Slashdot Mirror


User: vel-ex-tech

vel-ex-tech's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
695
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 695

  1. Re:Sue for making you stupid on A Woman Is Suing Her Parents For Posting Embarrassing Childhood Photos To Facebook · · Score: 1

    Who has u19925's naked baby pictures? Let's post them in public and see how u19925 likes it! Do you mind if I have your local newspaper publish them?

    Holy shit this thread is full of people who can't tell the difference between what should remain private and posting shit for all the world to see. Here I was starting to think this site had recovered somewhat.

  2. Re:Why do people continue to believe alarmist crap on The Sixth Mass Extinction Will Hit The Biggest Animals The Hardest, Says Stanford Study (gizmodo.com) · · Score: 1

    You're disputing that tobacco smoking/chewing causes cancer? Really?

    Have you lost your mind?

    You really think we are too dumb to recognize an agenda when we see one?

    No, but I think the alt-right is dangerous, paranoid, and irrational enough to invent an agenda out of whole cloth while completely fucking failing to identify why the economy is about to collapse. You're so far gone to the alt-right, there is no point in arguing with you.

    Remember, some of us gays have guns and fully intend to stand our ground when you assholes come for us.

  3. Re:Summary missing important piece... on Guccifer 2.0 Releases More DNC Documents (politico.com) · · Score: 5, Funny

    Naah, that's overblown. She was just having a routine problem with her human suit. Happens all the time. Those things don't last forever, you know. Gotta be replaced every now and then. The real trick is getting the aging correct since you can't just show up looking like you're 20 again. Humans tend to get suspicious when that happens.

    It's actually a rather complicated procedure because of how tightly integrated human suits are with lizard person physiology, so that's why she needed so much time off in August. "Skinning" can actually be a form of torture and can be fatal without the proper medical attention.

    It should be smooth sailing now!

  4. GP here. Surprised that was modded up.

    Yeah, it's a bit of jerk move logging to reply, but the voices are quite real. In fact, I briefly lost access to medical services because of TERF and other radfem voices, and I now need to travel over 150 miles to see a doctor.

    Once again you demonstrate that you have a very limited experience. You have never once been on the receiving end of a cisfemale with power using sexism* against you, have you?

    Remember that without power, there is no sexism. Are you really so isolated and stuck in the 70s that you cannot imagine a cisfemale having power?

    Both my doctor and psychologist were on board with medical cannabis, but treating the problems that having put up with TERFs and radfems for so long caused me is specifically against my state's medical law. SSRI drugs don't work. However, the waaaawawawaaawawawa replacement does do wonders to help.

    Yep, I'm such a big damned sexist and such a total jerk that cisfemales cannot obtain a $100-$200 refurbished laptop and learn programming on their own. That's so totally all my fault. I must have just mind controlled the cisfemale who gave me this job.

    So, seeing as how I actually do have somebody who is cisfemale ready to fill my position if I give up my job (certainly not a diversity hire--this person is more than capable but just won't have enough interest in programming until she has a job lined up), are you offering to take not just me in but also another person I'm supporting with my job?

    Do you have some other credible way to get a cisfemale programmer to precipitate out the aether?

    Otherwise it's so much waaawawaaawawa.

  5. Re: Look at the source on AAPS Doctors Run Survey On Hillary Clinton's Health (prnewswire.com) · · Score: 0

    Why is it that people who fixate on it only have proposals to make things worse? Why is it that this is the only fact you people know about LGBT folks? Doesn't that seem convenient? Why should I believe you have no sinister motivations? Why should I believe you do not wish to use violence against me?

    I have run out of patience. You want to lock me up in a mental institution and hold me against my will not because I spout off about lizard people but solely because I'm gay. You want to put me in prison. You want to make me wear a pink triangle. You want to send me to a FEMA concentration camp. You want me to be unemployable. You want me to starve to death. You want to torture and humiliate me.

