The fact that he is being indicted should be somewhat of a comfort in that the intent is to give him his day in court rather than in someone's crosshairs.
The indictment is secret because the U.S. knows that if we expose whatever wildly unsupported bullshit we've indicted him on, it will hurt the extradition case.
As long as it remains sealed, we can be all like, "oh, trust us, it's super important that you send him to us right away". Then, once he's on a plane, *poof*! Vanished like smoke.
This is actually something that happens to all people, not just kids -- if you increase your activity level by adding exercise, your system will attempt to maintain equilibrium by either unconsciously wanting to eat more, or by reducing your percieved energy level the rest of the day.
Jeep Rubicon? Excuse me, but that's an Italian river and more familiar with the phrase 'Crossing the Rubicon' akin to making a move from which there is no return, as Julius Caesar took his legion across the river (I'm sure they didn't have Jeeps then).
It's actually a reference to the reliability of reverse gear in the vehicle.
Pish tosh, simply have tiny electromagnets, holding back, spring-loaded barbs. The moment the device loses power, it immediately anchors itself, implacable, in the blood-vessel walls! Why, any child could have come up with this, both simple, and elegant, solution!
And treatment for addiction to non-prohibited drugs works way better than treatment for addiction to prohibited drugs, due to increased access to treatment, fewer social stigmas, a dramatically reduced chance of getting thrown in fucking prison simply for seeking treatment, and better medical and scientific access to the treatment subjects.
if you can't speak meaningfully on the subject of prohibition, you really should stop commenting on the subject of drug use
It's the consumers that decide which inventions matter... and an invention which is "like X, but online" might not resonate as well with someone who's never seen X not online.
One is something no sane person with basic knowledge of anything electrical would do, the other is something no sane person with basic knowledge of anything mechanical would do.
In 2011, he took his Roadster out for a drive and then parked it in a temporary garage while his home was being renovated. Lacking a built-in Tesla charger or a convenient power outlet, he left the car unplugged. Six weeks later his car was dead. It took four men two hours to drag the 2,700-pound Roadster onto a flatbed truck so that it could be shipped to Tesla's Los Angeles area service center, all at the owner's expense. A service manager then informed him that "it's a brick" and that the battery would cost approximately $40,000 to replace. He was further told that this was a special "friends and family" price, strongly implying that Tesla generally charges more.
As a second Roadster owner discovered, the Tesla battery system can completely discharge even when the vehicle is plugged in. This owner's car was plugged into a 100-foot long extension cord for an extended period. The length of this extension cord evidently reduced the electric current to a level insufficient to charge the Tesla, resulting in another "bricked" Roadster.
A third bricked Tesla Roadster apparently sits in its owner's garage in Newport Beach, California. That owner allegedly had a similar prior incident with a BMW-produced electric vehicle. He claimed BMW replaced that vehicle, but Tesla refuses to do the same. The owner either couldn't afford or didn't want to pay Tesla the $40,000 (or more) to fix his car.
A fourth customer shipped his Tesla Roadster to Japan, reportedly only to discover the voltages there were incompatible. By then, it was too late, the car was bricked, and he had to ship it back to the US for repairs.
1) Did not read the manual. 2) Ran into a legitimate issue the car should have warned him about; inconclusive. 3) Did not read the manual, TWICE. Holy shit. 4) Did not do the research.
2. is "inconclusive", because if the other brick-owners described are any indication, it's entirely possible that the car was giving low-current warnings and he just didn't notice and/or give a shit. Not enough info.
It's cute how you think there's some responsible way to inform the press of an anomalous experimental result.
The scientists just did the same thing you'd do if you got some weird result on a browser-based application, and the preliminary obvious steps didn't fix the problem: check to see if everyone else is seeing the same thing on their browsers, so to speak.
It's not their fault if someone in Marketing hears what's going on and writes a company-wide email saying "BROWSERS CAPABLE OF MAGIC!!! Film at eleven!!!"
