Because you can't dismiss the impact culture has on this. Culture surrounds us and impacts us from the first words we speak to the career we choose. And culture all to frequently has it's roots in a period of time when women were property.
Your implicit assumption that his conclusions are supported by the data is why you don't understand this. He's taking culture based data, assuming it's genetic and developing conclusions based on that. He's wrong and so are you.
His entire argument is that ability to do certain things is based on genetics with the implication that females can't do certain things. He's wrong and sexist for saying this. Most of what he perceives as genetics related to gender is actually cultural. It's this implicit assumption that cost him his job and it should have because its sexist.
It's not just property rights, it's safety. What happens when one of those transport cars catches fire? How do people get out? Do they burn to death or do they open the door and suffocate? What about other safety incidents? Accidents happen, people carry fire on their persons. What about terrorism?
The regulatory paperwork is there for a reason, it's to make sure when someone builds stuff like this they've actually thought through the safety aspects and have engineered them properly. Accidents happen, even improbable ones and the response should never be to just let those people die. On top of that as you mention you've got property rights but also mineral rights, disruptions to aquifers and all kinds of other issues. This all has to be sorted out before the first shovel full of dirt is moved. If you don't you can cause huge secondary problems, like poisoning an aquifer the people above rely on for drinking water.
The ponzi scheme he ran never DID make money. He robbed Retophin to make the victims of his Ponzi scheme whole. It's this very confusion that likely cause the Jury to not convict him. His Ponzi scheme hedge fund went out of business with several thousand dollars in the bank while he was giving people statements that added up to $80 million in assets. To get people to not go to the cops he robbed his current business to pay them off.
In the end the victims of his ponzi scheme were made whole but at the expense of the Retrophin investors who he robbed. This was a classic ponzi scheme.
The guy ran a ponzi scheme, at points when he was claiming $100million in fund assets when he only had $1000 in the funds account. In the end he stole money from his new company's investors to pay off the fund investors he'd cheated so they wouldn't go to the cops.
I bet the jury didn't convict him on the charges because his investors were made whole by the second theft. But when you commit a crime like he did it doesn't matter if you eventually make them whole, you commit the crime when you lie and commit fraud. I don't know if the court didn't explain this well enough to the jury or what, but the man defrauded hundreds of people, then stole money from Retrophin to pay back the investors from his failed hedge fund. He's no better than Madoff and he should go to jail for YEARS and be bared from any type of job in involving managing money including a cashier at the local grocery store.
He's a dumpster fire of a human being and he broke the law and should do the time. I hope he spends a whole lot of time in a 8x10 cell all by himself.
For the last 10 years since Intel gained complete monopoly control over Intel chipsets for Intel CPU's they go out of their way to make minor changes to force new motherboards to feed their income from chipsets. They add a pin or two or make some other minor change that makes it impossible to use new cpus with older montherboards even if the chipset is identical in features.
This is SOP at Intel these days. Use that Monopoly power to extract maximum revenue. Hell the new Platinum Xeon chips have MSRP's of up to $13,000. Something that would not be possible with legitimate competition.
But you can bet your ass that this law will be written to make the Bunny Ranch advertisements illegal.
Never forget that religious conservatives are all about the nanny state getting up and in your business as they are particularly concerned about what you do in your bedroom and home in general.
Those jobs were saved for a year or two. Carrier plans to automate the portion of the workforce they "saved" with a grant of $7million from the tax payers paying for that automation. In the end the Tax payers will have ended up paying millions for a few dozen jobs after the rest are automated out of existence.
The initial ACLU lawsuit involving two of the corralled innocents is available, I suggest you read it for an accounting of what police did. I'd also suggest you read up on the recently appointed DC police captain who's done this before in protests where they corralled a bunch of innocent people and arrested and charged them all without any evidence whatsoever that any of them did anything.
And at the same time lets not pretend that everyone on this block was engaged in the violence and needs to be prosecuted for being in public when it happened. The people that commit ed the violence should be arrested, what happened instead is they arrested everyone while some if not all the people who committed the violence got away (as attested to in the criminal compliant filed as part of the indictment).
No one that wasn't involved in the violence or who didn't assist those who did deserves to be prosecuted. In fact that's EXACTLY what's happening here and it should scare the daylights out of everyone.
I pray someday you get to experience schadenfreude because are out and about near a protest that turns violent that you are a arrested and charged like everyone involved in this case. Then hopefully you act like a man and you cheer your own felony conviction instead of whining like a little bitch because it's not fair when it happens to you but other innocent people are fair game.
BTW you deserve the police state you are cheering and don't deserve the constitution you are spitting on. You're a dreadful human being.
They are promoting it again if you haven't been into a store recently. I had the unfortunate displeasure of having to buy a couple things from them so I was in store as recently as a few weeks ago. I don't believe anything they are hanging the banner on is actually made in America, I'd be willing to be the bulk is crap made in china by an American company where some small minuscule process was done in America.
Anyone claiming such in advertising should be required by law to report the percentage.
