You know, maybe we should just individuals as individuals rather than members of group. Your entire basis of argument is to lump an entire group of people into one class, say part of that class might have a mental illness so the entire group should be disqualified.
That was the same argument for segregation and it means your a bigot.
Yes we understand. Democrats are all bad and Republicans are all good. We've got your train of thought.
So what about all the Democrats who became Republicans after the Republican party introduced their "Southern Effort" to recruit segregationist lawmakers to the party after the Democrats passed the civil rights bill. You know like Jeff Sessions or any one of a number of current Republicans? After all most of them spent more time as democrats than they've spent as republicans.
Be careful, that other tribe who is all bad an irredeemable is trying to do something and because they are all bad whatever they are doing must be pure evil!
After a certain number of licenses you can't buy any more without executing an enterprise license agreement, this is one of the terms in EULA. If you have 500 employees and you are buying your software a license at at time you're wasting money and likely in violation of the license.
No he doesn't. Even if he did the constitution mentions misdemeanors, which could include jaywalking. You don't think they could find him indictable for a misdemeanor? I suggest you read the following as obviously this has never happened no one knows for sure what the actual requirements are.
Not just that, but to fail to illegally stomp out an investigation. He's angry as Sessions for not stopping the Russia investigation. He wants to reorganize the FBI and put them under direct control of the president so he can politicize law enforcement.
Just remember Trump supporters. The same things you let Trump do will be available to the next Democratic president.
A Microsoft enterprise license already includes the ability to use the newest software as soon as it's released. My understand is that the difference this time is the new enterprise license terms charge extra if you aren't using Office365. Microsoft is gaming their deployment numbers by exploiting licensing terms to force people to upgrade. This forced most large business to upgrade because it costs more not to. Now mind you they could have already upgraded without cost, the license change was simply to accelerate this change, likely so they could game their deployment numbers for wall street.
It's the business licensing. If your licensing more than a few seats you have to buy the enterprise license and Microsoft forced everyone with an enterprise license to upgrade. Our IT was sending out emails telling everyone to upgrade because of it.
IMO it's not a legitimate metric when you force every existing business license to upgrade.
Create a new company, give class A (voting) ownership shares to current stockholders which breaks all financial links with Google. Give/sell (with a loan) the new company the sole right to sell advertising in Europe, with the cost that they must remit X% of the sales revenue to Google for this exclusive right. This would include a contract clause that Google can terminate the relationship at any time (in the event the independent company does something Google doesn't like). End all Google parent company operation in Europe. Any future business in the EU should be setup the same way, no direct control by Google licensed out to Google created independent entities. Google's profits are no longer profits, the payments could be structured as loan payments or dividends to reduce the taxes.
The Courts couldn't fine these new companies because they are independent business unconnected to Google and the independent company would have no access to change Google listings.
Honestly I've always wondered why they didn't do this from the start for all their advertising sales as it would insulate the main company from attacks on the revenue stream. And in the end Google USA would be immune from attacks by foreign court systems looking to pollute it's listings. In one simple stroke the power of the EU to regulate Google listings goes up in smoke.
This has little to nothing to do with American manufacturing. The product was a joke, I doubt it sold in quantities large enough to make it even worth anything. Nobody is paying $22K for a 55" TV with touchscreen.
I bet the only ones they sold were to cable news channels as that's the only place I've ever seen them.
Don't kid yourself, just the net neutrality they will get (pay) Congress to pass a new toothless regulation that bars the states from passing individual regulations. This is a time honored tradition in communications lobbying.
I'm sure Trump will go right along with it because if telecom companies can't sell your privacy to the highest bidder it will be bad for jobs.
The money was likely how they found him. Bitcoin and other crypto currencies are completely traceable if it is a real bank account or are converted a real money. They only remain anonymous while they are never used. The minute you do anything with them you tie them to your real life and with block chain public it becomes trivial for law enforcement to follow the block chain transaction to your real bank account and arrest you. A canadian living in Thailand with millions in money was likely creating so many transactions that it was trivial for them to trace him, the hard part was the international police effort but they likely had him for months while it was arranged.