When they state "the time discrepancy appears to have vanished" it would seem they are unable to reproduce the prior results.
Who is "they"? I saw no such statement in the article.
After tightening the connection and then measuring the time it takes data to travel the length of the fiber, researchers found that the data arrive 60 nanoseconds earlier than assumed. Since this time is subtracted from the overall time of flight, it appears to explain the early arrival of the neutrinos. New data, however, will be needed to confirm this hypothesis.
Sounds to me like they haven't actually reached the point of trying to reproduce the results yet, they just found a discrepency that very closely matches the apparently aberrant prior results.
mostly because of our historical reluctance to tap our own supply, despite it being readily available (Shale oil, gulf oil, tundra oil, the list goes on
Uhhhh huh, I'm sure the Koch brothers goofing around with contango to keep the prices high has nooooothing to do with it.
Drug and gun laws make things illegal that weren't illegal before, so your argument fails.
Drug laws increase violent crime. Gun laws, in the short term, increase gun violence, and long-term slowly replace it with other forms of violence.
The point of non-neutrality internet regulations is, in fact, to restrict honest use of it. The power to suppress political speech is overwhelmingly more important to any government than the power to briefly annoy copyright violators or whateverthefuck.
Slashdot Mirror
Fencing in stolen goods perhaps,
Not even that. The leaked documents were copied, not stolen, and they don't qualify for copyright protection.
So the most we can get him on is "being a big ol' naughtypants."
The fact that he is being indicted should be somewhat of a comfort in that the intent is to give him his day in court rather than in someone's crosshairs.
The indictment is secret because the U.S. knows that if we expose whatever wildly unsupported bullshit we've indicted him on, it will hurt the extradition case.
As long as it remains sealed, we can be all like, "oh, trust us, it's super important that you send him to us right away". Then, once he's on a plane, *poof*! Vanished like smoke.
This is actually something that happens to all people, not just kids -- if you increase your activity level by adding exercise, your system will attempt to maintain equilibrium by either unconsciously wanting to eat more, or by reducing your percieved energy level the rest of the day.
I loved that game!!
It not only was a brutal workout, but actually told you how many calories you burned playing it
Jeep Rubicon? Excuse me, but that's an Italian river and more familiar with the phrase 'Crossing the Rubicon' akin to making a move from which there is no return, as Julius Caesar took his legion across the river (I'm sure they didn't have Jeeps then).
It's actually a reference to the reliability of reverse gear in the vehicle.
He's be a idiot not to maximize his profits.
Which is why, if I ever get a MRSA infection, I'm suing these guys
Pish tosh, simply have tiny electromagnets, holding back, spring-loaded barbs. The moment the device loses power, it immediately anchors itself, implacable, in the blood-vessel walls! Why, any child could have come up with this, both simple, and elegant, solution!
Your anecdote instantly freed all the drug users in prison! It's a miracle!
Had heroin been cheap and easily available he would be dead by now.
Why? Do you believe regulated heroin would somehow be deadlier than un-regulated heroin?
addiction is the problem, not prohibition
And treatment for addiction to non-prohibited drugs works way better than treatment for addiction to prohibited drugs, due to increased access to treatment, fewer social stigmas, a dramatically reduced chance of getting thrown in fucking prison simply for seeking treatment, and better medical and scientific access to the treatment subjects.
if you can't speak meaningfully on the subject of prohibition, you really should stop commenting on the subject of drug use
EA/Bioware could have scored big with SWTOR by using Xwing vs TieFighter style combat in an MMO context where you can upgrade your ship.
Yeah, if Sony didn't patent that idea or some retarded shit.
Because the guys with the guns get a nice cut.
Whooooooosh.
His point was that "poverty" isn't a requirement for fraud. Regardless of the validity of that point, you missed it by a few kilometers.
There are a couple questions I have about the study:
Those sound less like questions about this study and more like questions about the next study that they haven't done yet...