Did you read the post or the linked news stories in the reply? They are trying to prosecute all 200 people as a group so they DON'T have to show that everyone there was actually involved, they are trying to prosecute them based on being at the location where it happened. Because, obviously everyone there was involved, right? The victims aren't even being given the option to show they weren't there to cause violence because they are trying to use the evidence on the few people they do have evidence on to convict everyone. And if you say you are innocent they are trying to get you to agree to plea deal that's a fucking felony.
When the violence took place (those involved in the violence should be caught and prosecuted) the FBI closed of an entire city block without warning and arrested EVERYONE within the block (this included people going to work, journalists covering the protest, people legitimately protesting and others but not rioting) and charged every single person with rioting whether or not they have any evidence of rioting. They are trying to charge them all as a group and use the evidence against the handful they have evidence of to convict the rest. This is a massive violation of rights.
I pray to god a Judge throws this whole case out and lets the guilty get away with it because of the tactics the FBI and Justice are using to convict innocent people of felonies they did not commit by being on a street when a riot they weren't involved with took place. Make no mistake if Justice is allowed to do this, the next time there is something they can call a riot they will be out there arresting every single person again and YOU might be the one caught up in it by being on a block where something happened.
No southern strategy eh? So when Nixon's political strategist Kevin Phillips starting talking to the press in 1970 about a strategy to recruit former segregationist lawmakers it was just a figment of history eh? Are you old enough to remember these events or do you deny history you didn't personally experience. Maybe you should pick up a history book and learn something sometime.
Robert Bird, ah look you found the only segregationist Democrat that didn't switch parties in the years after the civil rights act. What 1 out of about 30? But don't let me interfere with you pretending it didn't happen, at least publicly right buddy.
They could have infinite video modes as all the video modes do it dictate which pairs of wires are dedicated to that task and it's a signaling and driver issue on the computer at that point, in other words what the cable supports doesn't at all change the physical nature of the cable, the connector or anything else.
It's almost like you don't even know how USB works and you're posting a comment on it like an expert, what is this slashdot?
Every USB Cable including C has a little microchip in the cable end that negotiates and controls the connection and discovers the capabilities of both ends and reports it back to the connecting computer.
Good story bro, how does gender affect any of that? Anything at all. Is a woman incapable of picking up a gun? Is a transgendered person incapable of manning a rifle?
Slashdot Mirror
Because you can't dismiss the impact culture has on this. Culture surrounds us and impacts us from the first words we speak to the career we choose. And culture all to frequently has it's roots in a period of time when women were property.
Your implicit assumption that his conclusions are supported by the data is why you don't understand this. He's taking culture based data, assuming it's genetic and developing conclusions based on that. He's wrong and so are you.
His entire argument is that ability to do certain things is based on genetics with the implication that females can't do certain things. He's wrong and sexist for saying this. Most of what he perceives as genetics related to gender is actually cultural. It's this implicit assumption that cost him his job and it should have because its sexist.
It's not just property rights, it's safety. What happens when one of those transport cars catches fire? How do people get out? Do they burn to death or do they open the door and suffocate? What about other safety incidents? Accidents happen, people carry fire on their persons. What about terrorism?
The regulatory paperwork is there for a reason, it's to make sure when someone builds stuff like this they've actually thought through the safety aspects and have engineered them properly. Accidents happen, even improbable ones and the response should never be to just let those people die. On top of that as you mention you've got property rights but also mineral rights, disruptions to aquifers and all kinds of other issues. This all has to be sorted out before the first shovel full of dirt is moved. If you don't you can cause huge secondary problems, like poisoning an aquifer the people above rely on for drinking water.
The ponzi scheme he ran never DID make money. He robbed Retophin to make the victims of his Ponzi scheme whole. It's this very confusion that likely cause the Jury to not convict him. His Ponzi scheme hedge fund went out of business with several thousand dollars in the bank while he was giving people statements that added up to $80 million in assets. To get people to not go to the cops he robbed his current business to pay them off.
In the end the victims of his ponzi scheme were made whole but at the expense of the Retrophin investors who he robbed. This was a classic ponzi scheme.
Worse, they are gonna get anti-SLAPP'd in court and pay Bruce's legal fee's as well as their own. Not the smartest thing to do.
The guy ran a ponzi scheme, at points when he was claiming $100million in fund assets when he only had $1000 in the funds account. In the end he stole money from his new company's investors to pay off the fund investors he'd cheated so they wouldn't go to the cops.
I bet the jury didn't convict him on the charges because his investors were made whole by the second theft. But when you commit a crime like he did it doesn't matter if you eventually make them whole, you commit the crime when you lie and commit fraud. I don't know if the court didn't explain this well enough to the jury or what, but the man defrauded hundreds of people, then stole money from Retrophin to pay back the investors from his failed hedge fund. He's no better than Madoff and he should go to jail for YEARS and be bared from any type of job in involving managing money including a cashier at the local grocery store.
He's a dumpster fire of a human being and he broke the law and should do the time. I hope he spends a whole lot of time in a 8x10 cell all by himself.
You've lost track of time buddy. AMD hasn't been in the lead for more than a decade, last time they were on top GW Bush had just been elected.
