It will induce drone makers to start donating to Congress (cynical, but difficult to actually disprove that's the reason for the regulation, not the ostensible surface reasons) and in short order, people here on Slashdot will be talking about the corrupting influence of drone makers on Congress.
The empire that keeps the trade routes open prospers. Those that lord over their own people falter.
Someone will get to the asteroids. Better a free people than the new economic core of empire, China, with its skyrocketting prosperity due to greater economic freedom than in the US.
We are seeing there's a hell of a lot more to freedom w.r.t. prosperity than just freedom of speech.
Some have a strange sense of propriety that all must kneel to get permission of the king before doing anything. That's not freedom...even in a democracy.
Right after 9/11, in the heat to Get Those Guys and their network, the NSA went into vast recoding depositories to track back conversations, actual recorded calls. They admitted it and it kind of blew by in the moment.
Not only that, but they (and California even moreso) have crossed the linr from local government to quasi-national bloat and over-regulating government, placing burdens on their populations that were normally reserved (such as it is) for the top dog government.
Now they are plagued at two levels.
Europe is going the other way, introducing a power-inhaling pan-European government atop their own bloated national governments. Don't wanna be left out by their own dueling bloat levels.
You can cross the street without looking both ways and maybe get hit by a car. Oh, sure, you had the right of way. You're still dead, but you had the rogjt of way.
I remember the shock in the US whem the UK decided they could hold your silence against you. You were he heroes, the original English system on which much of the US is based, how sad you are straying.
We will. That has happened repeatedly in the past. It is no more logical for us to worry about humanity in 100 years than it would have been for people in 1900 to worry about us today.
Think of how much has been invented -- yet they would have been concerned about horse poop buildup and poop dust all over everything. 'Let's limit use of horses!" slowing the economy and leaving us with, say, 1980 level tech, "helping" absolutely no one.
So, to people 100 years from now. What did we do? Keep a powerful economy so you can have flying cars and autodocs, or weaken and hobble is so you don't?
We are the people in 1900 looking to hobble ourselves to "help" those way off in the future...of 2014.
I am not sure what planet you're yabbering from. They made a request. This is the opposite of hijacking.
From DC's point of view, it's called being nice. They need only send a letter agreeing to it, and they get good will. If they are tied up in exclusivity contracts, you have a quick conference call with those other businesses and explain the following: At this point, I would be in favor of an organized boycot of the upcoming Superman/Batman movie
Based on the buff pattern of his hand, he jerks off lefty. Flushing suggests approximately 6.5 hours ago. Computer estimates from wear pattern thinking of one Taylor Swift, body part: nose and upper lip.
This training can be completely subconscious by the trainer, too. A little flinch, slowing down, anything, and the dog reacts because that's what he's trained to do, in addition to actually smelling something.
Various "intelligent" animals that count out the answers to simple math problems were traced to the trainer relaxing after the animal had tapped X times, and the animal saw it and knew it was time to stop tapping. Researchers could predict when the animal would stop tapping by watching only the researcher, not seeing the animal, and not even knowing the question.
If further investigation would never have happened without the prompting of (presumably much more damning) illegal evidence, I submit this form of construction is itself illegal.
Just like America and Europe were about 150 years ago.
What some cynics in the West call our "race to the bottom", these dirt-floor nations with billions are rocketing upwards in quality, and no doubt length, of life, and they call it a boon, and a "finally, it's about time!" moment.
I'll tell you what -- all it'll take is the FDA causing the delay for one year of a decent cancer or heart disease or diabetes drug, and boom! They've cost more lives than they will have saved since 1938.
The entire concept is a joke because most countries' security are even more intrusive than the US, and abusing spying on their own citizens to the political benefit of the people in power there is long-term standard behavior.
My gripe with the current NSA issues is writing "Ya know, agent, ya really should get a warrant first" on a piece of paper is no barrier whatsoever to a G. Gordon Liddy type spying on citizens for some faction's political gain. I'm trying to stop that which goes on all the time in other countries.