It's the consumers that decide which inventions matter... and an invention which is "like X, but online" might not resonate as well with someone who's never seen X not online.
One is something no sane person with basic knowledge of anything electrical would do, the other is something no sane person with basic knowledge of anything mechanical would do.
You're welcome.
In 2011, he took his Roadster out for a drive and then parked it in a temporary garage while his home was being renovated. Lacking a built-in Tesla charger or a convenient power outlet, he left the car unplugged. Six weeks later his car was dead. It took four men two hours to drag the 2,700-pound Roadster onto a flatbed truck so that it could be shipped to Tesla's Los Angeles area service center, all at the owner's expense. A service manager then informed him that "it's a brick" and that the battery would cost approximately $40,000 to replace. He was further told that this was a special "friends and family" price, strongly implying that Tesla generally charges more.
As a second Roadster owner discovered, the Tesla battery system can completely discharge even when the vehicle is plugged in. This owner's car was plugged into a 100-foot long extension cord for an extended period. The length of this extension cord evidently reduced the electric current to a level insufficient to charge the Tesla, resulting in another "bricked" Roadster.
A third bricked Tesla Roadster apparently sits in its owner's garage in Newport Beach, California. That owner allegedly had a similar prior incident with a BMW-produced electric vehicle. He claimed BMW replaced that vehicle, but Tesla refuses to do the same. The owner either couldn't afford or didn't want to pay Tesla the $40,000 (or more) to fix his car.
A fourth customer shipped his Tesla Roadster to Japan, reportedly only to discover the voltages there were incompatible. By then, it was too late, the car was bricked, and he had to ship it back to the US for repairs.
1) Did not read the manual.
2) Ran into a legitimate issue the car should have warned him about; inconclusive.
3) Did not read the manual, TWICE. Holy shit.
4) Did not do the research.
2. is "inconclusive", because if the other brick-owners described are any indication, it's entirely possible that the car was giving low-current warnings and he just didn't notice and/or give a shit. Not enough info.
It's cute how you think there's some responsible way to inform the press of an anomalous experimental result.
The scientists just did the same thing you'd do if you got some weird result on a browser-based application, and the preliminary obvious steps didn't fix the problem: check to see if everyone else is seeing the same thing on their browsers, so to speak.
It's not their fault if someone in Marketing hears what's going on and writes a company-wide email saying "BROWSERS CAPABLE OF MAGIC!!! Film at eleven!!!"
When they state "the time discrepancy appears to have vanished" it would seem they are unable to reproduce the prior results.
Who is "they"? I saw no such statement in the article.
After tightening the connection and then measuring the time it takes data to travel the length of the fiber, researchers found that the data arrive 60 nanoseconds earlier than assumed. Since this time is subtracted from the overall time of flight, it appears to explain the early arrival of the neutrinos. New data, however, will be needed to confirm this hypothesis.
Sounds to me like they haven't actually reached the point of trying to reproduce the results yet, they just found a discrepency that very closely matches the apparently aberrant prior results.
Citation needed.
Every civilization that has had access to bees since before there was writing?
mostly because of our historical reluctance to tap our own supply, despite it being readily available (Shale oil, gulf oil, tundra oil, the list goes on
Uhhhh huh, I'm sure the Koch brothers goofing around with contango to keep the prices high has nooooothing to do with it.
I'll bet there are examples of women who have been similarly screwed
Funny how you never hear about them, even in open public forums.
Drug and gun laws make things illegal that weren't illegal before, so your argument fails.
Drug laws increase violent crime. Gun laws, in the short term, increase gun violence, and long-term slowly replace it with other forms of violence.
The point of non-neutrality internet regulations is, in fact, to restrict honest use of it. The power to suppress political speech is overwhelmingly more important to any government than the power to briefly annoy copyright violators or whateverthefuck.
Yeah, as an agrarian society...
Because he's a strong condender for the 2012 Republican candidacy.