Silk Road would have never been caught if it hadn't been for his early advertising that tied it to his real name because he'd never converted to cash any of the collected bitcoins he received which never gave them the financial transaction to tie to him.
The problem is the 10 episodes and following the BBC/UK television production standards. They should be doing the 22-26 episodes common to the US market.
This thing alone is the thing I hate most about Netflix's series.
Imagine that, someone claiming this is government regulation on slashdot.
This isn't government regulation, it's crony capitalism. This is the largest firms getting together with congress to write a law that will enevitably favor them to distract from the real issue. Whereas regulation would be the independent regulators who are not subject to the whims of politics creating a regulatory policy that gives everyone a level playing field then enforces those rules without regard to the size or political contributions of the violator.
What will come out of congress will be exactly the type of regulation the big companies like Comcast and ATT prefer, that's the kind that lets them do whatever they want, with no enforcement and prevents the FTC from declaring anything a monopoly. Mark my words, the big ISPs will write the bill and it will do the exact opposite of what the net-neutrality movement is about.
Must be a one of those new definitions of "new form of transportation" too. It's not new to take a technology that's existed for 200 years and upsize it.
It's neither new, nor here now. It's also got all the ugly problems that Trains have such as defined tracks with massive infrastructure costs. The reason cars won over trains is because of this, in comparison to RR tracks Roadways are ridiculously cheap and I have to believe that this hyperloop track will make a regular RR track look cheap. For comparison a high speed rail line from LA to SanFran is projected to cost $42 billion (I suspect the real number is closer to $200 when you factor in all the other costs like moving utilities). Building a road the same distance would cost 1/100th that. I suspect a hyperloop track for the same distance would be 10x as much as the railroad.
It's called Let's Encrypt. Use it, love it. 90 Day certs, full automatic signing and updating. Built-in support in most distributions (even pfsense has a package now).
If you are paying for anything other than an EV certificate you're an idiot.
Never underestimate Intel. They could easily rush production on the next generation or a process bump or something else by throwing a lot of money at it. With the AMD64 / Pentium D stuff where Intel was caught flat footed with nothing they had a better chip in 2 years. I suspect Intel has been sandbagging performance waiting to see what AMD could do and they could already have something sampling that will be better.
Either was it's good for the consumer because competition from AMD always drives down prices. The last time AMD competed effectively processor prices fell more than 50% and sometimes as much as 80%. I'd love to see Ryzen and Epyc be competitive because it will mean cheaper CPU's all around.
Rule of Law? I'd have to wonder if this is a another "rule suspension" where Trump appointees are deliberately ignoring the rule of law and imposing a change in rules without following the procedure required by law.
There is a VERY good reason congress required that rule making follow very strict procedures, that public input is received and that this process take a certain amount of time. This will be yet another in a long line of Trump cabinet members breaking the law and making or breaking regulations without following the law. You know what the funny part is, there will people who will defend this but don't consider the consequences of what this means the next time there's a democrat in the presidents office (2020).
Personally I think Judges should start issuing personal fines against the heads of these departments, the rule making process has very strict legally required steps that have been around for several decades. You don't get to just willy-nilly change federal regulations, there is a fucking process that needs to be followed to allow for public comment and to give opposing people and companies the ability to challenge the rules before they go into effect. This administration has CONTEMPT for the rule making process and the heads of departments should be personally financially responsible for that contempt, ignorance of the rule making requirement is not excuse. Maybe when a few of these incompetent idiots Trump nominated get hit with personal fines they will stop breaking the law.
Tesla is now producing the batteries for Tesla power systems in Nevada now, they stopped using the Asian produced cells for storage products a month ago. There is far more than just a battery cell that goes into a product like Tesla is offering. There are charge controllers, cooling systems (Tesla cells are water cooled), transformers, storage and systems to make repair easier.
This is not just a big battery, it's far more. Because everything is assembled into a standard shipping container it's just a matter of shipping them out from the gigafactory and then putting them on a ship. Once docked in austrailia they'll be loaded onto a truck or train and shipped to the site where they'll be unloaded and connected to the grid. The size of this battery is going to require dozens of the standard full size shipping crates, they would simply hook up each container as it arrived.