The term "living document" is used in the context of its meaning changing outside the amendment process, where what it means changes because how people choose to interpret it changes.
Many people disagree with that concept -- there are very good reasons to force people to amend the constitution to make such large changes to what the government is permitted to do. Mainly that historically, politicians leading people on rage crusades to increase the politician's power is standard operating procedure on the failure of freedom.
If a change is a good idea, then most people will agree, not just a transient bare majority, and will continue to agree 5 and 10 years down the road. This is the amendment process.
If you think the system's broken now, try later when the only people who get to run are those who can cobble together enough votes to get government funding, which is to say, the two main parties as they currently stand.
The only people to even touch on that percentage the past fifty years were Ross Perot, who funded himself (this will be illegal now???) and John Anderson, the libertarian candidate in 1980.
Yes, this will fix the problem...in the sense of entrenching the status quo even more.
Thanks but no thanks.
The entire front page of that kickstarter is nothing but generic fix the government platitudes...by design...as many politicians have blabbered about in innumerable campaigns of the past...for the purpose of getting you onboard fantasizing what *you* care about is what *they're* talking about.
say, in the US? If not, it's time to escalate this to the President, whose job is to defend American rights against all assaults, including the combined European Union.
As they should, because those with the most property benefit the most from city infrastructure, police and fire services, and national defense. Our society was built upon the understanding that those who benefit the most from something should pay the most.
Who told you that? Our society was built on the idea people should be free, meaning free from government, meaning free from politicians and muscular interests that could twist their arm to twist everyone's arm.
Slashdot Mirror
It will induce drone makers to start donating to Congress (cynical, but difficult to actually disprove that's the reason for the regulation, not the ostensible surface reasons) and in short order, people here on Slashdot will be talking about the corrupting influence of drone makers on Congress.
The empire that keeps the trade routes open prospers. Those that lord over their own people falter.
Someone will get to the asteroids. Better a free people than the new economic core of empire, China, with its skyrocketting prosperity due to greater economic freedom than in the US.
We are seeing there's a hell of a lot more to freedom w.r.t. prosperity than just freedom of speech.
Some have a strange sense of propriety that all must kneel to get permission of the king before doing anything. That's not freedom...even in a democracy.
Right after 9/11, in the heat to Get Those Guys and their network, the NSA went into vast recoding depositories to track back conversations, actual recorded calls. They admitted it and it kind of blew by in the moment.
Am I the only one who remembers this?
Not only that, but they (and California even moreso) have crossed the linr from local government to quasi-national bloat and over-regulating government, placing burdens on their populations that were normally reserved (such as it is) for the top dog government.
Now they are plagued at two levels.
Europe is going the other way, introducing a power-inhaling pan-European government atop their own bloated national governments. Don't wanna be left out by their own dueling bloat levels.
You can cross the street without looking both ways and maybe get hit by a car. Oh, sure, you had the right of way. You're still dead, but you had the rogjt of way.
I remember the shock in the US whem the UK decided they could hold your silence against you. You were he heroes, the original English system on which much of the US is based, how sad you are straying.
Additionally, if keys are not incriminatory, why is he in jail for not providing them?
We will. That has happened repeatedly in the past. It is no more logical for us to worry about humanity in 100 years than it would have been for people in 1900 to worry about us today.
Think of how much has been invented -- yet they would have been concerned about horse poop buildup and poop dust all over everything. 'Let's limit use of horses!" slowing the economy and leaving us with, say, 1980 level tech, "helping" absolutely no one.
So, to people 100 years from now. What did we do? Keep a powerful economy so you can have flying cars and autodocs, or weaken and hobble is so you don't?
We are the people in 1900 looking to hobble ourselves to "help" those way off in the future...of 2014.
Thanks for the "help".
Well, don't go stealing Russian credit card numbers.
I am not sure what planet you're yabbering from. They made a request. This is the opposite of hijacking.