For the last 10 years since Intel gained complete monopoly control over Intel chipsets for Intel CPU's they go out of their way to make minor changes to force new motherboards to feed their income from chipsets. They add a pin or two or make some other minor change that makes it impossible to use new cpus with older montherboards even if the chipset is identical in features.
This is SOP at Intel these days. Use that Monopoly power to extract maximum revenue. Hell the new Platinum Xeon chips have MSRP's of up to $13,000. Something that would not be possible with legitimate competition.
But you can bet your ass that this law will be written to make the Bunny Ranch advertisements illegal.
Never forget that religious conservatives are all about the nanny state getting up and in your business as they are particularly concerned about what you do in your bedroom and home in general.
Those jobs were saved for a year or two. Carrier plans to automate the portion of the workforce they "saved" with a grant of $7million from the tax payers paying for that automation. In the end the Tax payers will have ended up paying millions for a few dozen jobs after the rest are automated out of existence.
You are ignorant if you don't understand that.
The initial ACLU lawsuit involving two of the corralled innocents is available, I suggest you read it for an accounting of what police did. I'd also suggest you read up on the recently appointed DC police captain who's done this before in protests where they corralled a bunch of innocent people and arrested and charged them all without any evidence whatsoever that any of them did anything.
https://www.acludc.org/sites/d...
And at the same time lets not pretend that everyone on this block was engaged in the violence and needs to be prosecuted for being in public when it happened. The people that commit ed the violence should be arrested, what happened instead is they arrested everyone while some if not all the people who committed the violence got away (as attested to in the criminal compliant filed as part of the indictment).
No one that wasn't involved in the violence or who didn't assist those who did deserves to be prosecuted. In fact that's EXACTLY what's happening here and it should scare the daylights out of everyone.
You're right, it was DC police, but the prosecutors going along with the abuse are federal Justice. Mod parent up.
I pray someday you get to experience schadenfreude because are out and about near a protest that turns violent that you are a arrested and charged like everyone involved in this case. Then hopefully you act like a man and you cheer your own felony conviction instead of whining like a little bitch because it's not fair when it happens to you but other innocent people are fair game.
BTW you deserve the police state you are cheering and don't deserve the constitution you are spitting on. You're a dreadful human being.
They are promoting it again if you haven't been into a store recently. I had the unfortunate displeasure of having to buy a couple things from them so I was in store as recently as a few weeks ago. I don't believe anything they are hanging the banner on is actually made in America, I'd be willing to be the bulk is crap made in china by an American company where some small minuscule process was done in America.
Anyone claiming such in advertising should be required by law to report the percentage.
Really, is anyone surprised by this?
Did you read the post or the linked news stories in the reply? They are trying to prosecute all 200 people as a group so they DON'T have to show that everyone there was actually involved, they are trying to prosecute them based on being at the location where it happened. Because, obviously everyone there was involved, right? The victims aren't even being given the option to show they weren't there to cause violence because they are trying to use the evidence on the few people they do have evidence on to convict everyone. And if you say you are innocent they are trying to get you to agree to plea deal that's a fucking felony.
When the violence took place (those involved in the violence should be caught and prosecuted) the FBI closed of an entire city block without warning and arrested EVERYONE within the block (this included people going to work, journalists covering the protest, people legitimately protesting and others but not rioting) and charged every single person with rioting whether or not they have any evidence of rioting. They are trying to charge them all as a group and use the evidence against the handful they have evidence of to convict the rest. This is a massive violation of rights.
I pray to god a Judge throws this whole case out and lets the guilty get away with it because of the tactics the FBI and Justice are using to convict innocent people of felonies they did not commit by being on a street when a riot they weren't involved with took place. Make no mistake if Justice is allowed to do this, the next time there is something they can call a riot they will be out there arresting every single person again and YOU might be the one caught up in it by being on a block where something happened.
No southern strategy eh? So when Nixon's political strategist Kevin Phillips starting talking to the press in 1970 about a strategy to recruit former segregationist lawmakers it was just a figment of history eh? Are you old enough to remember these events or do you deny history you didn't personally experience. Maybe you should pick up a history book and learn something sometime.
Robert Bird, ah look you found the only segregationist Democrat that didn't switch parties in the years after the civil rights act. What 1 out of about 30? But don't let me interfere with you pretending it didn't happen, at least publicly right buddy.
They could have infinite video modes as all the video modes do it dictate which pairs of wires are dedicated to that task and it's a signaling and driver issue on the computer at that point, in other words what the cable supports doesn't at all change the physical nature of the cable, the connector or anything else.
It's almost like you don't even know how USB works and you're posting a comment on it like an expert, what is this slashdot?
Ever heard of the difference between a bit and byte? Or do you think it's coincidence that the B is capitalized in one measurement but not the other?
Every USB Cable including C has a little microchip in the cable end that negotiates and controls the connection and discovers the capabilities of both ends and reports it back to the connecting computer.
So you are arguing that anyone that needs surgery or medication should be thrown out of the military?
Good story bro, how does gender affect any of that? Anything at all. Is a woman incapable of picking up a gun? Is a transgendered person incapable of manning a rifle?