Go to the tesla website and look at the pictures for their industrial batteries, you can see everything you want to know in those pictures.
With the gigafactory in production the latest news I've seen is that Tesla can produce 1kwh of batteries for about $125 so they are making nearly $100 in gross margin per kwh on that sale.
Anything the president does is NEWS. Get used to that idea because it was as true in the Reagan administration as it was in the Clinton, Obama and Bush admins. You might be too young to realize it, but that's the entire reason they call it the bully pulpit because anything they do or say is automatically national news.
That's how the system works whether you like it or not, I'm sure you loved it when Obama was in office and you could laugh and ridicule him, but all of a sudden your pony is in office and it's not ok. Well here in the real world that's how it works, you don't have to like it but you don't get to deny reality.
The same suggestion you make should be taken to heart by you.
CNN didn't speak to hanassholesolo until AFTER the apology was made and all posting history was deleted. There can be no extortion if no threat was made and no "consideration" to CNN was made. CNN gained nothing by with holding his name, they did so only after he begged CNN not to include his real name and told them he'd already appoligized and deleted his prior posts. CNN agreed to withold his name, but did not make a promise to do so in the future if he remains in the news.
There was no extortion unless you distort the facts. Frankly I'm happy we've finally reached a point where news sources don't automatically name people posting anonymous comments, it's a MAJOR stepup from what would have happened even a year ago. A year ago every TV network in the world would have camped on the guys front lawn trying to get comments.
I don't make racist or anti-Semitic comments when I'm "blowing off steam" or for the "lulz", I don't belittle people to make myself feel better. If you do this you should be perfectly happy with your friends, neighbors and family members finding out you do it. If you are embarrassed or ashamed for doing this shit then you KNOW what you are doing is wrong.
I'm not ashamed or afraid of anything I've posted becoming attached to my real name, are you? If you are you should grow the fuck up and stop being an asshole.
Slashdot Mirror
You know, maybe we should just individuals as individuals rather than members of group. Your entire basis of argument is to lump an entire group of people into one class, say part of that class might have a mental illness so the entire group should be disqualified.
That was the same argument for segregation and it means your a bigot.
Yes we understand. Democrats are all bad and Republicans are all good. We've got your train of thought.
So what about all the Democrats who became Republicans after the Republican party introduced their "Southern Effort" to recruit segregationist lawmakers to the party after the Democrats passed the civil rights bill. You know like Jeff Sessions or any one of a number of current Republicans? After all most of them spent more time as democrats than they've spent as republicans.
Be careful, that other tribe who is all bad an irredeemable is trying to do something and because they are all bad whatever they are doing must be pure evil!
After a certain number of licenses you can't buy any more without executing an enterprise license agreement, this is one of the terms in EULA. If you have 500 employees and you are buying your software a license at at time you're wasting money and likely in violation of the license.
No he doesn't. Even if he did the constitution mentions misdemeanors, which could include jaywalking. You don't think they could find him indictable for a misdemeanor? I suggest you read the following as obviously this has never happened no one knows for sure what the actual requirements are.
http://litigation.findlaw.com/...
Not just that, but to fail to illegally stomp out an investigation. He's angry as Sessions for not stopping the Russia investigation. He wants to reorganize the FBI and put them under direct control of the president so he can politicize law enforcement.
Just remember Trump supporters. The same things you let Trump do will be available to the next Democratic president.
Don't worry more than half that number will still available when Trump is voted out of office. Who want's to work for such a dickhead?
A Microsoft enterprise license already includes the ability to use the newest software as soon as it's released. My understand is that the difference this time is the new enterprise license terms charge extra if you aren't using Office365. Microsoft is gaming their deployment numbers by exploiting licensing terms to force people to upgrade. This forced most large business to upgrade because it costs more not to. Now mind you they could have already upgraded without cost, the license change was simply to accelerate this change, likely so they could game their deployment numbers for wall street.
It's the business licensing. If your licensing more than a few seats you have to buy the enterprise license and Microsoft forced everyone with an enterprise license to upgrade. Our IT was sending out emails telling everyone to upgrade because of it.
