If you have a DC power supply and you increase the voltage at some gradual rate, what happens is you introduce high frequency "ringing" into the signal. In fact, there will be points in time where not only is the voltage decreasing, but it will actually drop below the original value. You can confirm this easily by connecting an oscilloscope and capturing the signal. Will you then begin to doubt that you ever turned the voltage up at all?
This property is common to all non-linear dynamical systems, that is to say, everything in the Universe. In every field of physics, you see the same pattern.
Yeah, you keep saying that over and over, but it's still just as nonsensical as the first time. The whole reason he turned down the salary is exactly so people like you would be gullible to believe that he doesn't care about money.
I'm pretty sure it's illegal to operate such devices (exception for law enforcement, etc.), so if no domestic agency says "Yep, that's ours," then go and disable/destroy it anyway.
Unless you're saying that DHS would risk leaving a foreign agency's device functional rather than risk disrupting a domestic agency's device, which I find highly believable. Another example where surveillance has made us less safe, from both our own government and others.
Information-theoretic security is a cryptosystem whose security derives purely from information theory. In other words, it cannot be broken even if the adversary had unlimited computing power. The adversary simply does not have enough information to break the encryption and so the cryptosystems are considered cryptanalytically-unbreakable.
The mathematicians already know that this is impossible. Remember that in Math, unlike Science, it is actually possible to disprove the negative. "New math" cannot destroy "old math" (provided the old math is proven).
The concepts of Perfect Secrecy and Information-Theoretic Security have been PROVEN. No matter what you do, introduction of a "master key" or similar idea will always make the scheme insecure.
It's like you're telling mathematicians to find a number which can be expressed as 2 different products of primes, and that they should just keep looking for it until they find it. Except the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic says that every non-prime number has a unique prime factorization, and that has also been PROVEN.
The problem is that the two party system has limited your choices already to those who are vetted by the elites. You dare not vote for a third party due to the spoiler effect.
Replacing First-Past-the-Post is the only way that your strategy works.
Campaign finance reform, replace First-Past-the-Post (e.g. with Instant Run-off), draw districts mathematically (e.g. with the shortest split-line method), and make all primaries in every state open to any registered voter.
Right now we have a system where the incumbency rate is at (or near) an all time high while the approval of Congress is at (or near) an all time low, so why should they give a shit what citizens think?
Not disagreeing with your sentiment (e.g. if Trump pulls the NK thing off), but don't you think that this will enable the continuation of the Venezuelan government which is ultimately responsible for its peoples' suffering?
Slashdot Mirror
Because we couldn't grow different things in different kinds of farms.
If you have a DC power supply and you increase the voltage at some gradual rate, what happens is you introduce high frequency "ringing" into the signal. In fact, there will be points in time where not only is the voltage decreasing, but it will actually drop below the original value. You can confirm this easily by connecting an oscilloscope and capturing the signal. Will you then begin to doubt that you ever turned the voltage up at all?
This property is common to all non-linear dynamical systems, that is to say, everything in the Universe. In every field of physics, you see the same pattern.
The science is settled.
I think you meant to respond to the parent?
Yeah, you keep saying that over and over, but it's still just as nonsensical as the first time. The whole reason he turned down the salary is exactly so people like you would be gullible to believe that he doesn't care about money.
Lol! The irony of this comment could collapse the Earth into a black hole. If we're not careful we could easily hit hypocritical mass.
I'm pretty sure it's illegal to operate such devices (exception for law enforcement, etc.), so if no domestic agency says "Yep, that's ours," then go and disable/destroy it anyway.
Unless you're saying that DHS would risk leaving a foreign agency's device functional rather than risk disrupting a domestic agency's device, which I find highly believable. Another example where surveillance has made us less safe, from both our own government and others.
Guess what the thing they stamp in your passport is for.
Pretty big difference between a Visa application and a Citizenship application.
Sorry, I meant "Unconditionally Secure", not ITS. Again, RSA is only thought to be, not proven to be.
Of course not, because if they did that they might actually learn something.
Fair enough. :D
Information theoretic security is based on the idea of OTP/perfect secrecy, but they are not the same. I never said they were.
E.g. RSA is thought to be ITS, but it is definitely not a OTP.
Not quite. The first sentence:
Information-theoretic security is a cryptosystem whose security derives purely from information theory. In other words, it cannot be broken even if the adversary had unlimited computing power. The adversary simply does not have enough information to break the encryption and so the cryptosystems are considered cryptanalytically-unbreakable.
The mathematicians already know that this is impossible. Remember that in Math, unlike Science, it is actually possible to disprove the negative. "New math" cannot destroy "old math" (provided the old math is proven).
The concepts of Perfect Secrecy and Information-Theoretic Security have been PROVEN. No matter what you do, introduction of a "master key" or similar idea will always make the scheme insecure.
It's like you're telling mathematicians to find a number which can be expressed as 2 different products of primes, and that they should just keep looking for it until they find it. Except the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic says that every non-prime number has a unique prime factorization, and that has also been PROVEN.
... and running into Eighth Amendment issues...
The problem is that the two party system has limited your choices already to those who are vetted by the elites. You dare not vote for a third party due to the spoiler effect.
Replacing First-Past-the-Post is the only way that your strategy works.
Seems to me that the Second Amendment is the One True Amendment To Rule Them All, while they shit all over the rest every chance they get.
Campaign finance reform, replace First-Past-the-Post (e.g. with Instant Run-off), draw districts mathematically (e.g. with the shortest split-line method), and make all primaries in every state open to any registered voter.
Right now we have a system where the incumbency rate is at (or near) an all time high while the approval of Congress is at (or near) an all time low, so why should they give a shit what citizens think?
Not disagreeing with your sentiment (e.g. if Trump pulls the NK thing off), but don't you think that this will enable the continuation of the Venezuelan government which is ultimately responsible for its peoples' suffering?
Lol, you sure sound like one.
OK, so why did Trump's lawyer pay her $130,000 then?
It's not slander if it's true.
IANAL, but my understanding is that courts have found that searches at borders or airports are reasonable.
Oh please you can do better than that. Dig deeper into the playbook.
I gotta admit, whoever writes your material is very good at it. They must have studied in a Western University.
Huh. TIL. Thanks!