Movie reviews were embargoed until the last moment, which is usually a bad sign of this being actually bad.
Movie studios always put review embargoes up when they push bad movies.
As for the non-spoiler reviews linked in the summary, if you read these enough, you'll understand that these are almost never accurate. Some suspiciously read like a damn ad.
Here's the source of the WSJ's reporting: https://www.oath.com/press/yah...
I have no idea why the WSJ is hiding that story behind a paywall if it's freely accessible on Oath's blog.
Too little, too late. You don't add features once in a while and expect to be on top. Look at what happened to IE. It was once a good browser, but it was left to sit in a corner. Once Oracle deprioritized Java, it was as good as dead.
This research is useless because they only compared it to Edge and IE. Of course it was better. All browsers are better than those 2. Furthermore, the study was sponsored by Google, which explains why it's so Chrome positive. https://www.x41-dsec.de/securi...
Slashdot Mirror
This is a ruse to keep discussions off net neutrality. Pretty obvious.
Yes. A wall will solve this problem. Walls solve every problems nowadays.
Tab warming is related to tab switch animations, not actual tab loading. It works only with your existing, already-loaded tabs.
Univ. of Michigan, Firefox, and Cisco researchers founded the Let's Encrypt project.
Movie reviews were embargoed until the last moment, which is usually a bad sign of this being actually bad. Movie studios always put review embargoes up when they push bad movies. As for the non-spoiler reviews linked in the summary, if you read these enough, you'll understand that these are almost never accurate. Some suspiciously read like a damn ad.
From the description, pretty much.... but it's crypto-escrow, not regular escrow. Ya' know!?!
They found out why I didn't renew my NFL Game Pass.... oh well, it was fun while it lasted :(
I concur
Dissent's thoughts on the whole situation are just gold and provide a deep look at how the FBI is hiding evidence: https://www.databreaches.net/i...
Chrome-only websites are actually a problem these days. Just like IE-only websites were a problem ten years ago. Trust me, they're a lot of them.
Those numbers are based on total monthly traffic stats. Only a small number of this "total" users are affected.
I'm sure glad their president set the record straight on global warming... cause this is obviously not that
But, why?
Happy birthday /.
Here's the source of the WSJ's reporting: https://www.oath.com/press/yah... I have no idea why the WSJ is hiding that story behind a paywall if it's freely accessible on Oath's blog.
Too little, too late. You don't add features once in a while and expect to be on top. Look at what happened to IE. It was once a good browser, but it was left to sit in a corner. Once Oracle deprioritized Java, it was as good as dead.
or.... Apple could ship something of value, not a product with small features here and there
SIMON and SPECK are simple block cipher designs. You don't need an ISO for that. What's next? An ISO for HTML header tags?
This research is useless because they only compared it to Edge and IE. Of course it was better. All browsers are better than those 2. Furthermore, the study was sponsored by Google, which explains why it's so Chrome positive. https://www.x41-dsec.de/securi...
This is only hear-say. It was never confirmed by Equifax or FireEye.
They removed Hello a while back
Stop trolling. This is /.
Only civilized conversations allowed
Nothing in the US makes sense anymore
Good news. ABI support coming to Swift in 2018 https://www.theregister.co.uk/...
Research soon to be cited in various divorce cases :)