Which is why GOP politicians go on massive hunts looking for voter fraud after every election, and never comes up with anything but a small handful of people who were just confused.
Riiight.. they were just "confused". That must be it.
When I read your post, it is obvious you are a Trump supporter, and by finishing your statement with "Fucking morons" you definitely fit the mold of a Trump supporter.
That's your criteria? Any given day I could find examples here of Clinton or Bernie supporters who say the same thing, in the same way, or even nastier (especially on threads discussing climate change). Trump supporters hardly own the trademark on insults and ad-hominems. Insults and epithets been flying around here since forever.
That remains to be seen. Trump, aside from being economy-oriented, is also very security conscious (possibly because he understands that the sense of security affects markets); I see no real indication that he'd reign in the NSA in that.
General David Petraeus for starters, or Harold Thomas Martin III, of Maryland, an NSA contractor, who took classified information home, but did not sell it.
That should be obvious. One is outright murder, with no legal justification. The other suggests Hillary be legally punished for her negligent breach of classified information, as several other gov't officials have been incarcerated for roughly the same, and not just give her a pass because of superior political clout.
Doubtful it will happen anyway.
That's likely what got Christie demoted. This also signals however that Pence may play a more active role as VP, instead of being a traditional hood ornament like Biden.
The fact that nobody in his campaign even knew that you have to replace the White House staff when you take office blows my mind. Were they paying that little attention when Obama, or any other president for that matter, took office?
Again: I hope for the best but fear the worst.
That is not a fact, per se, it was a claim by an Obama staffer or two. Kellyanne Conway laughed that off as absurd. A guy doesn't get to become a billionaire by not doing a little research into the most basic things like that, seriously. Some elements are bound to be a little overwhelming though, even for a seasoned politician.
You could say Steve Bannon is an outsider, though I'm not sure I get a good feeling about the guy.
I'd read that historically, absentee ballots tend to run something like 67% republican, 33% democrat. Or was it 63% - 37%? Anyway, they're roughly 2/3 republican since so many are military, plus overseas businessmen on trips. A sizeable chunk also comprises exchange students, likely to be mostly democrat votes. Considering that absentee ballots are not normally counted unless they number greater than the margin of difference between candidates in a state, that could still represent a very large number of votes, an assumed 2/3 of which would be pro Trump.
I find it unlikely that Hillary's popular vote count will rise nearly as much as Trump's if all the absentee ballots are counted.
And anymore, I read little or nothing from Verge, HuffPost, Vox, Mic, Salon, or Mother Earth Jones exactly because of the passive-aggressive to full-out bias. By the same token, I don't trust sites like Youngcons with facts much either, but at least they identify as the party they support, so you can sort of expect it.
That's what's funny about Snowden just now saying there's too much Presidential power...after all the significant executive orders that Obama issued to bypass Congress?
Bear in mind that US politics has 4 axes, not just two. There are not only Right and Left, but also Authoritarian and Libertarian (or sometimes labeled as Anarchist for extreme scale, I guess). Liberals can be just as authoritarian as conservatives, as the last several years bears out.
Definitely not outside the realm of possibility. We know her camp is pretty good at scheming. Assange is still claiming to have a bombshell to drop tomorrow, but he's likely part of it too, if there is such a master plan, his stuff has all been relatively minor as well. Maybe they used him to try to tie Trump to Russia. In any case, that particular conspiracy theory has been pretty much shot down.
I recently saw a doctored video clip on FB (well, obviously doctored to anyone with a minimal amount of critical thinking) that purported to show Obama at public forum admitting he was born in Kenya; but you could tell that certain key words were pasted in from other speeches, and when those strings of words were said, the camera view suddenly cut to a long shot so you couldn't see his mouth; and yet there were people swearing in the comments that it was proof, "there he is saying it". I don't even like Obama but bullshit is bullshit.
Yes, I'm a "nut job" because I don't recognize that HRC is corrupt as shit? Oh, and look how well that Obamacare is working out, BTW.
No, anyone who is a raving fan of either of today's candidates is likely the nutjob.
Which is why GOP politicians go on massive hunts looking for voter fraud after every election, and never comes up with anything but a small handful of people who were just confused.
Riiight.. they were just "confused". That must be it.
That's because you have the right to bear arms, and the bears don't want to be dismembered.
When I read your post, it is obvious you are a Trump supporter, and by finishing your statement with "Fucking morons" you definitely fit the mold of a Trump supporter.
