It's not security theater - it's not intended to make things 'more secure' - it's intended to allow enterprises (Fortune 100 types) to integrate their existing centralized key management systems into GCE so that they don't have two sets of keys, two sets of audit data, two sets of key policies, et cetera.
This will make it an easier decision for enterprises to push their key-oriented applications/systems/service-bus' into GCE. Previously this was a pain in the rear.
This is a move by Google to allow enterprise key management systems employed by big business to operate in the Google Cloud (previously a very hacky arrangement.)
I wouldn't be surprised, given Google's new focus on the Enterprise with GCE (note the leadership changes), to see Google Docs starting to embrace a 'bring your own' encryption feature set to its applications as well.
This would be a differentiator for Google as Microsoft's solution (RMS) really doesn't work well in this scenario and Amazon is starting to embrace enterprise key management (but is just starting.)
Google would be the first with a cloud offering, encryption integration points, and an enterprise encrypted document play that could be federated. The fear is, as some other posters noted, will Google commit to this or just do it for 2 years and then dump the whole thing?
The easiest distinguishing characteristic between a programmer and a software engineer - empathy for the people who have to test, maintain, document, and extend your code:).
I've always been surprised that people don't consider them separate things (programmers and software engineers) - so maybe it's just me.
Sure, if that sensor reading went from 0 to 100% (or similar) and then stayed registering 100%. It seems very likely, given Tesla's response that there is a very 'human' curve in the application of the accelerator prior to the accident and then a very 'human' curve to the release of the accelerator post impact. Then, a surprisingly totally functioning and normal accelerator afterwards...
People will never stop lying about things they think they can get away with - especially to avoid wounding their pride. One of the few positives to the surveillance state, the constant tracking of data - is occasionally the ability to point out just like Tesla - "Uh, you're a lying sack of shit..."
I work in it periodically during the day and then I'm back on CentOS/Ubuntu/Mint, and then on crappy days - OSX. If I couldn't use Linux, I'd use Windows 10 over OSX any day. Sounds weird, but I'm just being honest.
This argument doesn't really apply either. The person isn't saying you can't ever smoke, they're saying smoke in private. Nobody likes manufacturing pollution either, and we regulate it accordingly, it's not as simple a solution as banning public smoking.
That's not a particularly salient argument. Everyone would prefer that cars did NOT emit noxious fumes or gases; unfortunately it's not as simple a solution as banning smoking in public - ergo, we regular car emissions, and we're clearly moving towards vehicles that do not emit exhaust or only emit water.
...because when you see 'sophia' speak, you'll notice that all of the visemes in her speech are exaggerated (it makes the corners of her mouth look super twitchy.) This is because whoever wrote the animation side of their TTS solution either just started this week or has never done this before.
The solution to this is some trivial blending and based upon the near and mid term expected word rate and the viseme to viseme transitions about to happen.
For a company espousing how human their robots are, they've got lots of very basic and fundamental cognitive cueing issues (the need to introduce minute focal point adjustments of the eyes [human eyes are rarely completely still] for example.)
The point in mentioning the S-37 is because it is the test-bed for the Su-35 and emerging Russian technologies for integration into their existing front line and export aircraft.
The Su-27M is the export version.
The "Su-27M" is the Su-35. The 'K' version of an Su-27/35 Russian aircraft denotes an export version. Maybe you were referring to the Su-35S (the more recent upgrade, which is also available for export - China and Algeria have already bought them.)
If you read the article he mentions being capable of being marginally more offensive than he could be in an F-16. While this isn't to be dismissed as meaning 'nothing.' F-35 defenders should be careful to trumpeting the fact that a pilot finds the F-35 is not, in fact, worse than a 40+ year old airframe design.
The problem with the F-35's dogfighting is that it's performance is not remotely comparable to aircraft being sold abroad by the Russian aviation community. Yes, it has capabilities that many aircraft do not, and some capabilities that have not even been fully enabled as well; however, ALL of these abilities are unrelated to the basic physical performance of the aircraft and the basic performance of the aircraft is the area of primary concern as a platform for enabling these technologies.
Are people under the impression that the Su-37 can't get a 'look-thru' helmet cueing system? That, unlike fundamental airframe design, software capabilities cannot rapidly advance post construction of the aircraft?
I don't think the F-35 is useless, but it sure is an INCREDIBLY expensively mediocre aircraft intended to carry excellent (someday) software and sensors.
Apparently you have trouble comprehending what's written. I didn't say anything about there being value in killing, I'm saying there's value in sacrifice for the greater good.
