Almost all laptops today come with 1366x768 LCDs. I make screen resolution my first criteria when selecting a laptop, since higher resolutions are so rare. If she uses the machine for multitasking and wants to see more than one window on the screen at a time, this will suck.
Of course, it appears the non-Pro Macbook has a 1280x800 screen, so if she's happy with that, then get whatever is on sale at Slickdeals.
Now, should we initiate a lawsuit? Take the number of games in the field, A, multiply by the probable rate of winning, B, multiply by the average out-of-court settlement, C. A times B times C equals X. If X is more than the cost of a lawsuit, we don't do one.
I further deny them the use of one of my own computers "just for a minute" that inevitably turns into fifteen or more, I'm perceived as inconsiderate.
"Sorry, it's my work computer. If they catch me using it for Facebook I can get fired."
Or, just don't admin your router when they're on the network, or be a real admin and generate your own cert. You're not one of those people who just click on "accept this self-signed cert" all the time, are you?
That's okay, I spend a lot of time flying around on an ostrich and killing pterodactyls with my lance. I tried to sue the makers of Joust, but a hand pulled me into the lava.
The judge also said the defendants were "brutal, savage, unprincipled, uncivilized, treacherous -- in every way, splendid examples of homo sapiens, the very flower of humanity."
I have an old Netgear WNDR3300; I haven't tested it yet, but I recently installed DD-WRT on it, which supports IPv6. It's a dual-radio ABGN router. I think I paid $30 a year and a half ago and it got lost in a closet so I never set it up.
Slashdot Mirror
Almost all laptops today come with 1366x768 LCDs. I make screen resolution my first criteria when selecting a laptop, since higher resolutions are so rare. If she uses the machine for multitasking and wants to see more than one window on the screen at a time, this will suck.
Of course, it appears the non-Pro Macbook has a 1280x800 screen, so if she's happy with that, then get whatever is on sale at Slickdeals.
You do the same thing you do when any certificate gets compromised, revoke the cert.
Not that I think this is a good idea, though.
Jar Jar shot first!
Some young people have taken drugs which caused them to make poor decisions about their base.
Did they free base?
Doesn't even have to be virtual, I pay $30/month for real hardware with two IP addresses. That's cheaper than most plans with Comcast and Verizon.
Now, should we initiate a lawsuit? Take the number of games in the field, A, multiply by the probable rate of winning, B, multiply by the average out-of-court settlement, C. A times B times C equals X. If X is more than the cost of a lawsuit, we don't do one.
Sony wasn't a content producer at the time. Now piracy "costs them money".
Obviously a number means nothing without a unit of measure. Do you think it's 20 Libraries of Congress or football fields?
I further deny them the use of one of my own computers "just for a minute" that inevitably turns into fifteen or more, I'm perceived as inconsiderate.
"Sorry, it's my work computer. If they catch me using it for Facebook I can get fired."
Or, just don't admin your router when they're on the network, or be a real admin and generate your own cert. You're not one of those people who just click on "accept this self-signed cert" all the time, are you?
The people in LOST never seemed to have a problem with satellites going over the horizon. That phone looked awesome, too.
I find it amusing that most of the comments so far are as AC...
Fucking marketing people and their techie sell-out scumbags.
That describes almost everyone in IT.
Food and firepower and fuel are a war machine's most important components.
And what about population?
You can use them as food or firepower or fuel as well.
That's okay, I spend a lot of time flying around on an ostrich and killing pterodactyls with my lance. I tried to sue the makers of Joust, but a hand pulled me into the lava.
Once again, the conservative, sandwich-heavy portfolio pays off for the hungry investor.
*poof* Yes, you are.
I thought that's what Baidu was for. The only downside is most of the text is encrypted with indecipherable characters.
The point of the article is that while the base system may indeed be very secure, it is practically useless.
1998 called, they want their rationalization back. Besides, just about everyone turns off SELinux when they want to actually get work done.
Is lighttpd any more secure on OpenBSD than on Linux? No.
Good thing they have an audited, privsep, chrooted version of Apache, then.
With SELinux, you need not only a local privilege escalation, but a hole in SELinux as well.
Bullshit.
I would argue that OpenBSD may be secure by design, but SELinux is, in practice, more secure.
Adding complexity rarely increases reliability.
I would be absolutely ecstatic if OpenBSD implemented something more like SELinux in terms of privilege separation.
The Stephanie project worked towards doing just that, but it appears the project died several years ago.
The judge also said the defendants were "brutal, savage, unprincipled, uncivilized, treacherous -- in every way, splendid examples of homo sapiens, the very flower of humanity."
I have an old Netgear WNDR3300; I haven't tested it yet, but I recently installed DD-WRT on it, which supports IPv6. It's a dual-radio ABGN router. I think I paid $30 a year and a half ago and it got lost in a closet so I never set it up.
The Bush administration was notorious for keeping things secret whether or not there was a legitimate reason.
At least the Obama administration is fixing all that now. Good thing we got their guy out before it was too late.
If FOX is already on 24/7, then they can't watch it any more.
I would totally be behind wikileaks but Theo de Raadt is a meanie.
Bruce Schneier uses
(this week or last week, i'm getting this second hand)
To demonstrate how many news outlets do zero confirmatory investigation
I see what you did there.