That's your criteria? Any given day I could find examples here of Clinton or Bernie supporters who say the same thing, in the same way, or even nastier (especially on threads discussing climate change). Trump supporters hardly own the trademark on insults and ad-hominems. Insults and epithets been flying around here since forever.
Enjoy your new cost of living in Utopia.
They just need a hug. That should be no problem in California. ;)
Glad to hear that, because I hate the syntax of PowerShell.
That remains to be seen. Trump, aside from being economy-oriented, is also very security conscious (possibly because he understands that the sense of security affects markets); I see no real indication that he'd reign in the NSA in that.
General David Petraeus for starters, or Harold Thomas Martin III, of Maryland, an NSA contractor, who took classified information home, but did not sell it.
Because of Grammar Nazis.
Chief "Execution" Officer? :)
That should be obvious. One is outright murder, with no legal justification. The other suggests Hillary be legally punished for her negligent breach of classified information, as several other gov't officials have been incarcerated for roughly the same, and not just give her a pass because of superior political clout.
Doubtful it will happen anyway.
That's likely what got Christie demoted. This also signals however that Pence may play a more active role as VP, instead of being a traditional hood ornament like Biden.
The fact that nobody in his campaign even knew that you have to replace the White House staff when you take office blows my mind. Were they paying that little attention when Obama, or any other president for that matter, took office?
Again: I hope for the best but fear the worst.
That is not a fact, per se, it was a claim by an Obama staffer or two. Kellyanne Conway laughed that off as absurd. A guy doesn't get to become a billionaire by not doing a little research into the most basic things like that, seriously. Some elements are bound to be a little overwhelming though, even for a seasoned politician.
You could say Steve Bannon is an outsider, though I'm not sure I get a good feeling about the guy.
I'd read that historically, absentee ballots tend to run something like 67% republican, 33% democrat. Or was it 63% - 37%? Anyway, they're roughly 2/3 republican since so many are military, plus overseas businessmen on trips. A sizeable chunk also comprises exchange students, likely to be mostly democrat votes. Considering that absentee ballots are not normally counted unless they number greater than the margin of difference between candidates in a state, that could still represent a very large number of votes, an assumed 2/3 of which would be pro Trump.
I find it unlikely that Hillary's popular vote count will rise nearly as much as Trump's if all the absentee ballots are counted.
And anymore, I read little or nothing from Verge, HuffPost, Vox, Mic, Salon, or Mother Earth Jones exactly because of the passive-aggressive to full-out bias. By the same token, I don't trust sites like Youngcons with facts much either, but at least they identify as the party they support, so you can sort of expect it.
That's what's funny about Snowden just now saying there's too much Presidential power...after all the significant executive orders that Obama issued to bypass Congress?
Bear in mind that US politics has 4 axes, not just two. There are not only Right and Left, but also Authoritarian and Libertarian (or sometimes labeled as Anarchist for extreme scale, I guess). Liberals can be just as authoritarian as conservatives, as the last several years bears out.
That's America, 2016.
Definitely not outside the realm of possibility. We know her camp is pretty good at scheming. Assange is still claiming to have a bombshell to drop tomorrow, but he's likely part of it too, if there is such a master plan, his stuff has all been relatively minor as well. Maybe they used him to try to tie Trump to Russia. In any case, that particular conspiracy theory has been pretty much shot down.
I recently saw a doctored video clip on FB (well, obviously doctored to anyone with a minimal amount of critical thinking) that purported to show Obama at public forum admitting he was born in Kenya; but you could tell that certain key words were pasted in from other speeches, and when those strings of words were said, the camera view suddenly cut to a long shot so you couldn't see his mouth; and yet there were people swearing in the comments that it was proof, "there he is saying it". I don't even like Obama but bullshit is bullshit.
I think "audioshopped" would be the more likely term to emerge.
I bought an SE 64 gb for my son at a Best Buy in NJ a few months back.
Yes, I'm a "nut job" because I don't recognize that HRC is corrupt as shit? Oh, and look how well that Obamacare is working out, BTW.
No, anyone who is a raving fan of either of today's candidates is likely the nutjob.
You mean preventing illegal aliens and dead people from voting? Good.
That's so absurd it's hilarious.
What makes you think we'll still have a country in 4 years under Clinton? Both are pretty horrible.
They have nothing on Trump most likely because he's never held a government position, ergo, no official documents to leak.