    My actions as an individual and my STD-free status do not matter to you. You believe I have STDs because I said I was gay. You believe I'm a prostitute who tricks men into having sex so I can spread my disease. You believe I'm an invader with a woman suit I can put on and take off in 30 seconds flat. You believe I want to use my woman suit to rape your Hunnies in the bathroom.

    My Libertarian party membership means nothing to you. I was already automatically a secret Democrat to you.

    You believe I have a mental illness. You believe that I am merely confused. You believe you can "cure" me with ECT. You don't even know what ECT is useful for or not. All you know is it involves electro-shock so you think it must be a way to electrocute somebody and cause them horrific pain while keeping them alive.

    You believe that I am coming for your guns. You believe that I am trying to make Christmas illegal. (MERRY FUCKING CHRISTMAS, btw.) You believe that I am trying to recruit your sons and brainwash them.

    I lost my patience with feminism over this shit, and I have no patience to begin to offer the evil, authoritarian tyrants in the alt-right who want to lock me away and control my body.

  6. Re:Look at the source on AAPS Doctors Run Survey On Hillary Clinton's Health (prnewswire.com) · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Thank you for grabbing my attention with this. I will likely be breaking with the Libertarian party this year and voting Democrat, including Clinton. All in all, even if Clinton has Parkinson's, I'll still be voting for her.

    This topic is interesting to me, however, because I think there is definitely something not quite right going on with her. Perhaps she needs to get her human suit refit aboard the lizard person mothership? (Hmm, maybe that's what she was actually doing all August!)

    I just simply cannot do my usual "I don't give a fuck straight ticket Libertarian" thing this year given the rise of the alt-right. My state isn't a "battleground" state according to the pundits, but I'd sort of beg to differ. It regularly flips from a red to a blue state and flops back again every 4-8 years or so. I hear people spouting off alt-right shit all over the place, here and the other site, at the gas station, the grocery store, etc. It scares the bejeezus out of me.

  7. Re:social experiments on Robot Babies Not Effective Birth Control, Australian Study Finds (sky.com) · · Score: 1

    Oh go to hell. There are more than enough men out there who want to be fathers and be there for their children. In case you hadn't noticed, divorce court is heavily biased against giving custody to the father.

    Bigoted Keyboard Warriors like you need to get out more and meet some real people. But I'm sure in your head, you're the One Good Man, and your Hunnies would never, ever turn into psychotic liars after they've lured a man in with marriage and had a kid.

    Some men get lucky and are able to get sole custody of their children. The Hunny will pull out all the stops in that instance, finding whatever allies she can (who have never met the guy) such as pastors, women's shelters, etc, etc. I had to stop dating a guy once because having a trans faggot like me in the picture would have made things ugly quick, and I did not want to be the reason that battle was lost.

    Others aren't so lucky. Your idea of a "deadbeat dad" is plain and simple sexism. It's discrimination. On the other site, we had a debate about whether sexism can exist in the absence of power. Let's presume it can't. This is very much a place where power exists. You're working off a bigoted notion that men are always at fault when divorce occurs. You seek to back this notion up with laws and policies that allow women to gain exclusive custody, laws and policies that allow women to take half a man's possessions with divorce no matter how little she had before marriage, laws that allow the woman to collect child care, and laws to put men in prison who cannot pay child care.

    We got rid of debtor's prison for a reason. Some men who are not allowed to even talk to their children have to work two or three jobs simply to keep up with child care for bitch who took out a restraining order after lying about domestic violence. This is called slavery.

    I am so glad I'm t3h gay and do not want kids. Even if I did want kids, I'd rather wait for biotech to be able to give me a fully functional female reproductive system. Surrogate mothers, attempting a lesbian relationship, all very very risky things.

    I'll get modded to oblivion. It's just a matter of time before you run across the wrong Hunny and realize that yep, old insane Vel who's lived as both genders might just have had some reason based on real reality she kept posting shit like this.

  8. Peter Thiel had a vendetta, and an honorable one at that. How dare Gawker's BKWs (bigoted keyboard warriors) out somebody who is gay. That is inexcusable in my view.

