You're clearly a typical racist Democrat aren't you?
Guess what? We dont' care what the color of a person's skin is. What matters is how evil they are, which is why Hillary is considered the anti-Christ.
My wife puts it this way - and she saw second wave feminism begin in the 1960s:
"I wanted to be valued for being a housewife and mother. I enjoyed raising kids and I enjoyed keeping house. Yes, I had additional interests, some of which i did, and some of which I didn't. But feminism told me that my choice to want to be home to raise my kids was a terrible thing. And don't get me started with 'Ms.' What we WANTED was different titles to see what men were married, and what ones were single. What the feminists decided was that EVERYONE was gonna rut around regardless of marital status."
It's unfortunate.
Common sense - another 25% increase in premiums for ACA policies? How long can people pay this? I have employer sponsored health insurance and yes, it's quite expensive.
At some point, the penalty is larger than the premiums and more affordable.
One of my doctors is retiring because of medicare reimbursement shrinkage and increasing administrative overhead. Another won't take medicare patients because he's within 5 years of retirement.
I don't need a citation to see what I'm seeing.
"Were the freight cars sent to Minnesota?" "Form 357W is filled out in every particular, as required by the office of the Co-ordinator in conformance with the instructions of the comptroller and by Directive 11-403." "Were the freight cars sent to Minnesota?" "The entries for the months of August and September have been processed by --"
And it continues in US society.
That's an interesting question.
To whom would you like to lose your nation's right of self determination?
1. Its government leaders (pretty much this is already the case)
2. Corporations (ditto)
3. Unelected bureaucrats (ditto)
4. Colossus
Actually it sounds rather like something mutually beneficial, yes?
Europe may have been a speed bump to the soviets but the deterrence of NATO - and the across the Atlantic, the production capability and military size of the USA, and to a lesser extent the UK - but both sides got benefit from this - Europe and the US. There was never a soviet invasion of western Europe..As a citizen of the USA, personally, I don't regret a single dollar of American defense spending.
The difference is the Czechs and Slovaks were FORCED INTO THE domination of the USSR by FDR who gave away eastern Europe to Joseph Stalin.
Western Europe was (and is) in AMerican military sphere of influence but for the most part are left alone by Washington.
Since I doubt you were alive in the 1950s I don't totally see how you can discuss what people were like and what they thought.
Remember, fighting against segregation et al started in the 1950s - so I won't say that people didn't think that others deserved to be treated well.
Also remember, that if you looked at 1950s life people would, today, say 'Wow it's terrible! I have only a 900 square foot house, one bathroom, my family has one car, we spent over 20% of our income on food, we have one telephone and it has a wire. Things suck!"
Sheesh.
Given how the tech community substantially consists of Hillary bootlickers^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hsupporters, I can't see how they could not have security experts of significant caliber that would work for free.
Slashdot Mirror
You're clearly a typical racist Democrat aren't you? Guess what? We dont' care what the color of a person's skin is. What matters is how evil they are, which is why Hillary is considered the anti-Christ.
And "privacy experts are concerned!" And the useful idiots think that Mrs. Clinton is their friend.
My wife puts it this way - and she saw second wave feminism begin in the 1960s: "I wanted to be valued for being a housewife and mother. I enjoyed raising kids and I enjoyed keeping house. Yes, I had additional interests, some of which i did, and some of which I didn't. But feminism told me that my choice to want to be home to raise my kids was a terrible thing. And don't get me started with 'Ms.' What we WANTED was different titles to see what men were married, and what ones were single. What the feminists decided was that EVERYONE was gonna rut around regardless of marital status." It's unfortunate.
Strat said: Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce. Hear, hear!
Common sense - another 25% increase in premiums for ACA policies? How long can people pay this? I have employer sponsored health insurance and yes, it's quite expensive. At some point, the penalty is larger than the premiums and more affordable. One of my doctors is retiring because of medicare reimbursement shrinkage and increasing administrative overhead. Another won't take medicare patients because he's within 5 years of retirement. I don't need a citation to see what I'm seeing.
Except environmentalists have forced destruction of many hydroelectric installations because of the 'damage it does to the rivers.'
How can an AI be unbiased? It was written by a human and humans have biases.
Oh I agree with you, but as you say 'Theoretically..." But yes I did note the sarcasm!
Oh but this is 2016 and if you're a leftist cyber attacker, you're a 'freedom fighter.' God forbid if free expression matters.
"Were the freight cars sent to Minnesota?" "Form 357W is filled out in every particular, as required by the office of the Co-ordinator in conformance with the instructions of the comptroller and by Directive 11-403." "Were the freight cars sent to Minnesota?" "The entries for the months of August and September have been processed by --" And it continues in US society.
Not at all, since the health system is in the process of being dismantled.
It also sounds like what happens to men in tech, too.
That's an interesting question. To whom would you like to lose your nation's right of self determination? 1. Its government leaders (pretty much this is already the case) 2. Corporations (ditto) 3. Unelected bureaucrats (ditto) 4. Colossus
On your mark...get set...fire missiles! Oh wait, I meant 'bake!'
He's an example, but Mrs. Clinton is a stronger one.
Actually it sounds rather like something mutually beneficial, yes? Europe may have been a speed bump to the soviets but the deterrence of NATO - and the across the Atlantic, the production capability and military size of the USA, and to a lesser extent the UK - but both sides got benefit from this - Europe and the US. There was never a soviet invasion of western Europe. .As a citizen of the USA, personally, I don't regret a single dollar of American defense spending.
The difference is the Czechs and Slovaks were FORCED INTO THE domination of the USSR by FDR who gave away eastern Europe to Joseph Stalin. Western Europe was (and is) in AMerican military sphere of influence but for the most part are left alone by Washington.
Since I doubt you were alive in the 1950s I don't totally see how you can discuss what people were like and what they thought. Remember, fighting against segregation et al started in the 1950s - so I won't say that people didn't think that others deserved to be treated well. Also remember, that if you looked at 1950s life people would, today, say 'Wow it's terrible! I have only a 900 square foot house, one bathroom, my family has one car, we spent over 20% of our income on food, we have one telephone and it has a wire. Things suck!" Sheesh.
I'm sure it's a democrat, god knows, there are enough nut jobs on that side of the fence, too.
Given how the tech community substantially consists of Hillary bootlickers^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hsupporters, I can't see how they could not have security experts of significant caliber that would work for free.
They're also still the party of racism. All you have to do is look at their policies.
Indeed, look at Hillary Clinton. There's the shining example.
And thank goodness we did because I hate to be 'marketed to.'
The Democrats are worse. They're pushing TPP as hard as the non-Trump Republicans.
I doubt Mr. Cook would want to live in a rainy climate.