like a U.S. citizen. For $25/day you can live like a CEO in most of India.

  23. South-Eash Asian recruitment of Westerners by Gernot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I read Symbiosis on a stop-by at Kuala Lumpur Airport, see http://www.symbiosisonline.com/, I got the feeling that the Technology Park in KL is trying to attract Western Engineers by providing them with a luxurious working environment in regard to comfort, personal care and resources, even if the payment probably is mediocre.
    If I had to choose between a stressful job/high payment and an offer from there, I could still easily be tempted to go to Malaysia :-) See also http://www.tpm.com.my/ .

  24. Globalization by deft · · Score: 4, Funny

    If each country is going to be good at something in the global market, and everyone is carving out their niche, I say let India be the land of cubicles and tech support. More power to em.

    I also would like to make a call now to solidify our position as the world leader in strippers.

    Government Subsidize Gold Poles NOW!

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    1. Re:Globalization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sorry, Canada has already taken the position of world leader in exotic dancers.
      http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/A rticleNews /TPStory/LAC/20041123/STRIPPER23/TPNational/Canada

  25. Re:A Shame by GuyZero · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Radiologists are getting outsourced because x-ray machines produce shitty images and there simply aren't enough radiologists being trained to meet demands in the US & Canada.

    Invent a better x-ray machine and you could put radiologists out of business faster than you could break a leg.

    Notice how dedicated radio operators have gone the way of the dodo? Telephone operators? People who add up bills manually? Some day radiologists will be in the same bucket as buggy whip manufacturers.

  26. This might work for europeans by typedef · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most european countries have substantial socialist components to thier governments. This means that when these people quit working they'll have

    -Free healthcare
    -It won't be nearly as expensive (in most cases) for their children to attend university in europe
    -In some countries, they'll be given a pension to live off of when they retire

    In the U.S., things are a bit different. You have a retirement fund that you need to plug money into. You need to save for your kid's college education. You need health insurance. Now, you might be able to live quite well in India if work there, but the salary that you get is so small compared to what you recieve if you worked in the U.S., that you really won't be able to provide money for any of these things. I dunno, it might be a good experience for a couple of years, but as an American, I wouldn't plan on sticking around if I did it.

    1. Re:This might work for europeans by mslinux · · Score: 1

      Most european countries have substantial socialist components to thier governments.

      Historically, this is true. The reality today is that these systems are collapsing under their own weight... much like the US social security system will eventually. The moral of this is that individuals are going to have to start looking after themselves one day.

      I don't understand all this talk about moving to another country. They're in the same boat as everyone else. Start your own consulting business or switch careers. Take care of yourself, don't rely on a company or government to do it for you... if you do, you'll be sorely disappointed someday.

    2. Re:This might work for europeans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cost of living is also substanially less in India than it is the US. From what I hear most IT employees can get a butler for what they are paid.

    3. Re:This might work for europeans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean they have more individual freedom?

    4. Re:This might work for europeans by velo_mike · · Score: 1
      Most european countries have substantial socialist components to thier governments. This means that when these people quit working they'll have

      -Free healthcare


      Nothing in this world is free. To get "free" healthcare in France, the individual pays 25% of his salary to social security. Think that's not too bad? The employer portion is 50%, and if you're self employed you eat the entire thing. Right off the top, 75% of your salary is gone to pay for healthcare and retirement.

      -It won't be nearly as expensive (in most cases) for their children to attend university in europe

      Again, universities are subsidized by the state and are subject to their rules. In the US, anybody with an IQ over room temperature can spend the money and head off to college, maybe not Harvard, but there are any number of good, local schools that will take you if you can tie your shoes and answer a true/false question correctly within 3 tries. University in France is for the achievers and you only get one chance to get in. As one who started out in the trades, and found my way to college in my early twenties, I'm damn grateful for the American system, as I'd still be a mechanic, making a third of what I'm taking in with way worse work conditions. Even if you're one of those who went straight from high school to college to professional work at 22, it's nice to have the option at 30 or 40 to quit, go back to school, and do something else if you want.

      -In some countries, they'll be given a pension to live off of when they retire

      In the U.S., things are a bit different. You have a retirement fund that you need to plug money into

      And where do you think the money you're "given" comes from? See my response to your first point about confiscatory tax rates. I'd much rather sock 15% a year into my 401k and know where it is than fork over 75% and hope the government will give part of it back.

      --

      At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
      Alan Greenspan

    5. Re:This might work for europeans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know! I'll go into business consulting the millions of consultants that will be starting up their own companies!

      I'll take their money then tell them how stupid they are for starting their own company, when a majority of them will be gone in 5 years. Especially with everyone getting into the consulting business because thats the "new thing".

      I hope to make at least a million dollars so I can retire easily before foreigners start offering cheap telephone consultation.

    6. Re:This might work for europeans by MQBS · · Score: 1

      It also all depends on the kind of life you want to lead. You can live quite comfortably before thirty without a family anywhere in the world as long as you're not a whiny or exsessively spoiled. The trick is to not have kids to pay for college for or a strong consumer drive to buy all of the latest things new. Even if you only bought half of your stuff secondhand and didn't cook absolutely every night you could live quite comfortably on a small wage almost anywhere.

      --
      The dream reveals the reality which conception lags behind. That is the horror of life- the terror of art. -Franz Kafka
    7. Re:This might work for europeans by typedef · · Score: 1

      So fucking what? I wasn't comparing the two systems and implying that the European system is better, I was simply stating that it will be easier for Europeans to pull something like this off.

      In any event, I doubt that Europeans working abroad are going to be paying those "confiscatory tax rates" that you keep talking about, anyway, so it just works out that much better for them.

    8. Re:This might work for europeans by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1
      Most european countries have substantial socialist components to thier governments. This means that when these people quit working they'll have..
      ... not a great deal. We in the Netherlands pay only partly towards our own pension; the rest of the payments are premiums for a state pension. These premiums are to pay for the people who are retiring now, so they're spent immediately rather than saved up. You can see the problem here (everyone can except the politicians): the babyboomer generation is about to retire en masse, and the system is about to explode because the collected premiums do not nearly cover the pensions paid out. Young people can look forward to paying double pension premiums, and since there is no guarantee whatsoever the pension scheme will exist when they retire themselves, I advise them to do what I do and start saving for their own old age. So yes, I am paying triple.

      That is what socialism brings you. Beware.
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    9. Re:This might work for europeans by velo_mike · · Score: 1
      So fucking what? I wasn't comparing the two systems and implying that the European system is better, I was simply stating that it will be easier for Europeans to pull something like this off.

      It sure sounded like fawning over all the "free" stuff the Euro's get. Just so you're aware that there is no free lunch... In any event, I doubt that Europeans working abroad are going to be paying those "confiscatory tax rates" that you keep talking about, anyway, so it just works out that much better for them.

      Again, France is the only other one I know first hand, but they are still subject to French taxation when working out of the country, just like we were subject to US taxes when living as ex-pats...

      --

      At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
      Alan Greenspan

    10. Re:This might work for europeans by typedef · · Score: 1

      It sure sounded like fawning over all the "free" stuff the Euro's get. Just so you're aware that there is no free lunch...

      It wasn't, and I am. I'm afraid that you're just suffering from the all too common Reactionary Conservative Syndrome.

      Again, France is the only other one I know first hand, but they are still subject to French taxation when working out of the country, just like we were subject to US taxes when living as ex-pats...

      If you're working abroad you only need to pay US taxes if you make the equivalent of > $70,000 USD a year. I believe France and most other European countries have a simmilar system in place. If you're working in India for an Indian company, you are definatley not making that much money.

  27. Real Wage by haxor.dk · · Score: 1

    "The salaries are mediocre..."

    But, more importantly, taxes are even lower. Most western "welfare states" or nations in general have marginal tax rates of 40% or higher. In Denmark (where I live), the marginal tax (before sales taxes) is 62%.

    Gross wage is one thing, wage after the taxman has been in your paycheque is another thing entirely.

    I'm not in the least surprised to hear that people are moving to India. The neverending meddling in our personal lives and property because of the state is just too much.

    1. Re:Real Wage by Phragmen-Lindelof · · Score: 1

      2004 U.S. Federal marginal tax rates.

    2. Re:Real Wage by Silburn_Luke · · Score: 1

      Interesting, but I have no mod points - sorry.

      Do the states levy their own income taxes or do they subsist on property taxes, sales taxes and the like? I imagine some would and some won't. For those that do, how much would be representative?

      Regards
      Luke

      --
      #include witty_one_liner.h
    3. Re:Real Wage by Phragmen-Lindelof · · Score: 1

      Add to the income tax the following:
      12.4% tax for social security and 2.9% Medicare levy (up to some limit - $80,000 ?? of gross income)
      state income tax (perhaps 0% - 10% ?? depending on the state)
      property tax (rate varies widely)
      sales tax (perhaps 0% - 10% ?? depending on the state)

      You can do a google search and see the income and sales tax rates in each state. This might interest you. (I did not read it carefully but it objects to the shift in taxes during recent years from the rich to the poor.)

    4. Re:Real Wage by Silburn_Luke · · Score: 1

      Corresponding numbers for the UK:
      Income tax is progressive in 4 bands:

      0% first £4,745
      10% the next £1,960
      22% £1,961-30,500
      40% >£31,001

      Then add:

      11% for 'National Insurance' the notional levy that funds healthcare, pensions and unemployment payouts (up to a max income of ~£30,000, then down to 1% beyond that level).

      Local property taxes - also highly variable. I paid about £1100 this year for a small place (hence cheaper) in London (hence expensive).

      Sales taxes (actually VAT) of 17.5% - not on 'essentials' such as groceries which are zero-rated, but this is an ouch and often folded into posted prices, so less obvious than the equivalent imposts in the US.

      There are lots of one-off duties and charges squirrelled away in various bits of the economy of course (sin taxes are popular over here, which includes gasoline these days) but the above are the headline items.

      Regards
      Luke

      --
      #include witty_one_liner.h
  28. walkabouts by peter303 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Aussies commonly take a year or two travel vacations during their lives. The popular ages are just after school and when the kids are gone.
    Amerians are so hard up about working and consuming they miss the important things in life.

    1. Re:walkabouts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyone considers wandering the world to be one of the important things in life.

    2. Re:walkabouts by joshmccormack · · Score: 1

      Amerians are so hard up about working and consuming they miss the important things in life.

      Life can be a bit more complicated than just Americans or silly, or what not. In America, you have little vacation time, small pensions/retirements, and living is expensive. Student loans, mortgages, consumer debt, etc. can make taking a year or two off impossible.

    3. Re:walkabouts by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

      What you mean to say is that they usually spend a year or two living a dozen per one-bedroom apt, being paid next to nothing, and permanently rendering the East End of London vomit-smelling.

    4. Re:walkabouts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, get back to your cubicle and WORK, so your boss can wander the world. Moron.

    5. Re:walkabouts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like you are jealous. Were you turned down for a U.S. work visa?

    6. Re:walkabouts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you think that everyone in the world likes or wants to travel?

    7. Re:walkabouts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you mean to say is that they usually spend a year or two living a dozen per one-bedroom apt, being paid next to nothing, and permanently rendering the East End of London vomit-smelling.

      As opposed to British backpackers who spend a year or two living in cramped, illegal backpackers hostels in Sydney, being paid next to nothing and permanently wallpapering Bondi with vomit and urine.

      Then they outstay their visas by a few years and head home leaving a string of illegitimate children in their wake.

      The phenomonon of "backpackers" "gap year yobbos" is not only found in London (although Upton Park and Craven Cottage are beginning to be seen as "home ground" stadiums for Australia).

      It seems both countries set their worst elements upon each other.

    8. Re:walkabouts by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

      As opposed to British backpackers who spend a year or two living in cramped, illegal backpackers hostels in Sydney, being paid next to nothing and permanently wallpapering Bondi with vomit and urine.

      Then they outstay their visas by a few years and head home leaving a string of illegitimate children in their wake.

      The phenomonon of "backpackers" "gap year yobbos" is not only found in London (although Upton Park and Craven Cottage are beginning to be seen as "home ground" stadiums for Australia).


      Damn, those English are hardcore

  29. Re:A Shame by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

    Radiologists are getting outsourced because x-ray machines produce shitty images and there simply aren't enough radiologists being trained to meet demands in the US & Canada.

    There's no point in going to school for years if your job is going to be shipped blue-label to elsewhere. But that's okay, because we'll have 40,000% profits next quarter!

    Oh, we have a nine-figure trade deficit? Ahh, what do those economists know? Probably paying them too much too.

    --
    Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
  30. US, Japan and Germany. by khasim · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Great..... And you could have done that back in the 80's, too. I'm talking the 1880's.

    What you're talking about is NOT "Globalization". You've only been hitting the 1st world countries.

    Globalization is about exploiting the 3rd world countries. Go and live there for a few years and see if your attitude doesn't change.

    1. Re:US, Japan and Germany. by torpor · · Score: 1

      What I'm talking about is the globalist point of view, not your knee-jerk reactionary tinfoil version.

      Thinking globally; changing from an introverted to extroverted view, is globalization.

      As for 'exploiting 3rd world countries', as soon as I'm done exploiting the so-called '1st World' ones, you can bet your ass I'll be off to Timbuktu to help them put new tech to use.

      And I've -travelled-, not lived, in far more places than just the 4 I've mentioned ... I know parts of the world most couldn't find on a map .. so I resent your assumption that my 'attitude needs changing' ... its the root-seeders that need an attitude change, especially them white-picket-fence ones!!

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    2. Re:US, Japan and Germany. by kraut · · Score: 1

      Globalisation is about free trade, which actually benefits the 3rd world countries tremendously. Generally much more so if they are democratic, but that is a separate issue.

      One of the things that's really keeping the 3rd world down is the subsidy culture of the EU and the US. There's simply no way a 3rd world farmer can compete with, e.g., subsidised European sugar on the world market.

      --
      no taxation without representation!
  31. I dont think this is a trend by roxtar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article talks about very few foreigners coming to India and taking up jobs in call centres. Just one or two isolated incidents really dont show that people from europe are actually migrating to India. Also call centres dont offer too high pays as compared to the Indian IT companies and the work experience gained is also of little value. Also one doesnt know for how much time call centres will be around in India, so they are really thought of as temporary sources of income which mainly students use as a source of pocket money.

    1. Re:I dont think this is a trend by dajak · · Score: 1

      Europeans have been taking jobs in the rest of the world for decades. It is a good way to start a career with a multinational company. Americans also take jobs in Europe (and some other America-friendly countries).

      If you trade with Europe or America, it is good to employ some locals from those places. If you do business in India, you send over some people.

      Have total numbers changed or is the migration flow simply moving to India from other places?

  32. Not completely by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 0, Troll
    I have dealt with programmers in India. They can program, but it seems as though they are limited in common sense and creative problem solving skills.

    I had explained the equations to convert hardware values into input levels. They looked at the values and could not understand why they were getting 0 for an input value -- they didn't realized that you have to have an input device generating audio to have an input level. In porting an application from one platform to another, they didn't think of looking at the original application to answer questions -- yes, they did have the original application in a running condition.

    1. Re:Not completely by YankeeInExile · · Score: 1

      I've dealt with bonehead programmers from India, bonehead programmers from Mexico, and bonehead programmers from Berkeley.

      India does not have any monopoly on clueless newbies: Why, just look at how many we have here on /., most of whom are from the US :)

      --
      How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
  33. Somethings not quite right... by segfault_0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If they are coming here and taking our jobs and we are going there and taking theirs... why dont we just work in our own countries. Article doesnt make any sense or would more aptly be titled "Westerners who like to travel take temporary jobs while wandering." rather than reverse immigration.

    --

    I was crazy back when being crazy really meant something. (Charles Manson)
    1. Re:Somethings not quite right... by gabbarbhai · · Score: 1

      Says something about our respective countries, doesn't it? (I'm soon-to-be-back-home Indian)

    2. Re:Somethings not quite right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your missing the key reason any of this is even taking place. Westerners are working over there because the econmics of scale do not enable them to do the same thing from their home country. They still want to do that work, so they go where the work is. This is more than just wandering. It's the first step to migration.

  34. aha.....so now...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you call Delhi and receive technical support by Swedish girls!

    (""It's so different from Europe - the culture and the way you live - and I think it's fantastic," says Marie Blomquist from Stockholm."

  35. Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you would move somewhere for a call center job?

    Ever worked at a call center? I breifely have, and I thought people creating a career out of it were crazy, let alone people moving for one.

  36. Westerners Migrating to India for Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Is this the first wave of the much anticipated reverse-migration which will be a hallmark of the 21st century?"

    Yep.
    Compared to Britain India has better public transport, better food and (obviously) better weather. I'm British and unlike most people that hark on about the third world I have actually been to India. Here in Britain you might make 10 times more money than you would in India but everything costs 20 times as much. You do the math.

  37. Illegal workers by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    I suspect that the Indian government will start limiting this type of worker, because it impact on jobs for Indians.

    In Mexico (from my understanding), a foreigner must have a permit to work there. This is really ironic because Fox is pushing for more illegal workers in the USA.

    1. Re:Illegal workers by dfiguero · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He is not pushing for more illegal workers... He's just trying to get them to be treated as human beings.

      As you might now southern U.S. states are very mexican-unfriendly even when a U.S. company sponsors a mexican or if a mexican wants to go shopping to the U.S. you get stupid comments by immigration people like: 'how's the crop this year?'

      It just shows that no matter where you are from education means everything.

      --
      My penguin ate my sig
    2. Re:Illegal workers by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1
      He is not pushing for more illegal workers... He's just trying to get them to be treated as human beings.

      Huh? Lets see, they don't enforce the laws to require employers to check if the employee is legal. They offer amnestly to people who broke the law and was able to sneak across the border. When there was talk of amnesty last year, the number of attempted border crossings increased by about 50%. If there is a "guest worker" program, it should be required that they come across legally -- if they are here illegally, they are forever banned from using this program. I have gone through the process of getting a K-1 visa for my wife, so that I could bring her here -- LEGALLY!. Why should the people who went through the effort to follow all the rules, come here legally, have someone sign a document that prevents the immigrant from becoming a public charge, be slapped in the face by a program that says, "you broke the rules, ok -- it does not matter."
  38. The company by Sai+Babu · · Score: 4, Informative



    Even if 'the company' is supposed to take care of your visa, it pays to follow up on your own. This advice courtesy the guy who left Ecuador at the unpleasant end of a gun because the company he was working for FUCKED UP!.

    In addition to Ecuador, I've worked in China, Japan, Phillipines, Fiji, Tonga, Hong Kong, and Singapore. I hired on outside the USA. Most friends who are working or have worked expat. have hired on outside their home country.

    Want an overseas job, take a vacation, get to know the place, visit the company you want to work for. Hang out in the right bars.

    1. Re:The company by Viceice · · Score: 1

      ...Hang out in the right bars...

      Unless you're working in Saudi Arabia, in which case stay home and avoid alcohol related establishments like the plague.

      --
      Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
    2. Re:The company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have assumed one would avoid Saudi Arabia, entirely, like the plague.

    3. Re:The company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leaving Ecuador at the other end of a gun doesn't sound like it would be very peaceful either.

      Does a gun actually have a *pleasant* end? Fleece-lined handgrip?

    4. Re:The company by citog · · Score: 1

      Go to embassy parties if you want a drink. However, Saudi is still a shit hole so plague avoidance arguments still hold true.

  39. getting outsourced.. by Cederic · · Score: 4, Interesting


    The large corporation I work for is currently outsourcing all UK development to India.

    One interesting facet is that people whose roles are being relocated to India have the option of joining the Indian company involved. Their role would still be in India, and so they would be based there, but they would keep their UK salary.

    We're all currently discussing:
    - how good your standard of living would be in India on a UK salary
    - how long it would take for the Indian company to make you redundant (currently guess: 4 hours)
    - what the Indian employment laws are like

    All good fun,
    ~Cederic

    1. Re:getting outsourced.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Wouldn't be AXA by any chance? I just went to a recruitment day for them and I decided against it because I got the distinct impression that they were hiring project managers who would be put in charge of moving jobs to India.

    2. Re:getting outsourced.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      We're all currently discussing:
      - how good your standard of living would be in India on a UK salary
      - how long it would take for the Indian company to make you redundant (currently guess: 4 hours)
      - what the Indian employment laws are like.


      I am not in the UK but I would take this offer seriously. You could stay and look for a job right now but a UK salary in India would go along way and so what if it lasts 6 months or a year?

      The worst thing that will happen is you get to see India first hand and become worldly and not miopic.

      Say sure as long as you get a return ticket.

    3. Re:getting outsourced.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      a) You would live like a King in India with a UK Salary - checked the FX rates recently? A measley GBP 20,000 in UK translates to INR 1,700,000 which puts you in the league of CEOs in India! (OK - the CEO of a small company...)

      b) Unless your company is setting you up to be screwed, you will be fine... I've heard of very few Indian companies firing people. For all you know, your experience may be valuable enough to keep in the company indefinitely!

      c) Indian Employment laws exist for someone who earns $0.02 per hour. For anybody who earns more, the laws pretty much do not matter.