    These financing assholes trying to get rich as a gamble have no honor.

  9. Re:Intelligence into every digital experience? on Microsoft Buys AI-Powered Scheduling App Genee (thestack.com) · · Score: 1

    Nope, sorry, your request has been flagged as sexual harassment by Cortana, and this incident has been reported!

    I would rather have a butler, personally. I don't need some asshole AI playing fucking identity politics and reminding me that I'm an inferior, incomplete assigned male who must be constantly re-educated about just how awful being a woman is.... Because I could have no possible way to understand how people treat you when they think you're a woman.... No siree! None whatsoever, you bathroom rapist! Get back to being a sex slave! That is your only purpose in life!

    The Penis is evil! The Penis shoots Seeds, and makes new Life to poison the Earth with a plague of men, as once it was. But the Gun shoots Death and purifies the Earth of the filth of Brutals. Go forth, and kill! Zardoz has spoken.

  10. Re:Rape sympathizers on Group Wants To Shut Down Tor For a Day On September 1 (softpedia.com) · · Score: 1

    As for slurs, why don't you start by not ever calling anyone an "SJW" again? Take the high ground.

    My ears are still open for a more accurate term. I know that one's confusing to people like you who have never been accused of sexism or rape.

    No idea if that's what happened here, but what do you call the kind of person who takes somebody else's a false rape accusation and proceeds to defame the person accused all over (social) media? I've seen that enough times IRL.

    What about rape cultures? You have no problem with presuming every time an assigned male starts conversation with a womyn-born-womyn that he's trying to rape her? Or if an assigned male living as the female gender is caught in the womyn-born-womyn restroom she must be planning rape? What do you call somebody who thinks those are acceptable attitudes. I don't care if there are bowls of M&Ms or whatever involved in the rationalization.

    I doubt you'll give me a satisfactory answer. Just so glad to be gay.

    Only advice I can leave for men who are actually in public-ish positions is to simply don't talk to women.

    I don't even know why I'm here. This site and the new one have been shit lately.

  11. Re: Rule of thumb: believe the man on Tor Project Confirms Sexual Misconduct By Developer Jacob Appelbaum (theverge.com) · · Score: 2

    Sorry, that's pressuring a woman into sex. Please check yourself into the nearest university's rape culture presentation as soon as possible.

    You have to do the Schrodinger's Rapist dance correctly to even say "hello" to a woman without it being sexual harassment. I assume if you find the actual article (not at that link) they outline what the exact steps are. I don't really have any reason to go find out for myself.

    But yes, generally I prefer guys use your method with me over whatever the hell you're supposed to do to get consent from a woman without it being rape. Perhaps a lawyer here somewhere can draw up a Durable Consent to Intercourse contract. No, a marriage ring won't work. You need a Durable Consent to Intercourse on top of the ring.

    You should also make sure to have her drug tested and give her a breathalyzer immediately before intercourse, because the presence of any drugs or alcohol automatically makes it date rape. I'm not sure what the BAC limit is, but I'd recommend zero tolerance to be safe. If she fails either test, immediately vacate the premise.

    I think you also need to affirm consent every 15-20 seconds during the act, but I'm not sure on that part. It could be more frequently. If the response is any less than an enthusiastic yes or if there is any ambiguity, immediately stop, put your clothes on, and vacate the premise.

    "So you wanna?" is not likely to elicit an enthusiastic yes, so I doubt it could ever work.

    They cover all of this in rape culture training. This is pretty basic stuff. There are other rules such as avoiding the presence of women after dark, especially a woman who's walking alone. Do not make eye contact. Do not allow her to come within 100 feet of you. If she's attacked, do not attempt to intervene (you'll automatically, by policy, be considered complicit in the attack).

    At least that was my take away from rape culture training. If that prevents women from having a good time, that's their fucking problem. Boo hoo.

    Grand Valley State University if you must know. No, they don't advertise this.