IMO it's not a legitimate metric when you force every existing business license to upgrade.
Google Should call their bluff on this.
Create a new company, give class A (voting) ownership shares to current stockholders which breaks all financial links with Google.
Give/sell (with a loan) the new company the sole right to sell advertising in Europe, with the cost that they must remit X% of the sales revenue to Google for this exclusive right. This would include a contract clause that Google can terminate the relationship at any time (in the event the independent company does something Google doesn't like).
End all Google parent company operation in Europe.
Any future business in the EU should be setup the same way, no direct control by Google licensed out to Google created independent entities. Google's profits are no longer profits, the payments could be structured as loan payments or dividends to reduce the taxes.
The Courts couldn't fine these new companies because they are independent business unconnected to Google and the independent company would have no access to change Google listings.
Honestly I've always wondered why they didn't do this from the start for all their advertising sales as it would insulate the main company from attacks on the revenue stream. And in the end Google USA would be immune from attacks by foreign court systems looking to pollute it's listings. In one simple stroke the power of the EU to regulate Google listings goes up in smoke.
This has little to nothing to do with American manufacturing. The product was a joke, I doubt it sold in quantities large enough to make it even worth anything. Nobody is paying $22K for a 55" TV with touchscreen.
I bet the only ones they sold were to cable news channels as that's the only place I've ever seen them.
Don't kid yourself, just the net neutrality they will get (pay) Congress to pass a new toothless regulation that bars the states from passing individual regulations. This is a time honored tradition in communications lobbying.
I'm sure Trump will go right along with it because if telecom companies can't sell your privacy to the highest bidder it will be bad for jobs.
The money was likely how they found him. Bitcoin and other crypto currencies are completely traceable if it is a real bank account or are converted a real money. They only remain anonymous while they are never used. The minute you do anything with them you tie them to your real life and with block chain public it becomes trivial for law enforcement to follow the block chain transaction to your real bank account and arrest you. A canadian living in Thailand with millions in money was likely creating so many transactions that it was trivial for them to trace him, the hard part was the international police effort but they likely had him for months while it was arranged.
Silk Road would have never been caught if it hadn't been for his early advertising that tied it to his real name because he'd never converted to cash any of the collected bitcoins he received which never gave them the financial transaction to tie to him.
The problem is the 10 episodes and following the BBC/UK television production standards. They should be doing the 22-26 episodes common to the US market.
This thing alone is the thing I hate most about Netflix's series.
Imagine that, someone claiming this is government regulation on slashdot.
This isn't government regulation, it's crony capitalism. This is the largest firms getting together with congress to write a law that will enevitably favor them to distract from the real issue. Whereas regulation would be the independent regulators who are not subject to the whims of politics creating a regulatory policy that gives everyone a level playing field then enforces those rules without regard to the size or political contributions of the violator.
What will come out of congress will be exactly the type of regulation the big companies like Comcast and ATT prefer, that's the kind that lets them do whatever they want, with no enforcement and prevents the FTC from declaring anything a monopoly. Mark my words, the big ISPs will write the bill and it will do the exact opposite of what the net-neutrality movement is about.
Must be a one of those new definitions of "new form of transportation" too. It's not new to take a technology that's existed for 200 years and upsize it.
It's neither new, nor here now. It's also got all the ugly problems that Trains have such as defined tracks with massive infrastructure costs. The reason cars won over trains is because of this, in comparison to RR tracks Roadways are ridiculously cheap and I have to believe that this hyperloop track will make a regular RR track look cheap. For comparison a high speed rail line from LA to SanFran is projected to cost $42 billion (I suspect the real number is closer to $200 when you factor in all the other costs like moving utilities). Building a road the same distance would cost 1/100th that. I suspect a hyperloop track for the same distance would be 10x as much as the railroad.
It's called Let's Encrypt. Use it, love it. 90 Day certs, full automatic signing and updating. Built-in support in most distributions (even pfsense has a package now).
If you are paying for anything other than an EV certificate you're an idiot.