      Welcome to India...

    4. Re:getting outsourced.. by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >Unless your company is setting you up to be screwed, you will be fine...

      Thats like saying "You will be ok, unless you aren't."

      >Indian Employment laws exist for someone who earns $0.02 per hour.

      And why don't Indian Employement laws protect someone from even being paid $40 a year?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    5. Re:getting outsourced.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I reckon it could also be GSK. I left there a couple of years back as we started training the Indian replacements.

      Though I suppose realistically it could be any one of a number of very large, very stupid companies.

    6. Re:getting outsourced.. by Maul · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Let me get this straight? The company is outsourcing to India to save money, but is allowing everyone to move to India and continue at the same salary?

      Something definately does not sound right.

      --

      "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

    7. Re:getting outsourced.. by Gannoc · · Score: 1

      Let me get this straight? The company is outsourcing to India to save money, but is allowing everyone to move to India and continue at the same salary?

      Until they've trained Indians, then they'll be let go. Otherwise no, it doesn't make sense.

    8. Re:getting outsourced.. by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      IAAIndian, so here's my two paise's worth:
      - how good your standard of living would be in India on a UK salary
      One hypenated word: sky-high.

      Your Indian co-workers (or subordinates) would probably think that you live in a different world altogether. This not counting public amenities like clogged roads/pollution/cramped airports and stuff though.

      how long it would take for the Indian company to make you redundant (currently guess: 4 hours)
      As I posted earlier, if it's plain code-grunt work, then yes. But if it is managerial, or techno-managerial, work, then perhaps not; that Indian company will probably need you more than you need them.
      what the Indian employment laws are like
      Depends on what you're looking at, really. Let's just say this for now:- you probably know that the Indian economy is in 'reform' mode? Well, one of the places that our reform-minded policymakers needs work is labour laws; apparently, it's currently too stifling for companies.

      Which, of course, is not to say that labour laws are necessarily good; like I said, really depends on what you're looking at.

      A word of advice though (and I say this not as an Indian but as a migrant worker who's worked in three different countries): if you're venturing out of home, always leave with a return ticket in hand. If shit really hits the ceiling, you know you can always return and start afresh among your people. Also remember that any new cultural experience will change you in many ways; whether you consider it to be enriching or punishing is something you'd have to decide for yourself.

    9. Re:getting outsourced.. by Cederic · · Score: 1


      I suspect it's due to UK labour laws - it's certainly not possible to make someone redundant if their role still exists; it could be argued that the role does still exist, and so they must be allowed to continue in it.

      It just happens that the role is now in India not in the UK.

      Since handover to the Indian company will occur prior to the role transferral there's no incentive for the Indian's to retain the current UK staff, so they'll probably make it very very attractive to take a redundancy package (based on the "Substantial change to role" caused by the change in location)

      I'm happy to admit, I'm not fully au fait with the legalities, I'm just amused by the concept. Personally my role isn't one of those going (I'm merely at risk from our 25% headcount reduction which is also happening at the same time) so it's pretty academic for me.

      ~Cederic

  40. Big difference in the results. by khasim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a "work visa". Not citizenship.

    The kids going over there are working for a salary and, eventually, will be sent back to their home country. It's easy to explain with two examples.

    #1. Euro-kid goes to India and works for 2 years. He makes a "mediocre" wage (1/10th what he'd make back home). He banks it all and lives on cheap rice, curry and lentils. After 2 years he goes home with $X (or whatever his currency is). $X is 1/10 that he'd make in 2 years at home under the same conditions.

    #2. Indian guy goes to the US and works for 2 years. He makes a "mediocre" wage for a US job (still 10x what he'd make back home). Banks it all, eats rice, curry and lentils. After 2 years he, goes home. He now has 10x the money he'd have after 2 years of working in India.

    The effective difference is 100x between the two.

    Work visas are only good for making money in a wealthy country and then going home to a poor country. They suck for working in a poor country and then going home to a wealthy country.

    1. Re:Big difference in the results. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah that really doesn't make a lot of sense for say a US citizen to go work in India. You could make more money in the long run by taking a $15/hr job in the US doing whatever (and with such low wages you don't have to pay tax, or perhaps only very little). Really I don't see the point of what these guys are doing, unless they plan on staying in India forever. Even going there for job experience is worthless since you can instead work for a small company (which typically pays smaller salary) in the US and get the same experience. Makes no sense at all. *shrug*

    2. Re:Big difference in the results. by Otter · · Score: 5, Insightful
      #1. Euro-kid goes to India and works for 2 years. He makes a "mediocre" wage (1/10th what he'd make back home). He banks it all and lives on cheap rice, curry and lentils. After 2 years he goes home with $X (or whatever his currency is). $X is 1/10 that he'd make in 2 years at home under the same conditions.

      The real payoff is two years of living in India, supplementing your salary with a little savings or checks from Daddy that go a long way in Bangalore, having fun, being a bit of a bigshot, partying and putting something on your resume that will pay long-term dividends when you get back. (And, say, apply for a job supervising an outsourced project.)

      It's something you do for fun, not because it necessarily makes financial sense.

      (Apply same point to the initial BBC story and /. submission...)

    3. Re:Big difference in the results. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're over-simplifying it. Differences in tax rates and cost of living could sway that considerably. Plus with bonuses like the free housing and free ride to work you'd be saving a lot more of your earnings.

    4. Re:Big difference in the results. by pebs · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sorry, but having constant diarrhea and eating shitty food is not my idea of fun. Also, Indian chicks don't put out (unless you marry them), which makes matters worse. Then there's the rampant polution and health hazards. India is not a fun place to live no matter how you slice it. Trust me, I am an Indian, and I've visited India enough times to know this.

      BTW, in India, diarrhea is so common, it is normal for you to respond to "how are you doing?" with "I have diarrhea"

      --
      #!/
    5. Re:Big difference in the results. by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >go a long way in Bangalore, having fun, being a bit of a bigshot, partying

      I can't see India being some big party place with women with loose morals.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    6. Re:Big difference in the results. by kfg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can't see India being some big party place with women with loose morals.

      From which we can deduce you've never been to India.

      Where life is cheap, hard and poor, but there are also the fabulously wealthy, is always a big party place with women with loose morals.

      If you don't believe me you can test this hypothesis without ever leaving the good ol' US of A.

      Just visit Detroit.

      KFG

    7. Re:Big difference in the results. by pbox · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Quality of life != salary.

      Examples:

      Netherlands salaries are 10-20% less than US. But they get 30+ days of vacation. That comes out to 10-20% extra pay. Which one would you have 80+ hrs of EA weeks or 30+ hours of workweek after removing the vacation time?

      In India you can get a maid who cooks, cleans for rupies a week. Even when you make 10% of your Western salary you can afford it. The food is much cheaper in India, especially if you compare restaurants to restaurants. In other words you will not need to cook at all.

      Learning tolarenace is a gigantic value for your society, by being exposed (not as a tourist, but as a working member) to several different cultures is invaluable.

      --
      Code poet, espresso fiend, starter upper.
    8. Re:Big difference in the results. by klevin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a heck of a lot more to "partying" than getting drunk and having sex with whomever is at hand. That tends to get old real fast (and so does anyone who lives that way for an extended period of time).

    9. Re:Big difference in the results. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      As an interesting side note the two most efficient economies in terms of GDP per worker per hour are Germany and France. The USA makes more GDP in total per worker, but the workers tend to work much longer hours. As to which is better (the difference is about 15 hours per week and about a month of holiday time) I wouldn't like to say.

      In terms of GDP (PPP) the French and Germans (and most north Western European nations) make around 70% of what a US worker does in terms of mean GDP (PPP) per capita. What the median values are is another matter, of course, but are likely to be relatively close to the mean I would imagine.

    10. Re:Big difference in the results. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      But they get 30+ days of vacation

      I work in the UK and get 31 days of holiday time, plus 8 bank holidays, for a total of 39 days. However British workers tend to work longer hours than those on the continent.

    11. Re:Big difference in the results. by Afty0r · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Let's compare this with what could happen for a kid from a Western European island like the UK...
      #1. Euro-kid goes to India and works for 2 years. He makes a "mediocre" wage (1/10th what he'd make back home). He banks it all and lives on cheap rice, curry and lentils. After 2 years he goes home with $X (or whatever his currency is). $X is 1/10 that he'd make in 2 years at home under the same conditions.

      #2. Indian guy goes to the US and works for 2 years. He makes a "mediocre" wage for a US job (still 10x what he'd make back home). Banks it all, eats rice, curry and lentils. After 2 years he, goes home. He now has 10x the money he'd have after 2 years of working in India.
      Well, first of all the salary for a mediocre graduate in the UK in an IT/Project Management role is approximately £15k. These guys in India are getting £5-7k - so the difference is only 1/3. I don't know enough about tax rates, but let's assume they are the same... Take home on 15k in the UK is about 12-13k, in India let's assume a 5k take-home. Now in the UK living costs for a single man living alone in a major city will run you around 8k in a fairly cheap suburb. Add public transport daily onto that, food and just a small reasonable bit of a social life at Western prices and you're probably talking around 11-12k expenditure per year with no holidays, PCs, gadgets, clothes etc. In India our guy with a 5k take home only has to buy some food - which will set him back almost nothing in India. So at the end of the year our worker in India is 3k-4k up on our worker in the UK, has gained experience in a foreign country in a senior role, enriched his life, could easily be the life of the party everywhere by splashing cash and can now choose where to work...
      Hardly a difference of 100x... In fact I would bet our Indian is better off. Apart from health care and pollution standards, I can't think of anything our UK worker has that our Indian doesn't...
    12. Re:Big difference in the results. by happyhangone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't now where this myth started but is annoying already, outsourced jobs are not exploiting labor from india or other countries. They pay well if you live there (money to eat, housing, and entertainent), of course, comparing those salaries with the US equivalent is pointless. This is the real reason for a few first-world people migrating to the third-world, you got the option of no working at all up there, or working and living well down there. Of course, nobody is talking about savings. Another fact is that many of those outsourced jobs need managers and staff from the original countries, they offer them the same pay but they got to live on india (example). With the US salary in a third world country, you live as big fat ceo any day...

    13. Re:Big difference in the results. by FauxPasIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Work visas are only good for making money in a wealthy country and then going home to a poor
      > country. They suck for working in a poor country and then going home to a wealthy country.

      Yeah, unless all the jobs have been moved out of the rich country into the poor country. There's
      a point of desperation where having a roof over your head and free food is more than enough
      compensation for a day's work.

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    14. Re:Big difference in the results. by speed-sf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Um, no one is *making* you go. 'Sides, hit up Taco Bell and get all the diarrhea you in the comfort of your homeland.

      --
      All your database are belong to us
    15. Re:Big difference in the results. by corbettw · · Score: 3, Funny

      BTW, in India, diarrhea is so common, it is normal for you to respond to "how are you doing?" with "I have diarrhea"

      Damn, dude, if it's that common, get a frickin' euphamism.

      "How are you doing?"
      "My elephant is rampaging again."
      or
      "I've got Ghandi's revenge again."
      or
      "I've been awarded the OBE (Order of Bowel Explosions)."

      Use your imagination, make it fun.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    16. Re:Big difference in the results. by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      Doing drugs? Listening to loud music? Am I missing something?

      Unless, by "partying", you mean LAN partying. I've never been to an actual "party" but I've seen lots of them on TV.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    17. Re:Big difference in the results. by Otter · · Score: 1
      Trust me, I am an Indian, and I've visited India enough times to know this.

      Well, yeah. Being a middle-class Indian IT worker in India for a year or two is only a fun, exciting adventure if you're not a middle-class Indian IT worker. If you are, I agree that a masters from Stanford and a job at Cisco make for a much more attractive alternative.

      Just like being an Italian peasant is only fun if you have a faculty position waiting for you back in Berkeley.

    18. Re:Big difference in the results. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indian chicks don't put out

      If you want sex in India, look no further than the local Eunich whorehouse.

    19. Re:Big difference in the results. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Never done it, eh? As someone who is doing it right now (in China, not India), I can say that it absolutely rocks, and will not get old for some time. I'm sure after some years it gets old...but how can you argue against having sex with 20-year-old women? Sorry, buddy, you sound like a NERRRRRRRRRD.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    20. Re:Big difference in the results. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Oh, and you would feel OK employing this maid at a pittance, and exploiting her labor? Way to go, "tolerant" asshole.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    21. Re:Big difference in the results. by militiaMan · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the USA >$10/hr is hard to get now days unless you work for a union or corp/government. Most businesses in the USA are small. Average incomes are down for 30+ of the last 35 years when adjusted for inflation. www.bls.org This week 5 jobs in the whole IT section for Dallas Morning News. Wow that's 5 jobs for 20,000+ unemployeed IT workers in DFW. So if you make it to India you can make 22k a year and live great on $15/day. So your wrong, false government exchange rates are pushing U.S. citizens out.

    22. Re:Big difference in the results. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because it may be less than a maid might make in your country doesn't mean it's not a fair wage in theirs. A pittance to you might be a fortune to someone else. Jackass.

    23. Re:Big difference in the results. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey! What is this coming out of my ass? Oh - It's a number! Now I can post like you too!

    24. Re:Big difference in the results. by pbox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Consider that the pittance allows her to have a "comfortable"* life while the lack of pittance would put her in the slums.

      * comforatable means different things to different people.

      Otherwise way to go. Your comment style completely lacks any kind of intelligence. Is it by choice or you actually enjoy being stupid?

      --
      Code poet, espresso fiend, starter upper.
    25. Re:Big difference in the results. by ThousandStars · · Score: 2, Insightful
      but how can you argue against having sex with 20-year-old women?

      Quite easily.

    26. Re:Big difference in the results. by jcam2 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps that 'efficiency' comes from potentially low-paid workers in France and Germany not being able to get jobs at all, due to insane minimum wage laws? I'm sure the average US wage and thus productivity per worker could be increased if the lowest 10% of workers by salary were fired .. but would this be a good thing?

    27. Re:Big difference in the results. by kraut · · Score: 1

      Yes, I would feel very happy employing someone at the local going rate, or perhaps a bit higher if I felt it was warranted. How is that exploitation?

      --
      no taxation without representation!
    28. Re:Big difference in the results. by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Indian food in Western countries gives me the squits anyway. But a good vindaloo (I mean one that's practically inedible it's so hot) is a great cure for the common cold and many other ailments.

    29. Re:Big difference in the results. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm sure the average US wage and thus productivity per worker could be increased if the lowest 10% of workers by salary were fired .. but would this be a good thing?"

      In the USA they're in jail :-)

    30. Re:Big difference in the results. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where the hell do you live?

    31. Re:Big difference in the results. by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 0

      They pay well but they should pay the same. Where you live on a map should not decide your salary, just like your race or gender should not decide it.

      This is whats wrong about how outsourcing is implemented and until we have a global currency, its never going to work.

      --
      People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
    32. Re:Big difference in the results. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except the difference may be between working in India at mediocre wages-and not working at all.

    33. Re:Big difference in the results. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, in Silicon Valley, there aren't many women. Give it a few years-the USA will be just like India.

    34. Re:Big difference in the results. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      You might want to look up the definition of "exploitation" some day.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    35. Re:Big difference in the results. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1
      Never let your soldier go into battle without a helmet. Problem solved.

      Besides, at the link you provided, most of the health risks involve homosexual men. Not my bag, baby!

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    36. Re:Big difference in the results. by pebs · · Score: 1

      Um, no one is *making* you go. 'Sides, hit up Taco Bell and get all the diarrhea you in the comfort of your homeland.

      Well, no shit.. The point I was making was that the parent poster had a serious misconception that India was a fun place. Interesting place, maybe, but certainly not the fun he seemed to think it is.

      BTW Taco Bell's ability to produce diarrhea doesn't even compare to shit that will be spewing out of your ass if you eat or drink the wrong thing in India.

      --
      #!/
    37. Re:Big difference in the results. by say · · Score: 3, Funny

      As someone who is doing it right now (in China, not India), I can say that it absolutely rocks

      Uhhm... you should really be paying more attention to the girl while you're "doing it". Slashdot is not a turn-on for everyone!

      --
      Roses are #FF0000, violets are #0000FF, all my base are belong to you
    38. Re:Big difference in the results. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There's a heck of a lot more to "partying" than getting drunk and having sex with whomever is at hand.

      Are you joking?

    39. Re:Big difference in the results. by pebs · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah. Being a middle-class Indian IT worker in India for a year or two is only a fun, exciting adventure if you're not a middle-class Indian IT worker.

      I'm not an Indian IT worker in India. I was born in the U.S. and having visited family there several times. I've always found visits to India to be pretty unpleasant. Its cool for about a week, then I want to get the hell out of there. Maybe it's just my perspective, being born in the U.S., but I think that's the point I was making. Even Indian people who have moved to the U.S. don't want to go back.

      --
      #!/
    40. Re:Big difference in the results. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learning tolarenace is a gigantic value for your society -- I like SUVs: stupid people buy them then die in them. Darwin's dead hand at work... Your apparent outlook on life is appealing, but a little disturbing, too

    41. Re:Big difference in the results. by Etherael · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interesting and relevant statistic;

      it costs more to purchase a condom in india than a woman willing to use it with you.

      I spent a month in India, I didn't bother to even look for that side of things, but some girl on the street kissed me on the cheek and ran away for no apparent reason, so they can't be all *that* stuck up I guess.

      I only found out about the condom vs prostitute cost after leaving India, not that I would have taken advantage of said fact having had known it prior to this, however if you're the type of person who's idea of fun is getting drunk and fucking women with loose morals (and I'm not being down on you here, that's fine with me) then I assume the above information would mean you would be reasonably satisfied.

    42. Re:Big difference in the results. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Exploitation is pretty much the story all around. You think the people who hire you, ultimately, have the same standard that you do? Where does their improved standard of living come from? You don't have to be a Marxist to get what "surplus value" means.

    43. Re:Big difference in the results. by gordo3000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      don't know if you were trying to just be funny, but if this was serious(which some moderators thought it was) its possibly the biggest idiocy I've ever heard.

      Lots of people like Indian food and as a foreign IT worker, its quite easy you hire yourself a cook.

      You do not get diarrhea in india without doing some of the most foolish things as a foreigner. Native indians rarely get it. As a foreigner, you get it from not realizing you do not have immunities to lots of the things in Indian water and food(namely, meat). If you drink tap water and are a foreigner, you're screwed. Hell, you can be indian and have been back to the country for several years and you have lost your immunities.

      Yes there is a lot of pollution, its what happens when you cram that many people into such small places. If you want away from the pollution, go to the country side. A lot like most major cities in non-industrialized countries(and many industrialized countries). that is just how it is and you should know it way before going there.

      your last line must be a joke but India can be a really fun place if you know where to go. You've probably been stuck doing the family thing every time rather than finding the nightlife out in Bombay or another major city(which can be incredible). I suggest to anyone going there, make local friends quickly. Almost all educated indians speak fluent english(with that fun accent) and by meeting the right ones, you will always be able to find something to do.

      Anyways, indian chicks do put out. Its why they are predicting that within 15 years, india will have the highest numer of Aids cases in the world.

    44. Re:Big difference in the results. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod Parent Up!!!

    45. Re:Big difference in the results. by kalinh · · Score: 1

      > Where does their improved standard of living come from?

      Being paid or rewarded for possessing the rare skill of being able to manage others? Having more experience than thier know-it-all employees? Working harder to move forward in their carreers?

      Unless your employers have guns pointed at you, exploitation is pretty much a fantasy. You might need to be a Marxist to know what "surplus value" means, but you've got to be a non-Marxist to understand what it means.

      --

      Metamuscle.com - News in the Iro

    46. Re:Big difference in the results. by klaycomputer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So why the heck you even bother to post? Why don't you leave us alone and do whatever heck you do. People like you should never be trusted. Don't tell what you just wrote to your own mother. Even she will not be able to digest what you have become. If Mahatma Gandhi had thought like you, just imagine where you would be now. I live in a western country. From past few years. But for me now I have two homes.

    47. Re:Big difference in the results. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, but at the risk of sounding like some elitist:

      If you're white, well spoken, from a Euro/N.A./Aussie country, not fat, and not a chauvinist pig, you can write your own ticket when it comes to picking up chicks in Asia. Asian guys hate us like how we hated the French exchange student in high school who got all the chicks. I'm not talking prostitutes, or taking advantage of the destitute, I mean middle->upper class honeys who aren't just looking for a husband or sugar daddy. Over here you may be some pasty, bow-legged, nerd with broken glasses, but elsewhere you're exotic. I've travelled across Asia and only once was there ever a misunderstanding (we met in a bar, had drinks, went back to my place to make out, she said how much she'd love to see America and how easy it would be if we were engaged... I said 'sorry, my gf back home wouldn't dig it', she put back on her top and left :)

      If it takes reading slashdot to get your mojo going, I doubt it would be a problem :)

      (Posting AC to preserve my karma.... the moderators seem to be losing their humor lately)

    48. Re:Big difference in the results. by ashayh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem with your argument is..
      Maids in India always live in slums..

