In Logic of Empire, Heinlein gives an example of this sort of thing. All comms are done via FM; AM is an antiquated and forgotten technology. The rebels redevelop AM broadcast capability, and a receiver in the bush can hear the signal, while a stock FM receiver can't hear the AM.
And if they're communicating by some mechanism that we can't read? E.g. the equivalent of "subspace radio". Or maybe it's a point to point via laser (see Niven's Known Universe).
In the US, they came first for the war3z d00d5, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a war3z d00d; And then they came for the Evil Content Pirates(tm), And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Evil Content Pirate; And then they came for the legit BT users, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a BT user; And then . . . they came for me . . . And by that time there was no one left to speak up."
Because it causes problems for THEM, regardless of the EU.
This may be apocryphal, but ISTR reading somewhere that when they needed documentation (for internal purposes) on SMB, they had to use the Samba guys' stuff.
Slashdot Mirror
Damn. That was the first thing I thought of when I RTFS. You, sir, have beaten me to it.
Receiver now monitors his entangled particle
But at that point, you've messed with the sender's particle, again via quantum entanglement.
As Professor Farnsworth noted, "No fair! You changed the outcome by measuring it!"
Is that Julian or Gregorian?
In Logic of Empire, Heinlein gives an example of this sort of thing. All comms are done via FM; AM is an antiquated and forgotten technology. The rebels redevelop AM broadcast capability, and a receiver in the bush can hear the signal, while a stock FM receiver can't hear the AM.
Shitty OS, shitty results.
And if they're communicating by some mechanism that we can't read? E.g. the equivalent of "subspace radio".
Or maybe it's a point to point via laser (see Niven's Known Universe).
The old people will only use it for email.
Lucky you. I'm in the San Fernando Valley, and still no word on when FIOS will show up here.
I did. I can't find "Microsoft .NET Framework Assistant" anywhere.
When I drank 100 coffees in one day, I was able to save all my friends from a fire caused by a cigar.
<STEWIE>
Damn you, Tommy Tutone!
</STEWIE>
Yes, I mean HP. I work with a bunch of ex-Tandem types, so they call them 'Tandems'. I picked up that nomenclature.
Fannie Mae uses Tandem Nonstops.
From last Sunday
Or, to paraphrase Niemoller...
In the US, they came first for the war3z d00d5, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a war3z d00d;
And then they came for the Evil Content Pirates(tm), And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Evil Content Pirate;
And then they came for the legit BT users, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a BT user;
And then . . . they came for me . . . And by that time there was no one left to speak up."
My point was that the "robots with human dexterity, controlled by a human" won't work at distances past the Moon.
Four Words.
Speed of Light Latency.
I thought he sold it all the Symantec anyway, including rights to use his name
And I'm sure he's considering suing them for defamation of character.
The early seasons also had Spy vs. Spy.
Whatever happened to Mad TV?
It's still there on Saturday nights, but it sold out a long time ago.
Obviously, you didn't have a Mac Plus with a (25-pin) SCSI port.
They didn't produce SQL server, they bought Sybase.
It may be awesome, but it's symptomatic of a poor development culture at MS, and ties back into the lack of protocol documentation.
Because it causes problems for THEM, regardless of the EU.
This may be apocryphal, but ISTR reading somewhere that when they needed documentation (for internal purposes) on SMB, they had to use the Samba guys' stuff.
And therein lies the problem. MS should have created a spec for their networking protocols BEFORE implementing them.