  12. Re:Eric S. Raymond wouldn't have a clue on Tor Project Confirms Sexual Misconduct By Developer Jacob Appelbaum (theverge.com) · · Score: 1

    Yes, he's clearly full of shit because I've never been on the receiving end of a false rape accusation and it couldn't ever happen to me because I'm sooo goooood with women.

    I've also never had a woman come to me specifically to sexually harass me to try to set me up for further character assassination because I'm soooo gooood with women.

  13. Should I try to go back to my Chinese Amazon fantasy from before everything became so terribly wrong? I feel that was a much more positive personality. It's better than this reality at any rate.

  14. You'd be angry too if the life you had attempted to have had been raped from you at every turn. "We'd treat you according to your actions, but research shows that since you were assigned the male gender at birth, you're $thing." *present evidence* "Nope! Says right here you were assigned the male gender whether you like it or not!" *present more evidence* "Nice try you bathroom rapist!" *here's my plan to make this work* "Go to hell you demon!" All rational argument goes out the window. I am not an individual. Burn it all down. I'm looking forward to when the bombs fall in 2024.

    This is all wrong. It's not the way it's supposed to be.

  15. Re:Maybe they just don't like the shows? on Men Are Sabotaging The Online Reviews Of TV Shows Aimed At Women (fivethirtyeight.com) · · Score: 1

    Are your genitals good and mutilated? Were you forced to meditate with your head on your desk over lunch break like all the other boys because some other fuckwit who just happened to be assigned the same letter at birth as you was being a fuckwit during class? Were you given the lecture that even an accusation of thinking about date rape would have you expelled from campus?

    Imbalances. What a fucking piece of shit.

  16. Re:Strong enough for a man, made for a woman on Men Are Sabotaging The Online Reviews Of TV Shows Aimed At Women (fivethirtyeight.com) · · Score: 1

    Hey, if that's what make you feel better, whatever. I do commend you for gathering the subtext I had hoped to imply with "cisgendered hunnies," particularly the heterosexual requirement.

    How many cisfemales have you mentored in programming? I'll bet my "score" there is bigger than yours!

    How many times have you been accused of sexism as payment for your efforts?

    Oh, and by the fucking way, it was a cisgendered hunny who informed me that I didn't want women to be programmers. Could have fucking fooled me! I had no fucking idea before she informed me of that!

    Cisgendered hunnies deserve to starve in the street or be whipped until their backs are bloody because they don't have the initiative to run through a Linux from Scratch before they go "I wanna be a programmer" and then eventually "You sexist!" It's not about learning programming. It's about cisfemale hegemony. Same as this bullshit about cisfemale hunnies not having the fucking guts to vote down series they don't like.

  17. Re: Strong enough for a man, made for a woman on Men Are Sabotaging The Online Reviews Of TV Shows Aimed At Women (fivethirtyeight.com) · · Score: 1

    The old term was womyn-born-womyn.

  18. Re:Strong enough for a man, made for a woman on Men Are Sabotaging The Online Reviews Of TV Shows Aimed At Women (fivethirtyeight.com) · · Score: 0

    Ah! That's the trick! When she leaves him, you'll shame him for "not good with women!"

    A lot of us are fucking sick of being judged as sex objects for your cisfemale hunnies.

  19. Re:Strong enough for a man, made for a woman on Men Are Sabotaging The Online Reviews Of TV Shows Aimed At Women (fivethirtyeight.com) · · Score: 1

    Right, the way that the rape culture presentation in college wasn't targeted at me, despite the fact I was forced to attend because of my fucking gender on paper. The way none of those times I spent with my head on my desk---while my (cisfemale) friend were out playing on the playground--simply because of my gender on fucking paper were targeted at me.

  20. Re:Strong enough for a man, made for a woman on Men Are Sabotaging The Online Reviews Of TV Shows Aimed At Women (fivethirtyeight.com) · · Score: 1

    Yes, it is willful blindness at this point. The point is that the rest of us who don't behave poorly will be held accountable for their actions. NO MORE.

