its proabaly the reasoning by bill gates that enventualy linux might be easy to use someday and that he had better make windows stable( if you call running word while not crashing as stable).
not really, Bill Gates is more likely to succeed in domination. Their database is their only great product. and they overprice so I wouldnt worry too much about larry
Slashdot Mirror
probably alot of marketing tyoes are out. there realy is alot more of them than there are geeks
competition is much more fierce
not suspiciousat all actually. most programmers who arent shitty like to do outside programming on the side for fun.
maybe you are just a shitty programmer.
its proabaly the reasoning by bill gates that enventualy linux might be easy to use someday and that he had better make windows stable( if you call running word while not crashing as stable).
oh yeah blame "drivers".
so in the early days when slq server sucked and crashed alot (4.5-6.5). was it bad drivers?
what are you? another MCSE who doesnt know how an os works?
yeah, not by choice to be using kludge
i think he was talking about an alternative proprietary GOOD OS.
fuck off , if i recall it was the fucin brits who started all this crap hundreds of years ago.
so dont give us your bullshit
And what proof did you have it was wrong?
um, its supposed to be the other way around
what proof do you have that is right.
oh i forgot you are a commie
. Nope, it's another magical situation where American soldiers hit everytime they fire, but 1000 enemies can't hit anything.
maybe not magic at all, we did kill scores (1000)of those animals and lost only 18.
eom
fuck off, personally we should build a shield and
nuke the res of the neanderthals of the world
racist killers who rotured, raped and murdered many innocent Somali women and children.
like i said before , we didnt have to go in there. they do an awesome jab at it themselves.
try living there , beyach
no they didnt.... they do a pretty good job of killing themselves
oh yeah , one of those that think that all the worlds evils started with america.
how convenient.
fuck off
i bet hes a read a few quotes from amazon.com excepts, which is enough.
go live in somalia bud. my bet is that you will have your head on a platter within minutes. too bad we dint kill more than 1000 of those neanderthals.
dominate there and work WITH Microsoft to blend the media and the computer age.
many other foolish companies have. look what happened to them.
or muzzleing dissent
commie
what they need is product placement. you need someome witht the guts to build linux only PC's and be able to sell them at best buy.
"As hardware gets faster, the GUI sluggishness will be less apparent. "
you are right that stragedy worked for microsoft.
a beter question is Why Not DB2.dont get me wrong sql server is great for alot but
until sql server runs on a OS/390.. forget it.
Its not the #1 database
according to gardner it is albeit it is eroding slowly
actually he wasnt too far behind bill gates last year.
as for massive databases, I believe they are neck-in-neck.
not really, Bill Gates is more likely to succeed in domination. Their database is their only great product. and they overprice so I wouldnt worry too much about larry
Linux isn't a high end enterprise OS yet.
huh? neither is Microsoft and they aren doing too shabby.
when I think enterprise I Think SUN not microcrap.