      My mom has had like 40 maids in my lifetime (24 yrs) and they have always come from slums.

      Trust me, if you think you are doing these women any favour by hiring them to clean and cook you are sadly mistaken. Currently my mom in india pays her maid @20$ a month which is the very high end in India. In my undergrad years I paid my cleaning maid 5$ (FIVE) a month.

      In many cases their husbands are deserters drunkards and general losers who make their life difficult by beating, taking their money etc.My undergrad tution was 300$ a year. Plus books plus other expense.HOW do her children get educated, get 'proper' upbringing with a 50$ a month (600$ a year) salary?

      All maids my mom had were illiterate. I remember one maids daughter got married somewhere at the age of 9-12 (I dont remember, but she was pretty young).
      My mom-dad have tried to educate the maids children by paying for their Govt school (if you can call it a school) or tutoring them. But most of them are not interested in educating their children...they dont understand it.

      There are many such people in India who live totally fucked lives. Yes, and I call this exploitation. I have no solution for this, but I can tell you that its totally wrong to say its somehow any good for these women (and men) to slave like this.

      In fact, since coming to the US, I've come to very much appreciate the fact that many well off people will do their own laundry and cleaning and cooking... even I've learnt to cook after coming here.

      Another thing for comparision...In the US, my former landlords spring cleaning maid came in a new SUV. My landords an average US midde class fellow by the way.

    49. Re:Big difference in the results. by ashayh · · Score: 1

      6K UK is 500,000 Indian Rs a year and thats 42000Rs a month, = 500 UK a month.

      While people do get paid that much in India (the 'elite' IIT and Top-B-school types and other veterans), the VAST majority in IT have a salary of 200-400$ (or 100-210 UK) a month. A friend in India gets 300$ take home for working 100hrs a week. He graduated and got a job a year ago.

    50. Re:Big difference in the results. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Learning tolarenace is a gigantic value for your society, by being exposed (not as a tourist, but as a working member) to several different cultures is invaluable.

      If only Osama had been an intern at GE or IBM, what would the would be like?

    51. Re:Big difference in the results. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      No, for having cash, which is abstract, rather than a skill, which only has a use value. Your labor is what it is - you can only barter it with people who need that labor. Money can be exchanged for goods and services universally. The differential in power is based on the difference between the flexibility of money and the reduced flexibility of labor and goods.

    52. Re:Big difference in the results. by hapuchu · · Score: 1

      He makes a "mediocre" wage
      Is it just the wage?
      In India the Euro-kid with his *mediocre* salary can have a house maid for cleaning utensils, vacuuming the house and ironing the clothes. He can even have cook for making the food. All this for the fraction of amount.
      Euro-kid just needs to go to work, eat, sleep and sh*t.
      While back in Europe, even with the *European salary*, Euro-kid needs to do everything on this own.
      I am not even counting other facilities like car drops and pickup and other VIP treatment give to Europeans in India.

    53. Re:Big difference in the results. by pbox · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm,

      GE contracts on nu-cu-lar plants, don't it?

      There are people who despite of being privileged and brought up being exposed to different cultures and ideas manage to stay remarkably close minded. BTW, it equally applies to Osama and our Fuhrer, Georgie King... (Heil!)

      --
      Code poet, espresso fiend, starter upper.
    54. Re:Big difference in the results. by wwwillem · · Score: 1

      going there for job experience is worthless since you can instead work for a small company [...] in the US and get the same experience.

      Ehhhh, someone confusing 'job experience' with 'life experience' ..... Let's phrase that better, if you (in the USA) can hire a guy/gal that hanged out in university for a year longer than necessary, or another that did normal in university and after that "wasted" 2 years behind a helpdesk in India. Which one would you hire????

      --
      Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    55. Re:Big difference in the results. by pbox · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tip. I did.

      Unfortunately the dictionary does not include and warning to the extent of "eye of the beholder"...

      If you carefully look at your employment situation (I am ass-U-me-ing here, but statistically I might be right), one might characterize it as exploitation. I know mine could be argued, in spite of being a highly paid professional. I am paid the going rate, yet I know the work that I put in brings 100x revenue to my companies' owners. How about that for exploitation?

      How about exploitation, where the ruling elite decides on the minimum wage, and either refuses to have one (India) or sets it extremely low (US), so that you are stuck in the same wage jobs forever (can you imagine living on $5.25 even in rural America?). Even the relatively communist Santa Barbara local government's plan to increase hourly wage to $11 is laughable when your famaily income needs to be above $100K a year, in order to afford a median priced house in LA county (not even in Santa Monica).

      --
      Code poet, espresso fiend, starter upper.
    56. Re:Big difference in the results. by pbox · · Score: 1

      I tolerate people being stupid. I equally tolerate stupid people hurting (or killing) themselves. It's all good and part of the same philosophy. Hmmm, maybe I should start a religion on this... Hobbard did pretty well (as in $$$) with his concotion...

      --
      Code poet, espresso fiend, starter upper.
    57. Re:Big difference in the results. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      a few first-world people migrating to the third-world

      Just to note, despite the title Slashdot put on this, it's NOT about "migrating". More like extended working holidays, like some people take a few months travelling around Europe and may pick fruit for pocket money.

    58. Re:Big difference in the results. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Anyways, indian chicks do put out. Its why they are predicting that within 15 years, india will have the highest numer of Aids cases in the world.

      I can't quite tell; was the author intending for this to be a good thing, or a bad thing?

    59. Re:Big difference in the results. by northcat · · Score: 3, Informative

      India is not a fun place to live no matter how you slice it. Trust me, I am an Indian

      I'm an Indian too. I know your kind of people - "India sucks, every other country is better". If I were you I would be ashamed of myself. Looks like your kind of people are more common among Indian IT workers.

      and I've visited India enough times to know this.

      Exactly. You have visited India, not lived here. People of different countries have different kinds of fun. You can't have the kind of fun you have in USA or Somalia in India.

      BTW, in India, diarrhea is so common, it is normal for you to respond to "how are you doing?" with "I have diarrhea"

      If slashdot was in India, or if all slashdot mods had visited India, you would have been modded down as troll. This is the first time I'm hearing "Indians have diarrhea". For all the other slashdot readers: This guy deosn't live in India, he has just visited it, so he doesn't know more than any other foreigner who has visited India. If fact he "knows" even less than others because his type of people already have a bad image of India in their minds.

      and eating shitty food is not my idea of fun.

      This exactly what I am talking about. Calling Indian food shitty is completely baseless. He just thinks it must be bad because its Indian.

    60. Re:Big difference in the results. by pebs · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but you didn't make India sound any better (the comment about HIV/AIDS cases pretty much sums it up).

      --
      #!/
    61. Re:Big difference in the results. by pebs · · Score: 1

      Gandhi suffered to do what he did. He was a saint.

      However, I am not speaking to people who are saints. I am speaking to the typical American IT worker, warning them that India is not some wonderous place. It's a hostile environment. It's amazing that people can live in that hostile environment, and I commend you for that.

      --
      #!/
    62. Re:Big difference in the results. by pebs · · Score: 1

      For all the other slashdot readers: This guy deosn't live in India, he has just visited it, so he doesn't know more than any other foreigner who has visited India. If fact he "knows" even less than others because his type of people already have a bad image of India in their minds.

      Yes, I have only visited India for periods of 3 months at a time. But that's the point. Some American IT worker is going to experience the same thing I did when he moves over there to only stay a year or two. It's a harsh environment, and I commend you for being able to live through it. I don't recommend it to my fellow Americans who are used to a much easier environment.

      Someone who actually lives in India is going to have another perspective because you are used to it.

      If you want to experience something different, go ahead and visit / move to India. But don't expect it to be a pleasant trip.

      I've met a lot of people who moved to the U.S. from India that no longer want to go back even to visit India.

      BTW, I am not ashamed. I am telling it like it is. If it offends a ton of people, I'm not sorry.

      --
      #!/
    63. Re:Big difference in the results. by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dude you are just such a fucking typical ABCD, get the fuck over it. Just because Indian women don't want to sleep with you, doesn't mean they don't put out. I mean it's difficult to rape 500 Million women, dumb fuck. Further you got diarrhea because you are total fucking moron. Next time, try drinking a little bottled water. I lived in America, and am very to be back in India, thanks. And shit bags like you can stay exactly where you are, inventing a new flavour of toothpaste while the rest of us can go on living happy, productive lives. Just because your family happens to be a bunch of village idiots isn't my problem. If somebody took me to Rectumsville, Idaho for my US Vacation insetad of New York City, I think I'd have a pretty interesting picture of America. So, do yourself a favour, and go fuck yourself.

    64. Re:Big difference in the results. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have stayed in India for 25 years and have been in UK for 2 years now. When you say ' constant diarrhoea', you give me a feeling if you have been living in a slum or something. And you are talking about India of 50s , when you say ;Indian girls dont put out'. hmmm, actually, it depends upon the guy, seems like you have been having some bad experiences. People like you give india a bad name. If you can't say anything positive, keep quite.

    65. Re:Big difference in the results. by pebs · · Score: 1

      I commend you for being able to live in such a harsh environment. You are an inspiration to humanity. Good luck.

      --
      #!/
    66. Re:Big difference in the results. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Indians have a tendency to wallow in filth. I don't have any explanations behind this. We take baths as frequently as we can (and more so than those blasted Europeans at any rate!). And we do try to keep things clean somewhat (in house and garden). But the definitive smell pervading our railway stations (and really sadly, our International Airports) happens to Urine, mixed with rotting vegetables. Add that to the fact that any empty plot of land is renamed "Garbage Dump Indefinitely" and you have foreign investors running to Shanghai in droves! You see, we may be a democracy, may not remove women's ovaries after their first kid, we may kick butt when we create software, but somehow we forgot to erase the slag heaps, and allow the bio-degrable waste to degrade a bit too freely, in too many public places.

      This flaw is, unfortunately, a very VISIBLE flaw. When you walk on the streets of Delhi, you don't see the world-class software developers, or the fact that Indians value their right to Vote, and their right to free speech. What you do see are banana peels, heaps of slag piled around Big, Shiny multiplexes and (if you're not in Delhi) clouds of soot being emitted from the larger, diesel powered 4-wheelers. So India may be shining (and this Voice believes that it truly is) but it doesn't help if that shine is blocked out by the smell of fresh pee."

  41. Have you actually been to India? by glrotate · · Score: 0, Troll

    I have and the place is disgusting. The smell is nearly overwhelming. There is rotting trash in the streets as well as animal and human waste. There are too many people and because of religous issues they let all manner of beast wander the streets.

    1. Re:Have you actually been to India? by Razor's+Edge · · Score: 1

      glrotate, you're obviously concluding that all of India is like the big city in India which you visited. I've made many visits to India and your summary matches my impressions of Kolkata for the most part.
      Thankfully most of India is still rural and NOT like you describe. Every time I arrive in India I make sure to get the heck out of the city as quickly as possible due to primarily the horrible pollution. The smaller towns, villages and cities can be delightful compared with the city life.
      I'd hate for anyone too conclude that all of the USA is like Manhatten or LA.
      Also, there is no religious ground for the animals walking the streets. It's simply a different philosophy.

    2. Re:Have you actually been to India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Manhattan is a wonderful place to live. How can you compare Manhattan to some shithole in India where animals wander the streets?

    3. Re:Have you actually been to India? by Razor's+Edge · · Score: 1

      Say, Coward... I suppose if you actually knew how to read, then you'd be smart enough to see that I didn't compare Manhattan to India. Go back to sleep in that aforementioned hole that you yourself obviously live in! Ignorance is bliss, ain't it!? Or in terms that I'm sure even you can understand... No brain, no pain! Splendid!

  42. Nomads! by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    I've always been a nomad so that is no problem for me. The problem is more in little things like not being able to take my pets if I move to a different country. Most countries have some sort of period you have to leave your pets in quaratine which is usually long enough to make it somewhat cruel IMO.

    Also moving personal items can be a pain. All my DVDs are from the US, England, and Japan. That is enough to make life hard without a region free DVD player. If I moved to more countries and bought more DVDs in each country it'd just make the problem harder? Things like region codes definately seem anti-globalization to me. Then you get into the trouble of moving a dozen computers and getting power adapaters for them all and stuff like that.

    So.. if you plan to be nomadic outside the boundries of your home country then try not to have pets or a lot of stuff that'd be a pain to move.

    On the other hand it's my experience that it isn't hard to pick up girls and take them with you. "Hey, I'm going to Thailand, Malaysia, and India next week.. wanna go with me." is one hell of a pick-up line. Maybe that makes it worthwhile to give up my cat and my computers?

    What I think we really need is a tribe of nomads that migrate from country to country together and can make deals for our services as a group. A little geek tribe. Maybe we could legally make it a corporation to make it easier to work out deals.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    1. Re:Nomads! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Things like region codes definately seem anti-globalization to me."

      The corporations want globalization, in that they want to abuse the cheap labour overseas, yet they DON'T want the masses to use the same system (buying cheap import DVDs from overseas) so they use region coding.

    2. Re:Nomads! by torpor · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm a nomad and all I can say is:

      1. nomads have no need for pets.

      2. nomads don't posess much. things posess you, take only what you need.

      What I think we really need is a tribe of nomads that migrate from country to country together and can make deals for our services as a group.

      Yes, I have encountered this idea many times in my travels.. it would indeed be an interesting association to make, a few thousand nomads on the globe, or so ..

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    3. Re:Nomads! by Zen+Punk · · Score: 1

      If you have a laptop with a DVD drive, you can use the AnyDVD driver software to bypass that region encoding bullshit. Or, you can pick up a cheap Chinese or Taiwanese DVD player that will ignore region encoding(So I've heard.)

      --
      Sleep is futile.
    4. Re:Nomads! by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately various females have given me pets and while I would not have gotten pets for myself I do however like them. Of course I get around this limitation somewhat by leaving them, at times, with friends and family and just visiting them whenever I'm able. This isn't really ideal though because I can't afford to visit often. The same goes for actually visiting the friends and family I have.

      Again I agree in theory. For years I owned hardly anything. Gradually I am starting to build up property though which would pain me to replace or give up. To some degree the digital property I have I can put online. This is probably illegal in the US but that is really besides the point. I can copy all my movies, software, and music onto a server and access those files from anywhere and not bother carrying the originals around. I've been making some effort to transfer my collection of books and magazines (technical) into a digital format too. Most of my crap I don't mind lossing. Furniture and off the shelf electronics is easy enough to replace. I hate to give up some of the computers I've built myself though as some are rather unique. In the least I always keep my harddrives when I move so that I have a copy of all my data I've ever produced. As a programmer and engineer I have lots of work on those drives. Having been online more than a decade I have much of my life on those drives also. I tend to also keep the before mentioned digital copies of media on my drives as actually finding server space where you can get terabytes of space affordably isn't that easy yet. :)

      I think these problems would be lessened by moving in tribes. We could have community property such as servers that'd contain the entire tribes data. Files such as movies, music, and software could be kept as a single copy instead of everyone needing their own copies. Any family, friends, and even pets that belonged to the tribe could be brought with you into new countries. Really moving as tribes is the smart way for nomads to go.

      I've thought about setting up some sort of geek tribe here in the US and then gradually moving outward. Buy some bits of land throughout the US and allow any geek and their family to move onto this tribal land (and back and forth across different locations) so long as they join the tribe and follow the rules. Something a bit communal but not entirely. I suppose a little like native Americans were once upon a time.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    5. Re:Nomads! by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      True, I remove the region encoding anyway when I copy the DVDs. It's just the theory that to do such things legally there is a fair amount of hassle involved.

      The same as that since I move a lot I try not to own many things which therefore gives me no credit or equity if I needed to take out a loan or something. When you try to get credit, a job, or really anything they usually want to know how long you've lived at your current address and why you move so often. Little hassles like that. In the US at least it is somewhat frowned upon to live a nomadic lifestyle. You can believe any crackpot religion you want to, sleep with anyone you want to, etc but if you move to a new city every year then people think there is something wrong with you.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    6. Re:Nomads! by 2old2rockNroll · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm a nomad and all I can say is:
      1. nomads have no need for pets.
      2. nomads don't posess much. things posess you, take only what you need.

      How sad. It sounds so sterile. No pets. No home. No community to support and receive support from. No traditions. No family heirlooms or property. No place to call your own. I've read a number of your comments in this discussion, and you can have your nomadic existence. I would not willingly give up the things that make life enjoyable and satisfying.

    7. Re:Nomads! by kraut · · Score: 1

      Dude - if DVD region coding (which sucks, agreed) and power adaptors are your main problem, you have it wayto easy ;)

      BTW: get a laptop. You know, little computers that fold up. Much more convenient that lugging that CRT on the plane.

      --
      no taxation without representation!
    8. Re:Nomads! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of cheap Taiwanese DVD players ignore Macrovision as well. They're great (until the laser dies after 2 years, but then you pay $50 for a new one).

    9. Re:Nomads! by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      I never bother moving monitors anyway. It's mostly the harddrives I worry about. Sadly I've yet to see a laptop that can hold terabytes of data. That'd be really awesome though. :)

      Usually when I move I don't bother taking much of anything besides computer stuff with me.. not even spare cloths. I guess that means I'm a geek. Yes, in a single move, I've traveled more than 1500 miles by bus with nothing but a mini-itx files erver with a terabyte of data stuffed into a backpack. You can't get much geekier a nomad than that.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  43. Great food? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mmmmmmm Great Indian food...

  44. Re:I'm an Australian troll ... by quarkscat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Right-O.

    I'm certain that that expensive "Western"
    college education that you borrowed money
    to get can EASILY be paid off with the big
    paycheck you're going to get from that Indian
    IT company. And the storage company that you
    trusted all of your worldly possessions with
    will happily accept rupees, and a 1/10 of the
    per month agreed to storage payment. Oh, and
    God help you if you should get sick while over
    there working in India -- most Western medical
    plans will not cover your overseas "deployment".
    (Well, you could rely on the herbal remedies
    available locally -- just put enough money aside
    to have your body shipped home to Mum and Pop.)

    Thanks, but no thanks.

  45. Exchange rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The USD exchange rate is steadily decreasing the need to outsource to the East. Pretty soon, all those jobs will come back...

  46. US a wealthy country? by Drakonite · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...you obviously haven't been watching the USD lately.

    --
    Shoot Pixels, Not People!
    1. Re:US a wealthy country? by garaged · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And you havent seen 3rd world salaries very soon

      --
      I'm positive, don't belive me look at my karma
    2. Re:US a wealthy country? by discogravy · · Score: 0

      well, be fair, it's not like President Bush has been watching the USD lately either.

    3. Re:US a wealthy country? by Drakonite · · Score: 0
      Indeed.

      He's far too busy watching Sesame Street I'm sure.

      --
      Shoot Pixels, Not People!
    4. Re:US a wealthy country? by relaxmax · · Score: 1

      And you haven't seen the price of rice, curry and lentils in the US.

      --
      Love all, Trust few, Follow one.
  47. Who says you cant have a life... by WebCowboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...beyond work if you live a life as a "nomad"? That's crap! It's the 21st century man! Communications technology makes physical location nearly irrelevant. Many of my family members and friends travel extensively and have made good friends with fellow nomads all over the world. IM and email are good for keeping in touch--you should try using them sometimes. My girlfriend's brother met an Aussie nomad in Vancouver, now ehty arte engaged to be married in Australia. They both have friends and family on three continents. All my more nomadic friends manage to stay in touch and some even meet up several times a year--sometimes in locations that are neither person's "home"!

    A nomadic lifestyle isn't for everyone, so if you prefer to put down roots somewhere there is always telecommuting--that is essentially what workers in India, Ireland, Canada and other outsourcing hotspots are doing for their parent companies anyways.

    The Aussie is right--this is an era of globalisation and you'd better get used to it. It is sad that the US, a country historically known for its pioneering spirit and innovation, has become more whiny, inward-looking and reactionary than the average country with respect to immigration. The US got where it is today beause of immigration from all over the world. It seems selfish in this day and age to expect the rest of the world shouldn't be able to benefit from immigration as well.

    Hey, if Darwin's theory works in nature expect it in the economy as well. The US will adapt or die. India and other developing nations have been closer to death and have simply started adapting faster. In the end it'll all even out--unless of course politics unduly interferes and fouls up the balance of things.

    1. Re:Who says you cant have a life... by GoofyBoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >Communications technology makes physical location nearly irrelevant.

