Well, Obama certainly took credit for "ending the war". Maybe he should've tried a little harder to convince the Iraqis that more work was needed, but I doubt he gave it his all, since his attitude at the time seemed to be "job well done", as he trivialized the emerging ISIS as a "JV team".
I'd have it made it if I hit the lotto. I'd get a bigger house, and have a recording studio built in or near it; then fill said studio with gear, so I could pursue the music I've been doing for most of my adult life, composing and recording songs (instrumental mostly).
Purpose would not be an issue, boredom would not be an issue. I have add'l hobbies anyway that would provide me with a break from music when I needed it: Astronomy, photography, art, and a tour of Europe. Man that sounds good.
None of those are "supremacists". I'm not crazy about Bannon, but I don't see any valid evidence he's quite as bad as the accusations being leveled against him. The whole anti-semite thing was debunked. You must be a liberal. I'm a moderate conservative, but I'm afraid I don't see "conservative" as an insult the way you do.
'E's off the twig! 'E's kicked the bucket, 'e's shuffled off 'is mortal coil, run down the curtain and joined the bleedin' choir invisible!!
THIS IS AN EX - PARROT!
No, facts are facts. One can justifiably level many arguments against the Orange One but he is not filling his cabinet up with Goldman-Sachs exec, lobbyists, or white nationalists. If anyone gets way too literal, it's people on the left who hang on every tweet he makes.
Ah yes, getting rid of political corruption. Draining the swamp. I'm glad to see Trump is making great strides there, appointing Goldman Sachs alum left and right.
Left and right?? Other than Steven Mnuchin, for the Dept of theTreasury (and obviously the guy knows finance) who else in the cabinet is a Goldman Sachs executive/alumni?
Here's the list so far. None of these other than Mnuchin were affiliated with GS as far as I can tell. You can bet Hillary would've had more.
Department of Defense: James N. "Mad Dog" Mattis
Department of Treasury: Steven Mnuchin
Department of Transportation: Elaine L. Chao
Department of Health and Human Services: Tom Price
Department of Commerce: Wilbur Ross
Department of Education: Betsy DeVos
United Nations Ambassador: Nikki Haley
Department of Housing and Urban Development: Dr. Ben Carson
Your argument here is the same old tripe: "bu-bu-but Fox news".. just stop already, that's a canned response. They're a necessary counterbalance to the left wing shilling of CNN, MSNBC, and the rest. And for the record, Fox doesn't deny climate change. They don't particularly champion it, but they don't officially deny it either.
Add'ly, Google can't take too much pride just as yet until they've saved the amount of energy in fossil fuel consumption it took to manufacture all the renewable energy equipment they bought. Manufacture of solar cells, batteries, wind turbines, wiring.. those items are still being manufactured in factories using fossil fuels, so until the factories are themselves powered 100% by renewable, it's not a total conversion from fossil fuels. That's gonna take many years more.
Same here. I'm also glad that SpaceX and even Blue Origin are getting in on the act, since NASA seems to be in a less capable mode right now (especially with the Shuttles decommissioned). Imagine being stranded up there to starve, freeze, or suffocate, or some combination thereof.
It's a shame that so few people understand this these days. For far too many people in the US, that's exactly how they define hate. I'd even go so far as to say for a smaller subset it's whatever disagrees with their own political orientation, no matter how polite or well intentioned.
Agreed, balance is good. A company could still suffer losses due to some clueless dolt with a chip on his shoulder, or maybe more likely, an astro-turfer for a competitor, trying to damage the company's standing to improve it's own, relatively.
Likewise, the consumer always needs protection from any company with an army of lawyers.
Obviously his tweets are random musings that in no equate to policy or introduction of a bill, he often thinks hypotheticals outloud: "perhaps" this or that.
You think Hillary would've been any better? She actually sponsored an anti-flag burning bill in 2005 that proposes a jail term twice as harsh. You wake up. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Or, you know, libel is actually libel. If what is reported can be verified, then there's no issue of libel. Or is all the "fake news" that Facebook is concerned about imaginary now too?
And please cite where he'd "revoke citizenship" of a protestor. Perhaps you mean an ISIS defector?
And there you have it, the contradiction: this isn't just big business and conservatives pushing this. The Left espouses globalization and multiculturalism; it also supposedly supports the unions and American worker's rights. The two are currently incompatible. How are the unions - essentially democrat- okay with American workers' standard of living being challenged and lowered by the influx of H1Bs and illegal aliens willing to work for 40% of a native worker's pay? Because if you challenge these programs, you get called racist and xenophobic.
Many democrats did this exact thing in 2001, Bush/Gore. They actually pushed for a retroactive change, (AKA cheating). If it weren't for the electoral college, most major cities would decide the election for the entirety of the country every single time, and full representation would be a thing of the past.
If a two party system isn't bad enough, that'd usher in a permanent one party country (Dem) with a monolithic, centralized, all powerful federal government: USA: Urban Socialists (of the) Americas.
Slashdot Mirror
OTOH, if you like your fungi, you can keep your fungi.
Those were my thoughts. I've had much better luck with nvidia than AMD/ATI, from both a hardware and software perspective.