Never underestimate Intel. They could easily rush production on the next generation or a process bump or something else by throwing a lot of money at it. With the AMD64 / Pentium D stuff where Intel was caught flat footed with nothing they had a better chip in 2 years. I suspect Intel has been sandbagging performance waiting to see what AMD could do and they could already have something sampling that will be better.
Either was it's good for the consumer because competition from AMD always drives down prices. The last time AMD competed effectively processor prices fell more than 50% and sometimes as much as 80%. I'd love to see Ryzen and Epyc be competitive because it will mean cheaper CPU's all around.
Rule of Law? I'd have to wonder if this is a another "rule suspension" where Trump appointees are deliberately ignoring the rule of law and imposing a change in rules without following the procedure required by law.
There is a VERY good reason congress required that rule making follow very strict procedures, that public input is received and that this process take a certain amount of time. This will be yet another in a long line of Trump cabinet members breaking the law and making or breaking regulations without following the law. You know what the funny part is, there will people who will defend this but don't consider the consequences of what this means the next time there's a democrat in the presidents office (2020).
Personally I think Judges should start issuing personal fines against the heads of these departments, the rule making process has very strict legally required steps that have been around for several decades. You don't get to just willy-nilly change federal regulations, there is a fucking process that needs to be followed to allow for public comment and to give opposing people and companies the ability to challenge the rules before they go into effect. This administration has CONTEMPT for the rule making process and the heads of departments should be personally financially responsible for that contempt, ignorance of the rule making requirement is not excuse. Maybe when a few of these incompetent idiots Trump nominated get hit with personal fines they will stop breaking the law.
Are you really that stupid?
Tesla is now producing the batteries for Tesla power systems in Nevada now, they stopped using the Asian produced cells for storage products a month ago. There is far more than just a battery cell that goes into a product like Tesla is offering. There are charge controllers, cooling systems (Tesla cells are water cooled), transformers, storage and systems to make repair easier.
This is not just a big battery, it's far more. Because everything is assembled into a standard shipping container it's just a matter of shipping them out from the gigafactory and then putting them on a ship. Once docked in austrailia they'll be loaded onto a truck or train and shipped to the site where they'll be unloaded and connected to the grid. The size of this battery is going to require dozens of the standard full size shipping crates, they would simply hook up each container as it arrived.
Go to the tesla website and look at the pictures for their industrial batteries, you can see everything you want to know in those pictures.
With the gigafactory in production the latest news I've seen is that Tesla can produce 1kwh of batteries for about $125 so they are making nearly $100 in gross margin per kwh on that sale.
Anything the president does is NEWS. Get used to that idea because it was as true in the Reagan administration as it was in the Clinton, Obama and Bush admins. You might be too young to realize it, but that's the entire reason they call it the bully pulpit because anything they do or say is automatically national news.
That's how the system works whether you like it or not, I'm sure you loved it when Obama was in office and you could laugh and ridicule him, but all of a sudden your pony is in office and it's not ok. Well here in the real world that's how it works, you don't have to like it but you don't get to deny reality.
The same suggestion you make should be taken to heart by you.
CNN didn't speak to hanassholesolo until AFTER the apology was made and all posting history was deleted. There can be no extortion if no threat was made and no "consideration" to CNN was made. CNN gained nothing by with holding his name, they did so only after he begged CNN not to include his real name and told them he'd already appoligized and deleted his prior posts. CNN agreed to withold his name, but did not make a promise to do so in the future if he remains in the news.
There was no extortion unless you distort the facts. Frankly I'm happy we've finally reached a point where news sources don't automatically name people posting anonymous comments, it's a MAJOR stepup from what would have happened even a year ago. A year ago every TV network in the world would have camped on the guys front lawn trying to get comments.
You're an idiot.
I don't make racist or anti-Semitic comments when I'm "blowing off steam" or for the "lulz", I don't belittle people to make myself feel better. If you do this you should be perfectly happy with your friends, neighbors and family members finding out you do it. If you are embarrassed or ashamed for doing this shit then you KNOW what you are doing is wrong.
I'm not ashamed or afraid of anything I've posted becoming attached to my real name, are you? If you are you should grow the fuck up and stop being an asshole.