      How are you going to raise a child through IM? How are you going to take care of your parents through ICQ?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    2. Re:Who says you cant have a life... by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

      You don't care for them through AIM and ICQ, you take your family with you--I was talking of having a social life. My cousin and her husband travelled the world with an infant...their son had been to 8 countries by the time he was two. Done right raising a family while travelling the globe makes them more open and tolerant of different cultures and ways of life.

      Some dorm-mates I had were "army-brats" and spent their entire childhood at bases all around the world. They were extremely smart and had an education superior to what one could obtain through the public systems in North America (those that took the International Baccuralate programme in high school seemed to handle 1st-year university work better than most).

    3. Re:Who says you cant have a life... by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >you take your family with you

      You can't drag your 80 year-old mother around the world everytime you change jobs.

      Ask your cousin if she rather prefer to raise their child moving to a new culture/country each year or staying in one neighbourhood until the child is 18.

      Ask any 12 year old if they want to leave their school/friends/way-of-life for some alien culture. Hell, try asking him to turn off the tv and clean his room for that matter, if you think child raising is so easy.

      >Done right raising a family while travelling the globe

      Anything is possible if "done right". Raising a family "right" is hard enough in a consistant environment.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    4. Re:Who says you cant have a life... by zzyzx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Being an army brat isn't the same thing.

      You have more of a support structure there. No matter where you go, you're going to have other families around with other people who speak the same language as you. You have a lot fewer safety issues both physical and cultural.

    5. Re:Who says you cant have a life... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Communications technology makes physical location nearly irrelevant."

      Really? So, uh, why are we discussing this 'nomadic' shit again? Seems you are stuck in a nice self-contradiction there, defending the crappy lifestyle with technology that makes it unnecassary in the first place?

    6. Re:Who says you cant have a life... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RRighttttttt..... so that's how them Indians in dear old America must be managing it.

      Fine white folk have no idea what non-whites go through, do they? bah! Yet another India story, and yet another transmogrification of /. into a klan meeting.

    7. Re:Who says you cant have a life... by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

      You can't drag your 80 year-old mother around the world everytime you change jobs.

      Who says you have to travel/live with your mother? You're a big boy now, and she might like the independence (you are assuming that 80 year-olds are frail and/or they need the constant care and attention of their children--not true). I know it's possibly a cultural thing, or perhaps a lot of /.ers live with their parents until they are that old. Not everyone will want to (or have to) travel the world of course.

      Ask your cousin if she rather prefer to raise their child moving to a new culture/country each year or staying in one neighbourhood until the child is 18.

      Actually they wouldn't mind at all. *I* wouldn't, but that's a personal preference.

      Ask any 12 year old if they want to leave their school/friends/way-of-life for some alien culture. Hell, try asking him to turn off the tv and clean his room for that matter, if you think child raising is so easy.

      What if that 12-year-old's life WAS about travelling and being in an "alien culture"? Ever talk to a kid who was home-schooled or educated in a foreign place who has had to adjust to the cruel culture-shock of American public school? Such a person might get quite restless in US Surburbia.

      I also don't recall stating anywhere that raising a child is easy. I didn't even suggest that someone with an already established family and home environment might even consider it appealing. In any case the most important consistency in a child's life is its parents and family. I'd say that a child who has the love and attention of its parents but moves all over the world is much better off than the kid who has lived in the same house his whole life but whose parents work 80 hour weeks at EA.

    8. Re:Who says you cant have a life... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know it's possibly a cultural thing, or perhaps a lot of /.ers live with their parents until they are that old.

      Its a "cultural thing" in America to ship granny off to the nursing home. All other cultures take in their eldery and live with them. Of course you probably already knew that (not!).

    9. Re:Who says you cant have a life... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All other cultures take in their eldery and live with them.

      Ehm... No. (And I'm not american...)

    10. Re:Who says you cant have a life... by underCat · · Score: 1

      I grew up moving around and I wouldn't trade it for the world. The only bad thing about it is that I don't understand people with your views. I don't see the "normality" of the homesteaded lifestyle. Not everyone grows up like Beaver Cleaver. And we don't miss it. A child's idea of normal is set according their environment. If that environment is constantly changing then change becomes the norm and they identify with it. I does change your perception of the world. I look at things differently than friends I have that grew up in one spot.

      That being said, I like to be around family on certain holidays. Today being one. Family also includes good friends made while moving around.

      I caution folks to not consider their idea of normal to be shared by all. Nor even consider it to be desirable.

      I'd love to work overseas but I have a really good job here right now. But if anyone knows of any opportunities in Spain... let's talk.

      --
      Sig? No, thanks. I don't smoke.
    11. Re:Who says you cant have a life... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah those are the fellas whose daughters grow up to be porn stars for havin a fucked up life..

    12. Re:Who says you cant have a life... by JohnwheeleR · · Score: 0

      Look, I don't agree with you-you FUCKING moron. Its stupid idiots like you preaching bullshit like "Globalism is Good" that miss the REAL point. Being, start your own damn corporation/small business/whatever you have to do to stop working as a two-bit fucking retard employee for someone else. That's the dream, that's the ticket, that's the big picture. Not travelling around the globe living like a fucking nerd talking to people over the internet.

    13. Re:Who says you cant have a life... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How are you going to take care of your parents through ICQ?

      Well, I was on ICQ once and I got talking with this guy about Pusher Robots and Shover Robots.

      They sound really promising, and I wouldn't have known about them if I didn't have ICQ - so there you go.
      PAK CHOOIE UNF.

    14. Re:Who says you cant have a life... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "adapt or die"

      What a cheap phrase, did you get that from a fortune cookie?!

  48. bedtime? by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

    Hey, I know! Let's post a story about India just before all the Indians go to bed!
    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    1. Re:bedtime? by cheeni · · Score: 1

      Damn straight - yet another India story, and yet another transmogrification of /. into a klan meeting. Actually I'm kinda suprised at the lack of venom in this page; it must be because the primary actors here are WHITE swiss kids.

      Exactly when did I begin to peg /. down as a racist cabal? Must have been around the time them India stories started to get noticed. No, this was well after /. had stopped being cool; the good people had left or actively lurked.

      Is it the relative anonymity of the web that causes these racist feelings to flow freely ?

      Where were the racist bigots on /. hiding when I lived in America ? Were they the ones with the polite plastic smiles that I could never figure out ?

      Globalization is good for you. I know I love America, and I love the countless Americans who are friends, bosom buddies, mentors, peers and even family (3 cousins to be exact are married to White Americans).

      I got to know first-hand what it feels like to be brown in a white country, but fortunately for those of you planning on moving to India, being non-brown is not a crime here.

      Welcome...

  49. I knew it!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just knew this will happen. Not that it will last, of course... The salaries and prices in first world will have to drop significally, as well as there will be some raises in Outsourcia, proportional to overall impact to their economies, then the balance will be more or less restored. In One World, you have One Rate. I for one welcome our (previously) rich coleagues into our world of cheap white collar workforce.

  50. Some data points... by baywulf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here are some more information based on people I know:

    I had 2 coworkers go back to their home country (China) because they find the opportunities are better there now. They both had green cards and stable employment here yet choose to go.

    I had 1 coworker who wanted to leve computer programming field because be belived the reward to work ratio was too low compared to many other professions.

    I know one guy who is in college and came with his parents and now has a green card. Yet the only computer science internship he could find was back in his home country for the summer.

    Another person who became a citizen here had an offer from work to start offshore office in his home country at roughly the same salary as here. Otherwise he could stay here and travel a lot. He choose to stay here are the rest of his family is accustomed to living here.

    I guess what we are seeing here is a kind of equilibrium mechanism. At one time all the good jobs were in the US (or "Western" contries in general) so there was a mad rush for people to get here. Now things have been shifting to be more equal and the migration is trickling the other way.

  51. Re:I'm an Australian troll ... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    God help you if you should get sick while over
    there working in India -- most Western medical
    plans will not cover your overseas "deployment".
    (Well, you could rely on the herbal remedies
    available locally -- just put enough money aside
    to have your body shipped home to Mum and Pop.)


    Actually, India is becoming somewhat of a medical tourist destination, you probably won't have to worry about medical bills and health insurance so much if you "self-insure" -- the health insurance companies don't seem to have their claws in the system over there like they do in the US so medicine is still reasonably affordable, especially for someone with a decent (indian) job.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  52. And where is Mumbai? by gosand · · Score: 1

    For those interested, Mumbai was formerly known as Bombay.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  53. On the road again... by adoll · · Score: 2, Interesting
    My 12 year engineering career has taken me to Australia, Chile, Indonesia, the USA and elsewhere in Canada. The only places I really didn't love to live in were Indonesia and California (no offense, y'all).

    I'm presently on the move from Alberta to British Columbia for work, so yes, migration can also happen without leaving your own country. There has always been a place for mobile professionals in the world -- in the 1800s they were explorers, fur traders and mercenaries, in the 1900s they were generally business men, and in the 2000s they are engineers and exotic dancers.

    -AD

    1. Re:On the road again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever sat down and calculated the monetary loss from the constant moving, as well as the personal difficulties of moving so much (imagine a wife and kids, if you don't have any?) Not to mention the health effects?
      I thought the human race went ahead and worked out technology so we DON'T have to live like our ancestors?
      (Oh, and I like the comparison of engineers to exotic dancers. In today's reality, there's not much difference between a whore and an engineer.)

  54. Re:No Way by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And Buddhists are worse than Mormons, Scientologists, or Jehovah's Witnesses? I can't recall the last time a Buddhist knocked on my door trying to save my soul from reincarnation as a worm, a bird, or some other lower form of life like, say, you.

    Actually, an Indian engineer gets about $20K starting salary. Given the prices of things in India, that's about the equivalent of a $50K salary. You can't buy a hummer on that salary, but you wouldn't WANT one in Indian city traffic. My friend Sumit has a tiny little car, and even so, one of us had to get out to STOP TRAFFIC so we could get through.

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  55. Working vacation? by Thimble · · Score: 1

    Now if only they would outsource IT jobs to Bali, I'd be jumping on a plane...

  56. Birds of a feather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's sad to know that there are american BIRDS MIGRATING to warmer waters in the Indies.

    What will be really sad is when PEOPLE begin to EMMIGRATE to other countries in search of work. Because it has been the IMMIGRATION of forigners to America that has kept this country strong for so long.

    (sarcasm intended)

  57. Definition of "globalisation" by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

    (from dictionary.com)

    globalisation

    n : growth to a global or worldwide scale

    It doesn't say anything about exploitation of developing nations. The word is mis-used by way too many people.

    The (Canadian) city where I live hosted a big international summit some time ago. Protesters staged continual demonstrations about the evils of "Globalisation" (peaceful ones to their credit). Literally the majority of these protesters came from outside Canada, from the US and all over Europe. Was it lost on them that they were participating in the GLOBALISATION of their protest movement?

    Globalisation is inevitable...there is NOTHING that can or should be done to stop it. What is important is that you make your voice heard and be an active participant in the process. I may not have agreed with everything the protesters had to say (and am amused at their use of the word) but I applaud them for making their views known and doing it peacefully.

    As for going to live in 3rd world countries it seems that in most cases skilled workers (both native and immigrant) are actually treated quite well. They pay is only mediocre by western standards. The quality of life is on par with middle class America. Housing is cheap or free and the employer provides free transportation to and from the office. I'd say that's changing people's attitudes alright--their views of globalisation are becoming more favourable.

    1. Re:Definition of "globalisation" by computational+super · · Score: 1
      in most cases skilled workers (both native and immigrant) are actually treated quite well

      Hehe - that might make it worth the trip. As somebody with a four-year degree in computer science (currently pursuing a master's degree in the same) and 10 years experience desigining and implementing software, it might be an interesting change of pace to live in an environment where I'm actually considered skilled rather than treated consistently like a lego piece that can be replaced with little or no impact. In America (at least in the last three or four years), professional programmers are generally treated with slightly less respect than drug addicts who live in burned-out tenement buildings. At least they get their weekends off.

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
  58. The Workers are in for a Big Surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Unlike the USA and the rest of the West, Indian labor laws generally do not protect the rights of workers. Further, the quality of life in India is atrocious. Imagine what life was like in 1950 Japan. 2004 India is worse than 1950 Japan.

    That some starry eyed Westerners have gone to India to work is not a trend. They are there due to the novelty of the situation. It hits us all at times.

    Once the novelty wears off, they will be on the first plane back to the West. The place that is worse than India is China.

  59. Oh well, no jobs for me! by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From what I can tell, this is just call center stuff for the 20-somethings, not an opportunity for middle age coders, sysadmins, and DBAs. Too bad, I'd love to go to India.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:Oh well, no jobs for me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who told you that shit?

  60. Re:outsourcing of radiolologists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    state governments are not intrigued by anyone living in another state, let alone another country, and not paying taxes on income earned in another country. hence, radiologists working in India and reading a CT scan from Ohio have to be licensed in Ohio. certainly there are some overnight film reading services in India doing low fee temporary readings, but they are hired by radiology groups in the US to provide stop-gap non-final interpretations so that the docs in the US can get some sleep. there is no wholesale outsourcing of american radiology to India. This has been grossly overstated.

  61. We Can Only Hope by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    > Is this the first wave of the much anticipated
    > reverse-migration which will be a hallmark of
    > the 21st century?

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  62. Re:I'm an Australian troll ... by Jakosa · · Score: 1

    With that much angst, I can understand why you dont't go to India.

  63. hell ya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate the western monothiest values of war, greed and gluttony so if I can get an acceptable standard of living working in the east I will jump at the opportunity!

  64. Re:outsourcing of radiolologists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    certainly there are some overnight film reading services in India doing low fee temporary readings, but they are hired by radiology groups in the US to provide stop-gap non-final interpretations so that the docs in the US can get some sleep. there is no wholesale outsourcing of american radiology to India. This has been grossly overstated.

    SPIN it! Woowoowoowoo

  65. arrogant western countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If India plays this right they could easily become a world power while the arrogant western countries slowly slide down the tubes.

    I would say ths in inevitable. Too much fat management here to do the job.

    Outsourcers have one big advantage to locals, they get to charge for what the customer asks for which gives a false slant and perception to the mess. Most north american I/T shops do not charge the business units for service so are viewed as an unneccessary expense.

    The wool gets pulled off when the outsourcer comes back with the cost and a contract. Often forcing the irrational business types to get real with their requests, often not going for the extra service.

    Smart CIO/CTO/CEOs ask the business for the cost benefits and not just "service" without the costing.

  66. Re:A Shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    this is so bogus I dont know where to begin. evidentally you have never seen the images that radiologists read these days. modern multi-detector CT scanners have resolutions to .4 mm, are multiplanar, and show 3-D reconstructions immediately. they scan the body entirely in 20 seconds. they can be assessed around the world in a matter of a few seconds. modern MR is evolving just as quicklyl, with multichannel processing. I can only assume that this writer has no knowledge of radiology at all. yes, I can sit in New Delhi and read a study from Chicago, and via voice dictation, provide an answer in minutes. but as I stated, it is a matter of licensing and taxing, not image quality.

  67. Different struggles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Folks

    The 'developing' countries have different struggles compared to the western 'developed' countries. Any reasonable software engineer in a developing country like India can afford a chauffeur, and a full time maid. Sounds like luxury. But few there can afford a car for the chauffeur to drive, or a house for the maid to take care of...

    In US, a developer can buy a Corolla for 6 month's worth of salary. In India, it would be 4 year's worth of salary to get a watered down Corolla.

    For a US citizen, it is easy to complain about lack of job security in the US, but for an Indian Citizen it is difficult to relax with a roof over your head in India.

    For someone who has seen one side of the coin, it is easy to take positions. However, life mostly remains the same everywhere - Keep running, and still stand in the same place...!

    1. Re:Different struggles by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Housing isn't so terrible over in India. I know of someone over there who has a 2 bedroom apartment to themself. I forgot how much it cost exactly, but it was just about 1/3 of what they brought home each month. Sounds a bit pricy at first, but not that different from what the rent is in the US for many cities.

      Cars are a different matter. My old Nissan is worth about $1000 here in the states. If that same car was over in India, it would be worth... about $1000. The difference is, over there $1000 is a lot of money! Atleast in the US when you spend a significant portion of your income on a car, you'll probably get something fairly new and [hopefully] reliable.

    2. Re:Different struggles by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      Atleast in the US when you spend a significant portion of your income on a car, you'll probably get something fairly new and [hopefully] reliable.
      Oh, the car market is booming in India lately. We're building (or trying to build) some heavy-duty highways across the country, so all those noveau-riche types need something to spend on.
  68. I disagree by Stone316 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I would have to say that Americans have a stronger sense of family than other countries.. Look at their thanksgiving weekend.... Airports, train stations, etc are packed with travellers. Up in in Canada we can't say the same thing.

    Many people live a fair distance from their families, myself included.. I'm willing to move for work but i'm not willing to traverse continents.. The further you live from Family the less you see them.. IM, emailing or talking on the phone isn't the same as being there with them. You miss out on ALOT of stuff.. If you don't agree with that then you don't have a sense of family or you haven't live away from them long enough to realize.

    I've lived away from home for 7 years now.. and I miss it more and more each day... I've missed so much i'm afraid i'm going to regret it down the road.. i'm already starting to regret it now.

    --
    "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
    1. Re:I disagree by Ironsides · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Many people live a fair distance from their families, myself included.

      I wonder if Europeans sometimes don't grasp the distances that some people in the US live away from their relatives. Aside from my parents, my closest relatives are 800 miles (1300km) away. Given that (judging from a quick look at a map of europe) No european country is that long in any dimension, that is farther than anyone probably has to travel. Usually the only time I've been able to see them is at Christmass. If we lived half as far away we could see them a lot more often due to the time involved in travel.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    2. Re:I disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I would have to say that Americans have a stronger sense of family than other countries.

      That's the biggest sack of shit I have heard all week.

      Look at their thanksgiving weekend.... Airports, train stations, etc are packed with travellers. Up in in Canada we can't say the same thing.

      Which planet did you come from? Thanksgiving is an american holiday.

    3. Re:I disagree by speed-sf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, seeing as more people live in the state of California or New York than all of Canada it makes sense when the Airports/Train Stations/etc are packed. Besides, thanksgiving between the two coutries is wildly different. Compare Christmas, that would be more realistic. Per capita travel is likely very close. Tis about perspective.

      --
      All your database are belong to us
    4. Re:I disagree by jwdb · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I would have to say that Americans have a stronger sense of family than other countries

      Sorry, but unless you can back this up I'm gonna have to disagree, having lived in America and Europe. Thanksgiving is actually proof of a weak sense of family - it says they need a national holiday as excuse before they can do something together. For the rest of year, people pretty live individually, most noticable in the fact that many American families don't even eat dinner together.

      I have quite the involved family here in Belgium. If I'm at home, I'll eat with my family (which is every weekend). I'll stop by at one uncle's for breakfast, then spend the evening at another's place. We have two family reunions every year, and my grandparents regularly have big dinner parties, especially if it's their birthday.

      If I don't see a family member for two weeks, that's already a long time...

      I got nothing against the Americans - hell, I'm moving back there next year - but they do not have a strong sense of family at all, due to the individualistic culture.

      Jw

    5. Re:I disagree by Rie+Beam · · Score: 1

      Ah, but why don't you just move back then? That's one of the ironies in this - people flocking to see their familes and loved-ones, but then getting back on that plane a few days later to travel as far as possible away from them.

    6. Re:I disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      >>No european country is that long in any dimension

      Norway.
      I live 1600km ++ from my parents and family. ;-(

      And YES distance matters:
      -Your mother can not make food for you.
      -Friends can't "just come over".
      -Traveling takes time and money.
      -I live in a sometimes totally diffeent world when it comes to economy, food, weather, social life, job oppurtunities etc.

    7. Re:I disagree by zzyzx · · Score: 1

      Probably the planet that has a Canadian Thanksgiving holiday in October.

    8. Re:I disagree by Tripster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Funny thing that family stuff.

      I moved to Canada with my father and stepmom back in 1980 from Scotland, leaving behind my mother and a few siblings.

      I haven't seen them since then, I have communicated with my mom a bit but we don't really keep in steady contact of any sort.

      Of course this seperation not only from my real mom but also from the rest of our extended family has really left me with little sense of family life at all.

      Right now I live in a different province than my dad, they are 1000km from me. I talk to them on the phone maybe every other month. They recently came to visit my wife and I, first time they had been here in 4 years. I have been to visit them once in the last 10 years.

      My sense of family togetherness is all but gone, I spend little time with my wife's family too and they have a hard time understanding that it isn't them but me as I just don't get into family functions that much. Likely because I all but stopped having them at 13 when we moved here.

      Do I miss it? Sure, but at the same time I realize life goes on, I realize I need to fend for myself through life anyway. Then again, my dad was never all that supportive, he was never the type I could turn to if I needed help financially, etc.