(YMMV)
Just because some don't doesn't mean you can't.
Well, Obama certainly took credit for "ending the war". Maybe he should've tried a little harder to convince the Iraqis that more work was needed, but I doubt he gave it his all, since his attitude at the time seemed to be "job well done", as he trivialized the emerging ISIS as a "JV team".
Some people conflate moving "forward" a form of progress, even if it's a mistake or rushing to the edge of a cliff. It just sounds too good I guess.
I'd have it made it if I hit the lotto. I'd get a bigger house, and have a recording studio built in or near it; then fill said studio with gear, so I could pursue the music I've been doing for most of my adult life, composing and recording songs (instrumental mostly).
Purpose would not be an issue, boredom would not be an issue. I have add'l hobbies anyway that would provide me with a break from music when I needed it: Astronomy, photography, art, and a tour of Europe. Man that sounds good.
They're starting to take it seriously, getting their toes wet, at least.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news...
None of those are "supremacists". I'm not crazy about Bannon, but I don't see any valid evidence he's quite as bad as the accusations being leveled against him. The whole anti-semite thing was debunked. You must be a liberal. I'm a moderate conservative, but I'm afraid I don't see "conservative" as an insult the way you do.
'E's off the twig! 'E's kicked the bucket, 'e's shuffled off 'is mortal coil, run down the curtain and joined the bleedin' choir invisible!!
THIS IS AN EX - PARROT!
No, facts are facts. One can justifiably level many arguments against the Orange One but he is not filling his cabinet up with Goldman-Sachs exec, lobbyists, or white nationalists. If anyone gets way too literal, it's people on the left who hang on every tweet he makes.
Ah yes, getting rid of political corruption. Draining the swamp. I'm glad to see Trump is making great strides there, appointing Goldman Sachs alum left and right.
Left and right?? Other than Steven Mnuchin, for the Dept of theTreasury (and obviously the guy knows finance) who else in the cabinet is a Goldman Sachs executive/alumni?
Here's the list so far. None of these other than Mnuchin were affiliated with GS as far as I can tell. You can bet Hillary would've had more.
Your argument here is the same old tripe: "bu-bu-but Fox news".. just stop already, that's a canned response. They're a necessary counterbalance to the left wing shilling of CNN, MSNBC, and the rest. And for the record, Fox doesn't deny climate change. They don't particularly champion it, but they don't officially deny it either.
Add'ly, Google can't take too much pride just as yet until they've saved the amount of energy in fossil fuel consumption it took to manufacture all the renewable energy equipment they bought. Manufacture of solar cells, batteries, wind turbines, wiring.. those items are still being manufactured in factories using fossil fuels, so until the factories are themselves powered 100% by renewable, it's not a total conversion from fossil fuels. That's gonna take many years more.
I'll verify it for you, hack moron. I said "Federal".
https://www.aei.org/publicatio...
So verify it, you foul mouthed AC.
Same here. I'm also glad that SpaceX and even Blue Origin are getting in on the act, since NASA seems to be in a less capable mode right now (especially with the Shuttles decommissioned). Imagine being stranded up there to starve, freeze, or suffocate, or some combination thereof.
Neither did Obama, unless he created 200,000 federal jobs.. which come to think of it, maybe he did..
It's a shame that so few people understand this these days. For far too many people in the US, that's exactly how they define hate. I'd even go so far as to say for a smaller subset it's whatever disagrees with their own political orientation, no matter how polite or well intentioned.
Both
Agreed, balance is good. A company could still suffer losses due to some clueless dolt with a chip on his shoulder, or maybe more likely, an astro-turfer for a competitor, trying to damage the company's standing to improve it's own, relatively.
Likewise, the consumer always needs protection from any company with an army of lawyers.
Obviously his tweets are random musings that in no equate to policy or introduction of a bill, he often thinks hypotheticals outloud: "perhaps" this or that.
You think Hillary would've been any better? She actually sponsored an anti-flag burning bill in 2005 that proposes a jail term twice as harsh. You wake up.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Or, you know, libel is actually libel. If what is reported can be verified, then there's no issue of libel. Or is all the "fake news" that Facebook is concerned about imaginary now too?
And please cite where he'd "revoke citizenship" of a protestor. Perhaps you mean an ISIS defector?
That's why they develop Heisenberg compensators in the 23rd century. ;)
And there you have it, the contradiction: this isn't just big business and conservatives pushing this. The Left espouses globalization and multiculturalism; it also supposedly supports the unions and American worker's rights. The two are currently incompatible. How are the unions - essentially democrat- okay with American workers' standard of living being challenged and lowered by the influx of H1Bs and illegal aliens willing to work for 40% of a native worker's pay? Because if you challenge these programs, you get called racist and xenophobic.
Many democrats did this exact thing in 2001, Bush/Gore. They actually pushed for a retroactive change, (AKA cheating). If it weren't for the electoral college, most major cities would decide the election for the entirety of the country every single time, and full representation would be a thing of the past.
If a two party system isn't bad enough, that'd usher in a permanent one party country (Dem) with a monolithic, centralized, all powerful federal government: USA: Urban Socialists (of the) Americas.