From DC's point of view, it's called being nice. They need only send a letter agreeing to it, and they get good will. If they are tied up in exclusivity contracts, you have a quick conference call with those other businesses and explain the following: At this point, I would be in favor of an organized boycot of the upcoming Superman/Batman movie
Based on the buff pattern of his hand, he jerks off lefty. Flushing suggests approximately 6.5 hours ago. Computer estimates from wear pattern thinking of one Taylor Swift, body part: nose and upper lip.
It's on its way, people.
This training can be completely subconscious by the trainer, too. A little flinch, slowing down, anything, and the dog reacts because that's what he's trained to do, in addition to actually smelling something.
Various "intelligent" animals that count out the answers to simple math problems were traced to the trainer relaxing after the animal had tapped X times, and the animal saw it and knew it was time to stop tapping. Researchers could predict when the animal would stop tapping by watching only the researcher, not seeing the animal, and not even knowing the question.
Do memory devices have a specific smell or are they just going by human scent?
"It smells like...failure."
If further investigation would never have happened without the prompting of (presumably much more damning) illegal evidence, I submit this form of construction is itself illegal.
I assume they have a quick and easy method to hold the phone or ship it somewhere or provide a mechanism to heap invective on President Obama.
Just like America and Europe were about 150 years ago.
What some cynics in the West call our "race to the bottom", these dirt-floor nations with billions are rocketing upwards in quality, and no doubt length, of life, and they call it a boon, and a "finally, it's about time!" moment.
I'll tell you what -- all it'll take is the FDA causing the delay for one year of a decent cancer or heart disease or diabetes drug, and boom! They've cost more lives than they will have saved since 1938.
The entire concept is a joke because most countries' security are even more intrusive than the US, and abusing spying on their own citizens to the political benefit of the people in power there is long-term standard behavior.
My gripe with the current NSA issues is writing "Ya know, agent, ya really should get a warrant first" on a piece of paper is no barrier whatsoever to a G. Gordon Liddy type spying on citizens for some faction's political gain. I'm trying to stop that which goes on all the time in other countries.
The taint under the balls of the future dictator you will inevitably worship?
The term "living document" is used in the context of its meaning changing outside the amendment process, where what it means changes because how people choose to interpret it changes.
Many people disagree with that concept -- there are very good reasons to force people to amend the constitution to make such large changes to what the government is permitted to do. Mainly that historically, politicians leading people on rage crusades to increase the politician's power is standard operating procedure on the failure of freedom.
If a change is a good idea, then most people will agree, not just a transient bare majority, and will continue to agree 5 and 10 years down the road. This is the amendment process.
Someone gave this -1 troll. Ummm, that would be -1 orc, dumbass.
If you think the system's broken now, try later when the only people who get to run are those who can cobble together enough votes to get government funding, which is to say, the two main parties as they currently stand.
The only people to even touch on that percentage the past fifty years were Ross Perot, who funded himself (this will be illegal now???) and John Anderson, the libertarian candidate in 1980.
Yes, this will fix the problem...in the sense of entrenching the status quo even more.
Thanks but no thanks.
The entire front page of that kickstarter is nothing but generic fix the government platitudes...by design...as many politicians have blabbered about in innumerable campaigns of the past...for the purpose of getting you onboard fantasizing what *you* care about is what *they're* talking about.
Ahehe heheh eh ahah AHAHAHAHAH. In other languages, jajajajajaja loloololol xaxaxaxaxaxa, or orc, kekekekekekeke.
say, in the US? If not, it's time to escalate this to the President, whose job is to defend American rights against all assaults, including the combined European Union.
As they should, because those with the most property benefit the most from city infrastructure, police and fire services, and national defense. Our society was built upon the understanding that those who benefit the most from something should pay the most.
Who told you that? Our society was built on the idea people should be free, meaning free from government, meaning free from politicians and muscular interests that could twist their arm to twist everyone's arm.