As history has taught us, this is just one of many technologies that derived from the 80s that is in the process to be possibly fast tracked, and replaced for a loyalty-free variant. What is interesting is it took the mass collaboration of multiple groups to put together a newer, and better codec for overall support. Imagine if other technologies were affected the same as they age.
These are key things to consider in this "Fair Use" decision:
1.) Furthermore, this use was noncommercial, because the photo was not used to advertise a product or generate revenue."
2.) While Brammer's purpose in capturing and publishing the photograph was promotional and expressive, Violent Hues' purpose in using the photograph was informational: to provide festival attendees with information regarding the local area.
These are important reasons to consider when it comes to fair use cases.
With the understanding of how people view Yelp reviews as a decisive measure on services, it also seems redundant to hold Yelp reviews as a whole to be the end-all be-all. If all platforms that allow the masses to place reviews on content were to place similar claim to a reviewers opinion regardless of scale it would immediately get slapped down. This is an indication where ridiculous thought processes is losing ground to common sense thought processes.
From the conceptual look...
While this ideology would be a good stepping stone to microcomputer design, and maybe even push to smaller transition design, this from a consumer standpoint will most ironically give people a better way to hide their porn.
Moore's law is about transistors per unit area. Adding cores increases both. Only new manufacturing techniques to cram in more transistors will let the trend continue, and they are indeed pushing the limits of what's physically possible.
At 7nm we're talking features that are only about three dozen atoms wide. The current roadmap has 5nm production in a few years. This kind of thing is well outside my knowledge but I'm pretty confident you can't make devices smaller than a single atom, so they are rapidly approaching a wall one way or another!
=Smidge=
Let's break this down and make it simple.
Moore's law is the observation that the number of transistors in a dense integrated circuit doubles about every two years.
Simply put this is the founded definition.
Also,
Moore's prediction proved accurate for several decades, and has been used in the semiconductor industry to guide long-term planning and to set targets for research and development. Advancements in digital electronics are strongly linked to Moore's law: quality-adjusted microprocessor prices, memory capacity, sensors and even the number and size of pixels in digital cameras. Digital electronics has contributed to world economic growth in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. Moore's law describes a driving force of technological and social change, productivity, and economic growth.
For those that need a more in-depth understanding of Moore's Law go here:
https://www.britannica.com/tec...
Why? That we are all on the same page about the true definition of Moore's Law.
The only one missing the point is you. This isn't so much as missing a point as it is taking a point with a marketing tactic and reversing it against a competitor.
There were points made from both AMD and Intel. I'm surprised no one saw both. In hindsight it really doesn't matter. Both companies made bad PR stunts. It's just the usual competition.
It's you who's missing the point. Intel makes fun of AMD by saying they wanted the Intel CPUs so badly... it's PR and the whole world is watching. They can't talk crap about their competition. Making lighthearted fun of them is the way to go.
It honestly couldn't have been worst than Intel's PR stunt at Computex with a server processor, and trying to pass it off as a desktop product.
Here are our thoughts on the whole scenario. It looks like Intel was caught off guard with no previously planning for a reveal because they weren't prepared to show a new CPU for future launch. It also looks like they are scrambling to design a processor so they can show something in Q3 when AMD decides to launch its new CPU line. In the process of this Intel decided to use a bit of a smoke screen with an 8176 Zeon processor to boast similar stats.
It would have been more adventitious for Intel to state they have something coming soon rather than throw a sleight of hand hoping people wouldn't notice it. Not only was it purposely deceptive, but it was a dirty play pull peoples attention from AMD's new release.
Technically Cores, Threads, and PCI-E Lanes is the more sought-after requirement. Single threading performance is becoming a thing of the past with more applications supporting multi-core/multi-thread design. Sure, single-threaded performance still has it's merits, but nowhere near what it used to. Realistically, even at 6 GHz or even 7 Ghz it will realistically make the difference on the single-threaded spectrum. Not so much on the more load intensive processes more people are seeking.
The irony to it is now is going back 10, maybe 15 years ago faster was always better. The current consensus now is more PCI-E Lanes, Cores, and Threads are the way to go.
After looking into this.. it looked like Intel scrambled to put something together rather than have something readily available. A closer look reveals it uses the same socket set as the 8176 and 8180 Intel Xeon Platinum Socket LGA 3647 at 28 Cores and 56 Threads. It's basically a Xeon server CPU overclocked to 5Ghz and rigged with an extreme cooling solution to keep from frying the chip. Considering this socket type and CPU, this will be a very niche market for people that want to spend $7,000 to $10,000 on a server CPU if this is the case versus maybe $1600 to $1700 for the new Threadripper 2?
I also found it to be very sketchy that Intel wouldn't show the physical processor where AMD gladly flashed it's product. Does Intel really have a next generation processor to compete with AMD or is this a smoke screen to buy time for Q3.
In reading the details of the study; this would beg to question how accurate the participant results are , and how many of the participants consider what being truly mobile really means, and if said views are based on users with wired internet through a wireless router using nothing but mobile devices as mobile-only within that household.
Don't get me wrong. Going wireless is not necessarily a bad thing, however, reliability, and security would just be a few of the top concerns with a mobile-only solution.
Slashdot Mirror
As history has taught us, this is just one of many technologies that derived from the 80s that is in the process to be possibly fast tracked, and replaced for a loyalty-free variant. What is interesting is it took the mass collaboration of multiple groups to put together a newer, and better codec for overall support. Imagine if other technologies were affected the same as they age.