      My wife's parents on the other hand are the complete opposite. They would help in an instant if we asked. She talks to them daily, etc.

    9. Re:I disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your single anecdote makes a compelling case.

      Wait, no.

    10. Re:I disagree by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

      Which planet did you come from? Thanksgiving is an american holiday.

      One on which American *families* get together to enjoy their time off, enjoy each others' company, and maybe even celebrate the discovery of the American land.

    11. Re:I disagree by SimonInOz · · Score: 1

      No, Americans have less of a family sense than other countries.
      Americans are weird compared with - say - Europeans. During their life they generally move several times - often vast differences. Europeans - in general - do not. They usually stay at least in the same city, often the same neighbourhood.

      So when Americans try to have a family meeting (once a year - wow!) you need to travel a lot (Hank has to come over from CA, Joe comes up from Texas and so on - why didn't they all just stay in NYC?).

      Why? They had to move for work. Why? Well, it's because America is obsessed with fear, money and power - they are fairly uninterested in making life better (for anyone, let alone employees) when they (or at least the powerful) can just force them to do what is convenient. [And as you mostly just voted for George Bush, you can look forward to a lot more of pushing people about - and being pushed. Enjoy!].

      --
      "Cats like plain crisps"
    12. Re:I disagree by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Sweden is certainly a lot longer than that - and n0ot unusual for people from the north to move south for university or work. Also, it is becoming more and more common for people to work in other European countries, living even farther from their families.

      This distance pissing contest is moot, however, beyond a certain distance. As soon as you live far enough that airplane is the only reasonably quick way to close the distance (perhaps 1000km, depending on the available alternatives), it doesn't really matter much how far you live until you start changing continents. And that only becomes a factor due to the cost of travel, not the time as such.

      I can say I have almost the same amount of contact with my parents when I live in Japan as when I lived in southern Sweden. In some ways more, as we tend to call more often, rather than wait for infrequent visits.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    13. Re:I disagree by Stone316 · · Score: 1
      Ok, who modded this insightful? Last time I checked Belgium is like the size of Vermont! You go for a drive and your in another country! You can't compare families in tiny European countries to the states. Alot of family are spread apart by hundreds/thousands of miles so they can't have a weekly family dinner parties.

      Same up here in Canada, unless you grew up in a major centre chances are you moved for work. The majorty of people I went to school with are either spread across Canada and into the states. Not by choice, i'm sure alot of them would rather live closer at home.. At least 90% of the people that I know up here would like to move back.

      You don't need a national holiday to be with your family but as I said before if you live in another part of the country its great opportunity to get back for a visit. The idea behind Thanksgiving is why so many people travel for that holiday... Maybe it means nothing to you...

      --
      "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
    14. Re:I disagree by Stone316 · · Score: 1
      I'd love to move back closer to my family.. Are you willing to employ me? No? Should I work at McD's and shop at thrift stores for my kids clothes? No? Yes?

      There are many reasons why people move away and the big one is work. I'd love to move back to where i'm from but the economy is very weak. Its one of the few provinces were the population is decreasing.

      --
      "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
    15. Re:I disagree by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      FYI, generalizing about Americans like that is just as stupid as other generalizations. I know a LOT of people with whom I interact daily who spent today with both sides of their family in the same day. In many of those cases, every single member of the extended family attended.

      Keep in mind that there are 300 million people in the US and we have some of the widest ranges of diversity of anywhere on earth. In many communities, Americans do exactly what your European examples do: live in the same city for their entire lives. Oftentimes, these roots go back several generations. Except for my little pocket of family and a few here and there, my extended family (my grandparents, mother's 5 brothers, father's 3 brothers and their entire families (including children and, now grandchildren) totaling well over 100 people all still live in the same county that my great-grandparents immigrated to 100 years ago. Their children attend the same schools that they did, work the same farms they did and share in regular meals and gatherings together.

      The vast majority of Americans are NOT obsessed with fear, money and power. They just want to live their lives (pretty much like people the whole world over).

      Also, to equate George Bush's policies with the desires of the American people (given that only 1/3 of the population even voted and only 51% of those voted for Bush, and a significant percentage of those didn't do so enthusiastically, putting the real "mandate" at closer to 18%) is ignorant.

      How about this? I won't make gross assumptions about Europeans based only on the news I read and the things I see on TV and the Europeans who come here and you stop believing that Thanksgiving is the first time this year that all 300 million of us suddenly realized we have a family and frantically ran all over the country to find them. Please don't be simple.

    16. Re:I disagree by SimonInOz · · Score: 1

      "Please don't be simple" ... how can I help it? - I'm called Simon

      --
      "Cats like plain crisps"
    17. Re:I disagree by Rie+Beam · · Score: 1

      Yes, but considering the sheer amount of people who move around during the holidays, I take it that the job supply isn't dwindling in over half the nation.

    18. Re:I disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe families in America are closer than those in the UK or Canada or other 1st world nations (though I bet that would vary by state and on who was arguing)...

      But America's families are NOT closer than families in India or China. Obviously not, if you know any Asian people at all or have any interest in that region of the world. And those two countries make up close to half the earth's population. Sorry, but American families are absolutely frigid to each other even compared to South America. The question is: who keeps modding YOU insightful?

    19. Re:I disagree by jwdb · · Score: 1

      And what about your own family then? I wasn't only referring to the extended, but to the nuclear too. Before I started college, I ate at home almost every evening, chatted with my parents, ignored the phone... The only one of my friends who did likewise were 1st generation Americans. For the rest, it was eat when you're hungry, maybe with the family but probably without.

      It doesn't take much effort, but I met very few people who were willing to do even that. It may seem insignificant, but when is the family otherwise ever together?

      Jw

    20. Re:I disagree by Zilquis · · Score: 1
      I was in Norway recently and was quite surprised when i got told if you turn Norway upside down it would reach all the way to Rome. Made me realise just how long it is.

      Norway was a fantastic place to go

    21. Re:I disagree by pyota · · Score: 1

      stonger sense of family? then why have they got the higest divorce rate?

      imho americans have got it all wrong. the indispensible college education burys everyone in debt before they even start their career .. they then work like dogs for the rest of their days, trying to meet a zillion interest payments while paltry holidays allow only for brief conjugal visits. meanwhile, they are oblivious to the orwellian police state they reside in, as they are constantly plugged in to the state run media, but still think they are land of the free.

  69. It's not about saving money by Whiteout · · Score: 1

    With the disparity between incomes in developed and developing countries, of course it doesn't make sense to try to save money in a developing country with short-term work (though I wouldn't be surprised if is some money to be made somewhere). That's not the point. The point is to live in and experience a country and pay your way while you're there. Think VSO or it's US equivalent, Peace Corps; think work-for-accomodation in backpackers' hostels around the world, and so on. There's an awful lot more to life than money.

    By the way, there's very good health care available in India if your not desperately poor. Otherwise, there's plain old travel insurance to cover repatriation.

    1. Re:It's not about saving money by militiaMan · · Score: 0

      Give me your money if you really don't think it is important. Really.

  70. Westerners in Bangalore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will be going on a postdoc to Bangalore in the coming months. It would be fun to meet some westerners while staying there. Where do the westerners in Bangalore hang out? What should I do to meet these people? :)

  71. Bad Math - You have doubled booked the profits. by dwalsh · · Score: 2, Informative

    You are counting the 10X factor twice, and multiplying them. This is wrong.

    Look at it from the point of view of one country or the other, not both.

    Let's say the guy arrives back to India and compares his lot with the European, who is about to leave. He has saved 10 times as much as the European. End of story.

    --
    ${YEAR+1} is going to be the year of Linux on the desktop!
    1. Re:Bad Math - You have doubled booked the profits. by jonbryce · · Score: 3, Informative

      Lets demonstrate with some figures.

      Indian goes to America, and earns $50,000 per year for two years. He spends $25,000 per year on his living costs, so when he returns to India, he has $50,000 in the bank.

      American goes to India, and earns $5,000 per year for two years. He spends $2,500 per year on his living costs, so when he returns to America, he has $5,000 in the bank.

      Now lets look at the Indian. He is now living in India with $50,000, which the equivalent of ten years salary in the bank. That is a pretty reasonable sum of money. You are well on your way to being able to retire on that.

      What about the American. He is now living in America with $5,000 in the bank. That is the equivalent of about 5 weeks salary. Enough to cover fluctuations in his outgoings and prevent him from going overdrawn. Probably better than a lot of people, but nothing spectacular.

    2. Re:Bad Math - You have doubled booked the profits. by bilsaysthis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your figures ignore the taxes that, at least in the US, will be deducted as withholding from salary. $50k after US and state (esp. California and NY where so many Indian workers are located) surely comes to less than $35k net and so the savings end up much lower. Then again, H1-b is usually closer to six years than two.

    3. Re:Bad Math - You have doubled booked the profits. by jonbryce · · Score: 2, Informative

      True. It is the same in India, and pretty much every where else in the world.

      Lets just say that the tax was part of the living costs. The point of the illustration was to show that the grandparent was right to say that the Indian would be 100x better off than the American / European. Even if you add tax as an additional expense, the figures still work.

    4. Re:Bad Math - You have doubled booked the profits. by wolfdvh · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You are quite right, except for the young euro or american kid looking for a bit of adventure those are not the destinations.

      If you look at the real ex-pat community, you find them in exotic but different places, where instead of earning less they earn much more than their "home" wages. Until recently that meant some wealthy arab emmerate where unless you lived in a company 50's style compound with you family your social life wasn't so great but after a few years you could return with ten years western wages saved.

      The current analog for the western working class would be those folks from Mississippi or Liverpool working as a civilian contractors in Iraq. Not much of a life while they are there but if they survive, they will come home with several years wages in the bank.

    5. Re:Bad Math - You have doubled booked the profits. by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      I know of one person who when to Iraq enticed by the prospect of large quantities of tax free cash. I think it was something like GBP15,000 per month.

      After having his car bombed three times in the space of one month, he decided that no amount of money was worth the the very real risk of being killed.

      As he returned without spending a full tax year out of the country, he had to pay UK tax on his earnings. He now earns about GBP25,000 per year, and pays tax on that.

    6. Re:Bad Math - You have doubled booked the profits. by timpaton · · Score: 3, Funny
      American goes to India, and earns $5,000 per year for two years. He spends $2,500 per year on his living costs, so when he returns to America, he has $5,000 in the bank...What about the American. He is now living in America with $5,000 in the bank.

      How about:

      American goes to India and earns $5000 per year for two years. That makes him rich beyond the wildest dreams of his Indian peers. He lives like a king for $4,000 per year living costs, pisses another $500 per year up the wall on who knows what, and has $1000 left for his ticket home. He arrives home with the same bank balance as when he left, a big grin, and a hell of a lot of good stories...

    7. Re:Bad Math - You have doubled booked the profits. by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Probably true, except that I guess you can live like a king for $2,500.

      Your housing, food, and travel to work are paid for by the employer, so basically anything you spend is going to be on enjoying yourself.

      If you have the purchasing power equivalent of $25,000 to spend on parties, you are going to have a pretty good time.

  72. Re:A Shame by GuyZero · · Score: 1

    Awesome. Why would someone post this anon though, as it's unlikely anyone will see you telling me how full of shit I am.

    Not that I'm doing it on purpose - the number of radiologists working with ye shitte olde x-ray is probably two orders of magnitude higher than your multi-detector CT scanner, so my point isn't entirely bogus.

  73. Re:I'm an Australian troll ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm certain that that expensive "Western" college education that you borrowed money to get...

    I believe you just put your finger, perhaps unwittingly, on the big problem with Americans and globalization: Americans have to pay a ton for their education, putting them in debt right from the start, whereas in most of the world, the education is heavily subsidized by the government. So while the rest can get educated then move to any other country that fits their lifestyle, the educated Americans are restricted to a few wealthy countries, at least until they pay off their huge debts.

  74. Re:No Way by gabbarbhai · · Score: 1

    India is not Buddhist, unfortunately.. Thankfully, though, it is a secular state -- no mixing of temple and state, if you don't know what I'm talking about.. we can talk about why I think this is still true some other time. There are pockets of insanity here and there, but that's also a bit off topic here.

  75. one apple does make a bushel by westlake · · Score: 1
    With an influx of smart westerners how long do you think India will stay a third world country? They're getting all the jobs from those western countries while the best workers from the western countries flee to India in order to have jobs. If India plays this right they could easily become a world power while the arrogant western countries slowly slide down the tubes.

    60% of Indian workers are employed in subsistence agriculture, 23% in services.

    The educated elite has gained a thin slice of the high-tech pie. But that has not translated into the kind of broad based economic development that would take the masses out of poverty.

    1. Re:one apple does make a bushel by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Not yet, but they're aggressively moving into the market. If they play things right they'll bootstrap their entire economy. This won't absolutely happen but it's obvious that they are making an effort to make it happen. It's definately something that the rest of the world should keep in mind when we're setting our policies.

      Malaysia, India, China, etc are hungry and they're entering the technical industry at a point where they can cover more ground faster for not having all the baggage that most western powers have. Sometimes it's easier to start from a clean slate than to try to improve an already working system.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  76. Ah, so it DOES work! =) by Vthornheart · · Score: 1

    Haha, while everyone else has been working on increasing their skills to appeal to the remnant American market, I've been learning to develop a taste for curry-based products! India, here I come!!! ;)

    --
    -Vendal Thornheart
  77. MOD PARENT UP by arhar · · Score: 0

    Someone, please, mod parent informative

  78. Anti-Americanism at Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What kind of crap is that? What justified your bigoted cheap shot at all Americans? The parent poster was Australian, there were no American-centric comments in the thread.

    Well, anything to get a cheap shot at Americans, I guess.

    1. Re:Anti-Americanism at Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was replying in general to all the comments (from presumably American Slashdotters) saying "Travel sucks, why would you want to".

  79. Become pen-pals with a Malmo muslim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, go to Malayasia a muslim country and see how much you like Sharia law. Maybe you can become penpals with one of the muslims who are taking over the Swedish city of Malmo.

    1. Re:Become pen-pals with a Malmo muslim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually in Malaysia only muslims have to follow sharia so if you aren't muslim you can do what you like...although finding alchohol or porn could be tricky.

      I wouldn't move to even a relatively moderate muslim country like malayasia though. In a country of hundreds of millions theres bound to be more than a couple islamo-kooks looking to blow up westerners.

      Move to a buddhist country instead.

    2. Re:Become pen-pals with a Malmo muslim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apart from a part in the North, Malaysia is a very moderate Muslim nation.

      No chance of Sharia law there.

  80. Re:A Shame by Minkey+Brines · · Score: 1

    "The meaning of the word computer has changed but has always lagged behind the capabilities of machines in use at the time. The word was originally used to describe a person who performed arithmetic calculations and this usage is still valid."

    Computer operators?

  81. Re:A Shame by mordors9 · · Score: 1

    The only good thing about outsourcing to India was the potential to raise the lives of Indians. It is a country of somewhere around a billion people. Many areas with abject poverty. So now we are not going to educate Indians, we are not going to hire Indians, we are not going to put all of that money into the Indian economy. Instead the only benefit to the Indians might be some small amount of increase in servicing the Euros that come to India to take those jobs on a temporary basis. Taking any high tech skills they might have learned away. Taking any money they have saved out of the economy. That really seem to be a shame.

  82. development and impact by Vspiritas · · Score: 0

    * big corps&owners make more money outsourcing to india
    with the excuse that it is a necessity to growth and profitability
    * layoffs
    * no jobs at home
    * prices are too high to survive on welfare
    * move to india
    * get job in india
    * market at home decreases
    * big corps&owners make less money
    * big corps&owners export to india
    * home corps gets global eternal patents for everything
    * india corps serve alternatives to home corps
    * lots of conflicts

    its another example of the concentration of wealth and power by exploiting those with lesser means.. those without means and power at home and away.

    conclusion
    * we understand why lobbyism in Washington for IP control&business is increasing in popularity. its a necessity for the big corps to survive or their outsourcing business model is flawed and it will be like pissing in pants during wintertime.

    history
    * the emperial exploitation of third world countries for resources and stolen workers/slaves legalized in the name of modern capitalism.

    concern
    * we are in for a major conflict cause while capitalism is good it has its flaws like any system when they are evolved into extremes.

    disclaimer
    * I admit this scenario is incomplete, much more parameters needs to be included to minimize inaccuracy.

    final note
    * the top 1% gets richer at the rest can emigrate to somewhere else where they can live a better live.*1

    notes
    1 solution is pending, resolution is inevitable.*2
    2 so be it.

    1. Re:development and impact by Vspiritas · · Score: 0

      * one would only dare doing so, being of the impression that their economical expansion are protected by forces of military power that are second to none. * like organized crime. * the world order is out of balance.

    2. Re:development and impact by militiaMan · · Score: 0

      I think your 100% correct. The U.S. will soon lose its over powering military force by doing one of the following: 1. It will be reduced by U.S. slowing its tech development in relation to the rest of the world. For example, U.S. puts out 60k engineers per year while 30k are U.S. born, and China and India have 300k each. U.S. tech advantage will be small enough in 5-10 years that India and China will become real military competitors, and exceed the U.S. in 20-25 years. 2. The U.S. will use all of its military power to keep what it has by taking out Iran, North Korea, and all other non-Democractic countries and making OPEC its bitch starting with Iraq. Since Democractic countries have a hard time fighting long wars they will make sure that even with inferior military power they can control things with the Green back. Well, until another dictator pops up and starts clobbering everyone, but they don't seem to care. To bad it's already to late to stop the train. If I ran things I would reduce taxation, Stop redistribution of wealth, Reduce regulation, and other things to give the U.S. science, math, and engineering people a chance to make real money like Indian Computer Scientist. Oh well. South America is looking pretty good right now.

  83. Re:I'm an Australian troll ... by phatStrat · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nevermind that in Canada (land of free health care plagued by long wait times), people are starting to setup surgery-tourist packages to Indian hospitals, all-expenses paid including hotel, 1-month of follow up and a tour for something stupid like $5,000.

    Apparently the hospitals that rich people in India go to are world-class and offer care at 1/10th the cost.

    So I wouldn't rule out India's health care system so quickly.

  84. No way in hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry, but this is a complet bullshit. Maybe that happend to 2 or 3 persons, but why would they hire someone from EU to do outsourced job when they can have the same for less over there?

    Who posted this is either trying to start a flamewar or wants to make India look good.

    Move on now

  85. It's not "reverse migration" by lxt · · Score: 1

    ...it's "migration". Migration is defined as a move from one area to another, for at least one year (anything else being classed as "other" - holiday, sabbatical, gap year etc.). There is no such thing as reverse migration.

    To say so implies that by migrating, people are moving from a poorer country to a richer one (ie, from India to the US). That's not the case at all - migrating can be forced, can be voluntary, can be from an LEDC to an MEDC, from an MEDC to an LEDC...there's no "set" rule.

    1. Re:It's not "reverse migration" by shonagon53 · · Score: 1

      "Reverse migration" is a sociological term, indicating the reversal of reasons for migration from one to another culture. A "host culture" has certain elements which attract immigrants (e.g. the West has political freedom, and great salaries). When a few of these elements in the host culture get eroded, and these same elements become attractive in the "home culture", the effect is that not only the immigrants may decide to return, but that people from the "host culture" follow them along and become immigrants themselves. It's quite a well established sociological concept.

  86. depends.... by dep01 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    do the chicks there put out for white, geeky american guys? if so, then i'd consider a career in India.

    --
    "hey, could you pass me a paper towel? er.. I mean... DEPLOY ABSORBTION PANEL!"
    1. Re:depends.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, anyone have an answer to this one? I am curious too. Although I have no marketable skills anyway. So I'm pretty much stuck in my country.

    2. Re:depends.... by The+MESMERIC · · Score: 1, Funny

      good news and bad news:

      bad news: sex only after marriage.

      good news: the father will actually pay in gold - for you to marry his daughter.

      India - love it or loathe it but never indifferent.

      mere nam Mesmeric hai

    3. Re:depends.... by 4naxnt · · Score: 2, Informative

      In general, the place is conservative. An american guy, I know worked in Hyderabad for 8 months, saved a bundle but was very frustrated in the dating department. His outlet was bi-monthly visit to Bangkok. Banglore, apparently, is a bit more progessive on this scene. But I suspect, not helluva lot.

  87. Re:A Shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    simply aren't enough radiologists being trained to meet demands in the US & Canada

    That you can blame on the health system. In the 4th year of medical school, people apply for which field of medicine they want to specialize in, and go on interviews and such, and then on a magical spring day all the results are announced simultaneously, it's called "match day". Radiology is a very popular field right now, because of a combination of good lifestyle (You don't work 80 hour weeks with nights on call as a radiologist), and good pay, combined with a relatively short residency period. However, there are only a specific number of slots for radiology residencies, a limited number of hospitals do radiology residencies, and they only have a few slots apeice. Competition for these spots is insane, and many people who apply for one don't get one. If we need more radiologists, it's not because we don't have doctors who aren't interested in the field, but from the lack of training programs.

