Slashdot Mirror


User: yuriklastalov

yuriklastalov's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
457
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 457

  1. Re:surprise surprise on Russia Says it Was in Touch With Trump Campaign During Election (cnbc.com) · · Score: 1

    Yes, but the difference is that Trump is Literally Hitler (Hitler II?), so it's worse. Never you mind that Hitler I (have to differentiate between the two!) and the Russians didn't exactly see eye to eye.

  2. Re:yes they should on Slashdot Asks: Should The US Abolish The Electoral College? · · Score: 2

    But we have to do something! The quick fix never goes wrong!

  3. Re:Not a level playing field on Donald Trump Wins US Presidency (nytimes.com) · · Score: 1

    And clearly this fact means that Women should be running everything, because a firm belief in the genetic superiority of one group has never turned out poorly for anybody.

  4. Re:One party rule on Donald Trump Wins US Presidency (nytimes.com) · · Score: 1

    DAE Trump == Putin?! Looks like the "Literally Hitler" people were wrong, he was Putin's boy toy all along!!!

  5. Re:One party rule on Donald Trump Wins US Presidency (nytimes.com) · · Score: 1

    Yeah, Chomsky is a nutter. It seems to me, however, that that kind of thinking is entering the mainstream and being given some semblance of legitimacy through by the mainstream media.

    I'm sure things are going to get far more "interesting" now that Literally Hitler has hypnotized the white racists with his pussy grabbing powers to seize the Presidency at the behest of Vladimir Putin so they can lead the West, hand in hand, into a dystopian fascist hellscape.

  6. Re:One party rule on Donald Trump Wins US Presidency (nytimes.com) · · Score: 1

    We shall give you a splendid funeral then, my hysterical friend. The only Americans that have gone insane are the ones who were thinking "it can't happen here". Surprise!

  7. Re:One party rule on Donald Trump Wins US Presidency (nytimes.com) · · Score: 1

    I don't know that Bernie would have won versus Trump, but if Crooked Hillary hadn't been the preselected nominee there would have been other Democrats running in the primaries with him. Bernie might have still lost, but they would have had to try pretty hard to pick a worse candidate than Hillary Clinton.

  8. Re:One party rule on Donald Trump Wins US Presidency (nytimes.com) · · Score: 1

    They're playing the long con. Convince voters that their plan to be completely against their own nominee so that when he wins they can have more influence with makes any sense whatsoever.

    It's a bold move Cotton, we'll see how that works out for them.

  9. Re:And to think the DNC wanted to face Trump... on Donald Trump Wins US Presidency (nytimes.com) · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm sorry, but what part of "It's Her Turn" don't you understand? You sexists are all alike.

  10. Re:Im confused how Republicans could win so much on Donald Trump Wins US Presidency (nytimes.com) · · Score: 1

    So what you're saying is that he rigged the election while making speeches about how the election is being rigged? Brilliant.

  11. Re:In other news on Donald Trump Wins US Presidency (nytimes.com) · · Score: 1

    They can join the US. When was the last time a former colony colonized their mother state?

    Anglophones, UNITE!

  12. Re:Nice work jackasses. on Donald Trump Wins US Presidency (nytimes.com) · · Score: 2

    LOL, the Brexit result practically foreshadowed the US election. The media reliance on increasingly inaccurate polls meant they couldn't see it coming. You're a fool if you couldn't see the exact same Silent Majority just waiting in the wings in America after Brexit. Sure, the Limeys may talk funny and spell words the wrong way, but really they're all still Americans at heart.

  13. Re:Hmmm well on Donald Trump Wins US Presidency (nytimes.com) · · Score: 1

    They'll bend the knee soon enough.

  14. Re:One party rule on Donald Trump Wins US Presidency (nytimes.com) · · Score: 1

    Why, Make America Great Again, dear AC. Haven't you been paying attention? Buckle up.

  15. Re: No. Just No. on Ask Slashdot: Should Web Browsers Have 'Fact Checking' Capability Built-In? · · Score: 1

    More like Stalin, seeing as how they lean left so hard they're practically falling over.

  16. Re:Proudly on the road to gridlock on FBI: Review of New Emails Doesn't Change Conclusion on Clinton (cnn.com) · · Score: 1

    Sure, single party rule worked out OK for the Chinese, lets do it! End the Republican Party!

  17. Re:And I left out #spiritcooking which is just cre on FBI: Review of New Emails Doesn't Change Conclusion on Clinton (cnn.com) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    RWNJ stands for Right Wing Nut Job, and is a left wing smear against anyone who questions the glorious leftist narrative.

    Incidentally, due in large part to the growing ubiquity of leftist views in America, a sort of Left Wing Nut Job archetype has been taking shape. These are your basic "Trump is a Russian plant", "Biological sex is a myth", or "Hillary is the victim of a vast right wing conspiracy" type of people.

    Really, the alt-right and progressives (AKA alt-left) are essentially the same sorts of people but with different ideological backgrounds. They both clamor for utopian fantasies, berate detractors with hateful insults and rhetoric, and generally wrap themselves up in worldviews that assume everyone on the other side is some combination of evil, stupid, or insane.

    Both sides are incredibly toxic and are, in my opinion, regrettable side effects of the rise of internet culture and the ease with which it allows the creation of unassailable safe-space echo chambers where circlejerks and groupthink are the entire point.

  18. Re: Don't worry guys... on IT Workers Facing Layoffs Jolted By CEO's Message (computerworld.com) · · Score: 1

    Usually when I see people disparaging an "intellectual" it's mainly due to said intellectuals tendency to be as arrogant and condescending as possible.

    "You people are just too dumb to understand what I'm talking about. Fucking peasants." -- Anonymous American Intellectual

  19. YOUR IDEAS ARE BAD AND YOU SHOULD FEEL BAD!

    Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

  20. Re:schadenfreude is German too on Munich Court To Try Facebook's Zuckerberg For Inciting Hatred (dw.com) · · Score: 1

    Yes, whatever it takes! Won't somebody save us from this terrible free speech? These... people on the internet have ugly opinions, it's a travesty! They must be stopped!

  21. Re:schadenfreude is German too on Munich Court To Try Facebook's Zuckerberg For Inciting Hatred (dw.com) · · Score: 1

    First they came for our racial slurs, but I said nothing because I wasn't a racist.

    Then they came for our anti-women slurs, but I said nothing because I wasn't a misogynist.

    Then they came for our sexual orientation slurs, but I said nothing because I wasn't a homophobe.

    Then they came for me, and I called them a my friends because there weren't any other words left.

  22. What, fucking up patches? Where the hell have you been? If anyone has a patent on bad patches its Microsoft.

  23. Just think of all the bandwidth you'll be saving on that patch that bricks your machine!

  24. Wow, such brave! on Future iPhones Could Fold In Half (geek.com) · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now you can roll your phone up and shove it up your ass!

  25. I think the system image on them must be larger than normal, even with CyanogenMod. I have a love/hate relationship with that device... the space issue was a huge pain, and the camera complete shit but otherwise a decent device.

    I'm stuck on an ancient S3 after my G3 took a shit (DAC fried for some reason, thing doesn't make any noise, period) and it's driving me insane.