These are key things to consider in this "Fair Use" decision:
1.) Furthermore, this use was noncommercial, because the photo was not used to advertise a product or generate revenue."
2.) While Brammer's purpose in capturing and publishing the photograph was promotional and expressive, Violent Hues' purpose in using the photograph was informational: to provide festival attendees with information regarding the local area.
These are important reasons to consider when it comes to fair use cases.
With the understanding of how people view Yelp reviews as a decisive measure on services, it also seems redundant to hold Yelp reviews as a whole to be the end-all be-all. If all platforms that allow the masses to place reviews on content were to place similar claim to a reviewers opinion regardless of scale it would immediately get slapped down. This is an indication where ridiculous thought processes is losing ground to common sense thought processes.
Read this and was half expecting someone in the comments to say "It's not bestiality, it's inter species erotica.".
From the conceptual look... While this ideology would be a good stepping stone to microcomputer design, and maybe even push to smaller transition design, this from a consumer standpoint will most ironically give people a better way to hide their porn.
Moore's law is about transistors per unit area. Adding cores increases both. Only new manufacturing techniques to cram in more transistors will let the trend continue, and they are indeed pushing the limits of what's physically possible.
At 7nm we're talking features that are only about three dozen atoms wide. The current roadmap has 5nm production in a few years. This kind of thing is well outside my knowledge but I'm pretty confident you can't make devices smaller than a single atom, so they are rapidly approaching a wall one way or another! =Smidge=
Let's break this down and make it simple. Moore's law is the observation that the number of transistors in a dense integrated circuit doubles about every two years. Simply put this is the founded definition. Also, Moore's prediction proved accurate for several decades, and has been used in the semiconductor industry to guide long-term planning and to set targets for research and development. Advancements in digital electronics are strongly linked to Moore's law: quality-adjusted microprocessor prices, memory capacity, sensors and even the number and size of pixels in digital cameras. Digital electronics has contributed to world economic growth in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. Moore's law describes a driving force of technological and social change, productivity, and economic growth. For those that need a more in-depth understanding of Moore's Law go here: https://www.britannica.com/tec... Why? That we are all on the same page about the true definition of Moore's Law.
will have to pony up for a much more expensive X399 motherboard with the TR4 socket
Doesn't matter, they will not be able to afford the RAM anyways :)
Sadly, RAM is expensive on both ends of the bus.
Boy talk about missing the point....
The only one missing the point is you. This isn't so much as missing a point as it is taking a point with a marketing tactic and reversing it against a competitor.
There were points made from both AMD and Intel. I'm surprised no one saw both. In hindsight it really doesn't matter. Both companies made bad PR stunts. It's just the usual competition.
It's you who's missing the point. Intel makes fun of AMD by saying they wanted the Intel CPUs so badly... it's PR and the whole world is watching. They can't talk crap about their competition. Making lighthearted fun of them is the way to go.
It honestly couldn't have been worst than Intel's PR stunt at Computex with a server processor, and trying to pass it off as a desktop product.
Here are our thoughts on the whole scenario. It looks like Intel was caught off guard with no previously planning for a reveal because they weren't prepared to show a new CPU for future launch. It also looks like they are scrambling to design a processor so they can show something in Q3 when AMD decides to launch its new CPU line. In the process of this Intel decided to use a bit of a smoke screen with an 8176 Zeon processor to boast similar stats. It would have been more adventitious for Intel to state they have something coming soon rather than throw a sleight of hand hoping people wouldn't notice it. Not only was it purposely deceptive, but it was a dirty play pull peoples attention from AMD's new release.
Technically Cores, Threads, and PCI-E Lanes is the more sought-after requirement. Single threading performance is becoming a thing of the past with more applications supporting multi-core/multi-thread design. Sure, single-threaded performance still has it's merits, but nowhere near what it used to. Realistically, even at 6 GHz or even 7 Ghz it will realistically make the difference on the single-threaded spectrum. Not so much on the more load intensive processes more people are seeking.
The irony to it is now is going back 10, maybe 15 years ago faster was always better. The current consensus now is more PCI-E Lanes, Cores, and Threads are the way to go.
After looking into this .. it looked like Intel scrambled to put something together rather than have something readily available. A closer look reveals it uses the same socket set as the 8176 and 8180 Intel Xeon Platinum Socket LGA 3647 at 28 Cores and 56 Threads. It's basically a Xeon server CPU overclocked to 5Ghz and rigged with an extreme cooling solution to keep from frying the chip. Considering this socket type and CPU, this will be a very niche market for people that want to spend $7,000 to $10,000 on a server CPU if this is the case versus maybe $1600 to $1700 for the new Threadripper 2?
I also found it to be very sketchy that Intel wouldn't show the physical processor where AMD gladly flashed it's product. Does Intel really have a next generation processor to compete with AMD or is this a smoke screen to buy time for Q3.
In reading the details of the study; this would beg to question how accurate the participant results are , and how many of the participants consider what being truly mobile really means, and if said views are based on users with wired internet through a wireless router using nothing but mobile devices as mobile-only within that household. Don't get me wrong. Going wireless is not necessarily a bad thing, however, reliability, and security would just be a few of the top concerns with a mobile-only solution.