  88. Not completely a bed or roses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd just like to add a personal experience that probably occurs more often than is reported.

    I consulted for a company that outsourced all their development to India. Luckily my work didn't end up outsourced. After about eight months of effort, the development group in India was fired and the work was brought back and done internally.

    The problems:

    - Deadlines were constantly missed.
    - Significant effort managing remote development
    - Concerns regarding intelectual property

    They had to ramp up local development after wasting eight months of precious time, all for the lure of saving some cash.

    The funny part is that the management bozo who cooked up the scheme still has his job. Go figure...

    1. Re:Not completely a bed or roses by The+MESMERIC · · Score: 0

      That's nothing

      An ISP in England is now on the verge of bankrupcy because they outsourced to India.
      What a bunch of idiots lol.

      India: Lovely people - but crap technicians.

  89. They *are* by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    No URL for it, but a local TV station (KRON 4) had a segment on the news about that last night and some of the privacy issues.

    Yes, lawyers are being outsourced. Patent law work and legal work needing engineering/technical backgrounds is being outsourced to India as well.

    1. Re:They *are* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah, "KRON".
      News once a night, every night!
      Film at 0,23,*,*,*

      la la la flanders sucks like the lameness filter

  90. stragey by hkht · · Score: 0

    the strategy for hiring foreign nationals to service their home nations is also a way for these companies to make "deeper" inroads in to more industries. with "natives" on staff, indian ceos can get a better inside track since all the nuances of language are no longer problem. guess with a poplulation of over a billion, there definitley will be enough coders to handle all the new business they will be getting. anyone can do the coding, but not everyone knows how particular businesses or organizations functions in other nations. have those people from those nations working for u will know eventually know what u didn't. business will just get better for these big game hunters on safari, except these days it's not some european with a bunch of servants riding on a an elephant looking for a bengal tiger, it's indian high tech business wiz's laying down the roads for their future empire.

  91. lame PR move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just a lame PR move by the Indian companies. Now they can say, "Look we're not stealing your jobs. If you want to take a huge pay cut, move down here!"

  92. Little Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like some other people here, I live in the United States. I have watched the cost of everything go up and up and up. I have watched salaries drop while those prices still go up. I have watched people I respect become what equates to slaves for game companies like EA, etc. Then I have a thought.

    What I think would be interesting is if one could develop what I would call pods. These "pods" would almost be like a society within a society. Within the pod, you have a small housing development, you have a small company where members of the housing development work, and a less expensive method for living is developed. For example, a great deal of the food would be grown within the pod. Perhaps some alternative source of electricity could be deployed. Small private schools could be formed. Continuing education centers for adults could be developed....etc. By mixing commericial and residential zoning a bit, you could also do away with cars for the most part. Perhaps one family or individual within the pod has a bus or something and acts as the transit system for the pod. Goods generated by work done within the pod may be sold outside the pod. Largely, the pod would function within itself on bartering. There would still be need for items from the outside world though. For example, within the farming core of the pod, people just farm. But those people have needs as well. So cash generated from the corporation within the pod could be used to trade food for clothes for example. People work to live rather than work to be wealthy doing what they love...

    You find people who just love to farm and bring them in, you have people who just love to code...you bring them in. People who just want to do this for a living and really don't care about wealth...but are more interested in living a quality life rather than quantity, and having the freedom to pursue things in addition to work (furthering ones education for example...it should be a lifelong process).

    The key concept is to keep the cost of living down within the pod to compete with globalization from our own backyard. Yet, work a 40 hour or so work week like a normal human being in the process. A small Utopia within a insane world. Perhaps some will call that communism or something of that nature. I think there ought to be a way for people who don't really care about wealth to do what they love doing in this country. It's getting so that is becoming no longer a option though. But nobody is really doing anything to stop that from happening either.

    1. Re:Little Idea by militiaMan · · Score: 0

      http://www.freestateproject.org/ This is similar to what you stated. I expect country shopping virtual or real to become very important for the educated. I for one would love to live in a country with more freedom of speech and right to bears arms to a point that far exceeds others views. I would like to start a website dedicated to helping people find their country of choice virtual or real without so much guess work. Although, I expect visas, checkpoints, and gestapos too reduce the ability of free travel. I hope that the U.S. will remove the line it added in 1978 to the oath required for a passport that requires you to denounce the 2nd amendment. I am unable to honestly take the oath, and feel imprisoned. I could be considerably worse though. I could just be shot for saying such things in some countries.

  93. Re:No Way by ilyanep · · Score: 0

    I haven't been bothered by any religion, but India's somewhat buddhist, Japan's got like everything from that area.

    And if you actually go to a regular college you can start at say $60k a year in the US -- if you have a regular job (not tree-hugger).

    --
    ~Ilyanep
    To get message, take amount of carrier pigeons at each stage mod 2. Then decode binary.
  94. Re:No Way by GrimReality · · Score: 1
    India is not Buddhist, unfortunately..

    But, one could forgive one for thinking so. Consider all official (state/government) motifs (the wheel, the lion's head, the motto 'Truth Alone Triumphs' etc.). They are all taken from the period of Ashoka, the king who spread Bhuddism to all the parts of the world that we think of as Bhuddist (SriLanka, parts of China etc.).

    I believe the the choice of motifs was deliberate. An attempt by the politically correct moderates who dominated the framing of Indian constitution etc., to present a secular image.

    Also, if I remember correctly, (I don't know if they took this bit out of their constitution), but India might be the only country with a constitution that explicitly gives the right to preach your religion (except in state sponsored context.). In most other constituions, it is implied under 'Freedom of Speech'. I just thought it was interesting. Funny even. Even Hilarious. (Funny because, this is very reason why Fascists are attacking minorities in India right now, and I think, for the sake of the minorities, that explicit statement should be removed, because as long as it exists, the minorities will feel the urge to preach and get screwed --and it is not funny if you are the minority.)

  95. Sibling poster is a troll. by Viceice · · Score: 1

    Ignore him.

    --
    Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
  96. How to avoid diarrhea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Easiest way to avoid diarrhea is to cook your own, and cook it well. All you want to to is to kill bacteria and other germs in your food and water. Frying or boiling are the best ways to do this.

    Or buy something takeaway and microwave it yourself. Microwave is a little unreliable unless you have the new inverter design ones which have stepless power adjustment. Long steady sterilization does it. 1 minute on full micro power may leave cool unsterilized pockets in your food. 1 min at 100% and 2 mins at 60% is better.

    Always boil all of your water, even after buying that fancy ceramic water filter.

    All of these simple lessons I've learn the hard way over the years in many countries, including developed ones.

    If you need to eat out, take one strong aperitive before food, and one strong digestive after food. This may sound archaic to some but it really works wonders.

  97. Holland perks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful


    And chilling out after work in Holland really is second to none on this planet.

  98. Re:I'm an Australian troll ... by torpor · · Score: 1


    Assumption: You 'need' an 'expensive Western Education' to get anything done in life. Fact: FALSE Reason: Too much data to support the fact that "EWE"'s are, in fact, an utter waste of time.

    Assumption: Nomads freak about posessions. Fact: FALSE. Reason: If you haven't chucked it *all* away, completely, and started fresh at least 3 or 4 times, you are not a nomad. You are probably owned by your posessions, though.

    Assumption: Sick in India. Solution: There are a few million people living in India who do just fine without medical problems. Do what they do.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  99. Silver lining? Cultural opportunities by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Europeans already enjoy ready travel to other nations, speak different languages, understand other societies.

    But US citizens, famously provincial, could benefit from living and working abroad. No, you won't earn as much money, and you may find it hard to keep up with the latest pensées of Bill O'Reilly, and you'll have to learn to be tolerant and respectful of other cultures; but that seems like a decent trade-off, especially if the new migration creates better world citizens who can bring a measure of insight back to their own society.

    Probably it's too late for those in their 30s and 40s, who, having show determination to vote against their own economic interests, now face being relegated to lower-paying jobs and ultimately being forced out of the field by the very corporate interests who control their politicians. But the new generation coming along could try this. Remember, kids: buy your airline tickets before you're drafted. Better an adventure next Spring in New Delhi than in Fallujah.

    Happy Thanksgiving!

  100. For now... by Once&FutureRocketman · · Score: 1
    this is the Era Of The Nomad, in my opinion.


    That works at the moment, but that lifestyle is very much dependent on cheap energy. And while we are not actually running out of oil, we are definitely running out of cheap oil.

    --

    "Research is what I am doing when I don't know what I am doing." -- Wernher von Braun

  101. Correction: Re:aha.....so now...... by init-five · · Score: 2, Funny

    Actually, you call Dell.

    --
    Hallowed are the Ori
  102. Travel is not living there. by khasim · · Score: 1
    And I've -travelled-, not lived, in far more places than just the 4 I've mentioned ... I know parts of the world most couldn't find on a map .. so I resent your assumption that my 'attitude needs changing' ... its the root-seeders that need an attitude change, especially them white-picket-fence ones!!
    Great. That's some achievement. Particularly given that most US citizens cannot correctly fill in the states of their own country nor the nations in Europe. I'm sure Europeans would do better, but still, it's not that difficult.

    So, I've also been to places that "most couldn't find on a map". I don't think that says much about me or my viewpoint. Just my travel history.
    As for 'exploiting 3rd world countries', as soon as I'm done exploiting the so-called '1st World' ones, you can bet your ass I'll be off to Timbuktu to help them put new tech to use.
    Cute. Except you don't understand the word "exploit". :) Maybe you can find a dictionary in one of those places "most" cannot find on a map?
    What I'm talking about is the globalist point of view, not your knee-jerk reactionary tinfoil version.
    Well that's quite an achievement for you, I guess. Maybe you should bring that up to someone who has the "tinfoil" version sometime? I'm not interested in it.
    Thinking globally; changing from an introverted to extroverted view, is globalization.
    Nooooooo..... "globalization" is about the exploitation of off-shore workers. Otherwise we had "globalization" back when a British company had an office in New York, London and Hong Kong. Let's see, that would be about, oh 150 years ago.

    Congratulations, you're cutting edge 150 years too late.

    Even the Peace Corps have been doing what you're claiming since the 60's.

    The difference is that we used to IMPORT the raw materials from other countries and MANUFACTURE the finished goods here.

    Now, we setup factories in 3rd world countries and have them import the raw materials and then we import the finished goods.

    That's not a good idea if you want to maintain the standard of living of your population.
    1. Re:Travel is not living there. by kraut · · Score: 1

      >The difference is that we used to IMPORT the raw materials from other countries and MANUFACTURE the finished goods here.

      >Now, we setup factories in 3rd world countries and have them import the raw materials and then we import the finished goods.

      >That's not a good idea if you want to maintain the standard of living of your population.

      So now those poor people in foreign countries can actually have some qualified jobs in manufacturing, rather than just mining and farming like they were previously forced to? And why is that a bad thing?

      --
      no taxation without representation!
    2. Re:Travel is not living there. by MacDork · · Score: 1
      >That's not a good idea if you want to maintain the standard of living of your population.

      So now those poor people in foreign countries can actually have some qualified jobs in manufacturing, rather than just mining and farming like they were previously forced to? And why is that a bad thing?

      I think you've missed his point. To maintain the standard of living we have in America, we cannot continue to carry a half trillion dollar trade deficit. We are exporting America's wealth and not a lot else. I'm sure the third world nations love this, everyone wants to live the good life. However, when it comes time to cough up $10,000 a year for AIDS drugs or $250 a copy for Windows, they suddenly don't care for this whole 'exporting intellectual property' idea anymore. They've stopped paying. We'll have to stop buying.

      When that happens, who exactly will they be manufacturing for? Why, themselves of course. They will have the jobs, the training, and the expertise.

      Of course, your answer is 'be a nomad'. Your solution falls apart when everyone wants to 'be a nomad'. You know, supply and demand, simple economics. Does America just let any Indian come to work here? Consider the situation reversed and you'll see your answer is "Let them eat cake."

      The debate isn't about exporting jobs. It's about exporting wealth. Jobs are just a part of that.

    3. Re:Travel is not living there. by jcr · · Score: 1

      Nooooooo..... "globalization" is about the exploitation of off-shore workers.

      "When I say a word, it means what I choose it to mean" -Humpty Dumpty.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  103. Not stronger by cyberformer · · Score: 1

    Americans often seem to have a stronger sense of family than other cultures *because* they live so far apart. Holidays like Thanksgiving are the only chance may people get to see their families, so people need to pack a whole year's worth of family time into a weekend.

    But if you lived in a country where people could spend time with their families every day, spending time with your family wouldn't seem like that big a deal. You don't miss them till they're gone.

    1. Re:Not stronger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Everyone in this argument is talking out of their collective asses. Not everyone in Europe lives at home. Not everyone in America lives on the other side of the country. Not everyone in Europe cares for their Grandparents in their old age, not everyone in America sticks their grandparents in a nursing home.

      Christ, discussion these days has degenerated into a bunch of half-assed generalizations and stupid anecdotes. Friggin pathetic. For every point, someone has to pull out some tired story of their own, if only to provide a "counterpoint". Why? We could sit here all day doing that. Fine. Here goes. My grandparents lived no more than 20 miles from my house when I was growing up. I saw them damn near every weekend, if not more. (they lived in small towns and were always coming into our town for groceries, business..whatnot). Around the time I graduated from high school, we bought my mother's parents a house in our town..1 block away from our house. My parents were there *every* day from that point on until my grandparents passed away.

      After college I moved 1000 miles from home. However, I have an aunt/uncle, numerous cousins, and numerous friends from college nearby. Also, my brother moved here to go to college. Just had a big Turkey Day celebration. There! I have just shattered every argument stating Americans aren't family oriented. Aren't I special. Unless you have any *facts* and not just *anecdotes* you can't prove to me that my experience isn't closer to the norm than any other.

  104. Re:If it means... by leereyno · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Forget about them being in touch with the average American, they aren't even in touch with objective reality!

    Besides, these people aren't even liberals. They're mostly socialists with more than a few communists and other such paragons of wisdom and foresight thrown in. They started calling themselves "liberals" back when the word actually meant something good. Since they've run it into the ground they've slowly begun calling themselves "progressives" and other euphemisms. A genuine liberal is what would nowadays be called a libertarian, or at least someone who subscribed to the fundamental ideals of libertarianism. I make that distinction because the libertarian party is addled with some pretty wacked out BS itself, such as denying the very existence of a public good for example. I think that modern libertarianism is a response to modern "liberalism" that in some ways goes to far in the opposite extreme. The fundamental ideals upon which it is based are still sound however.

    I think it would be wonderful if the "progressives" and "liberals" among us would emigrate to countries where their ideology has had free reign, like Cuba or Eastern Europe for example. Maybe, just maybe, they would wake up and smell the coffee. Some people need to be hit over the head with 2x4 by reality before they'll recognize it.

    Unfortunately almost everyone who read that last paragraph is going to assume that by criticizing "liberalism" I'm silently endorsing "conservativism." The truth is that I've got almost as many problems with the right, particularly the religious right, as I do with the left. They are less offensive by comparison, but only by comparison.

    My dream for America is that the "liberals" either wake up, or leave, and that libertarianism rises up as an effective foil against conservativism. In fact I'll even make a small ammount of room for the "liberals" since even a broken clock is right twice a day and it is possible that they might be right about something from time to time.

    Mostly I just want a country where common sense and wisdom rule the day, not brain dead ideologies. Since that isn't possible because of the epidemic of stupidity that is part of the human condition, I'll settle for the gridlock that was built into the system by the founding fathers to ensure that those with an agenda get so tied up fighting those with other agendas that their collective ability to cause problems for the rest of us is minimized.

    But you know what, despite all the BS that flies nowadays, this is still the best country on the face of the earth and arguably the best that's ever been.

    Lee

    --
    Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
  105. Welcome to Kwik-E-Doc! by khasim · · Score: 0, Troll
    You get sick, you visit a doctor or hospital in your price range immediately and they treat you! I believe this approach is called free market or something like that.
    It is called the Kwik-E-Doc. Hello. I am Apu and I will be your doctor today. We are having a sale on pig heart-bypass valves. Only 1 week past their expiration date. They come with a coupon for 10% off of a Squishy drink.

    There's something I don't quite like about the "in your price range". Is there a difference in the medical treatment between the price categories?
    Religious freedom is guaranteed in India. It has been that way for millenia. India has the second highest Muslim population in the world and the highest Christian population in Asia! It is officially a "secular" country with no state religion.
    Yet the movies still have a problem showing a man even kissing a woman (to say nothing of a bare female breast).
    1. Re:Welcome to Kwik-E-Doc! by Guillermito · · Score: 1
      Yet the movies still have a problem showing a man even kissing a woman

      What about movies showing a woman kissing another woman. Are they ok? That should make Indian cinema interesting.

  106. Re:A Shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the post was anonymous because it was made by my father who I am introducing to the whole slashdot thing. it was his second post, and anonymity was for the sake of time.

  107. Look up "nationalization". by khasim · · Score: 1
    Fatalism? Democracy? Aren't they one and the same?
    Hardly. Fatalism is a philosophical school. Democracy is a political system.
    Nationalist pride in 'systems' are irrelevant when multi-national corps can demolish an entire economic system in a moments bank-wire ..
    The corps only have as much influence as the local governments allow them. In the past, many governments have "nationalized" industries to deal with that and other problems.
    The New World Order is upon us. The only thing we can do about it is construct another one, right on top of it.
    Whatever. There has always been a "World Order". The only things that have changed have been who's on top and how fast and easily we can move money and material.

    Cash now flows faster and easier than workers do. Before, it took the same effort for a person to go from London to New York as it did to send cash from London to New York.

    In order to equalize it, you can remove restrictions on people moving and living where they want to or slow down the transfer of cash.
    1. Re:Look up "nationalization". by kraut · · Score: 1

      >The corps only have as much influence as the local governments allow them.
      And, of course, the customers. Don't like what shell / nestle / smithkline are doing? Don't buy their products, and organise a boycott - heck, it works.
      Corporations do not exist as evil tools of world domination, even if it sometimes looks that way. They exist to make money for their shareholders, and they depend on customers to do that.

      >In the past, many governments have "nationalized" industries to deal with that and other problems.
      And, AFAIK, nationalisation has always and everywhere been an abject failure. I hope there is a counterexample, but I haven't found one yet.

      > Cash now flows faster and easier than workers do....In order to equalize it, you can remove restrictions on people moving and living where they want to or slow down the transfer of cash.

      Slow down the movement of money? Not in the real world. Have a look at the transaction volume of the FX market; any country that seriously impeded that would simply be routed around, to use that famous internet metaphor, and wither.

      I'd be all for removing restrictions on the movement of people, though. "Economic Migrant" is such a nasty term these days; people forget that e.g. the U.S. was mainly populated by these nasty economic migrants that we want to shut out so badly.

      --
      no taxation without representation!
  108. Liberate the world...(but don't get too capable) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this the proclaimed goal of the Western World: make far-off lands global contributors at par with ourselves? Oh wait...but not SO strong that they pass us? How do you expect them to gain higher standards of living if not through such employment?

  109. Move to the US by leereyno · · Score: 1

    Move to the US. Here even the highest tax bracket is less than half of what you're paying in Demnark.

    You clearly have a strong grasp of the english language, which is the only real thing that America requires of anyone to be accepted.

    I'm shocked at the tax rate you have to pay in Denmark, but not suprised. Socialism is just another form of communism. Communism is a philosophy founded upon the insane belief that because some people are able to rise to greater socio-economic heights than others, that everyone must be forcibly kept at the same level. This is their idea of "equality." In truth it doesn't work, even if it were somehow a good idea, which it isn't. Instead what happens is that those who enforce this "equality" set themselves up so that they are above the system. Party elites in the Soviet Union had special stores where they could buy things, including items from the west that your average Russian would likely never lay eyes on, let alone possess.

    Socialism does not try to prevent those with greater ability, effort, or dumb luck, from getting ahead per-se. Instead it simply extorts the fruits of their labor from them and uses it to support those who are more lacking in ability, effort, and dumb luck.

    Both systems attempt to homogenize a nation's wealth, which is ultimately destructive. It is far better to work to maximize the opportunity for each person to rise to greater heights. Those who have the ability and inclination will do so. Those who lack these qualities aren't worth a plug nickle anyway. The only danger that exists is the ultimate formation of an plutocracy, which is what the US suffers from to some extent.

    Lee

    --
    Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    1. Re:Move to the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a fellow dane i wouldn't mind him/her moving to the states, one less "I want it all and I give a crap about the rest" kind of ppl here.

      You immediately start ranting about communism/socialism and how it doesnt work. I wouldn't characterise the danish system as communism, though im sure some americans would :). However it doesn't really matter what you call it, the danish system does work. Denmark is one of the richest countries in the world, have some of the highest living standards, hardly any poor ppl, 100% literacy, free healthcare, free education and a good economy.