I have no reason to want that woman to lose her job, but her casting a vote for some total asshat is simpler her responding to a feeling of helplessness. It's a selfish vote. It's not illegal. and she's free to vote for whomsoever she chooses.
I'm also free to point out that this makes her an angry, selfish, and more worried about herself than America as a whole.
...you think he'd have kept you from losing your Disney job (despite the fact that he doesn't actually give a sh** about blue collar Americans once they're done casting votes) - your job is more important that the clear indications that he's a misogynistic racist hot head liar who has bankrupted FOUR TIMES.
This country really has become all about "me." Sure, I'll give up the fourth amendment, and start traipsing on the first - just to make sure some brown skinned guy doesn't crash an airplane with me in it. People who think like that don't deserve the sacrifices of our armed forces - Men and women who who lived through Bastogne, the horrors of Peleliu, through the years to the battle of Wanat (look it up.) They died so you could BE AMERICANS. EARN IT.
...you arrogant ridiculously bouffanted duck-tailed and bearded freak.
I'm happy to concede that this first new movie is pretty much Episode IV revisited - entirely for the purpose of establishing a baseline from which to create actual new movies.
They wouldn't have to do this, you rapist of childhood dreams, if you hadn't created the prequel "movies." 3 movies that will stand forever as a testament to size of your ego - just watch how uncomfortable many of the extremely talented people at ILM/LucasFilm are whenever you talk in your stupid gibberish about the juxtaposition of film and poetry during the 'making of' sessions. A legion of talented people who clearly understand that all they can do is nod their heads and say 'yes...' with confused looks on their faces.
Makes me wish I'd simply swerved hard left when you were driving alongside me northbound on the 101 just north of Corte Madera in 1997, in what I can only assume was your wife's mercedes convertible, Little did I know the horrors you were about to unleash. I was selfish not to.
Slashdot Mirror
It's not security theater - it's not intended to make things 'more secure' - it's intended to allow enterprises (Fortune 100 types) to integrate their existing centralized key management systems into GCE so that they don't have two sets of keys, two sets of audit data, two sets of key policies, et cetera.
This will make it an easier decision for enterprises to push their key-oriented applications/systems/service-bus' into GCE. Previously this was a pain in the rear.
Homomorphic encryption won't run anywhere near that fast ;)...
This is a move by Google to allow enterprise key management systems employed by big business to operate in the Google Cloud (previously a very hacky arrangement.)
I wouldn't be surprised, given Google's new focus on the Enterprise with GCE (note the leadership changes), to see Google Docs starting to embrace a 'bring your own' encryption feature set to its applications as well.
This would be a differentiator for Google as Microsoft's solution (RMS) really doesn't work well in this scenario and Amazon is starting to embrace enterprise key management (but is just starting.)
Google would be the first with a cloud offering, encryption integration points, and an enterprise encrypted document play that could be federated. The fear is, as some other posters noted, will Google commit to this or just do it for 2 years and then dump the whole thing?
...experience.
Thank you for Logo, from the bottom of my heart.
I will find a way to easter egg some turtles into our products today :).
Maybe you should read that article you linked. It doesn't say what you think it does.
I like yours better. Conveys more with less, is clever and yet strikingly clear and understandable by everyone.
The easiest distinguishing characteristic between a programmer and a software engineer - empathy for the people who have to test, maintain, document, and extend your code :).
I've always been surprised that people don't consider them separate things (programmers and software engineers) - so maybe it's just me.
Found in release builds.
Sure, if that sensor reading went from 0 to 100% (or similar) and then stayed registering 100%. It seems very likely, given Tesla's response that there is a very 'human' curve in the application of the accelerator prior to the accident and then a very 'human' curve to the release of the accelerator post impact. Then, a surprisingly totally functioning and normal accelerator afterwards...
People will never stop lying about things they think they can get away with - especially to avoid wounding their pride.
One of the few positives to the surveillance state, the constant tracking of data - is occasionally the ability to point out just like Tesla - "Uh, you're a lying sack of shit..."
I work in it periodically during the day and then I'm back on CentOS/Ubuntu/Mint, and then on crappy days - OSX.
If I couldn't use Linux, I'd use Windows 10 over OSX any day. Sounds weird, but I'm just being honest.
This argument doesn't really apply either. The person isn't saying you can't ever smoke, they're saying smoke in private.
Nobody likes manufacturing pollution either, and we regulate it accordingly, it's not as simple a solution as banning public smoking.
