...regardless of what he believes or not...he's separated from God for eternity...even Pascal believed it was better to be wrong than separated for an eternity...
Actually most public comments on proposed rule making are in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The FCC does not have to solicit public comment if they propose to end a regulation. Thus any comment does not count in any case. It was a a waste of breath to think it did.
net neutrality had nothing to do with what an isp charges you, it said isp's could not charge netflix more for using up all the bandwidth. rates charged you are set by the local government who signs an exclusive contract with the local isp. doh.https://tech.slashdot.org/story/18/10/15/2024241/997-percent-of-unique-fcc-comments-favored-net-neutrality-independent-analysis-finds#
i used to say the value of a plan was that it could be changed. fail to plan = planning to fail . what you're saying, or least it triggered this in my mind, is that the outcome is not always known, or maybe never known. unintended consequences can be bad or good, and the effect can't be seen until much, much later. imagine the shock when industrial psychologists discovered that any change is usually good.
we'll send the tax for that to you then. we turn out too many biologists as it is now, and they probably want their student loans forgiven too. all so you can read something cute.
yeah, it was a toss up with the facebook video and camera...or google in every room...
Digital Trends goes as far as calling it "the stupidest product of the year."
that was not his wager...read history then get back to me...
that's right - only god is permanent...
...regardless of what he believes or not...he's separated from God for eternity...even Pascal believed it was better to be wrong than separated for an eternity...
while you're at it - what year did fiber optics undergo a revolution, what was it, and what did that do to rates and supply?
what did internet access cost when it was de-regulated in 1996? 2006? Today? was that due to regulation or de-regulation?
hence the cfr notice is the only thing they look at - not web comments...
+5
read at the 6th grade level so it's not surprising
actually you did agree with me...not only was the analysis self selecting the original data was too...
Actually most public comments on proposed rule making are in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The FCC does not have to solicit public comment if they propose to end a regulation. Thus any comment does not count in any case. It was a a waste of breath to think it did.
net neutrality had nothing to do with what an isp charges you, it said isp's could not charge netflix more for using up all the bandwidth. rates charged you are set by the local government who signs an exclusive contract with the local isp. doh.https://tech.slashdot.org/story/18/10/15/2024241/997-percent-of-unique-fcc-comments-favored-net-neutrality-independent-analysis-finds#
actually it was 99.7% of 4% after the all the 22 million so-called copypasta were removed. and of either number, how many were real people?
on no issue, including net neutrality, is it believable that 99% were in favor...sounds wrong.
I had a Motorola dyna-tac flip phone in 1991 and a startac as soon as it came out, then a digital startac! those were the days!
ah, but what does gnu stand for?
it's called masking tape...see what i did?
so would the bad guys...cue twilight zone music...
they've probably sold millions of devices in the last 20+ years...
they were smart enough to login and see the note but the router was still unpatched? maybe that was the bad guys?
bravo zulu in the navy...not sure what that means...
i used to say the value of a plan was that it could be changed. fail to plan = planning to fail . what you're saying, or least it triggered this in my mind, is that the outcome is not always known, or maybe never known. unintended consequences can be bad or good, and the effect can't be seen until much, much later. imagine the shock when industrial psychologists discovered that any change is usually good.
sure, but borrowing billions to do that makes no sense.
we'll send the tax for that to you then. we turn out too many biologists as it is now, and they probably want their student loans forgiven too. all so you can read something cute.