    2. Re:Move to the US by amorsen · · Score: 1
      As a fellow dane i wouldn't mind him/her moving to the states, one less "I want it all and I give a crap about the rest" kind of ppl here.

      As another fellow Dane I support you completely. Besides, so what if the marginal tax is 62%? If you reach that tax bracket you're pretty well off. And if you become sick and unable to work, you know that you will never be without health care, a roof over your head, and food on the table. In a system with privatized health care, the health insurers will try to dump you when you get sick. Do you have the strength to fight a court battle when you are ill? And even if your health insurance doesn't screw you, will you have the money needed to send your children off to university if you are too ill to work?

      In the US, you live in constant financial danger, because noone will be there for you when you need it. Therefore it's important to work as hard as you can to save up. Since money is needed for basic survival, taxes in the US are seen as the government causing a risk for your basic survival. It is no wonder that Americans complain so much about taxes.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    3. Re:Move to the US by haxor.dk · · Score: 1

      Normally i dont respond to AC's but I'll make an exception.

      "You immediately start ranting about communism/socialism and how it doesnt work. I wouldn't characterise the danish system as communism, though im sure some americans would :). However it doesn't really matter what you call it, the danish system does work. Denmark is one of the richest countries in the world, have some of the highest living standards, hardly any poor ppl, 100% literacy, free healthcare, free education and a good economy."

      Healthcare is not free. Neither is education, or any of the other things you seem to take for granted. What you call "free" is paid in the extreme level of taxation in my previous post. Paid to a system where you are robbed of choice, and told to accept what you get (the quality of the various welfare services are btw, at best, mediocre).

      Denmark is not communist in the sense of Marx's original thesis, but it certainly is nearly communist if you take a look at a Lorentz-curve for Denmark, and if you consider how little control you have of your own privately earned funds.

      You can always claim that the system "works", and if you completely disregard the quality of the output, plus the negative impact on personl freedoms, you're right.

      However, I am NOT prepared to blindly accept that I have essentially become a wageslave for the state.

    4. Re:Move to the US by haxor.dk · · Score: 1

      "As a fellow dane i wouldn't mind him/her moving to the states, one less "I want it all and I give a crap about the rest" kind of ppl here.

      As another fellow Dane I support you completely. Besides, so what if the marginal tax is 62%? If you reach that tax bracket you're pretty well off."

      Ah, the old "you have enough $$$ already, hand 'em over".

      Sorry, my being "well off" is NOT an excuse for you to confiscate my property.

      " And if you become sick and unable to work, you know that you will never be without health care, a roof over your head, and food on the table."

      Have you ever heard of private health insurance? It can even be had in Denmark for less than 1000US$/yr.

      " In a system with privatized health care, the health insurers will try to dump you when you get sick."

      So may, and then they will have to face the courts. And the marketplace.

      Spare us the scaremongering, please.

      " Do you have the strength to fight a court battle when you are ill?"

      Oh, lots of people have to do that already in the current systems on both DK and USA.

      " And even if your health insurance doesn't screw you, will you have the money needed to send your children off to university if you are too ill to work?"

      It's inconcieveable to you that

      1) you kids may not WANT an Univ education?
      2) the kids can provide for themselves?

      "In the US, you live in constant financial danger, because noone will be there for you when you need it. "

      You're ignorant. The USA spends more money per capita on public healtcare than even the Danish system does.

      "Therefore it's important to work as hard as you can to save up. Since money is needed for basic survival, taxes in the US are seen as the government causing a risk for your basic survival. It is no wonder that Americans complain so much about taxes."

      Perhaps because taxes are also robbery, whether your language is Danish and English.

    5. Re:Move to the US by haxor.dk · · Score: 1

      "You clearly have a strong grasp of the english language, which is the only real thing that America requires of anyone to be accepted."

      Thank you Lee. I have already considered either Montana or New Hampshire.

      "I'm shocked at the tax rate you have to pay in Denmark, but not suprised. Socialism is just another form of communism. Communism is a philosophy founded upon the insane belief that because some people are able to rise to greater socio-economic heights than others, that everyone must be forcibly kept at the same level."

      True, but a more basic premise of the various forms of collectivism (which both socialism and communism is) is that the individual does not own himself or the fruits of his labor, and that the individual that acts in his own best interest does so on the basis of harming other. Neither of these assumptions are correct.

      " This is their idea of "equality." In truth it doesn't work, even if it were somehow a good idea, which it isn't. Instead what happens is that those who enforce this "equality" set themselves up so that they are above the system. Party elites in the Soviet Union had special stores where they could buy things, including items from the west that your average Russian would likely never lay eyes on, let alone possess.

      Socialism does not try to prevent those with greater ability, effort, or dumb luck, from getting ahead per-se. Instead it simply extorts the fruits of their labor from them and uses it to support those who are more lacking in ability, effort, and dumb luck."

      That is, in practise, the same as prevention of ability. When you rob a person of the outcome of his work, you rob his will to work. Pretty simple, actually.

      "Both systems attempt to homogenize a nation's wealth, which is ultimately destructive. It is far better to work to maximize the opportunity for each person to rise to greater heights. Those who have the ability and inclination will do so. Those who lack these qualities aren't worth a plug nickle anyway. The only danger that exists is the ultimate formation of an plutocracy, which is what the US suffers from to some extent.

      Lee"

      Read mises.org. The problem in the US is what Nader correctly calls "Corporate socialism". Not that i agree with the guy on most issues, thoigh.

    6. Re:Move to the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not the one taking education or anything else for granted, neither do i believe its free in the sense you seem to think i do.

      As for choices and personal freedoms... I'm more concerned with everyone having a basic amount of choice and freedom, rather than just the top few percent having a little extra. For the majority the quality of the output is fine, but if you want that extra BMW, consider moving ;).

    7. Re:Move to the US by amorsen · · Score: 1
      The USA spends more money per capita on public healtcare than even the Danish system does.

      Yes, in fact it spends about twice as much. Despite that it doesn't even offer universal health care, and health outcomes are average for an industrialized nation (among those covered, of course). Not particularly impressive.

      Perhaps because taxes are also robbery, whether your language is Danish and English.

      No, taxes are taxes. Next you'll be telling me that prison is kidnapping. There is a large majority in favour of taxes in Denmark. You may not like that, but it is a simple fact, and using emotional language does not change it. In a democracy the majority can force a minority to play along. (Subject to some constraints, which include certain protections for minorities -- because a majority has decided that such protections are a good idea.)

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
  110. Re:I'm an Australian troll ... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    Having the government pay for it isn't "free". It merely shifts the payer to the taxpayer, instead of the student. Americans have always had the option of a few years of military service to finance a college education, and indeed generations of working class elevated themselves to middle class in this fashion. For those who would never dream of firing a gun in this lifetime, student loans are readily availible.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  111. Can't wait for a swin on the Ganges River by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, I here the massive fecal chloroform count increases buoyancy, especially if you have a stomach full of Roasted Rat, popular food in India!

  112. Interesting by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

    Actually it is quite similar in Oil and Gas industry for those stationed in the middle east (and Russia if I remember). There is a secure compond for foreign workers (school and everything is there). Everybody speaks English and the security is better within the compound than it is in some places in the US. Outside the compounds of course, you may require an armed escort should you need to go to certain places.

    I think people underestimate the ability to raise a family under such circumstances (army or otherwise). Yes, it can be diffucult. Impossible? No. If you cannot deal with the local language and culture requirements, it isn't likely you'd be selected for the job in any case. Working overseas or in a job requiring extensive global travel isn't for everyone (I myself would not choose the nomadic life, although I'd relocate if required), but I forsee it becomeing much more commonplace in the future.

  113. Give it up Guys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The GOA Trance era ended in 1989!
    Go back home!

  114. Re:A Shame by GuyZero · · Score: 1

    Ah, US Thanksgiving, when generations come together... on Slashdot.

  115. Re:I'm an Australian troll ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of the finest doctors in the world come from India, I've been through there many times and got hurt baddly once in a motorcycle accident (literally ripped shreads from head to toe) while on a contract. The care I recieved in the hospitals in Dehli was about 300x faster and friendlier than I have recieved with health care in the states.

    The standards are equal to the states and I don't see where your comment is coming from or why it's even warranted. You've obviously never been there.

  116. Americans are taught the media to be fatalistic by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    The media has pounded into the heads of Americans that resistance to globalization is futile.

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  117. you rightwing bots have been saying that for years by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    That the European welfare states are collapsing-- but they just keep plugging along. Gee, I wonder if the corporatist-imperialist state of America will have to declare war on them if Americans finally catch on. And that happens ol' Cryofan will be here in America--fighting for Europe!

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  118. I call BS re India health-care; true horror story by nusratt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A well-off USA-resident Indian sysadmin friend of mine, when back in India briefly two years ago (either ND or Mumbai), had to deal with obtaining proper medical care for her middle-class (or better) India-resident father.

    He needed non-emergency corrective surgery related to a broken leg.
    I can accept that the surgeons insisted on being paid cash, in advance.

    But the hospital required that *she* personally make the trips between the hospital and the blood-bank to obtain and transport the (NOT rare) blood needed for his surgery.

    I'll pass, thank you.

  119. Re:No Way by militiaMan · · Score: 0

    20k is not ~50k in India. 20k is 120k in India on average. They are doing better than U.S. engineers during the so-called boom. Although, if you buy expensive imports then it may turn into ~50k, but if you like curry and by cheap products you can live like a king. Products like cars, washers, dryers, and such are expensive but they don't buy that stuff. Just stick to what the locals buy and an few extras like extra propane for power, a home computer, and internet connection.

  120. Reverse Migration ... by subVorkian · · Score: 1

    ... is a misnomer. Migration is migration is migration. "Reverse" migration strikes me as condescending and bigoted (ok I am setting myself for a flaming -- I used the "b" word). I admit, I am being semantic, but isn't the movement of people to other countries, always known as migration? Why the need to qualify it by saying it's reverse migration?

  121. 2 models for nomad execs of the 21st century by becca333 · · Score: 1

    There are 2 models in play for nomads of the 21st century. Take off to different country and work for local currency. Or live in the third world and contract out your services to first world countries. Either way you can live like a king. The second option is better because you can actually save money. hook up with one of the many language schools to learn the language or better deal with the transition abroad. Here's one of the better ones
    http://www.firststepworld.com/

  122. India in competition with Pakistan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    India is really in a competition against Pakistan to become the most advanced first, so they don't have to worry quite so much over their border

    That's totally wrong.
    It's based on what newsmedia reports.
    This is what a person who doesn't know much about India would say.
    India and Indians have their own manifest sense of destiny. They would like to make progress for the sake of progressing and to improve the lot of the citizens, not because there is some competition with Pakistan.
    If at all there is competition, it is with China.
    Pakistan is India's rival and sees itself as everything that India is not. India does not see itself as not Pakistan. Pakistan is more vocal and active and India is a reactive entity in response to Pakistan's activities. This is why it makes news.
    However, the real competitor, China is shrewd, patient and calculating. It may not be as shrill Pakistan, but it is the real rival (though Chinese would hate to call themselves India's rivals. To them, the Pacific rim is where the action is, not the Indian subcontinent).
    Hence, please get it out of your head that Pakistan and India are in a race. Nothing could be farther from the truth.

    A perusal of the events of past 60 years clearly shows the following:
    1. Post 1947, after independence of India, Indians built factories, ports, democratic insitutions, public sector undertakings, etc.
    Pakistan relied on foreign aid being the member of Cento.
    That's difference number 1.
    2. Result: Indian growth rate was about 3.5% and was called the Hindu rate of growth.
    I don't know what was Pak's growth rate but they tell us that in those days they were known as an Asian tiger. Pak was awash with western goodies.
    That's difference #2.
    3. Come 90s, India's investement in educational and other institutions started to pay off and India started drawing ahead. Poverty levels dropped, literacy increased, all consumer goodies came to India.
    Pak got caught in the aftermath of Afghanistan, sending its young people to fight in religious causes around the world and the poverty there actually *increased*.
    That's difference #3.
    Notice that Pak's and India's approaches have been radically different. It is only Pakistanis who think they are in race with India, Indians don't. Even if in the short term they get ahead of India, it won't bother India.

    1. Re:India in competition with Pakistan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's totally wrong.

      I'll bet an Indian Army officer wouldn't disagree with it.

      please get it out of your head that Pakistan and India are in a race.

      But the second violence erupts, you (I'm assuming you're Indian) will be in a race. Could you now fight Pakistan and China at the same time, if they decided to attack you? Note how that scenerio doesn't require India to focus on technological growth or war; it only requires actions on the part of China and Pakistan.

      China is shrewd, patient and calculating

      Yes, and without superior technology, they won't be able to overrun India, unless India were busy on the border with Pakistan.

      It is only Pakistanis who think they are in race with India, Indians don't. Even if in the short term they get ahead of India, it won't bother India.

      Ah. I understand now. I didn't mean that India was directly racing against Pakistan for the sake of beating them, but India and Pakistan each certainly wouldn't want the other to have a large military advantage.

      I stand by my original claim. The view that the world is a global civilization is erroneous. It's doubly stupid for one to think that one is a citizen of Earth first, and some nation second. China doesn't think that way, India doesn't think that way, the Muslims don't think that way, and the Americans don't think that way. The Chinese and the Muslims are willing to enforce their beliefs with war, and anyone advocating that a country kowtow to a global power is asking that country to be meat before the Chinese or the Muslims.

    2. Re:India in competition with Pakistan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'll bet an Indian Army officer wouldn't disagree with it.
      Consider your original statement:
      India is really in a competition against Pakistan to become the most advanced first
      It was to this that I replied. As an Indian, by advancement I understand the following:
      1. Excellent educational institutions,
      2. Excellent democratic institutions
      3. Excellent quality of life
      4. Flourishing innovation, science, commerce, trade
      5. Justice and fairness to all citizens
      6. Strength to protect India
      and more...
      You have taken one aspect of the entire spectrum and used that to attempt to negate my argument.

      In any case, your assessment of India's battle theatre is not entirely correct. While Pakistan is a potential adversary who has vowed a thousand-year war, numerous Indian batallions are situated not at Indo-Pak borders, but on the Eastern one, the one with China.
      Consider also this:
      1. China occupies a part of India known as Aksai Chin and calls it its own
      2. China refuses to recognize a state of India (Arunanchal Pradesh), as part of India.
      3. China is actively building bases in Tibet.
      4. China is wooing Myanmar (formerly Burma) to set up transmission towers and monitoring stations
      5. Till a few months ago, China didn't recognize Sikkim as a part of India.
      6. The entire north-Eastern border of India with China is undemarcated and one incident could set the whole border afire.
      7. China still lays claim to large swathes of Indian land
      8. Unlike Pakistan, whose economic strength is largely aid and remittances, China's economic strength is formidable. It is potential rival to Indian trade in every sphere. It can threaten India's sea-lanes. Pakistan cannot.

      Next you said
      But the second violence erupts, you (I'm assuming you're Indian) will be in a race
      This is generalized statement and is always true, irrespective of the parties involved. I have no quibble with that. However, your original statement implied that a present state of race exists. Now you are saying that it will exist should violence erupt. In my first post, I had replied to your original statement. Please do not change the goal-post now. I cannot reply to what you will be saying. I can only reply to what you have said.
      You also said: Yes, and without superior technology, they won't be able to overrun India, unless India were busy on the border with Pakistan.

      This is an insightful statement. Building on the anti-India sentiment in Pakistan, China is supplying military hardware(including nukes) to Pakistan. China wants to keep India busy on its western border. Now why would China want to do that? Because they know, whether or not they admit publicly, that only India is their real competition in Asia. One Chinese ambassador is on record as saying that India has conquered China without firing a shot (referring to Buddhism and other Indian cultural exports throughout the centuries).

      Ah. I understand now. I didn't mean that India was directly racing against Pakistan for the sake of beating them, but India and Pakistan each certainly wouldn't want the other to have a large military advantage.

      1. You are again talking of military advantage. Why is that only aspect you must consider? However, if military advantage was the the only thing, you would be correct. Pakistan has been described by its own citizens as a "garrison state." Pakistanis think of themselves as tall, fair-complexioned, tight-assed blokes and call Indians black, rice-eating, dhoti-wearing cowards. Till recently they used to think 1 Pakistani is equal to 10 Indians. They had weaponry that they got from US and India had it from the then USSR.

      Hence not only they had supposedly superior technology but excellent morale. Where did that lead them to? Several failed expeditions against India!
      Hence military advantage is not the only thing that counts when you talk of advancement.

      2. In any case, India is already way ahead of

    3. Re:India in competition with Pakistan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The view that the world is a global civilization is erroneo...

      I do not know what is the rationale for this statement in this discussion.

      This was the centerpoint of what my original argument was about. I was arguing against the view that the world works as a global civilization when there are obviously cultures that are at odds with each other. I used Pakistan and India as an example because it's better known than India and China. I don't think you and I hold opposing views, but I welcome the opportunity to learn some things I hadn't known before.

      You have taken one aspect of the entire spectrum and used that to attempt to negate my argument.

      I keep returning to the military aspect because it's what will protect you against China or Pakistan. Although they may not be able to damage you now, you can't just write them off, especially when another Muslim country might supply them with long range missiles. Whatever advancements India makes can be negated very quickly in the event of a war.

      Consider also this:

      Some of these I knew, most I did not.

      However, your original statement implied that a present state of race exists. Now you are saying that it will exist should violence erupt.

      A present state of race does exist. It always exists between enemies. I used the violence remark to try to provide an illustration of this, but it's Thanksgiving here, and I'm not really in essay-writing mode, so if my arguments aren't clear, I apologize.

      If you wait until Pakistan attacks to take assessment of their technology, they'll have the advantage, and it'll be your fault for not taking better assessment of them. It doesn't matter who built the nukes Pakistan tosses at you if you don't discover it until after they're fired. And even if you know all about Pakistan's technology, and they can't match India on any front, that doesn't mean you should stop watching them, but this is practically the definition of Intelligence gathering, and I doubt India is lax in this.

      You are again talking of military advantage. Why is that only aspect you must consider?

      Because if you lose a military advantage while you have enemies in the world, the enemies will attack. Other aspects of technology are as important, but most don't offer the same magnitude of damage if they fail.

      Hence not only they had supposedly superior technology but excellent morale. Where did that lead them to? Several failed expeditions against India! Hence military advantage is not the only thing that counts when you talk of advancement.

      This doesn't mean they'll fail next time. They won't try again until they think they can win, which means they are racing against you, even if you don't consider it a race.

      No party that has fought with another one in the past would want the other one to have military advantage.

      Right. The Pakistanis feel the same way, and they're working on correcting this now. As you said, "China is supplying military hardware(including nukes) to Pakistan." This is very worrying.

      of Europe, the conflicts that it wrought upon the world and now its state of unification.

      I scoff at Europe's current unification. The EU isn't very old at all, and already the EU High Council (or whatever it's called) has made some laws that Europeans didn't want. The only example I can think of concerns intellectual property, but I don't think the Europeans will stay like they are now if the EU increases its control.

      Perhaps, as the unification process starts, we will find other planets and the means to travel to them and populate them on the basis of religion, caste, sex, creed, etc

      If you like reading fantasy or Sci-Fi fiction books, then you should read the following books by Orson Scott Card, in this order: Ender's Game, Speaker for the Dead,

  123. Why go home? by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 0

    Why not just stay in India? All the jobs are there.

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
  124. Re:you rightwing bots have been saying that for ye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yay! Cryofan is here, to spread some more manure!

    Can you do math, Cryofan? If so, can you do the math that explains how dwindling populations of workers (less than replacement rate birth rates) will support expanding populations of non-workers (longer lifespans, lower retirement age)?

    Your European Golden Age cannot last. You'd better get over there now if you want to experience any of it.

    I do wonder why you haven't left your hated USA yet.

  125. What small company? by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You act like there is a lot of new small companies forming and that our economy has more than enough jobs for every American. What country have you been living in the past few years? Did you not notice the jobs moving to India during the recession? When theres not enough jobs, you move to the jobs.

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
  126. Virtual Jobs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey! Slashdot audiance. Here's a work related question.

    http://www.virtualassistantjobs.com/

    Does this sound to you like a good company to work for?

    http://www.sohojobs.org/scams.html

    And yes I'm aware of scams, but there must be some good one's out there.

  127. Why live in America? by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 0

    Why not just live in India? If I can have a work environment like that, and a lifestyle like that, who cares about the money? The quality of life is all that matters and the workers in India are being treated better from what I just read. Maybe its time we collectively move.

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
  128. Isnt that what its all about? by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 0

    I mean its about living, and if you can live better in India than in America, why not work there and live like a king. People want to have the good life more than they want to make a lot of money. India is not looking so bad as a place to work and live. American companies will just have to compete or I'll move to India.