That's not a particularly salient argument. Everyone would prefer that cars did NOT emit noxious fumes or gases; unfortunately it's not as simple a solution as banning smoking in public - ergo, we regular car emissions, and we're clearly moving towards vehicles that do not emit exhaust or only emit water.
...encrypt data with a distinct key per individual piece of content using a centralized key management system.
...because when you see 'sophia' speak, you'll notice that all of the visemes in her speech are exaggerated (it makes the corners of her mouth look super twitchy.) This is because whoever wrote the animation side of their TTS solution either just started this week or has never done this before.
The solution to this is some trivial blending and based upon the near and mid term expected word rate and the viseme to viseme transitions about to happen.
For a company espousing how human their robots are, they've got lots of very basic and fundamental cognitive cueing issues (the need to introduce minute focal point adjustments of the eyes [human eyes are rarely completely still] for example.)
...Valley area and are a C-level executive on the tech side and make less than 250K? You're an idiot.
...as temperatures reportedly fall all over hell.
The point in mentioning the S-37 is because it is the test-bed for the Su-35 and emerging Russian technologies for integration into their existing front line and export aircraft.
The Su-27M is the export version.
The "Su-27M" is the Su-35. The 'K' version of an Su-27/35 Russian aircraft denotes an export version. Maybe you were referring to the Su-35S (the more recent upgrade, which is also available for export - China and Algeria have already bought them.)
Look out for Norwegian pilots wanting to fly you ;).
If you read the article he mentions being capable of being marginally more offensive than he could be in an F-16. While this isn't to be dismissed as meaning 'nothing.' F-35 defenders should be careful to trumpeting the fact that a pilot finds the F-35 is not, in fact, worse than a 40+ year old airframe design.
The problem with the F-35's dogfighting is that it's performance is not remotely comparable to aircraft being sold abroad by the Russian aviation community. Yes, it has capabilities that many aircraft do not, and some capabilities that have not even been fully enabled as well; however, ALL of these abilities are unrelated to the basic physical performance of the aircraft and the basic performance of the aircraft is the area of primary concern as a platform for enabling these technologies.
Are people under the impression that the Su-37 can't get a 'look-thru' helmet cueing system? That, unlike fundamental airframe design, software capabilities cannot rapidly advance post construction of the aircraft?
I don't think the F-35 is useless, but it sure is an INCREDIBLY expensively mediocre aircraft intended to carry excellent (someday) software and sensors.
Apparently you have trouble comprehending what's written. I didn't say anything about there being value in killing, I'm saying there's value in sacrifice for the greater good.
I have no reason to want that woman to lose her job, but her casting a vote for some total asshat is simpler her responding to a feeling of helplessness. It's a selfish vote. It's not illegal. and she's free to vote for whomsoever she chooses.
I'm also free to point out that this makes her an angry, selfish, and more worried about herself than America as a whole.
...you think he'd have kept you from losing your Disney job (despite the fact that he doesn't actually give a sh** about blue collar Americans once they're done casting votes) - your job is more important that the clear indications that he's a misogynistic racist hot head liar who has bankrupted FOUR TIMES.
This country really has become all about "me." Sure, I'll give up the fourth amendment, and start traipsing on the first - just to make sure some brown skinned guy doesn't crash an airplane with me in it. People who think like that don't deserve the sacrifices of our armed forces - Men and women who who lived through Bastogne, the horrors of Peleliu, through the years to the battle of Wanat (look it up.) They died so you could BE AMERICANS. EARN IT.
...saying - she's correct.
That IS what made America a great country. That we weren't such cowards that we traded liberty for a false sense of security.
Ugh... Then what we he doing driving a silver late 80's mercedes roadster?
...you arrogant ridiculously bouffanted duck-tailed and bearded freak.
I'm happy to concede that this first new movie is pretty much Episode IV revisited - entirely for the purpose of establishing a baseline from which to create actual new movies.
They wouldn't have to do this, you rapist of childhood dreams, if you hadn't created the prequel "movies." 3 movies that will stand forever as a testament to size of your ego - just watch how uncomfortable many of the extremely talented people at ILM/LucasFilm are whenever you talk in your stupid gibberish about the juxtaposition of film and poetry during the 'making of' sessions. A legion of talented people who clearly understand that all they can do is nod their heads and say 'yes...' with confused looks on their faces.
Makes me wish I'd simply swerved hard left when you were driving alongside me northbound on the 101 just north of Corte Madera in 1997, in what I can only assume was your wife's mercedes convertible, Little did I know the horrors you were about to unleash. I was selfish not to.