  21. Re:Strong enough for a man, made for a woman on Men Are Sabotaging The Online Reviews Of TV Shows Aimed At Women (fivethirtyeight.com) · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it's almost as if we should look to a rape manual like Newton's Principia Mathematica and invent new ways to quantify the numbers. No! We fucking won't! No rape manuals! It's all the fault of those evil oppressor men and those invader bathroom rapist trans women! How dare they not like Sex and the City!!!!

    I mean, for fuck's sake, why shouldn't IMDB fucking restrict cisfemale hunnies to only see reviews from other cisfemale hunnies? I think that's a good fucking idea actually. I'd love to see cisfemales reporting to a medical center somewhere to receive a transvaginal ultrasound to verify they're fucking cisfemale! Forceably inject them with testosterone if they don't pass the test! If cisfemale hunnies can't stand the fact that some of us might just not fucking like Sex and the City, the fuck them!

  22. Re:Strong enough for a man, made for a woman on Men Are Sabotaging The Online Reviews Of TV Shows Aimed At Women (fivethirtyeight.com) · · Score: 1

    Can you not see how pathetic that is? You are trading your dignity and freedom for feigned affection and sex.

    I will never accept the new deal, the legal risks and general indignity of intimate relationships with women today is completely unacceptable to any man with a grain of self respect.

    Just say fucking no to this shit. You are better off without a woman in your life today. Guran-fucking-teed.

    This is truth! Do not be a sexual object to the cisfemale hunnies. Don't wait on them hand and foot. You'll get screwed in the end with child support or else a rape accusation. And yes, she is lying about being on the pill among many other scams that I've seen cisfemale hunnies pull.

    It's such fucking bullshit. My "internet boyfriend" (more like irc penpal) keeps telling me I'll never understand the appeal of a cisfemale hunny because I'm not a man. Maybe that's true. I can accept that. What integrity is left if men and trans women can't stand and tell the cisfemale hunnies and their white knights that we're just fucking sick of it all?

    No, I'm not going to suck feminism's cock like my womanhood is on the line. Fuck feminism. I'm a woman whether or not feminism permits or allows me to be one. Fuck them for even supposing that I'd be willing to compromise who I am just to get a modicum of conditional acceptance. Remember the Michigan Womyn's Music Festival always.

  23. Re:Men's interests might be more narrow on Men Are Sabotaging The Online Reviews Of TV Shows Aimed At Women (fivethirtyeight.com) · · Score: 0

    These are all more reasons to completely shun cisfemales. People assigned the male gender at birth will never be free to be themselves as long as the cisfemale hunnies keep getting put on that pedestal. It's men that do it, too, in some sick alpha male dominance ritual.

    Just let cisfemales starve in the streets.

  24. Re:Strong enough for a man, made for a woman on Men Are Sabotaging The Online Reviews Of TV Shows Aimed At Women (fivethirtyeight.com) · · Score: 0

    Well why the fuck not? That's the crux of the issue here. Cisgendered hunnies don't review shit! Their epidemiological position is silence! And feminism ENCOURAGES this! How the fuck do you help silence?!

    Get her up there on IMDB posthaste and have her give Xena: Warrior Princess a bad review because there's violence. There's even one episode where Xena offers acceptance to a crossdresser. I'm sure that'll infuriate your wife!

  25. Re:Strong enough for a man, made for a woman on Men Are Sabotaging The Online Reviews Of TV Shows Aimed At Women (fivethirtyeight.com) · · Score: 1

    Well fuck crying manbabies then. Was that the same one guy who wanted to boycott Fury Road because *gasp* it had a female protagonist?

    Just don't call me fucking sexist because I didn't see it in the theater. I think the last movie I saw in the theater, just because I'm such a big fucking sexist who doesn't watch Sex and the City, was Star Trek into Darkness. Carol Marcus about made me lose my lunch. Probably the only time in my life I'll agree with feminists about something.