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
  129. Re:you rightwing bots have been saying that for ye by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That the European welfare states are collapsing-- but they just keep plugging along.

    But not as well as Britain after Britain made their economy more market-oriented.

  130. I see you wouldnt make a good father. by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 0

    If you cant take care of your parents I'm also sure you couldnt take care of kids.

    Your parents took care of you all your life, when they get old its your responsibility to take care of them and handle their funeral.

    This is fair, its a cycle. Do you get it?

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
    1. Re:I see you wouldnt make a good father. by 808140 · · Score: 1

      I think your ad homniem attack on the GP is in poor taste. I grew up in a family that moved around; I was raised on two continents and now live on a third. Being moved around as a child was hard, but I think that frankly I've lived a lot more than most people my age, and with experience comes maturity, common sense and open-mindedness. There were times when I hated my parents for their dynamic lifestyles -- but as I understand it, non-mobile kids hate their parents for forcing them to do things they don't want to do too, like cleaning their room or not wearing that dress to the prom, or whatever.

      Now, I'm 25, I speak 4 languages fluently and am conversant in 6, am a citizen of no less than three different countries and have lived and worked all over the world. I'd love to take credit for these accomplishments, but who am I kidding? My parents did that for me, and its opened more doors for me than a xenophobic monoglot could possibly imagine. If that's bad parenting, man, I'd sure like to see good!

      As for taking care of the elderly, I agree that this is sometimes necessary -- but only when the elderly are incapable of taking care of themselves. Assuming that just because someone is in their 80s they can't live on their own is agist and my grandfather, at least, would resent it.

    2. Re:I see you wouldnt make a good father. by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 0

      How is an 80 year old supposed to work? who pays their property taxes?

      --
      People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
    3. Re:I see you wouldnt make a good father. by 808140 · · Score: 1

      Well, in my grandfather's case, he lives in a country that is rather generous with social security; and sound investment decisions when he was younger mean that he would probably live well even without these aids. He's French.

      For poor Americans that won't get much help from Social Security, even though they probably paid into it for most of their lives, I agree, financial aid is necessary. But then, you don't need to live with your grandparents to support them financially, do you?

      Understand that I'm not against your general view: that children should help parents. I think that's fair; as was mentioned previously, they take care of you when you can't take care of yourself, and you take care of them when they can't take care of themselves -- and throughout your lives, you help each other.

      But understand that there are many ways to satisfy these laudable goals.

  131. She'll be right boss by goon · · Score: 1
    '... I've worked in the U.S., Japan, and now Germany. In a few years time, I hope to move to India to work for a little while, then head back to Australia to do what I can to build up the national market for technology ...'

    to non-aus (with exception to kiwis and other antipodeans) this comment reflects reality for a number of reasons.

    Firstly for any scientific or technical work one of ways to get any recognition back home is to work overseas in a foreign company. It is a dilemma that faces many in country where business is timid clubby and insular and mono cultural. It is also a chance to get some $$$ in a country where pay for workers relatively to business exe s is pretty poor. Flame away ...

    Pria Viswalingam did a great doco, 'She'll be right boss' highlighting this problem.

    '... then head back to Australia to do what I can to build up the national market for technology ..'

    highlighting another problem(s) that exist - complete apathy in recognising the skills these people typically bring back (inside knowledge) and lack of interest by the business and political heads of the need to build a environment suitable for success.

    Global markets will smash australian business that fail to adapt to the upcoming competitors. So new blood, tempered with international experience is *needed* back into aus.

    --
    peterrenshaw ~ Another Scrappy Startup
  132. Re:Reverse Migration analogous reverse osmosis by ya8282 · · Score: 1

    I think the quote takes into consideration that outsourcing work is usually done by other countries into India because of the lower cost. There is a higher concentration of outsourced employees in India than Europe. Also, a greater number of Indians leave their country to pursue technology jobs outside of their country than Europeans. Therefore, it is a combination of outsourcing to the people of countries that usually outsource the work and migration of workers from an environment of lower outsourced concentration to greater outsourced concentration. I don't see any bigotry here, but I guess this kind of issue is subjective.

  133. RTFA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you ask a question that has already been addressed in a three sentence post! "The salaries are mediocre, but you get free housing, great food, snacks à volonté and a free taxi ride to work each morning" There's a vast difference between the expenses of single people and families- Also if you have savings, or any income source from, say, America, you can stretch that money considerably.

    1. Re:RTFA! by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      I don't see any numbers, and what one person considers "mediocre" is variable enough in itself to be almost no information at all. Almost as little information as your comment just now, in fact.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    2. Re:RTFA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What numbers one considers pertitnent are variable enough in itself to be almost no information at all. Seriously, your not asking the right questions, and now your pickin' on me because your just too dumb to figure out what to ask about employment in foreign countries

  134. Re:I'm an Australian troll ... by militiaMan · · Score: 0

    Maybe $1,000 for a ticket and the $10,000 loss in property will result in a bigger loss than the advantage of intellectual pursuits. 1. Leave to make a living wage and intellectual pursuits. Lose everything you worked for. 2. Stay and slowly lose everything you own, because a low paying brain dead service job is boring. Lose everthing you worked for. 3. Stay and fight against the Nazi Police State. Lose everything you worked for. 4. Kill yourself. Lose everything you worked for. 5. Realize that you wasted your life studying Science, Engineering, and/or Math in a high cost of living country that outsources to countries with government regulated exchange rates, and do something about it. Build something that people want and sell it. Then kill the Nazi Police State voters by insourcing cheap slave labor to replace them. Become King Of The World. Sometimes the option is clear or is it.

  135. You should have picked rich parents! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    College Loan? Storage company? Health Plans? My friend, you have taken the self-sufficiency myth too far. Even in the US (you live here right?) those problems only plague a small number of young, isolated, "middle class" college graduates. If you want to live with your head in a hole in the ground, OK. There's a big world out there, but it sounds like you've already become bitter and jaded.

  136. It's called "exploitation". by khasim · · Score: 1
    So now those poor people in foreign countries can actually have some qualified jobs in manufacturing, rather than just mining and farming like they were previously forced to? And why is that a bad thing?
    Because they don't have the worker and environmental protections that we in the 1st world have.

    Do I have to remind you of Kathy Lee Gifford's little episode with child labour?
    1. Re:It's called "exploitation". by kraut · · Score: 1

      If you're lobbying for workers' rights in the 3rd world, and right to union representation, I'm right behind you.

      But the parent poster only wanted to protect the jobs in his backyard :
      >That's not a good idea if you want to maintain the standard of living of your population.
      and I object to that hypocrisy.

      --
      no taxation without representation!
    2. Re:It's called "exploitation". by jcr · · Score: 1

      Because they don't have the worker and environmental protections that we in the 1st world have.

      Neither did we, until our productivity enabled us to worry about things beyond subsistence.

      If you want the third world to institute environmental laws, then you should be encouraging their economic development as much as possible.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  137. Readable version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  138. Re:I'm a Norwegian troll ... by xtermin8 · · Score: 1

    I toured Scandinavia shortly after graduating college, and was shocked to hear a Norwegian grad student was not only not paying for school, but actually getting a small stipend to live off while he continued his education. The American situation is, however only a "problem" for individual young Americans. From the perspective of American companies, corps and gov't; keeping talent local is a good thing.

  139. Re:A Shame by DissidentHere · · Score: 1

    I agree. I work in the US, but am a project manager working with a team of developers in India. I have found that:
    1) members of the team are very skilled and intelligent
    2) members of the team have excellent communication skills
    3) members of the team are very personable and easy to work with
    4) members of the team are very motivated, hard working, committed to the projects and to providing a quality product.

    This is not to say there have not been some frustrations, but these have proved easy to overcome. Timing is frequently an issue, but this is resolved by my getting up a bit earlier (between 5 and 6) and the team working a bit later (8 or 9). It took me about 3 weeks to get very comfortable with the accent, though IM has been a great way to communicate too.

    At first, I was worried, as I was a coder for a small company that was acquired by a large company that does a lot of outsorcing. Turns out I transitioned in to project/product management, and I enjoy it more and am much better at it. My point is that global outsourcing can be good. My new position is more fun with better pay.

    --
    "None of us are as dumb as all of us." - meeting mantra
  140. Re:A Shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More to the point, Why isn't there a (-1) Smartass mod?

  141. OT US healthcare by khallow · · Score: 1

    There's a lot wrong with US healthcare and health insurance, but insurance companies aren't responsible for high medical costs. That aspect runs counter to the interests of the health insurance companies. After all, they're the ones who actually pay most medical bills. My point here is that you also need to consider the other parties raising the cost of healthcare - the providers and patients.

    1. Re:OT US healthcare by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Insurance companies are definitely responsible for the out of control healthcare costs in the USA:

      Health Insurance - seperates responsibility for the bills from responsibility for the results. Thus you get patients who insist on all kinds of expensive tests and procedures because, from their perspective, "it's all free anyway." People who must pay for their own medical treatment personally understand the costs involved and thus make much more rational decisions about trade-offs between costs and results.

      Actual "health insurance" ought to be limited to catastrophic insurance only, where it follows the original concept of insurance to mitigate the risk of catastrophe rendering the patient unable to pay for the rare big-bucks treatement that is necessary for the patients very survival.

      Malpractice Insurance - These guys provide the deep pockets that make suing doctors and hospitals for malpractice so attractive. If their deep pockets weren't there such that a malpractice judgement might actually bankrupt a doctor or hospital (and thus result in little to no actual money being paid out) then there would be a whole lot less malpractice suits in the first place, and probably a whole lot more accountability within the medical profession as well because they would no longer have the shield that insurance provides them.

      As an alternative to malpractice insurance, each patient should buy "operation insurance," kind of like flight insurance. The cost for coverage would vary by factors such as the type of oepration, the surgeon's experience, the surgeon's history of success and failure, etc. The point being to take the fortune-hunting, deep-pockets attitude out of the system and replace it with something that is actually based on the risk of real complications and attempts to mitigate those risks as insurance was originally designed to do.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    2. Re:OT US healthcare by khallow · · Score: 1
      Ok, that's much better.

      I still don't buy it. Insurance companies don't shield the careers of medical practictioners. They don't force companies to purchase insurance that covers routine care, cosmetic surgery, or experimental proceedures. And insurance companies certainly aren't responsible for the litigious environment of modern healthcare.

    3. Re:OT US healthcare by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      > Insurance companies don't shield the careers of medical practictioners.

      Yes they do, I'm too lazy to dig up examples of first order shielding of specific doctors, but second order shielding is easy to see because they enable the typical corporate distribution of responsibility so that systemic failures are "no one's fault." Thus the groups making the decisions that ultimately result in systemic failures don't get overhauled and bad processes either continue or are replaced by new bad processes designed by the same people responsible for the original bad processes.

      > They don't force companies to purchase insurance that covers
      > routine care, cosmetic surgery, or experimental proceedures.

      The insurance lobby is one of the strongest proponents of federally-mandated health insurance for employers over a certain size (I think it is 25 employees).

      > And insurance companies certainly aren't responsible
      > for the litigious environment of modern healthcare.

      Like I said before, they provide the incentive by enabling the "deep pockets" attitude. It is a reciprocal system where they like the current litigious environment because it allows them to justify ever increasing rates - when your profit is effectively a percentage of the money that passes through your hands, that means more dollars for them the more lawsuits they pay out on. But, what's worse is that even in states where litigation is not ridiculous they still use it as justification for rate hikes.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    4. Re:OT US healthcare by khallow · · Score: 1

      Ok, you make a good case particularly in the example of federally-mandated health insurance. I think you're letting the many other members of this debacle slide.

    5. Re:OT US healthcare by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Certainly they are not alone in creating the situation, but they are an easy target to pick out and their role in creating/maintaing the current problems is key. Whether they are an easy target for legislative change in the USA is whole different question - that big lobby of their's and all.

      But, at the very least, if India is smart enough they won't let the health insurance industry develop over there the way it has over here, thus avoiding our current set of problems.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  142. Re:I dunno... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rome 100AD was pretty cool for it's time...

    The main problem with the US is that it's convuluting itself with laws and government.

    The main problem with the US government is that it tends to make more laws than it revokes creating an extreme beuracracy. If things do not change it will of course become no better than a 1980's version of the USSR (without free health care, free education, and the nifty Red Army National Anthem and May Day parades).

    I would like to point out that as an American citizen, we do not live in a "true democracy" nor "a true capitalistic state".

    I'm not saying it's a bad thing, but we should always be wary that in repressed countries citizens would often harp they had the best economic plan and had the most freedoms than the next country (which may or may not be true).

    Eventually our system of government will no longer be able to adapt to rapidly changing situations due to the fact that's its bogged down by regulations. However this is subjective and that there might be a US government for the next 400 years (however I will point out to all of you that the US will not be around forever... the sun has to die out eventually and neutrons and protos of all matter will decay something in a gazillion years).

    However I could be wrong about this and the next Teddy Rosevelt could take office in 2008 and rally the nation behind him and sweep laws that favor corporation monopolies out the door. However I feel that is unlikley.

    Rather than barbarians destroying a decaying system of Imperial government it will be smaller nations not playing by American rules that will be the downfall of the US.

    It won't be rather dramatic, but one traveling to the Russian Federation and to the US in circa 2015 won't be able to notice the difference in economics, education, crime rates, etc...

    Except one has bitterly cold winters and the other has alot of bad TV.

    (on a side note as a realist... the government should feed it's poor and should educate it's people, because hungry starving ignorant masses tend to become disgruntled and overthrow governments)

  143. I agree. by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
    (IAAIndian and all that) and we've been tracking reports of this type on blogsphere for over a year now. The overwhelming consensus is that it's great that the tourism industry is picking up in India.

    That said, there is a definite surge in ex-pat hiring in a different sphere altogether; at a managerial level, to be precise. Many Indian companies are about to venture out of the traditionally-protectionist Indian market, and are finding themselves without the necessary managerial experience to survive in the global market.

    Non-Indian /.-tters looking to work in India would be better off looking at PHB positions; you get all those cool perks (maid, driver, bungalow, club-memberships etc) AND international-level salaries. Indian software co's seem to be exclusively focussing on fresh grads, a demographic whose supply seems endless currently.

  144. Underinformed... by TheLink · · Score: 1

    "Actually in Malaysia only muslims have to follow sharia so if you aren't muslim you can do what you like...although finding alchohol or porn could be tricky.

    I wouldn't move to even a relatively moderate muslim country like malayasia though. In a country of hundreds of millions theres bound to be more than a couple islamo-kooks looking to blow up westerners."

    I'm in Malaysia. Finding alcohol is definitely not tricky, in fact beer's pretty cheap here considering it is a muslim country. Of course beer might not count as alcohol to some people (concentration is quite low). But you can all sorts of alcoholic drinks at bars, nightclubs, most restaurants, 7/11s, supermarts etc. Plenty of choices. You can get stout for about USD1.50 to USD3.00 depending on where you go.

    Finding porn tricky? Erm there's this thing called the Internet and spam sure gets here too. Avoiding porn has got to be trickier than finding porn...

    Malaysia only has 20+ million people. IIRC in the US there were more than a couple of "islamo-kooks" who blew up more than a few westerners.

    --
  145. Re:A Shame by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
    While I agree with your reasoning, I disagree on the conclusion; you really want to take a look at the numbers involved. We're not looking at damming the Colorado River here, it's more like trying to chlorinate Tuscon's water supply! :-)

    In essence, I think it's good that Indian workplaces are beginning to open up to other cultures, and I certainly think the Indian job market is big enough to handle a few international applicants.

  146. Learn to make friends by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 0

    That is why friendship is important. Having friends is just as important as having family. Friends are family.

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
  147. Oops, my bad... by MacDork · · Score: 1

    You never once mentioned America, and now you will destroy my assertion based on that. You are what you eat and I loaded up on turkey today... :-)

  148. Which is fair by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 0

    The tax payer benefits from a highly educated labor force.

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
  149. Good for us! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good and I hope we hang our flags and crap over there like what we have to deal with here. In my apartment complex the only things hanging outside of peoples doors are indian crap, and the smell eyyy gads, give it to 'em good guys/gals that move over there. Americans dont do that, they have respect for others and dont try and force there beleifs on each other by hanging gaudy trinkets outside there door that ya have to explain to everyone that comes over. I dunno, I may sound crass, but it really is ridiculous.

  150. more like vacation than migration... by Anonymous+Squonk · · Score: 1

    All of these people sign on for a year, and although some of them are extending their stays, I don't think many of them are planning to permanently put roots down in India.

    This is just a working holiday, the modern equivalent of backpacking and English teaching your way through Asia...

  151. horrible lies! by earthstar · · Score: 1
    YOu guys lie like anything !!!! WTFYOu say everyone had diarrhoea ! My ass!
    Utter crap!

    Jus as some one in USA or anywhere else gets diarrhoea, so do people in India or anyother counter.Iam an Indian too and I live in India. .

    May be you arent patriotic,but stop with that.You dont need to throw huge lies like that to show your liking for USA.

    1. Re:horrible lies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you, my friend, are the liar. enjoy your diarrhea.

      My ass!
      Utter crap!


      I rest my case.

  152. Re:I'm an Australian troll ... by killjoe · · Score: 1

    I know a guy who did that. It cost less to buy a ticket, go to india, get work done then to have it done here. He needed orthodonture (sp?) and his insurance didn't cover it.

    --
    evil is as evil does
  153. India has relatively few Buddhists by dieresis · · Score: 1

    Buddhism originated in India, but basically disappeared from the culture until recently. These days most converts to Buddhism are dalits (former untouchables) seeking to break with traditional caste-based religious practices.

  154. India Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just got back from a 2 month stay in multiple large cities in India on business, and all I have to say is...

    "God Bless the USA"

    The neighborhood that I live in the US has its share of middle and low income housing. And if I would lose my job in the US I gladly take a job at McDonalds and live in the lower income housing rather than taking a job overseas in a developing country. Some of my Indian friends hyped me up before my trip, all the talk about the maids, cooks and the "Live like a king talk on developers salary". I was looking at this trip as a trial run for my move to India if the US economy goes to $hit.

    This is no way a bash to Indian, it just what I experienced while I was there.
    So, before you quit your job and move to India...

    The maids. - Well, they aren't paid crap, so you get what you pay for. The homes that I visited that had maids, their houses weren't clean. I could have done a better job with a leaf blower then these maids did. I pay $100 a month for a maid who cleans my house twice a month and she does a better job then the maids that come ever day in India. I could eat off my bathroom floor after my housecleaner comes, I didn't want to eat off the dishes after the maid in India finished cleaning the apartment.

    The traffic. -If you aren't from NYC, then you're going to be in for a shock when you hit the roads in India. It's a free-for-all, now I know why so many foreigners become taxi drivers in the US, because driving in the US is relaxing compared to driving the India. If you're from the US, don't even think out driving there, because you'll want to kill someone. It would sometimes take 2 hours to go 3 miles. I sat in the car so much each week, I could have driven across the US. Oh, and bring a handkerchief with you while you're in the car, cause the pollution is unbearable.

    The poverty. - I read about the poverty in India but I was not prepared for what I saw. It was right out of a "Save the children" commercial. Higher income complexes right next to slums. People live in tarp tents on the side walks. Everyone I talked to said that the government does a lot for them and that is the life they decided to take, but I don't know.

    The food. - I love Indian food, love it to death. The food was great, until... I took every precaution, but I guess living in the US has weakened me. I couldn't wait to get back to the US to take a solid BM, or at least a BM in a western style toilet. Which leads me to my next point.

    The toilets (outside of your home). - I was prepared for this, and was reassured that there would be western style toilets everywhere. For those of you who don't know, there is an Indian style toilet, which is basically a toilet that is, no pun intended, flush to the floor, or, simply a hole in the floor that you squat over. I didn't mind it when I had to use one, but forget about a public toilet, I've been in some bad bathrooms before, but I think I've seen the most number of nasty bathrooms while there. Oh, carry a role of toilet paper with you, because you're most likely not going to find any at most places you go.

    The litter. -People of India, take pride in your country and use the trash bins clearly marked "USE ME" How about taking some of that outsourcing money and investing in a anti-litter campaign. I would see people throwing boxes right out there car windows, or throw garbage on the ground when they were sitting right next to a trash bin!! And these weren't low-class people these were professionals.

    The staring. - Women who are alone or not with a man get stared at constantly. I'm not saying everyone does it, but it happens a lot. The women that I worked with while I was there loved me because I said to some guy that was staring at them while we were in a market, "What the are you looking at?" Everyone says this only happens in the smaller cities, or by people who move into larger cities from smaller ones, but it's not true.

    The corruption. -This happens everyw

  155. Leaving US for retirement by heroine · · Score: 1

    Not sure if working in India is going to be as decent as Wallmart or Burger King, but for retirement you'll definitely be better off leaving US. With taxes expected to double or triple in 30 years, no-one with any brain cells is going to retire here.