It's a problem, certainly, but it may not have any bearing on the outcome of this particular election.
It doesn't matter whether the votes would have made a change or not. It is the basics of fairness that dictates that all votes should be counted. The margin of error should not play a role. If people are asked to vote, what is the problem with accepting the responsibility for counting them? The precedent set here says: we don't care about your vote since it doesn't matter. That is a very dangerous precedent because people will start losing interest and faith in the democratic system this way.
This can surely cause some ethical discussions. Next we try to poke into a mouse, cat, dog,... human. The real question we should be asking here whether this should be done all the way.
I can see the benefits of using external stimuli, but when does that go over to control. A grey area ahead...
You could actually try to feed the lyrics into the software. It just might interpret the text correctly and go on deleting itself from the harddisk permanently. That song I'd like to watch.
The problem was that they allowed two versions of the OS distribution. Obviously, most will opt for more features if the financial difference is small enough. If media player had to be downloaded separately for any version, then there would have been a difference. If this new case again allows for two versions without a significant monetary difference, then it will end in the same way: a dead duck.
Anyway, it drains a good amount of money out of MS each time they have to comply. That has got to hurt in the long run.
It is a profoundly obscene waste of taxpayers money. Maybe the legislators can be fined the $5000 each, as mentioned in the proposal, to finance the judicial costs of striking it down.
I actually think that the absolute number of BOFHs is constant. They are wilfully more exposed now by the survey. And, as all good BOFHs will do, is make sure that the survey is tainted by a --clickety-click-- unfortunate mishap caused by the surveyor. There is nothing more rewarding than a good survey beating.
Yes, the airlines should sue the family for not having their armband with "beat me, I am a potential terrorist". Any potential wrongdoer has to be readily identified using visual markers. We must save us all from the potentials. No measure should be omitted to make us all safe.
/sarcasm
Equality under the law is a Gaussian distribution from law offenders of a kind to law offenders of another kind. A bit like 2+2=5 for large values of 2. Some people are always a bit more equal than others.
No, no, there is no secret sauce; let me have a crack at it for you: 1) Irritate your customers by reducing their connectivity 2) get into greater debt 3) ask for Govt. bailout package 4) profit 5) get bought by competition to salvage the broken pieces 6) more profit
But the requirement of permit does not stop anybody from experimenting. You also need a drivers license before driving a car. Did that actually stop those who just drove away without? The whole point is that the knowledge is out of the box and, basically, anybody with a bit of patience and persistence can perform the tricks nowadays. Lets all create Frankenstein.
You might just ask around on the internet to find out who received the seeds? Maybe some survived and you can get a piece of the juice. But, then again, you could try for yourself and make potatoes, salad and corn containing THC. Let them regulate the entire food chain.
It doesn't hold them back. It takes a bit of getting used to. A homegrown terrorist would likely make it go a lot faster.
I really like to see the outcry of "we want security" the next time something happens. It looks like the US is shutting down step by step and heading directly into the dark ages. Who wants to deal with a bully? So, US citizens, if you are so afraid to die, you surely are more afraid of living.
Being among the first to read all about the "perfect attack" is by definition "stuff that matters". The slashdot effect is proportional to the headline and proportional to the amount of damage that potentially can be done [sorry, no citations available]. Therefore, reading TFA is merely a function of headline and potential damage.
BTW, I decoded your.sig, will you please sue me now?
Slashdot Mirror
It doesn't matter whether the votes would have made a change or not. It is the basics of fairness that dictates that all votes should be counted. The margin of error should not play a role. If people are asked to vote, what is the problem with accepting the responsibility for counting them? The precedent set here says: we don't care about your vote since it doesn't matter. That is a very dangerous precedent because people will start losing interest and faith in the democratic system this way.
This can surely cause some ethical discussions. Next we try to poke into a mouse, cat, dog,... human. The real question we should be asking here whether this should be done all the way.
I can see the benefits of using external stimuli, but when does that go over to control. A grey area ahead...
You could actually try to feed the lyrics into the software. It just might interpret the text correctly and go on deleting itself from the harddisk permanently. That song I'd like to watch.
The problem was that they allowed two versions of the OS distribution. Obviously, most will opt for more features if the financial difference is small enough. If media player had to be downloaded separately for any version, then there would have been a difference. If this new case again allows for two versions without a significant monetary difference, then it will end in the same way: a dead duck.
Anyway, it drains a good amount of money out of MS each time they have to comply. That has got to hurt in the long run.
Probably not much, but it never hurts to look for small gems.
That is, for the lack of a better description, a fucking good joke!
It is a profoundly obscene waste of taxpayers money. Maybe the legislators can be fined the $5000 each, as mentioned in the proposal, to finance the judicial costs of striking it down.
No need to repeat the fucking language or using any shells. You can use the law to wipe your ass instead.
Indeed, this should probably be in idle.
I actually think that the absolute number of BOFHs is constant. They are wilfully more exposed now by the survey. And, as all good BOFHs will do, is make sure that the survey is tainted by a --clickety-click-- unfortunate mishap caused by the surveyor. There is nothing more rewarding than a good survey beating.
Yes, the airlines should sue the family for not having their armband with "beat me, I am a potential terrorist". Any potential wrongdoer has to be readily identified using visual markers. We must save us all from the potentials. No measure should be omitted to make us all safe.
/sarcasm
Then Q needs to fiddle with it first and hand it over to 007.
Brown Zune Of Death
Equality under the law is a Gaussian distribution from law offenders of a kind to law offenders of another kind. A bit like 2+2=5 for large values of 2. Some people are always a bit more equal than others.
Relax, it is normal to become a Grumpy Old Sysadmin. It hits us all after some time.
Cases like this:
C: I got an error on my screen
S: What message text was displayed?
C: I don't know, I clicked it away
S: --explode--
Just SHA /. articles and comments. Should be no chance of being random.
Well, when you say stop and actually do stop. It is your choice not to opt for a certain service.
No, no, there is no secret sauce; let me have a crack at it for you:
1) Irritate your customers by reducing their connectivity
2) get into greater debt
3) ask for Govt. bailout package
4) profit
5) get bought by competition to salvage the broken pieces
6) more profit
But the requirement of permit does not stop anybody from experimenting. You also need a drivers license before driving a car. Did that actually stop those who just drove away without?
The whole point is that the knowledge is out of the box and, basically, anybody with a bit of patience and persistence can perform the tricks nowadays. Lets all create Frankenstein.
You might just ask around on the internet to find out who received the seeds? Maybe some survived and you can get a piece of the juice. But, then again, you could try for yourself and make potatoes, salad and corn containing THC. Let them regulate the entire food chain.
It doesn't hold them back. It takes a bit of getting used to. A homegrown terrorist would likely make it go a lot faster.
I really like to see the outcry of "we want security" the next time something happens. It looks like the US is shutting down step by step and heading directly into the dark ages. Who wants to deal with a bully? So, US citizens, if you are so afraid to die, you surely are more afraid of living.
Being among the first to read all about the "perfect attack" is by definition "stuff that matters". The slashdot effect is proportional to the headline and proportional to the amount of damage that potentially can be done [sorry, no citations available]. Therefore, reading TFA is merely a function of headline and potential damage.
BTW, I decoded your .sig, will you please sue me now?
Yes, you must not look and register any airforce base. Please use Google for that detail.
I think you were successful...